AN ASSESSMENT OF THE ADOPTION OF IMPROVED TECHNOLOGIES AMONGST ATASP-1 BENEFICIARIES IN NIGERIA

Page 68

Also, looking at the same table, the income per ha from sorghum farmer after project was N245005.88 which is significantly higher than income before project that was N118618.46 at 1% level of significance. This more than double income was attributable to the project effect which has resulted in tremendous increase in crop yields per ha compared with the traditional technologies formally in use by these farmers. Finally, looking at the table 28, rice farmers income per ha after project was N703128.95 which is significantly higher that before project income of N417303.47 at 1% level of significance. This significant increase in income is attributable to project effect which has brought about tremendous increase in yields and consequently income for rice farmers. Figure 9 presents the graphical representation of the difference in income of participating farmers before and after ATASP-1 project. From the figure, there is significant increase in income of farmers after ATASP-1 implementation for cassava, sorghum and rice. It is hoped that these increment will be sustained. Table 28: Effect of GAP on farmers’ income of farmer per ha Variables Income before adoption of GAP (? )

Estimate Average Min Max SD CV(%)

Cassava 472105.3 250000 900000 154615.5 32.75022

Sorghum Rice 118618.46 417303.47 32000.00 104000.00 600000.00 2437500.00 113515.71 378438.03 95.70 90.69

Income after adoption of GAP (? )

Average Min Max SD CV(%)

812972.2 450000 1250000 223496.7 27.49131

245005.88 703128.95 36500.00 195000.00 750000.00 3412500.00 189035.82 545552.61 77.16 77.59

t-statistics ***P<0.001

9.38***

54

7.75***

7.16***


Turn static files into dynamic content formats.

Create a flipbook

Articles inside

Annexure 6: Interview with a female farmers @ TunganKawo, Wushishi

0
pages 105-106

Annexure 5: Acassava crusher @ Tsadozhiko, Wushishi

0
page 104

Annexure 4: Interview with a farmer @ TungaKawo, Wushishi

0
page 103

Table 29: Effects of ATASP-1 on fabricators outputs

1min
page 69

Table 36c: Constraints militating against the adoption of Good Agronomic Practices among rice farmers

5min
pages 84-87

Table 32: Effects of ATASP-1 on processors income Table 33: Analyses of factors influencing adoption of disseminated technologies

9min
pages 71-74

Practices cassava farmers

1min
page 82

Table 36b: Constraints militating against the adoption of Good Agronomic Practices among sorghum farmers

1min
page 83

Table 28: Effect of GAP on farmers' income

1min
page 68

Table 26: Rate of adoption of rice technologies

3min
pages 65-66

Table 14: Membership of Associations by farmers

2min
pages 45-46

Table 23: Reasons for farmers' adoption of Good Agronomic Practices (GAP

2min
page 62

Table 25: Rate of adoption of sorghum technologies

1min
page 64

Table 15: Access to agricultural training among rice farmers

1min
pages 47-48

Table 16: Input used in crop production

1min
pages 49-50

Table 27: Effect of GAP on cassava, sorghum and rice production

1min
page 67

Table 12: Distribution of farmers by extension contact and membership of association

2min
pages 42-43

Table 9: Land area devoted to the cultivation of each crop

2min
page 39

1 Background of contributions to the ATASP-1 Program Development Objectives

2min
page 17

Table 4: Educational qualification of the household head

1min
page 36

1.3 Purpose of the Study

2min
page 18

1.6 Limitations of the Study

0
page 20

1.1 Introduction

2min
page 15

Table: 10 Year of experience in farming by farmers

1min
page 40

Table 1: Structure of farmer's household across crops in the ATASP-1 Project

2min
page 34
Issuu converts static files into: digital portfolios, online yearbooks, online catalogs, digital photo albums and more. Sign up and create your flipbook.