Culture on industry, industry on culture_Panels by Allegra Zanirato

CULTURE ON INDUSTRY INDUSTRY ON CULTURE

The renovation of the old slaughterhouse of Porto

An intervention in the city of Porto means dealing with a vast landscape, characterised by a robust industrial identity. When we talk about Porto, we are talking about an urban tissue composed of vast spaces: fragments of the industrial age that are located within the urban centre. The theme of urban mending is current and refers above all to the suburban areas of the eastern area. The Campanhã Valley is located on this limit. Until now, the proposals made in the area have made up for the lack of infrastructures but have not crossed the limit of the road system, which physically divides Campanhã from the urban centre. In this context lies the old slaughterhouse of Porto: an area of 25 thousand square meters now abandoned for two decades, adjacent to the railway line. With the following project, we want to propose a response to the redevelopment of the old industrial complex. The project stems from the public competition for the development of the Campanhã Valley, in favour of the urban rehabilitation between the city and the outlying areas. The project consists of reflections concerning the role of voids and the city, in particular, the peripheral city, precarious from the urban and social point of view. These concepts translate into an architectural project that finds its roots in the history of its territory. Using the notions of fragmentation, absence, memory and identity, we highlight the relationship between them within the city, being fundamental for the understanding of the place. From the programmatic choice for the enhancement of the local economic and cultural heritage to the strategic choices measured with the substantial identity of the area, the project crosses the history of the place, keeping clear the boundary between what belongs to the memory and the new elements that are going to be inserted. The intervention, therefore, aims to translate the issues addressed in an indissoluble relationship between theory and practice.

_ Laureanda Allegra Zanirato

_ Sessione di Laurea March 2019

_ Relatore Arch. Giovanni Avosani

_ Università Degli Studi di Ferrara, Dipartimento di Architettura

_ Correlatori Arch Diogo Sousa Rocha Arch. Roberto di Giulio

_ Riqualificazione dell’antico Mattatoio di Porto

THE CITY OF PORTO

The development of the city of Porto has always been influenced by the presence of natural barriers, that is the view on the Atlantic Ocean and the proximity to the Douro river. These limits have allowed the economic development of the northern area of the country, characterized above all by wine and textile production.

AN INDUSTRIAL IDENTITY 0,5 km

2 km

The area of Vila Nova de Gaia, beyond the river, is characterized by the presence of the cellars that go up to the area of Pinhão, a valley renowned for the production of Port wine, thanks to natural terraces and optimal solar orientation. The textile production areas instead are spread within the central and peripheral area of Porto. Since the IXX century, it has constituted the most active sector in the area. Even today, the North of Portugal is one of the largest textile production centres in Europe, thanks to its geographical position, low production costs and developed technologies in the field of fabrics. “Farftetch” is an example. During the 20th century, building speculation and the strong presence of workers in the city caused a peripheral phenomenon in which the residential centres moved to the Matosinhos coast. In a few years, the centre is dramatically depopulated. Today, urban expansion continues in the eastern zone, towards the district of Campanhã, divided from the city by the ring road that delimits the whole central area of Porto: a limit that has determined the creation of the so-called “Terrain Vague”.

Scale 1:20’000

DEMOGRAPHIC DATA DEMOGRAPHIC DATA

MAIA

Degradation of buildings

76%

Lack of employment

60%

Poverty

58%

Isolation of the sick

57%

Lack of access to adequate housing

37%

Degradation of public space

30%

Traffic jam

26%

Insecurity

22%

Difficulty in accessing equipment 18% and support services to insufficient living spaces

DEMOGRAPHIC DATA DEMOGRAPHIC DATA 46

41 39 38

76%

Lack of employment Degradation of buildings

60% 76%

Poverty Lack of employment

58% 60%

Isolation of the sick Poverty

57% 58%

Lack of access to adequate Isolation of the sick housing Lack of access to adequate housing Degradation of public space

37% 57%

Traffic jam of public space Degradation

26%

37% 30%

DEMOGRAPHIC 30% DATA Insecurity 22% Traffic jam 26% DEMOGRAPHIC DATA Difficulty in accessing equipment 22% 18% Insecurity Degradation and support services toof buildings Difficulty in living accessing equipment 18% insufficient Lack ofspaces employment Degradation of buildings and support services to Poverty Lack ofspaces employment insufficient living Lack of green areas 16%

MIRAMAR

sick Poverty Difficulty inIsolation accessing public 15% Lack of green areasof the 16% equipmentIsolation and services of access to adequate of the sick Difficulty inLack accessing public 15% housing Insufficient proximity trade 12% equipmentLack and services of access to adequate

76% 60% 76% 58% 60% 57% 58% 37% 57%

37% housing Difficulty inDegradation accessingtrade health 10% of public space 30% Insufficient proximity 12% DEMOGRAPHIC DATA facilities and services Traffic jam health 26% of public space 30% Difficulty inDegradation accessing 10% facilities and services Difficulty inTraffic accessing cultural 10% Insecurity 22% jam Degradation of buildings 76% 26% facilities and services Difficulty cultural equipment 10% 60% 22% Difficulty in accessing 18% LackinInsecurity ofaccessing employment facilities and services and support services to Difficulty inDifficulty accessing equipment 10% in accessing equipment Poverty 58% 18% insufficient living spaces and support services and support services to Difficulty in accessing equipment 10% Isolation of the sick living spaces 5% 57% 16% Lack of green areas and support services Difficulty ininsufficient accessing educational Lack ofand access to adequate 37% equipment services Difficulty in accessing 15% of green areas public 16% Difficulty inLack accessing educational 5% housing equipment and services equipmentDifficulty and services in accessing public 15% 1. The principals problems in Porto, Degradation of public space 30% 12% equipment and services Insufficient proximity trade Relatório sobre as sessões de participação nas Juntas de Freguesia, 2015. 1. The principals problems TrafficDifficulty jam in Porto, in proximity accessingtrade health 26% 10% Insufficient 12%

ESPINHO

Relatório sobre as sessões de participação nas Juntas de Freguesia, 2015.

60%

Social development

Poverty

Poverty 58%

58%

Poverty

Isolation of the sick

Isolation of the sick 57%

57%

Urban rehabilitation

access to adequate Lack of access to adequate Lack of 37% housing housing

37%

Services

Degradation of public space Degradation 30% of public space

30%

Heritage

Heritage 9% 9% Relatório sobre as sessões de participação nas Juntas de Freguesia, 2015.

Traffic jam

Traffic 26% jam

Insecurity

Insecurity 22%

26% 22% 45

Relatório sobre as sessões de participação nas Juntas de Freguesia, 2015.

Lack of employment Degradation of buildings Poverty Lack of employment

Others

7% Others

Culture

Culture 6% 6% Degradation of buildings 65% MAIN STRENGTHS OF THE CITY OF Fluvial-maritime front 5% 5% Lack of employment 65% PORTO Identity 4% 4% Poverty 72%

Dipartimento

Architettura

| Poverty Sessione

55% laurea

marzo

Urban space 4% Isolation of the sick Economy Instruction 3% Degradation of Social publicdevelopment space

Instruction

4% 46% 21% 3% 42% 13%

ESTADIO DO strengths / advantages of the city of Porto in which one should bet, 1. Main strengths / advantages of the city of Porto1.inMain which one should bet, Poverty 12% DRAGAO

Relatório sobre asofsessões de participação nas Juntasone de Freguesia, 1. Maindeproblems the district of Campanhã in which should bet,2015. in relation with the other districts Relatório sobre as sessões de participação nas Juntas Freguesia, 2015.

Urban rehabilitation 11% Relatório sobre as sessões de participação nas Juntas de Freguesia, 2015.

Housing size classification

20%

40%

Services

Heritage

Mobility Degradation of buildings7%77% Buildings by peri Housing size classification Buildings by period of construction Others 7%69% Economy Lack of employment 21%

PORTO Economy 21% Culture 6%55% Social development 13% Poverty CAMPANHÃ Social development Fluvial-maritime front 13% 5%55% Poverty 12% Isolation of the sick 0 100%20% 40% 60%12% 80% 100% 0 80% Poverty Identity 4% Urban rehabilitation 11% Lack of access to 42%20% adequate housing Urban rehabilitation 11% Urban space 4% 2 Services 9%

60%

area up to 50 m

area up to 50 m2

PORTO

CAMPANHÃ

40%

60%

80%

0 100%20%

between 1946 an

between 1971 an

Heritage Mobilityarea greater than 200 m29% 7%

between 1991 an

between 1991 and 1. Main strengths / advantages of the city of Porto in which one should bet,2011

area greater than 200 m2

Mobility 7% Others Relatório sobrefrom as sessões de participação nas Juntas de Freguesia, 2015. 1. Datas PDM, 2009.

1. Datas from PDM, 2009.

Others Culture

7% 6%

40%

before 1945

2 Instruction between 50 m ofand 100 m in which 3% 9% between 1946bet, and 1970 area between 50 m2 and 100 mServices 1. Main area problems of the district Campanhã one should Heritage 2 and 200nas m2Juntas between 100 between 1971 and 1990 area between 100 m2 and 200 m2 Relatórioarea sobre as sessões dem participação de Freguesia, 2015.

Mobility Heritage

area between 50 m2 and2 100 m2 area greater than 200 m area between 100 m2 and 200 m2

7% 9%

Relatório sobre as sessões de participação nas Juntas de Freguesia, 2015. 1. Main problems of the district of Campanhã in which one should bet,

Others Mobility 7% Degradation of buildings 77% Culture 6% Others 7% Economy Degradation of buildings 21% 77% Lack of employment 69% Fluvial-maritime 5% Culture 6% Social development 13% Housing classification front Lack ofsize employment 69% Poverty 55% Identity Fluvial-maritime front 5% Poverty 12% PORTO Housing size Poverty 55% 4% Isolation ofclassification the sick Urban 4% UrbanIdentity rehabilitation 11% CAMPANHÃ Isolation of thespace sick 55% Lack of access to 42% PORTO Instruction 3% Urban space 4% Services 9% adequate housing to 100% CAMPANHÃ 0 Lack 20%of access 40% 60% 80% 42% adequate housing Instruction Heritage 9% 3%

65% 65% 72% 65%

1. Datas from PDM, 2009.

2019

Arràbida Bridge, 1957 Luis I Bridge, 1886

1. Datas from PDM, 200

1. Datas from PDM, 2009.

11% 11%

0-14 years

64PDM, years2009 1. Datas > from

27%

100%

Industrial field 27%

0-14 years17

Industrial field Textile yarn

1. Datas from PDM, 2009.

Cotton fabrics Textile yarn PORTO Cotton/printed Cotton fabrics Basical PORTO services PORTO Buildings by period of construction CAMPANHÃ Really Good Reasonable Bad fabrics CAMPANHÃ PORTO INDUSTRIESPORTO IN THE XIX CENTURY Cotton/printed good Population by age group (2011): CAMPANHÃ PORTO CAMPANHÃ PORTO Cotton/silk fabrics fabrics 0 7% CAMPANHÃ PORTO INDUSTRIES IN THE XIX CENTURY Textile Population 1. Relatório sobre as sessões de participação nas Juntas de Freguesia, 2015. 100% CAMPANHÃ 20% 40%by age 60%group 80%(2011): 0 Cotton/linenfabrics fabrics 54% 52% residences without bathroom Cotton/silk 12% 10% 20% 40% before 54% 1945

60%

80% 12%

100%

8% 42%

Basical services SERVICES BASICAL 56%

Other Textile fields

25 - 64 years 7% residences without network 15-24 years residences without bathroom 10% 0 40% 60% 2520% - 64 years > 64 yearsnetwork 1. Datas from PDM, 2009. residences without 15-24 years 0 20%years40% 60% 0-14 27% 1. Datas from PDM, > 64 2009. years

52%

between 1946 and 1970 before 1945 between 1971 and 1990 between 1946 and 197023% between 1991 and 2011 between 1971 11% and 199023% between and 2011 1. Datas from 1991 PDM, 2009.

Cotton/silk/wool fabrics Cotton/linen fabrics Narrow silk fabrics Cotton/silk/wool fabrics

80%

100% Other fields

80%

100%

Narrow Narrow Silk/palettes silk fabrics fabrics Industrial field 1777-1800 1801-1810 1810-1813 0-14 years 11% 27% Narrow Silk/palettes 2 1. Datas from PDM,than 2009. PORTO INDUSTRIES IN THE XIX Wide silk fabrics area greater 200 mfront Fluvial-maritime 5% fabrics Industrial field 1777-1800 1801-1810 1810-1813 CENTURY/ 11% 11% Textile yarn 1 / Narrow cotton/silk fabric 1. Datas from PDM, 2009. Identity 4% Wide silk fabrics 1. Datas from PDM, 2009. Basical services Buildings by period of construction Housing size classification 1 Cottonyarn fabrics Textile // IN THE XIX CENTURY 13 PORTO / Wide cotton/silk fabrics PORTO INDUSTRIES Urban space 4% Narrow cotton/silk fabric Basical services Buildings by period of construction Housing size classification PORTO PORTO Cotton/printed / 3 1 Cotton fabrics PORTO CAMPANHÃ CAMPANHÃ Textile / / PORTO 1 Whitewash Instruction 3% Wide cotton/silk fabrics fabrics CAMPANHÃ CAMPANHÃ PORTO PORTO Cotton/printed Other fields Population by age group (2011): CAMPANHÃ 7% PORTO CAMPANHÃ // / 1/ Hats Whitewash 1 Cotton/silk fabrics 0 fabrics CAMPANHÃ 1. Main strengths / 20% advantages of the city60% of Porto in which one should bet, 100% CAMPANHÃ 20% 40% 60% 80% 0 100% 0 40% 80% Tannery residences without bathroom Population by age group (2011): Hats 100% 20% 040% 60% 80% 0 7% Relatório sobre as sessões de participação nas Juntas de Freguesia, 2015. Cotton/linen fabrics 1 / / 1 / 54% 10% 100% Cotton/silk fabrics 20% 40% 60% 80% 0 100% 0 20% 12% 40% 2 60% 52% 80% Crockery residences without network 25 64 years residences without bathroom Tannery before 1945 area up to 50 m Cotton/silk/wool fabrics / 1 / Cotton/linen fabrics residences 1 without / / Paper 54% 52%m2 15-24 between years 1946 and 1970 area between 12% 502 m2 and 100 10% 1. Datas from PDM, 2009. network Crockery area up to 50 m 25 - 64before years 1945 Narrow silk fabrics > 64 years between 1971 and 1990 area between 100 m2 and 200 m2 Cotton/silk/wool fabrics 8 / 15 / Total Paper between 1946 and 1970 area between 50 m2 and 100 m2 15-24 years 1. Datas from PDM, 2009. 0-14 years between 1991 and 2011 area greater 200 m2 1. Inquery about the Industries in the city o 23% than 27% Narrow silk Silk/palettes between 1971 and 1990 area between 100 m2 and 200 m2 Narrow fabrics field 81 > 64 years Industrial 1777-1800 1801-1810 1810-1813 5/ // Total fabrics 1. Datas from PDM,than 2009.200 m2 between 1991 and 2011 area greater 0-141.years Datas PDM,of 2009. Basicalfield services 11% 27% 1. Inquery about the Industries in the city o Buildings by from period construction Narrow Silk/palettes Housing size 23% classification Industrial 1777-1800 1801-1810 1810-1813 Industrial buildings Railway 11% 18 / Wide silk fabrics Textile yarn / PORTO 1 // / 9 fabrics area between 50 m and 100 m area greater than 200 m2 Culture area between 100 m2 and 200 m2

11%

1. Datas from PDM, 2009.

11% PORTO

CAMPANHÃ

0 PORTO 20%

40%

100% 60% Highway 80% CAMPANHÃ

Population by age group (2011):

CAMPANHÃ

Population by age group (2011):

area54% between 50 m2 and 100 12% m2 Metro

Infante Bridge, 2003

area between 100 m2 and 200 m2 54% 12% area greater than 200 m2 1. Datas from PDM, 2009.

Maria Pia Bridge, 1877

52% 52%

23%

Towns 23%

11%

1. Datas from PDM, 2009.

// CAMPANHÃ 3 Narrow fabrics 82 Cotton fabrics Wide silkcotton/silk fabrics Textile yarn 1 9/ Wide cotton/silk fabrics / 25 3 Cotton/printed Cotton fabrics Narrow cotton/silk fabrics 29 / 0 7% / / fabrics 100% 20% 40% 60% 80% 0 / Whitewash residences without Cotton/printed Wide cotton/silk fabrics 91 bathroom 25 / / / 1 1 Cotton/silk fabrics fabrics residences without Hats 1/ network / Whitewash before 1945 fabrics 1/ Tannery Cotton/linen Cotton/silk fabrics 1/ 1/ between 1946 and 1970 2 1. Datas from PDM, 2009. 10% / Rehabilitated industrial Hats areas 25 - 64 years between 1971 and 1990 Crockery Cotton/silk/wool 2 fabrics Cotton/linen fabrics 1/ 1/ // Tannery 2 15-24 years 10% between 1991 and 25 -2011 64 years Paper / Industrial fieldsilk fabrics 1777-1800 Narrow > 64 years Cotton/silk/wool fabrics Crockery 2 // 1 8/ 1801-1810 5 15-24 years 0-14 years 1. Datas from PDM, 2009. Total 35 45 Paper 27% Narrow Silk/palettes / / silk fabrics > 64 years 8 5/ yarn 1 1 1. InqueryTextile about the Industries in the city of Porto, 1813,/Josè Manuel Lopes Cordeiro. fabrics 0-14 years Total 35 45 27% Narrow Silk/palettes / 3 Cotton fabrics 1 Lopes Cordeiro. Wide silk fabrics 1. Inquery about the Industries in the city of Porto, 1813, Josè Manuel 8 9/ fabrics

PORTO PORTO 12%

CAMPANHÃ10%

Freixo Bridge, 1995

25 - 64 years 15-24 years > 64 years

23%

27%

11%

Avosani

Correlatori:

PORTO

Project Area

0-14 years

11%

Diogo

Sousa

CAMPANHÃ

Rocha,

Roberto

Giulio

1 1

Cotton/printed Narrow 2 Wide silkcotton/silk fabrics fabrics / / 8 fabrics Wide cotton/silk fabrics Narrow cotton/silk fabrics 9 2 / 1 Cotton/silk fabrics 1 Whitewash Wide cotton/silk fabrics 9 Cotton/linen fabrics 1 / Hats 1/ Whitewash Cotton/silk/wool fabrics / 1 Tannery 2/ Hats Narrow silk fabrics 8 5 Crockery 2 Tannery 2 Narrow Silk/palettes Paper // Crockery 2/ 1 / / fabrics Total 35 45 Paper / / Wide1.silk fabrics 8 of Porto, 1813, Josè9Manuel Lopes Cordeiro. / Inquery about the Industries in the city Total 35 45 Narrow cotton/silk fabrics 2 / / 1. Inquery about the Industries in the city of Porto, 1813, Josè Manuel Lopes Cordeiro.

CAMPANHÃ 52%

// 4 / 4/

1 / 2 / / 2/ / / / 1 1810-1813 / / 19 / // 9 1 // // 1 9/ 25 4/ / / / 25 4/ / 1/ 2/ / 1/ 2/ / // //

Textile industries

Population by age group (2011): 54%

PORTO

CAMPANHÃ

North

São João Bridge, 1991

Giovanni

23% between 1946 and 1970 20% between 40% 1991 60% 80% and 2011 between 1971 and 1990 23% 11% 1. Datas from PDM, between 19912009. and 2011 11%

How is perceived the quality of life in Campanhã:

Buildings by period of construction

PORTO area up to 50 m2

Relatori:

1. Datas from PDM, 2009.

area between m and 100 m of the city of Porto in which one should bet, 1. Main50 strengths / advantages 1. Main problems of the district of Campanhã in which one should bet, in relation with the other districts area up to 50 m2 Relatório sobre as sessões 2de participação 2 nas Juntas de Freguesia, 2015. and 200 m area between 100 m Relatório sobre as sessões de participação nas Juntas de Freguesia, 2015. Relatório sobre as sessões de participação nas Juntas de Freguesia, 2015. 2 2

Others

area greater than 200 m

INDUSTRIAL AREAS

1. Relatório s

7% Mobility

Urban space

1. Main strengths / advantages of the city of Porto in which one should bet,

SYMBOLS

Ferrara

Really good

Mobility

Identity

Isolation 46% Poverty of the sick 72% Degradation of 42% Isolation of the sick 46% public space Degradation of 42% 1. Main problems of the district of Campanhã which one should bet, 1. Main problems of the district of Campanhã in which one should bet, in relation with the districts public space 100% 0 other 20% 60% 80% of inthe 1. 40% Main strengths / advantages city of Porto in which one should bet,0 area up to 50 m2 Relatório sobre as sessões de participação nas Juntas de Freguesia, 2015. Relatório sobre as sessões de participação nas Juntas de Freguesia, 2015. Mobility 7% Relatório sobre as sessões de participação nasshould Juntasbet, de Freguesia, 2015. 1. Main problems of the district of Campanhã in which one 2 2

BRIDGES

URBAN DEVELOPMENT

INDUSTRIES IN THE CITY OF PORTO

8% 42

1. The principals problems in Porto,

Fluvial-maritime front

Relatório sobre as sessões de participação nas Juntas de Freguesia, 2015.

Degradation of buildings 65%

Difficulty in accessing cultural 10% facilities and services 1. Cold Wharehouse of cod (1939) 25. Industrial Mill “Ceres” (1940-50) 1123 65% Degradation of buildings 2. Massarelos’s Foundry “Aliança Society” (1852) 26. Ex pasta factory “Nobreza” (beginning XX cent.) Difficulty in 10% Degradation of accessing buildings equipment 77% 3. Massarelos’s thermoelectric power station, Porto 27. Ex factory “Minchin Junior”(end XIX cent.)and support Lack ofservices employment Degradation of buildings 65% Lack of employment 69% Degradation of buildings 77% railway company (1915) 28. Unidentified, disused building. (XIX cent.) Poverty 72% Lack of employment 65% Difficulty in accessing educational 5% 4. Warehouse “Josè Pinto da Miragalhães” (1920-30) 29. Ex Saponificio “do Esteiro” (1919) Lack Poverty 55% of employment 69% 1337 andof services 5. Cold warehouse of fish “Lota do Pescado” (1933) 30. Ex factory “do Esteiro” (end XIX cent.) equipment Isolation the sick 46% Poverty 72% Isolation of the sick Poverty 55% 6. Unidentified, disused building. 31. Unidentified, disused building. (XIX cent.) Degradation of sick 42% Isolation of the 46% 7. Family factory (XIX cent.) 32. Unidentified, disused building. (2°halfIsolation XX cent.) Lack to in Porto, 55% 42% 1.of Theaccess principals of the problems sick public space of housing 8. Factory “Corpo Santo, Barredo, Filho e Genro” (end 33. Unidentified, disused building. (2°halfadequate XX cent.) Relatório Degradation sobre as sessões de participação nas Juntas42% de Freguesia, 2015. Lack of access tospace 42% 1813 public XIX century) 34. Factory “Invicta Favorita” (end XIX century) 1. Main problems of the district of Campanhã in which one should bet, in relation with the other districts adequate 1. Main problemshousing of the district of Campanhã in which one should bet, 9. CUFP ex factory, Brewery “Leão” (1912) 35. Industrial complex “Mulini industiali Harmonia” (end Relatório sobre as sessões de participação nas Juntas de Freguesia, 2015. Main problems of the district of Campanhã in which one should bet, in relation with the other districts Relatório sobre as1.sessões de participação nas Juntas de Freguesia, 2015. 10. Massarelos pottery factory, subsequently Sugar fac- XIX cent.) 1. Main problems of the district of Campanhã in which one should bet, Relatório sobre as sessões de participação nas Juntas de Freguesia, 2015. tory “RAR” (XIX cent.) 37. CUP-Quimagal Factory (end XIX cent.) buildings RelatórioDegradation sobre as sessões de of participação nas Juntas65% de Freguesia, 2015. 1903 11. Unidentified. 38. “Socorte” Factory De Fitas e Viés LDA 65% 12. Port warehouse (1822) 39. Rio Sul Comérc. LDA Packaging Factory Lack of employment Degradation of buildings 77% 13. Deposit of the monastery “Madre di Deus” (XVIII cent) 40. Modatex Poverty 72% Lack of employment 69% 14. Building materials factory “Esorio e Sorromayor Lda” 41. OSDM_ O segreto do mar, Clothes and fabric factory Degradation of buildings 77% Isolation of the sick 46% 1948 15. Clemente Meneres Lda Society 1874 42. “Intimeia”, textile factory Poverty 55% Lack of employment 69% Degradation of 42% 16. Oporto Custom (1859) 43. “Jorpal”, textile factory Isolation 55% publicPoverty space of the sick 17. Ex magazzino della Compagnia “Real Velha” (XIX 44. “Mapis”, textile machine factory cent.) 45. WFIL, textil factory Lack of access to 42% Isolation of the sick 55% 1. Main problems of the district of Campanhã in which one should bet, in relation with the other districts 1978 18. Pottery “Massarelos” (1920) 46. Bobine, fabric Factory adequate housing Relatório Lack sobre as sessões de participação de Freguesia, 2015. of access to nas Juntas42% 19. Ex glass Factory “Barbosa a Almeida Ldt” (1917) 47. Lethes Home store adequate housing 1. Main problems of the district of Campanhã in which one should bet, 20. Freixo industrial warehouse (1940) 48. FARFETCH Relatório sobre as sessões de participação nas Juntas de Freguesia, 2015. 21. Freixo thermoelectric power station (1940) 49. Casa da Arquitectura, Matosinhos 1. Main problems of the district of Campanhã in which one should bet, Nowadays 22. Furniture factory “A Economica” (1°half XX century) 50. Fabrica de Conservas, Matosinhos Relatório sobre as sessões de participação nas Juntas de Freguesia, 2015. Degradation of buildings 77% 23. Soap Factory (1940-50) 51. Mercado do Bolhão, Porto 24. Glaze factory Minchin/Navega (1°half XX cent.) 53. The Matadouro; Campanhã Lack of employment 69%

Studi

How is p

from 34 to 37 Culture Fluvial-maritime front 6% 5% and support services to How is perceived the quality of life in C Economy 21% Degradation of buildings Poverty76% Difficulty in accessing equipment 18% Poverty 72% Fluvial-maritime front 5% 72% Difficulty in accessing cultural 10% Identity 4% insufficient living spaces POPULATION BY AGE GROUP and support services to facilities and Social development 13% Lack of employment 60% How is42% perceived the quality of 56% life in C Isolation of services the sick 46% Economy 21% Degradation of buildings Isolation 76% Identity 4% of the sick 46% Urban space 8% insufficient living spaces from 27 to 32 Buildings by perio Housing sizeby classification Population age group (2011): Lack of green areas 16% Population by age group (2011): Poverty 12% Poverty 58% Degradation of 42% 10% Difficulty in accessing equipment Social development 13% Lack of employment 60% of Urban space 4% Degradation 42% Instruction 3% Really Good 8% 42% 56% Lack of green areas 16% PORTO Difficulty in accessing public 15% public space and support services good public space Urban rehabilitation 11% Isolation of the sick 57% Instruction 3% Poverty 12% Poverty 58% 54% 52% 12% 10% 54% 52% equipment and services 12% 10% Really Good Difficulty in accessing public 15% 25 - 64 y CAMPANHÃ - 64bet, years 1. Main strengths / advantages of the city of Porto in which one 25 should 1. Main problems of the district of Campanhã which one should bet, in relation with the other districts Services 9% Lack of access to adequate1. Main problems 37%of the district of Campanhã inDifficulty in accessing educational 5% good which one should bet, in relation with the other indistricts 1. Relatório sobre as sessões de participação nas Juntas de Urban rehabilitation 11% Isolation of the sick 57% equipment and services 15-24 ye Insufficient proximity trade 12% Relatório sobre as sessões de participação nas Juntas de Freguesia, 15-242015. years 1. Main strengths / advantages of the city of Porto in which one should bet, Relatório sobre as sessões de participação nas Juntas de Freguesia, 2015. housing and services Relatório sobre as sessões de participação nasequipment Juntas de Freguesia, 2015. 20% 40% 0 100% 0 20% 40% 60% 80% Heritage 9% > 64 year >1.64 years Services 9% Lack of access to adequate 37% Insufficient 12% Relatório Relatório sobre as sessões de participação nas Juntas de Freguesia, 2015. sobre as sessões de participação nas Juntas de Difficulty in proximity accessingtrade health 10% 0-14 year Degradation of public space 30% housing 0-14 years 23% 27% Mobility 7% 23% 27% facilities and services before 1945 Heritage 9% area up to 50 m2 1. The principals problems in Porto, Difficulty in accessing health 10% Traffic jam of public space 26% between 1946 and area between 50 m2 and 100 m2 Relatório sobre sessões de participação nas Juntas de Freguesia, 2015. Others 7% facilities andasservices Degradation 30% 11% 11% 11% 11% Mobility 7% Difficulty 10% 2 2 VILA NOVA DE GAIAin accessing cultural between 1971 and and 200 m area between 100 m Degradation of buildings 77% Degradation 77% Insecurity 22% Culture 6% facilities and services Traffic jam 26% of buildings Difficulty Others 7% in accessing cultural 10% between 1991 and area greater than 200 m2 Buildings by period Housing size classification Lackand of employment 69% Lack of18% employment 69% Difficulty facilities services HOUSE SIZE CLASSIFICATION Fluvial-maritime front 5% Insecurityin accessing equipment 22% Culture 6% Difficulty in accessing equipment 10% 1. Datas from PDM, 2009. Buildings by PDM, period Housing and support services to 1. Datas from 2009 PORTO Poverty 55% How is perceived the quality ofsize life inclassification Campanhã: Poverty 55% Degradation of buildings 65% and support services Economy 21% Identity Difficulty in living accessing equipment 18% Difficulty in accessing equipment 10% Fluvial-maritime front 4% 5% insufficient spaces PORTO CAMPANHÃ PORTO PORTO CAMPANHÃ CAMPANHÃ Isolation of the sick13% 65% 55% and support services to PORTO INDUSTRIES and support services Isolation of the sick Economy 55% Lack ofinemployment How is perceived the quality of life in Campanhã: Social development Urban space 4% Difficulty accessing 21% educational 5% Identity 4% 8% 42% 56% 2% Lack of green areas 16% insufficient living spaces CAMPANHÃ Lack in of accessing access to educational 42%5% equipment and services Lack of access to 42% 20% 40% 6 0 100% 0 20% 40% 60% 80% Poverty Poverty 12% 72% Instruction 3% PORTO INDUSTRIES Difficulty Social development 13% Urban space 4% Really Good Bad 8% 42% 56% Reasonable 2% Difficulty in accessing 15% adequate housing housing Lack of green areas publicadequate 16% equipment and services 20% 40% 6 0 100% 0 20% 40% 60% 80% good Isolation of the sick12% Urban rehabilitation 11% 46% Poverty equipment and services Instruction 3% before 1945 area up to 50by m2 age 1. The principals problems in Porto, Really Good Population Reasonable Bad group (2011): 1. Main strengths / advantages of the city of Porto in which one should bet, Difficulty in accessing public1. Main problems 15%of the district of Campanhã in which 1. Main problems of the district of Campanhã in which one should bet, one should bet, 2 Degradation ofde participação 42%de Freguesia, 2015. Services 9% nas Juntas good between 1946 and 1 area up between 50 and 100 m2 Relatório sobre as sessões 2 m 0 20% 40% 60% Urban rehabilitation 1. Relatório2015. sobre as sessões de participação nastoJuntas de Freguesia, 2015. before 1945 Insufficient trade 12% area 50 m Relatório sobre as sessões de participação nas Juntas de Freguesia, 1. The principals problems in Porto, 11% equipment proximity and services Relatório sobre as sessões Relatório sobre as sessões de participação naspublic Juntas de Freguesia, 2 2 space 2015. de participação nas Juntas de Freguesia, 2015. 1. Main strengths / advantages of the city of Porto in which one should bet, between 1971 and 1 and 200 m area between 100 m between 1946 and 19 area between 50 m2 and 100 m2 Relatório sobre as sessões de participação Heritage 9% nas Juntas de Freguesia, 2015. 54% 52% Services 12% Difficulty in proximity accessingtrade health 10% Relatório2015. sobre as sessões de participação nas Juntas de Freguesia, 010% 20% 40% 60% 2 2015. Insufficient 12% Relatório sobre as sessões de participação nas Juntas de 1. Freguesia, 25 64 ye between 1991 and 2 area greater than 200 m between 1971 and 19 area between 100 m2 and 200 m2 1. Main problems of the district of7% Campanhã in which one should bet, in relation with the other districts facilities and services Mobility Heritage 9% 15-24 year between 1991 and 20 area from greater 200 m2 Difficulty in accessing health 10% 1. Datas PDM,than 2009. Relatório sobre as sessões de participação nas Juntas de Freguesia, 2015. 1. Datas from PDM, 2009. > 64 years Others Degradation of buildings Difficulty and in accessing 10% facilities services cultural Mobility 7% 65% 1. Datas from PDM, 2009. 1. Datas from PDM, 0-142009. years facilities and services 23% 27% Degradation of buildings Culture 6% 65% Lack of employment Others 7% Difficulty in accessing cultural 10% Basical services BUILDINGS BY PERIOD Buildings by period of construction Housing size classification Lack of employment 11% Difficulty and in accessing facilities services equipment 10% Fluvial-maritime front 6% 5% 65% Poverty 72%21% OF CONSTRUCTION Culture How is perceived the11% quality of life in Campanhã: Economy PORTO PORTO Basical services Buildings by period of construction Degradation of buildings 77% Housing size classification and support services Poverty Identity 4% 72% IsolationSocial of the sick 5% 46%13% Fluvial-maritime front Difficulty in accessing equipment 10% How is perceived the quality of life in Campanhã: development Economy 21% CAMPANHÃ 2% CAMPANHÃ 8% 42%Population by age group (2011): 56%XIX Lack of employment 69% PORTO PORTO INDUSTRIES IN THE CENTURYPORTO Difficulty in accessing and support services educational 5% Isolation of the Urban space Degradation of sick 4% 46% 42%12% Identity 0 Poverty Social development 13% (2011): equipment and services Good by Poverty 55% 8% 42% 56% 2% 100% CAMPANHÃ Bad 20% 40%age group 60% 80%Reasonable 0Population 100% CAMPANHÃReally 0 20% 40% 60% 80% public space Textile PORTO INDUSTRIES IN THE XIX CENTURY Degradation of Instruction 3% 42% residences withou Difficulty in accessing educational 5% Urban space 4% 54% 52% good 12% 10% Urban 11% Povertyrehabilitation 12% 0 PORTO CAMPANHÃ 25 - 64withou years Really Good Reasonable Bad public space Isolation of the sick 55% residences equipment and services Other 100% 20% 1945 40% 60% 80% 054%before 100% 0 districts 20% 80% 1. Main problems of the district of Campanhã one should bet, in relation with the other Textile area up to 40% 50 m2 60% 52% fields Instruction 3% in which11% 1. The principals problems in Porto, residences withou 12% 10% good 15-24 years Services 9% Urban rehabilitation 25 64 years 1. Relatório sobre as sessões de participação nas Juntas de Freguesia, 2015. 1. Main strengths / advantages city of Portonas in which one should bet,2015. Relatório as sessõesofdethe participação Juntas de Freguesia, Lacksobre of access to 42% between 1946 and 1970 area between 50 m2 and 100 m2 Relatório sobre as sessões de participação nas Juntas de Freguesia, 2015. 1. Main problems of the district of Campanhã in which one should bet, in relation with the other districts 1. Datas from PDM, 2009 residences withou > 64 years 100% Other fields 0 20% before 40% 80% Relatórioadequate sobre asServices sessões de participação nas Juntas de Freguesia, 2015. 15-24 years 1945 60% area up to 50 m2 1. The principals problems in Porto, Heritage housing 9% between 1971 and 1990 area between 100 m2 and 200 m2 1. Relatório sobre as sessões de participação nas Juntas de Freguesia, 2015. Relatório sobre as sessões de participação nas Juntas de Freguesia, 2015.

1. Main problems of the district of Campanhã in which one should bet, in relation with the other districts Relatório sobre as sessões de participação nas Juntas de Freguesia, 2015. Relatório sobre as sessões de participação nas Juntas de Freguesia, 2015. Relatório sobre as sessões de participação nas Juntas de Freguesia, 2015.

degli

10%

Lack of employment 60%

facilities and services Insecurity Difficulty in accessing health 22% 10% facilities and services Difficulty in accessing equipment Difficulty in accessing cultural 18% 10% Degradation of buildings 77% Degradation of buildings to65% and support facilitiesservices and services Lack of employment 69% Difficulty in accessing 10% Degradation of buildings 77% spaces Lackinsufficient of employment 65% cultural Degradation of living buildings facilities services equipment 10% Difficulty and in accessing Poverty 55% Lack of employment 69% Poverty 72% Lack of green areas 16% Lack of employment 65% and support services Difficulty in accessing equipment 10% Isolation of the sick 55% Poverty 55% Isolation of the sick 46% Difficulty insupport accessing public 15% Poverty 72% and services Difficulty in accessing educational 5% Lack of access to 42% equipment and services Isolation of the sick 55% Degradation of sick 42% Isolation of the 46% equipment and services adequate housing Difficulty in accessing educational 5% public space proximity trade Insufficient 12% Lack of access to 42% Degradation of 42% equipment and services 1. Main problemshousing of the district of Campanhã in which one should bet, adequate 1. The principals problems in Porto, public space indistrict accessing 1. MainDifficulty problems of the of Campanhãhealth in which one should 10% bet, in relation with the other districts Relatório sobre as sessões de participação nas Juntas de Freguesia, 2015. Relatório sobre as sessões de participação nas Juntas de Freguesia, 2015. facilities and Relatório sobre as1.sessões deservices participação Juntas de Freguesia, 2015. The principals problemsnas in Porto, 1. Main problems of the district of Campanhã in which one should bet,

Università

Difficulty in accessing health facilities and services

Lack of employment

DEMOGRAPHIC DATA jam Degradation of buildings 65%26% Insecurity 22% Degradation of buildings Traffic 65% Difficulty in accessing health 10% Insecurity 22% facilities and services Lack of employment 65% Difficulty in accessing equipment 18% DEMOGRAPHIC DATA Lack of employment 65% from 7 to 22

Degradation of buildings

12%

Economy

Difficulty ininaccessing 18% Lack of employment 60% Difficulty accessingequipment educational 5% Poverty 58% Difficulty in accessing educational 5% and support services to equipment and services equipment and services Poverty 58% Isolation of the sickspaces 57% insufficient living BOLHAO ˜ Isolation of theproblems sick 57% Lack of principals access to adequate 37% 1. The in Porto, 1. The principals problems in Porto, Lack of green areas 16% housing Relatório sobre as sessões de participação nas Juntas de Freguesia, 2015. ofdeaccess to adequate 37% Relatório sobre as sessões de participaçãoLack nas Juntas Freguesia, 2015. Difficulty in51 accessing public 15% housing Degradation public space 30% equipment of and services Degradation public47 space 30% Traffic jam of 26% Insufficient proximity trade 12%

DEMOGRAPHIC DATA DEMOGRAPHIC DATA

Insufficient proximity trade

76%

Lack of green areas 16% 16% Degradation of buildings 76% Difficulty in accessing public 15% Difficulty in accessing publicLack of15% employment 60% equipment and services equipment and services Poverty 58% 12% Insufficient proximity trade Insufficient 12% proximity trade Isolation of the sick 57% in accessing health 10% Difficulty in accessing health Difficulty 10% Lack of access to adequate 37% facilities and services facilities and services housing DEMOGRAPHIC in accessing DATA cultural 10% Difficulty in accessing culturalDifficulty 10% Degradation of public space 30% facilities and services DEMOGRAPHIC DATA facilities and services Traffic jaminofaccessing 26% Degradation Difficulty 10% Difficulty in accessing equipment 10% buildings equipment76% and support services Insecurity 22% and support services Degradation of buildings 76% Lack of employment 60%

CASA DA MUSICA

15%

Degradation 76% of buildings

Lack of green areas

Difficulty in accessing public equipment and services

Degradation of buildings

Difficulty in accessing equipment 18% Difficulty in accessing equipment 18% and support services toDATA and support services to DEMOGRAPHIC insufficient living spaces insufficient living spaces

50 MATOSINHOS

16%

Difficulty in accessing cultural 10% facilities and services 21% 21%Economy Difficulty in accessing equipment 10% Social development 13% 13%and support services 12% 12%Poverty Difficulty in accessing educational 5% Urban rehabilitation 11%equipment and services 11% 9% 9% Services

Lack of green areas

Wide cotton/silk fabrics 9 Laureanda: Allegra 1 Whitewash

25 Zanirato /

1/ 9 1 9

4 TAVOLA /

Lack of employment

˜ DISTRICT THE CAMPANHA IN BETWEEN THE VOIDS 0

0,25

Poverty 58% Campanhã district is located in the eastern part of the city of Isolation of the sick 57% Porto. Characterized by the strong industrial presence and by Lack of access to adequate that 37% the voids, not architecturally, run along the axis of the ring housing road and railway. The same highway and the topography of the area is a physical limit that clearly divides the district from Degradation of public space 30% the city of Porto. Large abandoned industrial areas and urban voids jam have caused the continued 26% deterioration of the area. Traffic

41° 9’ 36.36” 41° 9’ 36.36”

0,125

0,5 km

Scale 1:5000

Insecurity 22% The “Terrain Vague”, due to its characteristic of interstitial, of Difficulty in accessing equipment intermediate space, to be a reality18% among the riches, passes and support services to to the city in which the only possible through, a relic escaped insufficient living that spaces action remains of “mastering the void”, obliges a thought new operational strategies and new ways of reusing according Lack of green areas 16% to an informal design. Difficulty in of accessing public border 15% A territory abandonment, and border equipment services and cushion between established organism, and detachment neighbourhoods and different realities. Insufficient proximity trade 12%

DEMOGRAPHIC DATA Degradation of buildings

76%

Economy

21%

Lack of employment

60%

Social development

13%

Poverty

58%

Poverty

12%

Isolation of the sick

57%

Urban rehabilitation

11%

Lack of access to adequate housing

37%

Services

Heritage

Degradation of public space

30%

Mobility

Traffic jam

26%

Others

Insecurity

22%

Culture

Fluvial-maritime front

Identity

Urban space

Instruction

Difficulty in accessing equipment 18% and support services to insufficient living spaces Lack of green areas

16%

Difficulty in accessing public equipment and services

15%

Insufficient proximity trade

12%

Difficulty in accessing health facilities and services

10%

PORTO DOWNTOWN

Degradation58% of public space 57%

26% Degradation of buildings Insecurity 22% Lack of employment Difficulty in accessing equipment 18% and support services toPoverty insufficient living spacesIsolation of the sick

57%

30%

Traffic jam

26%

65%Insecurity

22%

1. Datas from PDM, 2009.

Poverty Urban rehabilitation

12%

Services

10%

Heritage Mobility Others Culture

Degradation of public space

30%

10%

Traffic jam

26%

Insecurity

22%

Difficulty in accessing cultural facilities and services

10%

Heritage Isolation of the sick

9%between 55% 1946 and 1970

Mobility Lack of access to adequate housing Others

7% 42% between 1991 and 2011

Poverty

72%

Isolation of the sick

46%

Difficulty in accessing educational 5% equipment and services

Degradation of public space

42%

Fluvial-maritime front

Identity

Urban space

Instruction

PORTO

8% 42%

Really good

20%

Good

Degradation of buildings 65% Degradation of buildings Lack of employment 65% Lack of employment Poverty 72% Poverty Isolation of the sick 46% Isolation of the sick Degradation of 42% Lack of access to adequate public space housing

PORTO

42%

CAMPANHÃ 0

55%

20%

40%

60%

054% 20%

100%

80%

55% 55% 42%

Lack of access to adequate housing

42%

CAMPANHÃ

20% 54%

13%

Poverty 1813 Urban rehabilitation Population by age group (2011):

12%

12% 1903 Heritage

Mobility

Traffic jam

26%

Insecurity

22%

Others 23% 1948 Culture

Poverty

Lack of 55% green areas Isolation of the sickDifficulty55% in accessing public equipment Lack of access to 42%and services adequate housing Insufficient proximity trade

16%

Difficulty in accessing health Relatório sobre as sessões de participação Juntasservices de Freguesia, 2015. facilitiesnasand

10%

1. Main problems of the district of Campanhã in which one should bet,

Difficulty in accessing cultural facilities and services

PORTO

15%

11%

Identity 1978 Urban space

Instruction

Maria Pia Bridge, 1877

25 - 64 years

São João Bridge, 1991

1123 1123

Crockery Paper

1337 1337

20%

40%

InfanteInfante Bridge,Bridge, Industrial areas 2003 area 2003 up to 50 m2

1813 1813 1. The principals problems in Porto,

100%

65%

Poverty

72%

Isolation of the sick

46%

Degradation of public space

42%

Dismissed industrial areas Freixo Freixo Bridge,Bridge, 54%1995 12% 1995

Metro Metro

52%

10%

Other fields

/60% /

Industrial b

0-14 years

Narrow silk fabrics Public spaces Narrow Silk/palettes fabrics

9 /

/ /

Wide cotton/silk fabrics

1 Whitewash Future pedestrian connection

Hats Tannery

2 Crockery 2 Industrial buildings Industrial buildings Paper /

/ /

Isolation of the sick

55%

Lack of access to adequate housing

42%

Railway Railway

55% CAMPANHÃ

/ Metro 1 Esta

Cotton/silk/wool fabrics

Poverty

Industrial Industrial areas areas

Cotton/printed / fabrics Pedestrian / Cotton/silk fabricsmain connections ProjectProject Area Area Cotton/linen fabrics 1

69%

Relatório sobre as sessões de participação nas Juntas de Freguesia, 2015.

CAMPANHÃ

Textile yarn / Metro / Textile industries industries CottonTextile fabrics

Lack of employment

1. Main problems of the district of Campanhã in which one should bet,

PORTO

Project are 1777-1800 1801-1810 1810-1813

Highway Industrial field

11%

PORTO

Wide silk fabrics 8 North Narrow cotton/silk fabrics 2

Degradation of buildings 77%

1. Datas from PDM, 2009.

> 64 years 27%

Proj

/ 100%

80%

residences without network

25 - 64 years

Nowadays Nowadays 11%

Textile

residences without bathroom Rehabilitated Rehabilitated industrial industrial areas areas Railway

15-24 years

23%

40%

North North

1. Main problems of the district of Campanhã in which one should bet, in relation with the other districts

Text

1. Inquery about the Industries in the city o

Dismissed Dismissed industrial industrial areasareas

100%

80%

Population by age group (2011):

1978 1978

Relatório sobre as sessões de participação nas Juntas de Freguesia, 2015.

60%

1. Datas from PDM, 2009.

Designed green areas São João São Bridge, João Bridge, 1991 1991

1948 1948

40%

Towns betweenTowns 1991 and 2011

1. Datas from PDM, 2009.

Degradation of buildings 65%

20%

between 1971 and 1990

Voids Maria area Pia Maria Bridge, Piathan Bridge, greater 200 m2 1877 1877

/ / Designed Designed green green areas 35 45areas Industrial Industrial buildings buildings

between 1946 and 1970

area between 100 m and 200 m

1903 1903

/ VoidsVoids 0 2 20% 2

before 1945

CAMPANHÃ

area between 50 m2 and 100 m2

Relatório sobre as sessões de participação nas Juntas de Freguesia, 2015.

/ Total

Basical services PORTO

CAMPANHÃ 80%

1. Inquery about the Industries in the city of Porto, 1813, Josè Manuel Lopes Cordeiro.

Highway Highway

PORTO

60%

Buildings by period of construction

Luis I Bridge, Luis I Bridge, 1886 1886

Difficulty in accessing educational 5% equipment and services

Total

Railway Railway

Housing size classification

CAMPANHÃ

Hats Tannery

Arràbida Arràbida Bridge,Bridge, 1957 1957

CAMPANHÃ

residences without bathroom 25 - 64 years residences without network 15-24 years

Whitewash

Relatório sobre as sessões de participação nas Juntas de Freguesia, 2015.

10%

Textile yarn Infante Infante Bridge, Brid Cotton 2003 fabrics 2003 Cotton/printed fabrics Maria Maria Pia Bridge Pia B Cotton/silk fabrics 18771877 Cotton/linen fabrics

8 9 / Narrow cotton/silk fabrics 2 / / Industrial Industrial areas areas PORTO INDUSTRIES IN THE XIX CENTURY Wide cotton/silk fabrics 9 25 4

Nowadays

12%

Luis ILuis Bridge, I Bridge Industrial field1886 17 1886

Wide silk fabrics

Freixo Bridge, 1995

3% CAMPANHÃ

PORTO

8 Narrow Silk/palettes North SYMBOLS 1 fabrics

0-14 years

27%

11%

Narrow silk fabrics

> 64 years 27%

> 64 years

1. Datas from PDM, 2009

100%

Cotton/silk/wool fabrics São João São João Bridge B Indu Narrow 1991 silk fabrics 1991 0-14 years 27% Narrow Silk/palettes fabrics Industrial field 1777-1800 1801-1810 1810-1813 11% DISTRICT LIFE QUALITY Wide silk fabrics 19781978 Highway FreixoFreixo Bridge, Bridg Textile yarn / quality of life 1 How is perceived the in Campanhã: / Narrow cotton/silk fabric 19951995 / 3 1 Cotton fabrics Wide cotton/silk fabrics 8% 42% 56% 2% Reh Metro Cotton/printed Nowadays Nowadays CAMPANHÃ / / Reasonable 1 Whitewash Good Bad fabrics Really good Hats / 1 / Cotton/silk fabrics Tannery 1. Relatório sobre as sessões de participação nas Juntas de Freguesia, 2015. Cotton/linen fabrics 1 / / Towns Crockery Cotton/silk/wool fabrics / 1 / Paper

15-24 years

Fluvial-maritime front

10%

residences 25Bridge, - 64withou years Arràbida Arràbida Br residences withou 19571957 15-24 years

1948Railway 1948 64 years 1. Datas from>PDM, 2009.

Infante Bridge, 2003

10%

Other fields

19031903

0 52%

1. Main strengths / advantages of the city of Porto in which one should bet,

Difficulty in accessing equipment 10% and support services

Lack of employment

100%

PORTO

30%

11%

80% 12%

Luis I Bridge, 1886

9% 52%

Degradation of public space

Difficulty in accessing equipment 18% Degradation of buildings 77% and support services to Lack of employment 69%living spaces insufficient

60%

1. Datas from PDM, 2009.

11%

11231123

PORTO

CAMPANHÃ

23% between 1991 and 2011 11%

Social development

100% 52% Textile

60% 12% 80%

18131813

between 1946Arràbida and 1970 Bridge, 1957 between 1971 and 1990

21%

40%

BASICAL Basical services SERVICES

before 1945

and 1001123 m2

Services

1. Main problems of the district of Campanhã in which one should bet, 1. Main problems of the district of Campanhã in which one should bet, in relation with the other districts Relatório sobre as sessões de participação nas Juntas de Freguesia, 2015. Relatório sobre as sessões de participação nas Juntas de Freguesia, 2015.

40%

Basical services

1. Datas from PDM, 2009.

Population by age group (2011):

100%

80%

1. Datas from PDM, 2009.

11%

PORTO

1337 Economy

54%

1. In

13371337 between 1991 and 2011

Buildings by period of construction PORTO

69%

between 1946 andPa 1 20% 40% 60% between 1971 and 1

between 1991 and 2

between 1946 and 1970 20% 40% 60% 80% between 1971 and 1990 23%

1. Datas from PDM, 2009.

55%

Total

1. Inquery about the Industries in the city of Porto, 1813, Josè Manuel Lopes Cordeiro.

Voids Voids

Highway Highway

ProjectProject area area

Designed Designed green green areas areas

Metro Metro

Metro Metro Estadio do Dragão Estadio do Dragão

Dismissed Dismissed industrial industrial areas areas

Pedestrian Pedestrian main connections main connections

Public Public spacesspaces

North North Università

degli

Studi

Ferrara

Dipartimento

Architettura

Sessione

laurea

marzo

2019

Relatori:

Giovanni

Avosani

Correlatori:

Diogo

Sousa

Rocha,

Roberto

Ha 6 Ta

before 1945 0

before 1945

area between 100 m2 and 200 m2

Isolation of the sick

1. Datas from PDM, 2009.

Bad

40%

PORTO

area between 50 m2 and 100 m2

area greater than 200 m2

77%

20%

Population by age group (2011): CAMPANHÃ PORTO INDUSTRIES IN THE XIX CENTURY

area up to 50 m2

area between 100 m2 and 200 m2

Degradation of buildings 76% Lack of employment 60% Poverty 58% Isolation of the sick 57% Lack of access to adequate housing 37%

Reasonable

area up to 50 m2

100%

BUILDINGS BY PERIOD OF CONSTRUCTION

46%

Povertysize classification Housing

DEMOGRAPHIC DATA

80%

Buildings by period of construction

Housing size classification

72%

69%

area between 50 m

60%

PORTO INDUSTRIES

1. Datas from PDM, 2009.

1. Main problems of the district of Campanhã in which one should bet, 1. Main problems of the district of Campanhã in which one should bet, in relation with the other districts Relatório sobre de participação nas Juntas de Freguesia, 2015. area up to as 50sessões m2 Relatório sobre as sessões de participação nas Juntas de Freguesia, 2015.

Relatório sobre as sessões de participação nas Juntas de Freguesia, 2015.

56% 40%

CAMPANHÃ

area between 50 m2 and 100 m2

65%

Lack of employment

Na Buildings by period

PORTO

CAMPANHÃ

65%

Degradation of buildings 77%

60%

area greater than 200 m2

Relatório sobre as sessões de participação nas Juntas de Freguesia, 2015.

40%

1. Relatório sobre as sessões de participação nas Juntas de Freguesia, 2015. 2 Relatório sobre as sessões de participação nas Juntas de Freguesia, 2015. m area between 100 m2 and 200

Relatório sobre as sessões de participação nas Juntas de Freguesia, 2015. 1. Main strengths / advantages of the city of Porto in which one should bet,

20%

1. Datas from PDM, 2009.

How is perceived the quality of life in Campanhã:

1. Main strengths / advantages of the city of Porto in which one should bet,

Mobility 7% Degradation of buildings Others 7% Lack of employment Culture 6% Poverty Fluvial-maritime front 5% Isolation of the sick Identity 4% Degradation of Urban space 4% public space Instruction 3%

Ind

HOUSE SIZE CLASSIFICATION

area greater than 200 m

Difficulty in accessing equipment 10% and support services

between 1971 and 1990

Housing size classification

65%

100%

1. Main problems of the district of Campanhã Culture 6% in which one should bet,

1. Main problems of the district of Campanhã in which one should bet, in relation with the other districts

Lack of employment

DOURO RIVER

9%before 55% 1945

80%

21%

Social development

Difficulty in accessing cultural 10% 77%facilities and services 69% Difficulty in accessing equipment 10% 55%and support services Economy 21% 55% Difficulty in accessing educational 5% Social development 13% 42%equipment and services Poverty 12%

Degradation of buildings 65%

60%

How is perceived the quality of life inCo C Identity 4% POPULATION BY AGE GROUP fab Urban space 4% 13% Population by age group (2011): 8% 42% 56% Co Instruction 3% 12% Really Good Co 54% 52% good 12% 10% 11% 25 -one 64should years bet, 1. Main strengths / advantages of the city of Porto in which Co years 9% Relatório sobre as sessões de participação nas Juntas 15-24 de Freguesia, 2015. sobre as sessões de participação nas Juntas de 1. Relatório Na > 64 years 9% 0-14 years 27% 23% Na 7% fab 11% 11% 7% W

Economy

Difficulty in accessing health facilities and services

Relatório sobre as sessões de participação nas Juntas de Freguesia, 2015.

40%

Relatório sobre as sessões de participação nas Juntas de Freguesia, 2015.

37%

1. The principals problems in Porto,

CAMPANHÃ

Services Poverty

Fluvial-maritime front

Lack of access to adequate housing

Difficulty in accessing educational 5% equipment and services

area greater than 200 m2

65%Difficulty in accessing equipment 18% 72%and support services to insufficient living spaces 46% Lack of green areas 16% 42% Difficulty in accessing public 15% equipment and services

PORTO

13%

20% 0 Urban Lack rehabilitation of employment 11%69%

area between 100 m2 and 200 m2

57%

1. The principals problems in Porto,

21%

100%

80%

area between 50 m and 100 m

Isolation of the sick

Difficulty in accessing equipment 10% and support services

60%

Degradation of public space

Heritage

40%

area up to 50 m2

Lack of access 16%to adequate housing Difficulty in accessing public 15% 1. The principals problems in Porto, 11% Urban rehabilitation equipment and services1. Main problems of the district of Campanhã in which one should bet, Relatório sobre as sessões de participação nas Juntas de Freguesia, 2015. Relatório sobre as sessões de participação nas Juntas de Freguesia, 2015. Services 9% Insufficient proximity trade 12% Lack of green areas

20%

37%

58%

10%

Buildings by period of construction

Economy

CAMPANHÃ

Poverty

Difficulty in accessing cultural facilities and services

42%

Poverty 12%77% Degradation of buildings

60%

10%

Degradation of public space

PORTO

Lack of employment

Difficulty in accessing health facilities and services

46%

Relatório sobre as sessões de participação nas Juntas de Freguesia, 2015.

Housing size classification

76%

12%

Isolation of the sick

1. Main problems of the district of Campanhã in which one should bet, in relation with the other districts

Degradation of buildings

Insufficient proximity trade

72%

58%

Traffic jam

15%

Poverty

Difficulty in accessing educational 5% Poverty equipment and services Isolation of the sick

Lack of access to adequate 37% Insufficient proximity trade Relatório sobre as sessões de participação nas Juntas de Freguesia, 2015. housing Difficulty in accessing health facilities and services Degradation of public space 30%

Difficulty in accessing public equipment and services

65%

Social development

1. Main problems of the district of Campanhã in which one should bet, in relation with the other districts

16%

Lack of employment

60%

Poverty Degradation of buildings 76% Isolation of the sick Lack of employment 60%

Lack of green areas

Degradation of buildings 65%

76%

Lack of employment

Difficulty in accessing equipment 18% and support services to insufficient living spaces

1. The principals problems in Porto,

Degradation of buildings Difficulty in accessing equipment 10% and support services Lack of employment

DEMOGRAPHICDegradation DATA of buildings

8° 34’ 51.83”

DEMOGRAPHIC DATA Relatório sobre as sessões de participação nas Juntas de Freguesia, 2015.

Relatório sobre as sessões de participação nas Juntas de Freguesia, 2015.

Lack of access to adequate housing Relatório sobre as sessões de participação nas Juntas de Freguesia, 2015.

Isolation of the sick

1. OMA, Bruce Mau,“S,M,L,XL”, 1997. Difficulty in accessing educational 5% equipment and services 2. Ignasi de Sòla Morales, Terrain Vague.

1. Main strengths / advantages of the city of Porto in which one should bet,

1. The principals problems in Porto,

Poverty

Difficulty in accessing health slaughterhouse 10% In this context, the ancient of Porto is the How is percei facilities and centre of theservices redevelopment plan of the Campanhã area, defining the heart of the new peripheral centre. 8% 42% Difficulty in accessing cultural 10% The project identifies the ancient slaughterhouse as an urban Really facilities and services organism, able to place itself “in-between” the reality of the good historicalincentre and the peripheral10% one of the city. Difficulty accessing equipment 1. Relatório sobre as s and support services

DEMOGRAPHIC DATA 10%

Difficulty in accessing cultural facilities and services

DEMOGRAPHIC DATA

60%

Giulio

Laureanda:

Allegra

Zanirato

TAVOLA

ARCHITECTURE AS A CONTEXT

LEARNING FROM CONTEXT 1. CONTEXT GUIDELINES

METRO

METRO CONNECTION

1. CONTEXT GUIDELINES

METRO

METRO CONNECTION

1. CONTEXT GUIDELINES

METRO

1. CONTEXT GUIDELINES

METRO

METRO CONNECTION

PARQUE DA CORUJEIRA

METRO CONNECTION

The area is between the metro access and the Campanhã main square. These accesses define the main circulation axes through the building. PARQUE DA CORUJEIRA

F’

2. ARCHITECTURE AS A CONTEXT

D’ A

METRO

C PARQUE DA CORUJEIRA

F’

ARCHITECTURE GUIDELINES

2. ARCHITECTURE AS A CONTEXT

D’

A F

METRO

A’

C’

PARQUE DA CORUJEIRA

D F’

B’

F’

B’

C’

METRO CONNECTION

2. ARCHITECTURE AS A CONTEXT

D’

A’ A

METRO

2. ARCHITECTURE AS A CONTEXT

A’

C’

METRO CONNECTION

B D’

A’

METRO CONNECTION

METRO

A’

CAMPANHÃ MAIN SQUARE

D B

B’

METRO CONNECTION

A’

C’

CAMPANHÃ MAIN SQUARE

D B’ A’

The new volumes defines the secondary circulation and the internal distribution of functions. Solid and introvert, the elements coincide with the axes outlined by the main supporting structure.

3. ADAPT TO SPACE

CAMPANHÃ MAIN SQUARE

3. ADAPT TO SPACE

ADAPT TO EXISTENT 3. ADAPT TO SPACE

3. ADAPT TO SPACE

4. FREE SPACE

The new volumes defines the secondary circulation and the internal distribution of functions. Solid and introvert, the elements coincide with the axes outlined by the main supporting structure.

4. FREE SPACE

FREE SPACE 4. FREE SPACE

STUDENT ATELIERS

DESIGN LABS

Free space as the concept of movement and mutability in order to define always new spaces and configurations. The circular casing are blur boundaries characterized by flexibility and transparency.

MAKER LABS

FUNCTIONAL PROGRAM BUSINESS LABS

STUDENT ATELIERS

DESIGN LABS

MAKER LABS

BUSINESS LABS

START UP

TEXTILE MUSEUM

PUBLIC OFFICES

RESTAURANT

BOOKSHOP + BAR

PUBLIC LIBRARY

AUDITORIUM

MUSEUM ARCHVIES PUBLIC OFFICES + MUSEUM OFFICES

START UP

PEDESTRIAN HIGHWAY

TEXTILE MUSEUM RESTAURANT

BOOKSHOP + BAR

PUBLIC LIBRARY

AUDITORIUM

MUSEUM ARCHVIES

PEDESTRIAN HIGHWAY

MUNICIPAL PERTINENCE

MUNICIPAL PERTINENCE + MUSEUM OFFICES

The complex is mainly divided into three functional bands, the first that runs along the ring road presents spaces dedicated to start-ups and companies in the textile sector, including ateliers for fashion students. The central strip presents an exhibition path that runs through the area until you reach the book-shop and bar that overlooks the future pedestrian connection with the metro. The same museum path defines one of the horizontal circulation axes: a public passage that crosses the various buildings connecting the square and the pedestrian crossing. The last band, instead, is dedicated to supporting functions for the museum and offices: the refreshment area, the public library and the museum archives.

SYMBOLS

Movable casing

Fixed room

Services

Municipal relevance/Not designed areas

Metro train station

Università

degli

Studi

Ferrara

Dipartimento

Architettura

Sessione

laurea

marzo

2019

Relatori:

Giovanni

Avosani

Correlatori:

Diogo

Sousa

Rocha,

Roberto

Giulio

Laureanda:

Allegra

Zanirato

TAVOLA

ATLAS OF ELEMENTS ATLAS OF ELEMENTS ATLAS OF ELEMENTS ATLAS OF ELEMENTS ATLAS OF ELEMENTS 30 m2 3,5 x 8 mt x 8 BUSINESS

LABS SERVICES

DESIGN LABS SERVICES

Area: 45m2 Materials

Area: 32 m2

Structure: coated steel structure Steal Glass Floors: 2 Ceramic

Structure: coated steel structure

9,4

Floors: 2

Functions: stairs, elevator, toilets

Functions: stairs, elevator, toilets, lockers

ATLAS OF ELEMENTS 5

30 m2 30 m23,5 x 8 mt x 8 OFFICE SERVICES 3,5 xPUBLIC 8 mt x 8 30 m22247 m2 Materials Area: 30 m 30 m Materials 3,5 x 8 mt x 8 3,5xx88mt mtxx88 3,5 Steal Structure: coated steel structure StealMaterials Glass Materials Materials GlassFloors: Ceramic 1 Ceramic Steal Steal Steal Glass Functions: wardrobe, toilets, lockers Glass Glass Ceramic Ceramic Ceramic

3,6

30 m2 3,5 x 8 mt x 8 Materials Steal Glass Ceramic

LIBRARY ENTRANCE

1,7

BOOKSHOP

LIBRARY READING ROOM

Area: 6 m2

Area: 69 m

Structure: coated steel structure

Floors: 2

Floors: 1

Functions: stairs, elevator, locker

Functions: foyer, lockers.

Functions: stairs, reading room

9,7

Area: 55 m2

3,5 5,5

4,7

RESTAURANT SERVICES 3,5

Area: 30,25 m2

3,5

5,5

Structure: coated steel structure Floors: 1

4,8

Functions: toilets. 5,5

ATLAS OF ELEMENTS

3,5

30 m2 3,5 x 8 mt x 8 4,8

Materials Steal

AUDITORIUM SERVICES

MUSEUM SERVICES Glass

Area: 41,3 m2

Ceramic Area: 41,3 m2

Structure: coated steel structure

Floors: 2

Functions: locker, toilets, museum gallery

6,7 5,5

MUSEUM ACCESS

ATELIERS SERVICES 8,5

RESTAURANT SERVICES

Area: 60 m2

Area: 60 m

Area: 46,75 m

Structure: steel structure

Structure: coated steel structure

Floors: 1

Floors: 2

Functions: lockers, stairs, elevator.

Functions: lockers, stairs, elevator, toilets.

Floors: 1 Functions: ticket office, stairs, lockers, elevator

9,5

LIBRARY SERVICES

AUDITORIUM

FREE SPACE

Area: 142,5 m2

Area: mixed

Structure: coated steel structure

Structure: U glass

Structure: pvc curtains, steel structure.

Floors: 1

Functions: auditorium

Functions: temporary program.

4,5

3,5

Area: 16 m2

Functions: toilets UniversitÃ

degli

Studi

Ferrara

Dipartimento

Architettura

Sessione

laurea

marzo

2019

Relatori:

Giovanni

Avosani

Correlatori:

Diogo

Sousa

Rocha,

Roberto

Giulio

Laureanda:

Allegra

Zanirato

TAVOLA

THE PROJECT

TERRAIN VAGUE AS DIRECTION TOWARDS SOLUTION SECTION FFI

Scale 1:500 0

10 m

Scale 1:250 0

pede

strian

Estadio do Dragão

high

way

conn

5m 2.5

ectio

+4.5

F’

metro station

+ 10

+ 7.0

+4.0

+3.00

+ 0.00

children area

+4.5

bike park

E’

+ 4.5

+ 0.00 - 0.7

+ 4.5

+4.5

+0.00

0.00

SECTION EEI

Università

degli

Studi

Ferrara

Dipartimento

Architettura

Sessione

laurea

marzo

2019

Relatori:

Giovanni

Avosani

Correlatori:

Diogo

Sousa

Rocha,

Roberto

Giulio

Laureanda:

Allegra

Zanirato

TAVOLA

THE PROJECT

ACCESS AND MAIN CONNECTIONS

GROUNDFLOOR PLAN

BOOKSHOP

METRO ACCESS

PUBLIC OFFICES

STUDENT

AUDITORIUM

ATELIERS

TEXTILE bar

MUSEUM

DESIGN LABS

TEXTILE

CENTRAL NAVE

LIBRARY

MUSEUM ARCHIVES

MUSEUM

public offices

MAKERS

TEXTILE

LABS

MUSEUM

RESTAURANT

bookshop

BUSINESS LABS

SQUARE ACCESS

NEW SPACES THROUGH ONE

BOOKSHOP

METRO ACCESS

PUBLIC OFFICES

auditorium 430 m2

STUDENT

AUDITORIUM

ATELIERS

LIBRARY TEXTILE

DESIGN LABS

MUSEUM

TEXTILE

CENTRAL NAVE

student ateliers 460 m2

MUSEUM ARCHIVES

MUSEUM

MAKERS

TEXTILE

LABS

MUSEUM

library 1100 m2

RESTAURANT

BUSINESS LABS

SQUARE ACCESS

temporary exposition 740 m2

BOOKSHOP

METRO ACCESS

PUBLIC OFFICES

STUDENT

AUDITORIUM

ATELIERS CENTRAL NAVE

LIBRARY TEXTILE patio

220 m2

LABS

MUSEUM

TEXTILE

MUSEUM ARCHIVES

design labs 1370 m2

MAKERS

TEXTILE

LABS

MUSEUM

BUSINESS LABS

museum deposite 600 m2

central nave 600 m2

MUSEUM

RESTAURANT

METRO METRO ACCESS METRO ACCESS ACCESS METRO ACCESS METRO ACCESS

temporary exposition 508 m2

SQUARE ACCESS

METRO ACCESS METRO METRO ACCESS ACCESS METRO ACCESS

PUBLIC PUBLIC PUBLIC

OFFICES PUBLIC OFFICES OFFICES PUBLIC OFFICES

BOOKSHOP BOOKSHOP BOOKSHOP BOOKSHOP

DESIGN

POSSIBILITIES FOR FASHIONOFFICES COUTURE PUBLIC

AUDITORIUM maker labs 460 m2

TEXTILE

DESIGN LABS

MUSEUM

TEXTILE

LABS DESIGN DESIGN DESIGN LABS LABS LABS

restaurant 800 m2

permanent exposition 424 m2

LIBRARY CENTRAL NAVE

ATELIERS

DESIGN

MUSEUM ARCHIVES

MAKERS

TEXTILE

LABS

MUSEUM

AUDITORIUM

AUDITORIUM AUDITORIUM

TEXTILE

AUDITORIUM

MUSEUM TEXTILE TEXTILE MUSEUM TEXTILE MUSEUM MUSEUM

LABS MAKERS MAKERS LABS MAKERS BUSINESS LABS LABS LABS

TEXTILE TEXTILE MUSEUM TEXTILE MUSEUM MUSEUM

BUSINESS BUSINESS LABS BUSINESS LABS LABS

MUSEUM

ATELIERS STUDENT

TEXTILE TEXTILE MUSEUM TEXTILE MUSEUM MUSEUM

MAKERS

0.00

STUDENT ATELIERS ATELIERS

ATELIERS

DESIGN

backstage

OFFICES

STUDENT

STUDENT STUDENT ATELIERS STUDENT ATELIERS ATELIERS

BOOKSHOP

PUBLIC

STUDENT OFFICES STUDENT STUDENT ATELIERS

CENTRAL CENTRAL CENTRAL NAVE CENTRAL NAVE NAVE NAVE

PUBLIC PUBLIC PUBLIC OFFICES OFFICES STUDENT OFFICES ATELIERS

patio 220 m2

METRO ACCESS

PUBLIC

LIBRARY DESIGN

DESIGN LABS DESIGN LABS LABS LIBRARY DESIGN LABS LIBRARY LIBRARY

LABS

MUSEUM MAKERS ARCHIVES

MAKERS LABS MAKERS

MAKERS MUSEUM LABS LABS ARCHIVES MUSEUM ARCHIVES LABS MAKERS MUSEUM BUSINESS ARCHIVES RESTAURANT LABS

BUSINESS LABS BUSINESS BUSINESS LABS

LABS RESTAURANT LABS BUSINESS RESTAURANT

RESTAURANT

LABS

SQUARE ACCESS SQUARE SQUARE ACCESS ACCESS SQUARE ACCESS

RESTAURANT

ticket office

BUSINESS LABS

SQUARE ACCESS

business labs 690 m2

SYMBOLS Flexible rooms

Access

Fixed rooms

Model access

Services

Public space connections

Audience

Circulation

municipal competence

North

2,5

Scale 1:250 0,00

UniversitÃ

degli

Studi

Ferrara

Dipartimento

Architettura

Sessione

laurea

marzo

2019

Relatori:

Giovanni

Avosani

Correlatori:

Diogo

Sousa

Rocha,

Roberto

Giulio

Laureanda:

Allegra

Zanirato

TAVOLA

THE PROJECT

ACCESS AND MAIN CONNECTIONS

1ST FLOOR PLAN

BOOKSHOP

METRO ACCESS

PUBLIC OFFICES

STUDENT

AUDITORIUM

ATELIERS

TEXTILE

DESIGN LABS

MUSEUM

TEXTILE

CENTRAL NAVE

LIBRARY

MUSEUM ARCHIVES

MUSEUM

MAKERS

TEXTILE

LABS

MUSEUM

RESTAURANT

BUSINESS LABS

SQUARE ACCESS

BOOKSHOP

METRO ACCESS

PUBLIC

0.00

OFFICES

0.00

STUDENT

NEW SPACES THROUGH ONE

AUDITORIUM

ATELIERS

TEXTILE MUSEUM

DESIGN LABS

TEXTILE

CENTRAL NAVE

LIBRARY

MUSEUM ARCHIVES

MUSEUM

MAKERS

TEXTILE

LABS

MUSEUM

RESTAURANT

BUSINESS

student ateliers 340 m2

LABS

0.00

SQUARE ACCESS

+4.20

library 580 m2

0.00

+4.50

permanent exposition 440 m2

museum offices 600 m2 +4.50

+4.50

0.00

METRO METRO ACCESS METRO ACCESS ACCESS METRO ACCESS METRO ACCESS

PUBLIC PUBLIC PUBLIC

METRO RELATIONS BETWEEN ACCESS SPACES

design labs 930 m2 +4.20

+4.50

RELATIONS

In and out RELATIONS RELATIONS BETWEEN BETWEEN THE THE SPACES: SPACES: intersection

maker labs 340 m2 0.00

In and In and outout intersection intersection

+4.20

Intersection Intersection between between thethe newnew volumes volumes

0.00

In and out intersection Inclusion Inclusion

PUBLIC

OFFICES PUBLIC PUBLIC PUBLIC OFFICES OFFICES STUDENT OFFICES ATELIERS

STUDENT OFFICES STUDENT STUDENT ATELIERS

STUDENT ATELIERS ATELIERS ATELIERS STUDENT

AUDITORIUM

ATELIERS

DESIGN

LIBRARY DESIGN STUDENT DESIGN AUDITORIUM LABS STUDENT AUDITORIUM DESIGN ATELIERS TEXTILE STUDENT LABS BETWEEN THE SPACES: LABS AUDITORIUM ATELIERS LIBRARY Intersection Inclusion DESIGN LABS LIBRARY MUSEUM ATELIERS DESIGNbetween the new LIBRARY TEXTILE LABS TEXTILE MUSEUM MAKERS LABS volumes MUSEUM ARCHIVES TEXTILE DESIGN MUSEUM MAKERS LABS MAKERS DESIGN MUSEUM MAKERS DESIGN MUSEUM LABS LABS LABS ARCHIVES MUSEUM TEXTILE LABS ARCHIVES LABS TEXTILE MAKERS MUSEUM LABS BUSINESS ARCHIVES MUSEUM MAKERS TEXTILE RESTAURANT MUSEUM LABS BUSINESS LABS LABS BUSINESS MUSEUM BUSINESS LABS MAKERS TEXTILE LABS RESTAURANT MAKERS TEXTILE LABS Inclusion BUSINESS RESTAURANT LABS Intersection MUSEUM MAKERS TEXTILE BUSINESS LABS between RESTAURANT MUSEUM the new LABS LABS volumes MUSEUM Exclusion Exclusion LABS CENTRAL CENTRAL CENTRAL NAVE CENTRAL NAVE NAVE NAVE

METRO ACCESS ACCESS METRO ACCESS

restaurant 600 m2

BOOKSHOP BOOKSHOP BOOKSHOP BOOKSHOP

METRO RELATIONS BETWEEN THE

OFFICES PUBLIC OFFICES OFFICES SPACES: PUBLIC OFFICES

SQUARE ACCESS

BUSINESS Mix BUSINESS LABS BUSINESS LABS LABS

Defining circulation

SQUARE SQUARE ACCESS ACCESS SQUARE ACCESS

+3.00

LANGUAGE:

Defining Defining circulation circulation

Services Defining main circulation and Defining space organisation circulation

MixMix

Blur Boundaries secondary/ temporary functions

Mix

DEFINING SPACES: LANGUAGE:

Inalterable

LANGUAGE: LANGUAGE: business labs 690 m2

Services Services Defining Defining main main circulation circulation andand space space organisation organisation

0.00

+4.20

Blur Blur Boundaries Boundaries secondary/ secondary/ temporary temporary functions functions

DEFINING DEFINING SPACES: SPACES:

Inalterable Inalterable

Movement

Services Defining main SYMBOLS circulation and In and In and OutOut space organisation TheThe ATLAS OF ELEMENTS: boundaries boundaries Flexible rooms become become platforms platforms DEFINING SPACES: meeting meeting the the Fixed rooms outdoor outdoor

Blur Boundaries secondary/ Inclusion Inclusion temporary Double Double functions boundary boundary Access

Model access

Inalterable Services Movement Movement

Movement Public space connections Change Change Circulation

Platform Platform Audience ATLAS OF ELEMENTS:

municipal competence

ATLAS ATLAS OFOF ELEMENTS: ELEMENTS:

North

2,5

Scale 1:250 0,00

UniversitÃ

degli

Studi

Ferrara

Dipartimento

Architettura

Sessione

laurea

marzo

2019

Relatori:

Giovanni

Avosani

Correlatori:

Diogo

Sousa

Rocha,

Roberto

Giulio

Laureanda:

Allegra

Zanirato

TAVOLA

BLUR BOUNDARIES MICRO-ARCHITECTURE AXONOMETRIC VIEWS

TEMPORARY EXHIBITION

SECTION DD1

MUSEUM EXHIBITION

PERMANENT EXPOSITION

+ 10

+ 7.0

+3.00

+ 0.00

D’

The museum area consists of several spaces characterized by the flexibility of the elements that allow different configurations in the distribution of exhibitors and rooms. Space is defined by light envelopes that pass through the existing structure, thus constituting the circulation axes and the museum rooms.

B’

C’

F’

The main entrance of the area takes place through the square that overlooks the road that connects the neighbourhood park with the slaughterhouse. Access to the museum areas is recognizable thanks to the blocking of services that comes out, creating continuity between inside and outside. Public space is defined by different playground areas for children and shaded areas with orange trees.

B’

PUBLIC SPACE

+ 4.5

The permanent exhibit takes place in the long corridor that crosses all the museum spaces. The arches and openings that are crossed characterize the extremely longitudinal space with a syncopated rhythm of elements that follow each other, thus fragmenting the infinite sense of the path.

+ 0.00

+3.00

+ 7.0

+ 10

E’

The existing architecture becomes the scenography of the fashion shows or exhibitions: the arches act as the architectural backdrop to the works, surrounded by light curtains that structure the complexity of the space. The paths that are created give the possibility to expose both inside and outside the casings, giving a certain continuity highlighted by the rhythm of the curves that follow each other between arch and arch.

+ 0.00 - 0.7

SECTION AA1

+ 4.5

+4.5

+0.00

SECTION BB1

+ 4.5

+ 0.00

+3.00

+ 7.0

+ 10

- 0.7

SECTION CC1 + 13

+ 10

+ 7.0

+ 4.5

+4.5

+3.00 +0.00 + 0.00

Università

degli

Studi

Ferrara

Dipartimento

Architettura

Sessione

laurea

marzo

2019

Relatori:

Giovanni

Avosani

Correlatori:

Diogo

Sousa

Rocha,

Roberto

Giulio

Laureanda:

Allegra

Zanirato

TAVOLA

THE AUDITORIUM

CONSTRUCTIVE DETAILS SECTION HHI

ROOF DETAIL

Scale 1:100 Flashing (weatherproofing) 10,5

0,5 cm

Terracotta tiles OSB 10,9

2 cm 5

waterproof sheath Acustic insulation

10,5

10,5 10,5 10,5

0,3 cm

3 cm

Thermal insulation 7 cm

OSB

10,9

10,9 10,9 10,9

1,5 cm

Wooden beam Wooden beam

SECTION GGI

U GLASS SYSTEM

4,8

Scale 1:100

4,8 6,8

4,8 4,8 4,8

3,8

10,8

+ 4.00

+ 3.00

+ 4.00

0.00

-0.20

6,8 6,8 6,8

12 12

3,8

10,8

3,8 3,8 3,8

10,8 10,8 10,8

2,8

+ 4.00 + 4.00

6,8

+ 3.00

2,8

2,8 2,8 2,8

+ 3.00 + 3.00

0.00

0.00 0.00

-0.20 -0.20 -0.20

Scale 1:100

2,5 1,8

2,5 2,2

FIRST FLOOR PLAN

Scale 1:20

2,7 2,5 2,5

2,5 3

Aluminium mast 5x15x500 cm

2,3

U glass double glazing Standard arrangement

4,8

5,25

auditorium 190 m2

1,8

2,5 2,5 2,5 2,5 2,5 2,5

2,5 3

2,7

Fireproof polyethersulfone curtain

2,7 2,7

permanent exposition 440 m2

hallway 24 m2

3 4

2,5 2,2

3,1

2,7

2,5 3 2,5 2,53 3

2,5 2,2

3,1

2,5 2,2

2,5 2,5 2,5 1,8 1,8 1,8

2,5 2,2

2,5 2,5 2,5 1,8 1,8 1,8

2,5 2,5 2,5 2,2 2,2 2,2

3,9

2,5 2,5

2,3 2,3

3,9

3,1

3,9 3,9

3,1 3,1

2,3

STEEL STRUCTURE SYSTEM 3,9

3,1

4,8

0,32

3,5

3,5 3,5 3,5

2,5 1,8

2,5 2,2

2,5 3 2,5 2,53 3

auditorium 190 m2

2,5 2,5

3 3

permanent exposition 440 m2

2,5 2,5 2,5 2,5 2,5 2,5

2,5 3

1,8

2,5 2,2

2,5 2,5 2,5 1,8 1,8 1,8

2,5 2,2

2,5 2,5 2,5 1,8 1,8 1,8

2,5 2,5 2,5 2,2 2,2 2,2

0,32 0,32 0,32

4,8 4,8 4,8

2,5 2,5 2,5 2,5 2,5 2,5

5,25 5,25

hallway 24 m2

3 4

5,25

2,5 3

auditorium 190 m2 auditorium auditorium 190 m2 190 m2

16 16

3 34 4

permanent exposition permanent permanent 440 m2 exposition exposition 440 m2 440 m2

hallway 24 m2 hallway hallway2 24 m2 24 m

3 4

3,5

0,26

2,5 1,8

2,5 2,2

GROUNDFLOOR PLAN

2,7

2,5 2,5

0,26 0,26 0,26

bathroom 8 m2

3,1

2,7 2,7

2,7

2,5 2,5 2,5 2,5 2,5 2,5

4,8

2,5 2,5 2,5 2,5 2,5 2,5

2,5 2,5

auditorium 190 m2

5,25

bathroom deposit 8 m2 bathroom bathroom 12 m2 8 m2 2 8m

hallway 24 m2

bathroom 8 m2

2,3 2,3

2,3

3,9

3,1

3,9 3,9

3,1 3,1

3,9

3,1

Scale 1:5

4,8

4,8 4,8 4,8

auditorium 190 m2

0,26

Steal perforated panel 120 x150x0,15 cm

2,5 2,5

5,25

5,25 5,25

deposit 12 m2

hallway 24 m2

5,25

16 16

2,5 2,5

deposit 12 m2 deposit deposit2 12 m2 bathroom 12 m 8 m2

G’

auditorium 190 m2 auditorium auditorium 190 m2 190 m2

hallway 24 m2 hallway hallway2 24 m2 24 m

3,5

1,8

2,5 2,2

3,1

2,5 2,2

2,5 2,5 2,5 1,8 1,8 1,8

0,26 0,26 0,26

2,3

2,5 2,5 2,5 2,2 2,2 2,2

3,9

Thermal insulation 5x300x150 cm

3,5

3,5 3,5 3,5

13,3x14,0x300 cm

2,5 2,5

0,26

Acustic insulation

2,5 1,8

bathroom 8 m2 bathroom bathroom 8 m2 8 m2

2,5 1,8

2,5 2,2

2,5 2,5 2,5 2,5 2,5 2,5

HEA 140 beam

3,5

3,5 3,5

0,26 0,26

5x300x3 cm 2,5 2,5 2,5 2,5 2,5 2,5

bathroom 8 m2

Hollow steel profile 5x5x300 cm

Aluminium frame 5x5x300 cm

1,8

2,5 2,2

2,5 2,5 2,5 1,8 1,8 1,8

2,5 2,5 2,5 2,2 2,2 2,2

H’ Università

degli

Studi

Ferrara

Dipartimento

Architettura

Sessione

laurea

marzo

2019

Relatori:

Giovanni

Avosani

Correlatori:

Diogo

Sousa

Rocha,

Roberto

Giulio

Laureanda:

Allegra

Zanirato

TAVOLA

0.26

Scale 1:5

0.07

+3.00 +7.00

Scale 1:5 1_ HEA 140 beam

13,3x14,0x300 cm

0.3 0.26

0.26

0.260.26

3_Steel perforated sheet

+3.00 +3.00

1 cm

+3.00

0.26 +0.00

0.03

+0.16

0.03

0.07

0.14

0.07

0.14

0.04

9_Angular steel section

0.3

8_Radiant system

12_Plywood panel 1 cm

0.3

+3.00

7_Acustic insulation 3 cm

11_U steel profile

0.3

6_U Aluminium frame

10_Corrugated sheet

0.04

8_Cement screed

+0.00

+0.16

7_Technical installations

0.3

0.3 0.3

13 8

3_Aluminium mast

5_Aluminium frame 2x2 cm

6_Epoxy resin floor

+3.00

4_Fireproof polyethersulfone curtain

5_Plywood panel +7.00

2_Vertical aluminum upright 5x15x500 cm

4_Alucobond facade system

150x1,2x300 cm

5 0.26

10x1,2x300 cm

0.3

+7.00

Scale 1:5

1_U glass double glazing Standard arrangement

2_Thermal insulation

RADIANT AND ACUSTIC PANEL

0,32

+3.00

0.07

U GLASS SYSTEM

0.07

Scale 1:10

+7.00 +7.00 +7.00

FACADE SYSTEM

0.07

STEEL STRUCTURE SYSTEM

0.070.07

CONSTRUCTIVE DETAILS

0.07

0.26

THE AUDITORIUM

13_Thermal insulation 3x300x cm

0,2 cm

0.3

1 4 6 2

+0.16

+0.16 +0.16

+0.00

0.03 0.03

0.03 0.07 0.07

0.14

0.07

0.14

0.04

0.040.03

0.07

0.14

15_Aluminium carter

0.04

+0.16

+0.00 +0.00

14_Vapor barrier

0.3

0.3 0.03

0.07

0.14

0.04

+0.16

+0.00

0.3

SECTION GGI

0.03

+0.00

0.07

0.14

0.04

+0.16

Scale 1:20 0.3

-0.20

12 2,5 2,5

3,1

2,5 2,5

wooden trusses

+7.00

2,5 1,8

+7.00

3,1

2,7

Corrugated sheet

+7.00

2,5 2,2

HEA 140 beam

+7.00

5,25

2,5 2,2

3,9

+7.00 +7.00

2,3

Technical installations U steel frame +7.00

3.8

Perforated steel sheet HEA 140 beam +7.00

3.8

Thermal Insulation

2,5 2,2

Perforated steel sheet

Plywood panel

Radiant system

3.8

auditorium 190 m2

3.8

3.8 3.8

2,5 2,2

Acustic insulation Aluminium frame

3.8

Aluminium frame +3.00

2,5 2,2

+3.00

3.8

Aluminium mast

2,8

3,8

permanent exposition 440 m2

0.00

+ 3.00

10,5 + 4.00

Aluminium frame

Fireproof curtain

Perforated steel sheet

+3.00

HEA 140 beam

4,8

+3.00

3,5

+3.00 +3.00

Thermal insulation

+3.00

hallway 24 m2

2.8

Epoxy resin floor 2,5 2,2

Thermal insulation

2,5 2,2

6,8

4,8

5 5

U steel frame Plywood panel

10,9

2,5 3

Technical installations

2,5 3

+3.00

10,8

2.8

2.8 2.8

3 4

2.8

HEA 140 beam

+0.00

2.8

+0.00

+0.00 +0.00

U glass system

+0.00

Epoxy resin floor +0.00

Aluminium frame

Thermal insulation HEA 140 beam UniversitĂ

degli

Studi

Ferrara

Dipartimento

Architettura

Sessione

laurea

marzo

2019

Relatori:

Giovanni +0.00

Avosani

Correlatori:

Diogo

Sousa

Rocha,

Roberto

Giulio

Laureanda:

Allegra

Zanirato

TAVOLA

THATâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;S ALL FOLKS!

UniversitĂ

degli

Studi

Ferrara

Dipartimento

Architettura

Sessione

laurea

marzo

2019

Relatori:

Giovanni

Avosani

Correlatori:

Diogo

Sousa

Rocha,

Roberto

Giulio

Laureanda:

Allegra

Zanirato

TAVOLA