Study of Earthquake Resistance in Highrise Structures

Page 1

STUDYOFEARTHQUAKERESISTANCE IN

AcademyofArchitecture,Mumbai
DESIGN
AUGUST-2022 GUIDED
AR.K.VPARMESHWAR
AR.
AR.
ARCHITECTURALBUILDINGCONSTRUCTIONANDMATERIALS SEMESTER7STUDIO
HIGH-RISESTRUCTURES
REPORT
BY
;
HARDIKDEDHIA;
MINALGAJJAR

STUDIOCONDUCTORS

Ar.K.V.Parmeshawar Ar.HardikDedhia Ar.MinalGajjar

STUDIOTEAM

RashmitaDake 31. SaloniPawar 32. AishwaryaRaikar 33. NidhiKhot 34. SairajHalpatrao 35. AnjaliKarpate 36. PranaliThool 37. AmeyaThanawala 38. SharvilMore 39. DhruvanshiSanghavi 40. KarishmaKaurHooda 41. HarshTank 42. TarikaDeshpande 43. PrajaktaGosavi 44. SanchitaTandel 45. RasikaSalgaonakar 46. JigishaSoni 47. PoojaTambe 48. VaishnaviSiddhapara 49. KartikaPinjarkar 50. VardhanArora 51. KrisshChavan 52. MansiBhatia

RoshaniChabhare

AcademyofArchitecture,Mumbai
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
15.
16.
17.
18.
19.
20.
21.
22.
23.
24.
25.
26.
27.
28.
29.
ARCHITECTURALBUILDINGCONSTRUCTIONANDMATERIALS SEMESTER7STUDIO
SejalUmare
PuneetMaru
VaibhaviKhedkar
AbhishekSuryawanshi
RohitChopade
ShivanjayBhagat
KimayaChuri
GaurangRajput
PalakBhattad
SarthakEkal
NehaJayashanker
IshaPatil 13. BhoomikaChaudhari 14. AdityaKanade
ShruteePatil
ShwetaUtekar
VaishnaviGurnalkar
ShaktiJadhav
VireshDesai
IshanLathia
PrajaktaPai
LaxareeSawant
SakshiGothankar
SimranAjgaonkar
KrishnaKhurusane
SiddhiShinde
AtharvaGirme
ManasaRavikumar
30.
53. HarshwardhanShirpurkar 54. AakashKharade 55. AditiWadate 56. MithilaGadag 57. AryaJumde
AcademyofArchitecture,Mumbai GROUP01 VAISHNAVIGURNALKAR_17 VIRESHDESAI_19 SHARVILMORE_38
VISUALIZATION CORE
Team01| DesignReport FORMDEVELOPMENT Core Core 20000 mm 50000 mm PLAN ELEVATIONS
ANDFLOORPLATES
MODELWITHBRACINGONSHORTERSIDES MODELPHOTOS Team01| DesignReport
MODELWITHOUTBRACINGS

FROMLEVEL56TO75 (225MTO300M)

VISUALIZATION

FROMLEVEL38TO56 (150MTO225M)

FROMLEVEL0TO38 (0MTO150M)

FLOORPLATES

Team01| DesignReport FORMDEVELOPMENT
TWISTEDPART MODELPHOTOS

ANALYSISANDCONCLUSION

STANDARDFORM

Thefirstpolygonalformtakenwasof8sideswith4shorterand4 longer sides taking inspiration from a diamond shape. The sides also faced the common core in the center for easy structural designandstability.

The model without bracings was subjected to twisting, mostly on the shorter facades. Hence, for stability bracings were added on shorted facades since they were the weak part of the structure. Thisalsohelpedtomaintainthelargerfacadesopentoviewsand alsosavingthematerial.

Team01| DesignReport CONCLUSION
TWISTING
WITHOUTBRACING STABILITYWITHBRACING

ANALYSISANDCONCLUSION

SCULPTURALFORM

Theformwasdesignedsuchthatthetoppartishalfcantilevered With change in orientation. Like two cuboids meeting in air. The taskforthisdesigntocreateacounterweightforthecantilevered cuboidandmaintainingtheC.G.

Firstly a common core was planned for circulation and stability. Thethetopcuboidwasmajorlytakensupportsfromthecommon core. Further, without bracing, the structure was moving a lot.

STABILITYWITHBRACING

COMMONCOREFOR CIRCULATIONANDSTABILITY

PRIMARYBRACING (onthecoreside)

SECONDARY BRACING (sideadjacenttothecore)

AcademyofArchitecture,Mumbai
GROUP02 GAURANGRAJPUT_08 VAISHNAVISIDDHAPARA_48 KARTIKAPINJARKAR_49

PLAN BIRDEYEVIEW

ISOMETRICVIEW WORMSEYEVIEW

SKETCHES Team02| DesignReport
MODEL
1:GEOMETRICMODEL

PLAN BIRDEYEVIEW

DIGITALMODELPHOTOS Team02| DesignReport
MODEL1:GEOMETRICMODEL
Team02| DesignReport MODEL1:GEOMETRICMODEL
THREEDIMENSIONALVIEW THREEDIMENSIONALVIEW SKETCHES Team02| DesignReport MODEL2:SCULPTURALMODEL

PLAN FRONTELEVATION

DIGITALMODELPHOTOS Team02| DesignReport
THREEDIMENSIONALVIEW THREEDIMENSIONALVIEW MODEL2:SCULPTURALMODEL

TOPVIEW VIEWOFMODELAFTERSHAKETEST

Team02| DesignReport
MODEL2:SCULPTURALMODEL

MODEL1:REGULARMODEL

This model had a main pentagonal shaped core with 5 branches along its five sides, consisting of 15 main vertical elements and 12 horizontalbracings.

Inthehorizontalbracings,toallowmovementofjoineries,therewere straws used as make connecters for the wooden watchmakers sticks.Thesewerethentiedtotheverticalelements.

Shake table test observations : The model underwent torsion. This wasseen,asthemodel’sverticalelementsweretwistedandslightly bent in one direction. With diagonal bracings between horizontal elements,thetwistingcouldbeavoided.

MODEL2:SCULPTURALMODEL

The main USP of the model was torsion (twist). Each floor plate was rotatedatanangleof3degreeswiththecentralcorecontinuingtill top. This makes the use of diagonal columns for structural stability which were connected through HALF LAP JOINT, with further use of steelcable(strings)asbracings.

Shaketabletestobservations:The model was sturdy and stiff. The bracing, made out of thick strings, replicating tension cables did undergoslightdeformations.

OVERALLINFERENCESANDCONCLUSIONS

● Columns must be properly anchored to the ground in order to resistearthquakeforcesandtransferload.

● The form explorations done may or may not survive an earthquakebuttheyarestrongenoughtoallowtheresidentsto evacuatethebuildingsafelywithoutanylossoflife.

● Both the forms are a good example of aesthetic as well as structuralstability.

CONCLUSION
CONCLUSION
ANALYSISAND
Team02| DesignReport

GROUP03

SIDDHISHINDE_26 JIGISHASONI_46 ARYAJUMDE_57

AcademyofArchitecture,Mumbai
Team03| DesignReport INITIALSKETCHES
SCULPTURALMODEL-BASICPLANNING GEOMETRICMODEL-ISOMETRIC SCULPTURAL MODEL-ISOMETRIC
Team03| DesignReport GEOMETRICMODELPHOTOS
ISOMETRICVIEW1 ISOMETRICVIEW2 VIEWFROMBOTTOM ZOOMEDVIEWOFBRACING

FRONTVIEW ISOMETRICVIEW

Team03| DesignReport SCULPTURALMODELPHOTOS
TOPVIEW ISOMETRICVIEWFROMTOP

INFERENCES

● Theformofanybuildingcontributestoitsoverallstability, strengthandstiffness

● Theformshouldbesuchthatithaslessernumberofjointsor suchthatloadtransferfromregionofapplicationtothebottom isquick

● ForHighRisesduetolateralloadsitbecomesessentialto designkeepinginmindtheireffect,forwhichweusevarious kindsofbracingsystems,coresystems,foundationsystemsetc accordingly.

MODEL1(REGULARPOLYGON-TRIANGULARBASE)

● Theuseofequilateraltriangleshapedfloorplatemakesit stable.

● Themodelinelevationisinthesilhouetteofanhourglass;the upperhalfismadelighterinordertoreducethedeadweight gettingappliedtothebaseviatheneck

● Theneckbecomesasensitiveregionsidetheentiredead weightoftheupperhalfisbalancedbythat;toovercomethis theneckisdiagonallybraced,theleakofwhichcausesthe structuretotwist

● Thiscontributestothestabilityofthestructuresinceithasno verticalsupportsrunningcontinuouslyfromtoptobottom

MODEL2(SCULPTURAL)

● Thesquareshapedfloorplatesmakethestructurestableiall coordinates

● Thealternaterotatingfloorplatesgetheldstronglywiththese squareplatesviacrossbracinginalldirections

● Theprojectingbracingsaddontothesculpturalaestheticsof thestructure

● Fourverticalsupportsonallofthevertex’ofthesquarerunfrom toptobottomandaidtodirectloadtransfer

Team03| DesignReport CONCLUSION ANALYSISANDCONCLUSION
AcademyofArchitecture,Mumbai
GROUP04 SAKSHEEGOTHANKAR_23 ANJALIKARPATE_35 ADITIWADATE_55

PLANS Isometric

ELEVATIONWITHBRACING INDICATINGSERVICECORE Team04| DesignReport INITIALSKETCHES
ELEVATION TOPVIEW/JOINERYDETAIL ELEVATION Team04| MODELPHOTOS
ISOMETRIC

PLANS

ELEVATION
Team04| DesignReport INITIALSKETCHES
WITHBRACING ISOMETRICVIEW
Team04| DesignReport MODELPHOTOS
ISOMETRIC ELEVATION TOPVIEW ELEVATION

Geometricmodel

- Themodelislightweightwithangle bracingatsubsequent floors.

Theangledbracingsontwofacesofthestructurepassloadat thesamecolumn.

- Thecoreatoneedgeheldthefloorplatestogether

- Aftertakingthemodelonshaketable,themovementwasseen laterally,thecolumnswerecomparativelyrigidasweusedlap jointtojointwowatchmakersticksandtieditwiththreadwhich gaveextrastrengthtothecolumns.

Organicmodel

- Thesplittowersfrombottomandthesubsequentmiddlefloor platesplayacrucialroleinstructuralstrengthofthestructure. Thebareframebracingsrunningthroughthestructurewerethe pointswheremovementtookplace.

- Thecrossbracingsurroundingthecoreheldthestructure togetherandbalancedthe45degreetwistsformofthe structure.

Team04| DesignReport CONCLUSION
ANALYSISANDCONCLUSION

GROUP

05

SHAKTIJADHAV_18 PRAJAKTAPAI_21 KRISHNAKHURUSANE_36

AcademyofArchitecture,Mumbai
ELEVATIONS 3DVIEW Team05| DesignReport GEOMETRIC|DIGITALMODEL
GEOMETRY ANATOMY

TITLE IMAGETITLE PLANARVIEW

Team05| DesignReport GEOMETRIC|PHYSICALMODEL
IMAGE

ANATOMY

ELEVATION Team05| DesignReport SCULPTURAL|DIGITALMODEL

DIGITALTOPVIEW FRONTVIEW

TeamO5| DesignReport SCULPTURAL|PHYSICALMODEL
3DVIEW

MODEL1:Geometric

● Itisacombinationofsmaller(35x35m)andlarger(50x50M)square floorplatesonevery10thfloorlevel(i.e.40m).

● Theseareconnectedbydiagridsystem,whichresistedtheearthquake pressureduringthetest.

● Someamountofswayingwasobservedinupperhalfofthestructuredue totheeffectoflateralloads.

● Thestructureachievedstrength,stabilityandstiffnessinveryless materialduetoitssymmetricalnature(C.G.atgeometriccentre)and diagridstructuralstability.

MODEL2:Geometric

● Themodelisanexplorationintwistingandinversionofmass.

● Rhomdicalfloorplatesdecreaseinsizeandturn25degreesclockwiseat every20m'suptoaheightof140m’s.

● Thegeneratedmassismirrored,continuingthetwist,givingrisetoa softlytwistingsculpturalform

● Beforeaddingthebracing,thetwistingduetoeccentricplacementof loadswasobserved.

● Bracingfollowingthegeometryoftheform,butoppositetothedirection oftwistwereaddedtoresistdeformationandprovideadditionalsupport.

● TheBracingsprovetobeeffectiveinresistingtorsionuponadditionof minorloadsandincreasedintensityofShaketable.

CONCLUSION

● Thebracingshelpincounteringtheswayingresultingduetolateralloads suchasearthquake.

● Theswayingisobservedindecreasingintensityfromtopleveltobottom.

● TheColumnsneedtobeanchoredtothegroundfirmly.

● Thetotalnumberofjointsshouldbeminimisedforeffectiveloadtransfer.

CONCLUSION
CONCLUSION
ANALYSISAND
Team05| DesignReport
AcademyofArchitecture,Mumbai
ROHITCHOPADE_06 SAIRAJHALPATRAO_34 AAKASHKHARADE_54 GROUP06

STRUCTURALSYSTEM&FACADE

BRACINGS

COLUMNS

FLOORPLATE BEAMS

STRUCTURALSYSTEM-ZOOMEDIN

STRUCTURALSYSTEM-ZOOMEDIN STRUCTURALSYSTEM&FACADE

Team06| DesignReport INITIALSKETCHES

BIRD’SEYE-STRUCTURALVIEW WITHFACADE-ISOMETRIC BUG’SEYE-STRUCTURALVIEW FLOORPLATES-AXONOMETRIC

Team06| DesignReport DIGITALMODELPHOTOS Corecolumns Exoskeleton&Bracings SlabBeams

NORTHELEVATION SOUTH ELEVATION

EAST
Team06| DesignReport DIGITALMODELPHOTOS Corecolumns Exoskeleton&Bracings SlabBeams
ELEVATION WESTELEVATION
Team06| DesignReport MODELPHOTOS
MODEL-
ISOMETRIC
MODEL-ISOMETRIC MODEL-FRONTELEVATION MODEL-SITEELEVATION
Team06| DesignReport INITIALSKETCHES
BRACINGS
STRUCTURALSYSTEM STRUCTURE-ZOOMEDIN UNITPLAN-FLOORPLATE COREANDTHEFLOORPLATES
COLUMNS
FLOORPLATE BEAMS
PLAN
TOPVIEW BIRD’S
STRUCTURALVIEW Team06| DesignReport DIGITALMODELPHOTOS Corecolumns Exoskeleton&Bracings SlabBeams
BUG'SEYE-STRUCTURALVIEW ROTATINGFLOORPLATES
STRUCTURAL
-
EYE-
ISOMETRIC-WITHFACADE ISOMETRIC-WITHFACADE Team06| DesignReport DIGITALMODELPHOTOS Corecolumns Exoskeleton&Bracings SlabBeams
STRUCTURAL-ISOMETRIC MODELELEVATION

MODEL-ISOMETRIC MODEL-BACKELEVATION

MODEL-FRONTELEVATION
Team06| DesignReport MODELPHOTOS

● Thestructureonthetopmostpartswaysmore thanonthe bottomparti.e.nearthegroundduringtheearthquaketest.

● Theswayingofthestructurewasreducedsignificantlywhen testedwithbracings.

● Columnsneedtobelargerinsizeascomparedtobeamsand needtobeproperlyanchoredtothegroundinordertotransfer load

● Buildingsmayormaynotsurviveearthquakebutthestructure canbedesignedinsuchawaythatitcanresistearthquakefor atimesufficientfortheresidentstoescapefromthebuilding anditcanbeensuredthatthereisnolossoflife.

Team06| DesignReport CONCLUSION
CONCLUSION
ANALYSISAND

07

AcademyofArchitecture,Mumbai
GROUP
SIMRANAJGAONKAR_24 AMEYATHANAWALA_37 KARISHMAKAURHOODA_40

1. StudyaHighrisewithoffsetsandbranching.

2. To understand the role of Symmetrical and Asymmetrical Formsinrestraininglateralforces.

3. To explore different Joineries between Core and offsets of theForm.

Team07| DesignReport INITIALSKETCHES_EXTRUSION

TheformisfurtherDevelopedwitha10X10Mgridandisconceptuallyresolvedwrtdimensionsandarea.

EVOLUTION_EXTRUSION
Team07| DesignReport

flexibleatthesametime,hencemakingofsmall membersisalsopossiblebyjustbreakingitinto pieces. Apart from this the material also allows variation in its usage such as clubbing of 2-3 members to make it stronger and half lap joints wherever required and gives a cleaner finish to themodel.

SKETCHES

Threadwasusedasamediumoftyingtogether the members and eventually making the model stand. The white thread was initially used to tie the members but due to its thickness the knots weretoobulky.Hencetheochrecolourthreadof comparatively less thickness were used. They not only tied the members tightly but also gave a very seamless look to the model since it's colour matched with the colour of the watchmakersticks.

CORRUGATEDSHEET BEARING

30cmx30cm square cut out of a corrugated sheet. The model was fixed onto the sheet by makingholesandinsertingthecolumnsintothe sheet which were secured from the bottom of thesheet.(actsasafoundation)

For the TMD (Tune mass damper) test, a metal bearing was used. The weight of the bearing allowstocontroltheswayofthestructureduring aninducedearthquake.

MATERIALSANDTYING_EXTRUSION
Team07| DesignReport
WATCHMAKERSTICKS SYNTHETICTHREADS
Continuing
CONSTRUCTIONPROCESS 1. A module of area 2500 sqm at 1:500scaleismadeandplacedon abasesurface. 2. With referencetothemodule,the columnsareerected. 3. Thenextmoduleisinsertedwithin theframecreatedbythecolumns exactly in alignment of the base module. Coreiserectedfirstwhichfollows slipformmethodofconstruction. 4. Each module is placed in the samemannerataheightof4cm. (ie.5floorsclubbed) Team07| DesignReport
thesameprocessuntoheight of300m

ROLEOFGREENBUFFERS ROLEOFCORE

The cantilevered Spaces act as a Green Buffer betweentwozonesofthebuilding.

It also ties the two zones of the building and structurally prevents the Building from an overallShearing.

The Core in the Centre has Belt truss system whichmakesitrigid.

The two zones of the building can be used as flexiblespaces.

The core extends about 30m above the Terrace slabtohouseservicesandTMD.

PHYSICALMODELWITHINTENDEDFUNCTIONALSPACES
Team07| DesignReport

During the Shake Table test, Model without bracing undergoes a significant displacement/swaywhichmightbeundesired.

This is also because the joints are free to move andthustheydisplacewiththeactionofapplied lateralforce

Along with Sway, the phenomenon of DRIFT is also clearly visible where individual floor modulestendtoslipaway.

TheModelisbracedwithFRAMESHEARTRUSSat ends at a Global level to keep the structural integrityandmakethebuildingactasoneunit.

As the Joints are restrained, swaying automaticallyreduces.

PhenomenonofDriftisabsent.

PERFORMANCEWITHANDWITHOUTBRACING
BRACING WITHBRACING Team07| DesignReport
WITHOUT

WITHOUTBRACING+TMD

The TMD reduces the sway further by absorbing the mechanical vibrations which cause lateral forcesonthestructure.

TMD Oscillates in the opposite direction of the resultantactionthusstabilizingthestructure.

ACTIONOFLOAD

The load causes eccentric forces or bending in thestructure.

Withtheappliedload,theswayincreases.

Cross Bracing at cantilever parts and Outrigger systems would have helped to keep a check on theactionsoftheappliedload..

Team07| DesignReport PERFORMANCEWITHTMDANDAPPLIEDLOAD

TWISTINGDUETOAPPLIEDLOAD

A couple is further generated causing torsional forcesortwistingalongtheLongitudinalaxis.

A RIGID BUNDLED TUBE SYSTEM WITH OUTRIGGERS would check this action as the Longitudinal movement is restrained in a SHEARWALL.

WITHBRACINGANDTMD
Team07| DesignReport

OPTION1

Organically developing modules on each side of a Squarecore

OPTION2

Alternating form of static anddynamicsquares.

OPTION3 Square unit rotated at angle to give a twisting form

SELECTIONCRITERIA

ThefollowingformisselectedfortheSculpturalForm: 1. StudytheresolutionandmodellingofaTwistedStructurewhere floorplatechangesateveryfloor 2. TounderstandBracingandfacadesystemsonangledsurfaces 3. To explore aerodynamic forms and how forms themselves can helpresistlateralloads.

Team07| DesignReport INITIALSKETCHES_SCULPTURAL
EVOLUTION_SCULPTURAL Team07| DesignReport

PLASTICSTRAWS

WATCHMAKERSTICKS

The plastic straws were used as a material exploration in the sculptural model since it is flexible and lightweight. Exploration in terms of combinationofmaterialwasalsoachieved

material was selected as it is rigid as well as flexibleatthesametime,hencemakingofsmall membersisalsopossiblebyjustbreakingitinto pieces. Apart from this the material also allows variation in its usage such as clubbing of 2-3 members to make it stronger and half lap joints wherever required and gives a cleaner finish to themodel.

THREADS

CORRUGATEDSHEET

Threadwasusedasamediumoftyingtogether the members and eventually making the model stand. The white thread was initially used to tie the members but due to its thickness the knots weretoobulky.Hencetheochrecolourthreadof comparatively less thickness were used. They not only tied the members tightly but also gave a very seamless look to the model since it's colour matched with the colour of the watchmakersticks.

30cmx30cm square cut out of a corrugated sheet. The model was fixed onto the sheet by makingholesandinsertingthecolumnsintothe sheet which were secured from the bottom of thesheet.(actsasafoundation)

MATERIALSANDTYING_SCULPTURAL
Team07| DesignReport

ROLEOFFORM ROLEOFCORE

The twisting spiral around the core of the buildingopensupmulti-directionalviewsforthe usersoneachlevel.

It also resists lateral loads on the building and structurally prevents the Building from an overallTorsion.

The Core in the Centre has a Beam Outrigger systemwhichmakesitrigid.

Thebaseformofthestructureisheldinposition by the core where each floor plate turns at an angleof10degrees.

Team07| DesignReport PHYSICALMODELWITHINTENDEDFUNCTIONALSPACES

During the Shaketable test, Model without bracing undergoes a significant displacement/swaywhichmightbeundesired.

This is also because the joints are free to move andthustheydisplacewiththeactionofapplied lateralforce

As the form is twisted already, if the Joints are not restrained they tend to shear off which may causedamagetothestructure.

The Model is braced in one direction following theshorterdimensionandthedirectionoftwist.

This helps in tying and maintaining structural integrity.

Also the structure becomes more resistant to swaying.

Team07| DesignReport PERFORMANCEWITHOUTBRACING
WITHOUTBRACING WITHBRACING

APPLIEDLOADONMODELWITHOUTBRACING ANDMADEWITHSTRAWS

On application of a Load, The structure bends andtwistsaboutlongitudinalaction.

The twisting is vigorous as the Joints are not bracedmakingthendriftindividually.

Alsothepropertyofmaterialplaysacrucialrole. Straw being a lighter material, twists immediatelyinthedirectionoftheAction.

THUS STRENGTH, STABILITY AND STIFFNESS can be concluded as 3 major criteria for designing earthquakeresistantstructures

APPLIEDLOADONMODELWITHBRACINGAND MADEWITHWATCHMAKERSTICKS

Comparatively, The braced model acts a Rigid momentframerestrainingtorsion.

The aerodynamic form reduces impact of wind loadsandlateralloads.

Also,thestrengthofWatchmakersticksishigher than straws thus it absorbs the vibrations and dissipatesthemquicklytopreventanystructural damage.

IMAGE
Team07| DesignReport CONSTRUCTIONPROCESS
IMAGETITLE
TITLE

ANALYSISANDCONCLUSION

● The CORE, being the basis of both the models has contributed to the rigidity of the structure as the majorverticalspineagainstthelateralforces.

● Addition of Bracings helped in countering the movement of the structure as compared to the one withoutBracings.

● Differentmaterialsshowcaseddifferentbehaviorsbasedontheselfweightandflexibilityofconnecting knots. Sticks held up together more rigid as compared to the straws were strong enough to resist the forcesyetswayedmoreduetoflexibleconnections.

● Placement of the load either Axial or eccentric as well as symmetry and asymmetry of structural componentsplayakeyroleinresistingearthquakeforces.

● Too much eccentricity can cause torsion and bending thus improvisations in architectural terms is required.

● As the Slenderness ratio of a structure increases, we tend to require additional members like trusses, braces,shearwalls,spaceframestoimpartstiffnessagainstlateralloads

● Secondary measures like TUNED MASS DAMPER and base isolators show significant change in the impactofearthquakeloads

● We analysed that Either the Structure can be made flexible and is allowed to sway upto a tolerance (likeextrusionmodel)oritcanbebracedfullyandmakejointsrigidsuchthatswayingisnotpermitted (Eg.Sculpturalmodel)

● ThestructurealsobehaveslikeaCantileverasitisfixedatoneendandfreeatanother.Thustheupper partisseverelyaffectedwhilethelowerpartislessaffected.

TAKEAWAYS:

● Methodstoreduceselfweightwithoutcompromisingonthestructuralstabilityofthestructure.

● JoineriesandTyingtechniques.

● Comparingandanalysingstrengthsofmaterials

● Handsontestingofgravityloads,lateralloadsandimpactloadsandaccordingstructuralbehaviour

● Understandingactionduetoload,andhowtorestrainthatmovement.

● Makingthestructureacting asoneintegratedunit.

Team07| DesignReport

GROUP

08

ISHAPATIL_12 SALONIPAWAR_31 NIDHIKHOT_33

AcademyofArchitecture,Mumbai
MODEL2FLOORPLATES Team08| DesignReport INITIALSKETCHES
PLATES&SERVICECORE ADDITIONOFBELTTRUSSINTHE CENTREANDTOP ADDITIONOFBRACINGS Team08| DesignReport DIGITALMODELPHOTOS
FLOOR
THROUGHCORE JOINERYDETAILS Team08| DesignReport MODEL1PHOTOS
ELEVATION PLAN
ELEVATION
JOINERYDETAILS ELEVATION Team08| DesignReport MODEL2PHOTOS
PLAN

Geometricmodel

● Thisgeometricmodelhastworight-angledtrianglesandtwo equilateraltrianglesfacingeachotherinoppositedirections.

● Theformiscreatedinawaythatitcansurvivestrongwinds andearthquakesaswell.

● Afloorplateiscreatedbyfourrightangledtriangleswitha squarecoreatitscentre.

● Bracingsaredoneoneachfloor

● Afteradditionofliveloadsandseismicloads,thestructure swayedalittle.

● Itsustainedtheforcesforawhile,butfailedafteralongtimeat somepointswherethebracingswereconnected.

● Continuousbracingsacrosstwofloorplatesmighthavestayed firm

Sculpturalmodel

● Thismodelwasformedbychamferingtheedgesofasquare.It formedahexagonshaped.

● Repetitionoffloorplatesinastaggeringmanneralongthe servicecorecreatedlargecommonfloorplatesat3intervals.

● Thefloorplateswereconnectedverticallybyaddingfacade bracingswhichhelpedthebuildingswayandnotstayrigid.

● Afteradditionofliveloadsandseismicloadsthestructure swayedandleanedontoaside.

● Additionofrigidbracingscouldhavehelpedtocontrolthelean.

Team08| DesignReport CONCLUSION
CONCLUSION
ANALYSISAND
AcademyofArchitecture,Mumbai
GROUP09 BHOOMIKACHAUDHARI_13 ADITYAKANADE_14 RASIKASALGAONKAR_45
Team09| DesignReport INITIALSKETCHES

SEISMICMODEL1 SCULPTURAL

The final form is a derivative of a glass-hour; a tweaked and evolved sculptural form to become more resilientduringearthquakesalongwith the aesthetics getting even more enhanced.

The majority of bulk mass of the structureliesbelowthenarrowestgirth andthefloorplatesaboveitalsohave small areas to ensure that the head does not become bulky, for that will make the structure more prone to swaying. The vertical columns run throughout give an inclination of 3° every10floors.The9thfloorplateoutof the10hasanoctagonalskydeckwhich is provided with a counterweight element at 180° jutting high pointedly. The load from the skydeck as well the counterweight are transferred to the vertical columns on the floors below eventually via large bracket like structural members who are again following the curvy language of the structure.

Materials-

● Columns, beams & outriggerswatchmakersticks(4mmdia)

● Service core shear wallssunboard(3mmthk)

● Service core beams to outriggers- plastic straw (6mm dia)

Joineries

● Columns and beams - cotton threadknot

● Outriggers and core beamscopperwire

Team09| DesignReport DESCRIPTION
ELEVATIONALVIEW APEXVIEW VIEWOFSKYDECKFLOORPLATE AXONOMETRICVIEW Team09| DesignReport MODELPHOTOS Service core Counter weight Skydeck Columns Outriggers beams Skydeck Counter weight Service core Tension cables

Buttjointincolumns

Crossknotsforsticksintersectingat90degrees Columnlapjointdetail

Team09| DesignReport INITIALSKETCHES
Skydeckjoinerydetail Skydeckfloorplate
Team09| DesignReport INITIALSKETCHES
Skydeckjoinerydetail Joineryatintersectionof3members

SEISMICMODEL-2 GEOMETRIC

The floor plates are formed from 3 triangles alternating with a triangular core in the central triangle. The cantilevering triangles have been supported with tension rods and brackets.Thebulkmassofthestructure thoughalternatingasweriseabovehas beendistributedevenlythroughout.

3 outriggers are connected from each intersectionofthecentraltriangletothe centre of the shear wall of the core. 3 columns run vertically parallel to the core.

Materials-

● Columns, beams & outriggerswatchmakersticks(4mmdia)

● Service core shear wallssunboard(3mmthk)

● Service core beams to outriggers- plastic straw (6mm dia)

Joineries

● Columns and beams - cotton threadknot

● Outriggers and core beamscopperwire

Team09| DesignReport DESCRIPTION 09| DesignReport MODEL2
Team09| DesignReport INITIALSKETCHES
OUTRIGGERCONNECTINGFLOORPLATE
Team09| DesignReport MODELPHOTOS
TENSIONRODSCONNECTINGFLOORPLATE
Outriggers
JOINERYDETAILS OUTRIGGERDETAILS Team09| DesignReport INITIALSKETCHES

MODEL1-Sculptural

Structuralobservations

● Due to outriggers the entire structural frame started acting as oneandtheeveryjointbecamestronger.

● The inclination of the vertical columns being only 2° does not compromisestructuralintegrity.

● Atrussbeltwasaddedatthefloorplateswithnarrowestgirthas theloadfromskydeckandcounterweightbracketsrestedatthe given intersection; being the most vulnerable section in the structure,addingabelttrusssecuredit.

Conclusion

● Provedtobeagoodexampleof‘structuralintegrity+aesthetics’

● Above form may or may not survive an earthquake but is resilientenoughtoallowtheresidentstoevacuatethebuilding.

MODEL2-Geometric

Structuralobservations

● Due to no columns for peripheral triangles minor structural instability was observed during the shake table test, but the tension rods and brackets held the entire system from failing prettywell.

● Even on trying to tug at the white stretchable strings the stiffnessandstrengthcanbeexperienced.

● Outriggers kept the central triangle on the all floors resistant to theshocksfromtheshaketabletest.

Conclusion

● Proved to be a good example of ‘structural integrity’ with experimentation into various structural systems like columns, beamstooutriggersandtensionrods.

● Thus, above form may or may not survive an earthquake but is resilientenoughtoallowtheresidentstoevacuatethebuilding.

Team09| DesignReport CONCLUSION ANALYSISANDCONCLUSION
AcademyofArchitecture,Mumbai
GROUP10 ABHISHEKJAISINGHSURYAVANSHI_04 AISHWARYASANDEEPRAIKAR_32 HARSHRAJESHTANK_41
Team10| DesignReport INITIALSKETCHES
2.1Plan
Team10| DesignReport DIGITALMODELPHOTOS
1.1Plan 1.2Elevation 1.3Elevation 1.4Elevation
Team10| DesignReport MODELPHOTOS 1.3Elevation 1.4Elevation 1.1Plan 1.2Elevation

2.2Elevation

Team10| DesignReport DIGITALMODELPHOTOS
2.3Elevation 2.4Elevation
Team10| DesignReport MODELPHOTOS 2.3Elevation 2.4Plan 2.1Plan 2.2Elevation

First model:

The top floor and the bottom floor composed of ‘shuriken’ are rotated by 90degreesandthenconnected.Theedgesofthefloorplateareoriented @120degrees.

● Acontinuouscolumnofgreatercrosssectionalareawasconnected tothe verticesoftheshurikenwhichactedasprimarycolumnsand areperpendiculartotheground.Thesecolumnssupportedthefloor platesbutdidnotresistthetorsionalforceandtheshearforce.

● Hencethestructurewasnotstiffenoughtoresisttheearthquake.

● Therefore additional columns of smaller cross sectional area were tiedfromonevertexofthebottomfloortotheadjacentvertexofthe top floor of shuriken. These inclined columns helped to resist the torsional force and also resisted the Bending moment generated fromtheearthquake.

SecondModel:

Atrapezoidalfloorplatewaspivotedalongacolumnby10degreesafter every30muptotheheightof300m.ThusaTurningstructurewasformed.

● In order to maintain the twist, diagonal columns were tied along the structure joining the vertices and following the rotation. Yet the structure was not stable and stiff, as it was unable to resist the torsionalforce.Itcamebacktoitsoriginalposition.

● In order to resist the shear and bending force, additional column wasplacedalongthelongerside.Thismadethestructurestable.

● Diagonal Bracings were joined in opposite direction with that of the rotationtoresistthetorsionalforce.

● They were joined after every 2 floors along longer side and 3 floors alongshortersideinaccordancewiththeturningfactorofthefaces.

● Thus the structure was made stiff with the bracings and additional column.

Team10| DesignReport CONCLUSION
ANALYSISANDCONCLUSION
AcademyofArchitecture,Mumbai
GROUP11 SARTHAKEKAL_10 ATHARVAGIRME_27 HARSHWARDHANSHIRPURKAR_53
Team11| DesignReport INITIALSKETCHES
IMAGETITLE IMAGETITLE IMAGETITLE IMAGETITLE
IMAGE
IMAGETITLE IMAGETITLE Team11| DesignReport MODELPHOTOS
IMAGETITLE
TITLE
SKETCHES Team11| DesignReport
PLAN 3DVIEW ISOMETRICVIEW SIDEELEVATION MODEL1:GEOMETRICMODEL

PLAN 3DVIEW

SKETCHES Team11| DesignReport
ISOMETRICVIEW SIDEELEVATION MODEL1:GEOMETRICMODEL
Team11| DesignReport DIGITALMODELPHOTOS

ANALYSISANDCONCLUSION

MODEL1:REGULARMODEL

This model had a main triangular core with ‘V’ shaped plan on the ground that gradually transforms into ‘Inverted V’ shaped plan at thetop,givingthehighrisealeaningelevationconsistingof8main obliqueelementsand10horizontalintermediate bracings. Bracing system serves to stabilize the main oblique members during construction, to contribute to the distribution of load effects and to provide restraint to compression members where they wouldotherwisebefreetobuckle.

Shaketabletestobservations:TheIncreasingCantileverwithevery levelwasincreasingtheloadonthecorrespondingtiebackbracing which resulted into wear and tear of members on the diagonally oppositeside.

MODEL2:SCULPTURALMODEL

Two Triangular towers of varying cross section along its height are linkedbyTwobridgesenforcedwithbelttruss.Somefloorplatesare cantilevering inwards but are supported by the other tower via the connectingtrussbridges.

Shaketabletestobservations:Themodelswayedandbulkedmore alongtheshorterwidthascomparedtothelongerside.BridgeTruss binded the tower couple with great strength and flexibility in load transfer.

OVERALLINFERENCESANDCONCLUSIONS

The general principles to be observed in the construction of such earthquake resistant buildings as observed in this exercise are Lightness, Continuity of Load Path, avoiding/reinforcing Projecting and suspended parts, Building configuration, strength in various directions, stable foundations, Ductility of structure, Connection to non-structuralpartsandfiresafetyofstructures.

Team11| DesignReport CONCLUSION

GROUP12

NEHAJAYASANKER_11 DHRUVANSHISANGHAVI_39 MANSIBHATIA_52

AcademyofArchitecture,Mumbai

HIGHRISE BUILDING1STRUCTURAL HEXAGONAL FLOORPLATE

ELEVATION
Team12| DesignReport PROCESSMODEL
PARTMODEL

PLAN BRACING

Team12| DesignReport DIGITALMODELPHOTOS
ELEVATION 3D
VIEW
MODELPHOTOS
Team12| DesignReport INITIALSKETCHES
ELEVATION PART
SKETCHES-STRUCTURE2
PLAN
MODEL HIGHRISEBUILDING 2SCUPLTURALDIAMOND
Team12| DesignReport DIGITALMODELPHOTOS BRACING ELEVATION 3DVIEW
PLAN

PLAN 3DVIEW

Team12| DesignReport MODELPHOTOS
ELEVATION ELEVATION

Thestructuralmodelhasaregularhexagonasafloorplatewhile thesculpturalmodelhasairregularsixsidedpolygonasafloor platethattaperstowardsthetopinorderto compareandanalyse thestabilityofthetwostructures.

Whiletestingthetwomodelsontheshaketableitwasobservedthat thestructuralmodel(regularhexagon)iscomparativelystifferand isnotmuchaffectedbytheinducedearthquakeascomparedtothe sculpturalmodelwhichbeginstosway.Theloadinthestructural modelaretransferreddirectlyfromtoptobottomwhileinthe sculpturalmodeltheloadcarryingcapacityisaffectedduetothe reducingfloorplatesandthestructuralmembersactingatanangle whichresultinreducedstability.

Onaddingthebracings,inthesculpturalmodeltheloadtransfer becomeseasierandthemodelbecomesstrongerandstifferthan beforeandthereisareductionintheswayaswetestthemodelon theshaketable. Similarlywhenthebracingsareaddedtothesculpturalmodels,they providebetter.distributionofloadfromtoptobottomasaresultof whichtheswayingmovementbecomeslesserascomparedto before. Conclusion-Fromtheaboveanalysisitcanbeconcludedthatthe earthquakeresistancedependsonthe● Formof

Team12| DesignReport CONCLUSION ANALYSISANDCONCLUSION
thestructure ● StructuralConfiguration ● LateralStiffness ● Lateralstrengthandductility ● Abilitytoredistributeforcestravellingduringseismicevent
AcademyofArchitecture,Mumbai
GROUP13 ISHANLATHIA_20 SHWETAUTEKAR_16 PRANALITHOOL_36

HAVINGATAPERINGFORMWITHFOURDIFFERENT WINGSTOREDUCETHENUMBEROFBRACINGS

Xshapeprovideswithfourwingsinfour directionsintersectingatrightanglestoeach otherwithashearcoreinthecenter

Team13| DesignReport SKETCHES
THETAPEREDWINGSACTASHUGERETAINING WALLSTORESISTBOTHWINDFORCEANDSEISMIC
FORCESACTINGFROMONEDIRECTIONARE RESISTEDBYTHEWINGSTANDINGONTHE OPPOSITESIDEOFTHEBUILDING
Team13| DesignReport MODELPHOTOS BRACINGS

FLOORPLATE-ROTATINGANDREDUCINGATTHESAME TIME TWISTINGFORMWITHBRACINGSTHATACT ASTHE

BRACINGS-INONEDIRECTION Team13| DesignReport SKETCHES BRACINGSINBOTHDIRECTIONS
COREANDFLOORPLATECONNECTEDWITHBEAMS Team13| DesignReport
TUNEDMASSDAMPER
Team13| DesignReport MODELPHOTOS
BRACINGSPROVIDEDINBOTHTHEDIRECTIONSActingas
TUNEDMASSDAMPER

● WindandEarthquakeloadingsaretwomajortypesoflateral dynamicactionsexperiencedbyhighrisebuildings.

● In Highrisebuildingsthereisaneedforoptimizationtosafely carrygravityandlateralloads.

● Withincreaseintheheightofthebuilding,theneed toresist lateralloadsincreasesdrastically.Thus,thebuildingismore sensitivetoearthquakeandwindloads

● Thisarisestheneedforprotectionfromtheseloadstoresist structuralandnonstructuralearthquakedamage.

● Earthquakeandwindorienteddeflectionsmustbelimitedfor multiplereasonsandhenceabundantstructuralstiffnessis important.

● Thiscanbedonebyaddingcentralcore, strongshearwalls, bracings,structuralframes,deepfoundations.

Team13| DesignReport CONCLUSION ANALYSIS
CONCLUSION
AND

GROUP14

TARIKADESHPANDE_42 PRAJAKTAGOSAVI_43 VARDHANARORA_50

AcademyofArchitecture,Mumbai
Team14| DesignReport INITIALSKETCHES
ELEVATION ELEVATION ISOMETRICVIEW ISOMETRICVIEW Team14| DesignReport DIGITALMODELPHOTOS
Team14| DesignReport MODELPHOTOS
PERSPECTIVEVIEW Team14| MODELPHOTOS
Team14| DesignReport INITIALSKETCHES
VIEW ISOMETRICVIEW Team14| DesignReport DIGITALMODELPHOTOS
ELEVATION ELEVATION ISOMETRIC

ELEVATION

Team14| DesignReport

PERSPECTIVEVIEW

PERSPECTIVEVIEW

Team14| DesignReport

MODEL1:Sculptural

● Withatrapezoidalplan,theformofthesculpturalmodelis rotatedbya180degreeevery5floors.

● Themodelwhentestedforearthquakeresistanceinitially resistedthebendingmomentgeneratedwithitsFramework.

● Uponadditionofload,certainjointsintheTopmostpartofthe frameworkstartedtogetloose.

● Themodelisseentobeswayingafteranincreasedintensityof theshaketable.

● UponadditionofBracingstheintensityofswayingisreduced.

MODEL2:Geometric

● ThemodeliscomposedofTrapeziumsinplanand2Service Cores.

● 2TrapeziumsarejoinedtoformanelongatedHexagon.

● Theservicecoresonbothsidesreducestheeffectofseismic loadsonthestructure.

● ThemodelwhentestedforEarthquakeresistanceinitiallywas seentoquitesturdybecauseofitssimpleloadtransfersystem.

● TheBracingsprovetobeeffectiveuponadditionofminorloads andincreasedintensityofShaketable.

CONCLUSION

● TheSwayingofthestructureiscontrolledwiththeeffectiveuse ofBracingSystems.

● ThestructureswaysmoreattheToppart.

● TheColumnsneedtobeanchoredtothegroundandshouldbe strongenoughtoresistloads.

● ThestructuralConfigurationandFormofthebuildingplayan importantroleinEarthquakeResistance.

● Theformshouldhavelessernumberofjointssothattheload transferfromToptobottomhappenseffectively.

Team14| DesignReport CONCLUSION
ANDCONCLUSION
ANALYSIS
AcademyofArchitecture,Mumbai
GROUP15 PUNEETMARU_02 VAIBHAVIKHEDKAR_03 PALAKBHATTAD_09

FIGURINGOUTPLAN

PLACEMENTOFCORECOLUMNSANDBEAMS 3DSKETCH Team15| DesignReport INITIALSKETCHES

PERSPECTIVEVIEWOFTHEMODEL PLANSHOWINGSINGLEFLOORPLATE PERSPECTIVEFROMTHETOP ELEVATIONOFTHEMODEL

Team15| DesignReport DIGITALMODELPHOTOS

IDEAOFANGULARBUILDING LIFTINGITINAIRWITHACORE

FURTHERINCREASINGTHEANGLE, ADDINGBRACING,STIFFENERS

3DSKETCH Team15| DesignReport INITIALSKETCHES
Team15| DesignReport
SIDEELEVATION Team15| DesignReport DIGITALMODELPHOTOS

The Pentagonal Form of the building allowed easier load transfer in plan and then to the Ground. Since the Core (Pentagonal) was not concentric to the externalfaceofthebuildingitreducedtheprobabilityofatwisthencemaking eachfloorfirm.Thestararrangementofthebeamsmadethestructuremore stable by connecting the peripheral ends to each other and not just to the core.

TheStructurebeingSymmetricinplanandelevation,reducedthemagnitude of damage to the building significantly by the equal division and transfer of load.Henceduringthetest,thebuildingdidnotfail.

The scale of the model and of the materials used made it difficult to show all the columns that would be actually present hence columns at the corners of the pentagonal plan were not added which would in reality stabilize the structurefurther.

Hence Concluding that having a central core, well connected to internal and peripheralcolumnsmakesthestructuremorestable.Asymmetricallayoutfor a highrise building is always better in terms of Load transfer and countering torsioncausedbywind,thusshouldbepreferred.

LOADTRANSFERDIAGRAM-PLAN LOADTRANSFERDIAGRAM-ELEVATION

Team15| DesignReport CONCLUSION
ANALYSISANDCONCLUSION
VERTICALLOADTRANSFER HORIZONTALLOADTRANSFER

ANALYSIS

Itwasaninspirationalideaandwewantedtomakeitworkbymaking minimumcompromises.Butaftercomingtotermswiththescaleand magnitudeofthedesignweunderstoodthatastructurewithsuchacantilever wouldnotbeprobableandhencetomakeitprobable(beforemakingit earthquakeresistant)weneededtomodifyittoaformthatwouldbeableto standstableonitsownandfurtherbestableduringanEarthquake.Thiscould bedoneintwoways;

1. Reducethecantileverstoanallowablelimit.Thiswouldallowthe structuretobeabletobalanceitselfwellandnotfailevenintheabsence ofanearthquake.

2. Addverticalsupports-columnswhichwouldautomaticallyremovethe cantilever.Thiswouldmakethestructurestableandmoregrounded henceallowingeasiertransferoftheloadstotheground.Itwouldadd rigiditytotheentiremassandhencethemovement,damageduringand earthquakewouldbereduced.

Inboththecasesthedesignwouldbecompromisedhencewechoseacase combiningboththeideasintoonesolution

Team15| DesignReport ANALYSIS
WHENOPTION1WOULDBEIMPLEMENTED WHENOPTION2WOULDBEIMPLEMENTED
BRACINGANDSTIFFENING FINAL3DSKETCH Team15| DesignReport MODIFIEDSKETCHES
CHAMFERINGTHEFORMTOREDUCECANTILEVER ADDITIONALANCHORINGTOTHEGROUND

Despite the earthquake's magnitude, the design remained fairly stable during the test. Theform'schamferincreasedthestabilityofthestructurebyreducingthecantilever.

The angular column that connected the floor plates externally was extended to the ground, contributing to the structure's support and stability while providing an alternative route for load transfer to the ground. It effectively reduced the cantilever spanwhilemakingfewerdesigncompromises.

Thecoreservedasameansoftransferringtheentireloadofthebuildingtotheground. The only way to keep it from falling over owing to the weight of the cantilever was to make it stronger and more sturdy. As a result, the columns in the core were braced verticallyaswellmakingthestructurelessvulnerabletofailure. Bracing the floor plates individually also reduced the torsion and the probability of failureoftheslabbymakingtheshapemorerigid.

Topreventthehorizontaljointsfrommovingortwisting,thebracingprovidedwasatan angle (along the facade), to the overall form which made the floor beams and slabs rigidthusreducingtheirmovementandprobabilityofsnapping.

Evenintheabsenceofsymmetryinthestructure,theloadgottransferredtotheground andthestructureacedthetestbyallowingminimummovement.

Team15| DesignReport CONCLUSION
CONCLUSION
ANALYSISAND
SIDEELEVATIONSHOWINGBRACINGINTHECORE FRONTELEVATIONSHOWINGBRACING COLUMN BRACING ANGULARCOLUMN MAINBRACING
AcademyofArchitecture,Mumbai
GROUP16 SEJALUMARE_01 KIMAYACHURI_07 SANCHITATANDEL_44

REPEATINGUNIT

CORE PLAN

1/3RDSTAGGER

CROSS BRACING

1/3RDSTAGGER

Team16| DesignReport INITIALSKETCHES

IMAGETITLE

Team16| DesignReport DIGITALMODELPHOTOS
IMAGETITLE
1.1FRONTELEVATION 1.2PLAN
ELEVATION Team16| DesignReport MODELPHOTOS 3WAY CORNER JOINT
LAP EXTENSIONJOINT
2.1
HALF

FIRSTMODEL

● Thisisgeometricalmodelwherethesquareshapeof 10cmx10cmisdividedequallyintonineparts.

● Subtractingthefourcornersofthesquareacrossshapedis beenformedwhichformsafloorplate foramodel.

● Thecoreatthecenterhavealternatebracingsatevery5floors

● Thefloorplateisshiftedontheupperfloorsaftereveryalternate floors,thatisthefloorplateatevery5floorsisdifferent.

● Thealternateshiftoffloorsgivessymmetryandalsocounter weightstheloadofthestructureequally.

SECONDMODEL:

● Thecentrallyplacedcoreofsmallcross-sectioniswrapped alongtheperimeter bysquarefloorplates.

● Thecuboidconsistof5floorswitheachfloorheightupto4m. Thecuboidsareelevatedby2floorsi.e,8mineachconsecutive shiftgivinghelicalpathelevation.

● Thedoubleheightedspacescreatesterraces.

● Thecuboidsareconnectedviatransversegirdersystemtothe megacolumnsofcoretransferstheloadmakingedgescolumn free.

● Thecrossbracingsplacedalternateonoppositesidesalongthe twofloorstrengthensthecoreagainsttwistingproviding stiffness.

● Inordertocreatebalancebetweenthecantilevers,even numberofcuboidsarewrappedforonehelicalcurvewithlast cuboid placedexactlyoppositetothefirstone.

Team16| DesignReport CONCLUSION ANALYSISANDCONCLUSION

17

AcademyofArchitecture,Mumbai
GROUP
SHRUTEEPATIL_15 MANASARAVIKUMAR_28 KRISSHCHAVAN_51

EXPLORINGELEVATIONS INITIALIDEAS DECIDINGSTRUCTURALSYSTEMS

Team17| DesignReport INITIALSKETCHES

DIAGONALBRACINGOVER15LEVELS CROSSBRACINGOVER10LEVELS CROSSBRACINGOVER5LEVELS ISOMETRICVIEW

Team17| DesignReport DIGITALMODELPHOTOS

ELEVATION ELEVATION

Team17| DesignReport MODELPHOTOS

INITIALIDEAS-ELEVATION

INITIALIDEAS-ISOMETRIC

Team17| DesignReport DIGITALMODELPHOTOS
AXONOMETRIC Team17| DesignReport DIGITALMODELPHOTOS
ELEVATION
MODIFIEDELEVATION

PLAN

Team17| DesignReport MODELPHOTOS ELEVATION ELEVATION

FIRSTMODEL(GEOMETRIC):

● Apentagonshapedbasewaschosenforastablebaseform andanextrudedvolumewascreatedataheightof75m.

● Theirregularshapedpentagonshadshorterandlongersides.

● Thefacadesoftheshortersideweregivendiagonalbracingson everyalternate5floorsofthebuildingsinordertooptimizethe totalnumberofmembersrequiredandused.

● This helped in tying the floors together apart from the main structuralmembers(columns)andreducedtheswayingofthe buildingofsuchheight.

● Asimpleformworkwasadaptedandworkedontounderstand thebasicsofloadtransferandplacementsofbracings.

SECONDMODEL(SCULPTURAL):

● Astructuresplitinto2joinedonthetopfloorswasthebasic outlineoftheform.Thestructureswasservedby2different servicecoreat2endswhichaddedtothestructuralsystemof thestructure.

● Thefloorplateswereshiftedtoeitherendsoftheservicecore allowingfordoubleheightspacestobeformed.Thesewere joinedtogetherusingcolumnsgoingthroughandthrough.

● Thetopportionofthestructurewhichactedasacommon joiningportion,wasbraceddiagonallyforaddedstability,soas toalsobearthestrengthofjoiningthetwodifferentbuildings andtheirservicecores.

Team17| DesignReport CONCLUSION ANALYSISANDCONCLUSION
AcademyofArchitecture,Mumbai
GROUP18 LAXAREESAWANT_22 POOJATAMBE_47 MITHILAGADAG_56
SCULPTURAL
in) Team18| DesignReport DIGITALMODELPHOTOS
STANDARDMODEL(Full) SCULPTURALMODEL(Full) STANDARDMODEL(Zoomedin)
MODEL(Zoomed
STANDARD MODEL(Plan) SCULPTURALMODEL(Plan) STANDARD MODEL(Elevation) SCULPTURALMODEL(Elevation) Team18| DesignReport MODELPHOTOS

AStructureundergoesdamageduringanearthquakeduetothe forceexertedbythemovementofthetectonicplateswhichinduces momentsinthestructure

Thejointsofastructurearevulnerabletotheseforces,thusthey needtobewellsecured.

STANDARDMODEL

● Thecolumnsare connectedinabuttjoint, bydrillingholesintothe columnendandsecuring withthread.Sincethere wasnooverlap,thisiswas thepointoffailureand wherethestructurebent.

SCULPTURALMODEL

● Thecolumnsare connectedinahalflap joint,withanoverlapof 5cm,andsecuredwith thread.Thismadethe columnjoinerymore sturdyandsecure.

Plastic Hinge

AccordingtotheStrengthHierarchyofa structure,theperipheralcolumnsmust bestrongerthanthebeams.The contraryresultsintheformationof plastichingesatthebaseofthe columnswhichresultsinfailure. TheperipheralcolumnsinthisStandard Modelareslenderandsmallerin diameterthanthebeams,which contributedinthefailure,incontraryto theSculpturalModel.

Team18| DesignReport CONCLUSION
CONCLUSION
ANALYSISAND
BUTTJOINT(StandardModel) LAPJOINT(SculpturalModel)

Theresistancetodeformationorinertiaofastructuredependson theamountofmassanditsdistancefromthecentroidalaxis. I=m×r2 where, m=Sumoftheproductofthemass r=Distancefromtheaxisoftherotation.

STANDARDMODEL

● Sinceheaviercolumns weregivenclosertothe centreofmassofthe structure,thecapacityto generate inertiawasless, causingfailure.

SCULPTURALMODEL

● Sincethecolumnswere spacedfarapartfromthe centreofmass,the structurehadmore capacitytogenerate inertia,andresist deformation.

Team18| DesignReport CONCLUSION
CONCLUSION
ANALYSISAND

GROUP19

SHIVANJAYBHAGAT_06 ROSHANICHABHARE_29 RASHMITADAKE _30

AcademyofArchitecture,Mumbai

Centralvoid DiagridandSpiraljoinery

Processmodel Centralcore
Team19| DesignReport MODELPHOTOS
INITIALSKETCHES
Structurewithoutbracings Structurewithbracings Joinerydetails CrossBracingjoinery Team19| DesignReport MODELPHOTOS

MODEL1

Thesculpturalmodelismadefromsmallcrosssectionsofbamboo, benttoformarches,beams,voidandincorporatedthediagrid systemofloadtransfer.

● Thedurableandflexiblenatureofbamboowasmadeuseto achievethearchesfortheorganiccurves.

● Bamboocrosssectionswerejoinedusingwiretoensure optimummaterialusageandcreateflexiblejointstohelpin earthquakefailures.

● Thecircularfloorplatesoftheformwereheldtogetherbythe diagridsystemwhichhelpedtoresistthetorsionalforceinthe highriseform.

● Diagridsenvelopedaroundthecircularformandweretiedto thebeamswhichfurtherformedthevoidinthecentrebetween thecores.

MODEL2

Thestructuralmodelshowcasedtriangularfloorplatesarranged oneabovetheotherwithacentraltriangularcore.

● Thelinearextrusionwasmadepossiblebysplicingthecolumns andcreatinglapjointstoachievethehighlength.

● Columntobeamjoineryweretiedusingthreadstoensurestiff butflexiblemovablejoints.

● Toresistbendingofthestructure,joinerieswerecreated betweenthetriangularcoreandthemidpointsofthetriangular floorbeams.

● Columntobeamjoinerieswereweakintorsionalforcesleading totwistandturnsinthestructureswheninearthquake; thereforecrossbracingonadjacentfacadesresistedtorsional andshearforces.

Team19| DesignReport CONCLUSION
CONCLUSION
ANALYSISAND

THANKYOU

AcademyofArchitecture,Mumbai

Turn static files into dynamic content formats.

Create a flipbook
Issuu converts static files into: digital portfolios, online yearbooks, online catalogs, digital photo albums and more. Sign up and create your flipbook.