VOL. 4 ISSUE 4, SEPT. 2020
THE MINNESOTA HOUSING INDUSTRY NEWS SOURCE BY HOUSING FIRST MINNESOTA • HOUSINGINDUSTRYNEWS.ORG
Citing national high marks in current energy performance, those opposed to a new residential code are concerned about the housing affordability impacts.
Debate continues over new residential energy code Housing industry, code officials united against adoption Will Minnesota adopt a new residential energy code this code cycle, or will it maintain the current standard? Builders and code officials have been waiting for the answer to this for several years now. An Aug. 3 administrative law hearing was the first major step directed at answering this question. The hearing was initially scheduled for May 18 but was delayed due to the spring’s stay-at-home order. The hearing fulfilled a federal mandate which requires that states must review the U.S. Department of Energy’s (US DOE) analysis of the International Energy Conservation Code (IECC). Judge Eric Lipman, who presided over the hearing, will be weighing the arguments and technical information provided by interested parties and the Department of Labor and Industry (DLI). He will then issue his recommendation to
the DLI Commissioner, who will make the final determination on whether to open rulemaking proceedings or not. If DLI opts not to open rulemaking on a new residential energy code, no further actions will be taken until the next code adoption process. Opening rulemaking, on the other hand, would restart the residential energy code technical review process. In 2018, the Department’s Energy Code Technical Advisory Group (TAG) completed its work only on the commercial energy code. A technical review of the 2015 and 2018 IECC changes and any proposed amendments would likely take months, or potentially longer. Builders, REALTORS®, building officials opposed to new energy code
Citing national high marks in current energy performance, those opposed to the opening of a new residential energy code focused on the housing affordability and related impacts which they believe a new code would unnecessarily bring forth. During the Aug. 3 hearing, Nick Erickson, director of research and regulatory affairs at Housing First Minnesota, told the judge that Minnesota is facing a three-pronged housing crisis of affordability, availability and equity. Adopting a new energy code will increase housing costs and further deepen the crisis at a time when newly built homes are already among the most energy efficient in the country. Housing First Minnesota also convened a group of associations opposing consideration of a new residential energy code.
INSIDE THIS ISSUE
Multi-family housing in the COVID-19 era PAGE 6
Millennial surge drives housing market PAGE 9
Electrical code contested PAGE 4
CONTINUED >> PAGE 4
Lumber supply problems rise as housing demand surges The COVID-19 pandemic and the ensuing economic shutdowns across the country have caused widespread supply chain issues. Notably, issues with the lumber supply chain have caused further disruptions for new home construction. Builders have noticed a sharp increase in the prices of these building materials.
Lumber prices were on a roller coaster of ups and downs before COVID-19 started. Three years ago, the Trump administration placed a tariff of about 20% on Canadian softwood lumber. The National Association of Home Builders (NAHB) estimates that these tariffs added about $9,000 to the cost of a typical new home. CONTINUED >> PAGE 2 HOUSING INDUSTRY NEWS
| 1
2960 Centre Pointe Drive Roseville, MN 55113 HousingFirstMN.org
PRSRT STD U.S. POSTAGE PAID PERMIT # 93652 TWIN CITIES, MN