The Ungated Community

Page 1

The UNGATED COMMUNITY

Transformation of the PI Haarlem, into a Live/Work Community, realized in collective private ownership Marije Ruigrok P5 Presentation 16th of December 2014

1


The UNGATED COMMUNITY

2


The UNGATED COMMUNITY

3


4


VISION

5


6


7


8


INTRODUCTION

9


10


11


DEMOCRATIC TRIANGLE

12


BIG SOCIETY

13


PARTICIPATORY SOCIETY

14


15


16


17


MASTERPLAN DJI

18


RPLAN DJI

19


20


NEW STRATEGIES

21


RIJKSMONUMENTEN

BIJLAGE 3

BENADERING ‘BEZIT & AFSTOOTPROGNOSES’ APRIL _2014

20%

± 1000 B ± 100 A

?%

± 1500 B ± 375 A

25%

DU

± 5800 B

20%

± 870 A 25%

± 4200 B ± 2000 A

50%

± 1000 - ± 4000 B ± 1000 A

?%

IER

3,5%

EN

± 42.000 B ± 2500 A

5%

00 0 40 .

00 60

55 0

0

%

50 00

10 0

0

AFSTOOTPROGNOSE

00

UL

10%

50 0

PA RT IC

± 3400 B ± 680 A

20%

15

ST BED RI RI EL JV E S EN EC EN TO R WO CO NIN RP GB OR OU AT W IES OR RE GA LIG NI IEU SA Z TIE E S ON TW P IK RO KE JE LA CT AR S

00

DE OV CEN ER TR HE AL MA DE E N AT SC H OR AP GA PE NI LIJ SA K TIE E S

± 1800 BEZIT ± 450 AFSTOOT

30%

45

EID

40 00

RH

00

VE

35

IN

SO

30 00

JK

25 00

RI

RO EP

0

EN AA RS G

20 0

E IG

RIJKSMONUMENTEN (AANTAL)

22


00

80

00

00

70 75

00 00

65

60

00

55

00

00

50

45

00

40

00

00

00

35

30

25

00

20

00

00

BIJLAGE 4

15

10

0

50

LEEGSTAND / AFSTOOTPROGNOSE ± 8000

TOTALE VOORRAAD RIJKSMONUMENTEN ± 64.000

BENADERING ‘BEZIT & AFSTOOTPROGNOSES’

RIJKSMONUMENTEN APRIL _2014

RIJKSMONUMENTEN (AANTAL)

23


PROBLEM STATEMENT

24


THE GROWING AMOUT OF (MONUMENTAL) REAL ESTATE IS IN DISBALANCE WITH THE DEMAND AND (FINANCIAL) CAPICITIES OF THE TRADITIONAL ACTORS.

25


!

26


RESEARCH QUESTION

27


28


29


A

30


CPO

31


BUILDING IN COLLECTIVE PRIVATE OWNERSHIP CPO

ASPECTS OF CPO CPO

- Great diversity in housing; - Own dream house; - Financial security; - Social cohesion with neighbors; - Cost shared thus saves money; - Benifits of sharing common areas; - Collective durability plan;

‘Beter een goede buur dan een verre vriend’ 32


CPO traditional

CPO 2.0

A

source: de Hoofden

33


CPO WITH LEASE CONSTRUCTION

COO

€ PERATION

MONTHLY RENT

Combination of owning and renting

34


35


CASE STUDY

36


PANOPTIC PRISON HAARLEM

37


38


ten

PRISONS FOR SALE

5

7

9 11

21 4

18

17 16

13 22

1

12

23 19 6 14

20

3

2 penintentiaire inrichtingen justitiele jeugdinrichtingen

8

detentiecentra forensische zorg (TBS)

23 gevangenissen sluiten

PRISONS FOR SALE

5

7

9 11

21 4

18

17 16

13 22

1

12

23 19 6 14

20

3

2 penintentiaire inrichtingen justitiele jeugdinrichtingen

8

detentiecentra forensische zorg (TBS)

3

39


W. METZELAAR

J. BENTHAM FOUNDER PANOPTICUM Jeremy Bentham Londen 1748–1832

ViRGINIA STATE PRISON

DESIGN BOUET, 38 CELLS

WESTERN PENITENTIARY

DESIGN BOUET, 78 CELLS

40


Fotos: Ros FLoor

41


42


43


44


45


46


47


Spaarnoogplan_ reconstruction workers’ quarter 2005

48


49


Quarter ‘Molen de Adriaan’_19th century

50


51


Scheepmakerskwartier_currently under construction

52


Scheepmakerskwartier 2015

53


Waardepolder _industry

54


koepel

St. Bavo

Legenda Spaarne

row housing canal-side houses bigger building units

Source: De Key, Masterplan Scheepsmakerswartier, july 2011

55


PROGRAM

Affordaible housing

Public functions

Green spot

56


OBJECTIVES

57


PRESERVATION MONUMENTAL VALUE INTEGRATION WITH CITY AND SURROUNDINGS, YET MAINTIANING EXLUSIVE POSITION INVERTING PANOPTICON; FROM ABSOLUTE ISOLATION TO INTENSE COMMUNICATION FROM DEJECTED ENVIROMENT TOWARD A QUALITIVE RESIDENTIAL AREA INCORPORATION INTO CIVIL POPULATION (PARTCIPATION SOCIETY) FINANCIALLY SOUND

58


HOFJES Bakenessekamer_1395

Attic

Hofje in den Groenen Tuin_1616

GF

GF

Hofje van Noblet_1761

Codde en van Beresteyn_1969

Attic GF

GF

De 3 hoven_ (1965) 2007

Johan Enschede Hof_2007

2nd

Attic 1st

59


Bakenessekamer_1395

60


‘HETEROTOPIA’

61


DESIGN

62


ALDO ROSSI

MONUMENT: ELEMENT OF PERMANENCE *Formal Permanence > physical sign/symbol of the past

*Vital permanence >

able to change functions over time continue participating in the city

63


ALDO ROSSI

MONUMENT: ELEMENT OF PERMANENCE *Formal Permanence > physical sign/symbol of the past

*Vital permanence >

able to change functions over time continue participating in the city “In this case it becomes more than a sign of hisotry or collective memory. It continues to have a meaning for the city of today and becomes more than a symbol�

64


National monument Built before 1950 with high rated architectural value for the cityscape Built before 1950 with different rated architectural values. The facades contriute to the streetscape but indiviualy don’t own special architectural or urban value Built after 1950 Plannend for 2014-2015

65


66


67


68


69


70


71


72


73


74


75


76


77


PROGRAM

78


79


80


81


82


83


INTERVENTIONS

84


ACCES TO THE COURTYARD

85


ACCES TO THE COURTYARD

86


87


OPEN STRUCTURE OF THE DOME

88


CONSTRUCTION DOME 1901

89


BALCONIES

90


INITIAL STARTING POINTS

1902

ABSOLUTE ISOLATION

DEPRESSIVE ENVIRONMENT

2016

INTENSIVE COMMUNICATION

HAPPY OASE

C

UNDER CONTROL

TAKING CONTROL

91


REFERENCE TO THE ‘HAARLEMSE HOFJES’

92


DOME FUNCTIONS AS LANDMARK

93


94


95


ADAPTING CELLS

CELLS ELLS

1956 96


SCHEME FOR ADAPTING CELLS IN PAIRS OF TWO

97


98


99


100


101


102


103


104


105


106


107


108


109


110


111


112


113


114


115


116


117


118


119


CONNECTION NEW TO OLD

120


FLEXIBILITY OF NEW BUILDING

EXAMPLE THIRD FLOOR

121


FLEXIBILITY OF NEW BUILDING

EXAMPLE FOURTH FLOOR

122


FLEXIBILITY OF NEW BUILDING

ROOF

123


SUN SCHEME

124


SUN SCHEME

125


SUN SCHEME

126


SUN SCHEME

127


SUN SCHEME

128


SUN SCHEME

129


SUN SCHEME

130


SUN SCHEME

131


SOUTH WEST FACADE

AFTERNOON SUN

132


FINANCIAL MODEL

133


CPO WITH LEASE CONSTRUCTION

COO

€ PERATION

MONTHLY RENT

“ shortage affordable housing to rent free sector”

source: PvdA haarlem 2012

“ more interest in CPO than available locations; in search for new possibilities and locations ” source: Gemeente haarlem 2013

134


PROJECT COSTS

DEMOLITION + PREPARATION CONSTRUCTION

PURCHASE

+/-

3.0

00.

000

+/Eur

o

1.0

00.

000

Eur

o

REFERENCE PROJECT PI NOORDSINGEL ROTTERDAM PI HAARLEM_ 1900 20.054m2 f 500.000,- = E 6.300.000 in 2012

NEW CONSTRUCTION 25 PARTS OF 4 LAYERS 100 UNITS 35000 E / UNIT E5.100.000,DEMOLITION 20 E /M2 BVO

PI NOORDSINGEL_ 1863 26.232 m2 f.1.000.000 = E10.000.000 in 2012

ALTERATIONS OLD PART INTERVENTIONS E2.900.000,DOME E940.000,-

4290 M2

MAKING AREA READY FOR CONSTRUCTION 35 E/M2 14500 M2

If we can compare the inflation of the prisons, PI Haarlem could cost.

E2.900.000,SOURCE: RVOB

INTERVENTIONS OLD BUILDING + NEW CONSTRUCTION

ESTIMATION:

E742.000,-

SOURCE: SPREADSHEAT DAG VH LEGE GEBOUW

GARDEN AND SURROUNDING TERRAIN E4.200.000,-

ESTIMATION:

E13.140.000,-

SOURCES: 1. SPREADSHEAT DAG VH LEGE GEBOUW 2. REKENEN MET VASTGOED

135


PROJECT COSTS

DEMOLITION + PREPARATION CONSTRUCTION

PURCHASE

+/-

3.0

00.

000

+/Eur

o

1.0

00.

+/000

Eur

o

REFERENCE PROJECT PI NOORDSINGEL ROTTERDAM PI HAARLEM_ 1900 20.054m2 f 500.000,- = E 6.300.000 in 2012

E2.900.000,SOURCE: RVOB

000

.00

0E

uro

25 PARTS OF 4 LAYERS 100 UNITS 35000 E / UNIT E5.100.000,ALTERATIONS OLD PART INTERVENTIONS E2.900.000,DOME E940.000,-

4290 M2

MAKING AREA READY FOR CONSTRUCTION 35 E/M2 14500 M2

If we can compare the inflation of the prisons, PI Haarlem could cost.

13.

NEW CONSTRUCTION

DEMOLITION 20 E /M2 BVO

PI NOORDSINGEL_ 1863 26.232 m2 f.1.000.000 = E10.000.000 in 2012

INTERVENTIONS OLD BUILDING + NEW CONSTRUCTION

E742.000,-

E. 17.000.000,-

ESTIMATION:

SOURCE: SPREADSHEAT DAG VH LEGE GEBOUW

GARDEN AND SURROUNDING TERRAIN E4.200.000,-

ESTIMATION:

E13.140.000,-

SOURCES: 1. SPREADSHEAT DAG VH LEGE GEBOUW 2. REKENEN MET VASTGOED

136


COO

€ PERATION

MONTHLY RENT

137


E. 17.000.000,-

138


COO

PERATION

139


5%

FUTURE HABITANTS DEPOSIT ACCORDING TO M2 >E 850.000

140


5%

FUTURE HABITANTS DEPOSIT ACCORDING TO M2 >E 850.000

15%

FUTURE TENANTS ENTREPRENEURS DEPOSIT ACCORDING TO M2 >E 2.500.000

141


5%

FUTURE HABITANTS DEPOSIT ACCORDING TO M2 >E 850.000

15%

BANK

FUTURE TENANTS ENTREPRENEURS DEPOSIT ACCORDING TO M2 >E 2.500.000

80%

142


5%

FUTURE HABITANTS DEPOSIT ACCORDING TO M2 >E 850.000

15%

? BANK

FUTURE TENANTS ENTREPRENEURS DEPOSIT ACCORDING TO M2 >E 2.500.000

80%

143


5%

FUTURE HABITANTS DEPOSIT ACCORDING TO M2 >E 850.000

15%

FUTURE TENANTS ENTREPRENEURS DEPOSIT ACCORDING TO M2 >E 2.500.000

30% - 50%

>>>THE CROWD<<<

144


SHARE : STARTING FROM 500 EURO >>>THE CROWD<<<

145


5%

BANK

25-50% * EXPLOTATION GARANTEED * NO LEASE CONTRACT GROUND (ERFPACHT)

FUTURE HABITANTS DEPOSIT ACCORDING TO M2 >E 850.000

15%

FUTURE TENANTS ENTREPRENEURS DEPOSIT ACCORDING TO M2 >E 2.500.000

30% - 50%

>>>THE CROWD<<<

146


total benefits

Euro

18 MIL

3 MIL 2

VARIABLES

interest duration morage maintainance costs cost increase inflation rent

20

10

4,0% 30 35.000 3,0% 1,0% 850.000

rent increase value increase start value vacancy vacancy increase

30

years

2,0% 1,0% 17.000.000 5,0% 0,0% 147


Conclusion

148


149


QUESTIONS?

150


Turn static files into dynamic content formats.

Create a flipbook
Issuu converts static files into: digital portfolios, online yearbooks, online catalogs, digital photo albums and more. Sign up and create your flipbook.