The W h o l e P e r s o n a t Wo r k
The Whole Person at Work Russell Connor
About the Author: Russell Connor is the Managing Director of Dynamic Link (www.dynamiclink.com). Dynamic Link uses a Work Levels framework to help fully appreciate an individual’s capability and to match people to jobs.
Acknowledgements: Dynamic Link acknowledges the important influence of Elliott Jaques, Gillian Stamp and Mihalyi Csíkszentmihályi
Overview: Profiling people has become associated with assessing personality using sophisticated psychometric instruments. At the same time an emphasis, especially in the area of leadership, has been placed on identifying behaviour and competences. Whilst there are benefits to these approaches the essence of the person can be lost in the process. Russell argues that in order to really understand the being in human being you have to go beyond concepts of personality or just focusing on behaviour. It is necessary to go upstream to the source of behaviour- to the thinking process.
Limitations of Many Psychologically Based Approaches People seem to like to put a label on others and say that they are this or that kind of person. Many psychological approaches to people-profiling provide nice easy labels and this may account for their popularity. However individuals resent being labelled themselves for the very real reason that they do behave in different ways in different situations. Many standard psychologically based profiling tools are designed to neatly ‘box’ someone. However, they not only create the impression that people are unable to flex their behaviour once labelled, they also lose the essence of the person in the analysis. The following approaches have severe limitations when it comes to fully understanding a person at work:
1
Green Paper series
Personality factors. Traits and factors don’t take into account context - but human beings are highly context sensitive, Competency frameworks. These often focus on behaviour- but behaviour is an output:– an end result of something else, EQ. Emotional awareness is important but emotions are difficult to name, often come from deep within us and are often the result of how we interpret the world and make meaning. In terms of broader analyses, many approaches to organisation development rest on psychological theories that see aspects of business life such as interpersonal stresses, aggression and damaging game-playing as the results of psychological processes involving the unconscious. As a natural follow-on, practitioners utilising these underlying ideas espouse that in