Elop*6 final review

Page 1

elop* alliance Stanford University | Organization Bern University of Applied Sciences | Lead Bauhaus University Weimar Cologne University of Applied Sciences HEPIA, Geneva ITESM Quéretaro Politecnico di Milano Polytech’Marseille

„Education is not an arsenal - it is a horizon.“ Hans Blumenberg

elop*6 Crossroads / Crossfunctions – Stanford / Palo Alto FINAL REVIEW January 23rd 2014 City Hall Palo Alto, CA USA


elop*6 crossroads / crossfunctions Agenda Welcome Introduction

08:30 – 09:00

am PST

Team NUKAK

09:00 – 10:00

am

Team ATSINA

10:15 – 11:15

am

Team SAMI

11:30 – 12:30

am

Team KUCHI Team BEDOUIN Team TUAREG

13:30 – 14:30 14:45 – 15:45 16:00 – 17:00

pm pm pm

FINAL WORD

17:00

Lunch

20’ Presentation / 40’ Discussion (Faculty & Guests)


Team NUKAK 09:00 – 10:00


HYBRID.

Elop*6 - Stanford University - Team Nukak - 23 January 2014

- Antonia Herten - Christopher Fรถrderer - Elisabeth Karcher - Chris Chan - Farah Sefsouf - Jesus Ocampo - Juliette Sgorbini -


HYBRID.

PROCESS - NUKAK -

NUKAK AS A GROUP


HYBRID.

CONCEPT - SCALE Territory scale : The Caltrain as a unifying element of a system research park A research park at the territory scale.

Sensitive scale : Tension and compression exercised by invisible fields

All stations become a piece of the research park system which answer to the needs and to the demand of his territory.

Broadcast

Topography punctuated by mountains and valleys of tension and compression.

District scale : A strong abstraction - Palo Alto and Stanford, two inseparable magnets -

1 : REPULSION - Palo Alto and Stanford, neighboring cities who look back 2 : ATTRACTION - Palo Alto and Stanford, inseparable cities that attract each other and thus create ... 3 : ... INVISIBLE FIELDS - Interactions -

Gather


HYBRID.

CONCEPT Invisible fields transform the site in a district

The district revitalizes the surrounding

Positive poles, Palo Alto and Stanford are attracted by a central negative pole The district becomes the attractor. The three entities meet and interact.

The district eminates its influence through Palo Alto and Stanford. Residual spaces become potential spaces for the diffusion of the research park.


CONCEPT - PRINCIPLES -

HYBRID. The district is related to the local territory The district extends beyond the local borders; it creates articulation points where the tension is higher than elsewhere, and different entities can interact.

LEGEND : ENTITIES Existing landscape entities Water entity District entity

INVISIBLES FIELDS District park - Diffuse and gather -

Interraction -Tension & compression-

ACTIVITIES Art Culture Sport Potential spaces


CONCEPT - HYBRID & PROGRAM work

HYBRID.

live

shop LEGEND : articulation spaces : promontories Tension area : park Park program Promontory program


HYBRID.

PROGRAM - STAKEHOLDER -

The repartition of the program Dropper promontory

Urban farming promontory

Houseups promontory

Crok promontory

The cost repartition of the program


HYBRID.

TOOLS - LANDSCAPE Circulations - Hook to the district -

Vegetal typologies

Agricutural production

Orchard 1000 à 4000m2 Mesh 6x6m

Arboretum Little and big grove Tree lined

Urban hook

Landscape hook

Dock

Earth walkway

Crossing

agricole walkway

Public space

Sky walkway

Promontory

Eucalyptus - Chêne - Cereal crops Cèdre - Tamaris

Existing typologies

Eucalyptus Amandier Chêne Tulipier Platane

Albizia Mélia Faux-poivrier

New typologies


TOOLS - ARCHITECTURE ARCHITECTURE TOOLS

The promontory

The south east orientation functionas as a shading device and as a strategy for acomodatio of strategy.

The north west orientation gives the building the oportunity to take advantage of wind cooling through the design.

we used this environmental tools since the beggining of the design in order to get a grid and base the process of the design in this orientations.

HYBRID.


HYBRID.

TOOLS - ARCHITECTURE - ENERGY ARCHITECTURE TOOLS DROPPER

ENERGY CONCEPT HOUSEUPS

PV-Cells

Natural Ventilation

Shading

Daylight and Views

Reversible HEAT Pump


FINAL CONCEPT- ARCHITECTURE -

HYBRID.


MASTERPLAN - DISTRICT -

HYBRID.


FOCUS

HYBRID.


HYBRID.

SECTIONS Section AA’ - Scale 1/1000 -

A

Crok

Houseups

A’

Dropper

Section BB’ - Scale 1/250 -

B

Sky walkway

Blond walkway

Earth walkway

Dock

DROPPER

El Camino Real

B’

Section CC’ - Scale 1/250 -

Market place C’

Reservoir place

Section DD’ - Scale 1/250 -

D

D’

Fields CROK

HOUSEUPS


INTERIOR

HYBRID.


ADAPTABILITY

HYBRID.


ADAPTABILITY

HYBRID.


HYBRID.


Team ATSINA 10:15 – 11:15


Team atsina - elop*6


2

A


City strategy

3

A


Local strategy

El Camino Real

University Avenue

Palo Alto

Existing pedestrian links

Palm Drive

Potential pedestrian links

Stanford

4

A


Site strategy

Slow way of inputs

Intermediar way of inputs

Strong way of inputs

5

Landscape strategy

A


6

A


A

City strategy

Local strategy

El Camino Real

University Avenue

Palo Alto

Existing pedestrian links

Research Park of the 21st century Palm Drive

Garage 8%

Train station 6%

Potential pedestrian links

hybrid Tower 15%

Stanford Recreation 14%

Site strategy

Basement 13%

Research cluster 44%

Slow way of inputs

Intermediar way of inputs

Strong way of inputs

A’ Landscape strategy

Central spine

Transversal ridge

New buildings 0

10

Plan : 1-1000

A

7

100m

50

N

A

A’


Clearing ambiance

Edge path ambiance

8

Community garden ambiance

A


9

A


10

A


11

A


hybrid Tower

restaurant 4% co-working 9% restaurant 4% service co-working 24% 9%

administration 2%

hybrid Tower

office 34%

administration 2% housing 27%

office 34%

service 24% housing 27%

Basement bar 20%

Basement

terrace bar 37% 20%

hall 43%

hall 43%

terrace 37%

12

A


13

A


14

A


15

A


first floor 35%

retail 13% workshop 15%

service 14%

service 12%

cafe 30%

health center 14%

second floor

first floor

ground floor service 12%

co-working 88%

restaurant 16%

office 86%

second floor service 14%

office 86%

Research Cluster

second floor 32%

ground floor 33%

first floor 35%

ground floor service 12% cafe 30%

health center 14%

16

retail 13% workshop 15%

restaurant 16%

A


17

A


18

A


19

A


20

A


21

A


22

A


23

A


24

A


HVAC - System Scheme

HVAC - Concept Facts: - Focus on free cooling/ solar gain / natural ventilation - Reduce mechanical energy production - Decentralized system - LEED Platinum (min. Gold) - EnEV 2009 U-Values (German Energy Consumption Regulation) - Heating energy consumption max. 30 W/ sqm (~3 W/ sqf) - Cooling energy consumption max. 60 W/ sqm (~6 W/ sqf) 25

A


team atsina elop*6 Thanks for your attention.

26

A


Team SAMI 11:30 – 12:30


E.I.C. experimentation innovation centre


TEAM PROCESS


METAPHORES


TERRITORIAL STRATEGY

SITE AS A MAIN CORE

POTENCIALS INSTEAD OF BARRIERS

- Underground Caltrain - Increase soft Mobility

VEGETATION CONNEXION

TRAFFIC STRATEGY


VISION




LARGE TERRITORY SYSTEM

WIN - WIN SITUATION


PROGRAMS & FONCTIONS



Blog Assunta Diaz


TRAFFIC AND TRANSPORTATION

UNDERGROUND CALTRAIN


MASTERPLAN


LINEAR PUBLIC SPACE


PATIOS


San Francisquito Creek Palo Alto Park

STITCH COMMUNITY

El Palo Alto Avenue

Alma Street

Linear plateform Alma Street

Simple crossing University Avenue Alma Street


FLOOR ORGANISATION


RAMPS SYSTEM


VERTICAL CIRCULATION SYSTEM


THANKS FOR ATTENTION


Team KUCHI 13:30 – 14:30


elop*6 project Crossroads/crossfunctions Stanford CA

final review - 01

00

+ 01

+ 02

kuchi’s hive Coaches Key Portilla Kawamura Kathrin Merz Jßrgen Melzner Students Tringa Qerreti Eduardo Medina Carla Claassen Carla Marino Zhe Chen Maximilian Sternal Jonathan Musy


RESEARCH ?

2 23


In all cases, creativity doesn’t appear alone

3 23


Commuters City palo Alto

Companies

site

Stanford

site becomes the meeting point

Inhabitants

4 23

stakeholders synergy


5 23

programmatic strategy the balance

INSPIRATION

CULTURAL

SOUL

MOVEMENT

SPORTS

BODY

LOGIC

SCIENCE

MIND


MULTI-DIRECTIONAL DYNAMIC & COMPLEX NETWORK

6 23

POTENTIAL HIVE INSTALLATIONS

ACTUAL HIVE’S NETWORK LAYER

NEW SUBURBANISTIC PROGRAM LAYER

metaphorical approach the hive


7 23

2-dimensional time scale reaction


8 23

intensity variations process


Active

TEAM PROCESS / TEAM WORK

ELOP

Comming together

9 23

ELOP

ELOP

working intensively

Passive

ELOP

spreading thinking of own diciplinary point of view

ELOP

linking to each other, sharing more

active and passive continuum life-cycles


bay

3 menlo park

1

palo alto baylands

2 arboretum

stanford

hills

10 23

4 5 belt

swarming areas large scale strategy


menlo

palo alto

creek interface

university ave

site creek

urban interface

mall

arboretum

palm drive

new transversal axis of use limits

flows

new spatial sequences

11 23

experience phasing

sequencing situation and goals


1

spaces G’

vegetal structures activities

creek’s interface

E’

A

water management

creek’s ballade

2

G’

woodlands cords

playground

3

D’

retention and infilitration basin

theater orchards

E

west core

4 fire gardens

D

water games

C’

reservoir park

mall’s perspective

channel

5

woodlands cords

B’

pine allee

oak’s range

moving banks

orchard

east core

downtown palo alto

docks

agora orchard

station’s piazza

6 woodlands cords

12 23

leland’s belvedere

pine square

buses’ stops

urban interface B

C

waiting areas

A’

the hives masterplan


CORE STRUCTURE

CORE STRUCTURE CORE STRUCTURE

RAMPING CONNECTION

RAMPING CONNECTION RAMPING CONNECTION

SKYLIGHT

DISTRIBUTION OF PROGRAMM BY FLOOR

SKYLIGHT SKYLIGHT

DISTRIBUTION OF PROGRAMM BY FLOOR DISTRIBUTION OF PROGRAMM BY FLOOR

NW

NE

PALO ALTO DOWNTOWN

NODES_PIAZZAS_CREEK

NW NW

NE NE

PALO ALTO DOWNTOWN PALO ALTO DOWNTOWN

NODES_PIAZZAS_CREEK NODES_PIAZZAS_CREEK

STICK OF THE PROGRAMMED SWARM TO THE CORE CORE STRUCTURE CORE STRUCTURE CORE STRUCTURE CORE STRUCTURE

core structure

RAMPING CONNECTION RAMPING CONNECTION RAMPING CONNECTION RAMPING CONNECTION

circulations through ramps

SKYLIGHT SKYLIGHT SKYLIGHT SKYLIGHT

DISTRIBUTION OF PROGRAMM BY FLOOR DISTRIBUTION OF PROGRAMM BY FLOOR DISTRIBUTION OFOF PROGRAMM BYBY FLOOR DISTRIBUTION PROGRAMM FLOOR

skylight

NW NW NW

NODES_PIAZZAS_CREEK NODES_PIAZZAS_CREEK NODES_PIAZZAS_CREEK NODES_PIAZZAS_CREEK

STICK OF THE PROGRAMMED STICK OF THE PROGRAMMED STICK OFOF THE PROGRAMMED STICK THE PROGRAMMED SWARM TO THE CORE SWARM TO THE CORE SWARM TOTO THE CORE SWARM THE CORE

GENERATION OF TERRACES GENERATION OF TERRACES GENERATION OFOF TERRACES GENERATION TERRACES AT DIFFERENT HEIGHTS AT DIFFERENT HEIGHTS ATAT DIFFERENT HEIGHTS DIFFERENT HEIGHTS

SW SW SW CAMINO REAL CAMINO REAL CAMINO REAL CAMINO REAL

CONNECTIONS THROUGH VIEWS CONNECTIONS THROUGH VIEWS CONNECTIONS THROUGH VIEWS CONNECTIONS THROUGH VIEWS

13 23

NE NE NE

PALO ALTO DOWNTOWN PALO ALTO DOWNTOWN PALO ALTO DOWNTOWN PALO ALTO DOWNTOWN

SW CAMINO REAL

STICK OF THE PROGRAMMED

STICK OFTOTHE stick of the honeycomb on SWARM THEPROGRAMMED CORE TO THE CORE theSWARM core structure

distribution of program by floor

GENERATION OF TERRACES AT DIFFERENT HEIGHTS

GENERATION OF TERRACES

OF TERRACES generation of terraces between ATGENERATION DIFFERENT HEIGHTS ATthe DIFFERENT HEIGHTS honeycombs

visual linkage

CONNECTIONS THROUGH VIEWS

SW SW CAMINO REAL CAMINO REAL

CONNECTIONS THROUGH VIEWS CONNECTIONS THROUGH VIEWS

SE

NODES_PIAZZAS_ TRAIN STATION_ UNIVERSITY AVE

SE SE

NODES_PIAZZAS_ NODES_PIAZZAS_ TRAIN STATION_ TRAIN STATION_ UNIVERSITY AVE UNIVERSITY AVE

SE SE SE

NODES_PIAZZAS_ NODES_PIAZZAS_ NODES_PIAZZAS_ NODES_PIAZZAS_ TRAIN STATION_ TRAIN STATION_ TRAIN STATION_ TRAIN STATION_ UNIVERSITY AVE UNIVERSITY AVE UNIVERSITY AVE UNIVERSITY AVE

honeycombs shaping


14 23

hive’s flower field reservoir park


15 23

bees life inside the hive


Gardening - public space

ts

Mal

e

/ toile

Mal

e

/ toile

ts

Soul

10

9

11

8

12

7

13

6

14

5

15

4

16

3 10

17

2

9

11

1

8

18 19

12

7

13

6

14

5

15

4

16

3

17

2

1

18 19

-Open-air amphitheatre -Art performance -Exhibitions spaces

Body / toilets

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 9

8

7

6

19

5

18

11 4

17

12 3

16

10

Mind 13

Male

2

9

8

7

6

5

4

11

3

12

2

13

1

14

15

14 15

/ toile

ts

16 17 18 19

-7.50 -2.48

15

14

16 23

-2.56 -2.56

16

13

-0.60 -2.58

17

12

pouf-seating

18

11

book shells

-Gym -Sports fields -Collective festivals -Pedestrians paths -Bicycles roads

/ toilets

19

10

Male

1

Male

-Library -Auditoriums -Multifunctionary rooms -Offices -Meeting rooms

-3.60 -2.43

-2.46 -2.46

-0.67 -0.67

0.50 0.00

structure of cores organization


5.90

-1.60 -1.60

17 23

-0.40 -2.02

-0.60 -2.56

-0.53 -2.87

-0.40 -0.40

-1.90 -2.60

west core catalysis

-3.8 -3.8


Floods climax

Coppicing

Bark removal

Fire maintenance

herbaceous post fire

pioneers

Vegetation’s stages

-2.13 -2.13

18 23 el camino

Traces and water games

-2.50 -2.50

actual vegetal cords

banks vegetation shrubs mass

-4.93 -2.60

-7.50 -2.56

playground

-2.49 -2.59

-1.38 -1.38

time story-telling


phase C - reservoir park and the playground

A

phase B - east core

phase A - transportation interface and tramway

B

phase D - west core

D

19 23

development on site phasing


multi-resources model

solar photovoltaics

single provider model

kairos

multi-provider model

grid chronos underground resources chronos

20 23

energy models


Daylight

Temperature control

21 23

energy efficiency strategies


main events

22 23

repercution (secondary event)

expension of time (event)

linear time (chronos)

event’s impacts waggle dance


ephemeral architecture

23 23

meeting points

concerts

kairos festival the 21st century research park


Team BEDOUIN 14:45 – 15:45


Team Bedouin

Muriel Braun

Joris Katkevicius

Thibaut Defois

Morgane Robert

Salvador Espinosa

Carina Schmidt

Gretchen Heberling

Heinrich Schmidt

final presentation - Team Bedouin


Team Bedouin

final presentation - Team Bedouin

2


Vision • Welcoming landmark for Palo Alto • Meeting place and local attraction • Connect surrounding amenities on both a small and large scale • Preserve and enhance the natural environment • Offer a view of the future • Provide an educational component

final presentation - Team Bedouin

3


Metaphor

Succession:

Symbiosis:

final presentation - Team Bedouin

4


Team Process Success Organizational issues

Agreements

Misunderstandings

UPS & DOWNS

Decisions

Progress Irritations

final presentation - Team Bedouin

Communication breakdowns 5


Decision-making Decision-making regarding PROGRAM Different types of decision-making:  VOTING  FINDING A COMPROMISE  INDIVIDUAL DECISIONS final presentation - Team Bedouin

? 6


Historical & Cultural Context

final presentation - Team Bedouin

7


Analysis: Sustainability

final presentation - Team Bedouin

8


Concept

final presentation - Team Bedouin

9


Analysis: Stakeholders Stanford

Commuters

Homeless people

People working on the site final presentation - Team Bedouin

City of Palo Alto

Tourists

Residents of Palo Alto

Researchers 10


Concept STANFORD University

Students

PALO ALTO Community

Children/Teenager

Research Park

RESEARCHERS final presentation - Team Bedouin

11


Program Entrance Building

Office Building

Research Buildings

Interactive Museum

private offices

coworking offices

science labs

lobby

meeting spaces

communal kitchens

office labs

exposition space

auditorium

recreation space

recreation space

bookshop

dining area

cafeteria

meeting spaces

education space

reception

lounge area

cafeteria

cafeteria

lounge area

lounge area

+ underground train station & tracks

+ (public) transportation restructuring

+ remodeled park area

final presentation - Team Bedouin

12


Analysis: Landscape Design

final presentation - Team Bedouin

13


Masterplan

final presentation - Team Bedouin

14


Analysis: Architecture

final presentation - Team Bedouin

15


Plans & Schemes

final presentation - Team Bedouin

16


3D Perspective

final presentation - Team Bedouin

17


Interior Rendering

final presentation - Team Bedouin

18


Timeline & Budget 2014 I

II

2015 III

IV

I

II

2016 III

IV

construction

[I,II,III] demolition and site preperation

I

II

2017 III

IV

I

II

2018 III

IV

I

II

[II] research buildings 2 & 3

IV

I

II

2021

2020 III

IV

I

II

III

IV

I

II

2022 III

IV

I

II

III

IV

[IV] interval for HSR constructiion in PA

[III] office building

[I,IV] underground train station

[I] dislocation of MacArthur Park

landscape modeling

2019 III

[I] old station (refurbishment)

[II] entrance building

[III] re-design of the park area (tree nursery, stormwater basin, paths)

[II] external works

[I] interactive museum

[I] external works

[I,VI] crossroads bus terminals and access zones

[I] external works

[V] circulation zone

[I,II,V,VI] external works

[IV] linear park

special events

aa grand opening

public project presentation

1st market on the site (after this every month)

2nd workshop

1st workshop

3rd workshop

St. Francisquito floods stormwater basin gets filled

entrance building

51,000 ft² GFA $

11,130,750.00

office building

54,000 ft² GFA $

10,449,000.00

museum

20,000 ft² GFA $

5,220,000.00

research building 1

34,000 ft² GFA $

11,857,500.00

research building 2

34,000 ft² GFA $

11,857,500.00

787,000 ft² GFA $

8,853,750.00

external works final presentation - Team Bedouin

TOTAL project cost $

59,368,500.00

19


Construction Logistics

final presentation - Team Bedouin

20


Team TUAREG 16:00 – 17:00


{ }


{ }


{ } WELCOME TO THE

RESEARCH

FACTREE


#NUTRITION CYCLE METAPHOR <Closed loop model>

+LIGHT

+ WATER + AIR

PLANT GROWTH + DEAD LEAVES + OTHER PLANTS +ANIMAL MATTER

{ }

+DECOMPOSITION {elop*6 | Crossroads / Crossfunctions | Project Fall 2013 / 2014 | Team: Tuareg}

+ MIINERALS 4


CLOSED LOOP

Urban City-Offices

Experimentation Start-Ups

Experimentation Gardens

Measurement Labs Sharing Research Market

Hotel, Accomodation

Replication Research Exchange School

Stanford

{ }

{elop*6 | Crossroads / Crossfunctions | Project Fall 2013 / 2014 | Team: Tuareg}

5


{ }

{elop*6 | Crossroads / Crossfunctions | Project Fall 2013 / 2014 | Team: Tuareg}

VOLUMETRIC AND SUN LIGHT STUDIES 6


{ }

{elop*6 | Crossroads / Crossfunctions | Project Fall 2013 / 2014 | Team: Tuareg}

7


YOUNG ENTREPRENEUR

{ }

{elop*6 | Crossroads / Crossfunctions | Project Fall 2013 / 2014 | Team: Tuareg}

8


{ }

{elop*6 | Crossroads / Crossfunctions | Project Fall 2013 / 2014 | Team: Tuareg}

9


YOUNG ENTREPRENEUR

{ }

{elop*6 | Crossroads / Crossfunctions | Project Fall 2013 / 2014 | Team: Tuareg}

10



YOUNG ENTREPRENEUR

{ }

{elop*6 | Crossroads / Crossfunctions | Project Fall 2013 / 2014 | Team: Tuareg}

12


LANDSCAPE Palo Alto

Framing // Direct Linear Park

Research Center

Mound

Rugged Park

Intimate space // Winding path

Stanford Shopping Mall

{ }

Arboretum

Open space // Large path {elop*6 | Crossroads / Crossfunctions | Project Fall 2013 / 2014 | Team: Tuareg}

13


SCIENTIST

{ }

{elop*6 | Crossroads / Crossfunctions | Project Fall 2013 / 2014 | Team: Tuareg}

14



SCIENTIST

{ }

{elop*6 | Crossroads / Crossfunctions | Project Fall 2013 / 2014 | Team: Tuareg}

16


iBARK Automated Building Logistic System

{ }

{elop*6 | Crossroads / Crossfunctions | Project Fall 2013 / 2014 | Team: Tuareg}

17


SCIENTIST

{ }

{elop*6 | Crossroads / Crossfunctions | Project Fall 2013 / 2014 | Team: Tuareg}

18



SCIENTIST

{ }

{elop*6 | Crossroads / Crossfunctions | Project Fall 2013 / 2014 | Team: Tuareg}

20


FAMILY

{ }

{elop*6 | Crossroads / Crossfunctions | Project Fall 2013 / 2014 | Team: Tuareg}

21


17 16 15 14 13 12 11 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1



FAMILY

{ }

{elop*6 | Crossroads / Crossfunctions | Project Fall 2013 / 2014 | Team: Tuareg}

24


RUGGED PARK

{ }

Vegetation density provides an atmosphere of forest {elop*6 | Crossroads / Crossfunctions | Project Fall 2013 / 2014 | Team: Tuareg}

25


EXTERNAL LECTURER

{ }

{elop*6 | Crossroads / Crossfunctions | Project Fall 2013 / 2014 | Team: Tuareg}

26



Bioreactor System 30 KW/m²

Wind NanoVent Skin

Solar Photovoltaiks 100 W/m²

Slab Active & Passive Cooling / Heating System 40 - 56 W/m²


BUILDING TECHNOLOGY BUILDING TECHNOLOGY EXPECTED ENERGY DEMAND 35 30

% ELECTRIC USAGE

25 20 15 10 5

50, 000 m2 (538 000 SF )

0

≈3750 KWh

% NATURAL GAS USAGE

670.000sf

75 W/m2 (7 W / sf)

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35

{ }

BUILDING DEMAND BY END USE

I

APROX FLOOR AREA

{elop*6 | Crossroads / Crossfunctions | Project Fall 2013 / 2014 | Team: Tuareg}

I

PROJECTED DEMAND

29


EXTERNAL LECTURER

{ }

{elop*6 | Crossroads / Crossfunctions | Project Fall 2013 / 2014 | Team: Tuareg}

30


{ }

{elop*6 | Crossroads / Crossfunctions | Project Fall 2013 / 2014 | Team: Tuareg}

31


EXTERNAL LECTURER

{ }

{elop*6 | Crossroads / Crossfunctions | Project Fall 2013 / 2014 | Team: Tuareg}

32


FINANCIAL EVALUATION Legend

CONSTRUCTION COSTS ≈ $158.000.000

{ }

ANNUAL INCOME ≈ $19.500.000

{elop*6 | Crossroads / Crossfunctions | Project Fall 2013 / 2014 | Team: Tuareg}

Offices Laboratories Research Exchange School Underground iBARK Research Market Automated Underground Parking Retail Gastronomy Earthwork and Landscaping Bioreactor Technology Photovoltaik

33



Turn static files into dynamic content formats.

Create a flipbook
Issuu converts static files into: digital portfolios, online yearbooks, online catalogs, digital photo albums and more. Sign up and create your flipbook.