The European Security and Defence Union Issue 22

Page 14

14 European Security & Defence 2015

European defence policy

Rebuilding institutions, cementing structures (BSC/Minister Dr Lubomír Zaorálek*) Not even the largest,

In the pursuit of this aim, the new strategy should have a grea-

most populous and economically most powerful countries of

ter reach than the ESS by incorporating other external policies

the European Union can stand in isolation. Coping with the

within the competence of the European Commission, as this

fundamental challenges faced by Europe today – including

would assuredly contribute to a more consistent approach

the Russian-Ukrainian conflict, the refugee crisis and the

towards foreign policy.

massive problems with unemployment, particularly among

In my view, it is the way in which we face up to European

the young and especially in the south of the Union – requires

neighbourhood in the new strategy that will be central to the

commitment from the European Union as a whole.

future of the EU as a global power. At any rate, I believe it

The Euro-Atlantic Alliance has long been a “firm anchor” for

would be appropriate for the EU to renew its commitment to

the Czech Republic. It is through that Alliance that we aspire

supporting the sovereignty and territorial integrity of its neigh-

not only to protect common global interests by a show of po-

bours.

wer, but also to promote shared values – a liberal democracy, the universality of human rights of all generations, and the rule

As for capacity building, I am convinced that the EU set out on the right track in the conclusions reached by the European

of law.

Council in Decem-

Today, as European

ber 2013 and the

Union members, we

Foreign Affairs

can see the inadequa-

Council in May 2015,

cy of some of the Union structures. Design defects, precipitated perhaps by nothing

“The EU needs to build both military and civilian capacities, the latter in particular representing a unique EU instrument.”

in which it studiously dwelt on the issue of filling the gaps in capacity. In view

more than our lack of

of the sophistica-

vision as the architects

ted concept of its

of European edifices have surfaced in the crises plaguing the

comprehensive approach, the EU needs to build both military

euro area. In the face of the refugee crisis, we are aiming at

and civilian capacities, the latter in particular representing a

addressing serious deficiencies that put the overall functio-

unique EU instrument.

ning of the Schengen area at risk. The Common Security and Defence Policy (CSDP), as a

We also need to make considerable headway in the financing of missions and operations. I am confident that, with

fundamental component of the EU’s Common Foreign and

European Commission President Jean-Claude Juncker on

Security Policy, merits equal attention, not just because Eu-

board, we will achieve the more flexible institutional mindset

rope needs to underpin its political significance with credible

required for defence funding. Accompanied by a reversal in

military capability – alongside economic weight and functional

the national defence spending trends of most Member States,

diplomacy – in order to engage fully in the international arena,

including the Czech Republic, this could prompt a qualitative

but also because we will have to take more account of the link

leap forward in the development of CSDP capacities.

between the internal and external security of the EU and its Member States. European defence features permanently on the European

Faced with scarce resources, numerous Member States and allies, including the Czech Republic, have had to build capacities in such a way that they can be used in both a European

Council agenda. The urgency and complexity of the challen-

and Alliance context. For us, this is an additional pragmatic

ges that lie ahead of us were factors in the decision, endorsed

reason why we have long pursued – as one of the Czech

by the conclusions of the June European Council Summit, to

priorities – the intensification and deepening of cooperation

revise the 2003 European Security Strategy (ESS).

between the EU and NATO. This stands alongside the belief

The new European Global Strategy of the Foreign and Se-

that only strategic and operational coherence, rather than

curity Policy should primarily define, as precisely as possible,

competition and the duplication of the forces of both key orga-

the extent of the EU’s political ambitions in responding to the

nisations safeguarding security in Europe, makes sense.

security threats that have been identified and in safeguarding

I am conscious of the fact that attempts to converge the

its own security, which includes wielding an active influence

two organisations and define their relations have yielded little

over developments in the Union’s immediate neighbourhood.

progress for us since the 1990s. The strategic partnership di-


Turn static files into dynamic content formats.

Create a flipbook

Articles inside

Exhibitors and sponsors

22min
pages 58-64

Speakers and experts

1hr
pages 46-57

Main Programme

5min
pages 42-43

Panel Programme

6min
pages 44-45

steep

2min
page 37

Panasonic

4min
pages 35-36

OMNINET

2min
page 34

Sikorsky

3min
page 32

computacenter

3min
page 33

Lockhead Martin

3min
pages 28-29

secunet

2min
page 31

RUAG

2min
page 30

Pfisterer

2min
page 27

KPMG

3min
page 26

Wolfgang Hellmich MP, Berlin

6min
pages 20-21

Raytheon

3min
page 25

Dr Lubomír Zaorálek, Prague

6min
pages 14-15

John B. Emerson, Berlin

4min
pages 18-19

Robert Walter

4min
pages 16-17

Jirˇí Šedivý, Brussels

5min
pages 22-24

Dr Karl von Wogau, Freiburg

3min
pages 12-13

Dr Hans-Gert Pöttering, Berlin

4min
page 11

Michael Roth MP, Berlin

3min
pages 9-10
Issuu converts static files into: digital portfolios, online yearbooks, online catalogs, digital photo albums and more. Sign up and create your flipbook.