Ecstacy

Behavioural Intervention: An Approach to theEcstasy Problem

Foong Kin, Ph.D. & Vemala Devi, M.Sc. Centre for Drug Research, USM

Paper presented at the National Public Health Conference, Ministry of Health, Kuala Lumpur, April 2001

Synthetic Drug Explosion (LSD, Amphetamines, Ecstasy, etc.)

• Begun in the mid 1980s • Emergence of a new sub-culture: the rave phenomenon • Illicit production,trafficking & consumption surpassed heroin

STIMULANT ABUSE • Stimulants used to enhance vitality, improve mood and escape reality • 2 groups of synthetic stimulants i.e. amphetamine group and ecstasy group • Attractiveness of stimulants is their action on CNS

MDMA (Ecstasy) Abuse • • • •

The love drug European discotheques (mid-1980s) Linked with explosion of dance music Used by an elitist section of population

Methamphetamine Abuse Year

N

1997

255

% of total addicts identified 0.70

1998

772

2.05

1999

774

2.19

2000

1,284

4.70

Source: National Narcotics Agency

Amphetamine Type Stimulants & Other Psychotropic Pills Abuse Year

N

% of total addicts identified

1997 1998 1999 2000

264 264 168 612

0.73 0.70 0.48 1.76

Source: National Narcotics Agency

ATS SEIZURES Year

Syabu (kg)

Ecstasy (#)

Psy. Pills (#)

2000

208.10

49,901

145,486

1999

5.41

55,975

329,265

1998

6.44

9,231

1,724,104

1997

2.09

40,990

1,356,989

Ecstasy… just the facts • 3,4-MithileneDioxyMethAmphetamine (MDMA) • Developed in 1914 by Merck • Historically used for anti-fatigue, antidepressant & appetite suppresant • Similar to the stimulant amphetamine and the hallucinogenic mescaline – can produce stimulant and psychedelic effects • Taken orally as tablet or capsule

PROFILE OF ABUSERS • Teens and twenties • Often educated • Relatively privileged social background • Recreational purposes • Social context of dance scene

Sought-after Effects • • • • • •

Energizing effects Profoundly positive feelings Empathy for others Elimination of anxiety Feeling of serenity/calmness Enhancement of performance, communication & sensual experience • Mild euphoric rush • Suppress need to eat, drink, or sleep

Short-term Side Effects • • • • • •

Jaw tightening Brief nausea Sweating A dry mouth and throat A loss of appetite Difficulty in coordinating body

These all lead to a user having weakened physical and mental conditions the next day after use.

Extensive use over several days can lead to anxiety, panic, confusion and insomnia

Potential Dangers/ Health Risks • • • •

Heat stroke due to dehydration Increased heart rate and blood pressure Suppression of the immune response Psychiatric disturbances e.g. anxiety, confusion, depression, paranoia, hallucination • Brain damage • Severity of adverse reactions to synthetic impurities

BRAIN SCAN

Sumber: National Institute on Drug Abuse, USA

Current Strategies to Curb the Spread • Supply reduction (law enforcement, legislation) • Demand reduction (prevention, education, treatment)

DRUG ABUSE PROGRAM CONTINUUM Non-use of Drugs

Experimental

Integral Part of Lifestyle

Recovery

PROGRAM TYPE: Information

Education Alternatives

Initial Drug Experience

Occasional or Frequent Use

Intervention

Treatment

Drug Abuse

Rehabilitation

Maintenance of Drug-free Lifestyle

Principles in Promoting Behaviour Change • Understanding individual and environmental risk factors influencing behaviour, i.e. ecstasy abuse • Identify important target groups for targeting behaviour change • Application of theories from social communication, behaviour and psychological sciences to change behaviours

Risk Factors in Ecstasy Abuse Among Malaysian Youths • Little is known • Lack systematic study • Only anecdotal data available; mostly from law enforcement and medical practitioners

An Ecological Perspective: Levels of Influence in Ecstasy Abuse Intrapersonal Factors

Knowledge, attitudes, beliefs, and personality traits

Interpersonal Factors

Social influence of family, friends, peers

Institutional Factors

Rules, regulations, policies, and informal structures

Community Factors

Social networks and norms

Public Policy

Local, state, federal policies and laws

Prevention Approaches • Information dissemination/media campaigns • Affective education • Alternatives • Resistance skills • Personal and social skills training

Application of Theoretical Frameworks to Prevention • Health Belief Model (Rosenstock, 1974) • Social Learning Theory (Bandura, 1977) • Problem Behaviour Theory (Jessor & Jessor, 1977)

Drug use is a socially learned, purposive and functional behaviour, and a result of the complex interplay of environmental and individual factors

Health Belief Model Vulnerability Benefits

Seriousness

Likelihood of taking health action

No Barriers

Cues Self-efficacy

An individual is less likely to abuse ecstasy if: • Perceives that he is susceptible to ecstasyrelated problems • Thinks that using ecstasy would result in serious consequences • Sees immediate benefits of non-use • Perceives an absence of barriers to action • Know how to resist influence (has selfefficacy) • Is reminded/supported (media campaigns, advice from others, etc.)

Social Learning Theory Person

Behaviour

Environment

Social Learning Theory Behaviour change is influenced by 1. Reciprocal determinism: person and environment continually interact ďƒ˜ change the environment to facilitate behaviour change

2. Expectations about outcomes of behaviour ďƒ˜ motivate person to adopt new behaviour by telling about benefits

Social Learning Theory 3. Behavioural capability: having knowledge and skills to perform a desired behaviour  train the person with skills 4. Self-efficacy: confidence in one’s ability to successfully perform a specific action  enhance confidence 5. Observational learning (modeling)

Problem Behaviour Theory • Problem behaviour is a result of a complex interaction of: – Personal factors (cognitions, attitudes and beliefs) – Physiological and genetic factors – Perceived environmental factors

• Drug use is perceived as functional, serving as a way to coping with: – Boredom – Social anxiety – Rejection – Gaining admission to a peer group

Problem Behaviour Theory (multilevel approach) 3 levels of analysis/behaviour change –Level of behaviour –Level of personality –Level of environment

Health is enhanced by: 1. Weakening or eliminating behaviours that compromise health 2. Strengthening/introducing behaviours that enhance health

Personality Approaches • Make adolescents realise the misperception to believe that benefits of drug use outweigh the risks • Believe there are alternative ways of coping with anxiety, establishing effective interpersonal relationships or achieving any other desired goal

Environmental Approaches 1. Factors aimed at resisting or avoiding health-compromising behaviour a. Reducing availability of ecstasy b. Media campaigns to discourage use c. Social and policy sanctions for drug-related activities

Environmental Approaches 2. Environmental supports for healthenhancing behaviours a. Positive peer relations b. Drug-free activities for adolescents c. Health/fitness programmes

An Integrated Approach to Prevention • Integrate 3 theories • Each theory suggests special areas of emphasis • HBM – identify personally oriented goals for intervention • SLT – teaching of appropriate skills (Assertiveness, stress management, & interpersonal communication to resist environmental pressures) • Problem behaviour theory – Person focused (skills building activities) – Environmentally focused

Ecstasy abuse prevention should: 1.

Eliminate or at least reduce to the greatest extent possible environmental influences promoting or facilitating use –

Decrease availability of ecstasy • Through law enforcement (raids, urine screening) • Having drug free night spots (“Drug Free Discos”) – Dialogue, persuasion of club owners and employees – City Council and police working together

– Reduce visibility of negative ecstasy-using role models – Increasing the visibility of attractive, high-status (nonecstasy role models) – Altering attitudes and social norms concerning acceptability of ecstasy use and abuse (laws, media campaigns)

2. Develop preventive intervention designed – To reduce susceptibility/vulnerability to the various environmental factors promoting ecstasy use – To reduce motivation to use ecstasy

Examples of Measures • Teaching of specific skills designed to resist social influences to use ecstasy (techniques for resisting peer pressure) • Making adolescents aware of sources of influence and skills to counter them

Examples of Measures • Enhance self-esteem, perceived control, self-confidence, selfsatisfaction, and assertiveness • Teach life skills (decision-making, goal setting, social skills, assertiveness) • Provide an array of general coping skills (anxiety reduction and problem solving)

Communication Programmes to Promote Behaviour Change Objectives of programme: – Inform – Change attitudes – Teach skills and specific steps on how to resist initiation of ecstasy use

Important Principles in Message Design • Be relevant (youth input) • Personalise the message • Be specific to the different target goups • Use emotional positive appeal • Be clear and simple • Be interesting

How to the Deliver Message?

What Media and Channel?

• Choice dependent on characteristics of target groups and objectives of the message – e.g. general public (TV/newspapers) – Night spot goers (use distribution methods close to the techno culture (posters, youth magazines, flyers, Tshirts, post cards, etc.)

– Peer education approach (mouth-to – mouth propaganda – Ecstasy outreach workers

Effective Prevention Strategy • Multiple components • Uses programme providers and delivery channels that efficiently reach target population • Provides ongoing intervention throughout the initiation of ecstasy use

3 Pronged Strategy • Monitoring • Control • Targeted Prevention