Impact Evaluation of Education Quality Improvement Programme in Tanzania: Endline Quantitative Technical Report, Volume II

Provider of PTP training (% schools):

EQUIP-T LANES

WEO and/or HT Other

The number of schools reporting that the PTP received on its roles and responsibilities from provider x in the last two years/all schools, expressed as a percentage.

Has EQUIP-T provided training on SCs, PTPs, grants and business plans for head teachers? (EQUIP-T input)

Head teacher received EQUIP-T training on SC roles and responsibilities (% head teachers)

Head teacher received EQUIP-T training on PTP roles and responsibilities (% head teachers)

Head teacher received EQUIP-T training on PTP grant 1 application and management (% head teachers)

Head teacher received EQUIP-T training on business plan development and income generation (% head teachers)

The number of head teachers reporting that they received training from EQUIP-T on SC roles and responsibilities in the last 4 years/all interviewed head teachers, expressed as a percentage.

The number of head teachers reporting that they received training from EQUIP-T on PTP roles and responsibilities in the last 4 years/all interviewed head teachers, expressed as a percentage.

The number of head teachers reporting that they received training from EQUIP-T on PTP grant 1 application and management in the last 4 years/all interviewed head teachers, expressed as a percentage.

The number of head teachers reporting that they received training from EQUIP-T on business plan development and income generation in the last 4 years/all interviewed head teachers, expressed as a percentage.

Has PTP capacity increased and are PTPs active? (EQUIP-T output)

Head teachers

The relevant period for midline is 20142015; and for endline 2016-2017.

Head teachers

Head teachers

Head teachers

Head teachers

Number of times PTP met in 2017 (mean) The average number of times the PTP met in 2017 Schools

PTP met at least four times in 2017 (% schools)

PTP did not meet in 2017 (% schools)

Number of male and female teacher members of the PTP (mean)

Number of male and female parent members of the PTP (mean)

Parents are members of the PTP (% parents of Standard 3 pupils)

Parents are aware that a PTP exists at the school (% parents of Standard 3 pupils)

Parents attended meetings to receive information about the PTP (% parents of Standard 3 pupils)

Head teachers reporting that role of PTP and SC in school is (% schools):

About the same

Somewhat different

Very different

The number of schools where PTP met at least four times in 2017/all schools with a PTP, expressed as a percentage. Schools

The number of schools where PTP did not hold any meetings in 2017/all schools with a PTP, expressed as a percentage. Schools

The average number of male and female teacher members of the PTP Schools

The average number of male and female parent members of the PTP Schools

The number of parents of Standard 3 pupils who report being members of the PTP/all interviewed parents of Standard 3 pupils, expressed as a percentage.

The number of parents of Standard 3 pupils who are aware of the existence of a PTP at the school /all interviewed parents of Standard 3 pupils, expressed as a percentage.

The number of parents of Standard 3 pupils who report attending any meeting that provides information about the PTP/all interviewed parents of Standard 3 pupils who are not members of the PTP, expressed as a percentage.

The number of head teachers reporting that the role of the PTP and SC in the school is about the same/somewhat different/very different/all interviewed head teachers, expressed as a percentage.

Has PTP taken action to improve education? (EQUIP-T intermediate outcome)

Parents of Standard 3 pupils

Parents of Standard 3 pupils

Parents of Standard 3 pupils

Head

teachers