2 minute read
Impact Evaluation of Education Quality Improvement Programme in Tanzania: Endline Quantitative Technical Report, Volume II
PTP / community engagement
Pupil welfare
School committee
Other
Parents only received written information from the school about their child’s academic progress in 2017 (% parents of Standard 3 pupils)
Parents only met with a teacher to receive information about their child’s academic progress in 2017 (% parents of Standard 3 pupils)
Parents received written information from the school and met with a teacher on their child’s academic progress in 2017 (% parents of Standard 3 pupils)
Parents did not receive written information from the school nor meet with a teacher on their child’s academic progress in 2017 (% parents of Standard 3 pupils)
The number parents reporting receiving written information from school about their child’s academic progress in 2017 but not meeting with a teacher/all interviewed parents of Standard 3 pupils, expressed as a percentage.
The number of parents reporting meeting with a teacher to receive information about their child’s academic progress in 2017 but not receiving written information from the school/all interviewed parents of Standard 3 pupils, expressed as a percentage.
The number of parents reporting receiving written information from the school and meeting with a teacher on their child’s academic progress in 2017/all interviewed parents of Standard 3 pupils, expressed as a percentage.
The number of parents reporting not receiving written information from the school nor meeting with a teacher on their child’s academic progress in 2017/all interviewed parents of Standard 3 pupils, expressed as a percentage.
Has EQUIP-T provided PTP grants (EQUIP-T input) and have PTP grants been spent? (EQUIP-T output)
School received PTP grant 1 (% schools)
School received correct amount of PTP grant 1 (% schools)
PTP grant 1 has been spent (% schools)
PTP grant 1 was spent on (% schools):
Infrastructure and furniture
Admin expenses
Pupil welfare
Teaching and learning
Extra-curricular
Other
The number of schools reporting receiving PTP grant 1/all schools, expressed as a percentage.
The number of schools reporting receiving the correct amount of PTP grant 1/all schools who received PTP grant 1, expressed as a percentage.
The number of schools reporting that they have spent the PTP grant 1/all schools, expressed as a percentage.
Parents of Standard 3 pupils
Parents of Standard 3 pupils
Parents of Standard 3 pupils
Parents of Standard 3 pupils
Head teachers
Head teachers
Head teachers
The correct amount is TZS 550,000 per grant
The number of schools reporting that the PTP grant 1 was spent on x/all schools, expressed as a percentage.
Has EQUIP-T provided IGA grants (EQUIP-T input) and have IGAs started? (EQUIP-T output)
School and community developed a business plan for IGA and submitted a proposal to EQUIP-T in 2016 or 2017 (% schools)
Type of IGA proposed (% schools):
Agriculture/horticulture
Livestock /livestock products
Trading/sales
The number of schools reporting that the school together with the community developed a business plan for income generating activities and submitted a proposal to EQUIP-T in 2016 or 2017/all schools, expressed as a percentage.
The number of schools reporting that the IGA proposed was type x/all schools, expressed as a percentage.
Head teachers
Head teachers
Head teachers
