The Village of Nikiti, An Inventory of Buildings and People by Ιason Koutsomitelis

FACULTY OF ENGINEERING SCIENCE RAYMOND LEMAIRE INTERNATIONAL CENTRE FOR CONSERVATION KASTEELPARK ARENBERG 1 â&#x20AC;&#x201C; POSTBUS 02431 3001 LEUVEN, BELGIUM

The Village of Nikiti, Greece;- An Inventory of Buildings and People Part I: The Analysis

Promoters:

Krista De Jonge Eleftheria Deltsou

Thesis to obtain the degree of Master of Science in Conservation of Monuments and Sites Presented by Iason Koutsomitelis

Leuven, June 2020

© Copyright KU Leuven Without written permission of the thesis supervisor and the author it is forbidden to reproduce or adapt in any form or by any means any part of this publication. Requests for obtaining the right to reproduce or utilize parts of this publication should be addressed to KU Leuven, RLICC, Kasteelpark Arenberg 1, B-3001 Heverlee (Belgium), +32-1632 17 48 or by email rlicc@kuleuven.be. A written permission of the thesis supervisor is also required to use the methods, products, schematics and programs described in this work for industrial or commercial use, and for submitting this publication in scientific contests.

Zonder voorafgaande schriftelijke toestemming van zowel de promoter als de auteur is overnemen, kopiëren, gebruiken of realiseren van deze uitgave of gedeelten ervan verboden. Voor aanvragen tot of informatie i.v.m. het overnemen en/of gebruik en/of realisatie van gedeelten uit deze publicatie, wend u tot de KU Leuven, RLICC, Kasteelpark Arenberg 1, B-3001 Heverlee (België), 32-16-32 17 48 of via e-mail rlicc@kuleuven.be. Voorafgaande schriftelijke toestemming van de promoter is eveneens vereist voor het aanwenden van de in deze masterproef beschreven (originele) methoden, producten, schakelingen en programma’s voor industrieel of commercieel nut en voor de inzending van deze publicatie ter deelname aan wetenschappelijke prijzen of wedstrijden.

Acknowledgements

This research is the result of a lot of work and effort during unprecedented circumstances

for the global history, which will make the year 2020 unique for more than one reasons. During the insecure months, watching the spread of a global pandemic and the enormous social changes it brings, this master thesis would have never been possible without the infinite help and support from certain people. Thus, I wish to express my gratitude and appreciation. First and foremost, to my promoter, prof. Krista De Jonge, for her endless support, trust and guidance since the beginning and for pointing me out new directions in the study of conservation. To my co-promoter, prof. Eleutheria Detsou, a fountain of knowledge for Nikiti, for her enormous help and support and for guiding me on the new path in the science of anthropology. To Dr. Ioakeim Papangelos, truly an authority in the history of Nikiti, for offering his time and knowledge. To Mr. Angelos Mantsios, Mr. Vasilis Papageorgiou, Mr. Dimitris Dimitros and Ms. Despina Giannoulidou for providing me with much needed information and knowledge. To Dr. Chang-Xue Shu for her interest in my thesis since the beginning. To the people who kindly offered their time to answer my questionnaires and trusted me with their opinions. To my fellow students in RLICC and my friends back home for always having my back. And finally, to all my parents and siblings for their everlasting patience and encouragement and to my mother, my biggest admirer and supporter.

Table of Contents

Introduction

Historical Analysis

Antiquity and Hellenistic period Roman period Early Christian period Byzantine period - The origin of Nikiti The last years of Byzantine control Early Ottoman period Late Ottoman period â&#x20AC;&#x201C; The revolutionary wars First half of the 20th c. Expansion in the years between 1900-1930 Evolution after WW2

15 15 17 17 21 21 25 26 27 30

Spatial Analysis

General Statement The subject

11 12

Macro scale Meso scale Micro scale

39 43 45

Legal Framework and Protection Status

Historic Locus

51 51 53 54

Individual buildings General Urban Plan Remarks

Building Inventory

Overview of traditional architecture in Chalkidiki Methodology and set up of the inventory Buildings Typologies Comments on the decoration Relation with the environment Types of interventions Degree of intervention State of Conservation Value Assessment Results Conclusions in view of the anthropological approach

57 62 62 64 64 65 65 66 66 68 76

Anthropocentric Approach-Questionnaires

Methodology Case no. 1 Case no. 2 Case no. 3 Case no. 4 Case no. 5

79 81 83 86 88 92

Epilogue 97 Bibliography 101 List of Figures 107 Apendix 109

Introduction

General Statement

The

question that should probably be asked first is why Nikiti was chosen as my thesis subject. What makes this particular village so special to dedicate my final work for my masterâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;s degree to it? Apart from the apparent personal connection because I have been visiting the area for more than twenty years, what makes the place worth paying attention to? The village is considered by many to be one of the most beautiful in the region of Chalkidiki. A region not particularly known for its rich building heritage, but more for the admittedly remarkable shoreline and beaches, which attract thousands of tourists every summer season as well as its peculiar shape on the map. Three peninsulas, known as legs, forming the shape of a hand in the Aegean Sea. For others, the fact that Nikiti has a historic core with so many traditional buildings and is not just another touristic settlement on a beautiful coastline still remains a mystery.

1. Neoclassical pediment on one of the houses in Nikiti.

All these are factors that make Nikiti special. Nikiti seems to be in the middle of constant interactions and contradictions between opposing processes. Interactions between the values of the old and the demands for the new, between the needs of the locals and those of the non-locals, between the importance of its building heritage and the significance of its touristic attractiveness. It is precisely these contradictions that make Nikiti such an interesting case in the setting of the region of Chalkidiki.

2. Fragment of a date-plate embedded in the wall after the restoration.

Nikiti is a large village with a historical background which can be traced back in the 14th century A.D. and a vigorous economic activity based both on tourism and

agriculture. A large part of what the locals call the Old village, an area that largely corresponds to the extent of the settlement before WWII, is under a protection status for its historical significance. With a short walk in the Old village one will be surprised by the large number of outstanding examples of the traditional architecture of mainland Greece. However, after closer observation one could also be negatively impressed by the number of large or small interventions that many of these buildings have undergone. In this case, a different type of contradiction emerges which concerns the buildings that are theoretically under the same protection and at a short distance from each other, but for various reasons, have been treated completely differently. Therefore, the role of the protection status is definitely in question and in this research it will be investigated. However, it is not enough to just deal with this. Obviously, there are factors that have been overlooked, parameters that have not been considered and could contribute to a more thorough analysis and a better understanding of the village. Through this thought process we arrive to the first level of the main objectives of this research, which is to investigate and try to comprehend, as much as possible, the processes and the sequence of actions that led to the current state of this traditional settlement and the buildings that compose it, to discover how this village was created, how it was structured and developed throughout the years, to perceive its present condition and ultimately, to have a better understanding of the village in multiple levels. As we move to the second level, in the

Iason Koutsomitelis

light of these observations, of the findings and the conclusions that will be drawn, thoughts and suggestions could be recorded regarding a series of difficulties and threats faced by the protected settlement of Nikiti, but mainly regarding the comparative advantages of the village and the opportunities that should not be missed. These could be elements of its future sustainable development which will be processed by experts in this specific field. The main tools used for this purpose were two. The first one was the creation of a complete and comprehensive inventory of all the important buildings (263 in total) in the Old village. The second tool was a more anthropocentric approach in order to record and include in the research the perspectives of those who are most connected with the village, namely the owners of the houses. This part was conducted with an indicative research with the help of questionnaires addressed to owners of houses in Nikiti. The inventory and the anthropocentric research are accompanied with a thorough historic analysis, a spatial analysis of Nikiti and its surrounding area as well as an overview of the current legislation on the protection of the village.

Master Thesis 2019/20

3. Detail of a map from 1745. Nikiti is indicated as Niquiti. 4. The location of Nikiti in Greece.

5. The entrance of the old parish church dedicated to the Assumption of Mary.

Historical Analysis

6. The engraved stone indicating the construction date of the new parish church of Nikiti.

7. The voting inscription dating from 200 B.C. found around Nikiti.

1. Αποστολίδης [Apostolidis], 1973, p. 11 2. ZέλλιουMαστοροκώστα [Zelliou-Mastorokosta], 2003, p. 209-210 3. Παπάγγελος [Papangelos], 2000, p. 14 4. Ηρόδοτος [Herodotus], 7.122.1 5. Παπάγγελος [Papangelos], 2013, p. 17 6. Παπάγγελος [Papangelos], 1981, p. 139 7. Παπάγγελος [Papangelos], 2013, p. 17 8. Σαμσάρης [Samsaris], 1984, p. 124 9. Ibid., p. 115 10. Παπάγγελος [Papangelos], 2000, p. 21

Antiquity and Hellenistic periods

another settlement were found. Finally, the most important remnants were found at Agios Georgios position, an area approximately 2 km south-east of the historical core of Nikiti. This particular settlement most probably began to form during the 3rd century B.C. and continued until the 6th century A.D7.

The

region of Chalkidiki and the area around Nikiti in particular, has been continuously inhabited since the prehistoric era, as evidenced by the numerous, either small or large, settlements found in the area. During the 8th century B.C., a large number of colonies from the ancient Greek citystates of Eretria and Chalkida were established in the region, followed by more during the 6th century B.C. The modern name of Chalkidiki derives from those colonies of Chalkida, although it was not used during the antiquity1 but it was given to the region by 19th century scholars. There is also the theory that the name derives from the many copper mines of the region (the word copper in Greek is χαλκός [xalkós]). Some of those mines were probably used until the 2nd millennium B.C2. During the Classical period, in the Sithonia peninsula, there were the cities of Galipsos, Parthenopolis(?), Toroni, Sarti and Siggos3. Galipsos (Γαληψός) in particular, a city mentioned by Herodotus4 , was located, according to Papangelos, on the costal position of Kastri, 4 km south of the modern village of Nikiti5 and it developed on top of an important prehistoric settlement. During that period, Galipsos was the most important settlement in the area around Nikiti. It was abandoned probably in the 6th century A.D6. There are also traces of important settlements of the Hellenistic period in the area close to Nikiti. In the position Anemomilos, 500 meters south of the historical core of Nikiti, there was a Hellenistic settlement, where a voting inscription roughly dating from 200 B.C. was found. To the west of Nikiti, in Kastamoniti position, traces of

Roman period During the Roman period, the area around Nikiti was under the control of the roman colony of Kassandreia (Iulia Augusta Cassandresis). A headstone of a local overlord of the roman colony was found around the village of Nikiti hinting that the area was in the zone of control of Kassandreia8. The roman colony in the Hellenistic city of Kassandreia was established in the second half of the 1st century B.C., during a period in which the interest of the Romans for the region of Chalkidiki was reignited, almost a century after the conquest of the region9. According to the limited archaeological research that took place in Chalkidiki, during the Roman times, the whole region was densely populated, with towns, settlements and individual estates10. In Sithonia and in the area around Nikiti, the Hellenistic settlement at Agios Georgios position

Iason Koutsomitelis

8. Map of Chalkidiki indicating locations mentioned in the historical analysis.

9. Map of Nikiti and its surroundings indicating locations mentioned in the historical analysis.

Master Thesis 2019/20

has continued to thrive during the Roman period as well. The name of that settlement remains unknown. According to Papangelos, it seems that the growth of this settlement was the main reason for the decline of the nearby town of Galipsos11. The settlement in Agios Georgios continued to exist until the Early Christian period. Many evidences from that period were found during the archaeological research. Between the 4th and the 5th centuries A.D., Christianity had spread throughout the region of Chalkidiki12, including the settlement in Agios Georgios.

Early Christian period

administrative centre18.

Many early Christian evidences were spotted and investigated by Papangelos around the village of Nikiti. Some of the most important were located at the Agios Georgios position, in the unnamed settlement mentioned above. Two early Christian basilicas have been discovered, along with a bathhouse and several graves.

10. Kastri location south of Nikiti. 11. The basilica of Sofronios in Agios Georgios position. 12. Early Christian basilica in Agios Georgios position.

11. Παπάγγελος [Papangelos], 1981, p. 139 12. Παπάγγελος [Papangelos], 2013, p. 17 13. Νικονάνος [Nikonanos], 1984, p. 133 14. Παπάγγελος [Papangelos], 2000, p. 24-25 15. Παπάγγελος [Papangelos], 2013, p. 17 16. Νικονάνος [Nikonanos], 1984, p. 131 17. Παπάγγελος [Papangelos], 2000, p. 27 18. Ibid., p. 101 19. Παπάγγελος [Papangelos], 1981, p. 139

The first basilica (Sofroniou basilica) dates from the first half of the 5th century A.D. and is richly decorated with intricate marble engravings and mosaics, that show a 11 very close artistic connection with Thessaloniki, the largest urban settlement close to the region of Chalkidiki13. On the floor there are five votive inscriptions, one of them referring to a bishop named Sofronios, thus the name of the basilica. It is the first reference to a bishop in the whole region of Chalkidiki14. The second basilica was a smaller cemetery church, built around the same period. On top of its ruins, in the 18th century A.D., the small church of St. George, Agios Geor- 12 gios, was constructed15. After their destruction, most probably by fire, both the basilicas were abandoned and never used again. There are two possible causes for the destruction, the first one being the invasion of the Huns in 540 A.D. that destroyed the settlement of Kassandreia and possibly the rest of the region. The second possible cause is an attack from the Avars and the Slavs in the end of the 6th century A.D16. Most of the early Christian monuments show signs of severe destruction dating from the late 6th century17. According to Papangelos, the settlement at the Agios Georgios position probably was the most important in the peninsula of Sithonia during the early Christian times and possibly a prominent ecclesiastical or/and

Byzantine period - The origin of Nikiti There are numerous evidences of settlements in the general area of Nikiti, however we cannot claim that there is continuity between those settlements and the modern village of Nikiti. Between the 6th and the late 13th century A.D. there is no information for the area19. The first evidence of Nikiti can be traced during the late Byzantine era, in the beginning of the 14th century A.D. During the Byzantine and later the Ottoman period the area of Chalkidiki was one of the main regions providing goods and resources to the monastic orders of Mt.

Iason Koutsomitelis

Athos. The area was organised as a steady base of economic production for the function of the monasteries, from the 10th century up until the start of the 20th century A.D20.

Turkish archive of 170524.

Today, the villages of Chalkidiki could be divided into 5 different categories according to the way and the time of their establishment21. Those categories are: i. Villages where uninterrupted continuity from cities-states of the antiquity can be traced. ii. Villages that already existed from the 9th and 10th century A.D. iii. Pre-existing villages which had fallen to the category of monastic states, Metochia (sing. Metochi). iv. Villages that started as farmer communities of monastic estates, Metochia, and after many years evolved into independent properties of the old monastic lands. v. Villages that were established by refugees from Asia Minor in the decade of the 1920s, after the exchange of populations between Greece and Turkey. The first 25 of those villages were established in monastic lands. Among others, the settlements that still bare the prefix “New” usually belong to this category. The term Metochi refers to land, an estate belonging to a monastery, outside of its immediate area of control, in which there is usually a small chapel and residence for those who cultivate this land. Metochion, in ecclesiastical terminology, is a branch of the Monastery to which it belongs. Nikiti is one of the villages that started as a Metochi of the Monastery of Xenophon. The name under which it first appears in the archives of the monastery is the “… land (=Metochi) of Neakitos…” (…γή του Νεακίτου όνομαζομένη…)22. At this point it is important to clarify the issue of the origin of the modern name of the village, in order to follow the rest of its history. According to Papangelos, the name of Nikiti does not come from the patron saint of the village, St. Nikitas. On the contrary, the correlation of the village with St. Nikitas happened much later, in the 19th century. The modern version of the name is coming from the evolution of the name Neakitos in the local dialect23. The first time we find the modern name of Nikiti is in a

Master Thesis 2019/20

According to Papangelos, the land of Neakitos has come into the ownership of the Monastery of Xenophon for the first time around 1089 and it remained in its possession until the last quarter of the 13th century A.D. After that and for a brief period of time, which ended before 1300 A.D., the land was bestowed to a keeper25. In 1300, we have the first inventory of the land owned by the monastery according to the Metochi of Neakitos belongs to the administration of the nearby village of Psalida. The settlement of Psalida was a village of the area, independent of the control of the Mt. Athos monasteries that, as it seems, existed already in the 11th century A.D26. The name Psalida also appears in documents of other monasteries of Mt. Athos, that date from 1023 to 133827. From 1300 onward the Metochi of Neakitos is growing continuously and by the time of the 1318 inventory of the lands held by the Monastery of Xenophon, the land of the Metochi has expanded by five times28. That rapid growth of the Metochi could be explained by various reasons, one of them being the activity of the Catalan Company in the early 14th century. During the late Byzantine period (12611453) the region of Chalkidiki underwent several invasions and raids. Up until the middle of the 14th century, the region was still under the control of the Byzantines. Between 1307 and 1309, the region was devastated by the raids of the Catalan mercenaries of the Byzantine emperor Andronikos B’, that used the area of Kassandreia, in the first peninsula of Chalkidiki, as a camp site29.

20. Κολοβός [Kolovos], 2000, vol. 1, p. 73

The raids of the Catalans in the northern regions of the modern-day Greece are considered among the most destructive. A very indicative example of the aggressiveness of the Catalan Company is their ef-

27. Αρσένης [Arsenis], 1970, p. 18

21. Παπάγγελος [Papangelos], 2014 22. Παπάγγελος [Papangelos], 1972, p. 305 23. Παπάγγελος [Papangelos], 1972, p. 314 24. Ibid., p. 303 25. Παπάγγελος [Papangelos], 2014, p. 186 26. Παπάγγελος [Papangelos], 2013, p. 17

28. Παπάγγελος [Papangelos], 2014, p. 186 29. Παπάγγελος [Papangelos], 1984, p. 204-205

13. Map of Sithonia depicting early Christian settlements.

1. Agramada 2. Brachoto 3. Amygdalouda 4. Kastamoniti 5. Pikrosykia 6. Agios Georgios 7. Kastri 8. Isl. of Kalogria

9. Agios Pavlos 10. Elia 11. Isl. Gelfos 12. Tripotamos 13. Grigoriatiko 14. Pitsakonisi 15. Spalathronisia 16. Toroni

17. Peristeronisi 18. Cave in Kofos 19. Episkopi 20. South of Sarti 21. Sarti 22. Panagia of Vourvourou 23. Agios Andreas 24. Zervos

25. Cemetery 26. Agios Isodoros 27. Peristeri 28. Mega Teixos 29. Palaifournos 30. Mytari Tower 31. Smardela 32. Cave of Karatziobali

Iason Koutsomitelis

14. The remains of the tower of Psalida.

fect on the nearby monastic orders of Mt. Athos, where, according to E. Koukou, out of the 300 monasteries and sketes (hermitages), only 25 survived30.

15. Sections of the tower of Psalida.

According to Papangelos, the village of Psalida was most certainly destroyed during that period and at least a part of its inhabitants moved to the nearby Metochi of Neakitos, thus increasing its size and land area31. The last time the village of Psalida is mentioned in a document is in 1320 and it would be safe to say that by that time Psalida had already been incorporated into the lands of the Metochi32. Today, the only traces of Psalida are the ruins of the tower. In 1318, we have the reference to the existence of inhabitants/farmers -a family of 4 members (the farmer, his wife and their two children33)- while in 1320 the number of families had already risen to 7, with a total number of 22 people. Finally, in 1338, 31 families and a population of 100 people were recorded and by that year it is clear that a tower had already been built in the Metochi. The first indirect mention of the tower can be found in the inventory of 1318, where a reference to a road connecting a tower with the area of Psalida in the south-east is made. In 1352, we have the first direct mention of the tower of Neakitos. As stated by Papangelos, the most possible date for the

Master Thesis 2019/20

construction of the tower is between the years 1300 and 131834. The presence of the tower and the sense of safety that it provided was an important factor for the creation of the small village around it. As for the location of the tower, it is almost certainly placed on the site of the new parish church of St. Nikitas, built in 1867. The oral traditions of the village mention a ruined tower on the site. Around the church, Papangelos has located the remains of a settlement and a cemetery from the byzantine era35.

30. Κούκου [Koukou], 1990, p. 83 31. Παπάγγελος [Papangelos], 2014, p. 186 32. Παπάγγελος [Papangelos], 1972, p. 314 33. Παπάγγελος [Papangelos], 2013, p. 17 34. Παπάγγελος [Papangelos], 2014, p. 188 35. Παπάγγελος [Papangelos], 2014, p. 188

16. Map on the base of Sithonia depicting the limits of the Metochi of Neakitos in 1318.

36. Νεράντζη-Βαρμάζη [Nerantzi-Varmazi], 1984 37. Νεράντζη-Βαρμάζη [Nerantzi-Varmazi], 1984, p. 193 38. Νεράντζη-Βαρμάζη [Nerantzi-Varmazi], 1984, p. 193-194 39. Κολοβός [Kolovos], 2000, vol. 1, p. 95 40. Oικονόμου [Oikonomou], 1995, p. 33

The last years of Byzantine control From the fourth quarter of the 14th century onwards and for the next decades, the Byzantine Empire was slowly losing control and the region of Chalkidiki was subjected to constant raids, conquests, and change of control. During the late Byzantine period, the interest of the various rulers is mostly concentrated in the monasteries of Mt. Athos. Many of the inhabitants are farmers in the estates and Metochia of the monasteries. Farming in the monastery estates during that period, was far more profitable, as the monasteries were under special declarations and tax exemptions. However, there are areas that were independent from the monastic authority and were individually farmed. As stated by Nerantzi-Varmazi, from the archives of Mt. Athos monasteries we can clearly see that the area in the 13th and up until the 15th century A.D. was mostly dependet and defined by the constant change of overlords and the presence of the monasteries of Mt. Athos36. In the decade between 1340 and 1350 there was another raid on the region of Chal-

kidiki, this time by Turkish pirates37. It is unclear, however, if the Metochi or by that time already the village of Neakitos was somehow affected by those raids. Between 1345 and 1423 the region’s authority status changed five times between the Byzantines, the Serbs, and the Ottomans. Finally, from 1423 and for the next five centuries, the region was under the control of the Ottoman Empire38.

Early Ottoman period It is unclear when and under which circumstance the village of Nikiti gained independence from the Monastery of Xenophon. However, according to Kolovos, in 1478 Nikiti was already part of a Timar (Τιμάριο), land granted as an estate by the Ottoman ruler to a subject as a reward for his services. In 1519, Nikiti along with the rest of the peninsula belonged to an even larger estate, called Hass (Χάσι)39. In general, during the Ottoman occupation, a policy of tolerance is practiced by the rulers and several “privileges” are granted to the Christian communities. Therefore, in Chalkidiki the population remains mostly Greek40. According to Kolovos, in Chalkidiki we do not observe drastic changes in

Iason Koutsomitelis

17. Settlements in Chalkidiki in the 15th 16th century.

Master Thesis 2019/20

Iason Koutsomitelis

Master Thesis 2019/20

the number of inhabited villages neither in the plains nor in the mountainous areas and the settlements of Muslim populations were quite limited and did not disturb the organisation of the villages established in the previous years41. During the 15th, 16th and 17th centuries A.D. the region seems to suffer by constant pirate raids and the shoreline remained mostly uninhabited. However, the early 16th century A.D. is a period of rapid growth of the population in the whole region42. During this time, Nikiti was the only village of the surrounding area that could be considered relative large, very close to the sea but still hidden from the shoreline43. Table. Changes in the population of Nikiti in the 15th and 16th centuries. (Κολοβός [Kolovos], 2000, vol. 2, p. 89).

18. The old parish church dedicated to the Assumption of Mary. 19. The new parish church dedicated to St. Nikitas. 41. Κολοβός [Kolovos], 2000, vol. 1, p. 83 and p. 99 42. Ibid., p. 98 and p. 106 43. Ibid., p. 111 44. Παπάγγελος [Papangelos], 2014, p. 188 45. Ibid., 2014, p. 189 46. Bellin, 1745 47. Κανατάς [Kanatas], 2000, p. 21 and p. 50 48. Χρυσανθίδης [Chrysanthidis], 1870, p. 16 49. Κανατάς [Kanatas], 2000, p. 18 & Βασδραβέλλης [Vasdravellis], 1963, p. 120 50. Παπάγγελος [Papangelos], 2014, p. 188 51. Παπάγγελος [Papangelos], 2013, p. 18 52. Βασδραβέλλης [Vasdravellis], 1963, p. 120 53. Παπάγγελος [Papangelos], 2013, p. 18 54. Urquhart, 1838, vol. II, p. 137 55. Ibid., p. 134-138

At the end of the 16th or in the beginning of the 17th century A.D., the old parish church was constructed. It is a building with multiple construction phases and, as it seems, the only part that survived from that period is the west segment of the middle aisle44. Today it is the cemetery church, dedicated to the Assumption of Mary. It was built on the same site of another building, which seems to be an older church from the 14th century45. A few fragments of the 14th century church has survived embedded in the cemetery walls. Some of the murals from the 16th-17th century A.D. still survive on the walls of the old parish church. In 1745, in a map created by Jacques-Nicolas Bellin for the French Ministère de la Marine the village is depicted under the name of Niquiti46.

Late Ottoman period – The revolutionary wars In 1821, Nikiti had around 700 inhabitants. Along with the rest of the region of Chalkidiki, Nikiti participated actively in the Greek revolutionary wars of 1821 against the Ottoman rule. However, the revolution in Chalkidiki failed and soon after, many of the villages of the region, including Nikiti, burned down completely. During this time, many of its inhabitants fled mainly to the

Sporades, a cluster of islands in the Aegean Sea. Some of their descendants can still be found even today47. Most probably, during the Greek revolution of 1821, along with the rest of the village, the old parish church was burned as well. It was repaired a few years later, but its size was no more sufficient for the needs of the village48. According to other sources the church was burnt down in 185449. At the end of the 19th century, the old parish church was burned once again and was rebuilt around 192050. After the war, an amnesty is issued, and up until 182751 the villagers slowly return to rebuild their destroyed homes and village. A second attempt for a revolution followed in 185452, which again ended with the destruction of the village. According to Papangelos though, the village was not destroyed then53. It is safe to state that after those two consecutive revolutionary wars, the remains of the village from the previous centuries are truly minimal. The wars were followed by a period of extensive reconstruction and the village started to grow fast. During the 19th century A.D., we have two very interesting cases of travellers that passed through Nikiti on their journey. The first one is David Urquhart, a Scottish diplomat and politician, who was actively involved in the politics of the Balkans and the Ottoman Empire during the early 19th century A.D. In 1838 he published a book titled Spirit of the East, in which he described his travels in Greece and Turkey from 1829. Many of the chapters are dedicated in Chalkidiki and Mt. Athos and he also briefly refers to the village of Nikiti itself, Niket as he calls it. He vividly describes the landscape and the forests that surrounded the village and makes an extensive mention to the beekeeping activities of the locals, which even until today remain a very important economic activity of Nikiti. In the village he found “…the ruins, or the remains of 280 houses…” which were”…fancifully placed around on the steep sides, or on the terraces, or concealed by orchards in the bottom of the chasm54.” Most probably those were remnants of houses destroyed during the revolution of 1821, though it is not clear. On top of the hill he finds the remains of a small enclosure around the “church”, apparently the old parish church, and seven marble columns55.

Iason Koutsomitelis

The next traveller who passed through Nikiti was Nikolaos Chrysanthidis, who in 1869 travelled in Chalkidiki, accompanying the former Metropolitan of Kassandreia, Chrysanthos. He described all the villages and metochia of the region, along with the monasteries of Mt. Athos, providing useful information for Chalkidiki of the late 19th century A.D. According to his writings, the village consisted of around 195 houses and it also had a “mutual learning” (Αλληλοδιδακτικόν) school. The plains between the village and the shoreline were rented to shepherds from the mountainous region, between September and March to pass the winter56. In 1867, the new parish church was constructed in the site of the old tower. The new church was devoted to St. Nikitas, but as we have already mentioned, the name of the village itself most probably does not derive from said Saint, as Chrysanthidis seems to believe57. As he also mentions, there was a great dispute in the community regarding the location of the new church. In the end, it was decided to build the church on the top of the hill, above the village, where it is located to this day. Funding for the construction of the church came from various sources such as the Monastery of Vatopaidi58 and other monasteries of Mt. Athos, from offerings of the people of Nikiti and the whole region of Chalkidiki and even from the renting of the land to the shepherds59. In 1888, the site was completed with the addition of the bel tower60. In 1870, the school was built next to the St. Nikitas church, with the support of the common fund of the community and the church61. Today, in the old school the Folklore Museum of Nikiti is housed. In 1900, according to a newspaper, the population of Nikiti was around 1000 Greek speaking people62 and in 1903, 110 students attended the school which was divided into 6 grades63. Nikiti remained primarily a Greek speaking Christian community throughout the Ottoman rule. In general, in the whole region of Chalkidiki the presence of Muslim communities was limited. In 1908, out of the 125 villages only 6, at the outskirts of the region, were inhabited by Muslims64.

Master Thesis 2019/20

20. The building of the School.

21. Fragments of an older structure embedded in the cemetery walls.

First half of the 20th c. Until that time, the development towards the see was minimal and the area between the village and the shoreline to the south was covered by forest. From that point onwards though, the village slowly started to grow to the south and outside of the valley. In 1912, and after the end of the Balkan Wars, the region of Chalkidiki and Nikiti became part of the modern state of Greece. At that time, Nikiti was a prosperous village with an economy based on agriculture and the production of honey and silk65. In 1914, a doctor named Papanikolaou, made a report on the health and living conditions in Chalkidiki. Among the villages that he visited was Nikiti. According to his findings, Nikiti was a village of around 240 houses, built on a wide but barren, rocky valley. The building of the school, that accommodated 170 students during that time, was found in good enough condition. The village had 2 different fountains, most probably the ones that we can still locate in the village but are not functional anymore. One of them had even pipes made of steel. What is quite interesting is his comment regarding the health conditions of the village. As in many areas in Chalkidiki, in Nikiti there were many cases of malaria. According to Papanikolaou, two were the main reasons for that: The proximity to

56. Χρυσανθίδης [Chrysanthidis], 1870, p. 15-18 57. Ibid., p. 17 58. Χιούτης [Hioutis], 2003, p. 126 59. Παπάγγελος [Papangelos], 2010, p. 203-204 & Χρυσανθίδης [Chrysanthidis], 1870, p. 17-18 60. Παπάγγελος [Papangelos], 2010, p. 206-207 61. Κανατάς [Kanatas], 2000, p. 23 62. Ibid., 2000, p. 24-25 63. ZέλλιουMαστοροκώστα [Zelliou-Mastorokosta], 1995, p. 321 64. Zεγκίνης [Zeginis], 1995, p. 191 65. Παπάγγελος [Papangelos], 2013, p. 18

22-25. The growth of Nikiti in the first decades of the 20th century.

a large swamp (10-15 km²) next to the sea and the presence of many stagnant waters in the village, due to the rough streets66.

66. ZέλλιουMαστοροκώστα [Zelliou-Mastorokosta], 2001, p. 307

Finally, in 1918 we have the first reference to a building on the shore. It was a simple shack built in front of a small wooden pier. Once a week, a ferry line connected Nikiti and other villages of Chalkidiki with the city of Thessaloniki67.

67. Κανατάς [Kanatas], 2000, p. 25 68. Παπάγγελος [Papangelos], 2000, p. 15 69. Κανατάς [Kanatas], 2000, p. 25 70. Ibid., p. 27 For more information regarding the night of the 5th of March check Μάντσιος [Mantsios], 2018 71. Παπάγγελος [Papangelos], 2010, p. 207 72. Γιαννουλίδου [Giannoulidou], 2006 73. Κανατάς [Kanatas], 2000

In 1920, the population of Nikiti increased to 133568 inhabitants and in 1930 the number of inhabitants was around 160069. Generally, the interwar period was another period of a significant expansion of the village. The great fires of 1925, which devastated the forests around Nikiti and the whole peninsula, and the strong earthquake of 1932 halted the constructions only for a short period of time. After 1933, the families affected by the earthquake started to reconstruct their homes. By that time, the village had already expanded outside the old historical core.

This period of growth and expansion ceases suddenly with the start of the Second World War, the German occupation and the Greek Civil War that followed. The population in 1940, at the beginning of the war was 1738 people. During the nights of March 5th and October 22nd, 1948, the village was the theatre of conflicts between the opposing sides of the civil war that resulted in the burning of several houses70 and of the interior of the new parish church of St. Nikitas71.

Expansion in the years between 1900-1930 Mapping the village in the first decades of the 20th century is very difficult as there is not much visual information available. However, with the aid from the research done by a local architect72 with information from Kanatas73, the expanding borders of the village between 1900 and 1930 can be roughly traced.

Iason Koutsomitelis

26. View of Nikiti in 1926. The buildings of the school and the church of St. Nikitas are visible on the back.

Master Thesis 2019/20

27. View of Nikiti, circa 1970. The new regional road is visible in the front.

Iason Koutsomitelis

28. View of Nikiti in 1938.

Master Thesis 2019/20

29. The seaside section of Nikiti, circa 1970.

Iason Koutsomitelis

Evolution after WW2 The shape of the village started to drastically change after the 1950s. The expansions of the previous decades, although very important, were relative limited. However, after the 1950s and 60s the expansion towards the south and along the shoreline was extensive and fast. During the 1970s the centre of life of the village had already moved from the old historical core towards the south. After the Second World War and especially after the end of the Greek Civil war in 1949, the village of Nikiti underwent a series of great changes in its size and extent. To examine the drastic evolution of the size of the village, I created a series of maps that were based on historical aerial photographs which I obtained from the archives of the Military Geographical Service. Five maps were created from these photographs, each corresponding to a different date, with a distance of about 10-20 years (1945, 1960, 1980, 1989 and 1997). The sixth map represents the current situation.

The comparison between those maps can lead to some interesting observations: i. In the 1945 map, we can clearly see the old historical core of the village and how the village had already started to slightly spread out, mainly along the road that connected the village with the shoreline. ii. By observing the waterways and the seasonal streams on the older maps, which were very clearly depicted on the aerial photos, we see that they overlap with almost all of the roads that lead to the shoreline today. The majority of the modern-day roads used to be waterways. It is no surprise that even in the latest years heavy seasonal rainfalls cause extensive flooding and damages in the village. iii. Up until 1960, the expansion of the village outside of the historical core was still quite limited. It was mostly along the shoreline and to the immediate south of the old regional road. In the following years, the expansion has spread along the main north-to-south road. iv. In 1980, the regional road had already been built. The remains of the old road are still in use as a side street. The regional road passing through Nikiti is the man artery for the rest of the peninsula and during the touristic season, the crossroad

Master Thesis 2019/20

30-34. Aerial photographs of Nikiti from 1945, 1960, 1980, 1989 and 1997. 35. Aerial view of Nikiti 32 in 2020.

is the cause of large-scale traffic issues. The construction of the new road was followed by further development along its sides. v. The development of the port and the marina started relatively late, in the beginning of the 2000s. Until then, the shoreline had only one dock. vi. Sometime by the end of the 90s, the coastline started to be adjusted and conformed into small bays divided by rocky jetties.

vii. After 1989, we see the creation of new roads in the old part of the village. Mainly new ways to bypass the old historical core. Around this period, we also observe the start of development on the hills, around the village. viii. On the map of 1989 we see the initial stages of the new expansionsâ&#x20AC;&#x2122; plan, based on a grid. However, as shown on the following maps, the grid plan was not widely followed and only a few segments of the village retain this plan -one part between the new and the old regional road and a slightly larger segment west of the main north-to-south road.

ix. Although the expansion of the village after 1960 was in general wide, we observe that in the last 20 years the development was considerably broader. Considering also that the country was in economic recession for the last 10 years, that development is condensed in a smaller period of time. The expansion of the road network was mostly done randomly, following old rural roads, expanding them to fill the gaps. x. Despite the extent and the density of the village today, there are still certain areas that remain completely empty from any kind of development, even in the centre of the settlement.

36-41. Maps based on the aerial photographs, depicting the growth of Nikiti from 1945 to 2020.

Iason Koutsomitelis

42. View of Nikiti from the North hilltop.

Master Thesis 2019/20

Spatial Analysis

Macro scale analysis Morphology of the peninsula Geographically, the region of Chalkidiki is a mountainous peninsula where the Aegean Sea is dividing the land into three very distinctive capes, the so called â&#x20AC;&#x153;legsâ&#x20AC;?. Those are the Kassandra peninsula, the Sithonia peninsula and the autonomous monastic region of Mount Athos. Nikiti is located in the base of the Sithonia peninsula, which is also organised as a municipality with the same name. The maximum length of the peninsula is about 47 km and the width ranges from 5-18 km. The land, for the most part, is mountainous and semi-mountainous and it is mostly occupied by the mountain range of Itamos (817 meters). The northern area of the peninsula is less steep covered mainly by lowlands and hills. The coastal areas in the beginning of the peninsula include mainly hilly areas with smooth slopes. Moving further to the south the terrain gets more rugged, interrupted by a series of large valleys, where most of the settlements of the area are located. Sithonia has no rivers and there are no streams that have water all year round. The rocky shorelines of the peninsula are interrupted by many, large and sandy beaches. The main feature of the peninsula are its forests, which cover most of the area. 43. The forests on Mt. Itamos. 44. The main settlements in Sithonia. 45. Important touristic areas in Sithonia. 46. Nature protection areas in Sithonia.

a protected nature reserve under the European network of Natura 2000. Furthermore, a large area around mount Itamos is designated as wildlife refuge, where hunting activities are forbidden.

Important settlements and tourism The whole region of Chalkidiki is relative sparsely populated and none of the settlements is larger than 10.000 people. The administrative centre and capital of the region is Polygyros and the largest city and port is Nea Moudania. In Sithonia there are only two settlements with more than 2000 inhabitants, Nikiti which is also the capital of the municipality and Neos Marmaras. All of the settlements are located next to or very close to the shoreline. However, during the holiday season the population of Chalkidiki is rapidly increasing. The region is the most popular touristic destination in northern Greece. In Sithonia there are numerous touristic facilities, from large resorts and hotels, family owned rooms to let and more than 10 organised camping areas. The shoreline and the beaches are the main touristic focus of the region.

Around the peninsula there is also a small number of islands, which are all completely uninhabited, except from Diaporos island, on which private holiday homes have been built. A very large part of the peninsula along with certain sections of the shoreline, a total area of 233,34 square kilometres, is 43

Iason Koutsomitelis

Master Thesis 2019/20

Iason Koutsomitelis

Master Thesis 2019/20

Meso scale analysis

Land uses

Morphology of Nikiti

As of the rest of the region, Nikiti is heavy oriented towards tourism development. The majority of the buildings in the newest part and close to the sea are dedicated to tourism, with hotels, rental rooms, restaurants, cafes and bars, which most of them are only operating during the holiday season. Along the regional road and the main street connecting the old part with the shoreline is the main commercial zone of Nikiti. The rest of the areas are dedicated to housing, both for the permanent residents and mostly for the seasonal inhabitants. The areas where the density of permanent inhabitants is larger are roughly between the heavily touristic coastal zone and the old core of Nikiti.

Nikiti was built in a valley between the hills of Tzironis and Kotsikas, largely hidden from the shoreline. Initially, the village was divided by two streams which today are mostly dry and covered by the local road network, resulting to flooding problems in the event of heavy rains. Moving to the south, the terrain gradually slopes towards the shore, without any significant height difference. In this relative flat area is where the village has rapidly expanded after the 1950s. As we have already seen, the area had a number of seasonal streams which today are covered by the parallel streets leading to the shoreline. The village is divided by the regional road, the main artery connecting the whole peninsula with the rest of the region.

47. Land uses in Nikiti.

Iason Koutsomitelis

Master Thesis 2019/20

Micro scale analysis We have already seen that the Old part of Nikiti is located in a valley with large altitude differences. As we observe on the maps, in the historical core of the village in the north, the houses are built densely and with no order in relatively small plots of lands. The buildings form a semicircle around the church and the school and most of the front facades are oriented towards the two roads that define the area. In terms of their interaction with other buildings, in this part of the village the houses are almost equally divided, with half of them being free standing and the rest being linearly organised in clusters of usually two or, rarely, three buildings.

48. Morphology of Nikiti and its surrounding area. 49. The Old part of Nikiti nestled between the hills of Tzironis (left) and Kotsikas (right).

Following the expansion towards the south, the houses follow the steep geomorphology of the area between the two hills and are organised in a more linear structure, still without any specific order. However, on the main street leading out of the village, the houses are clearly more organised and many of the facades are oriented towards the southwest. The majority of the buildings are free standing in slightly larger land plots.

Finally, in the last part of the survey area the valley is much wider and less steep and the land plots are getting larger. On the edges, the buildings are still following the smoother slopes of the two hills, while in the middle part they are mostly built without specific order. Exceptions are houses along the main street, which are built close to the road, with the main facade facing to the south and their side facade being parallel to the street. The vast majority of the buildings are free standing. The road network consists of few main streets, parallel to the contour lines that lead from the historical core out of the valley. We have seen already that many of those streets were also waterways for the seasonal streams. More streets, parallel to the main ones, are leading to the parts of the village that are on a higher level. The parallel streets are connected by smaller paths with no steady width, which snake around the houses in various directions. Many of those paths eventually are leading to dead ends. Later on, a new road that bypasses a large segment of the village and connects the church of St. Nikitas with the square of the Old Fountain was created. In the last few years, there was an effort to

Iason Koutsomitelis

remove the asphalt from the streets and pave them with slates, however the execution of the project and the materials that were used are debatable. The different elevations and the dense and disorganised structure of the village did not leave enough space for large public spaces. There are some open areas that could classify mostly as open plateaus rather than organised squares. From north to south those are: -The open area between the church of St. Nikitas (50) and the cemetery in the northern tip of the village. -The Old Square (51), where the two streets from St. Nikitas church merge and the centre of life of the historical core of Nikiti used to be. -The Horostasi square (52), west of the main road, that was used as a gathering point for celebrations and -The Old Fountain square (53) that, on some point during the 1920s, was the southern limit of the village and it is still one of the main crossroads of the old part.

50-53. The squares of Nikiti. 50

54. Relation between 51 built-unbuilt in the Old part. 55. The streets in relation with the building plots. 56. Relation of the buildings with their environment. 57. Hierarchy of the road network.

Master Thesis 2019/20

58. Squarespaces, streetviews (i-vi) and viewpoints (vii-xii) in 53 the Old part of Nikiti.

Master Thesis 2019/20

ii.

iii.

iv.

vi.

Iason Koutsomitelis

Master Thesis 2019/20

vii.

viii.

ix.

xi.

xii.

Legal Framework and Protection Status

Before we move on with the rest of the

chapters it is important to explain the legislation responsible for the protection of the village of Nikiti.

Historic Locus In 1987, the old part of Nikiti was declared Historic Locus/Site (Ιστορικός τόπος), in need of special protection from the state, because its “…urban structure and the architecture of it houses are remarkable and representative examples of the traditional architecture of Chalkidiki, of which it is one of the oldest villages.74” Historic Locus is either a piece of land or sea or lakes or rivers that have been (or there are indications of) events of extraordinary historical or mythical interest, or areas that contain (or there are indications of) monuments dating after 1830, or combined works of man and nature later dating after 1830. Those areas are characteristic and homogeneous spaces, which can be defined topographically, and whose protection is essential due to their folklore, ethnological, social, technical, architectural, industrial or in general historical, artistic or scientific significance75 .

74. ΥΠΠΟ/ ΔΙΛΑΠ/Γ/51809/3198 75. Ν. 3028/2002 76. https://www.culture. gov.gr/el/ministry/ SitePages/viewyphresia. aspx?iID=2047 77. Ν.Α. οικ./58779 78. N.A. οικ./Ε.Π.Α./1207 79. N. 4495

The agency responsible for the protection is the Department of Modern Monuments and Technical Works of Central Macedonia (former 4th Ephorate of Modern Monuments), under the jurisdiction of the Ministry of Culture. Among others, two of the main responsibilities of the department are the establishment of special terms for the construction and the uses around “monuments” and the approval of requests for interventions and changes in the uses in “monuments” and their immediate environment, as well as inside Historic Locus/Sites and the super-

vision of the respective projects carried out by third parties76. The declaration was followed in 1988 by the setup of the limits of the protection area77, which in 1991 was slightly expanded78. It was also accompanied by a table with very general architectural guidelines and rules (Δελτίο αρχιτεκτονικής αναγνώρισης). Those rules very roughly regulate the materials on the roofing, the facades and the window frames as well as the slope and the projection of the roof (which is obligatory). A translated copy can be found in the appendix. The maximum plot coverage and the size for any new houses is also regulated. This is the main legislation under which the village is protected. Apart from that, as mentioned above, for any new construction, restoration works or demolition of a building, inside the protection zone, an approval from the Department of Modern Monuments (the Ephorate) is required.

Individual buildings Furthermore, there are eleven buildings, both inside and outside of the protection zone, that are protected as individual buildings. Six of them are houses and the rest are three windmills, the School and the church of the Assumption. Not all of the individually protected buildings were able to be identified. For any intervention to be done in those buildings an extra approval is required. This approval is given by the Architectural Council of the region of Chalkidiki (Συμβούλιο Αρχιτεκτονικής, Σ.Α.), an agency of the Ministry of Environment and Energy. Approval from the Architectural Council can be also required for some other cases as well79.

Iason Koutsomitelis

Master Thesis 2019/20

General Urban Plan 59. Map depicting the General urban plan of Nikiti.

Finally, the Urban Planning Agency is also regulating the allowed functions inside the village and the surrounding areas. According to the General Urban Plan of Nikiti and the rest of the municipality of 2007/2008 the area inside the protection zone is designated as area of Pure Housing (Αμιγής Κατοικίας80). Inside an area of Pure Housing the only commercial uses allowed are those serving the daily needs of the area's residents, bakeries and hotels with maximum 30 beds. Note that according to this urban plan any food and beverages establishment are forbidden81. However, the legislation is not very clear on that part, something that has caused problems with establishments that have opened in the past. According to local rumours, which were not confirmed, an owner that proves that the establishment had a food and beverage function in the past, will be allowed to reopen it. But, according to the local architect’s office inside the protection zone those functions are forbidden and an approval from the Ephorate is required. The situation remains quite vague.

Under the same Urban Plan certain zones of Special Archaeological Site status are designated, where possibly after research, archaeological evidence will be found, as such the addition of those areas in the settlement’s limits is not recommended. Finally, an area of Architectural interest and Historical interest is proposed, not designated, that includes the Historic Locus protection zone and the area immediate to the south, until the limits of the old regional road. Those areas are only propositions and are not designated by any other law, thus they do not contribute to the protection.

60. Simplified diagram showing the legal procedures inside the protection zone of Nikiti.

80. Υ.Α. 52778 & Π.Α. 1660 81. Π.Δ. 59

Iason Koutsomitelis

Remarks At this point, I would like to point out the difficulty on collecting information, it was a time-consuming process, during which the responsible Department was not particularly helpful and the results were not really enlightening. After the preliminary research there were still several gaps in the understanding of the legal procedures that need to be followed for any kind of work or intervention in the village. The village has legislated protection, but on the same time someone can easily identify several cases of interventions that are obviously contradicting any sense of protection. Thus, for the clarification of the processes, I requested the help from a local architect’s office who have the experience and the knowledge from working in Nikiti. The legal procedures are presented in a simplified version in figure 60.

-The number of the required approvals and the overlapping jurisdictions along with the resistance and the unwillingness of the Ephorate have as a result extremely prolonged and sometimes costly procedures. -This is one reason that many times leads to unauthorized interventions on the buildings.

60-61. Tables showing the building restrictions inside the protection zone (Δελτίο αρχιτεκτονικής αναγνώρισης).

Some other important remarks that were made during this interview are: -The biggest concern of the Ephorate is changes made in the facades of the buildings. They are not concerned for changes in the interior of the buildings and they do not have the jurisdiction to oppose anything for that. -There is not a clear set of rules for the restoration projects. The creation of the plan for the restoration project is based on the judgement of the architect. The project always has to go through the approval of the Ephorate, which is responsible for the protection. -After the approval, the Ephorate never executes any follow-up checks. If a report is made by a citizen, the Urban Planning Agency is responsible to check. -Many of the interventions are unauthorized, without the required approvals or permits. However, and only after recent laws, in order for the owners to sell or transfer the ownership of the buildings, those interventions have to be legalized and for that an approval from the Ephorate is needed. The Ephorate can demand for changes to be made in that case.

60 62. The protection limits as described in the chapter.

-For interventions that were done before 1987 and the inscription of the protection, the approval from the Ephorate is not required, thus the interventions can remain as they are. -Many of the interventions in Nikiti still remain unauthorized and not legal.

Master Thesis 2019/20

Building Inventory

Overview of traditional architecture in Chalkidiki

es the second floor is made by wood. Usually the stone walls are tied by horizontal wooden beams. Wood is also used in the flooring of the second storey, the roof, the window frames, the staircases and the balconies. The inner walls are constructed with a wooden frame that usually is filled up with a mixture of mortar strengthened with straws and goat hair. This technique is called tsatmas84 (τσατμάς).

Traditional

architecture in Chalkidiki follows the same typologies and construction methods found in all regions of Northern Greece and the Balkans meaning the most basic form is a square volume82. However, in Chalkidiki as in all the other regions, there are certain typological particularities that differentiate traditional architecture in each region83. Construction materials used in Chalkidiki are mainly local stone and wood from the rich forests of the regions and Mt. Athos. Stone is used in the construction of the bearing elements, the outer walls, which often exceed 50-60 cm. in thickness. The stone walls usually reach the height of both floors of the houses, but in some cas-

63. Building with a triangular sahnisi/erker from Nikiti.

64-67. Sketches with different configurations of wide-front typology.

Regarding the typologies in the region of Chalkidiki, any kind of vernacular/traditional house can be found, from the small, one-floor one-space house to larger symmetric two-floor mansions. However, the predominant typology is the two-floor, wide-front plan house, with an internal or external steep staircase85. In terms of the division of functions, on the first floor usually there are storage areas, a stable

82. ZέλλιουMαστοροκώστα [Zelliou-Mastorokosta], 1990, p. 166 83. Many specific cases were also described by Zέλλιου-Mαστοροκώστα [Zelliou-Mastorokosta], 1990 84. Μουτσόπουλος [Moutsopoulos], 1979, p. 11 85. Ibid., p. 15

Iason Koutsomitelis

and areas for domestic animals and other functions related with the occupation of the owners and on the second floor are the domestic spaces86. One of the most common architectural features of the traditional houses in the region of Chalkidiki is the hagiati (best possible translation could be loggia), an important element of traditional architecture. It is a covered open-air space, typically facing to the south that acts as the connecting space between the rest of the rooms and as the main source of light and fresh air. In many cases the hagiati can protrudes as much as one meter from the volume of the building or it can be supported by wooden columns87. Many of the daily activities took place in the hagiati. Usually one, two or even three of the sides of the hagiati are open88. An additional common feature of the traditional architecture in the region is the sahnisi89 or erker. The erker is a wooden structure that is formed when the volume of the second floor is slightly larger than that of the first floor. A protrusion of the upper volume is formed then, usually but not always, parallel to the wall underneath, but it can form many shapes. The overhanging structure is supported by wooden trusses or beams. The erker was covering the need for extra room and was usually attached to the most prominent and formal room of the house90. Finally, another common feature, that can also replace the hagiati, is the wooden balcony. In this case, on both the first and the second floor, the plan of the house is a solid shape without niches or protrusions, formed by the outer stone walls. The balcony is a structure usually attached to the front facade and in many cases, it is also the landing of the external staircase. Most of the times the balcony is covered, either by an extension of the main roof or by a lower cover91. In general, a full typological catalogue of all the buildings in Chalkidiki can be quite challenging as in many cases the builders had to adjust to various difficulties and improvise in their building style. Thus, there are many cases that cannot be classified easily in a general typology. 68. Sketch of a building with balcony from Chalkidiki.

Master Thesis 2019/20

69. Sketch of a building with hagiati from Chalkidiki. 86. Μουτσόπουλος [Moutsopoulos], 1979, p. 15 87. Ibid., p. 27 88. ZέλλιουMαστοροκώστα [Zelliou-Mastorokosta], 1990, p. 175 89. For more information regarding the origin of the hagiati and the erker/ sahnisi in the traditional architecture in N. Greece and the Balkan region, Μουτσόπουλος [Moutsopoulos], 1993 90. Μουτσόπουλος [Moutsopoulos], 1979, p. 39 and ZέλλιουMαστοροκώστα [Zelliou-Mastorokosta], 1990, p. 184-186 91. Μουτσόπουλος [Moutsopoulos], 1979, p. 17 and 29 and ZέλλιουMαστοροκώστα [Zelliou-Mastorokosta], 1990, p. 179-181

Iason Koutsomitelis

Master Thesis 2019/20

70. The limits of the survey area (red) north of the old regional road (blue). 71. The six sectors of the survey area.

Iason Koutsomitelis

Methodology and set up of the inventory The survey was conducted in the area of the Old village, at the north side of the former regional road. The selected area includes the limits of the declared Historic Locus. However, the survey area was extended further south, in order to include buildings outside the protected zone and examine whether different behaviours are observed or if the existing limits of the protection are excluding buildings that should otherwise be protected. The limit of the survey area towards the south was set to be the old regional road. We know already that the extension of the village up until the 1960s was extremely limited south of the road, so there was no need to extend the survey area further to that direction. For the purpose of the thesis and for more practical reasons, the survey area was divided into 6 sectors. Three of the sectors are the subdivision of the Historic Locus area (sectors 1, 2 and 3). The rest of them are subdividing the area outside of the protection zone (sectors 4, 5 and 6). The limits of each sector are roughly following the main streets of the village. The sectors were created in order to facilitate the creation of the inventory, as well as for readers to locate the inscriptions more easily. Each building was given a registration number that also indicates in which sector it can be found. Finally, for each inscription the following information was included:

-Photographs -Location and coordinates -Building date (if possible, to easily identify) -Function -No. of floors -Specific comments on the decoration -Typology of the building -Relation of the building with the environment -Types of interventions and brief description -Degree of the interventions -State of conservation with brief justification -Value assessment

Master Thesis 2019/20

Buildings Typologies For the purpose of the thesis a number of typologies and their subdivisions were identified. All typologies derive from two initial and basic archetypes. Those are, Type A – square plan - and Type B – rectangular or wide-front plan. The rest of the typologies derive from those two archetypes with the addition of other morphological characteristics related with the traditional architecture. Those characteristics are the balcony, the hagiati and the sahnisi/erker. As explained in the previous chapter, traditional architecture in Chalkidiki, in terms of the structure and the morphology, is directly connected with the architecture of Northern Greece and the Balkan region in general. The development of the typologies for the thesis was based on information from the bibliography92 that was adjusted to the particular case of the village of Nikiti. The typological analysis of the surveyed buildings takes into accounts only the exterior characteristics and the volume and does not include elements of the interior configurations and interventions. Emphasis was given on looking at all the buildings of the survey area instead of only surveying a limited number of them in terms of both their external and internal morphology.

A Types: A: Square-plan building at all levels, in its simplest form. A1: Square-plan building at all levels, with a balcony. In some cases, we may find two or three balconies on the same or a different facade. A2: Square-plan building, with sahnisi/erker. A3: Square-plan building, with hagiati. A2.3: Mixed typology, square-plan building with erker and hagiati. A4: Siblings’ Split or double house typology, on a square-plan at all levels, with a balcony. The building is separated in the middle, occasionally at the time it was constructed but more often at a later stage on the occasion of separating the parental family house. The two sides were acquired by different members of the family, two brothers for example, and in most of cases, they develop independently93.

92. Μουτσόπουλος [Moutsopoulos], 1979, Μουτσόπουλος [Moutsopoulos], 1990, Μουτσόπουλος [Moutsopoulos], 1993 and Zέλλιου-Mαστοροκώστα [Zelliou-Mastorokosta], 1990 93. Μουτσόπουλος [Moutsopoulos], 1979, p. 18 and Zέλλιου-Mαστοροκώστα [Zelliou-Mastorokosta], 1990

72. Typology charts depicting the various typologies in Nikiti.

B Types: B: Wide-front plan building at all levels, with the entrance either on the long or the short facade. B1: Wide-front plan building at all levels, with a balcony. In some cases, we may find two or three balconies, on the same or a different facade. B2: Wide-front plan building, with erker. B3: Wide-front plan building, with hagiati, located centrally at the building or not. B2.3: Mixed typology, wide-front plan building with erker and hagiati. B4: Siblings’ Split or double house typology, on a wide-front plan at all levels. B4.1: Siblings’ Split typology, on a widefront plan, with balcony. The building is separated in the middle. In this case, two external staircases on the front facade are very common.

B4.3: Mixed typology, Siblings’ Split on a wide-front plan, with erker and one or two balconies. The building is separated in the middle.

Type C Finally, there is also Type C, which includes buildings that were used in the past or are still being used for agricultural purposes or for storage. Type C was selected in order to inventorise buildings that are connected with economic and agricultural activities of the village. Some of those activities, like bee-harvesting or olive oil production, are still important for the life of the village, while others, such as sericulture are no longer active. Those buildings are the remnants of those past activities and should be preserved.

B4.2: Siblings’ Split typology, on a widefront plan, with erker. The building is separated in the middle. Iason Koutsomitelis

Comments on the decoration The typologies explained before were based on the general form of their floor plan (square or rectangular), their basic configuration (single house or siblingsâ&#x20AC;&#x2122; split) and the presence or not of individual characteristics (balcony, etc). In terms of the decoration, the vast majority of the buildings follow what would be considered as the style of the traditional villages of northern Greece. However, in the case of Nikiti, we can observe certain examples of buildings that have been decorated with neoclassical elements, which more than often are associated with urban areas. As such, this information was included in the inventory as it could lead to interesting insights for the social development of the village. Another decorative element that can also be associated with neoclassical influences is the characteristic triangular pediment on the front facade. In many cases, in the centre of this pediment, the stone plate indicating the construction date can often be found.

73-74. Examples of buildings with neoclassical decorative elements.

Relation with the environment To goal was to collect information about the relation of the buildings with their immediate natural environment and, subsequently, examine what is the fabric and the structure of the village in general. The data acquired from this part of the inventory were combined with other information and have been used in the Micro Scale analysis of the village in the previous chapters. For the entries of the inventory, four different typologies were identified: Env. 1: Standalone buildings, that have the minimum interaction with their environment. They are located in a large or small flat piece of land (76). 76 Env. 2: Connected buildings, with at least one of their sides shared with another building (77).

75. Example of a building with triangular pediment.

Env. 3: Standalone buildings, that were built on a slope and take advantage of the height differences of the environment (78). Env. 4: Connected buildings that, at least one of their sides, is shared with an- 78 other building and were built on a slope (79).

Master Thesis 2019/20

76-79. Relation with the environment 79 typologies.

Types of interventions

Degree of intervention

A number of different interventions were identified in the majority of the surveyed buildings. However, most of those interventions could be categorised into some general groups. Those groups were the base in the development of the different types of intervention. The types are only referring to changes that were made on the exterior of the building and are visible from the outside. Interior changes have not been surveyed.

An evaluation system that determines the level of interference of the interventions on the building. It is based on the following criteria:

Each entry of the inventory, along with the type, is also accompanied with a brief description.

-How much the intervention has altered the basic characteristics of the buildingâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;s typology.

T.1: This category includes recent renovations as well as interventions that were done on the outer shell of the building including blocking of openings and windows, changes on the covering of the walls etc.

-How much do the materials and the construction techniques used for the intervention correspond to the original and traditional ones.

T.2: This type includes changes that have to do with the balconies of the buildings (replacement, extensions, alterations in the shape and size and reconstructions without appropriate use of materials) T.3: This category consists of interventions in the original volume of the buildings. Added rooms (small or large) and additions of extra volumes, with or without corresponding materials and forms.

-How extended is the intervention. Extra attention was given to interventions made on the front facade. -How intrusive is the intervention to the original volume and form of the building.

Each case is examined separately and, based on the previous criteria, is classified into five corresponding degrees. These are Low, Medium, High degree, ending up in the Severe degree of interventions to which the most serious cases belong. The last category is for the buildings with no obvious exterior interventions.

T.1+2: Buildings that, apart from interventions in the outer shell or renovation, have clear changes at the balcony and fall under both T.1 and T.2 categories. T.1+3: Buildings that fall under both T.1 and T.3 categories, having changes on the outer shell, renovation and visible added volumes of any kind. T.2+3: This type includes buildings that have interventions described in all the previous categories (mostly those in T.2 and T.3.). Alteration at the balcony, added volumes, renovation, changes on the walls, 80 etc.

80. Example of a Severe intervention.

81-83. Intervention typologies.

Iason Koutsomitelis

State of Conservation

Value Assessment

It is an evaluation system with the aim to determine the overall current status of the buildings. It is based on the combination of a series of criteria referring to:

This is the concluding evaluation system based on the combination of all the collected data for each building. All the buildings were classified into the scale of Low, Medium and High value. The criteria considered for the classification are:

-The types of intervention that have been identified on each building. This criterion is strongly connected with the degree of the identified types of intervention. -The degree of intervention that is strongly connected with the types of intervention. In general, a higher degree of invasive intervention, such us large extensions, would usually lead to a downgrade of the state of conservation. -The actual number of interventions on each building. -The percentage of the original structure that remains, to the extent that this can be identified. -The inhabitability conditions of the building. For example, if a building has collapsed to a degree that many of its characteristics are not recognizable anymore, it is automatically classified as Ruin. -The level of maintenance. A higher maintenance level will subsequently lead to a higher state of conservation. -The presence of other minor factors, mainly on the facades of the building, that could interfere with the aesthetic coherence of the building and would not classify as one of the previous types of intervention. Such factors could be satellite dishes and aerials, air-condition units, chimneys and other pipes and ducts, pergolas, etc. Each case was examined individually and was classified on one of the five corresponding levels. These levels are Excellent, Good, Adequate, Poor and Ruin, which, as it already has been mentioned, is reserved for collapsed buildings. Along with the classification, a short explanation for each building was also included in the inventory.

-The typology of the building and the density of the typology among the entries. Typologies which are quite rare among the rest in the village. Siblingsâ&#x20AC;&#x2122; Split typologies could also classify as of higher value, due to their rarity and the fact that they are proof of former social practices in the village. -The construction date of the building and in case this is not known, an estimate. Buildings that are proven to be older could classify as of higher value than others. -The presence of special decorative features such as elements of neoclassical decoration. -The state of conservation that has been determined for each building. This criterion was often related with the typology of the building, especially for the most commonly found typologies such us the B1. A building of excellent state could classify as of higher compared to another of the same typology with a poor state of conservation. -The location inside the village. Extra value could be given to a building located in the historical core of the village due to the association with an area of greater cultural and historical significance. -The function. This is a criterion with less significance as the prevailing function is housing. However, some exceptions in the function, especially related to the location or the construction date, could lead to higher value. -Other important morphological characteristics that were noted during the survey.

84. Example: Case no. 107 The house is maintained at a rather good level, however half of it is abandoned. Furthermore, high degree of interventions have been identified: on the balcony, addition of rooms on the front facade, as well as the presence of various intervening factors (antennas and pergolas). Accordingly, the building will classify as of Poor state of conservation. Also, the building belongs to a very rare typology: Siblings' Split A4. It is also located in the historical core of the village. Thus, it is of High value.

Master Thesis 2019/20

Results In total, the inventory consists of 263 entries, in an area of around 318,045.10 m²/31,80 hectares. Within the limits of the protected ‘Historic Locus’ area we have 193 entries while in the rest of the survey are there are 70 entries. All the entries can be found in Part II of the thesis.

Buildings’ Typologies In total: Out of the 263 buildings of the inventory, 94% of them were classified in to one of the typologies. Out of them, 42% were under one of the A types (square plan), 52% under the B types (wide-front plan) and 6% belong to the C typology. In the previous chapter we have seen that, according to the bibliography, one of the most common features in traditional architecture in Chalkidiki is the hagiati (loggia). However, in Nikiti, only 12% of the buildings belong to a typology with a hagiati. By far, the most common feature is the balcony, with 67% of the buildings having at least one and the least common feature is the sahnisi (erker) with only 6% of the buildings having one. 3% of the entries have more than one of the architectural features and a total of 11% are just simple volumes without any special feature. Finally, buildings belonging to one of the Siblings’ Split typologies are 11% of the total number. Protected/Unprotected zones: Regarding the difference between the protected and unprotected zone, we do not observe any significant variations in the findings with the following exceptions: Siblings’ Split buildings are by far less dense in the unprotected zone with only 3% vs. 15%. This does not seem to be related with the existence or the absence of the protection, but more with the construction date. We have already seen that almost the entire survey area outside the protection zone was inhabited later than the rest. The absence of many double house typologies most probably has to do with society changes and shifts in the social practices inside the family fabric.

Neoclassical decoration Quite similarly, cases of buildings with neoclassical elements in the decoration are very rare in Nikiti, only 3%. In terms of location, we mostly find them within the

Master Thesis 2019/20

protection zone, but not close to what is considered to be the old core of the village. This fact corresponds to their estimated building year which is in the interwar period and after the big earthquake of 1932, when the village started to expand further to the south. Neoclassical decoration is primarily considered a characteristic of urban environments and it is very rarely found in villages and rural areas. For Nikiti it could show strong connections with big urban centres in Greece or even abroad and also represents signs of social change and attempts of social mobility. It could also be related with the fact that Nikiti, after 1912, was not part of the Ottoman empire anymore, therefore the neoclassical influences could have a political background.

Number of floors The vast majority, 86%, of the buildings, have two floors, while the rest 12% have one floor and only 2% three floors. Half of the one floor buildings belong to the type C category, which is an expected fact for buildings that are mostly used as storage and for other farming activities. The rest are houses belonging to the A and B typologies. The vast majority of two-storey buildings corresponds to the typical configuration of traditional houses in the region of Chalkidiki that was established through the bibliography, with the first floor dedicated to spaces related with the occupation of the family and the second floor with the domestic area. Of course, those functions are not the same anymore, with the domestic areas extended to both floors, but there are a few exceptions, mainly in the case of buildings that still have shops -all of them empty- on the ground floor.

85. Buildings with neoclassical elements in the survey area. 86-91. Result maps from the inventory.

Types and Degree of interventions

State of Conservation

In total: Out of all the entries, 33% have undergone interventions that can classify as Severe or High (13% and 20% respectively), while 39% of them have interventions of Low degree. 23% of the buildings have undergone interventions which classify as Medium.

In total: In total, 28% of the entries classify as Excellent, 37% as Good, 18% as Adequate, 13% as Poor and only 4% of them are in a state of ruins.

However, it is very interesting that, whether the interventions classify as Severe, High, Medium or Low, 94% of all buildings have undergone some kind of intervention. In more details, 32% of them have an intervention related with the balconies, 20% have an addition of a room or other structure and 25% of them have both types of interventions. Out of the cases with Severe and High degree of interventions, 16% are related only with changes in the balconies, 33% with additions in the volume and in around 50% of the cases we observe both of the aforementioned interventions. The cases that could not be classified into any of the building typologies are either those who are in a state of ruin or because their interventions were so severe that it was not possible to recognise any typology. Buildings that belong to the “Siblings’ Split” typologies were found mostly with Low or Medium degree of intervention -with a percentage of 67%- while the rest belong in the High and Severe categories. Protected/Unprotected zones: 28% of the buildings in the protected zone have undergone interventions of a Severe and High degree. On the contrary, the corresponding percentage outside the limits of the protected area is 50%. The lack of protection clearly has an impact on the buildings. However, the distribution of the types of interventions in the two zones does not show significant variation from the grand total. Inside the protection area we have balcony interventions in 31% of the buildings, room additions and extensions in the 19% of them and both kind of interventions in the 23% of the buildings. The percentages in the unprotected area are 33%, 26% and 31% respectively.

It is worth mentioning though that, in the case of the “Siblings’ Split” typologies, 63% of them are in Excellent or Good state and only the 11% were found in Poor state of conservation and as for the very rare buildings with neoclassical decoration, we observe that 7 out of the 8 are found in Good or Excellent state of conservation. Protected/Unprotected zones: Buildings in an Excellent state are significantly more (34% vs. 13%) in the protected ‘Historic Locus’ zone. The buildings of Sector 1, which mostly corresponds to the old core of the village, are the ones that mainly contribute to this high performance (more than half are in an Excellent condition) However, the percentage of buildings in Adequate and Poor state inside the protection zone is 31% which is still rather high for a protected zone. The respective percentage in the unprotected zone is 40% which is also high.

Value Assessment In total: 40% of the buildings were found to be of High value, while 31% is of Medium value and the rest 29% of Low value. The vast majority of “Siblings’ Split” typologies, 78% of their total number, were classified as of high value. Similarly, 7 out of 8 of the buildings with neoclassical decoration are classified as of High value and only one, a small one-floor store, as Medium value. Protected/Unprotected zones: Inside the protection zone, 46% of the buildings are of High value –twice the respective percentage (23%) in the rest of the survey area. Buildings of Medium value category represent a 30% inside the protection and 34% outside, while for those of Low value the percentages are 25% and 43% respectively.

Iason Koutsomitelis

Conclusions in view of the anthropocentric approach From the results of the inventory, it is obvious that the majority of the buildings in the Historic Locus area are of High value. However, it is also clear that the value of the village is not necessarily limited within the strictly defined Historic Locus zone but it extends, with less density of course, further out. It is safe to claim though, that outside of the survey area and further south of the regional road the situation changes dramatically and there is no point to refer to an area but to individual buildings only. The state of conservation of the old buildings in the survey area is assessed mainly from Good to Adequate. The old part of Nikiti is not a perfectly preserved village -at least not in its full extent- as a significant proportion of all buildings has been subjected to some kind of intervention, ranking from a Low to a Severe degree. In fact, most of those interventions are obvious and distinct even by the eye of a non-expert. It should also be noted that, even inside the protected zone, the number of cases with Severe and High interventions remains quite high. At this point the question arises as to why this is happening. We have already identified the inefficiency of the laws and regulations, the bureaucratic procedures as well as the lack of clear guidelines and follow-up controls. These are parameters that undermine the effectiveness of the protection. But can we claim that this is the only problematic factor? Looking at the types of interventions in both the protected and unprotected zones, we observe that most of them concern changes in the balconies of the buildings which follow a pattern of extending and reconstructing them with new materials such as concrete. Some of them are done with care and attention using materials, like wood, that corresponds with the traditional practices but others with no consideration at all. A question worth exploring is whether these actions correspond to certain needs such as the need of extra space or the need of safer and more reliable structures, with less maintenance requirements or if the use of modern materials may also imply a social change. Changes involving additions of rooms or even extended structures in the main volume of the building are also very frequent.

Master Thesis 2019/20

These changes, more than often, are classified as of Severe or High degree of intervention. It would be interesting to investigate the uses of those extensions, the kind of needs that had to be met, the way they have been constructed, the reason they were not done differently, in a less invasive and impactful manner, coherent with the pre-existing structures. Many of the buildings are permanent residences while many other are used exclusively as summer houses, which means less space requirements and possibly more limited maintenance and care costs. To what extent this differentiation could be a possible explanation for the way in which the various changes in the houses took place but also for the severity with which they were applied? Could this be an explanation for the fact that there are houses that have been restored in an exemplary way, while in others the changes have been made in an aggressive way? In other words, the question that arises is to what extent the relationship of permanent residents with their homes has different characteristics from that of the seasonal ones and, ultimately, whether this is a factor affecting the state of the buildings. Finally, according to the research and the inventory, in Nikiti there are the cases of the Siblingsâ&#x20AC;&#x2122; Split typologies whose absence from the area outside the historical core of the village could be related mainly to a shift in the social practices rather than to changes in the field of legislation. However, what is of great interest is the fact that, in almost all cases of Siblingsâ&#x20AC;&#x2122; Split type, the two parts of the buildings evolved in a very different way, both in the field of their external decorative elements and in the interventions that have been made in them.

92. View on the interior of a destroyed house.

Anthropocentric Approach-Questionnaires

Methodology

In the process of this research and the cre-

ation of the full inventory of Nikiti, as an architect and a prospective professional in the field of heritage, I had to evaluate the degree of interventions on each building, its state of conservation and, ultimately, its value. The methodology I followed for this purpose has been explained in a previous stage and the analysis of the results of the inventory has already led to some questions and even to some speculations on the answers. We have already established the historical importance of Nikiti through the historical analysis. We have looked at the drastic spatial changes of the village over the last seven decades and the current situation in terms of the spatial structure of the village. Finally, with the creation of the complete inventory of the buildings, we have sufficiently perceived, not only the structure of the village, but also its most important elements, namely the houses and the buildings.

93. Family in front of a house with hagiati.

But what was missing was the understanding of the processes behind the actions that led to, for example, severe interventions or to a particular kind of intervention. The analysis of the inventory has left us with several questions that could reveal important aspects in the understanding of the village. Which were the needs, the reasons, and the explanations? What is the perpective of the people that are directly connected with a historical, protected settlement? Which is the profile of the owners and the inhabitants that are affected in multiple ways by the mere existence or the effectiveness of the protection and the way it is implemented? These are parameters that need to be

documented or, at least, noted, in order to fully comprehend the village of Nikiti and its values. Right from the beginning of this research, it was decided that one part of it would be focused on a more anthropocentric approach. What was surprising though is that it resulted to be more enlightening than anticipated.

Initial planning and changes Originally, the qualitative methodology was planned to be based on a series of interviews. After discussion with my co-promoter, the people related with houses in Nikiti’s Old village were separated into 2 different, general groups. The Nikitians, i.e. people who come from the village and the Non-Nikitians, i.e. those who do not. The two general groups were further divided into more groups according to the “relation” with their house. In more details, these groups are:

Nikitians

-Owns a dwelling and lives in it -Owns a dwelling and uses it for other purposes -Chose to leave the “Old” part and move to the “New” part -Chose to return to the “Old” part

Non-Nikitians

-Owns a dwelling and lives in it perma nently -Owns a dwelling and uses it as a sec ond home -Owns a dwelling and uses it only as a summer/vacation home -Foreigner that owns a dwelling and uses it as a summer/vacation home -Foreigner that owns a dwelling and uses it as a permanent home

Iason Koutsomitelis

Initially, I was planning to select one individual from each group and conduct an interview applying, as much as possible, tools used by anthropologists, in order to collect the information, I was looking for. However, the Covid-19 pandemic, the social distancing measures and, finally, the lockdown of the country in force from March 14th, proved to be big obstacles to overcome, as face-to-face communication between people has been prohibited and, even after the lift of the quarantine, it continued to be discouraged. Furthermore, as mentioned in previous chapters, the lockdown started right after the data collection for the inventory has been completed. The analysis of those data would, subsequently, lead to certain revisions as well. Thus, the original scheme that was submitted during the intermediate presentation had to be revised in order to accommodate to the new situation.

New methodology After discussions with both my promoters and their approval, a variation in the qualitative research methodology has been followed. In more details: -The information would be acquired in the form of distributed questionnaires and not through interviews. -The people to whom the questionnaires would be addressed would not necessarily be selected according to the groups previously presented. Instead, we decided to take advantage of our acquaintances from the village and refer to people that would be more willing to spend some time and give answers. -However, among those acquaintances, I decided to specifically choose cases of particular interest, due to their owners’ connection with the village and/or because the dwellings have characteristics that are particularly interesting in the village. All the people selected had different “relation” with the village, in order to somehow accommodate the initial plan that was based on the various categories of inhabitants/owners. In total, five different cases were chosen. -A general questionnaire was created, but for some cases it was adjusted accordingly, by removing irrelevant questions, or by adding new ones corresponding to each case.

Master Thesis 2019/20

-The questionnaires were completely anonymous and extra attention was given to avoid the connection between people and specific houses. It is important to clarify that, the sample for the questionnaires it is rather small and in no case constitutes a representative sample of the inhabitants of the village – the sample is strictly indicative of the variation of different practices and perceptions in the context of the old village. Therefore, the results from the questionnaires will not necessarily lead to safe conclusion. The results are five different narratives with the aim to explore an alternative opportunity in the development of an inventory of a traditional settlement, by creating a methodology for documenting the perceptions of the inhabitants. However, the development of the questionnaires and the analysis of the answers from the five selected cases will offer us a small hint on the social processes that took place in the village, both in the past and today, and, more importantly, on the impact that these practises had in the state and the preservation of the houses and the village.

(1931). The reason behind them was bare necessity; they were implemented due to the need for better living conditions. Already since it was built, the house had been divided into two separate apartments -one at each floor. The first floor was occupied by the parents-in law of the current owner; unavoidable since the house belonged to them. Consequently, the family of the current inhabitant was limited on the second floor that initially had only one room. In addition, the house had an external toilette, as it was very common at that time.

The case Case number 1 concerns a house outside of the protection zone but in close proximity to them. It is a two-storey building located in a medium sized plot. The house has major added extensions, to the extent that the original structure is no longer immediately recognisable. During the inventory process, these interventions were classified as Severe and the state of conservation has been found Poor. However, care has been taken to a certain degree so that the extensions would somehow integrate with the rest of the house. Regarding the profile of the owner, the house is permanently inhabited, for more than forty years, by a widowed person, close to the retirement age, functioning as a primary residence. This person does not originate from Nikiti and its family has inherited the house from the spouse’s parents who were from the village.

Observations I have already mentioned that the house has undergone extensive intervention. What is really surprising though is that these changes have been applied in accordance with all the necessary procedures. The plans were made by architects, following all the required legal processes and the works have not been done by the owners themselves, unlike what I have initially expected. Besides, according to the current owner, the neighbours repeatedly called upon the police without reason as “nothing bad or wrong” was done. The changes were made in 1985, around 50 years after the original house has been built

During a period of 50 years the needs have changed and increased. Using the words of the current owner, “…we needed more space. Where would we stay, where would the kids stay, where would a guest stay? ...” No matter how the changes were done, eventually the additional needs of the current owner’s family were covered by the construction of the extension. One of the main and urgent needs was the toilet –the pre-existing external toilette has been demolished due to the widening of the road, in the mid-1980s. Despite the fact that the changes were done following the legal procedures and according to plans made by architects, I still classify them as highly invasive, given that a very large segment of the original structure is completely covered by the extension. We could assume that local architects during the 80s had a very different perspective regarding the value of a traditional house located in a traditional settlement. It is quite clear that the main goal was to meet the needs of the owners rather than the preservation and protection of the original form of the house. As mentioned by the owner, the old houses were not appreciated. People preferred to leave them crumble and fall down in order to build new structures. “…they didn’t know then that tourists would come and show interest in them...” The perception of what is a traditional house and the question regarding the appearance of a traditional house should have, is another interesting point. Currently, the outer stone walls of the house are plastered. As it turned out, originally they were uncovered. Once again, I refer to the words of the owner when asked about this: “… back then nobody cared about the stones. It is only in the last 20 years that people went crazy about them. 50 years ago, they weren’t interested in them, they didn’t

Iason Koutsomitelis

like them. Even if the walls were not plastered, they would whitewash them, so that they would appear clean…” The house was originally built in 1931, without covering on the outer walls. The association of white walls with cleanliness is not really a surprise, although in the traditional architecture of northern Greece it does not really exist as it does in other parts of Greece (e.g. traditional architecture of the Cyclades). It seems, though, that back in 1985 it definitely did and, in this case, obviously this view remains active up until today. The owner mentioned that the only further change planned for the future is to repaint the outer walls white, to be “… bright and clean.” To sum up, 35 to 40 years ago, traditional houses were undesirable by the locals. They had no interest in them. Back then, elements such as the exposed stone walls which today are primarily associated with the traditional architecture of the area and are highly appreciated and preferred, were treated as a nuisance and were concealed. It is also interesting that the perception of the locals about their homes has gradually started to be influenced and began to change mainly due to the interest shown by others in them. Practically, it seems that the changing approach is not really related to the mindset of the locals, rather to an external factor, namely the tourists/ foreigners. It should be noted that, in many answers given by the owner, family and economic issues were often mentioned. First of all, the house has not been sold, although there were thoughts and plans to move to a land plot in the new part of the village. Those plans were abandoned due to family issues and instead the extension of the old house was decided and built. The answer to the question whether things could have been done differently was clear. Yes, because “…this one here never ended up being a proper house…” and "Land plots were very cheap back then and building a new house with a shop on the ground floor would be a better option..." On the one hand, although the extension was necessary in order to meet their needs, in the end it created further issues. On the other hand, staying in the old house and extend it was a bad investment; in other words, it was not worth it.

Master Thesis 2019/20

The last interesting point is the opinion of the owner regarding the protection of the village. The owner is aware of the fact that the house is not inside the protection zone –it is located right next to its limitsbut also acknowledges the significance of the protection and has no objection to it. To quote, “…a law that comes out should be implemented…” However, the financial issue seems to be the problem here as well. According to the owner, the authorities do not show understanding for the fact that the old traditional houses are costly and demand expenses while the people from the villages face economic problems. “Words and computers are easy”. In my opinion, a very important parameter arises at this point. There is no doubt that an old traditional house represents a high cost for its permanent resident. The importance of retaining the traditional houses is in a sense recognised by the owner, probably without knowing the exact reasons. However, this issue seems to be very much intertwined with the economic factor and the concurrent absence of support and understanding from the authorities. It is a correlation that has been identified already since the beginning of the research -in the sector of the legal framework analysis- and it does not really surprise me. It is important though that this view is also expressed by those directly related. It would be also interesting to watch if and how it is commented by the rest of the cases.

in order to cover the family needs of the current owner’s father, a significant number of changes have been done. The hagiaiti was closed off to create extra rooms, inside the house the kitchen was moved to another space, a new toilet was built, and two new balconies were added on the front and side facades. Those changes were approximately dated by the current owner around 1955. Once again, we observe a similar pattern as in case no. 1. A junior member of the paternal family starts his own family, the living standards change and new needs emerge. Eventually those needs lead to extensive expansions of the house, to the detriment of its original appearance and form.

The case Case number 2 is completely different. It concerns a residence inside the protection zone, in the historical core of the village. It is a two-storey building, with commercial spaces on the first floor. The house is limited on the second floor. At the moment and for the last 10-15 years the building is not inhabited, and its state of conservation is classified as Poor. Moreover, several highly invasive interventions were detected on its facades, to a degree that its typology could not be easily identified. The current owner is a local, born in Nikiti, who grew up in this particular property, currently splitting his/her time between Nikiti and Athens. The house was an inheritance from the parents of the owner. As it turns out from the questionnaire, the building is a case of Siblings’ Split typology, although this is certainly not obvious anymore. The two halves belonged to two different families that were not related in any way. The questionnaire was focused on the house which is located in the one part of the building and in this case some extra questions related to the future of the houses were also added.

Observations Regarding the obvious changes on the outside of the house, as stated by the owner, it was built around 1900, with some reservation, as a date plate was not found. Date and ownership plates were a very common practice during that period and in many houses they are still evident on the facades. The house originally had “…the appearance of the traditional ones, with a ‘hagiati’/loggia in the front.” However, at a later stage,

In this case though, there is a key difference. The changes did not follow any plans made by an engineer or an architect. To quote the owner, “…It was improvised architecture. There were only craftsmen, no engineers. They had some space there and they said let’s build it and create a new room…”. The processes were simpler and more direct but the values of the traditional architecture as we appreciate them today did not exist in any way. As mentioned in the beginning, the first floor of the building was occupied by commercial uses -a tailor shop and a traditional coffeehouse, which was described as “historical” by the owner. At this point, a very interesting matter emerges which was pointed out by the owner when asked about the difficulties of living in an old village. Unlike the situation today where the old part of the village is primarily a place of residence, the main street of the village had many shops such as groceries, a bakery, a barbershop, a blacksmith workshop etc. According to the owner, the absence of services of this kind in the village is very apparent. And it is true that, in the recent years, the only efforts to revitalize the old core of the village were done by individuals in the form of night bars -often moving on the fringes of the law. The importance that the shops and functions of the past bare for the owner is also reflected on his/her future plans to restore the building and use it again as a residence for private use. But most importantly, to restore the uses of the past on the first floor -especially the old coffeehouse, which has a significant historical value.

Iason Koutsomitelis

At this point, a significant parameter is revealed by what the interviewee states. It regards a misconception on the issue of the preservation of a historical settlement, according which, preserving automatically means stripping a place from any function other than residences. In reality, the aim should not be to create a lifeless and empty environment with limited uses that prevents people from inhabit them and function them. On the contrary, the inclusion of social functions is equally important to successfully protect a historic area. Finally, we arrive to the last segment of the questionnaire which is mainly related to the protection services and authorities. The owner’s answer was very clear supporting the protection status of the village and highlighting it as a very positive aspect. “Fortunately, there is a kind of protection and not everyone does what they want.” However, on the same time, two issues related to the authorities are posed. The first problem is that meddling with the protection services usually results to overcomplicated procedures as quite often the people in charge are “… a bit strict and not very open-minded…” with their decisions. I n this case the interviewee is mentioning the Urban Plan Agency and not the Ephorate of Modern Monuments which is actually responsible for those decisions. Once again, the complexity and inefficiency of the protection services is indicated. Second, once again a hint is made on how costly the restoration of an old house could be.

94. Dating plate of a traditional house.

Master Thesis 2019/20

Iason Koutsomitelis

the front facade. The new staircase was leading to a new and extended concrete balcony that replaced the old wooden one. The main entrance of the house was moved from the first floor to the upper one, at the balcony door. Halfway, climbing the stair, on the middle landing, a toilet was built. Finally, the outer walls were plastered, as “… that was the fashion back then…”

The case Case no. 3 concerns once again a building located inside the protection zone and very close to an area that used to be the centre of the village of Nikiti before its expansion to the south. It is a two-storey house that dates from the 1930s and was built by the grandparents of the current owner. The house has been recently renovated in an exemplary manner which is obvious and has been noted in the inventory, even before it was selected as one of the case studies. The building is found to be of an Excellent state of conservation. The current owner was born and raised in Nikiti and is a permanent resident of the village, however not a permanent resident of the case house.

Observations Regarding the changes that have taken place at the house, there have been three consecutive phases. The house was initially built around 1930. On the first floor, there was a small room, storage space and a stable on the back, in a smaller, semi-separated structure. The upper floor was the residence with two rooms and a small kitchen. The two floors were connected with an internal staircase. In general, the house was built with the very typical configuration of the storage and work area of the family located on the first floor and the residence on the second floor. Between 1960-1970, the house went under a series of changes, that were described in detail by the current owner. The internal staircase was removed and instead a new concrete one was built at the outside, on

Master Thesis 2019/20

When asked for the reason behind these changes, the answer followed a similar explanation as in the previous cases. Changes in the needs; the grandparents probably wanted to facilitate their everyday life as they were getting older. The old, interior staircase was dark and steep, there was a need for extra space in the kitchen that was too small and an easier access to the toilet was necessary. We can observe that, once again, similar needs as in the previous cases emerged during roughly the same period in time. It is interesting to point out that we observe analogous changes in a plethora of cases throughout the village, both inside and outside of the protection zone. The replacement of a balcony with a new concrete structure and the addition of a staircase at the outside is one of the most common type of intervention. Likewise, the reference to the plastering of the walls as a fashionable move has already come up in other cases as well. By following the three cases that were analysed so far we could, with extra caution, come to the conclusion that many of the interventions that were included in the inventory were made before the protection status was even established, in 1987. In fact, one could argue that it was those interventions that initiated the effort for the enactment of some kind of protection at the first place. Moving to the third phase of the building and the changes realised by the current owner. The house has been restored in its original form, under the guidance of an architect who was experienced in the restoration of buildings in Chalkidiki. As mentioned above, the restoration of the house, in my opinion, is an exemplary sample in Nikiti. All the additions from the 1960s were removed, the structure was consolidated with minimum invasive techniques and the stable from the back, that had already collapsed, was rebuilt according to the original form.

Quoting the owner, the reason behind such meticulous restoration was “… a lot of personal motivation, interest and passion in restoring our old house.”

their house, but even they admit that to do so “…a great deal of money was spent...” and by following all the legal processes the whole project took several years to finish.

Here, I would like to call the attention in the different opinions for the value of the old house, between the owner and their parents -two consecutive generations of locals. After the grandparents died, the owner’s father wanted to “get rid” of the house and sell it. It was a burden, “… a ruin that wasn’t worth the money or the effort to fix it and it would be better to build a new one instead.”

We arrive to the final remarks that have to do mainly with the protection, the authorities and the legal procedures. There is a general disappointment from the owner’s part about the protection status. Once again, as in the previous cases, the importance of the protection status is highlighted. “There should be rules to preserve the cultural identity of the area…” and those should certainly be stricter.

However, the current owner, with the active endorsement of the spouse, followed a completely different path and decided to restore the house. We have the narrative of a very similar mindset as in case no. 1. Back then, the locals had no interest or respect even for their old houses and their concern was to sell them and move to newer, more modern houses. But today, the next generation of locals, the owners of case no. 3 in particular, have a completely different opinion regarding the values of their old houses. Certainly, we cannot claim that this is a general behaviour that can be traced to all the members of the youngest generations of locals. Let us also not forget the significant role of the spouse, who is a non-local and the one that initially ignited the interest in restoring the old house.

Besides the fact that for the first time, there is a mention of a cultural identity of the area, according to the owner, the whole procedure is a complete chaos. The protection authorities gave them only a set of rules to follow during the restoration, they made an initial visit on site before the start of the works and then they never appeared again. In reality, as mentioned by the interviewee, nobody abides by the rules and if you want to do a good job restoring your house you have to rely on your personal interest and care. Some very specific examples, which are explained bellow, were stated as well to confirm that opinion.

The significance of non-locals in the preservation of the village came back in the discussion following the question regarding the protection status. According to the owner, during the 70s and the 80s, the majority of the locals were abandoning the old village for the new developing zone in the south and they were selling the old houses extremely cheap. It was then when, mainly Germans, discovered the village, started buying the old houses and restore them, slowly forming a small community. They were the first ones who paid attention to them and now “… you see their houses and you envy them. They appreciated them more than those who had them before.”

One of the aforementioned rules is that solar water heaters are forbidden, especially on visible parts of the house. Thus, the owner decided to install a new type of heater which the main parts are not visible and disturbing. However, as it was pointed out and as I personally could tell after conducting the inventory, it is very obvious that there are numerous cases of big and bulky solar heaters installed on the exact spots where it is forbidden. Another rule is that the chimneys should always be restored according to the originals, as they are a characteristic of the local architecture. However, there is no additional information available to people wishing to restore their house on how that should be done; the authorities do not have a knowhow, not even an archive or a record explaining it.

Moving to a different topic, that of the cost of living in an old house. The difference in the economic background is an important factor. Not many have the luxury of inevitably spending a considerable amount of money, time and resources in restoring an old house, especially when it is not even the primary residence. In this case, the owners followed their passion in restoring

Those statements from the owner support what has already been analysed in the legal protection chapter before. The rules implied by the protection status are quite vague and much of the is based on the judgement and the individual effort of the owner and the architect in charge of the project and with the role of the responsible authorities being limited in only accepting

Iason Koutsomitelis

or rejecting the plan. Once again, we come to the same conclusion. The problem is not the absence of regulations. The problem is the inefficiency and the negligence of the authorities imposing those regulations as well as the subsequent lack of interest and responsibility from the inhabitants. Quoting the owner one last time, “…there is no [collective] vision and everything is based on the individuals’ interest. It cannot all be blindfolded [actions]”

The Case This case is particularly interesting, not only for the building which it is connected with but also for the opinions expressed by the owner which, to a significant extent, contradict those recorded in the previous cases. The building is inside the zone of protection, close to the old central square of the village. It is a two-floor building, built around 1925, with stores on the first floor and houses on the second floor. The building follows a Siblings’ split typology, with two separated parts under the same roof. The two families are not related to each other and the two parts of the building are completely individual. Furthermore, it is one of the few that were built with neoclassical elements on the decoration. The questionnaire was addressed to the owner of one of the two parts of the house. The owner is a seasonal inhabitant, mostly during the summer and Easter holidays, that was born and lived in Nikiti for a few years. The house and the store located on the first floor were inherited from the owner’s father, who had built the house. During the survey for the inventory, the entire building was classified as of a Good state of conservation, although some interventions were detected, mostly on one of the parts and on the back facade.

Observations In this particular case the answers can be grouped into two axes. Those that are related with the morphology of the house -which are the fewest- and those which have to do with the inconvenience caused by the protection regulations. I will start the analysis with first group of answers.

Master Thesis 2019/20

According to the owner, the reason behind the Siblings’ Split typology is that the land plot was originally inherited by two different people that both were in need for a new house. The plot was too small for two separated structures to fit; thus, the building was built with two, separated between them, parts. So, the house was not actually split between siblings and the two parts were and continue to be completely autonomous. The split is even more obvious by the fact that the decorative elements of the two parts are quite different from each other. It is still unclear if the two parts were built at different times or if the entire building was constructed at the same time. The owner could not give a definite answer on that. Still, in my opinion, the two parts were built at the same time. Furthermore, according to the owner, the building, unlike the majority of the rest, is not constructed with stone but with bricks. As for the neoclassical decoration, we have already mentioned that those houses are very rare in the village and were built during the interwar period. The decoration along with the construction materials are both methods that, back in their time, would be considered quite advanced. At this point, a very interesting narrative from the owner could help to identify the reason why a neoclassical house would be built in Nikiti: The owner’s father was married a second time, and the new wife was from one of the most prominent families of the village. Her desire for more “amenities” could be the reason that pushed for more innovative and contemporary approaches in the construction of the house. Quoting again, “… at one point, our house was the most modern in the village, because [it] had the kitchen and the toilet upstairs (however, still outside, in the balcony), when all the rest didn’t. It was the only house with shutters on the windows.” This is still only a narrative and should be perceived carefully. Obviously, the owner has a sense of superiority coming from the “many modern” amenities of the house, regardless of whether they actually existed or not and how significant those amenities actually were. We get a hint thought, on how a change in the socio-economic status could be a stimulating factor for the inclusion of a series of innovations in the construction of a house.

Regarding the protection status of the village, for the first time we have an absolute depreciation of the protection status as completely unnecessary. The answer to the question about the difficulties in living in a traditional village was clear. All the problems derive from the protection status as “…they aren’t letting us do anything.” And the main difficulty, that was repeated in many answers of the questionnaire, was the restrictions on renting and using the stores on the first floor. As stated by the owner, this is the main reason that led to the emptiness of the old village. The issues of the empty stores and the seclusion of the Old part of village from the rest have already been mentioned in other cases, and it is seems to be widely held argument. However, in this particular case, invoking this problem as an excuse, the whole purpose of the protection status is completely disregarded as a burden and the cause of most difficulties. The protection status is not even considered a factor that helped in the preservation of the village. “The village is preserved; the old houses are getting fixed and nothing has changed…” The owner clearly refers to changes and interventions on the houses of Nikiti, meaning that the village is preserved regardless the existence of the protection status. Obviously, this perception is not based on actual facts. Things have certainly changed in the houses of Nikiti; we have already established the fact that the majority of the buildings in Nikiti have undergone some kind of intervention. The discomfort of the owner towards the protection goes as far as to directly accuse the instigator of the legislation, as the “…start of all the problems” and also the non-locals that bought houses in Nikiti and want to be in an empty village, “like living in a cemetery.” At this stage, it is important to further explain the situation in relation to the stores in this particular location of the village. A few years ago, there was an attempt to revitalise the area and a number of the old stores opened as bars. In the beginning it did not seem to be a problem, but as those bars were gradually getting more popular, they started to operate until late at night and subsequently the problem quickly escalated. Eventually, after the appeal of inhabitants, most were found to be operating illegally and closed.

Iason Koutsomitelis

Master Thesis 2019/20

At this point, I would like to go back to something noted before, as it can lead us to some useful observations. It is the connection between the disregard of the protection status and the inability of the owner to exploit the commercial space in their property. It seems that the persistence of the owner for more shops (mainly cafes and bars) may only partially be based on the fact that the old village is now empty, while it used to be alive. In any case, the owner is a seasonal inhabitant and such a firm wish for liveliness would rather be expected from a permanent resident of the village. This persistence might also be a result of the missed opportunity to profit from the aforementioned store and any function is acceptable and desired. Here there is the difference between the comments made in Case no. 2. Both of them bring the issue of the liveliness and the lack of activities in the old part of the village. But according to the opinion of case no. 2 the solution could be to bring back previous uses that are considered iconic for the area, for example the cafes which were mentioned quite often. As such, it is mainly only one specific parameter of the regulation that led to the disregard of the entire protection status. Rules that have to do with the allowed interventions and extensions on the house are not that concerning unless they are interfering with the exploitation of the commercial areas. “I will not change the way my house looks, I don’t want to change it. But the fact that they don’t allow me to have chairs and bar tables outside is frustrating…” However, regardless how sharp the owner’s expressions might be, it is still a view/perspective that needs to be heard. Beneath the misconceptions and misinterpretation there are some issues worth noting: The absence of services and other social functions other than housing and the fact that many commercial spaces that used to give liveliness to the village and were also a source of income for the locals, are now left empty and unused.

95. View on the interior of a destroyed house.

Iason Koutsomitelis

peans and continues until today -not only with foreigners, but with people from the big cities nearby. Regarding the changes that were done during the restoration of the house, as mentioned above, the two floors were autonomous, connected from the outside. Therefore, most of the changes had to do with the connection of the two floors in a single house, the structural reinforcements and the addition of certain amenities in order for the house to be functional. A new staircase was built internally, bathrooms were added in both floors and the old external toilet on the back of the building was expanded to fit an extra room.

The case The final case is a building inside the protection zone. It is a two-floor house, built in 1926. Originally, the building was divided; on the first floor there was a traditional coffeehouse while on the second there was the residence. The two floors were connected from the outside with a wooden staircase. The current owners (a couple that answered the questionnaire together) do not originate from Nikiti. They bought the property in 2007 and in 2014 they finished with the restoration works. They use the house periodically, mainly during the Easter and summer holidays, and for certain times of the year they offer it for rent through an online rental platform.

Observations Out of the five cases it is the only one that the owners do not have any family ties with Nikiti and the house was not inherited. As such, it would be interesting to investigate why the village of Nikiti and this particular house was selected. According to the owners, they actively decided to look for a house in the Old part of Nikiti, because they were familiar with the general area, as they used to spend the holidays in an nearby village, and also because they consider Old Nikiti to be “…the most beautiful village of the whole of Chalkidiki.” The appeal of the village is still strong even, if not more, among people that do not have any previous connection or family ties with it. We have already seen how, a few decades ago, the interest in the village started with the Germans and other Euro-

Master Thesis 2019/20

Furthermore, the house is nestled on the hillside, so large-scale works were done for the landscaping of the surrounding plot. It seems that the fact that the house was destined as a holiday home from the beginning and there were not any extensive requirements in terms of the living standards, did not lead to any highly invasive interventions. The communication between the protection authorities was done by the architect who was responsible for the restoration. According to the owners, there were some very specific rules that they needed to follow, for example, changes in the volume, on the front facade and in the size of the openings were forbidden. However, during or after the restoration works the authorities did not check if they followed and complied with them. One again, we find that the protection services operate just as the authority that draws instructions on certain regulations, without any active role in the control of the works and the inspection of the results afterwards. In general, the understanding of the owners towards the protection of the village was somehow vague. They agreed on the necessity and the absolute importance of the protection for the village, but, at the same time, it was admitted that their knowledge for the protection status was limited: “I don’t know anything about it, but I am in favour of any kind of protection.” It was not even clear to them which areas of the village are covered by the protection zone. At this point, I want to mention, that in my opinion, it is not a case of people that are ignorant towards the protecting of the building heritage of the village. They

proved this by buying a house explicitly in the old part of Nikiti and by the effort they gave in restoring that house, regardless of how successfully or not this was done. But, there is a contradiction, which in my opinion, is very interesting. They are people that are aware and vocally really supportive towards the protection, but do not fully conceive that this means the existence of a framework of rules, not necessarily convenient for every single wish and need. “There should be rules, but it would be very annoying if they were bothering us every time…” and “…I believe that it’s good that they are strict [the protection authorities], but maybe the [legal] framework should change by not being so suffocating” are two representative quotes of the owners. Finally, through the rest of the questions we get some very similar answers given in the previous cases. These regard the issue of the cost required to restore and maintain a historical house and, once again, the issue of the lack of liveliness in the village and the absence of any services in the old part of the village. For the issue of the cost, a proposal was made by the owners that restoring traditional and protected buildings should come with a monetary compensation in the form of interest-free loans. Finally, the issue of the emptiness of the village and the bars and cafés in its old part has been raised in almost all cases and in every tone and no further analysis is needed. The owners in this case are not opposed to the presence of bars and cafés, as long as their number is regulated and their aesthetic coherence with the rest of the village is controlled. On the contrary, they believe that the presence of people and the liveliness that brings is an added value for the village. They do stress thought that the car traffic and the issue of parking is a nuisance and should be controlled. Furthermore, they emphasized the need for more stores in the area, like groceries and restaurants so that there is no dependence on the car to meet daily needs.

Iason Koutsomitelis

Epilogue

In the process of this research a number of

questions arose. Some of them were expected, others proved to be more complex than anticipated, some still remain unanswered and others led to more questions. In this final chapter it is necessary to go through some of the most important observations that emerged. One of the goals of the inventory was to carefully examine one of the most important components of the village, namely its buildings. Equally important was to investigate, as carefully as possible, the interventions that many of the buildings were subjected to and, of course, the reasons behind those changes. To identify the reasons was a challenging and complicated task, as most of them are overlapping and influencing each other and, therefore, it is difficult to determine and evaluate their gravity. However, most of the reasons can be arranged in to two broad groups:

-Those deriving from the legislation

-Those deriving from the people

The law

96. View of the village of Nikiti, during spring.

There is no doubt that the current legislation is deficient and inadequate on many levels. It is a legislative framework that was first applied more than 30 years ago. Since then the concept and the perception regarding the protection of cultural heritage and especially the protection of historical areas has changed and evolved quite significantly. The type and versions of protection that have been considered necessary and imperative in 1987, may no longer be sufficient and therefore need to be developed and adapted to the new conditions, needs and challenges. Furthermore, the plethora of public servic-

es with overlapping responsibilities that are authorized to give the required permits before the commencement of any project -according to the existing law- is an extremely problematic factor. As a result, the legal process becomes very difficult and restraining and therefore very often is bypassed. This inevitably leads to misinterpreting, overlooking or even knowingly ignoring of the advantages, benefits and opportunities that the protection framework could represent for the traditional settlement. Additionally, necessary inspections after the restoration works are completed are not carried out. As a result, any violations of the legal framework that may have occurred during the restoration works or the construction of a new building quite often remain with no changes imposed by the regulations. Another issue that was identified and needs to be addressed is the limits of the protection zone. There is a significant number of buildings located outside the protection zone which need attention and care due to their historical and architectural value but also because they are integral part of the Old village. Therefore, the inclusion of specific areas adjacent to the protection zone as defined, i.e. the north parts of Sectors 4, 5 and 6, as well as the area along the main road leading to the historical core of Nikiti, is essential due to the density of high value buildings. Finally, as was pointed out by the local architects I have consulted with and also as witnessed by one of the questionnaires, there is a significant number of interventions made before the protection law was enacted in 1987. For those interventions

Iason Koutsomitelis

to be legalized, an approval is not required by the Department of Modern Monuments, as it is for cases after 1987. Therefore, they cannot be evaluated as problematic by the authorities. For the upgrade of the protection status of the Old village I strongly believe that, at least the invasive irregularities and arbitrariness should be repaired and reversed with the responsibility of the authorities and this issue should not be left to the good will of the owners. From all the aforementioned observations and findings, as evidenced by the inventory of the 263 buildings of the protected zone of the village of Nikiti, it is clear that the existing legal framework is inadequately implemented. The current protection status with the unclear provisions, the in vitro determination of its areas of application, the conflict of responsibilities, the bureaucratic function, the absence of legality checks is insufficient and needs to be reviewed and updated.

The people However, as the research showed, this does not necessarily imply the enactment of more and stricter laws. The goal should not be to create a settlement-cocoon and this conclusion emerged from the analysis of the socio-economic development of the village over the years, from inventory of the 263 buildings of Nikiti but mainly from the anthropocentric observation of the current situation of the settlement. According to the modern approach of cultural heritage and protection which imposes a legal framework that does not ignore the people who live, work and shape the social and cultural environment of a place, the revision of the rules and restrictions for the historic settlement of Nikiti should take these parameters into account. The importance of people as a critical factor in the effort to preserve the historical part of the village was highlighted during the study as I did not approach and observe the buildings as individual cases but the entire settlement of Nikiti as an environment inhabited -permanently or temporarily- by groups of people who have different, often opposing, characteristics, behaviors, desires or needs. The questionnaire helped us to understand the importance of knowledge, acknowledgment and understanding of all these elements for the determination of any future conservation and protection plan to

100 Master Thesis 2019/20

be prepared by experts. It became evident how the new and different needs that arise in each generation are the cause of most of the interventions made in the buildings. We can safely assume that, over the time, people's needs will continue to change, diversify and possibly increase, thus it is of an essential importance to continuously observe them, identify and respect them so that unavoidable and often highly invasive interventions as those observed during the research do not occur in the future. Consequently, I consider the flexibility of the legal framework an important and necessary factor. The need for a firm protection status is not disputed by almost all the interviewees in my research. However, everyone pointed out the lack of communication between the authorities and the inhabitants, both in terms of the absence of a clearly defined set of rules and also in terms of their inflexibility and rigidity in the course of the required procedures. This was also confirmed by me personal observation and experience. The inability to communicate may be due to the fact that the authorities in charge, namely the Department of Modern Monuments, have under their administration an immense number of individually protected monuments and historic areas. Thus, the proper management of all those monuments could be very challenging. Especially for historic areas where the elements that need to be considered are multidimensional and the solutions required are complex and time consuming. This is a possible interpretation of the situation but not its justification. Consequently, creating a clear, comprehensible and easily applicable set of actions to be followed and implemented during the restoration works and the construction of new buildings is imperative. It is also important to simplify the procedures and the communication with the authorities in charge to avoid errors, misunderstandings, delays or even the bypass of the legal requirements. The questionnaires showed that people's perceptions of what is considered strict vary and not everyone is likely to accept that firm regulation could mean unavoidable compromises and enforcement of rules and guidelines that are not necessarily convenient or completely comprehended. Finally, it is commonly accepted and em-

phatically mentioned that there should be certain activities in the old village which would cover the needs of the daily life of the inhabitants such as grocery store, bakery, etc. Moreover, it is pointed out by all that the Old village needs liveliness. Interestingly, all interviewees focus, in a rather simplistic way, on the operation of cafĂŠs and food and beverage establishments and do not suggest other alternative ways in which the Old village could gain the coveted liveliness and become a pole of attraction for visitors. Developing a serious mild plan with a variety of activities is something that needs to be seriously considered. As for the operation of these stores, not everyone understands it in the same way for reasons related to parameters such as their needs, their visions, their lifestyle, their aspirations their potential personal benefit or their relationship with the village. The research highlights that there is a need to create a clear regulatory framework for the operation of such stores that will take into account what is provided by the law and the regulations, the character of the area, but also what is required by the modern way of life and the needs of people living or visiting the Old village â&#x20AC;&#x201C;with respect and care for the cultural heritage.

Iason Koutsomitelis

101

97. Sketch of Nikiti.

102 Master Thesis 2019/20

Bibliography

Sources Ηρόδοτος [Herodotus]. (n.d.). Ιστορίαι [Histories].

Archives Hellenic Military Geographical Service. Retrieved February 2020, from http://www.gys. gr/index_en.html

Maps Bellin, J. N. (1745). Carte de l'archipel présentée à Monseigneur le comte de Maurepas/ par le Sr. Grognard, pilote entretenu du département de Toulon. Bibliothèque na- tionale de France, GE DD-2987 (6176B). Retrieved April 2020, from https://www. europeana.eu/en/item/9200517/ark__12148_btv1b53012121v

Laws Υ.Α. ΥΠΠΟ/ΔΙΛΑΠ/Γ/51809/3198: Χαρακτηρισμός ως ιστορικού τόπου του παλιού οικισμού της Νικήτης Νομού Χαλκιδικής [Ministerial Decision ΥΠΠΟ/ ΔΙΛΑΠ/Γ/51809/3198: Declaration as historical locus of the old settlement of Nikiti, Prefecture of Chalkidiki], ΦΕΚ-Β-250/29-05-1987 (May 19, 1987). Retrieved March2020, from http://www.et.gr/index.php/anazitisi-fek Ν.Α. οικ./58779: Καθορισμός κατηγοριών, ορίων και περιορισμών δόμησης στους οικισμούς Νικήτης κ.α. [Prefectural Decision 58779: Determination of categories, limits and construction restrictions in the settlements of Nikiti etc.], ΦΕΚ-Δ-592/12-08-1988 (August 12, 1988). Retrived April 2020, from http://www. et.gr/index.php/anazitisi-fek N.A. Οικ./Ε.Π.Α./1207: Συμπλήρωση και διόρθωση της Απόφασης Νομάρχη που αφορά στον καθορισμό ορίων που έγινε για την κοινότητα Νικήτης [Comple- tion and correction of the Prefectural Decision concerning the determination of limits made for the c. of Nikiti], ΦΕΚ-Δ-350/11-06-1991 (June 11, 1991). Retrieved May 2020, from http://www.et.gr/index.php/anazitisi-fek Ν. 3028/2002 «Για την προστασία των Αρχαιοτήτων και εν γένει της Πολιτιστικής Κληρονομιάς» [Law No. 3028/2002 "On the Protection of Antiquities and Cultural Heritage in general"], ΦΕΚ-A-153/28-06-2002 (June 28, 2002). Retrieved January 2020, from http://www.et.gr/index.php/anazitisi-fek Υ.Α. 52778: Έγκριση Γενικού Πολεοδομικού Σχεδίου (Γ.Π.Σ.) του οικισμού «Νικήτης» του δήμου Σιθωνίας (Ν. Χαλκιδικής) [Ministerial Decision: Approval of the Gener al Urban Plan of settlement "Nikiti", municipality of Sithonia (Prefecture of Chalkidiki), ΦΕΚ-97/14-03-2007 (March 14, 2007). Retrieved March 2020, from http://www.et.gr/index.php/anazitisi-fek Π.Α. 1660: Έγκριση Γενικού Πολεοδομικού Σχεδίου του Δήμου Σιθωνίας Χαλκιδικής [Prefectural Decision: Approval of the General Urban Plan of the Municipality

Iason Koutsomitelis

103

of Sithonia, Chalkidiki], ΦΕΚ-Α.Α.Π.-406/12-09-2008 (September 12, 2008). Retrieved April 2008, from http://www.et.gr/index.php/anazitisi-fek

N. 4495: Έλεγχος και προστασία του δομημένου περιβάλλοντος [Law 4495: Control and protection of the built environment], ΦΕΚ-Α-167/03-11-2017 (November 3, 2017). Retrieved March 2020, from http://www.et.gr/index.php/anazitisi-fek Π.Δ. 59: Κατηγορίες και περιεχόμενο χρήσεων γης [Presidential Decree 59: Catego- ries and content of land uses], ΦΕΚ-Α-114/29-06-2018 (June 29, 2018). Retrieved March 2020, from http://www.et.gr/index.php/anazitisi-fek

Works Books Αραμπατζή [Arabatzi], Χ. Α. (2016). Προσφυγικές εγκαταστάσεις και προσφυγικοί οικισμοί στη Χαλκιδική κατά το πρώτο μισό του 20ου αιώνα [Refugee establish ments and refugee settlements in Halkidiki during the first half of the 20th century]. Θεσσαλονίκη: Εκδόσεις Αφοί Κυριακίδη. Κανατάς [Kanatas], Γ. Δ. (1981). Η παλιά Νικήτη [The old Nikiti]. Θεσσαλονίκη: Ε.Ε.Ν. Νικήτης. Κανατάς [Kanatas], Γ. (2000). Η παλιά Νικήτη [The old Nikiti]. Θεσσαλονίκη: Ε.Ε.Ν. Νικήτης ο ΣΙΘΩΝ. Κότσιανος [Kotsianos], Σ. (1951). Ένα ταξίδι στη Χαλκιδική στα 1793. Εντυπώσεις και κρίσεις του Γάλλου προξένου Θεσσαλονίκης E. Cousinery [A journey to Chalkidiki in 1793. Impressions of the French consul in Thessaloniki E. Cousinery]. Αθήνα. Μάντσιος [Mantsios], Ά. (2018). Η μεγάλη μάχη [The great battle]. Θεσσαλονίκη. Μιχαηλίδης, Γ., Αυγουστίδου, Μ., Κοκκώσης, Χ., Λουκίσσας, Φ., Σκαγιάννης, Π., & Γεωργίου, Χ. (2003). Μελέτη Τουριστικής Ανάπτυξης των Περιφερειών Κεντρικής και Δυτικής Μακεδονίας [Study of Tourism Development of the Prefectures of Cen tral and Western Macedonia]. Θεσσαλονίκη: Ελληνικός Οργανισμός Τουρισμού. Μονιούδη-Γαβαλά [Monioudi-Gavala], Δ. (2015). Oικιστικά σύνολα του παρελθόντος μέσα σε σύγχρονα αστικά τοπία: πρόσληψη και διαχείριση [Settlements of the past in Modern Urban Landscapes: monitoring and management]. In Δ. Μονιούδη-Γαβαλά, Η Ελληνική πόλη από τον Ιππόδαμο στον Κλεάνθη (pp. 125- 141). Αθήνα: Εθνικό Μετσόβιο Πολυτεχνείο. Μουτσόπουλος [Moutsopoulos], Ν. (1976). Άθυτος Χαλκιδικής, Μελέτη αναβιώσεως και εξωραϊσμού [Athitos of Chalkidiki, Study for the revitalization and beautifica tion]. Θεσσαλονίκη: Εθνικός Οργανισμός Τουρισμού. Μουτσόπουλος [Moutsopoulos], Ν. (1979). Σπίτια της Χαλκιδικής [Houses of Chalkidi ki]. Θεσσαλονίκη: Εκδόσεις Γαρταγάνη. Μουτσόπουλος [Moutsopoulos], Ν. (1993). Τα αρχοντικά της Μακεδονίας 15ος - 19ος αιώνας [The mansions of Macedonia 15th - 19th century]. Θεσσαλονίκη: Εκδόσεις Παρατηρητής. Νομικός [Nomikos], Μ. (2004). Αποκατάσταση, επανάχρηση ιστορικών κτιρίων και συνόλων: Μεθοδολογία-Εφαρμογές [Restoration, reuse of historic buildings and ensembles: Methodology-Applications]. Θεσσαλονίκη: Τμήμα Αρχιτεκτόνων Α.Π.Θ. Παπάγγελος [Papangelos], Ι. (1981). Χαλκιδική [Chalkidiki]. Θεσσαλονίκη: Μαλλιάρης- Παιδεία. Χρυσανθίδης [Chrysanthidis], Ν. (1870). Αυτοσχέδιος περιγραφή της Χαλκιδικής Χερσονήσου, μετ’ αρχαιολογικώνν σημειώσεων καί ιστορικών συμβάντων [An autobiographical description of the peninsula of Chalkidiki, with archeolo- gical notes and historical events.]. Κωνσταντινούπολη: "Ανατολή" Ευαγγελινού

104 Master Thesis 2019/20

Μισαηλίδου.

Ad hoc Group. (2009). Guidance on inventory and documentation of the cultural heritage. Strasbourg: Council of Europe Publishing. Pini, D. (2008). The inventory of the historic city of Sana'a; A tool for urban conservation. UNESCO Press. Urquhart, D. (1838). The Spirit of the East, Illustrated in a journal of travels through Roumeli (Vol. I). London: Henry Colburn. Urquhart, D. (1838). The Spirit of the East, Illustrated in a journal of travels through Roumeli (Vol. II). London: Henry Colburn.

Articles Αποστολίδης [Apostolidis], Γ. (1973). Άκανθος - Ερισσός - Ιερισσός [Akanthos - Erissos -Ierissos]. Χρονικά της Χαλκιδικής, 23-24, pp. 3-87. Αρσένης [Arsenis], Σ. (1970). Ιστορικαί σημειώσεις δια τον Άγιον Νικόλαον και Νικήτην [Historical notes for Agios Nikolaos and Nikiti]. Χρονικά της Χαλκιδικής, 19-20, pp. 18-25. Βασδραβέλλης [Vasdravellis], Ι. (1963). Η Επανάστασις του 1854 εις την Χαλκιδικήν χερσόνησον [The revolution of 1854 in the peninsula of Chalkidiki]. Μακεδονικά, 5, pp. 102-124. Δέλτσου [Deltsou], Ε. (1996). Ο "Ιστορικός Τόπος" και η σημασία της "Παράδοσης" για το Έθνος κράτος [The "Historic Locus" and the significance of "Tradition" for the Nation State. Εθνολογία, 4, pp. 107-126. Δημαράς [Dimaras], Δ. (2013). Ο ιερός ναός Αγίου Νικήτα [The Church of Saint Nikitas. Παγχαλκιδικός Λόγος, 14, pp. 21-23. Zέλλιου-Mαστοροκώστα [Zelliou-Mastorokosta], Ε. (2001). Έκθεση τού νομιάτρου Γ. Παπανικολάου γιά τήν Χαλκιδική [Report of the appointed doctor G. Papaniko- laou fot Chalkidiki]. Μακεδονικά, 32, pp. 293-312. Zέλλιου-Mαστοροκώστα [Zelliou-Mastorokosta], Ε. (2003). Χαλκιδική: Παρθενώνας, Ν. Μαρμαράς [Chalkidiki; Parthenonas, N. Marmaras]. Χρονικά της Χαλκιδικής, 48-49, pp. 207-214. Κότσιανος [Kotsianos], Σ. (1976). Πώς ήταν η Χαλκιδική στα 1869 [How was Chalkidiki in 1869]. Χρονικά της Χαλκιδικής, 29-30, pp. 35-65. Παπάγγελος [Papangelos], Ι. (1972). Συμβολή εις την ετυμολογίαν του ονόματος του χωριού Νικητή της Χαλκιδικής [Contribution to the etymology of the name of the village of Nikiti in Chalkidiki]. Μακεδονικά, 12, pp. 303-316. Παπάγγελος [Papangelos], Ι. (1983). Προσπάθεια εντοπισμού της "καθέδρας των γερόντων" [The effort to locate the "holy seat of the monks"]. Μακεδονικά 23, pp. 305-317. Παπάγγελος [Papangelos], Ι. (2000a). Επιγραφή για τον βασιλέα Φίλιππο από την Νικήτη Χαλκιδικής [An inscription for King Phillip from Nikiti, Chalkidiki]. Τεκμήρια 5, pp. 108-112. Παπάγγελος [Papangelos], Ι. (2013). Περί της Νικήτης, ολίγα [A few about Nikiti]. Παγχαλκιδικός Λόγος, 14, pp. 17-18. Χιούτης [Hioutis], Κ. (2003). Οικονομική αρωγή των μονών Ξηροποτάμου και Βατοπαιδίου σε εκκλησίες της Χαλκιδικής (1835-1924) [Financial assistance of the monasteries of Xiropotamos and Vatopedi in Chalkidiki churches (1835-1924)]. Χρονικά της Χαλκιδικής, 48-49, pp. 117-139. Myers, D. (2016). Heritage inventories: promoting effectiveness as a vital tool for sustainable heritage management. Journal of Cultural Heritage Management and Sustainable Development, 6(2), pp. 102-112.

Iason Koutsomitelis

105

Conference proceedings Zεγκίνης [Zeginis], Ε. (1995). H κατάσταση στη Xαλκιδική κατά την τελευταία περίοδο της τουρκικής διοικήσεως [The situation in Calkidiki during the last period of Turkish rule]. Τέταρτο Πανελλήνιο Συνέδριο «Η Χαλκιδική κατά την περίοδο της τουρκοκρατίας» [Fourth Panhellenic Congress "Chalkidiki during the Turkish Occupation" (pp. 189-201). Ποσείδι: Ιστορική και Λαογραφική Εταιρεία Χαλκιδικής. Zέλλιου-Mαστοροκώστα [Zelliou-Mastorokosta], Ε. (1990). Μια προσέγγιση στην κατοικία της βόρειας Χαλκιδικής κατά το 19ο αιώνα. Αρχοντικό Κοτσιάνου στον Πολύγυρο [An approach to the house of northern Chalkidi- ki during the 19th century. Kotsianou Mansion in Polygyros]. Τρίτο Διεθνές Συμπόσιο «Πολιτιστική κληρονομιά και αρχιτεκτονική παράδοση στη Χαλκιδική και στο Άγιον Όρος» [Third International Symposium "Cultural Heritage and Archi- tectural Tradition in Chalkidiki and Mount Athos"] (pp. 165-220). Ουρανούπολη: Ιστορική και Λαογραφική Εταιρεία Χαλκιδικής. Zέλλιου-Mαστοροκώστα [Zelliou-Mastorokosta], Ε. (1995). H παιδεία κατά την περίοδο της τουρκοκρατίας. Xαλκιδική [Education during the Turkish occupation. Chalkidiki]. Τέταρτο Πανελλήνιο Συνέδριο «Η Χαλκιδική κατά την περίοδο της τουρκοκρατίας» [Fourth Panhellenic Congress "Chalkidiki during the Turkish Occupation" (pp. 253-424). Ποσείδι: Ιστορική και Λαογραφική Εταιρεία Χαλκιδικής. Κούκου [Koukou], Ε. (1990). Η γένεση του Άγιου Όρους [The birth of Mount Athos]. Τρίτο Διεθνές Συμπόσιο «Πολιτιστική κληρονομιά και αρχιτεκτονική παράδοση στη Χαλκιδική και στο Άγιον Όρος» [Third International Symposium "Cultur- al Heritage and Architectural Tradition in Chalkidiki and Mount Athos"] (pp. 73-85). Ουρανούπολη: Ιστορική και Λαογραφική Εταιρεία της Χαλκιδικής. Μουτσόπουλος [Moutsopoulos], Ν. (1990). Διερεύνηση της τυπολογίας της χωρικής κατοικίας της Χαλκιδικής. Σκέψεις και προτάσεις για τη διατήρηση, ανάπλαση και αναβίωση των παραδοσιακών μορφών [Investigation of the typology of the houses of Calkidiki. Thoughts and suggestions for the pr. Τρίτο Διεθνές Συμπόσιο «Πολιτιστική κληρονομιά και αρχιτεκτονική παράδοση στη Χαλκιδική και στο Άγιον Όρος» [Third International Symposium "Cultural Heritage and Archi- tectural Tradition in Chalkidiki and Mount Athos"] (pp. 29-64). Ουρανούπολη: Ιστορική και Λαογραφική Εταιρεία Χαλκιδικής. Νεράντζη-Βαρμάζη [Nerantzi-Varmazi], Β. (1984). Πληροφορίες για τη Χαλκιδική από τα έγγραφα του Αγίου Όρους (13ος-15ος αι.) [Information for Chalkidiki from the archives of Mt. Athos (13th-15th c.)]. Πρώτο Πανελλήνιο Συμπόσιο «Ιστορία και Αρχαιολογία της Χαλκιδικής» [First Panhellenic Sym- posium "History and Archeology of Chalkidiki"] (pp. 193-201). Πολύγυρος: Ιστορική και Λαογραφική Εταιρεία της Χαλκιδικής. Νικονάνος [Nikonanos], Ν. (1984). Έρευνες στα βυζαντινά και μεταβυζαντινά μνημεία της Χαλκιδικής [Research on the Byzantine and post-Byzantine monuments of Chalkiiki]. Πρώτο Πανελλήνιο Συμπόσιο «Ιστορία και Αρχαιολογία της Χαλκιδικής» [First Panhellenic Symposium "History and Archeology of Chalkidi ki"] (pp. 127-145). Πολύγυρος: Ιστορική και Λαογραφική Εταιρεία της Χαλκιδικής. Οικονόμου [Oikonomou], Ζ. (1995). Από τη βυζαντινή Γαλάτισσα στην απελευθέρωση [From Byzantine Galatissa to the liberation]. Τέταρτο Πανελλήνιο Συνέδριο «Η Χαλκιδική κατά την περίοδο της τουρκοκρατίας» [Fourth Panhellenic Con- gress "Chalkidiki during the Turkish Occupation" (pp. 17-114). Ποσείδι: Ιστορική και Λαογραφική Εταιρεία Χαλκιδικής. Παπάγγελος [Papangelos], Ι. (1984). Το πολίχνιον της Κασσανδρείας [The town of Kas sandreia]. Πρώτο Πανελλήνιο Συμπόσιο «Ιστορία και Αρχαιολογία της Χαλκιδικής» [First Panhellenic Symposium "History and Archeology of Chal- kidiki"] (pp. 201-211). Πολύγυρος: Ιστορική και Λαογραφική Εταιρεία της Χαλκιδικής. Παπάγγελος [Papangelos], Ι. (2010). Περί της ανεγέρσεως του ναού του Αγίου Νικήτα

106 Master Thesis 2019/20

στην Νικήτη Χαλκιδικής (1867) [On the construction of the church of Agios Nikitas in Nikiti, Chalkidiki (1867)]. Β' Επιστημονικό συμπόσιο νεοελληνικής εκκλησιαστικής τέχνης [2nd Scientific symposium on modern Greek ecclesiastical art] (pp. 201-216). Θεσσαλονίκη: Εθνικό και Καποδιστριακό Πανεπιστήμιο Αθηνών.

Παπάγγελος [Papangelos], Ι. (2014). Τα αγιορειτικά μετόχια ως συντελεστές ιδρύσεως χωριών στην Χαλκιδική χερσόνησο [The monastic estates of Mt. Athos as founding factors in the establishment of villages in the Chalkidiki peninsula]. Θ' Διεθνές επιστημονικό συνέδριο· Η εξακτίνωση του Αγίου Όρους στον Ορθόδοξο κόσμο: Τα μετόχια [9th International scientific conference; The spread of the influence of Mt. Athos to the orthodox world: The Metochia, monastic estates (pp. 183-190). Θεσσαλονίκη: Αγιορείτικη Εστία. Σαμσάρης [Samsaris], Δ. (1984). Οι Ρωμαίοι και η Χαλκιδική [The Romans and Chalki- diki]. Πρώτο Πανελλήνιο Συμπόσιο «Ιστορία και Αρχαιολογία της Χαλκιδικής» [First Panhellenic Symposium "History and Archeology of Chalkidiki"] (pp. 113-127). Πολύγυρος: Ιστορική και Λαογραφική Εταιρεία της Χαλκιδικής. Principles for the recording of monuments, groups of buildings and sites. (1996). 11th ICOMOS General Assembly. Sofia: ICOMOS International Council of Monuments and Sites. Retrieved from https://www.icomos.org/charters/archives-e.pdf

Academic works Γιαννουλίδου [Giannoulidou], Δ. (2006). Η παλιά Νικήτη [Old Nikiti] (Research subject). Τμήμα Αρχιτεκτόνων Μηχανικών, Πανεπιστήμιο Θεσσαλίας. Κολοβός [Kolovos], Η. (2000). Χωρικοί και μοναχοί στην οθωμανική Χαλκιδική 15ος- 16ος αιώνες: όψεις της οικονομικής και κοινωνικής ζωής στην ύπαιθρο και η Μονή Ξηροποτάμου [Peasants and monks in ottoman Halkidiki: aspects of the economic and social life in the rural landscape and the Monastery of Xenophon] (Doctoal dissertation). Φιλοσοφική Σχολή, Αριστοτέλειο Πανεπιστήμιο Θεσσαλονίκης. Παπάγγελος [Papangelos], Ι. (2000b). Η Σιθωνία κατά τους Βυζαντινούς χρόνους, Ιστορία, Μνημεία, Τοπογραφία [Sithonia during the Byzantine times, History, Monuments, Topography] (Doctoral dissertation). Φιλοσοφική Σχολή, Αριστοτέλειο Πανεπιστήμιο Θεσσαλονίκης. Deltsou, E. (1995). Praxes of tradition and modernity in a village in Northern Greece (Doctoral dissertation). Department of Anthropology, Indiana University.

Iason Koutsomitelis

107

108 Master Thesis 2019/20

List of Figures

1. Neoclassical pediment on one of the houses in Nikiti. © Iason Koutsomitelis

1318. © Παπάγγελος [Papangelos] (1972), pp. 310

2. Fragment of a date-plate embedded in the wall after the restoration. © Iason Koutsomitelis

17. Settlements in Chalkidiki in the 15th 16th century. © Κολοβός [Kolovos] (2000), vol. II, map E’

3. Detail of a map from 1745. Nikiti is indicated as Niquiti. © Bellin (1745)

18. The old parish church dedicated to the Assumption of Mary. © Iason Koutsomitelis

4. The location of Nikiti in Greece. © Iason Koutsomitelis 5. The entrance of the old parish church dedicated to the Assumption of Mary. © Iason Koutsomitelis

19. The new parish church dedicated to St. Nikitas. © Iason Koutsomitelis 20. The building of the School. © Iason Koutsomitelis

6. The engraved stone indicating the construction date of the new parish church of Nikiti. © Iason Koutsomitelis

21. Fragments of an older structure embedded in the cemetery walls. © Iason Koutsomitelis

7. The voting inscription dating from 200 B.C. found around Nikiti. © Παπάγγελος [Papangelos] (2000a), fig. 1

22-25. The growth of Nikiti in the first decades of the 20th century. Based on Γιαννουλίδου [Giannoulidou] (2006) © Iason Koutsomitelis

8. Map of Chalkidiki indicating locations mentioned in the historical analysis. © Iason Koutsomitelis 9. Map of Nikiti and its surroundings indicating locations mentioned in the historical analysis. © Iason Koutsomitelis 10. Kastri location south of Nikiti. © Iason Koutsomitelis 11. The basilica of Sofronios in Agios Georgios position. © Iason Koutsomitelis 12. Early Christian basilica in Agios Georgios position. © Iason Koutsomitelis 13. Map of Sithonia depicting early Christian settlements. © Παπάγγελος [Papangelos] (2000b), pp. 104-105, map A’ 14. The remains of the tower of Psalida. © Iason Koutsomitelis 15. Sections of the tower of Psalida. © Παπάγγελος [Papangelos] (2000b), pp. 104-105, fig. 13 16. Map on the base of Sithonia depicting the limits of the Metochi of Neakitos in

26. View of Nikiti in 1926. The buildings of the school and the church of St. Nikitas are visible on the back. © Κανατάς [Kanatas] (2000), pp. 196, fig. 56 27. View of Nikiti, circa 1970. The new regional road is visible in the front. © Κανατάς [Kanatas] (2000), pp. 269, fig. 166 28. View of Nikiti in 1938. © Κανατάς [Kanatas] (2000), pp. 195, fig. 54 29. The seaside section of Nikiti, circa 1970. © Κανατάς [Kanatas] (1981) 30-34. Aerial photographs of Nikiti from 1945, 1960, 1980, 1989 and 1997. © Hellenic Military Geographical Service 35. Aerial view of Nikiti in 2020. © Google Maps 36-41. Maps based on the aerial photographs, depicting the growth of Nikiti from 1945 to 2020. © Iason Koutsomitelis 42. View of Nikiti from the North hilltop. © Iason Koutsomitelis

Iason Koutsomitelis

109

43. The forests on Mt. Itamos. © Iason Koutsomitelis

[Moutsopoulos] (1990), pp. 56, fig. 17

44. The main settlements in Sithonia. © Iason Koutsomitelis

67. Sketch with different configuration of wide-front typology. © Μουτσόπουλος [Moutsopoulos] (1990), pp. 46, fig. 10

45. Important touristic areas in Sithonia. © Iason Koutsomitelis

68. Sketch of a building with balcony from Chalkidiki. © Μουτσόπουλος [Moutsopoulos] (1979), pp. 143, fig. 179

46. Nature protection areas in Sithonia. © Iason Koutsomitelis 47. Land uses in Nikiti. © Iason Koutsomitelis 48. Morphology of Nikiti and its surrounding area. © Iason Koutsomitelis 49. The Old part of Nikiti nestled between the hills of Tzironis (left) and Kotsikas (right). © Iason Koutsomitelis 50-53. The squares of Nikiti. © Iason Koutsomitelis 54. Relation between built-unbuilt in the Old part. © Iason Koutsomitelis 55. The streets in relation with the building plots. © Iason Koutsomitelis 56. Relation of the buildings with their environment. © Iason Koutsomitelis 57. Hierarchy of the road network. © Iason Koutsomitelis 58. Squarespaces, streetviews (i-vi) and viewpoints (vii-xii) in the Old part of Nikiti. © Iason Koutsomitelis 59. Map depicting the General urban plan of Nikiti. Based on Υ.Α. 52778 & Π.Α. 1660 © Iason Koutsomitelis 60. Simplified diagram showing the legal procedures inside the protection zone of Nikiti. © Iason Koutsomitelis 60-61. Tables showing the building restrictions inside the protection zone (Δελτίο αρχιτεκτονικής αναγνώρισης). © Ν.Α. οικ./58779 62. The protection limits as described in the chapter. © Iason Koutsomitelis 63. Building with a triangular sahnisi/erker from Nikiti. © Iason Koutsomitelis 64. Sketch with different configuration of wide-front typology. © Μουτσόπουλος [Moutsopoulos] (1990), pp. 46, fig. 9 65. Sketch with different configuration of wide-front typology. © Μουτσόπουλος [Moutsopoulos] (1990), pp. 53, fig. 15 66. Sketch with different configuration of wide-front typology. © Μουτσόπουλος

110 Master Thesis 2019/20

69. Sketch of a building with hagiati from Chalkidiki. © Μουτσόπουλος [Moutsopoulos] (1979), pp. 16, fig. 9 70. The limits of the survey area (red) north of the old regional road (blue). © Iason Koutsomitelis 71. The six sectors of the survey area. © Iason Koutsomitelis 72. Typology charts depicting the various typologies in Nikiti. © Iason Koutsomitelis 73-74. Examples of buildings with neoclassical decorative elements. © Iason Koutsomitelis 75. Example of a building with triangular pediment. © Iason Koutsomitelis 76-79. Relation with the environment typologies. © Iason Koutsomitelis 80. Example of a Severe intervention. © Iason Koutsomitelis 81-83. Intervention typologies. © Iason Koutsomitelis 84. Example: Case no. 107 © Iason Koutsomitelis 85. Buildings with neoclassical elements in the survey area. © Iason Koutsomitelis 86-91. Result maps from the inventory. © Iason Koutsomitelis 92. View on the interior of a destroyed house. © Iason Koutsomitelis 93. Family in front of a house with hagiati. © Κανατάς [Kanatas] (2000), pp. 104, fig. 28 94. Dating plate of a traditional house. © Iason Koutsomitelis 95. View on the interior of a destroyed house. © Iason Koutsomitelis 96. View of the village of Nikiti, during spring. © Iason Koutsomitelis 97. Sketch of Nikiti. © Μουτσόπουλος [Moutsopoulos] (1979), front cover

Appendix Questionnaires

Iason Koutsomitelis

111

Master Thesis - Questionnaire (Type A) This questionnaire is part of my dissertation on the traditional settlement of Nikiti, Chalkidiki. The work is part of my postgraduate studies in the Master of Conservation of Monuments and Sites program at KU Leuven University in Belgium. The purpose of the thesis is to understand the value of the settlement by recording its historic buildings and houses and creating a comprehensive list that will include, among other things, the views, and opinions of residents. The questionnaires are completely anonymous. The data will be processed exclusively for the purpose of the dissertation and in no case will they be disclosed to third parties. During the publication of the final work, all necessary measures will be taken in order to maintain anonymity and to avoid the identification of persons with specific buildings / dwellings.

Thank you in advance for your time, Iason Koutsomitelis Architect Engineer

Part 1 – General questions 1. Are you a permanent or an occasional (seasonal) resident of Nikiti? ……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… ……………….. -

In the case you are an occasional resident of the village, do you visit your house only for your summer vacations or during the winter as well? ……………………………………………………………………………………………………………. …………………………………………………………………………………………………………… ………………………………

2. Is your origin from Nikiti? Did you grow up or have you lived for some years in the village? ……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… ……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… …………………………………… 3. If your origins are from Nikiti, is this house your parental home, have you inherited it from any other member of the family or did you buy it? ……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… ……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… …………………………………… -

If it is your parental home or an inheritance, why did you decide to live in this house instead of selling or rending it? ……………………………………………… …………………………………………………………………………………………………………… …………………………………………………………………………………………………………… ………………………………

If you bought it, when did this happen and for what reason did you choose this particular house?

…………………………………………………………………………………………………………… …………………………………………………………………………………………………………… ………………………………. 4. If you are not from Nikiti: -

For what reason did you choose a house in the old village? ……………………………………….. …………………………………………………………………………………………………………… …………………………………………………………………………………………………………… ……………………………….

Why did you buy this particular home? …………………………………………………………….. …………………………………………………………………………………………………………… …………………………………………………………………………………………………………… ……………………………….

5. Do you rent or give your house to others for certain periods of the year? For what reason? ……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… ……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… ……………………………………………………… 6. When was your house built? ……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… ……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… …………………………………… 7. What are the positives of living in an old, traditional village and what are the difficulties? ………………………………………………………………………………………………………….. ……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… ……………………………………………………… 8. And also, what are the positives of living in an old, traditional house and what are the difficulties? ………………………………………………………………………………………………… ……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… ……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… ……………………………………………………… 9. The old village is a protected settlement. Which part of the village is protected? Is your house located within the limits of the protected zone? ………. ……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… ……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… ……………………………………

10. Do the rules in force help help in maintaining the character of the villages or do they simply represent an obstacle to your activities and make the daily life of the residents difficult? For what reason and in what sectors of the peoples’ activities? ……………………………………………………………………………………………… ……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… ……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… ……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… ……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… …………

Part 2 – Questions about the changes in the house 11. What are the changes applied in the outside of the house in general (e.g. replacement of the frames, addition of spaces or rooms, extensions etc)? For what reason? …………… ……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… ……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… ……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… ……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… ……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… ……….. 12. Were the works done by you or any member of your family or did you assign them to a constructors’ team, to an architect or any other person related to building projects? ……………………. ……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… ……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… 13. When did the changes happen? …………………………………………………………………………………………………. ……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… ……………….. 14. Your house is old and traditional and it is located in the old village. Το σπίτι σας είναι παλιό και παραδοσιακό και βρίσκεται στο παλιό χωριό. How did this affect the changes you made and the way you did them?………………… ……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… ……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… ……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… ……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… …………………………… 15. More specifically, in the case of works done on the balcony of the house:

Did you replace the old balcony with a new one made from scratch? ………… …………………………………………………………………………………………………………… …………………………………………………………………………………………………………… ………………………………

For what reason (wear due to age, stability and security problems, limited space, it did not match to the rest of the house, other)? ………… …………………………………………………………………………………………………………… …………………………………………………………………………………………………………… ………………………………………………

What are the differences between the new and the original balcony? ……………………………………… …………………………………………………………………………………………………………… …………………………………………………………………………………………………………… ………………………………………………

When did the works on the balcony take place and by whom (by you or had they been done in an earlier stage)? …………………………………………………………………………….. …………………………………………………………………………………………………………… ………………………………………………

16. Did you add any balcony anywhere in the house where it did not exist before? For what reason did you decide to do so? …………………………………………………………………………………………………….. ……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… ……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… ………………………………………………………………………… -

How did you decide the form of the new balcony?………………………………………….. …………………………………………………………………………………………………………… …………………………………………………………………………………………………………… ……………………………………………….

17. More specifically, in the case that rooms or extra spaces were probably added in your house: -

How many and which are the added spaces? ..…………………………………….. …………………………………………………………………………………………………………… …………………………………………………………………………………………………………… …………………………………………………………………………………………………………… ………………………………………………

For what reason were these additions made? ..…………………………………………………….... …………………………………………………………………………………………………………… ………………………………………………

When did the additions take place and by whom (by you or had they been done in an earlier stage)? ….. …………………………………………………………………………………………………………… …………………………………………………………………………………………………………… …………………………………………………………………………………………………………… ………………………………………………

What is the current use of the added spaces? .……………………….. …………………………………………………………………………………………………………… …………………………………………………………………………………………………………… ………………………………………………

Does it remain the same as the original or has it changed over the years? If so, for what reason? ..………………………………………………………….…………….. …………………………………………………………………………………………………………… ………………………………………………

18. More specifically, in the case you have replaced the frames: -

For what reason did you do this work?…………………………………………………………. …………………………………………………………………………………………………………… …………………………………………………………………………………………………………… ………………………………………………

Did you replace all the frames or only some of them?…………………. …………………………………………………………………………………………………………… ……………….…………………………………………………………………………………………… ……………………………….…………………………………………………………………………… ……………………………………………….

What kind of frames did you choose (wooden, made of aluminum or plastic, other) and why? ………………………………………………………………………………………………………….. …………………………………………………………………………………………………………… ………………..………………………………………………………………………………………… …………………………………………………………………………………………………………… ………………………………………………….

What are the differences between the new and the original frames? ……………………………………………………… ……………………………………………………………………………………….…………………… …………………………………………………………………………………………………………… ……………………………………………….

19. Do you know if the stones of the external walls have always been with no rendering or did you choose to do it this way; ……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… ………

For what reason? ……………………………………………………………………………………………………… …………………………………………………………………………………………………………… ……………………………….

Did the external stone walls need any special treatment (for instance in the joints)? ……………………………………………………………………………….. …………………………………………………………………………………………………………… …………………………………………………………………………………………………………… …………………………………………………………………………………………………………… ……………………………………………….

20. For the works and the changes you made, did you use traditional materials such as stone or wood or more contemporary ones such as cement, glass etc? ……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… ……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… …………………………………… -

Why did you choose these materials?……………………………………………………… …………………………………………………………………………………………………………… …………………………………………………………………………………………………………… ……………………………………………..

Part 3 – Questions about the procedures 21. What was the process you followed in order to do the changes you wanted? To whom did you assign the task to follow the required procedures such as license, submission of plans etc? ……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… ……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… ……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… ……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… ……………………………………………………………………………………………………………… 22. What difficulties did you encounter in this process? ………………….…………………………………………………………………………………………………… ………………………………….…………………………………………………………………………………… ……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… ………………………….…………………………………………………………………………………………… ………………………………………….…………………………………………………………………………… ……………………………………………………………………………………………………… 23. Your house is located in the protected area of the old village. Το σπίτι σας βρίσκεται στη ζώνη προστασία του παλιού χωριού. Did you face more difficulties to make the changes? What difficulties? ………………….…………………………………………………………………………………………………… ………………………………….……………………………………………………………………………………

………………………….…………………………………………………………………………………………… ………………………………………….…………………………………………………………………………… ……………………………………………………………………………………………………… 24. From the proposed changes which were approved and which were rejected from the Town Planning Service and the Architectural Control Committee? …………………………………………………………………………………. ……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… ………………….…………………………………………………………………………………………………… ………………………………….…………………………………………………………………………………… ……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… ………………………….…………………………………………………………………………………………… ………………………………………….…………………………………………………………………………… ……………………………………………………………………………………………………… 25. However, which of the rejected changes did you decide to do? For what reason? ………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………. ……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… ………………….…………………………………………………………………………………………………… ………………………………….…………………………………………………………………………………… ……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… ……………………………………………………………………………………………………… 26. Did the works cost the same as for other houses which are not old and traditional? For which works was the cost higher, for which the same and for which less? …………………………………….. ……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… ………………….…………………………………………………………………………………………………… ………………………….…………………………………………………………………………………………… ………………………………………….…………………………………………………………………………… ……………………………………………………………………………………………………… 27. After the completion of the works, did the services in charge conduct any additional check? ……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… ……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… ………………….…………………………………………………………………………………………………… ………………………………….…………………………………………………………………………………… ……………………………………………………

Part 4 – Final questions 28. Which are the additional changes and interventions you would like to do in the future? For what reason? ……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… ………………….…………………………………………………………………………………………………… ………………………………….…………………………………………………………………………………… ……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… ………………………….…………………………………………………………………………………………… ……………………………………………………………………………………………………… 29. If it were in your power, would you abolish the protection status of the old village? For what reason? …………………………………………………………………………………………………………………. ……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… ………………….…………………………………………………………………………………………………… ………………………………….…………………………………………………………………………………… ……………………………………………………………………………………………………… Data Protection Disclaimer The questions contained in the survey are of a general nature only and not intended to address the specific circumstances of any particular individual or entity. Personal data protection The research coordinators are committed to user privacy. The specific policy for the protection of your privacy has been designed on the basis of Regulation 2016/679 on the protection of natural persons with regard to the processing of personal data and on the free movement of such data, and repealing Directive 95/46/EC (General Data Protection Regulation). Recipients of the Information Your replies will only be read and analysed by Iason Koutsomitelis. The analysis of the data obtained by this survey can be used for scientific purposes and may be published. The anonymization and confidentiality of the collected data are safeguarded at any stage of the study

Confidentiality and data security measures Your survey answers will be stored in .doc format. Your responses will remain anonymous. No one will be able to identify you or your answers, and no one will know whether or not you participated in the study. Your participation in this research study is voluntary. You may choose not to participate. If you decide to participate in this research survey, you may withdraw at any time. If you decide not to participate in this study or if you withdraw from participating at any time, you will not be asked the reasons why. You may access, rectify, or erase any data collected at any time during the retention period. Contact If you have any questions about the research study, or you want to exercise your rights please contact: Iason Koutsomitelis tel: +30 6072959300, email: iasonkouts@yahoo.gr Krista De Jonge email: krista.dejonge@kuleuven.be

ΔΙΠΛΩΜΑΤΙΚΗ ΕΡΓΑΣΙΑ – ΕΡΩΤΗΜΑΤΟΛΟΓΙΟ (Type B) Το παρόν ερωτηματολόγιο αποτελεί μέρος της διπλωματικής μου εργασίας σχετικά με τον παραδοσιακό οικισμό της Νικήτης Χαλκιδικής. Η εργασία γίνεται στο πλαίσιο των μεταπτυχιακών μου σπουδών στο πρόγραμμα Συντήρησης Μνημείων και Ιστορικών Τόπων (Master of Conservation of Monuments and Sites) του πανεπιστημίου KU Leuven, στο Βέλγιο. Σκοπός της διπλωματικής είναι η κατανόηση της αξίας του οικισμού με την καταγραφή των ιστορικών κτηρίων και σπιτιών του και η δημιουργία ενός ολοκληρωμένου καταλόγου που θα περιλαμβάνει, εκτός των άλλων, τις απόψεις και τη γνώμη των κατοίκων. Τα ερωτηματολόγια είναι απολύτως ανώνυμα. Η επεξεργασία των δεδομένων θα γίνει αποκλειστικά και μόνο για τον σκοπό της διπλωματικής εργασίας και σε καμία περίπτωση δε θα κοινοποιηθούν σε τρίτους. Κατά τη δημοσιοποίηση της τελικής εργασίας θα ληφθεί κάθε αναγκαίο μέτρο ώστε να τηρηθεί η ανωνυμία και να αποφευχθεί ταυτοποίηση προσώπων με συγκεκριμένα κτήρια/κατοικίες. Σας ευχαριστώ προκαταβολικά για το χρόνο σας, Ιάσων Κουτσομητέλης Αρχιτέκτονας Μηχανικός

Ενότητα 1 – Γενικές ερωτήσεις 1. Είσαστε μόνιμη κάτοικος της Νικήτης;…………………………………………………………………………….. -

Είναι η καταγωγή σας από τη Νικήτη; Μεγαλώσατε (έχετε ζήσει κάποια χρόνια) στη Νικήτη;………………………………………………………………………………………………………….

2. Το σπίτι που μένετε είναι το πατρικό σας, το κληρονομήσατε από κάποιο άλλο συγγενικό σας πρόσωπο ή το αγοράσατε;……………………………………………………………………….. -

Αν είναι το πατρικό σας ή το κληρονομήσατε, γιατί επιλέξατε να μείνετε σε αυτό και όχι να το πουλήσετε ή να το νοικιάσετε και να μείνετε κάπου αλλού στο χωριό;…………………………………………………………………………………………………………… ……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………

Αν το αγοράσατε, πότε έγινε αυτό και για ποιο λόγο επιλέξατε το συγκεκριμένο σπίτι;…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… ……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….…… …………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….

3. Υπάρχουν κάποια διαστήματα του χρόνου που νοικιάζετε ή παραχωρείτε το σπίτι σας σε τρίτους; Για ποιο λόγο; ………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… ………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… …………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………

4. Πότε χτίστηκε το σπίτι σας; ………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… ………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… 5. Ποια είναι τα θετικά του να μένει κανείς σε ένα παλιό, παραδοσιακό χωριό και ποιες είναι οι δυσκολίες; ………………………………………………………………………………………………………….. ………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… ………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… ………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… 6. Και επίσης, ποια είναι τα θετικά του να μένει κανείς σε ένα παραδοσιακό σπίτι και ποιες είναι οι δυσκολίες; ………………………………………………………………………………………………… ………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… ………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… ………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… 7. Το παλιό χωριό είναι ένας οικισμός που προστατεύεται. Ποιο μέρος του χωριού είναι αυτό που προστατεύεται; Το δικό σας σπίτι είναι μέσα στη προστατευόμενη ζώνη;………. ………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… ………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… 8. Οι κανόνες που ισχύουν βοηθούν να διατηρηθεί το χωριό ή αποτελούν απλώς εμπόδιο στις δραστηριότητές σας και δυσκολεύουν την καθημερινότητα των κατοίκων; Για ποιο λόγο και σε ποιους τομείς; ……………………………………………………………………………………………… ………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… ………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… ………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… ………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… ………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… ………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… …………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………

Ενότητα 2 - Ερωτήσεις σχετικές με αλλαγές στο σπίτι 11. Τί αλλαγές έχουν γίνει στο εξωτερικό του σπιτιού σας γενικά; (πχ. Αντικατάσταση κουφωμάτων, προσθήκες χώρων ή δωματίων, επεκτάσεις, κλπ.) Για ποιο λόγο; …………… ………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… ………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… ………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… ………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… ………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… ………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… ………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………..

12. Οι εργασίες έγιναν από εσάς ή κάποιο μέλος της οικογένειάς σας ή τις αναθέσατε σε συνεργείο οικοδόμων, σε αρχιτέκτονα ή άλλον σχετικό με τις οικοδομές; ……………………. ………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… ………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… ………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… 13. Το σπίτι σας είναι παλιό και παραδοσιακό και βρίσκεται στο παλιό χωριό. Με ποιον τρόπο αυτό επηρέασε τις αλλαγές που κάνατε και τον τρόπο που τις κάνατε;………………… ………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… ………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… ………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… ………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… .……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………..………………… ……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….. ………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… ………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… 14. Έχετε χτίσει μία μεγάλη επέκταση μπροστά και στο πλάι του σπιτιού. -

Για ποιο λόγο έγινε αυτή η επέκταση; ………………………………………………………………… …………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… …………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… ……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………

Πότε έγινε αυτή η επέκταση και από ποιον (από εσάς ή είχαν γίνει σε προγενέστερη φάση); ………………………………………………………………………………………… ……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….…… …………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….

Πόσοι χώροι έχουν προστεθεί; …………………………………………………………………………… …………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… …………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… …………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….

Πώς αποφασίσατε ποια μορφή θα έχουν οι επεκτάσεις; …………………………………… …………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… …………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… …………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….

Τί χρήσεις έχουν τα δωμάτια της επέκτασης; …………………………………………………… …………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… …………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… …………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….

Είχαν πάντα τις ίδιες χρήσεις ή έχουν αλλάξει με τα χρόνια; Αν αλλάξανε, πώς; .. …………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… …………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… …………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….

Έγιναν όλες οι εργασίες μονομιάς ή πιο σταδιακά; …………………………………………….

15. Προσθέσατε μια βεράντα μπροστά , στον πρώτο όροφο, σε σημείο που δεν υπήρχε προηγουμένως. Για ποιο λόγο το αποφασίσατε αυτό; ……………………………………………………. ………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… ………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… ………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… -

Πώς αποφασίσετε τη μορφή της νέας βεράντας; ………………………………………… …………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… …………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… ………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………

16. Ειδικότερα σχετικά με τα κουφώματα του σπιτιού: -

Για ποιο λόγο τα αντικαταστήσατε; ……………………………………………………………………. ……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………. .…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… .……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………

Αντικαταστήσατε όλα τα κουφώματα του σπιτιού ή μόνο ορισμένα;…………………. ……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………. ……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………. …………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….

Τι είδους κουφώματα επιλέξατε (ξύλινα, αλουμινίου, πλαστικά, άλλα) και για ποιο λόγο; ………………………………………………………………………………………………………….. ……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………. .…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… …………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….

Τι διαφορές έχουν με τα παλιά κουφώματα; ……………………………………………………… ……………………………………………………………………………………….…………………………………… …………………………………….……………………………………………………………………………………… …………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….

17. Γνωρίζετε αν οι εξωτερικοί τοίχοι ήταν πάντα ασβεστωμένοι ή το διαλέξατε εσείς;………............................................................................................................................. -

Για ποιο λόγο;……………………………………………………………………………………………………… …………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… …………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….

Πώς επιλέξατε τα χρώματα στους εξωτερικούς τοίχους; ……………………………………. …………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… …………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….

18. Για τις εργασίες και τις αλλαγές που κάνατε, χρησιμοποιήθηκαν παραδοσιακά υλικά όπως πέτρα και ξύλο ή πιο σύγχρονα όπως είναι το τσιμέντο, το γυαλί κλπ; ………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… ………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… -

Για ποιους λόγους επιλέξατε αυτά τα υλικά; ……………………………………………………… …………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… …………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… …………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………..

Ενότητα 3 – Ερωτήσεις σχετικές με τις διαδικασίες 19. Ποια ήταν η διαδικασία που ακολουθήσατε για να κάνετε τις αλλαγές που θέλατε; Σε ποιον τις αναθέσατε να την κάνει (άδειες, κατάθεση σχεδίων κλπ); ………………………….. ………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… ………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… ………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… ………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… ………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… ………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… 20. Ποιες δυσκολίες συναντήσατε στη διαδικασία αυτή; …………………………………………………… ………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… .………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………. ………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… …………………………………………………………………………………………….………………………………………… …………………………………………………………………………………………….………………………………………… ………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… 21. Το σπίτι σας βρίσκεται στη ζώνη προστασία του παλιού χωριού. Αντιμετωπίσατε περισσότερες δυσκολίες στο να κάνετε τις αλλαγές και ποιες ήταν αυτές;……………………… ………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… .………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………. ………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… …………………………………………………………………………………………….………………………………………… …………………………………………………………………………………………….………………………………………… ………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… 22. Από τις αλλαγές που προτείνατε, ποιες ενέκρινε και ποιες απέρριψε η πολεοδομία και η επιτροπή αρχιτεκτονικού ελέγχου; …………………………………………………………………………………. ………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… .………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………. ………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… …………………………………………………………………………………………….………………………………………… …………………………………………………………………………………………….………………………………………… …………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………

23. Ποιες από τις αλλαγές που απορρίφθηκαν αποφασίσατε να τις κάνετε παρόλα αυτά; Για ποιο λόγο; ………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………. ………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… .………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………. ………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… …………………………………………………………………………………………….………………………………………… …………………………………………………………………………………………….………………………………………… ………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… 24. Το κόστος εργασιών ήταν ίδιο με άλλα σπίτια που δεν είναι παλιά και παραδοσιακά; Τι είναι αυτό που κόστισε περισσότερο, τι το ίδιο και τι λιγότερο; …………………………………….. ………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… .………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………. ………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… …………………………………………………………………………………………….………………………………………… …………………………………………………………………………………………….………………………………………… ………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… 25. Μετά την ολοκλήρωσή των εργασιών έγιναν από τις αρμόδιες υπηρεσίες επιπλέον έλεγχοι; …………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… ………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… .………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………. ………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… 26. Ποιες επιπλέον αλλαγές και παρεμβάσεις θέλετε να κάνετε στο μέλλον; Για ποιο λόγο;… ………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… .………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………. ………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… …………………………………………………………………………………………….………………………………………… …………………………………………………………………………………………….………………………………………… ………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… 27. Αν ήταν στο χέρι σας, θα καταργούσατε το καθεστώς προστασίας του παλιού χωριού; Για ποιο λόγο;…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………. ………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… .………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………. ………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… …………………………………………………………………………………………….………………………………………… …………………………………………………………………………………………….………………………………………… …………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………

ΔΙΠΛΩΜΑΤΙΚΗ ΕΡΓΑΣΙΑ – ΕΡΩΤΗΜΑΤΟΛΟΓΙΟ (Type C) Το παρόν ερωτηματολόγιο αποτελεί μέρος της διπλωματικής μου εργασίας σχετικά με τον παραδοσιακό οικισμό της Νικήτης Χαλκιδικής. Η εργασία γίνεται στο πλαίσιο των μεταπτυχιακών μου σπουδών στο πρόγραμμα Συντήρησης Μνημείων και Ιστορικών Τόπων (Master of Conservation of Monuments and Sites) του πανεπιστημίου KU Leuven, στο Βέλγιο. Σκοπός της διπλωματικής είναι η κατανόηση της αξίας του οικισμού με την καταγραφή των ιστορικών κτηρίων και σπιτιών του και η δημιουργία ενός ολοκληρωμένου καταλόγου που θα περιλαμβάνει, εκτός των άλλων, τις απόψεις και τη γνώμη των κατοίκων. Τα ερωτηματολόγια είναι απολύτως ανώνυμα. Η επεξεργασία των δεδομένων θα γίνει αποκλειστικά και μόνο για τον σκοπό της διπλωματικής εργασίας και σε καμία περίπτωση δε θα κοινοποιηθούν σε τρίτους. Κατά τη δημοσιοποίηση της τελικής εργασίας θα ληφθεί κάθε αναγκαίο μέτρο ώστε να τηρηθεί η ανωνυμία και να αποφευχθεί ταυτοποίηση προσώπων με συγκεκριμένα κτήρια/κατοικίες. Σας ευχαριστώ προκαταβολικά για το χρόνο σας, Ιάσων Κουτσομητέλης Αρχιτέκτονας Μηχανικός

Ενότητα 1 – Γενικές ερωτήσεις 1. Είσαστε μόνιμος ή περιστασιακός (εποχικός) κάτοικος της Νικήτης;……………………………… ……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….. 2. Είναι η καταγωγή σας από τη Νικήτη; Μεγαλώσατε (έχετε ζήσει κάποια χρόνια)στη Νικήτη; ………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….. ………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… ………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… 3. Πού μένετε; …………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….. ………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… 4. Το σπίτι αυτό είναι το πατρικό σας, το κληρονομήσατε από κάποιο άλλο συγγενικό σας πρόσωπο ή το αγοράσατε; …………………………………………………………………………………………….. ……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….. -

Αν είναι το πατρικό σας ή το κληρονομήσατε, γιατί δεν επιλέξατε να μείνετε σε αυτό; ………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… …………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… ……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………

Αν το αγοράσατε, πότε έγινε αυτό και για ποιο λόγο επιλέξατε το συγκεκριμένο σπίτι; ..………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… …………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… …………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….

5. Πότε χτίστηκε το κτήριο αυτό; ……………………………………………………………………….………….. ……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………. 6. Ποια είναι τα θετικά του να μένει κανείς σε ένα παλιό, παραδοσιακό χωριό και ποιες είναι οι δυσκολίες; ………………………………………………………………………………………………………….. ………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… ………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… ………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… 7. Το παλιό χωριό είναι ένας οικισμός που προστατεύεται. Ποιο μέρος του χωριού είναι αυτό που προστατεύεται; Το δικό σας σπίτι είναι μέσα στη προστατευόμενη ζώνη;………. ………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… ………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… 8. Οι κανόνες που ισχύουν βοηθούν να διατηρηθεί το χωριό ή αποτελούν απλώς εμπόδιο στις δραστηριότητές σας και δυσκολεύουν την καθημερινότητα των κατοίκων; Για ποιο λόγο και σε ποιους τομείς; ……………………………………………………………………………………………… ………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… ………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… ………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… ………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… ………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… ………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… ………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… 9. Μέχρι πότε κατοικείτο το σπίτι και από ποιους; Για ποιο λόγο έπαψε να κατοικείται; …… ………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… ………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… ………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… ………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… ………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… 10. Τί χρήσεις υπήρχαν στο ισόγειο του σπιτιού; Πότε και για ποιο λόγο εγκαταλείφθηκαν? ………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… ………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… ………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… ………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… ………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… Ενότητα 2 - Ερωτήσεις σχετικές με τις αλλαγές στο κτήριο 11. Τί αλλαγές έχουν γίνει στο εξωτερικό του σπιτιού σας γενικά; (πχ. Αντικατάσταση κουφωμάτων, προσθήκες χώρων ή δωματίων, επεκτάσεις, κλπ.) Για ποιο λόγο; …………… …………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………

………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… ………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… ………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… ………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… ………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… ……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….. 12. Πότε έγιναν οι αλλαγές;…………………………………………………………………………………………………. ……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….. 13. Ειδικότερα για το μπαλκόνι. Έχει ένα πολύ ιδιαίτερο σχήμα, είναι ημικυκλικό, με σιδερένια κάγκελα. -

Είναι αυτή η αρχική μορφή του ή αντικαταστάθηκε με καινούργιο κάποια στιγμή; ……………………………………………………………………………………………………………. …………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… ……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………

Αν αντικαταστάθηκε: -

Για ποιο λόγο έγινε αυτό; (φθορά λόγω παλαιότητας, πρόβλημα σταθερότητας και ασφάλειας, μικρό μέγεθος, δεν ταίριαζε με το υπόλοιπο σπίτι, άλλο)………… …………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… …………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… ……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………

Για ποιο λόγο χτίστηκε με αυτό το σχήμα; ………………………………………………………… …………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… …………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… ……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………

Πότε έγιναν αυτές οι εργασίες στο μπαλκόνι και από ποιον (από εσάς ή είχαν γίνει σε προγενέστερη φάση);……………………………………………………………………………. …………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… …………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… …………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….

Αν αυτή είναι η αρχική του μορφή: -

Για ποιο λόγο έχει αυτό το ιδιαίτερο σχήμα; ……………………………………………………… …………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… …………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… …………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….

14. Ειδικότερα για την πλαϊνή βεράντα. Υπήρχε πάντοτε σε εκείνο το σημείο του σπιτιού ή έγινε μεταγενέστερα;………………………………………………………………………………………………………. ………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… -

Αν έγινε μεταγενέστερα, για ποιο λόγο; …………………………………………………………… …………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… ……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………

Τί αλλαγές έχουν γίνει και γιατί; ………………………………………………………………………… …………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… …………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… …………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….

15. Ειδικότερα στην περίπτωση που ενδεχομένως έγιναν προσθήκες δωματίων ή επιπλέον χώρων στο σπίτι σας: -

Πόσοι και ποιοι είναι οι χώροι που έχουν προστεθεί; ..…………………………………….. …………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… …………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… ……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………

Για ποιο λόγο έγιναν αυτές οι προσθήκες; ..…………………………………………………….... …………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… …………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… ……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………

Πότε έγιναν και από ποιον (από εσάς ή είχαν γίνει σε προγενέστερη φάση); ….. …………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… …………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… ……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………

Η χρήση τους παρέμεινε ίδια με την αρχική ή είχε αλλάξει μέσα στο χρόνο; Αν έχει αλλάξει, για ποιους λόγους έγινε αυτό; ..………………………………………………….. …………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… …………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… ……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………

16. Έχουν γίνει εργασίες σταθεροποίησης ή στήριξης στο σπίτι; ………………………………………….. ………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… -

Σε ποια σημεία και για ποιο λόγο; ……………………………………………………………………… …………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… …………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… ……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………

Έγιναν από εσάς ή κάποιο μέλος της οικογένειά σας ή τις αναθέσατε σε κάποιον μηχανικό; …………………………………………………………………………………………………………… …………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… ……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………

Ποια ήταν η διαδικασία σχετικά με τις υπηρεσίες, πολεοδομία κλπ.; ………………… …………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… …………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… …………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… …………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… …………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….

17. Γνωρίζετε αν οι εξωτερικοί τοίχοι ήταν πάντα σοβατισμένοι ή το διαλέξατε εσείς; ………… ………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… -

Για ποιο λόγο; …………………………………………………………………………………………………….. …………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… …………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… …………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….

Ενότητα 3 – Ερωτήσεις σχετικές με τις διαδικασίες 19. Με ποιο τρόπο θα χρησιμοποιήσετε το σπίτι στο μέλλον; (πώληση, ενοικίαση, προσωπική χρήση ή χρήση από κάποιο άλλο μέλος της οικογένειας). Για ποιο λόγο; ……. ………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… ………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… ………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… ………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… ………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… ………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… 20. Με ποιον τρόπο θα χρησιμοποιήσετε τους ισόγειους χώρους; Για ποιο λόγο; ………………. ………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… ………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… ………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… ………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… ………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… …………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………

21. Ποιες χρήσεις επιτρέπονται στους ισόγειους χώρους; ……………………………………………………. ………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… ………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… ………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… 22. Ποιες αλλαγές και παρεμβάσεις θέλετε να κάνετε; Για ποιο λόγο; …………………………………. ………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… ………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… ………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… ………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… ………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… .……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… ………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… ………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… 23. Το σπίτι σας είναι παλιό και βρίσκεται στο παλιό χωριό. Με ποιον τρόπο αυτό θα επηρεάσει τις αλλαγές που σκοπεύετε να κάνατε και τον τρόπο που θα τις κάνατε; Θα αντιμετωπίσετε περισσότερες δυσκολίες; ;…………………………………………………………..………… ………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… .………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………. ………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… …………………………………………………………………………………………….………………………………………… ………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… ………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… …………………………………………………………………………………………….………………………………………… ………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… 24. Το κόστος εργασιών θα είναι το ίδιο με άλλα σπίτια που δεν είναι παλιά και παραδοσιακά; Τι είναι αυτό που θα κοστίσει περισσότερο, τι το ίδιο και τι λιγότερο; ………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… ……………………………………….……………………………………………………………………………………………… ……………………………………….……………………………………………………………………………………………… ………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………. ………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………. ………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… …………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………

Ενότητα 4 – Τελική ερώτηση 25. Αν ήταν στο χέρι σας, θα καταργούσατε το καθεστώς προστασίας του παλιού χωριού; Για ποιο λόγο;…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………. ………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… .………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………. ………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… …………………………………………………………………………………………….………………………………………… …………………………………………………………………………………………….………………………………………… …………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………

ΔΙΠΛΩΜΑΤΙΚΗ ΕΡΓΑΣΙΑ – ΕΡΩΤΗΜΑΤΟΛΟΓΙΟ (Type D) Το παρόν ερωτηματολόγιο αποτελεί μέρος της διπλωματικής μου εργασίας σχετικά με τον παραδοσιακό οικισμό της Νικήτης Χαλκιδικής. Η εργασία γίνεται στο πλαίσιο των μεταπτυχιακών μου σπουδών στο πρόγραμμα Συντήρησης Μνημείων και Ιστορικών Τόπων (Master of Conservation of Monuments and Sites) του πανεπιστημίου KU Leuven, στο Βέλγιο. Σκοπός της διπλωματικής είναι η κατανόηση της αξίας του οικισμού με την καταγραφή των ιστορικών κτηρίων και σπιτιών του και η δημιουργία ενός ολοκληρωμένου καταλόγου που θα περιλαμβάνει, εκτός των άλλων, τις απόψεις και τη γνώμη των κατοίκων. Τα ερωτηματολόγια είναι απολύτως ανώνυμα. Η επεξεργασία των δεδομένων θα γίνει αποκλειστικά και μόνο για τον σκοπό της διπλωματικής εργασίας και σε καμία περίπτωση δε θα κοινοποιηθούν σε τρίτους. Κατά τη δημοσιοποίηση της τελικής εργασίας θα ληφθεί κάθε αναγκαίο μέτρο ώστε να τηρηθεί η ανωνυμία και να αποφευχθεί ταυτοποίηση προσώπων με συγκεκριμένα κτήρια/κατοικίες. Σας ευχαριστώ προκαταβολικά για το χρόνο σας, Ιάσων Κουτσομητέλης Αρχιτέκτονας Μηχανικός

Ενότητα 1 – Γενικές ερωτήσεις 1. Είσαστε μόνιμος ή περιστασιακός (εποχικός) κάτοικος της Νικήτης;……………………………… ……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….. -

Στην περίπτωση που είσαστε περιστασιακός κάτοικος του χωριού, επισκέπτεστε το σπίτι σας μόνο για τις καλοκαιρινές διακοπές σας ή και κατά τη διάρκεια του χειμώνα; ……………………………………………………………………………………………………………. …………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… ……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………

2. Είναι η καταγωγή σας από τη Νικήτη; Μεγαλώσατε (έχετε ζήσει κάποια χρόνια)στη Νικήτη; ………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….. ………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… ………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… ………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… 3. Αν κατάγεστε από τη Νικήτη, το σπίτι που μένετε είναι το πατρικό σας, το κληρονομήσατε από κάποιο άλλο συγγενικό σας πρόσωπο ή το αγοράσατε; ………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… ………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… ………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… -

Αν είναι το πατρικό σας ή το κληρονομήσατε, γιατί επιλέξατε να μείνετε σε αυτό και όχι να το πουλήσετε ή να το νοικιάσετε; ……………………………………………… …………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… ……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………

Αν το αγοράσατε, πότε έγινε αυτό και για ποιο λόγο επιλέξατε το συγκεκριμένο σπίτι; ………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… …………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… …………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….

4. Υπάρχουν κάποια διαστήματα του χρόνου που νοικιάζετε ή παραχωρείτε το σπίτι σας σε τρίτους; Για ποιο λόγο; ………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… ………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… ………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… 5. Πότε χτίστηκε το σπίτι σας; ………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… ………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… 6. Ποια είναι τα θετικά του να μένει κανείς σε ένα παλιό, παραδοσιακό χωριό και ποιες είναι οι δυσκολίες; ………………………………………………………………………………………………………….. ………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… ………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… ………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… 7. Και επίσης, ποια είναι τα θετικά του να μένει κανείς σε ένα παραδοσιακό σπίτι και ποιες είναι οι δυσκολίες; ………………………………………………………………………………………………… ………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… ………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… ………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… 8. Το παλιό χωριό είναι ένας οικισμός που προστατεύεται. Ποιο μέρος του χωριού είναι αυτό που προστατεύεται; Το δικό σας σπίτι είναι μέσα στη προστατευόμενη ζώνη;………. ………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… ………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… 9. Οι κανόνες που ισχύουν βοηθούν να διατηρηθεί το χωριό ή αποτελούν απλώς εμπόδιο στις δραστηριότητές σας και δυσκολεύουν την καθημερινότητα των κατοίκων; Για ποιο λόγο και σε ποιους τομείς; ……………………………………………………………………………………………… ………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… ………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… ………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… ………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… ………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… ………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… …………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………

Ενότητα 2 – Ειδικές ερωτήσεις για το σπίτι 10. Το σπίτι σας δεν έχει την τυπική εμφάνιση ενός παραδοσιακού σπιτιού του χωριού. Γνωρίζετε γιατί χτίστηκε με ένα στυλ που μοιάζει σε νεοκλασικό; Ποια είναι η ιστορία του; …………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………. ………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… ………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… ………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… ………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… ………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… 11. Θυμάστε τι χρήσεις είχαν τα μαγαζιά στο ισόγειο; Ανήκαν στους ιδιοκτήτες των σπιτιών; Μέχρι πότε λειτουργούσαν; …..………………………………………………………………………………………. ………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… ………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… ………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… ………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… ………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… 12. Προτιμάτε να μείνουν κλειστά ή να λειτουργήσουν ξανά; Τι θα θέλατε να γίνουν; ……….. ………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… ………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… ………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… 13. Το κτήριο στο οποίο μένετε είναι χωρισμένο σε δύο σπίτια. Φτιάχτηκε έτσι από την αρχή ή χωρίστηκε σε μεταγενέστερο στάδιο; Γνωρίζετε για ποιο λόγο έγινε ο διαχωρισμός; ……………………………………………………………………………………………………………… ………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… ………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… ………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… ………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… 14. Είναι συγγενικά σας πρόσωπα οι ιδιοκτήτες του άλλου μέρους του κτιρίου; Πώς είναι οι μεταξύ σας σχέσεις; Σήμερα, τα δύο μέρη είναι απολύτως αυτόνομα; …………………………… ………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… ………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… ………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… ………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… ………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… 15. Παρατηρώ ότι υπάρχουν διαφορές στα διακοσμητικά στοιχεία της πρόσοψης (κορνίζα παραθύρων, γύψινα διακοσμητικά στις κολώνες κλπ) ανάμεσα στα δύο μέρη του κτιρίου. Γνωρίζετε γιατί; ……………………………………………………………………………………………….. ………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… …………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………

………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… …………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………

Ενότητα 3 - Ερωτήσεις σχετικές με τις αλλαγές 17. Τί αλλαγές έχουν γίνει στο εξωτερικό του σπιτιού σας γενικά; (πχ. Αντικατάσταση κουφωμάτων, προσθήκες χώρων ή δωματίων, επεκτάσεις, κλπ.) Για ποιο λόγο; …………… ………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… ………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… ………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… ………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… ………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… ………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… ……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….. 18. Οι εργασίες έγιναν από εσάς ή κάποιο μέλος της οικογένειάς σας ή τις αναθέσατε σε συνεργείο οικοδόμων, σε αρχιτέκτονα ή άλλον σχετικό με τις οικοδομές; ……………………. ………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… ………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… ………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… 19. Πότε έγιναν οι αλλαγές;…………………………………………………………………………………………………. ……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….. 20. Πριν κάνετε τις αλλαγές στο δικό σας μέρος του κτιρίου, συνεννοηθήκατε για αυτές με τους ιδιοκτήτες του άλλου μέρους; Υπήρχαν διαφωνίες και ποιες λύσεις βρέθηκαν για αυτές; ……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………. ………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… ………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… ………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… ………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… 21. Το σπίτι σας είναι παλιό και παραδοσιακό και βρίσκεται στο παλιό χωριό. Με ποιον τρόπο αυτό επηρέασε τις αλλαγές που κάνατε και τον τρόπο που τις κάνατε;………………… ………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… ………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… ………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… ………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… .……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………..………………… ……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….. …………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………

22. Ειδικότερα στην περίπτωση που έγιναν εργασίες που αφορούν τα μπαλκόνια του σπιτιού: -

Αντικαταστήσατε το παλιό μπαλκόνι με ένα νέο που φτιάχτηκε εξαρχής;………… …………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… ……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………

Τι διαφορές έχει το καινούριο μπαλκόνι με το αρχικό;……………………………………… …………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… …………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… ……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………

Πότε έγιναν αυτές οι εργασίες στο μπαλκόνι και από ποιον (από εσάς ή είχαν γίνει σε προγενέστερη φάση);…………………………………………………………………………….. …………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… …………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… ……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………

23. Προσθέσατε κάποιο μπαλκόνι σε σημείο που δεν υπήρχε προηγουμένως; Για ποιο λόγο το αποφασίσατε αυτό;…………………………………………………………………………………………………….. ………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… ………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… ………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… ………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… -

Πώς αποφασίσετε τη μορφή του νέου μπαλκονιού;………………………………………….. …………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… …………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… …………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….

24. Ειδικότερα στην περίπτωση που έγιναν προσθήκες δωματίων ή επιπλέον χώρων που ενδεχομένως έγιναν στο σπίτι σας: -

Ποια είναι σήμερα η χρήση των χώρων που έχουν προστεθεί; ..……………………….. …………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… …………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… ……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………

Παραμένει ίδια με την αρχική ή έχει αλλάξει μέσα στο χρόνο; Αν έχει αλλάξει, για ποιους λόγους έγινε αυτό; ..………………………………………………………….…………….. …………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… …………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… ……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………

25. Ειδικότερα στην περίπτωση που αντικαταστήσατε τα κουφώματα του σπιτιού: -

Για ποιο λόγο κάνατε αυτήν την εργασία;…………………………………………………………. …………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… …………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… ……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………

26. Για τις εργασίες και τις αλλαγές που κάνατε, χρησιμοποιήθηκαν παραδοσιακά υλικά όπως πέτρα και ξύλο ή πιο σύγχρονα όπως είναι το τσιμέντο, το γυαλί κλπ; ………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… ………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… -

Ενότητα 4 – Ερωτήσεις σχετικές με τις διαδικασίες 27. Ποια ήταν η διαδικασία που ακολουθήσατε για να κάνετε τις αλλαγές που θέλατε; Σε ποιον τις αναθέσατε να την κάνει (άδειες, κατάθεση σχεδίων κλπ); ………………………….. ………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… ………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… ………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… ………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… ………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… ………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… 28. Ποιες δυσκολίες συναντήσατε στη διαδικασία αυτή; …………………………………………………… ………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… .………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………. ………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… …………………………………………………………………………………………….………………………………………… …………………………………………………………………………………………….………………………………………… ………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… 29. Το σπίτι σας βρίσκεται στη ζώνη προστασία του παλιού χωριού. Αντιμετωπίσατε περισσότερες δυσκολίες στο να κάνετε τις αλλαγές και ποιες ήταν αυτές;……………………… ………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… .………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………. ………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… …………………………………………………………………………………………….………………………………………… …………………………………………………………………………………………….………………………………………… ………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… 30. Από τις αλλαγές που προτείνατε, ποιες ενέκρινε και ποιες απέρριψε η πολεοδομία και η επιτροπή αρχιτεκτονικού ελέγχου; …………………………………………………………………………………. ………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… .………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………. ………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… …………………………………………………………………………………………….………………………………………… …………………………………………………………………………………………….………………………………………… ………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… 31. Ποιες από τις αλλαγές που απορρίφθηκαν αποφασίσατε να τις κάνετε παρόλα αυτά; Για ποιο λόγο; ………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………. ………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… .………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………. ………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… …………………………………………………………………………………………….………………………………………… …………………………………………………………………………………………….………………………………………… …………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………

32. Το κόστος εργασιών ήταν ίδιο με άλλα σπίτια που δεν είναι παλιά και παραδοσιακά; Τι είναι αυτό που κόστισε περισσότερο, τι το ίδιο και τι λιγότερο; …………………………………….. ………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… .………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………. ………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… …………………………………………………………………………………………….………………………………………… …………………………………………………………………………………………….………………………………………… ………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… 33. Γίνονται έλεγχοι όταν ολοκληρώνονται οι εργασίες; ………………………………………………………. ………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… ………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… …………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………

Ενότητα 5 – Τελικές ερωτήσεις 34. Ποιες επιπλέον αλλαγές και παρεμβάσεις θέλετε να κάνετε στο μέλλον; Για ποιο λόγο;… ………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… .………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………. ………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… …………………………………………………………………………………………….………………………………………… …………………………………………………………………………………………….………………………………………… ………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… 35. Αν ήταν στο χέρι σας, θα καταργούσατε το καθεστώς προστασίας του παλιού χωριού; Για ποιο λόγο;…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………. ………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… .………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………. ………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… …………………………………………………………………………………………….………………………………………… …………………………………………………………………………………………….………………………………………… …………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………

FACULTY OF ENGINEERING SCIENCE RAYMOND LEMAIRE INTERNATIONAL CENTRE FOR CONSERVATION KASTEELPARK ARENBERG 1 â&#x20AC;&#x201C; POSTBUS 02431 3001 LEUVEN, BELGIUM

The Village of Nikiti, Greece;- An Inventory of Buildings and People Part II: The Inventory

Promoters:

Krista De Jonge Eleftheria Deltsou

Thesis to obtain the degree of Master of Science in Conservation of Monuments and Sites Presented by Iason Koutsomitelis

Leuven, June 2020

Table of Contents

Sector 1 Sector 2 Sector 3 Sector 4 Sector 5 Sector 6

9 67 111 207 219 263

The limits of the survey area (red) north of the old regional road (blue) and the six sectors of the survey area.

All photos and maps ÂŠ Iason Koutsomitelis

Sector 1

The Village of

NIKITI

Buildings Inventory of the Old Village.................. Author:..................................Iason Koutsomitelis Sector...............................................................1 Registration No:..............................................101

Photographs

Administrative region:.............Central Macedonia Regional unit:........................................Chalkidiki Municipality:......................................Sithonia Municipal community:..................................Nikiti

Location Building year:............xxxx Function:.....Private house .................................. Number of floors:............2 Basement:...................No Comments on decoration and typology : --Coordinates:

40°13’53.3”N 23°40’27.4”E

-Norht-west (front) facade. Typology

Typology

in relation with the environment

A2.3

-South-west (side) facade. Interventions typology

Interventions discription

-Reinforcement of the erker. -Blocking of four windows.

Degree of interventions: Low State of conservation Good -Few and not highly invasive interventions. -Low degree of interventions. -Adequate maintenance. -North-west (front) facade. 12

Value assessment:............................................................Medium

The Village of

NIKITI

Photographs

40°13’53.5”N 23°40’27.5”E

-North-west (front) facade. Typology

Typology

in relation with the environment

-North-east (side) facade. Interventions typology

Interventions discription

-Added extensions on the roof. -Additions and interventions on the second floor.

Degree of interventions: Medium State of conservation Good -Few and not highly invasive interventions. -Low degree of interventions. -Adequate maintenance. -Detail of the North-west (front) facade. 13

Value assessment:............................................................Medium

The Village of

NIKITI

Photographs

Location Building year:............1879 Function:.....Private house .................................. Number of floors:............2 Basement:...................No Comments on decoration and typology : --Coordinates:

40°13’54.2”N 23°40’27.7”E

-South-west (front) facade. Typology

Typology

Interventions

in relation with the environment

-South-east (side) facade. typology

discription

-Renovated. -Possible interventions on the loggia on the first and second floor.

Degree of interventions: Low State of conservation Excellent

-Detail of the ownership plate.

-Few and not highly invasive interventions. -Appropriate renovation. -Low degree of interventions. -Excellent maintenance. -Absence of other minor interfering factors.

Value assessment:..................................................................High

The Village of

NIKITI

Photographs

40°13’45.1”N 23°40’12.2”E

-South-east (side) facade. Typology

Typology

Interventions

in relation with the environment

-North-east (back) facade. typology

discription

-Renovated. -Small shed added on the back facade, not intergrated with the rest of the building. -A work of art was added on one of the facades.

Degree of interventions: Medium State of conservation Excellent

-South-east (side) facade.

-Few and not highly invasive interventions. -Appropriate renovation. -Low degree of interventions. -Excellent maintenance. -Minimum minor interfering factors (a/c unit, small shed).

Value assessment:..................................................................High

The Village of

NIKITI

Photographs

Location Building year:..aprox. 1900 Function:.....Private house .................................. Number of floors:............2 Basement:...................No Comments on decoration and typology : --Coordinates:

40°13’53.8”N 23°40’29.3”E

-South (front) facade. Typology

Typology

Interventions

in relation with the environment

-West (side) facade. typology

discription

-Possibly the building was extended to the right on a later stage, or was initially built in two phases. -Addition of chimneys and pipes on the front facade.

Degree of interventions: Low State of conservation Good -Few and not highly invasive interventions. -Low degree of interventions. -Adequate maintenance. -Considerable minor interfering factors (chimneys, pipes, el. wires) -South (front) facade. 16

Value assessment:..................................................................High

The Village of

NIKITI

Photographs

40°13’55.4”N 23°40’28.1”E

-South-west (front) facade. Typology

Typology

Interventions

in relation with the environment

-North-west (side) facade. typology

discription

-Renovated. -Room added on the back facade.

Degree of interventions: Medium State of conservation Excellent

-South-west (front) facade.

-Few and not highly invasive interventions. -Appropriate renovation. -Low degree of interventions. -Excellent maintenance. -Absence of other minor interfering factors.

Value assessment:............................................................Medium

The Village of

NIKITI

Photographs

40°13’55.0”N 23°40’27.6”E

-South-east (side) facade. Typology

Typology

in relation with the environment

-South-west (front) facade. Interventions typology

Interventions discription

-Replacement and extension of the balcony and staircase with concrete structures. -Small room (WC) added on the front facade.

-North-east (back) facade.

Degree of interventions: High State of conservation Poor -Many interventions. Some of them highly invasive. -High degree of interventions. -Abandoned half of the building. -Considerable minor interfering factors (pergolas, antennas). -South-west (front) facade. -North-west (side) facade. 18

Value assessment:..................................................................High

The Village of

NIKITI

Photographs

40°13’54.8”N 23°40’27.1”E

-South-west (front) facade. Typology

Typology

in relation with the environment

-South-west (front) facade. Interventions typology

Interventions discription

-Renovated -Replacement of the balcony and staircase with concrete structures. -Small room (WC) added on the front facade.

Degree of interventions: High State of conservation Adequate -Many interventions. Some of them highly invasive. -High degree of interventions. -Adequate maintenance. -Minimum minor interfering factors (pergola, antennas) -South-west (front) facade. 19

Value assessment:..................................................................Low

The Village of

NIKITI

Photographs

40°13’54.8”N 23°40’25.6”E

-South (front) and south-east facades. Typology

Typology

in relation with the environment

-South (front) facade. Interventions typology

Interventions discription

-Replacement of the balcony and staircase with concrete structures. -Room added on the front facade.

Degree of interventions: High State of conservation Adequate -Many interventions. Some of them highly invasive. -High degree of interventions. -Adequate maintenance. -Considerable minor interfering factors (a/c unit, solar water heater) -West (side) facade. 20

Value assessment:..................................................................Low

The Village of

NIKITI

Photographs

40°13’55.0”N 23°40’26.1”E

-South (front) facade. Typology

Typology

Interventions

in relation with the environment

-East (side) facade. typology

discription

-Room and balcony added on the front not intergrated with the rest of the building. -Small room added on the back

Degree of interventions: Severe State of conservation Adequate -Many interventions. Some of them highly invasive. -Severe degree of interventions. -Adequate maintenance. -Considerable minor interfering factors (a/c unit, antenas). -East (side) facade. 21

Value assessment:............................................................Medium

The Village of

NIKITI

Photographs

Location Building year:............xxxx Function:.....Private house .................................. Number of floors:............2 Basement:...................No

Coordinates:

40°13’54.6”N 23°40’25.1”E

Comments on decoration and typology : Interesting position and shape of the small balcony. Plan not fully rectangular.

-South (side) facade. Typology

Typology

Interventions

in relation with the environment

-West (front) facade. typology

discription

-Renovated

-West (front) facade.

Degree of interventions: Low State of conservation Excellent

-South-west (front) facade. -West (front) facade. 22

-Few and not highly invasive interventions. -Appropriate renovation. -Low degree of interventions. -Excellent maintenance. -Absence of other minor interfering factors. Value assessment:..................................................................High

The Village of

NIKITI

Photographs

40°13’45.1”N 23°40’25.2”E

-South (front) and east facades. Typology

Typology

Interventions

in relation with the environment

-East (side) facade. typology

discription

-Renovated. -Appropriate replacement of the balcony. -Pergola added on the front facade.

-North (back) facade. Degree of interventions: Low State of conservation Excellent

-South-west (front) facade. -North (back) facade. 23

-Few and not highly invasive interventions. -Appropriate renovation. -Low degree of interventions. -Excellent maintenance. -Minimum minor interfering factors (a/c unit, pergola). Value assessment:..................................................................High

The Village of

NIKITI

Photographs

40°13’55.4”N 23°40’25.7”E

-South (front) facade. Typology

Typology

Interventions

in relation with the environment

-North (back) facade. typology

discription

-Renovated

Degree of interventions: Low State of conservation Excellent

-East (side) facade.

-Few and not highly invasive interventions. -Appropriate renovation. -Low degree of interventions. -Excellent maintenance. -Absence of other minor interfering factors.

Value assessment:..................................................................High

The Village of

NIKITI

-North (back) facade.

Photographs

40°13’55.3”N 23°40’26.2”E

Typology

Interventions

in relation with the environment

-South-west (front) facade. typology

discription

-Small room added on the back facade not intergrated with the rest of the building.

-South (front) facade.

Degree of interventions: Medium State of conservation Adequate -One invasive intervention. -Medium degree of interventions. -Low maintenance. -Low inhabitability conditions -Absence of other minor interfering factors. 25

Value assessment:..................................................................Low

The Village of

NIKITI

Photographs

Location Building year:............xxxx Function:.....Private house .................................. Number of floors:............2 Basement:...................Yes Comments on decoration and typology : --Coordinates:

40°13’55.5”N 23°40’26.7”E

-North-west (side) facade. Typology

Typology

Interventions

in relation with the environment

-North-west (side) facade. typology

discription

-Renovated -Large room added on the back facade.

Degree of interventions: Medium State of conservation Good

-South-west (front) facade.

-One highly invasive intervention. -Appropriate renovation. -Medium degree of intervention. -Good maintenance. -Absence of other minor interfering factors.

Value assessment:..................................................................High

The Village of

NIKITI

Photographs

40°13’56.0”N 23°40’26.6”E

-South-west (front) facade. Typology

Typology

Interventions

in relation with the environment

-South-west (front) facade. typology

discription

-Renovated. -Big extension on the front facade, possibly closely after the main constuction. -Small room (WC) added on the left facade.

Degree of interventions: Medium State of conservation Good

-North-west (side) facade.

-Some invasive interventions. -Appropriate renovation. -Medium degree of intervention. -Good maintenance. -Some minor interfering factors (pergola, shed).

Value assessment:............................................................Medium

The Village of

NIKITI

Photographs

Location Building year:............xxxx Function:.....Private house .................................. Number of floors:............1 Basement:...................Yes Comments on decoration and typology : --Coordinates:

40°13’56.5”N 23°40’28.8”E

-South-west (front) facade. Typology

Typology

Interventions

in relation with the environment

-North-west (side) facade. typology

discription

-Renovated

Degree of interventions: Low State of conservation Excellent

-North-west (side) facade.

-Few and not highly invasive interventions. -Appropriate renovation. -Low degree of interventions. -Excellent maintenance. -Absence of other minor interfering factors.

Value assessment:..................................................................Low

The Village of

NIKITI

Photographs

Location Building year:............xxxx Function:.....Private house .................................. Number of floors:............2 Basement:...................Yes Comments on decoration and typology : --Coordinates:

40°13’58.1”N 23°40’29.1”E

-North-west (front) facade. Typology

Typology

Interventions

in relation with the environment

-North-west (front) facade. typology

discription

-Renovated.

Degree of interventions: Low State of conservation Excellent -Few and not highly invasive interventions. -Appropriate renovation. -Low degree of interventions. -Excellent maintenance. -Absence of other minor interfering factors. 29

Value assessment:............................................................Medium

The Village of

NIKITI

Photographs

Location Building year:............xxxx Function:......................... .................................. Number of floors:............x Basement:....................x Comments on decoration and typology : --Coordinates:

40°13’58.7”N 23°40’24.8”E

-South and west facades. Typology

Typology

in relation with the environment

-West facade. Interventions typology

Interventions discription

Degree of interventions: xxx State of conservation Ruin -In state of collapsing. -No maintenance.

Value assessment:..................................................................Low

The Village of

NIKITI

Photographs

Location Building year:............xxxx Function:.....Private house .................................. Number of floors:............1 Basement:..................Yes Comments on decoration and typology : --Coordinates:

40°13’58.2”N 23°40’26.6”E

-South (side) facade. Typology

Typology

Interventions

in relation with the environment

-South (side) facade. typology

discription

-Entire two-floor structure added on the back facade, failed attempt to intergrate it.

Degree of interventions: Severe State of conservation Adequate

-West (front) facade.

-One highly invasive intervention. -Severe degree of intervention. -Good maintenance. -Absence of other minor interfering factors. -Failed attempt of intergrating a new structure.

Value assessment:..................................................................Low

The Village of

NIKITI

Photographs

Location Building year:............xxxx Function:............xxxx .................................. Number of floors:............x Basement:...................x Comments on decoration and typology : --Coordinates:

40°13’57.3”N 23°40’26.5”E

-South and west facades. Typology

Typology

in relation with the environment

-West facade. Interventions typology

Interventions discription

Degree of interventions: xxx State of conservation Ruin -In state of collapsing. -No maintenance.

Value assessment:..................................................................Low

The Village of

NIKITI

Photographs

40°13’56.7”N 23°40’25.1”E

-South (front) facade. Typology

Typology

in relation with the environment

-South and west (side) facade. Interventions typology

Interventions discription

-Renovated, possibly not recently.

-West (side) facade.

Degree of interventions: Low State of conservation Good -No highly invasive interventions. -Renovated. -Low degree of interventions. -Adequate maintenance.

Value assessment:..................................................................High

The Village of

NIKITI

Photographs

40°13’57.4”N 23°40’25.2”E

-West (side) facade. Typology

Typology

Interventions

typology

in relation with the environment

discription

-Renovated. -Possibly, reconstruction of the loggia.

Degree of interventions: Medium State of conservation Good -Few and not highly invasive interventions. -Appropriate renovation. -Medium degree of interventions. -Excellent maintenance. -Some minor interfering factors (pergola, satellite dish). 34

Value assessment:..................................................................High

The Village of

NIKITI

Photographs

40°13’57.8”N 23°40’25.0”E

-South-west (side) facade. Typology

Typology

Interventions

typology

in relation with the environment

discription

-Renovated. -Added room on the back facade, not intergrated with the rest of the building.

Degree of interventions: High State of conservation Good -Few and not highly invasive interventions. -Appropriate renovation. -Medium degree of interventions. -Good maintenance.

Value assessment:..................................................................High

The Village of

NIKITI

Photographs

40°13’56.5”N 23°40’23.4”E

-South (front) facade. Typology

Typology

Interventions

in relation with the environment

-South and east facades. typology

discription

-Low quality interventions. -Concrete extension of the second floor,on the left facade. -Concrete terace and staircase added on the front facade. -Careless window replacements.

Degree of interventions: Severe State of conservation Poor -Many and highly invasive interventions. -Severe degree of interventions. -No maintenance. -Low inhabitability conditions. -South and east facades. 36

Value assessment:..................................................................High

The Village of

NIKITI

Photographs

40°13’57.1”N 23°40’23.2”E

-South (front) facade. Typology

Typology

in relation with the environment

-North (back) facade. Interventions typology

Interventions discription

-Renovated. -Replacement of the balcony with concrete structure.

Degree of interventions: Medium State of conservation Good -Few interventions. -Renovated. -Medium degree of interventions. -Excellent maintenance. -Absence of other minor interfering factors. 37

Value assessment:............................................................Medium

The Village of

NIKITI

Photographs

40°13’57.1”N 23°40’22.8”E

-South (front) facade. Typology

Typology

in relation with the environment

-North (back) facade. Interventions typology

Interventions discription

-Renovated. -Replacement of the balcony with concrete structure. -Small room added in the front facade.

Degree of interventions: Medium State of conservation Good -Few interventions. -Renovated. -Medium degree of interventions. -Excellent maintenance. -Absence of other minor interfering factors. 38

Value assessment:.................................................................High

The Village of

NIKITI

Photographs

40°13’57.0”N 23°40’22.4”E

-South (front) facade. Typology

Typology

in relation with the environment

-North (back) facade. Interventions typology

Interventions discription

-Replacement of the balcony with concrete structure.

Degree of interventions: Low State of conservation Poor

-South (front) and west (side) facades.

-Few interventions. -Low degree of interventions. -No maintenance. -Low inhabitability conditions. -Abandoned.

Value assessment:..................................................................High

The Village of

NIKITI

Photographs

Location Building year:............xxxx Function:................. ..xxxx .................................. Number of floors:............x Basement:...................xx Comments on decoration and typology : The typical fireplace is maintainted. Coordinates:

40°13’56.2”N 23°40’24.3”E

-Interior of North facade. Typology

Typology

in relation with the environment

-Interior of North facade. Interventions typology

Interventions discription

Degree of interventions: xxx State of conservation Ruin -In state of collapsing. -No maintenance.

Value assessment:..................................................................Low

The Village of

NIKITI

Photographs

Location Building year:............1930 Function:.....Private house .................................. Number of floors:............2 Basement:...................No Comments on decoration and typology : Front facade with triangular pediment. Coordinates:

40°13’55.8”N 23°40’24.9”E

-East (front) facade. Typology

Typology

Interventions

in relation with the environment

-North (side) facade. typology

discription

-Small shed added on the left side, possibly close to the building stage. -Mismatched frames.

-Detail of the ownership plate. Degree of interventions: Low State of conservation Adequate -Few and not highly invasive interventions. -Low degree of interventions. -Low maintenance.

Value assessment:..................................................................High

The Village of

NIKITI

Photographs

40°13’56.1”N 23°40’25.5”E

-East (front) facade. Typology

Typology

in relation with the environment

-South-west (front) facade. Interventions typology

Interventions discription

-East (front) facade.

Degree of interventions: xxx State of conservation Ruin -In state of collapsing. -No maintenance.

Value assessment:..................................................................Low

The Village of

NIKITI

Photographs

Location Building year:............1926 Function:.....Private house .................................. Number of floors:............2 Basement:...................No

Coordinates:

40°13’55.3”N 23°40’24.6”E

Comments on decoration and typology : Interesting shape of the erker. -Front facade with triangular pediment. -Rare typology.

-South (front) facade. Typology

Typology

Interventions

in relation with the environment

-South (front) facade. typology

discription

-New roof over the balcony. -Blocking of some windows.

-Detail of the ownership plate. Degree of interventions: Low State of conservation Poor

-South-west (front) facade. -East (side) facade. 43

-Few and not highly invasive interventions. -Low degree of interventions. -Low maintenance. -Half of the building abandoned. -Half of the balcony collapsed. Value assessment:..................................................................High

The Village of

NIKITI

Photographs

Location Building year:....app. 1930 Function:.....Private house .................................. Number of floors:............2 Basement:...................No Comments on decoration and typology : --Coordinates:

40°13’55.2”N 23°40’24.1”E

-South (front) facade. Typology

Typology

in relation with the environment

-North (back) facade. Interventions typology

Interventions discription

-Renovated with respect to the original building. -Appropriate replacement of the balcony.

Degree of interventions: Medium State of conservation Excellent

-South (front) facade.

-Few and not highly invasive interventions. -Appropriate renovation. -Low degree of interventions. -Excellent maintenance. -Absence of other minor interfering factors.

Value assessment:............................................................Medium

The Village of

NIKITI

Photographs

Location Building year:............1908 Function:.....Private house .................................. Number of floors:............2 Basement:...................Yes

Coordinates:

40°13’55.1”N 23°40’23.7”E

Comments on decoration and typology : A very characteristic example of the A4 typology. -Front facade with triangular pediment.

-South (front) facade. Typology

Typology

in relation with the environment

-South (front) facade. Interventions typology

Interventions discription

-Blocked four windows. -Replacement of the balcony structure some point in the past. The replaced structure is already in deteriorating state.

-East (side) facade. Degree of interventions: Low State of conservation Adequate

-South-west (front) facade. -North (back) facade. 45

-Some interventions. -Low degree of interventions. -Low maintenance. -Some minor interfering factors (blocked windows). -Balcony collapsed. Value assessment:..................................................................High

The Village of

NIKITI

Photographs

Location Building year:............xxxx Function:....Private house, Cafe/Bar............................ Number of floors:............2 Basement:...................No

Coordinates:

40°13’54.0”N 23°40’23.1”E

Comments on decoration and typology : Front facade with triangular pediment. -The property also includes a former commercial, 1 floor building turned into a bar.

Typology

Interventions

typology

in relation with the environment

discription

-Renovated. -Two blocked windows.

-South-east facade of the secondary building. Degree of interventions: Low State of conservation Excellent

-South-west (front) facade. -South-west facade of the secondary building. 46

The Village of

NIKITI

Photographs

40°13’54.7”N 23°40’22.8”E

-Interior of South (front) facade. Typology

Typology

in relation with the environment

-South (front) facade. Interventions

Interventions

typology

discription

Degree of interventions: xxx State of conservation Ruin -In state of collapsing. -No maintenance. -Interior of South (front) facade. 47

Value assessment:............................................................Medium

The Village of

NIKITI

Photographs

40°13’54.7”N 23°40’22.1”E

-South (side) facade. Typology

Typology

Interventions

in relation with the environment

-West (front) facade. typology

discription

-Renovated with respect to the original building.

Degree of interventions: Low State of conservation Excellent

-West (front) facade.

-No invasive interventions. -Appropriate renovation. -Low degree of interventions. -Excellent maintenance. -Absence of other minor interfering factors.

Value assessment:..................................................................High

The Village of

NIKITI

Photographs

Location Building year:............1925 Function:.....Private house .................................. Number of floors:............2 Basement:...................No Comments on decoration and typology : Front facade with triangular pediment. Coordinates:

40°13’55.5”N 23°40’22.1”E

-South (front) facade. Typology

Typology

Interventions

in relation with the environment

-Detail of the ownership plate. typology

discription

-Renovated with respect to the original building. -Appropriate replacement of the balcony. -Small room added to the left.

Degree of interventions: Medium State of conservation Excellent

-South and west facades.

-Few and not highly invasive interventions. -Appropriate renovation. -Medium degree of interventions. -Excellent maintenance. -Absence of other minor interfering factors.

Value assessment:..................................................................High

The Village of

NIKITI

Photographs

40°13’55.8”N 23°40’22.2”E

-South (front) and west facades. Typology

Typology

Interventions

in relation with the environment

-North (front) and east facades. typology

discription

-Renovated. -Big room added to the back.

Degree of interventions: Medium State of conservation Excellent

-West (side) facade.

-Few and not highly invasive interventions. -Appropriate renovation. -Medium degree of interventions. -Excellent maintenance. -Absence of other minor interfering factors.

Value assessment:..................................................................High

The Village of

NIKITI

Photographs

Location Building year:............1887 Function:.....Private house .................................. Number of floors:............2 Basement:...................No Comments on decoration and typology : --Coordinates:

40°13’56.5”N 23°40’21.9”E

-South (front) and west facades. Typology

Typology

in relation with the environment

-North (back) facade. Interventions typology

Interventions discription

-Renovated with respect to the original building. -Appropriate replacement of the balcony and staircase.

-Detail of the ownership plate. Degree of interventions: Low State of conservation Excellent -Few and not highly invasive interventions. -Appropriate renovation. -Low degree of interventions. -Excellent maintenance. -Absence of other minor interfering factors. 51

Value assessment:..................................................................High

The Village of

NIKITI

Photographs

40°13’56.3”N 23°40’22.3”E

-South (front) and west facades. Typology

Typology

Interventions

in relation with the environment

-North (back) and east facades. typology

discription

-On going renovation.

-South (front) facade. Degree of interventions: Low State of conservation Good -Few and interventions. -Ongoing renovation. -Low degree of interventions. -Some minor interfering factors (pergolas).

Value assessment:............................................................Medium

The Village of

NIKITI

Photographs

40°13’56.5”N 23°40’21.4”E

-South-west (front) facade. Typology

Typology

Interventions

in relation with the environment

-South-west (front) and south-east facades. typology

discription

-Renovated with respect to the original building. -Additions to the balcony structure.

Degree of interventions: Low State of conservation Excellent

-South-east (side) facade.

-Few and not highly invasive interventions. -Appropriate renovation. -Low degree of interventions. -Excellent maintenance. -Absence of other minor interfering factors.

Value assessment:..................................................................High

The Village of

NIKITI

Photographs

Location Building year:............xxxx Function:.....Private house .................................. Number of floors:............2 Basement:...................No

Coordinates:

40°13’56.7”N 23°40’21.0”E

Comments on decoration and typology : A very rare example of this configuration of the typology. -Most of the original structure intact.

-South-west (front) facade. Typology

Typology

Interventions

in relation with the environment

-South-west (front) facade. typology

discription

-In need of restoration.

-North-west (side) facade. Degree of interventions: xxx State of conservation Poor -No invasive interventions. -No maintenance. -Low inhabitability conditions. -Abandoned. -South-west (front) facade. -North-east (back) facade. 54

Value assessment:..................................................................High

The Village of

NIKITI

Photographs

Location Building year:...1880-1890 Function:.....Private house .................................. Number of floors:............2 Basement:...................No Comments on decoration and typology : Interesting balcony structure. Coordinates:

40°13’57.1”N 23°40’20.6”

-South-east (front) facade. Typology

Typology

in relation with the environment

-South-east (front) and north-east facades. Interventions typology

Interventions discription

-Renovated, probably not very recently.

Degree of interventions: Low State of conservation Good -Few and not highly invasive interventions. -Low degree of interventions. -Good maintenance. -Absence of other minor interfering factors. -South-west (side) facade. 55

Value assessment:..................................................................High

The Village of

NIKITI

Photographs

Location Building year:............xxxx Function:.....Private house .................................. Number of floors:............2 Basement:...................No

Coordinates:

40°13’45.1”N 23°40’12.2”E

Comments on decoration and typology : Interesting shape of the erkers. -The only example with two triangular erkers in the village.

-West (front) facade. Typology

Typology

in relation with the environment

-West (front) facade. Interventions typology

Interventions discription

-Renovated with respect to the original building.

Degree of interventions: Low State of conservation Excellent

-North (side) facade.

-Few and not highly invasive interventions. -Appropriate renovation. -Low degree of interventions. -Excellent maintenance. -Absence of other minor interfering factors.

Value assessment:..................................................................High

The Village of

NIKITI

Photographs

Location

Coordinates:

40°13’57.6”N 23°40’21.5”E

Building year:............xxxx Function:.....Private house .................................. Number of floors:............2 Comments on decoration and typology : The different progress of the two halves is obvious on the decoration and the configuration of the facades. -One side was renovated in a neoclassical style, on some point in its history.

-South (front) and east facades. Typology

Typology

in relation with the environment

-North (front) facade. Interventions typology

Interventions discription

-Both sides renovated. -On the left side, balcony replaced with a concrete structure, possibly during the recent renovation.

-North (front) facade. Degree of interventions: Medium State of conservation Excellent

-South-west (front) facade. -East (side) facade. 57

The Village of

NIKITI

Photographs

Location Building year:............1909 Function:.....Private house .................................. Number of floors:............2 Basement:...................No Comments on decoration and typology : --Coordinates:

40°13’57.5”N 23°40’21.0”E

-South (front) facade. Typology

Typology

Interventions

in relation with the environment

-Detail of the ownership plate. typology

discription

-Recently renovated with respect to the original building.

Degree of interventions: Low State of conservation Excellent

-East (side) facade.

-Few and not highly invasive interventions. -Appropriate renovation. -Low degree of interventions. -Excellent maintenance. -Absence of other minor interfering factors.

Value assessment:..................................................................High

The Village of

NIKITI

Photographs

40°13’57.5”N 23°40’20.7”E

-East (side) facade. Typology

Typology

Interventions

in relation with the environment

-North (back) facade. typology

discription

-Renovated. -Concrete balcony added at the front facade.

Degree of interventions: High State of conservation Good

-South (front) facade.

-Some interventions. -Recent renovation. -High degree of some interventions. -Excellent maintenance. -Absence of other minor interfering factors.

Value assessment:..................................................................High

The Village of

NIKITI

Photographs

Location Building year:............xxxx Function:.....Private house .................................. Number of floors:............2 Basement:...................No

Coordinates:

40°13’58.0”N 23°40’19.9”E

Comments on decoration and typology : On this case, the split between the two sides is on the short facade. -Rare configuration of the typology.

-South-east (front) facade. Typology

Typology

Interventions

in relation with the environment

-South-east (front) and north-east facades. typology

discription

-Renovated with respect to the original building.

-South-east (side) facade. Degree of interventions: Low State of conservation Excellent -Few and not highly invasive interventions. -Appropriate renovation. -Low degree of interventions. -Excellent maintenance. -Absence of other minor interfering factors. 60

Value assessment:..................................................................High

The Village of

NIKITI

Photographs

Location Building year:..aprox. 1885 Function:.....Private house .................................. Number of floors:............2 Basement:...................No Comments on decoration and typology : --Coordinates:

40°13’59.2”N 23°40’19.5”E

-South (front) and east (side) facades. Typology

Typology

Interventions

in relation with the environment

-East (side) facade. typology

discription

-Renovated with respect to the original building. -Appropriate replacement of the balcony.

Value assessment:..................................................................High

The Village of

NIKITI

Photographs

Location Building year:............1886 Function:.....Private house .................................. Number of floors:............2 Basement:...................No Comments on decoration and typology : --Coordinates:

40°13’59.1”N 23°40’19.9”E

-South (front) facade. Typology

Typology

Interventions

in relation with the environment

-Detail of the ownership plate. typology

discription

-Renovated with respect to the original building.

Degree of interventions: Low State of conservation Excellent

-South (front) facade.

-Few and not highly invasive interventions. -Appropriate renovation. -Low degree of interventions. -Excellent maintenance. -Absence of other minor interfering factors.

Value assessment:..................................................................High

The Village of

NIKITI

Photographs

40°13’59.2”N 23°40’20.2”E

-South (front) and east facades. Typology

Typology

Interventions

in relation with the environment

-South (front) facade. typology

discription

-Renovated. -Two windows blocked.

Degree of interventions: Low State of conservation Excellent

-South (front) facade.

-Few and not highly invasive interventions. -Appropriate renovation. -Low degree of interventions. -Good maintenance. -Some minor interfering factors (blocked windows).

Value assessment:..................................................................High

The Village of

NIKITI

Photographs

40°14’00.0”N 23°40’20.9”E

-South (front) facade. Typology

Typology

in relation with the environment

-North (back) facade. Interventions

Interventions

typology

discription

Degree of interventions: xxx State of conservation Ruin -In state of collapsing. -No maintenance. -South (front) facade. 64

Value assessment:..................................................................Low

The Village of

NIKITI

Photographs

40°13’58.5”N 23°40’20.2”E

-South-east (front) facade. Typology

Typology

in relation with the environment

-South-east (front) facade. Interventions typology

Interventions discription

-Renovated with respect to the original building.

-South-east (front) facade. Degree of interventions: Low State of conservation Excellent -No highly invasive interventions. -Appropriate renovation. -Low degree of interventions. -Good maintenance. -Absence of other minor interfering factors. 65

Value assessment:..................................................................High

The Village of

NIKITI

Photographs

Location Building year:..aprox. 1880 Function:.....Private house .................................. Number of floors:............2 Basement:...................No Comments on decoration and typology : --Coordinates:

40°13’58.4”N 23°40’20.7”E

-South (front) facade. Typology

Typology

Interventions

in relation with the environment

-South (front) facade. typology

discription

-Multiple additions of concrete structures on the front facade. -Balcony replaced and extended with concrete structure. -Added concrete staircase.

Degree of interventions: Severe State of conservation Poor -Many interventions. -High degree of interventions. -Good maintenance. -Considerable minor interfering factors (pergolas, antenas

Value assessment:............................................................Medium

The Village of

NIKITI

Photographs

40°14’00.8”N 23°40’20.1”E

-South-east (front) facade. Typology

Typology

in relation with the environment

-South-east (front) facade. Interventions typology

Interventions discription

-Renovated.

Degree of interventions: Low State of conservation Excellent -No highly invasive interventions. -Appropriate renovation. -Low degree of interventions. -Good maintenance. -Absence of other minor interfering factors. 67

Value assessment:..................................................................High

Sector 2

The Village of

NIKITI

Buildings Inventory of the Old Village.................. Author:..................................Iason Koutsomitelis Sector...............................................................2 Registration No:..............................................201

Photographs

Location Building year:............1932 Function:.....Private house .................................. Number of floors:............2 Basement:...................No Comments on decoration and typology : --Coordinates:

40°13’51.9”N 23°40’23.2”E

-South-west (front) facade. Typology

Typology

Interventions

in relation with the environment

-North-east (back) facade. typology

discription

-Renovated. -Balcony replaced with concrete structure. -Extension, one-floor concrete structure to the left side.

-Detail of the ownership plate. Degree of interventions: High State of conservation Adequate -Some invasive interventions. -High degree of interventions. -Adequate maintenance. -Some minor interfering factors (pergolas, chimneys).

Value assessment:..................................................................High

The Village of

NIKITI

Buildings Inventory of the Old Village.................. Author:..................................Iason Koutsomitelis Sector...............................................................2 Registration No:..............................................202

Photographs

40°13’52.6”N 23°40’24.0”E

-South-west (front) facade. Typology

Typology

Interventions

in relation with the environment

-South-west (front) facade. typology

discription

Right part: -Balcony replaced with concrete structure. -Staircase added. Left side: -Extension, two-floor concrete structure with pilotis to the front and to the left side. -Staircase added. -South-west (front) and south-east (side) facades. Degree of interventions: Severe State of conservation Poor -Many highly invasive interventions. -Severe degree of interventions. -Considerable minor interfering factors. -Big part of the original structure covered by the extensions. -Large part of the original structure jeopardized. 69

Value assessment:............................................................Medium

The Village of

NIKITI

Buildings Inventory of the Old Village.................. Author:..................................Iason Koutsomitelis Sector...............................................................2 Registration No:..............................................203

Photographs

Location Building year:....app. 1900 Function:.....Private house and store on the first floor. Number of floors:...........2 Basement:...................No Comments on decoration and typology : --Coordinates:

40°13’53.4”N 23°40’23.3”E

-South-west (front) and north-west (side) facades. Typology

Typology

in relation with the environment

-North-west (side) facade. Interventions typology

Interventions discription

-Multiple interventions at the outer walls. -Typlogy cannot be identified due to the possible interventions. -Added concrete balcony.

Degree of interventions: Severe State of conservation Poor -Considerable number of interventions. -High degree of interventions. -No maintenance. -Abandoned. -South-west (front) facade. 70

Value assessment:..................................................................High

The Village of

NIKITI

Buildings Inventory of the Old Village.................. Author:..................................Iason Koutsomitelis Sector...............................................................2 Registration No:..............................................204

Photographs

40°13’45.1”N 23°40’12.2”E

-South-west (front) facade. Typology

Typology

in relation with the environment

-South-east (side) facade. Interventions typology

Interventions discription

-Multiple interventions at the outer walls. -Typlogy cannot be identified due to the possible interventions. -Possibly, balcony replaced or added.

Degree of interventions: Severe State of conservation Poor -Some number of interventions. -High degree of interventions. -Lack of maintenance. -Abandoned. -South (side) facade. 71

Value assessment:..................................................................High

The Village of

NIKITI

Buildings Inventory of the Old Village.................. Author:..................................Iason Koutsomitelis Sector...............................................................2 Registration No:..............................................205

Photographs

Location Building year:............1887 Function:.....Private house .................................. Number of floors:............3 Basement:...................No Comments on decoration and typology : Very rare example of the typology. Coordinates:

40°13’53.0”N 23°40’24.1”E

-South-west (front) facade. Typology

Typology

Interventions

in relation with the environment

-North-west (side) facade. typology

discription

-Renovated. -Possibly, interventions at the loggia.

Degree of interventions: Low State of conservation Good

-North-west (side) facade.

-Few interventions. -Renovated. -Low degree of interventions. -Good maintenance. -Some minor interfering factors.

Value assessment:..................................................................High

The Village of

NIKITI

Buildings Inventory of the Old Village.................. Author:..................................Iason Koutsomitelis Sector...............................................................2 Registration No:..............................................206

Photographs

Location Building year:............xxxx Function:.............xxx .................................. Number of floors:............1 Basement:...................No Comments on decoration and typology : --Coordinates:

40°13’53.6”N 23°40’24.2”E

-South-east (front) facade. Typology

Typology

Interventions

in relation with the environment

-South-west (back) facade. typology

discription

-Renovated.

Degree of interventions: Low State of conservation Excellent -No highly invasive interventions. -Renovated -Low degree of interventions. -Excellent maintenance. -Absence of other minor interfering factors. 73

Value assessment:..................................................................Low

The Village of

NIKITI

Buildings Inventory of the Old Village.................. Author:..................................Iason Koutsomitelis Sector...............................................................2 Registration No:..............................................207

Photographs

40°13’53.4”N 23°40’24.6”E

-North-west (front) facade. Typology

Typology

Interventions

in relation with the environment

-North-east (side) facade. typology

discription

-Partly renovated. -Walls of the erker replaces with bricks. -Terrace added on some point of its history. -Consolidation work has been made.

-North-east (side) facade. Degree of interventions: Medium State of conservation Adequate -Some interventions. -Medium degree of interventions. -Lack of maintenance. -South-west (front) facade. -North-west (front) facade. 74

Value assessment:..................................................................High

The Village of

NIKITI

Buildings Inventory of the Old Village.................. Author:..................................Iason Koutsomitelis Sector...............................................................2 Registration No:..............................................208

Photographs

Location Building year:............1903 Function:.....Private house .................................. Number of floors:............1 Basement:...................Yes

Coordinates:

40°13’53.2”N 23°40’24.7”E

Comments on decoration and typology : Possibly, the only example where stone was used for the lintels and the transoms.

-South-east (front) and north-east facades. Typology

Typology

Interventions

in relation with the environment

-South-east (front) facade. typology

discription

-Consolidation work has been made. -Small room (WC) added to the left side.

Degree of interventions: xxx State of conservation Ruin -In state of collapsing. -No maintenance. -North-east (side) facade. 75

Value assessment:..................................................................High

The Village of

NIKITI

Buildings Inventory of the Old Village.................. Author:..................................Iason Koutsomitelis Sector...............................................................2 Registration No:..............................................209

Photographs

Location Building year:............xxxx Function:.....Private house .................................. Number of floors:............3 Basement:...................No Comments on decoration and typology : --Coordinates:

40°13’53.6”N 23°40’24.9”E

-South-west (front) facade. Typology

Typology

in relation with the environment

-South-west (front) facade. Interventions typology

Interventions discription

-Renovated. -Balcony replaced and extended with wooden structure.

Degree of interventions: Low State of conservation Excellent

-South-west (front) facade.

-No highly invasive interventions. -Appropriate renovation. -Low degree of interventions. -Excellent maintenance. -Absence of other minor interfering factors.

Value assessment:..................................................................High

The Village of

NIKITI

Buildings Inventory of the Old Village.................. Author:..................................Iason Koutsomitelis Sector...............................................................2 Registration No:..............................................210

Photographs

40°13’53.5”N 23°40’25.2”E

-South-west (side) facade. Typology

Typology

Interventions

in relation with the environment

-South-east (front) facade. typology

discription

Left part: -Renovated. -Possibly, balcony replaced. Right part: -Recently renovated. -Balcony replaced with concrete structure. -Room added to the right facade. -South-east (front) facade. Degree of interventions: High State of conservation Adequate -Many interventions. -High degree of interventions. -Adequate maintenance. -Absence of other minor interfering factors. -South-west (front) facade. -North-east (side) facade. 77

Value assessment:..................................................................High

The Village of

NIKITI

Buildings Inventory of the Old Village.................. Author:..................................Iason Koutsomitelis Sector...............................................................2 Registration No:..............................................211

Photographs

40°13’53.7”N 23°40’26.0”E

-South-west (front) facade. Typology

Typology

Interventions

in relation with the environment

-North-east (back) facade. typology

discription

-Recently renovated.

Degree of interventions: Low State of conservation Excellent -No highly invasive interventions. -Appropriate renovation. -Low degree of interventions. -Excellent maintenance. -Absence of other minor interfering factors. 78

Value assessment:............................................................Medium

The Village of

NIKITI

Buildings Inventory of the Old Village.................. Author:..................................Iason Koutsomitelis Sector...............................................................2 Registration No:..............................................212

Photographs

40°13’53.7”N 23°40’26.6”E

-South-west (front) facade. Typology

Typology

Interventions

in relation with the environment

-North-west (side) facade. typology

discription

-Renovated. -Balcony replaced with concrete structure. -Staircase added. -Small room added to the front facade.

Degree of interventions: Medium State of conservation Good -Some interventions. -Renovated -Medium degree of interventions. -Good maintenance. -Absence of other minor interfering factors. 79

Value assessment:..................................................................Low

The Village of

NIKITI

Buildings Inventory of the Old Village.................. Author:..................................Iason Koutsomitelis Sector...............................................................2 Registration No:..............................................213

Photographs

40°13’54.0”N 23°40’25.4”E

-North-east (side) facade. Typology

Typology

Interventions

in relation with the environment

-North-west (front) facade. typology

discription

-Balcony and staircase replaced with concrete structure. -Multiple interventions at the outer walls.

Degree of interventions: Medium State of conservation Adequate -Some interventions. -Medium degree of interventions. -Lack of maintenance. -Considerable minor interfering factors

Value assessment:............................................................Medium

The Village of

NIKITI

Buildings Inventory of the Old Village.................. Author:..................................Iason Koutsomitelis Sector...............................................................2 Registration No:..............................................214

Photographs

40°13’54.2”N 23°40’24.3”E

-South-west (front) facade. Typology

Typology

in relation with the environment

-South-west (front) facade. Interventions typology

Interventions discription

-Renovated. -Extension, two-floor concrete structure to the back side. -Balcony added to the back.

-North-east (back) facade. Degree of interventions: High State of conservation Good -Some interventions. -Renovated -High degree of interventions. -Adequate maintenance. -Some minor interfering factors (pergolas). 81

Value assessment:............................................................Medium

The Village of

NIKITI

Buildings Inventory of the Old Village.................. Author:..................................Iason Koutsomitelis Sector...............................................................2 Registration No:..............................................215

Photographs

40°13’53.2”N 23°40’26.3”E

-North-west (front) facade. Typology

Typology

Interventions

in relation with the environment

-North-east (side) facade. typology

discription

-Renovated. -Balconies replaced with wooden structure according to the original form.

Degree of interventions: Low State of conservation Excellent

-North-west (front) facade.

-Few and not highly invasive interventions. -Appropriate renovation. -Low degree of interventions. -Excellent maintenance. -Absence of other minor interfering factors.

Value assessment:..................................................................High

The Village of

NIKITI

Buildings Inventory of the Old Village.................. Author:..................................Iason Koutsomitelis Sector...............................................................2 Registration No:..............................................216

Photographs

40°13’53.1”N 23°40’25.7”E

-South-west (front) facade. Typology

Typology

Interventions

in relation with the environment

-North-west (side) facade. typology

discription

-Renovated. -Balconies replaced with wooden structure according to the original form.

-North-east (back) facade. Degree of interventions: Low State of conservation Excellent -Few and not highly invasive interventions. -Appropriate renovation. -Low degree of interventions. -Excellent maintenance. -Absence of other minor interfering factors. 83

Value assessment:..................................................................High

The Village of

NIKITI

Buildings Inventory of the Old Village.................. Author:..................................Iason Koutsomitelis Sector...............................................................2 Registration No:..............................................217

Photographs

40°13’52.4”N 23°40’24.7”E

-South-west (front) facade. Typology

Typology

Interventions

in relation with the environment

-North-west (side) facade. typology

discription

-Renovated. -Balconiy replaced and extended with wooden structure.

Degree of interventions: Low State of conservation Excellent

-South-west (front) facade.

-Few and not highly invasive interventions. -Appropriate renovation. -Low degree of interventions. -Excellent maintenance. -Absence of other minor interfering factors.

Value assessment:..................................................................High

The Village of

NIKITI

Buildings Inventory of the Old Village.................. Author:..................................Iason Koutsomitelis Sector...............................................................2 Registration No:..............................................218

Photographs

40°13’52.1”N 23°40’23.9”E

Typology

Interventions

in relation with the environment

-North and east (back) facades. typology

discription

-Renovated. -Extension, one-floor structure to the front side. -Extended height of the house.

-West (front) facade. Degree of interventions: High State of conservation Good -Multiple interventions. -Renovation. -High degree of interventions. -Excellent maintenance. -Possibly small portion of the original structure preserved. 85

Value assessment:..................................................................Low

The Village of

NIKITI

Buildings Inventory of the Old Village.................. Author:..................................Iason Koutsomitelis Sector...............................................................2 Registration No:..............................................219

Photographs

40°13’51.8”N 23°40’24.2”E

-South-west (front) facade. Typology

Typology

Interventions

in relation with the environment

-North-west (side) facade. typology

discription

-Renovated. -Balconiy replaced and extended with wooden structure.

Value assessment:............................................................Medium

The Village of

NIKITI

Buildings Inventory of the Old Village.................. Author:..................................Iason Koutsomitelis Sector...............................................................2 Registration No:..............................................220

Photographs

40°13’51.4”N 23°40’24.5”E

-South-west (front) facade. Typology

Typology

Interventions

in relation with the environment

-North-west (side) facade. -South-west (front) facade. typology

discription

-Possibly the house was divided in a later stage. Left side: -Balcony replaced with concrete structure. -Staircase added. Right side: -Shed added at the front facade. -Balcony removed.

-North-west (side) facade.

Degree of interventions: High State of conservation Poor -Myltiple interventions. -High degree of interventions. -Lack of maintenance. -Considerable minor interfering factors (sheds, pergolas).

Value assessment:............................................................Medium

The Village of

NIKITI

Photographs

Buildings Inventory of the Old Village.................. Author:..................................Iason Koutsomitelis Sector...............................................................2 Registration No:..............................................221

40°13’51.1”N 23°40’23.9”E

-West (front) facade. Typology

Typology

Interventions

in relation with the environment

-West (front) facade. typology

discription

-Balcony replaced and reshaped with concrete structure. -Possibly extended.

Degree of interventions: Medium State of conservation Adequate -Few interventions. -Medium degree of interventions. -Lack of maintenance.

Value assessment:............................................................Medium

The Village of

NIKITI

Photographs

Buildings Inventory of the Old Village.................. Author:..................................Iason Koutsomitelis Sector...............................................................2 Registration No:..............................................222

Location Building year:............1926 Function:.....Private house .................................. Number of floors:............2 Basement:...................No Comments on decoration and typology : --Coordinates:

40°13’50.7”N 23°40’23.0”E

-West (front) facade. Typology

Typology

in relation with the environment

-West (front) facade. Interventions typology

Interventions discription

-Renovated. -Possibly small extension at the right side.

Degree of interventions: Low State of conservation Excellent -Few and not highly invasive interventions. -Renovated -Low degree of interventions. -Excellent maintenance.

Value assessment:.............................................................Medium

The Village of

NIKITI

Photographs

Buildings Inventory of the Old Village.................. Author:..................................Iason Koutsomitelis Sector...............................................................2 Registration No:..............................................223

40°13’49.9”N 23°40’22.2”E

-West (front) facade. Typology

Typology

in relation with the environment

-West (front) facade. Interventions typology

Interventions discription

-Renovated. -Balcony and staircase replaced and extended. -Room added to the right facade on the second floor. -Added shed over the balcony.

Degree of interventions: Medium State of conservation Good -Considerable interventions. -Renovated -Medium degree of interventions. -Good maintenance. -West facade. 90

Value assessment:............................................................Medium

The Village of

NIKITI

Buildings Inventory of the Old Village.................. Author:..................................Iason Koutsomitelis Sector...............................................................2 Registration No:..............................................225

Photographs

Location Building year:............1903 Function:.....Private house .................................. Number of floors:............3 Basement:...................No Comments on decoration and typology : Entrance on the short side. Coordinates:

40°13’49.3”N 23°40’21.9”E

-West (front) and south facades. Typology

Typology

Interventions

in relation with the environment

-Detail of the ownership plate. typology

discription

-Front balcony replaced with concrete structure. -Added sheds over the balconies. -Possibly windows have opened. -Extension, two-floor concrete structure to the right side. -Added staircase.

Degree of interventions: Severe State of conservation Poor -Many and highly invasive interventions. -Severe degree of interventions. -Good maintenance. -Considerable minor interfering factors (sheds, pergolas, antenas). -West (front) and north facades. 91

Value assessment:..................................................................High

The Village of

NIKITI

Buildings Inventory of the Old Village.................. Author:..................................Iason Koutsomitelis Sector...............................................................2 Registration No:..............................................226

Photographs

40°13’49.0”N 23°40’21.4”E

-West (side) facade. Typology

Typology

Interventions

in relation with the environment

-South (front) and west facades. typology

discription

-Renovated. -Balcony and staircase added, concrete structure. -Sheds added over the balcony and to the left side. -Stonework on the front facade.

Degree of interventions: Severe State of conservation Poor -Many and highly invasive interventions. -Severe degree of interventions. -Good maintenance. -Some minor interfering factors (a/c unit, shed, pergola).

Value assessment:..................................................................Low

The Village of

NIKITI

Photographs

Buildings Inventory of the Old Village.................. Author:..................................Iason Koutsomitelis Sector...............................................................2 Registration No:..............................................227

40°13’48.8”N 23°40’21.7”E

-South (front) facade. Typology

Typology

Interventions

typology

in relation with the environment

discription

-Renovated. -Large extension, one-floor concrete structure to the front side.

Value assessment:..................................................................Low

The Village of

NIKITI

Buildings Inventory of the Old Village.................. Author:..................................Iason Koutsomitelis Sector...............................................................2 Registration No:..............................................228

Photographs

40°13’48.3”N 23°40’20.8”E

-South (front) and west facades. Typology

Typology

in relation with the environment

-West (side) facade. Interventions typology

Interventions discription

-Renovated. -Large extension, one-floor structure to the front and to the right side. -Balcony replaced with concrete structure. -Added shed.

-North (back) and west facades. Degree of interventions: High State of conservation Good -Considerable interventions. -Appropriate renovation. -High degree of some interventions. -Excellent maintenance.

Value assessment:..................................................................Low

The Village of

NIKITI

Buildings Inventory of the Old Village.................. Author:..................................Iason Koutsomitelis Sector...............................................................2 Registration No:..............................................229

Photographs

Location Building year:............1946 Function:.....Private house .................................. Number of floors:............2 Basement:...................No Comments on decoration and typology : --Coordinates:

40°13’47.3”N 23°40’20.1”E

-South (front) and west facades. Typology

Typology

Interventions

in relation with the environment

-West (side) facade. typology

discription

-Renovated. -Small room added to the left side. -Small room added to the front side. -Extension, two-floor structure to the right side. -Balcony and staircase replaced with concrete structure. -North (back) and west facades. Degree of interventions: High State of conservation Good -Considerable interventions. -Renovated. -High degree of some interventions. -Excellent maintenance.

Value assessment:............................................................Medium

The Village of

NIKITI

Buildings Inventory of the Old Village.................. Author:..................................Iason Koutsomitelis Sector...............................................................2 Registration No:..............................................230

Photographs

40°13’46.1”N 23°40’19.3”E

-South (front) and west facades. Typology

Typology

in relation with the environment

-West (side) facade. Interventions typology

Interventions discription

-Extension, one-floor concrete structure to the left side.

-North (back) and west facades. Degree of interventions: Medium State of conservation Poor -Few interventions. -Medium degree of interventions. -Lack of maintenance. -Abandoned.

Value assessment:............................................................Medium

The Village of

NIKITI

Photographs

Buildings Inventory of the Old Village.................. Author:..................................Iason Koutsomitelis Sector...............................................................2 Registration No:..............................................231

40°13’45.4”N 23°40’18.9”E

-West (front) facade. Typology

Typology

Interventions

typology

in relation with the environment

discription

-Recently renovated.

Degree of interventions: Low State of conservation Good -Renovated. -Low degree of interventions. -Excellent maintenance. -Absence of other minor interfering factors.

Value assessment:..................................................................Low

The Village of

NIKITI

Buildings Inventory of the Old Village.................. Author:..................................Iason Koutsomitelis Sector...............................................................2 Registration No:..............................................232

Photographs

40°13’44.4”N 23°40’18.0”E

-North-west (front) facade. Typology

Typology

in relation with the environment

-North-west (front) facade. Interventions typology

Interventions discription

-Renovated. -Extension, two-floor structure to the left side. -Small room added at the right side. -Added sheds at the front facade.

-North-west (front) facade. Degree of interventions: High State of conservation Good -Considerable interventions. -Renovated. -High degree of some interventions. -Excellent maintenance.

Value assessment:............................................................Medium

The Village of

NIKITI

Buildings Inventory of the Old Village.................. Author:..................................Iason Koutsomitelis Sector...............................................................2 Registration No:..............................................233

Photographs

Location Building year:............xxxx Function:.....Private house and store on the first floor. Number of floors:............2 Basement:...................No Comments on decoration and typology : --Coordinates:

40°13’44.1”N 23°40’17.5”E

-South-west (front) facade. Typology

Typology

in relation with the environment

-North-west (side) facade. Interventions typology

Interventions discription

-Room added at the right side. -Added staircase. -Consolidation work done.

Degree of interventions: Medium State of conservation Good -Some interventions. -Medium degree of some interventions. -Excellent maintenance. -Some minor interfering factors (pipes, chimneys).

Value assessment:............................................................Medium

The Village of

NIKITI

Buildings Inventory of the Old Village.................. Author:..................................Iason Koutsomitelis Sector...............................................................2 Registration No:..............................................234

Photographs

40°13’44.3”N 23°40’18.3”E

-South-west (front) facade. Typology

Typology

in relation with the environment

-North-east (back) facade. Interventions typology

Interventions discription

-Extension, two-floor concrete structure to the right side.

-Balcony and staircase replaced with concrete structure.

Degree of interventions: Medium State of conservation Good -Some interventions. -Medium degree of some interventions. -Excellent maintenance. -Some minor interfering factors. -South-west (front) facade. 100

Value assessment:............................................................Medium

The Village of

NIKITI

Buildings Inventory of the Old Village.................. Author:..................................Iason Koutsomitelis Sector...............................................................2 Registration No:..............................................235

Photographs

40°13’43.9”N 23°40’18.6”E

-South-west (front) facade. Typology

Typology

in relation with the environment

-North-east (back) facade. Interventions typology

Interventions discription

-Room added at the back. -Balcony replaced with concrete structure.

Degree of interventions: Medium State of conservation Good -Some interventions. -Medium degree of some interventions. -Excellent maintenance. -Some minor interfering factors.

101

Value assessment:............................................................Medium

The Village of

NIKITI

Buildings Inventory of the Old Village.................. Author:..................................Iason Koutsomitelis Sector...............................................................2 Registration No:..............................................236

Photographs

Location Building year:............xxxx Function:.....Private house .................................. Number of floors:............1 Basement:...................No Comments on decoration and typology : --Coordinates:

40°13’43.8”N 23°40’20.6”E

-South-west (front) facade. Typology

Typology

Interventions

in relation with the environment

-South-west (front) facade. typology

discription

-Extension, three-floor structure to the back side, in various stages.

Degree of interventions: Severe State of conservation Poor -Several highly invasive intervention. -Severe degree of intervention. -Adequate maintenance. -Some minor interfering factors (a/c unit, small shed). -Failed attempt of intergrating a new structure. 102

Value assessment:..................................................................Low

The Village of

NIKITI

Buildings Inventory of the Old Village.................. Author:..................................Iason Koutsomitelis Sector...............................................................2 Registration No:..............................................237

Photographs

Location Building year:............xxxx Function:.....Private house .................................. Number of floors:............1 Basement:...................No Comments on decoration and typology : --Coordinates:

40°13’45.2”N 23°40’19.8”E

-South-west (front) facade. Typology

Typology

in relation with the environment

-South-west (front) facade. Interventions typology

Interventions discription

-Room added at the left side. -Blocked windows.

Degree of interventions: Medium State of conservation Good -Few interventions. -Medium degree of some interventions. -Good maintenance. -Absence of other minor interfering factors.

103

Value assessment:..................................................................Low

The Village of

NIKITI

Buildings Inventory of the Old Village.................. Author:..................................Iason Koutsomitelis Sector...............................................................2 Registration No:..............................................238

Photographs

Location Building year:............xxxx Function:.....Private house .................................. Number of floors:............2 Basement:...................No

Coordinates:

40°13’44.8”N 23°40’20.5”E

Comments on decoration and typology : Front facade with remnants of triangular pediment.

-South-west (front) facade. Typology

Typology

Interventions

typology

in relation with the environment

discription

-Possibly, left side of the building collapsed. Replaced with other structure. Right side: -Renovated. -Balcony replaced with concrete structure. -South-west (front) facade.

Degree of interventions: High State of conservation Adequate -Several interventions. -Renovated -High degree of interventions. -Good maintenance. -Large part of the original structure missing. -Some minor interfering factors. 104

Value assessment:..................................................................Low

The Village of

NIKITI

Buildings Inventory of the Old Village.................. Author:..................................Iason Koutsomitelis Sector...............................................................2 Registration No:..............................................239

Photographs

Location Building year:............xxxx Function:.....Private house .................................. Number of floors:............1 Basement:...................No Comments on decoration and typology : --Coordinates:

40°13’44.3”N 23°40’21.9”E

-South-west (side) facade. Typology

Typology

Interventions

in relation with the environment

-South-east (back) facade. typology

discription

-Renovated.

Degree of interventions: Low State of conservation Excellent -Few interventions. -Low degree of interventions. -Excellent maintenance.

105

Value assessment:..................................................................Low

The Village of

NIKITI

Buildings Inventory of the Old Village.................. Author:..................................Iason Koutsomitelis Sector...............................................................2 Registration No:..............................................240

Photographs

Location Building year:............1933 Function:.....Private house .................................. Number of floors:............1 Basement:...................No Comments on decoration and typology : --Coordinates:

40°13’47.8”N 23°40’22.6”E

-West (front) facade. Typology

Typology

Interventions

in relation with the environment

-Detail of the ownership plate. typology

discription

-Renovated. Possibly, balcony replaced.

Degree of interventions: Low State of conservation Good -Few interventions. -Renovated. -Low degree of interventions. -Good maintenance.

106

Value assessment:............................................................Medium

The Village of

NIKITI

Photographs

Buildings Inventory of the Old Village.................. Author:..................................Iason Koutsomitelis Sector...............................................................2 Registration No:..............................................241

Location Building year:............xxxx Function:.....Private house .................................. Number of floors:............1 Basement:...................No Comments on decoration and typology : --Coordinates:

40°13’47.8”N 23°40’24.0”E

-West (front) facade. Typology

Typology

Interventions

in relation with the environment

-West (front) facade. typology

discription

-Renovated.

Degree of interventions: Low State of conservation Good -Few interventions. -Renovated. -Low degree of interventions. -Adequate maintenance.

107

Value assessment:..................................................................Low

The Village of

NIKITI

Photographs

Buildings Inventory of the Old Village.................. Author:..................................Iason Koutsomitelis Sector...............................................................2 Registration No:..............................................242

Location Building year:............xxxx Function:.....Private house .................................. Number of floors:............1 Basement:...................No Comments on decoration and typology : --Coordinates:

40°13’48.4”N 23°40’24.4”E

-West (front) facade. Typology

Typology

Interventions

in relation with the environment

-West (front) facade. typology

discription

-Renovated.

Degree of interventions: Low State of conservation Excellent -Renovated. -Low degree of interventions. -Excellent maintenance.

108

Value assessment:..................................................................Low

The Village of

NIKITI

Photographs

Buildings Inventory of the Old Village.................. Author:..................................Iason Koutsomitelis Sector...............................................................2 Registration No:..............................................243

Location Building year:............xxxx Function:.....Private house .................................. Number of floors:............1 Basement:...................No Comments on decoration and typology : --Coordinates:

40°13’49.3”N 23°40’25.0”E

-West (front) facade. Typology

Typology

Interventions

typology

in relation with the environment

discription

-Renovated. -Small room added at the left and right side.

Degree of interventions: Low State of conservation Excellent -Renovated. -Low degree of interventions. -Excellent maintenance.

109

Value assessment:...................................................................Low

The Village of

NIKITI

Photographs

Buildings Inventory of the Old Village.................. Author:..................................Iason Koutsomitelis Sector...............................................................3 Registration No:..............................................244

40°13’51.7”N 23°40’25.4”E

-West (front) facade. Typology

Typology

Interventions

in relation with the environment

-South (side) facade. typology

discription

-Balconies and staircase replaced with concrete structure. -Small rooms added at the back and at the left sides.

Degree of interventions: High State of conservation Adequate -Several interventions. -High degree of interventions. -Lack of maintenance.

110

Value assessment:..................................................................High

Sector 3

111

The Village of

NIKITI

Photographs

Buildings Inventory of the Old Village.................. Author:..................................Iason Koutsomitelis Sector...............................................................3 Registration No:..............................................301

Location Building year:............xxxx Function:......Abandoned .................................. Number of floors:............1 Basement:...................No Comments on decoration and typology : --Coordinates:

40°13’42.6”N 23°40’06.7”E

-South (front) facade. Typology

Typology

Interventions

in relation with the environment

-West facade. typology

discription

Degree of interventions: xxx State of conservation Adequate -No interventions. -No maintenance. -Absence of other minor interfering factors.

112

Value assessment:..................................................................Low

The Village of

NIKITI

Photographs

Buildings Inventory of the Old Village.................. Author:..................................Iason Koutsomitelis Sector...............................................................3 Registration No:..............................................302

Location Building year: .....approx. 1945-55................ Function:.....Private house .................................. Number of floors:............2 Basement:...................No

Coordinates:

40°13’42.7”N 23°40’08.1”E

Comments on decoration and typology : ---

-South (front) facade. Typology

Typology

in relation with the environment

-East facade. Interventions typology

Interventions discription

-Replacement of balcony with concrete structure. -Added staircase.

Degree of interventions: Low State of conservation Good -Few interventions. -Low degree of interventions. -Adequate maintenance. -Absence of other minor interfering factors.

113

Value assessment:..................................................................Low

The Village of

NIKITI

Photographs

Buildings Inventory of the Old Village.................. Author:..................................Iason Koutsomitelis Sector...............................................................3 Registration No:..............................................303

40°13’43.1”N 23°40’08.1”E

-West (side) facade. Typology

Typology

in relation with the environment

Interventions typology

Interventions discription

Degree of interventions: xxx State of conservation Ruin -In state of collapsing. -No maintenance.

114

Value assessment:..................................................................Low

The Village of

NIKITI

Photographs

Buildings Inventory of the Old Village.................. Author:..................................Iason Koutsomitelis Sector...............................................................3 Registration No:..............................................304

40°13’43.1”N 23°40’08.6”E

-South (front) facade. Typology

Typology

Interventions

in relation with the environment

-South (front) facade. typology

discription

-Replacement of both balconies with concrete structures. -Room added to the left of the building.

-East (side) facade. Degree of interventions: High State of conservation Good -Considerable interventions. -High degree of interventions. -Adequate maintenance. -Absence of other minor interfering factors.

115

Value assessment:.................................................................High

The Village of

NIKITI

Photographs

Buildings Inventory of the Old Village.................. Author:..................................Iason Koutsomitelis Sector...............................................................3 Registration No:..............................................305

Location Building year: .....approx. 1945-55................ Function:.....Private house .................................. Number of floors:............2 Basement:...................No

Coordinates:

40°13’43.7”N 23°40’09.6”E

Comments on decoration and typology : ---

-South (front) facade. Typology

Typology

in relation with the environment

Interventions typology

Interventions discription

-Renovated. -Extension one-floor added at the back.

Degree of interventions: High State of conservation Good -Considerable interventions. -High degree of interventions. -Good maintenance. -Some minor interfering factors (solar water heater, shed).

116

Value assessment:..................................................................Low

The Village of

NIKITI

Photographs

Buildings Inventory of the Old Village.................. Author:..................................Iason Koutsomitelis Sector...............................................................3 Registration No:..............................................306

Location Building year: .....approx. 1945-55................ Function:.....Private house .................................. Number of floors:............2 Basement:...................No

Coordinates:

40°13’43.9”N 23°40’10.8”E

Comments on decoration and typology : ---

-South (front) facade. Typology

Typology

in relation with the environment

-North (back) facade. Interventions typology

Interventions discription

-Replacement of balcony and staircase with concrete structures. -Blocking of several windows.

Degree of interventions: Medium State of conservation Adequate -Some interventions. -Medium degree of interventions. -Lack of maintenance. -Considerable minor interfering factors (sheds, satellite dish, blocked windows). 117

Value assessment:.............................................................Medium

The Village of

NIKITI

Buildings Inventory of the Old Village.................. Author:..................................Iason Koutsomitelis Sector...............................................................3 Registration No:..............................................307

Photographs

Location Building year: .....approx. 1945-55................ Function:.....Private house .................................. Number of floors:............2 Basement:...................No

Coordinates:

40°13’43.7”N 23°40’10.1”E

Comments on decoration and typology : ---

-West (side) facade. Typology

Typology

in relation with the environment

Interventions typology

Interventions discription

-Addition of an entire twofloor concrete structure with pilotis at the front facade of the building.

-South (front) facade.

Degree of interventions: Severe State of conservation Poor -Many highly invasive interventions. -Severe degree of interventions. -Considerable minor interfering factors. -Big part of the original structure covered by the extensions.

118

Value assessment:..................................................................Low

The Village of

NIKITI

Buildings Inventory of the Old Village.................. Author:..................................Iason Koutsomitelis Sector...............................................................3 Registration No:..............................................308

Photographs

40°13’43.4”N 23°40’10.6”E

-South-west (front) facade. Typology

Typology

in relation with the environment

Interventions typology

Interventions discription

-Addition or replacement of the balcony with concrete structure. -Addition of several twofloor concrete structures to the right side of the building.

Degree of interventions: Severe State of conservation Adequate -Many highly invasive interventions. -Severe degree of interventions. -Some minor interfering factors. -Good maintenance. -Big part of the original structure covered by the extensions. 119

Value assessment:..................................................................Low

The Village of

NIKITI

Photographs

Buildings Inventory of the Old Village.................. Author:..................................Iason Koutsomitelis Sector...............................................................3 Registration No:..............................................309

40°13’43.0”N 23°40’11.1”E

-West (side) facade. Typology

Typology

in relation with the environment

-South (front) facade. Interventions typology

Interventions discription

-Renovated. -Addition of a three-floor structure to the right side of the building.

-East (side) facade. Degree of interventions: Severe State of conservation Adequate -Many highly invasive interventions. -Severe degree of interventions. -Considerable minor interfering factors. -Good maintenance. -Big part of the original structure covered by the extensions. 120

Value assessment:..................................................................Low

The Village of

NIKITI

Buildings Inventory of the Old Village.................. Author:..................................Iason Koutsomitelis Sector...............................................................3 Registration No:..............................................310

Photographs

Location Building year:............1956 Function:.....Private house .................................. Number of floors:............2 Basement:...................No Comments on decoration and typology : --Coordinates:

40°13’44.1”N 23°40’11.4”E

-South (front) facade. Typology

Typology

in relation with the environment

-North (back) facade. Interventions typology

Interventions discription

-Small sheds added to the left of the building.

Degree of interventions: Low State of conservation Adequate -Few interventions. -Low degree of interventions. -Lack of maintenance. -Considerable minor interfering factors (sheds, antenas, blocked windows). 121

Value assessment:.............................................................Medium

The Village of

NIKITI

Buildings Inventory of the Old Village.................. Author:..................................Iason Koutsomitelis Sector...............................................................3 Registration No:..............................................311

Photographs

40°13’44.7”N 23°40’09.0”E

-South (front) facade. Typology

Typology

Interventions

in relation with the environment

-East (side) facade. typology

discription

-Renovated in 1996. -Added room at the left side.

-North (back) facade. Degree of interventions: Low State of conservation Excellent -Few interventions. -Appropriate renovation. -Low degree of interventions. -Excellent maintenance. -Few minor interfering factors (back chimneys). 122

Value assessment:..................................................................High

The Village of

NIKITI

Buildings Inventory of the Old Village.................. Author:..................................Iason Koutsomitelis Sector...............................................................3 Registration No:..............................................312

Photographs

Location Building year:............xxxx Function:.....Private house .................................. Number of floors:............1 Basement:...................No Comments on decoration and typology : --Coordinates:

40°13’45.2”N 23°40’07.7”E

-South and east (front) facades. Typology

Typology

in relation with the environment

-South and west facades. Interventions typology

Interventions discription

-Recently renovated.

-East facade. Degree of interventions: Low State of conservation Excellent -Appropriate renovation. -Low degree of interventions. -Excellent maintenance. -Absence of other minor interfering factors.

123

Value assessment:..................................................................Low

The Village of

NIKITI

Buildings Inventory of the Old Village.................. Author:..................................Iason Koutsomitelis Sector...............................................................3 Registration No:..............................................313

Photographs

40°13’45.1”N 23°40’12.2”E

-South-east (front) and north-east facades. Typology

Typology

in relation with the environment

-South-west (side) facade. Interventions typology

Interventions discription

-Recently renovated. -Balcony replaced with respect to the original form.

Degree of interventions: Low State of conservation Excellent -Few interventions. -Appropriate renovation. -Low degree of interventions. -Excellent maintenance. -South-east (front) and north-east facades. 124

Value assessment:..................................................................High

The Village of

NIKITI

Buildings Inventory of the Old Village.................. Author:..................................Iason Koutsomitelis Sector...............................................................3 Registration No:..............................................314

Photographs

Location Building year:............1939 Function:.....Private house .................................. Number of floors:............2 Basement:...................No Comments on decoration and typology : --Coordinates:

40°13’46.1”N 23°40’12.8”E

-South-east (front) facade. Typology

Typology

Interventions

in relation with the environment

-South-west (side) facade. typology

discription

-Renovation on process. -Balcony to the right side was just built with concrete. -Balcony to the left side replaced with concrete structure. Blocked windows.

-North-west (back) facade. Degree of interventions: High State of conservation Poor -Considerable interventions. -High degree of interventions. -Lack of maintenance. -Some minor interfering factors (a/c unit, small shed). -South-west (front) facade. -South-east (front) facade during the ren. works. 125

Value assessment:..................................................................High

The Village of

NIKITI

Buildings Inventory of the Old Village.................. Author:..................................Iason Koutsomitelis Sector...............................................................3 Registration No:..............................................315

Photographs

40°13’46.5”N 23°40’12.3”E

-South-east (front) facade. Typology

Typology

Interventions

in relation with the environment

-South-east (front) facade. typology

discription

-Both balconies and staircases replaced with concrete structure. -Maybe divided at a later stage. -Small room added at the left side.

-South-east (front) facade. Degree of interventions: Medium State of conservation Poor -Considerable interventions. -Medium degree of interventions. -Lack of maintenance. -Some minor interfering factors (balcony shed).

126

Value assessment:..................................................................High

The Village of

NIKITI

Buildings Inventory of the Old Village.................. Author:..................................Iason Koutsomitelis Sector...............................................................3 Registration No:..............................................316

Photographs

Location Building year:............xxxx Function:.....Private house .................................. Number of floors:............1 Basement:...................No Comments on decoration and typology : --Coordinates:

40°13’47.7”N 23°40’11.6”E

-North-east (back) facade. Typology

Typology

Interventions

in relation with the environment

-South-west (front) facade. typology

discription

-Renovated

Degree of interventions: Low State of conservation Good -Renovated. -Low degree of interventions. -Good maintenance. -Absence of other minor interfering factors.

127

Value assessment:..................................................................Low

The Village of

NIKITI

Photographs

Buildings Inventory of the Old Village.................. Author:..................................Iason Koutsomitelis Sector...............................................................3 Registration No:..............................................317

Location Building year:............xxxx Function:.....Private house .................................. Number of floors:............1 Basement:...................No Comments on decoration and typology : --Coordinates:

40°13’47.9”N 23°40’16.6”E

-West (front) facade. Typology

Typology

Interventions

in relation with the environment

-South (side) facade. typology

discription

-Renovated.

Degree of interventions: Low State of conservation Excellent -Renovated. -Low degree of interventions. -Excellent maintenance. -Absence of other minor interfering factors.

128

Value assessment:..................................................................Low

The Village of

NIKITI

Buildings Inventory of the Old Village.................. Author:..................................Iason Koutsomitelis Sector...............................................................3 Registration No:..............................................318

Photographs

40°13’47.7”N 23°40’15.3”E

-South (front) facade. Typology

Typology

in relation with the environment

-South (front) facade. Interventions typology

Interventions discription

-Added and extended balcony with concrete structure. -Small room added to the left side. -Blocked windows.

Degree of interventions: High State of conservation Poor

-South and west facades. 129

-Considerable interventions. -High degree of interventions. -Lack of maintenance. -Considerable minor interfering factors (blocked windows, window frames, a/c unit). Value assessment:.............................................................Medium

The Village of

NIKITI

Buildings Inventory of the Old Village.................. Author:..................................Iason Koutsomitelis Sector...............................................................3 Registration No:..............................................319

Photographs

40°13’46.4”N 23°40’13.6”E

-South-east (front) facade. Typology

Typology

in relation with the environment

-North-east (side) facade. Interventions typology

Interventions discription

-Renovated. -Balcony and staircase added with concrete structure. -Small room added to the left side. -Possibly a color scheme that doesn’t correspond with the original.

-South-east facade. Degree of interventions: Medium State of conservation Good -Some interventions. -Medium degree of interventions. -Excellent maintenance. -Some minor interfering factors (satellite dish, balcony shed).

130

Value assessment:..................................................................High

The Village of

NIKITI

Buildings Inventory of the Old Village.................. Author:..................................Iason Koutsomitelis Sector...............................................................3 Registration No:..............................................320

Photographs

Location Building year:............1933 Function:.....Private house .................................. Number of floors:............2 Basement:...................No Comments on decoration and typology : Neoclassical elements in the decoration. Coordinates:

40°13’46.6”N 23°40’14.7”E

-South (front) facade. Typology

Typology

Interventions

in relation with the environment

-South and west facades. typology

discription

-Renovated. -Balcony replaced.

-East and north (back) facades. Degree of interventions: Low State of conservation Excellent -Few interventions. -Low degree of interventions. -Excellent maintenance. -Absence of other minor interfering factors. -South-west (front) facade. -Detail of the ownership plate. 131

Value assessment:..................................................................High

The Village of

NIKITI

Photographs

Buildings Inventory of the Old Village.................. Author:..................................Iason Koutsomitelis Sector...............................................................3 Registration No:..............................................321

40°13’45.5”N 23°40’14.8”E

-South (front) facade. Typology

Typology

Interventions

in relation with the environment

-South (front) facade. typology

discription

-Renovated. -Balcony replaced with concrete structure.

-South facade. Degree of interventions: Low State of conservation Excellent -Few interventions. -Low degree of interventions. -Good maintenance. -Absence of other minor interfering factors.

132

Value assessment:.................................................................High

The Village of

NIKITI

Buildings Inventory of the Old Village.................. Author:..................................Iason Koutsomitelis Sector...............................................................3 Registration No:..............................................322

Photographs

40°13’45.8”N 23°40’15.5”E

-South-east (side) facade. Typology

Typology

in relation with the environment

-South-west (front) facade. Interventions typology

Interventions discription

-Balcony replaced with concrete structure. -Extended to the left with two-floor concrete structure.

Degree of interventions: Severe State of conservation Adequate -Many highly invasive interventions. -Severe degree of interventions. -Some minor interfering factors. -Good maintenance.

133

Value assessment:............................................................Medium

The Village of

NIKITI

Buildings Inventory of the Old Village.................. Author:..................................Iason Koutsomitelis Sector...............................................................3 Registration No:..............................................323

Photographs

Location Building year:............1955 Function:.....Private house .................................. Number of floors:............2 Basement:...................No

Coordinates:

40°13’46.7”N 23°40’15.5”E

Comments on decoration and typology : Unusual configuration of the typology. The two entrances are spaced out.

-South-east (front) facade. Typology

Typology

Interventions

in relation with the environment

-Detail of the ownership plate. typology

discription

-Both balconies and staircases replaced with concrete structures.

Degree of interventions: Medium State of conservation Good -Some interventions. -Medium degree of interventions. -Good maintenance. -Some minor interfering factors (antenas, balcony tents). -North-east (side) facade. 134

Value assessment:............................................................Medium

The Village of

NIKITI

Buildings Inventory of the Old Village.................. Author:..................................Iason Koutsomitelis Sector...............................................................3 Registration No:..............................................324

Photographs

40°13’46.9”N 23°40’16.1”E

-South-east (front) facade. Typology

Typology

Interventions

in relation with the environment

-South-west (side) facade. typology

discription

-Balcony probably rebuilt in concrete.

Degree of interventions: Medium State of conservation Adequate -Some interventions. -Medium degree of interventions. -Lack of maintenance. -Few minor interfering factors. -South-east (front) facade. 135

Value assessment:..................................................................High

The Village of

NIKITI

Buildings Inventory of the Old Village.................. Author:..................................Iason Koutsomitelis Sector...............................................................3 Registration No:..............................................325

Photographs

40°13’47.1”N 23°40’16.6”E

-South-east (front) facade. Typology

Typology

in relation with the environment

-North-west (back) facade. Interventions typology

Interventions discription

-Renovated. -Balcony replaced with wooden structure. -Extended to the left with two-floor structure. -Window shutters replaced with plastic blinds.

Degree of interventions: High State of conservation Excellent

-North-east (side) facade. 136

-Considerable interventions. -Renovated. -High degree of interventions. -Excellent maintenance. -Absence of other minor interfering factors. Value assessment:.............................................................Medium

The Village of

NIKITI

Buildings Inventory of the Old Village.................. Author:..................................Iason Koutsomitelis Sector...............................................................3 Registration No:..............................................326

Photographs

Location Building year:............1935 Function:.....Private house .................................. Number of floors:............2 Basement:...................No Comments on decoration and typology : --Coordinates:

40°13’44.7”N 23°40’15.9”E

-South-west (front) facade. Typology

Typology

Interventions

in relation with the environment

-South-west (front) facade. typology

discription

-Balcony replaced with concrete structure. -Small shed added at the front facade. -Blocked windows.

-North-west (front) facade. Degree of interventions: Medium State of conservation Adequate -Considerable interventions. -Medium degree of interventions. -Lack of maintenance. -Some minor interfering factors (balcony shed, blocked windows). -South-west (front) facade. -Detail of the ownership plate. 137

Value assessment:..................................................................High

The Village of

NIKITI

Buildings Inventory of the Old Village.................. Author:..................................Iason Koutsomitelis Sector...............................................................3 Registration No:..............................................327

Photographs

40°13’45.1”N 23°40’16.7”E

-South-west (front) facade. Typology

Typology

Interventions

typology

in relation with the environment

discription

-Renovated. -Balcony replaced with concrete structure. -Large two-floor concrete extension added in the front facade.

-South-west (front) facade. Degree of interventions: Severe State of conservation Adequate -Many interventions. -Severe degree of interventions. -Some minor interfering factors. -Good maintenance of the original strusture. -Large part of the original structure covered by the extensions. 138

Value assessment:............................................................Medium

The Village of

NIKITI

Buildings Inventory of the Old Village.................. Author:..................................Iason Koutsomitelis Sector...............................................................3 Registration No:..............................................328

Photographs

40°13’45.5”N 23°40’17.3”E

-South-east (front) facade. Typology

Typology

Interventions

typology

in relation with the environment

discription

-Renovated. -Large two-floor concrete extension added to the left side.

-South-east (front) facade.

Degree of interventions: Severe State of conservation Good -Some interventions. -Severe degree of interventions. -Excellent maintenance of the original structure. -Big part of the original structure covered by the extensions.

139

Value assessment:..................................................................Low

The Village of

NIKITI

Buildings Inventory of the Old Village.................. Author:..................................Iason Koutsomitelis Sector...............................................................3 Registration No:..............................................329

Photographs

40°13’46.1”N 23°40’18.2”E

-South-west (front) facade. Typology

Typology

Interventions

in relation with the environment

-South-west (front) facade. typology

discription

-Large two-floor concrete extension added to the left side. -Large one-floor concrete extension added to the front facade.

Degree of interventions: Severe State of conservation Poor

-South-west (front) facade. 140

-Many interventions. -Severe degree of interventions. -Considerable minor interfering factors. -Lack of maintenance of the original strusture. -Large part of the original structure covered by the extensions. Value assessment:.............................................................Medium

The Village of

NIKITI

Buildings Inventory of the Old Village.................. Author:..................................Iason Koutsomitelis Sector...............................................................3 Registration No:..............................................330

Photographs

Location Building year:..poss. 1942 Function:.....Private house .................................. Number of floors:............2 Basement:...................No Comments on decoration and typology : --Coordinates:

40°13’46.4”N 23°40’18.7”E

-South-east (front) facade. Typology

Typology

in relation with the environment

-South-east (front) facade. Interventions typology

Interventions discription

-Renovated. -Possibly, balconies replaced with concrete structures. -Room added to the back facade.

-North-east (side) facade. Degree of interventions: Medium State of conservation Excellent -Some interventions. -Medium degree of interventions. -Renovated. -Excellent maintenance. -Few other minor interfering factors. 141

Value assessment:............................................................Medium

The Village of

NIKITI

Buildings Inventory of the Old Village.................. Author:..................................Iason Koutsomitelis Sector...............................................................3 Registration No:..............................................331

Photographs

Location Building year:............xxxx Function:..........Storage/ former silkworm facility.... Number of floors:............1 Basement:...................No Comments on decoration and typology : --Coordinates:

40°13’47.0”N 23°40’19.0”E

-South-east facade. Typology

Typology

Interventions

in relation with the environment

-South-west (front) facade. typology

discription

Degree of interventions: xxx State of conservation Poor -No interventions. -No maintenance. -Few minor interfering factors. -Large part of the original structure jeopardized.

142

Value assessment:..................................................................Low

The Village of

NIKITI

Buildings Inventory of the Old Village.................. Author:..................................Iason Koutsomitelis Sector...............................................................3 Registration No:..............................................332

Photographs

Location Building year:............1949 Function:.....Private house .................................. Number of floors:............2 Basement:...................No Comments on decoration and typology : --Coordinates:

40°13’47.4”N 23°40’19.1”E

-South-east (front) facade. Typology

Typology

in relation with the environment

-South-east (front) and side facades. Interventions typology

Interventions discription

-Renovated. -Possibly balconies replaced with concrete structures. -Blocked windows.

Degree of interventions: Medium State of conservation Good

-South-west (side) facade. 143

-Some interventions. -Medium degree of interventions. -Renovated. -Good maintenance. -Few other minor interfering factors. Value assessment:............................................................Medium

The Village of

NIKITI

Buildings Inventory of the Old Village.................. Author:..................................Iason Koutsomitelis Sector...............................................................3 Registration No:..............................................333

Photographs

40°13’47.8”N 23°40’19.3”E

-South-west (front) facade. Typology

Typology

in relation with the environment

-North-west (side) facade. Interventions typology

Interventions discription

-Renovated. -Balcony replaced with wooden structure. -Large two-floor extension at the right side.

-North-east (back) facade. Degree of interventions: High State of conservation Adequate -Considerable interventions. -High degree of interventions. -Renovated. -Excellent maintenance. -Few other minor interfering factors. -A part of the original structure covered by the extensions. 144

Value assessment:.............................................................Medium

The Village of

NIKITI

Buildings Inventory of the Old Village.................. Author:..................................Iason Koutsomitelis Sector...............................................................3 Registration No:..............................................334

Photographs

Location Building year:............xxxx Function:.....Former oil press facility.................. Number of floors:............1 Basement:...................No Comments on decoration and typology : --Coordinates:

40°13’48.2”N 23°40’19.4”E

-South-east (front) facade. Typology

Typology

Interventions

in relation with the environment

-South-west (side) facade. typology

discription

-Renovated.

Degree of interventions: Low State of conservation Excellent -Few interventions. -Appropriate renovation. -Low degree of interventions. -Good maintenance.

145

Value assessment:..................................................................Low

The Village of

NIKITI

Buildings Inventory of the Old Village.................. Author:..................................Iason Koutsomitelis Sector...............................................................3 Registration No:..............................................335

Photographs

40°13’48.7”N 23°40’20.1”E

-South-east (front) facade. Typology

Typology

in relation with the environment

-South-west (side) facade. Interventions typology

Interventions discription

-Renovated. -Balcony replaced with concrete structure. -Large extension added to the back.

-North-east (side) facade. Degree of interventions: High State of conservation Good -Some interventions. -High degree of interventions. -Renovated. -Good maintenance.

146

Value assessment:............................................................Medium

The Village of

NIKITI

Buildings Inventory of the Old Village.................. Author:..................................Iason Koutsomitelis Sector...............................................................3 Registration No:..............................................336

Photographs

Location Building year:.....pre. 1950 F u n c t i o n : . . . . . . . .Tavern .................................. Number of floors:............2 Basement:...................No Comments on decoration and typology : --Coordinates:

40°13’50.1”N 23°40’21.1”E

-South-east (front) facade. Typology

Typology

Interventions

in relation with the environment

-North-east (side) facade. typology

discription

-Balcony replaced with concrete structure. -Small room added at the front facade. Added shed at the front facade.

Degree of interventions: Medium State of conservation Good -Some interventions. -Medium degree of interventions. -Good maintenance. -Some minor interfering factors (front shed).

147

Value assessment:..................................................................Low

The Village of

NIKITI

Buildings Inventory of the Old Village.................. Author:..................................Iason Koutsomitelis Sector...............................................................3 Registration No:..............................................337

Photographs

40°13’51.0”N 23°40’21.3”E

Typology

Interventions

in relation with the environment

-South-east (front) facade.

typology

discription

-Renovated. -Balcony replaced with concrete structure. -Room added at the front facade.

Degree of interventions: High State of conservation Adequate -Some interventions. -High degree of interventions. -Renovated. -Excellent maintenance. -Part of the original structure covered by the extensions. 148

Value assessment:..................................................................Low

The Village of

NIKITI

Buildings Inventory of the Old Village.................. Author:..................................Iason Koutsomitelis Sector...............................................................3 Registration No:..............................................338

Photographs

40°13’50.9”N 23°40’21.1”E

Typology

Interventions

in relation with the environment

-South-east (front) facade.

typology

discription

-Renovated. -Balcony replaced with concrete structure.

Degree of interventions: Low State of conservation Good -Few interventions. -Low degree of interventions. -Renovated. -Good maintenance. -Some minor interfering factors (a/c unit). 149

Value assessment:..................................................................Low

The Village of

NIKITI

Buildings Inventory of the Old Village.................. Author:..................................Iason Koutsomitelis Sector...............................................................3 Registration No:..............................................339

Photographs

40°13’50.8”N 23°40’20.9”E

Typology

Interventions

in relation with the environment

-South-east (front) facade.

typology

discription

-Renovated. -Balcony replaced with concrete structure.

Degree of interventions: Medium State of conservation Good -Few interventions. -Medium degree of interventions. -Renovated. -Good maintenance.

150

Value assessment:..................................................................Low

The Village of

NIKITI

Buildings Inventory of the Old Village.................. Author:..................................Iason Koutsomitelis Sector...............................................................3 Registration No:..............................................340

Photographs

Location Building year:............1904 Function:.....Private house .................................. Number of floors:............2 Basement:...................No Comments on decoration and typology : --Coordinates:

40°13’51.7”N 23°40’21.7”E

-South (front) facade. Typology

Typology

Interventions

in relation with the environment

-South (front) facade. typology

discription

-Renovated. -Both balconies replaced with concrete structures. -The right part of the building was not necessaraly renovated according to the original form. -Added room at the front facade of the right part. -West (side) facade. Degree of interventions: Medium State of conservation Good

-South-west (front) facade. -Detail of the ownership plate. 151

-Some interventions. -Medium degree of interventions. -Renovated. -Good maintenance. -Some other minor interfering factors. Value assessment:..................................................................High

The Village of

NIKITI

Photographs

Buildings Inventory of the Old Village.................. Author:..................................Iason Koutsomitelis Sector...............................................................3 Registration No:..............................................341

40°13’52.3”N 23°40’21.0”E

-South (front) facade. Typology

Typology

Interventions

in relation with the environment

-South (front) facade. typology

discription

-Balcony replaced with concrete structure.

Degree of interventions: Medium State of conservation Good -Few interventions. -Medium degree of interventions. -Good maintenance. -Some other minor interfering factors. -South facade. 152

Value assessment:.................................................................High

The Village of

NIKITI

Buildings Inventory of the Old Village.................. Author:..................................Iason Koutsomitelis Sector...............................................................3 Registration No:..............................................342

Photographs

40°13’45.1”N 23°40’12.2”E

-South (front) facade. Typology

Typology

Interventions

typology

in relation with the environment

discription

-Balcony replaced with concrete structure.

-West (side) facade.

Degree of interventions: Medium State of conservation Poor -Some number of interventions. -Medium degree of interventions. -Lack of maintenance. -Abandoned.

153

Value assessment:..................................................................High

The Village of

NIKITI

Buildings Inventory of the Old Village.................. Author:..................................Iason Koutsomitelis Sector...............................................................3 Registration No:..............................................343

Photographs

40°13’51.7”N 23°40’20.8”E

-South-east (front) facade. Typology

Typology

in relation with the environment

-North-east facade. Interventions typology

Interventions discription

-Balcony and staircase replaced. -Large two-floor extension at the left side. -Plastering on the facade.

Degree of interventions: High State of conservation Good -Some interventions. -High degree of interventions. -Excellent maintenance. -Some minor interfering factors (antenas, balcony tents).

154

Value assessment:..................................................................Low

The Village of

NIKITI

Buildings Inventory of the Old Village.................. Author:..................................Iason Koutsomitelis Sector...............................................................3 Registration No:..............................................344

Photographs

40°13’51.3”N 23°40’20.4”E

-South-east (front) facade. Typology

Typology

in relation with the environment

-South-east (front) facade. Interventions typology

Interventions discription

-Renovated. -Balcony nad staircase replaced. -Large two-floor extension at the right side. -Small extension at the left side.

-South-west (side) facade. Degree of interventions: High State of conservation Good -Some interventions. -High degree of interventions. -Excellent maintenance. -Some minor interfering factors (antenas, balcony tents).

155

Value assessment:..................................................................Low

The Village of

NIKITI

Buildings Inventory of the Old Village.................. Author:..................................Iason Koutsomitelis Sector...............................................................3 Registration No:..............................................345

Photographs

40°13’51.6”N 23°40’20.0”E

-South-west (front) facade. Typology

Typology

in relation with the environment

-South-west (front) facade. Interventions typology

Interventions discription

-Balcony and staircase replaced with concrete structure. -Added shed at the front facade.

Degree of interventions: Medium State of conservation Adequate -Few interventions. -Medium degree of interventions. -Adequate maintenance. -Some minor interfering factors (antenas, front shed).

156

Value assessment:..................................................................Low

The Village of

NIKITI

Buildings Inventory of the Old Village.................. Author:..................................Iason Koutsomitelis Sector...............................................................3 Registration No:..............................................346

Photographs

Location Building year:............1875 Function:.....Private house .................................. Number of floors:............2 Basement:...................No

Coordinates:

40°13’50.7”N 23°40’20.5”E

Comments on decoration and typology : Probably the oldest example of the typology.

-South-east (front) facade. Typology

Typology

in relation with the environment

-North-west (back) facade. Interventions typology

Interventions discription

-Renovated -Loggia closed with plastic tent.

-Detail of the ownership plate. Degree of interventions: Low State of conservation Excellent -Low degree of interventions. -Appropriate renovation. -Excellent maintenance.

157

Value assessment:..................................................................High

The Village of

NIKITI

Buildings Inventory of the Old Village.................. Author:..................................Iason Koutsomitelis Sector...............................................................3 Registration No:..............................................347

Photographs

Location Building year:............1910 Function:.....Private house .................................. Number of floors:............2 Basement:...................No Comments on decoration and typology : --Coordinates:

40°13’51.1”N 23°40’19.1”E

-South-east (side) facade. Typology

Typology

Interventions

in relation with the environment

-South-west (front) facade. typology

discription

-Renovated. -Balcony replaced with wooden structure according to the original form.

-Detail of the ownership plate. Degree of interventions: Low State of conservation Excellent -Few interventions. -Low degree of interventions. -Appropriate renovation. -Excellent maintenance. -South-west (front) facade. -South-west (front) facade. 158

Value assessment:..................................................................High

The Village of

NIKITI

Buildings Inventory of the Old Village.................. Author:..................................Iason Koutsomitelis Sector...............................................................3 Registration No:..............................................348

Photographs

40°13’50.5”N 23°40’20.0”E

-South-west (front) facade. Typology

Typology

Interventions

in relation with the environment

-North-east (back) facade. typology

discription

-Renovated. -Balcony replaced with wooden structure according to the original form. -Added wooden pergola.

Degree of interventions: Low State of conservation Excellent -Few interventions. -Low degree of interventions. -Appropriate renovation. -Excellent maintenance.

159

Value assessment:..................................................................High

The Village of

NIKITI

Buildings Inventory of the Old Village.................. Author:..................................Iason Koutsomitelis Sector...............................................................3 Registration No:..............................................349

Photographs

40°13’50.1”N 23°40’20.2”E

-South-west (front) facade. Typology

Typology

Interventions

in relation with the environment

-South-west (front) facade. typology

discription

-Renovated.

Degree of interventions: Low State of conservation Excellent -Few interventions. -Low degree of interventions. -Appropriate renovation. -Good maintenance. -South-west facade. 160

Value assessment:..................................................................High

The Village of

NIKITI

Buildings Inventory of the Old Village.................. Author:..................................Iason Koutsomitelis Sector...............................................................3 Registration No:..............................................350

Photographs

40°13’50.0”N 23°40’20.3”E

Typology

Interventions

in relation with the environment

-South-west (front) facade.

typology

discription

-Renovated. -Balcony and staircase replaced with concrete structure.

Degree of interventions: Low State of conservation Good -Few interventions. -Low degree of interventions. -Renovated. -Good maintenance. -Some minor interfering factors (antenas, balcony tents). 161

Value assessment:..................................................................Low

The Village of

NIKITI

Buildings Inventory of the Old Village.................. Author:..................................Iason Koutsomitelis Sector...............................................................3 Registration No:..............................................351

Photographs

40°13’49.9”N 23°40’20.5”E

Typology

Interventions

in relation with the environment

-South-west (front) facade.

typology

discription

-Renovated. -Balcony replaced and extended with wooden structure according to the original form.

Degree of interventions: Low State of conservation Excellent -Some interventions. -Low degree of interventions. -Appropriate renovation. -Good maintenance. -Absence of other minor interfering factors. 162

Value assessment:.............................................................Medium

The Village of

NIKITI

Buildings Inventory of the Old Village.................. Author:..................................Iason Koutsomitelis Sector...............................................................3 Registration No:..............................................352

Photographs

Location Building year:............1909 Function:.....Private house .................................. Number of floors:............3 Basement:...................No Comments on decoration and typology : --Coordinates:

40°13’50.2”N 23°40’18.7”E

-South-west (front) facade. Typology

Typology

in relation with the environment

-South-east (side) facade. Interventions typology

Interventions discription

-Renovated. -Balcony replaced and extended with wooden structure according to the original form.

-Detail of the ownership plate. Degree of interventions: Low State of conservation Excellent -Few interventions. -Low degree of interventions. -Appropriate renovation. -Good maintenance. -Some minor interfering factors. 163

Value assessment:..................................................................High

The Village of

NIKITI

Photographs

Buildings Inventory of the Old Village.................. Author:..................................Iason Koutsomitelis Sector...............................................................3 Registration No:..............................................353

40°13’49.5”N 23°40’18.0”E

-South (front) facade. Typology

Typology

Interventions

in relation with the environment

-South facade. typology

discription

-Balconies on both sides replaced with concrete structures. -On the left side, concrete staircase added. -On the left side, treatment of the stone work on the facade does not correspond with the original form. -East (side) facade. Degree of interventions: High State of conservation Adequate -Many interventions. -High degree of interventions. -Good maintenance. -Considerable minor interfering factors

164

Value assessment:.............................................................Medium

The Village of

NIKITI

Photographs

Buildings Inventory of the Old Village.................. Author:..................................Iason Koutsomitelis Sector...............................................................3 Registration No:..............................................354

40°13’48.9”N 23°40’18.1”E

-South (front) facade. Typology

Typology

in relation with the environment

-East (side) facade. Interventions typology

Interventions discription

-Balcony at the left facade replaced with concrete structure. -Extension and replacement of balcony at the front facade with concrete structure. -Added room at the front facade.

-North (back) facade. Degree of interventions: Severe State of conservation Adequate -Many highly invasive interventions. -Severe degree of interventions. -Good maintenance. -Considerable minor interfering factors.

165

Value assessment:.............................................................Medium

The Village of

NIKITI

Buildings Inventory of the Old Village.................. Author:..................................Iason Koutsomitelis Sector...............................................................3 Registration No:..............................................355

Photographs

40°13’48.8”N 23°40’17.5”E

-South (front) and west facades. Typology

Typology

in relation with the environment

-West (side) facade. Interventions typology

Interventions discription

-Renovation on process. -Balcony replaced with concrete structure.

-North (back) and east facades. Degree of interventions: Medium State of conservation Good -Few interventions. -Medium degree of interventions. -Good maintenance. -Absence of other minor interfering factors.

166

Value assessment:............................................................Medium

The Village of

NIKITI

Photographs

Buildings Inventory of the Old Village.................. Author:..................................Iason Koutsomitelis Sector...............................................................3 Registration No:..............................................356

40°13’48.6N 23°40’16.7”E

-South (front) facade. Typology

Typology

in relation with the environment

-West (side) facade. Interventions typology

Interventions discription

-Balcony replaced and extended with concrete structure.

Degree of interventions: Medium State of conservation Good -Few interventions. -Medium degree of interventions. -Good maintenance. -Absence of other minor interfering factors.

167

Value assessment:..................................................................Low

The Village of

NIKITI

Buildings Inventory of the Old Village.................. Author:..................................Iason Koutsomitelis Sector...............................................................3 Registration No:..............................................357

Photographs

40°13’51.4”N 23°40’18.7”E

-South-west (front) facade. Typology

Typology

in relation with the environment

Interventions typology

Interventions discription

-Balcony and staircase replaced with concrete structure.

-South-west (front) facade.

Degree of interventions: Medium State of conservation Good -Few interventions. -Medium degree of interventions. -Excellent maintenance. -Some minor interfering factors (a/c unit, antenas).

168

Value assessment:............................................................Medium

The Village of

NIKITI

Buildings Inventory of the Old Village.................. Author:..................................Iason Koutsomitelis Sector...............................................................3 Registration No:..............................................358

Photographs

40°13’52.0”N 23°40’19.0”E

-South-west (side) facade. Typology

Typology

Interventions

in relation with the environment

-North-west (back) facade. typology

discription

-Renovated.

Degree of interventions: Low State of conservation Good -Few interventions. -Low degree of interventions. -Good maintenance. -Some minor interfering factors (a/c unit, pergolas).

169

Value assessment:...................................................................Low

The Village of

NIKITI

Photographs

Buildings Inventory of the Old Village.................. Author:..................................Iason Koutsomitelis Sector...............................................................3 Registration No:..............................................359

40°13’52.6”N 23°40’18.5”E

-South (front) facade. Typology

Typology

Interventions

in relation with the environment

-South facade. typology

discription

-Renovated. -Balcony and staircase replaced with concrete structure. -Added shed over the balcony. -Small room added to the front facade.

Degree of interventions: High State of conservation Adequate -Some interventions. -High degree of some interventions. -Good maintenance. -Some minor interfering factors.

170

Value assessment:..................................................................Low

The Village of

NIKITI

Buildings Inventory of the Old Village.................. Author:..................................Iason Koutsomitelis Sector...............................................................3 Registration No:..............................................360

Photographs

Location Building year:............xxxx Function:.....Private house .................................. Number of floors:............2 Basement:...................No

Coordinates:

40°13’52.8”N 23°40’18.7”E

Comments on decoration and typology : Possibly the left side of the building has collapsed.

-South (front) facade. Typology

Typology

Interventions

in relation with the environment

-South and east facades. typology

discription

-Renovated. -Balcony replaced with wooden structure according to the original form. -Small room added to the left side.

Degree of interventions: Medium State of conservation Good -Some interventions. -Medium degree of interventions. -Excellent maintenance. -Possibly, half of the building collapsed or never built. -South facade, west edge of the building. 171

Value assessment:..................................................................High

The Village of

NIKITI

Buildings Inventory of the Old Village.................. Author:..................................Iason Koutsomitelis Sector...............................................................3 Registration No:..............................................361

Photographs

Location Building year:............1913 Function:.....Private house .................................. Number of floors:............2 Basement:...................No Comments on decoration and typology : --Coordinates:

40°13’53.1”N 23°40’18.5”E

-South (front) and west facades. Typology

Typology

Interventions

typology

in relation with the environment

discription

-Ongoing renovation. -Balcony replaced and extended with wooden structure according to the original form.

-West (side) facade.

Degree of interventions: Medium State of conservation Good -Few interventions. -Medium degree of interventions. -On going renovation. -Good maintenance. -Absence of other minor interfering factors. 172

Value assessment:..................................................................High

The Village of

NIKITI

Buildings Inventory of the Old Village.................. Author:..................................Iason Koutsomitelis Sector...............................................................3 Registration No:..............................................362

Photographs

40°13’53.4”N 23°40’18.9”E

-South (front) facade. Typology

Typology

Interventions

typology

in relation with the environment

discription

-Balcony and staircase replaced with concrete structure.

-South (front) facade.

Degree of interventions: Medium State of conservation Good -Few interventions. -Medium degree of interventions. -Good maintenance. -Few minor interfering factors.

173

Value assessment:............................................................Medium

The Village of

NIKITI

Photographs

Buildings Inventory of the Old Village.................. Author:..................................Iason Koutsomitelis Sector...............................................................3 Registration No:..............................................363

40°13’53.4”N 23°40’19.2”E

-South (front) facade. Typology

Typology

Interventions

typology

in relation with the environment

discription

-Renovated. -Balcony replaced with wooden structure according to the original form.

-East (side) facade.

Degree of interventions: Low State of conservation Excellent -Few interventions. -Low degree of interventions. -Excellent maintenance. -Absence of other minor interfering factors.

174

Value assessment:............................................................Medium

The Village of

NIKITI

Buildings Inventory of the Old Village.................. Author:..................................Iason Koutsomitelis Sector...............................................................3 Registration No:..............................................364

Photographs

40°13’53.7”N 23°40’19.7”E

-South (front) facade. Typology

Typology

Interventions

in relation with the environment

-South (front) facade. typology

discription

-South and west facade. Degree of interventions: Low State of conservation Good -Low degree of interventions. -Low maintenance. -Absence of other minor interfering factors. -Appears to be uninhabited. Could deteriorate in the future. -South-west (front) facade. -West 175 (side) facade.

Value assessment:..................................................................High

The Village of

NIKITI

Photographs

Buildings Inventory of the Old Village.................. Author:..................................Iason Koutsomitelis Sector...............................................................3 Registration No:..............................................365

40°13’53.8”N 23°40’20.0”E

-South (front) facade. Typology

Typology

Interventions

typology

in relation with the environment

discription

-Renovated. -Side balcony replaced with wooden structure according to the original form. -Front balcony replaced with concrete structure.

-East (side) facade.

Degree of interventions: Medium State of conservation Excellent -Some interventions. -Appropriate renovation. -Medium degree of interventions. -Excellent maintenance. -Few minor interfering factors (balcony tents and sheds). 176

Value assessment:..................................................................High

The Village of

NIKITI

Buildings Inventory of the Old Village.................. Author:..................................Iason Koutsomitelis Sector...............................................................3 Registration No:..............................................366

Photographs

40°13’53.6”N 23°40’20.7”E

-South-east (front) facade. Typology

Typology

in relation with the environment

-South-west (front) facade. Interventions typology

Interventions discription

-Renovated. -Shed added to the left.

-South-east (front) facade.

Degree of interventions: Low State of conservation Excellent -Few interventions. -Appropriate renovation. -Low degree of interventions. -Excellent maintenance. -Absence of other minor interfering factors. 177

Value assessment:..................................................................High

The Village of

NIKITI

Buildings Inventory of the Old Village.................. Author:..................................Iason Koutsomitelis Sector...............................................................3 Registration No:..............................................367

Photographs

40°13’53.3”N 23°40’20.9”E

-North-west (back) facade. Typology

Typology

in relation with the environment

A2.3

Interventions typology

Interventions discription

-Renovated. -Balcony replaced with wooden structure according to the original form.

-South-east (front) facade.

Value assessment:..................................................................High

The Village of

NIKITI

Buildings Inventory of the Old Village.................. Author:..................................Iason Koutsomitelis Sector...............................................................3 Registration No:..............................................368

Photographs

40°13’53.1”N 23°40’20.6”E

-South-west (side) facade. Typology

Typology

Interventions

in relation with the environment

-South-east (front) facade. typology

discription

-Renovated. -Balcony replaced with wooden structure according to the original form.

Degree of interventions: Low State of conservation Excellent

-South-east facade. 179

-Few interventions. -Appropriate renovation. -Low degree of interventions. -Excellent maintenance. -Absence of other minor interfering factors. Value assessment:..................................................................High

The Village of

NIKITI

Buildings Inventory of the Old Village.................. Author:..................................Iason Koutsomitelis Sector...............................................................3 Registration No:..............................................369

Photographs

40°13’52.9”N 23°40’20.2”E

-South-east (front) facade. Typology

Typology

Interventions

in relation with the environment

-North-west (back) facade. typology

discription

-Renovated. -Balcony replaced with wooden structure according to the original form. -Small room added to the front facade.

Degree of interventions: Low State of conservation Excellent

-North-east (side) facade. 180

-Few interventions. -Appropriate renovation. -Low degree of interventions. -Excellent maintenance. -Some minor interfering factors (a/c unit, pergolas). Value assessment:..................................................................High

The Village of

NIKITI

Buildings Inventory of the Old Village.................. Author:..................................Iason Koutsomitelis Sector...............................................................3 Registration No:..............................................370

Photographs

40°13’52.3”N 23°40’19.4”E

-South-east (side) facade. Typology

Typology

in relation with the environment

-South-east (side) facade. Interventions typology

Interventions discription

-Balcony replaced with concrete structure.

Degree of interventions: Low State of conservation Adequate -Few interventions. -Low degree of interventions. -Lack of maintenance.

181

Value assessment:.............................................................Medium

The Village of

NIKITI

Buildings Inventory of the Old Village.................. Author:..................................Iason Koutsomitelis Sector...............................................................3 Registration No:..............................................371

Photographs

Location Building year:............1923 Function:.....Private house .................................. Number of floors:............2 Basement:...................No Comments on decoration and typology : --Coordinates:

40°13’52.4”N 23°40’20.3”

-North-east (side) facade. Typology

Typology

in relation with the environment

-North-west (front) facade. Interventions typology

Interventions discription

-Renovation halted.

-Detail of the ownership plate. Degree of interventions: Low State of conservation Poor -Some interventions. -Low degree of interventions. -Lack of maintenance. -Halted renovation for some time.

182

Value assessment:..................................................................High

The Village of

NIKITI

Buildings Inventory of the Old Village.................. Author:..................................Iason Koutsomitelis Sector...............................................................3 Registration No:..............................................372

Photographs

40°13’52.7”N 23°40’20.9”E

-South-west (front) facade. Typology

Typology

in relation with the environment

-South-west (front) facade. Interventions typology

Interventions discription

-Balcony replaced with wooden structure according to the original form. -Small room added at the front facade. -Added shed over the balcony.

Degree of interventions: Medium State of conservation Adequate

-South-west (front) facade. 183

Value assessment:..................................................................High

The Village of

NIKITI

Buildings Inventory of the Old Village.................. Author:..................................Iason Koutsomitelis Sector...............................................................3 Registration No:..............................................373

Photographs

40°13’45.7”N 23°40’16.8”E

-South-west (front) facade. Typology

Typology

in relation with the environment

-North-west (side) facade. Interventions typology

Interventions discription

-Balcony replaced with concrete structure.

-South-west (front) facade. Degree of interventions: Medium State of conservation Good -Some interventions. -Medium degree of interventions. -Good maintenance. -Some minor interfering factors.

184

Value assessment:.............................................................Medium

The Village of

NIKITI

Buildings Inventory of the Old Village.................. Author:..................................Iason Koutsomitelis Sector...............................................................3 Registration No:..............................................374

Photographs

40°13’46.4”N 23°40’17.7”E

-South-west (front) facade. Typology

Typology

Interventions

in relation with the environment

-North-west (side) facade. typology

discription

-Balcony and staircase replaced with concrete structure. -Extension, one-floor concrete structure to the left side.

-North-west (side) facade. Degree of interventions: High State of conservation Adequate -Some interventions. -High degree of interventions. -Adequate maintenance.

185

Value assessment:.............................................................Medium

The Village of

NIKITI

Buildings Inventory of the Old Village.................. Author:..................................Iason Koutsomitelis Sector...............................................................3 Registration No:..............................................375

Photographs

40°13’47.1”N 23°40’17.7”E

-South-west (front) facade. Typology

Typology

Interventions

in relation with the environment

-South-west (front) facade. typology

discription

-Renovated. -Balcony replaced and extended with wooden structure according to the original form. -Small room added to the right side.

Degree of interventions: Medium State of conservation Excellent -Some interventions. -Medium degree of interventions. -Excellent maintenance. -Absence of other minor interfering factors.

186

Value assessment:............................................................Medium

The Village of

NIKITI

Buildings Inventory of the Old Village.................. Author:..................................Iason Koutsomitelis Sector...............................................................3 Registration No:..............................................376

Photographs

40°13’55.8”N 23°40’18.9”E

-South-east (front) facade. Typology

Typology

Interventions

in relation with the environment

-West (side) facade. typology

discription

-Renovated. -Balcony replaced and extended with wooden structure according to the original form.

-North-west (back) facade. Degree of interventions: Low State of conservation Good -Few interventions. -Low degree of interventions. -Good maintenance. -Some minor interfering factors (satellite antenas, sheds).

187

Value assessment:..................................................................High

The Village of

NIKITI

Buildings Inventory of the Old Village.................. Author:..................................Iason Koutsomitelis Sector...............................................................3 Registration No:..............................................377

Photographs

Location Building year:............xxxx Function:................. .................................. Number of floors:............1 Basement:...................Yes Comments on decoration and typology : --Coordinates:

40°13’56.3”N 23°40’19.5”E

-South-west (front) facade. Typology

Typology

Interventions

in relation with the environment

-North-east (back) facade. typology

discription

-Renovated.

Degree of interventions: Low State of conservation Excellent -Low degree of interventions. -Good maintenance. -Absence of other minor interfering factors.

188

Value assessment:..................................................................High

The Village of

NIKITI

Buildings Inventory of the Old Village.................. Author:..................................Iason Koutsomitelis Sector...............................................................3 Registration No:..............................................378

Photographs

40°13’56.8”N 23°40’20.1”E

-South-east (front) facade. Typology

Typology

in relation with the environment

-North-west (back) facade. Interventions typology

Interventions discription

-Staircase replaced with concrete structure. -Extension, two-floor concrete structure to the left and back side.

-South-west (side) facade. Degree of interventions: High State of conservation Adequate -Considerable interventions. -High degree of interventions. -Adequate maintenance. -Some minor interfering factors (blocked windows).

189

Value assessment:..................................................................High

The Village of

NIKITI

Buildings Inventory of the Old Village.................. Author:..................................Iason Koutsomitelis Sector...............................................................3 Registration No:..............................................379

Photographs

40°13’57.8”N 23°40’17.4”E

-South-east (front) facade. Typology

Typology

in relation with the environment

-North-side (side) facade. Interventions typology

Interventions discription

-Renovated. -Balcony replaced with wooden structure according to the original form.

-North-side (side) facade. Degree of interventions: Low State of conservation Good -Few interventions. -Low degree of interventions. -Good maintenance.

190

Value assessment:..................................................................High

The Village of

NIKITI

Buildings Inventory of the Old Village.................. Author:..................................Iason Koutsomitelis Sector...............................................................3 Registration No:..............................................380

Photographs

Location Building year:............xxxx Function:.....Private/guest house.................. Number of floors:............2 Basement:...................No Comments on decoration and typology : --Coordinates:

40°13’56.1”N 23°40’20.8”E

-South-east (front) facade. Typology

Typology

in relation with the environment

-North-east (side) facade. Interventions typology

Interventions discription

-Renovated. -Small room added at the back.

Degree of interventions: Low State of conservation Excellent -Few interventions. -Low degree of interventions. -Excellent maintenance.

191

Value assessment:..................................................................High

The Village of

NIKITI

Photographs

Buildings Inventory of the Old Village.................. Author:..................................Iason Koutsomitelis Sector...............................................................3 Registration No:..............................................381

40°13’55.4”N 23°40’19.0”E

-East (front) facade. Typology

Typology

Interventions

typology

in relation with the environment

discription

-Recently renovated. -Balcony replaced with wooden structure according to the original form.

Degree of interventions: Medium State of conservation Excellent -Few interventions. -Medium degree of interventions. -Excellent maintenance.

192

Value assessment:............................................................Medium

The Village of

NIKITI

Buildings Inventory of the Old Village.................. Author:..................................Iason Koutsomitelis Sector...............................................................3 Registration No:..............................................382

Photographs

40°13’55.4”N 23°40’21.4”E

-South-east (front) facade. Typology

Typology

in relation with the environment

-South-east (front) facade. Interventions typology

Interventions discription

-Renovated. -Probably two buildings that were connected. -Balcony added, concrete structure.

-North-east (side) facade. Degree of interventions: Low State of conservation Excellent -Few interventions. -Low degree of interventions. -Excellent maintenance. -Absence of other minor interfering factors. -South-west (front) facade. -South-west (side) facade. 193

Value assessment:..................................................................High

The Village of

NIKITI

Buildings Inventory of the Old Village.................. Author:..................................Iason Koutsomitelis Sector...............................................................3 Registration No:..............................................383

Photographs

40°13’54.9”N 23°40’20.5”E

-South-east (front) facade. Typology

Typology

Interventions

in relation with the environment

-North-east (side) facade. typology

discription

-Renovated. -Windows blocked at the right side. -Balcony replaced with wooden structure according to the original form.

Degree of interventions: Low State of conservation Good -Few interventions. -Low degree of interventions. -Good maintenance. -Some minor interfering factors (chimneys, blocked windows).

194

Value assessment:..................................................................High

The Village of

NIKITI

Buildings Inventory of the Old Village.................. Author:..................................Iason Koutsomitelis Sector...............................................................3 Registration No:..............................................384

Photographs

40°13’54.6”N 23°40’21.7”E

Typology

Interventions

in relation with the environment

-East (front) facade.

typology

discription

-Renovated. -Balcony replaced and extended with wooden structure according to the original form.

Degree of interventions: Low State of conservation Good -South (side) facade.

195

-Few interventions. -Low degree of interventions. -Good maintenance. -Absence of other minor interfering factors.

Value assessment:..................................................................High

The Village of

NIKITI

Buildings Inventory of the Old Village.................. Author:..................................Iason Koutsomitelis Sector...............................................................3 Registration No:..............................................385

Photographs

40°13’54.6”N 23°40’21.4”E

-North (back) facade. Typology

Typology

Interventions

in relation with the environment

-South (front) facade. typology

discription

-Room added to the front facade.

Degree of interventions: Low State of conservation Adequate -Few interventions. -Low degree of interventions. -Lack of maintenance. -West (side) facade. 196

Value assessment:..................................................................High

The Village of

NIKITI

Buildings Inventory of the Old Village.................. Author:..................................Iason Koutsomitelis Sector...............................................................3 Registration No:..............................................386

Photographs

40°13’54.6”N 23°40’20.6”E

-South-east (front) facade. Typology

Typology

Interventions

in relation with the environment

-South-east (front) facade. typology

discription

-Renovated. -Balcony replaced and extended with wooden structure according to the original form. -Extension, two-floor structure to the left side.

Degree of interventions: High State of conservation Good -Considerable interventions. -High degree of interventions. -Excellent maintenance. -Absence of other minor interfering factors.

197

Value assessment:..................................................................High

The Village of

NIKITI

Buildings Inventory of the Old Village.................. Author:..................................Iason Koutsomitelis Sector...............................................................3 Registration No:..............................................387

Photographs

Location Building year:............xxxx Function:.....Former house ...now tavern..................... Number of floors:............2 Basement:...................No Comments on decoration and typology : --Coordinates:

40°13’54.2”N 23°40’21.7”E

-South (front) facade. Typology

Typology

in relation with the environment

-South (front) facade. Interventions typology

Interventions discription

-Multiple extension to the front and to the left sides with disrespect of the original form.

-South (front) facade. Degree of interventions: Severe State of conservation Poor

-South-west (front) facade. -East (side) facade. 198

-Considerable interventions. -High degree of interventions. -Good maintenance. -Big part of the original structure covered by the extensions. -Few minor interfering factors (solar water heater). Value assessment:............................................................Medium

The Village of

NIKITI

Buildings Inventory of the Old Village.................. Author:..................................Iason Koutsomitelis Sector...............................................................3 Registration No:..............................................388

Photographs

40°13’53.7”N 23°40’21.1”E

-South-east (front) facade. Typology

Typology

in relation with the environment

-South-east (front) facade. Interventions typology

Interventions discription

-Renovated. -Small room added to the right side. -Balcony replaced with wooden structure according to the original form.

Degree of interventions: Low State of conservation Excellent

-South-east facade. 199

-Some interventions. -Low degree of interventions. -Appropriate renovation. -Good maintenance. -Absence of other minor interfering factors. Value assessment:.............................................................Medium

The Village of

NIKITI

Photographs

Buildings Inventory of the Old Village.................. Author:..................................Iason Koutsomitelis Sector...............................................................3 Registration No:..............................................389

Location Building year: ....app. 1925 Function:.....Private house and stores on the 1st floor. Number of floors:............2 Basement:...................No

Coordinates:

40°13’53.0”N 23°40’22.1”E

Comments on decoration and typology : Neoclassical elements on the decoration. -Different decorative elements at the two separate sides of the building.

-East (front) facade. Typology

Typology

in relation with the environment

-East (back) facade. Interventions typology

Interventions discription

-Extension, two-floor concrete structure to the left side. -Added room at the back side.

-East (side) facade. Degree of interventions: High State of conservation Good -Some interventions. -High degree of some interventions. -Good maintenance. -Absence of other minor interfering factors.

200

Value assessment:..................................................................High

The Village of

NIKITI

Buildings Inventory of the Old Village.................. Author:..................................Iason Koutsomitelis Sector...............................................................3 Registration No:..............................................390

Photographs

40°13’52.6”N 23°40’21.8”E

-West (side) facade. Typology

Typology

Interventions

in relation with the environment

-South (front) facade. typology

discription

-Right part of the building probably collapsed on one point. -At a later stage an extra structure was built at the front. -Balcony replaced with concrete structure. -Added pergola on the balcony. -Added staircase.

-South (front) abd east facades.

Degree of interventions: High State of conservation Adequate -Considerable interventions. -High degree of interventions. -Good maintenance. -Possibly, half of the building collapsed or never built.

201

Value assessment:............................................................Medium

The Village of

NIKITI

Buildings Inventory of the Old Village.................. Author:..................................Iason Koutsomitelis Sector...............................................................3 Registration No:..............................................391

Photographs

40°13’52.3”N 23°40’21.7”E

-East (front) facade. Typology

Typology

Interventions

in relation with the environment

-North (back) facade. typology

discription

-Renovated. -Balcony replaced with concrete structure. -Small room added to the right side.

Degree of interventions: Medium State of conservation Good -Some interventions. -Medium degree of some interventions. -Good maintenance. -Absence of other minor interfering factors. -East (front) facade. 202

Value assessment:............................................................Medium

The Village of

NIKITI

Photographs

Buildings Inventory of the Old Village.................. Author:..................................Iason Koutsomitelis Sector...............................................................3 Registration No:..............................................392

Location Building year:............xxxx Function:.............Hotel .................................. Number of floors:............2 Basement:...................No Comments on decoration and typology : Rare example of the typology. Coordinates:

40°13’51.6”N 23°40’22.5”E

-South (front) facade. Typology

Typology

Interventions

in relation with the environment

-South (front) facade. typology

discription

-East (side) facade. Degree of interventions: xxx State of conservation Poor -Lack of maintenance. -Abandoned.

203

Value assessment:..................................................................High

The Village of

NIKITI

Buildings Inventory of the Old Village.................. Author:..................................Iason Koutsomitelis Sector...............................................................3 Registration No:..............................................393

Photographs

40°13’50.9”N 23°40’22.2”E

-South (front) facade. Typology

Typology

Interventions

in relation with the environment

-East (side) facade. typology

discription

-Renovated.

Degree of interventions: Low State of conservation Excellent

-South (front) facade. 204

-No highly invasive interventions. -Renovated.. -Low degree of interventions. -Excellent maintenance. -Absence of other minor interfering factors. Value assessment:............................................................Medium

The Village of

NIKITI

Buildings Inventory of the Old Village.................. Author:..................................Iason Koutsomitelis Sector...............................................................3 Registration No:..............................................394

Photographs

Location Building year:............xxxx Function:..............Store .................................. Number of floors:............1 Basement:...................No Comments on decoration and typology : Neoclassical elements on the decoration. Coordinates:

40°13’50.9”N 23°40’21.8”E

-South (front) facade. Typology

Typology

Interventions

in relation with the environment

-South (front) facade. typology

discription

-Renovated.

-West (side) and south facades. Degree of interventions: Low State of conservation Excellent -Renovated.. -Low degree of interventions. -Excellent maintenance. -Absence of other minor interfering factors.

205

Value assessment:.............................................................Medium

206

Sector 4

207

The Village of

NIKITI

Photographs

Buildings Inventory of the Old Village.................. Author:..................................Iason Koutsomitelis Sector...............................................................4 Registration No:..............................................401

Location Building year:............xxxx Function:.................xxxxx .................................. Number of floors:............x Basement:...................No Comments on decoration and typology : --Coordinates:

40°13’37.9”N 23°40’01.6”E

-View from the south. Typology

Typology

in relation with the environment

-View from the west. Interventions

Interventions

typology

discription

-The building is used as chicken enclosure.

-View from the north. Degree of interventions: xxx State of conservation Ruin -In state of collapsing. -No maintenance.

208

Value assessment:..................................................................High

The Village of

NIKITI

Photographs

Buildings Inventory of the Old Village.................. Author:..................................Iason Koutsomitelis Sector...............................................................4 Registration No:..............................................402

Location Building year:............xxxx Function:...........Storage .................................. Number of floors:............1 Basement:...................No Comments on decoration and typology : --Coordinates:

40°13’39.0”N 23°40’01.6”E

-South facade. Typology

Typology

Interventions

in relation with the environment

-West (side) facade. typology

discription

Degree of interventions: Low State of conservation Adequate -Low degree of interventions. -Adequate maintenance.

209

Value assessment:..................................................................Low

The Village of

NIKITI

Buildings Inventory of the Old Village.................. Author:..................................Iason Koutsomitelis Sector...............................................................4 Registration No:..............................................403

Photographs

Location Building year: .....approx. 1945-55................ Function:.....Private house .................................. Number of floors:............1 Basement:...................No

Coordinates:

40°13’37.7”N 23°40’08.9”E

Comments on decoration and typology : -Entrance from the short facade.

-South-west (front) facade. Typology

Typology

Interventions

in relation with the environment

-South-west (front) facade. typology

discription

-Recently renovated.

Degree of interventions: Low State of conservation Excellent -Renovated. -Low degree of interventions. -Excellent maintenance. -Absence of other minor interfering factors.

210

Value assessment:..................................................................Low

The Village of

NIKITI

Buildings Inventory of the Old Village.................. Author:..................................Iason Koutsomitelis Sector...............................................................4 Registration No:..............................................404

Photographs

Location Building year: .....approx. 1945-55................ Function:.....Private house .................................. Number of floors:............1 Basement:...................Yes

Coordinates:

40°13’45.1”N 23°40’12.2”E

Comments on decoration and typology : ---

-South-east (side) facade. Typology

Typology

in relation with the environment

Interventions typology

Interventions discription

-Renovated.

Degree of interventions: Low State of conservation Good -Few interventions. -Low degree of interventions. -Good maintenance.

211

Value assessment:..................................................................Low

The Village of

NIKITI

Photographs

Buildings Inventory of the Old Village.................. Author:..................................Iason Koutsomitelis Sector...............................................................4 Registration No:..............................................405

Location Building year:............xxxx Function:.....Private house .................................. Number of floors:............1 Basement:...................No Comments on decoration and typology : --Coordinates:

40°13’40.8”N 23°40’11.2”E

-East (front) facade. Typology

Typology

Interventions

in relation with the environment

-East (front) facade. typology

discription

-Recently renovated. -The current state of the building came to be after the merging of two separate structures with a new construction. The interventions were done respecting the original buildings.

-East facade. Degree of interventions: High State of conservation Excellent -Many interventions. -High degree of some interventions. -Appropriate renovation. -Excellent maintenance. -Absence of other minor interfering factors. 212

Value assessment:............................................................Medium

The Village of

NIKITI

Photographs

Buildings Inventory of the Old Village.................. Author:..................................Iason Koutsomitelis Sector...............................................................4 Registration No:..............................................406

Location Building year: .....approx. 1945-55................ Function:.....Private house .................................. Number of floors:............2 Basement:...................No

Coordinates:

40°13’41.6”N 23°40’08.7”E

Comments on decoration and typology : ---

-South (front) facade. Typology

Typology

Interventions

in relation with the environment

-West (side) facade. typology

discription

-Renovated. -Multiple interventions on the front facade and addition of a concrete balcony. -The builing was probably divided into two houses on a later stage.

-North (back) facade. Degree of interventions: Severe State of conservation Adequate -Some interventions. -Severe degree of interventions. -Good maintenance. -Some minor interfering factors.

213

Value assessment:............................................................Medium

The Village of

NIKITI

Photographs

Buildings Inventory of the Old Village.................. Author:..................................Iason Koutsomitelis Sector...............................................................4 Registration No:..............................................407

Location Building year: .....approx. 1945-55................ Function:.....Private house .................................. Number of floors:............1 Basement:...................Yes

Coordinates:

40°13’40.3”N 23°40’07.8”E

Comments on decoration and typology : ---

-West (side) facade. Typology

Typology

in relation with the environment

Interventions typology

Interventions discription

-Room added to the left.

Degree of interventions: Low State of conservation Good -Few interventions. -Low degree of interventions. -Good maintenance.

214

Value assessment:..................................................................Low

The Village of

NIKITI

Buildings Inventory of the Old Village.................. Author:..................................Iason Koutsomitelis Sector...............................................................4 Registration No:..............................................408

Photographs

Location Building year:.......... poss. interwar period................. Function:.....Private house Number of floors:............2 Basement:...................No Comments on decoration and typology : --Coordinates:

40°13’41.3”N 23°40’07.6”E

-South-west (front) facade. Typology

Typology

in relation with the environment

-East (side) facade. Interventions typology

Interventions discription

-Balcony replaced in a later stage.

Degree of interventions: Low State of conservation Good -Few interventions. -Low degree of interventions. -Adequate maintenance.

215

Value assessment:..................................................................High

The Village of

NIKITI

Buildings Inventory of the Old Village.................. Author:..................................Iason Koutsomitelis Sector...............................................................4 Registration No:..............................................409

Photographs

40°13’42.0”N 23°40’07.8”E

-South (front) facade. Typology

Typology

Interventions

in relation with the environment

-East and north (back) facades. typology

discription

-Addition of a two floor concrete structure at the left side of the building. -Replacement of balcony with cocrete structure. -Small room added in the front facade.

-West (side) facade. Degree of interventions: Severe State of conservation Poor -Many highly invasive interventions. -Severe degree of interventions. -Considerable minor interfering factors. -Big part of the original structure covered by the extensions. -Large part of the original structure jeopardized. 216

Value assessment:.............................................................Medium

The Village of

NIKITI

Photographs

Buildings Inventory of the Old Village.................. Author:..................................Iason Koutsomitelis Sector...............................................................4 Registration No:..............................................410

Location Building year:............xxxx Function:.........Storage .................................. Number of floors:............1 Basement:...................No Comments on decoration and typology : --Coordinates:

40°13’41.8”N 23°40’07.0”E

-North-west facade. Typology

Typology

Interventions

in relation with the environment

-North-east facade. typology

discription

Degree of interventions: Low State of conservation Adequate -Low degree of interventions. -Lack of maintenance.

217

Value assessment:..................................................................Low

The Village of

NIKITI

Buildings Inventory of the Old Village.................. Author:..................................Iason Koutsomitelis Sector...............................................................4 Registration No:..............................................411

Photographs

40°13’40.0”N 23°40’10.5”E

-South-west (front) facade. Typology

Typology

Interventions

in relation with the environment

-South-east (side) facade. typology

discription

-Extension, two-floor concrete structure to the right side.

-North-east (back) facade. Degree of interventions: Severe State of conservation Poor -Many highly invasive interventions. -Severe degree of interventions. -Considerable minor interfering factors. -Big part of the original structure covered by the extensions. -Large part of the original structure jeopardized. 218

Value assessment:..................................................................High

Sector 5

219

The Village of

NIKITI

Buildings Inventory of the Old Village.................. Author:..................................Iason Koutsomitelis Sector...............................................................5 Registration No:..............................................501

Photographs

40°13’43.6”N 23°40’13.5”E

-North-west (front) facade. Typology

Typology

in relation with the environment

-North-west (front) facade. Interventions typology

Interventions discription

-Ongoing renovation. -Added romm to the right. -The surface of the facades covered with layer of industrial stonework.

Degree of interventions: Severe State of conservation Poor -Considerable interventions. -Severe degree of interventions. -Halted renovation. -Large part of the original structure jeopardized. -South-west facade, detail. 220

Value assessment:...................................................................Low

The Village of

NIKITI

Buildings Inventory of the Old Village.................. Author:..................................Iason Koutsomitelis Sector...............................................................5 Registration No:..............................................502

Photographs

40°13’43.4”N 23°40’13.8”E

-South-west (front) facade. Typology

Typology

in relation with the environment

-South-west (front) facade. Interventions typology

Interventions discription

-Balcony replaced and extended with concrete structure. -Extension, two-floor concrete structure to the right side.

Degree of interventions: High State of conservation Adequate -Some interventions. -High degree of interventions. -Lack of maintenance. -Appears to be abandoned.

221

Value assessment:............................................................Medium

The Village of

NIKITI

Buildings Inventory of the Old Village.................. Author:..................................Iason Koutsomitelis Sector...............................................................5 Registration No:..............................................503

Photographs

40°13’42.9”N 23°40’14.6”E

-South-west (front) facade. Typology

Typology

Interventions

in relation with the environment

-South-west (front) facade. typology

discription

-Ongoing renovation. -Balcony replaced with wooden structure according to the original form.

Degree of interventions: Medium State of conservation Good -Few interventions. -Medium degree of interventions. -Currently renovated. -Absence of other minor interfering factors.

222

Value assessment:..................................................................High

The Village of

NIKITI

Buildings Inventory of the Old Village.................. Author:..................................Iason Koutsomitelis Sector...............................................................5 Registration No:..............................................504

Photographs

40°13’42.5”N 23°40’15.0”E

-South-west (front) facade. Typology

Typology

Interventions

in relation with the environment

-South-east (side) facade. typology

discription

-Renovated. -Balcony replaced with wooden structure according to the original form. -Windows replaced with aluminium frames.

Degree of interventions: Low State of conservation Excellent -Some interventions. -Appropriate renovation. -Low degree of interventions. -Excellent maintenance. -Absence of other minor interfering factors. 223

Value assessment:..................................................................High

The Village of

NIKITI

Buildings Inventory of the Old Village.................. Author:..................................Iason Koutsomitelis Sector...............................................................5 Registration No:..............................................505

Photographs

40°13’43.9”N 23°40’13.9”E

-North-west (front) facade. Typology

Typology

in relation with the environment

-North-west (front) facade. Interventions typology

Interventions discription

-Extension, two-floor concrete structure with pilotis and balcony to the front and right sides. -Due to the interventions typology cannot be identified.

-North-east (side) facade. Degree of interventions: Severe State of conservation Poor -Many interventions. -Severe degree of interventions. -Big part of the original structure covered by the extensions. -Large part of the original structure jeopardized.

224

Value assessment:............................................................Medium

The Village of

NIKITI

Buildings Inventory of the Old Village.................. Author:..................................Iason Koutsomitelis Sector...............................................................5 Registration No:..............................................506

Photographs

40°13’43.6”N 23°40’14.4”E

-South-west (front) facade. Typology

Typology

in relation with the environment

A2.3

-South-west (front) facade. Interventions typology

Interventions discription

-Extension, one-floor concrete structure to the left side.

-North-east (back) facade. Degree of interventions: Medium State of conservation Good -Few interventions. -Medium degree of interventions. -Good maintenance. -Some minor interfering factors (antenas, pergolas).

225

Value assessment:..................................................................High

The Village of

NIKITI

Buildings Inventory of the Old Village.................. Author:..................................Iason Koutsomitelis Sector...............................................................5 Registration No:..............................................507

Photographs

Location Building year:............1936 Function:.....Private house .................................. Number of floors:............2 Basement:...................No Comments on decoration and typology : --Coordinates:

40°13’43.6”N 23°40’15.9”E

-South-west (front) facade. Typology

Typology

Interventions

in relation with the environment

-South-west (front) facade. typology

discription

-Balcony and staircase replaced with concrete structure. -Extension, concrete structure to the back side.

-North-west (side) facade. Degree of interventions: High State of conservation Good -Some interventions. -High degree of interventions. -Good maintenance. -South-west (front) facade. -Detail of the ownership plate. 226

Value assessment:..................................................................High

The Village of

NIKITI

Buildings Inventory of the Old Village.................. Author:..................................Iason Koutsomitelis Sector...............................................................5 Registration No:..............................................508

Photographs

40°13’43.5”N 23°40’16.1”E

-South-west (front) facade. Typology

Typology

Interventions

in relation with the environment

-South-west (front) facade. typology

discription

-Balcony and staircase replaced with concrete structure. -Room added to the front facade.

Degree of interventions: High State of conservation Adequate -Some interventions. -High degree of interventions. -Poor maintenance. -Some minor interfering factors (antenas).

227

Value assessment:..................................................................High

The Village of

NIKITI

Buildings Inventory of the Old Village.................. Author:..................................Iason Koutsomitelis Sector...............................................................5 Registration No:..............................................509

Photographs

40°13’43.1”N 23°40’16.5”E

-South-west (front) facade. Typology

Typology

in relation with the environment

-North-west (side) facade. Interventions typology

Interventions discription

Degree of interventions: Low State of conservation Good -Low degree of some interventions. -Adequate maintenance.

228

Value assessment:..................................................................High

The Village of

NIKITI

Photographs

Buildings Inventory of the Old Village.................. Author:..................................Iason Koutsomitelis Sector...............................................................5 Registration No:..............................................510

40°13’43.2”N 23°40’16.9”E

-South (front) facade. Typology

Typology

Interventions

in relation with the environment

-East (front) facade. typology

discription

-Room added to the back facade. -Balcony replaced and extended. -Blocked windows.

-South (back) facade. Degree of interventions: High State of conservation Good -Some interventions. -High degree of some interventions. -Good maintenance. -Some minor interfering factors (blocked windows)

229

Value assessment:..................................................................High

The Village of

NIKITI

Buildings Inventory of the Old Village.................. Author:..................................Iason Koutsomitelis Sector...............................................................5 Registration No:..............................................511

Photographs

40°13’42.6”N 23°40’16.6”E

-South-west (front) facade. Typology

Typology

in relation with the environment

-South-east (side) facade. Interventions typology

Interventions discription

-Balcony replaced with concrete structure.

-South-east (side) and back facades. Degree of interventions: Low State of conservation Good -Few interventions. -Low degree of interventions. -Good maintenance. -South-west (front) facade. 230

Value assessment:..................................................................High

The Village of

NIKITI

Buildings Inventory of the Old Village.................. Author:..................................Iason Koutsomitelis Sector...............................................................5 Registration No:..............................................512

Photographs

40°13’40.9”N 23°40’15.1”E

-South-west (front) facade. Typology

Typology

Interventions

in relation with the environment

-South-east (side) facade. typology

discription

-Renovated. -Balconies replaced with wooden structure. -Possibly, erker added at the back facade.

Degree of interventions: High State of conservation Excellent -Some interventions. -High degree of interventions. -Excellent maintenance. -Absence of other minor interfering factors.

231

Value assessment:............................................................Medium

The Village of

NIKITI

Buildings Inventory of the Old Village.................. Author:..................................Iason Koutsomitelis Sector...............................................................5 Registration No:..............................................513

Photographs

40°13’40.2”N 23°40’15.3”E

-East (front) and north facades. Typology

Typology

Interventions

in relation with the environment

-East (front) facade. typology

discription

-Renovated. -Balcony replaced and extended with concrete structure. -Extension, two-floor concrete structure to the back side.

-East (front) and south facades. Degree of interventions: Severe State of conservation Adequate -Many interventions. -Severe degree of interventions. -Some minor interfering factors (a/c unit, drain pipes).

232

Value assessment:..................................................................Low

The Village of

NIKITI

Buildings Inventory of the Old Village.................. Author:..................................Iason Koutsomitelis Sector...............................................................5 Registration No:..............................................514

Photographs

40°13’40.1”N 23°40’14.9”E

-East (front) facade. Typology

Typology

in relation with the environment

-East (front) and south facades. Interventions typology

Interventions discription

-Renovated. -Room added to the back facade.

-Detail of the ownership plate. Degree of interventions: Medium State of conservation Excellent -Few interventions. -Renovated -Medium degree of interventions. -Excellent maintenance. -Absence of other minor interfering factors. 233

Value assessment:..................................................................High

The Village of

NIKITI

Buildings Inventory of the Old Village.................. Author:..................................Iason Koutsomitelis Sector...............................................................5 Registration No:..............................................515

Photographs

40°13’38.4”N 23°40’14.8”E

-South (front) facade. Typology

Typology

Interventions

in relation with the environment

-South (front) and east facades. typology

discription

-Highly invasive renovation. -Logia created on the left side of the building, on the second floor. -Room added to the left side.

Degree of interventions: High State of conservation Good -Few interventions. -Renovated -High degree of interventions. -Excellent maintenance. -Absence of other minor interfering factors. 234

Value assessment:............................................................Medium

The Village of

NIKITI

Buildings Inventory of the Old Village.................. Author:..................................Iason Koutsomitelis Sector...............................................................5 Registration No:..............................................516

Photographs

40°13’36.3”N 23°40’13.9”E

-South (front) and east facades. Typology

Typology

in relation with the environment

-East (side) facade. Interventions typology

Interventions discription

Degree of interventions: Low State of conservation Adequate -Low degree of interventions. -Lack of maintenance. -Absence of other minor interfering factors.

235

Value assessment:............................................................Medium

The Village of

NIKITI

Photographs

Buildings Inventory of the Old Village.................. Author:..................................Iason Koutsomitelis Sector...............................................................5 Registration No:..............................................517

40°13’35.8”N 23°40’14.6”E

-South (front) facade. Typology

Typology

Interventions

in relation with the environment

-East (side) facade. typology

discription

-Renovated. -Balcony and staircase replaced with concrete structure. -Extension, two-floor to the left side.

-North (back) facade. Degree of interventions: High State of conservation Good -Few interventions. -High degree of interventions. -Excellent maintenance. -Absence of other minor interfering factors.

236

Value assessment:............................................................Medium

The Village of

NIKITI

Buildings Inventory of the Old Village.................. Author:..................................Iason Koutsomitelis Sector...............................................................5 Registration No:..............................................518

Photographs

40°13’35.2”N 23°40’14.7”E

-South (front) facade. Typology

Typology

Interventions

in relation with the environment

-East (side) facade. typology

discription

-Renovated. -Balcony and staircase replaced with concrete structure. -Extension, two-floor to the left side.

-North (back) facade. Degree of interventions: High State of conservation Good -Few interventions. -High degree of interventions. -Excellent maintenance. -Absence of other minor interfering factors. -South-west (front) facade. -Detail of the ownership plate. 237

Value assessment:..................................................................High

The Village of

NIKITI

Photographs

Buildings Inventory of the Old Village.................. Author:..................................Iason Koutsomitelis Sector...............................................................5 Registration No:..............................................519

40°13’34.5”N 23°40’14.7”E

-South (front) facade. Typology

Typology

Interventions

in relation with the environment

-South (front) facade. typology

discription

-Renovated. -Balcony probably extended in a later stage.

-East (side) facade. Degree of interventions: Low State of conservation Good -Few interventions. -Low degree of interventions. -Excellent maintenance. -Absence of other minor interfering factors.

238

Value assessment:............................................................Medium

The Village of

NIKITI

Buildings Inventory of the Old Village.................. Author:..................................Iason Koutsomitelis Sector...............................................................5 Registration No:..............................................520

Photographs

40°13’32.8”N 23°40’14.1”E

-South (front) and east facades. Typology

Typology

in relation with the environment

-South (front) facade. Interventions typology

Interventions discription

-Renovated. -Small room added to the left side. -Balcony replaced and extended with concrete structure.

-East (side) facade. Degree of interventions: High State of conservation Good -Few interventions. -High degree of interventions. -Excellent maintenance. -Absence of other minor interfering factors.

239

Value assessment:.............................................................Medium

The Village of

NIKITI

Photographs

Buildings Inventory of the Old Village.................. Author:..................................Iason Koutsomitelis Sector...............................................................3 Registration No:..............................................521

Location Building year:............1950 Function:.....Private house .................................. Number of floors:............2 Basement:...................No Comments on decoration and typology : --Coordinates:

40°13’45.1”N 23°40’12.2”E

-South (front) facade. Typology

Typology

Interventions

in relation with the environment

-South (front) facade. typology

discription

-Balcony replaced with concrete structure. -Extension, two-floor concrete structure to the left side.

-North (back) facade. Degree of interventions: Severe State of conservation Adequate -Some interventions. -Severe degree of interventions. -Good maintenance.

240

Value assessment:..................................................................Low

The Village of

NIKITI

Photographs

Buildings Inventory of the Old Village.................. Author:..................................Iason Koutsomitelis Sector...............................................................3 Registration No:..............................................522

40°13’32.0”N 23°40’14.4”E

-West (front) facade. Typology

Typology

Interventions

in relation with the environment

-South (side) facade. typology

discription

-Balcony with shed and staircase added at the right side, concrete structure. -Small room added at the back. -Balcony at the front side removed.

Degree of interventions: Medium State of conservation Good -Some interventions. -Medium degree of interventions. -Lack of maintenance. -Absence of other minor interfering factors.

241

Value assessment:............................................................Medium

The Village of

NIKITI

Buildings Inventory of the Old Village.................. Author:..................................Iason Koutsomitelis Sector...............................................................3 Registration No:..............................................523

Photographs

Location Building year:............1930 Function:.....Private house /Store............................. Number of floors:............2 Basement:...................No Comments on decoration and typology : --Coordinates:

40°13’31.2”N 23°40’14.1”E

-West (front) facade. Typology

Typology

in relation with the environment

-West (front) and north facades. Interventions typology

Interventions discription

-Renovated.

Degree of interventions: Low State of conservation Excellent The building is protected as an individual protected monument. -Low degree of interventions. -Excellent maintenance. -Absence of other minor interfering factors. -North facade. 242

Value assessment:..................................................................High

The Village of

NIKITI

Buildings Inventory of the Old Village.................. Author:..................................Iason Koutsomitelis Sector...............................................................3 Registration No:..............................................524

Photographs

Location Building year:.................. ............approx. 1950s........ Function:.....Private house Number of floors:............2 Basement:...................No Comments on decoration and typology : --Coordinates:

40°13’30.9”N 23°40’12.7”E

-South (front) facade. Typology

Typology

in relation with the environment

-South and east (side) facades. Interventions typology

Interventions discription

-Renovated.

Degree of interventions: Low State of conservation Excellent -Few interventions. -Low degree of interventions. -Excellent maintenance. -Absence of other minor interfering factors.

243

Value assessment:..................................................................Low

The Village of

NIKITI

Buildings Inventory of the Old Village.................. Author:..................................Iason Koutsomitelis Sector...............................................................3 Registration No:..............................................525

Photographs

40°13’31.2”N 23°40’12.1”E

-South-west (front) facade. Typology

Typology

in relation with the environment

Interventions typology

Interventions discription

-Balcony and staircase replaced and extended. -Extension, one-floor structure to the right side.

Degree of interventions: Medium State of conservation Good -Some interventions. -Medium degree of interventions. -Adequate maintenance. -Some minor interfering factors (balcony tents).

244

Value assessment:..................................................................Low

The Village of

NIKITI

Buildings Inventory of the Old Village.................. Author:..................................Iason Koutsomitelis Sector...............................................................3 Registration No:..............................................526

Photographs

Location Building year:............1957 Function:.....Private house .................................. Number of floors:............2 Basement:...................No Comments on decoration and typology : --Coordinates:

40°13’30.6”N 23°40’11.2”E

-South-west (front) facade. Typology

Typology

in relation with the environment

-South-west (front) facade. Interventions typology

Interventions discription

-Balcony replaced and extended. -Possibly extension, to the left side.

-Detail of the ownership plate. Degree of interventions: Medium State of conservation Good -Some interventions. -Medium degree of interventions. -Good maintenance. -Some minor interfering factors (a/c units, window frames).

245

Value assessment:..................................................................Low

The Village of

NIKITI

Buildings Inventory of the Old Village.................. Author:..................................Iason Koutsomitelis Sector...............................................................5 Registration No:..............................................527

Photographs

Location Building year:............xxxx Function:.....Private house .................................. Number of floors:............1 Basement:...................No Comments on decoration and typology : --Coordinates:

40°13’31.8”N 23°40’10.5”E

-West (front) facade. Typology

Typology

Interventions

in relation with the environment

-West (front) and south facades. typology

discription

Degree of interventions: xxx State of conservation Poor -Lack of maintenance. -Abandoned.

246

Value assessment:..................................................................Low

The Village of

NIKITI

Photographs

Buildings Inventory of the Old Village.................. Author:..................................Iason Koutsomitelis Sector...............................................................5 Registration No:..............................................528

40°13’32.8”N 23°40’10.3”E

-South (front) facade. Typology

Typology

in relation with the environment

-South (front) facade. Interventions typology

Interventions discription

-Balcony extended, concrete structure. -Possibly extension, to the left side.

Degree of interventions: Medium State of conservation Good -Some interventions. -Medium degree of interventions. -Adequate maintenance. -Absence of other minor interfering factors.

247

Value assessment:..................................................................Low

The Village of

NIKITI

Buildings Inventory of the Old Village.................. Author:..................................Iason Koutsomitelis Sector...............................................................5 Registration No:..............................................529

Photographs

40°13’33.5”N 23°40’10.1”E

-South (front) and west facades. Typology

Typology

Interventions

in relation with the environment

-South (front) facade. typology

discription

Degree of interventions: Low State of conservation Poor -Lack of maintenance. -Abandoned.

248

Value assessment:..................................................................Low

The Village of

NIKITI

Buildings Inventory of the Old Village.................. Author:..................................Iason Koutsomitelis Sector...............................................................5 Registration No:..............................................530

Photographs

40°13’34.6”N 23°40’09.5”E

-South-east (front) facade. Typology

Typology

in relation with the environment

-South-east (front) facade. Interventions typology

Interventions discription

-Renovated. -Balcony and staircase replaced with concrete structure. -Small room added to the left side.

Degree of interventions: High State of conservation Good -Some interventions. -High degree of interventions. -Excellent maintenance. -Some minor interfering factors (a/c unit, chimneys).

249

Value assessment:..................................................................Low

The Village of

NIKITI

Buildings Inventory of the Old Village.................. Author:..................................Iason Koutsomitelis Sector...............................................................5 Registration No:..............................................531

Photographs

40°13’34.1”N 23°40’08.3”E

-South-west (front) facade. Typology

Typology

in relation with the environment

Interventions typology

Interventions discription

-Possibly, balcony extended, concrete structure. -Added shed over the balcony.

Degree of interventions: Low State of conservation Adequate -Some interventions. -Low degree of interventions. -Lack of maintenance. -Some minor interfering factors.

250

Value assessment:..................................................................Low

The Village of

NIKITI

Buildings Inventory of the Old Village.................. Author:..................................Iason Koutsomitelis Sector...............................................................5 Registration No:..............................................532

Photographs

40°13’34.9”N 23°40’07.8”E

-North-west (side) facade. Typology

Typology

in relation with the environment

Interventions typology

Interventions discription

-Possibly, balcony extended, concrete structure. -Extension, two-floor concrete structure to the back side.

Degree of interventions: High State of conservation Adequate -Some interventions. -High degree of interventions. -Adequate maintenance. -Some minor interfering factors.

251

Value assessment:..................................................................Low

The Village of

NIKITI

Buildings Inventory of the Old Village.................. Author:..................................Iason Koutsomitelis Sector...............................................................5 Registration No:..............................................533

Photographs

40°13’36.1”N 23°40’10.0”E

-North-west (side) facade. Typology

Typology

in relation with the environment

-North-east (back) facade. Interventions typology

Interventions discription

-Blocked and changed windows. -Extension, one-floor concrete structure to the righ side.

Degree of interventions: High State of conservation Adequate -Few interventions. -High degree of interventions. -Adequate maintenance. -Some minor interfering factors (blocked windows).

252

Value assessment:..................................................................Low

The Village of

NIKITI

Buildings Inventory of the Old Village.................. Author:..................................Iason Koutsomitelis Sector...............................................................5 Registration No:..............................................534

Photographs

Location Building year:............xxxx Function:............xxx .................................. Number of floors:............x Basement:...................x Comments on decoration and typology : --Coordinates:

40°13’36.9”N 23°40’09.2”E

-View from the south-west. Typology

Typology

in relation with the environment

Interventions typology

Interventions discription

Degree of interventions: xxx State of conservation Ruin -In state of collapsing. -No maintenance.

253

Value assessment:..................................................................Low

The Village of

NIKITI

Buildings Inventory of the Old Village.................. Author:..................................Iason Koutsomitelis Sector...............................................................5 Registration No:..............................................535

Photographs

40°13’37.5”N 23°40’11.6”E

-South (front) and west facades. Typology

Typology

in relation with the environment

-South (front) facade. Interventions typology

Interventions discription

-Renovated. -Small room added at the back. -Balcony replaced and extended with concrete structure.

Degree of interventions: Severe State of conservation Adequate -Some interventions. -Severe degree of interventions. -Good maintenance. -Some minor interfering factors.

254

Value assessment:..................................................................Low

The Village of

NIKITI

Photographs

Buildings Inventory of the Old Village.................. Author:..................................Iason Koutsomitelis Sector...............................................................5 Registration No:..............................................536

40°13’39.4”N 23°40’12.8”E

-West (front) facade. Typology

Typology

in relation with the environment

-North (side) facade. Interventions typology

Interventions discription

-Renovated. -Extension, two-floor concrete structure to the front side. -Extension, one-floor concrete structure to the right side. -Due to the intervention typology cannot be identified. -East (back) facade. Degree of interventions: Severe State of conservation Adequate -Many interventions. -Severe degree of interventions. -Big part of the original structure covered by the extensions. -Excellent maintenance.

255

Value assessment:..................................................................Low

The Village of

NIKITI

Buildings Inventory of the Old Village.................. Author:..................................Iason Koutsomitelis Sector...............................................................5 Registration No:..............................................537

Photographs

40°13’38.8”N 23°40’13.2”E

-East (front) and north facades. Typology

Typology

in relation with the environment

-North (side) facade. Interventions typology

Interventions discription

-Possibly, balcony replaced. -Extension, two-floor concrete structure to the back side.

Degree of interventions: High State of conservation Good -Some interventions. -High degree of interventions. -Good maintenance. -Absence of other minor interfering factors.

256

Value assessment:..................................................................Low

The Village of

NIKITI

Buildings Inventory of the Old Village.................. Author:..................................Iason Koutsomitelis Sector...............................................................5 Registration No:..............................................538

Photographs

40°13’39.9”N 23°40’12.7”E

-South-west (front) facade. Typology

Typology

in relation with the environment

-South-west (front) facade. Interventions typology

Interventions discription

-Renovated. -Balcony extended to the front and to the right, concrete structure. -Room added to the left side.

Degree of interventions: High State of conservation Good -Some interventions. -High degree of interventions. -Excellent maintenance.

257

Value assessment:..................................................................Low

The Village of

NIKITI

Photographs

Buildings Inventory of the Old Village.................. Author:..................................Iason Koutsomitelis Sector...............................................................5 Registration No:..............................................539

40°13’40.5”N 23°40’12.8”E

-West (side) facade. Typology

Typology

in relation with the environment

-East (side) facade. Interventions typology

Interventions discription

-Extension, two-floor concrete structure to the front and to the right side. -Shed added to the left.

-North (back) facade. Degree of interventions: Severe State of conservation Adequate -Many interventions. -Severe degree of interventions. -Big part of the original structure covered by the extensions. -Excellent maintenance.

258

Value assessment:............................................................Medium

The Village of

NIKITI

Photographs

Buildings Inventory of the Old Village.................. Author:..................................Iason Koutsomitelis Sector...............................................................5 Registration No:..............................................540

40°13’40.5”N 23°40’14.0”E

-South-west facade. Typology

Typology

in relation with the environment

Interventions

typology

discription

Degree of interventions: xxx State of conservation Ruin -In state of collapsing. -No maintenance.

259

Value assessment:..................................................................Low

The Village of

NIKITI

Photographs

Buildings Inventory of the Old Village.................. Author:..................................Iason Koutsomitelis Sector...............................................................5 Registration No:..............................................541

40°13’41.9”N 23°40’13.0”E

-West (side) facade. Typology

Typology

in relation with the environment

-West (side) facade. Interventions typology

Interventions discription

-Extension, two-floor concrete structure with pilotis to the left side.

-North (back) facade. Degree of interventions: Severe State of conservation Poor -Some interventions. -Severe degree of interventions. -Some minor interfering factors (a/c unit, small shed). -Big part of the original structure covered by the extensions. -Lack of maintenance. 260

Value assessment:............................................................Medium

The Village of

NIKITI

Buildings Inventory of the Old Village.................. Author:..................................Iason Koutsomitelis Sector...............................................................5 Registration No:..............................................542

Photographs

40°13’41.3”N 23°40’14.3”E

-West (side) and north facades. Typology

Typology

in relation with the environment

Interventions typology

Interventions discription

-Extension, one-floor concrete structure to the left side.

Degree of interventions: High State of conservation Adequate -Some interventions. -High degree of interventions. -Adequate maintenance.

261

Value assessment:............................................................Medium

262

Sector 6

263

The Village of

NIKITI

Buildings Inventory of the Old Village.................. Author:..................................Iason Koutsomitelis Sector...............................................................6 Registration No:..............................................601

Photographs

40°13’42.6”N 23°40’18.8”E

-North-west (side) facade. Typology

Typology

in relation with the environment

-North-west (side) facade. Interventions typology

Interventions discription

-Renovated. -Small room added at the back.

Degree of interventions: Low State of conservation Good -Few interventions. -Low degree of some interventions. -Good maintenance.

264

Value assessment:............................................................Medium

The Village of

NIKITI

Buildings Inventory of the Old Village.................. Author:..................................Iason Koutsomitelis Sector...............................................................6 Registration No:..............................................602

Photographs

Location Building year:.................. ............approx. 1950s........ Function:.....Private house Number of floors:............1 Basement:...................No Comments on decoration and typology : --Coordinates:

40°13’42.7”N 23°40’18.1”E

-North-west (front) facade. Typology

Typology

Interventions

in relation with the environment

-South-west (side) facade. typology

discription

-Small room added to the left side.

Degree of interventions: Low State of conservation Adequate -Few interventions. -Low degree of interventions. -Lack of maintenance. -Appears to be abandoned.

265

Value assessment:............................................................Medium

The Village of

NIKITI

Buildings Inventory of the Old Village.................. Author:..................................Iason Koutsomitelis Sector...............................................................6 Registration No:..............................................603

Photographs

40°13’41.8”N 23°40’18.5”E

-North-west (front) facade. Typology

Typology

in relation with the environment

Interventions typology

Interventions discription

-Renovated. -Balcony replaced and extended with concrete structure. -Extension, one-floor structure to the left and to the right side.

Degree of interventions: High State of conservation Good -Considerable interventions. -Renovated.. -High degree of interventions. -Excellent maintenance. -Absence of other minor interfering factors. 266

Value assessment:............................................................Medium

The Village of

NIKITI

Buildings Inventory of the Old Village.................. Author:..................................Iason Koutsomitelis Sector...............................................................6 Registration No:..............................................604

Photographs

Location Building year:............xxxx Function:.....Private house .................................. Number of floors:............1 Basement:...................No Comments on decoration and typology : --Coordinates:

40°13’40.3”N 23°40’16.1”E

-South (front) and west facades. Typology

Typology

in relation with the environment

Interventions typology

Interventions discription

-Balcony replaced.

Degree of interventions: Low State of conservation Good -Few interventions. -Low degree of some interventions. -Good maintenance.

267

Value assessment:..................................................................Low

The Village of

NIKITI

Photographs

Buildings Inventory of the Old Village.................. Author:..................................Iason Koutsomitelis Sector...............................................................6 Registration No:..............................................605

40°13’40.0”N 23°40’16.4”E

-South (front) facade. Typology

Typology

in relation with the environment

-West (side) facade. Interventions typology

Interventions discription

-Extension, two-floor concrete structure to the back side. -Extension, one-floor concrete structure to the left side. -Balcony added, concrete structure. -Due to the interventions typology cannot be identified. -North (back) facade. Degree of interventions: Severe State of conservation Poor -Many highly invasive interventions. -Severe degree of interventions. -Considerable minor interfering factors. -Big part of the original structure covered by the extensions. -Large part of the original structure jeopardized. 268

Value assessment:..................................................................Low

The Village of

NIKITI

Photographs

Buildings Inventory of the Old Village.................. Author:..................................Iason Koutsomitelis Sector...............................................................6 Registration No:..............................................606

40°13’39.2”N 23°40’15.9”E

-South (front) facade. Typology

Typology

in relation with the environment

-West (side) facade. Interventions typology

Interventions discription

-Balconies replaced and extended with concrete structures. -Blocked windows.

-North (back) facade. Degree of interventions: High State of conservation Poor -Some interventions. -High degree of interventions. -Some minor interfering factors (chimneys, antenas, drain pipes). -Big part of the original structure covered by the extensions.

269

Value assessment:.............................................................Medium

The Village of

NIKITI

Photographs

Buildings Inventory of the Old Village.................. Author:..................................Iason Koutsomitelis Sector...............................................................6 Registration No:..............................................607

40°13’38.7”N 23°40’15.6”E

-South (front) facade. Typology

Typology

in relation with the environment

-West (front) facade. Interventions typology

Interventions discription

-Renovated. -Balcony replaced and extended.

Degree of interventions: Low State of conservation Excellent

-South facade. 270

The Village of

NIKITI

Buildings Inventory of the Old Village.................. Author:..................................Iason Koutsomitelis Sector...............................................................6 Registration No:..............................................608

Photographs

40°13’37.9”N 23°40’16.6”E

-South (front) facade. Typology

Typology

in relation with the environment

Interventions typology

Interventions discription

-Extension to the left.

-South (front) facade.

Degree of interventions: High State of conservation Adequate -Few interventions. -High degree of interventions. -Good maintenance. -Some minor interfering factors (antenas, chimneys).

271

Value assessment:..................................................................Low

The Village of

NIKITI

Buildings Inventory of the Old Village.................. Author:..................................Iason Koutsomitelis Sector...............................................................6 Registration No:..............................................609

Photographs

40°13’36.1”N 23°40’15.4”E

-South (front) facade. Typology

Typology

Interventions

in relation with the environment

-West (side) facade. typology

discription

-Staircase added to the front facade, at the left side. -Added sheds over the balconies. -Possibly, balconies replaced.

-West and north facades. Degree of interventions: Medium State of conservation Adequate -Considerable interventions. -Medium degree of interventions. -Lack of maintenance. -Appears to be abandoned.

272

Value assessment:..................................................................High

The Village of

NIKITI

Buildings Inventory of the Old Village.................. Author:..................................Iason Koutsomitelis Sector...............................................................6 Registration No:..............................................610

Photographs

40°13’35.5”N 23°40’15.4”E

-South (front) facade. Typology

Typology

Interventions

in relation with the environment

-South (front) facade. typology

discription

-Renovated. -Added sheds over the balconies. -Possibly, balconies replaced.

-West (side) facade. Degree of interventions: High State of conservation Good -Some interventions. -High degree of some interventions. -Good maintenance. -Some minor interfering factors (a/c unit, antenas). -South-west (front) facade. -North (back) facade. 273

Value assessment:..................................................................High

The Village of

NIKITI

Photographs

Buildings Inventory of the Old Village.................. Author:..................................Iason Koutsomitelis Sector...............................................................6 Registration No:..............................................611

Location Building year:................... ...........approx. 1940s........ Function:.....Private house Number of floors:............1 Basement:...................No Comments on decoration and typology : --Coordinates:

40°13’35.6”N 23°40’16.1”E

-South (front) facade. Typology

Typology

in relation with the environment

-South (front) facade. Interventions typology

Interventions discription

-Renovated. -Balcony replaced with wooden structure.

Degree of interventions: Low State of conservation Excellent -Few interventions. -Renovated.. -Low degree of interventions. -Excellent maintenance. -Some minor interfering factors (a/c unit, antenas). 274

Value assessment:............................................................Medium

The Village of

NIKITI

Buildings Inventory of the Old Village.................. Author:..................................Iason Koutsomitelis Sector...............................................................6 Registration No:..............................................612

Photographs

Location Building year:............1944 Function:.....Private house .................................. Number of floors:............2 Basement:...................No Comments on decoration and typology : --Coordinates:

40°13’35.5”N 23°40’16.5”E

-South (front) facade. Typology

Typology

in relation with the environment

-South (front) facade. Interventions typology

Interventions discription

-Renovated. -Possibly, balcony replaced. -Added shed over balcony. -Added staircase.

-Detail of the ownership plate. Degree of interventions: Low State of conservation Good -Some interventions. -Renovated.. -Low degree of interventions. -Good maintenance. -Some minor interfering factors (balcony sheds, antenas). 275

Value assessment:............................................................Medium

The Village of

NIKITI

Photographs

Buildings Inventory of the Old Village.................. Author:..................................Iason Koutsomitelis Sector...............................................................6 Registration No:..............................................613

40°13’35.1”N 23°40’15.3”E

-South (front) facade. Typology

Typology

in relation with the environment

-West (side) facade. Interventions typology

Interventions discription

-Renovated. -Possibly, balcony replaced and extended. -Added shed over balcony. -Added staircase.

Degree of interventions: Low State of conservation Good -Some interventions. -Renovated.. -Low degree of interventions. -Good maintenance. -Few minor interfering factors (balcony sheds). 276

Value assessment:............................................................Medium

The Village of

NIKITI

Photographs

Buildings Inventory of the Old Village.................. Author:..................................Iason Koutsomitelis Sector...............................................................6 Registration No:..............................................614

Location Building year:............xxxx Function:...........xxx .................................. Number of floors:............1 Basement:...................No Comments on decoration and typology : --Coordinates:

40°13’34.5”N 23°40’15.5”E

-West (front) facade. Typology

Typology

Interventions

typology

in relation with the environment

discription

-Renovated.

Degree of interventions: Low State of conservation Excellent -Few interventions. -Appropriate renovation. -Low degree of interventions. -Good maintenance.

277

Value assessment:..................................................................Low

The Village of

NIKITI

Buildings Inventory of the Old Village.................. Author:..................................Iason Koutsomitelis Sector...............................................................6 Registration No:..............................................616

Photographs

Location Building year:............1958 Function:.....Private house .................................. Number of floors:............2 Basement:...................No Comments on decoration and typology : --Coordinates:

40°13’30.2”N 23°40’17.4”E

-South-west (front) facade. Typology

Typology

in relation with the environment

-Detail of the ownership plate. Interventions typology

Interventions discription

-Renovated. -Balcony replaced and extended with concrete structure. -Added shed at the front facade.

Degree of interventions: Medium State of conservation Good -Some interventions. -Renovated.. -Medium degree of interventions. -Good maintenance.

278

Value assessment:..................................................................Low

The Village of

NIKITI

Buildings Inventory of the Old Village.................. Author:..................................Iason Koutsomitelis Sector...............................................................6 Registration No:..............................................617

Photographs

40°13’36.0”N 23°40’20.3”E

-South-east (side) facade. Typology

Typology

in relation with the environment

-North-west (side) facade. Interventions typology

Interventions discription

-Renovated. -Balcony replaced and extended with concrete structure.

Degree of interventions: Medium State of conservation Good -Some interventions. -Renovated.. -Medium degree of interventions. -Good maintenance.

279

Value assessment:............................................................Medium

The Village of

NIKITI

Photographs

Buildings Inventory of the Old Village.................. Author:..................................Iason Koutsomitelis Sector...............................................................6 Registration No:..............................................618

Location Building year:............xxxx Function:.....Private house .................................. Number of floors:............1 Basement:...................No Comments on decoration and typology : --Coordinates:

40°13’37.4”N 23°40’17.4”E

-North (side) facade. Typology

Typology

in relation with the environment

Interventions typology

Interventions discription

-Extension, two-floor concrete structure to the front side. -Due to the interventions typology cannot be identified.

Degree of interventions: Severe State of conservation Poor -Some highly invasive interventions. -Severe degree of interventions. -Big part of the original structure covered by the extensions. -Large part of the original structure jeopardized.

280

Value assessment:..................................................................Low

281