ﺳﻴﺎﺳﻲ
ﭘﻨﺠﺸﻨﺒﻪ 12ﺁﺑﺎﻥ1390
politic@jamejamonline.ir
ﻫﺰﻳﻨﻪ ﻫﺎ ﻭ ﺩﺳﺘﺎﻭﺭﺩﻫﺎﻱ ﺗﺴﺨﻴﺮﻻﻧﻪ ﺟﺎﺳﻮﺳﻲﺁﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎ
ﻧﮕﺎﻩ ﺟﻨﮓ ﺳــﺮﺩ ﺑﻪ ﻗﻠﺐ ﺯﻣﻴﻦ ﺗﺴــﻠﻂ ﭘﻴﺪﺍ ﻛﻨﻨﺪ .ﻫﻤﺎﻥﻃﻮﺭ ﻛــﻪ ﻗﺒــﻞ ﺍﺯ ﺁﻥ ﺑــﺮﺍﻱ ﺣﻤﻠﻪ ﺑﻪ ﭼﻜﺴــﻠﻮﺍﻛﻲ ﻫــﻢ ﺍﺯ ﺁﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎ ﺍﺟﺎﺯﻩ ﻧﮕﺮﻓﺘﻪ ﺑﻮﺩﻧﺪ. ﺩﺭ ﻣــﻮﺭﺩ ﺟﻨﮓ ﺗﺤﻤﻴﻠﻲ ﻫﻢ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺗﻮﺟﻪ ﺩﺍﺷــﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺻﺪﺍﻡ ﻳﻚ ﺭﻫﺒﺮ ﺑﻠﻨﺪﭘﺮﻭﺍﺯ ﺑﻮﺩ ﻭ ﺣﻜﻮﻣﺖ ﺑﺮ ﺗﻤﺎﻡ ﻛﺸــﻮﺭﻫﺎﻱ ﻋﺮﺑﻲ ﺭﺍ ﺟﺴﺘﺠﻮ ﻣﻲﻛﺮﺩ .ﺑﺤﺚ ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﻓﻘﻂ ﺍﺭﻭﻧﺪﺭﻭﺩ ﻭ ﻗﺮﺍﺭﺩﺍﺩ 68ﻧﺒﻮﺩ. ﺩﺭ ﻭﺍﻗﻊ ﺻﺪﺍﻡ ﺑﻪ ﺩﻧﺒﺎﻝ ﺍﻫﺪﺍﻑ ﺗﻮﺳــﻌﻪﻃﻠﺒﺎﻧﻪ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺑﻮﺩ .ﺍﻳﻦﻛﻪ ﮔﻔﺘﻪ ﻣﻲﺷــﻮﺩ ﺑﻪ ﺩﻟﻴﻞ ﺍﻗﺪﺍﻡ ﺩﺍﻧﺸﺠﻮﻳﺎﻥ ،ﺁﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎ ﺍﺯ ﺻﺪﺍﻡ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺟﻨﮓ ﺣﻤﺎﻳﺖ ﻛﺮﺩﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ ،ﻣﺤﺘﺎﺝ ﺗﺤﻘﻴﻖ ﻭ ﺑﺮﺭﺳﻲ ﺍﺳﺖ. ﺍﮔﺮﭼﻪ ﺑﺮﺧﻲ ﻣﻘﺎﻣﺎﺕ ﺁﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎﻳﻲ ﻣﺪﻋﻲ ﻫﺴﺘﻨﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺁﻥ ﺩﻭﺭﻩ ﺍﮔــﺮ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﺎﺟﺮﺍ ﭘﻴﺶ ﻧﻤﻲﺁﻣﺪ ﻣﻮﺿﻊ ﺁﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎ ﻣﺨﺎﻟﻔﺖ ﺑﺎ ﺣﻤﻠﻪ ﺑﻮﺩ ،ﺍﻣﺎ ﺩﺭ ﭘﺬﻳﺮﺵ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﻇﻬﺎﺭﻧﻈﺮ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺩﻗﺖ ﻛﺮﺩ .ﻗﺮﺍﺋﻦ ﻧﺸﺎﻥ ﻣﻲﺩﻫﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺍﺳﺎﺳﺎ ﭘﻴﺮﻭﺯﻱ ﺍﻧﻘﻼﺏ ،ﻣﻌﺎﺩﻻﺕ ﻣﻨﻄﻘﻪ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﻫﻢ ﺯﺩﻩ ﺑﻮﺩ .ﺳﻘﻮﻁ ﺷﺎﻩ ﻭ ﺧﺮﻭﺝ ﺍﺭﺗﺶ ﺷﺎﻩ ﺍﺯ ﻣﻌﺎﺩﻻﺕ ﻣﻨﻄﻘﻪﺍﻱ ﻣﻮﺟﺐ ﺷــﺪﻩ ﺑﻮﺩ ﻛﻪ ﺁﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎ ﻣﻮﺍﻓﻖ ﮔﻮﺷﻤﺎﻟﻲ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺑﻪ ﻭﺳﻴﻠﻪ ﺻﺪﺍﻡ ﺑﺎﺷــﺪ ،ﺑﻨﺎﺑﺮﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺭﻭﻳﻜــﺮﺩ ﺍﺯ ﻫﻤﺎﻥ ﺍﺑﺘﺪﺍﻱ ﭘﻴﺮﻭﺯﻱ ﺍﻧﻘﻼﺏ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﺩﺍﺷﺖ ﻭ ﻧﻤﻲﺗﻮﺍﻥ ﮔﻔﺖ ﺗﺴﺨﻴﺮ ﻻﻧﻪ ﺟﺎﺳﻮﺳﻲ ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﺣﻤﺎﻳﺖ ﺍﺯ ﺻﺪﺍﻡ ﻣﺠﺎﺏ ﻛﺮﺩﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ.
ﻫﺮ ﻛﻨﺶ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﻰ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺳﻄﺢ ،ﻫﺰﻳﻨﻪﻫﺎ ﻭ ﻓﺎﻳﺪﻩﻫﺎﻳﻰ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺑﻪﻃﻮﺭ ﻣﻨﺼﻔﺎﻧﻪ ﺑﺮﺭﺳﻰ ﺷﻮﺩ ﺣﺴﻦ ﺑﻬﺸﺘﻲﭘﻮﺭ /ﺟﺎﻡﺟﻢ
ﻧﻜﺘﻪ
ﺩﺍﻧﺸﺠﻮﻳﺎﻥ ﺍﺣﺴﺎﺱ ﻣﻲﻛﺮﺩﻧﺪ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﻣﻮﻗﺖ ﺁﻥﻃﻮﺭ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﻭ ﺷﺎﻳﺪ ،ﺍﻧﻘﻼﺑﻲ ﻋﻤﻞ ﻧﻤﻲﻛﻨﺪ ﻭ ﻓﻀﺎ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﺳﻤﺖ ﺳﺎﺯﺵ ﺑﺎ ﺁﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎ ﭘﻴﺶ ﻣﻲﺑﺮﺩ. ﺍﻭﺝ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﺣﺴﺎﺱ ﺩﺭ ﻣﺴﺎﻟﻪ ﺩﻳﺪﺍﺭ ﻣﺮﺣﻮﻡ ﺑﺎﺯﺭﮔﺎﻥ ﻭ ﺑﺮژﻳﻨﺴﻜﻲ ﻣﺘﺒﻠﻮﺭ ﺷﺪ .ﺩﻳﺪﺍﺭﻱ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺣﺎﺷﻴﻪ ﺟﺸﻦﻫﺎﻱ ﺍﺳﺘﻘﻼﻝ ﺍﻟﺠﺰﺍﻳﺮ ﺻﻮﺭﺕ ﮔﺮﻓﺖ
ﻣﺘﻦ ﻭ ﺣﻮﺍﺷﻲ ﺭﻭﻳﺪﺍﺩ
ﺑﺮﺁﻳﻨﺪ ﺗﺎﺛﻴﺮ ﻣﻮﺍﺭﺩ ﺫﻛﺮﺷــﺪﻩ ﺳــﺒﺐ ﺷــﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺍﻧﺸﺠﻮﻳﺎﻥ ﺩﺭ ﺗﺴــﺨﻴﺮ ﺳــﻔﺎﺭﺕ ﺁﻣﺮﻳــﻜﺎ ﺟﺪﻱ ﺷــﻮﻧﺪ ﻭ ﺑــﺮﺍﻱ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻛﺎﺭ ﺑﺮﻧﺎﻣﻪﺭﻳﺰﻱ ﻛﻨﻨﺪ .ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﺑﺮ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺑﻮﺩ ﻛﻪ ﺳــﻔﺎﺭﺕ ﭘﺲ ﺍﺯ ﺗﺴﺨﻴﺮ، ﺗﻨﻬﺎ ﺣﺪﻭﺩ 72ﺳــﺎﻋﺖ ﺩﺭ ﺍﺧﺘﻴﺎﺭ ﺩﺍﻧﺸﺠﻮﻳﺎﻥ ﺑﺎﺷﺪ .ﭼﻮﻥ ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﺑﺨــﺶ ﺩﻭﻟﺘﻲ ﻧﺒﻮﺩﻧــﺪ ،ﻣﺠﺎﺯﺍﺕ ﺣﻤﻠﻪ ﺑﻪ ﺳــﻔﺎﺭﺕ ﺑﻪ ﻟﺤﺎﻅ ﺣﻘﻮﻗــﻲ ﮔﺮﻳﺒﺎﻥ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺭﺍ ﻧﻤﻲﮔﺮﻓﺖ .ﻗــﺮﺍﺭ ﺍﻭﻟﻴﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺑﻮﺩ ﻛﻪ
ﭘﻴﺎﻣﺪﻫﺎﻱ ﺍﻧﻘﻼﺏ ﺩﻭﻡ
ﻃﺮﺡ :ﺟﺎﻡﺟﻢ
ﻭﺍﻗﻌــﻪ ﺍﺗﻔﺎﻕ ﺍﻓﺘــﺎﺩﻩ ﺩﺭ ﺗﺎﺭﻳــﺦ 13ﺁﺑﺎﻥ ﺳــﺎﻝ 1358ﺭﺍ ﻧﻤﻲﺗﻮﺍﻥ ﺑﺪﻭﻥ ﺩﺭ ﻧﻈﺮ ﮔﺮﻓﺘﻦ ﻋﻮﺍﻣﻞ ﭘﻴﺸــﻴﻦ ﻭ ﺭﻳﺸــﻪﻫﺎﻱ ﺍﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﻲ ﻭ ﺳﻴﺎﺳــﻲ ﺑﻪ ﺑﺤﺚ ﻭ ﺑﺮﺭﺳــﻲ ﻧﺸﺴــﺖ .ﺩﺭ ﻣﺴﻴﺮ ﺑﺮﺭﺳﻲ ﺭﻳﺸﻪﻫﺎﻱ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﺗﻔﺎﻕ ﺑﻪ ﻧﻜﺎﺕ ﺫﻳﻞ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺍﺷﺎﺭﻩ ﻛﺮﺩ: ﺍﻭﻝ( ﭘﻨـﺎﻩ ﺩﺍﺩﻥ ﺁﻣﺮﻳـﻜﺎ ﺑﻪ ﺷـﺎﻩ :ﺗﺤﻠﻴﻞ ﺍﻓــﺮﺍﺩ ﻣﻮﺛﺮ ﺩﺭ ﺟﻨﺒﺶ ﺩﺍﻧﺸــﺠﻮﻳﻲ ﺁﻥ ﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺑﻮﺩ ﻛﻪ ﻭﻗﺘﻲ ﺁﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎ ﺑﻪ ﺷﺎﻩ ﭘﻨــﺎﻩ ﺩﺍﺩﻩ ﺍﺳــﺖ ،ﺑﻪﺗﺪﺭﻳﺞ ﺯﻣﻴﻨﻪ ﺭﺍ ﺑــﺮﺍﻱ ﺗﻜﺮﺍﺭ ﻛﻮﺩﺗﺎﻱ 28 ﻣﺮﺩﺍﺩ ﺳــﺎﻝ 1332ﺁﻣــﺎﺩﻩ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ ﺗﺎ ﺑﺘﻮﺍﻧﺪ ﺷــﺎﻩ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﻗﺪﺭﺕ ﺑﺮﮔﺮﺩﺍﻧﺪ .ﺷﺎﻳﺪ ﻣﻬﻢﺗﺮﻳﻦ ﺩﻟﻴﻞ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺍﻧﺸﺠﻮﻳﺎﻥ ﺭﺍ ﻣﺘﻘﺎﻋﺪ ﻛﺮﺩ ﺗﺎ ﺳﻔﺎﺭﺕ ﺁﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎ ﺩﺭ ﺗﻬﺮﺍﻥ ﺭﺍ ﺗﺴﺨﻴﺮ ﻛﻨﻨﺪ ،ﻫﻤﻴﻦ ﻣﺴﺎﻟﻪ ﺑﻮﺩ، ﭼﺮﺍ ﻛﻪ ﻣﺪﺍﺧﻠﻪﻫﺎﻱ ﺁﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎ ﺩﺭ ﻋﺮﺻﻪ ﺳﻴﺎﺳــﺖ ﺩﺍﺧﻠﻲ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ، ﺧﺼﻮﺻــ ًﺎ ﺩﺭ ﻣﺎﺟﺮﺍﻱ ﻛﻮﺩﺗﺎﻱ ﻣﻌــﺮﻭﻑ ،ﺩﺭ ﺣﺎﻓﻈﻪ ﺗﺎﺭﻳﺨﻲ ﻣﺮﺩﻡ ﻭ ﺩﺍﻧﺸــﺠﻮﻳﺎﻥ ﺛﺒﺖ ﺷﺪﻩ ﻭ ﺍﺯ ﻫﻤﻴﻦ ﺭﻭ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﭘﻴﺸﮕﻴﺮﻱ ﺍﺯ ﭼﻨﻴــﻦ ﺭﻭﻳــﺪﺍﺩﻱ ،ﺣﺮﻛﺖ ﻣﺬﻛﻮﺭ ﺗﻮﺳــﻂ ﺩﺍﻧﺸــﺠﻮﻳﺎﻥ ﺍﺟﺮﺍ ﺷﺪ. ﺩﻭﻡ( ﻋﻤﻠﻜـﺮﺩ ﺩﻭﻟـﺖ ﻣﻮﻗـﺖ :ﺩﺍﻧﺸــﺠﻮﻳﺎﻥ ﺍﺣﺴــﺎﺱ ﻣﻲﻛﺮﺩﻧــﺪ ﺩﻭﻟــﺖ ﻣﻮﻗﺖ ﺁﻥﻃــﻮﺭ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﻭ ﺷــﺎﻳﺪ ،ﺍﻧﻘﻼﺑﻲ ﻋﻤــﻞ ﻧﻤﻲﻛﻨــﺪ .ﮔﺎﻫﺎ ﺍﺣﺴــﺎﺱ ﻣﻲﺷــﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻳــﻦ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﻭ ﺍﻓﺮﺍﺩ ﻣﻮﺛﺮ ﺩﺭ ﺁﻥ ،ﻓﻀﺎ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﺳــﻤﺖ ﺳــﺎﺯﺵ ﺑــﺎ ﺁﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎ ﭘﻴﺶ ﻣﻲﺑﺮﻧــﺪ .ﺍﻭﺝ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﺣﺴــﺎﺱ ﻋﺪﻡ ﺗﻄﺎﺑﻖ ﻋﻤﻠﻜــﺮﺩ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺑﺎ ﺭﻭﺣﻴــﻪ ﺍﻧﻘﻼﺑﻲ ﺟﺎﻣﻌﻪ ﺩﺭ ﻣﺴــﺎﻟﻪ ﺩﻳﺪﺍﺭ ﻣﺮﺣــﻮﻡ ﺑﺎﺯﺭﮔﺎﻥ ﻭ ﺑﺮژﻳﻨﺴــﻜﻲ ﻣﺘﺒﻠﻮﺭ ﺷــﺪ؛ ﺩﻳﺪﺍﺭﻱ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺣﺎﺷــﻴﻪ ﺟﺸﻦﻫﺎﻱ ﺍﺳــﺘﻘﻼﻝ ﺍﻟﺠﺰﺍﻳﺮ ﺻﻮﺭﺕ ﮔﺮﻓﺖ ﻭ ﺷــﻚ ﻭ ﺗﺮﺩﻳﺪ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻮﺭﺩ ﻋﻤﻠﻜــﺮﺩ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺍﻓﺰﺍﻳــﺶ ﺩﺍﺩ .ﻣﺮﺩﻡ ﻧﮕــﺮﺍﻥ ﺑﻮﺩﻧﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺑــﺎ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻋﻤﻠﻜﺮﺩ ،ﺯﻣﻴﻨــﻪ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺑﺎﺯﮔﺸــﺖ ﺁﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎ ﺑﻪ ﻋﺮﺻﻪ ﻓﺮﺍﻫﻢ ﻛﻨﺪ ،ﺑﺎﺯﮔﺸــﺘﻲ ﻛﻪ ﻃﺒﻌﺎ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺟﺎﻣﻌﻪ ﺍﻧﻘﻼﺑﻲ ﺁﻥ ﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﻣﻮﺭﺩ ﻗﺒﻮﻝ ﻧﺒﻮﺩ.
ﺳـﻮﻡ( ﻣﻮﺿﻌﮕﻴﺮﻱﻫـﺎﻱ ﺍﻣـﺎﻡ)ﺭﻩ( :ﺩﺭ ﺑﺮﺭﺳــﻲ ﺳــﺨﻨﺮﺍﻧﻲﻫﺎﻱ ﺍﻣﺎﻡ ،ﺍﻳﻦ ﻧﻜﺘﻪ ﺗﻮﺟﻪ ﻣــﺎ ﺭﺍ ﺟﻠﺐ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻳﺸــﺎﻥ ﺗﻘﺮﻳﺒﺎ ﺍﺯ ﺧﺮﺩﺍﺩ ﺳــﺎﻝ 58ﺑﻪ ﺑﻌﺪ ،ﺧﻴﻠﻲ ﺑﻴﺸﺘﺮ ﺁﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎ ﻭ ﺳﻴﺎﺳــﺖﻫﺎﻱ ﺁﻥ ﺭﺍ ﻣــﻮﺭﺩ ﺍﻧﺘﻘــﺎﺩ ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﺩﺍﺩﻩﺍﻧــﺪ ،ﺑﻪ ﻃﻮﺭﻱ ﻛﻪ ﮔﻮﻳﻲ ﺍﻳﺸــﺎﻥ ﻧﺴــﺒﺖ ﺑﻪ ﻋﻤﻠﻜﺮﺩ ﺁﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎ ﺩﺭ ﻛﺸــﻮﺭ ﺩﭼﺎﺭ ﻧﮕﺮﺍﻧﻲﻫﺎﻳــﻲ ﺷــﺪﻩﺍﻧﺪ .ﺍﻣﺎﻡ ﺑﻪ ﻫﻤﺎﻥ ﺍﻧﺪﺍﺯﻩ ﻛــﻪ ﺩﺭ ﻣﺒﺎﺭﺯﻩ ﺑﺎ ﺍﺳــﺘﺒﺪﺍﺩ ﺩﺍﺧﻠﻲ ﺟــﺪﻱ ﺑﻮﺩﻧﺪ ،ﺑﻪ ﻣﺒﺎﺭﺯﻩ ﺑﺎ ﺍﺳــﺘﻌﻤﺎﺭ ﺧﺎﺭﺟﻲ ﻫــﻢ ﺍﻫﻤﻴﺖ ﻣﻲﺩﺍﺩﻧﺪ .ﺍﮔﺮﭼﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺁﻥ ﻣﻘﻄﻊ ﻣﺒﺎﺭﺯﻩ ﺑﺎ ﺍﺳــﺘﺒﺪﺍﺩ ﺩﺍﺧﻠﻲ ﺑﻪ ﺳــﺮﺍﻧﺠﺎﻡ ﺭﺳــﻴﺪﻩ ﺑﻮﺩ ،ﺍﻣﺎ ﺍﮔﺮ ﺍﺯ ﻣﺒﺎﺭﺯﻩ ﺑﺎ ﺍﺳــﺘﻌﻤﺎﺭ ﺧﺎﺭﺟﻲ ﻏﻔﻠﺖ ﻣﻲﺷﺪ ،ﻫﻤﻴﻦ ﺍﺳﺘﻌﻤﺎﺭﮔﺮﺍﻥ ،ﺍﺳﺘﺒﺪﺍﺩ ﺩﺍﺧﻠﻲ ﺭﺍ ﺩﻭﺑﺎﺭﻩ ﺑﻪ ﻗﺪﺭﺕ ﻣﻲﺭﺳــﺎﻧﺪﻧﺪ ،ﭼﺮﺍ ﻛﻪ ﺍﺳﺎﺳﺎ ﺧﺎﺳﺘﮕﺎﻩ ﺍﺳﺘﺒﺪﺍﺩ ﺩﺍﺧﻠﻲ ﺩﺭ ﺧﺎﺭﺝ ﺍﺯ ﻛﺸــﻮﺭ ﺑــﻮﺩ .ﻧﻘﻄﻪ ﺍﻭﺝ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﻼﺣﻈﺎﺕ ﺍﻣﺎﻡ ﺩﺭ ﭘﻴﺎﻣﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻳﺸــﺎﻥ ﺩﺭ ﺳــﺎﻝ 58ﺻﺎﺩﺭ ﻛﺮﺩﻧﺪ ،ﻣﺘﺒﻠﻮﺭ ﺷــﺪ. ﭘﻴﺎﻣــﻲ ﻛــﻪ ﺍﻣﺎﻡ ﺩﺭ ﺁﻥ ﻫﻤﮕﺎﻥ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﻣﺒــﺎﺭﺯﻩ ﺑﺎ ﻣﻮﺍﺿﻊ ﺁﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎ ﺩﻋــﻮﺕ ﻭ ﺑﻪ ﻧﻮﻋﻲ ﺣﺠﺖ ﺭﺍ ﺗﻤﺎﻡ ﻛﺮﺩ .ﺑﺨﺸــﻲ ﺍﺯ ﭘﻴﺎﻡ ﻣﺬﻛﻮﺭ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺷــﺮﺡ ﺑﻮﺩ» :ﺑﺮ ﺩﺍﻧﺸﺠﻮﻳﺎﻥ ،ﺩﺍﻧﺶﺁﻣﻮﺯﺍﻥ ﻭ ﻣﺤﺼﻠﻴﻦ ﻋﻠﻮﻡ ﺩﻳﻨﻴﻪ ﺍﺳــﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺎ ﻗﺪﺭﺕ ﺗﻤﺎﻡ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﺁﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎ ﻭ ﺍﺳــﺮﺍﺋﻴﻞ ﺍﻗــﺪﺍﻡ ﻛﻨﻨــﺪ ﺗﺎ ﺁﻧﻬــﺎ ﺭﺍ ﻭﺍﺩﺍﺭ ﺑﻪ ﺑﺎﺯﮔﺮﺩﺍﻧﺪﻥ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺷــﺎﻩ ﻣﺨﻠﻮﻉ ﻛﻨﻨﺪ«. ﭼﻬـﺎﺭﻡ( ﻋﻤﻠﻜـﺮﺩ ﺳـﻔﺎﺭﺕ ﺁﻣﺮﻳـﻜﺎ :ﻓﻌﺎﻟﻴﺖﻫــﺎﻱ ﻣﺪﺍﺧﻠﻪﺟﻮﻳﺎﻧﻪﺍﻱ ﻛﻪ ﺳــﻔﺎﺭﺕ ﺁﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎ ﻣﻲﻛﺮﺩ ﺑﻌﺪ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻧﺘﺸــﺎﺭ ﺍﺳــﻨﺎﺩ ﻻﻧــﻪ ﺟﺎﺳﻮﺳــﻲ ،ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﺑــﺮﺍﻱ ﻫﻤﮕﺎﻥ ﺗﺒﻴﻴﻦ ﺷــﺪﻩ ﺍﺳــﺖ .ﺷــﺎﻳﺪ ﺑﺮﺧﻲ ﺑﮕﻮﻳﻨﺪ ﻛﻪ ﻫﻤﻪ ﺳــﻔﺎﺭﺗﺨﺎﻧﻪﻫﺎ ﺍﺯ ﻛﺸﻮﺭ ﻣﻘﺼﺪ ﺍﻃﻼﻋﺎﺕ ﺟﻤﻊ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﻨﺪ ﺍﻣﺎ ﺁﻳﺎ ﻫﻤﻪ ﺳــﻔﺎﺭﺗﺨﺎﻧﻪﻫﺎ ﺩﺭ ﻛﻨﺎﺭ ﺟﻤﻊﺁﻭﺭﻱ ﺍﻃﻼﻋﺎﺕ ﺑﻪ ﺩﻧﺒﺎﻝ ﺗﻐﻴﻴﺮ ﺳﻴﺴــﺘﻢ ﺳﻴﺎﺳــﻲ ﻛﺸــﻮﺭ ﻣﻮﺭﺩ ﻧﻈﺮ ﻫﻢ ﻫﺴﺘﻨﺪ؟ ﺍﻳﻦﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺳﻔﺎﺭﺗﺨﺎﻧﻪﺍﻱ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﻛﻮﺩﺗﺎ ـ ﻣﺎﻧﻨﺪﻣﺎﺟﺮﺍﻱﻛﻮﺩﺗﺎﻱﻧﻮژﻩـﺑﺮﻧﺎﻣﻪﺭﻳﺰﻱﺷﻮﺩ،ﻣﻄﺎﺑﻖ ﻋﺮﻑ ﺩﻳﭙﻠﻤﺎﺗﻴﻚ ﺍﺳــﺖ؟ ﻃﺒﻌﺎ ﺍﻳﻦﮔﻮﻧﻪ ﻧﻴﺴﺖ ،ﻛﺎﺭﻫﺎﻳﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺳــﻔﺎﺭﺕ ﺁﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺍﻳﺠﺎﺩ ﺷﻮﺭﺵﻫﺎﻱ ﺍﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﻲ ﺩﺭ ﻛﺸﻮﺭ ﺍﻧﺠــﺎﻡ ﻣــﻲﺩﺍﺩ ،ﻫﻤﭽﻮﻥ ﻣﺎﺟﺮﺍﻱ ﮔﻨﺒﺪ ،ﺷــﻮﺭﺵﻫﺎﻱ ﺧﻠﻖ ﻣﺴــﻠﻤﺎﻥ ﻳﺎ ﺧﻠﻖ ﻋﺮﺏ ،ﻗﻄﻌﺎ ﺍﺯ ﺣﻮﺯﻩ ﺩﻳﭙﻠﻤﺎﺳــﻲ ﺧﺎﺭﺝ ﺑﻮﺩ. ﺍﻳﻦ ﮔﻮﻧﻪ ﺍﻗﺪﺍﻣﺎﺕ ﺳــﻔﺎﺭﺕ ﺁﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎ ﺍﮔﺮﭼﻪ ﭘﺲ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻧﺘﺸﺎﺭ ﺍﺳﻨﺎﺩ ﺑﺮ ﻫﻤﮕﺎﻥ ﻣﺤﺮﺯ ﺷــﺪ ،ﺍﻣﺎ ﭘﻴﺶ ﺍﺯ ﺗﺴﺨﻴﺮ ﺳﻔﺎﺭﺕ ﻧﻴﺰ ﺑﻌﻀﺎ ﺑﻪ ﺳــﻤﻊ ﻭ ﻧﻈﺮ ﻣﺮﺩﻡ ﻭ ﺩﺍﻧﺸﺠﻮﻳﺎﻥ ﻣﻲﺭﺳﻴﺪ .ﺑﺨﺸﻲ ﺍﺯ ﻋﻤﻠﻜﺮﺩ ﻏﻴﺮﻣﺴﻮﻭﻻﻧﻪ ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﺍﺯ ﻫﻤﺎﻥ ﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﭘﻴﺶ ﺍﺯ ﺗﺴﺨﻴﺮ ﻧﻴﺰ ﻣﺸﺨﺺ ﺑــﻮﺩ ﻭ ﻫﻤﻴﻦ ﻣﺴــﺎﻟﻪ ﻳﻜــﻲ ﺍﺯ ﻋﻮﺍﻣﻞ ﺗﺼﻤﻴﻢ ﺩﺍﻧﺸــﺠﻮﻳﺎﻥ ﺑﻪ ﺷﻤﺎﺭ ﻣﻲﺭﻭﺩ.
ﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﺗﺴــﺨﻴﺮ ﻃﻮﻻﻧﻲ ﻧﺒﺎﺷــﺪ ﻭ ﺑﻌﺪ ﺍﺯ ﺑﻪ ﺩﺳﺖ ﺁﻭﺭﺩﻥ ﺍﺳﻨﺎﺩ ﺩﺧﺎﻟﺖﻫﺎﻱ ﺁﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ،ﭘﺲ ﺍﺯ ﻓﻴﺼﻠﻪ ﻳﺎﻓﺘﻦ ﻗﻀﻴﻪ ،ﻳﻚ ﻣﻮﺝ ﺿﺪﺁﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎﻳﻲ ﺩﺭ ﻛﺸﻮﺭ ﺑﻪ ﺭﺍﻩ ﺑﻴﻔﺘﺪ. ﺣﺮﻛﺖ ﺩﺍﻧﺸﺠﻮﻳﺎﻥ ﺑﻌﺪ ﺍﺯ ﺍﺷﻐﺎﻝ ﺳﻔﺎﺭﺕ ﻭ ﺗﻤﺎﻡ ﺍﻣﻮﺭ ﻛﺎﻣﻼ ﺑــﺎ ﻣﺪﻳﺮﻳﺖ ﺍﻣﺎﻡ ﭘﻴﺶ ﻣــﻲﺭﻭﺩ .ﺑﻌﺪ ﺍﺯ ﻭﺭﻭﺩ ﺩﺍﻧﺸــﺠﻮﻳﺎﻥ ﺑﻪ ﺳــﻔﺎﺭﺕ ﻭ ﺣﻀﻮﺭ ﺍﺣﻤﺪﺁﻗﺎ ،ﻣﺸﺨﺺ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻣﺎﻡ ﺩﺭ ﻣﺮﺍﺣﻞ ﺑﻌــﺪﻱ ﺗﺼﻤﻴﻤــﺎﺕ ﻭ ﻛﺎﺭﻫﺎ ﺣﻀﻮﺭ ﺩﺍﺷــﺘﻪﺍﻧﺪ .ﺩﺭ ﻧﻬﺎﻳﺖ ﻫﻢ ﺍﻣــﺎﻡ 4ﻣﺤﻮﺭ ﺭﺍ ﻣﺸــﺨﺺ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﻨﺪ ﻭ ﻣﻮﺿــﻮﻉ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﻣﺠﻠﺲ ﻣﻲﺳﭙﺎﺭﻧﺪ. ﺩﺭ ﺁﻥ ﻃــﺮﻑ ﻣﺎﺟﺮﺍ ﻫﻢ ﺁﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎﻳﻲﻫﺎ ﻗﺒﻞ ﻭ ﺑﻌﺪ ﺍﺯ ﭘﻴﺮﻭﺯﻱ ﺍﻧﻘــﻼﺏ ،ﺩﺭ ﻣــﻮﺭﺩ ﺍﻳﻦﻛــﻪ ﺁﻳﺎ ﺑــﺎ ﺟﺮﻳﺎﻥ ﺍﻧﻘﻼﺑــﻲ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﻫﻤﻜﺎﺭﻱ ﻛﻨﻨﺪ ﻳﺎ ﺧﻴﺮ ،ﺩﭼﺎﺭ ﺍﺧﺘﻼﻑ ﻧﻈﺮ ﻋﻤﻴﻖ ﺑﻮﺩﻩﺍﻧﺪ .ﮔﻔﺘﻪ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ ﺍﻓﺮﺍﺩﻱ ﻣﺜﻞ ﺑﺮژﻳﻨﺴﻜﻲ ﻭ ﻛﺴﻴﻨﺠﺮ ﻫﻮﺍﺩﺍﺭ ﺷﺎﻩ ﺑﻮﺩﻧﺪ ﻭ ﻣﻌﺘﻘــﺪ ﺑﻮﺩﻧﺪ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺑﺎ ﺟﺮﻳﺎﻥ ﻣﺬﻫﺒﻲ ﺍﻧﻘﻼﺑﻲ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﻣﺒﺎﺭﺯﻩ ﻛﺮﺩ .ﺩﺭ ﺳــﻮﻱ ﻣﻘﺎﺑﻞ ،ﻭﺯﻳﺮ ﺧﺎﺭﺟﻪ ﻭﻗﺖ ﺁﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎ ﻭ ﻟﻴﻨﮕﻦ ﻛﻪ ﻛﺎﺭﺩﺍﺭ ﺁﻣﺮﻳــﻜﺎ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺑﻮﺩ ،ﻣﻌﺘﻘﺪ ﺑﻮﺩﻧﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻣﻜﺎﻥ ﻫﻤﻜﺎﺭﻱ ﺑــﺎ ﻃﻴﻒﻫﺎﻱ ﻟﻴﺒﺮﺍﻝ ﺍﻧﻘﻼﺑﻴــﻮﻥ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ ﻭ ﺁﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎ ﻣﻲﺗﻮﺍﻧــﺪ ﺑﻌﺪ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻧﻘﻼﺏ ﻫﻢ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺑﺎﻗﻲ ﺑﻤﺎﻧﺪ .ﻛﺎﺭﺗﺮ ﻣﺪﻋﻲ
ﺍﺳــﺖ ﻛﻪ ﻫﺎﻳﺰﺭ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺣﻞ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﺸــﻜﻞ ﺑﻪ ﺗﻬﺮﺍﻥ ﻓﺮﺳﺘﺎﺩﻩ ﺍﺳــﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺑﻴﻦ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺩﻭ ﺗﺎ ﻧﻈﺮ ﻳﻜﻲ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺮﮔﺰﻳﻨﺪ .ﻫﺮ ﭼﻨﺪ ﺑﺴﻴﺎﺭﻱ ﻣﻌﺘﻘﺪﻧــﺪ ﻫﺎﻳﺰﺭ ﻣﺎﻣﻮﺭ ﻛﻮﺩﺗﺎ ﺑﻮﺩﻩ ،ﻭﻟﻲ ﭼﻮﻥ ﺩﻳﺪﻩ ﻛﻪ ﭘﻴﺮﻭﺯﻱ ﻛﻮﺩﺗﺎ ﺧﻴﻠﻲ ﺑﻌﻴﺪ ﺍﺳــﺖ ،ﺑﻪ ﺁﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎ ﺑﺎﺯﮔﺸــﺘﻪ ﺍﺳــﺖ .ﺣﺘﻲ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻮﺭﺩ ﺭﻓﺘﻦ ﺷــﺎﻩ ﺑﻪ ﺁﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎ ﻫﻢ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﺧﺘﻼﻑ ﻧﻈﺮ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﺩﺍﺷﺘﻪ ﻭ ﺩﺭ ﻧﻬﺎﻳــﺖ ﺧــﻮﺩ ﻛﺎﺭﺗﺮ ﺗﺼﻤﻴﻢ ﮔﺮﻓﺘﻪ ﺍﺳــﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺷــﺎﻩ ﻭﺍﺭﺩ ﺁﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎ ﺷﻮﺩ. ﺟﺎﻟﺐ ﺍﺳــﺖ ﻛﻪ ﻛﺎﺭﺗﺮ ﻭ ﺩﻳﮕﺮﺍﻥ ﺩﺭ ﺧﺎﻃﺮﺍﺗﺸﺎﻥ ﻧﻮﺷﺘﻪﺍﻧﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﻧﮕﺮﺍﻥ ﺑﻮﺩﻩﺍﻧﺪ ﺩﺭ ﺑﺎﺯﺗﺎﺏ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺣﺮﻛﺖ)ﭘﺬﻳﺮﻓﺘﻦ ﺷــﺎﻩ( ﺳــﻔﺎﺭﺕ ﺁﻣﺮﻳــﻜﺎ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﻣﻮﺭﺩ ﺗﻬﺎﺟﻢ ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﮔﻴــﺮﺩ ،ﺍﻟﺒﺘﻪ ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﭘﻴﺶﺑﻴﻨﻲ ﻧﻤﻲﻛﺮﺩﻧﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺗﻬﺎﺟﻢ ﺍﺯ ﺳــﻮﻱ ﺩﺍﻧﺸــﺠﻮﻳﺎﻥ ﺑﺎﺷــﺪ .ﺑﻪ ﻫﺮ ﺣﺎﻝ ﻣﺎﺟﺮﺍﻱ ﺗﺴﺨﻴﺮ ﻻﻧﻪ ﺟﺎﺳﻮﺳﻲ ﺑﺎ ﻣﺪﻳﺮﻳﺖ ﺍﻣــﺎﻡ ﺩﺭ ﻧﻬﺎﻳﺖ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻳﻨﺠﺎ ﺭﺳــﻴﺪ ﻛﻪ 52ﺁﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎﻳﻲ 444ﺭﻭﺯ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﻧﮕﺎﻩ ﺩﺍﺷﺘﻪ ﺷﺪﻧﺪ. ﺁﻳﺎ ﺟﻨﮓ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﻭ ﻋﺮﺍﻕ ﻧﺘﻴﺠﻪ ﺗﺴﺨﻴﺮ ﺳﻔﺎﺭﺕ ﺁﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎ ﺑﻮﺩ؟
ﺩﺭ ﺧﺼــﻮﺹ ﺗﺴــﺨﻴﺮ ﻻﻧﻪ ﺟﺎﺳﻮﺳــﻲ ،ﮔﺎﻫــﻲ ﺍﻭﻗﺎﺕ ﺑﺤﺚﻫﺎﻳــﻲ ﻣﻄــﺮﺡ ﻣﻲﺷــﻮﺩ ﻣﺒﻨﻲ ﺑــﺮ ﺍﻳﻦﻛﻪ ﺍﻳــﻦ ﻛﺎﺭ ﺩﺭ
ﻧﻬﺎﻳﺖ ﺑﻪ ﺿﺮﺭ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺗﻤﺎﻡ ﺷــﺪﻩ ﻳﺎ ﻣﺜﻼ ﺳــﺒﺐ ﺣﻤﻠﻪ ﻋﺮﺍﻕ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﻭ ﺣﺘﻲ ﺳــﺒﺐ ﺣﻤﻠﻪ ﺷــﻮﺭﻭﻱ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻓﻐﺎﻧﺴﺘﺎﻥ ﺷﺪﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ. ﺑﺮﺧــﻲ ﺗﻮﺿﻴﺤــﺎﺕ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺑــﺎﺏ ﺿﺮﻭﺭﻱ ﺑﻪ ﻧﻈﺮ ﻣﻲﺭﺳــﺪ. ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺗﻮﺟﻪ ﺩﺍﺷــﺖ ﻛــﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺗﺤﻠﻴﻞ ﺗﺎﺭﻳﺨﻲ ﺑﺎﻳــﺪ ﺗﻤﺎﻡ ﺟﻮﺍﻧﺐ ﺩﺭ ﻧﻈﺮ ﮔﺮﻓﺘﻪ ﺷــﻮﺩ .ﺑﻪ ﻋﻨﻮﺍﻥ ﻣﺜﺎﻝ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻮﺭﺩ ﺣﻤﻠﻪ ﺷــﻮﺭﻭﻱ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻓﻐﺎﻧﺴــﺘﺎﻥ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺗﻮﺟﻪ ﺩﺍﺷــﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻛﺸﻮﺭ ﭘﻴﺶ ﺍﺯ ﺣﻤﻠﻪ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻓﻐﺎﻧﺴــﺘﺎﻥ ﺳــﻌﻲ ﻛﺮﺩﻩ ﺑﻮﺩ ﺩﺭ ﺁﻧﺠﺎ ﻛﻮﺩﺗﺎ ﻛﻨﺪ ،ﺍﻣﺎ ﻣﻮﻓﻖ ﻧﺸــﺪﻩ ﺑﻮﺩ .ﻳﻌﻨــﻲ ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﺩﺭ ﻫﺮ ﺻــﻮﺭﺕ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻓﻐﺎﻧﺴــﺘﺎﻥ ﺣﻤﻠﻪ ﻣﻲﻛﺮﺩﻧﺪ ﻭ ﺍﻳﻦ ،ﺍﺭﺗﺒﺎﻃﻲ ﺑﻪ ﻣﺎﺟﺮﺍﻱ ﺗﺴﺨﻴﺮ ﺳﻔﺎﺭﺕ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﻧﺪﺍﺷﺖ. ﺷــﻮﺭﻭﻱ ﺑﻪ ﺩﻧﺒﺎﻝ ﮔﺴــﺘﺮﺵ ﻧﻔﻮﺫ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺑﻮﺩ ﻭ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﻴﺎﻥ ﺍﮔﺮ ﻣﻲﺗﻮﺍﻧﺴﺖ ﺣﺘﻲ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﻫﻢ ﺣﻤﻠﻪ ﻣﻲﻛﺮﺩ .ﻟﺬﺍ ﻧﻤﻲﺗﻮﺍﻥ ﻣﺪﻋﻲ ﺷــﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻛﺎﺭ ﺻﺮﻓﺎ ﺗﺤﺖ ﺗﺎﺛﻴﺮ ﺣﺮﻛﺖ ﺩﺍﻧﺸﺠﻮﻳﺎﻥ ﺑﻮﺩﻩ ﺍﺳــﺖ ،ﺍﻟﺒﺘﻪ ﺍﺯ ﻧﻈﺮ ﺯﻣﺎﻥﺑﻨﺪﻱ ،ﺷــﻮﺭﻭﻱ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ ﻧﻈﺮ ﮔﺮﻓﺘــﻪ ﺑــﻮﺩ ﻛﻪ ﺁﻣﺮﻳــﻜﺎ ﺩﺭ ﺑﺪﺗﺮﻳﻦ ﺷــﺮﺍﻳﻂ ﺑﻴﻦﺍﻟﻤﻠﻠﻲ ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ ﻭ ﻓﺮﺻﺖ ﺧﻮﺑﻲ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺍﺷــﻐﺎﻝ ﺍﻓﻐﺎﻧﺴــﺘﺎﻥ ﺑﻪ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﺁﻣﺪﻩ ﺍﺳــﺖ .ﺍﻣﺎ ﺍﻳﻦﻛﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻛﺎﺭ ﺭﺍ ﻧﺘﻴﺠﻪ ﻣﺴﺘﻘﻴﻢ ﺍﻗﺪﺍﻡ ﺩﺍﻧﺸﺠﻮﻳﺎﻥ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻧﻲ ﺑﺪﺍﻧﻴﻢ ،ﺩﺭﺳــﺖ ﻧﻴﺴﺖ ،ﭼﺮﺍ ﺭﻭﺱﻫﺎ ﻣﺼﺮ ﺑﻮﺩﻧﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ
9
ﻣﻲﺩﺍﻧﻴﻢ ﻛﻪ ﭘﺲ ﺍﺯ ﮔﺬﺷــﺖ ﭼﻨﺪ ﻣــﺎﻩ ﺍﺯ ﭘﻴﺮﻭﺯﻱ ﺍﻧﻘﻼﺏ، ﺟﺮﻳﺎﻥﻫــﺎﻱ ﻣﺨﺘﻠﻒ ﺳﻴﺎﺳــﻲ ﺩﺭ ﻛﺸــﻮﺭ ﺑﻪ ﺳــﻤﺖ ﻧﻮﻋﻲ ﺗﺸــﺘﺖ ﻭ ﺍﺧﺘﻼﻑ ﻧﻈﺮ ﺭﻓﺘﻪ ﺑﻮﺩﻧــﺪ .ﺍﻭﻟﻴﻦ ﺛﻤﺮﻩ ﻭ ﭘﻴﺎﻣﺪ ﻣﺜﺒﺖ ﺍﻗﺪﺍﻡ ﺩﺍﻧﺸــﺠﻮﻳﺎﻥ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺑﻮﺩ ﻛﻪ ﺗﺸــﺘﺖ ﻣﻮﺭﺩ ﻧﻈﺮ ﺍﺯ ﺑﻴﻦ ﺭﻓﺖ ﻭ ﺍﻳــﻦ ﻭﺍﻗﻌﻪ ﺯﻣﻴﻨﻪﺳــﺎﺯ ﻭﺣﺪﺕ ﮔﺮﻭﻩﻫﺎﻱ ﻣﺨﺘﻠﻒ ﺳﻴﺎﺳــﻲ ﺩﺭ ﻛﺸﻮﺭ ﺷﺪ. ﺍﺯ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﭘﻴﺎﻣﺪﻫﺎﻱ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻛﺎﺭ ﺧﻠﻊﺳــﻼﺡ ﭼﭗﻫﺎ ﺩﺭ ﻛﺸــﻮﺭ ﺑﻮﺩ ،ﭼﺮﺍ ﻛﻪ ﺑﻪ ﻫﺮ ﺣﺎﻝ ﺟﺮﻳﺎﻥ ﭼﭗ ﺩﺭ ﺁﻥ ﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﺩﺭ ﻛﺸﻮﺭ ﻓﻌﺎﻝ ﺑﻮﺩ ﻭ ﺧﻴﻠﻲ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻧﻘﻼﺑﻴﻮﻥ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﻋﻨﻮﺍﻥ ﻣﻬﺮﻩﻫﺎﻱ ﺁﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎ ﻣﻌﺮﻓﻲ ﻣﻲﻛﺮﺩ ،ﺑﺎ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﻗﺪﺍﻡ ﻋﻤﻼ ﺑﻪ ﻫﻤﮕﺎﻥ ﺍﺛﺒﺎﺕ ﻣﻲﺷﺪ ﻳﻚ ﺟﺮﻳﺎﻥ ﺿﺪﺁﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎﻳﻲ ﻗﻮﻱ ﺩﺭ ﻛﺸــﻮﺭ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ ﻭ ﺳﺮﺩﻣﺪﺍﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻗﺼﻪ ﭼﭗﻫﺎ ﻧﻴﺴﺘﻨﺪ .ﺑﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺗﺮﺗﻴﺐ ﭼﭗﻫﺎ ﺧﻠﻊ ﺳﻼﺡ ﻣﻲﺷﺪﻧﺪ. ﭘﻴﺎﻣــﺪ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﺍﻳــﻦ ﻭﺍﻗﻌــﻪ ،ﻛﻨﺎﺭﻩﮔﻴﺮﻱ ﻭ ﺣﺎﺷﻴﻪﻧﺸــﻴﻨﻲ ﻟﻴﺒﺮﺍﻝﻫﺎ ﺑﻮﺩ .ﺩﺭ ﻣﺠﻤﻮﻉ ﺑﻌﺪ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﺗﻔﺎﻕ ﺟﺮﻳﺎﻥﻫﺎﻱ ﺍﻧﻘﻼﺑﻲ ﻗﺪﺭﺕ ﺑﻴﺸــﺘﺮﻱ ﻳﺎﻓﺘﻨﺪ .ﺑﻪ ﻃﻮﺭﻱ ﻛــﻪ ﻣﺎ ﻣﻲﺑﻴﻨﻴﻢ ﺩﺭ 12ﺁﺫﺭ ﺳﺎﻝ 58ﻳﻌﻨﻲ ﻛﻤﺘﺮ ﺍﺯ ﻳﻚ ﻣﺎﻩ ﺑﻌﺪ ،ﻫﻤﻪﭘﺮﺳﻲ ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻥﺍﺳﺎﺳﻲ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺍﻧﺠﺎﻡ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ ﻭ ﺍﻛﺜﺮﻳﺖ ﻣﺮﺩﻡ ﺩﺭ ﺁﻥ ﺷﺮﻛﺖ ﻛﺮﺩﻧﺪ. ﻳﻜــﻲ ﺍﺯ ﻋﻤﺪﻩﺗﺮﻳــﻦ ﺩﻻﻳﻞ ﺍﻳــﻦ ﺩﺳــﺘﺎﻭﺭﺩ ﻫﻤﻴﻦ ﺣﺮﻛﺖ ﺍﻧﻘﻼﺑﻲ ﺑﻮﺩ. ﺍﻟﺒﺘــﻪ ﻣﺎ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻛﺎﺭ ﻫﺰﻳﻨﻪ ﻫﻢ ﺩﺍﺩﻳﻢ .ﺍﻳﻦ ﮔﻮﻧﻪ ﻧﻴﺴــﺖ ﻛﻪ ﭼﻨﻴﻦ ﺍﻗﺪﺍﻣﻲ ﺩﺭ ﻋﺮﺻﻪ ﺳﻴﺎﺳــﻲ ﺑﺪﻭﻥ ﻫﺰﻳﻨﻪ ﺑﻮﺩﻩ ﺑﺎﺷﺪ. ﻫﺮ ﻛﻨﺶ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﻲ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺳﻄﺢ ﻫﺰﻳﻨﻪﻫﺎ ﻭ ﻓﺎﻳﺪﻩﻫﺎﻳﻲ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺑﻪ ﻃﻮﺭ ﻣﻨﺼﻔﺎﻧﻪ ﺑﺮﺭﺳــﻲ ﺷــﻮﺩ .ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﮔﻮﻧﻪ ﻣﻮﺍﻗﻊ ﻧﺒﺎﻳﺪ ﺩﭼﺎﺭ ﺍﺣﺴﺎﺳــﺎﺕ ﺷﺪ ﻭ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺍﺯ ﺗﺤﻠﻴﻞﻫﺎﻱ ﺳﻄﺤﻲ ﻭ ﺩﻡﺩﺳﺘﻲ ﺩﻭﺭﻱ ﺟﺴــﺖ .ﻳﻌﻨﻲ ﺗﻤﺎﻣﻲ ﻣﺴــﺎﺋﻞ ﺣﻮﻝ ﻭﺍﻗﻌﻪ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺟﺰء ﺑﻪ ﺟﺰء ﺑﺮﺭﺳــﻲ ﻭ ﺗﺤﻠﻴﻞ ﺷﻮﺩ ﻭ ﺑﺎ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺑﺮﺭﺳﻲ ﺟﺎﻣﻊ ،ﺑﻴﻄﺮﻓﺎﻧﻪ ﻭ ﻣﻨﺼﻔﺎﻧــﻪ ﺍﻣﻜﺎﻥ ﺑﺮﺁﻭﺭﺩ ﻫﻤﺰﻣﺎﻥ ﻫﺰﻳﻨﻪﻫﺎ ﻭ ﻓﺎﻳﺪﻩﻫﺎﻱ ﻭﺍﻗﻌﻪ ﻣﻮﺭﺩ ﻧﻈﺮ ﻓﺮﺍﻫﻢ ﺷــﻮﺩ .ﺗﻨﻬﺎ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺻﻮﺭﺕ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﻣﻲ ﺗﻮﺍﻥ ﺍﻃﻤﻴﻨﺎﻥ ﺩﺍﺷﺖ ﻗﻀﺎﻭﺕ ﻋﺎﺩﻻﻧﻪ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﺧﻮﺍﻫﺪ ﺩﺍﺷﺖ .ﺑﺮﺭﺳﻲ ﻫﻤﻪﺟﺎﻧﺒــﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺗﺤﻠﻴﻞ ﻭﻗﺎﻳﻊ ﻣﻬﻢ ﺳﻴﺎﺳــﻲ ،ﺍﺻﻠﻲ ﺍﺳــﺖ ﻛﻪ ﮔﺎﻫﻲ ﺍﻭﻗﺎﺕ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻮﺭﺩ ﻣﺴــﺎﻟﻪ ﺗﺴﺨﻴﺮ ﻻﻧﻪ ﺟﺎﺳﻮﺳﻲ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺭﻋﺎﻳﺖ ﻧﻤﻲﺷﻮﺩ.