CHILDREN'S INDEPENDENT MOBILITY A child-oriented perspective on walking, playing and socialising in

Figure 2. A conceptual framework to CIM. (By the author inspired by Kyttä, 2004; Badland et al., 2016; Weeb Jamme, Bahl and Banerjee, 2018; Johansson et al., 2020; Mitra and Manaugh, 2020)

Turn static files into dynamic content formats.

Create a flipbook

Articles inside

CHILDREN'S INDEPENDENT MOBILITY A child-oriented perspective on walking, playing and socialising in

Articles inside

Appendix 3. Household questionnaire

Appendix 2. Caretakers' questionnaires

BIBLIOGRAPHY

CONCLUSION

7.2. Strengths and limitations

7.1. Policy and practice implications

DISCUSSION AND REFLECTIONS

Image 3. Play streets and courts

Graph 6. Caretakers' reasons to walk

Graph 5. Children's reasons NOT to walk

Graph 3. Parental independent licence

4.4. Statement of ethics

Graph 10. Time outdoors during the week and weekend by gender

Graph 1. Trip information and independence

4.3. Research variables and data analysis

2.4. What about play? Insights from environmental psychology

Figure 2. A conceptual framework to CIM

INTRODUCTION

2.3. A socio-ecological perspective

Figure 1. Socio-ecological model and correlations to CIM

CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK

2.2. Children’s independent mobility as social practice

ABSTRACT