PhD Tesis annexes draft translation: ECO-URBAN OPTIMIZATION OF THE RIVERSIDE AREAS OF THE LARGE CITY

AsAsa amanuscript manuscript

Marina Matashova

Marina Matashova

OPTIMIZACION ECO-URBANISTICA OF THE RIVERSIDE AREAS (case study of Khabarovsk city)

ECO-URBAN OPTIMIZATION OF THE RIVERSIDE AREAS OF A LARGE CITY ANNEXOS (caseTheses studyfor of aKhabarovsk city) scientific degree PhD in architecture

ANNEXES Theses for a scientific degree PhD in architecture

Moscow - 2011 Moscow - 2011

172

Introduction

ECO-URBAN OPTIMIZATION OF THE RIVERSIDE AREAS (EUO RA) OF A LARGE CITY : CASE STUDY OF KHABAROVSK CITY STRUCTURE OF THE STUDY

I CHAPTER

HISTORICAL ANALYSIS

PREREQUISITES OF THE STUDY MODERN TENDENCIES

INTERNATIONAL

THEORETICAL BASE OF STUDY

EXPERIENCE

CRITERIA FACTORS I GROUP II GROUP III GROUP

HYPOTHESIS

II ГЛАВА II CHAPTER

EUO RA PROGRAM PRINCIPLES

EUO RA METHODS

KHABAROVSK RA OPTIMIZATION ZONES LAYOUT COMPREHENSIVE MODEL OF ACTIVITIES FOR KHABAROVSK EUO RA

ECOLOGICAL RESTRUCTURING SOCIAL ADAPTATION CUMULATIVE RECOUPMENT

III CHAPTER

ECO-FRAMEWORK FORMING STRATEGY

ECOLOGICAL FRAMEWORK COMPONENTS OPTIMAL FUNCTIONING CONDITIONS

KHABAROVSK RIVERSIDE AREASOPTIMAL DEVELOPMENT SCENARIOS

ECO-FRAMEWORK FORMING TECHNIQUES

EUO RA IMPLEMENTATION MECHANISMS

HISTORICAL HISTORICAL HISTORICAL HISTORICALEVOLUTION EVOLUTION EVOLUTION EVOLUTIONOF OF OF OFAPPROACHES APPROACHES APPROACHES APPROACHESTO TO TO TOTHE THE THE THEKHABAROVSK KHABAROVSK KHABAROVSK KHABAROVSKRIVERSIDE RIVERSIDE RIVERSIDE RIVERSIDEAREAS AREAS AREAS AREASURBAN URBAN URBAN URBANDEVELOPDEVELOPDEVELOPDEVELOPSTAGE STAGE STAGE STAGE

STAGE STAGE STAGE STAGE

STAGE

STAGE STAGE STAGE STAGE

STAGE

TOWN-PLANNING TOWN-PLANNING TOWN-PLANNING TOWN-PLANNING DOMINANTS DOMINANTS DOMINANTS DOMINANTS COMMUNITY COMMUNITY COMMUNITY COMMUNITY NODES NODES NODES NODES

URBAN URBAN URBAN URBAN CORE CORE CORE CORE

STA (1940-1

PLANNING STRUCTURE MODEL

THE RIVER LOSES PRIORITY THE THE THE RIVER RIVER RIVER LOSES LOSES LOSES PRIORITY PRIORITY PRIORITY COMMUNICATION FUNCTION COMMUNICATION COMMUNICATION FUNCTION FUNCTION COMMUNICATION FUNCTION TRANS-SIBERIAN TRANS-SIBERIAN TRANS-SIBERIAN TRANS-SIBERIAN RAILWAY RAILWAY RAILWAY RAILWAY BRIDGE BRIDGE BRIDGE BRIDGE INDUSTR. INDUSTR. INDUSTR. INDUSTR. ZONE ZONE ZONE ZONE

IND. ZONE OUTIND. ZONE OUTIND. ZONE OUTIND. ZONE OUTSIDE THE CITY SIDE THE CITY SIDE THE CITY SIDE THE CITY BORDERS BORDERS BORDERS BORDERS IND. RING IND. IND. RING RING IND. RING URBAN URBAN URBAN URBAN CORE CORE CORE CORE

RAILWAY RAILWAY RAILWAY RAILWAY STATION STATION STATION STATION

NATURAL NATURAL NATURAL NATURAL TERR. TERR. TERR. TERR.

RIVER RIVER RIVER RIVER

RAILWAY RAILWAY RAILWAY RAILWAY IND. ZONE OUTIND. ZONE OUTIND. ZONE OUTIND. ZONE OUTSIDE THE CITY SIDE THE CITY SIDE THE CITY SIDE THE CITY BORDERS BORDERS BORDERS BORDERS

LINEAR MODEL PARALLEL TOMODEL THE RIVER LINEAR LINEAR LINEAR LINEAR MODEL MODEL MODEL PARALLEL PARALLEL PARALLELTO TO TO TOTHE THE THE THERIVER RIVER RIVER RIVER PARALLEL

ORTHOGONAL MODEL ORTHOGONAL MODEL DISSECTED MODEL LINEAR -DISSECTED IN COMBINATION WITHMODEL ORTHOGONAL MODEL DISSECTED ORTHOGONAL ORTHOGONAL ORTHOGONAL MODEL MODEL MODEL ORTHOGONAL ORTHOGONAL ORTHOGONAL MODEL MODEL MODEL DISSECTED DISSECTED DISSECTEDMODEL MODEL MODEL MODEL WITH ORTHOGONAL PRIORITY TO DIRECTIONS LINEAR LINEAR LINEAR -DISSE -DISS -DIS -DIS LANDSCAPE MORPHOLOGY PERPENDICULAR TO THE IN INCOMBINATION COMBINATION COMBINATION COMBINATION WITH WITH WITH WITH WITH WITHPRIORITY PRIORITY PRIORITY PRIORITY TO TO TORIVER DIRECDIRECDIRECININ WITH WITH TO DIRECLANDSCAPE LANDSCAPE LANDSCAPEMORPHOLOGY MORPHOLOGY MORPHOLOGY MORPHOLOGY TIONS TIONS TIONSPERPENDICULAR PERPENDICULAR PERPENDICULAR PERPENDICULAR LANDSCAPE TIONS PRIORITY FACTORS OF PLANNING STRUCTURE DEVELOPMENT REFUNCTIONING TO TO TOTHE THE THE THERIVER RIVER RIVER RIVERAPPROACHES WITH PRIORITY GIVEN TO CULTURE AND SERVI TO PRIORITY OF MASS DOMINANT IMPORTANCE THE STABLE INFLUENCE LOSS OF DOMINANT INFLUPRIORITY OF INDUSTRIAL PRIORITY PRIORITY PRIORITY(DOMINANT) (DOMINANT) (DOMINANT) (DOMINANT) FACTORS FACTORS FACTORS OF OF OFPLANNING PLANNING PLANNING PLANNING STRUCTURE STRUCTURE STRUCTUREDEVELOPMENT DEVELOPMENT DEVELOPMENT DEVELOPMENT PRIORITY OF STRUCTURE AL RESIDENTIAL D OF THE RIVER IN PLANNING OF THE RIVER ANDFACTORS THE ENCE OF THE RIVER DEVELOPMENT ON THE STRUCTURE DEVELOPMENT NATURE OF THE RELIEF ON RIVERSIDE AREAS PRIORITY PRIORITY PRIORITYOF OF OF OFINDUSTRIAL INDUSTRIAL INDUSTRIAL INDUSTRIAL LOSS OF A SIGNIFI DOMINANT DOMINANT DOMINANTIMPORTANCE IMPORTANCE IMPORTANCE IMPORTANCE THE THE THESTABLE STABLE STABLE STABLE INFLUENCE INFLUENCE INFLUENCE LOSS LOSS LOSSOF OF OF OFDOMINANT DOMINANT DOMINANT DOMINANT INFLUINFLUINFLUTHE PLANNING STRUCTURE PRIORITY DOMINANT THE INFLUENCE LOSS INFLUTHE RAILWAY FORMS A ZONE PRIORITY PRIORITY PRIORITY OFOF OM DEVELOPMENT DEVELOPMENT DEVELOPMENT ON ON ON THE THE THE OF OF OFTHE THE THE THE RIVER RIVER RIVERININ IN INPLANNING PLANNING PLANNING PLANNING OF OF OFTHE THE THE THERIVER RIVER RIVER RIVERAND AND AND ANDTHE THE THE THE ENCE ENCE ENCEOF OF OF OFTHE THE THE THERIVER RIVER RIVER RIVER NATURAL RESOUR DEVELOPMENT DEVELOPMENT ON THE OF RIVER OF ENCE OF GRAVITATION PRIORITY DEVELOPMENT OF LACK OF CONNECTION OF NEW INDUSTRIAL INDUSTRIAL INDUSTRIAL R RIVERSIDE RIVERSIDE RIVERSIDE AREAS AREAS AREAS STRUCTURE STRUCTURE STRUCTURE DEVELOPMENT DEVELOPMENT DEVELOPMENT NATURE NATURE NATUREOF OF OF OFTHE THE THE THERELIEF RELIEF RELIEF RELIEFON ON ON ON RIVERSIDE AREAS STRUCTURE DEVELOPMENT NATURE PUBLIC AND SOCIAL FUNCRESIDENTIAL AREAS OF THE DEVELOPMEN DEVELOPME DEVELOPM THE THE THEPLANNING PLANNING PLANNING PLANNINGSTRUCTURE STRUCTURE STRUCTURE STRUCTURE THE BEGINNING RECREATIONAL ZO THE OF THE THE THE THE RAILWAY RAILWAY RAILWAY FORMS FORMS FORMS A A A ZONE ZONE ZONE THE RAILWAY FORMS A ZONE TIONS ON THE RIVERSIDE CITY WITH THE RIVER DEVELOPMENT OF DEVELOPMENT DEVELOPMENT DEVELOPMENT OF IN LACK LACK LACKOF OF OF OFCONNECTION CONNECTION CONNECTION CONNECTIONOF OF OF OF OPMENT PRIORITY PRIORITY PRIORITYDEVELOPMENT DEVELOPMENT DEVELOPMENT DEVELOPMENTOF OF OF OF TRANSVERSE DEVELOPMENT INDUSTRIAL EXPANSION OF LACK PRIORITY OF OF OFGRAVITATION GRAVITATION GRAVITATION GRAVITATION OF AREAS LOSS LOSS LOSS OFOF OF ATHE ASIG AS DIRECTIONS IN CITY NEW NEW NEWRESIDENTIAL RESIDENTIAL RESIDENTIAL RESIDENTIALAREAS AREAS AREAS AREAS THE PART PUBLIC PUBLIC PUBLICAND AND AND ANDSOCIAL SOCIAL SOCIAL SOCIALFUNCFUNCFUNCFUNC- RELATION TO THE RIVER THE RIVERSIDE AREAS NEW PUBLIC PART PART OFOF OF NATU NA NA OF OF OF THE THE THE CITY CITY CITY WITH WITH WITH THE THE THE RIVER RIVER RIVER TIONS TIONS TIONS ON ON ON THE THE THE RIVERSIDE RIVERSIDE RIVERSIDE DEVELOPMENT DEVELOPMENT DEVELOPMENTOF OF OF OFTRANSTRANSTRANSTRANSOF THE CITY WITH THE RIVER TIONS ON THE RIVERSIDE DEVELOPMENT SOURCES SOURCES SOURCES THE THE THEBEGINNING BEGINNING BEGINNING BEGINNINGOF OF OF OFTHE THE THE THE THE AREAS AREAS AREAS VERSE VERSE VERSEDIRECTIONS DIRECTIONS DIRECTIONS DIRECTIONSININ IN IN AREAS VERSE INDUSTRIAL INDUSTRIAL INDUSTRIAL EXPANSION EXPANSION EXPANSION OF OF OF INDUSTRIAL EXPANSION OF PRIORITY FACTORS OF PLANNING STRUCTURE DEVELOPMENT RECREATIONA RECREATION RECREATIO RECREATIO RELATION RELATION RELATIONTO TO TO TOTHE THE THE THERIVER RIVER RIVER RIVER RELATION THE THE THERIVERSIDE RIVERSIDE RIVERSIDE RIVERSIDEAREAS AREAS AREAS AREAS THE DEVELOPMEN DEVELOPME DEVELOPM CENTER CENTER CENTER OFOF OF TH

SOCIAL & ECONOMICAL ASPECT

ARCHITECTURAL & URBAN PLANNING ASPECT

COMMUNICATION COMMUNICATION COMMUNICATION COMMUNICATION FUNCTION OF RIVER FUNCTION FUNCTION FUNCTION OF OF OF RIVER RIVER RIVER

STA ST SS

STAGE (1911-1930)

PLANNING PLANNING PLANNING PLANNINGSTRUCTURE STRUCTURE STRUCTURE STRUCTUREMODEL MODEL MODEL MODEL

VECTOR OF CITY VECTOR VECTOR VECTOR OF OF OF CITY CITY CITY DEVELOPMENT DEVELOPMENT DEVELOPMENT DEVELOPMENT

STAGE STAGE STAGE STAGE

STAGE

STAGE STAGE STAGE STAGE

STAGE STAGE STAGE STAGE

STAGE STAGE STAGE STAGE

STAGE STAGE STAGE STAGE DEVELOPMENT DEVELOPMENT DEVELOPMENTCONCEPT CONCEPT CONCEPT CONCEPT DEVELOPMENT

PLANNING PLANNING PLANNINGSTRUCTURE STRUCTURE STRUCTURE STRUCTUREMODEL MODEL MODEL MODEL PLANNING

VECTORS OF DEVELOPMENT PERPENDICULAR TO THE RIVER INDUSTRIAL INDUSTRIAL INDUSTRIAL INDUSTRIAL SETTLEMENT SETTLEMENT SETTLEMENT SETTLEMENT

INDUSTRIAL INDUSTRIAL INDUSTRIAL INDUSTRIAL SETTLEMENT SETTLEMENT SETTLEMENT SETTLEMENT MASS MASS MASS MASS HOUSING HOUSING HOUSING HOUSING DISTRICT DISTRICT DISTRICT DISTRICT HISTORIC HISTORIC HISTORIC HISTORIC CORE CORE CORE CORE

DEVELOPMENT ALONG THE RIVER INDUSTRIAL INDUSTRIAL INDUSTRIAL INDUSTRIAL SETTLEMENT SETTLEMENT SETTLEMENT SETTLEMENT

URBAN LANDSCAPE COMPLEX NATURAL

IRECREAIRECREAIRECREAIRECREATIONAL TIONAL TIONAL TIONAL ZONES ZONES ZONES ZONES INDUSTRIAL INDUSTRIAL INDUSTRIAL INDUSTRIAL SETTLEMENT SETTLEMENT SETTLEMENT SETTLEMENT MASS MASS MASS MASS HOUSING HOUSING HOUSING HOUSING DISTRICTS DISTRICTS DISTRICTS DISTRICTS

THE EMBANKMENT CONSTRUCTION MASS MASS MASS MASS HOUSING HOUSING HOUSING HOUSING DISTRICTS DISTRICTS DISTRICTS DISTRICTS

LANDSCAPE LANDSCAPE LANDSCAPE AND AND AND LANDSCAPE AND RECREATIONAL RECREATIONAL RECREATIONAL RECREATIONAL AREA AREA AREA AREA

COMMERCIAL COMMERCIAL COMMERCIAL COMMERCIAL DEVEDEVEDEVEDEVELOPMENT LOPMENT LOPMENT LOPMENT

CONSTRUCTION OF THE BRIDGE OVER THE RIVER IECOLOGICAL IECOLOGICAL IECOLOGICAL MASS RESID IECOLOGICAL CORRIDORS CORRIDORS CORRIDORS REFUNCTIONING BALANCE OF NATURAL APPROACHES AND ANTHROPOGENIC WITH PRIORITY GIVEN COMPONENTS TO CULTURE IN THE ANDCITY SERVI ST CORRIDORS

ECOLOGICAL & LANDSCAPE ASPECT

NATURAL-ANTROPOGENIC ANTROPOGENIC LINEAR LINEAR LINEAR-DISSECTED -DISSECTED -DISSECTED -DISSECTEDMODEL MODEL MODEL MODEL LINEAR

ANTROPOGENIC-TECHNIGENIC

LINEAR LINEAR LINEARMODEL MODEL MODEL MODEL LINEAR

TECHNOGENIC

LINEAR LINEAR LINEARMODEL MODEL MODEL MODELWITH WITH WITH WITHTHE THE THE THE LINEAR FORMATION FORMATION FORMATIONOF OF OF OFRING RING RING RINGSTRUCSTRUCSTRUCSTRUCFORMATION TURES TURES TURES TURES

LINEAR LINEAR LINEARMODEL MODEL MODEL MODELWITH WITH WITH WITHTHE THE THE THE LINEAR FORMATION FORMATION FORMATIONOF OF OF OFRING RING RING RINGSTRUCSTRUCSTRUCSTRUCFORMATION TURES TURES TURES TURES

PRIORITY PRIORITY PRIORITY(DOMINANT) (DOMINANT) (DOMINANT) (DOMINANT)FACTORS FACTORS FACTORS FACTORSOF OF OF OFPLANNING PLANNING PLANNING PLANNINGSTRUCTURE STRUCTURE STRUCTURE STRUCTUREDEVELOPMENT DEVELOPMENT DEVELOPMENT DEVELOPMENT PRIORITY PRIORITY PRIORITY PRIORITYOF OF OFMASSIVE MASSIVE MASSIVE PRIORITY OF MASSIVE INDUSTRIAL INDUSTRIAL INDUSTRIALRESIDENTIAL RESIDENTIAL RESIDENTIAL INDUSTRIAL RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT DEVELOPMENT DEVELOPMENT DEVELOPMENT LOSS LOSS LOSSOF OF OFAAASIGNIFICANT SIGNIFICANT SIGNIFICANT LOSS OF A SIGNIFICANT PART PART PARTOF OF OFNATURAL NATURAL NATURALREREREPART OF NATURAL RESOURCES SOURCES SOURCES SOURCES RECREATIONAL RECREATIONAL RECREATIONALZONES ZONES ZONES RECREATIONAL ZONES DEVELOPMENT DEVELOPMENT DEVELOPMENTOF OF OFIN IN INTHE THE THE DEVELOPMENT OFCITY IN THE CENTER CENTER CENTER OF OF OF THE THE THE CITY CITY OF THECENTER DEGREE OF CHANGE OF THE CITY

THE RIVERSIDE LANDSCAPE

ATTEMPT ATTEMPT ATTEMPTTO TO TORETURN RETURN RETURNTO TO TO ATTEMPT TO RETURN TO THE THE THERIVERINE RIVERINE RIVERINEAREAS AREAS AREASOF OF OF THE RIVERINE AREAS OF THE THE THELOST LOST LOSTNATURAL NATURAL NATURALAND AND AND THE LOST NATURAL AND RECREATIONAL RECREATIONAL RECREATIONALFUNCTION FUNCTION FUNCTION RECREATIONAL FUNCTION RETAINING RETAINING RETAININGOF OF OFTHE THE THEPRIORITY PRIORITY PRIORITY RETAINING OF THE PRIORITY OF OF OFMASSIVE MASSIVE MASSIVEINDUSTRIAL INDUSTRIAL INDUSTRIAL OF MASSIVE INDUSTRIAL RESIDENTIAL RESIDENTIAL RESIDENTIALDEVELOPMENT DEVELOPMENT DEVELOPMENT RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT

RIVERSIDE

INDUSTRIAL INDUSTRIAL INDUSTRIALZONES ZONES ZONES ZONES INDUSTRIAL TRANSFORMATION TRANSFORMATION TRANSFORMATION TRANSFORMATION

HIGH HIGH HIGHCOMMERCIAL COMMERCIAL COMMERCIALDEDEDEHIGH COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT(INVESTMENT) VELOPMENT(INVESTMENT) VELOPMENT(INVESTMENT) VELOPMENT(INVESTMENT) INTEREST INTEREST INTERESTTO TO TOTHE THE THERIVERSIDE RIVERSIDE RIVERSIDE INTEREST TO THE RIVERSIDE AREAS AREAS AREAS AREAS CHAOTIC CHAOTIC CHAOTICDEVELOPMENT DEVELOPMENT DEVELOPMENTOF OF OF CHAOTIC DEVELOPMENT OF RIVERSIDE RIVERSIDE RIVERSIDEAREAS AREAS AREAS RIVERSIDE AREAS

THE THE THEFORMATION FORMATION FORMATIONOF OF OFAAA THE FORMATION OF A SINGLE SINGLE SINGLELANDSCAPE-RECLANDSCAPE-RECLANDSCAPE-RECSINGLE LANDSCAPE-RECREATIONAL REATIONAL REATIONALCOMPLEX COMPLEX COMPLEXON ON ON REATIONAL COMPLEX ON RIVERSIDE RIVERSIDE RIVERSIDEAREAS AREAS AREAS RIVERSIDE AREAS DEVELOPMENT DEVELOPMENT DEVELOPMENTOF OF OFTHE THE THEECOECOECODEVELOPMENT OF THE ECOLOGICAL LOGICAL LOGICALFRAMEWORK FRAMEWORK FRAMEWORK LOGICAL FRAMEWORK

RELATION RELATION RELATION TOTO TO THE THE THE RIVER RIVER RIVER

STAGE STAGE STAGE

STAGE STAGE STAGE

STAGE (1970-1980)

STAGE STAGE STAGE DEVELOPMENT DEVELOPMENT DEVELOPMENT CONCEPT CONCEPT CONCEPT

STAGE

(CONCEPT DEVELOPMENT)

PLANNING PLANNING PLANNING STRUCTURE STRUCTURE STRUCTURE MODEL MODEL MODEL

INDUSTRIAL INDUSTRIAL INDUSTRIAL SETTLEMENT SETTLEMENT SETTLEMENT MASS MASS MASS HOUSING HOUSING HOUSING DISTRICT DISTRICT DISTRICT HISTORIC HISTORIC HISTORIC CORE CORE CORE

INDUSTRIAL INDUSTRIAL INDUSTRIAL SETTLEMENT SETTLEMENT SETTLEMENT

INDUSTRIAL INDUSTRIAL INDUSTRIAL SETTLEMENT SETTLEMENT SETTLEMENT

INDUSTRIAL INDUSTRIAL INDUSTRIAL SETTLEMENT SETTLEMENT SETTLEMENT

IRECREAIRECREAIRECREATIONAL TIONAL TIONAL ZONES ZONES ZONES

MASS MASS MASS HOUSING HOUSING HOUSING DISTRICTS DISTRICTS DISTRICTS COMMERCIAL COMMERCIAL COMMERCIAL DEVEDEVEDEVELOPMENT LOPMENT LOPMENT

INDUSTRIAL ZONES INDUSTRIAL INDUSTRIAL ZONES ZONES TRANSFORMATION TRANSFORMATION TRANSFORMATION INDUSTRIAL ZONES LANDSCAPE AND LANDSCAPE LANDSCAPE AND AND TRANSFORM. RECREATIONAL RECREATIONAL RECREATIONAL LANDSC.-RECR. AREA AREA AREA REVERSIDE AREA

NEW ECOCORRIDORS IECOLOGICAL IECOLOGICAL IECOLOGICAL CORRIDORS CORRIDORS CORRIDORS

MASS MASS MASS HOUSING HOUSING HOUSING DISTRICTS DISTRICTS DISTRICTS

D MODEL LINEAR MODEL SSECTED SSECTED ECTED SECTEDMODEL MODEL MODEL LINEAR LINEAR LINEAR MODEL MODEL MODEL

ICE SECTORS

LINEAR MODEL WITH THE FORMATION OF RING STRUCTURES LINEAR LINEAR LINEAR MODEL MODEL MODEL WITH WITH WITH THE THE THE FORMATION FORMATION FORMATION OFOF OF RING RING RING STRUCSTRUCSTRUCTURES TURES TURES

LINEAR LINEAR LINEAR MODEL MODEL MODEL WITH WITH WITH THE THE THE FORMATION FORMATION FORMATION OFOF OF RING RING RING STRUCSTRUCSTRUCTURES TURES TURES

TASKS TO ACHIEVE BALANCED ATTEMPT TO RETURN TO THE HIGH COMMERCIAL DEVELOPSIVE INDUSTRIDEVELOPMENT RIVERINE AREASFACTORS OF THE LOST OF MENT(INVESTMENT) INTEREST TODEVELOPMENT DEVELOPMENT OF THE CITY PRIORITY PRIORITY PRIORITY (DOMINANT) (DOMINANT) (DOMINANT) FACTORS FACTORS OF OF PLANNING PLANNING PLANNING STRUCTURE STRUCTURE STRUCTURE DEVELOPMENT DEVELOPMENT NATURAL AND RECREATIONAL THE RIVERSIDE AREAS WITH A FOCUS ON SUSTAINICANT PART OF ABLE DEVELOPMENT OF FMASSIVE MASSIVE MASSIVE ATTEMPT ATTEMPT ATTEMPT TOTO TO RETURN RETURN RETURN TOTO TO CHAOTIC HIGH HIGH HIGH COMMERCIAL COMMERCIAL COMMERCIAL DEDETHE THE THE FORMATION FORMATION FORMATION OFOF OF A AA RCES DEVELOPMENT OFDELRESIDENTIAL LRESIDENTIAL RESIDENTIAL THE THE THE RIVERINE RIVERINE RIVERINE AREAS AREAS AREAS OF OF OF RIVERSIDE VELOPMENT(INVESTMENT) VELOPMENT(INVESTMENT) VELOPMENT(INVESTMENT) SINGLE SINGLE SINGLE LANDSCAPE-RECLANDSCAPE-RECLANDSCAPE-RECRETAINING OF THE PRIORITY OF AREAS MENT NT ENT DEVELTHE THE THE LOST LOST LOST NATURAL NATURAL NATURAL AND AND AND INTEREST INTEREST INTEREST TOTO TO THE THE THE RIVERSIDE RIVERSIDE RIVERSIDE REATIONAL REATIONAL REATIONAL COMPLEX COMPLEX COMPLEX ON ON ON MASSIVE INDUSTRIAL RESIDENONES RECREATIONAL RECREATIONAL RECREATIONAL FUNCTION FUNCTION FUNCTION AREAS AREAS AREAS RIVERSIDE RIVERSIDE RIVERSIDE AREAS AREAS AREAS TIAL DEVELOPMENT E CENTER OF SIGNIFICANT GNIFICANT SIGNIFICANT ATURAL ATURAL URAL RERERECHAOTIC CHAOTIC CHAOTIC DEVELOPMENT DEVELOPMENT DEVELOPMENT OFOF OF DEVELOPMENT DEVELOPMENT DEVELOPMENT OFOF OF THE THE THE ECOECOECORETAINING RETAINING RETAINING OFOF OF THE THE THE PRIORITY PRIORITY PRIORITY RIVERSIDE RIVERSIDE RIVERSIDE AREAS AREAS AREAS LOGICAL LOGICAL LOGICAL FRAMEWORK FRAMEWORK FRAMEWORK OFOF OF MASSIVE MASSIVE MASSIVE INDUSTRIAL INDUSTRIAL INDUSTRIAL ONAL ONAL AL NALZONES ZONES ZONES RESIDENTIAL RESIDENTIAL RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT DEVELOPMENT DEVELOPMENT MENT NT ENTOFOF OF ININ IN THE THE THE A SINGLE LANDSCAPE-RECFHE THE THE CITY CITY CITY REATIONAL COMPLEX DEVEL-

COMMERCIAL REAL ESTATE DEVELOPMENT

DENTIAL DEVELOPMENT WITHOUT REGARD FOR NATURAL CONDITIONS TRUCTURE ICE SECTORS NATURAL -ANTROPOGENIC LANDSCAPE COMPLEXES REGENERATION ON THE RIVERSIDE AREAS AND CITY ECOLOGICAL FRAMEWORK DEVELOPMENT

173 173 173

AREA INDUSTRIAL EXPANSION

PROBLEMS OF ECO-URBAN OPTIMIZATION OF KHABAROVSK RIVERSIDE AREAS

OPMENT ON THE RIVERSIDE AREAS

Section 1.2HISTORICAL EVOLUTION OF APPROACHES TO THE KHABAROVSK RIVERSIDE AREAS URBAN DEVELOPMENT

TAGE 1960)

Chapter I

STAGE STAGE AGE TAGE

THE THE THE RIVERSIDE RIVERSIDE RIVERSIDE AREAS AREAS AREAS

174

Chapter I Section 1.2

PROBLEMS OF ECO-URBAN OPTIMIZATION OF KHABAROVSK RIVERSIDE AREAS ANALYSIS OF INTERNATIONAL TRENDS IN THE WATERSIDE AREAS TRANSFORMATION THE YEARS 60-80S OF THE XX CENTURY INCREASING DENSITY OF DYNAMICALLY GROWING CITIES THE STRATEGIC PLAN FORMATION LAND FOR DEVELOPMENT SALE SUBJECT TO THE CREATION OF AN OPEN SPACE SYSTEM IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE STRATEGIC PLAN VERTICAL FUNCTIONAL ZONING OF MULTI-STOREY BUILDINGS WITH RECREATIONAL-PUBLIC AND SERVICE FUNCTIONS DEVELOPMENT ON GROUND FLOOR

VANCOUVER FALSE CREEK AREA REGENERATION

ENCOURAGE WALKING, CYCLING ACTIVITY AND PUBLIC TRANSPORT A MODEL OF A NEIGHBOR COMMUNITY IN URBAN CONDITIONS DEVELOPMENT ON THE BASIS OF AN OPEN SPACES PERMEABILITY MANAGEMENT

REFUNCTIONING APPROACHES WITH PRIORITY GIVEN TO CULTURE AND SERVICE SECTORS MODELING OF THE PHASED DEVELOPMENT PROCESS MAXIMUM USE OF EXISTING BUILDINGS AND STRUCTURES MULTIFUNCTIONALITY ENCOURAGING A HIGH LEVEL OF STREET ACTIVITY, ESPECIALLY IN THE STRUCTURE OF SHOPPING STREETS REPRODUCTION OF TRADITIONAL TYPES OF URBAN OPEN SPACES ENSURING PROFITABILITY ALONG WITH PRESERVING THE ARCHITECTURAL TEXTURE

BALTIMORE. INNER HARBOR REGENERATION WITH THE A NEW TYPE OF PUBLIC SPACE DEVELOPMENT FESTIVAL MARKETPLACE

CHANGING THE MECHANISMS OF TERRITORY DEVELOPMENT MANAGEMENT THE IMPLEMENTATION OF LARGE-SCALE TRANSFORMATIONS WITHIN A SINGLE PROJECT WAS MADE POSSIBLE ONLY AS A RESULT OF A CHANGE IN TRADITIONAL RELATIONS BETWEEN THE STATE, THE PRIVATE SECTOR AND THE PUBLIC

HETEBURG: THE PAVILION, INFORMING ABOUT THE CHANGES OCCURRING WITHIN THE FRAMEWORK OF THE WATER FRONT REGENERATION PROJECT

STATE MUNICIPALITY

PRIVATE INVESTOR

PLANNING

FINANCING

PUBLIC-PRIVATE PARTNERSHIP

TERRITORIAL DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM PUBLIC PARTICIPATION POPULATION

175 174 PROBLEMS OF ECO-URBAN OPTIMIZATION OF KHABAROVSK RIVERSIDE AREAS

Chapter I Section 1.2

ANALYSIS OF INTERNATIONAL TRENDS IN THE WATERSIDE AREAS TRANSFORMATION END OF THE XX BEGINNING OF THE XXI CENTURY RIVERSIDE AREAS DEVELOPMENT AS A CATALYST FOR RENEWING THE CITY IMAGE STRATEGIC PLANNING, PROVIDING FOR INTEGRATION INTO CITYWIDE AND REGIONAL NETWORKS INCLUSION OF CREATIVE FUNCTIONS RELATED TO CULTURE, SCIENCE, TOURISM, BUSINESS INTO THE STRUCTURE OF RENEWED WATERFRONT AREAS ORIENTATION TO THE INTERNATIONAL CONTEXT APPLICATION OF NEW RESOURCE-SAVING TECHNOLOGIES IMPLEMENTATION

BILBAO. STRATEGIC PLANNING OF THE CITY’S ROLE AS A EUROPEAN GATEWAY TO THE ATLANTIC, CHANGING THE IMAGE OF THE CITY IN EUROPE AS A INTERCONNECTING CULTURAL CENTER

HIGH QUALITY REQUIREMENTS FOR THE ENVIRONMENT FORMATION OF THE PUBLIC SPACES SYSTEM WITH THE PRIORITY GIVEN TO A PEDESTRIAN, BICYCLE AND PUBLIC TRANSPORT EXCLUSIVE DESIGN PRESENCE

GUGGENHEIM MUSEUM BILBAO

TRANSITION TO THE SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT MODEL STRATEGIC PLANNING, PROVIDING FOR THE FORMATION OF A SINGLE ENVIRONMENTAL FRAMEWORK PRIORITY OF FILLING WATERFRONT AREAS WITH NATURAL COMPONENTS MAXIMUM CONSERVATION OF NATURAL PROCESSES WHILE MINIMIZING THE IMPACT FORMING A SYSTEM OF SPACES THAT MEET THE DIVERSE NEEDS OF DIFFERENT SOCIAL GROUPS AT ANY TIME OF THE YEAR USE OF LANDSCAPE DESIGN TECHNIQUES TO CREATE A QUALITY ENVIRONMENT APPLICATION OF RESOURCE-SAVING TECHNOLOGIES

BOGOTÁ - THE GREEN CITY STRUCTURE PLAN DEVELOPMENT ON THE BASIS OF A COMPREJENSIVE APPROACH TO THE OPTIMIZATION OF THE ECOLOGICAL FUNCTIONS OF THE LANDSCAPE MORPHOLOGIC ELEMENTS.

SHANGHAI - THE FORMATION OF THE URBAN PARKS SYSTEM FOR THE EXPO 2010 ON THE BASIS OF THE PRIORITY OF CONSERVATION OF NATURAL PROCESSES (IN PARTICULAR FLOOD PROCESSES).

176 PROBLEMS OF ECO-URBAN OPTIMIZATION OF KHABAROVSK RIVERSIDE AREAS

Chapter I Section 1.3

CRITERIA FOR ASSESSING THE EXISTING STATE OF RIVERINE AREAS. MAIN CONFLICTS

THE CONFLICT BETWEEN SPATIAL ORGANIZATION AND THE TERRAIN FORM

I

I LONG NEGLECT OF THE RIVERSIDE LANDSCAPES CHARACTERISTIC FEATURES IN THE DESIGN LED TO THE DANGEROUS GEOLOGICAL PROCESSES DEVELOPMENT ALONG WITH DECLINE IN THE LANDSCAPE AESTHETIC QUALITY LEGEND:

THE CONFLICT BETWEEN LAND-USE REGIME AND ECOLOGICAL POTENTIAL OF THE AREA

II

GREEN AREAS WEAKLY DEVELOPED AREAS WITH COMPLEX TERRAIN SHORELINE OPEN WATERCOURSES

III

CLOSED WATERCOURSES KHABAROVSK CITY BOUNDARY

HOLLOW SPACES TRANSFORMED INTO BOULEVARDS (CLOSED WATERCOURSES)

II

ZONES OF CONFLICT LOCALIZATION: WEAKLY DEVELOPED FLOODPLAIN AREAS

FLOODPLAIN SPACES ARE SUBJECT TO DEGRADATION AS A RESULT OF MANMADE, ANTHROPOGENIC AND NATURAL IMPACTS.

WEAKLY DEVELOPED HOLLOW AREAS

The experience of the hollow spaces transformation in the city center indicates a high environmental and social potential of these areas.

Long neglect of the riverside landscapes characteristic features in the design led to a the dangerous geological processes development along with decline in the landscape aesthetic quality.

III

THE CONFLICT BETWEEN LAND-USE REGIME AND ECOLOGICAL POTENTIAL OF THE SMALL WATERCOURSES

Hollow and floodplain spaces, complex in development, are subject to degradation as a result of man-made, anthropogenic and natural impacts.

177 PROBLEMS OF ECO-URBAN OPTIMIZATION OF KHABAROVSK RIVERSIDE AREAS

Chapter I Section 1.3

CRITERIA FOR ASSESSING THE EXISTING STATE OF RIVERINE AREAS. MAIN CONFLICTS

THE CONFLICT BETWEEN THE LEVEL OF OPEN SPACES DEVELOPMENT AND THE NEEDS OF THE POPULATION IN RECREATIONAL AREAS WITH ACCESS TO THE RIVER

I

III

I

SPONTANEOUS RIVERINE AREAS APPROPRIATION FOR PICNICS LEADS TO DEGRADATION OF NATURAL COMPONENTS (CONTAMINATION WITH SOLID DOMESTIC WASTE, UNAUTHORIZED CARS MOVEMENT ON THE RIVERBANK PROTECTIVE STRIP)

LEGEND INDUSTRIAL, PORT AREAS IN RIVERSIDE AREAS RESIDENTIAL AREAS

II

HIGH DENSITY RESIDENTIAL AREAS HIGHWAYS OF URBAN IMPORTANCE SHORELINE

II

THE BORDER OF KHABAROVSK

ZONES OF CONFLICT LOCALIZATION THE LEVEL RIVER POLLUTION OF DOESN’T CORRESPOND TO THE FUNCTION OF BATHING, HOWEVER, THERE ARE NO ALTERNATIVES TO THE BEACH NEAR THE RIVER

EQUIPPED RECREATIONAL AREA, EXPERIENCING EXCESSIVE LOADS URBAN BEACHES ZONES OF SPONTANEOUS REST BY THE RIVER (PICNICS) ZONES OF SPONTANEOUS REST NEAR THE RIVER (VIEWPOINTS)

III

Lack of recreational zones in riverside areas. As a result, existing equipped territories experience excessive loads.

Imbalance of recreational load during the annual and daily cycle

Spontaneous use of riverside areas for recreation is carried out on sites in the accessibility of each residential area near the river and leads to significant degradation of the natural components of riverine areas.

178 PROBLEMS OF ECO-URBAN OPTIMIZATION OF KHABAROVSK RIVERSIDE AREAS

Chapter I Section 1.3

CRITERIA FOR ASSESSING THE EXISTING STATE OF RIVERINE AREAS. MAIN CONFLICTS

THE CONFLICT BETWEEN RIVERSIDE AREAS INVESTMENT POTENTIAL AND THE EXISTING APPROACHES TO ORGANIZATION OF URBAN ENVIRONMENT II I III I ABANDONED APPERANCE OF “DALDIZEL” FACTORY PARK

WITHOUT POSSESSING INVESTMENT APPEAL, THE NATURAL ENVIRONMENT IS DOOMED TO DEGRADATION LEGEND

IV

MOST IMPORTANT ZONES OF BUSINESS, COMMERCIAL, PUBLIC DEVELOPMENT CURRENT ZONES OF RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT CURRENT INVESTMENT-ATTRACTIVE PART OF THE CITY

II A NEW COTTAGE DEVELOPMENT ON THE DANILOVSKY ST. ADJOINS THE WAREHOUSE ZONE

SHORELINE HIGHWAYS OF URBAN IMPORTANCE THE BORDER OF KHABAROVSK

WITHOUT OF A COMPLEX CITY ENVIRONMENT TRANSFORMATION, NEW INVESTMENT OBJECTS LOSE ITS ATTRACTIVENESS

ZONES OF CONFLICT LOCALIZATION NEW HIGH DENSITY DEVELOPMENT NEW LOW-RISE DEVELOPMENT DEGRADED RECREATIONAL AREAS

III THE RIVERINE TERRITORY NEAR THE RESIDENTIAL COMPLEX MOUNTAIN KAZACHYA OCCUPIES CARGO RIVER PORT

The discrepancy between the quality of the residential environment in the riverside areas and the claimed level, as a result of object-oriented design without providing public spaces Degradation of valuable natural areas that do not have investment attractiveness.

IV PRIVATE BEACH AREA IN A FENCED AREA

179 PROBLEMS OF ECO-URBAN OPTIMIZATION OF KHABAROVSK RIVERSIDE AREAS

Chapter I Section 1.3

CRITERIA FOR ASSESSING THE EXISTING STATE OF RIVERINE AREAS. MAIN CONFLICTS

THE CONFLICT BETWEEN THE NATURE OF THE REGULATIONS FOR THE USE OF RIVERSIDE AREAS AND THE PRINCIPLES OF ENVIRONMENTAL SUSTAINABILITY I

II

III

I

II

The existing regulations on these riverside areas are aimed at compaction of the development, these stimulate the process of breaking ecological links of a large natural green massifs.

III

IV

IV

The areas status transfer from the landscape-recreational zone to the recreational-public zone along with the lack of green and open spaces ratio regulations creates the danger of displacing the natural components in the riverside areas.

IV

V

KHABAROVSK URBAN ZONING MAP, 2006

These protected historically valuable landscape territories are transferred to the rank of the center of business, public and commercial activity, stimulating the development of buildings that do not correspond to the context of the area and the destruction of valuable landscapes in the city center.

180 PROBLEMS OF ECO-URBAN OPTIMIZATION OF KHABAROVSK RIVERSIDE AREAS

Chapter I Section 1.4

TRENDS IN THE KHABAROVSK CITY RIVERSIDE AREAS DEVELOPMENT MASTER PLANS KHABAROVSK CITY MASTER PLAN, 1985

KHABAROVSK CITY MASTER PLAN, 1992

KHABAROVSK CITY MASTER PLAN, 2006

TRENDS IN THE RIVERSIDE AREAS PLANNING IN THE LATEST MASTER PLANS OF THE KHABAROVSK CITY

PRIORITY RECREATIONAL AREAS DEVELOPMENT IN THE RIVERSIDE AREAS, ALTERNATING WITH INDUSTRIAL ZONES

RECREATIONAL AREAS

LENGTH OF FUNCTIONAL ZONES ALONG THE SHORELINE DEVELOPMENT OF RESIDENTIAL AREAS IN RIV- PRIORITY OF LINEAR GREEN SPACES ALONG THE SHOREERSIDE AREAS, STRENGTHENING ALTERNATION LINE, THE EMERGENCE OF RECREATIONAL-PUBLIC ZONE OF MONOFUNCTIONAL NONINTEGRATED ZONES TYPE AND DENSIFICATION OF RESIDENTIAL ZONES

INDUSTRIAL AND WAREHOUSE ZONE

RESIDENTIAL ZONE

PUBLIC AND RECREATIONAL-PUBLIC ZONES

A CHANGE OF RIVERSIDE AREAS DEVELOPMENT TRENDS : PROJECTS

THE HYDROPARK “AMUR” PROJECT, 1986

RESIDENTIAL COMPLEX “PARUS” PROJECT, 2002

PROBLEMS OF ECO-URBAN OPTIMIZATION OF KHABAROVSK RIVERSIDE AREAS

Chapter I Section 1.6

FACTORS AND PREREQUISITES AFFECTING THE KHABAROVSK RIVERSIDE AREAS FORMATION I GROUP FACTORS

KHABAROVSK EOLOGICAL FRAMEWORK (BY I. NARBUT)

LANDSCAPE FUNCTIONAL COMPONENTS SCHEME

KHABAROVSK LANDSCAPE MORFOTYPES (MASTER PLAN 2006)

LANDSCAPE STRUCTURE ANALISYS

LANDSCAPE-FUNCTIONAL ZONES SPECIALLY PROTECTED NATURAL TERRITORIES

HILLY TERRAIN/ GENTLY SLOPING PLAIN

LANDSCAPE AND RECREATIONAL ZONES

WATERSHED

OTHER LANDSCAPING AREAS EROSION-ACTIVE ZONES DUST-PRODUCING ZONES, ASH DUMPS

GULLIES OF RAVINES, SMALL WATERCOURSES

RIVERBANK SLOPESOF OFFLOODPLAIN FLOODPLAIN TERRACES RIVERBANK SLOPES TERRACES

WATERSHED AREA, HILLY SURFACE PLATEAU, FLOODPLAIN TERRACE

HILLSIDES

FLOODPLAIN, LOWLAND PLAIN

URBAN AND INDUSTRIAL ZONES

WATERSHED AREAS

SLOPE EDGE

LOWLANDS

WALLEYS OF SMALL RIVERS AND RAVINES

INCREASE IN THE ECOLOGICAL POTENTIAL OF THE TERRITORY

MORPHOTYPE

MORPHOTYPE ROLE

RIVERBANK SLOPES OF DISTRIBUTORS FLOODPLAIN TERRACES

HILLSIDES

LOWLANDS

VALLEYS OF SMALL RIVERS & RAVINES

LOCATION

LOW STABILITY

NORTHTERN PART OF THE CITY

WIND, WATER EROSION OF SOILS, LANDSLIDE PROCESSES, SLOPES ARE CUT BY RAVINES, STREAMS TO A DEPTH OF 10-30 M

DISTRIBUTORS

RELATIVELY UNSTABLE

NORTHTERN PART OF THE CITY

WIND, WATER EROSION, LANDSLIDE PROCESSES

SLOPES OF LVOV, KHABAROVSK, VORONEZH HEIGHTS, STRETCHING IN STRIPES OF THE NORTH-EASTERN DIRECTION

CONCENTRATORS DISTRIBUTORS

STABLE

CONTRIBUTE TO THE RAPID TRANSLATION OF MASS-ENERGY FLOWS FROM HIGH-ALTITUDE LANDS

RESISTANT TO NATURAL AND ANTHROPOGENIC INFLUENCES TERRITORY, WELL-VENTILATED

ABSORBERS

RELATIVELY STABLE

DETAIN AND ACCUMULATE WITHIN THEIR LIMITS SUBSTANCES AND ENERGY (INCLUDING VARIOUS POLLUTION)

THERE ARE SEPARATE AREAS WITH THE DANGER OF SUBSIDENCE AND FLOODING, POOR AIRING CONDITIONS, INVERSIONS ARE DETECTED

DISTRIBUTORS ABSORBERS

UNSTABLE

ARTERIES, BY WHICH MASS EXCHANGE OCCURS IN THE NATURAL COMPLEX

CHARACTERIZED BY THE GREATEST VOLATILITY TO NATURAL AND ANTHROPOGENIC INFLUENCES

DEVELOPMENT REGIME

MINIMIZING THE IMPACT ON THE LANDSCAPE, MEASURES TO STRENGTHEN THE SLOPES, REMEDIATION

CARRYING THE FLOWS OF MATTER AND ENERGY

CONTRIBUTE TO THE RAPID TRANSLATION OF MASS-ENERGY FLOWS FROM HIGH-ALTITUDE LANDS

WATERSHED

MORPHOTYPE STABILITY

MINIMIZATION OF IMPACT ON THE LANDSCAPE, MEASURES TO STRENGTHEN THE SLOPES, REMEDIATION, STORM DRAINAGE DEVELOPMENT

ALONG THE RIVER FROM NORTH TO SOUTH INTENSIVE USE, THE BAN ON THE CONSTRUCTION OF HIGH-POLLUTING FACILITIES ON HIGH SITES

MAINLY IN THE SOUTHERN PART OF THE CITY

THE OF AERATION FRAMEWORK FORMATION IN ORDER TO IMPROVE VENTILATION, COMBAT INVERSIONS

THE NORTHERN PART OF THE CITY - RAVINES, THE SOUTHERN PART OF THE CITY - SMALL WATERCOURSES

MEASURES TO REDUCE STAGNANT PHENOMENA

182 182 PROBLEMS OF ECO-URBAN OPTIMIZATION OF KHABAROVSK RIVERSIDE AREAS

Chapter I Section 1.6

FACTORS AND PREREQUISITES AFFECTING THE KHABAROVSK RIVERSIDE AREAS FORMATION I GROUP FACTORS

   () ..

KHABAROVSK URBAN LANDSCAPE  COMPLEXES TYPOLOGY     () ..  TABLE 1



 SELECTION CRITERIA 

  TECHNOGENIC       INDUSTRIAL AND  FACILITIES  

URBAN LANDSCAPE COMPLEXES

  ANTHROPOGENIC AND  TECHNOGENIC  

    ANTHROPOGENIC NATURAL AND   ANTROPOGENIC             GARDENS AND URBAN OPEN SPACES, CONDITIONALLY-NATRESIDENTIAL    PARKS AGRICULTURAL URAL             NATURAL AND   PREDOMINANTLY   MODIFIED MOSTLY MODIFIED MODIFIED NATURAL    ь       ь      AGRICULTURAL     AND FOREST, MEADOW,     MULTI-STOREY, SANATORIUM, SPONTANEOUSLY   MARSH AND MEAD   ONE-STOREY BUILDING FOREST PARK PROCESSED, COUNTRY   OW-SWAMP FLOODPLAIN   PLOTS, EMPTY PLOTS.      

    COMBINATION OF FUNCTION ING PROCESSES   ь  DEGREE OF CHANGE IN THE ACTIVE SURFACE ь ь  ь 

BY THE NATURE OF USE   AND THE COMBINATION OF   NATURAL FEATURES (IN NATU RAL-ANTHROPOGENIC)  

 MODIFIED     INDUSTRIAL AND   FACILITIES   LINEAR-NODE  TRANSPORT  

TOTAL CITY  

 

 

 

 

TOTAL RIVERSIDE AREAS









RATIO OF URBAN LANDSCAPE COMPLEXES IN KHABAROVSK RIVERSIDE AREAS BY DISTRICTS

     .  .      .  .

70 60 70 50 60 40 % 50 30 40 % 20 30 10 20 0 10

1

2

3

27 1 48 27

31 2 62 31

35 43 5

- 

12 48 13 12

8 62 0 8

38 43 15 38

-

13

0

15



0

-   -

     

 ь  CENTRAL PART OF THE CITY RIVERSIDE AREAS  ь 

NORTHERN PART OF THE CITY RIVERSIDE AREAS SOUTHERN PART OF THE CITY RIVERSIDE AREAS

183 183 PROBLEMS OF ECO-URBAN OPTIMIZATION OF KHABAROVSK RIVERSIDE AREAS

Chapter I Section 1.6

FACTORS AND PREREQUISITES AFFECTING THE KHABAROVSK RIVERSIDE AREAS FORMATION I GROUP FACTORS

ANALYSIS OF THE URBAN AREAS ECOLOGICAL CONDITION

KHABAROVSK URBAN LANDSCAPE COMPLEXES

THE MOST UNFAVORABLE UNFAVORABLE RELATIVELY UNFAVORABLE RELATIVELY FAVORABLE FAVORABLE

TECHNOGENIC

SURFACE WATER CONDITION

ANTHROPOGENIC AND TECHNOGENIC

GRADE III “MODERATELY POLLUTED”

ANTHROPOGENIC

GRADE IV “POLLUTED”

NATURAL-ANTHROPOGENIC

GRADE V “DIRTY”

NATURAL

GRADE VI “VERY DIRTY“

LANDSCAPE ECOLOGICAL ANALISYS

TERRITORY TYPE BY TERRITORIES ECOLOG.CONDITION

AIR QUALITY 2 MPC* 1 MPC

SOIL CONDITION

VERY HEAVILY POLLUTED

2 MPC 1 MPC

HEAVILY POLLUTED

2 MPC 1 MPC

MEDIUM AND HEAVILY POLLUTED

2 MPC 1 MPC

LOW POLLUTION

2 MPC 1 MPC

RELATIVELY CLEAN POLLUTANTS CLASS 1 POLLUTANTS CLASS 2 POLLUTANTS CLASS 3

MPC - MAXIMUM PERMISSIBLE CONCENTRATION

URBAN LANDSCAPE COMPLEXES

184

PROBLEMS OF ECO-URBAN OPTIMIZATION OF KHABAROVSK RIVERSIDE AREAS

Chapter I Section 1.6

FACTORS AND PREREQUISITES AFFECTING THE KHABAROVSK RIVERSIDE AREAS FORMATION I GROUP FACTORS

  

PROVISION OF POPULATION WITH GREEN OPEN SPACES

500

500

21%

138

82,8

19%

75

45

20%



SPACE REQUIRED IN , WITH ACCORDANCE NORM THE

%%OF THE NORMATIVE иPROVISION

POPULATION и, TH. PEOPLE . 





LIST OF OBJECTS OF GREEN OPEN SPACES  OF CITY SIGNIFICANCE  

LEVEL OF IMPROVEMENT

AREA, , HA

   

NORTHERN DISTRICT  

   и -  50-и  CENTRAL DISTRICT    «и»,  и   и и. и SOUTHERN DISTRICT   и. и 

TOTAL 

LIST OF OBJECTS OF GREEN OPEN SPACES    OF DSTRICT SIGNIFICANCE

19,87 20,29

0

23,94 29,19

+ +

9,79 103,08

0



NORTHERN DISTRICT  

  и    "и"     и     10- и  и ии и- TOTAL   CENTRAL DISTRICT     и и  и.  TOTAL  

3,48 5,02 6,06 1,03 0,37 15,96 1,05 5,45 2,41 8,91

+ +

SOUTHERN DISTRICT 

   .  и   и   .    и. 1,34  -1 TOTAL   RAILWAY DISTRICT  

2,15 2,58 1,34 0,79 6,86

200

120

6%

    /     . и.  TOTAL  

1,4 1,13 3,72 6,25

145

87

7%

186 186 PROBLEMS OF ECO-URBAN OPTIMIZATION OF KHABAROVSK RIVERSIDE AREAS

Chapter I Section 1.6

FACTORS AND PREREQUISITES AFFECTING THE KHABAROVSK RIVERSIDE AREAS FORMATION II GROUP FACTORS

ADMINISTRATIVE DISTRICTS OF KHABAROVSK

CORRESPONDENCE OF THE RA CONDITIONS TO THE RECREATIONAL USE REQUIREMENTS

EVALUATION OF THE NEED FOR ACCESS TO RIV. AREAS AND THE AVAILABILITY OF WELL-EQUIPPED RECREATIONAL AREAS

EVALUATION OF FACTORS CAUSING DISCOMFORT WHILE STAYING ON THE RIVERSIDE AREAS

THE RESULTS OF SOCIOLOGICAL SURVEY PERFORMED BY THE AUTHOR KRASNOFLOTSKY DISTRICT

KIROVSKY DISTRICT

CENTRALNY DISTRICT

ZHELEZNODOROZHNY DISTRICT

DENSITY OF POPULATION

INDUSTRIALNY DISTRICT

LEGEND THE CENTRAL EMBANKMENT IS SUFFICIENT CENTRALNY KIROVSKY INDUSTRIALNY ZELEZNODOROZNY KRASNOFLOTSKY

IN MY AREA THERE IS ACCESS TO THE RA (RIVERSIDE AREA), BUT ITS CONDITION IS UNSATISFACTORY IN MY DISTRICT THERE IS ACCESS TO THE RA AND I USE IT FOR RECREATIONAL PURPOSES IN MY AREA THERE IS ACCESS TO THE RA AND I USE IT FOR RECREATIONAL PURPOSES, DESPITE THE FACT THAT IT IS NOT LANDSCAPED

ABSENCE OF EQUIPPED DESCENTS TO WATER AREA LACK OF EQUIPPED PEDESTRIAN RECREATIONAL ZONES NEAR THE RIVER LACK OF SPORT PATHS (CYCLING, RUNNING, SKIING) OVERCROWDED ON WEEKENDS

MY AREA IS TOO FAR FROM THE RA

LOW LEVEL OF RECREATIONAL SERVICES

I WOULD LIKE TO HAVE ACCESS TO RA IN MY RESIDENTIAL AREA

CLIMATE DISCOMFORT LENGTH OF ROUTES TO LEISURE FACILITIES FROM HOUSING AND PUBLIC TRANSPORT STOPS STORAGE AREAS, WASTE DUMPS LOCATION IN RIVERSIDE AREAS

187 PROBLEMS OF ECO-URBAN OPTIMIZATION OF KHABAROVSK RIVERSIDE AREAS

Chapter I Section 1.6

FACTORS AND PREREQUISITES AFFECTING THE KHABAROVSK RIVERSIDE AREAS FORMATION II GROUP FACTORS COMPONENTS OF THE RIVERSIDE AREAS EQUIPMENT THAT COULD ATTRACT RESPONDENTS IN THE FUTURE

COMPONENTS OF THE RIVERSIDE AREAS EQUIPMENT CURRENTLY USED

COMPONENTS OF THE RIVERSIDE AREAS EQUIPMENT RESPONDERS ARE READY TO PAY TO BE ABLE TO USE

RATING OF THE COMPONENTS OF RIVERSIDE AREAS EQUIPMENT LEGEND PLAYGROUNDS FOR TEAM SPORTS OPEN AIR CONCERT HALL CLUB, MULTIMEDIA SPACES EXHIBITION MULTIMEDIA SPACES EXTREME SPORTS AREAS TRACKS FOR CYCLING, ROLLER, RUNNING, ETC. PARKS FOR CHILDREN OF ALL AGES THEME PARKS OBSERVATION PLATFORMS PATHS FOR PEDESTRIAN WALKS WITH RECREATION AREAS BEACHES WITH ARTIFICIAL SWIMMING POOLS CAFES, BARS, RESTAURANS PICNIC AND ECO-TOURISM SITES

RESPONDERS AGE

THE RESULTS OF SOCIOLOGICAL SURVEY EXHIBITION MULTIMEDIA SPACES

EXTREME REST AREAS

EXTREME REST AREAS

CLUB, MULTIMEDIA SPACES

PLAYGROUNDS FOR TEAM SPORTS

PLAYGROUNDS FOR TEAM SPORTS

PLAYGROUNDS FOR TEAM SPORTS

PARKS FOR CHILDREN OF ALL AGES

BEACHES WITH ARTIFICIAL SWIMMING POOLS OPEN AIR CONCERT HALL

EXHIBITION MULTIMEDIA SPACES

THE RESULTS OF SOCIOLOGICAL SURVEY READINESS TO VISIT PAID RECREATIONAL AND SPORTS AREAS ON THE EMBANKMENT

DOES THE CITY NEEDS A BICYCLE LANES?

YES, IN CASE OF LOW PRICE YES, IN CASE OF CONFORMITY OF THE PARK TO THE CONSUMERS’ IDEA ABOUT COMFORTABLE REST NO

HOW DOES THE RESPONDENTS GET FROM THE HOUSE TO THE RESTING PLACES ON THE RIVER BANK?

YES, IT IS NECESSARY

USING PERSONAL TRANSPORT

BY BICYCLE

NO

ON FOOT

BY PUBLIC TRANSPORT

FORMS OF SOCIAL PARTICIPATION IN RIVERSIDE AREAS DEVELOPMENT

PUBLIC DISCUSSION OF PROJECTS PLACING PROJECTS ON WEBSITES ACCOMMODATION OF INFORMATION AT PUBLIC TRANSPORT STOPS, IN PUBLIC PLACES INTRODUCTION OF A SPECIAL RUBRIC IN THE MEDIA - NEWSPAPERS, TELEVISION I DO NOT THINK IT IS NECESSARY TO INVOLVE PUBLIC IN THE DISCUSSION OF RIVERSIDE AREAS DEVELOPMENT

185 PROBLEMS OF ECO-URBAN OPTIMIZATION OF KHABAROVSK RIVERSIDE AREAS

Chapter I Section 1.6

FACTORS AND PREREQUISITES AFFECTING THE KHABAROVSK RIVERSIDE AREAS FORMATION II GROUP FACTORS THE RESULTS OF SOCIOLOGICAL SURVEY PERFORMED BY THE AUTHOR RATING OF MEASURES THAT MOTIVATE CITIZENS TO VISIT RIVERSIDE AREAS IN THE COLD SEASON

EQUIPMENT OF THE SITES WITH WINDPROOF STRUCTURES

CITY EVENTS AND CELEBRATIONS

CREATION OF COVERED HEATED PLACES FOR REST AND FOOD

CREATION OF INDOOR HEATED SPORTS GROUNDS

MESOCLIMATIC AREAS OF THE CITY

ARRANGEMENT OF SKI TRAILS

RIVERSIDE ORGANIZATION OF EXTREME WINTER SPORTS ACTIVITIES ON SHORE SLOPES

SOUTHERN CENTRAL

ORGANIZATION OF EXTREME WINTER SPORTS ACTIVITIES ON ON THE RIVER

ORIENTAL NORTHERN

ARRANGEMENT OF OPEN SPACES FOR GAME WINTER SPORTS

% OF THE FREQUENCY OF UNCOMFORTABLE CONDITIONS IN WINTER % OF THE FREQUENCY OF UNCOMFORTABLE CONDITIONS IN SUMMER WIND SPEED EXCESS

RESPONDENTS AGE GROUPS 41-60 41-50

26-40

18-25

12-17

THE RESULTS OF SOCIOLOGICAL SURVEY PERFORMED BY THE AUTHOR FACTORS AFFECTING THE AMOUNT OF TIME PEOPLE STAY BY THE RIVER

SECURITY OF STAY THE NATURE OF LEISURE BY THE RIVER CLIMATIC COMFORT CONDITIONS

DYNAMIC OF VISITING RIVERSIDE AREAS DEPENDING ON THE SEASON

AUTUMN

SPRING

WINTER

SUMMER

RESPONDERS AGE

OVER 60

SECURITY OF STAY

CLIMATIC COMFORT

THE TYPE OF LEISURE BY THE RIVER

RARELY

1 TIME A YEAR

1 TIME A MONTH

MORE THAN 1 TIME A MONTH

1 TIME A WEEK

MORE THAN 1 TIME A WEEK

NIGHT

ACCOMMODATION OF INFORMATION AT PUBLIC TRANSPORT STOPS, IN PUBLIC PLACES INTRODUCTION OF A SPECIAL RUBRIC IN THE MEDIA - NEWSPAPERS, TELEVISION

PLACING PROJECTS ON WEBSITES

PUBLIC DISCUSSION OF PROJECTS

READINESS TO VISIT PAID RECREATIONAL AND SPORTS ZONES ON THE EMBANKMENT

PICNIC AND ECO-TOURISM SITES

CAFES, BARS, RESTAURANS

BEACHES WITH ARTIFICIAL SWIMMING POOLS

PATHS FOR PEDESTRIAN WALKS WITH RECREATION AREAS

OBSERVATION PLATFORMS

THEME PARKS

PARKS FOR CHILDREN OF ALL AGES

TRACKS FOR CYCLING, ROLLER, RUNNING, ETC

EXTREME SPORTS AREAS

EXHIBITION MULTIMEDIA SPACES

CLUB, MULTIMEDIA SPACES

OPEN AIR CONCERT HALL

STORAGE AREAS, WASTE DUMPS LOCATION IN RIVERSIDE AREAS

LENGTH OF ROUTES TO LEISURE FACILITIES FROM HOUSING AND PUBLIC

CLIMATE DISCOMFORT

LOW LEVEL OF RECREATIONAL SERVICE

OVERCROWDED ON WEEKENDS

LACK OF SPORT PATHS (CYCLING, RUNNING, SKIING)

LACK OF EQUIPPED PEDESTRIAN RECREATIONAL ZONES NEAR THE RIVER

ABSENCE OF EQUIPPED ACCESS TO WATER AREA

I WOULD LIKE TO HAVE ACCESS TO RA IN MY RESIDENTIAL AREA

MY AREA IS TOO FAR FROM THE RA

IN MY AREA THERE IS ACCESS TO RA AND I USE IT FOR RECR. PURPOSES, DESPITE THE FACT THAT IT ISN’T LANDSCAPED

IN MY AREA THERE IS ACCESS TO THE RA, BUT ITS CONDITION IS UNSATISFACTORY IN MY DISTRICT THERE IS ACCESS TO THE RA AND I USE IT FOR RECREATIONAL PURPOSES

THE CENTRAL EMBANKMENT IS SUFFICIENT

ACCESS BY PUBLIC TRANSPORT

ACCESS BY BICYCLE

ACCESS ON FOOT

ACCESS USING PRIVATE TRANSPORT

STRUCTURAL BLOCKS OF SOCIOLOGICAL SURVEY

Chapter I

EVENING

DAY

MORNING

AUTUMN

SUMMER

SPRING

PLAYGROUNDS FOR TEAM SPORTS

STRUCTURAL BLOCKS OF SOCIOLOGICAL SURVEY

ADMINISTRATIVE DISTRICTS OF KHABAROVSK

Section 1.6

WINTER

STRUCTURAL BLOCKS OF SOCIOLOGICAL SURVEY

RESPONDERS AGE

188

PROBLEMS OF ECO-URBAN OPTIMIZATION OF KHABAROVSK RIVERSIDE AREAS

FACTORS AND PREREQUISITES AFFECTING THE KHABAROVSK RIVERSIDE AREAS FORMATION SOCIO-SPACIAL PARAMETERS

II GROUP FACTORS

CENTRALNY

KIROVSKY

INDUSTRIALNY

ZELEZNODOROZNY

KRASNOFLOTSKY

SOCIO- MOTIVATIONAL PARAMETERS

OVER 60

SOCIO- MOTIVATIONAL PARAMETERS

189 PROBLEMS OF ECO-URBAN OPTIMIZATION OF KHABAROVSK RIVERSIDE AREAS

Chapter I Section 1.2

FACTORS AND PREREQUISITES AFFECTING THE KHABAROVSK RIVERSIDE AREAS FORMATION III GROUP FACTORS ZONES OF MAXIMUM URBANIZATION

BY GENERAL PLAN 2006

MAIN TRANSPORT FRAMEWORK AXIS

BY GENERAL PLAN 2006

LANDSCAPE - URBAN PLANNING TYPES DEFINITION

INDUSTRIAL ZONE HIGH-DENSITY ZONE MID-DENSITY ZONE LOW-DENSITY ZONE OPEN SPACES

INCREASE OF THE INTENSITY OF URBAN IMPACT

LOCALIZATION

LANDSCAPE-PLANNING TYPE SCHEME

PLANNING SCHEME

TOPOGRAPHY TYPE

LANDSCAPE - URBAN PLANNING TYPE I

NORTH PART OF THE CITY, KIROVSKY, KRASNOFLOTSKY DISTRICTS

COMPACT DISSECTED PLANNING MODEL

HILLY TERRAIN

LANDSCAPE - URBAN PLANNING TYPE II THE HISTORICAL CENTER OF THE CITY, THE INDUSTRIALNY DISTRICT PART LOCATED ALONG THE PIONERSKAYA STREET

COMPACT RECTANGULAR PLANNING MODEL

RAVINE-HILLY TERRAIN

LANDSCAPE - URBAN PLANNING TYPE III THE SOUTH PART OF THE CITY, THE NORTHERN OUTSKIRTS OF THE CITY

LINEAR DISSECTED PLANNING SCHEME

FLAT TERRAIN

190 PROBLEMS OF ECO-URBAN OPTIMIZATION OF KHABAROVSK RIVERSIDE AREAS

Chapter I Section 1.2

FACTORS AND PREREQUISITES AFFECTING THE KHABAROVSK RIVERSIDE AREAS FORMATION III GROUP FACTORS PROBLEM BLOCKS OF THE URBAN SUBSYSTEMS

THE TENDENCY TO DEVELOP THE FLOODPLAIN PART OF THE RIVERSIDE AREA TO THE SOUTH OF THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF THE CITY

ARCHITECTURAL & URBAN PLANNING

ARCHITECTURAL & URBAN DEVELOPMENT OF RIVERSIDE AREA ONLY IN THE CENTRAL PART OF THE CITY THE TENDENCY TO DEVELOP THE FLOODPLAIN PART OF THE RIVERSIDE AREA TO THE SOUTH OF THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF THE CITY THE POLARIZATION OF THE PUBLIC CENTERS ALONG THE THE CITY LONGITUDINAL HIGHWAYS

FUNCTIONAL

RESIDENTIAL AREAS PREDOMINANCE ON THE UPPER TERRACE OF A HIGH RIVERSIDE SLOPE, THE OPEN SPACE OF WHICH DOES NOT HAVE A FUNCTIONAL IDENTITY EXCEPT SOME POINT RECREATIONAL OBJECTS. THE BUSINESS AND SOCIAL ACTIVITY CENTERS CONCENTRATION IN THE CITY CENTER THE INDUSTRIAL AND WAREHOUSE AREAS PREDOMINANCE, ALTERNATING WITH RESIDENTIAL AREAS IN THE INDUSTRIALNY DISTRICT

TRANSPORT

RAILWAYS IN THE PORTS AND INDUSTRY PROVIDE A BARRIER TO ACCESS TO THE RIVER ABSENCE OF A STABLE COMMUNICATION FRAMEWORK IN THE RIVERSIDE ZONE, EXCEPT FOR THE TERRITORY OF THE CENTRAL EMBANKMENT THE TRANSIT HIGHWAY OF THE SOUTHERN PART OF THE CITY CUTS OFF THE RIVERSIDE TERRITORY FROM THE CITY

NATURAL THE RIVERSIDE LANDSCAPE-ECOLOGICAL REGION IS DISTINGUISHED AS THE AREA WHICH LANDSCAPE CONDITIONS ARE ASSOCIATED WITH THE INFLUENCE OF THE AMUR RIVER. THE NORTHERN PART - IS CARACTERISED BY STEEP EROSION-DANGEROUS SLOPES OF HIGH TERRACES, DISMEMBERED BY RAVINES AND STREAMS THE SOUTHERN PART - IS WIDER AND MORE SLOPING, TURNS INTO A FLAT LOWLAND PLAIN - BOG, IS CARACTERISED BY A LARGE PROPORTION OF ALTERED LANDSCAPES, DISTURBED TERRITORIES

Chapter I EXISTING URBAN GREEN ZONES

EXISTING URBAN GREEN ZONES

FUNCTIONAL ZONES THAT LOST THEIR RELEVANCE

DISRUPTED AREAS

SPECIALLY PROTECTED NATURAL SPECIALLY PROTECTED N AREAS OF REGIONAL IMPORTANCE AREAS OF CITY IMPORT

INUNDATED BANKS

ABANDONED INDUSTRIAL AREAS

ASH DUMPS

WAREHOUSES

LANDFILLS

CO TE

PROBLEMS OF ECO-URBAN OPTIMIZATION OF KHABAROVSK RIVERSIDE AREAS KHABAROVSK RIVERSIDE AREAS ECO-URBAN OPTIMIZATION TERRITORIAL RESOURCES

NATURAL TANCE

STREET GREENING

RAVINES

GREEN AREAS WITH RESTRICTED AREAS

FLOODPLAINS OF SMALL WATERCOURSES

BUFFER ZONES GREENING

STEEP RIVERBANK SLOPES

191

DECREPIT HOUSING

ONTAMINATED SMALL WAERCOURSES FLOODPLAINS

SAND MINING AREAS

PORT AREAS

ABANDONED SPECIAL TERRITORIES

AREAS OF SPONTANEOUS ACCESS BY AUTO TRANSPORT

INFRASTRUCTURALLY USED AREAS

Chapter II Section 2.2

RIVERSIDE AREAS LAYOUT CONTACT ZONE

(ACCORDING TO FUNCT MINES THE BOUNDARY DEPTH OF THE CITY AN CITY HIGHWAY, HAS LIN TASK OF PROVIDING RA THE POPULATION FROM RIVERSIDE AREAS; IN-DEPTH ZONE

INCLUDES THE MOST F BETWEEN THE CONTAC ORIENTED TOWARDS M RIVERSIDE AREAS (ZON FORESHORE ZONE

(ACCORDING TO NATUR OCCUPIES THE FLOODP SLOPE, IS LIMITED BY T AND IDENTIFIED AS A ZO FOR CONSERVATION OF ACCOUNT THE RESTRIC MATIONS IN THE ZONES HAZARDS (ZONE WIDTH

THEORETICAL FOUNDATIONS OF ECO-URBAN OPTIMIZATION OF KHABAROVSK RIVERSIDE AREAS RIVERSIDE AREAS STRUCTURE

OPTIMIZATION ZONES

TIONAL-PLANNING CRITERIA) DETERY OF THE RIVERSIDE AREAS IN THE ND IS FORMED ALONG THE TRANSIT NEAR-NODAL NATURE, SOLVING THE APID TRANSPORT CONNECTION FOR M THE DEPTH OF THE CITY TO THE

RAL AND LANDSCAPE CRITERIA) PLAIN AND PART OF THE RIVERBANK THE EDGE OF THE SLOPE AND A DIKE, ONE WITH MAXIMUM REQUIREMENTS F NATURAL PROCESSES, TAKING INTO CTIONS FOR POTENTIAL TRANSFORS OF HIGHEST RISKS OF GEOLOGICAL H IS 20 - 250 M).

In-depth zone

Foreshore zone

192

FUNCTIONALLY SIGNIFICANT SPACES CT AND FORESHORE ZONES, MAINLY MOBILIZING THE RESOURCES OF THE NE WIDTH IS 40 - 1900 M);

Contact zone

Chapter II

THE ECOLOGICAL FRAMEWORK (BY NARBUDT I.E.)

FORESHORE ZONE

IN-DEPT ZONE

RIVERSIDE AREAS OF THE NORT

RIVERSIDE AREAS OF THE CENT SPECIALLY PROTECTED NATURAL TERRITORIES LANDSCAPE AND RECREATIONAL ZONES OTHER GREEN AREAS EROSION-ACTIVE ZONES DUST-ACTIVE ZONES ANTHROPOGENIC AND TECHNOGENIC ZONES

RIVERSIDE AREAS OF THE SOU FORESHORE ZONE RIVERSIDE AREA BOUNDARYCONTACT ZONE

INCREASE OF ECOLOGICAL POTENTIAL

NATURE OF THE SHORELINE (IN THE FORESHORE ZONE): 1) UNSETTLED RIVERBANK SLOPE, 2) EMBANKMENT-PIER, 3) INUNDA TYPOGRAPHY TYPE (IN THE IN-DEPTH ZONE): 4) RAVINE-HILLY, 5) RAVINE-HILLY WITH CLOSED WATERCOURSES, 6) PLAIN WITH INTERACTION OF MAIN HIGHWAY WITH THE TOPOGRAPHY TYPES: 7) ALONG THE WATERSHED PARALLEL TO THE RIVER, 8) AL CHARACTER OF FUNCTIONAL ZONES INTEGRATION TO THE FORESHORE ZONE: 10) DISPERSE TWO-LEVEL, 11)TWO-LEVEL: CON PLANNING SCHEME IN IN-DEPTH ZONE: 13)COMPACT SLOPE, 14) COMPACT RECTANGULAR 15) LINEAR; THE NATURE OF THE DEVELOPMENT OF THE FUNCTIONS OF THE SOCIAL CENTER (IN THE CONTACT ZONE): 16) NODAL, 17) GR

* THE SIZE IS GIVEN FROM THE SHORELINE TO THE CONTACT ZONE, IN PARENTHESES IS THE AVERAGE VALUE OVER THE WHOL

THEORETICAL FOUNDATIONS OF ECO-URBAN OPTIMIZATION OF KHABAROVSK RIVERSIDE AREAS

E RIVERSIDE AREAS’ ZONES OF TRANSFORMATION STRUCTURE THEORETICAL MODELING

TH

ANTHROPOGENIC AND TECHNOGENIC ZONES (GENERAL PLAN 2006)

CONTACT ZONE

THERN PART OF THE CITY

TRAL PART OF THE CITY

INDUSTRIAL ZONE HIGH-DENSITY ZONE MID-DENSITY ZONE LOW-DENSITY ZONE OPEN SPACES

UTHERN PART OF THE CITY FORESHORE ZONE RIVERSIDE AREA BOUNDARY CONTACT ZONE

INCREASE OF THE INTENSITY OF URBAN IMPACT

ATED AREA, DAM; H OPEN WATERCOURSES; LONG THE WATERSHED PERPENDICULAR TO THE RIVER, 9) ON A DAM WITH THE INTERSECTION OF SMALL WATERCOURSES; NTINUOUS LONGITUDINAL, LINEAR-NODE, 12) DISPERSED SOLID;

ROUP, 18) LINEAR.

LE AREA

Chapter II

TH NATURAL AREAS

FORESHORE ZONE

IN-DEPT ZONE

RIVERSIDE AREAS OF THE NOR

RIVERSIDE AREAS OF THE CEN

RIVERSIDE AREAS OF THE SOU

NATURE OF THE SHORELINE (IN THE FORESHORE ZONE): 1) UNSETTLED RIVERBANK SLOPE, 2) EMBANKMENT-PIER, 3) INUND TYPOGRAPHY TYPE (IN THE IN-DEPTH ZONE): 4) RAVINE-HILLY, 5) RAVINE-HILLY WITH CLOSED WATERCOURSES, 6) PLAIN WIT INTERACTION OF MAIN HIGHWAY WITH THE TOPOGRAPHY TYPES: 7) ALONG THE WATERSHED PARALLEL TO THE RIVER, 8) AL CHARACTER OF FUNCTIONAL ZONES INTEGRATION TO THE FORESHORE ZONE: 10) DISPERSE TWO-LEVEL, 11)TWO-LEVEL: CON PLANNING SCHEME IN IN-DEPTH ZONE: 13)COMPACT SLOPE, 14) COMPACT RECTANGULAR 15) LINEAR; THE NATURE OF THE DEVELOPMENT OF THE FUNCTIONS OF THE SOCIAL CENTER (IN THE CONTACT ZONE): 16) NODAL, 17) GR

* THE SIZE IS GIVEN FROM THE SHORELINE TO THE CONTACT ZONE, IN PARENTHESES IS THE AVERAGE VALUE OVER THE WHOL

THEORETICAL FOUNDATIONS OF ECO-URBAN OPTIMIZATION OF KHABAROVSK RIVERSIDE AREAS

HE RIVERSIDE AREAS’ ZONES OF TRANSFORMATION STRUCTURE THEORETICAL MODELING

TH E

CONTACT ZONE

URBAN AREAS

RTHERN PART OF THE CITY

NTRAL PART OF THE CITY

DATED AREA, DAM; TH OPEN WATERCOURSES; LONG THE WATERSHED PERPENDICULAR TO THE RIVER, 9) ON A DAM WITH THE INTERSECTION OF SMALL WATERCOURSES; NTINUOUS LONGITUDINAL, LINEAR-NODE, 12) DISPERSED SOLID;

ROUP, 18) LINEAR.

LE AREA

194

UTHERN PART OF THE CITY

Chapter II Section 2.3.1

METHODS OF KHABAROVSK RIVERSIDE AREAS ECO-URB ECOLOGICAL RESTRUCTURING METHOD a system of prioritized natural components of the landscape formation, based on the restoration of the lost fragments of natural environment and functionally justified substitution of anthropogenic and technogenic components with the aim of an ecological framework creation.

BY FUNCTION IN THE ECOLOGICAL FRAMEWORK

COMMUNICATION ELEMENTS

NODAL ELEMENTS

BUFFER ELEMENTS

BY ECOLOGICAL FUNCTION

ENVIRONMENT-FORMING

ENVIRONMENT-STABILIZING

VULNERABLE

BY DEGREEOF NATURALNESS

NATURAL-LIKE

NATURAL-ANTROPOGENIC

ARTIFICIAL

DEPENDING ON THE MOTIVATION OF INDIVIDUAL STAY

MOVEMENT ALONG THE RIVER

STAY IN RECREATIONAL AREAS

DIRECTED MOVEMENT RIVER-CITY

THEORETICAL FOUNDATIONS OF ECO-URBAN OPTIMIZATION OF KHABAROVSK RIVERSIDE AREAS

BAN OPTIMIZATION

ECO-OASIS BASED ON NATURAL AREAS

ECO-OASIS - REGENERATION OF POST-INDUSTRIAL AREAS

ECO-OASIS - REGENERATION OF POST-INDUSTRIAL AREAS

ECO-CORRIDORS FUTURE DEVELOPMENT

EXISTING URBAN GREENING

BUFFER SPACE

CONSERVED INDUSTRIAL FACILITIES

195

ECO-OASIS - REGENERATION OF POST-INDUSTRIAL AREAS

Chapter II Chapter

II

THEORETICAL FOUNDATIONS OF ECO-URBAN OPTIMIZATION OF KHABAROVSK RIVERSIDE AREAS

METHODS OF KHABAROVSK RIVERSIDE AREAS ECO-URBA

Section 2.2

SOCIAL ADAPTATION METHOD creating a system of spaces responding to the structure of current public needs and the diversity of motivations of different age groups, at any time of the year.

BY PERIOD OF USE

DEPENDING ON RESISTANCE ON THE WEATHER CONDITIONS

SEASONAL-USE

OPEN

BY THE TYPE OF THE RECREATIONAL FUNCTION

ACTIVE RECREATION

BY DEGREE OF PRIVACY

PUBLIC USE

ALL-SEASONAL USE

USING MEANS SMOOTHING DISCOMFORT

SEMI-CLOSED

PASSIVE RECREATION

COMMUNITY USE

SEASONALLY TRANSFORMABLE FUNCTION

CLOSED

EDUCATIONAL/ PERFOMANCE

PRIVATE USE

THEORETICAL FOUNDATIONS OF ECO-URBAN OPTIMIZATION OF KHABAROVSK RIVERSIDE AREAS

AN OPTIMIZATION

PUBLIC ACCESS FROM REMOTE PARTS OF THE CITY

PUBLIC ACCESS FROM REMOTE PARTS OF THE CITY

MAIN PEDESTRIAN ACCESS ROUTES

197

PEDESTRIAN ACCESS THROUGH PERMEABILE RESIDENTIAL

RESIDENTIAL DISTRICTS SEASONAL USE FACILITIES

ZONES OF HIGH DENSITY DEVELOPMENT CITY HIGHWAYS

ALL-SEASON USE SERVICE AND RECREATION FACILITIES

FORESHORE KHABAROVSK CITY BOUNDARY

FORESHORE IMPROVEMENT & COMMUNICATION FRAMEWORK

Chapter II II Chapter

THEORETICAL FOUNDATIONS OF ECO-URBAN OPTIMIZATION OF KHABAROVSK RIVERSIDE AREAS

METHODS OF KHABAROVSK RIVERSIDE AREAS ECO-URBAN

Section 2.3.3

CURRE MENTPART O

CENTE COMM ACTIVI

FORMATION OF COMMUNICATION NETWORK AND ANCHORED POINTS OF DEVELOPMENT

BY ZONE OF DEVELOPMENT

BY STRATEGY OF ANTROPOGENIC & NATURAL ENVIRONMENT INTERACTION

FILLING OF THE LOTS DEFINED AS A RESULT OF THE FORMATION OF PUBLIC SPACES STRUCTURE

ZONES COMM ACTIVI

POSTINDUSTRIAL ZONE

RESIDENTIAL ZONE

NATURAL ZONE

ECOLOGICAL FRAMEWORK FORMATION

MUTUAL INTEGRATION

COMMUNICATION FRAMEWORK FORMATION

CUMULATIVE RECOUPMENT METHOD

FORM SPACE THE R

ZONES COMM ACTIVI

gradual development of natural infrastructure in the area, following a model that ensures recoupment at each individual stage of project implementation.

RESID

THEORETICAL FOUNDATIONS OF ECO-URBAN OPTIMIZATION OF KHABAROVSK RIVERSIDE AREAS

N OPTIMIZATION

ENT INVESTT-ATTRACTIVE OF THE CITY

ERS OF BUSINESS, MERCIAL, PUBLIC ITY

199

S OF BUSINESS, MERCIAL, PUBLIC ITY

MATION OF PUBLIC ES TOWARDS RIVER

S OF BUSINESS, MERCIAL, PUBLIC ITY

DENTIAL ZONES

CURRENT INVESTMENT-ATTRACTIVE PART OF THE CITY CITY HIGHWAYS FORESHORE KHABAROVSK CITY BOUNDARY

196

Chapter II

THEORETICAL FOUNDATIONS OF ECO-URBAN OPTIMIZATION OF KHABAROVSK RIVERSIDE AREAS ECOLOGICAL RESTRUCTURING METHOD

Section 2.3.1 ZONE OF METHOD APPLICATION

CASE STUDY

MODEL DEFINITION

MODEL OF THE FORMATION OF IN-DEPTH GREEN WATER CONNECTIONS SYSTEM

BOGOTA, GREEN MASTER PLAN OF THE CITY

The model of in-depth green water connections system formation with the nodal completion in the foreshore zone on the basis of the rehabilitation of small watercourses and hollow spaces.

MODEL OF THE EFFECTIVE GREEN SPACES FORMATION ON THE AREAS WITH A COMPLEX FLOOD REGIME

SEOUL, YEOUIDO RIVERSIDE PARK, COMPETITION PROJECT

The model of the effective green spaces formation on the foreshore areas with a complex flood regime illustrates the approach based on the principle of ecological positivity with the priority of natural processes preservation.

MODEL OF AN ECOLOGICAL FRAMEWORK FORMATION BASING ON THE POSTINDUSTRIAL SPACES DEVELOPMENT

HELSINKI, PARK-JEWEL IN LANSATAMANPUISTO DISTRICT

The model is based on the fact that the identification of the structure of green public spaces becomes a decisive factor in the formation of the new planning structure of the postindustrial areas and it’s stable links with the city.

198

Chapter II

THEORETICAL FOUNDATIONS OF ECO-URBAN OPTIMIZATION OF KHABAROVSK RIVERSIDE AREAS

Section 2.3.2 ZONE OF APPLICATION

SOCIAL ADAPTATION METHOD MODEL DEFINITION

CASE STUDY

MODEL OF FUNCTIONALLY-RICH COMMUNICATION SPACE FORMING

BOGOTA, GREEN MASTER PLAN

Corridor of city importance provides access to the population from nodal areas in contact zone to the foreshore zone.

These territories are formed on the principle of functional diversity that ensures the attractiveness of the corridor, on the one hand and partial redistribution of recreational load from the foreshore zone, in depth of the city, on the other hand.

SONGDO INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS DISTRICT S.KOREA

MODEL OF OF A COMMUNICATION SPACE, COMBINED WITH A COLLECTIVE SPACE FORMING

ARABIANRANTA RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT, HELSINKI

SAINT DENIS FRANCE, ECOLOGICAL DISTRICT

Communication of internal importance for access to riverside areas from adjacent residential areas.

It can be formed by integration of the collective space to the ecological framework.

These are non-transport ecological corridors that include recreational areas for low-mobility population groups with effective screening of transit slow mobility flows, thus, provided effective shielding, the communication space can play the role of a collective space, forming a residential recreational zone.

200

Chapter II

THEORETICAL FOUNDATIONS OF ECO-URBAN OPTIMIZATION OF KHABAROVSK RIVERSIDE AREAS

Section 2.3.1 ZONE OF METHOD APPLICATION

ECOLOGICAL RESTRUCTURING METHOD CASE STUDY

MODEL DEFINITION

MODEL OF AN ECOLOGICAL FRAMEWORK CONSTRUCTION IN THE STRUCTURE OF COMPLEX RE-PROFILED AREAS

TORONTO CITY BEACH

The model is based on creating a program for stage-by-stage development. A strategy that assumes as a priority of spatial structure of the territory the objectives of system of green spaces creation for general use adequate to the needs of different population groups

VANCOUVER, RESIDENTIAL AREA FALSE CREEK

MODEL OF ENVIRONMENTAL FRAMEWORK COMPONENTS INTEGRATION WITH BUSINESS, RESIDENTIAL, RECREATIONAL FUNCTIONS

ARABIANRANTA RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT, HELSINKI

Integration of the ecological framework and adjacent residential development allows the formation of a buffer space that includes a variety of recreational functions and regulates the direct pressure to components of a nature.

MODEL OF COMMERCIAL PUBLIC SERVICES INCLUSION IN THE STRUCTURE OF THE ECOLOGICAL FRAMEWORK COMPONENT

PARIS PARK LA VILLETTE

The model assumes the adaptation of natural areas to recreational use with the transition from spontaneous destructive use to an organized, preserving natural processes, by creating a communication framework with a service system based on the principles of self-sufficiency, expanding the set of types of public spaces for different age groups with the inclusion of commercial use.

THEORETICAL FOUNDATIONS OF ECO-URBAN OPTIMIZATION OF KHABAROVSK RIVERSIDE AREAS

Chapter II Section 2.4

INTEGRATED MODEL FOR ECO-URBAN OPTIMIZATION OF RIVERSIDE AREAS OF KHABAROVSK

ECOLOGICAL RESTRUCTURING METHOD (scheme 1)

SOCIAL ADAPTATION METHOD (scheme 2)

CUMULATIVE RECOUPMENT METHOD (scheme 3)

FUNCTIONAL OPTIMIZATION (scheme 4)

LEGEND (scheme 1)

LEGEND (scheme 2)

ECO-OASISES: ECO-OASISES: BASED ON NATURAL TERRITORIES

PUBLIC ACCESS FROM REMOTE PARTS OF THE CITY

REGENERATION OF POSTIND.TERRITORIES

MAIN PEDESTRIAN ACCESS ROUTES

BUFFER SPACE ECO-CORRIDORS PERSPECTIVE ECO-CORRIDORS DEVELOPMENT INTO THE DEPTH OF THE CITY RETAINED INDUSTRIAL AREAS EXISTING URBAN GREEN ZONES

PUBLIC-TRANSPORT NODES PEDESTRIAN ACCESS THROUGH PERMEABILE RESIDENTIAL AREA FORESHORE IMPROVEMENT & COMMUNICATION FRAMEWORK DEVELOPMENT ALL-SEASON USE SERVICE AND RECREATION FACILITIES SEASONAL USE FACILITIES RESIDENTIAL DISTRICTS ZONES OF HIGH DENSITY DEVELOPMENT

LEGEND (scheme 3)

LEGEND (scheme 4)

CURRENT INVESTMENT-ATTRACTIVE PART OF THE CITY INVESTMENT ZONES OF RECONSTRUCTION (GENERAL PLAN 2006) ZONES OF BUSINESS, COMMERCIAL, PUBLIC ACTIVITY

CONTACT ZONE

ZONES OF RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT RECREATIONAL ZONES CENTERS OF BUSINESS, COMMERCIAL, PUBLIC ACTIVITY CENTERS OF RECREATIONAL ACTIVITY FORMATION OF PUBLIC SPACES TOWARDS THE RIVER RECREATIONAL ZONES ALONG THE RIVER

NODE CENTERS IN THE CONTACT ZONE IN-DEEPTH ZONE FORESHORE ZONE

RESIDENTIAL DISTRICTS PUBLIC CENTERS OF DISTRICTS

202 THEORETICAL FOUNDATIONS OF ECO-URBAN OPTIMIZATION OF KHABAROVSK RIVERSIDE AREAS

Chapter II Section 2.5

A TYPOLOGY OF ECOLOGICAL FRAMEWORK COMPONENTS OF KHABAROVSK CITY

202

BY FUNCTION IN THE ECOLOGICAL FRAMEWORK COMMUNICATION ELEMENTS

BUFFER ELEMENTS

NODAL ELEMENTS

BY THE NATURE OF INTERACTION WITH ENVIRONMENT ENVIRONMENT-FORMING

ENVIRONMENT-STABILIZING

VULNERABLE

BY DEGREE OF NATURALNESS NATURE-LIKE

NATURAL-ANTHROPOGENIC

ARTIFICIAL

DEPENDING ON THE MOTIVATION OF INDIVIDUAL STAY MOVEMENT ALONG THE RIVER

STAY IN RECREATIONAL AREAS

DIRECTED MOVEMENT RIVER-CITY

DEPENDING ON THE ZONES OF BOUNDARY SPACES WITH WATER

WITH HOUSES

WITH COMMUNITY CENTER

WITH INDUSTRIAL ZONE

WITH URBAN HIGHWAY

204

Chapter III Section 3.2

DIRECTIONS AND MECHANISMS FOR THE IMPLEMENTATION OF ECO-URBAN OPTIMIZATION OF KHABAROVSK RIVERSIDE AREAS THE STRATEGY OF KHABAROVSK ECOLOGICAL FRAMEWORK DEVELOPMENT

FIRST STAGE : THE DISPERSED FORMATION OF “ECO-OASES” ON THE RIVERSIDE TERRITORIES IS PROPOSED AS THE KEY ELEMENTS OF THE CITY ECOLOGICAL FRAMEWORK.

Chapter III Section 3.2

DIRECTIONS AND MECHANISMS FOR THE IMPLEMENTATION OF ECO-URBAN OPTIMIZATION OF KHABAROVSK RIVERSIDE AREAS THE STRATEGY OF KHABAROVSK ECOLOGICAL FRAMEWORK FORMING

3.3       TABLE 3. LIST OF THE OPEN SPACES PROPOSED TO FORM THE NODAL ELEMENTS OF THE ECOLOGICAL FRAMEWORK AT THE FIRST STAGE

DISTRICT

  



Ь  TERRITORIAL RESOURCES  FOR ECO-OASIS FORMATION



 OF OBJECTS SITUATED ON THE AREA AREA  ECO-OASIS OF TRANSFORMATION

 RA OF SOUTHERN PART

RAЬ OF CENTRAL PART OF THE CITY

 RA OF NORTHTERN PART OF THE CITY





UNDEVELOPED  RAVINE AREAS SPECIALLY PROTECTED NATURAL   HA AREAS  TECHNOGENICALLY DESTURBED AREA

 FOREST PARK “VORONEZSKY“  NAVY OFFICERS HOUSE PARK   GREEN AREAS OF RESTRICTED  ACCESS TRANSFERRED TO THE CITY 

 UNDEVELOPED RAVINE / INFRAUSED  AREAS

HA 

  UNDEVELOPED AREA ADJACENT TO THE  AMUR RIVER BRIDGE  SMALL WATERCOURSE FLOODPLAIN RAVINE AREA 

HA 

 THE PARK ZONE OF THE MILITARY SANATO   RIUM “BOGDANOVKA” PARK ZONE IN THE DISTRICT OF THE ALCO HOL FACTORY     GREEN GROVE IN THE TOPOGRAPHIC  COLLEGE AREA  





   



UNDEVELOPED AREAS  SPECIALLY PROTECTED NATURAL  AREAS  PARK AREA ASSIGNED





INDUSTRIAL AREAS  BUFFER ZONE GREEN AREA  SPECIALLY PROTECTED NATURAL AREAS

 HA

 Ь









TECHNOGENICALLY DESTURBED AREA   CARGO PORT AREA  TRANSPORT INFRASTRUCTURE AREAS  BUFFER ZONE GREEN AREA  UNDEVELOPED RAVINE AREAS

      UNDEVELOPED AREAS  DESTURBED  TECHNOGENICALLY AREA TRANSPORT INFRASTRUCTURE AREAS    

TECHNOGENICALLY  DESTURBED AREA

 INDUSTRIAL AREA   TECHNOGENICALLY DESTURBED AREA 

 HA

  BUILDABLE

    GREENERY PAVED

 ENVIRONMENT-FORMING   





 ENVIRONMENT-FORMING 





 ENVIRONMENT-FORMING







ЬЬ FACTORY “DALDISEL“ PARK OF FACTORY “DALDISEL“ ЬЬ

 ENVIRONMENT-STABILISING  



 ENVIRONMENT-STABILISING



    CARGO PORT AREA  TREATMENT FACILITIES AREA LANDSLIDE RIVERSIDE SLOPES   PERSPECTIVE  AQUAPARK AREA (10 HA) 

Ь 

 HA

  PROPOSED ECO-OASIS TYPE  

     UNUSED FLOODED FORESHORE AREA  SITUATED BETWEEN PIONERSKAYA STREET AND AQUATORY       

HA 

ASH   TWO DUMPS 50% OF WHICH IS SITU ATED IN THE SANITARY PROTECTIVE ZONE

 HA

NON-FUNCTIONING CEMENT-PROCESSING  PLANT    CONTIGUOUS TECHNOGENICALLY DES   TURBED FORESHORE AREA

















 ENVIRONMENT-FORMING 





ENVIRONMENT-STABILISING 







ENVIRONMENT-STABILISING 







206

DIRECTIONS AND MECHANISMS FOR THE IMPLEMENTATION OF ECO-URBAN OPTIMIZATION OF KHABAROVSK RIVERSIDE AREAS

Chapter III Section 3.2

THE STRATEGY OF KHABAROVSK ECOLOGICAL FRAMEWORK DEVELOPMENT

SECOND STAGE : TRANSITION FROM A HOMOGENEOUSLY DISPERSED MODEL TO A SINGLE SYSTEM OF AN ECOLOGICAL FRAMEWORK BY MEANS OF OPTIMIZATION OF COMMUNICATION ELEMENTS OF THE FRAMEWORK — ECO-CORRIDORS.

LEGEND ECO-CORIDORS TOWARDS THE RIVER SEQUENCE NUMBER SEE DESCRIPTION

NATURAL-BASED ECO-CORIDORS

LONGITUDINAL ECO-CORIDORS TYPE 1 TYPE 2 TYPE 3

ECO-CORIDORS BASED ON POST-INDUSTRIAL ZONES REGENERATION PRESERVED INDUSTRIAL ZONES

207 DIRECTIONS AND MECHANISMS FOR THE IMPLEMENTATION OF ECO-URBAN OPTIMIZATION OF KHABAROVSK RIVERSIDE AREAS

Chapter III Section 3.2

THE STRATEGY OF KHABAROVSK ECOLOGICAL FRAMEWORK FORMING

DISTRICT

TABLE 4. LIST OF THE OPEN SPACES PROPOSED TO FORM THE COMMUNICATIONAL ELEMENTS OF THE ECOLOGICAL FRAMEWORK AT THE SECOND STAGE: ECO-CORRIDORS IN THE DIRECTION CITY-RIVER  

RAЬ OF CENTRAL PART OF THE CITY

RA OF NORTHTERN PART OF THE CITY

 

  

 Ь CORRIDOR   TERRITORIAL RESOURCES FOR OBJECTS SITUATED ON THE CON DEVELOP  ECO-CORRIDOR FORMATION NECTED AREAS OF TRANSFORMATION   DEPTH  MENT 



 UNDEVELOPED AREA WITH OPEN   WATERCOURSE 



TECHNOGENICALLY DESTURBED  AREA, ASSIGNED PARK AREA 





ZONE OF NEW REAL ESTATE RESI DENTIAL DEVELOPMENT WITH DEM OLITION AND PARTIALLY RECON STRUCTION OF DILAPIDATED FUND





 



INDUSTRIAL ZONE, RAILWAY



  EXISTING RECREATIONAL AREA 



 





EXISTING RECREATIONAL AREA 



SPACE   WITH  TRANSPORT INEFFICIENTLY ADJACENT AREAS USEDЬ

           

 





ZONE NEW REALЬ ESTATE RESI OF  DENTIAL DEVELOPMENT WITH DEM    OLITION OF DILAPIDATED FUND









RA OF SOUTHERN PART 





     CORRIDOR – IS A  CONNECTION OF  THE   OF SERAPHIM  SAROSSKY TEMPLE PARK,    SANITARY ZONE AND TOPOGRAPHIC TECH   NICAL SCHOOL GREEN AREA, PASSING IN  DIFFERENT PLANES WITH RAILWAY TRACKS   THE HOLLOW SPACE  WITH A TEMPORARY THAT  LEADS   WATERCOURSE TO THE WA  TER AREA IN THE  VICINITY OF THE STREET. KAVALERIYSKAYA, SITUATED IN THE    STRUCTURE RESIDENTIAL OF LOW-RISE  AREA  Ь OFTHE   CONNECTION OIL REFINERY WITH   THE RIVERSIDE TERRITORY THROUGH THE AERATION CORRIDOR 





  ENVIRONMENT-STABILIZING ECO-CORRIDOR IN  OF  CONDITIONS RECONSTRUCTION    

ENVIRONMENT-STABILIZING ECO-CORRIDOR     INTEGRATED WITH THE PUBLIC SPACES OF THE   RESIDENTIAL ZONE



  IN ENVIRONMENT-STABILIZING ECO-CORRIDOR CONDITIONS OF RECONSTRUCTION  

  Ь  ENVIRONMENT-STABILIZING ECO-CORRIDOR AMURSKY BOULEVARD, A HOLLOW SPACE  TRANSPORT ZONE    WITH WITH A DEVELOPED SYSTEM OF GARDEN    ING 

 Ь  AMURSKY A HOLLOW  SPACE BOULEVARD,  WITH A DEVELOPED SYSTEM OF GARDEN    ING     USSURIYSKY BOULEVARD, A HOLLOW  Ь SPACE WITH A DEVELOPED SYSTEM OF   Ь  GARDENING 



 ENVIRONMENT-STABILIZING ECO-CORRIDOR WITH TRANSPORT ZONE     ENVIRONMENT-STABILIZING ECO-CORRIDOR WITH TRANSPORT ZONE  

  ENVIRONMENT-STABILIZING ECO-CORRIDOR       INTEGRATED A HOLLOW SPACE WITH A TEMPORARY WAWITH THE PUBLIC SPACES OF THE       TERCOURSE IN THE VICINITY OF YUNOSTI RESIDENTIAL ZONE  STREET 

FLEGONTOV STREET, CONNECTING THE      PARK OF GAGARIN AND THE RECREATION   AL AND SPORTS ZONE UNDER CONSTRUC TION ON THE RIVER  BANK  









ON   ECOCORRIDOR TECHNOGENICALLY DISTURBED TERRITORIES   IN THE STRUCTURE OF RESIDENTIAL     ZONE 







ENVIRONMENT-FORMING ECO-CORRIDOR IN      THE TERRITORY ADJACENT TO THE BRIDGE, TEGRATED WITH THE PUBLIC SPACES OF THE        THE WATERCOURSE IN THE RAVINE ALONG RESIDENTIAL ZONE  Ь THE OSIPOVKA STREET.

  

Ь  INTRAQUARTER TRANSPORTLESS   SPACE WITH AN OPEN WATER COURSE

 ON    ECOCORRIDOR TECHNOGEN DISTURBED   ICALLY TERRITORIES   ESTATE  OF NEW REAL RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT 

 ECO-CORRIDOR WIDTH, M





ZONE NEW REALЬ ESTATE RESI OF  DENTIAL DEVELOPMENT WITH DEM    OLITION OF DILAPIDATED FUND

Ь ECO-CORRIDOR FUNCTIONAL TYPE

Ь TECHNOLOGICALLY DISTURBED AREA AD   JACENT  TO THE INDUSTRIAL STREET

  ENVIRONMENT-STABILIZING ECO-CORRIDOR     INTEGRATED WITH THE PUBLIC SPACES OF THE   RESIDENTIAL ZONE    

ENVIRONMENT-STABILIZING ECO-CORRIDOR     INTEGRATED WITH THE PUBLIC SPACES OF THE   RESIDENTIAL ZONE

    ENVIRONMENT-STABILIZING ECO-CORRIDOR     INTEGRATED WITH THE PUBLIC SPACES OF THE      A HOLLOW SPACE WITH A SMALL WATER- RESIDENTIAL ZONE   COURSE   



  ACCESS TO THE RIVER FROM THE CENTER  OF A RESIDENTIAL AREA 

ENVIRONMENT-STABILIZING ECO-CORRIDOR     INTEGRATED WITH THE PUBLIC SPACES OF THE   RESIDENTIAL ZONE





208

Chapter III Section 3.2

DIRECTIONS AND MECHANISMS FOR THE IMPLEMENTATION OF ECO-URBAN OPTIMIZATION OF KHABAROVSK RIVERSIDE AREAS THE STRATEGY OF KHABAROVSK ECOLOGICAL FRAMEWORK FORMING

TABLE 5. LIST OF THE OPEN SPACES PROPOSED TO FORM THE COMMUNICATIONAL ELEMENTS OF THE ECO     DIRECTION.   LOGICAL FRAMEWORK AT THE SECOND STAGE: ECO-CORRIDORS IN THE LONGITUDINAL

  ECO-CORIDOR 

TYPE

Ь TERRITORIAL RESOURCES FOR  ECO-CORRIDOR FORMATION

ECO-CORIDOR Ь EXTENTION

  ECO-CORRIDOR FUNCTIONAL TYPE Ь 

ECO-CORRIDOR WIDTH, M   TYPE 1

 ANTHROPOGENICALLY MODIFIED RIVERSIDE  AREAS

TYPE 2 

RIVERSIDE AREAS WITH ACTIVE FORMS OF  RELIEF PREDONINANCE Ь

TYPE 3 

 RIVERSIDE AREAS IN CONDITIONS OF COM PLEX FLOOD REGIME 





   ENVIRONMENT-FORMING  ENVIRONMENT-FORMING 

 

 

ENVIRONMENT-STABILIZING

  

ENVIRONMENT-STABILIZING

  

ENVIRONMENT-STABILIZING



217 DIRECTIONS AND MECHANISMS FOR THE IMPLEMENTATION OF ECO-URBAN OPTIMIZATION OF KHABAROVSK RIVERSIDE AREAS

Chapter III Section 3.2

THE STRATEGY OF KHABAROVSK ECOLOGICAL FRAMEWORK FORMING HYPOTHETICAL AERATION FRAMEWORK MODEL FACTORS AFFECTING THE AERATION REGIME

WIND ROSE

WINTER

SUMMER

RA OF THE NORTHERN PART OF THE CITY

The highest frequency of uncomfortable conditions in the winter period due to the significant wind loads.

Especially in the coastal zone, where the average temperature is 1.5 to 1.0 degrees below the city average.

BREEZE CIRCULATION

DAY

RA OF THE CENTRAL PART OF THE CITY AERATION REGIME CONDITIONS

NIGHT

RA OF CENTRAL PART OF THE CITY

In the historical center, the frequency of uncomfortable conditions is the smallest (40-55%) due to the presence of aeration framework formed by urban boulevards.

The width of the boulevards is 110-140m The size of the buildable area between the boulevards is 600m10-140m

size of the buildable area between

The greatest frequency of discomfort conditions is observed in the summer (40-75%) due to urban heat island effect in high density areas.

At the same time, the presence of a considerable number of industrial enterprises causes environmental discomfort.

In the peripheral part, significant wind force excess is detected.

OBJECTIVES OF AERATION REGIME REGULATION Wind speed decrease in the riverside area

Wind speed decrease mainly in the foreshore zone Providing aeration of in-depth zone in summer

Wind speed decrease mainly in the peryphery area Providing aeration of in-depth zone in summer

STRUCTURE OF AERATION CORRIDORS PROPOSAL

Oil refinery plant II polution class

Southern Industrial Area III-IV polution class

Stationary sources of pollution in the river influence zone

Night breeze circulation with possible harmful emissions transfer

Zones where wind protection measures are required

Aeration corridors, “sucking” the air in the city depths

209 DIRECTIONS AND MECHANISMS FOR THE IMPLEMENTATION OF ECO-URBAN OPTIMIZATION OF KHABAROVSK RIVERSIDE AREAS

Chapter III Section 3.2

RIVERSIDE AREAS OPTIMAL DEVELOPMENT SCENARIOS

CITY NORTHERN PART RIVERSIDE AREAS

CITY CENTRAL PART RIVERSIDE AREAS

DEVELOPMENT SCENARIO FOR THE RIVERSIDE AREAS WITH ACTIVE FORMS OF RELIEF PREDOMINANCE

RIVERSIDE AREAS IN CONDITIONS OF HIGH RECREATIONAL LOADS DEVELOPMENT SCENARIO

NATURAL ECOSYSTEMS IN SLOPING AREAS CONSERVATION AND RECUPERATION CONCEPT

POSTINDUSTRIAL AREAS REGENERATION WITH PRESERVATION OF “MEMORY OF A PLACE” CONCEPT

NATURAL AND RECREATIONAL FRAMEWORK CONSTRUCTION CONCEPT

RE-DEVELOPMENT BASED ON THE I NATURAL COMPONENTS NTRODUCTION AND THE ENERGY SAVING TECHNIQUES USE CONCEPT

ECOLOGICAL FRAMEWORK COMPONENTS INTEGRATING INTO THE STRUCTURE OF RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT CONCEPT

ENVIRONMENTAL FRAMEWORK COMPONENTS AND COMMERCIAL SERVICE FUNCTIONS INTEGRATION CONCEPT

CITY SOUTHERN PART RIVERSIDE AREAS RIVERSIDE AREAS DEVELOPMENT IN CONDITIONS OF ANTHROPOGENIC AND TECHNOGENIC LANDSCAPES REGENERATION ECOLOGICAL FRAMEWORK CONSTRUCTING IN THE STRUCTURE OF TRANSFORMED POST-INDUSTRIAL SPACES RIVERSIDE AREAS REGENERATION ON THE AREAS WITH COMPLEX FLOOD REGIME

ECOLOGICAL RESTRUCTURING METHOD GULLY LANDS ARRANGEMENT WITH THE ECO-CORRIDORS FORMATION

FORMATION OF FUNCTIONALLY FILLED SPACES IN THE STRUCTURE OF ECO-CORRIDORS

NATURAL PROCESSES IN THE FORESHORE ZONE PRESERVATION AND STIMULATION

SLOPE AREAS GEOSTABILITY INCREASING

TRANSPORT COMMUNICATION SPACES RENATURALIZATION

NATURAL AREAS REVITALIZATION ALONG WITH NATURAL-ANTHROPOGENIC COMPLEXES FORMATION

BUFFER ZONES FORMATION AND IMPROVEMENT

SMALL WATERCOURSES REHABILITATION AS THE NEW ECO-CORRIDORS ECOLOGICAL FRAMEWORK CONSTRUCTION ON THE POSTINDUSTRIAL TERRITORIES

TRANSPORT SPACES BUFFER SCREENING

area between the boule

area between

ECO-OASIS

ECO-CORRIDORS

ARTIFICIAL, RENATURALISED

TRANSVERSE TRANSPORT

NATURAL-BASED

TRANSVERSE NON-TRANSP.

ANTHROPOGENIC AND TECHNOGENIC ZONE BUFFER AREA TRANSPORT STREETS REGENERATED ZONE

ENVIRONMENT-FORMING AREA

LONGITUDINAL NON-TRANSP.

BUILDABLE AREA

NON-TRANSPORT STREETS

3D SCHEME LEGEND TRANSPORT ECO-CORRIDOR

ECO-OASIS

NON-TRANSPORT ECO-COR-

LANDSCAPE MORPHOLOGY KEY ELEMENTS

RIDOR

SOCIAL ADAPTATION METHOD RECREATIONAL FACILITIES ARRANGEMENT IN THE ZONE OF VISUAL COMMUNICATION WITH THE RIVER AT PUBLIC TRANSPORT NODES

C O M M U N I C AT I O N SPACES VERTICAL STRATIFICATION

RECREATIONAL LOAD REDISTRIBUTION BY THE NEW RECREATIONAL OBJECTS INTRODUCTION TO THE FORESHORE ZONE

PEDESTRIAN AND BICYCLE ROUTES DEVELOPMENT IN THE FORESHORE ZONE

SET UP OF NON-TRANSPORT PEDESTRIAN ROUTES TOWARDS THE RIVER

DEVELOPMENT OF NON-TRANSPORT PEDESTRIAN ROUTES TOWARDS THE RIVER

EXTENDED RECREATIONAL SPACES STRUCTURING

CONSTRUCTION OF A COMMUNICATION FRAME IN THE RIVERSIDE SLOPE ZONE

NATURAL AND RECREATIONAL FRAME CONSTRUCTION ON THE FLOODED FORESHORE AREA

SEASONALLY TRANSFORMABLE RECREATIONAL OBJECTS RECREATIONAL OBJECTS CLOSED TYPE ALL-SEASON USE IN PUBLIC TRANSPORT NODES

OPEN TYPE ALL-SEASON USE

CLOSED TYPE ALL-SEASON USE

OPEN TYPE SEASONAL USE

ANTHROPOGENIC AND TECHNOGENIC ZONE

PEDESTRIAN FLOWS DIRECTIONAL MOVEMENT CITY-RIVER

TRANSPORT STREETS

TRANSIT TRAFFIC ALONG THE RIVER

BUILDABLE AREA

RECREATIONAL MOVEMENT

UNDERGROUND PARKING

3D SCHEME LEGEND DIRECTIONAL MOVEMENT CITY-RIVER

ALL-SEASON USE RECREATIONAL OBJECTS IN PUBLIC TRANSPORT NODES

TRAFFIC ALONG THE RIVER

SEASONAL USE RECREATIONAL OBJECTS

CUMULATIVE RECOUPMENT METHOD ECOLOGICAL FRAMEWORK COMPONENTS INTEGRATION INTO THE NEW REAL ESTATE DEVELOPMENT

POST-INDUSTRIAL TERRITORIES RE-PROFILING TO THE URBAN ENVIRONMENT BRANDING OBJECTS

NATURAL INFRASTRUCTURE PROVISION AS A FACTOR OF REAL ESTATE CONSUMER APPEAL

COMMERCIAL RECREATIONAL SERVICE FUNCTIONS INTEGRATION INTO THE SUBURBAN FOREST PARKS SYSTEM

RECREATIONAL SPACES FILLING WITH SERVICE OBJECTS CORRESPONDING TO THE MODERN SOCIAL NEEDS STRUCTURE

PERIPHERY PARKS RECUPERATION AS CITY AND REGIONAL SIGNIFICANCE HERITAGE OBJECTS

PRIORITY TO THE GREEN INFRASTRUCTURE DEVELOPMENT TOWARDS THE RIVER AS THE BASIS FOR URBAN ENVIRONMENT REGENERATION.

COMMERCIAL PEDESTRIAN STREETS DEVELOPMENT TOWARDS THE RIVER

COMMERCIAL ACTIVITY AXES AND OBJECTS REAL ESTATE TRANSFORMABLE OBJECTS ON THE LEASED AREAS

ANTHROPOGENIC AND TECHNOGENIC ZONE

DEVELOPMENT OF RETAIL AND SERVICES ALONG THE COMMUNICATION AXES

MAIN PEDESTRIAN VECTORS

HIGHWAYS

REGENERATED ZONE

STREETS

THE MOST SUTABLE AXES FOR COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT

BUILDABLE AREA

PASSAGES

ARRANGEMENT OF RECREATIONAL AREAS ON THE BASIS OF ENCUMBRANCES

3D SCHEME LEGEND STABLE COMMERCIAL ACTIVITY AREAS SEASONALLY-TRANSFORMABLE COMMERCIAL ACTIVITY AREAS

COMMERCIAL ACTIVITY DEVELOPMENT ALONG COMMUNICATION AXES SEASONAL COMMERCIAL ACTIVITY DEVELOPMENT AXES

ALL-SEASON EQUIPMENTS OBJECTS OF SEASONAL USE

Chapter III Section 3.3.1

ECO-OASES - (MOST SUSTAINABLE COMPONENTS OF THE ECOLOG-

ECOLOG RESTRU

ICAL FRAMEWORK) ARE THE TERRITORIES WHERE ECOLOGICAL BALANCE IS ACHIEVED THROUGH RECONSTRUCTION, INCLUDING DEMOLITION OF DECREPIT HOUSING, PRESERVATION OF STRUCTURES WITH FILLING OPEN SPACES WITH NATURAL COMPONENTS, COMMUNICATION SYSTEM AND FLAT STRUCTURES USED ALL YEAR ROUND.

SOCIAL ADAPTA ENVIRONMENT-FORMING ECO-OASES • COMPACT PLAN FORM • THE PRESENCE OF NATURAL ECOSYSTEM AREA: MINIMUM - 20 HA

ENVIRONMENT-STABILIZING ECO-OASES • COMPACT PLAN FORM • THE WIDTH AND AREA PARAMETERS ARE DETERMINED DEPENDING ON THE DOMINANT DISCOMFORT FACTOR

CUMUL RECOUP

ENVIRONMENT-FORMING FUNCTION BUFFER SPACE ZONE WITH COMFORTABLE ENVIRONMENT BUFFER SPACE

ENVIRONMENT-STABILIZING FUNCTION ZONES OF VEHICLES NEGATIVE IMPACT ECO-OASIS AREA RADI- ZONE WITH A COMFORTABLE AREA, HA US, M GAS VISUAL IMPACT ENVIRONMENT, M NOISE CONTAMINATION

and more

800 and more

ECOOAS STRUCT

GICAL UCTURING

L ATION

LATIVE PMENT

SIS TURE

DIRECTIONS AND MECHANISMS FOR THE IMPLEMENTATION OF ECO-URBAN OPTIMIZATION OF KHABAROVSK RIVERSIDE AREAS ECO-OASES FUNCTIONAL OPTIMIZATION ECO-OASIS STRUCTURE

BUFFER SPACE ECO-OASIS NODE LANDSCAPE-RECREATIONAL ZONE

ACCESS / SERVICE ZONE THEMATIC OPEN SPACES ZONE ZONE OF NATURAL-RECREATIONAL FRAMEWORK ZONE OF RECREATIONAL SERVICE FUNCTION WITH POSSIBILITY OF BUILDING CONSTRUCTION ZONE OF TEMPORARY RECREATIONAL SERVICE OBJECTS INCLUSION ZONE OF USE “ECOSYSTEM SERVICES OF NATURAL COMPLEX” - SOFT MOBILITY FRAMEWORK ZONE OF RESTRICTED / VISUAL ACCESS

ACCESS / SERVICE ZONE THEMATIC OPEN SPACES ZONE ECO-OASIS NODE LANDSCAPE-RECREATIONAL ZONE

Chapter III Section 3.3.1 NATURAL FRAMEWORK CREATION IN THE STRUCTURE OF A POSTINDUSTRIAL SPACE TECHNIQUE

TECHNIQUE OF A GREEN-RECREATION FRAMEWORK CONSTRUCTION IN THE STRUCTURE OF TERRITORIES WI

TECHNIQUE OF NATURAL AND RECREATIONAL FRAMEWORK FORMATION IN THE STRUCTURE OF PRESERVED

ECO-OASIS NODE LANDSCAPE-RECREATIONAL ZONE

THEMATIC OPEN SPACES ACCESS / SERVICE ZONE

DIRECTIONS AND MECHANISMS FOR THE IMPLEMENTATION OF ECO-URBAN OPTIMIZATION OF KHABAROVSK RIVERSIDE AREAS ECO-OASES FUNCTIONAL OPTIMIZATION ECO-OASES FORMING TECHNIQUES THE NATURAL FRAMEWORK CONSTRUCTION BY INCORPORATING THE COMPONENTS OF THE SECOND NATURE CONTRIBUTES TO THE IMPROVEMENT OF THE ENVIRONMENT AND THE FORMATION OF A SPATIAL PLANNING FRAMEWORK. PRESERVATION OF COMPONENTS REFLECTING THE HISTORY OF PREVIOUS USE IN COMBINATION WITH LANDSCAPE DESIGN TECHNIQUES APPLICATION CONTRIBUTES TO THE ACHIEVEMENT OF FIGURATIVE EXPRESSIVENESS OF SPACE. CREATION OF INTERCULTURAL SPACE IN THE SAVED ARCHITECTURE OBJECTS

ITH A COMPLEX FLOOD REGIME NATURAL FLOODING PROCESSES PRESERVATION CONTRIBUTES TO THE DEVELOPMENT OF NATURAL HABITATS,

ALLOWS THE USE OF THE REGIONAL COMPONENT IN THE FORMATION OF AN IDENTICAL RECREATIONAL SPACE.

NATURAL TERRITORIES

S ZONE E

TERRITORY ZONIFICATION ACCORDING TO THE DEGREE OF ANTHROPOGENIC LOADS ALLOWS TO CREATE A STABLE NATURAL-ANTHROPOGENIC FRAMEWORK. FUNCTIONAL INTEGRATION OF THE FOREST PARK ALLOWS TO MAINTAIN THE NATURAL COMPONENTS PRIORITY AND CREATE A SERVICE ZONE WITH PARKING FOR ALL-SEASON USE OF THE PARK.

219

INCREASES THE ABILITY OF THE LANDSCAPE TO SELF-REGULATION,

Chapter III

F

Section 3.3.2

ECOLOG RESTRU

ECO-CORRIDORS- ARE URBAN AREAS LOCATED IN EXISTING

COMMUNICATION SPACES, AS WELL AS LINEAR ELEMENTS OF NATURAL FRAMEWORK, WHERE IT IS PROPOSED TO ALLOCATE PROPER PEDESTRIAN INFRASTRUCTURE, CYCLING ROUTES WITH DEVELOPED SYSTEM OF GREEN SPACES OF LINEAR CHARACTER.

SOCIAL ADAPTA ENVIRONMENT-FORMING ECO-CORRIDOR

ENVIRONMENT-STABILIZING ECO-CORRIDOR

ENVIRONMENT-FORMING FUNCTION ECO-CORRIDOR TYPE ECO-CORRIDOR BASE BAND ECO-CORRIDOR PERIPHERAL BAND

ECO-CORRIDOR WITH SMALL WATERCOURSE

FROM THE AXIS

CUMUL RECOUP

ECO-CORRIDOR IN A HOLLOW SPACE ECO-CORRIDOR IN A FORESHORE ZONE

ENVIRONMENT-STABILIZING FUNCTION MICROCLIMATIC EFFICIENCY OF ECO-CORRIDORS ECO-CORRIDOR TYPE ECO-CORRIDOR WITH TRANSPORT SPACE TRANSPORT FREE ECO-CORRIDOR ECO-CORRIDOR IN FORESHORE ZONE - SOLAR RADIATION TRANSMITTANCE COEFFICIENT - AIR TEMPERATURE REDUCTION - AIR HUMIDITY INCREASE - WIND SPEED REDUCTION

ECOCOR STRUCT

DIRECTIONS AND MECHANISMS FOR THE IMPLEMENTATION OF ECO-URBAN OPTIMIZATION OF KHABAROVSK RIVERSIDE AREAS

FUNCTIONAL OPTIMIZATION OF ECOLOGICAL FRAMEWORK COMMUNICATION ELEMENTS

GICAL UCTURING

L ATION

LATIVE PMENT

RRIDOR TURE

ECO-CORRIDORS STRUCTURE

BUFFER SPACE ECO-CORRIDOR BASE BAND ECO-CORRIDOR PERIPHERAL BAND

ANTHROPOGENIC ZONE ZONE OF NATURAL-RECREATIONAL FRAMEWORK OPEN SPACES ZONE

ZONE OF RECREATIONAL SERVICE FUNCTION WITH POSSIBILITY OF BUILDING/ TRANSPORT LANE CONSTRUCTION ZONE OF RESTRICTED / VISUAL ACCESS ZONE OF USE “ECOSYSTEM SERVICES OF NATURAL COMPLEX” - SOFT MOBILITY FRAMEWORK ZONE OF TEMPORARY RECREATIONAL SERVICE OBJECTS INCLUSION

BUFFER SPACE ECO-CORRIDOR BASE BAND ECO-CORRIDOR PERIPHERAL BAND LANDSCAPE-RECREATIONAL ZONE

Chapter III Section 3.3.2

TECHNIQUE OF ECO-CORRIDORS INTEGRATION INTO THE STRUCTURE OF SEMI-PUBLIC SPACE

BASE BAND,M

PERIPHERAL BAND,M

BASE BAND,M

PERIPHERAL BAND,M

TECHNIQUE OF ECO-CORRIDORS INTEGRATION INTO THE STRUCTURE OF PUBLIC SPACE

DIRECTIONS AND MECHANISMS FOR THE IMPLEMENTATION OF ECO-URBAN OPTIMIZATION OF KHABAROVSK RIVERSIDE AREAS FUNCTIONAL OPTIMIZATION OF ECOLOGICAL FRAMEWORK COMMUNICATION ELEMENTS ECO-CORRIDORS FORMING TECHNIQUES

EFFECTIVE TRANSPORT SPACES SCREENING CARRIED OUT BY MEANS OF STRUCTURAL DELIMITATION WITH THE ARRANGEMENT OF BUFFER BANDS ALONG THE ROUTE

DIFFERENTIATION BY ZONES FOR VARIOUS SOCIAL (AGE) GROUPS ALLOWS EFFECTIVELY SCREENING NATURAL COMPONENTS FROM ACTIVE EXPOSURE WHILE AT THE SAME TIME ALLOWS REST, WALKING AND TRANSIT TRAFFIC ALONG THE WATER FLOW

SERVICE ZONE,M

TOTAL CORRIDOR SIZE,M

222

THE NATURAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE BORDERS DO NOT MATCH THEREFORE THE SPATIAL CONNECTION OF COLLECTIVE SPACES, ASSIGNED GREEN AREAS OF PRIVATE OR RESTRICTED USE AND PUBLIC SPACES WILL ALLOW GREEN AREAS CONTINUITY FOR EFFECTIVE ECO-CORRIDORS CREATION

FORMATION OF FUNCTIONALLY FILLED COMMUNICATION SPACE

SERVICE ZONE,M

TOTAL CORRIDOR SIZE,M

221 DIRECTIONS AND MECHANISMS FOR THE IMPLEMENTATION OF ECO-URBAN OPTIMIZATION OF KHABAROVSK RIVERSIDE AREAS

Chapter III Section 3.3.2

FUNCTIONAL OPTIMIZATION OF ECOLOGICAL FRAMEWORK COMMUNICATION ELEMENTS ECO-CORRIDORS FORMING TECHNIQUES VERTICAL STRATIFICATION OF THE STRUCTURE OF PEDESTRIAN COMMUNICATION SPACES TECHNIQUE EFFECTIVE SCREENING OF CYCLING AND PEDESTRIAN TRANSIT SPACES

VARIABLE, PULSE WIDTH APPLICATION FOR THE LINEAR SPACES TO AVOID OVER ORDERED PATTERN E

ON

EZ

OR

H ES

R

FO BASE BAND,M

PERIPHERAL BAND,M

SERVICE ZONE,M

TOTAL CORRIDOR SIZE,M

NATURAL BIOTOPES PRESERVING TECHNIQUE

THE NECESSARY COMMUNICATION FRAMEWORK CREATION ALONG WITH PRESERVING FLOODED AREAS ECOSYSTEMS WITHOUT AFFECTING EXISTING BIOMASS AND ESTABLISHED PROCESSES OF NATURAL COMPONENTS INTERACTION

E

ON

EZ

OR

H ES

ARTIFICIAL, NATURAL-LIKE RESERVOIRS CREATION DUE TO SURFACE WATERS REDISTRIBUTION

R

FO

BASE BAND,M

PERIPHERAL BAND,M

SERVICE ZONE,M

TOTAL CORRIDOR SIZE,M

NATURAL AND RECREATIONAL FRAMEWORK CREATION TECHNIQUE

THE NECESSARY COMMUNICATION FRAMEWORK CREATION PRESERVING SLOPE AREAS ECOSYSTEMS WITHOUT AFFECTING EXISTING BIOMASS AND ESTABLISHED PROCESSES OF NATURAL COMPONENTS INTERACTION

S

RE

FO BASE BAND,M

PERIPHERAL BAND,M

E

ON

EZ

R HO

SERVICE ZONE,M

TOTAL CORRIDOR SIZE,M

223

DIRECTIONS AND MECHANISMS FOR THE IMPLEMENTATION      OF ECO-URBAN OPTIMIZATION OF KHABAROVSK RIVERSIDE AREAS       .       (    .   .. )       .       3.3  ECOLOGICAL FRAMEWORK COMPONENTS FORMING TECHNIQUES (Section  .   .. )       .             . (    .   .. ) MICROCLIMATIC EFFICIENCY OF ECOLOGICAL FRAMEWORK COMPONENTS       (    .   .. ) DEPENDING ON THE SPATIAL PARAMETERS AND GARDENING TECHNIQUE          (BASING OF THE DATA OF N. KRASNOSHCHEKOVA AND A. GORODKOV)                ,%               ECO-OASES MICROCLIMATIC EFFICIENCY DEPENDING ON SIZE       ,%   , -  -        %     ,%      ,      ZONE WITH A ZONES OF VEHICLES NEGATIVE IMPACT %   ECO-OASIS ECO-OASIS ,% 3 100  9 91 83 33  COMFORTABLE  ,  AREA,7 HA AREA RADIUS  % 150 29 71 64 24    3 100 9 91 83 33 ENVIRONMENT  ,  NOISE GAS CONTAMINATION VISUAL IMPACT  % 929 8364  250 50 60 44 15 7 150 320 100 9171 3324 50 400 68 32 28 10 20 250 50 60 44 3 100 9 91 83 3315 7 150 29 71 64 24 113 600 78 22 19 6 50 400 68 32 28 7 150 29 71 64 2410 20 250 50 60 44 15 150  800  113 600 78 22 19 20 250 50 6015 4410 15650 400 68 32 28 10 85-90   150  800  50 400 68 3215 2810 10 113 600 78 22 19 685-90   78 22 19 6 150113  800600  85-90 15 10 150  800  85-90 15 10 150 AND MORE 800 AND MORE              .            .

ECO-CORRIDORS MICROCLIMATIC EFFICIENCY DEPENDING ON GARDENNG TECHNIQUE TYPE       K%  V% ∆t°C – AND FUNCTIONAL ∆r% -            K%  ∆t°C V% – ∆r% -      -.

4,5-22 0,3-1,0 0-5 5-15          K% V%   ∆t°C – ∆r%     -.

ECO-CORRIDOR TYPE 4,5-22 0,3-1,0 0-5 5-15    K% V%  ∆t°C – ∆r%     4-10 1,2-1,7 5-7 50-70 4,5-22 0,3-1,0 0-5 5-15 TRANSPORT SPACE WITH SINGLE-ROW TREE PLANTING         4-10 1,2-1,7 5-7 50-70 4,5-22 0,3-1,0 0-5 5-15         4-10 1,2-2,0 5-8 60-70 TRANSPORT SPACE WITH A TWO-LANE TREE PLANTING 4-10 1,2-1,7 5-7 50-70           4-10 1,2-2,0 5-8 60-70 4-10 1,2-1,7 5-7 50-70              2-10 1,5-3,5 20-10 85-95 TRANSPORT WITH MULTI-ROW TREE PLANTING  4-10 1,2-2,0 5-8 60-70  SPACE           2-10 1,5-3,5 20-10 85-95 4-10 1,2-2,0 5-8 60-70             NON-TRANSPORT SPACE ON THE ECO-OASIS BORDER 2-10 1,5-3,5 20-10 85-95  4-10 1,6-1,8 8-10 25-70           2-10 1,5-3,5 20-10 85-95 (70% )  4-10 1,6-1,8 8-10 25-70        LONGITUDINAL ECO-CORRIDOR IN THE COASTAL ZONE     (70% ) 4-10 1,6-1,8 8-10 25-70      5-20 0,5-1 2-3 5-30 (70% GREENERY)  (40% )     (70% )  4-10 1,6-1,8 8-10 25-70 5-20 0,5-1 2-3 5-30     (40% ) (70% )    LONGITUDINAL ECO-CORRIDOR IN THE COASTAL ZONE 100 0,4-0,6 3-53,, 0 5-20 0,5-1 2-3 5-30  (20%) )     (40%   (40% GREENERY) 100 0,4-0,6 3-53,, 0 5-20 0,5-1 2-3 5-30  (20% ) K%     (40% )     LONGITUDINAL ECO-CORRIDOR IN THE COASTAL  ZONE 100 0,4-0,6 3-53,, 0 1,5  (20% ) (20%     K% -–GREENERY)     ∆t°C    100 0,4-0,6 3-53,, 0  (20% ) ∆t°C    ∆r% -–SOLAR    K% -     RADIATION TRANSMISSION COEFFICIENT V%    ∆r%    K%    AIR TEMPERATURE REDUCTION COEFFICIENT ∆t°C -–    V%-–   ∆t°C    AIR HUMIDITY INCREASE COEFFICIENT ∆r%    V%    --  WIND SPEED REDUCTION COEFFICIENT ∆r%           V%           THE BUFFER SCREENING AREAS  MINIMUM WIDTH FOR REDUCING OF THE VARIOUS DISCOMFORT FACTORS       ,                 ,         DOMINANT FACTOR OF ENVIRONMENTAL DISCOMFORT MINIMUM WIDTH, M       20-25     ,    100-200 DUST POLLUTION     20-25     ,      100-150   100-200 ATMOSPHERE GAS POLLUTION   20-25   - 20-25 150-200   100-150 NOISE POLLUTION   100-200   COMBINED EFFECT OF GAS AND NOISE FACTOR     150-200   100-200   100-150    20-25   WIND CONDITIONS OPTIMIZATION   100-150   150-200    20-25     150-200      20-25    20-25

Chapter III

213

Chapter III

DIRECTIONS AND MECHANISMS FOR THE IMPLEMENTATION OF ECO-URBAN OPTIMIZATION OF KHABAROVSK RIVERSIDE AREAS

EXPERIMENTAL MODEL OF RIVERSIDE AREAS ECO-URBAN OPTIMIZATION IN THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF KHABAROVSK

IMPLEMENTATION Chapter III

THESIS PROVISIONS IMPLEMEN and D

DIRECTIONS AND MECHANISMS FOR THE IMPLEMENTATION OF (“Russian State AREAS Research ECO-URBAN OPTIMIZATION OF KHABAROVSK RIVERSIDE

DEVELOPM

Section 3.2.3

DEVELOPMENT SCENARIO FOR RIVERSIDE AREAS IN CONDITIONS OF HIGH RECREATIONAL LOADS

ECO-OASIS

V

S

ARTIFICIAL, RENATURALISED (RE-PROFILING OF TERRITORIES) NATURAL-BASED (ECOSYSTEM RESTORATION) ECO-CORRIDORS TRANSVERSE TRANSPORT AND NON-TRANSPORT

S

LONGITUDINAL NON-TRANSPORT BUFFER AREAS PERIPHERAL-PERIMETER SPACES ANTHROPOGENIC AND TECHNOGENIC ZONE TRANSPORT AREAS BUILDABLE AREA

S

GREEN CORRIDORS FORMATIO RUPTION BY TRANSPORT ROU

THE SLOPES FRAGMENTS PRO

FLOODPLAIN AREAS USE FOR PLANTS RESISTANT TO CHANG

CREATING DEPRESSIONS AND

NTATION IN THE PLANNING PLAN OF THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF KHABAROVSK Design Institute of Urbanistica, State Committee for Construction, St. Petersburg)

MENT SCENARIO FOR RIVERSIDE AREAS IN CONDITIONS OF HIGH RECREATIONAL LOADS

CITY CENTRAL PART RIVERSIDE AREAS ECO-URBAN OPTIMIZATION MODEL

S

S

F

S

OFILING WITH THE TERRACE SYSTEM CREATION

RECREATION PURPOSES WITH APPLICATION OF GES IN WATER LEVEL

D MOUNDS USING NATURAL TERRAIN FEATURES

V

S

ECOLOGICAL FRAMEWORK COMPONENTS

F

ENVIRONMENT-FORMING COMPONENTS

S

ENVIRONMENT STABILIZING COMPONENTS

V

VULNERABLE COMPONENTS

214

ON TOWARDS THE RIVER WHILE AVOIDING INTERUTES

S

ECOLOGICAL FRAMEWORK COMPONENTS ECO-OASIS BUFFER SPACE ECO-CORRIDORS GREEN AREAS OF LIMITED USE KINDERGARTEN AND SCHOOL GREEN AREAS PRIVATE AND SEMI-PRIVATE GREEN AREAS RESIDENTIAL ZONE GREEN AREAS

IMPLEMENTATION Section 3.2.3

THESIS PROVISIONS IMPLEMEN (“Russian State Research and D

DEVELOPM

DEVELOPMENT SCENARIO FOR RIVERSIDE AREAS IN CONDITIONS OF HIGH RECREATIONAL LOADS

RECREATIONAL OBJECTS CLOSED TYPE ALL-SEASON USE IN PUBLIC TRANSPORT NODES CLOSED TYPE ALL-SEASON USE OPEN TYPE ALL-SEASON USE OPEN TYPE SEASONAL USE PEDESTRIAN FLOWS DIRECTIONAL MOVEMENT CITY-RIVER TRANSIT TRAFFIC ALONG THE RIVER RECREATIONAL MOVEMENT ANTHROPOGENIC AND TECHNOGENIC ZONE TRANSPORT AREAS

SCREENING OF RECR SIT ZONES DUE TO S

ARRANGEMENT OF Y SIDE SLOPE UPPER TO PUBLIC TRANSPO

BUILDABLE AREA VEHICLE STORAGE AREAS

MITIGATING CLIMATI ATIONAL AREAS OF

NTATION IN THE PLANNING PLAN OF THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF KHABAROVSK Design Institute of Urbanistica, State Committee for Construction, St. Petersburg)

MENT SCENARIO FOR RIVERSIDE AREAS IN CONDITIONS OF HIGH RECREATIONAL LOADS

CITY CENTRAL PART RIVERSIDE AREAS ECO-URBAN OPTIMIZATION MODEL

YEAR-ROUND USE RECREATIONAL CENTERS ON THE RIVERTERRACE IN ACCLIMATIZED BUILDINGS WITH EASY ACCESS ORT AND PARKING

IC DISCOMFORT ELEMENTS INTRODUCING IN THE RECRETHE EMBANKMENT AND VIEWING PLATFORMS

215

REATIONAL AREAS FOR DIFFERENT AGE GROUPS AND TRANSEPARATING LAWNS, RELIEF DIFFERENCES

EXTREME SPORTS TRACKS ARRANGEMENT ON THE TERRITORIES UNSUITABLE FOR CONSTRUCTION CREATION OF CANOPIES AND COVERED PAVILIONS FOR PROTECTION AGAINST PRECIPITATION THE ALLOCATION OF ZONES WITH SEASONALLY TRANSFORMING FUNCTIONS ALONG THE AXIS OF THE ECO-CORRIDOR TERRITORIES AND OBJECTS OF RECREATIONAL USE, DEPENDING ON RESISTANCE TO WEATHER CONDITIONS ALL-SEASONAL USE OBJECTS ZONES WITH SEASONALLY-TRANSFORMABLE FUNCTIONS ZONES ARE WEAKLY RESISTANT TO WEATHER CONDITIONS ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION GARDENING

IMPLEMENTATION

THESIS PROVISIONS IMPLEMEN (“Russian State Research and D

DEVELOPM

Section 3.2.3

DEVELOPMENT SCENARIO FOR RIVERSIDE AREAS IN CONDITIONS OF HIGH RECREATIONAL LOADS

T

S

S

C INVEST-ATTRACTIVE OBJECTS NEW REAL ESTATE TRANSFORMABLE LEASED AREAS

OBJECTS

ON

THE

MAIN PEDESTRIAN AXIS RETAIL AND SERVICES DEVELOPMENT ALONG THE PEDESTRIAN COMMUNICATION ROUTS COMMERCIAL FACILITIES DEVELOPMENT ALONG THE TRANSPORT HIGHWAYS ANTHROPOGENIC AND TECHNOGENIC ZONE TRANSPORT AREAS BUILDABLE AREA

C S

ARRANGEMENT OF TERRITORIES GROUNDS USED ON A COMMERC

FORMATION ON RIVERSIDE AREA WORK MAINTAINED BY ADJACEN

PEDESTRIAN PROMENADES DEVE ON THE PRINCIPLE OF SAW-BOUG

DESIGNATED PROMENADE ZONE MENT ACTIVITIES SEPARATE FRO

COMMERCIAL AMENITIES INTROD

ARRANGEMENT OF EXHIBITION S COMMERCIAL BASIS

LOCATION OF THE BEACHES WITH

NTATION IN THE PLANNING PLAN OF THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF KHABAROVSK Design Institute of Urbanistica, State Committee for Construction, St. Petersburg)

MENT SCENARIO FOR RIVERSIDE AREAS IN CONDITIONS OF HIGH RECREATIONAL LOADS

CITY CENTRAL PART RIVERSIDE AREAS ECO-URBAN OPTIMIZATION MODEL

C

S

S

S

AS OF A EVERYDAY USE CULTURAL AND RECREATIONAL FRAMENT RESIDENTIAL GROUP

ELOPMENT IN A STRUCTURE OF GREEN CORRIDORS WITH RETAIL GHT IN THE ZONE OF MUSEUM COMPLEXES

WITH THE OFFER OF VARIOUS RECREATIONAL AND ENTERTAINOM PEDESTRIAN AND BICYCLE TRANSIT

DUCTION IN THE PUBLIC TRANSPORT NODES ZONE

SPACES IN THE PARK ZONE WITH POSSIBLE DEVELOPMENT ON A

H ARTIFICIAL WATER FEATURES ON A COMMERCIAL BASIS

SOCIAL EQUIPMENT AND AMENITIES COMMERCIAL RETAIL

216

S FOR SPORT AND HEALTH PURPOSES WITH VARIETY OF SPORT CIAL BASIS WITH SOCIALLY JUSTIFIED PRICES

S C R

GREEN AREAS, THE EXPLOITATION OF WHICH ALLOWS PARTIAL REGREEN AREAS, EXPLOITATIONNEEDED OF WHICH PARTLY RECOUPMENT OF THE INVESTMENT FORALLOWS ITS MAINTENANCE COUPMENT THE INVESTMENT NEEDS FOR ITS MAINTENANCE RESIDENTIAL GROUPS GREEN AREAS RESIDENTIAL GROUPS GREEN AREAS GREEN AREAS OF REGIONAL IMPORTANCE GREEN AREAS OF REGIONAL IMPORTANCE GREEN AREAS OF CITY IMPORTANCE GREEN AREAS OF CITY IMPORTANCE COMMERCIAL OBJECTS GREEN AREAS COMMERCIAL OBJECTS GREEN AREAS PUBLIC AMENITIES GREEN AREAS PUBLIC AMENITIES GREEN AREAS OBJECTS AND AREAS OF COMMERCIAL USE IN THE GREEN AREAS STRUCTURE COMMERCIAL USE OBJECTS AND AREAS IN THE GREEN AREAS STRUCTURE LIMITED USE GREEN AREAS,WHICH EXPLOITATION DOESN’T ALLOW FOR ECONOMICAL RECOUPMENT GREEN AREAS OF SCHOOL AND KINDERGARTEN SPECIAL PURPOSE GREEN AREAS WHICH EXPLOITATION DOESN’T ALLOW ECONOMICAL RECOUPMENT STREET GREENERY

Chapter III Section 3.4

ECO-URBAN O

PARTICIPANTS

POPULATION

MUNICIPALITY

GENERAL OBJECTIVE

LIFE QUALITY IMPROVING

CITY AND ALL ITS STRUCTURES SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT

PROGRAMMING

INFORMATION MECHANISM

ORGANIZATIONAL ECONOMIC MECHANISM

ROLE

TARGET GROUPS

SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT POLICY INITIATOR CORE FINANCING

ECOLOGICALLY AND SOCIALLY COMFORTABLE ENVIRONMENT ACHIEVEMENT IN THE STRUCTURE OF RIVERSIDE AREAS

PURPOSEFUL TRANSFORMATION OF RIVERSIDE AREAS IN ORDER TO ACHIEVE THE REQUIRED ENVIRONMENT QUALITY PARAMETERS, INCLUDING FUNCTIONAL CHARACTERISTICS CHANGING, LANDSCAPES REGENERATION AND COMFORTABLE SOCIAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS ACHIEVEMENT.

SOCIAL ADAPTATION METHOD

ECOLOGICAL RESTRUCTURING METHOD

IMPROVEMENT LEVEL OF SOCIAL APROPRIATION, DIVERSITY AND COMFORT, OF RA WITH PUBLIC ENGAGEMENT IN THE TRANSFORMATION PROCESS

INCREASING SUSTAINABILITY OF THE ENVIRONMENT AND EXTENDING THIS INFLUENCE DEEP INTO THE CITY THROUGH SINGLE ECOLOGICAL FRAMEWOK DEVELOPMENT

EUO RA OBJECTIVES

DESIGN

RESULT

O

DIRECTIONS AND MECHANISMS FOR THE IMPLEMENTATION OF ECO-URBAN OPTIMIZATION OF KHABAROVSK RIVERSIDE AREAS

OPTIMIZATION AS A COMPREHENSIVE PROGRAM OF RIVERSIDE AREA TRANSFORMATION

INVESTOR

PROFIT-MAKING

REGULATORY FRAMEWORK

GREATER FINANCING

CUMULATIVE RECOUPMENT METHOD

RISK SHARING IN DEVELOPMENT OF COMPLEX BUT WELL LOCATED AREAS, ACHIEVING A RETURN ON INVESTMENTS IN OPTIMIZATION OF THE CITY ENVIRONMENT

Urban planning policy should be aimed at harmonizing the interests of its different participants, supporting activities that provide measures to stabilize the ecological situation in riverside areas, as well as stimulating priority projects and programs.

224

INVESTMENT RESOURCES OF RIVERSIDE AREAS IMPLEMENTATION

Riverside areas eco-urban optimization is a policy aimed at the rational use of riverside areas in a spatial aspect, the conduct of which contributes to the improvement of the quality and the standard of living of the population as a result of the formation of a comfortable environment in the city, the improvement of the ecological situation with an agreed change in all its structures.

Questionnaire

SOCIOLOGICAL STUDY IN KHABAROVSK (520 PEOPLE SURVEYED)

WHAT IS YOUR OPINION ABOUT THE TRANSFORMATION OF URBANN RIVERSIDE AREAS? WHAT IS YOUR OPINION ABOUT THE TRANSFORMATION OF URBAN RIVERSIDE AREAS?

QUESTIONNAIRE (mark the letters of your answers in a circle) 1. Please specify your age group? а – 12 – 17; d – 41 – 60; b – 18 – 25; e – above 61. c – 26 -40; 2. What's your education level: а – higher education; d – secondary; b - incomplete higher; e - lower secondary. c - specialized secondary; 3. What's your gender: а – female; b – male.

4. What is the district of your residence? а – Centralny; d – Kirovsky; b – Jeleznodorojny; e – Krasnoflotsky. c – Industrialny; 5. Please specify the name of the nearest public transport stop on the way to the place of your residence. _____________________ 6. What, is the approximate, the distance from the river you live? а – up to 500 m; c – up to 5 km; b – up to 1 km; d – more than 5 km.

7. How often do you spend your free time on the river bank? more than once a week once a week more than once a month once a month rarely never

summer

autumn

winter

spring

8. Would you like to have access to a landscaped recreation area by the river in your area of residence, or the central embankment is sufficient to you? а – in my district there is access to the riverside area, but its condition is unsatisfactory; b – in my district there is access to the riverside area and I use it for recreational purposes; c - in my area there is access to the riverside area and I use it for recreational purposes, despite the fact that it is not landscaped; d - I would like to have access to riverside area in my residential area; e – central embankment is sufficient; f – my area is too far from the river.

9. At what time of the year / day you are more likely to spend time by the river? (please select all possible options) а – winter; а – day; b – autumn; b – evening; c – spring; c – morning; d – summer d - night.

10. Which factor has the greatest effect on your choice of time at the river? а – the nature of leisure by the river; b – climatic comfort conditions; c – security of stay by the river.

11. Do you feel uncomfortable while relaxing by the river. What causes you this discomfort? (please select all possible options) а – absence of equipped descents to water area; b – lack of equipped pedestrian recreational zones near the river; c – lack of sport paths (cycling, running, skiing); d – overcrowded on weekends;

Questionnaire

SOCIOLOGICAL STUDY IN KHABAROVSK (520 PEOPLE SURVEYED)

WHAT IS YOUR OPINION ABOUT THE TRANSFORMATION OF URBANN RIVERSIDE AREAS?

e – low level of recreational services; f – climate discomfort (in the hot and cold season); g – length of routes to leisure facilities from housing and public transport stops; i – storage areas, waste dumps location in riverside areas.

12. Would you visit the landscaped parks on the embankment for sports and recreation if the entrance was paid? а – yes, in case of low price; b – yes, in case of conformity of the park to the consumers’ idea about comfortable rest; c – no.

9. What are the riverside areas equipment components most relevant to you? (please mark in each of the three columns all possible options) Riverside areas equipment components Playgrounds for team sports Open air concert hall Club, multimedia spaces Exhibition multimedia spaces Extreme sports areas Tracks for cycling, roller, running, etc.

Parks for children of all ages Theme parks Beaches with artificial swimming pools Paths for pedestrian walks with recreation areas Observation platforms Cafes, bars, restaurans Picnic and eco-tourism sites

Currently used components

Components that could attract you in the future

Components you are willing to pay for

10. What activities could attract you to visit the riverside areas in the winter season? (please select all possible options) а - arrangement of open spaces for game winter sports (hockey and etc.); b - organization of extreme winter sports activities on the river (kiting, snowmobiling); c - organization of extreme winter sports activities on shore slopes (snowboard etc.); d - arrangement of ski trails; e - creation of indoor heated sports grounds; f - creation of covered heated places for rest and food; g - city events and celebrations; i - equipment of sites with windproof structures.

11. How do you get to recreational areas on the river bank from the house? а – on foot; c – by public transport; b – by bicicle; d – by private transport.

12. Does the city need a bicycle paths? а – yes, I consider it necessary; b – no, I do not ride a bicycle.

13. To what extent, in your opinion, the state of urban riverside areas in Khabarovsk meets the requirements of comfortable recreation? а - 0-30%; c - 50-80%; b - 30-50%; d - 80-100%.

14. In your opinion, how to involve citizens in the development of riverside areas? (please select all possible options) а - public discussion of projects; b - placing projects on websites; c - accommodation of information at public transport stops, in public places; d - introduction of a special rubric in the media - newspapers, television; e – I do not consider it necessary to involve citizens in the discussion.

MANY THANKS FOR HELP IN ASSESSING! YOUR OPINION IS VERY IMPORTANT!

IMPLEMENTATION

CONCEPT OF THE RIVERSIDE AREA REGENERATION IN THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF THE KHABAROVSK CITY

THESIS PROVISIONS IMPLEMENTATION IN THE PLANNING PLAN OF THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF KHABAROVSK (“Russian State Research and Design Institute of Urbanistica, State Committee for Construction, St. Petersburg)

226

IMPLEMENTATION

CONCEPT OF THE RIVERSIDE AREA REGENERATION IN THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF THE KHABAROVSK CITY

CONCEPT OF THE RIVERSIDE AREA REGENERATION IN THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF THE KHABAROVSK CITY

THESIS PROVISIONS IMPLEMENTATION IN THE PLANNING PLAN OF THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF KHABAROVSK (“Russian State Research and Design Institute of Urbanistica, State Committee for Construction, St. Petersburg)

227

IMPLEMENTATION

THESIS PROVISIONS IMPLEMENTATION IN THE PLANNING PLAN OF THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF KHABAROVSK OF and THE Design RIVERSIDE AREA REGENERATION THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF THE KHABAROVSK CITY (“Russian StateCONCEPT Research Institute of Urbanistica,INState Committee for Construction, St. Petersburg)

225

IMPLEMENTATION

CONCEPT OF THE RIVERSIDE AREA REGENERATION IN THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF THE KHABAROVSK CITY

THESIS PROVISIONS IMPLEMENTATION IN THE PLANNING PLAN OF THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF KHABAROVSK (“Russian State Research and Design Institute of Urbanistica, State Committee for Construction, St. Petersburg)

228