JR. Mastinggal Environmental Portfolio

ENVIRONMENTAL PORTFOLIO

JHAMELA MASTINGGAL INSTRUCTOR: MARY POLITES

IMAGE: Caption Caption

BIO

JHAMELA RAE MASTINGGAL

My name is Jhamela, I am originaly from the Philippines and I am currently based in Boston, MA. I have a Bachelor’s degree in Medical Laboratory Science and I am currently taking my Master’s in Architecture.

My interest includes arts, architecture, and travelling. My recent trip to Hawaii opened my eyes on the imidiate environmental consequences of our carbon footprint. It is also where I recently developed my interest in hiking, snorkeling and whale watching.

EDUCATION 2020-2023

Master’s in Architecture candidate

Boston Architectural College, Boston MA

2011-2016

Bachelor’s Degreee in Medical Technology Saint Louis University, Baguio Philippines

EXPERIENCE

Over 5 years of Medical technology experience at hospital and biotech laboratory settings.

Spring 2022 teacher’s assistant for foundation studio (BAC)

Household Carbon Footprint Calculator

Household Carbon Footprint Calculator

Your Household Carbon Footprint Report

Home Energy Transportation Waste

CARBON AND ECOLOGICAL FOOTPRINT ENVIRONMENTAL ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS

Home Energy Transportation Waste

Make a selection in all calculator sections and fields to improve your results.

Your Household Carbon Footprint Report

Your Household Carbon Footprint Report

If 100 of your friends took these actions, over 5 years their households would avoid 502,245 poungs of emissions, equivalent to the emissions from burning 25,624 gallons of gasoline.

Your Household Carbon Footprint

Make a selection in all calculator sections and fields to improve your results.

View Your Annual Estimated CO2 Emissions (lbs) from...

Make a selection in all calculator sections and fields to improve your results.

Print/Save

Home Energy Transportation Waste

Your Household Carbon Footprint

Your Household Carbon Footprint

View Your Annual Estimated CO2 Emissions (lbs) from...

View Your Annual Estimated CO2 Emissions (lbs) from...

Print/Save

Print/Save

Home Energy Transportation Waste

Home Energy Transportation Waste

YOUR HOUSEHOLD CARBON FOOTPRINT

Your Current Total 16,752 New Total After Your Planned Actions 15,748 U.S. Average

Your Current Total 16,752 New Total After Your Planned Actions 15,748 U.S. Average

Your Current Total 16,752 New Total After Your Planned Actions 15,748 U.S. Average

Your CO2 Emissions are lower than the U S average Keep up the good work!

https://cccommission.maps.arcgis.com/apps/MapSeries/index.html?appid=efa7276c967f48658c6190d53196ba1d

Your CO2 Emissions are lower than the U S average Keep up the good work!

Your CO2 Emissions are lower than the U S average Keep up the good work!

https://www3.epa.gov/carbon-footprint-calculator/ 1/5

YOUR PLANNED ACTIONS EQUAL TO: https://www3.epa.gov/carbon-footprint-calculator/ 1/5

https://www3.epa.gov/carbon-footprint-calculator/ 1/5

SITE TOPOGRAPHY

ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS

The site is located at MacMillan parking lot in Provincetown, Cape Cod MA. The site separates the beach into two, creating a divide in the circulation of people. The site can be accessed through Commercial street and a pier that is attached to the parking lot.

Marine Water Recharge Areas Groundwater Discharge Permits

SUN STUDY

ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS

Provincetown, Cape Cod is exposed to extreme weathers of heat in the summer and cold in the winter. This conditions influences the duality of the design program for the space to be functional whole year out.

Summer Solstice Winter Solstice

Section Cut SIte Axon

Climate Graph- Weather/Month Hours of Sunshine

CLIMATE ANALYSIS

ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS

The temperature chart on the right plots the months with the average highest temperatures recorded in a year in Provincetown, MA. July has the highest temperature while January, February and December has the lowest temperature.

PSYCHOMETRIC CHART

ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS

The psychometric chart shows the best indoor temperature for human comfort specific to Provincetown, MA. Since Provincetown us exposed to both extreme temperatures, the ideal indoor temperature changes throughout the year.

ARCHITECTURAL BACKGROUND

DESIGN CONCEPT

Provincetown is known for its rich and diverse community. It is the melting pot for different races, artists and LGBTQ+community. During the summer time various events are celebrated in the area. One of which is the “Family Week” which is the largest gathering of familes int he LGBTQ+ community in the world.

The architecture in Provincetown is deeply influenced by the New England style of building houses or otherwise known as Colonial architecture. A typical house has a pitched roof, one-three stories high and is made of wood.

The town has preserved its original architecture through out the years but since its the convertion to a LGBTQ hot spot, the facade has been made more colorful. The area is also close to the coast hence a lot of marine related themes and can be seen as a decor.

Marine Life Research Center Project

MASSING STUDY

DESIGN CONCEPT

The design is meant to act as a connection between the two beaches where the parking lot divides. Circulation, framing and access to the beach is given emphasis by the change in groun materiality and addition of semi open spaces.

The green spaces in the project act as a buffer from the outside world and adds to the quality of experience with in the site.

SITE PLAN SITE AXON

HEAT MAP AND CIRCULATION

DESIGN CONCEPT

Heat Map

The diagram shows a heat map of the building’s circulation space. There is already an existing central halway that connects the rooms to each other. These hallways provide an opportunity for interaction.

The generous ammount of space given to circulation creates a breathable atmosphere inside the building.

Circulation

The total area of the building is 8000 sf and the calculated area for circulation is 23.03%. After revising the plan by absorbing some entrance space to the outdoors, the area for circulation was reduced to 15.6%.

Heat Map Diagram

The area that was absorbed into the outdoor space is covered by an overhang. This allows people to gather outdoors in a semi protected area.

Most used space

Medium used space

Least used space

WINDOW TO WALL RATIO

DESIGN CONCEPT

SOUTH B1,2

BUILDING 2 NORTH FACADE

TOTAL WINDOW AREA= (6’X3’)3=54 SF

TOTAL WALL AREA= 14’X36’= 504SF WWR= 10.7%

BUILDING 2 NORTH FACADE

TOTAL WINDOW AREA= (6’X3’)3=54 SF

TOTAL WALL AREA= 14’X36’= 504SF

WWR= 10.7%

BUILDING 1 EAST FACADE

TOTAL WINDOW AREA= (6’X3’)4=72 SF

TOTAL WALL AREA= 26’X38’= 988SF

WWR= 7.3%

SOUTH B1,2

BUILDING 1 SOUTH FACADE

TOTAL WINDOW AREA= (6’X3’)12=216 SF

TOTAL WALL AREA= 26’X60’= 1560SF

WWR= 13.8%

BUILDING 2 SOUTH FACADE

TOTAL WINDOW AREA= (6’X3’)3=54 SF

TOTAL WALL AREA= 14’X36’= 504SF WWR= 10.7%

EAST B1 WEST B2

WEST B1 EAST B2

SOUTH B1,2

BUILDING 1 WEST FACADE

TOTAL WINDOW AREA= (6’X3’)12=216 SF

TOTAL WALL AREA= 26’X38’= 988SF

WWR= 21.9%

SOUTH B1,2

EAST B1 WEST B2

EAST B1 WEST B2 WEST B1 EAST B2 SOUTH B1,2

BUILDING 2 EAST FACADE

TOTAL WINDOW AREA= (6’X3’)12=216 SF

TOTAL WALL AREA= 14’X36’= 504SF WWR= 42.9%

EAST B1 WEST B2

WEST B1 EAST B2

BUILDING 2 WEST FACADE

TOTAL WINDOW AREA= (6’X3’)4=72 SF

TOTAL WALL AREA= 14’X36’= 504SF WWR= 14.3%

SOUTH B1,2 EAST B1 WEST B2

WEST B1 EAST B2

CONCRETE STUDY MATERIALITY

Concrete has a longer life span than wood but the environmental effects of the product should be taken into consideration when choosing the material.

The graphs shows that the bulk of the global warming potential of concrete stems out of the sourcing of its materials that are also heavy followed by maintenance and replacement. Indicating that the detrimental effects occurs at its early life stages.

This is because

Project Name

Full building summary

Project Name

4/23/2022

4/23/2022

Full building summary

Results per Life Cycle Stage

Results per Life Cycle Stage (Concrete)

Results per Life Cycle Stage

Warming Potential

Legend

Legend

Net value (impacts + credits)

Life Cycle Stages

Net value (impacts + credits)

Life Cycle Stages Product [A1-A3] Transportation [A4] Maintenance and Replacement [B2-B5] End of Life [C2-C4] Module D [D]

Product [A1-A3] Transportation [A4] Maintenance and Replacement [B2-B5] End of Life [C2-C4] Module D [D]

WOOD STUDY

MATERIALITY

Wood has a shorter life span than concrete but cutting down trees is needed in order to acquire wood which then directly impacts the environment and the biodiversity that it sustains.

The graphs shows that the bulk of the global warming potential of wood stems out from its end of life. The material itself is organic, lightweight and recyclable and because of the cellular composition of wood it is prone to accidification and Eutrophication.

Results per Life Cycle Stage

Project Name

Full building summary

4/23/2022

Results per Life Cycle Stage (Wood)

Results per Life Cycle Stage

Warming

Acidification Potential

Smog Formation Potential

Legend

Net value (impacts + credits)

Legend Net value (impacts + credits)

Life Cycle Stages

Life Cycle Stages

Product [A1-A3]

Product [A1-A3] Transportation [A4] Maintenance and Replacement [B2-B5] End of Life [C2-C4] Module D [D]

Transportation [A4] Maintenance and Replacement [B2-B5]

End of Life [C2-C4]

EC3 CONCRETE

MATERIALITY

The Boxplot diagram shows the range of 231.2 to 363.6 kgCO2e embodied per 1 yd3 potential for concrete. Which is significantly higher than wood.

The search was narrowed down to materials located at the Americas.

Manufacture Comparison Chart

EC3 CONCRETE

MATERIALITY

Plant by Plant Comparison Chart

EC3 CONCRETE

MATERIALITY

Products Comparison Chart

EC3 WOOD

MATERIALITY

The Boxplot diagram shows the range of 114.6 to 239.2 kgCO2e embodied per 1 yd3 potential for wood.

The search was narrowed down to materials located at the Americas.

Manufacture Comparison Chart

MATERIALITY

Plant by Plant Comparison Chart

EC3 USBC LA BUILDING STUDY

MATERIALITY

The GWP Sankey Chart shows a potential of 45% total embodied carbon reduction based on the selected product choices of the USBC LA building study.

The chart also shows the potential reduction of embodied carbon calculated by material category.

GWP Sankey Chart

EC3 USBC LA BUILDING STUDY

MATERIALITY

The LEED bar chart shows the impact of embodied carbon reduction per category needed for a LEED certification.

The most EC carbon reduction can be seen in concrete and steel.

LEED Bar Chart

Provincetown, MA is home to a population of 2.73k people, from which 96.4% are citizens. As of 2019, 9.96% of Provincetown, MA residents were born outside of the country (272 people).

Households in Provincetown, MA have a median annual income of $58,313, which is less than the median annual income of $65,712 across the entire United States. This is in comparison to a median income of $49,018 in 2018, which represents a 19% annual growth.

Median Household Income

Demographic

Social Media Report

Household Income

PROPERTY VALUE

SITE CONDITIONS

In 2019, the median property value in Provincetown, MA grew to to $626,300 from the previous year's value of $622,900.

The following charts display, first, the property values in Provincetown, MA compared to it's parent and neighbor geographies and, second, owner-occupied housing units distributed between a series of property value buckets compared to the national averages for each bucket.

In Provincetown, MA the largest share of households have a property value in the $500k - $750k range.

Median Property Value

INTRODUCTION

INTEGRATION

COTE SUPERSPREAD

The project is meant to raise awareness to the condition of our coastal ecologies through integrating the existing landscape and urban conditions in the design.

COMMUNITY

COTE SUPERSPREAD

DESIGN FOR EQUITABLE COMMUNITIES

The design is built around existing nodes and access points to establish a direct circulation from the city fabric and from the pier to the site. The main material used are wood, concrete, and steel. There are plenty of open and semi open spaces that provides access to the man made tidal pools where people can see and study marine animals.

The site serves both as a destination for marine life enthusiasts and historians. A gallery is made to display marine life artifacts and the whaling past of Cape Cod. An auditorium and several lecture spaces are also available for public use.

MARINE LIFE AND THE COMMUNITY

DESIGN FOR WATER

COTE SUPERSPREAD

The project hopes to address the rising sea level in a subractive way, inviting the sea water in, with the construction of tidal pools. With in these tidal pools are different marine life that are local to Cape Cod. There are several tidal pools located in the site. Most are for public access and two are specifically for marine life researchers.

DESIGN FOR WATER

COTE SUPERSPREAD

ARTIFICIAL REEFS

These tidal pools will help mitigate the impact of crashing waves to the waterfront lessening the potential of corrosion. Man made artificial reefs are also implored near the shoreline for additional buffer against the sea.

The irrigation required to sustain the added greenery in the site is sourced from recycled water.

DESIGN FOR ECOLOGY

COTE SUPERSPREAD

The project is located at a parking lot in Mac Millan Pier, Province Town, Cape Cod. Because the site is a paved parking lot, there is no existing green space or open soil to develop. It is also crucial to take into consideration that the site will be directly affected by the rising sea level.

In landscaping, appropriate flora and fauna should be carefully selected to benefit the existing biodiversity in the area. The idea is to create vegetative roof tops that will attract and sustain biodiversity and to develop occupiable green spaces around the building, in which Provincetown lacks.

1. VEGETATED AREA

The area of the site reserved for vegetation before and after development determined by subtractung all impervious areas from the site. In most cases, it’s desirable to increa a site’s vegetated area.

3. LEVEL OF ECOLOGICAL DESIGN

The strategies implemented by the project to help users become more aware or connected with the site and their regional ecosystems.

2. NATIVE PLANTINGS

Native plants include those that are indigenous to a specific geographic location and are adapted for the local climate and ecosystems.

A greater percentage of native plants and a smaller percentage of turf grass is usually preferable.

DESIGN FOR ECONOMY

Measure 5 ‐ Design for Economy

Explanations

The goal is to increase the efficiency of the building. This is primarily achieved by allocating proper and efficient space for each building program. By doing so, the overall mass of the building is reduced. Thus, lessening the resources to construct, operate and maintain the building.

Other ways to reduce building operating costs includes: Investing in high quality products that would require less maintenance and repair in the future, strategizing cleaning time for maximum cleaning using the least time and resources needed, and promoting public transportation or providing scheduled shuttles from offsite parking/train stations.

Measure 5 ‐ Design for Economy

1

Benchmark ‐ Building Type Specific $212.63/ sf Benchmark SourceRS Means Data Actual construction cost $500.00/ sf Construction cost reduction from the benchmark ‐135%

DESIGN FOR ENERGY

COTE SUPERSPREAD

The chart on the right reflects the amount of energy that can be saved by mitigating the electricity used in the building. Heating and cooling take up the largest amount of energy that the building generates. By applying passive house design, this would optimize the gains and losses of the building based on climate. In effect, this would significantly reduce the heating and cooling costs without compromising the quality of air and comfort inside the building.

Use these cells to document the tools and reference codes used to calculate predicted energy consumption.

For both Predicted and Measured Monthly Energy Use:

Step 1 ‐ Select and confirm the unit of measurement for each fuel type, i.e. kWh or kBTU of grid electricity.

Step 2 ‐ Fill out the predicted energy consumption or generation per fuel type.

Use energy model outputs for predicted energy and a utility bill for measured energy. On‐site renewables calculations in this spreadsheet require gross metering, not net‐metering values. If an energy model was not completed for the project, just fill out the measured energy use. If a fuel type was not used, leave the monthly inputs as Zero.

Step 3 ‐ Enter the local energy cost for each fuel type if available. The cost of renewables is calculated as negative.

Step 4 ‐ For projects using Chilled Water for cooling, use the dropdown to assign the appropriate carbon conversion factor by system type. The default is a natural gas absorption chiller.

For

Step

or generation per fuel type. Use energy model outputs for predicted energy and a utility bill for measured energy. On‐site renewables calculations in this spreadsheet require gross metering, not net‐metering values.

If an energy model was not completed for the project, just fill out the measured energy use. If a fuel type was not used, leave the monthly inputs as Zero.

Step 3 ‐ Enter the local energy cost for each fuel type if available. The cost of renewables is calculated as negative.

Step 4 ‐ For projects using Chilled Water for cooling, use the dropdown to assign the appropriate carbon conversion factor by system type. The default is a natural gas absorption chiller.

Step 1: Calculate the total installed lighting power density for your building.

Step 2: The benchmark value is auto‐filled from the Referenced Tables tab.

Step 1: Calculate the total installed lighting power density for your building.

Step 2: The benchmark value is auto‐filled from the Referenced Tables tab.

Record your building's window wall ratio.

For both Predicted and Measured Monthly Energy Use:

Step 1 ‐ Select and confirm the unit of measurement for each fuel type, i.e. kWh or kBTU of grid electricity.

January17,444.0 7,833.0 12,000.0 5,000.0

Record your building's window wall ratio.

January17,444.0

Step 2 ‐ Fill out the predicted energy consumption or generation per fuel type.

Use energy model outputs for predicted energy and a utility bill for measured energy. On‐site renewables calculations in this spreadsheet require gross metering, not net‐metering values.

7,833.0 12,000.0 5,000.0 February17,444.0

7,833.0 15,000.0 9,000.0 March17,444.0

7,833.0 16,000.0 5,000.0 April17,444.0

7,833.0 11,000.0 9,000.0 May17,444.0

7,833.0 10,000.0 5,000.0 June17,444.0

If an energy model was not completed for the project, just fill out the measured energy use. If a fuel type was not used, leave the monthly inputs as Zero.

February17,444.0 7,833.0 15,000.0 9,000.0 March17,444.0 7,833.0 16,000.0 5,000.0 April17,444.0 7,833.0 11,000.0 9,000.0 May17,444.0 7,833.0 10,000.0 5,000.0 June17,444.0 7,833.0 12,000.0 5,000.0 July17,444.0 7,833.0 16,000.0 5,000.0 August17,444.0 7,833.0 18,000.0 4,000.0 September17,444.0 7,833.0 12,000.0 5,000.0 October17,444.0 7,833.0 17,000.0 4,000.0 November17,444.0 7,833.0 15,000.0 5,000.0 Decembe 17,444.0 7,833.0 15,000.0 5,000.0 Total 209,328 0 0 093,996169,000 0 0 066,000

7,833.0 12,000.0 5,000.0 July17,444.0

7,833.0 16,000.0 5,000.0 August17,444.0

January17,444.0 February17,444.0 March17,444.0 April17,444.0 May17,444.0 June17,444.0 July17,444.0 August17,444.0 September17,444.0 October17,444.0 November17,444.0

17,444.0

7,833.0 18,000.0 4,000.0 September17,444.0

Step 3 ‐ Enter the local energy cost for each fuel type if available. The cost of renewables is calculated as negative.

7,833.0 12,000.0 5,000.0 October17,444.0

7,833.0 17,000.0 4,000.0 November17,444.0

Step 4 ‐ For projects using Chilled Water for cooling, use the dropdown to assign the appropriate carbon conversion factor by system type. The default is a natural gas absorption chiller.

7,833.0 15,000.0 5,000.0 December 17,444.0 7,833.0 15,000.0 5,000.0

Step 1: Calculate the total installed lighting power density for your building.

Step 2: The benchmark value is auto‐filled from the Referenced Tables tab.

Record your building's window wall ratio.

May17,444.0

June17,444.0

July17,444.0

August17,444.0

September17,444.0

October17,444.0

November17,444.0

December 17,444.0

DESIGN FOR ENERGY

Step

COTE SUPERSPREAD

Step

7,833.0 10,000.0 5,000.0

7,833.0 12,000.0 5,000.0

7,833.0 16,000.0 5,000.0

7,833.0 18,000.0 4,000.0

7,833.0 12,000.0 5,000.0

7,833.0 17,000.0 4,000.0

7,833.0 15,000.0 5,000.0

7,833.0 15,000.0 5,000.0

Total 209,328 0 0 093,996169,000 0 0 066,000

kBTU Conversion Factor 3.411000.001000.001194.00 3.41 3.411000.001000.00 1.19 3.41

Total Energy (kBtu/yr) 714,256 0 0 0320,728576,652 0 0 0225,201

Cost of Energy (per selected unit) $0.12 $0.94 $0.18 $9.39 ‐0.02 $0.12 $0.94 $0.18 $9.39 ‐0.02

District Chilled Water Type (if applicable)

Carbon Conversion Factor (kg‐CO2e / kBtu) 0.118 0.053 0.053 0.066 ‐0.118 0.118 0.053 0.053 0.066 0.118

Total Operational Carbon (kg‐CO2e / yr) 84,432 0 0 0 ‐37,91368,166 0 0 026,621 Step

Step 1: Determine the area of the building that is regularly occupied.

The landscape of the site is manipulated to create tidal pools and to accomodate the rising sea levels. Each building is strategically placWWoor condition includes strategic placement of windows to allow for natural sunlight and cross ventilation, thermostats and CO2 detectors at each floor and careful selection of materials.

Step 2: Input the area of occupied spaces that have access to views, operable windows, daylight, and complaince with the annual solar exposure area criteria.

For quality views, include workstations that have a direct line of sight to nature. For operable windows, include work stations within 25' of an operable window. For Daylight, input a continuous daylight autonomy metric. If daylight performance wasn't simulated, input the total area within 15' from a perimeter wall.

Input the total number of accessible thermostats and the percent of occupants who control their own light levels.

Input information on indoor air quality measurements.

you avoided. Then name each of those chemicals and the standard that you used as a guide. Examples of the standards include:

*Living Building Challenge Red List

*WELL Building Standard

*Healthier Hospitals Initiative Safer Chemicals

*Six Classes (chemicals from Green Science Policy Institute)

*Kaiser Permanente Facilities Design Program's Chemicals of Concern in Building Materials, Fabric, Furniture, and Finishes list.

Calculators:

Measure 7 ‐ Design for Wellness

Explanations

views6,000sf

Reproductive Toxicants

The major structural material used is reinforced concrete. To reduce the total embodied carbon, careful and considerate selection of manufacturer and material is taken into consideration. Another way to reduce the embodied carbon is to reduce the total mass that requires concrete. This is achieved by reducing the internal circulation of the building and designing for bigger windows that creates bigger cut outs in the concrete building.

DESIGN FOR WELLNESS

COTE SUPERSPREAD

The materials used for the artificial reef is also left over materials from the site construction.

The design accomodates coastal flooding and extreme temperatures. Thus dual purpose of spaces is incorporated to maximize the use of space in both the summer and winter time. The tidal pools act as a source of research for the marine center and turns into a skating rink in the winter.

SECTION 6 | DISCOVERY

Engagement with the building doesn’t stop after construction, it is intended to continously monitor the quality of habitation and the effectivity of environmental measures applied.

Calculators: Enter your values into the yellow cells. Enter non‐numerical data into the green Select all the post occupancy strategies that were employed. Select all the transparency strategies that were employed.

Which of the following did you do to stay engaged with the building? Which of the following did you do to share the lessons of the project? ENVIRONMENTAL PORTFOLIO | JHAMELA MASTINGGAL

Measure 10 ‐ Discovery Calculators: Enter your values into the yellow cells. Enter non‐numerical data into the green Select all the post occupancy strategies that were employed. Select all the transparency strategies that were employed.

Which of the following did you do to stay engaged with the building? Who has access to performance feedback?

Which of the following did you do to stay engaged with the building? Which of the following did you do to share the lessons of the project?

Select the level of occupancy feedback. All occupants are presented with feedback

Which of the following did you do to stay engaged with the building? Who has access to performance feedback?

Select the level of occupancy feedback. All occupants are presented with feedback

Measure 10 ‐ Discovery Explanations 1 ‐ Level of Commissioning Basic CommissioningYes Enhanced Commissioning (Third Party)No Continuous CommissioningYes Monitoring‐Based CommissioningYes Enclosure CommissioningNo Commissioning Score60% 2 ‐ Level of Post Occupancy Engagement Contact the owner / Occupant to see how things are goingYes Formal post occupancy air quality testingYes Obtain utility bill to determine actual performanceYes Data logging of indoor environmental measurementsYes Survey building occupants on satisfactionYes Post occupancy energy analysisYes Formal onsite daylight measurementsYes Develop and share strategies to improve the building's PerformanceYes Share collected data with building occupantsYes Teach occupants and operators how to improve building performance Yes Post Occupancy Evaluation Score100% 3 ‐ Level of Transparency Present the design of the project to the officeYes Present outcomes and lessons learned to the office Yes Present the design of the project to the professionYes Present outcomes and lessons learned to the profession Yes Present the design of the project to the publicYes Present outcomes and lessons learned to the public Yes Publish post occupancy data from the buildingYes Publish any lessons learned from design, construction, or occupancyYes other: other: Transparency Score80% 4 ‐ Level of Occupant Feedback Choose one Feedback Score100%

SUMMARY

COTE SUPERSPREAD

Engagement with the building doesn’t stop after construction, it is intended to continously monitor the quality of habitation and the effectivity of environmental measures applied.

Data gathered is shared to the firm, construction community and to clients. Transparency on the efficiency and effectivity of environmental measures will encourage a learning environment that is inclusive to everybody.

Percent Grey/Black Water Use 0% % total water use from grey or blackwater

Potable Water Use Reduction 90%

Potable Water Used for Irrigation Yes

Rainwater Managed On‐Site 50%

Estimated Runoff Quality 40%

Measure 5 ‐ Design for Economy

Actual construction cost $500 Dollar (USD) / sf

Benchmark Construction cost $213 Dollar (USD) / sf

Construction cost Reduction from the Benchmark ‐135%

Efficiency Ratio Achieved 75% Net to Gross

Efficiency Ratio Percent Improvement 14%

Measure 6 ‐ Design for Energy

Net site EUI 49.2 kBtu / sf / yr

Gross site EUI 89.3 kBtu / sf / yr

Net Energy Use Reduction from Benchmark 70%

Operational Carbon Emissions per Area 6 kg‐CO2e / sf / yr

Percent from Renewable Energy 45%

Percent Operational Carbon Reduction from Benchmark 60%

Net site EUI 43.9 kBtu / sf / yr

Gross site EUI 72.1 kBtu / sf / yr

Net Energy Use Reduction from Benchmark 73%

Operational Carbon Emissions per Area 12 kg‐CO2e / sf / yr

Percent from Renewable Energy 39%

Percent Operational Carbon Reduction from Benchmark 18%

Lighting Power Density 0.70 W/sf

Lighting Power Density % Reduction 45%

Window to Wall Ratio 30%

Measure 7 ‐ Design for Wellness

Quality

Individual

Individual

Measure 8 ‐ Design for Resources

Embodied carbon intensity 35.3 kg‐C02e / sf

Total embodied carbon 282,400 kg‐C02e

Embodied carbon modeled Yes Y/N

Biogenic carbon considered? No Y/N

Number of EPDs Collected 2

Percent of reused floor area 0%

Percent of construction waste diverted 20%

Percent of recycled content of building materials 5%

Percent of regional materials 0%

Percent of installed wood that is FSC Certified

SUMMARY

COTE SUPERSPREAD

Engagement with the building doesn’t stop after construction, it is intended to continously monitor the quality of habitation and the effectivity of environmental measures applied.

Data gathered is shared to the firm, construction community and to clients. Transparency on the efficiency and effectivity of environmental measures will encourage a learning environment that is inclusive to everybody.

Measure 7 ‐ Design for Wellness

Quality views 75% % occupied area

Operable windows 63% % occupied area

Daylit area (sDA 300/50%) 75% % occupied area

ASE Compliant Area (ASE 1000,250) 63% % occupied area

Individual thermal control 4.3 Occupants per thermostat

Individual lighting control 20% % occupants who control their own lighting

Peak measured CO 2 5000 ppm

Peak measured VOC 500 ppb

Materials with health certifications 4 Materials

Chemicals of Concern Avoided 0 Chemicals

Measure 8 ‐ Design for Resources

Embodied carbon intensity 35.3 kg‐C02e / sf

Total embodied carbon 282,400 kg‐C02e

Embodied carbon modeled Yes Y/N

Biogenic carbon considered? No Y/N

Number of EPDs Collected 2

Percent of reused floor area 0%

Percent of construction waste diverted 20%

Percent of recycled content of building materials 5%

Percent of regional materials 0%

Percent of installed wood that is FSC Certified

Measure

Local Hazard Research Score 50%

Functionality Without Power (Resiliency) Score 33%

Building Design Lifespan 200 Years

Measure

RESULTS

Engagement with the building doesn’t stop after construction, it is intended to continously monitor the quality of habitation and the effectivity of environmental measures applied.

Data gathered is shared to the firm, construction community and to clients. Transparency on the efficiency and effectivity of environmental measures will encourage a learning environment that is inclusive to everybody.

This page compares metrics against their benchmark along a scale from "Baseline" to "Very High Performance"

Baseline

0

1

0 50%

40%

0% 14% 135%

45% 75% 63% 75%

100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% Measured 90% 100% No (1) 100%

RESULTS

COTE SUPERSPREAD

Engagement with the building doesn’t stop after construction, it is intended to continously monitor the quality of habitation and the effectivity of environmental measures applied.

Data gathered is shared to the firm, construction community and to clients. Transparency on the efficiency and effectivity of environmental measures will encourage a learning environment that is inclusive to everybody.

Cumulative carbon over building life

Building Materials 16%

Energy/year 5%

Commute/year 79%

Cumulative carbon after 1 year occupancy Commute/year 94%

1 0%

4 200 33% 50%

35.30 282,400 1 0

63% 0% 20% 5% 60% 100%

71% 95% 100% 100% 0% 0% 80%

CARBON OVER TIME: 100% >50% >50% Measured 73% 105% 39% 100% 18% 100% 75% 100% 100% 100% 100% Yes (1) Yes (1) Carbon Calculations 10+ Total kg of Carbon Dioxide Equivalents from: 10+ Lifespan Commute/yearEnergy/yearBuilding Materials Total 1Year1,436,91094,787 282,400 1,814,097 20Year28,738,2021,895,741282,400 30,916,343 100Year143,691,0129,478,703282,400 153,452,115 Yes (1) 200Year287,382,02418,957,406282,400 306,621,830 Yes (1) Design 200Year287,382,02418,957,406282,400 306,621,830 100% 100%

Total Percentage of Carbon Dioxide Equivalents from: 100% Lifespan Commute/yearEnergy/yearBuilding Materials Total 100%

1Year79.2% 5.2% 15.6% 100.0% 100% 20Year93.0% 6.1% 0.9% 100.0% 100Year93.6% 6.2% 0.2% 100.0% 100% 200Year93.7% 6.2% 0.1% 100.0% 100% Design 0Year93.7% 6.2% 0.1% 100.0% 200 100% 100% 100%

PORTFOLIO | JHAMELA MASTINGGAL

BIBLIOGRAPHY

ENVIRONMENTAL PORTFOLIO

“Carbon

Footprint Calculator”

US EPA, Office of Air & Radiation, Office of Atmospheric Programs, Climate Change Division. (2022, August). Household carbon footprint calculator. US EPA. https://www3. epa.gov/carbon-footprint-calculator/

“Marine Water Recharge Areas”

Story map series. (2022, February). CCOMISSION. https://cccommission.maps.arcgis. com/apps/MapSeries/index.html?appid=efa7276c967f48658c6190d53196ba1d

“Groundwater Discharge Permits”

Story map series. (2022, February). CCOMISSION. https://cccommission.maps.arcgis. com/apps/MapSeries/index.html?appid=efa7276c967f48658c6190d53196ba1d

“Site

Topography”

Cape Cod national seashore topo map in Barnstable. (2015, December 26). TopoZone. https://www.topozone.com/massachusetts/barnstable-ma/park/cape-cod-nationalseashore/

“Topographic map”

Cape Cod topographic map, elevation, relief. (n.d.). Topographic-Map.Com. Retrieved May 16, 2022, from https://en-us.topographic-map.com/maps/sax4/Cape-Cod/

“Climate Graph”

ClimateData.Org; US Topographic Map. https://en.climate-data.org/north-america/unitedstates-of-america/massachusetts/provincetown-141814/#climate-graph

“Demographic Data” and “Property Value”

Household income. (2022, February 2). Data Cape Cod. https://datacapecod.org/pf/ household-income/