Manning River Estuary Catchment and Management Program 2021-2031

Page 142

11.1 MERI FOR THE MANNING RIVER, ESTUARY AND CATCHMENT MidCoast Council will implement a broadscale environmental monitoring, evaluation, reporting and improvement (MERI) program to support the management objectives of the ECMP. The MERI Program will provide a high-level assessment of environmental quality to ensure the values in Section 2 are maintained across the Manning River estuary and catchment. Implementing the MERI Program will assist Council and our stakeholders to establish a baseline of data characterising water quality including ecological health. Continued long-term monitoring will enable us to detect changes (positive or negative) in water quality over time. Analysing the data will aid decision-making and adaptive management, helping us to improve the program and achieve our objectives. The MERI Program constitutes the science program defined in the CMP Program Logic Model (see Section 3.4).

11.1.1 Principles The MERI Plan adopts the following Principles: • Adaptive Management – adopts a systematic approach to improving natural resource management by learning from management Relies on an agreed program logic – robust outcomes and making changes to improve the methodology to ensure outcomes can be ecological response and reduce stressors effectively measured • Values cultural knowledge – recognises the Uses Best Practice - current best practice and importance of cultural knowledge holders in scientific knowledge and multiple (environmental increasing understanding of the condition indicator) lines of evidence and health of the Manning River estuary and catchment and the influence environmental Adopts a risk-based approach – assists MidCoast change may have on physical and non-physical Council to prioritise monitoring of ecological elements of cultural heritage responses and stressors that pose the highest risk • Values local knowledge – recognises the value of to ecological health local knowledge in understanding and interpreting Emphasises collaboration – builds on existing scientific results about the heath and condition of programs to improve efficiency and reduce the Manning River Estuary and Catchment duplication in effort • Values citizen science – recognises the role of Transparent reporting – offers open access to citizen science programs in filling knowledge gaps information and increasing understanding of the condition and health of the Manning River estuary and catchment.

• Uses SMART Objectives – Specific, Measurable, Achievable, Realistic, Time-bound •

142

Manning River Estuary and Catchment Management Program (ECMP)


Turn static files into dynamic content formats.

Create a flipbook

Articles inside

Table 9: Contribution of the ECMP to objects of the CM Act

10min
pages 165-168

14 Bibliography

4min
pages 157-158

Appendix 6: MCC land-use strategies aligned to the CM SEPP objectives

9min
pages 178-184

12 Proposed amendments to the CM SEPP

2min
pages 154-155

13 Conclusion

0
page 156

Table 8: Research Program

1min
pages 152-153

11.2 MERI for the ECMP Action Program

1min
page 149

Catchment

4min
pages 142-144

10 Coastal Zone Emergency Sub-Plan

1min
page 140

Actions led by Council

2min
pages 137-138

7.8 Governance Actions

0
page 123

7.5 Aboriginal Custodianship Actions

1min
pages 117-118

7.4 Biodiversity Actions

1min
pages 115-116

Health Actions

5min
pages 109-112

7.1 Stewardship Actions

2min
pages 106-108

Figure 35: The three stages of evaluation

0
pages 104-105

7 Management Actions

4min
pages 102-103

between issues

1min
page 101

6.14 Erosion and Sediment

1min
page 100

6.12 Biodiversity Loss

1min
page 98

6.11 Urban Stormwater and Litter

1min
page 97

20 March 2021

3min
pages 95-96

coastal inundation

1min
page 94

6.9 Entrance Modifications

4min
pages 92-93

Table 4: Key impacts associated with water pollution from diffuse-source runoff

1min
page 88

6.8 Modified Flow

4min
pages 90-91

6.6 Loss and degradation of riparian vegetation

1min
page 85

Acid Sulfate Soil

1min
page 83

6.2 Community Stewardship

1min
page 77

6.4 Loss and degradation of coastal wetlands

1min
page 81

5.2 Manning Threat and Risk Assessment

1min
page 69

Table 1: Gross revenue of major industries in the MidCoast Region

1min
page 64

4.5 Population Projections and land use

0
page 65

Figure 22: Risk ratings for sediment and nutrient loading in drainage units

0
page 68

Figure 17: The sampling location for water quality data

1min
page 58

Figure 20: Manning River chlorophyll-a for the period 2015-2018

1min
pages 61-62

Figure 18: Manning River TN and TP readings from 2015-18

0
page 59

Figure 19: Manning River turbidity for the period 2015-2018

0
page 60

Figure 16: Water quality monitoring sites in the estuary

1min
page 57

4.3 Water Quality

1min
page 56

4.2 Natural assets

5min
pages 52-54

Figure 14: Program Logic Model

1min
page 49

of the Manning catchment

0
page 55

3 Objectives, principles, program logic

1min
page 45

Figure 12: Values our community ascribed to each subcatchment

6min
pages 39-44

Figure 13: Problem tree

0
page 48

3.2 Principles

1min
page 47

2.3 What our community told us

2min
pages 37-38

Coastal Management

2min
pages 20-22

Figure 10: Option for the Manning River ECMP Governance Structure

2min
page 31

1 Introduction Looking after the river we love

1min
page 13

Figure 2: Map of the Planning Areas for the three separate Coastal Management Programs

1min
page 19

2.2 Our stakeholder consultation program

5min
pages 33-35

1.1 About this program

0
page 14

2 Water Quality and Ecosystem

1min
page 7

Characteristics of the estuary and

1min
page 4
Issuu converts static files into: digital portfolios, online yearbooks, online catalogs, digital photo albums and more. Sign up and create your flipbook.