Manning River Estuary Catchment and Management Program 2021-2031

Page 69

5.2 MANNING THREAT AND RISK ASSESSMENT Key risks and threats to our ECMP objectives for the Manning River estuary and catchment were assessed and ranked using MidCoast Council’s risk assessment methodology. Once ranking was complete, a risk tolerance was assigned from low tolerance to moderate and high tolerance. All risks assigned low to moderate tolerance were then nominated as issues for further analysis.

5.2.1 Threat and Risk Assessment Method Several inputs were considered when assessing risks and threats to our objectives and the ECMP Management Areas. The steps included: • Review of the NSW Government’s Marine Estate Management Strategy (2018) state-wide Threat and Risk Assessment (TARA) and finer scale TARA for the Northern Region which includes the Manning estuary. These documents assess and rank risks to ecological and socio-economic values. • A literature review for the Manning River estuary and its catchment, conducted for the Stage 1 Scoping Study. • A workshop with our Technical Advisory Group (TAG) to select and assess the risks that related to the Manning estuary and catchment, using best available scientific and local knowledge (MCC 2018). Existing management regimes, research and knowledge gaps were accounted for in the risk assessment. • Consultation with the ECMP Reference Group who were invited to identify their top three issues. Issues that featured most strongly and align with the TAG consensus were acid sulfate soil discharge, sediment and erosion control and managing agricultural impacts. Other issues raised by the Reference Group were flood mitigation, drought resilience and lack of community understanding and stewardship. • A more detailed climate change threat and risk assessment was conducted by Salients Consulting, based on a literature review and consultation with key stakeholders. Council’s Risk Management Framework was used to rate the risks. Scores were assigned to the likelihood and consequence of threats to environmental, social and economic risk, and the risk rating was derived from the matrix below. Management controls were then considered, and the scoring repeated to assess the residual risk.

Acid sulfate soil

Manning River Estuary and Catchment Management Program (ECMP)

69


Turn static files into dynamic content formats.

Create a flipbook

Articles inside

Table 9: Contribution of the ECMP to objects of the CM Act

10min
pages 165-168

14 Bibliography

4min
pages 157-158

Appendix 6: MCC land-use strategies aligned to the CM SEPP objectives

9min
pages 178-184

12 Proposed amendments to the CM SEPP

2min
pages 154-155

13 Conclusion

0
page 156

Table 8: Research Program

1min
pages 152-153

11.2 MERI for the ECMP Action Program

1min
page 149

Catchment

4min
pages 142-144

10 Coastal Zone Emergency Sub-Plan

1min
page 140

Actions led by Council

2min
pages 137-138

7.8 Governance Actions

0
page 123

7.5 Aboriginal Custodianship Actions

1min
pages 117-118

7.4 Biodiversity Actions

1min
pages 115-116

Health Actions

5min
pages 109-112

7.1 Stewardship Actions

2min
pages 106-108

Figure 35: The three stages of evaluation

0
pages 104-105

7 Management Actions

4min
pages 102-103

between issues

1min
page 101

6.14 Erosion and Sediment

1min
page 100

6.12 Biodiversity Loss

1min
page 98

6.11 Urban Stormwater and Litter

1min
page 97

20 March 2021

3min
pages 95-96

coastal inundation

1min
page 94

6.9 Entrance Modifications

4min
pages 92-93

Table 4: Key impacts associated with water pollution from diffuse-source runoff

1min
page 88

6.8 Modified Flow

4min
pages 90-91

6.6 Loss and degradation of riparian vegetation

1min
page 85

Acid Sulfate Soil

1min
page 83

6.2 Community Stewardship

1min
page 77

6.4 Loss and degradation of coastal wetlands

1min
page 81

5.2 Manning Threat and Risk Assessment

1min
page 69

Table 1: Gross revenue of major industries in the MidCoast Region

1min
page 64

4.5 Population Projections and land use

0
page 65

Figure 22: Risk ratings for sediment and nutrient loading in drainage units

0
page 68

Figure 17: The sampling location for water quality data

1min
page 58

Figure 20: Manning River chlorophyll-a for the period 2015-2018

1min
pages 61-62

Figure 18: Manning River TN and TP readings from 2015-18

0
page 59

Figure 19: Manning River turbidity for the period 2015-2018

0
page 60

Figure 16: Water quality monitoring sites in the estuary

1min
page 57

4.3 Water Quality

1min
page 56

4.2 Natural assets

5min
pages 52-54

Figure 14: Program Logic Model

1min
page 49

of the Manning catchment

0
page 55

3 Objectives, principles, program logic

1min
page 45

Figure 12: Values our community ascribed to each subcatchment

6min
pages 39-44

Figure 13: Problem tree

0
page 48

3.2 Principles

1min
page 47

2.3 What our community told us

2min
pages 37-38

Coastal Management

2min
pages 20-22

Figure 10: Option for the Manning River ECMP Governance Structure

2min
page 31

1 Introduction Looking after the river we love

1min
page 13

Figure 2: Map of the Planning Areas for the three separate Coastal Management Programs

1min
page 19

2.2 Our stakeholder consultation program

5min
pages 33-35

1.1 About this program

0
page 14

2 Water Quality and Ecosystem

1min
page 7

Characteristics of the estuary and

1min
page 4
Issuu converts static files into: digital portfolios, online yearbooks, online catalogs, digital photo albums and more. Sign up and create your flipbook.