Manning River Estuary Catchment and Management Program 2021-2031

Page 92

6.9 ENTRANCE MODIFICATIONS The Manning River ECMP Planning Area commences 2 km up-river of AHD and is a wholeof-catchment program primarily concerned with the impact of land on water. The CMP for Old BarManning Point, which addresses coastal processes will consider the issue of entrance modifications. There will be integration and consistency between the two programs. At the river entrances, a single breakwater/training wall at the northern entrance at Harrington has created a permanent ocean entrance while Farquhar Inlet is mechanically opened to the ocean when flood trigger levels are reached.52 Entrance modification has been included in the issues analysis for both the Manning River ECMP and Old Bar-Manning Point CMP as modifications of the entrance to the Manning River may impact on both coastal and estuary processes. In March 2020, the Minister for Transport and Roads, together with the Member for Myall Lakes, announced the establishment of the Manning River Taskforce to consider options for providing a permanent entrance to the Manning River. MidCoast Council was a stakeholder to the Taskforce. In November 2020, following its deliberation, the Taskforce released its report investigating options to improve safety and navigability of the Manning River entrance (Transport for NSW 2020). The following

context is quoted from the report. “The objective of the Taskforce was to build on a previous study (Manly Hydraulics Laboratory 2018) by providing expert advice to the NSW government about the expected economic benefits that could be generated by a permanent entrance to the Manning River at Harrington, the optimal engineering solution and consideration of how such a proposal could be designed and delivered in the context of the requirements of the Coastal Management Act 2016. The Task Force was also to consider implications for potential improvements at the southern entrance of the river at Farquhar Inlet.” “The Taskforce was comprised of experts in coastal engineering, maritime infrastructure, coastal management and maritime industry, and was chaired by Transport for NSW - Maritime. The first two options considered were 1) Status Quo/ Do Nothing and 2) Routine Dredging which was described as similar to the status quo.” “The report then considered option 3) The Southern Entrance Breakwater option consisting of the construction of a southern breakwater to stabilise the entrance between that breakwater and the existing northern breakwater. That is the option which has been generally in the past supported by those seeking to improve safety and navigability of the Manning River Entrance – which is what the Taskforce was set up to investigate.”

“Finally, the report considered another solution 4 the Manning Point Twin Breakwaters. This would involve the creation of a new opening at the narrowest point of the Mitchell Island sand spit. The report suggested that this would be considerably cheaper than option 3.” “The MidCoast Council has resolved to support the Expert Taskforce and its processes. As indicated in recommendation 1 set out above, before any proposal can proceed to a Final Business Case a more rigorous engineering, constructability and environmental Impact statement will be undertaken.” The Taskforce report concluded with two recommendations. Recommendation 1 was for Transport for NSW to enter the proposed Manning River Entrance Project into the Infrastructure NSW Investor Assurance and NSW Treasury business case process. The development of a Strategic Business Case (SBC) is required to further analyse the optimal engineering outcome, the broader impacts of intervention in the area, and the relative costs and benefits of the identified options. If the benefits are found to outweigh the costs of the project, a more rigorous engineering, constructability, and environmental impact assessment should be undertaken in a Final Business Case prior to a decision to invest in a permanent solution.

52: Parsons, 2010 53: NSW Marine Estate Threat and Risk Assessment Report, BMT WBM, August 2017 54: NSW Marine Estate Management Authority, July 2018 55 (Nielsen & Gordon, 2008)

92

Manning River Estuary and Catchment Management Program (ECMP)


Turn static files into dynamic content formats.

Create a flipbook

Articles inside

Table 9: Contribution of the ECMP to objects of the CM Act

10min
pages 165-168

14 Bibliography

4min
pages 157-158

Appendix 6: MCC land-use strategies aligned to the CM SEPP objectives

9min
pages 178-184

12 Proposed amendments to the CM SEPP

2min
pages 154-155

13 Conclusion

0
page 156

Table 8: Research Program

1min
pages 152-153

11.2 MERI for the ECMP Action Program

1min
page 149

Catchment

4min
pages 142-144

10 Coastal Zone Emergency Sub-Plan

1min
page 140

Actions led by Council

2min
pages 137-138

7.8 Governance Actions

0
page 123

7.5 Aboriginal Custodianship Actions

1min
pages 117-118

7.4 Biodiversity Actions

1min
pages 115-116

Health Actions

5min
pages 109-112

7.1 Stewardship Actions

2min
pages 106-108

Figure 35: The three stages of evaluation

0
pages 104-105

7 Management Actions

4min
pages 102-103

between issues

1min
page 101

6.14 Erosion and Sediment

1min
page 100

6.12 Biodiversity Loss

1min
page 98

6.11 Urban Stormwater and Litter

1min
page 97

20 March 2021

3min
pages 95-96

coastal inundation

1min
page 94

6.9 Entrance Modifications

4min
pages 92-93

Table 4: Key impacts associated with water pollution from diffuse-source runoff

1min
page 88

6.8 Modified Flow

4min
pages 90-91

6.6 Loss and degradation of riparian vegetation

1min
page 85

Acid Sulfate Soil

1min
page 83

6.2 Community Stewardship

1min
page 77

6.4 Loss and degradation of coastal wetlands

1min
page 81

5.2 Manning Threat and Risk Assessment

1min
page 69

Table 1: Gross revenue of major industries in the MidCoast Region

1min
page 64

4.5 Population Projections and land use

0
page 65

Figure 22: Risk ratings for sediment and nutrient loading in drainage units

0
page 68

Figure 17: The sampling location for water quality data

1min
page 58

Figure 20: Manning River chlorophyll-a for the period 2015-2018

1min
pages 61-62

Figure 18: Manning River TN and TP readings from 2015-18

0
page 59

Figure 19: Manning River turbidity for the period 2015-2018

0
page 60

Figure 16: Water quality monitoring sites in the estuary

1min
page 57

4.3 Water Quality

1min
page 56

4.2 Natural assets

5min
pages 52-54

Figure 14: Program Logic Model

1min
page 49

of the Manning catchment

0
page 55

3 Objectives, principles, program logic

1min
page 45

Figure 12: Values our community ascribed to each subcatchment

6min
pages 39-44

Figure 13: Problem tree

0
page 48

3.2 Principles

1min
page 47

2.3 What our community told us

2min
pages 37-38

Coastal Management

2min
pages 20-22

Figure 10: Option for the Manning River ECMP Governance Structure

2min
page 31

1 Introduction Looking after the river we love

1min
page 13

Figure 2: Map of the Planning Areas for the three separate Coastal Management Programs

1min
page 19

2.2 Our stakeholder consultation program

5min
pages 33-35

1.1 About this program

0
page 14

2 Water Quality and Ecosystem

1min
page 7

Characteristics of the estuary and

1min
page 4
Issuu converts static files into: digital portfolios, online yearbooks, online catalogs, digital photo albums and more. Sign up and create your flipbook.