100 Strategy 2: New Residential Housing, Urban development in that part of the island requires radical analysis of current situation, and before starting this analysis I should mention, the old town planning doesn’t reflect only one period era, but several layers of planning through the ages . Thus, for the better understanding the logic of the town planning, I should also refer to a certain circumstances. Which is quite difficult at the moment to get what it was meant by each single building on the island. Furthermore I drew the first logic on the island, which is the main access, which creates the sense of continuity between the old town and the new developments. The First diagram shows the north - south grid while the second diagram shows the east-west grid network. It shows also, they were much more concerns about the vertical street and network, while a lot of opinions were trying to find interpretations for that. In my opinion, the vertical networks are representing the ventilation access while the all the vertical street is very narrow and controlling summer wind ventilation speed. Focusing on the left side of the island and by extending the logical grid on the other side, I would also talk about the integration between the built environments with the food production lands. The diagram on the right side, represents the schematic idea what I want to say. Different layers of residential houses, recreational activities, educational facilities and agricultural lands, all those are integrated together in a harmony and interacting in all scales. It is also proposing the possibility of reusing the existing train infrastructure and replaces it with another productive infrastructure that the island can gain a benefit out of it. At the end, an additional layer to the floating structure -that I already explained- of a food production, and achieving a high level of the food security in the region.
Figure 74: North- South Networks
Figure 75: East- West Networks
Figure 76: Combined Networks
101
Figure 77: Agricultural integration in Lindau - proposal
102
Strategy 2 : New Residential Housing- Design Process The Development for the residential houses with different layers, the first layer is the public layer of recreational and commercial facilities. The second layer is glasshouses on top of the commercial facilities to fulfill their needs of food. The Third layer is planting the elevations especially on the southern parts of the buildings. The fifth layer is the residential apartment, which occupies 5 floors. It is also possible to mix the residential houses with office building or multi- - purpose facilities. The Diagram below shows the process of the development for one residential building. It starts with the regular courtyard right in the middle which I also proposed a vegetation inside the courtyard, Furthermore, if I want to differentiate between the
Figure 78: Design Process - Mixed use units
old and the new towns, I will propose that we can flip it out, the building becomes a garden and the courtyard becomes a building, in this solution I could keep the same old structure of the houses, at the same time it will be inverted and easy to differentiate between the old and the new buildings blocks. Roof tops are always playing a very important role in the design, its also adds 7% to effective food production lands. On the right side, the sketches shows how it ends up with glass houses all around the building block, a small courtyard right in the middle just for lighting, and finally a continue series of open pedestrian friendly walkways.
103 1170
Cable guides on outer curtain wall support
service system
Swivel clamp
harvesting floor
1
a patented uspended d harvesting can rise as
40m
NFT tray with holes for plants
harvesting bins and germination trays
PLANT CABLE LIFT (PCL) SECTION Section through facade farm showing VIG
Figure 79: VIG process sketches- AgriGREEN market P1 lding integrated hydroponic cultural shed - Marchintegrating 19, 2008 buildings Source: utah.agclassroom.orgfiles
Figure 79’: Diagrams and sketches- Agricultural integrating buildings
104
Strategy 2: New Residential Housing- Design Details Diagrams and sketches, represent different layer of activities, public, semi public semi private and private zones. Although the food productions zones have a special focus in my proposal, but it is integrated with built environment as well. And in order to enhance this relationship between the housing and agriculture, old town and new town, public and private.. etc , a new diagram explaining - in details- this combination.
Figure 80: Detailed Sketch layout - Agricultural integrating buildings
Figure 81: Proposed _Zoning Agricultural integrating buildings
Figure 82: Proposed _Section. Agricultural integrating buildings
105
106
Strategy 2 : Design Sketches Visionary conceptual sketches, for two different spots in the island, the most influential places. Starting and ending The first sketch represents the first impression when the passenger arrives to Lindau, from my point of view, the island still needs to present the nature, being natural island in lake constant and overlooking to the sounding mountain is kind of magic. I want to guide the message. Sketch 2, showing the place where the island meets with the lake, it is a special unique location on the island. A new intervention for a community center and multipurpose hall are located in this place .Accessible rooftops and visual continuity were my keywords
Figure 83: Sketch 1: Proposal_ Island First Impression
Figure 85: Sketch 2: Proposal_ A new intervention for a community centre and multipurpose hall
Figure 84: Sketch 2: Proposal_ A new intervention for a community centre and multipurpose hall
107
108
109
Figure 87: Zoning diagram
50
100
Figure 86: Master Layout - Stratgy 2
300
500
110 Strategy 2: The new development in Reutin (Mainland) On the other side, the mainland, the new commercial center of Lindau, where the old train station was located in this area before. Although, the new commercial center is being developed recently, it does have a tough barrier against the waterfront side. My idea is to break the limits and to attract as much as possible to the other side, by locating new commercial facilities. Furthermore the train tracks are creating that barrier and dividing visually and physically this area into two different parts. Besides the high demands in housing due to the houses expensiveness in the island. Thus, in order to solve all these problems, I started to analyze the existing situation and defining the main problems and opportunities. Indeed, new connections and facilities are needed to accomplish a successful link crossing to the other side, so I created a structure platform for pedestrians. Furthermore, new activities for public are invented over there and it became more active vibrant connection rather than just a typical bridging. Consequently they enjoy crossing over the platform that is also a commercial extension for the existing shopping mall. A new 66 apartment are designed over this platform, which has access from the lower level as well. On the other side a new shopping zone for organic food, which is planted around the site. The shape of the structure creates different zones, one is the opposite of the other one around and courtyard has interactions with the place on front. So the structure is well integrated together with the urban fabric and interacted with all scales and levels.
Figure 88: Section throught the bridge
Figure 89: Car-based network The Maiin Pedestrian Routes
111
Figure 90: Proposal _ Master Layout
Figure 91: Zoning Diagram
Figure 92: Proposal _ Section
112
Strategy 2 : Modelling -Reutin Connections,continuousness of the urban fabric between both sides Figure 93: Reutin Model
113
114
115
50
100
Figure 94: Master Layout
300
500
116
IV.
Contents Chapter
3
Urban Design strategies
3.0
Chapter 3: Urban Design strategies 3.1 Regional Framework of the Future of Lindau (Midterm) 3.1.1 3.1.2
Urban Analysis and Strategies of the Region Sustainability strategies 3.1.3.1 Strategy 1 3.1.3.2 Strategy 2
117
Urban Design Strategies
118 3.2 A Framework for the Future Development of the Island (Final Term) 3.2.1 Regional Strategy Paths to a Fossil CO2 Free, Lindau Cities must lead the way to a climate friendly and sustainable energy future. Today, Lindau has a special location and boundaries, which allow it to participate more toward solving the climatic and global warming issues. As I showed already in the first chapter the strategies for carbon freedom, and one of those strategies is reducing the CO2 emissions due to food transporting. Lindau Region alone has approximately 800 hectare of unplanned agriculture lands, some of them already been used as for food production and others not, my vision is to connect all those regional lands towards a food production strategy. Although pressures on the rural landscape are no longer serious, including mounting burdens of water pollution, but soil degradation and irrigation demand of a definite agricultural base. In the region of Lindau, and despite the absence of significant connection between the agricultural, an opportunity exists to produce meaningful qualities and quantities of food for large urban population, within the built environment. By combining these regional agricultural lands, which is almost 8 Km2, equal to 800 Hectare, which is able to feed around 2000 person.
al, 2007;UNEP, 2007; Brown and Funk, 2008; Lobell et al, 2008) The concept is repose both to global warming and climate change and to reduce long distance food transport and achieving security and food safety. Within a biking distance -around 6 kilometers - is my limits to produce the intended amount of vegetables, poultry,..ect.. Thus, this distance allows all the farmers and the employees to transport their products by their own bikes and without any cars or trucks. As a result of this food production strategy, the regional agricultural lands can produce vegetable with a lower total energy outputs, per kilogram or delivered product than either conventional green house agriculture or profile. As an added value, the regional agricultural network can deliver much-needed jobs to urban areas. Creating thousands of green label jobs, such as a building and operating greenhouse facilities, installing solar panels and constructing green buildings, are an excellent way to fight both global warming and offering jobs. To operate these lands, it could be operated by community housing projects regardless of the location or operated by community civil associations I would have called it a community -support agriculture systems.
A new modern agriculture network feeds 2000 of mouths every day and cuts the fossil fuels based on transporting the food. New urbanization rewords that food, once grown and harvested, must travel a long distances, addition to fossil fuel consumption, traffic congestions, air pollution and carbon emissions while all those problems are already solved in my proposal. On the other side, Global warming is predicted to lead to widespread shortages of food, water and arable land by 2050 within abroad belt extending north and south of water and encompassing some of the world’s most populous regions (Parry et
Figure 95: Eat Your Green Source: Lehmann, S., & Crocker, R. (2012)
119
400
800
1200
2000
Figure 96: Green zones - Visionary urban design master plan
120
Lindau’s Food Security within cycling distance The World Health Organization defines food security as having three facts: food availability, food access, and food use. Food availability is having available sufficient quantities of food on a consistent basis. Food access is having sufficient resources, both economic and physical, to obtain appropriate foods for a nutritious diet. Food use is the appropriate use based on knowledge of basic nutrition and care, as well as adequate water and sanitation. The FAO adds a fourth facet: the stability of the first three dimensions of food security over time FAO Agricultural and Development Economics Division (June 2006). Food Security. Retrieved 8 June 2012. Thus, from this point of departure, and within the cycling distances, I provide fragmented agricultural lands that the inhabitant of Lindau island can enjoy cycling to the destination and buying their own food. It is also an attempt to provide a local food system production, which is important part of food security. Its also another way to express such an integration between the agricultural lands (rural life) and the built environment ( urbanized ) in a way that its encouraging the locals to investigate Their own farms and get the experience
20
00
m.
121
200
400
800
Figure 97: Main food Production Strategy _Routes
1200
122
Lindau’s Food Security within cycling distance Focusing on rediscovery of harvesting for urban life in the region of Lindau , is about networking the agricultural lands all around the island for the food security purposes. It is a generic link and connection to reshape rural-urban relations in many regards. For the island of Lindau for 3,000 future residents it can generate bearable identity and images. It is also proposing for the spaces between country and city, to regain agricultural practices as part of urban attitudes, as the basis of urban culture. Intensive and integrated food production and careful use of the lands. Responding and reopening the experience and ability to deal with resources. The idea of networking the agriculture for everyone is based on the desire for substantiality and the search for sustainable and better lifestyles. These networks will be enhanced with activities for the community such as organic food markets, selling points, recreational facilities, Restaurants, cycling routs,..ect.
Figure 98: Food Markets Sources:(EXPO ,2015,Milan,2010)
The Diagrams show how many spaces do we need to grow the certain amount of vegetation in order to feed 3000 inhabitants in the island of Lindau. Many of those lands are located all around waterfronts and overlooking to the lake of constants, which allows me to create a new layer of activities and creating new identities for these zones. Figure 99: Proposed public green corridors Sources: (Zukunft findet Stadt 7/17/2012 )
123
Regional agricultural zone -within biking distance
Regional routes / activities
Number of inhabitants covered by the production
Figure 100: Regional - biking distance- Agricultural zones
124 3.2.2 A carbon-neutral self-sufficient offshore / floating farming platform (FFP) Based on the regional vision, it’s only sufficient to produce only 25% of the 3000 inhabitants in the island. Thus the original agricultural land is not enough to create such a self-sufficient island, a new additional land should be added. From this approach, I started to think about a new typology that offers a new vegetation platform, a new land locating close to the island to cut the emissions based on food mileages of transporting the food from point A to Point B. Thus, FFB is a proposal and has conceptualized a self-sufficient, carbon neutral floating offshore farming platform .FFB is intended to serve Lindau island with an emphasis on areas with dense population lacking adequate land for food production. The FFB runs on an very simple wooden structure system and rotating with fuelled by renewable energy collected by the platform’s on board solar and wind generators. FFB also has a possibility to anchor at the island and expand when needed. The new typology starts from the main island, which is basically an extension of the main vibrant street on the island to the waterside.
Design The structure of the platform comes from the island itself, extending the main commercial street to the waterside and creating new activities that courage the locals and visitors to be close to their farms. Although the new extended platform island has the same form of Lindau Island, it is also considered as an extension for the activities which occur often over the island. A new series of greenhouses having the same protected shape of the island, the structure of the island is introverted and focused more inside where the most activities are occurring. On the other hand a floating platforms are spreading around the main heart to provide more vegetation The sufficing FFB provides around 1.2 km2 of the food, which is only 25% of the demands. Thus, the proposal shows that the island can expand anytime and whenever needed. Expandable will be able to perform a variety of functions, including the increasing food production, water desalination, poultry rising and renewable energy generation. The zero-emission platform will include recycled and natural materials and all the energy it needs will be supplied by on board including photovoltaic and renewable energy generators. By this logic, I propose that the island needs three FFB to fulfil the required needs of food and energy, Thus needs to prepare the island for this moment. The mechanism
Figure 101: Lindau layout Source: Googleearth.com
The platform also harvests rainwater and desalinates lake water to use within the floating farm. Premium crops are to be grown in the platform using hydroponic methods. The greenhouse nurtures crops protect them from environmental exposure at the lake. The platform also has the ability to anchor at the most suitable food growing locations at lake, and after the product is ready to be harvested, the platform can come back to the shore. Its also offers a seeds’ storages to save them for the next season.
125
1
2
Extend the main Street to reach waterfront
5
Expanding...
Figure 102: Floating Farming Platform
Create a recreational Zone- floating
6
Detaching with another FFB.Island
3
Create an Agricultural land
7
Expanding ...
4
Extending an Agricultural land
126 Mobile platform While FFB is a light structure and they vegetated hydroponically, a new system of moving around the island is necessary for two reasons. First is that we need around 3 platforms to cover 3000 inhabitant’s food. So it’s a possible way to create another FFB and let it seals into the lake , or we can even cover the whole lake with platforms so we can get food products probably for the whole region. Second is because the process of photosynthesis allows plants to grow by absorbing carbon dioxide and sunlight and turning it to food, allowing the plant to grow. The solar energy is used to convert carbon dioxide into sugars with the waste products of the process being emitted as oxygen. All land plant life uses this process, but sea plants
have had to develop a slightly different process due to the lack of sun and carbon dioxide in water thus FFB is movable to allow as much sun light and carbon dioxide in water as possible. Expendability FFB is able to expand anytime and any direction needed, it doesn’t have a certain limit, except allowing the ships and boat to seal smoothly from and out the harbour. It also carries two possibilities for the expansions, The first possibility is to expand while the platform is connected to the island, the second possibility is to detach together with another platform. Adding a new area to the FFB depends on the demands of each time; in special seasons it will expand of double size to fulfill their needs.
Urban zones Main Street Agricultural Lands/ Gardens/ Parks
Old Structure of the island
Figure 103: Floating Farming platform
First Development of the island
FFB , Extension of the main Street - 1st Anchor
FFB , Extension of the main Street - 2nd Anchor
127
Stability To achieve the best stability performance in the FFB , I designed two different systems that can carry this floating farms easily and effectively . The first system is more towards the natural materials, which made basically of wood, used to transport lumbermen and logs downstream. Large Cedar trunks from forest - fire area were preferred because their sealed pores absorb very little water. Ton increase lifting force and to compensate for waterlogging over time, additional layer of logs were manoeuvre underneath, sometimes building up a reverse pyramid of up to 15 feet. Wooden structure improves the motion performance of the system significantly due to damping and entrained water effects. FFB structures are made from wood this also improve its stability performance. The second system is , Styrofoam kegs
FFB , Extension of the main Street - Both Anchors
or steel drums that are sunk and then filled with air are used more and more. The stringers, the lowest part of the super structure, have to be replaced once a decade or so, depending on the quality of the wood and the water condition. Advantages There are three advantages of the FFB first, its static and dynamic stability providing sufficiently low pitch performance enabling use of recreational and food production offshore platform; second, its design and size allow for onshore landing and anchoring in different locations; last but not least it is a temporary structural it doesn’t demolish the island which can be removed anytime if not prohibited. In addition to its visual appearance is accepted in a way that it doesn’t change the image of island.
FFB while moving around
FFB while Harvesting Time
128 Floating farming platform F.F.P. Structure Two different structural systems: 1- Cedar trunks: a, logs large Cedar trunks from forest - fire area were preferred because their sealed pores absorb very little water. Ton increase lifting force and to compensate for waterlogging over time, additional layer of logs were maneuver underneath, sometimes building up a reverse pyramid of up to 15 feet. Wooden structure improves the motion performance of the system significantly due to damping and entraining water effects. FFB structures are made from wood this also improve its stability performance. 2- the second system is Styrofoam kegs or steel drums that are sunk and then filled with air are used more and more. The stringers, the lowest part of the superstructure, have to be replaced once a decade or so, depending on the quality of the wood and the water condition. Figure 104: ‘Floating Farming platform’ strucutre systems
Figure 106: Cedar Trunk, Sources : http://cdn.c.photoshelter.com/img-get/ I00001trALQ6tkMo/s/750/750/WHITE-CEDAR-LOGS-6979.jpg
Figure 105: ‘Floating Farming platform’ irrigation systems
129
Figure 107: ‘Floating Farming platform’ digrams Floating Glass House - When The water Rises Up
Floating Glass House - When The water goes down
130 Sustainable crops and fish farming A new proposal of a sustainable fishery is that it is one that is harvested at a sustainable rate, where the fish population does not decline over time because of fishing practices.However avoiding overfishing through technical techniques such as “individual fishing quotas, cu curtailing destructive and illegal fishing practices by lobbying for appropriate law and policy, setting up protected areas, restoring collapsed fisheries, incorporating all externalities involved in harvesting marine ecosystems into fishery economics, educating stakeholders and the wider public, and developing independent certification
programs”http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sustainable_fishery. Some primary concerns around sustainability are that shows in the proposal, such as providing a natural fishing system within the FFP. A new fishing net are underneath in the middle of the platform in order to keep the fish around and let them swim naturally in the lake. Thus, not only will organize recruitment overfishing but also will pretend lose diversity and resilience of the fishing process.
Crops
Restaurants
Fish Farm Figure 108: ‘Floating Farming platform’ fish farm
131
1 Figure 108 ‘Floating Farming platform’ Extensions
2
3
132 Enrich Public Spaces Yet, The Value of FFB creates economic, social and environmental value, by adding new layer of public activities in order to bring life there. Running, jogging, playing, entertaining and inspiring with a fascinating lake overview all along the FFB. As, a vital part of FFB everyday urban life, the places where children play, or where we encounter nature and wildlife; the local platform in which we enjoy sports, walking the dog and sitting.
Figure 109 ‘Floating Farming platform’ Activities
Restaurants
133
Boat Docks
20081 68 8618002
20081 68 861800 2
Diving
Cycling Routes
Running Path Photovoltaic network
Recreational Facilities
Crops
Electrical Renewable Generators
Figure 110 ‘Floating Farming platform’ Diagram Activities
134
Figure 111 ‘Floating Farming platform’ Section
135 20
40
Lindau FFB Master-Layout
Figure 112 ‘Floating Farming platform’ Master Layout
80
120
136 Models
Scale 1:1000
Figure 113 :‘Floating Farming platform’ Modelling
137
138 3.2.3 The new Glass House of Lindau Public and Social place Concerning a different typology of the new and old town in Lindau Island, common questions, how do different social groups NEW EXTENSTION appropriate public, commonOLDand semi-public spaces? What TOWN forms of public life and cultures appear, for example exchange of religion festivals, evening walking along the Main Street, Sunday football game, BBQ parties, etc? How do people live and intervene on public and common space in Lindau? How do they interact in the main streets? How could it be possible Connectivity to maintain cultural diversity and enhance social interaction among different groups?
Y RAR LIB L GATHERING ZONE - BU SOCIA IESF C EE SHOPS-SHOPS-ORGANFER ZONE - FOOD P CILIT S BLI IC RODUCTION-PUBLIC FA -COFF OP EN PU H ATION CENTRE - TOURISTS FOOD SHOPS - G S R E S E EDUC N HOUSE-TOURISTIC U OP P TER - MUILTI FUNCTIONTINI PORT CENTRE - EDUCATIONAL FACILITIES - ILITIES THEA NG EXH FAC IBITION - MU NSEUM - COMMERCIAL
NEW EXTENSTION
On the contrary, and side-by-side with the old town, a new possibility for an intervention to be developed in the island. NEW EXTENSTION Nevertheless the old town has followed a certain logics of OLD TOWN stitching together and being a unique urban fabric. While the new modern part of the island has been partially built by another logics, fulfilling the demands of the modern life. A new zone is created in between, it’s actually a leftover space and it’s hardly to decide for which side it is belonging. Thus the Wide range Connectivity main goal is to emerge both together in the actual social fabric the result is a single building.
OLD TOWN
Figure 114 :Diagrams, the new development in Lindau
ARY IBR S- L ITIE R ZONE C FOOD PRODUCTION-PUBLIC FACIL PS - PUBLI FOO O N H D S S H UPPORT OPS - GREEN HOUSE-TOURISTICES - OPE IES I C ILIT NG EXH ENTRE - EDUCATIONAL FACILIT FAC IBITION - MU NSEUM - COMMERCIAL
139
Train Entrance
NEW EXTENSTION
NEW EXTENSTION
Public Entrance for locals NEW EXTENSTION
OLD TOWN
OLD TOWN Landscape
Old Train Station
Connectivity
Wide range Connectivity
Agriculture Re search Institue
ance
Food Mark et
NEW EXTENSTION
OLD TOWN
OLD TOWN
Old Train Station
Wide range Connectivity
NEW EXTENSTION
L GATHERING ZONE - BU SOCIA FFER Z O EE SHOPS-SHOPS-OR N -COFF TION CENTRE - TOU GANIC FOODE - FOOD PRODUCT A SHOPS - GREE RISTS S EDUC N HO UP TER - MUILTI FUNCTIONTINI PORT CENTRE - EDUCAT THEA NG EXH IBITION - MU NSEU
Public Entrance for locals
NEW EXTENSTION
Public Entrance for locals
OLD TOWN
Food Productio on nGlass House
- Public Museum uilti -M Theater zone Purpose
Museum Old Train Station
OLD TOWN
NEW EXTENSTION
OLD TOWN
OLD TOWN
140
On the other hand it’s also to investigate different typologies of urban fabric and production of food within the urban fabric of the residential areas, Local cultures and public space are together in one single building carrying different layers of cultural activities.
Figure 115 :Section cutting through the glasshouse
141
Figure 116 :Proposal _ Glass House_ Lindau , Functions diagrams
142 The Glasshouse of Lindau as a public infrastructure, Besides the social and public use of the glasshouse building, it is also used for growing plants inside which allows sunlight to reach plants on each floor. In addition to pure functionality, this decision also showcases the plants growing within, creating a more solid tie between city inhabitants and the food they consume. From the diagrams, it’s also obvious that the building is divided into several sectors, First, the public entrance and educational facilities about an agricultural institute, training centres for the new entrepreneurs, and an agricultural research centre. Second, is the partition of the food markets where also the restaurant and café shops are located in, indoor and outdoors, fully flexible design that allows furniture to change the inner space depending on what they want. Third part is more concerning planting crops and vegetables hydroponically; it’s mainly for food production. It’s also accessible by public for 24 hours, they can have a tour inside and watch out the different seasoned products. During the harvesting time, it is going to be a special moment when they have a seasonal festival while celebrating the harvest. Fourth sector is more focusing in social and culture aspects, where the new museum of Lindau is located over there and special place for ceremonies carnivals and exhibitions are located inside and overlooking for Constant Lake.
Figure 117 :Proposal _ Glass House_ Lindau ,Activities sketch
143
144
B
B A
20
40
80
120
Figure 118 :Proposal _ Glass House_ Lindau ,Land uses
A
145
Figure 119 :Proposal _ Three Dimensional Section A_A
Figure 120 :Proposal _ Three Dimensional Section B_B
146
Figure 121 :Proposal _ Three Dimensional Section
147
148 Form Versus Identity Flatten and curved roofing Two Proposed Alternatives for the rood cover of the glasshouses. Mainly From Glass Material which allows sunlight to reach plants on each floor. The First Alternative has a flattened roofs fully covered with photovoltaic network and other open able windows for ventilation. In between the parts of glasshouses, are intermediate zone, smothery crossing west east side and providing social and cultural facilities. Thus the intermediate zones also covered by the photovoltaic cells but also as shading devices. The second roof design alternative, and within a smooth curved shape, Thus will add a special uniqueness character to the island. As well as the roof will be fully covered with a photovoltaic network that occupy around 27300 m2
Figure 122 :Proposal _ Sketches
Figure 123 :Flat and Curved Roofs
149
150
3.2.4 Sustainable Housing and infrastructure development Throughout the last hundred years and until now, the Island of Lindau has been developing towards its logic of urban design Blocks. The urban design of the island doesn’t have a clear designing block but. The urban design was by accretion. The main principle was to create such an island which is protected by itself and has an introverted fabric which opens to inside and exposed some other facilities outside and over the harbor. Nevertheless, its obvious from diagram that the main logic of the street networks, north south and west east, where the north south networks have more narrow streets and its less public. The other opposite networks - West East- is more public and most of the commercial and recreational activates are located over there. The new proposal of the vacant land - West part- of the island currently needs a sustainable development. However nowadays there are no high demands for housing purposes, but we as an urban designer, should think about how can we find the best solution for a modern part which should stick together w tightly side to side the old town as well.
Vertical Connections
Horizontal Connections
Urban Fabric Grid _ Extensions
151
Main Streets
The New Proposed Buildings
The New Proposed Green Belt Figure 124 :Lindau, Analysis_ Urban Fabric Logics
152 Furthermore, Analysis of the specific building block in order to understand the logic of blocks. While analyzing this block, founding that the block as an overall condition wasn’t built at the same time, the only buildings - where those built at first-are the buildings which defining the main streets, Thus, Following the sequences of the diagrams in order to understand the logic of what happens through the time, the second stage the building on the second row of housing, and so on…
2
Figure 127 :building in between with large courtyards in the middle
3
Figure 125 :Urban Analysis for an existing Housing Block
1
Figure 126 :Buildings on the edges to define the main streets
Figure 128 :Last Step, an overall view of a complete block of the building
4
Figure 129 :Current Situation
153 In my proposal, I followed the same ways of designing by accretion. First proposing the main access and streets extensions, then followed by the first row of building that defines the main streets. The overall conclusion after few yeas is totally unplanned it always depends on the demands in each era .By this concept, I am just setting the guidelines which based on the main logic of the old town. A new commercial and entertainment facilities for the new housing will be offered within a walking distance from home. The main square right in the middle is mainly a daily or weekly market that always provides a fresh and organic food shops and restaurants.
All the rooftops are providing a food production in order to save building energy and enrich the lives of building occupants. Indeed new grids of the photovoltaic system are producing renewable energy not only for electricity use but also for heat consumptions. On the other hand, the sustainable design prototypes of homes that have a zero carbon footprint on the plan that harvest its own electricity and water; contain and treat its own sewage; and heat and cool itself without fuel and produce a significant amount of food.
1
2
3
4
Figure 130 :The process of Lindau hosing Development _ Proposal
154 3.2.5 Sustainable Mobility Control Due to the islands’ current changes in order to enhance the different arrival ways, and due to the public voting the society decide to have the main train station on the main land instead of being in the island - a new system of train network are going to connect the island with the surrounding cities - Bregenz and Friedrichshafen - with a local electrical train. Nevertheless, a new connection with the main land with an electrical tram ways running into three main stops; Reutin Banhof - Lindau Hauptbanhof - Lindau Harbour. In addition to the heavy trains – Dbhanare going to connect from Munich to Zurich, without stopping in Lindau any more.
Figure 131 :Proposal _ Diagram , train directions and stops
155 Lindau Car sharing “Car sharing is a mode of transport where vehicles are owned by a separate firm or an organization, and shared amongst a number of people throughout the day”. Car sharing in the Island of Lindau is a possible way to achieve a sustainable car electrical based can access all streets in the island - with a full priorities for pedestrians- in a close network of vehicle locations called “Pods.” located on different parts in the island (see the map), car sharing is as an alternative solution to meet the mobility gaps between public transit, taxi, bike, car rental, and private vehicle travel.
The two major social benefits of car sharing are fewer vehicles on the road and lower emissions over the island. On average, each shared vehicle replaced 15 personally owned vehicles, and car sharing members drove 31% less than when they owned a personal vehicle These two factors translate into 482,170 fewer tons of CO2 emissions and less travel congestion in urban areas.
Figure 132 :Proposal _ Diagram ,Car sharing
156
157
20
40
80
Figure 133 :Lindau _ Master Layout
120
158
Figure 134 :Lindau _ Perspective
159
3.2.6
Perspectives
160
3.2.6
Perspectives
Figure 135 :Visualisation _ Intermediate social zone - Open market
161
162
Figure 136 :Visualisation _ Intermediate social zone - Open market
163
164
Figure 137 :Visualisation _ Modelling
165
166
4.0 Conclusion Biocity Lindau _one planet living Addressing Challenges today means avoiding being disappointed tomorrow. There are number of ways in which “ one planet living” can be implemented without major structural transformations. Locating highly productive, environmental robust food production systems were one of these challenges. It aims to, enrich the lives of island dwellers, while offering a solution to some of the integral challenges facing our planet; reducing fossil fuel consumption; reducing the environmental impact of growing food; reducing the distance food travels before reaching urban consumers; and reducing the environmental impact of building. On the other hand, Today’s notion of green environment does not appear to be green enough, nor widely enough applied, to reverse these trend. A more aggressive solution could be within reach. Growing food crops on the water will reduce the environmental ecological footprint to one planet living, In my proposal I offered more than 2000 hectares of food production within a biking distance, Thus will defiantly reduce the human impact on the island.
Figure 138 :Vision_ Lindau Biocity
167
Figure 139:Vision_ Lindau Biocity icons
168
5.0
Bibliography
Garden city: Dragonfly-shaped skyscraper could feed Earth’s booming population | Mail Online. Retrieved from http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-1186312/Garden-city-Dragonfly-shapedskyscraper-feed-Earths-booming-population.html Living planet report 2008: World Wildlife Fund (WWF). Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia: Sustainability. Retrieved from http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index. php?oldid=498905220 Prelinger Archives: Highlights 1965 -- A Progress Report (Part II) (1965). (1965). Lawrenceville, NJ, Orangeville, ON: Films Media Group; McIntyre Media [distributor]. North Korea: Secret Nation. (2002). Lawrenceville, NJ, Orangeville, ON: Films Media Group; McIntyre Media [distributor]. World Development Report 2010. (2009): World Bank Group. Energy atlas: Future concept : renewable Wilhelmsburg. (2010). Berlin: Jovis. [Australian calendars 2012]. (2011-2012). Australia: Various commercial and non-commercial publishers. Report of the IUCN Renowned Thinkers Meeting, 29–31 January 2006. (2006). The Future of Sustainability: Re-thinking Environment and Development in the Twenty-first Century. Aiolova, M. (2012). One Prize. Retrieved from http://www.oneprize.org/semifinalists American Hydroponics. (2012). Image: NFT.jpg - BuildingGreen.com. Retrieved from http://www.buildinggreen.com/auth/image.cfm?imageName=images/1802/NFT.jpg&fileName=180201a.xml Andres Duany. (2012). Urbanism Principles. Retrieved from http://www.newurbanism.org/newurbanism/ principles.html Ayres, E. (1999). God’s last offer: Negotiating for a sustainable future. New York: Four Walls Eight Windows. Bentley, I. (1985). Responsive environments: A manual for designers. London: Architectural Press. Bloom, A., & Breines, W. (1995). “Takin’ it to the streets”: A sixties reader. New York: Oxford University Press. BMELV. (2012). BMELV - Internetauftritt des Bundesministeriums für Ernährung, Landwirtschaft und Verbraucherschutz. Retrieved from http://www.bmelv.de/DE/Startseite/startseite_node.html Droege, P. (2006). The renewable city: A comprehensive guide to an urban revolution / Peter Droege. Chichester: Wiley-Academy. Retrieved from http://www.loc.gov/catdir/enhancements/ fy0740/2007279057-b.html
169
Droege, P. (2008). Urban energy transition: From fossil fuels to renewable power / Peter Droege. Oxford: Elsevier. Droege, P. (2009). 100% renewable: Energy autonomy in action / edited by Peter Droege. London: Earthscan. Duany, A., Speck, J., & Lydon, M. (2010). The smart growth manual. New York: McGraw-Hill. Early, D. (1993). What is sustainable Design: The Urban Ecology, Society of Urban Ecology. Easton, T. A. (2009). Environmental studies (3rd ed.). Boston: McGraw-Hill Higher Education. Eurostat. (2012). From farm to fork - food chain statistics - Statistics Explained. Retrieved from http://epp. eurostat.ec.europa.eu/statistics_explained/index.php/From_farm_to_fork_-_food_chain_statistics EXPO <2015, Milano>. (2010). Agropolis-München-Magazin: Zur Eröffnung der Weltausstellung in Mailand ein Heft über den Münchener Beitrag zu “Feeding the planet - energy for life” ; mit einem Bericht über das neue Freiham und die Viktualientram ; Open scale, young & local ideas, München, 2009. München: Lehrstuhl für Planen und Bauen im Ländlichen Raum, Techn. Univ. Gardening Articles. (© 2012). Who Invented the First Hydroponics System? Retrieved from http://gogardenguides.com/guide/who-invented-the-hydroponics-system/ Girardet, H. (2010). Regenerative cities. Hamburg: World Future Council. Girardet, H. (2012). Creating Regenerative Cities - Urban Development - Heinrich Böll Foundation. Retrieved from http://www.boell.de/economysocial/urbandevelopment/urban-development-urban-futureregenerative-city-11735.html Gleiser, M. (2010). A tear at the edge of creation: A radical new vision for life in an imperfect universe (1st ed.). New York, NY: Free Press. Global Footprint Network. (2003-2012). Footprint for Nations. Retrieved from http://www.footprintnetwork.org/en/index.php/GFN/page/footprint_for_nations/ Hamm, O. G. (2010). Projekte und Konzepte: Katalog zur Zwischenpräsentation 2010 = Projects and concepts : catalogue for the Interim Presentation 2010. Berlin: Jovis. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sustainability. James D. Taylor. (2011). Hydroponic Vegetable Gardening Secrets. Retrieved from http://www.hydroponicvegetablegardening.com/ Lehmann, S., & Crocker, R. (2012). Designing for zero waste: Consumption, technologies and the built environment / edited by Steffen Lehmann and Robert Crocker. Earthscan book series on sustainable design. London ; New York: Earthscan.
170
LiveOAK Media. (2010). Hydroponic Greenhouse Will Create Food And Jobs in MN bright-farms-hydroponic-system – Crisp Green. Retrieved from http://crispgreen.com/2012/06/hydroponic-greenhousewill-create-food-and-jobs-in-mn/bright-farms-hydroponic-system/ Loh, J. (2000). Living planet report 2000. Gland, Switzerland: WWF--World Wide Fund for Nature. Magnago Lampugnani, V., Barth, S., & Rumpf, P. (2011). Urban Design as craft: Eleven conversations and seven projects 1999-2011 : elf Gespräche und sieben Projekte 1999-2011. Zürich: gta-Verl. Maureen Hart. (2012). What is an indicator of sustainability? | Sustainable Measures. Retrieved from http://www.sustainablemeasures.com/node/89 Moen, M., Aasen, C., Ellingsen, B., & Wahl, T. (2010). A northern view on a living planet: Earth observation in Norway. Oslo: Norwegian Space Centre. Nellemann, C., & Corcoran, E. (2010). Dead planet, living planet: Biodiversity and ecosystem restoration for sustainable development : a rapid response assessment. Nairobi, Kenya: United Nations Environment Programme. Newman, P., & Jennings, I. (2008). Cities as sustainable ecosystems: Principles and practices. Washington, D.C: Island Press. Peter Droege. Petrella, R., & La Saussay, P. d. (1993). Living together: Reshaping science and technology priorities to serve the basic needs and aspirations of 8 billion people. Global perspective 2010. tasks for science and technology, Petrella, R., & La Saussay, P. d. (1993). Reshaping science and technology priorities to serve the basic needs and aspirations of 8 billion people. [Brussels]: Commission of the European Communities. Pollard, D. (2010). Living planet report 2010: Biodiversity, biocapacity and development. Gland: WWF International. Retrieved from http://www.worldcat.org/oclc/754613321 Pollard, D. (2010). Living planet report 2010: Biodiversity, biocapacity and development. Gland: WWF International. Schmidt, G. W. H. & de, w. b. (2012). Fünfte Architekturwoche A5 - 16. bis 24. Juli 2010. Retrieved from httpwww.architekturwoche.orgimg_siteAgropolis_Picknick_und_Ernte.jpg Schroeder, J. (2009). Agropolis München Magazin: Zur Eröffnung der Weltausstellung in Mailand ein Heft über den Münchener Beitrag zu “Feeding the Planet - Energy for Life”. Mit einem Bericht über das neue Freiham und die Viktualientram ; [die Wiederentdeckung des Erntens im urbanen Alltag]. München: Technische Uni München Lehrstuhl für Planen und Bauen im Ländlichen Raum. Schultz, J., & Sieweke, J. (2008). Atlas IBA Hamburg: Wilhelmsburg neu vermessen. Berlin: Braun.
171
Seymour, J., & Sutherland, W. (2009). The self-sufficient life and how to live it: The complete back-tobasics guide (100th ed.). New York, N.Y: DK Pub. Sheffield, C., Alonso, M., & Kaplan, M. A. (1994). The World of 2044: Technological development and the future of society. St. Paul, Minn: Paragon House. Steffen Lehmann, & Lehmann, S. (2010). The principles of green urbanism: Transforming the city for sustainability. London: Earthscan. United States. (2002). Living on a restless planet: Solid Earth Science Working Group report. Pasadena, Calif: National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology. Weizsäcker, E. U. von. (2009). Factor five: Transforming the global economy through 80% improvements in resource productivity : a report to the Club of Rome / Ernst von Weizsäcker … [et al.]. London: Earthscan. Wheeler, S., & Beatley, T. (2004). The sustainable urban development reader. London ;, New York: Routledge. Wikipedia. (2012). Hydroponics - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia. Retrieved from http://en.wikipedia. org/w/index.php?oldid=500955068 World Wide Fund for Nature; Zoological Society of London; Global Footprint Network. Living planet report: Biodiversity, biocapacity and development. Gland, Switzerland. Zukunft findet Stadt. (2012). Zukunft findet Stadt / openscale. Retrieved from http://www.zukunft-findetstadt.de/
172
6.0
Appendix
6.1. List of Figures Fig.001. Fig.002. Fig.003.
Fig.004. Fig.005.
Scheme of sustainable development: at the confluence of three constituent parts. Communities are a web of interactions among the environment, the economy and society. Maureen Hart. (2012). What is an indicator of sustainability? | Sustainable Measures. Retrieved on 6/24/2012, from http://www.sustainablemeasures.com/node/89 “Agropolis” Girardet, H. (2012). Creating Regenerative Cities - Urban Development - Heinrich Böll Foundation. Retrieved on 6/24/2012, from http://www.boell.de/economysocial/urbandevelopment/ urban-development-urban-future-regenerative-city-11735.html “Ecopolis”– Girardet, H. (2012). Creating Regenerative Cities - Urban Development - Heinrich Böll Foundation. Retrieved on 6/24/2012, from http://www.boell.de/economysocial/urbandevelopment/ urban-development-urban-future-regenerative-city-11735.html “circular metabolism” Girardet, H. (2012). Creating Regenerative Cities - Urban Development - Heinrich Böll Foundation. Retrieved on 6/24/2012, from http://www.boell.de/economysocial/urbandevelopment/ urban-development-urban-future-regenerative-city-11735.html
Fig.006.
Hydroponic food production system , LiveOAK Media. (2010). Hydroponic Greenhouse Will Create Food And Jobs in MN bright-farms-hydroponic-system – Crisp Green. Retrieved on 6/24/2012, from http://crispgreen.com/2012/06/hydroponic-greenhouse-will-create-food-and-jobs-in-mn/bright-farmshydroponic-system/
Fig.007.
Hydroponic food Production system, Gardening Articles. (© 2012). Who Invented the First Hydroponics System? Retrieved on 6/27/2012, from http://gogardenguides.com/guide/who-invented-the-hydroponics-system/
Fig.008.
Hydroponic irrigation system, American Hydroponics. (2012). Image: NFT.jpg -BuildingGreen. com. Retrieved on 6/24/2012, from http://www.buildinggreen.com/auth/image. cfm?imageName=images/1802/NFT.jpg&fileName=180201a.xml/ Eat your Green. Own illustration. VIG – the vertically integrated greenhouse .facade farm- Elevation and section Living in a terrarium. Own sketch, Illustration by Phil Testemale (Newman, 2008, p.213) The Load of Ecological Footprint - Own sketch, Illustration by Phil Testemale (Newman, 200 8, p.212) Every human activity uses bio logically productive land and/or fishing Grounds (Pollard, 2010, p.33) A Comparison between The developed countries and the poorer countries form an ecological point of view, (Map: courersy IPCC, 2009) , (Lehmann, 2012,p.86) Predicted increase in Energy consumption by 2030, (Lehmann, 2012,p.86) Own illustrations. Own illustrations. Calibrated transect illustration, Retrieved on 7/3/2012, from http://www.dpz.com/pdf/02-b-TRANSECT-KRIER.pdf
Fig.009. Fig,010. Fig.011. Fig.012. Fig.013. Fig.014. Fig.015. Fig.016. Fig.017. Fig.018.
173
Fig.019. Fig.020 Fig.021. Fig.022. Fig.023. Fig.024. Fig.025. Fig.026. Fig.027. Fig.028. Fig.029. Fig.030. Fig.031. Fig.032. Fig.033. Fig.034. Fig.035. Fig.036. Fig.037. Fig.038. Fig.039. Fig.040. Fig.041. Fig.042. Fig.043. Fig.044. Fig.045.
Fig.046.
Natural and rural urban transect, Retrieved on 7/3/2012, from http://transect.org/trans_images2/hires_single/rural-urban_hi/nat_and_rural_urb_hi.zip The Pienza transect, Retrieved on 7/3/2012, from http://www.dpz.com/pdf/05_Transect_Cornelius.pdf Natural and rural urban transect Retrieved on 7/3/2012, from http://transect.org/trans_images2/hires_single/rural-urban_hi/nat_and_rural_urb_hi.zip Successional Transect Zones, Retrieved on 7/3/2012, from http://transect.org/trans_images2/hires_single/rural-urban_hi/nat_and_rural_urb_hi.zip Own Illustration Own Illustration Own Illustration The transect of Lindau Island - Location of the transect- Own Illustration. Own Illustration Own Illustration, googleEarth.com Lindau During 1800. Source: Wikipedia.org Left, IBA Hamburg- Area and Projects, (Hamm, 2010, p.21) The IBA energy hill Sketch diagram (Hamm, 2010, p.98) Germany Map, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Germany_location_map.svg Lindau in winter, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Lindauwinter.JPG Table of content of the report “ Klimaschutzkonzept Lindau 2020” established by Stadt Lindau, a sustainable vision for 2020. Final energy consumption by private households in Lindau, (energy source, 2007) Final energy consumption by sector in Lindau, Energy source, 2007 Energy potentials of the town of Lindau 2020, Energy source, 2007, p.39 Energy potentials of the town of Lindau 2020, Energy source, 2007, p.40 Possibilities of generating renwable heat/ pwer elctricity rates. Historical maps of Lindau – own illustrations. Diagrams Historical maps of Lindau – own illustrations. One Planet Living icon, http://icicp.blogspot.com/2010/04/healing-earth-with-service.html One Planet Living _ Lindau. Main proposal diagram Food Import Dependency. FAO.com Self-sufficiency in the main agricultural products, Eurostat. (2012). From farm to fork - food chain statistics - Statistics Explained. Retrieved from http://epp.eurostat.ec.europa.eu/statistics_explained/ index.php/From_farm_to_fork_-_food_chain_statistics Structure of the food chain, selected indicators, Eurostat. (2012). From farm to fork - food chain statistics - Statistics Explained. Retrieved from http://epp.eurostat.ec.europa.eu/statistics_explained/ index.php/From_farm_to_fork_-_food_chain_statistics
174
Fig.047. Fig.048. Fig.049. Fig.050. Fig.051. Fig.052. Fig.053. Fig.054. Fig.055. Fig.056. Fig.057. Fig.058. Fig.059. Fig.059. Fig.060. Fig.061. Fig.062. Fig.063. Fig.064. Fig.065. Fig.066. Fig.007. Fig.068. Fig.069. Fig.070. Fig.071. Fig.072. Fig.073. Fig.074. Fig.075. Fig.076. Fig.077. Fig.078. Fig.079. Fig.080.
One Acre farm per family, Retrieved from http://foodfreedom.wordpress.com/2011/07/20/start-a- 1-acre-self-sufficient-homestead/ Diagram, the process of food production, own illustrations Lindau Main Layout- showing the new proposed land- own illustrations Lindau land uses percentages - own illustrations Lindau food Production calculations - own illustrations Lindau food Production calculations a six-time land needed for food production sufficiency Lindau different transect section. Own illustration Solid Voids ratio, connectivity with the waterfront, own illustration Water front vs. public activities, own illustration SWAT Analysis, Own illustration SWAT Analysis, Own illustration Train station locators, own illustration Train tracks redevelopments, own illustration Strategy 1, own illustration Strategy 2, own illustration Own illustration Own illustration Visualisation presents public life of the corridors in between the farms, Retrieved on 7/17/2012 ,from httpwww.architekturwoche.orgimg_siteAgropolis_Picknick_und_Ernte.jpg Proposed network of Agricultural lands, own illustration Visualisation Sketch of the proposed glasshouse in Lindau, Own illustration Sketch Diagrams of inside activities- Glasshouse, Own illustration Collecting the food form the surrounding region, own illustration Sketch of the interior space - Glasshouse, Own illustration Lindau Master Plan - Strategy 1, own illustration Different Alternatives of the new electrical tram in the island, own illustration Floating Garden Structure, Own illustration Boats/Ships Docks, Own illustration Lindau Master Layout - Strategy 2, own illustration North- South Networks, Own illustration East- West Networks, Own illustration Combined Networks, Own illustration Agricultural integration in Lindau – proposal, own illustration Design Process - Mixed-use units, own illustration VIG process sketches- Agricultural integrating buildings utah.agclassroom.orgfile Detailed Sketch layout - Agricultural integrating buildings, own illustration
175
Fig.081. Fig.082. Fig.083. Fig.084. Fig.085. Fig.086. Fig.087. Fig.088. Fig.089. Fig.090. Fig.091. Fig.092. Fig.093. Fig.094. Fig.095. Fig.096. Fig.097. Fig.098. Fig.099. Fig.100. Fig.101. Fig.102. Fig.103. Fig.104. Fig.105. Fig.106. Fig.107. Fig.108. Fig.109. Fig.110. Fig.111. Fig.112. Fig.113. Fig.114.
Proposed _Zoning Agricultural integrating buildings, own illustration Proposed _Section. Agricultural integrating buildings, own illustration Sketch 1: Proposal_ Island First Impression, Own illustration Sketch 2: Proposal_ A new intervention for a community centre and multipurpose hall Sketch 2: Proposal_ A new intervention for a community centre and multipurpose hall. Master Layout - Strategy 2, own illustration Zoning diagram, own illustration Section through the bridge, own illustration Car-based network The Main Pedestrian Routes, Own illustration Proposal _ Master Layout, Own illustration Zoning Diagram, Own illustration Proposal _ Section, Own illustration Reutin Model, Own illustration Master Layout, Own illustration Figure 95: Eat Your GreenLehmann, S., & Crocker, R. (2012), Green zones - Visionary urban design master plan, own illustration Main food Production Strategy _Routes, own illustration Figure 98: Food Markets Retrieved from, http://www.zukunft-findet- stadt.de/openscale/images/Agropolis.gif Proposed public green corridors Retrieved from, httpwww.architekturwoche.orgimg_siteAgropolis_ Picknick_und_Ernte.jpg on 7/7/2012 Regional - biking distance- Agricultural zones, own illustration Lindau layout, Retrieved from Googleearth.com Floating Farming platform, own illustration Floating Farming platform, own illustration Floating Farming platform’ structure systems, own illustration Floating Farming platform’ irrigation systems, own illustration Cedar Trunk, http://cdn.c.photoshelter.com/img-get/I00001trALQ6tkMo/s/750/750/WHITE- CEDARLOGS-6979.jpg Floating Farming platform’ fish farm, Own illustration Floating Farming platform’ Extensions, Own illustration Floating Farming platform’ Activities, Own illustration Floating farming platform’ Diagram Activities, Own illustration Floating farming platform’ Section, Own illustration Floating farming platform’ Master Layout, Own illustration Floating farming platform’ Modelling, Own illustration Diagrams, the new development in Lindau, Own illustration
176
Fig.115. Fig.116. Fig.117. Fig.118. Fig.119. Fig.120. Fig.121. Fig.122. Fig.123. Fig.124. Fig.125. Fig.126. Fig.127. Fig.128. Fig.129. Fig.130. Fig.131. Fig.132. Fig.133. Fig.134. Fig.135. Fig.136. Fig.137. Fig.138. Fig.139.
Section cutting through the glasshouse, own illustration Proposal _ Glass House_ Lindau, Functions diagrams, own illustration Proposal _ Glass House_ Lindau, Activities sketch, own illustration Proposal _ Glass House_ Lindau Land uses, Own illustration Proposal _ Three Dimensional Section A_A, Own illustration Proposal _ Three Dimensional Section B_B, Own illustration Proposal _ Three Dimensional Section, Own illustration Proposal _ Sketches, Own illustration Flat and Curved Roofs, Own illustration Lindau, Analysis_ Urban Fabric Logics, Own illustration Urban Analysis for an existing Housing Block, Own illustration Buildings on the edges to define the main streets, own illustration Building in between with large courtyards in the middle, own illustration Step, an overall view of a complete block of the building, own illustration Current Situation, Own illustration The process of Lindau hosing Development _ Proposal, Own illustration Proposal _ Diagram, train directions and stops, Own illustration Proposal _ Diagram, Car sharing, Own illustration Lindau _ Master Layout, Own illustration Lindau _ Perspective, Own illustration Visualisation _ Intermediate social zone - Open market, own illustration Visualisation _ Intermediate social zone - Open market, own illustration Visualisation _ Modelling, Own illustration Vision_ Lindau Biocity , Own illustration Vision_ Lindau Biocity icons, own illustration
177
178
6.2
Maps 6.2.1
Transportation System
179
180
6.2
Maps 6.2.1
Transportation System
181
Regional and metropolitan analysis Fauna and flora
182
lake
6.2.2
Flora, fauna and landscapes valley 2000
Regional and metropolitan analysis Fauna and flora aerial
protected areas
mountains
2000
4000
8000
12000 aerial
aquatic
terrestrial
settlements protected areas
terrestrial
rrestrial
aerial
aquatic
terrestrial
terrestrialsettlements
slopes
XTRA - LARGE 1:100’000 egional context
8000
EXTRA - LARGE 1:100’000 regionalmountains context
valley
aquatic
4000
slopes
lake
40
MEDIUM 1:2’000 urban context
LARGE 1:10’000 metropolitan context 80aquatic
160
aquatic
40
80
160
240
MEDIUM 1:2’000 urban context
aerial
aquatic
aquatic
aerial
terrestrial
terrestrial
lake valley slopes mountains lake
aerial
aquatic
settlements valley protected areas slopes mountains aerial
aquatic
settlements
terrestrial
protected areas
MEDIUM 1:2’000 rban context
40
80
160
MEDIUM 1:2’000 urban context protected areas
settlements
40
80
160
240
SMALL 1:500 street context
183
terrestrial
protected areas 200 240 LARGE 1:10’000 metropolitan context
800
1200 10
aerial
aquatic
aquatic
400
SMALL 1:500 street context
20
40
60
terrestrial
domestic
Proposed waterfront side - Design Process
protected areas settlements 10
SMALL 1:500 street context
20
Institute for Architecture und Planning Summer Semester 2012 Master of Science in Architecture Concentration Sustainable Urban Design
40Lecturer: Prof. Peter60 Droege DI MAAS MCPIA Tutor: Anis Radzi BArch MUD Students: Hana Pleskačová & Johannes Peter Steidl
01
lake valley
184
slopes mountains
6.2.2 lake
Flora, fauna and landscapes aerial
aquatic
valley
settlements
terrestrial
slopes
protected areas
protected areas
mountains aerial
aquatic
40
settlements
MEDIUM 1:2’000 rban context
80
160
terrestrial
240
SMALL 1:500 street context
protected areas
40
80
160
domestic
240
MEDIUM 1:2’000 urban context
aerial
terrestrial
aquatic
aerial
terrestrial
settlements
settlements
settlements
185 lake valley slopes
protected areas
mountains aerial
aquatic
10
settlements
MALL 1:500 eet context
20
40
terrestrial
60
protected areas
mestic
40
80
MEDIUM 1:2’000 urban context
aquatic
aerial
terrestrial
settlements Institute for Architecture und Planning Summer Semester 2012 Master of Science in Architecture Concentration Sustainable Urban Design
settlements
Lecturer: Prof. Peter Droege DI MAAS MCPIA Tutor: Anis Radzi BArch MUD Students: Hana Pleskačová & Johannes Peter Steidl
01
160
240
Tº min average: 1
25% SE
SW S
NW
25%
NE
5
15
ARBON
186
6.2.3
Climate N
25% NW
20
NW
15
20
N
25%
NE
E SE
SW
SE
SW
20
NW
15
10
4
S
N
25%
NE
E
5
Tº max average: 19 W Tº min average: 1
Tº max average: 17 Tº min average: 0
5
W
10
BREGENZ
NE 10
20
NW
20 15
N
S
NE
15
Exercise 1: Regional and metropolitan anlysis Climate 10
5
3
W
10
5
E
5
3
W
E
4
W
E
SE
SW S
SE
SW
25% - direction of wind 3 - wind speed (knots)
SE
SW
S
S
DORNBIRN
Tº max average: 19 2000 Tº min average: 1 4000
XTRA - LARGE 1:100.000 egional context
8000
SMALL 1:500 street context
NW
20
NE
10
20
40
5
WAGEN
5 E
7
2
W
Tº max average: 17.5 Tº min average: -0.5
10
Tº max average: 19 Tº min average: 1
NE
10
15
FRIEDRICHSHAFEN W
20 15
N
25%
MEDIUM 1:2.000 urban context
N
25% NW
12000
E
SE
SW S SE
SW S
2_SHORE: Climate at the shore is dependent from the lak place where the winds strongest. In summer th cooled down with a fres However in winter the w causes a more freezing
N
25% NW
20
3_OPEN SPACE: Trees stop the wind a l and in the summer thei shadow cool down the more.
NE
15 10
OBERSTAUFEN
5
LINDAU
7
W
Tº max average: 17.5 Tº min average: -0.5
E
Tº max average: 19 Tº min average: 1 S
NE
5
N
25% NW
20
NW
15
3
W
20
NE
S
trees
20
SE S
NE
5
3
E
SE
SW
fountain
SE
SW
SW
4
W
E
SE
25% - direction of wind 3 - wind speed (knots)
E
10
insolation SW
4
15
5
E
W
MALL 1:500 treet context
NW
10
5
N
25%
15
10
E
5
S
N
25%
NE
5
W
10
Tº max average: 19 W Tº min average: 1
Tº max average: 17 Tº min average: 0
NE 10
20 15
BREGENZ
20 15
N
25% NW
NW
S
SE
SW S
DORNBIRN
Tº max average: 19 Tº min average: 1
summer wind winter wind
4_CITY EDGE: The wind is stoped by t fortification wall. The w work as a thermal mas winter the shadows cau lower temperatures.
N
25% SE
SW
ARBON
60 1_LAKE: Because of its size and up to 250 m, the Boden a giant thermal mass in region, which influence climate drastically. In s the highest temperature lower, cool wind is blow from the lake to the lan sometimes the Foeh (c from the Alps) creates waves on the lake.
10
20
40
60
5_CITY: Wind is largely blocked flow into the city. In sum the west wind ventilate main street. South-nort are narrow to prevent w winds and east-west st are wider to benefit from sun.
urban N context
region, which influences the waves on the lake. climate drastically. In summer 3_OPEN SPACE: the highest temperatures are 2_SHORE: Trees stop the wind a little bit 10 15 Because of its size and depth lower, cool wind is blowing Climate at the shore is greatly SE and in the summer their SW 5 up10to 250 m, the Bodensee is from the lake to the land and dependent from the lake. Is theshadow cool down the air even 5 W a giant thermal mass in the E S sometimes the Foeh (cold wind place where the winds are the more. 2 12000 7 which influences region, the W max average: from the Alps) creates Tº high E strongest. In17.5 summer the air is 17.5 climate drastically. In summer waves on the lake. cooled down with a fresh wind. 4_CITY EDGE: Tº min average: -0.5 Tº max average: 0.5 MEDIUM 1:2.00019 the highest temperatures are However in winter the wind The wind is stoped by the old N Tº min average: 1 lower, cool wind is blowing SE urban context 2_SHORE: 25%causes a more freezing feeling.fortification wall. The walls SW NE N from the lake toSEthe land and Climate at the shore is greatly 20 NW NE work as a thermal mass. In SW 25% S sometimes the Foeh (cold wind dependent from the lake. Is the 15 1_LAKE: 3_OPEN SPACE: winter the shadows cause N 20 NW NE fromS the Alps) Because of its size and depth 25%creates high place where the winds are the Trees stop the wind a little bit lower temperatures. 10 wavesNWon the20lake. up15 to 250 m, the Bodensee is NE strongest. In summer the air is and in the summer their 5 10 15 a giant thermal mass in the E cooled down with aWfresh wind. shadow cool down the air even5_CITY: 5 E 5 2_SHORE: 10 region, which influences the However in winter the wind more. Wind is largely blocked to W Tº maxcauses average: 17.5 Climate at the shore is greatly E 5 climate7 drastically. In summer a more freezing feeling. flow into the city. In summer N dependent from the lake. Is the the highest temperatures are 4_CITY EDGE: Tº min average: -0.5 the west wind ventilates the W max average: 19 Tº max average: 19 E 4 5% place where the winds are the 3_OPEN SPACE: lower, cool wind is blowing SE The wind is stoped by the old main street. South-north streets N SE 20 min average:NE1 min average: SW from theTº lake to the land and1 strongest. In summer the air is 25% Trees stop the wind a little bit fortification wall. The walls are narrow to prevent winter 15 wind. and SE (cold wind cooled down with a fresh NW sometimes the Foeh 20 in the summer NE their work as a thermal mass. In winds and east-west streets SW S 10 However in winter the wind SE shadow from the Alps) creates high 15 cool down the air even winter the shadows cause N are wider to benefit from the 5 N SW causes a more freezing feeling. more. wavesS on the 25% lake. 10 lower temperatures. sun. 25% 7 20 Tº max NW NE average: 17.5 E 5 20 S NW NE 15 SPACE: 2_SHORE: 4_CITY EDGE: 5_CITY: Tº min 3_OPEN average: -0.5 W 15 5 E 10 is greatly Trees stop the wind a little bit The wind is stoped by the old Wind is largely blocked to Climate at the shore 10 N 5 lake. Is the 25% and in the summer their dependent from the fortification wall. The walls flow into the city. In summer 5 EDIUM 1:2.000 cool down place the shadow 20 E NE the air even work as a thermal mass. In the west wind ventilates the W where the winds Tº maxSEaverage: 19 4 areNW W ban context 4 strongest. EIn summer the air is more. 15 winter the shadows cause main street. South-north streets N SE Tº min average: 1 cooled SW Tº max average: 17.5 S 25% down with a fresh wind. 10 lower temperatures. are narrow to prevent winter _LAKE:NW 20 NE However 4_CITY EDGE: in winter the wind 5 Tº min average: -0.5 winds and east-west streets S ecause of its size 15 and depth the old 5_CITY: causes a more freezing feeling.SE The 5wind is stoped by are wider to benefit from the N W E SW p to 250 m, the Bodensee is SE 10 SW 25% Wind is largely blocked to sun. Tº max average: 19fortification wall. The walls giant thermal mass 5 in the 20 NW NE work as a thermal mass. In 3_OPEN SPACE: flow into the city. In summer S Tº min average: 1 winter the shadows cause gion,NE which influences theS 15E Trees stop the wind a little bit the west wind ventilates the W 9mate 4 drastically. In summer lower temperatures. and10in the summer their main street. South-north streets SE e highest temperatures are 5 shadow cool down the airSW even are narrow to prevent winter wer, cool wind is blowing 5_CITY: more.5 winds and east-west streets W E S om the lakeE to the land and average: 17.5 10 are wider 20 to benefit from 40 60 Wind is largely blocked to the SE SW the Foeh (cold wind ometimes flow into the city. In summer 4_CITY EDGE: sun. average: -0.5 om the Alps) creates high the west wind ventilates the The wind is stoped by the old EN S aves on the lake. main street. South-north streets % fortification wall. SE The walls SE SW 0 are narrow to prevent winter NE work as a thermal mass. In Tº max average: 19 _SHORE: 15 winds and east-west streets winter the shadows cause S imate at Tº the min shoreaverage: is greatly 1 10 are wider to benefit from the lower temperatures. ependent from the lake. Is the 5 sun. ace where the winds are the 5_CITY: 5 rongest. In summerEthe air is Wind is largely blocked to ooled down with a fresh wind. 20 40 60 flow into the city. In summer 10 owever in winter the wind the west wind ventilates the 9 auses a more freezing feeling. main street. South-north streets SE are narrow to prevent winter _OPEN SPACE: winds and east-west streets S ees stop the wind a little bit are wider to benefit from the nd in the summer their sun. hadow cool down the air even 10 20 40 60 ore.
Tº NWmax20average: 17.5 NE 15 Tº min average: -0.5
25%
NW
20 1_LAKE:
3
2
NE
4 5
OBERSTAUFEN
LINDAU
2
1
3
40
80
160
4
187
5
NDAU
3 OBERSTAUFEN
BREGENZ
240
4
5
2
OBERSTAUFEN 3
4
40
5
BREGENZ 1 OBERSTAUFEN
80
160
240
DORNBIRN
RSTAUFEN
DORNBIRN
_CITY EDGE: he wind is stoped by the old rtification wall. The walls ork as a20 thermal mass. In 40 nter the shadows cause wer temperatures.
2
3
1
2
3
4
5
1
1
2
LINDAU CLIMATE
2
3
3
4
MINIMUM AND MAXIMUM AVERAGE TEMPERATURES (°C)
A
24 22
1
60
20
2
3 1816
4
5
14 12 10
_CITY: ind is largely blocked to ow into the city. In summer e west wind ventilates the ain street. South-north streets e narrow to60 prevent winter nds and east-west streets e wider to benefit from the un.
8
LINDAU CLIMATE
MINIMUM AND MAXIMUM AVERAGE TEMPERATURES (°C) 6 24 22
1
2
3
LINDAU CLIMATE
1LINDAU CLIMATE
2
-2
16
-4
10
22
8
20
6
18
4
16
2
24
12
-2
22
10
20
-4
8
18
6
16
4
14
2
12
0
MINIMUM AND MAXIMUM AVERAGE TEMPERATURES (°C) 14
6
22
4
20
2
18
0
16
-2
jan
MINIMUM AND MAXIMUM AVERAGE TEMPERATURES (°C) 12
3
MINIMUM AND MAXIMUM AVERAGE TEMPERATURES (°C) 8 24
4
0
18
24
10
16 4
2
20
14
LINDAU CLIMATE
feb
0
feb
mar
apr
4
mar
apr
may
jun
jul
aug
sept
oct
feb
may
jun
2
jul
3
aug
4
137.2
5 143
mar
apr
103.2 86.8
5
nov
AVERAGE PRECIPITATION (mm)
7 103.2
47.5
6 4
dec
jul
aug
91.9 93.6
sept
dec
103.2
86.8
161.7
143
86.8 nov
133.4 52.4
47.5 jun may
137.2
8
143
W
52.4 133.4
AVERAGE HUMIDUTY (% 88
jan
feb
oct
nov
2
93.6 91.983 84 77 75 apr may jun 71.5
mar
2
W
7ju
dec
WIND
8 AVERAGE HUMIDUTY (%) N 71.5 7 20% 20% NW dec jan feb mar apr may jun jul NWaug 15 sept oct NE nov dec 88 6 6 87 88 88 86 15 10 10 161.752.4 84 83 AVAREGE NUMBER OF RAINY DAYS 81 47.5 5 5 80 77 75 78W 4 E W
AVERAGE PRECIPITATION (mm) feb
apr
AVERAGE PRECIPITATION (mm) 7 6 168.8 5 161.7 4 may jun 3 jul aug 143sept oct 2 137.2 jan
jan
mar
137.2
168.8
AVAREGE HOURS OF SUNSHINE
-4
5
AVAREGE HOURS OF SUNSHINE
jan
-2
AVERAGE PRECIPITATION (m
4
sept 168.8 oct
16
7
nov
133.4
7
16 2 16 2
Tº min average: 0 N
25% NW
20
NE
10 5
N
25% 20
3
W NE
15 10 5
188
3
W
E
20
NW
6.2.3 SW
SW
SW
trees S
fountain
SMALL 1:500 street context
SW
Wind is largely blocked S flow into the city. In sum the west wind ventilate main street. South-nort are narrow to prevent w winds and east-west st are wider to benefit from sun.
S
SE
SW S
NW
20
5 NE
4
W
SE
SW E
S
15 10 E
5
SE
SW
4
W S
SE
N
25%
E
Climate 3
E
NE
10
3
W
4
SE
15
10
5
25% - direction of wind insolation 3 - wind speed (knots)
S
NE
15
10
S
25% - direction of wind 3 - wind speed (knots)
20
5
N Tº max average: 19 W 25% Tº min NW average: 1 20
5 NE
15 SE
NW
N
E 25%
W
SE
25%
Tº max average: 17 Tº min average: 0
15
NW
ARBON
E
10
BREGENZ
N
E
SE
SW S
SE
SW S
DORNBIRN
Tº max average: 19 Tº min average: 1
DORNBIRN
Tº max average: 19 Tº min average: 1
10
20
40
60
summer wind winter wind
10
20
40
60
MALL 1:500 treet context
LINDAU CLIMATE
insolation trees insolation
fountain
trees
summer wind
fountain
winter wind
summer wind winter wind
flow into the city. In summer the west wind ventilates the main street. South-north streets are narrow to prevent winter winds and east-west streets are wider to benefit from the sun.
LINDAU CLIMATE
189
1
2
3
MINIMUM AND MAXIMUM AVERAGE TEMPERATURES (°C)
4
5
AVERAGE PRECIPITATION (mm)
24
168.8
22 20
137.2
18
AVERAGE HUMIDUTY (%)
10
75
78
80
81
jul
aug
87
88
88
86
sept
oct
nov
dec
91.9 93.6
86.8
8
83
133.4
103.2
12
84
77
16 14
88
161.7
143
71.5
6 4
47.5
2
52.4
0 -2 -4 jan
feb
mar
apr
may
jun
jul
aug
sept
oct
nov
dec
AVAREGE HOURS OF SUNSHINE
2 jan
3 feb
4
mar
5
apr
6
feb
mar
apr
may
7
7
N NW
6
jun
jul
aug
sept
oct
2
nov
dec
NW
E
jan
feb
mar
14
apr
15
16
15 13
may
sept
oct
nov
dec
jan
jun
jul
aug
sept
14
14
12 oct
W
20% 15 10 5
jul
E
W
SE
NW
E
SE
W
feb
mar
apr
may
N NE
NW
E
W
SE
SW
20% 15 10 5
jun
E
SE
SW
NW
20% 15 10 5
E
W
NW
E
sept
Institute for Architecture und Planning Summer Semester 2012 Master of Science in Architecture Concentration Sustainable Urban Design
20% 15 10 5
W
E
NE
E
SE
SW S
jun
20% 15 10 5
N NE
NW
E
7
W
20% 15 10 5
7
N NW
Lecturer: Prof. Peter Droege DI MAAS MCPIA Tutor: Anis Radzi BArch MUD Students: Àngela Vilaplana & Matic Brdnik
NE
E
SE
SW
S
nov
20% 15 10 5
8
W
SE
SW
S
oct
E
SE
SW
NE
SE
SW
S
NW
S
7
W
N NE
may
N NE
20% 15 10 5
7
S
SE
SW
S
NW
apr
7
W
N NE
SE
SW
N NE
20% 15 10 5
6
S
mar
7
aug
20% 15 10 5
7
N NE
S
dec
NW
S
7 SW
nov
N NE
feb
N
16
20% 15 10 5
SW
S
NW
13
aug
7
W
SE
SW
AVAREGE NUMBER OF RAINY DAYS
15
jul
N NE
7
W
2
20% 15 10 5
jan
16
jun
WIND 8
4
may
jan
S
dec
01
EXTRA - LARGE 1:100’000 regional context
Country: Germany State: Beyern Region: Schwaben
Konstanz
84.693
59.002
Lindau Neighbouring cities:
Friendrichshraten (Germany) Bregenz, Dornbirn and Lustenau (Austria) St. Gallen (Switzerland)
Historical facts about Lindau:
Lindau island first mentioned in 882 by monk from St. Gallen. In 1180 the St. Stephan’s church was founded Lindau. WWII-1955 under French administra84.693 tion. In 1955 returned to Bavaria.
190 6.2.4
Friedrichshrafen 13.490 Arbon
Lindau island area: 0.68 km²
Settlement networks
Konstanz
Friedrichshrafen
59.002
SWITZERLAND Exercise 1: Settlement networks Regional and metropolitan analysisGERMAN Exercise 1: Settlement networks Regional and metropolitan analysis Historical facts about Lindau:
Lindau island first mentioned in 882 Lindau Political hierarchy: Country: Germany by monk from St. Gallen. In 1180 the St. Stephan’s church was State: Beyern Region: Schwaben founded Lindau. WWII-1955 under French administration. Lindau Neighbouring cities: In 1955 returned to Bavaria. Friendrichshraten (Germany) Bregenz, Dornbirn and Lindau Political hierarchy: Lustenau (Austria) Country: Germany St. Gallen (Switzerland) State: Beyern Region: Schwaben Lindau island area: 0.68 km²
EXTRA - LARGE 1:100’000 regional context EXTRA - LARGE 1:100’000 regional context
Historical facts about Lindau:
Lindau Political hierarchy: Country: Germany State: Beyern Region: Schwaben
Lindau Neighbouring cities:
Friendrichshraten (Germany) Bregenz, Dornbirn and Lustenau (Austria) St. Gallen (Switzerland)
Lindau island first mentioned 84.693 in 882 by monk from St. Gallen. In 1180 the St. Stephan’s church was founded Lindau. WWII-1955 under French administration. In 1955 returned to Bavaria.
Lindau Political hierarchy:
Konstanz
4000
12000 72.959
St. Gallen
LARGE 1:10’000 metropolitan context 24.772
L
MEDIUM 1:2’000 urban context
Secondary roads
59.002
SWITZERLAND Friedrichshrafen 59.002
Region policentre
3000
Lindau - is
Roschach
Friedrichshrafen
GERMANY
St. Gallen 8883 72.959
Primary roads
GERMANY Roschach
Secondary roads
St. Gallen
Countries borders
72.959
21.229 Lustenau
MEDIUM 1:2’000 urban context
Friendrichshraten (Germany) Bregenz, Dornbirn and Lustenau (Austria) St. Gallen (Switzerland)
13.490 Arbon
24.772 Lindau
13.490
Lindau island area: 0.68 km²
Arbon
40
3000
24.772
80
Lindau - island
Lindau
MEDIUM 1:2’000 urban context
3000
SWITZERLAND
Lindau - island 27.942
8883
SWITZERLAND
Bregenz Roschach
27.942
8883 Roschach Historical St. Lindau Gallen (mixed use buildings) 72.959 Train station
Countries borders
Region policentre St. Gallen 72.959
Boat station
Car parking areas
Historical Lindau
Boat parking areas
46.011 Water routes
21.229
Dornbirn 40
40
80
Dornbirn
46.011
21.229 Lustenau
Railway tracks
MEDIUM 1:2’000 urban context
Railway
Lustenau
Later centuries (mixed use buildings) Health centre
AUSTRIA
Roads and route
AUSTRIA
Bregenz
Region policentre
Countries borders
8000
12000
8883
Primary roads Konstanz
Primary roads
MEDIUM 1:2’000
2000
Countries borders
8000
Arbon SWITZERLAND
Secondary roads
Secondary roads
Arbon
4000
13.490
Countries borders
Lindau Neighbouring cities:
Primary roads
2000
Region policentre
Country: Germany State: Beyern Region: Schwaben
Lindau island area: 0.68 km²
Rosc
13.490
Region policentre
Friendrichshraten (Germany) Bregenz, Dornbirn and Lustenau (Austria) St. Gallen (Switzerland)
84.693
Historical facts about Lindau:
Secondary roads
Lindau Neighbouring cities:
Lindau island area: 0.68 km²
Lindau island first mentioned in 882 by monk from St. Gallen. In 1180 the St. Stephan’s church was founded Lindau. WWII-1955 under French administration. In 1955 returned to Bavaria.
8883
Primary roads
160
1 ha
80
160
240
240
SMALL 1:500
24.772
191
Lindau 3000 Lindau - island
ysis 27.942 12000
Bregenz
AUSTRIA LARGE 1:10’000 metropolitan context
LARGELustenau 1:10’000 metropolitan context
80
200
400
800
1200
Railway Water routes 200
46.011
21.229
0
Roads and routes
400
800
1200
Dornbirn
160
240
10
20
40
60
Photos of Lindau
SMALL 1:500 street context
The main pedestrian street in historical settlement core.
The Marktplatz square.
The islands coast landscape.
Railway tracks at Linda
The healt centre, residental house and educartion building at the West part of Lindau island.
The Lindau main land b
7.942
z
AUSTRIA
Roads and routes
Historical maps
Railway Water routes
Roads and routes 46.011 Railway
The Lindau island 1597.
Dornbirn Water routes
240
10
20
40
60
SMALL 1:500 street context 10
SMALL 1:500
20
40
60
Photos of Lindau
Photos of Lindau
SWITZERLAND SWITZERLAND
Secondary roads
Region policentre
Bregenz Roschach
6.2.4
Settlement networks
Countries borders
Historical Lindau (mixed use buildings) St. Gallen Train station 72.959 Boat station
Railway tracks
Later centuries (mixed use buildings) Health centre
Car parking areas
Boat station
Railway tracks
Green areas
Later centuries (mixed use buildings) Health centre
Car parking areas
Railway tracks
Green areas
Historical Lindau (mixed use buildings)
MEDIUM 1:2’000 urban context MEDIUM 1:2’000 urban context
Train station
40
1 ha
Train station
Later centuries (mixed use buildings) Health centre
Boat station Later centuries (mixed use buildings) Health centre
Railway tracks
Railway tracks
Boat parking areas
Car parking areas
Green areas
Boat parking areas Green areas
Car parking areas
80
160
240
80
160
240
SMALL 1:500 street context
Boat parking areas
1 ha
Boat station
Dornbirn 40
Green areas
Train station
Dornbirn
Boat parking areas
Boat parking areas
Historical Lindau (mixed use buildings)
Lustenau 46.011
21.229 Lustenau
Car parking areas
Historical Lindau (mixed use buildings)
Railway 46.011 Water routes
21.229
1 ha
Later centuries (mixed use buildings) Health centre
AUSTRIA
Roads and route
AUSTRIA
Bregenz
Train station Roschach St. Gallen Boat station 72.959
Countries borders
1 ha
27.942
Historical Lindau 8883 (mixed use buildings)
Region policentre
192 Secondary roads
27.942
8883
Primary roads
Primary roads
Lindau - island
Roads and routes
193
Railway Water routes
10
20
40
60
Photos of Lindau
LL 1:500 context
Historical maps
The main pedestrian street in historical settlement core.
The Marktplatz square.
The islands coast landscape.
Railway tracks at Lindau island.
The healt centre, residental house and educartion building at the West part of Lindau island.
The Lindau main land building settlement.
The Lindau island 1597.
The Lindau island in 17th century.
The old Lindau island fortifications. Institute for Architecture und Planning Summer Semester 2012 Master of Science in Architecture Concentration Sustainable Urban Design
Lecturer: Prof. Peter Droege DI MAAS MCPIA Tutor: Anis Radzi BArch MUD Students: Sintija Jonikane & Zolan Major
06
194
195
7.0
Affidavit
Bio City Lindau I Herbey declare that this dissertation is my own original work and has not been sumbitted before to an y institution for assessment purpose. Further, I have acknowledged all soruces used and have cited these in refrence section. Vaduz, July 27th, 2012
Mohamed Kamel
196
Author: Mohamed Kamel FS 100199 Al_Mokttam, Bl.5040, Cairo , Egypt +2 0100 122 66 16 mohamed.m.kamel@gmail.com Master Thesis for Obtaining the degree of Master of Science in Architecture University of Liechtenstein, Graduate School Course of Study: Master of Science in Architecture, Module,Urban Sustainable Architecture Printed and Binding in Austria. Copyright © 2012 All rights reserved.
197