Oak Grove, MN 2040 Comprehensive Plan by MSA Professional Services

City of Oak Grove Anoka County, Minnesota

Adopted: July 27th 2020

2040 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN

Acknowledgements Oak Grove City Council

2040 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN

Mayor Dan Denno Scott Lawrence Paul Tradewell John West Weston Rolf Former Mayor Mark Korin Former Council Member Mike Wylie

Oak Grove Planning Commission

Chairperson William Smith Wayne Lee Patrick Marier John West Guy Farah

Oak Grove City Staff

Loren Wickham, City Administrator

MSA Professional Services, Inc.

Christopher Janson, AICP Chuck Schwartz, PE Josie Matteson Shawn Oâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;Shea, AICP Claire Michelson

This page intentionally left blank

Table of Contents Chapter 1: Introduction.........................................................................1-2 1.1 The Plan as a â&#x20AC;&#x153;Living Guideâ&#x20AC;? 1.2 A Snapshot of Oak Grove 1.3 Key Community Indicators

2040 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN

Chapter 2: Planning Process & Public Participation.........................2-2 2.1 Overview of the Planning Process 2.2 Project Website & Steering Committee 2.3 Community Survey 2.4 Public Workshop 2.5 Draft Plan Open House 2.6 Adjacent and Affected Jurisdiction Review Chapter 3: Community Elements.........................................................3-2 3.1 Vision 3.2 Goals Overview 3.3 Goals and Policies Chapter 4: Land Use...............................................................................4-2 4.1 Growth Forecast 4.2 Community Designation 4.3 Existing Land Use 4.4 Land Use Goals and Policies 4.5 Future Land Use Map 4.6 Future Land Use Categories 4.7 Staged Development and Redevelopment 4.8 Natural & Special Resources Chapter 5: Implementation...................................................................5-2 5.1 Implementation Actions 5.2 Plan Amendment Process 5.3 Guiding Decisions Appendix A: Community Indicators....................................................A-2 A.1 Transportation A.2 Housing A.3 Parks and Trails A.4 Water Resources A.5 Economic Competitiveness A.6 Resilience Appendix B: Plan Maps..........................................................................B-2 B.1 Parks and Trails Network Map B.2 Water Distribution System Map B.3 Stormwater System Map B.4 Sanitary Sewer System Map B.5 Existing Land Use Map B.6 2040 Future Land Use Map Appendix C: Complete Survey Results...............................................C-2 Appendix D: Watershed Management Plans.....................................D-2 Appendix E: Local Water Supply Plan..................................................E-2

This page intentionally left blank

2040 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN

1 Introduction Chapter provides the foundation for the Comprehensive 2 This Plan, outlining why we plan, the planning process, Smart and the planning area. In addition, Chapter 1 also 3 Planning, provides community background information including community indicators. 4 key Page The Plan as a â&#x20AC;&#x153;Living Guideâ&#x20AC;? 1-2 5 1.1 1.2 A Snapshot of Oak Grove 1-4 1.3 Key Community Indicators 1-9 Appendix A Appendix B Appendix C Appendix D Appendix E

1.1 The Plan as a “Living Guide” Why Plan? It is difficult to know what the future may bring for Oak Grove, or for any community. As residents and businesses come and go, and economic trends rise and fall, changes will occur. The purpose of this plan is to establish a shared vision for Oak Grove to guide future actions and decisions. This guidance provides predictability and consistency over time, which encourages investment. We plan so that we can act and react in a changing world with a confident understanding of our common values and goals.

Plan Maintenance This planning document is a “living” guide for growth and change in the City of Oak Grove. The plan represents the City’s best effort to address current issues and anticipate future needs; however, it can and should be amended from time to time if conditions warrant reconsideration of policies in this plan. If decisions are being made that are not consistent with this plan, then the plan has lost its relevance and should be amended. The process of amending the comprehensive plan should not be onerous, but it should trigger a brief pause to consider again the long term vision for the community. This plan’s value is dependent upon frequent use and occasional updates.

Google Earth View of Oak Grove City Hall August 2017

1-2

2040 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN

About Thrive MSP 2040 Thrive MSP 2040 is the vision for the Minneapolis -St. Paul Metropolitan Region over the next 30 years. It reflects the regions joint concerns and aspirations, anticipates future needs in the region, and addresses our responsibility to future generations. Under state law, the Council prepares a long-range plan for the Twin Cities region every 10 years. Thrive MSP 2040 sets the policy foundations for systems and policy plans developed by the Council: • Transportation Policy Plan • Water Resources Policy Plan • Regional Parks Policy Plan • Housing Policy Plan Thrive MSP 2040 addresses issues that transcend any one neighborhood, city, or county, as we build and maintain a thriving metropolitan region. Our region’s investments provide an important economic foundation so all residents of the region can prosper. Transportation, jobs, community development, affordable housing – these are the bricks-and-mortar basics that make other things possible health outcomes, and safeguard Minnesota’s exceptional quality of life. Choice, Place and Opportunity examines where opportunities in the region are, which residents have access to those opportunities, and how future public investments - made by the Council and other agencies - can assure equitable access to opportunity for

all residents of the region. Recommendations outlined in the assessment influences Thrive MSP 2040, which identified “equity” as one of five outcomes of the regional planning process over the next decade. While Oak Grove will establish a unique local vision, the City’s plan must also reflect the adopted regional policies outlined in the system and policy plans. Local plans contain much greater detail than regional plans by identifying local street connections, neighborhood parks, residential development standards, and phasing of utility extensions and improvements necessary for the individual community. But these local planning efforts tie into the larger regional infrastructure of parks and trail systems, arterial road networks, and wastewater infrastructure. It is the efforts of the 188 cities, townships, and counties together that implement a shared regional vision. Minnesota Statute requires certain topic areas to be included in local comprehensive plans. The Local Planning Handbook is organized around these Plan Elements and provides guidance on how to meet requirements within these planning areas. These Plan Elements in the Local Planning Handbook are: • Land Use • Transportation • Water Resources • Parks & Trails • Housing • Plan Implementation • Resilience • Economic Competitiveness

The Plan as a "Living Guide" | 1-3

1.2 Plan Organization Plan Organization The organization of the plan is based on the planning process and is divided into five chapters plus two important appendices. Chapter 1: Introduction Chapter 1 discusses the role of the plan, the planning area boundaries, regional context and key community indicators. Chapter 2: The Planning Process and Public Participation Chapter 2 outlines the planning process, including a description of public participation methods and feedback. Chapter 3: Community Elements Chapter 3 includes a vision for the future of the City, as desired in 2040, goals and strategies, key indicators and action steps for each element of the plan, including: Transportation Water Resources Parks & Trails Housing Resilience Economic Competitiveness Chapter 4: Land Use and Development Chapter 4 covers growth forecast, community designation, existing land use, future land use, density calculations, staged development and redevelopment, natural resources and special resources protection. Chapter 5: Implementation This chapter outlines how the plan is to be implemented, how the plan should be amended when necessary, and the annual management of the plan. Appendix A: Community Indicators Appendix A is a compilation of data that describes the existing conditions, trends, and projections for Oak Grove. This data informs the planning process and should be updated from time to time to track progress and change in the community. Appendix B: Comprehensive Plan Maps Appendix C: Complete Survey Results Appendix D: Watershed Management Plans Appendix E: Local Water Supply Plan

1-4

2040 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN

Plan Organization | 1-5

1.3 A Snapshot of Oak Grove History of Oak Grove The City of Oak Grove was incorporated from a Township to a City in 1993. The Town Board drafted Oak Grove’s first comprehensive land use plan in 1983. The most recent comprehensive plan update was conducted in 1998. All Metro Area communities were required to update their comprehensive plans in 1998 following a change in the Regional Development Framework. Settlement of Oak Grove Township was primarily by Irish immigrants during the late 1800’s. In 1880, Oak Grove’s population totaled 305. The early settlers of Oak Grove cultivated the land for small potato farms. Oak Grove’s population began to grow when the Soo Line Railroad was constructed and the Town of Cedar was established around 1899. However, agricultural land uses continued to dominate in the community up until the 1960’s when residential development became more active. Lake George was a popular recreational destination for residents of the Twin Cities Metro Area and many people had seasonal homes located on the Lake’s shore. By the 1990’s agricultural development had diminished to just a few small acreages and hobby farms and the seasonal homes around Lake George were converted to permanent residences. While there remains to be a fair amount of vacant land in the City today, many of these vacant parcels are not actively used for farming operations. Preservation of natural resources and preserving rural character have been key elements of the City’s planning documents since the beginning.

Metropolitan Council Growth Forecasts for Oak Grove through 2040 Forecast Year 2010 2020 2030 2040

1-6

Population

Households

Employment

8,031 8,600 9,500

2,744 3,100 3,600

741 920 980

10,400

4,100

1,000

Source: Minnesota Historical Society

2040 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN

Planning Area and Community Designation The study area for this Plan includes all lands within the current municipal limits. The City of Oak Grove and corresponding planning area is approximately 22,502 acres or 35.16 square miles in size. The Metropolitan Council’s modified community designation for the City of Oak Grove is “Rural Residential”. The Rural Residential community designation recognizes the existing development pattern of 1 unit per 2.5 acres or less, but discourages future rural residential development patterns and where opportunities exist, and encourages the City to plan for rural development at densities that are not greater than 1 unit per 10 acres. The City will allow development consistent with the existing development pattern of 1 unit per 2.5 acres. The map below shows Oak Grove’s city limits/planning area, City’s community designation and the community designations of the surrounding jurisdictions.

Source: Metropolitan Council Planning Handbook

A Snapshot of Oak Grove | 1-7

Regional Context The City of Oak Grove is located in Anoka County, Minnesota and is a member of the Twin Cities Metropolitan Area. Oak Grove shares borders with the cities of East Bethel, St. Francis, Andover and Ramsey, Minnesota. Oak Grove is in a great location for residents to reside in the city and easily commute to nearby areas for work, entertainment, and trade. Oak Grove strives to provide a high quality of life and remain a great location to live in the Twin Cities.

St. Francis

an Area

MAJOR REGIONAL CITIES AND DISTANCE FROM OAK GROVE City

Population

Distance by Road

Minneapolis, MN

410,939

30 Miles

St. Paul, MN

304,442

36 Miles

St. Cloud, MN

65,842

57 Miles

Coon Rapids, MN

61,476

15 Miles

Minnetonka, MN

49,734

35 Miles

Bethel

Linwood Twp.

57 mi. East Bethel

2040

Oak Grove

Nowthen

ignations ANOKA Columbus Ramsey

Andover

Forest Lake

Ham Lake

15 mi.

Scandia

Anoka

Ma on C

Dayton

Rogers

Coon Rapids

Champlin Hanover

36 mi. Blaine

35 mi. Osseo

Greenfield

Lake Park

Brooklyn Park

Hugo

Centerville

Shoreview

Mounds View

May Twp.

WASHINGTON

Circle Lexington Pines

Spring 30 mi.

Maple Grove

Corcoran

Lino Lakes

White Bear Twp.

North Oaks

Stillwater Twp.

Dellwood

nce

etrista

Brooklyn Center Loretto

Crystal

HENNEPIN Medina

Fridley

RAMSEY

Hilltop Columbia Heights

New Hope

Plymouth

Arden Hills

New Brighton

Robbinsdale Roseville

Maple Plain

Medicine Lake Long Lake

Woodland Minnetonka Beach Deephaven

Falcon Heights

St. Louis Park

Minnetonka

Bay

Landfall

Lilydale

Chanhassen

Fort Snelling (unorg.)

West St. Paul Mendota Mendota Heights

Woodbury

Sunfish Lake

South St. Paul

Eden Prairie Bloomington Chaska

Baytown Twp.

West Lakeland Twp.

Excelsior

Richfield

1-8

Oak Park Heights

Lake Elmo

Oakdale

St. Paul

Minneapolis

Edina Victoria

Stillwater

Hopkins

Tonka Bay Shorewood

Vadnais Gem Lake Birchwood White Village Heights Bear Lake Pine Springs Little North Canada St. Paul Maplewood

Wayzata

Orono

Spring Mound Park

Lauderdale Golden Valley

Grant Mahtomedi

Eagan

Inver Grove Heights

Newport

St. Paul Park Cottage

Afton

1.4 Key Community Indicators

2040 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN

Key Community Indicators This section analyzes population and demographic trends for the City of Oak Grove. Examination of these trends provides a foundation for the planning process and implementation of the plan.

projected population for 2020 from the Metropolitan Council is 8,600 people, an increase of about 7% from 2010.

According to Metropolitan Council the City of Oak Grove has continued to gain population over the past several decades. Oak Groveâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;s population grew by approximately 16.34% between 2000 - 2010. The

For the same time period the number of households in Oak Grove has also continued to increase as well. The Metropolitan Council projects the City will gain 356 households by 2020 for a total of 3,100. Household numbers are projected to continue growing to 4,100 households in 2040.

The average number of people per household in Oak Grove has decreased from 3.32 in 1990 to 2.92 in 2010. Anoka County and the Twin Cities Region also saw a slight decrease in household size over this

period of time. The estimated average number of people per household in Oak Grove for 2016 is 2.91 according to the Metropolitan Councilâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;s estimates; a slight decrease from 2010.

Key Community Indicators | 1-9

This page intentionally left blank

2040 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN

1 2 Planning Process & Public Participation 3 This chapter provides an overview of the planning process. Summaries of public input for the 4 comprehensive planning process are provided. 5 Page Overview of the Planning Process 2-2 Appendix A 2.1 2.2 Project Website & Steering Committee 2-4 Community Survey 2-5 Appendix B 2.3 2.4 Public Workshop 2-10 Draft Plan Open House 2-15 Appendix C 2.5 2.6 Adjacent and Affected Jurisdiction Review 2-16 Appendix D Appendix E

2.1 Overview of the Planning Process Planning Process

Incorporating Input into the Plan

A transparent public participation process is the foundation to a successful plan. The involvement of residents, business owners, and other stakeholders is essential to the creation and implementation of the plan. Elements of public participation for the 2040 Oak Grove Comprehensive Planning process included:

The goals and policies of this comprehensive plan support the community’s vision for the future of Oak Grove and address barriers to realizing this vision. Elements of the plan have been crafted from individual participant’s ideas, discussions and debates among committee members and the past experiences of the community as a whole.

• • • • • • • •

This input allows us to construct underlying themes as a frame for the plan, and provides information on what specific issues and ideas are most important to Oak Grove’s citizens. This foundation ensures that the plan is not just a hollow document, but a guide for future decisions in Oak Grove that are in line with the community’s ideals. From this foundation, the City of Oak Grove will continue to grow and thrive.

2-2

Advisory Committee Meetings Planning Commission Meetings Parks Commission Meeting Public Workshop/SWOT Analysis Community Survey City Council Meetings Draft Plan Open House Public Hearing

2040 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN

Planning Process Schedule Kickoff Meeting with Advisor Committee Meeting

February 27, 2017 - Project Kickoff and Issues/Opportunities Exercise Joint Council, Parks Commission and Planning Commission Meeting March 22, 2017 - Expectations, Existing Conditions and Issues/Opportunities Exercise Public Workshop May 9, 2017 - Review Existing Conditions and Issues/Opportunities Exercise Advisory Committee Meeting #2 August 28, 2017 - Review Partial Draft Plan Draft Plan Open House October 9th, 2017 - Review Partial Draft Plan and Map Exercise Advisor Committee #3 October 30, 2017 - Review Full Draft Plan Planning Commission Meeting November 16, 2017 - Final Review and Recommendation City Council Meeting December 11, 2017 - Final Review by City Council MONTH February 2017 March 2017 April - June 2017 July - August 2017 August 2017 August - October 2017 October 2017 October 2017 November 2017 December 2017 February 2018 March - December 2018

TASKS • Advisor Committee Meeting #1 - Project Kick-Off Meeting with City Staff • Begin Existing Plan Review, Demographics and Exiting Conditions Analysis • Launch Project Website • Ongoing - Existing Plan Review, Demographics and Exiting Conditions Analysis • Joint Council and Planning Commission Workshop – SWOT Analysis • Open Online Survey • Ongoing - Existing Plan Review, Demographics and Exiting Conditions Analysis, Online Survey, and Interviews • Public Workshop – SWOT Analysis • Prepare Draft of Comprehensive Plan Update • Advisory Committee Meeting #2 - Presented Draft and Future Land Use Charrette • Prepare Draft Plan • Public Workshop to Review Draft Plan • Advisory Committee Meeting #3 - Review Final Draft Plan and Input from Public Workshop • Planning and Zoning Commission Public Hearing and Review for Recommendation to Council • City Council Public Hearing and Review • Upload Plan for Metropolitan Council Preliminary Review and Comments • Distribute Plan to Surrounding Jurisdictions for Review and Comments • Receive and Consider Comments from Surrounding Jurisdictions and Metropolitan Council • City Council Public Hearing and Consideration of Adoption of Plan • Deliver Final Plan Documents and Map Data • Upload Final Documents to Metropolitan Council Website

Overview of Planning Process | 2-3

2.2 Project Website and Advisory Commission Project Website A project website was developed where posts and feedback were shared such as the project schedule and draft documents. It also provided a venue to share draft materials and solicit comments throughout the planning process. This aspect of the communication and participation strategy was important for transparency, and for sharing information with stakeholders who were unable to attend meetings.

Advisory Committee A Advisory Committee was established to oversee the process and ensure that the established goals and objectives were being accomplished in a timely manner. The Advisory Committee, comprised of members of the City Council was a primary review body throughout the planning process. These meetings were open to the public. Advisory Committee presentation materials were posted on the project website for public access.

2-4

2.3 Community Survey

2040 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN

Community Survey The development of a community wide survey served as an essential tool to reach those that could not attend the Public Workshop and to give individuals an anonymous platform to voice opinions and concerns. The survey was primarily online, distributed via Survey Monkey. There were also paper copies available at City Hall for those who preferred to complete a printed survey. 95 surveys were received. There are several key questions included in this chapter and the complete results are included in Appendix B.

Community Survey Summary | 2-5

2-6

2040 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN

Community Survey Summary | 2-7

2-8

2040 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN

Community Survey Summary | 2-9

2.4 Public Workshop

2-10

2040 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN

Public Workshop - SWOT Analysis A Public Workshop was held on May 9, 2017. The purpose of the meeting was to gather input on the City’s strengths, concerns and opportunities to provide direction to the comprehensive planning process. Many citizens shared their opinions on the future of Oak Grove. The first part of the workshop focused on educating the attendees about the purpose of the comprehensive plan, the process for updating Oak Grove’s plan, the requirements of the Metropolitan Councils’s Thrive 2040 planning efforts, and a brief existing conditions overview.

The second part of the workshop explored Isaias and opportunities for the community using a Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities and Threats (SWOT) analysis. The three focus topics were Beautification, Development and Mobility. Consultants, City Staff and Advisory Committee members were available to discuss topics and answer questions about the plan and planning process. The following pages provide a brief summary of the feedback and comments collected from each category.

Public Workshop Results | 2-11

Beautification from Public Workshop Opportunities/Strengths (+) • • • • • • • • • •

2-12

Lake George Rum River Waterways Country Feel Low Density Open space Parks Trees Wildlife Trails

Issues/Threats/Weaknesses (-) • • • • • • • • • • •

Blighted areas Junk yards Septic Maintenance Irresponsible use of lawn chemicals Noise Abatements Unprotected aquifers Oak Wilt Unkept vehicles MET Council Tree Disease Climate Change

2040 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN

Development from Public Workshop Opportunities/Strengths (+) • • • • • • • • • • •

No big box stores Perfect amount of retail Possibility of smaller lot sizes Possibility to diversify from single family homes Interconnected trails A lot of parks Good schools Good employment opportunities Increased lot sizes New residents Bedroom community

Issues/Threats/Weaknesses (-) • • • • •

Increased population could mean increased crime Not enough commercial and retail Not enough industrial Lack of public transportation Lack of senior housing

Public Workshop Results | 2-13

Mobility from Public Workshop Opportunities/Strengths (+) • • • •

2-14

Proximity to services Public Works Department Central location to highways Vehicle diversity accepted

Issues/Threats/Weaknesses (-) • • • • •

Lack of shoulders on larger roads Lack of public transportation Excessive traffic Lack of transportation services for seniors Unsafe roads

2.5 Draft Plan Open House

2040 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN

Draft Plan Open House A Draft Plan Open House was held at City Hall on October 9, 2017. The event was well attended and provided the consultant team and the Advisory Committee with great feedback for the draft plan. The evening started with a 15 minute period for attendees to review the draft plan and maps and

ask questions. This was followed by a 20 minute presentation of the draft plan by MSA Professional Services, Inc. The presentation was followed by 20 minutes of continued review of the draft plan and maps. Attendees were also asked to complete a feedback worksheet focused on the draft plan update and implementation of the plan.

Draft Plan Open House | 2-15

2.6 Adjacent and Affected Jurisdiction Reviews Oak Groveâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;s Affected Jurisdiction Review Natural areas, trails, roadways, and infrastructure often cross municipal boundaries. Reviewing and collaborating with adjacent jurisdictions provides potential opportunities to work together on shared areas of importance as well as communicate on potential concerns. As part of the 2040 Comprehensive Plan process, Oak Grove a was required to share its proposed Comprehensive Plan Update (CPU) with its adjacent and affected jurisdictions at least six months before official submittal to the Metropolitan Council (MN Â§473.858 Subd. 2). The following Affected Jurisdictions were contacted by Oak Grove in January 2018: Jurisdiction City of Andover City of Ham Lake City of Ramsey City of East Bethel City of Nowthen City of St. Francis Anoka County Transportation Upper Rum River Water Management Organization Minnesota Department of Natural Resources (Anoka Hennepin ISD #11) Lower Rum River Watershed Management Organization Minnesota Department of Transportation Anoka County Parks Anoka County Transit

2-16

Responded Responded No Response Comments Enclosed No Comments Received X X X X X X X X X X X X X X

2040 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN

Anoka County Parks Adjacent or Affected Jurisdiction Name: _Anoka County (Parks Department) Please check the appropriate box: We have reviewed the proposed Plan Update, do not have any comments, and are therefore waiving further review. X We have reviewed the proposed Plan Update and offer the following comments (attach additional sheets if necessary) 

Well done. Thank you for allowing the County to review your Comprehensive Plan. A few comments are listed below.

Appendix A, Community Indicators: a. Page A-10 Bicycle and Walking Section: i. The City describes Destination, Linking and Natural Surface Trails, but doesn’t highlight destination or linking trails on the Parks and Trails Map. It would be helpful to either highlight on a map or provide a few examples for reference. b. Page A-17, A.3 Parks and Trails i. The map on page A-17 incorrectly shows Sugar Hills Regional Trail as a search corridor. It would be shown as a regional trail. There is an approved master plan for the trail as of July 2016. ii. In the Rum River Regional Trail paragraph on page A-18, the City’s reference to the Sugar Hills Search Corridor should be changed to Sugar Hills Regional Trail. c. Parks and Trails Network Map on page A-19: i. The County acknowledges the proposed trail link between Lake George Regional Park and the City of Oak Grove’s Dunlop Property. ii. The City’s proposed local trails within the County’s Cedar Creek Conservation Area should be removed. Appendix B, Comprehensive Plan Maps a.

Parks and Trails Network Map on page B-3: i. The County acknowledges the proposed trail link between Lake George Regional Park and the City of Oak Grove’s Dunlop Property. ii. The City’s proposed local trails within the County’s Cedar Creek Conservation Area should be removed.

Name of Reviewer _Karen Blaska, Park Planner_ Date ______05/30/18_______________ Signature of Reviewer __________________________

Draft Plan Open House | 2-17

City of Andover

2-18

2040 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN

Anoka- Hennepin ISD #11

Draft Plan Open House | 2-19

Lower Rum River Watershed Organization

2-20

2040 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN

Anoka County Transportation

Highway Transit Surveyor GIS Fleet

Date:

September 10, 2018

To:

Loren Wickham (lwickham@ci.oak-grove.mn.us) City Administrator City of Oak Grove 19900 Nightingale Street NW Oak Grove, MN 55011-9204

RE: Comments on the Transportation Section of the Oak Grove 2040 Comprehensive Plan Dear Mr. Wickham: Thank you for providing us the opportunity to comment on the draft 2040 Comprehensive Plan for the city of Oak Grove. The following contains the Anoka County Highway Department review of the Transportation Section of your Plan. To provide better clarity, comments on the transportation section were made on the pdf of the document and are posted below.

1440 Bunker Lake Blvd. NW  Andover, MN 55304-4005  www.anokacounty.us Office: 763-324-3100  Fax: 763-324-3020 Affirmative Action / Equal Opportunity Employer

Draft Plan Open House | 2-21

2-22 2

2040 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN

Thank you again for allowing us the opportunity to comment on the Transportation Section/Chapter of the Cityâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;s Comprehensive Plan. If you have any questions on the comments, please feel free to contact me at 763-324-3179. Sincerely,

Jack Forslund Transportation Planner Anoka County Highway Department cc (by email): Douglas Fischer, P.E., Transportation Division Manager/County Engineer Joe MacPherson, P.E., Assistant County Engineer Mark Schermerhorn, Transit Planner Bart Biernat, Environmental Health Specialist Karen Blaska, Park Planner

P:\17-16-00 2040 Transportation Plan\CITY COMP Plans\Oak Grove - ready\Oak Grove 2040 Comp. Plan - ACHD Comments on the Transportation Section.docx

Draft Plan Open House | 2-23

Minnesota Department of Transportation Metropolitan District 1500 County Road B2 West Roseville, MN 55113

February 23, 2018

Tim Smith Director of Public Works City of Oak Grove 19900 Nightingale Street NW Oak Grove, MN 55011-9204 SUBJECT:

Oak Grove 2040 Comp Plan MnDOT Review # CPA18-002 West of MN 65 Oak Grove, Anoka County

Dear Tim Smith, Thank you for the opportunity to review the Oak Grove Comprehensive Plan Update. The Minnesota Department of Transportation (MnDOT) has reviewed the draft plan and has the following comments. Multi-Modal: MnDOT recommends giving priority to establishing trails in the area around any potential transit station development to allow residents the ability to reach the station without driving. Future land use designations should accommodate transit-oriented development. Review Submittal Options: MnDOT’s goal is to complete the review of plans within 30 days. Submittals sent in electronically can usually be turned around faster. There are four submittal options. Please submit either: 1. One (1) electronic pdf version of the plans. MnDOT can accept the plans via e-mail at metrodevreviews.dot@state.mn.us provided that each separate e-mail is under 20 megabytes. 2. Three (3) sets of full size plans. Although submitting seven sets of full size plans will expedite the review process. Plans can be sent to: MnDOT – Metro District Planning Section Development Reviews Coordinator 1500 West County Road B-2 Roseville, MN 55113 3. One (1) compact disc. 4. Plans can also be submitted to MnDOT’s External FTP Site. Please send files to: ftp://ftp2.dot.state.mn.us/pub/incoming/MetroWatersEdge/Planning Internet Explorer doesn’t work using ftp so please use an FTP Client or your Windows Explorer (My Computer). Also, please send a note to metrodevreviews.dot@state.mn.us indicating that the plans have been submitted on the FTP site. An equal opportunity employer

2-24

2040 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN

If you have any questions concerning this review, please contact me at (651) 234-7788. Sincerely,

Josh Pansch Senior Planner

Copy sent via E-Mail:

Brian Kelly, Water Resources Buck Craig, Permits Nancy Jacobson, Design Cameron Muhic, Multi-Modal Planning Ashley Roup, Right of Way Gayle Gedstad, Traffic Melissa Barnes, Area Engineer Rylan Juran, Aeronautics Russell Owen, Metropolitan Council

Draft Plan Open House | 2-25

Anoka County Transit From: Mark Schermerhorn <Mark.Schermerhorn@co.anoka.mn.us> Sent: Wednesday, December 5, 2018 10:45 AM To: Loren Wickham <lwickham@ci.oak-grove.mn.us> Cc: Meghan L. Mathson <Meghan.Mathson@co.anoka.mn.us> Subject: 2040 Comp Plan Good Afternoon Mr. Wickham My name is Mark Schermerhorn. I am the new Transit Program Coordinator with the Anoka County Transit Unit. You may remember my previous supervisor Tim Kirchoff. He retired in March and with other vacancies at the Transportation Division there was a restructuring that among other things created this position. I’ve spent 18 years in the Transit Office and thought I’d take this opportunity to introduce myself while taking a look at the Transit section of City of Oak Grove’s 2040 Comp. Plan. Sorry if this is late getting to you but with the changes in the office things were a little held up. In your plan I just had a couple comments. • •

Anoka County Volunteer Transportation is now Anoka County Medlink and operates MondayFriday from 8:00 a.m. to 4:30 p.m. Anoka County Traveler Transit Link provides dial-a-ride service in the county as well as NW Ramsey County (Arden Hills, Falcon Heights, Lauderdale, Mounds View, New Brighton, Roseville, St. Anthony, and Shoreview) Operating hours are Monday-Friday 6:00 a.m. to 7:00 p.m.

Feel free to contact me if you have any questions or thoughts about: • Anoka County Traveler fixed routes • Anoka County Traveler Transit Link • Anoka County Medlink or • Anoka County Commute Solutions

I look forward to working with you.

Mark Schermerhorn Transit Program Coordinator 763 324 3108 Anokacounty.us/transit Anoka County Transit 1440 Bunker Lake Blvd. NW Andover, MN 55304 Transit Office 763 324 3250 Fax: 763 324 3020

2-26

2040 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN

Draft Plan Open House | 2-27

This page intentionally left blank

2040 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN

1 2 3 Community Elements chapter includes a vision for the future of the City, 4 This as desired in 2040, goals and policies for the community of the plan, including: Transportation, Water 5 elements Resources, Parks & Trails, Housing, Resilience, and Appendix A Economic Competitiveness. Appendix B Page 3.1 Vision 3-2 Goals Overview 3-3 Appendix C 3.2 3.3 Goals and Policies 3-4 Appendix D Appendix E

3.1 Oak Groveâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;s Vision for 2040

Oak Grove in 2040... We are a welcoming community to live, work and experience. Residents and visitors love our rural character, natural areas, recreational amenities, friendly neighbors and our strong commitment to our communityâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;s quality of life.

3-2

3.2 Goals Overview

2040 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN

Oak Groveâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;s goals for a better future... Each element of the comprehensive plan contains goals and policies established during the planning process based on public input, community indicators, and the 2030 plan. A goal is a long-term target that states what the community wants to accomplish. Written in general terms, the statement offers a desired condition. A policy is a statement that identifies a course of action to achieve a goal. They are more specific than goals and are usually attainable through planning and implementation activities.

Transportation T1: Provide guidance for a safe, efficient, coordinated, and convenient multi-modal transportation system that is integrated with anticipated land use and development plans, and that protects and enhances natural resources. T2: Develop a comprehensive street system that effectively moves automobile traffic through the City. T3: Establish a local street system that connects isolated neighborhoods and promotes the safe and convenient interchange of traffic. T4: Maintain safe and functional railroad service through Oak Grove.

Water Resources

Parks and Trails PT1: Ensure that land use and development is compatible and harmonious with the natural environment. PT2: Establish a comprehensive system of safe, aesthetically pleasing and useful parks, natural habitat/greenway corridors and trails that are geographically located throughout the community in a manner compatible with surrounding land uses and that provide a variety of recreation opportunities to all residents of Oak Grove. PT3: Acquire land for development of a park and trail system to fulfill the long term needs of Oak Grove residents. PT4: Establish and continue partnerships with Anoka County, adjacent cities and townships, school districts, churches, and civic organizations to provide recreation facilities and programs.

Housing H1: Strengthen community character by encouraging the maintenance and improvement of the existing housing stock and properties throughout the community.

WR1: Limit investment in public infrastructure to reduce the tax burden of City residents.

H2: Retain and continue to attract people including young professionals, families and retirees in Oak Grove by supporting a range of housing options.

Resilience

Economic Competitiveness

R1: Encourage Energy Efficiency in Buildings, Lighting, and Infrastructure

EC1: Preserve and protect existing active farms from encroachment of incompatible land uses.

R2: The City will promote education and awareness regarding hazards and risks in the community.

EC2: Support strategic economic growth within the City which compliments the rural character of the area and provides additional businesses and services for the community.

R3: The City will protect and support the development of access to direct sunlight for solar energy.

Goals Overview | 3-3

3.3 Goals and Policies Oak Grove’s 2040 Community Elements Goals and Policies Transportation Transportation is an essential aspect of life. It is about the ability to readily and safely gain access to work, school, shopping, recreation, medical care and social gatherings. It is also an essential component of most economic activity. The City of Oak Grove’s overarching transportation themes are safety, efficiency and diversity of transportation options. Goal T1: Provide guidance for a safe, efficient, coordinated, and convenient multi-modal transportation system that is integrated with anticipated land use and development plans, and that protects and enhances natural resources. Policies: 1. Provide an understanding of the transportation issues facing Oak Grove as it grows. 2. Recognize the important relationship between land use and transportation and develop appropriate policies that promote a sustainable transportation system; future land use designations should accommodate transitoriented development. 3. Give priority to establishing trails around potential transit station development to allow residents the ability to reach the station without driving. 4. Recognize the importance and value of the environmental resources in the region and minimize negative impacts to such areas. 5. Develop a network and functional hierarchy of streets that balance the needs of access with safety and mobility. 6. Encourage planning and development of a safe, interconnected pedestrian and bicycle system. 7. Coordinate the local transportation system with the regional needs and support of other agencies in developing infrastructure decisions in the area. 8. Investigate reasonable funding strategies and develop an implementation plan that recognizes funding limitations and realities. 9. Protect previous investments and ensure efficient 3-4

use of the road system by giving high priority to operational maintenance, safety improvements, and capacity improvements that are cost-effective projects (such as signalization upgrades, adding turn lanes, and signage) and increased level of service. Goal T2: Develop a comprehensive street system that effectively moves automobile traffic through the City. Policies: 1. Plan transportation facilities to function in a manner compatible with adjacent land use. 2. Develop a network and functional hierarchy of streets that balance the needs of site access with mobility. 3. Implement the Anoka County access spacing guidelines in the City’s land use planning to control access to the collector and arterial street system. 4. Plan for and acquire sufficient street right-of-way for the City’s collector and arterial street system in conjunction with future subdivision. 5. Require lots abutting collector and arterial streets to have additional lot depth to provide at least a 20 foot buffer yard. 6. Work with Anoka County to identify and plan for the long range transportation infrastructure through Oak Grove. Goal T3: Establish a local street system that connects isolated neighborhoods and promotes the safe and convenient interchange of traffic. Policies: Require proper visibility, design and control of all intersections to promote safety. Design local or residential streets to prevent penetration by through traffic and properly direct traffic to collector or arterial streets. Provide complete street systems to eliminate isolated neighborhoods and dead-end streets and allow for inter-connections between neighborhoods.

2040 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN

Goal T4: Maintain safe and functional railroad service through Oak Grove. Policies: 1. Work with and encourage BNSF Railroad to maintain the railroad in top performance. 2. Officially support continued main line railroad service to the City of Oak Grove. 3. Cooperatively ensure that the on-grade railroad crossings are maintained to prevent hazardous situations in regards to street conditions, signing, and visibility. 4. Investigate the opportunity for rail access into the City’s industrial area at Sims Road. 5. Promote the Cambridge Corridor as a commuter rail line. 6. Lobby the State for a transit station located in Oak Grove’s Cedar neighborhood.

Water Resources The rural character and setting of Oak Grove is an important part of the lives of the people in the community. The community will work to protect, conserve, and intelligently utilize their shared groundwater and surface water systems in ways that protect public health, support rural residential growth and development, maintain habitat and ecosystem health, and provide for recreational opportunities to continually improve the quality of life of the entire community. Goal WR1: Limit investment in public infrastructure to reduce the tax burden of City residents. Policies: 1. Adopt development performance standards that insure environmentally friendly development. 2. Preserve the ecological formation of the City’s waterways, drainage system and wetlands to avoid City need for public storm sewer. 3. Manage stormwater on site to avoid down stream issues related to flooding or stormwater quality.

4. Promote low impact design stormwater techniques. 5. All rural residential subdivisions shall be integrated with the natural features of the land. 6. Prohibit development in areas of floodplains, wetlands, and drainageways that may create the need for City intervention to correct stormwater issues. 7. All lots shall be designed to meet City development regulations to insure safe placement of buildings, private wells, and individual sewage treatment systems. 8. Implement inspection and improvement programs to insure ongoing safe operation of private wells and independent sanitary sewer treatment systems. 9. Manage community facilities and services to meet the needs of City residents in a cost effective manner. 10. Annually update the City Capital Improvement Program to address the City’s capital needs.

Parks and Trails Quality of life is the single most important factor to retain current residents and attract future residents to Oak Grove. The community’s rural character and recreational access to parks and trails rank high on the list of contributions towards an improved quality of life. The community of Oak Grove will continue to build a best in class recreation system that is so important to the people and the region. Goal PT1: Ensure that land use and development is compatible and harmonious with the natural environment. Policies: 1. As a precursor to development, identify and evaluate all critical and sensitive environmental features in Oak Grove. 2. Encourage the preservation, restoration and Goals and Policies | 3-5

enhancement of shoreland, floodplain and wetland environments in their natural state. Where desirable and practical, promote development which complements existing natural features and that which is in conformance with Federal, State, and local regulations. Encourage subdivision design (in the development review process) that preserves natural features in order to maintain the healthy environment, aesthetics and economic benefits such features provide to the area. Implement erosion control, wetland preservation, open space designation, clustering, and park land dedication as methods that developers may use to protect environmentally sensitive areas. Establish greenway or natural habitat corridors and linear parks to break up urban land use patterns, allow wildlife movement, and preserve open space while allowing the community to enjoy the natural amenities within Oak Grove. Utilize trails for both transportation and recreational purposes (connections between activity centers, schools or by providing access to natural areas, waterways, waterbodies, or other natural areas).

Goal PT2: Establish a comprehensive system of safe, aesthetically pleasing and useful parks, natural habitat/greenway corridors and trails that are geographically located throughout the community in a manner compatible with surrounding land uses and that provide a variety of recreation opportunities to all residents of Oak Grove. Policies: 1. Implement the 2006 Oak Grove Park, Open Space and Trail System Plan. 2. Maintain a balance between active, passive and cultural recreational areas and activities tailored to the needs of the entire community. 3. Integrate parks, natural habitat/greenway corridors and trails as a comprehensive system for serving the recreation needs of the community 3-6

5. 6. 7.

through physical connections and planned development of a full variety of facilities and diverse uses during all seasons. Utilize consistent design elements for park and trail facilities (buildings, play equipment, landscape plantings, signage, fixtures, etc.) that promote community identity, recognition of public facilities, and safety. Consider long term costs for maintenance and operation in a facilityâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;s design and construction as part of the planning process. Coordinate the construction of trails in conjunction with State, Anoka County, or Oak Grove street improvement projects to minimize costs. Require trail construction to be in accordance with City design standards, and to meet the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) requirements.

Goal PT3: Acquire land for development of a park and trail system to fulfill the long term needs of Oak Grove residents. Policies: 1. Implement the 2006 Oak Grove Park, Open Space and Trail System Plan. 2. Acquire park land through land dedication, purchase, or donation. 3. Accept land dedication for park, trail and open space facilities (in satisfaction of subdivision requirements) only when the parcel satisfies the needs of the community, as determined by Oak Grove. 4. Do not accept park land that serves no previously defined system purpose as part of subdivision applications but instead accept a comparable cash contribution. 5. Only accept unsolicited park and trail donations that are free of obligations or impacts that may limit their use. 6. Acquire parcels that will provide for both active recreation needs and that contain natural amenities and unique landscape areas such as waterbodies, waterways, wetlands, ponds,

2040 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN

streams, significant tree stands, native prairie, and areas of rugged topography. Goal PT4: Establish and continue partnerships with Anoka County, adjacent cities and townships, school districts, churches, and civic organizations to provide recreation facilities and programs. Policies: 1. Pursue grants, joint powers agreements and other alternative funding sources for the acquisition and development of park, trail and open space facilities. 2. Coordinate local facility development and related services with the needs and facilities of surrounding communities, school districts, athletic associations, civic groups and other organizations.

Housing As a city grows and changes, housing must change to meet the needs of the population. Housing is included in a comprehensive plan to provide guidance for decision-makers and developers when considering additions to and renovations of the Cityâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;s housing stock. Character, market needs, and quality are important considerations for housing growth in Oak Grove. The Metropolitan Council also provides the following guidance for housing: 1. Promote housing options to give people in all life stages and of all economic viable choices for safe, stable and affordable homes 2. Promote a balanced housing supply and a mix of housing affordability to ensure long-term community viability.

3. Identify and analyze local markets, location, condition, and availability of affordable units, both publicly subsidized and naturally occurring, to inform the housing element of the local comprehensive plan. Oak Grove Specific Goals Goal H1: Strengthen community character by encouraging the maintenance and improvement of the existing housing stock and properties throughout the community. Policies: 1. Continue to monitor and encourage property maintenance. 2. Actively enforce code violations related to housing standards and property maintenance. 3. Encourage and support the creation of neighborhood associations and locally led neighborhood planning efforts. Goal H2: Retain and continue to attract people including young professionals, families and retirees in Oak Grove by supporting a range of housing options. Policies: 1. Examine housing market conditions in Oak Grove and the surrounding communities and carefully track Oak Groveâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;s housing stock availability as it relates to regional housing needs. 2. Support reasonable petitions from developers to provide more diverse housing options for young professional, families, empty nesters and retirees provided the character of proposed developments compliments the rural character of the community.

Resilience Natural, technological, and human-caused hazards take a high toll on communities. Oak Grove Goals and Policies | 3-7

understands the importance of better managing risks and the importance of good planning. Good planning will reduce the negative impacts of disasters on the livelihoods and quality of life of the community. The Cityâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;s future planning will strengthen resilience and improve a communityâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;s abilities to continue or restore vital services in a more timely way as well as build back better after damaging events. Goal R1: Encourage Energy Efficiency in Buildings, Lighting, and Infrastructure 1. Communicate to residents and businesses about rebates, audits, and other opportunities to decrease energy costs and lower energy-related emissions. 2. Integrate energy efficiency best practices information and assistance into building permit process. 3. Encourage an integrated approach to designing building and infrastructure systems (heating, cooling, water, etc). 4. Maximize the energy efficiency of all public buildings, campuses, infrastructure, and operations. 5. Improve fuel efficiency of City vehicle fleet. 6. Encourage fuel/charging stations or supporting infrastructure for low emissions vehicles. 7. Look for opportunities to partner with other public entities, utility companies, and private sector to maximize energy efficiencies. Goal R2: The City will promote education and awareness regarding hazards and risks in the community. Policies: 1. Strive to keep citizens apprised of the situation and possible outcomes during flooding, snow storms and other naturally occurring hazards. 2. Collaborate with local agencies and organizations

5. 6. 7.

to inform the community about disaster preparedness, especially including evacuation procedures in flood-prone areas and the location of public shelters. Encourage private disaster preparedness, including resilient building practices and materials, establishment of disaster response and recovery plans by families and businesses, and maintenance of emergency kits and supplies as recommended by the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA). Encourage and implement programs to support participation in the National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP) and hazard proofing of residences and businesses. Discourage private development in floodprone areas and will work to restore the natural floodplain. Commit to the safe development of public facilities, and will evaluate the feasibility of re-siting and upgrading facilities to mitigate potential hazards. Plan for the effective delivery of emergency services and basic human needs in the event of a worst case scenarios, such as catastrophic flooding, wind damage from tornados or large snowfall events.

Goal R3: The City will protect and support the development of access to direct sunlight for solar energy. Policies: 1. Ensure that developing and redeveloping properties have adequate access to sunlight. 2. Enforce solar access protections currently provided for by the uniform implementation of lot and building performance standards of the Oak Grove Zoning Ordinance.

Economic Competitiveness Economic development is realized through the

3-8

2040 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN

growth and retention of jobs, a diversity of business types, an increase in buying power, investment in the built environment, and a general improvement in the communityâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;s quality of life. Creating and supporting economic competitiveness requires the collaborative efforts of public and private entities, and the support of the community overall. Oak Grove recognizes that economic success for the community as primarily bedroom community requires extensive collaboration with regional public and private entities - the City will be an active partner in these efforts and will avoid duplication of services. â&#x20AC;&#x153;Supportâ&#x20AC;? for these efforts may include staff time, funding, policies, or simply endorsement for regional economic activities that make Oak Grove a stronger community. EC1: Preserve and protect existing active farms from encroachment of incompatible land uses. Policies: 1. Maintain agricultural activities/farming as an allowed use within the Rural Residential Zoning District. 2. Require residential subdivisions adjoining active farms to be designed in a manner to buffer residential properties from ongoing farming activities through lot size, building location, setbacks, landscaping, and buffering. 3. Require sales promotion material for new subdivisions to disclose proximity to adjoining farms to potential buyers.

5. 6.

guidelines for businesses to address landscaping, aesthetics, lighting, noise, parking, and access. Support the idea of public-private partnerships and will work with private business and land owners to facilitate investment in the community. Support the needs of growing businesses and work with local partners to provide programs, space and infrastructure necessary to support business growth. Maintain an adequate supply of land for commercial and industrial development. Emphasize attracting businesses and industries that operate in a sustainable manner, contribute to the sustainability of the community as a whole, and are responsible environmental stewards. Expansion of development along highways 22 and 9 should be addressed through the future land use map, comprehensive plan and future studies.

EC2: Support strategic economic growth within the City and the compliments the rural character of the area and provides additional businesses and services for the community. 1. Promote the rural character of the community to assist in marketing targeted economic growth opportunities. 2. Consider the creation of an enforcement of design Goals and Policies | 3-9

This page Intentionally left blank

2040 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN

1 2 3 4 Land Use chapter covers growth forecast, community des5 This ignation, existing land use, future land use, density staged development and redevelopment, Appendix A calculations, natural resources and special resources protection. Appendix B Page Growth Forecast 4-2 Appendix C 4.1 4.2 Community Designation 4-3 Existing Land Use 4-4 Appendix D 4.3 4.4 Land Use Goals and Policies 4-6 4.5 Future Land Use Map Appendix E 4.6 Future Land Use Categories 4-10 4-12 4.7 Staged Development and Redevelopment 4.8 Natural and Special Resources

4-17 4-18

4.1 Growth Forecast Metropolitan Council Forecasting Process The Metropolitan Council develops forecasts of when, where and how much population, household and job growth the region and its communities can expect. They update the 30-year regional and local forecasts at least once per decade.

Oak Grove Generalized Land Use 2018

Regional Forecast The regional forecast looks at the seven-county region’s position within the larger, national economy. The region’s business conditions and competitive advantages determine economic and employment levels which, in turn, drive population growth by attracting people to the Twin Cities. Local Forecasts Once the regional forecast is complete, additional land use modeling locates future population, households and employment to specific communities within the region. The Metropolitan Council’s model looks at how demographics, regional policies, and available land affect real estate supply and demand. Modeling only takes the forecasts so far. Working with local governments and planners to incorporate their on-the-ground knowledge about local development to adjust the forecast results is the next important step in the process.

2040 Growth Forecast for Oak Grove Forecast Year 2010 2020 2030 2040

Population

Households

Employment

8,031 8,600 9,500

2,744 3,100 3,600

741 920 980

10,400

4,100

1,000

Source: Metropolitan Council

4-2

Regional Planned Land Use in Oak Grove for 2040

4.2 Community Designation

2040 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN

Metropolitan Council Community Designation Policy - Rural Residential The Metropolitan Council has developed policies related to the orderly and efficient use of land for the 7-county metropolitan area and identified 10 different community designations for land use policy across the region. Oak Grove, as a developing mostly large-lot residential community has been designated by the Metropolitan Council to be “Rural Residential” for the 22 year planning period. The Metropolitan Council has established the following policies for the Community of Oak Grove to follow regarding land use planning based on this determination: • Discourage future development of rural residential patterns (unsewered lots of 2.5 acres or less) and where opportunities exist, plan for rural development at densities that are not greater than 4 units per 10 acres. • Implement conservation subdivision ordinances, cluster development ordinances, and environmental protection provisions in local land use ordinances, consistent with the Council’s flexible residential development guidelines. • Promote best management practices for stormwater management, habitat restoration, and natural resource conservation in development plans and projects. Additionally, the Metropolitan Council’s Role is to do the following: • Encourage rural development patterns that will protect natural resources and preserve areas where post-2040 growth can be provided with cost-effective and efficient urban infrastructure.

Source: Metropolitan Council & City of Oak Grove

•

Discourage future development of rural residential patterns (unsewered lots of 2.5 acres or less) and encourage rural development at densities that are not greater than 1 unit per 10 acres. Work with communities to plan development patterns that will protect natural resources and water quality and quantity, and maintain existing contiguous lots that are 10 or more acres in size. Encourage the use of the Council’s flexible residential development guidelines and adoption of ordinances that provide for residential clustering and protection of sensitive natural resources. Provide technical assistance to communities to plan for adequate land availability to address current needs and forecasted growth using development practices that protect the quantity and quality of the region’s surface and groundwater resources and natural resources identified in regional or local inventories.

Source: Metropolitan Council

Community Designation | 4-3

4.3 Existing Land Use Existing Land Use Oak Grove is approximately 20,400 acres in area excluding rights-of-way and bodies of water. In total, the City is about 35 square miles in area. The following table and map shows the existing land use in Oak Grove as characterized by the Metropolitan Councilâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;s land use categories. Currently the primary existing land uses in the City are Rural Residential lots consuming 54 percent and Agricultural occupying 33

22%

RESIDENTIAL

COMMERCIAL

INDUSTRIAL

4-4

percent of the total area. There is approximately 1,400 acres of land devoted to Park and Recreation purposes including State-owned and DNR-owned land, City parks and golf courses. The City has a small number of Single Family Residential lots which comprise about 200 acres in total. The remainder of the City is devoted to a small amount of commercial and industrial land as well as 636 acres of institutional uses.

11%

PARKS AND OPEN WATER

66%

AGRICULTURAL AND UNDEVELOPED LAND

2040 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN

U V

" )

M a L

U V

221ST

NIGHT

u ked

Norris Lake

U V

S A I N T F R A N C I S 103 OAK GROVE R AV E N

UNIVERSITY

U V

H O L LY

U V

UU V V

U V

Oak Grove Existing Land Use Map

Ge or g

U V

INGALE

Lake

Existing Land Use Map City of Oak Grove Comprehensive Plan

City of Oak Grove Municipal Boundary

U V 86

Rivers Waterbody

Generalized Land Use (2016) SIMS

Farmstead Seasonal/Vacation Single Family Detached Single Family Attached Multifamily DEN

Retail and Other Commercial WAL

Office Mixed Use Residential

U M

Industrial and Utility IVE R

197TH

FLAMINGO

ckey Hi ake L

NOWTHEN OAK GROVE

VERDE VALLEY

Extractive Institutional Park, Recreational or Preserve Golf Course Railway

U V

Agricultural

U V

Swan Lake

Water

Printed By: cjanson, File: C:\Users\cjanson\Documents\ArcGIS\Projects\Oak Grove Comprehensive Plan\Oak Grove Comprehensive Plan.aprx

EBI

U V

BLU

Rogers Lake

CEDAR

SWAN LAK

Undeveloped

OAK GROVE ANDOVER

Base data provided by Anoka County, Metropolitan Council.

City of Oak Grove Anoka County, MN 0

0.25

0.5 Miles

Print Date: 8/14/2018

Existing Land Use | 4-5

4.4 Land Use Goals and Policies 2040 Land Use Goals and Policies The Oak Grove Land Use Plan promotes very low density rural growth patterns characterized by large lots, conservation subdivision design, individual wells and septic systems, and a rural level of community services. This rural land use pattern is reflective of the City’s growth history and the City’s goal of retaining its rural character. The 2040 Land Use Plan outlines land use patterns and development strategies reflective of Oak Grove’s vision for a rural community throughout most of the City.

General Land Use LU1: Establish a cohesive land use pattern that insures compatibility and functional relationships among activities. Policies: 1. All future land development shall be consistent with Oak Grove’s Comprehensive Plan and development regulations. 2. Building on community strengths such as regional parks, environmental quality, open space, strong residential neighborhoods, quality local government, and park amenities in defining the City’s rural identity. 3. Property values shall be protected through the harmonious relationship of land uses, streets, and natural features and the maintenance of properties. 4. Relate land use development to transportation systems of the City as identified in the Oak Grove Transportation Plan. 5. Establish sufficient lot area and setback requirements for new development along major streets to establish attractive street corridors, buffer yards and screening of adjacent land uses, natural noise barriers, and safe street intersections. 6. Provide land use transitions through site design, separation, and buffering or screening between distinctly different types of land uses. 4-6

7. Ensure that changes in types of land use occur either at center or mid-block points so that similar uses front on the same street, or at borders of areas separated by major man-made or natural barriers. 8. Ensure that intensification of land use activity and development is accompanied by sufficient corresponding increases in related supportive and service facilities such as parks, off-street parking, onsite wells, individual sewage treatment systems, fire and police protection, etc. 9. Inform local property owners of the regulations and programs that may assist them in the maintenance or renovation of their properties through community education, seminars, newsletters, and outreach programs. 10. Examine requested land use changes in relation to adjoining land uses, site accessibility, utility availability, and consistency with the City’s Comprehensive Plan and policies. 11. All development proposals shall be analyzed on an individual basis from a physical, economic and social standpoint to determine the most appropriate uses within the context of the community as a whole.

Agricultural LU2: Preserve and protect existing active farms from encroachment of new residential neighborhoods. Policies: Maintain agricultural activities/farming as an allowed use within the Rural Residential Zoning District. Require residential subdivisions adjoining active farms to be designed in a manner to buffer residential properties from ongoing farming activities through lot size, building location, setbacks, landscaping, and buffering. Require sales promotion material for new subdivisions to disclose proximity to adjoining farms to potential buyers.

2040 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN

Rural Residential LU3: Develop the majority of the City as Rural Residential land use. Policies: 1. Maintain a maximum Rural Residential density of four units per 10 acres. 2. Require adequate lot sizes to provide necessary building pads along with the safe placement of private wells and individual sewage treatment systems. 3. New subdivision in the Rural Residential areas shall be designed to be integrated with existing neighborhoods, the natural features of the land, and the City’s transportation network. 4. Protect the City’s environmental areas from the encroachment of development to maintain their ecological functions, preserve natural open space, define neighborhood boundaries, and create attractive view sheds. 5. Maintain large rural lots and setbacks that provide “elbow room” between homes. LU4: Protect areas containing significant environmental natural features by allowing planned unit development cluster residential developments that maintain an overall Rural Residential density and minimize the impact of a site’s natural features. Policies: 1. Require a natural resource inventory with all new subdivision applications that identifies wetlands, floodplains, waterbodies, steep slopes, and significant tree cover. 2. Design subdivisions (i.e., street layout, lot configuration, building placement) in a manner that is least disruptive to the land’s natural features. 3. Support cluster subdivision in areas of environmental significance to create greenway corridors and/or conservation areas to protect high value environmental areas. Clustered subdivisions shall meet the following criteria:

• Include the need to reserve land resources for efficient future urban development as part of the ordinance purpose. • Identify the land characteristics required to support future urbanization. • Allow no more than 25% of the developable land in a project to be developed, reserving larger future urbanization parcels. • Protect future urbanization parcels with temporary development agreements, easements, or deed restrictions. • Provide for the rezoning of the future urbanization parcels to a residential zoning classification at densities consistent with Council policy at such time that urban services are available. • Encourage the use of community wastewater treatment systems to serve the temporary clustered.

Commercial LU5: Identify and reserve land for commercial development that will provide goods and services to Oak Grove residents. Policies: 1. Locate commercial land uses at the intersections of the City’s major highways to take advantage of the visibility and accessibility from the major roadways. 2. Coordinate commercial land use planning with the access spacing guidelines of Anoka County to ensure safe ingress and egress to the commercial sites without disruption of on- street traffic. 3. Highway commercial developments must be respective of future County highway improvements and right-of-way needs with regard to setbacks, lot size, access, frontage roads, and parking. 4. Spot or uncoordinated linear commercial development shall be discouraged in favor of a unified development pattern. 5. Commercial and service centers shall be develLand Use Goals and Policies | 4-7

oped cohesively promoting highly interrelated and coordinated units with adequate off-street parking and appropriate regulated points of access. 6. Direct property access to County highways shall be discouraged and the development of a frontage or backage road system shall be encouraged. 7. Protect residential neighborhoods from commercial land uses through proper site design including, but not limited to, building orientation, setbacks, landscaping, controlled lighting, and controlled access. LU6: Create a cohesive and unified identity for Oak Grove’s commercial areas. Policies: 1. Require commercial development in Oak Grove to meet architectural performance standards which assure the creation of attractive, functional and durable structures. Different standards may be established for different areas. 2. Work with local business people to gain an understanding of the changing needs of the business environment. 3. Promote a full and broad range of office, service, retailing, dining, and entertainment uses within the commercial areas of Oak Grove that address the needs of Oak Grove residents. 4. Attract new businesses to Oak Grove that are complementary to existing businesses, and will contribute to the customer attraction and business interchange of the local commercial areas. 5. Design commercial areas to promote safe and convenient pedestrian movement, including access for persons with disabilities. 6. Ensure that service and commercial uses are adequately and appropriately landscaped according to community requirements. 7. Ensure that all service and commercial uses are adequately screened or buffered from any adjacent residential development. 8. Visual pollution from signs, utility lines and dilap4-8

idated structures is to be eliminated through the strict enforcement of City ordinances. 9. Promote commercial site clean up through community promotion and code enforcement. 10. Restrict outdoor storage or sales on commercial sites to approved designated areas of the site.

Industrial/Business Park LU7: Identify and reserve lands for future industrial/ warehousing land use as a means of expanding the City’s tax base and providing local employment opportunities. Policies: 1. Identify areas for industrial parks/business parks that provide the following locational characteristics: • The site should be reasonably level and offer a site area that is capable of accommodating industrial buildings and required ancillary activities (i.e., parking, shipping and receiving, outdoor storage, etc.). • The site soils should be well drained and capable of bearing heavy loads. • The site should be flood-free. • The site should take advantage of available community transportation facilities such as highways and collector streets. • The site should be protected from residential encroachment or other incompatible land use neighbors. • The industrial area should allow for further future industrial expansion. 2. Industrial sites must have sufficient lot area to accommodate building pads, required setbacks, private wells, individual sewage treatment systems, and required parking. 3. Industrial development shall provide adequate off-street parking and loading facilities. 4. Outside storage of equipment and materials shall be screened and landscaped to eliminate any visual impact. 5. Existing industrial uses and new industrial devel-

2040 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN

opment shall not cause pollutants or contaminants to be emitted into the surrounding environment in excess of State and Federal regulations. 6. Promote the development of transitional land use between industrial land uses and residential uses to provide buffering and separation in an effort to establish compatible land use patterns. 7. Encourage industrial site designs that integrate the facility with natural features of the land and provide an aesthetically attractive appearance.

Land Use Goals and Policies | 4-9

4.5 Future Land Use Map Using the Future Land Use Map The Future Land Use Map (opposite) identifies categories of similar use, character and density. These categories are described in the subsequent pages, including explanation of the City’s intent, design and development strategies for each. This map, and the corresponding text, are to be consulted whenever development is proposed. Development shall be consistent with the use category shown on the map and the corresponding text. Where uses in this map differ from the current use, it is not the general intent of the City to compel a change in use. Except in rare instances when the City may actively facilitate redevelopment of a priority site, the City’s use of this map will be only reactive, guiding response to proposals submitted by property owners.

Amending the Future Land Use Map It may, from time to time, be appropriate to consider amendments to the Future Land Use Map. The following criteria should be considered before amending the map.

Agricultural The total number of acres of agricultural land may continue to decrease in Anoka County. As the population of Oak Grove continues to grow and land is annexed and/or rezoned to accommodate the development needed to support the additional population. This anticipated growth must be balanced against the goals of preserving agricultural land for the purposes of resource protection and maintaining agricultural contributions to the county and regional economies. Compatibility The proposed development, or map amendment, will not have a substantial adverse effect upon adjacent property or the character of the area, with a particular emphasis on existing residential neighborhoods. A petitioner may indicate approaches that will minimize incompatibilities between uses.

4-10

Natural Resources The land use map does not include important natural features such as wetlands, floodplains, steep slopes, scenic vistas or significant woodlands, which will be adversely affected by the proposed development. The proposed building envelope is not located within the setback of Floodplain zones (raised above regional flood line). The proposed development will not result in undue water, air, light, or noise pollution. Petitioner may indicate approaches that will preserve or enhance the most important and sensitive natural features of the proposed site. Emergency Vehicle Access The lay of the land will allow for construction of appropriate roads and/or driveways that are suitable for travel or access by emergency vehicles. Ability to Provide Services Provision of public facilities and services will not place an unreasonable financial burden on the City. Petitioners may demonstrate to the City that the current level of services in the City, or region, including but not limited to school capacity, transportation system capacity, emergency services capacity (police, fire, EMS), parks and recreation, storm water, library services, and potentially water and/or sewer services, are adequate to serve the proposed use. Petitioners may also demonstrate how they will assist the City with any shortcomings in public services or facilities. Public Need There is a clear public need for the proposed change or unanticipated circumstances have resulted in a need for the change. The proposed development is likely to have a positive fiscal or social impact on the City. Adherence to Other Portions of this Plan The proposed development is consistent with the general vision for the City, and the other goals, objectives, and policies of this Plan. A “Petitioner” refers to anyone that comes before the City of Oak Grove with a request to amend the Future Land Use Map in this Comprehensive Plan.

2040 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN

2040 Future Land Use Map and Percentages

U V

U V 103

U V

Norris Lake

FRANCIS GROVE

R AV E N

UNIVERSITY

U S AOI AN KT V

H O L LY

U V

UU V V

U V

The Future Land Use Categories section of the Land Use chapter describes the City’s efforts to define Oak Grove’s rural development areas. Based on these defined boundaries within Oak Grove, the proposed 2040 Land Use Plan has been prepared.

ud M ke La

U V 74

221ST

NIGHT

" )

U V

Agricultural Preserves Rural Residential

U V 86

R UM

Commercial Utility (Closed Landfill) Institutional

R VE RI

Parks and Recreational Areas Golf Course Railway Corridor WAL

DEN

Municipal Boundaries

197TH

City Parcels

FLAMINGO

ckey Hi ake L

NOWTHEN OAK GROVE

Multifamily Residential

Industrial

SIMS

VERDE VALLEY

City of Oak Grove Comprehensive Plan Open Water

INGALE

Lake Ge or g

2040 Future Land Use Map

U V 22

U V

Swan Lake

City of Oak Grove Anoka County, MN

U V

EBI

U V

Base data provided by Anoka County, Metropolitan Council.

OAK GROVE ANDOVER

BLU

Rogers Lake

CEDAR

SWAN LAK

Printed By: cjanson, File: C:\Users\cjanson\Documents\ArcGIS\Projects\Oak Grove Comprehensive Plan\Oak Grove Comprehensive Plan Dec 2018.aprx

Planned Land Use

Acres

Percentage of Total Acres

Agricultural Preserve

138

0.66%

Parks and Recreation Areas

1581

7.55%

Golf Course

441

2.10%

Industrial

0.39%

Institutional

284

1.36%

Commercial

145

0.69%

0.02%

17,435

83.22%

150

0.72%

Multifamily Residential Rural Residential Utility (Closed Landfill) Railroad Corridor

0.38%

Open Water (Lakes)

611

2.92%

20,950

100%

Total Acreage (Does not Include Road/Street Right-of-way)

0.25

0.5 Miles

Print Date: 1/16/2019

Future Land Use Map | 4-11

4.6 Future Land Use Categories Future Land Use Categories The future land use categories identify areas of similar use, character and density. These classifications are not zoning districts - they do not legally set performance criteria for land uses (i.e. setbacks, height restrictions, density, etc.). The strategies listed with each category are provided to help landowners and City officials make design decisions during the development process consistent with the intent of the land use category. .

Agricultural Preserves

Oak Grove has parcels enrolled in the Metropolitan Agricultural Preserves Program established as part of the Metropolitan Agricultural Preserves Act. Parcels that are enrolled in the Program are guided as such via an overlay. While enrolled in the program these properties are limited to a residential density of one unit per 40 acres. If any of these properties are removed from the Program pursuant to the required statutory process, the Rural Residential guiding would apply.

Rural Residential

The Rural Residential land use areas of Oak Grove will be predominantly low density single family homes

4-12

on large lots and agricultural land uses. In looking to the future, it is anticipated that residential growth pressure will result in further reductions in active farm lands. While this changing land use trend will be accommodated, the City will promote subdivision design and land use patterns that protect active farms from the premature encroachment of residential development. In the Rural Residential land use areas, the City will focus on the following land use objectives: 1. Preservation of and protection of existing active farms to avoid land use conflicts with new residential neighborhoods. 2. Preserve open space and environmentally sensitive areas of the City to reinforce the Cityâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;s rural character. 3. Reduce the agricultural/rural residential land use conflicts through the establishment of strategies and residential performance standards that will allow continued farming activities. Future Rural Residential development is not intended to encumber the operations or use intensities of the remaining active farms, rather the City will undertake the following efforts to protect active farms from encroachment of incompatible, non-agricultural land uses: 1. The City will maintain zoning districts that allow agricultural activities as permitted uses within the City. Within the Rural Residential land use classification, property may be enrolled in the Agricultural Preserve Program provided that the property maintains a residential density of no more than one unit per forty acres. 2. The City will develop performance standards for rural residential uses related to densities, lot size, setbacks, clustering, and buffering requirements that recognize ongoing active farm operations. 3. As part of approval of any subdivisions in close proximity to an existing active farm, the City will require sale promotion materials to disclose to the potential buyer the proximity and operation of the farm to the subdivision. Rural Residential land uses are defined as single family lots at a development density of four units per 10 acres

2040 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN

or less without active commercial farming activities. This land use is served by private wells and individual sewage treatment systems (ISTS). Rural Residential will continue under the following development scenarios. Standard Subdivision

subdivisions along collector and arterial streets to provide landscape buffer yards to screen residential lots from these major streets and establish attractive travel corridors within the City. The standard subdivision design will be permitted throughout the Cityâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;s designated Rural Residential areas to provide opportunities for large lot ownership and hobby farms. Rural Residential/Planned Unit Development (PUD) Cluster Subdivision.

To maintain and enhance the rural character of Oak Grove, the City will allow a standard rural subdivision meeting the following criteria: 1. Minimum lot size of 2.5 acres. The density shall not exceed 4 units per 10 acres. 2. The lot must demonstrate a minimum of a 11,000 square foot building pad with a length to width ratio of 4:1 that contains at least four feet of vertical separation between redoximorphic soils and natural grades. 3. All ISTS must meet City adopted standards and Minnesota Pollution Control Agency Rules Chapter 7080. 4. All private wells shall be located, constructed and maintained in accordance with the Water Well Construction Code of the Minnesota Department of Health. 5. All subdivisions shall be integrated with the natural features of the land. In areas of floodplains, wetlands, and natural drainage areas, residential subdivisions shall be designed to preserve the areas in a manner that protects their ecological functions. 6. Environmental areas and designated greenways shall be used to provide separation between neighborhoods, provide rural view sheds, and define neighborhood boundaries. 7. Subdivisions shall be designed to provide direct lot access from local streets. The City shall require

A second rural residential subdivision option that may be available in Oak Grove will be Rural Residential/ PUD Clustered subdivision. This subdivision design option will be used to achieve the following land use objectives: 1. The permanent preservation of open spaces and greenway corridors for environmental protection, scenic enjoyment, recreational use, and rural identity within Oak Grove. 2. To create cohesive neighborhoods that encourage neighborhood identity and resident interaction. 3. To implement the Comprehensive Plan objectives related to greenway corridor planning, agricultural protection and environmental protection. Through the Planned Unit Development standards of the Oak Grove Zoning Ordinance, the City may accommodate a Rural Residential clustered subdivision when it fulfills the aforementioned community objectives. Within the cluster subdivision, the following standards will apply: Future Land Use Categories | 4-13

1. The density within the cluster subdivision shall not exceed 4 units per 10 acres. 2. The minimum lot size shall be 1.5 acres in area. 3. Flexibility in lot width and setbacks shall not vary more than 40 percent below base district standards. 4. The protected open space shall be encompassed by a conservation easement or contributing to an endowment for land conservation along with a maintenance agreement that outlines the long term maintenance responsibilities for the open space approved by the City. 5. Each lot must demonstrate full compliance with the Cityâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;s regulations governing buildable land, ISTS, and private wells. 6. Beyond the approved Planned Unit Development flexibility, the cluster subdivision shall comply with the design performance standards for a standard residential subdivision. The Metropolitan Council encourages communities to consider alternative forms of development that protect natural resources and ensure long-term, sustainable sewerage treatment capabilities. For more information, please consider the Councilâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;s Flexible Residential Development Guidelines: https:// metrocouncil.org/Handbook/Files/Resources/ Fac t-Sheet/LAND -USE/Flexible -R esidentialDevelopment-Examples-for-Dive.aspx Low Density Residential Sewered The area surrounding Lake George originally developed as seasonal lake cabins on small lots. Over the years, these properties have become year-round homes. The City faces issues of private maintenance, renovation, and redevelopment of the homes related to lot size, shoreland regulations, and provision of sanitary sewer. In 1984, the City installed 201 municipal sewer systems around the west and northeast sides of Lake George. The treatment systems on the northeast edge of the lake are not meeting Minnesota 4-14

Pollution Control Agency treatment standards. The City is currently investigating either replacement of the treatment facility or directing the sewer flows to the western sewer treatment facility. The City will make a decision on which option to pursue based on the physical and financial realities of both options. The City will continue to encourage private reinvestment into the private homes. Building additions and home expansion will be required to comply with applicable zoning and shoreland setbacks. Existing Low Density Residential Sewered areas of the community have an allowed density of 6.2 to 0.7 units per acre depending on the zoning district of the property. There are no plans to expand Low Density Residential Sewer land use through 2040.

Multifamily Residential

The Future Land Use Plan illustrates an area of multifamily residential land use between County Road 9 and Old Lake George Boulevard. This site consists of a 50-unit West Lake George senior housing project - the Oak of Lake George. This project provides an alternative housing choice for elderly residents currently living in rural residential single family homes. Current zoning of the property allows for a density of up to 20 dwelling units per acre. There are no plans to expand multifamily residential land use through 2040.

2040 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN

Commercial

Historically, commercial development has been limited, consisting of sites near the intersection of County Road 9/County Road 22 and some small businesses in the Cedar neighborhood. In looking to the future, the City recognizes that with growth, there will be greater demand for commercial goods and services. The Proposed Land Use Plan builds on existing commercially zoned areas of the City and identifies new locations for commercial growth. The Proposed Land Use Map illustrates future commercial locations at the intersections of major streets. These locations take advantage of the visibility, accessibility and traffic volumes offered by the adjoining streets. Additionally, the commercial land use serves as transitional land use, moving less compatible residential land uses away from these high traffic intersections.

1. The City will utilize its zoning regulations to define the range of commercial land use that may be appropriate for each proposed commercial location. Through its commercial site planning, the City will require new commercial development to be compatibly designed with surrounding land uses through the use of transitional land uses, proper setbacks, building orientation, screening and landscaping. 2. Site access will be controlled to provide safe traffic movement and to reduce the commercial traffic impacts on residential neighborhoods. 3. The City will promote commercial site designs that emphasize pedestrian accessibility, shared parking, and green space in an effort to create a customer friendly environment and promote a high level of business interchange among local businesses when feasible. 4. Architectural and site standards will be developed and applied to City commercial development in an effort to establish aesthetically pleasing, high quality commercial buildings and streetscapes where they apply. 5. Commercial development will be required to be responsive to the environmental concerns of the City with regard to site planning, on-site well and ISTS construction, landscaping, impervious surfacing, and storm water management.

The intent of the Comprehensive Plan is to identify commercial locations within the City that will provide attractive shopping environments and convenient access to retail goods and services for community residents and regional commuters. The various commercial areas will serve different roles in the communityâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;s future. Larger commercial locations along major County roads are anticipated to attract businesses that will serve the entire community and adjoining communities. Smaller commercial areas will have a more neighborhood orientation. The size and configuration of the commercial locations recognize the County highway access guidelines and provide opportunity to implement the following commercial land use strategies: Future Land Use Categories | 4-15

Industrial

6. The industrial area should allow for further future industrial expansion.

Institutional

The City is open to expanding its industrial land use to insure a diverse tax base and to provide local employment opportunities. The City’s current industrial park, located at Tamarack Street and County Road 22, includes Builders FirstSource and a number of smaller industries. The 2040 Future Land Use Plan does not identify any additional industrial areas based on a lack of foreseeable interest in additional industrial development. However, should additional industrial development be requested the following elements would be considered by the City in a review of proposals: 1. The industrial area should have reasonably level topography that offers lots of a size that are capable of accommodating industrial buildings and required ancillary activities (i.e., parking, shipping, receiving, outdoor storage, ISTS and well locations, etc.). 2. The industrial area soils should be well drained and capable of bearing heavy loads. Soils must be capable of providing for an individual sewage treatment system. 3. Industrial areas should avoid areas of floodplain or wetland. 4. The site should take advantage of available community transportation facilities, such as major streets, highways, railroads. 5. The industrial sites require isolated locations protected from residential encroachment or incompatible non-industrial neighbors to allow for unencumbered industrial operations. 4-16

This land use category includes all the various public and semi-public facilities that are ancillary to an urban community. In Oak Grove, this includes government buildings, schools, and churches. In looking to the future, there will be a need for additional institutional land use to serve the City’s growing population. While this need is recognized, it is not practical to geographically identify sites where future institutional land uses may be appropriate. The City will plan for future institutional land uses using the following strategies: 1. Institutional facilities will be considered a conditional use within the base zoning districts of the City. This mechanism shall allow the City to evaluate the appropriateness of these uses in the context of the Comprehensive Plan policies without changing the zoning. 2. The City will monitor its institutional needs and plan for building additions and/or new facilities within the context of its Capital Improvement Program. 3. All institutional uses located within Oak Grove shall be designed to be consistent with the City’s rural character in the following manner: • All lots shall be properly sized to accommodate the proposed use including building location, private well, individual sewage treatment system (ISTS), stormwater management, and required off-street parking. • Institutional uses shall be designed to be

4.7 Staged Development

2040 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN

Staged Development and Redevelopment

â&#x20AC;˘ â&#x20AC;˘

integrated with the natural features of the property. Institutional uses shall be designed to compatibly coexist with Rural Residential neighborhoods. Institutional land uses that include the large assemblies of people shall be located adjacent to City collector streets.

Open Water This land use category includes bodies of open water or flowing waterways inclusive within a discernible shoreline and does not included wetlands or seasonally flooded areas.

Golf Course This land use category includes property used for golfing, including driving range and practice areas.

The City of Oak Grove is committed to maintaining its rural residential character and does not have any plans to expand, extend or install new sanitary sewer or drinking water infrastructure to facilitate new development in rural areas of the community. Rural Residential development is forecast to continue dominating the development patterns of the community at a density of four housing units per 10 acres. The City of Oak Grove supports development and redevelopment of property consistent with the Land Use Goals and Policies, Future Land Use Map, and the concepts outlined in the Future Land Categories. New sanitary sewer and drinking water infrastructure required for development will be primarily provided by the development and the City will continue to maintain and expand its amenities and transportation network to meet the needs of its growing population.

Railway Corridor This land use category includes property used and occupied or intended to be occupied by multiple railroad track lines or similar uses.

Parks and Recreational Areas This land use category includes property designated for park and recreational sport assembly or passive open space.

Utility This land use category includes a particular property that was formerly used as a landfill is likely undevelopable in the foreseeable future.

Future Land Use Categories | 4-17

4.8 Natural & Special Resources Natural Resources Goal & Policies

Historic Preservation

NR1: It is the goal of the City of Oak Grove to protect the environment from the negative impacts of growth and development.

The City of Oak Grove does not contain any buildings or structures that are listed on the Register of National Historic Places or that have been identified by the Minnesota Historical Society as being eligible for the National Register.

Policies: • Implement relevant policies of the Upper Rum River Watershed Management Plan. • Establish erosion and sedimentation control standards consistent with MPCA’s best management practices. • Require that stormwater ponds meet the design standards of the National Urban Runoff Program (NURP). • Coordinate efforts with appropriate authorities to minimize noise and other negative impacts of area highways. • Maintain landscaping standards in all new developments.

4-18

The City is, however, committed to preservation of its history. As opportunities arrive and funding is available, the City will take the appropriate steps to ensure preservation.

Aggregate Resources There are no regionally significant aggregate resources in Oak Grove.

2040 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN

Natural & Special Resources | 4-19

This page intentionally left blank

2040 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN

1 2 3 4 5 Implementation chapter outlines how the plan is to be Appendix A This implemented, how the plan should be amended Appendix B when necessary, and the annual management of the plan. Appendix C Page 5.1 Implementation Actions 5-2 Appendix D 5.2 Plan Amendment Process 5-7 5.3 Guiding Decisions 5-8 Appendix E

5.1 Implementation Actions INTRODUCTION Administration and implementation of the Comprehensive Plan and related supportive ordinances are equally as important as the development of the plan itself. Only through the proper coordination of the Comprehensive Plan with the City’s related development tools can the City fulfill its development and redevelopment vision and goals.

BUDGETING AND FINANCE The Comprehensive Plan recognizes Oak Grove as a growing rural community. The plan recommendations emphasize the need for regulating future development in a manner that protects Oak Grove’s natural environment, preserves its rural character, and limits community expenditures on municipal infrastructure. Under these circumstances, concerns have been expressed with regard to expanding future public expenditures. In response to this issue, the City will continue to implement the following strategies: 1. Continue the City’s proactive public facilities maintenance programs to avoid significant disrepair or breakdown. 2. Maintain the five year Capital Improvement Plan that identifies needed public capital improvements, assigns costs and schedules implementation based on project priority and funding availability. 3. Pursue intergovernmental cooperation for sharing public services and facilities, to avoid duplication and economize on City investments. 4. Promote the maintenance, modernization and expansion of local land uses to preserve and expand the City’s tax base and revenues. 5. Pursue available county, state and federal grants and aids as appropriate to facilitate community improvements and programs. 6. Utilize cost effective financing programs when authorized to encourage growth and development projects. 7. Require all street utility infrastructure costs be borne by the development creating the demand for said utilities. 5-2

COMMUNITY SERVICES/UTILITIES Through good communication with the public and responsiveness to residents’ needs, the City administration has been cited as a community strength. High quality resident service will continue to be the standard for City operations in the future. The City continues to take a proactive approach to insure a high level of community services in a fiscally responsible manner. These efforts include: 1. Regular scheduled inspections of streets, utilities, parks and facilities to identify areas of disrepair, or facility replacement to insure that City maintenance or capital improvement funds are properly planned and utilized. 2. Utilize available new technologies to assist in delivery of services in an efficient and cost effective manner. 3. Maintain good communication with City residents and businesses through direct contact, open meetings, television, newsletters, media releases, City website, and project bulletins. 4. Periodically utilize community surveys to solicit resident perceptions, issues, or comments on community concerns and/or operations. 5. Undertake City sewer projects to direct sanitary sewer flows from the northeastern and eastern sides of Lake George to the City-owned 201 sewage treatment system on the southwest side of the lake. 6. Continue to enforce Section 8-2 within the City Code that regulates the installation, inspection, and maintenance of individual sewage treatment systems (ISTS). Consistent with Metropolitan Council requirements, this section of the City Code includes: • All installation of ISTS shall comply with the rules of the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency Chapter 7080 and the design standards of Chapter 1004 of the Oak Grove City Code. • All installation of ISTS shall be permitted and inspected by the City. • The owner of an ISTS shall file a maintenance

2040 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN

report on the system with the City Clerk on a regular schedule. • All ISTS shall be pumped by a City licensed pumper and hauler. • The City requires property owners to have their septic tanks inspected and pumped regularly but not less frequently than once every three years. • Inspection results shall be reported to the City on forms provided by the City. • ISTS found in violation of adopted City standards shall be pumped immediately to abate discharge and continued to be pumped as often as necessary until satisfactory repairs are completed. 7. Continue to enforce Chapter 1008 of the City Code regulating water wells. The City requires all private wells to be located, constructed, maintained, and sealed in accordance with the water well construction code of the Minnesota Department of Health. The City Code establishes the right of entry onto private property for the purpose of testing wells, water sources, and outlets of water used for drinking purposes, human consumption, or domestic purposes after giving reasonable notice to the property owner. 8. Continue to work with the Upper Rum River Watershed Management Organization (URRWMO) to protect groundwater supplies. The City will continue to enforce Chapter 1020, Groundwater Protection Ordinance of the City Code. Chapter 1020, in conjunction with the City’s zoning regulations, establishes land use regulations, restrictions, and guidelines to protect groundwater resources within the boundaries of the URRWMO. Update the Local Watershed Management Plan in 2019 after the URRWMO Plan is adopted. 9. The City wishes to investigate opportunities with new development or redevelopment to implement low impact design (LID) technologies into site and building plans. Low impact design offers opportunities for environmentally friendly design and reduces demands on public infrastructure. | 5-3

CONSISTENCY WITH THE PLAN

ZONING ORDINANCE

The City’s actions will be consistent with the policies of the Comprehensive Plan. Those actions include but are not limited to:

The following City zoning standards serve to implement Oak Grove’s rural development land use objectives: 1. Consistency with the Comprehensive Plan. The City Zoning Ordinance has a direct relationship to the Oak Grove Comprehensive Plan (Chapter 1308, Subd. 2.). 2. Buildable Land. The City requires each lot to demonstrate a minimum 11,000 square foot area with a length and width ratio of 4:1 (building pad) that maintains a minimum of four feet of vertical separation between natural grade and redoximorphic features. A newly constructed building must be constructed within this defined building pad (Chapter1308, Subd. 5.D). 3. Lowest Floor Opening. The City shall require all dwellings to maintain a three foot vertical separation between the bottom of the basements or lowest floor and the highest evidence of mottled soil. The City shall also require a two foot vertical between the lowest floor building opening from the 100 year flood elevation (Chapter 1308, Subd. 5.E). 4. Setbacks from Arterial Streets. To preserve opportunities for expanding street rights-of- way for future street improvements, the City requires expanded building setbacks for lots abutting arterial streets as designated in the Oak Grove Comprehensive Plan (Chapter 1308, Subd. 12). 5. A, Agricultural Zoning District. The current Agricultural Zoning Districts are consistent with the Comprehensive Plan land use recommendations for protecting active farm operations and preserving the City’s rural character. The Agricultural Zoning District allows for the continued protection of active farms. This zoning shall be designated on larger tracts of vacant land (10 acres or greater) until property owners wish to pursue development (Chapter 1314, Subd. 1). 6. Rural Residential Zoning District – SFR, Single Family Residential District. Except for shoreland

• • • • • • •

Review of development applications The Capital Improvements Plan Neighborhood, corridor and district plans Plans of other agencies as they affect Oak Grove Official Maps The Zoning Ordinance and Zoning Map The Subdivision Ordinance.

If major City actions are inconsistent with the Comprehensive Plan, the City should consider amending the plan or adjusting its actions. The City should continue to utilize the Comprehensive Plan as a central decision-making guide for the City.

ORDINANCES / CODES / GUIDELINES The Oak Grove 2040 Comprehensive Plan identifies that the whole of the community is designated as Rural Residential and the City anticipates development without municipal utilities. This area of the City will be characterized by very low residential densities and low intensity commercial and industrial land uses. To implement this long term vision for the community, Oak Grove shall continue to strictly regulate future development to ensure environmental sensitivity and prevent the need for municipal utilities. The City’s current zoning regulations have established standards that reflect the City’s rural development ambitions and there are not currently any planned or foreseen changes to officials controls necessary to implement the plan.

5-4

2040 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN

City of Oak Grove Zoning

0.25

2541

BUTTERNUT ST.

ADLER ST.

UNIV. AVE. NW

EVERGREEN ST.

DOGWOOD ST.

COTTONWOOD ST.

HOLLY ST.

GOLDENROD ST.

KUMQUAT ST.

JUNIPER ST.

FLINTWOOD ST.

UNIVERSITY AVE

SYCAMORE ST

UNITY ST

HOLLY ST

GROUSE ST

WINTERGREEN ST

NIGHTINGALE ST

LINNET ST

CEDAR DR (CO RD 13)

LINNET ST

ILEX ST.

OLIVE ST.

NORWAY ST.

MAGNOLIA ST.

LARCH ST.

CEDAR DR.

TAMARACK ST.

SYCAMORE ST.

REDWOOD ST.

QUINCE ST.

XEON ST.

WINTERGREEN ST.

VALE ST.

UNITY ST.

ALBATROSS ST.

ZILLA ST.

YELLOW PINE ST.

DRAKE ST.

CRANE ST.

BLUEBIRD ST.

HUMMINGBIRD ST.

GROUSE ST.

FLAMINGO ST.

EAGLE ST.

KILLDEER ST.

JAY ST.

NIGHTINGALE ST.

MARTIN ST.

LINNET ST.

RAVEN ST.

QUINN ST.

PARTRIDGE ST.

IBIS ST. IBIS ST

1145

IRD

COTTONWOOD ST

22001 21921

EVERGREEN ST

HOLLY ST

TAMARACK ST

JUNIPE R ST

1060

DRAKE ST

194TH AVE 1760

19355 1820

19445

19526

D LN

815

1645

191ST AVE

19010

19020

1307

990

1270

19099

1321

1275

19001

18900

2480

18187

18150

2475

18225

18159

CEDAR DR (CO RD 13)

BUTTERNUT ST

EVERGREEN ST

TERNUT ST

BUT

O NW

COTT O

06T H

DR 20632 W

T ST

DOGWOOD ST

FLINTWOOD ST

ILEX ST

19040

19091

231

19031

H 190T

LN 19005 40

19000

170 589 220

101

19041

200 145

18960

18961

SWAN LAKE LN

352

180

160

18604

18658

606 18626

18621

LAKE

18665

560 18556

466

336

18571 18550 18531 18460

18345

18531

18461

18431

18361

18360 18302

18241

18220 18210

182ND LN

18144

1055

1701

18101

18160 18140

1211

2351

03 2239 22

03 2161 2123

1291

2105

1157

18120

181ST AVE (CO RD 58)

2400

19112 19090

18721

18321

18230

2300

2600

19180

352

18241 18310

2500

32 16 6 19250 220

2530

2555

100

Swan Lake

VIKING BLVD (CO RD 22)

200

2580

2635

19520

18321

18220

182ND AVE

2610

19710

116

170

360

975

18250

18245

508 19528 19533

534

400

2430

19580

300

2481

19619

195TH LN 560

600

2775 2731

2521

425

500

2565

19620 535

19070

800

18200

2700

2800

SERVICE DR

18991

1000

18221

18130

2480

2601

197TH LN

19660 19643

565

19038

1302

1200

2520

18260

125

D ST 19716

19715

19653

19 191ST AVE

18945

1100

2870

19107

18930

183RD AVE 2580

18281

18241

18315

18300

19900

19905

19790

190TH LN

18444

2461 2435 2545 2501

18330

161

19720

19087 19052 19048

910

1280

19730

19845

19725

18871

Ce 18370

18240

18175

18 19 5 15 801761 19 191ST 1 8 LN 15 12 19115 19 8 19

970

2621

18315

18270

192ND AVE 7

18401

18291

18237

19235

981

192ND AVE

191ST AVE 1320

1430

18934

BUTTE 19790 19715

19950

19925

19891 19900 19890

19980

275 221

19248 19247 19228 3 19220 2219224 19214 19 19210 763 751

LEE ST

1160

936

1006

190TH AVE 18947

1850

1046 1120

MAIN ST

1337

19058 1715

1660

200TH AVE

19845 344 404

19400

905

19121

19265

19264

19170

1720

19921

19920

19401

LEE ST

19213

1314

1352

19159

1770

YELLOW PINE ST

19257

1808

1750

19970

159 1131

19401

19323

19097

131

19981

19920

19891

421

162

20075 20031

195TH LN

18459

2661

2711

181ST LN

2920

CEDAR DR (CO RD 13)

19600

19580

19542

19530

19470

19404

1745

1960

19990

UNIVERSITY AVE

19419

GILLIS ST

19451

19961

DOGWOOD ST

FLAMINGO ST (CO RD 78)

19570

19511

19428

CEDAR DR (CO RD 67)

18691

2755

18291

COTTONWOOD ST

ST MAGNOLIA ST

RGRE EN

P I NE ST

OLIVE ST

1470

19575

19454

CEDAR DR

19356

2075 19340

1827

TAMARACK ST

1841

1129

2131

19325 19322

2831

18225 18200

2900

3000

NROD

GROUSE ST

14 1919

1300

18107

GOLDE

KILLDEER ST

19518

19437 19411

19614 19601

18929

2971 3025

CEDAR DR (CO RD 13)

IBIS ST

LINNET ST

21201

21140

QUINN ST

21062

NIGHTINGALE ST NIGHTINGALE ST

19556

IBIS ST

2020

2040

ST 183RD LN LA O D 18361 18335 2760 18310

18240

2049 2027

2050

1574

19658

19656

19631

19671

19623 19628

1500

18130

2980

3030

GOLDENROD ST

QUINN ST 21242

2124

RAVEN ST

21160

VALE ST

HUMMINGB

HUMMINGBIRD ST

1652

1400

3121

3100

3300

3200

3500

3400

3600

3800

3700

3900

4100

4000

4300

2041

19270

I 3140

2110

19222

O C

3441

3645

ROSE ST

3405

3633

3655

3725 3711

18140

3231

2101

2626

2831

18251

D LN

3361

19708

1611

1649

196TH LN

1960 2161

NDER ST

4200

1663

19625

4400

1735

19626

242 20029

470 19753

19711

2020

19620

2060

19367

LOW

4600

2091 19720

2140

19331

UPLA

4500

2115

2220

20061

19925

405

501

198TH

540

VIKING BLVD (CO RD 22)

4800

2175

19770

19775

2225

181ST AVE (CO RD 58)

4700

2227

AL SW

3701

2313

2731

3025 2975

3085

3080

3301

2026

2090

575

19750

18375

182N

3423

2140

19348

2445

VERDIN ST

JIVARO ST

19735

18831

18303

20304

189

19900

19745

19100

2756

2701

18244

3500

2180

LINNET ST

19370

18370 18380

CIR

18121

19800 19716

19116

18360 18340

IVYWOOD ST

3543

19930

19807

19544

18409

ADIOLA ST

3613

19921

2101

19410

18521

18409

DST

20130

19990

19470

18673

K DR

20320

20020

19160

2870 18706

204TH

700

2918

2960

19951

19851

19211

2875

FLORA ST

HEATHER ST

3010

3753

181ST AVE. NW.

2220

18861

18850 2919

187TH LN

20 50

20360

20165

900

18890

2965

20430 20421

20550

20461

1743

18280

2151

2140

18515

18233

182ND AVE

19785

18831

3230

3555 3531 18209

19931

19900 19870

2201

8T 1818891

18901

3019

206TH AVE 115

205TH L N 120

20127

191ST AVE

20560

20601

20518

20157

20139

1360

3621

3821

20126

2060

18300

3831

20154

1909

18975

3309 3249

4000

19915 19920

19875

19407

19430

WREN ST

3223

3300

A R C R EE

3340

18213

19830

2000

18935

20538

20070

19976

19075

18932

20580 20551

371

19155

2870

206TH LN

20545

20531

20601

20061

ALBATROSS ST

2920

E P Y HO L L

20313

20209

195TH LN

EIDELWEISS ST

3321

18021

3242

3337

3335

1920

MARTIN ST

192ND AVE

18463 18445 18435 18417

3261

3310

3360 3345

Rogers Lake

2301

19790

3434

1950

20119

2760

DAHLIA ST

3410

3520

1845

FLAMINGO ST (CO RD 78)

7) O D BLV M RU

3622

3315

184TH LN

18305

20236

1909

198TH AVE

CEDAR CREEK DR

18400

19920

19851 19860

19830

18495

18340

21061 19911

2430

2480

18557

18320

2024

20040

19975

18960 18919

3070

18525

18350

183RD AVE

2020

2057

QUINN ST

199TH LN 2530

18537

18531

3359

2060

20001

2361

AL LO

19970

2170

19255

504

20475

20300

2600 2869

20061

19001

18920

XAVIS ST ST 19940

18617 18605

18510

18541

1920

1949

KILLDEER ST

ARROWHEAD ST

EIDELWEISS ST

XAVIS

20020

W ST

ZION ST

WREN ST

2630

2825

2852

2909

436

630 640 20557

680

20541

20326

1952

19080

18846

3558

LAKE 2259 GEORGE DR 2251 2252 2242

2243

20015

19951 19980

700

ST OD 20631

20610 320

201ST AVE 2140

2165

18715

18475 18435

2290

E GE

S LAK

VERDIN ST

20021 20020

2415

545

480 20601

20420

3046

18975

18919

18425

WALDEN BLVD

20021 20010

2141

20701

20621

AV E

T ST

18520

18450

RAVEN ST

VERDIN ST

2463

2519

2462 24 24 51 24 45 24 41 24 29 24 27 24 24 00 2159 0 21 55 7

2190

2231

503

20731

203RD AVE

202ND AVE

20075 20050

20672

20652

701

18930

19251 19231

20750

TTER

4451

OSAGE ST.

UPLANDER ST.

2507

25 2500 25 25 23 25 15 25 05

25 25 79 25 71 61 25 41 2580 2572

2552 2542 2536 2532 2526 2522 2516

ZION PARKWAY

R R O W HEAD ST

20030

2670

2820

2847

19041

208TH AVE

E 1512

20801

20820

20770

197TH AVE

2822

20885

20914

20810

445

2021

2165

2122

20135 2255

20070

2240

2825

T ER BUT

20861

T NU

430

20343

202ND AVE

2146

20165

20120

2418

20070 20004

19730

2870

20941 20918

20851

1825

2175

2845

21007

230

209TH AVE

206TH AVE H AV

20950 270 20920

461

20971

20815

2005

2050

2417 20111 2501

20061

19880

HLIA ST

4450

185TH LN

20234

19685

2870

21010

215

H LN

0T 21

318

21001

20775

2040

2075

VIKING BLVD (CO RD 22)

3026

18663

4510

THRUSH ST.

2 26TH

2641

2665 2607 2603 2601 2543

2717

ASTER DR

2837

2707 2661

2771 2735

2737

2719

2849

GLADIOLA ST

2930 2935

2930

243

210T

21010

490

21100

210TH LN

20838

1470

AVE

2070

19675

2915

194TH LN

3001

18725

4511

SWALLOW ST.

VERDIN ST.

ZION ST.

YUKON ST.

XAVIS ST.

WREN ST.

CROCUS ST.

ARROWHEAD ST.

BITTERSWEET ST.

DAHLIA ST.

EIDELWEISS ST.

2847 2829 28 22

7 300

20900

2913

2861

2879

GLADIOLA ST

DAHLIA ST

20070

200TH AVE

2830

195TH LN 2958 2947

18886

2671

19735

2970

19045

20875 20 86 5

21081

45 85

125

2670

2821

2860

191ST AVE

18826

RIV ER

20160

20141

20235

4 TH

2070

2135

203RD

20290

20255

ROANOKE ST

20256

2816

2861

3008

19075

2120

20327 20320

20325

3016

19057

21132

19069

3060 3017 3133

206T

1700

18716

4531

1731

1765

19131

19154 3231

3330

20878

21027

678

718

21121

201ST AVE 2720

20001

2560

1831

2031

2000

3370

3420

208

20973 21002

561

19175

191ST LN

3061

18555 4530

4670

182ND AVE. NW.

3041

19230

4664

4665

H LN

18420

184TH AVE. NW.

20156

BLVD

20359

20350 20345

20320

18641 18545

18519

183RD AVE. NW.

20155

WALDEN 20359 20347 20321

AT ORCH

19126

3425

19266

3146

19201

4727

20212

2109

2135

2219

198TH AVE

186TH LN 4750

185T

185TH AVE. NW.

20224

20211

19910

19875

2923

HER

186TH AVE. NW.

4637

20231

2718

19263

21001 21028

760

21151 21146

20715

re e

3450

20445

199TH AVE

3055

19235

20970

20924

880

775

1861

1931

2100

3475

19113

19230

21012

20956

209TH LN

890

110

21131

309

20720

1951

20237

19920

194TH AVE

19070

18844

20306

2653 2629 2613 2557

2731

20030

19915

2957

HEATHER ST

19115

3400

20980

20751

19110

192ND LN 3466

19245

20 20

3630

ID ST

19250 19200

2085

1835

1810

20571

20531

20244

19320

19155

1891

1830

20959 20933

20915

212TH LN 21180

21221

21135 21124

21060

210TH AVE

20984

21001 21010

20928

20675

20541

2831

19280

3401

1920

20715

20207

20170

2780

20031

VE 19341

19290

1915

208TH LN

20409

20346

20321 20247

3174

O P I ST

3030 3015

3315 3271

4041

LN H 4064 9T 18 4076

3084 3075

4075 4161

3085

195TH AVE

3345

18961

20171

19975

2985 19560

19519

19503

3230

19400

19071

H 4124

20202

20141 2745

EIDELWEISS ST

ST PI

19531

195TH AVE 3260

18840

4660

HEATHER ST.

3131

21 21 12 21 127 8 12 5 1

20980

31 31

20001 19970

ORA FL

4337

20214

2830

Hickey Lake

19000

4065

19001

189TH AVE

SIL

19344

20244

20231

2860

20075

20006

3300

21025

209TH AVE 1971

21000

21061 1151 21021

1170

20915

21211 21224

101

150

220

21061 21058

491

21044

21101

20961

1960

21155

21140

21090

21059

1305

20900

19575

19081 19041

4330

189094401

ST 19370

19371

19530

3330 3400

21200 21126

20814

20352

201ST AVE

19561

H AV

21220

21119 21185

21226

316

21270

422

21216

21150

20960

20861

420

860

21200

21101

21100

223

300

21245

21060

1280

20635

2558 20380

20337

20304 20258

20269

20136

2961

3040 20070

20007

194TH LN

3514

19470

3375 3445

3540

3565

19000 18970

3414

3531

)

19101

190TH LN

4711

20166

3070

21390

213TH LN

671

21141

1800

20601

201ST LN 3100

R RY

214TH AVE

SIMS RD (CO RD 86)

21130

211T

21420

541

809

212

1500

1820

1806

21530

21490

21479

21480

331

21531

21520

21533

21570

21581 21550

DO G W O O D

19090

19059

4400 18936

18649

20220

3030

20009 3050

212

1601

20511

204TH AVE 20361 2620 20334

3085 3031

3125

3130

20030 20010

21521

21579

21550

1003

18112

19135 19111

19557

19520

3570

19130

191ST AVE. NW.

19580

3591

20315

CROCUS ST

LAKE GEORGE BLVD (CO RD 9)

3070

21515

21270

1675

2636

YUKON ST

BLV

20365

20331 20330

202ND LN 3110

21401

21360

2101

DAHLIA ST

20415

20361 20350

3142

HEATHER ST

19391

3710

VINTAGE ST

3711

21010 20942 2055

21400

1107

21250

1560

21609

21630

21605

21563

216TH LN

21432

21161

SIMS RD

21035

1161

1215

1551 1540

21059

209TH LN 20912

21630 21611

21475

21250

1731 1761

1905

20653

2635 2557 2543 2515

20421 20420

20281 20276

2865

LAKE GEORGE BLVD (CO RD 9)

19200

WOODBINE ST

3775

2670

3360

BLACKFOOT ST

192ND AVE. NW.

3464 3452 3466

VIK

3760

3734

3821

3820

21131

21116

20959

21649

21662

21650 21647

21315

S RD

SIM OLD

1831

21790

21731

21670

21425

21440

YELLOW PINE ST

3840

1851

21759

21726

21 4TH LN

Grass Lake

1810 1600

21191

21821

21760

E ST

3875

3940

21361

21330

1831

1870

21225

21230

21024

21810

1475

21127

21135

21480

21401

1600

19710

193RD AVE. NW.

187TH AVE. NW.

20270

1580

21455

21341

21215

20911

DER ST UPLAN

ORCHID ST

3301

3860

3921

18712

20330

3059

19800

19661 3270

3950

3961

2200

3415

3359

19670

19565 19578

194TH LN

188TH AVE. NW.

20341

2940

3250

3262

2730

2760

20431

19750

3840

3980

GLADIOLA ST.

22 81 2 22 81 228 0 08 22806 22804 22802 22800 22798 22796 22261

POPPY ST

61 30

20350

3080

3101

1620

21475

1775

214TH AVE

21363

21560

1520

1585

D R AK

3871

19431

19470 19420

189TH AVE. NW.

20370

203R D LN

1678

1605

205TH AVE

2901

19820

198TH AVE

MARIGOLD ST

3921

195TH LN 19510

195TH AVE. NW.

190TH AVE. NW.

2931

19640

3622

19601

194TH AVE. NW.

3127

3128

1675

1720

21490

21401

1904

1970

20713

XAVIS ST

ROSE ST

IE NN

19958 3555

3537

3528

19610

19607

19575

3544

3910

3554

3840

19671

19541

3512

19646 19610

SILVEROD ST

4070

4218

YUCCA ST

4110

4216

21527 1770

21460

1900

TULIP ST

YUCCA ST

3437

197TH LN

1715

21469 21461

2553 2525

2645

1771

1800

QUAY ST

E ST

W OODBIN

NARCISSIS CT

ORCHID ST

B L VD ORG E

3240

19827 3247

197TH AVE 4324

19625

21946

21875

213 305

21645

20771

204TH AVE

GLADIOLA ST

BLACKFOOT ST

ZEA ST

7) BLVD RIVER

K IO W A S T

VIKING BLVD (CO RD 22)

4768

22020

101

20751

20530

R ST

AZTEC ST

LIPAN S

RUM

3915

100

21975 21915

219TH AVE

21751

IN FL

3975

19744

4021

2820

GUARANI ST

POTAWATOMI ST

(C0 RD

QUAPAW ST

20 4 TH QUAPAW ST

19847

19828

20720

20760

20761

21537 21536 21481 21500

21305

2030

21247

2400

20542

19920

199TH AVE

4249

22070

22065

22001

3315

19846

4065

19731

2850

3227

198TH LN

3825

3865

21980

21870

21730

1675

LAKE GEORGE PKWY

1 95 1 20 94 20

20912

20630

3251

3430

3623

4155

22020

21940

217TH AVE

1700

21615

21430 21420

21331

2175

20819

20600

20001 19881

19761

21908

CO T T O

3453

19947

20760

207TH 20LN

21500

21440

21400 2221

211TH LN

208TH LN 20830

20521

3140

20041 20024

19918

19820

22050

470

21921 21920

20201

4440

22060 22041

21967

437

219TH LN

207TH AVE

2948

20473

3145

20220 20152

19961

3530

214TH AVE

23 23 19 23 27 35

2614

20805

20542

199TH LN 3550

2700

2755

20650

20401 20420

20140

20012

G OR KE GE20915

20504

3127

202ND LN

20160

20186

22020

491

21950

21719

21 6 T H L N

20659

205TH AVE

20530

20421 20430

20340

3221

3360

3516

3515

21970

21951

GE 20056

22071

22007

624

21971

21950

21720

20140

201ST AVE

219TH AVE

22020 22031

22001 22000

21919

ANE ST

20161

20731

20461 20460

20440

3319

20222

21540

21485 2203

2243

N ST

20218

19815

4744

20464

20342

19926

19710

197TH AVE. NW.

196TH AVE. NW.

3015 20730

2985 20710

20551

20195

20121

3760 3734

20760

20633

20541 20560 20539

3230

20410

20201

2840

20585 20570

3231

3270

20434

3610

20836 20816

2870

20761

S LA

21600

1905

21640

21633

20611 3275

206TH AVE

20460

202ND LN 20210

2980

206TH LN 3341

3360

201ST LN

4461 4445

19720

3107

3371

3370

3359

20181

22010

21961 21970

21845

H AV

21930

21827

21741

215TH LN

215TH AVE

2245

RAVE

3751

19767

4670

3079

3161 3121 3101

20360

4405

198TH 4431 LN

4675

4740 4720

20601

3557

4370 4360

4460

197TH L

3000

20854

2910

2979

208TH AVE

207TH AVE

3310

19915 4430

4600

4741 4731

2970 3101 3031

3082

3509 3607

4415

199TH LN

3010

20821

20800

20660

3539

20230

4320

19940

3060

20871

20860

20700

20650

3520

21970

21931

21900

21730

213TH LN

2850

20731 20711

20515

4605

19875

HL 9T

4331 4285

3213

20748

20450

20379

200 T 4350

20620

131 107

249

436

22061 830

22031

22010

21961

21850

21746

21640

21610

21324 21314 21310

2821

2859

20 20921

3820

4541 4575

19915

4375

4415

4420

20000

19850

19730

3870

3920

4461

4520

4540

19965

19880

4515

4541

4660

19940

198TH AVE. NW.

3970

19970

4030

4070

VINTAGE DR

200TH

VE20027

3560

20470

20075

20057

3840

3815

3831

20232

20135

20060

199TH AVE. NW.

4430

20163

4720

20010

20624 3575

3841

20465

3257

3327

20775

20339

201ST LN

4740

4765

200TH A

3925

20315

4429

4464

20210

4120

UA20353 R

20330

I ST

4750

4330 4360

4473

202ND LN

20210 20160 4715

4761

4461

4520

20260

202ND AVE. NW.

204TH LN 4130

4230

M AKA H S

4610

20265

20585

205TH LN

3961

21930

22021

4479

203RD LN 4660

20270

20541 20554

21000

3161

20900

2501 2507

4661

20300

4010

20470

SILVEROD ST

4641 4621

204TH LN

4305

4740

4760

4031

4060

4121

21033

20661 20641

21960

21831

21675 21678

21570

21424 21414 21404 21358 21370

21123

20700

20670

20671

20635

3795 4301

4531

20371

4750

201ST AVE. NW.

4071

4120

4161

3843

20621

145

215

22110

425

21853

21851

21570

21210 22 22 212TH AVE 21180 21170 2240 21160 21177

2921

21600

21517

21129 21055

20816

20740

20400 4741

4121

205TH LN 20531

4231

20721

204TH AVE. NW.

203RD AVE. NW.

200TH AVE. NW.

20575

4261 4300 20421

4710 4670 4640 4630

20410

3901

20601 20616

4030

3341

21432 21480 21470

10 24 20 24 30 07 24 40 24 17 24 25 24 24 35 24 41 24 49 24 7 245 2461

20700

20453

204TH LN

20440

3945

206TH LN

4630

4631

20727

3421

20800

22010

22050

990

22070 1216

21851

T ST

21841

21662

21640

21657

21119

21052

20820

3470

20775

1 14 9 21 13129 2121

208TH LN 20831 3510

4629

4660

20720

4015

4050

205TH AVE

20761

301

365 635

777

21910 21860

21760

21260 21252 21265 21238 21250 212TH LN 2228 21226 2244 21220

20767

22130 675

1057

1510 1560

1630

22000

21677

Lake George

20946

TULIP ST

4661

4061

205TH LN

4711 4671 4661

21202

21042

3459

3515

120 112 102

221ST AVE (CO RD 74)

21900

21771

21440

21191

21050

er Riv

20674

4041

20730

4614

20770

20570

20520

20460

4050

4631 4615

4632

20840

206TH AVE. NW.

205TH AVE. NW.

4700

4061

4120

20731

VER D E V ALL E Y R

20811

20830

TE AZ

AV E

4741 4760

20600

4160

207TH AVE. NW.

208TH

20761

21924

21770

42 215 34 215 30 215 24 215 14 215 52 214 50 21444 214

21 21 45 21 445 1 43 214111 21409

21403 21347 21335 21327 21325 21313 21321 21313 21303 21261 21257 21253 212518 22 0 21 23 2 21 23 21 234 21217 21

21210

21145

211TH AVE

3581

1541

2135

20891

20760

21191

G EO RG

20821

4161

VERDE VALLEY RD 4771

3480

3420

21050

20975

20880

208TH AVE. NW.

21160

3535

3610

Rum

21025

4061

4060

209TH AVE. NW.

31 31 12 30 31 31 50 56

KERRY ST

BLACKFOOT ST

4030

4071

4120 4130

20912

3640

146

230

4080

4110

4125

4271

21055

3540

211TH LN

22246

222ND LN 260

22200

BUTTERNUT

4231

210TH AVE. NW.

3710

1631

SYCAMORE ST

210TH LN

3637 3601

3647

3757

3750

3435

2453

LA KE

21501

21496

OLD LAKE GEORGE BLVD

4031

4061

4117

21036

3475

QUAY ST

211TH AVE. NW.

21521

21420

S DR ER21214 SH FI

4020

4048

3158

21540

3505 3525

1701

1660

H AV

3160

21544

3430

21275

3640

LIP

4118

3641

212TH LN 3670

211TH LN 21141

3153

216T 21561

21321 3701

3710

103

115

147

557

22175

22015

21637 21627 21617

21620

21431 21490

21285

22338 22308 22270

22281

22215

22130

21360

21311

21215

22370

22311

22330

21800

KERRY ST

21320

21225

21210

4161

21461

21414

261

1961

22135

21717

214TH LN

21245 4201

22245

2365

21325

21330

21255

21230

3651

3648

22442

22413

215 22285

2240

E GE

21300 3948 3912

21254 4071

21231

3731

22335

22270

22200

2215

21647

3240

215TH AVE

21449 21439 21429 21419 21409 21389 0 21391 35

4144

4222

3407

3955

22410

22335

2740

OLD LAK

22521

22449

22440

22201

2501

BLVD (CO RD 9)

21 21

21261

21280

TULIP

AZ 3975

4003

SUNSHINE DR

22580

22491

22190

3215

21617

21562

21520

4033 4181

4360

21230

21615

21555

4430

XENIA ST

RUM RIVER BLVD (CO RD 7)

21570

22620

22603

22443 22456

22360

21810

21725

21665 3290

POPPY ST

4460

4570

212TH AVE. NW.

3420

3500

21345

21640

21607

4044

21320

213TH AVE. NW.

21645

21640

RUM RIVER

4141

3321

3370

ORGE GE KE

21422

21417

3850 21641

21630

22320

2511

21761 21780

3361

3427

217TH AVE

21505

21360

21770

3461

820

854

100

21770

3535

912

22715 22639

1012

21840

218TH AVE 21760

21654

900

22559

1010

1020

21871

21804

21751

3770

SILVEROD

21430

214TH AVE

21825

3775

1030

22420

22001

4475

21451

4670

21750

3831

1060

22670

22675

1028 22437

21915

POPPY ST

21460

21470 4531

4581

VE 3834

TH AVE 217

3525

20 4700

3841 3835

21701

154 22761

22721

22491

22420

218TH LN

21841 21830

22610 975

225TH LN 1110

3070

21863 21900

980 1000

1015

1075

1131 22540

22031

21860

22650

930

1050

1120

22600

22730

227TH AVE

22721

22807 22720

562

885

925

912

21856 21933

1015

22833 640 22761

22710

22561

22525

280 530

22805 830

860

221ST AVE

22055

3150

3260

3445

21900

21861

3860

21700 21650

3340 3400

3500

3517

21951

UNDERCLIFT ST

ELDORADO ST

21510

21465 21430

47 21390

21800

2 18 T H A

21780 21730

DAKOTA

21530

21507 21530

21436

214TH AVE. NW.

21820

21870

3820

1848

985 22735

22661

22660

229TH AVE (CSAH 24)

22855

841

228TH LN

22771

225TH AVE

22370

2503

22130

22031

875

668

22770

22475

219TH LN 21945 21940

21905

3850

TE C ST

(CO

R BLVD

21600 21567

21517

21801

21617

RUM RIVE

POTAWATOMI ST

4440

21530

21470

GUARANI ST

JIVARO ST

ST FRANCIS BLVD

) 47 H

ONEIDA ST

(T BL VD IS C AN FR ST

QUAPAW ST

4480

3860

21841

21830

22730

1901

22851

22785

22775

4520

4570

21515

21630

21871

21860

22081

1975

22861 22894

22831 22800

22765 22790

NORWA Y S

215TH AVE. NW.

21815

21661

22000

22871 22860

22810

22780

21575 21570

21530

AVE

22070

21985 21945

229TH AVE (CSAH 24) 1220 1574

22861

22715

1830

221ST AVE

3440

22800

22737

O OD

21600

21658 21615

21937

22031

3710 21920

MUSA_FutureExpansion

21621 21600

21913

4270

4341

4371

3860 3775

Scenic River District

SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL

21640

216TH AVE. NW.

4316

4415

4475

217TH AVE

3866

3845

PUBLIC/INSTITUTIONAL

HIGH DENSITY RESIDENTIAL

226TH AVE

218TH 4350 4515

3875

219TH AVE

4245

k roo

3961

3215

22801

ALE S

21661

3975

4651

4295

3761 22020

3831

220TH AVE 3870

3950

AZ T

21801

4701

4321

AV E

4170

PARK

LAKE GEORGE DISTRICT 3

22730

1960

22470

250

3301

3331

3367

221ST AVE

22080

22081

FUTURE BUSINESS PARK

LAKE GEORGE DISTRICT 2

227TH AVE

22510

223R D LN

22218 22216 22214 22212 22210 22208 22206 22204 22202 22200 22144 22142 22140 22138 22136 22134 22132

2901

22263

1907

22685 1910

NIGHTING

21875 21840

219TH

4190

22030

4001 4027

21955

4210

22070

22203

22620

H AV E 2 24T

3260 22150

3441

3461

3131

DLN

3300 22217

22637

2510

21857

22070

3931

3967

22008

21970

21807

21670 21661 21660

22035

S eel y 21950

22055

22070

22020 22020

21775

4731

217TH AVE. NW.

22085

3257 3231

22 2N

3315

W AY

22031

21957

219TH LN 21920

22160

ZI ON PAR K

223RD AVE 7

3301 22231

22200

22815 22813 22809 22807

18 228 6 81 22 4 81 22

22670

22575

22051

22020

22310 22260

22231

218TH AVE. NW.

22080

4461 21970

22319

3509

22075

22450

22356

22375 22320

22120

22121

4515

4470

22345

1820 22770

22661

4531

4520

219TH AVE. NW.

22330

22070

22370

3920

22313

22061

3960

22208 22140

22151

22130

4550

3320

22600 22602 22604 22606 22608 22610 22612 27 03 22614 22616 22618 22620 22622 22624 22626 22628 22630 7 271 22632 22634 22636 3 22638 272 22 64 0

22145 22215

4420

4460

22119

4540

ST IP 22445

L TU

3741

3775

2601 2603 2605 LN 2607 2606 2609 2611 2610 2613 2612 2614 22517 22515 18 225 22516 22513 22514 22511 22509 22510 22507 22508 22505 22503 22506 22501 22504 2714 22502 22500

22245 4415

4520

22031

22310

22281

22280 4471

4521

222ND AVE 4566

22601 22603 22605 22607 22609 22611 22613 22615 22617 22619 22621 22623 22625 22627 22629 22631 22633 22635 22637 22639

IVYWOOD ST

3835

GENERAL BUSINESS

LAKE GEORGE DISTRICT 1

22700 22731

22843 22841 22839 22837 22835 22833 22831 22829 22827 22825

22855 22870

22856 22808 2040

22755

22842 22840 22838 22836 22834 22832 22830 22828 22826 22824 22822 22820

2112

22823 2238

22529

22277

4571

3225

3251

224TH AVE

223RD AVE NW.

222ND AVE. NW.

3325

LAKE GEORGE BLVD (CO RD 9)

3875

22430

22390

22340

220TH AVE. NW.

22616

2 8 TH LN

22580

22426

Mud Lake

22633

225TH AVE 3961

LIMITED INDUSTRY

WILDLIFE MANAGEMENT AREA

2010 2780

22615

22535

224TH AVE. NW.

221ST AVE. NW.

31612

22426

22470

PUD

AGRICULTURAL

229TH AVE (CSAH 24) 22851

2936

22 22 53 22 53 8 22 534 6 22 532 53 0 2252 8 2252 2252 6 2252 4 2 22

POPPY ST

3101 3100 3111 3110 3121 3120 3130 3131 3140 41 31

NORRIS LAKE RD

Norris Lake

22665

22893 22891 22889 22887 22885 22883 22881 22879 22877 22875 22873 22871 22869 22867 22865 22863 22861

22711

S BL

FLORA ST.

KERRY ST.

JONQUIL ST. AY

227TH AVE. NW.

ZION PAR KW

22754

225TH AVE. NW.

1.5

229TH AVE (CSAH 24)

22849 22839

22858

22806

22745

226TH AVE. NW.

225TH

22851

22811

228TH AVE. NW.

IVYWOOD ST.

ORCHID ST.

NARCISSIS ST.

MARIGOLD ST.

229TH AVE. NW.

4635

0.5

AG PRESERVE

Miles

QUAY ST.

ROSE ST.

POPPY ST.

UNDERCLIFT ST.

TULIP ST.

SILVEROD ST.

XENIA ST.

WOODBINE ST.

VINTAGE ST.

BLACKFOOT ST.

AZTEC ST.

ZEA ST.

YUCCA ST.

ELDORADO ST.

DAKOTAH ST.

CREE ST.

HOPI ST.

GUARANI ST.

FOX ST.

LIPAN ST.

KIOWA ST.

JIVARO ST. INCA ST.

ONEIDA ST.

NAVAJO ST.

MAKAH ST.

ROANOKE ST.

QUAPAW ST.

POTAWATOMI ST.

This map is intended for display purposes only and is not intended for any legal representations. The City of Oak Grove is not responsible for inaccuracies contained herein.

LAKE GEORGE BLVD.

Parcel Date: July 3, 2012 House Number & Street Name Date: July 13, 2012 Data Source: Anoka Co. & the City of Oak Grove Zoning Designations as of August 15, 2012 Map Compilation: LOGIS August 24, 2012

Zoning Descriptions

| 5-5

lots surrounding Lake George, the balance of the Rural Residential land uses in Oak Grove will be zoned SFR, Single Family Residential. This district requires a maximum density of one unit per 2.5 acres. This existing zoning district, in conjunction with the City’s environmental regulations, will implement the City’s stated Rural Residential land use goals (Chapter 1314, Subd. 3). The use of a planned unit development within the SFR Zoning District may offer the opportunity for design flexibility related to lot area, lot width, and/or setbacks, however, the underlying SFR District development density shall be maintained (Chapter 1326). 7. LG-1 and LG-2, Lake George Residential Districts. There exists residential development surrounding Lake George with lot sizes below SFR District standards. In recognition of this existing condition, Oak Grove has adopted the LG-1 and LG-2, Lake George Single Family Residential Districts. These districts have a minimum lot size of 40,000 square feet and 60,000 square feet, respectively. These zoning districts include shoreland protection standards for all lakeshore development. 8. Commercial Zoning Districts. Areas identified for commercial land uses shall be zoned either BP, Business Park or GB, General Business District. These districts establish design provisions for setbacks, impervious surface, building height, and lot width. Both districts also establish building architectural standards and site design standards that reflect the community’s commercial land use goals (Chapter 1314, Subd. 4 and 5). The City may re-examine the range of uses allowed in the commercial zoning districts to insure that the uses are reflective of the City’s long range ambitions for their commercial sites.

5-6

9. Industrial Zoning District. The industrial guided location of the Comprehensive Plan will be zoned LI, Limited Industry. The industrial locations in close proximity to residential neighborhoods will require the City to re-examine their industrial zoning standards pertaining to setback, buffer yards, site landscaping, outdoor storage, exterior lighting, and noise mitigation (Chapter 1314, Subd. 6).

ENVIRONMENTAL REGULATIONS In addition to Oak Grove’s zoning regulations, the City has also adopted the following environmental regulations to insure development within the City is safe and environmentally sensitive: 1. Title 1100, Water Resources Management Plan. This section of the City Code includes its shoreland regulations, consistent with Minnesota Statutes Chapter 105, Minnesota Regulations 6120.2500 6120.3900. 2. Title 1600, Scenic River Regulations. This section of the City Code includes development regulations governing the bluffland and riverland areas of the Rum River. These regulations were established to protect and preserve the outstanding scenic, recreational, natural, historical, and scientific values of the Rum River, consistent with Minnesota Statutes Sections 103F,301 – 103F.345 and Minnesota Rules Parts 5105.0010– 0250 and Parts 6105.1400 – 1500. 3. Title 16, General Floodplain Ordinance. This ordinance establishes development regulations for lands that fall within the designated floodplain maps developed by the Federal Emergency Management Agency.

2040 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN

INTERGOVERNMENTAL COOPERATION

LINK TO ANNUAL GOALS AND BUDGET

The City of Oak Grove shares boundaries with the adjoining communities of Andover, East Bethel, Nowthen, Ham Lake, Ramsey, and St. Francis. When considering any public improvements along shared boundaries, the City will cooperate with the affected adjoining community in planning and implementing the improvement project to avoid duplication, economize on available funding, and to promote a uniform improvement design.

The most important opportunity for this plan to influence the growth and improvement of the City is through the annual goal-setting, budgeting and capital planning processes. These existing annual efforts determine what projects will and will not be pursued by the City, so it is very important to integrate this plan into those processes every year.

SOLAR ACCESS PROTECTION Ensuring that all properties have equal access to sunlight is a priority not only for potential solar energy systems, but for the protection of property and aesthetic values as well. Solar access protection is provided for by the uniform implementation of lot and building performance standards adopted as part of the Oak Grove Zoning Ordinance. Requirements such as minimum lot size, maximum building height, and yard setback standards are implemented for the purpose of creating separation between structures and allowing equal sunlight access such that a property is not in the shadow of an adjacent building. The following cost-free technical assistance programs, which are designed for local governments, are available to the City of Oak Grove: • U.S_ Dept. of Energy’s SolSmart Program - Solar Permitting, Zoning, and Development • MN GreenStep Cities Program - Sustainability

The compilation of actions in the next section is a resource to support decisions about how and where to invest the City’s limited resources. The Annual Report should draw from these actions. Planning Commission should make formal recommendations for Council consideration, identifying those choices and commitments most likely to further the goals and objectives identified in this plan. The following process and schedule is recommended: June - Staff completes the Comprehensive Plan Annual Report. July - Planning Commission considers Annual Report and makes formal recommendation to Council regarding action items to pursue and comprehensive plan amendments. August - Department Directors consider Annual Report and Planning Commission recommendations, complete goal setting exercises. -Council holds a public hearing and considers adoption of any comprehensive plan amendments. September - City Council Goal Setting October - December - Budget preparation process December - Budget Adopted

| 5-7

CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM The City of Oak Grove will continue to utilize a five-year capital improvement plan to guide local public infrastructure spending in harmony with this plan. The 2040 Oak Grove Comprehensive Plan will be used as a guide in setting priorities in the annual updates of the Capital Improvements Plan (CIP). The CIP allows the City Council and staff to better plan for the City’s capital and financial needs in future years. The need for services will continue to increase in the City. At the same time, the costs of vehicles, equipment, and infrastructure are expected to increase. The CIP is a long-term plan for capital expenditures to be incurred each year and the associated revenues to fund the expenditure. A capital improvement is defined as an expenditure related to the acquisition, expansion or rehabilitation of an element of the government’s fixed assets or infrastructure. Planned improvements are listed by departments and the most recent adopted version of the five year CIP for the City of Oak Grove is available through the City’s website at: https://www. ci.oak-grove.mn.us/

City of Oak Grove CIP Work Paper Budget Year Updated for: Status Active Active Active Active Active Active Active Active Active Active Active Active Active Active Active Active Active Active Active Active Active Active Active Active Active Active Active Active Active Active Active Active Active Active Active Active Active Active Active Active Active Active Active Active Active Active Active Active Active Active Active Active Active Active Active Active Active Active Active Active Active Active Active

TOTAL

5-8

Capital Improvement Project Name 1996 Dump Truck Roller Hose Washer Radios 2008 Pickup truck (2687) Pressure Washer Portable Generator 1995 Tanker (3909) ‐ T11 Street Improvements Picnic Shelter #1 ‐ OG Preserve 3 into 1 Radios Lawn Mower Trailer (9413) Street Improvements 2001 Dump Truck (3227) 1996 Pup Trailer (0423) Breathable Air Compressor Ditch Mower Radios Replace Door Controllers (City Hall) Rescue Truck Fire Rescue Tool Set (Jaws of Life) Playground Equipment ‐ City Hall Sirens (4) Helmets Replace Phone System (City Hall) Playground Equipment ‐ Ramblin Rum Street Improvements Trail Overlays 2005 Pickup Truck (4839) Street Improvements CAT Loader (6052) Shelter City Hall 2003 Dump Truck (3471) Dunlop Property Park Development 2000 Pickup Truck (6549) ‐ G21 Additional Bay to Station 2 Network File Server and Switches 2001 Pumper (1683) ‐ E11 2001 Pumper (1699) ‐ E21 Street Improvements Dunlop Property Park Development Swan Lake Lane 2006 Dump Truck (5238) 4 Gas Meters Hose Washer Street Improvements Electronic Sign at Fire Station Additional Officer Vehicle Fire Station #1 Phone System Replacement Swan Lake Lane Dryer Breathable Air Compressor Thermal Cameras Rescue Airbags 4 Gas Meters Replace Air Packs Washer/Dryer Furnace ‐ PW Grass 11 ‐ Replace 2011 Tahoe ‐ Replace Rescue Struts Fire Rescue Tool Set (Jaws of Life)

Note: Using 4% per year increase in costs to make sure fundin

2019

Amount 200,000 15,000 11,000 35,000 31,700 5,000 20,000 310,000 500,000 30,000 124,000 12,000 500,000 180,000 20,000 41,000 20,000 70,000 5,000 295,000 44,000 20,800 100,000 8,200 10,000 16,000 500,000 20,000 36,000 500,000 121,000 13,500 288,000 15,000 59,000 809,000 15,000 752,000 752,000 500,000 1,656,076 2,140,000 257,000 2,900 12,000 500,000 20,000 56,000 4,100,000 45,300 200,000 49,000 50,000 15,000 12,000 2,900 59,000 68,000 7,200 64,000 59,000 85,000 50,000

Source Useful Life Year 20 2017 2017 10 2017 10 2017 2017 2017 2017 20 2017 2017 2017 10 2018 2018 2018 2018 2018 15 2018 2019 10 2019 2019 20 2019 10 2019 2019 2019 10 2019 2019 2019 2019 2019 2019 2020 2020 2020 2020 2020 20 2020 30 2020 6 2021 20 2021 20 2021 2021 2021 2021 2021 4 2021 10 2022 2022 2022 15 2022 30 2022 2022 2022 10 2023 15 2023 5 2024 10 2024 4 2025 10 2025 10 2025 10 2025 20 2026 15 2026 10 2026 10 2027

Dept. Public Works Public Works Public Safety Public Safety Public Works Public Works Public Works Public Safety Public Works Parks and Recreation Public Safety Public Works Public Works Public Works Public Works Public Safety Public Works Public Safety General Government Public Safety Public Safety Parks and Recreation General Government Public Safety General Government Parks and Recreation Public Works Public Works Public Works Public Works Public Works Parks and Recreation Public Works Parks and Recreation Public Safety Public Safety General Government Public Safety Public Safety Public Works Parks and Recreation Public Works Public Works Public Safety Public Safety Public Works General Government Public Safety Public Safety General Government Public Works Public Safety Public Safety Public Safety Public Safety Public Safety Public Safety Public Safety Public Works Public Safety Public Safety Public Safety Public Safety

Fund Description Asset replacement Asset replacement Asset replacement Asset replacement Asset replacement Asset replacement Asset replacement Asset replacement Road Improvement Park Development Asset replacement Asset replacement Road Improvement Asset replacement Asset replacement Asset replacement Asset replacement Asset replacement Asset replacement Asset replacement Asset replacement Park Development Asset replacement Asset replacement Asset replacement Park Development Road Improvement Park Development Asset replacement Road Improvement Asset replacement Park Development Asset replacement Park Development Asset replacement Asset replacement Asset replacement Asset replacement Asset replacement Road Improvement Park Development Road Improvement Asset replacement Asset replacement Asset replacement Road Improvement Asset replacement Asset replacement Asset replacement Asset replacement Road Improvement Asset replacement Asset replacement Asset replacement Asset replacement Asset replacement Asset replacement Asset replacement Asset replacement Asset replacement Asset replacement Asset replacement Asset replacement

Fund 411 411 412 412 411 411 413 412 403 207 412 411 403 411 411 412 411 412 413 412 412 207 413 412 413 207 403 207 411 403 411 207 411 207 412 412 413 412 412 403 207 403 411 412 412 403 413 412 413 413 403 412 412 412 412 412 412 412 413 412 412 412 412

2040 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN

ng is available for replacement when Useful Life expires

2017 200,000 15,000 11,000 35,000 31,700 5,000 20,000 310,000 500,000 30,000 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 1,157,700

2018 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 124,000 12,000 500,000 180,000 20,000 41,000 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 877,000

2019 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 20,000 70,000 5,000 295,000 44,000 20,800 100,000 8,200 10,000 16,000 500,000 20,000 36,000 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 1,145,000

2020 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 500,000 121,000 13,500 288,000 15,000 59,000 809,000 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 1,805,500

2021 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 15,000 752,000 752,000 500,000 1,656,076 2,140,000 257,000 2,900 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 6,074,976

2022 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 12,000 500,000 20,000 56,000 4,100,000 45,300 200,000 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 4,933,300

2023 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 49,000 50,000 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 99,000

2024 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 15,000 12,000 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 27,000

2025 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 2,900 59,000 68,000 7,200 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 137,100

2026 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 64,000 59,000 85,000 ‐ ‐ ‐ 208,000

2027 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 50,000 ‐ ‐ 50,000

2028 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐

| 5-9

Criteria to Consider When Reviewing Plan Change These criteria should be considered when reviewing changes to the plan:

1. The change is consistent with the goals and objectives or other elements of the Oak Grove 2040 Comprehensive Plan. . 2. The change does not create an adverse impact on public facilities and services that cannot be mitigated. Public facilities and services include roads, sewers, water supply, drainage, schools, police, fire and parks. 3. Development resulting from the change does not create an undue impact on surrounding properties. Such development should be consistent with the physical character of the surrounding neighborhood or would upgrade and improve its viability. 4. The change allows a more viable transition to the planned uses on adjacent properties than the current land use. 5. The change does not have a significant adverse impact on the natural environment including trees, slopes and groundwater, or the impact could be mitigated by improvements on the site or in the same vicinity. 6. There is a change in City policies or neighborhood characteristics that would justify a change. 7. The change corrects an error made in the original plan. 8. There is a community or regional need identified in the Comprehensive Plan for the proposed land use or service. 9. The change helps the City meet affordable, workforce and senior housing needs. 10. The change does not adversely impact any landmarks or other historically significant structures or properties unless mitigated through relocation.

5-10

5.2 Plan Amendment Process

2040 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN

PLAN AMENDMENT PROCESS

EDUCATION AND ADVOCACY

The Comprehensive Plan is intended to be general and flexible; however, formal amendments to the plan will be required when land use elements or growth policies are revised. Periodically, the City should undertake a formal review of the plan to determine if amendments are needed to address changing factors or events in the community. While a plan amendment can be initiated at any time, the City should carefully consider the implications of the proposed changes before their adoption. All amendments to the plan must be submitted to the Metropolitan Council, Anoka County, and affected local jurisdictions for review prior to implementation.

Implementation of this plan also depends, to a great degree, on the actions and decisions of entities other than City government. Some responsible parties that the City of Oak Grove does not control or directly include, but are not limited to:

When considering amendments to this plan, the City will use the following procedures: 1. Landowners, land developers, the Planning Commission or the City Council may initiate amendments. 2. The Planning Commission will direct staff or a planning consultant to prepare a thorough analysis of the proposed amendment. 3. Staff or the planning consultant will present to the Planning Commission a report analyzing the proposed changes, including their findings and recommendations regarding the proposed plan amendment. 4. A formal public hearing will be held on the proposed amendment.

• • • • • • • • • • •

Anoka Community School District St. Francis Community School District City of Anoka City of Andover City of Coon Rapids City of Blaine Anoka County Minnesota Department of Transportation Army Corps of Engineers Minnesota Department of Natural Resources Minnesota Metropolitan Council

It is necessary to persuade these entities to be active partners in the implementation of the goals, policies, and strategies of this plan. The following City activities can support this effort: •

• •

Share this plan with each organization, including a memo highlighting sections of the plan that anticipate collaboration between the City and the organization. Take the lead role in establishing a collaboration Know and communicate the intent of relevant objectives and strategies - partner organizations need to understand and buy in to the rationale before they will act.

5. Following the public hearing, the Planning Commission will make a recommendation to the City Council. 6. The City Council will receive the recommendation from the Planning Commission and make a final decision on whether to adopt the amendment. 7. Certain amendments may require referral to the Metropolitan Council, Anoka County and other affected jurisdictions before local adoption. | 5-11

5.3 Guiding Decisions CITY ROLES AND RESPONSIBILITIES Responsibility for implementing this plan lies primarily with the Planning Commission, City Council and City Staff. City Council City Council sets priorities, controls budgets and tax rates, and often has the final say on key aspects of public and private development projects. The value and legitimacy of this plan is directly related to the degree to which Council members are aware of the plan and expect City actions to be consistent with this plan. Each Council member should have a copy of this plan and should be familiar with the major goals and objectives described herein. City Council should expect and require that staff recommendations and actions both reference and remain consistent with this plan. Planning Commission Land use and development recommendations are a core component of this plan, and the Planning Commission has a major role in guiding those decisions. Planning Commission members shall each have a copy of this plan and shall be familiar with its content, especially Chapter 4: Land Use and Development. It is generally the responsibility of the Planning Commission to determine whether proposed projects are consistent with this plan, and to make decisions and staff recommendations that are consistent with this plan. In cases where actions that are inconsistent with this plan are deemed to be in the best interest of the City, the Planning Commission should initiate efforts to amend the plan to better reflect City interests. This will help to reinforce the legitimacy of the plan as an important tool in City functions. City Staff City staff have a significant influence on the selection and completion of all kinds of capital and operational projects. It is imperative that individuals in key roles know about, support, and actively work to implement the various strategies and actions in 5-12

this plan. Specifically, the following people should consult and reference the comprehensive plan during goalsetting and budgeting processes, during planning for major public projects, and in the review of private development projects: • • • • • •

City Administrator Director of Public Works Building Official Finance Manager Fire Chief City Engineer

These key staff members are expected to know and track the various goals, objectives, strategies and actions laid out in this plan, and to reference that content as appropriate in communications with residents and elected and appointed officials. All other staff should also be aware of the plan and the connections between the plan and City projects. The purpose of this extra effort is to strengthen staff recommendations and reinforce the plan as a relevant tool integral to City functions.

ANNUAL REPORT To provide lasting value and influence, this plan must be used and referenced regularly, especially during budgeting and goal setting processes. To inform these annual processes, City staff will prepare a concise Comprehensive Plan Annual Report with input from the planning commission, including the following information: • Action items in progress or completed during the prior 12 months (celebrate success!) • Staff recommendations for action items to pursue during the next 12 months. • City actions and decisions during the past 12 months not consistent with the plan (if any). • Staff recommendations for any amendments to the adopted plan.

2040 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN

UTILIZING EXISTING TOOLS Many of the Oak Grove’s 2040 Comprehensive Plan element’s goals and strategies to addresses existing and future needs for the community, which are detailed in Chapter 3 and Chapter 4 of this plan, will utilize existing City ordinances and programs. The City’s key implementation tools for fulfilling their 2040 goals for the elements of Housing, Transportation, Land Use, Water Resources, Parks and Trails, Resilience and Economic Competitiveness include: Operational Tools • Annual Goal-Setting Process/Strategic Planning • Annual Budget Process • Capital Improvement Plan Regulatory Tools • Land Development Regulations • City Code Funding Tools • Local General Fund • Bonds • State and Federal Funding Programs The City has procedures for utilizing the tools listed above that comply with City, State and Federal Regulations. HOUSING PLAN Local Housing Tools The City of Oak Grove will meet its existing and future housing needs, as outlined in section A.2 of Appendix A, by working to achieve the goals laid out in section 3.3 of Chapter 3 of this plan. Addressing character, market needs, and quality are important needs for housing growth in Oak Grove. The City will utilize its City Code, Land Development Regulations and the funding tools listed above to meet these needs and reach its goals. The City will also maintain their ability to refer residents and potential residents to any applicable housing programs available to them as well as maintain a Fair Housing Policy. Oak Grove does not have an allocation of affordable housing for 2040 because the City is not forecasted to have any residential growth that is sewer-serviced between 2021 and 2040, and cannot plan for highdensity land to promote affordable housing. Therefore the City would not find a need to utilize the following

tools to support high-density rental housing development: Housing Bond Issuance, CDBG, TaxIncrement Financing, Community Land Trusts specifically for Oak Grove Two Rivers Community Land Trusts, Tax Abatement, Super RFP, LCA, HOME, Site-Assembly, or CDA. Housing Bond Issuance - Minnesota State Statute allows HRA’s to issue housing bonds to provide affordable housing, or the acquisition of accumulated equity for low income preservation. The City does not anticipate using its HRA to develop a new housing project in the duration of the plan. CDBG - Department of Housing and Urban Development provides Community Development Block Grants (CDBG) funds to communities with over 45,000 residents for the use of providing and maintaining affordable housing. Anoka County HRA administers these CDBG funds for the City of Oak Grove. The city does not plan on utilizing this tool in the duration of the plan. Tax-Increment Financing - Cities may create a housing district to create a tax increment financing district. The TIF bonds issued on this district are to be used to support to construction of affordable housing and property taxes received above the original tax value from the development are utilized to finance these bonds. The city should determine if the level of affordable housing and affordability would provide a public benefit the use of TIF. The city does not plan on using this tool in the duration of the plan. Community Land Trusts - The City should partner with Twin Rivers Community Land Trusts. No financial commitment is necessary for a partnership, and it allows the land trust to be aware of properties that are in distress that may come on the market soon. The city does not plan on using this tool in the duration of the plan. Tax Abatement -Cities may issue bonds to be used to support the construction of affordable housing, using a portion of the property tax received (tax abatement) from the development to finance these bonds. This removes the property from paying taxes for the services need for this property. The city does ot anticipate using Tax Abatement to meet any housing goals at present. The city does not plan on using this tool in the duration of the plan. | 5-13

Regional/State Programs Supported by The City Metropolitan Council Section 8 Rental Assistance Minnesota Housing Finance Agency (MHFA) Minnesota Mortgage Program Homeownership Assistance Fund Purchase Plus Program Minnesota Urban and Rural Homesteading Program Partnership for Affordable Housing Rental Assistance for Family Stabilization (RAFS) Energy Cost Homeownership Program (ECHO) Anoka County Fair Housing Implementation First Time Homebuyer Program HOME Investment Partnerships Program Housing Referral Assistance Continuum of Care Shelter Plus Care Anoka County Community Action Program ACCAP provides a variety of programs for low to moderate income individuals and families, including pre-purchase education, confidential financial counseling, down payment assistance, post purchase follow-up, reverse mortgage counseling, foreclosure prevention, housing maintenance assistance, various service areas. Additional tools that are available to meet the housing needs of the of the Minneapolis-St. Paul Metropolitan Region are listed on the Metropolitan Councilâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;s Housing Tools guide available here: https://metrocouncil. org/handbook/files/resources/fact-sheet/housing/ recognized-tools-and-resources.aspx

5-14

2040 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN

1 2 3 4 5 Appendix A Community Indicators The Community Indicators Report is a summary of current Appendix B conditions and recent trends in Oak Grove, based on the best available data from the Metropolitan Council and Appendix C other resources. The purpose of these indicators is to enable informed choices about the future of the community. This Appendix D report is included as an appendix to the 2040 Oak Grove Comprehensive Plan so that it may be updated from time to Appendix E time as new data becomes available. Page A.1 Transportation A-2 A.2 Housing A-13 A.3 Parks and Trails A-19 A.4 Water Resources A-22 A.5 Economic Competitiveness A-27 A.6 Resilience A-29

A.1 Transportation An Overview of Oak Grove’s Transportation Indicators The City of Oak Grove’s 2030 Comprehensive Plan included a Transportation Plan. The following data and maps contained in the sub-sections of this section (A.1 Transportation) along with the Transportation Goals and Strategies detailed in Chapter 3, fulfill the 2040 Comprehensive Plan - Transportation Element requirements. At the present time, there are no metropolitan highways (functionally classified as principal arterials or freeways) in the City of Oak Grove. The primary traffic carrying capacity within the City is provided at Anoka County’s network of 11 designated State aid highways or County roads which traverse the community or pass along its borders. The County’s system is supplemented and augmented by Oak Grove’s designated State aid street (MSAS) system. Oak Grove is outside of the Transit Capital Levy District and therefore, there is no regular route transit service existing or planned in the City. However, there is potential for commuter rail service to and through the community with a possible station located adjacent to Viking Boulevard (CSAH 22), near the former Town of Cedar in the southeast corner of the City, along the existing BNSF Railroad.

A-2

In 2006, Oak Grove adopted its Park, Open Space and Trail System Plan that outlines the City’s future trail system corridors. Oak Grove contains no airport or aviation facilities except Lake George which is designated as a sea plane lake.

Transportation Analysis Zones (TAZ) The table below and map to the right illustrate the forecasted growth of population, households and employment for the City of Oak Grove, which has 18 TAZ’s. Oak Grove’s Future Land Use Map for 2040, located in Chapter 4 of this plan, allocates corresponding residential and commercial growth to areas accessible by the TAZ’s existing and planned major roadways and transit corridors. As developing Rural Residential community, serviced only by Anoka County highways and local roadways, most future residential growth will be greenfield development. It is planned that development will occur within the existing service areas and will be well served by planned improvements to within the TAZ. The City currently has no regular Metro Transit service.

2040 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN

TAZ Map + Table

Oak Grove Transportation Analysis Zone Forecasting - Population, Housholds and Employment 2010 2020 TAZ Zone Population Households Employment Population Households Employment 10 225 65 10 210 75 8 11 323 107 65 350 125 64 12 524 167 10 545 188 15 13 271 87 2 275 98 0 14 380 124 28 398 143 66 15 1140 429 26 1348 483 28 16 478 164 79 514 184 66 17 479 159 72 512 184 108 18 589 213 14 673 241 22 19 338 117 66 352 130 47 20 533 195 117 586 215 154 21 324 122 33 371 140 41 22 395 141 29 425 160 58 23 429 144 58 436 165 70 24 637 206 38 645 229 10 25 221 74 8 233 82 12 26 583 170 78 536 190 140 27 162 60 8 191 68 11 Totals 8031 2744 741 8600 3100 920

Population 241 415 578 295 449 1429 543 584 725 388 636 435 484 503 709 260 603 223 9500

2030 Households 90 156 213 111 169 538 204 220 273 150 247 171 190 197 265 97 225 84 3600

Employment 8 64 15 0 67 29 67 110 22 51 167 47 63 77 19 13 148 13 980

Population 255 435 600 302 475 1475 555 625 750 400 675 502 535 779 818 287 671 261 10400

2040 Households 109 197 230 123 200 583 219 264 303 172 278 204 217 230 297 111 261 102 4100

Employment 8 61 15 0 62 28 63 104 21 52 174 53 67 81 29 14 152 16 1000

Community Indicators | A-3

Roadway System Functional Classifications The map to the right identifies roadways in the City of Oak Grove, including their jurisdiction and “functional classification”. These roadways are under the jurisdiction of the State, County and the City. Limited access roadways that carry larger volumes of traffic at higher speeds tend to be under the jurisdiction of the State of Minnesota (e.g., Interstates, U.S. Highways and State Trunk Highways), including State Highway 65, which is just to the east of City. Roads that carry mostly local traffic are under the jurisdiction and are the responsibility of the City. Anoka County has jurisdiction of roads that carry intermediate levels of traffic and which provide connections among communities in the County. County roadways include those that receive direct aid from the State of Minnesota, which are called County State Aid Highways. Roadways in the City are described by their functional classifications in the sections that follow. Principal Arterials (State Highway 65) The metropolitan highway system is made up of roads called “principal arterials”. They include all interstate freeways and other major roadways that provide long distance connections within the metropolitan area. Connections with other roadways are limited to other principal arterials and to a minimal number of other roads. State Highway 65 is the nearest principal arterial that serves the City of Oak Grove. State Highway 65 provides important connections to the bulk of the metropolitan area to the south of Oak Grove. This roadway is under the jurisdiction of the Minnesota Department of Transportation (MNDOT) but no planned improvement to this principal arterial is located within the City of Oak Grove. Minor Connector “Minor Connectors” are roadways that generally provide mobility for shorter distances than principal arterials, providing interconnection between other arterial roadways and between regional business concentrations. They often supplement principal arterials. The former roadways are eligible to compete for federal funding in State applications. A-4

The Minor Connectors in Oak Grove are Viking Blvd./ County Highway 22, Lake George Blvd. NW/County Highway 9, Cedar Dr. NW/County Highway 13, Saint Francis Blvd. NW/State Highway 47, and 229th Ave. NW/ County Highways 24 and 13. All of these Minor Collectors are currently 2-lane highways and there are no current plans for any lane additions within the Oak Grove’s City limits. Minor Expander “Minor Expander” are roadways that are designed to serve shorter trips. Their function is to collect and distribute automobile traffic from neighborhoods and commercial/ industrial areas onto the reliever roadway system. These roads are designed to provide access as much as mobility. Flamingo St. NW/County Highway 78 is Oak Grove’s only Minor Expander. Flamingo St. NW is currently a two-lane highway and there are no current plans for the lane additions within the Oak Grove’s City limits. Major Collectors “Major Collector” streets place an equal emphasis on both mobility and land access. The collector street system for Oak Grove has been further classified as major and minor collectors, per the Metropolitan Council system. The major and minor collectors provide accessibility and connection to neighboring cities and townships and/or direct accessibility to arterials, connectors and expanders. Local Streets The primary function of local streets is to provide direct access to the abutting properties with minimal emphasis on mobility. In fact, the local street system is reflective of the city’s environmental constraints and design standards to encourage lower speeds and to discourage the intrusion of through traffic into the neighborhoods. The neighborhoods have and are being designed to have local streets channel the neighborhood traffic to the city collector street system which, in turn, links to the surrounding collector street system, which funnels the traffic to the arterial streets when necessary.

2040 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN

Regional Transportation System - Functional Class Roads Bethel

229TH AVE NW

227T H

NORRIS LA K E RD N W

BRIDGE ST NW

AVE NW

221ST AVE NW

SIMS RD NE

CEDAR DR NW

POLK ST NE

LAKE GEORGE BLVD NW

E NE 197TH AV

SAINT FRANCI

VIKING BLVD NW

VIKING BLVD NE

0.5

VERDIN ST NW

TULIP ST NW

ROANOKE S TN W

Andover

HANSON BLVD NW

FLAMINGO ST NW

NE JACKSON ST

Ramsey

181ST AVE NW

PALM ST NW

179T H L N NW

Oak Grove

East Bethel

S BLVD NW

IVE R

BLVD NW

Nowthen

NIGHTINGALE ST NW

CLEARY R

D NW

SIMS RD NW

221ST AVE NE

HIGHWAY 65 NE

St. Francis

RAVEN ST NW

I DG

E STONE RD N W

Oak Grove

177TH AVE NW

Ham Lake 175TH AV

E NE 9/3/2015

Miles

Existing Functional Class Roads

Planned Functional Class Roads

County Boundaries

Principal Arterial

City and Township Boundaries

A Minor Augmentor

Lakes and Rivers

A Minor Reliever

A Minor Expander

A Minor Connector

Other Arterial

Major Collector

Minor Collector

Source: Metropolitan Council Local Planning Handbook

Community Indicators | A-5

SK YL AR

ST N

MONROE STREGULUS

R D ELL RD JO

JACKSON ST

BL VD

G T O N ST

G IN

DR JORDELL

WASHINGTON CT

3RD

A ST

RO E

M ON

7TH

TON

QU INC

WASHING

VAN BUREN ST

VAUXHALL ST

UNIVERSITY AVE

TY LE R

BRYWOOD LN

BUTTERNUT ST

7TH

VAN BUREN ST

B D E AV A M ER C T

O E ST O C E T

NEBULA ST

NR O

M LL

JACKSON ST

OAKS

PINE

BLACKBIRD LN

AVE

MADISON

JODRELL

4TH

B LU EB ILL LN

JOSEPH CT

H EN

CA R O

MARILYN

JACKSON PK

VIL LA DR GE

CEN TER

LOIS

MEADOW VIEW TRL

NOTTINGHAM MADISON LN ST

COUNTRY

AVE 4TH

CIR

COACH

TRL

ST A

4TH AVE

2ND

CIR

AQUA

JON AVE

WHIPPOORWILL LN

AVE

ST 5TH

LA KE

5TH ST

LA KE SHADOW

KINGFISHER CT

TRL

N VAUGHA CT

HOKAH

TOTEM

TRL

LE M AP

62ND

176TH LN

ASH ST

PLAZA

TH 1 69

? @ A

166TH LN ST

MADISON ST

TERRACE RD

PARK

VAN

B URE N

JEFFERSON ST

PINGER'S

QUINCY ST

173RD AVE

E AV

¬ «

NC O R

GLEN CIR

RED

TRL

JEFFER SO N

TRL

COYO TE CT

STHOLLOW LN

SOUTH

FOX

MADISON ST

TH RD WARE

6TH

5TH ST VE

C IR

ST 3RD

WEST

SIOUX LAK OTA TRL

RD AVE

HODGSON

LAURENE

OAKWOOD DR

K WOOD

NU T

BUTT ER WOOD ST

16 6 T

SUNRISE

LAKEVIEW

GLENVIEW LN

L PE I

UNIVERSITY AVE

BALDWIN LAKE RD

EGLEN

H 9T 16A VE 169TH AVE E AV H 8T 16 168TH AVE 167TH LN O

ERSITY AVE

NTWOOD ST

PER ST

JACKSON ST

MO NR

WASHINGTON ST

7TH ST ST APOLLO

5TH

4TH

TRL

CLYDESDALE CIR

LEONARD

ST 3DRR D

ANTELOPE DR

BEHM

MUSTANG

SUNFISH CT

MOURNING DOVE RD

E T AVE

QUITO

ROCKNEY

DUEN WAY

WOODCREST DR

N LDE LK LN

SCHOOL LA RD KE

ARTHUR CT

FLINTWOOD

DO G

MAGNOLIA ST

TYLER ST

20 8 AV T H E

AVE

ST 3RD

AVE

PINTO LN C

UNIVERSITY

DR JEANNE

AVE

SUNSET PACKARD ST PACKARD

STUTZ ST

STUTZ CT

KISSELL

LEVER

D EN

ITH

JEWEL ST

DR P PARK D AR P INE R E K

C EN TER

I IV

ERSKIN

CIR I

OAK RD

OAK

AURORA LN MOONLITE DR

CORD

PATTI

AVE

E R ST

JE WEL CT L

NATIONAL ST

MARMON ST

NATIONAL

RD FRAIZER ST GHIA ST HUPP ST ISETTA PKWY

AVE

LEXINGTON

JACKSON AVE

FOR ES

MARION CT

DUNLAP BRANT ST

CORD

AUSTIN ST

YALTA

GOL

AVE

DUWAYNE AVE

ALBERT

XEBE C

UNIVERSITY

L PA

LEVER ST

PK WY GHIA ST

ERSKI OO CIR DL AVE CORD CT

LEXINGTON

LAKE DRIVE

AU STIN ST

YALTA

AUSTIN

DUNLAP

HAMLINE

RENDOVA

TIPPECANOE

PALM

RENDOVA ST

HICKBEAVER ORY TRL PL FLOWER RD IRO NW CIR OO D

ME PINE O ES

$ b " !

ST OS CR

TRA ER BOAT AUNCH

LAKE WARD

S MONROE ST

ALDER

E BIRCHWOO D CIR

3RD ST AVE

STU TZ

PACKARD ST

TTO

R N U T ST

ST ST LEVER

DOGWOOD

ZEST ST

WA KE CT

WAKE ST

XEBEC

AVE

SYNDICATE XEBEC AVE ASPEN AVE RYAN PL GRIGGS AVE

ST EM OY CT

PETERSBURG QUEMOY ST QU

ARONA AVE

NAPLES

SYCAMORE ST

V IK

HALL

L CI TY

BETHE ST

WILD RICE DR

OPAL ST

COTTONWOOD ROCKNEY

Z ST

PACKARD ST

FLINTWOOD ST

AVE

ILEX ST

NATIONAL ST ST

BL V D

CEDAR DR

ST NAPLES ST S

MIDWAY

LE YTE

BUTTER N U T

ISETTA ST

LEXINGTON AVE 136TH

STUT

EVERGREEN LEXINGTON AVE

RD COST

AUSTIN ST

BRANT ST

D O ILD W O W

ZEST ST

WO OD N-

YALTA

GOLDENROD ISETTA

AUSTIN

URAL ST

HUPP

MAIN

LEXINGTON AVE

EVERM ARMO N GREEN NATI O NA L ST ST

DURANT

GOLD FRAIZER ST EN ROD E

D 2N

BR AN ST T

YALTA ST

GHIA ST

RENDOVA ST

TIPPECAN OE ST

XEBEC QUEMOY ST

VICKERS ST A

SHENAN DO ST AH

YA LT ST ST

TIPPECANOE ST

QUEMOY ST

R LE GA CY C

WY K PK

MIDWAY CT

OKINAWA ST

CIR

N APL

ST GILLIS CED ST AR DR

LEE ST N

MEADOW

FLA ND CT E

GUADAL CANAL CT

LN K

N RK CT KI EDISON ST

JEWELL ST

LAUREL

ELM FOREST

GROVE RD

ASPEN

RD CEDAR

JUNIPER

VICKERS

OLIVE ST

MAGNOLIA STWAKE

SHENANDOAH ST QUEMOY ST

AVE

NAPLES

LEYTE ST

KISKA ST

KISKA ST M AV E W IDAY

XEBEC

EDISON ST

FLANDERS ST

J A ME ST BLV O D

FLAN-

R D

WILDWOOD CT

EDISON ST FL A ST FLANDERS

KIRK

TAMARACK JAMESTOWN ST ST

EDISON ST

FLANDERS

ST ST VALE EDISON

CORAL SEA CT DUNDUNKIRK ST

CORAL SEA ST DUN- DUNKIRK KIRK ST

BATAAN

DEWEY ST

COOP

MARMON ST

T W O OD S T

FLI N EAS T

BLVD

LEVER ST

FRONT

LEVER

JUNIPER RD

IVY

RD RD

GROVE RD

HAWTHORNE RD

RD HOLLY BIRCH

PETERSBURG ST

CEDAR DR

NAPLES

LEYT E ST

ST R

GU ADALCA N AL HARPERS ST HARPERS ST

JAMESTOWN ST

IWO JIMA CT JAMESTOWN ST

FLANDERS ST

HARPE RS K TAMARAC ST

PK SEA S W KI R Y K ST

RA L

SEA

T U A RY ION VER MILL

YANCY ST

XYLITE

ZUMBROTA

UNIVERSITY

ST DURANT

ST ERSKINE

L DE NGO D RO ST VD

VIK IN

THIELEN BLVD

POINT

YALTA ST

VICKERS

BREEZY POINT

B R E E ZY

DR CEDAR

POINT DR

NAPLES ST

EV ER ST LEYTE

WINTERGREE N ST BATAAN

ST CORAL

CORAL SEA ST

YANCY CT

ST ALAMO XEON CT

ZUM BROTA ST

YANCY

WACONIA

YELLOW PINE ST ST

CIR

ALAMO CT O

XYLITE

BLUEBIRD

93RD LN

AIRPORT RD

93RD LN

JENKINS CT

HANSON BLVD

AV O CE T ST

ARTHUR ST

ER AVE

KISSEL ST

NORWAY ST

PALM

TIPPECONOE

S N AP LE

RENDOVA ST

SHENANDOAH ST

T LN 1S 17 ST

EDISON

VALE EDISON STST

BATAAN

ALAMO ST

WOODHILL LN DUNKIRK ST

TACONITE

WAC CT O CT NIA

VERMILLION CT

E D IS O

TA BA

ALA

M O

ZILLA ST

PINE ST C

Y ELLO W

XYLITE CT

A LB

URBANK CT WAVE CONIA M ILL RCT CT ION

AMEN CT 10

PARK DR

GOODHUE ST NOVEMBER MIKE ST LIMA ST KILO ST JULIETT INDIA ST HOTEL ST

ST ISANTI HASTINGS ST

HASTINGS

ST SPRING CREEK

MCKINLEY ST

STINSON BLVD

ANOKA ST

LVD

DOGWOOD ST

DURANT

W AK E

OD ST

RED

UNITY ST

SYCAMORE ST

ST S

PLE NA

D CT

ST LEYTE

HARPERS ST

176 A TH VE

BATAAN ST

BATAAN BA T A ST ST

XYLITE ST

Y EL L

URBANK ST

WACONIA ST

ON AC

YANCY ST

ALAMO ST

RA D DI S ON RD

ADE

N ST X YLI ST PINE YELLOW TE

CLOUD DR

URBANK

12 AV 1ST E

A. P

ST P

T. P

ATR OSASMEN T

SYCAMORE ST

UNITY

C ORA

L SEA ST

TAMARACK ST

VER STMIL LI ON

ST ST

PINE XYLITE URBANK ST

W. VERMILLIONC

QUAMBA ST

STAPLES ST

T AC ON ITE ST

URBANK ST

ROCHESTER ST

RADDISON

ES PL STA

ST TA CO N ITE

PALIS

129 C T

PALISADE ST

OWA-

SA ALI DE CT PL

LONDON CT CIR H

E NT

MANKATO ST

AM U RN

NASSAU CT

NASSAU ST

RADISSON

FLAMINGO ST

REDW OO

D BLV BETHEL EAST

ST WINTERGREEN

ALAMO ST

O N ST

I L LI

Y ANCY ST

ZUMBROTA ST

XYLITE

URBANK ST

STAPLES ST

TACONITE ST

A ST Q U AMB

URBANK ST

EAST KENYON ST

LONDON

NASSAU

O TO W CT N AC NA T

MANKATO ST

JENKINS ST

LONDON LONDON ST ST

KENYON ST

W A T A NN A

MANKATO

M INGOISANTI

DRAKE

D 2N 12

ISANTI CT

KENYON ST

LONDON

ISAN JENKINS

TONNA OWAST TONNA CT PALISADE

GUADALCANAL ST

SW E

NASSAU ST

OWATONNA ST A

ATO CIR N N

MANKATO ST

JENKINS ST

OLD SI

SOUTH HAM LONDON ST

LONDON ST

CRANE ST RD

ST KENYON

ISANTI ST

ST ISANTI

HASTINGS

GOODHUE

ISANTI

FERGUS ST GOODHUE

HASTINGS

GOODHUE ST

F LA

HASTINGS ST GOODHUE

ST HASTINGS

GOODHUE HASTINGS

ARNOLD KEN

ISANTI CT

NTI CT

ISA

SPORTS CTR

NATIONAL

TAMARACK ST

YANCY ST

BLUEBIRD ST

DRAKE ST

ISANTI ST

GOODHUE ST

GROUSE ST

ISANTI CIR

ISANTI ST ST HASTINGS

ISAN TI

GOODHUE ST

CARRIAGE OAKS DR

HAYES ST

LAKESIDE RD

75TH AVE

STINSON BLVD

MEADOW

HWY 65 SERVICE RD

PARTRIDGE ST BROOKVIEW DR

LUCIA LN

PIERCE ST

CENTRAL AVE

D ELLW O O D DR PIER C E ST

CEDAR

XYLITE ST

YANCY ST

XYLITE ST

M BR OT

WINTERGREEN ST

DRAKE ST PALISADE ST

U SE ST O

183 A RD V E

M O RE S

LT I

ABERDEEN ST

ABERD EEN ST

VICTORY VILLAGE BLVD ST

CENTRAL AVE

E BALTIMOR

DAVENPORT

ST DAVENPORT ELDORADO ST

GOODHUE ST

CENTRAL AVE

DAVENPORT

HUMMINGELDORADO ST GOODHUE BIRD ST ST

PLAZA BLVD

WESTWOOD RD

SUNSET RD

ARTHUR ST

BENJAMIN ST

MCKINLEY PLEASANT VIEW DR

G ARFI

HAR TIG

MIDD LE-

ST BUCHANAN

ABLE

VAN BUREN

JAMESTOWN ST

DAVENPORT

ST ULYSSES

ST BALTIMORE

ULYSSES

DAVENPORT ST

CHISHOLM

BALTIMORE ST

HUMMINGBIRD ST

KILLDEER

IBIS

ABERDE E N ST

DR AVE CENTRAL

DAVENPORT ST

CHISHOLM ST

HUMMINGBIRD ST LN

ABERDEEN ST

V E NPORT ST

EVELETH ST

KILLDEER

EVELETH ST ST

ABERDEEN

CENTRAL AVE

ABERDEEN CT

DAVENPORT

CHISHOLM

BALTIMORE

ABERDEEN ST

CENTRAL AVE

CE N TRAL AVE

RADO ST ELD O

FERGUS CT

IBIS ST

DAVENPORT ST

CENTRAL AVE

ABERDEEN

DAVENPORT

FERGUS

DAVENPORT ELDORADO

ABERDEEN ST

BALTIMORE ST

ES C

FILLMORE ST

TAYLOR

PIERCE E SANDPIPER

BUCHANAN BUCHANAN ST

T U LYSSE S

LINCOLN ST PIERCE ST

ST LINCOLN PIERCE ST ST

C E NT R

LADDIE RD

MONROE QUINCY ST VER

BATAAN

PALIS

ZU HASTINGS ST

KEYON ST

DAVENPORT ST

JENKINS ST

GOODHUE

IBIS ST LINNET ST ST LINCOLN

BUCHANAN ST

JOHNSON

PIERCE ST

JOHNSON

FILL MORE ST

PIERCE ST

C HA N A N LINCOLN ST

LINCOLN

ST RE

NA N

MARTIN ST

AN LINCOLN CT

BUCHAN

PIERCE

O RE ST M F ILL PIERCE

BUCHANAN ST

LINCOLN

PIERCE ST

JOHNS ON ULYSSES ST

7. 6. 7.

ULYSSES

BUCHANAN ST

PIERCE ST

BUCHA N A N ST

LINCOLN ST ST JOHNSON JOHNSON ST ULYSSES

BUCHANAN ST

ULYSSES ST

NIGHTINGALE

AN AN

BU CT C H

LINNET U ST LYS S E S

BU C

TYLER

LK PO

ABLE

ABLE ST

VAN BUREN ST ABLE ST

TYLER ST ST

RT RTYLERABLE ID GE

LA DD RD

JACKSON ST

POLK ST

TYLER ST

PARTRIDGETAYLOR ST ST

JACKSON

ST ST

AVE ST ST

WEST CIR

JACKSON ST

BAKER OAKLEY TAYLOR

ABLE BAKER

VAN BUREN

AB LE ST

SON

MADISON

UNIVERSITY AVE

7TH

OAKLEY DR

ABLE

WASH ING TO N JE FFER

RIC E

AVE 4TH ST

MAIN ST

WREN ST UNIVERSITY ST

JUPITER

RLITE BLVD

Y DR

UPL AN DE ST

HICKORY ST

WREN CT

ZION RD

RIVER

AVE

R EE K

EAST

RR SERVICE RD

ASHTON

AVE

HTON

HAR T

ROUND

IVY WO ST O D

QU IL ST JON

MARIGOLD ST

ORCHID ST

NARS ISUS ST

VERMILLION ST

DY N SA

AV E

JAY ST E N ST

A BE R D E

EL ET ST H

ULYSSES ST

JOHNSON ST

NIGHTINFILLMORE ST GALE ST

LINNET ST 18

JOHNSON ST

NIGHTINGALE ST

LINNET

JOHNS

BUCHANAN ST

PIERCE ST

JACKSON

ABLE ST TY ST LER

ABLE ST

QUINCY ST CK CIR VAN BUREN

R EN

TYLER

VA N

POLK

TAYLOR

ABLE CIR TYLER CIR

JACKSON ST

DUKE DR

BLVD

PAUL PKWY JACKSONST

TAYLO FILL R MO

O.R. CIR

MONROE ST

TYLER ST

ABLE ST

VAN BUREN CT

TAYLOR

ABLE

MO QUINNR OE ST CY VAN BUREN VAN BUREN CT

113TH QUINCY ST CIR VAN BUREN CT

TY LE

ABLE

REEK

CED AR C

VAN

TAYLOR ST FI LLMORE FI LLMORE PL ST PIERCE PL

ABLE ST ST

TYLER

JACKSON

CIR

TYLER ST

ABLE ST

TYLER

QUINCY

ST POLK OSAGE CT ST TAYLOR ST W SAN DPIPER

JACKSON CIR ST

TYLER

VAN BUREN

TAYLOR ST FILLMORE ST

MONROE LN

INC Y ST

VAN BUREN ST

STST

JEFFERSON

MAD IS

N GTON

N ROE DR BLVD

MADISON ST

Q UINCY

MADISON ST

JEFFERSON

MADISON ST MONROE ST

(EAST )

MADISON ST

OE ST

JA C SO K N

JEFFERSON ST MO

W QUINCY ST CIR LN ST JACKSON

JEFFERSON JEFFERSON ST

MADISON ST SW A LL ST MONROE O ST MADISON ST

JEFFERSON

MADISON

17 3R C D IR ST MADISON

ST SWALLOW MONROE STQUINCY

M EM

. SE R

TAYLOR CT

MADISON

IN G T O N

W A SH

TERRACE RD

TER. RD

EN T

SID

P RE

TERRACE RD

S HI

TE RA RCE CT WASHINGTON

OV ER PK LE AF WY

WASH ING T

WA SH-

ING TO N

THRUSH JEFFERSON ST ST

4TH ST SYM PHO NY ST

UNIVERSITY AVE E SERVIC

WREN ST EAST

BUCHANAN ST

VAN BUREN ST

SO N

JA C K

ST TYL ER

TAYLOR ST

MADISON ST

JEFFERSON

MONROE

MA DIS ON

MADISON ST

TERRACE CT

6TH

6TH ST

6TH

5TH ST

6TH ST

ST WREN 3RD ST

VERDIN

5TH

VI C

ST 6TH UPLANDER RD

RANCHERS RD

V E R S I TY

UNIVERSITY AVE

LYRIC TEM P MELO O DY

COMMERCE LN

UNIVERSITY AVE

R ANC HERS RD

UP6TH LANDER TERRACE CIR

BUCHANAN ST

JACKSON

O RD

NC CO

STST ST

POLK

ABLE ST

B URE N

VAN

QUINCY ST

POLK ST

QUINN ST

QUINN ST ST

OSAGE ST

JEFFERSON ST

MONROE ST

QUINN

ABLE ST

TYLER ST

VAN BUREN

JACKSON ST

TERRACE RD

JE FF SO ERN ST

7TH

3RD ST 4TH ST 5TH ST 5TH PL 6TH ST

ST 7TH

3RD ST 4TH ST 5TH ST

7TH ST

6TH ST

4TH ST

PRESIDENT DR

5TH ST

WASHINGTON

6TH

PRE SI DENT T ER RAC E

7TH

TERRACE RD

PRESIDENT DR

7TH ST

6TH ST

EST PRESIDENT ) DR

U PLA NDER

95 LN TH 6TH ST

TERRACE

3RD ST 5TH ST

AVE

UPLANDER CT ST

UNIVERSITY

6TH ST

R R ACE RD

7TH

AV E

MAIN

ELM

BUCHANAN NIGHTINGALE ST

JACKSON ST

POLK ST

PIERCE ST

JACKSON ST

MADISON ST

ST RAVEN ST

JEFFERSO N

MADISON ST

JEFFERSON ST

ST MADISON ST RAVEN

C IR

TER RA RD CE

SWAON LLOW ST ST WASH INGT

WALDEN

WREN ST

UNIVERSITY AVE ST

5T H

4TH

3RD ST

ST ALDER

3RD

E ST R

OAK OA PARK DR

5TH ST

3RD ST

B.NUT ST

ALDER ST

BUTTERNUT ST

HIGHWAY 47

7T H ST

DOGWOOD

COTTONWOOD ST

G.ROD ST

OC S T 9 US ARROWHEAD ST FLINTWOOD OOK

GBR RI N

SP ST ZION

COTTONWOOD ST

HICKORY ST

BEECH

LINCOLN ST

ALDEN

LAKEWOOD DR

ST 4TH

ST BU TTE CT RNUT

BUTTERNUT ST

XAVIS

AL DE ST R

COTTONWOOD ST

ST CTWD.

D ST OO

BLVD

HOLLY ST

FOLEY

ILEX

HOLLY

ILEX CIR

CROCUS ST

JOHNSON

POLK ST TAYLOR TYLER ST

O E ST MO NR

O C E T

ST TH

ST ST VERDIN 3RD

5TH ST

UNIVERSITY AVE

SOUT 3RD H ST GEO LAKE RGE DR 4TH ST

AVE

BUTTERNUT

HOLLY ST

FLIN

EVERGREEN ST

HOLLY CIR HOL

ROD CIR

MAGNOLIA CIR

LY HOLLY ST ST GOLDEN-

DOGWOOD ST

YUKON ST G R E E N ST CIR

EVERGREEN

X ST

ENR

D O G WOOD ST

EVRGRN. ST

COTTN D. ST W B.N UT B.NUT ST ST

ILEX ST

ILEX HO CIR CIR LLY

106TH AVE

LARCH ST

NORWAY ST

MAGNOLIA

DAHLIA

JN PR .

CROCUS ST

EIDELWEISS ST

MARTIN

BUC

ST R TY LE

PIERCE ST

VAN BUREN ST

7TH

B D E AV A M ER C T

WASHINGTON ST

O M

5TH

3RD

4TH

5TH ST

UNIVERSITY AVE

ST 6TH

COUNTY PKW Y B

PKWY

COUNTY

JUNIPER ST

FOLEY BLVD

LARCH ST KILLDEER

MAGNOLIA

JUNIPER ST

ILEX

FOLEY BLVD

LARCH LARCH CIR ST

MAGNOLIA ST

JUNIPER ST

JUN IPE ST R

JUNIPER ST ILEX ST

KUMQUAT ST

DAHLIA ST

OLIVE ST

W TAMARACK

5TH ST

3RD ST

UNIVERSITY

XAVIS

EVERGREEN

FLINTWOOD ST

IS ILEX ST

XAV 1 39

E E N ST

EVE RGR

ZION ST

CIR

CROCUS ST

VERDIN ST

OO NW ST

O TT O

ARROWHEAD ST

ST RD

ARROWHEAD

PR A IR

EVERGREEN ST

OLIVE ST

OLIVE

UN TY CO PKWY C

ST DAHLIA ST

O D

R ED W ST O

PALM ST

PA ST LM

ST Y

GLADIOLA ST

MISSISSIPPI BLVD

HEATHER ST

VAN BUREN ST

7TH

WASHINGTON ST

QUINCY

VERDIN ST

BUTTERNUT ST

BUTTER N U T

AVE

7TH ST

UNIVERSITY

R N U T ST E

ST NU T

ST ILEX JUNIPER ST

AY ST NO R W

O LI V E

LARCH ST

DOGWOOD ST

KUMQUAT ST

ASTER DR

DAHLIA ST PALM ST

GLADIOLA ST

SYC MO ARE CIR

HEATHER

EIDELWEISS ST

QUINCE ST PALM ST OLIVE ST NORW AY ST NO LIA

Y LN

OD O

NORWAY ST MAG

W ST

FLORA ST

TAMARACK ST

D W OOD

GLAD IO LA

EIDLEWEISS ST

IVYWOOD ST ST U N IT

IVYWOOD HEATHER ST

MONRO

HOL

YUKON ST ST

XA VIS ST

GOLDE NROD

D ST

FLINTWOOD ST ST DOGWOOD

ILEX ST

LN 6T H 22 LAKE

WOOD ST G DO

FLINTWOOD ST

NS OLD C O

GOLDENROD ST

SYCAMORE ST

LE VA

IT Y ST

ST SYCAMORE ST

UI N C

VALE ST GLADIOLA

VE VALE ST

EIDELWEISS PALM ST

ERG RE E W I N TA N

ST XEON

HEATHER ST

DRAKE ST E

BLVD

LAKE

POPPY ST

ROSE ST

TULIP

EVERGREEN

GOLDENROD

BIT SW TEREE TS T

MAGNOLIA ST

D B LV W N

CROSSTO

UNITY ST

VALE ST

XEON ST

EAGLE ST

REDWOOD ST

CRANE ST CRANE

BLUE-

AVOCET ST ZILLA ST

E BIRD ST

CRA ST NE

DRAKE ST

CRANE

ZI LL A ST

BL UEB IRD

I VY

CRANE BLUEBIRD

DRAKE ST

BLU BIR D EST

CRANE ST

AV E

CET ST

A VO BL UEBIRD ST

EG 10 RE T BL 4TH VD

H AVE 103 RD

1 0 4T

B L UEBIR D

AV ST O CET C ST E ZILLA ST T ST

Y.P. ST

ORCHID ST

ORCHID ST ORCHID ST

POPPY ST

QUAY ST

EVERGREEN ST

CROCU

PALM SYCAMORE ST

YA H DR N ST

EAGLE ST

KERRY S T

DRAKE ST

W O OD

DRAKE ST

BLUEBIR

AVOCET ST

YELLOW PINE ST

DRAKE ST

ST CRANE KERRY ST CRANE ST

DRAK ST E

CRA NE ST

AN E ST

EAGLE

YELLO W PINE ST

DRA ST KE

BLU EBI RD ST

DRA KE ST

CRAN E ST

ZILLA ST YELLOW PINE ST W P IN

EAGLE DRAKE CIR

CRANE ST

CIR

LAKE GEORGE BLVD

IBIS ST

10 ST

JAY ST

IBIS

FLAMINGO ST

ST IBIS

JAY ST

KILLDEER ST

9 C 9T H IR

LINNET

LINNET ST

ST MARTIN

LINN CIRET

ZILLA

AVOCET ST

HANSON BLVD

HUMMINGBIRD

IBIS ST

ST USE

GR O ST

IBIS

JAY ST

KILLDEER

HUMMINGBIR D

GROUSE ST

JAY ST

IBIS ST

LINNET ST

KILL DE ER ST

GROUSE ST

FLAMINGO ST

EAG LE

RC HID

IBIS ST HUMMINGBIRD

HANSON BLVD

JAY ST

HUMM BIRD INGST

JA C Y IR

GRO U SE

ORCHID

EAG

JAY ST

EA G

IB IS

ST MARIGOLD GROUSE ST GROUSE ST ST

BLVD HA NS ON MARTIN ST

HANSON

BLVD

FLAMINGO ST

RTIN

13 0T H M A

PARTRIDGE

OSAGE ST

E ST

E ST AL

ROSE ST

QUAY ST

UNDERCLIFT ST

XENIA

WOODBINE ST

Y LLE VA

225TH

TAMARACK ST

XEON ST

VALE ST

BUTT ER

NARCISSUS CT

TOWER DR

GROUSE ST

LINNET

JAY

IBIS ST

MAR TIN CT

POPPY ST

MA RTI N ST

MARTIN ST

QUINN ST

PARTRIDGE ST

OSAGE ST

QUINN ST

ST RAVEN

RAVEN ST

QUINN

PARTRIDGE

KEY CIR

QUINN ST

CEDAR DR

BLVD

LAKE

HUMMINGBIRD ST

HANSON BLVD

ORCHID ST

OLD LAKE GEORGE BLVD

LINNET ST LINNET ST

NIGHTINGALE

PARTRIDGE ST

OLD LAKE GE O

MAR TIN ST

OSAGE ST

RAVEN ST

Q UINN ST

RAVEN ST U INN

IE Q

138TH

SILVER OD ST ST

RAVEN S W A LL O W ST

RAVEN ST

SWALLOW ST

SILVEROD

UI N N ST

E ST

INN

TULIP ST

XENIA

AZ TEC

AZTEC ST

ST AZTEC ELDORADO ST

ST JIVARO INCA ST

N 72

0 17

CO U N T R

0 T

WA TRL

LINDEN

ARRO

S EL W EIS

PINE ST

LEE ST ST GILLIS CED ST AR DR MAIN

Y ELLO W

ALBA TRO SS

FLAMINGO ST

GEORGE

OSAGE

PARTRIDGE ST

ROSE ST RAVEN ST ST

QUINN ST

S WALLO W

QUAY ST QUINN ST

RAVEN

SILVEROD ST

THRU SH

RE EK CE DA RC

BLACKFOOT ST

AZTEC ST

NAVAJO ST

JUNIPER

OLIVE ST

DA HL

GLADIOLA ST

IVYWOOD

EID

DRAKE

YELLOW PINE ST

IBIS ST

LINNET ST

MARTIN ST

POPPY ST

CT ST POPPY ST

ID GE

RT R

QUAY ST

17 3R C D IR

UPL AN DE ST

TULIP ST

UPLANDER ST

N W SS TO C RO

XAVIS ST

WREN ST

U PLAND ER ST

ST BL

VERDIN

VERDIN ST

ST THRUSH

ST VERD IN ST

A N D ER

WREN ST

RU ST SH

SH ST ST Q G

RU TH VER. CIR

BITTERSWEET ST

BL VD RIV E ST R

OR A CT

Y EL LO

IVYWOOD ST

CRANE ST

JONQUIL ST

RR Y

RO S CT E

W CIR

SW ALLO

THRUSH ST

UPLANDER TULIP

UPLANDER CIR

WREN ST

WREN CT

WREN ST ST

TULIP YUKON ST

YUKON ST

XAVIS

CREEK

8. UPLANDER ST 9. SWALLOW ST 10. UPLANDER ST 11. SWALLOW ST

XAVIS ST WREN ST

XAVIS ST

IS ST WREN

AV ST

WR ST EN

BITTERSWEET ST

HEATHER ST FL

PINE

ST GO LD MARI

QUINN

NIGHTINGALE

SILVEROD

UPLANDER ST

ZION ST ST

VERDIN

UPLANDER ST

THRUSH ST

EIDELWEISS ST

CROCUS ST

Z I O N ST

EIDELWEISS

CROOKED LAKE BLVD

ZION K O N ST

VIS XA

DAHLIA ST

VE R

C R O O K E D L A K E BLVD

VALE

RU M ST

OLD SI

ST KILLDEER

WALDEN

ST WREN ST

U PLA NDER

C ST US

DAHLIA

CRO

CROCUS ST

ARROWHEAD ST

W O

RTH

ST N ZIO

LAKE CROCUS ST

C CREOO N BL EK VD

ZIO ST N

C R OC

AZTEC

MIS SISSI PPI

FLORA ST

EIDELW E ISS ST

KILLDEER

IBIS

QUINN ST

RAVEN ST

BUTTERFIELD DR

WREN ST

XENIA ST

YUCCA ST

BINE

WOO D

ZION

UNDERCLIFT ST DAHLIA ST

FLORA ST

D TO DR VINTAGE W N DR

CRO

ARROWHEAD ST

BLVD

C RO

BITTERSWEET ST

O KE D

COO

YUCCA ST

VINTAGE DR

123

ZION YU K ON S XA VIS

HUMMINGBIRD ST

VINTAGE XA VIS

ZION ST

EIDELWEISS

AMBASSADOR BLVD DAHLIA ST

RU M WOODBINE RIV E YUKON ST R BL VD

EIDELWEISS ST

DAHLIA ST

LI P

HEATHER ST

O ST O D

IVYW

GLADIOL A ST

ST ZEA

HEATHER ST

H ER ST

MARIGOLD ST

E AT

ST EIDELWEISS ST

I O LA

GLA D

H EATH ER ST

JONQUIL ST IVYWOOD ST

ST ST

LILY DR

BLACKFOOT

NARCISSUS

KERRY ST

JONQUIL ST

ORCHID ST

LILY ST

KERRY ST JONQUIL ST

R IV

R UM

TONTO ST

HUMMINGBIRD ST

ST NIGHTINGALE ST LINNET

VERDIN ST SOU TH GEOR LAK E GE DR

VINTAGE ST

UNDERCLIFT ST

ASTER DR

XAVIS

ZEA ST ST

W O OD

GLADIOLA

I VY

HEATHER

ZE A 225TH ST FLORA ST LN GLAD IO LA

IVYWOOD ST

HEATHER ST

AZ T EC ST

POPPY ST

MARIGOLD ST

KERRY ST

QUIL

JON

ORCHID ST

MARIGOLD ST S

I SS U

D C IR

LILY ST

O LD

LILY

MA RI G

K E RRY

Y PO PP

QUAY ST POPPY

ROSE ST DR

SILVEROD ST

RIDGE

VINTAGE ST

L I FF ST

TULIP ST

D E RC UN

PHE AS

IVYWOOD ST

TUL IP ST

UNDER CLIFF ST

WOODBINE ST

UIL ST

ORCHID ST

JONQ

NARSIS US ST

NA R CIS SUS ST

ST OT

A C KFO

ORCHID ST

ROUND LAKE BLVD

BLACKFOOT ST

AZTEC ST

QUAY ST

SILVEROD ST ROSE ST

QUAY ST

ROSE ST

QUAY ST

ROSE ST

SILVEROD CT

QUAY ST POPPY ST

ROSE ST

BLVD

D ALE

ROUND

IR C

4T H

AVE 10TH

121 AV ST E

BLACKFOOT ST

CREE ST

AZTEC ST

BLACKFOOT ST

DAKOTAH ST

ZEA

YUCCA

HOPI

IVYWOOD ST

UNDERCLIFT ST

BLVD UNDERCLIFT ST

RIV ER

RUM

AVE

TULIP SILVEROD

LAKE

9TH

WOODBINE

RC HID

BLVD

ORCHID ST

RI V POPPY ST QUAY ST

T H S

ELDORADO ST ROSE DA KO ST TA ST QUAY

QUAY ST

SI L VE R D ST O

TU LI ST P

GUARANI ST XENIA ST

WOODBINE ST VINTAGE ST

WOODBINE ST

12TH

RA CI NT R

LINCOLN PL

11TH AVE

KIOWA HOFF MAN WAY

EL DO ST

9TH

ST ELDORADO

BLVD

YUCCA ST

C ST

MARIGOLD ST

SAINT

ST ST

ORCHID

AV E

ROSE ST

QUAY ST

UNDERCLIFT ST TULIP ST

ODBINE RWO ST UM

ST TULIP

TULIP ST

CREE ST

ST DAKOTA ST

D O ST

E LDOR A

AZ TEC ST

FO CK

AZTEC

AVE

COLFAX

SPRAGUE

7TH LN

AVE

GS KIN

Q U EEN S LN

7T AV H E

LAKE GEORGE BLVD

VINTAGE DR

GUARANI ST

XENIA ST XENIA

VINTAGE

VA LL EY

1 60

GUARANI ST FOX

YUCCA ST

6TH AVE

7TH AVE

AL. CIR AVE

AVE

8TH AVE

AVE

7TH

6TH

5TH

4TH

5TH AVE

FRANCIS

LN POPPY ST

R EE ST

VINTAGE DR

SILVEROD ST

FOX ST

AZTEC DR

INCA ST

HOP I ST

INCA CIR

KI O W A ST

KIOWA ST

INCA ST

LIPAN ST

LIPAN

GUARANI

5TH AVE

MILL AVE

AVE

3RD

SA LIS CIR H

A W A CO C O

UTE ST

TONTO ST

DE G

SILVEROD ST

GU AR AN I

KIOWA

BLACKFOOT

JIVARO ST

AZTEC ST

BLACKFOOT ST

AZTEC ST

AZTEC

INCA ST

ELDORADO ST

LLEY DR VA

DA S T

POTAWATOMI ST ST

MAKAH ST

QUAPAW

STATE LN

FER RY

FRANKLIN

ROANOKE S T

DRAKE ST

LAKE

NARCISSUS CT

ORCHID ST

YA HN DR

BLVD OL D LAKE GE O

DAKOTAH ST

KERRY S T

QUAY ST

ELDORADO ST

UNDERCLIFT ST

ZEA

NNA

BLACKFOOT ST

BLVD

AC KA

RIVER

LIPAN

KIOWA

VAJO NA

ONEIDA ST

P O T W ATOMI ST A

ONEIDA ST

QUAPAW ST

ONEIDA ST

MAKAH

CO WA

BAILEY LN

STATE AVE

AVE GREEN

L E V E AVE E

BLVD

1ST AVE

FA IRO AK

AV E

CR ES AV SY E

HOPI

BLVD R

R IV E RUM NAVAJO ST

ST ROANOKE

ST CT

X KIM

YAKIMA

SALISH ST

NT O

XKIMO

X. SHASTA AVE

VERNDALE AVE

EUCLID AVE

AVE

E RS LN

QUAPAW

ST YAKIMA

VENT RE ST

ST VENTRE

YAKIMA

BARIUM

ARGON ST

YAKIMA

ZUNI ST

IUM

ODD

KWOOD DR

STON

THUR PO RTER

AZTEC ST

LIPAN ST

RUM

QUAPAW

ROANOKE ST

ST CO WA

SA LIS CIR H

O ST

TO N

A ST

TONTO ST

YAKIM

ARGON

ZUNI

FRAN SAINT

N ST KI TE

IU M ST ON ST

B AR

CHASE AVE

V W EA

EAST M I N ER AL POND

ST H E L IUM

LN ST

144 CTTH IO D I

DY S P RO

IODINE ST

GERMANIUM ST

SIU M

JUNKITE ST

CIS BL VD

ST IODINE I N E ST

IOD

TH 155

KR YP CT .

ON 14

SIUM ST

GN E

KRYPTON ST

UTE ST

ST BARIUM

YAKIMA ST

ST N

O ST

HELIUM ST

DI N

FLUORINE ST

JUNKITE ST

LITHIUM ST

NEON ST

LT ST

RA TUNGST EN ST

RIV

GEORGE

POPPY ST

ST TULIP

ROSE ST

TULIP

ST C KFO O T

ST KANABEC B

ER RAVEN BA NK

BLVD

P LI

XENIA ST

BLVD

ER R IV

JIVARO ST

MOHICAN ST

GUARANI ST

POTAWATOMI ST

SALISH 199TH

BLVD SAINT FRANC IS

WACO ST

ERKIUM ST GERMANIUM ST

AR G O N

ST SSIU M

Q UICKSILVER ST

OSM. ST ST OSMIUM

RADIUM ST

GUARANI ST

RU M

ONEIDA ST

ROANOKE

P O T W ATOMI ST A

AV E

QUAPAW

UTE ST

S BLV D

FRANCI

SAINT

XKIMO ST

CO B A

WEST FORD BROOK DR

ARGON ST

KRYPTO N ST O

KRYPT KRYP. ST

IU ST M

P OTASS

SODIUM ST

W O L FR A ST R D U RA NIUM ST ST

LACKAWANNA ST

A ST

YAKI M

LITHIUM ST

BARIUM ST

LT ST

ERK IUM ST

CLEARY

POTAS SIU M ST

CLEARY RD

POTASSIUM ST

ST U RAN IUM

VANADIUM ST

SODIUM

RADIUM

CO B A

VANADI UM

BL V D

LK . DR

SU N F.

RADIUM ST

WAY

TUN GSTE N

XENON ST

M ST DIU

UNITY

YUCCA ST

ERKIUM ST

COBA DYSPR OSIUM LT ST ST RD

GERMANIUM ST

TUNGSTEN ST

WOLFRAM ST

SODIUM

BRIDGESTONE RD URANIUM ST WOLFRAM ST

CLI FTO RD

TONTO ST

WASH IN G

SALISH ST

P PE

R O W H EAD

175TH AVE

N 72

Y IN C Q U ST

ROANOKE

1 77

YAKIMA

WA CO ST

URN

TO N

LINDA AVE

LINDA CT

RAVENS CT

18 ¬ «

BIRCH

L ON

ASH ST

¬ «

COYOTE

CIR

ROHAVIC LN

H 7T

IR C

ENT RE ST

YAKIMA ST

SCHLAVIN CT

DG O DRIT OO C W

170TH AVE

SAN

X FO IR C

IM A

WO O DEE R

YAK

189

PRAIRIE

LINDA AVE

PINE

7TH ST

178TH AVE

7TH T S

T O M AH A W K TRL

¬ «

RIC E CT

H KA H O DR AR

BALDWIN CIR

7TH T S

ZUNI

YAKIMA

BARIUM

VALHALLA DR

WAY PATH

TOWN

UX SIO KOUT O LO LN

APOLLO DR

VILLAGE

JACKSON ST

¬ «

AVE

APPLE LN PLUM LN

WHITE

BUTTER NU T

ARGON

SAIN T FRA NC IS

IL L

79TH

OAK LN

BARBARA LN

AQUA

CHERRY LN

WOODRIDGE

LS LN

NAN C Y

MARSHAN CT

WA R E

? @ A

2 ND

SAN D H

IN W

ER COBBL CT

XEON ST

E M

166TH AV E

R ST

4TH

ON RD

EGRET

? @ A

1 73 R D LN

AV E

W OODDUC K

S DG

EREV EEN GR LN

SNOW OW CI R L

1 84

1 CARRY N BOAT AUNCH H

166TH

E TYL

199TH

R U ST

HOL

ERKIUM ST

¬ «

PARK

5TH

HO E

£ ¤

166TH AVE

HIGHLAND TRL

18 6TDR H

RICE LAKE CT

C JEFFERSON ST

INO

APOL

OJI B

¬ «

VICKY

¬ «

PHEASANT VIEW LN

58 ¬ «

HLN CIR D

LILAC ST

WILD FLOWER DR GLDST CIR

173 RD AVE

16 9 L N TH

T LE J O HN DR

TANNER CT

L IT

HIL

GREENWOOD LN

THOMAS ST

UIN Q

R R VE D BE A

NNA

GLENVIEW PARKVIEW DR

RIDG

INDIAN

SHERWOOD LN

HILLCREST LN

AVE

HOOD ROBIN LN

OAK

. L. G CIR

ST LN

ARLO

AVE LO

LLO APO CT

T PIN

ITH KE DR

ST ST

ULMER

GLENVIEW

FLUORINE

GRANT IE B LN

MAIN

SMOKETREE

BRIAR

GLADSTONE DR

GE DR

LDE N

198 C

197TH

SAVA

ELM

SS RO DR INTC PO

ERKIUM

TON ST

TO P LU ST

7TH

ARABIA N CIR

UT S STUTZ ST

198TH AVE

MANOR

AR G O

NG WASHI ICARUS ST

4TH ST

199TH ST AVE

189TH

MARVY

SOUTH

F LEA

RIDGE TRL

VA C N C

200TH AVE

PARK

TECKLA CT

201ST L

IS AD AY W

COMMUNITY

PAL OM

GREEN

SO. RD

MN MOSQU TO CONTRO

! | y

141ST

NORSELAND

¬ «

19 3R D CARL BLVD

LILAC

LEA CT TER RA CT HEA THER CT MEADO W CT

E DR PIN

MEO CA LN

OAK

AVE

74TH

± S ª S

RD HE

OD WO

PUB C SAFETY CAMPUS

166TH AV E

E RN BU TT

170TH LN

203RD LN

ANDALL

CARL ST

MUSTANG CT

PROPOSED TRA S

167TH AVE

T WES OD WO LIN

NE Y ROCK ST

OPA

S G HT D R HEI

SH T

177TH 87TH AVE

85TH LN

PO CE F RE

AVE

EAST

C IR

CIR

K OA

OA K O PAL ST

EN LD DR GO K OA

HGHTS CIR

ITAGE TR L

¬ «

88TH LN

205TH LN

SH LN AN

104TH AVE

A Y DR

TRA S

COUNTRY OAKS PARK

E TRI

TRI

103RD

WOODLAND RD 92ND CIR

207TH

207TH A

M AR

AVE

RD ED DR DR LE C ER D NN

PONY CT

AVE

104TH LN 104TH AVE

AVE

\ ! VA "

PO CE

HERITAGE LN

105TH

86TH LN

W SS

195T H AV

M OR G AN LN

106TH LN 106TH AVE

85TH

CENTRAL ST VILLAGE

KE LA

108TH

101ST LN

ADY WAY

TH 88

86TH A VE

87TH LN

FIREBARN

88TH LN

88TH AVE 87TH LN 87TH AVE

CIVIC

Y PKW

FLOWERFIELD

88TH CT

PARK BU D NG

167TH

T WES

H RT N O KE LA

T WES

AL D STNATIOT N

106TH AVE

NORTH

BLVD

GE VILLA WY PK HER-

102ND AVE

N LDE GOLAKE RD

E AV

AL A

CORAL SEA ST

¬ «

KE LA

88TH LN

87TH AVE

ú ? @ A

VILL. PKWY VILL. PKWY LL. VI WY PK

CONCORD RD

93RD DR 93RD CURV WOODLAND RD 93RD AVE DR BOSTON 92ND LN E LIBERTY LN 92ND CT 92ND DR IC PATRIOT 92ND CURV 92ND AVE RV LN SE 92ND AVE 91ST LN 91ST LN UTH 91ST DR 91ST DR 91ST SO CT 91ST CURV R RESTWOOD RD RD RESTWOOD D 91ST AVE Y R 90TH LN A YD 90TH DR HW A 90TH CURV HW IG 90TH AVE H HIG 89TH LN RTH 89TH DR O U TH 89TH CURV 89TH AVE

TWINKLE TER

E AG VILL

THCT

EDITH LN

OAK 181ST LNAVE

LOVELL

89TH AVE CT

IN ST

99TH AVE 98TH 97TH 98TH AVE LN 98TH CT 97TH LN AVE 97TH CENTERWOOD 97TH AVE LN RD EDGEWOOD RD

AVE

F OR EST M EA D O W S PA R K CT

102ND

ST LN

101 ST LN

101ST LN

99TH LN

99TH AVE 98TH LN

92 92ND ND LN AVE 92ND AVE

91ST AVE

89TH CT

H U 88T N KI R AV

COUNTY ROAD J

103RD CT ST

¬ «

E N A PL 95TH AVE

106TH CT LN L

106TH LN

94TH LN

ERS

W PK

AVE

114TH AVE

108 TH

107TH

AVE

115TH

¬ «

AVE

RIDGE

BALL

( d & %

99TH CT

AVE

PINE

196TH LN

Y VIKING ENTU R

109TH

SA EA

ION ALL ST LN

AVE

101ST AVE

BA CT AN

89TH

± S

1 90

111TH AVE

DR Y GA L A X TE ST T WIL IT E DU STAR

92 ND LN

90TH

CRK RD

SI DE CT WO OD

$ b " !

NOR TH

93RD LN

RICE CRE E K

85TH AVE

LEVER ST

HARPERS CT

94TH AVE

DANA CT

CAMELOT

RICE

SWAN

E 179TH A V

AVE

ZUMBROTA CIR

C IR

207TH AVE

¾ ? @ A 5TH

194TH LN

ST ANDREWS CT

10 3RD L

H A RP

92ND LN

ST ANDR. DR

AU ST

137TH AVE

LE V

REW

1 0 4TH

93RD

91ST LN

SA IN T

A ND

RUN

MO ST ALA

95TH

ND A

W 117TH AVE

AVE

H IDD EN HAVEN N EIGHB ORH OODO PAR KJ

ROBINSON

165 214TH LN

208TH

REE K

124TH LN

215TH

4. 219TH LN 5. 7TH ST

125TH AVE

¬ «

114TH

1. TERRACE RD 2. 220TH AVE

W 3. WASHINGTON ST

208TH AVE

121ST

105TH AVE

AVE

BROADWAY

204TH

DEO CT RO

215TH LN

206TH AVE

PARK

¬ «

8 TH

129TH LN

H 8T 11 VE A

¬ «1 ¬« E AV

197TH LN

LAKE AREA

TA ZUM BRO CT

109TH CT

131ST LN

SWAN

AVE LN

2. 2.

B UT T

RG BU RS T C

h POST OFF CE b

195TH LN

FOREST CT

126TH

192N D AVE

AV E H

1. OKINAWA CIR 2. QUEMOY ST 3. 127TH LN

¬ «

190T H LN

KN W O LL O CT OD - RODEO

D A VE

221ST AVE

200TH AVE

SWAN LAKE ESTATES PARK

RD C IR

66TH AVE

66 1/2 AVE

J Æ

198TH

ING WYOM

A ó @ 11 ? ¬ «

222N

AVE

19P1ST H EASA

CED AR C

FLIN TW O O D

AVE

117TH191ST

117TH

22 5 T

21 8TH

205TH

205TH AVE

110TH AVE

H 1 0 4 T CT 1 0 3 RD

S ST

AVE

N ORT HERN RD BOU ND AR IES A RM 7TH ST PA RKAMEF

201ST

136TH

AUSTIN

KER

C IR

T BR AN ST

VIC

¬ «

GLEN

H AVE

125TH 4. PETERSBURG ST AVE LN

226TH

224TH

138TH AVE

AVE

212 TH

FOREST

139TH LN

CIR

E D IS ON ST

TY ROAD J COUNLONG LAKE RD

KE ST WA

192ND AV L ES AP E

ND U RK KI T C

‐ ÷

181ST LN

216TH LN

149TH AVE

6 TH

G ST BU R

M ID- Y WA ST

TH AVE

TH 137 E AV

NDO V A

1 19

137TH LN

235

AVE

217TH AVE

UT R N IR TTE C BU

152ND AVE LN

PARK

12 2

PETE

HO L

E AV

O ND ENA ST

SJAME N TOW

D IS RA

CIR

KISSEL

KISKA

DU RANT ST

UR AL

LE Y

WA ID M

KI S K A

N W

SLEE PY

W AK E

N AL

123RD

E AV 2.

AVE

A Ò ? @

161ST

206TH LN

BUNKER LAKE BLVD

131ST

12 4T

D 2N

171ST LN

210TH

128TH AVE

AVE

¬ «

185TH

214TH AVE

152ND LN

14 9TH LN

VE A

148TH LN

140TH AVE

- 107 TH CO L RA AVE

NC C Y T

LAKE

GUA D A LC A

126TH ST

DERS

LA K E 117TH AVE

91ST

CORD ST

W AK E

UN K D K IR IR C

O ALAM ST TA RO MB ZU ST

U TH

AVE 68TH AVE

IDAHO HAWAII GEORGIA FLORIDA DELAWARE CONNECTICUT COLORADO CALIFORNIA ARKANSAS ARIZONA ALASKA ALABAMA

TA ISET

AWA O KIN ST

TH 146

RK PA

N OR T H R ID G E PA R K

A VE 209TH AVE

146TH

143RD LN

120TH CT

121ST CT

S D

133RD

118TH AVE

LK 11 7 EN TH SP DR

128TH

1 24 TH

119 TH CT

LAKE

AVE

124TH

CIR

LAK

D 2N 12 CT

13 4TH

RS NDE CT

LITE

CIR

86TH LN

T HI E L E N

VICKERS

G BUR PETERS ST

LEYTE ST

AVE

D UN

N WO OD

91ST LN

153 R D

AV E

FLA

C YA N I R C

H 8T

DEER RDG

OHIO AVE N. DAKOTA N. CAROLINA NEW YORK NEW MEXICO NEW JERSEY NEW HAMPSHIRE NEVADA NEBRASKA

2 10 TH

ATU

NORWAY ST

DUNKIRK

TA RO

O LI IL

¬ « G

H 184T LN

SYCAMORE

¬ «

C ED

X FO RDG

MISSIOURI MISSISSIPP

JEW ELL ST

STI N

JAMESTOWN ST

R D

1. ZUMBROTA DR 2. ZUMBROTA CIR 3. BATAAN ST 4. CORAL SEA LN 5. DUNKIRK LN

11 AVE AV6TH E

106TH LN

BIRCH PARK RIDGE OHIO

AVE

155TH

20 7T

17 3 R D AVE

166TH AVE

165TH AVE

214TH LN

AVE

150TH LN

146TH

23 7TH A V

BONDE PARK

LEXINGTON AVE

AVE

P P 213TH LN

YA NC

M ER

R ADISSO

OREGON

FRAZER

190

D ST

O ALAM ST

8TH

AT ST

S ST

R ED W O O

D AN KL OA D R

E AV

T ES

108 AV TH E

107TH LN T O WN

NAPLE

DERS ST

128TH

12 0T LN H

H 8T 11 C T

AMEN CT

AMEN DR

GHIA

KU M QU

DU N

SS AU

W ç S

64TH AVE

N BE E OR M R

NA T I O

OKINAWA

LEYTE

PARK LN

MISSISSIPPI

¬ «

RENDOVA ST

AN FL

LITE

FLUORINE ST

BLVD

YE RS LA Y PKW

TH 1 59

206TH

AVE

144TH AVE

R LLEN D

EL BETH

EDISON

Y NC CT

NK BA UR ST

STAPLES ST

C R E EK

TIPP E CA N O E

NAP

J AM E S

N ILL IO VERM ST

R R O CH E ST E ST

TIMBER RDG SBER TIM G RD

S Q UI RE

ST STAPLES

69TH N-

66TH A V

63RD AV

TACONITE ST

SHAMROCK LN

STINSON BLVD

64TH AVE

TH 175LN

HA CTST IN

73 1/2 AVE

AVE

NORTON AVE

64TH AVE

P. CT

153RD AVE

BURMAN

WMA

190TH AVE

WARD

HA S TIN GS R

ANNE L

ON DR

RY ST

¬ «

ONONDAGA

AVE 67TH AVE

66TH AVE

CLO-

BENNETT

TH 1 64AVE AVE

HICKO

S KE LA

MA LN N

RHODE ISLAND PENNSYLVANIA

ç S

75TH AVE

AVE

KLEY ST OA

68TH

AVE

GREE NBROOK

MOOR DR

TER

PAN DORA OV ERTO N KEN N AST

T C

RICE

CRK

RIC

67TH

66TH

LEH

167TH

EK RE ST

68 AV TH E

SO D IS R A RD

79TH AVE

72ND AVE

69TH AVE

CIR NIA

191ST DR

R YE S

108TH LN

9TH 11 CT

. TR

N. DAKOTA N. CAROLINA NEW MEXICO NEW JERSEY NEW MEXICO NEVADA NEBRASKA MONTANA MISSOURI MISSISSIPPI MINNESOTA MICHIGAN MASSACHESETTS MARYLAND MAINE LOUISIANA KENTUCKY KANSAS IOWA INDIANA

COUNTY PARK PARK¬ «NG OT

A à ? @

I SS

ON NY KE CT

D RA

83RD RD AVE AV E

82 AVEND

76TH AVE

73 1/2 AVE 73RD

SOUTH CIR

73RD AVE

T 28

AVE

m )

WYLDWOOD LN

80TH AVE LAK E V 78TH CIR

CHAMBER OAKS DR

CENTER CIR

¬ «

109TH AVE

AVE

143RD

ND AVE

AVE

100TH CT

BALLANTYNE LN

AVE

A ST Y

COUNCIL OAKS DR

NORTH CIR

AIL QU

81ST

WYLDWOOD LN AVE

AVE

BRIGADOON PL

STA

ST MANKATO

79TH

LA KE LN WA CO

NK URBA ST

13 ¬ «

AVE

135THE AV

128TH

6. 6. 7. 6.

¬ «

GENERAL AVIATION

¬ «

AV E

75TH AVE

ER ST

OSBORNE

17 0T H

LN ORY

AVE

63RD

T 1 12 1T H 1TH 11 11 E CT AV H 110TCT

W IE

LN TER DR

DNR

174TH 6 AVE 9T H

163RD

Y ON

177TH AVE

AVE

80TH

MARLBORO CT RALEIGH LN VICEROY DR

78TH AVE

134 TH

XY-

Õ S

210TH AVE

AV E

142

137TH

195TH LN

RVE ION MILL

193RD

AVE

THEORIN

¬ «PUB CLN WORKS

1 7 0TH

75TH AVE

CT WAY

87TH

PARK TER

CE 172NDARENA AV E

0THE 1 5 AV

92ND AVE

AVE

T 121S CIR

PA LM

A VE

101ST AVE

93RD

PKWY

85TH

WOODLAND AVE M EADOWS RC TOW P IE RD N PARK

AVE LN

BALLANTYNE

120TH AVE

229TH AVE

18 8T AV H E

AVE

170TH

167TH

CONSTANCE BLVD

162ND LN D 2N 16AVE 161ST

149TH LN E AV

AVE

124TH DR 5. WACONIA ST 124TH 4. 5. 6. YANCY ST LN 3. EDISO N 7. 122ND AVE 1. 123RD ST RINA ALAMO 123RD CT Y 2. CIR MA CIR

RT C. R OB EAVE C IR 118TH TR L LN N ES T. MA B U R118TH LN TH1 118 E 1 9 T H AVE AV K PA R117TH L L

118TH LN

E US O T GR S

82ND

ROSEDALE RD

6TH 16 LN

94TH

HOLLAND LN

RECO LN

COMMERCE

CIR

RY KO HIC CIR

ON R KENY CI

H GHWAY SUBSTAT ONS

80TH

RC DR U RY

MA NK A TO

CENTER

AVE

124TH

1 6 4TH

147TH

SH WA

CRANBERRY

AVE

219TH LN

¬ «

AVE

158TH

H 8T 14AV E

OO LI N W

190TH

177TH LN

6TH 17 VE A

CROSSTOWN BLVD

157TH

155TH

197TH

N EMERSO DR

177TH AVE

O O D 213TH PL 213TH LN

229TH

LONGFELLOW DR

LI NORTH NW

TH 213 LN

168TH LN

134TH LN

CLO

14 9T

143RD

140TH

181ST

COMET

101ST

CENTER

CHRISTENSON

SPORTS

89TH

L EP

AVE

83RD

AVE

83RD AVE

N BATAA

1. 132ND LN 2. PALISADE CT 3. URBANK CT

3. TH

LN AVE 217TH169TH

145TH

ZUM B

144TH

125TH AVE

CIR

AVE

144TH LN

EK 130TH CT C RE 129TH CT T C 8TH 12 LN

¬ «

222ND LN

219TH LN

16 0T H A

AVE

135TH LN

1 76TH

SHADE TREE COMMONS PARK 165TH

16 5TH AVE

ó ? @ A

209TH

MARILYN

UTH

201S PL T

T AVE

LL EN CO ST BRYANT LN G CT F CT

DAHLIA DR

178TH

INTERLACHEN DR

¬ «

SIMS

160TH LN

137TH LN

2 ND A 13 PKWY

É S

AVE

» S

148TH LN

146TH

V E

236TH LN

238TH LN

SO MIN N

LONGFELLOW DR

151ST

AND

132ND CT

164TH A

147THAVE

133RD

BAL TI MOR E

63 1/2 WAY 63RD WAY 62 1/2 WAY

R D

62ND

LM ORE

ALDE WAY

NATIONAL

90TH AVE

AVE

LN 164TH SATELLITE

64TH WAY

63 1/2

WAY 63RD WAY

VE 6 7T H A

UE ODHST

US FERG ST

PKWY

105TH

FI L

EE RICE CR

ANTLER CIR

AVE

Y 66 L U N D 'S O IR T HMISSISSIPPI NSSIPP MISSI WAY RPLI K WAY PA MISSISSIPP

ER KT

LUND AVE

IONE

CIR

170TH

YTE

BLVD

1. 1 32

1. GOODHUE CT 2. BALTIMORE CT 3. CHISHOLM ST 4. ELDORADO ST

AVE

3TH 11 CT

117TH AVE

AVE

91ST

86TH AVE

125TH LN

208TH LNWESTL

ROBERT

CREEK

172ND LN

AVE

LEAF

87TH AVE

MA PLE AV E

N LO

ELDO

ST US F ERGRADO ST

OR E

2TH 11 E AV CLUB WEST CIR

103RD AVE

189TH LN

LINCOLN

6 T H LN

LAKE

A W A O NN TA ST

1 16T H CT

LN 113TH AVE

3T 11

99TH

AVE

71ST AVE

EK RE VD BL

DH UE OO

H LN

S KE

EMERSON

LA K EV A VEI EW

WO OD LAN D DR

165TH LN

AVE

TER

MANOR

90TH LN

127TH LN

E AV

IN GS ST

BALTIM

RE ST

107TH

AVE 96TH LN 96TH AVE 95TH LN

TAGE C OT OD WO

LUND AVE 84TH

W EE

AVE

RICE C AVE 166TH TH WA

119TH

118TH

116 TH

W EST

RDLN H

164TH

RS C WE T ET

69TH AVE

KIN JENCIR

FERGUS

C L UB

UL Y S S E

ORE LM FIL TAY

SH RU TH C IR

AVE

¬ «

132N D

AVE

CORRECT ONA ¬ « FAC 175THTYAVE 174TH L

I A º S E

WAY

67TH WAY

FE RG US ST

OU CL

144TH

134TH LN

132ND LN

D 122N LN

1ST HAVE 19 A

111TH

95TH AVE

H 5T 12 T C

AS H T

164TH LN

TT E

LOCKE LK RD

KE H 6T 13A VE

116TH

TAYLOR OR LM ST FIL

JACKSON ST

C LO V

SS ES

N VA REN BU CT

C Y ST Q U IN

ALLOW SW

CLOVERLEAF

99T

96TH AVE

95TH LN

95TH AVE

95THE AV

DH GOO ST

U LY

TY L

LE AB H 7T T C

97TH

92ND AVE

ELM

98TH

97TH LN

E DI S

ROCHEST

N JE

EVELETH ST

11 7

BL V D

E IC E RV N SE RD

EAD ARROWH ST

69TH WAY

MAN

HASTINGS

NC Y UI

3RD ST

.D RV SE

¾ ? @ A

Y 70TH WA

E WH AR R O ST

JON S

RO S

7T H AVE

16 4T H A VE

163RD

CROCUS ST

71ST WAY 69TH

167TH

PI ERC

4. 104TH AVE 5. 103RD WAY 6. JOHNSON ST 7. LINCOLN ST 8. 103RD AVE 9. PIERCE PL

98TH AVE

96TH AVE

17MAPLE 5 T ST

ERSON

97TH LN

88 1/2 AVE

87TH

119TH LN

NE LA IVE DR

99THT C

98TH LN

98TH AVE

125TH LN

ISA N C TI T

120TH AVE

1. 104TH WAY

101ST LN

14 5T

QUAIL 1

122ND AVE

120TH LN

106 TH LN

BUNKER

127TH AVE

107TH LN

1. 2. 3. 4. 5.

99TH

132ND LN

4. 121ST 120TH LN

114TH AVE

102 2. 104TH PL ND LN 3. 104TH LN

102ND AVE

101ST LN

99TH CIR

97TH AVE

RO AD

101ST AVE 101ST AVE 100TH 100TH LN LN 100TH LN

99TH LN

96T H

AVE

CO UN TY

LINCOLN

JEFF

7TH

88TH

78TH AVE

ð ñ ò

ABERDEEN

ING T O

102ND CIR 102ND AVE

A VE

90TH

105TH AVE

122ND 3. AVE

108TH AVE

107TH AVE

104TH AVE

102ND LN

RK W AY

TRL

ASH

95 TH

LO R

AVE

2. 3.

A à ? @

109TH LN JOHNSON ST 109TH LN

106TH LN 106TH AVE

AVE

AVE 148TH AVE

136TH LN

120TH C ED A R A C R ES PA R K

1. CHISHOLM CIR 2. 2. ABERDEEN CIR

AVE

TH AV

AV E

150TH AVE

° S

196TH

H N L EEAVE JO117TH 116TH T. PA R K ES CT

T AVE 1S

140

152ND LN

152ND AVE

BA M 150TH AVE UA Q ST

AVE

132ND AVE CT 131ST 131ST AVE CT 13 0 TH LN 130TH CT 129TH LN AVE TH 5. 129CT 129TH AVE

AVE 6TH 4. 125TH LN

CLO

T AVE

O N

LN 141ST

132ND

159T H

BR O TA ST

AVE

152ND LN

147TH

145TH AVE

AVE

117TH

FILL

98TH LN

91ST

WESTBY DR

CIRCLE

TYLER

H 7T 11 CIR

TH AVE

1. 128TH AVE 128TH 2. ULYSSES CIR LN 3. ELDORADO CT 128TH AVE 4. ELDORADO ST 127TH 5. KENYON ST

AVE

BLVD

AV E

131ST

130TH LN

12 3R D AVE

153RD

194TH AVE

BLVD

DR SO R INT ERL A C HEN UTH D

171ST AVE

SAVE ¼

149TH

132ND LN

130TH

8. 123RD CT

UL 1. PKW Y

AVE

99TH LN

129TH AVE

131ST LN

15 8

1T H

148TH

9. 123RD LN 1. 2. 3. 10. PIERCE CT 124TH 124TH 4. 11. LINCOLN ST LN 5. 6. 124TH 1. 7. AVE 8. 9. 123RD 123RD 123RD 123RD LN

10.

AVE

H 182ND LN 98TH LN

131ST AVE 130TH LN 130TH AVE 129TH LN

126TH LN

113TH CT

AVE

132ND

1. 2.

AVE

73RD

¬ «

CIR

71 1/2 WAY

101 ST

101ST

133RD AVE

126TH AVE

« ¬

97TH LN 97TH AVE

89TH LN

BALLANTYNE LN

ROSEDALE RD

# V ¬ «

0TH

C RK

B LV

F RE PUB C WORKS LN

12 LN GE RID K L OAK OA TR PA RK CT

3RD ST

CHESNEY WAY PKWY

LOGAN

E RD

PIER C E

GT WASHINVD O N BL

PID

ORN

113TH LN

LN 102ND AVE

)

N O

89TH

LUND AVE

WYLDWOOD LN

LETH EV E

M OR FI LL ST E

R EN

AVE

87 TH LN

174TH LN AVE

ST BALTIMORE

E MOR ST

QUINCY

DR NT TERRACE R D

OSB

WAY

VAN

S W AL LOW

4TH ST

PEA

77TH AVE

HI G H W A

E RC ST

INGT ON ST

O C

OD WO AY FIR W

ARD RICKRD Y WA Y 76TH

(EA ST

10 0TH

98TH LN

RSITY IVE UN AVE NORTHTOWN

TAY LOR

T E R RA

ST EX

TH RU

77TH WAY

AIG

169TH75TH WA DGE LN TALMA WA Y

E AV

115TH LN

152 N D

E AV

E LAD

KEVIE LA

182ND LN

195TH AVE

20 9T LN H

7TH

¬ «

237TH LN

C D O ON R

230TH AVE

CIR

13 ¬ « 202N LN

201S

215T H

m )

H AN NE L LN

KARENS CT

13 ¬ « G

BIRCHWOOD

SPORTSMAN RD

T AV E

189TH AVE

166TH AVE

162ND AVE

IA N O C A W ST

160TH AVE

191S

AVE

M AR

219TH AVE

163R LN D

154TH

143RD

168TH

LAK E

148TH

134TH LN 134TH LN 1. 131ST LN 2. 131ST DR 133RD LN

171ST

B ETH EL C OMMU N IT Y PA R K

AVE

13 ¬ « ¬ «

HAM

CIR AVE

PARK

170TH AVE

16 2N D NK BA ST UR

197TH AVE

190TH

AVE

182ND AVE

AVE

TH 209

20 0TH

23 1

229TH AVE

AVE

21 0T H

H AVE

AVE

W YATT ST

¬ «

1. 243RD CIR 2. PIERCE ST 3. 243RD LN 21

POST OFFICE

SANDSHORE LAKE OPEN SPACE

228TH LN

168TH AVE

151ST LN

8TH 17AV E

TERRACE

174TH

171ST LN

1 « ¬

180TH AVE AVE

IRK SYCAMORE 176TH AVE

BLVD

AVE

2 06

9TH

16 AV4T H E

164TH AVE

135TH

135TH AVE

2N D LN 194TH PA 11.

118TH AVE

116TH LN

BUREN 105TH LN H TER RI 5T TO 10 RIA 104T L

99TH LN

MAPLE ST

79TH

CENTRAL AVE

RAV EN

3RD ST

ER NIP ST

ONT

171ST AVE

118TH

118TH AVE

114TH

AVE

144TH AVE 143RD

138TH AVE

1. 2. LN

AVE

148TH LN

C HAR M AR ESTATES PARK 140 TH

132ND AVE

130TH LN 130TH AVE 129TH LN

124TH LN

VIKING

K RIDGE

103RD 103RD AVE LN 102ND

98TH AVE

MANOR DR

78TH AVE

JOHNSON ST

PI E

WASHINGTON ST

RS BITTE

79TH WAY

W AY

N Q

127TH AVE 126TH LN

BUCH

122N AVE D

114TH

T H LN

AVE

127TH

ANAN CIR

115TH AVE

104TH 104TH CT CT

176TH

D? A Ò @ ! C

POLK ST

MADISON ST

UPLANDER

AY HW HIG

83R D

FLORARIVERVIEW CT

E ON A IR LL Y BE WA

SANBURNOL

81ST

130TH LN

OAK RIDGE PT

180TH

92ND AVE ST

AVE

‐ ÷

83RD

173RD LN

ELY

OAKS PARK RS

168TH

Y QU INC ST

CE RD RA

ST TAGE

EGE

FILL M O R E

CE TERRA

A L ER D

FLINTWO O D

FRON

79TH WAY

93RD

90TH LN 90TH AVE

AVE

174TH LN

110TH

97TH LN

91ST

85TH AVE

83RD LN

CIR

111TH

9 THLN 10

H AVE

TH 104

CIR

91ST

N O RW

AG ST

HUGO

M O RE ST

WASH IN G

H 7T

176TH

113TH

112TH AV E

AVE

PL.

94TH AVE

92ND AVE

¬ « 177TH

172ND AVE E LONGFELLOW ST AV WHITE

YL CHERST ALO BUFF ST

TAYLOR ST

Y NC QUI ST

7TH ST

PKW

W ç S

VILLAGE GREEN

7TH ST

EN RE RG

AVE

‐ ÷

87TH LN

92ND LN

114TH AVE

C R 100TH EE K CT

97TH AVE

HAWK 94TH RIDGE94CTHPARK IR AVE

ULYSSES ST

ST BUCHANAN

JACKSON ST

COUN

AVE

116TH LN 116TH AVE

139TH AVE

131ST CT 131ST LN

128TH

MONROE CIR

AVE

R PIE

183RD

178TH LN

164TH

140TH

FIRE STATION LN 132ND

PIE RC PLE

PKWY

114TH LN

WA SH TO INGN CT

D AVE

143RD

CITY HALL 133RD

13 3R CT D

135TH LN

131ST PARK AVE

MAD- MONISON ROE ST

N 115TH

P LE ASU

101ST CT

K LA

LN 5TH

HALL

118TH AV E

116TH

W A

AVE

99TH AVE

58 ¬ « ¬ «

H AVE

JE N KINS

97TH LN

5TH

ST BUTTER NU T

7 13

OLIA

COTTONWOOD ST

E NR OD ST G O LD ST LLY HO

84TH CIR .

AVE

ET H

RNUT

ILEX ST

Y ST LL HO

99TH

BU TTE

PK WY

E EV

R WAY NO

AVE

98TH 2 ND AVE LN 98TH AVE

H LN 7T

AVE

109TH

TERRITORIAL

103RD

122 ND AVE

22 AVE

1 0 8T

1 04T H LN

183RD AVE

100TH AVE

D ST

AVE

10 2

E AV

¬ «

H 176T IR C

ST O FAIRM ST HUG OE CIR GLENC NT ST MO FAIR ST ST ELY DOVER LIBERTY

103RD A V 102N E

IR IN GB D ST

TAYLOR ST

HO LL

105TH UNIV CIR

149TH

AVE

OAKCT

124TH LN

A VE 107T 1 0 7 CIR H M BL VD 106TH 10 AV E 6T LN H

106T H LN

106TH AVE

153RD

BUCHANAN CITY OAK GROVE ST

124TH AVE

PAUL

PRESID E

111TH AVE

110TH LN

107TH LN

AVE

JE SO FF ER N ST -

108TH AVE

D BLV97TH

L ST KIMBAL ILLE ST ESV JAN

D. W IR TN C

U MM

R ST

Y LE JU

FILLMORE ST

TYLE

JEFFERSON ST

AY HW

E AV

BLVD

F RE LN

RTRIDGE ST

FLIN TW O O D

170TH

D ERO SILV S T

165TH

8 4TH

114TH

Sou ce Anoka Coun y H ghway Depa ¬ «men

166TH FIRE STATION

85TH AVE

SI P

IS MI SS

STATE AND LN TH

ST RIVER

58 1W ç S

164TH AVE

169TH

ILEX

177TH AVE

86TH

× C

104TH AVE

99TH

98TH LN

RD 93 LN

127TH

119TH

117TH LN

109TH AVE

C V C CENTER

AVE GO F170TH COURSE

105TH AVE

179TH

85TH LN

172ND

AVE

173RD LN

171ST

VIE

DYS P

164TH LN

165TH AVE

TAMARACK ST

ST C R I

EY LL A DR V 169TH LN

165TH AVE

173RD LN

86TH LN 176TH AVE

A RPORT

174TH AVE

AY RW NO

172ND

VALLEY VIEW PARK

174TH AVE

C TY PARK

172ND

173RD

AVE

177TH AVE

88TH LN

88TH A V E

174TH

174TH LN

COUNTY PARK 174TH

AVE

C EDA R C REST PA RK

GROW OAK VIEW PARK

A-6

ó ? @ A

175TH LN

E LW EISS EID

174TH

175TH AVE LANGSETH PARK

111TH AVE

95TH LN

¬ «

136TH

133RD LN

132ND AVE

¬ «

PA RK DR

LN 113TH M 113TH 113TH O AVE C T R SQ 112TH AVE 112TH SQ 111TH SQ 111TH LN

¬ «

LN LN

117TH

ISL

147TH B A AVE

202ND 138TH LN AVE

184TH AVE

221ST AVE

6TH

È S

É S

MAIN ST

WILD RICE DR

225TH AVE

20 9T

204TH LN

167TH

AVE

15 2N

209TH AVE

241ST LN

FRANCIS

AVE

225TH

185TH

SH DI

175TH AVE 174TH AVE

CONSTANCE BLVD 162ND LN 162ND AVE 161ST LN

162ND AVE

13 GROVE

1S 121ST 12 E LN D UK 120TH LN 120TH RK LN E PA 120TH AV OA

116TH AVE 116TH AVE 115TH LN 115TH AVE

115TH AVE

107TH AVE

TH LN

OTHER FEATURES

17 1

AJ O

176TH AVE

93RD AVE

AVE

129TH 129

119TH 1. TERRACE RD 118TH AVE 1.

¬ « A

7T 22

163RD LN

150TH AVE

137TH LN 137TH AVE

198TH AVE

122ND AVE

119TH CIR

AVE

150TH LN

143RD

1. 2. 195TH3. LN

109TH LN

A ó @ ¬ « ?

¬ «

1. JOHNSON ST 2. 124TH LN 3. 124TH WAY 6. 123RD DR 7. 123RD WAY 4. 124TH CT 5. 124 AVE

120TH LN

117TH AVE

GREEN EGRET BLVD AVE 106TH ESTATES 105THPARK LN

NA V

CEDARCREST EST. PARK

¬ «9

119TH AVE

106TH AVE

‐ ÷

119TH

16 8TH AVE

PA R K

144TH AVE

132ND LN

1 2 1 ST

168TH 216TH CIR LN

203RD AVE

TO W

182ND LN 181ST LN

172ND LN

AVE

MANKATO CIR

ISL AN D

142ND AVE 141 ST LN

8TH

136TH LN

134TH LN 134TH

7TH

BUT NU TERT ST

110TH AVE

109TH LN 10 9TH A

181ST LN

1. EIDLEWEISS ST 2. EIDLEWEISS CT 3. HEATHERS ST 4. MARIGOLD ST 176TH LN

112TH

AVE

1. VAN BUREN ST 126TH 2. ABLE ST 3. 125TH DR 125TH

123 RD AVE

171ST

164TH LN

LN 208TH DR

FILL-

203RD AVE

MAIN ST

122ND AVE

170TH AVE

159TH AVE

150TH AVE

142ND AVE

¬ «

PIN ES

154TH AVE

2 02 N D AVE

WAS H

AVE

1 24T HAV E

SST O

PKWY 3R D A D D 159TH AVE

153RD

182ND AVE

176TH AVE

H AVE

145TH

BENGAL DR

126TH LN

NTOD ST C OT OO W

183RD LN 101ST AVE

AV98TH E

93RD LN

111TH

A Ò ? @

VALE 96TH LN

120TH LN

117TH AVE

HIG

AVE

H 0T R 12 CI

113TH L N

E ST DCR

97TH

ILE

LN 8 TH H LN 8T 10 108TH AVE

100TH

S PID

175TH AVE

AV E

176TH LN

178TH AVE

AVE 205TH

138TH LN 138TH AVE

125 TH LN

AVE

FLINTWOOD CIR

TOWER PL

AVE

102ND AVE

94TH LN 94TH AVE

178TH

BLVD

ER 124 TT TH LN BU T ST NU

1 07 TH LN

N D LN 182

BLVD

116TH AVE

VALE ST W INT E RG REE N

E GRET BLVD ST SE

98TH

124TH AVE

HICKEY 11LAKE 8T H WOODSAVPARK E

103RD AVE

CO O N

126TH LN

O TW

124TH LN

121ST

115TH

RD 103 LN

1ST

R RD

AVE

H LN

104TH AVE

E. RIVE

104TH LN 104T H AV E

LN CEDAR RIDGE PARK

AV O

XEON

G RO U

1 0 6 TH

95TH AVE

178TH LN TIM BE R TR A ILS

LAKE

170TH LN

169TH

214TH AVE

159TH AVE

20 4T H LN

BLVD

140TH LN

139TH LN

149TH AVE

A VE

141ST LN

170 TH LN

165TH AVE

SIMS

MCKAY

NIA

1 R 84 V E LN TH

183RD LN

145TH LN

e S

WALDE N ESTATES PARK

A à ? @215TH

ANDOVER BLVD

12 0TH

FL O

N ST

148 TH

148TH AVE 147TH LN

C ED AR SIDE

5. GOLDENROD ST

ILEX R IP E JU N T UA KU M Q H K LAR C MA G NOL I A NO R W A Y

OLIVE ST R E D W O OD ST

AV ST

AVE

180TH AVE

148TH LN

145TH LN

PINEWOOD

167TH AVE

154TH

209TH LN 209THE AVE AVE

SODERVILLE

C RO

157TH

154TH AVE

152ND

130TH AVE

AVE

119 T H

AVE

0T H

PIN ES 2N D 154TH RK A D D PA AVE

AVE

158TH AVE

131ST LN 131ST AVE

126TH AVE

CR E E

9 HIG T H AVE HW 109TH LN A Y 108TH AV 10 E

XEON ST

N OR W A

ITYIR UN C

AV O C

E RE

RA V E

SLEE PY

UNITY ST H 4T IR 12 C

154TH

138TH AVE

LARCH ST

HE AT

E ST AK

DY LN OO 112T H

111TH

m )

LN TH 139 E AV

MA GN ST

R KE

PINE

127TH

ST Y

E 114 TH

AVE

176TH 176TH LN AVE

DE WO ERDROD

GEORGE 160TH 159TH

RW IA

175TH

171ST AVE

MAPLETON HEATHER EDGEWOOD

LOMBARDY

JUNIPER LN

212TH LN

212TH TER AVE

AVE

DEERWOOD

175TH LN

MEADOW

IVY LN

» S

150TH

206TH AVE

171ST LN HEMLOCK

165TH AVE

213TH LN LAKE

177TH AVE

174TH AVE

BIRCHVIEW CHESTNUT

166TH LN ST

Ã S

172ND LN

VE 197TH AAVE 128TH

121ST LN

NO RT HD AL

E T ST

H 5T 10 AVE

97TH LN

BU N S

114TH LN

AP ID

15 4

BUNKER

27 T H

LN 124TH

1 1 7 T H LN

117 TH AVE

W AC

189TH AVE

184TH AVE

173RD LN

H LN 169T

æ S

BLVD

178TH AVE

177TH LN

VIKING

DUNLOP H PROPERTY 0T 17

AVE 142ND

1S 14

138TH LN

125TH AVE

120TH LN

120TH AVE

192N 118THD LN AVE

UNITY ST

XEON

ROB INSO N DR

EE R LLD KI

H LN

200TH AVE PAR K 199TH

PRAIRIE RD

124TH

ITYIR UN C

187TH

AVE

SE RV

13 9 T H

122ND AVE

AVE

214TH AVE

144TH LN

AVE

204TH AVE

JUNI140TH PER

ER AT H HE

122N LN

12 0T AV H E

H 5T 10AV E

DR A

RE ST

W INT E R G RE EN ST

11 8T H

SYC MO ARE ST TAM RA C AK ST

N ST

0TH E AV

LN 0TH

BLVD

132ND AVE

123RD

ZILL A ST ET

E AV TH

SE R O IR C

BLV D

G. ST

AVE

COUNTY PKWY B

123RD 194TH LN LN

12 2N AV D E

120TH LN

HW A

110TH AVE

8T H LN

99TH AVE

SYC A

D ST

121ST

9TH 10

DRON R

102ND CIR

141ST LN

D BLV

OW D HIG

W RED

109TH LN

EAGLE CIR

144TH

201ST

195TH LN

117TH AVE

A PR

RD ST

¬ «

115TH AVE

« 184TH ¬ LN

CE BLVD

208TH

AVE

142ND AVE

138TH AVE

R EGGI RIDGE PA RK

PARK

AV O CIR

XEO

H 6T

142ND LN

14 0T AV H ST E

G RS

AVE

176TH LN

173RD AVE

150TH LN

146TH

LA ZIL

IS IB IR C

180TH LN

TA M AR A C

XEON

BL U EBI

19 1S T

1 06TH LN

LA KE

A R R OW H EA D PA R K

198TH AVE

120TH LN

119TH

AVE

R R VE D BE A

C US RO

H 9T 15 LN

XEON ST

W O NE LL PI CIR

194TH AVE

107TH AVE

104TH

EN STCY RA V UIN Q

NORWAY ST

PARK RD

195TH AVE

R ST EE

L SW

AVE

PA RK

ZILLA ST AVOCET ST

HQ 0T U

M ILESTONE

125TH LN

118TH

207TH LN

D IAN E GR ABO W PARK

141ST

DRAKE

KI L

GROUS E

107TH AVE

PID 105TH LN S BLV D

103RD LN

D 2N E 14 A V

LN M EADOWS

C RO

E AV

H 9T 16A VE 169TH AVE E AV H 8T 16 168TH AVE 167TH LN O

GE ORAVE GE

D 15 3R LN

199TH AVE

ZILLA ST

AKE DR

Y JA R CI

181ST

BLUEB IRD

L KI

A RTIN ST

SWA L

143RD AVE

129T H

LAKE

128TH LN 128TH AVE 127TH LN

109TH LN

156TH AVE

ANDOVER BLVD

204TH AVE

142 ND LN 142N D AVE 141S T LN

133RD

QUINN

107TH LN

R MA

INN ST

HW 1 1 6 T AY 10

205TH AVE144TH

143RD LN

137TH 201ST LN LN LN

130TH

0 TH AVE 12

E AV

156TH LN

155TH AVE

145TH LN

K ER

NIGH T IN

BLVD

3RD

PARK

CR A N ST

H OA

BLVD

182ND AVE

UEBIRD ST BL

MARTIN ST

D ENAN

QUINN

¬ « ¬ «

E CR

106 TH

ET OC AV

119 IBIS

¬ «

CEDAR AVE

TR PAR

122ND LN

ND 122 LN

D 2N 17 H 0T 17

AVE

13 AV0TH E

111TH AVE

CO ON

AVOCET

MARTIN ST

PART

AVE

5T H LN

VE L ZI L 6TH A 14

139TH

SOU TH

207TH 148TH

HICKEY

131ST AVE

EA M

110T H A VE

SER RD

ING ALE

PID S BL VD

105TH

D AV E MISS ISSIP PI

ING RD BI

VE N ST

149TH LN

4TH E 11 114TH AV AVE

109TH AVE

THRUSH 10 8TH

106TH AVE

DIN ST ER ST WREN

125TH LN

195TH AVE

175TH AVE

16 6 TH

150T

FIL L

É S

237TH AVE

BROADWA Y

AVE

SAINT

78 ¬ « 213TH

SMITH LAKE PARK

235 TH

199TH

185TH AVE

239TH AVE

AV E

7TH

217TH

243RD AVE

FIRE STATION

217TH AVE

212TH AVE

203RD AVE

194TH AVE

L H IL RN K F E PA R

AVE

219TH LN

187TH

A 221ST AVE

¬ «

D LN

239TH

d S KLONDIKE

226TH AVE

VALHALLA DR

1 77

159TH

154TH LN

202ND LN139T LN H

9TH AVE 15

A NW EE GR ISL

151STE

1 4 0T H AVE

132ND LN

127TH

123RD LN

117TH AVE

HIG

AVE

110TH LN

EE R ST

121ST AVE

192ND LN LN

209

1ST 15 LN

AVE

132ND AVE

111TH LN

111TH CIR

¬ «

158TH AVE

U 152ND LN

6 T H AVE

160TH LN

H 7T 15 LN

13 8 TH

112TH AVE

110TH

AVE 109TH AVE

HU M

4TH LN

178TH AVE

AV E

TAN

159TH AVE

E 155TH LN 155TH AV

203RD LN

AVE

ST 206TH D LN LN ST

VIS ST

LN AVE 7TH LN 6 TH

Q UI

124TH LN

115TH

ST 12 7TH

124TH AVE 123RD LN

166TH

159 TH

AV 20 8 T H AVE H LN

137TH

12 C 8T IR H

TI N

128TH

123RD LN

AVE

EAGLE ST

113TH 112TH

HTS

7 10 IEW

ON ST YUK

RI VER V

E V

I SSIPP MISSI

FLO

DIRECT

127TH AVE

1 1 5TH AVE

129TH LN

SH QU RU TH ST11.

AV E

AVE 110TH LN

128TH

10.

NORTHDALE BLVD

IG HE

109TH A V E

132ND AVE

125TH LN

109TH LN

134TH AVE

132ND LN

130TH AVE 129TH LN

128TH 9. AVE 127TH LN

191ST

UTH

T ST ER SWEE BITT

0TH

129TH

9TH AVE

E US G RO ST

ROSE

YU K

112 TH 11 1 TH 11

POPPY

UPLANDER ST

LA D IOLA ST

BL VD

TH 115 LN

112TH LN

109TH AVE LN

130TH AVE

W IL L R O G ER S ADD. PA R K

1 6 TH A

H 134T AVE

GEORGE

160TH AVE

TH AVE

158TH AVE

143RD AVE

¬ «

134TH LN

240TH

239TH AVE

2 31

AVE

H AV E

LN 236TH

205TH AVE

227TH

189TH

181ST LN

¬ «

207TH AVE

¬ «

181ST

173R

161ST

ND 1 52

146TH

144TH

199TH 132ND AVE LN 132ND AVE 198TH131ST 131ST LN LN AVE LN 198TH 130TH LN LN AVE 197TH J 1 28TH AVE AVE LN A 128TH

118TH

BLVD

PKWY 135TH AVE

184 TH

219T

24 ¬ «

237TH AVE

209TH LN

224TH AVE

d S

WMA

208TH LN

207TH LN

ND AVE

0 T

AVE

210TH AVE

¬ «

198TH CT

E 224TH AV

THE PONDS PARK

211T

209TH CT

209TH AVE

199TH AVE

AVE

18 6TH

173RD AVE

158TH AVE LN

AVE

138TH AVE

134TH LN

189TH

177TH

160TH LN 160 159TH LN

138TH AVE

131ST

129TH LN

149TH LN

AVE

BLVD

211TH LN

209TH AVE

S IN NK JE ST H AVE

11 ¬ « ST

221ST

197TH AVE

CR EEK

LAKE

212TH LN

KLONDIKE DR

199TH AVE

1 92

190

4TH

201ST LN

200TH AVE

229TH AVE19 3R D

SIMS RD

203RD LN

195TH AVE

VIKING

215TH AVE

D 223R E AV

216TH AVE

213TH LN

BUCHANAN CT

223RD LN

E 179TH AV

AVE

214TH LN

181ST AVE

AVE

161ST

15 3 R D

150TH

146TH AVE

139T H

139 TH

H LN

199TH LN

130TH LN

123RD CIR

116TH LN

140 TH AVE

RIDGE ST

133RD LN

LN 11 8 T H AVE

«LN ¬

137TH LN

13 5 T

166TH AVE

140TH

139TH LN

138TH AVE

N CO N

4TH

AVE

132ND LN

124TH

146TH LN

BLVD

AVE

EDGEWILD PARK

212TH AVE

207TH AVE

N IS O AD AY W

222ND

BETHEL

É S

221ST AVE

11 ¬ «

225TH AVE

224TH AVE

216TH AVE

205TH LN

196TH LN

6TH

18 « ¬

207TH LN

198TH AVE 19

167TH AVE

14 8TH AVE

AVE145TH

AVE

223RD LN

217TH AVE

Ç S

214TH LN

207TH AVE

197TH LN

PKWY

C ST ET

147TH

GE SA ST

LN G

OSAGE ST

197TH AVE

VD BL ST

AVE

115TH LN

115TH AVE

1 4 0TH

128TH LN

LE U IL DA NQ RTH JO

KERRY

117TH LN

1ST

A VE

E IDG ER PIN DR

¬ «

147TH LN

AVE 200TH AVE

SWAN

AV O

15 5T

BLU E BI RD

AVE

B UT T

24 ¬ «

ZI O N

SH RU TH C IR

R D DE UP LA N DR

O 5. N ST

146TH

160TH AVE

ACRES

170TH AVE

AVE

C C RO STUS -

118TH LN

CROCUS BL VD

AVE

O AC W

BARIUM ST

170TH LN

¬ «

VER

PA R K

1. UPLANDER ST 2. THRUSH ST 131ST LN 3. 132ND AVE

D E IN

192ND LN

RDIN ST

FLORA

B LS W O OCD AR

173RD AVE

UPLANDER

E AV

TH LN 19 119TH AVE

116TH

148TH

147TH CT

160TH LN

158TH LN 158TH

154TH

TH 206

HILLCREST NIG H 102ND

166TH LN

163RD

LIL

L UI N Q ST JO

H 7T 11 LN

AVE

204TH

201ST

192ND AVE 191ST AVE

ZIO

162ND

159TH AVE

STATION

ST 1 LN N D D N VE D AVE BLV142N

MAIN ST

COLLEGE DR

IN ST RD

N WR E

AY HW

BLVD

193RDLNLN 1S

BLVD 158TH AVE 7TH 15 C IR

153RD

BLVD

150TH

OA K S

SH RU ST

190TH LN

AVE

162ND AVE 161ST

¬ «

AVE

149TH

135TH LN

13 2 N D AV

AV E

168TH A VE

163RD

214TH

114TH AVE 113TH LN HRALN P 9T IDS 189TH VD 18

AVE

17 3 R A VED

165TH

194TH ALN VE

D W ILAVE

141ST AVE

208TH LN

151ST

BUNKER

135TH

132ND LN

131ST AVE

126TH LN

126 TH

201ST AVE 136TH

135TH LN

1. ARROWHEAD ST 2. 130TH CIR 3. XAVIS ST 2. 4. 130TH LN 5. 129TH LN 6. 130TH AVE 7. THRUSH ST

10. 11.127TH AVE HIG

S W AL LOW

EET

L ST BLVD JONQUI

177

RSW BITTE

ALE HD

RAV EN

D ARROWHEA ST

8. CROOKED LAKE LN 9. 129TH AVE 10. 127TH LN 127 TH 11. IVYWOOD STCIR

AVE

195TH

¬ «

151ST

150TH

R D

EN HI D D BITTERSWEET ST

12 9

178TH LN

H 169T LN

EISS

CO B ALT

171ST A VE

EID ELW ST

CHID OR ST

VENTRE ST

AVE

171ST

CROCUS ST

A VE

MEMO RI

202ND 139TH

AVE

132ND LN

8. 9.

176TH AVE

172N AVE D

134TH LN 134TH AVE 133RD 3. 133RD AVE LN

103R

179TH

H LIS S ACIR

215TH LN

AVE

208TH

206TH AVE

205TH

157TH

156TH AVE

154TH

153RD LN

145TH AVE

183RD AVE

179TH LN

115TH LN CO ON 115T HA VE LN MISSIS S IP PI DR

114TH

EISS ST EL W

D HI O R C ST

AV E

E TAG VIN

E LW EISS EID

YW IV

ERO D ST

118TH AVE

116TH

AV E

S ILV

118TH LN

11 7 TH

TH AV

AVE

12 0 TH LN

AVE

139TH LN 138TH

132ND AVE

130TH AVE LN E

¬ «

AVE

116TH

155TH LN TH 154 VE A

208TH AVE

206TH LN

6. 8. 7.

LAKE

216 TH

AVE156TH

T NU IR TTER C BU

198TH LN

LN 230TH

191ST

AVE

¬ «9

AVE

161ST LN

158TH LN

158TH AVE

14 LN 1ST

140TH LN 140TH

AVE

215TH AVE

ND O

195TH LN

167TH

211TH

C TE

ROSE ST

1. FLORA ST 2. EIDELWEISS ST 3. EIDELWEISS ST 4. 131ST LN

H 108T

185TH LN

AZ L

109TH

TH LN

FLORA CT

RIV ER DR

SUNNY

¬ «

JONQUIL ST

H 8T 20 VE A

190TH 115TH LN

IP S

AVE

141ST LN

135TH CIR

129 ST Y KE RR

123RD

TUL

115TH AVE

11 8TH LN

117TH LN

FLO

EC S T ZT

ROSE ST

XENIA ST

116TH AVE

D VERO SIL ST

119TH ZE

YE EL K O O BR

D 132N AVE

RIVERDALE COMMONSPL

WED G

LN DR RS HE 159TH FIS 158TH LN

CREEK

13 7T LN H

A Ò ? @

124TH

ZEA CIR

WOODBINE ST

ST DR

HE R

HE AT

m )

RIG

WO O D B IN E

AT HE

E RE AVE

163RD LN

212TH LN

201ST LN

S NARCISSU ST

231ST LN

217TH

1. TERRACE RD 2. 220TH AVE 3. WASHINGTON ST 4. 219TH LN 5. 7TH ST

215TH LN

AVE 219TH AVE

242ND

210TH

HO L

LAKE

WARD

¬ «

175TH AVE

217TH

AVE

QUAY S T

173RD AVE

B L ITEA VD U

D 2N 13

TH 164 E AV

VE A

E AV

A à ? @

24 3R D

212TH

205TH AVE

232 A N LNR DRD

C ED

192ND AVE

214TH AVE

AVE

25TH

217TH AVE

234 CT TH

ESTATES RUM LN PA RK

142ND AVE

13 A V 6TH E

JIVARO S T

+ y 185

185TH

R IVER W O OD H ILL S SO U T H PA R K

173RD AVE

167TH MA AVE N

K ER

19 TH LN

YU C C

AZTEC

186TH LN

¬ «7

TIMB E R R IVER S PA R K

NE R

DO RA

AKW

º S

164TH

205TH LN

COLLEGE 111TH AVE DR

BROOKVIEW NORTH PARK

ROSE

8TH

O LN

ST 120TH AVE

ZE A

AV E

166TH AVE

211TH

135TH

NO RT

124TH CIR

D 122N E AV

189TH AVE

WASHINGTON SOUTH

129

¬ « 124TH AVE

RIVE

1. 132ND 3. 2. 1ST 13 4.

1 7 0TH

169TH

149TH AVE

233RD LN

PA RK

181ST

177TH AVE

218TH LN 218TH AVE RAMBLIN '

151ST LN

IAR M O LD G CIR

219TH AVE

214TH LN

213TH LN

210T H

206TH

¬ «

3. 4.

21 8TH

STONEHOUSE 209TH PARK AVE

228TH LN

222ND LN

172ND AV E

RIVER

¬ «

161ST

AVE

135 TH CT AVE

1ST AVE 19

221ST AVE

175 T

174TH CIR

172ND AVE

V ETER

AVEST

THE 191ST POND S PAR K 190TH AVE

AVE

216TH LN

223RD AVE

AVE

176TH

AVE

154TH AVE D 15 3RLN

CIR

AVE

176TH

R UM RIVER ESTATES AVE PA RK

219TH LN

234TH AV E

230T H OYAL LN R OAKS

BLVD

182ND LN

180TH

MEADOWS

142ND

139TH

¬ «

AVE

134TH AV E

¬ «

154TH LN

139TH LN

228TH VIKING AVE

196TH

229TH LN

227TH1ST 19 AVE

169TH LN

164TH

0 T H AVE

138TH

VIKING BLVD

MAIN

JEFFERSON

EA ST

135TH LN

133RD

RI V

H ST HIGHWAY 10

138TH

138TH CT

135TH

217TH AVE

141ST AVE

136TH AVE WAY CT

R U M R IVER P RESER VE PA R K

143RD AVE

136TH LN

CLEVELAND

12 3 R

FERRY

KV IEW W AY

5. ORCHID ST 6. NORTHDALE LN

ADAMS

BL V D

¬ «7

SUNNY

114TH LN

180TH AVE

AVE

R ANI UA

EAST

¬ «

RSW C E T ET

AVE

221ST AVE

217TH AVE

Õ S

236 TH CT

224TH

222ND

210TH AVE

234TH

234TH LN

Ç1 S ¬ «

AVE

222ND LN 243RD AVE

219TH LN

237TH AVE

235TH

225TH AVE

RIVERDALE

RIV ER LN

177TH LN 177TH

O RT

PIN ST E

182ND LN

R IVER W O OD H IL LS N O R T H PA R K

YUCCA ST

FIRE STATION

¬ «

RIV

17 1

NORTH ST

WASHINGTON

183RD L N

q S

INE

y )

1 84

TH AVE

W O O DB

PARK

¬ «

ADAMS ST

TH LN

AVE

208TH LN

233RD AVE 234TH AVE 233RD LN UNDERCLIFT ST 232ND AVE ND 232 LN 231ST ST 231ST AVE 230TH LN 5. BITTERSWEET ST

BRIDGE

RU M RIVER WOODS PA RK

173RD LN

218TH171ST AVE A VE

ITTE

163RD LN

AVE

139TH A V E LN

TAG

LINCOLN

VAN BUREN ST

140TH AVE

139TH AVE

E N 198TH 131S T MEADOWOOD WAY LN LN 4.3. ROSE ST

GRANT ST

GOLF ST

MONROE

MADISON ST

197TH PIER CE LN ST

¬ «

BRG. SQ

RICE ST

E V

MAPLE

ES W

ON T

139TH

138TH

199TH LN

RANDAL DR

¬ «

142ND

140TH

140TH AVE

ROOSEVELT

C IR

JOHNSON ST

CALHO UN ST

140TH AVE

AV E

L DRI C H

GROVE

DOUGLAS ST

BE NTO

HULL

GRANT ST PRESERVE

GRA Y ST

CLAY

T ST

140TH LN

AVE

OAK

AVE

9TH LN AVE

FERRY ST

LN CUTTER ST

TH ATE RD 20IV0

¬ «

PLEASANT ST

38TH LN 38TH

AVE RD

202ND LN 10TH

ER AVE AC

RAINIER AVE

BLVD

R RY

H ST IG H WAY 10

PA RK

¬ «

AVE

BL A

40TH LN

206T H AVE

LIBRARY

195TH LN

¬ «

174TH LN

AVE

F OXR ID GE PA RK

145TH AVE

UTH 204TH

ROAD

2 ND AVE

179TH

TH AVE 176CIR

164TH LN

¬ «

205TH LN SO

144TH AVE

AVE

¬ «

203RD

41ST AVE

PARK SEELYE B ROOK PR ESERVE B

PARK

197TH AVE

183RD AVE

PA RK

176TH AVE

170TH

198TH AVE

150TH LN 149TH LN

T 20 6

145TH AVE

143RD

181ST LN

168TH

146TH

AVE

D LN

173RD LN

E AV

2 02 N D AVE

DELLWOOD RIVER PARK

225TH LN

RIVER

DRLN

1. 2. 202ND 3. AVE 4. 5. 6. 7. 8.

203RD AVE

23 9 TH SIMS

Ç S

LAND H IGH AVE W OODS PA R K

205TH

183RD LN

160TH LN

152ND

M EAD OWS 177TH AVEWEST177TH AVE

164T H AVE

235TH AVE

20 4T H LN

224TH AVE ST

¬ «

SEELYE BROOK HEIGHTS PARK

146TH AVE 145TH LN 145TH

145TH LN

ER DR

227TH CT

LN AVE 226TH

208TH

AVE

RIV

227TH AVE

172ND

199TH

AVE

H LN 0T 1 5 6TH VE 20 9T LN H 154TH LN

155TH LN

VERDE VALLEY RD

AVE

9TH

146TH LN

8TH LN ST HAVE 8TH M AK A

D G CTLS

EE NH AV

AVE

144TH LN

201ST LN

20MCC A 0THNN AVE A V MCKINLEY ST E

WILSON

CHURCH

185TH

AVE

208TH LN

203RD AVE

µ AVE

24 ¬ «

TH 20 2174TH 19 LN 2 T 174TH AVE 174TH H AVE

163RD

D 232N CT

P.O.

229TH

AVE

CO MMU NITY 192ND

176TH LN

165TH

235TH

BLVD

WOODBURY PARK

194TH LN

175TH LN

15 4 T H LN

AVE

194TH AVE

159TH AVE

153RD LN

D 3R 15 LN

195TH AVE

184TH LN

AVE

210TH AVE

EL D O R

147TH

145TH AVE

38TH

ID GE ST

ND PO

JA CO

X 147TH

178TH AVE

AVE

¬ «

DURIGAN 200TH AVE LOCHER PARK

195THFIRE LN

PA R K

211TH LN

ER TOW BL

ZU NI W GARFIELD ST ST W GARFIELD ST

BLV

HIN

161ST

149TH

148TH LN

147TH

PAW

AVE

151ST

GENIE

DR K SOUTH ENCHANTED

155TH AVE

153RD 152ND

149TH LN

S UN S

198TH AVE

19 1S T

215TH AVE LN

U ST R Y A VE

IC E

EQ AV

KE BUNKER LA

20 CO OL

BLVD

2 ND LN

165TH

PKWY

209TH AVE

POLICE /

171ST AVE

¹ S

201ST

18 2N

173RD LN

153RD AVE

AVE 142ND

189TH AVE

208TH

AVE

204TH AVE

199TH AVE

¬ «7

AVE

T H A174TH VAVE E

165TH AVE

D 2N 15 CT

146TH AVE

NTY P

214TH AVE GEORGE

206TH AVE

233RD LN 202ND LN

187TH

SE RO IR C

8T H

207TH LN

232ND AVE

AVE

157TH

204TH LN

IN D

149TH AVE

140TH LN 140TH CT

140TH

W ç S

158 AV TH E

CIR

2 19

PA R K

169TH LN

164TH AVE

¬ «

AVE

205TH LN

D 3R 14 LN D 3R 14 V E A

RINE ST FLUO

AVE DR GROVE GE CUTTERS PINE RI D B LU F S RIVER

A Ò ? @

219TH AVE

215TH

1. VINTAGE CT 2. UNDERCLIFT CT 209TH LN

GEO LAKE

205TH AVE

HIGHWAY SUBSTATION

176TH AVE

175TH AVE

206TH LN

22 7TH AVE

178TH

AVE

173RD

168TH AVE

154TH LN

174TH

174TH ES ES TAT

AVE

217TH

A AK H A TO

155TH LN

176TH LN

172ND

146TH LN

POT

H LN

153RD CT LN

146T CIR H

XKI

CUTT

J. R.

4 TH AVE

SE ELYE B R O OK

207TH DR

229TH

180TH AVE 178TH LN

176TH AVE

161ST

147TH LN

¬ «

LOGAN ST

BALT C OST

AV E

VISTA WAY

AVE

7T CIRH

ARGON

SE HW RV Y IC 10 E RD

O CT

CO WACT

MCKINLE Y

AV E

160TH

VALLEY

148TH AV

E AV

FORD 180TH LN R OOK PARK

0 8 TR H AVE ST2A

195TH AVE

4TH LN

3. C R

21 8TH172ND AS VE T C IR

145TH LN

LY N

TO YS MA R VD BL

ALPINE DR

149TH

ERKIUM

4TH

140TH LN

161ST

145TH CIR

JU NKI T E

HELIU

191ST

180TH LN

214TH AVE

162ND

AJO

165TH AVE

SUNWOOD DR

SU N W

BL EN WTH M ST

142 141ST LN

KIU

A Ò ? @

AV E

NA V

164TH LN

150TH LN 1 5 0T H LN 150TH LN AVE NI JU

9TH

BUNKER LAKE BLV D

¬ «

143RD CIR

142ND

SUNFISH LAKE CT

RIV

R M A NIUMST

PT KRY

VERDB A E

E AV

UM ST P O TASSI

H 7T

173RD AVE

AVE

R ID

15 2 N

N IP

C O BA LT

4TH

ERKIUM ST

TER 154TH CT 154TH D TER 153R

DIUM

145TH

143RD LN

159TH

153RD CT

148TH LN

148TH 148TH A

O OD

213TH LN LAKE

É S

241ST AVE

216TH LN

212TH LN

SOUT H

198TH AVE

1. 192ND LN 2. 1. LN E

D BL V IS 1. 228TH AVE 2. DAKOTAH ST 3. ELDORADO ST

SWA NS ON 'S B RO OK VIE W PA R K

170TH AVE

165TH

155TH

BLVD

150

COBALT

ST E RIN FL UO IUM MAN

N HE

¬ «

151ST LN

209T

199TH AVE

TH 89

7TH AVE

T C

SODI U M

15 2ND AVE

156TH

154TH LN

EY LSTL 51 VA1 LN

214TH AVE

WAL EN GRE ISL

6. 5.

199TH LN

1 C N

M IU

Ş

161ST LN

NOWT

N CO N

DEER CR EEK

182ND AVE

H AVE

166TH LN

163RD LN

210T15H6TH

210TH AVE

AVE

A Ò ? @

158TH AVE

157

177T

SODIUM

RADIUM ST

157 TH

155TH

158TH LN

170TH LN

167TH AVE

164TH

LI T H

16 0 TH

TH AV E

233RD AVE

CEDAR

AVE

163

171ST

O AC W

171ST AVE

WA CO

164TH

GERMANIUM

H LN

172ND AVE

169TH LN

MORTON I PARK PRESERVE

FRA INT

222ND AVE

¬ « 173RD AVE

165TH

LISH SACIR

BARIUM ST

AVE

DR JIVARO ST

CO B ALT

233RD 201ST 232ND AVE AVE 4.

201ST LN

WOLFRAM

170TH LN

1 6 9T

185TH LN

178TH LN

AVE

C M. T

AVE

179TH

173RD AVE

181ST

179TH LN

177TH

P O PTS

170TH AVE

180TH AVE

172ND LN

TH A KA H M

DINE

q S

174TH AVE

234TH AVE

202ND

180TH AVE

173RD AVE

182ND LN

185TH LN

184T H

183RD LN

177TH AVE

ST. FRANCIS CITY HALL

JIVARO ST

180TH LN

7T H

AVE

VENTRE ST

183RD AVE

¬ «

189TH AVE

LAKE

V EG DR A

232ND S T LN 232ND CT

199TH LN

190TH LN

189TH AVE

180TH LN

211TH

A ST ST

2. 3.

WICKSTROM FOREST PARK

185TH

177TH VALLEY

GEORGE

LAKE

BLVD

POPPY

N O LIT HI RR IS W A

178TH LN

236THLN LN DEGAR DD EGA R D NER NER PA RK A RD N ATU R E PAR K H 206T LN 205TH AVE LN CIR

HOPI ST IN C

AV E

202ND LN

186TH LN

EC ZT

PAW

Á S

CR TER BL ES T VD 187TH AVE

8TH

M A K AH

A Ò ? @

229TH

179TH LN

E RS FISH

198TH AVE 23 7. 2N D 198TH GU NAVAJO ST LN 1 AR PA RK LN 197TH LACKAWANNA AN 197TH LN ST 2 30 AVE LN I VIKING BLVD 197TH AVE MOHICAN ST AV LN ELDORADO ST 230TH E CT 195TH 231ST LN SE EYL E LN DEER DAKOTAH ST B R O O K 194TH LN CREEK 2ND PA R K LN 229TH 231ST CT PARK

1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7.

¬ « 195TH AVE

23 2 N D

AVE

N ST OUARANI RS G DE

RD 201ST 3 3 LNC T 20 0TH 2 20 0TH

BLVD

234TH AVE

3 RD LN 23

4TH

H 8T 20 VE A

O NE I

235TH 234TH LN205TH LN

234TH CT 203RD

EQ AV

AV E

MER LE LN S

E AV

208TH

A Ò ? @ 216

208TH

1. 236TH 20AVE 6T H LN

204TH LN

VIKING

189TH LN

211TH

236TH LN

235TH AVE 205TH LN

OLD

20 9 TH LN

210TH AVE

215TH AVE

¬ «

AVE

+ y Anoka County Highway 28 Map ¬ «

206 TH AVE

Æ S

191ST

217TH

SYCAMORE

LLEY

204TH LN

217TH AVE

221ST AVE

D ST

211TH LN

218TH LN

218TH AVE

TH 241ST AVE218AVE

S U N SH

AVE

215TH AVE

214TH AVE

VALLEY

O NE R

9TH

21 8TH AVE

AMBASSADOR BLVD VER DE

244TH

¬ « R ED W O O

210TH

AVE

217TH

239TH AVE

210TH AVE

T H AV

225TH AVE

221ST AVE

HIDDEN PONDS PARK

2 19

214TH

GYPSY

AVE

212TH AVE

28 ¬ «

H LN

RIVER DR

8T H

24 1 S

Á S

WACO

241ST CT

EC S T ZT

240TH LN

A Ò ? @

242ND CT

221ST AVE

AVE

0TH

224TH AVE

223RD LN

223RD AVE

222ND LN

MAP

218TH AVE

¬ «

222ND AVE

PKWY

¬ «

2040 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN

Average Daily Traffic (ADT) Map 2017

Oak Grove Traffic Count Map

August 28, 2017 25,000 and greater

Draft AADT

5,000 - 24,999

Route Labels

1,000 - 4,999

City Labels

100 - 999

Counties

Less than 100 Source: Minnesota Department of Transportation

0.5

0.75

1:64,000 1

1.5

2 mi 3 km

Commnity Indicators | A-7

1,400

2,500

1,900

2,200

3,900 8,300

3,600

1,000

3,100

11,700

2,900

7,300

2,200

2,700

2,800

2,400

300

6,800

1,600

2,000

2,200

2,000

800

2,500

1,300

3,400 4,200

1,900 1,400 600

2,000

3,100

2,100 1,200

31,100

2,400

1,600

400

5,500

800

5,400

1,900

1,000

500

3,800

2,300

3,900

800

1,800

2,400

8,200

3,000 2,200

26,100

7,200 1,300

7,700

1,900

1,700

3,500

3,200

1,300

4,400

5,000

1,900

2,900

1,700

15,200

1,400

2,000

1,500

5,400

11,800

1,700

25,900

1,900

2,400 1,000

3,400

2,000 9,400

9,200

1,100 1,500

1,200

1,700

10,300

Average Daily Traffic (ADT) Forecast for 2040 for Oak Grove 2,400

8,700

7,800

7,100

6,300

5,800

4,600

8,600

800

1,700

2,000

11,800

9,300

9,900

800

900

9,700 3,700

7,700

3,900

1,400

5,200

5,000

7,700

4,100 8,000

5,700

5,300

3,100

1,900 1,000

8,000

4,500

1,100

3,200

10,300

9,600

9,500

7,700

11,400

48,400

25,900 13,400

21,300

800

1,500

6,000 21,400

13,100

81,100

5,600

6,800

6,100

8,500

1,100

7,500

8,000

29,000 2,600

700

1,300

5,000

5,500

5,000 4,600

4,100

3,800

3,300

6,300

35,100

3,200

8,700

800

30,500

12,500

21,100

1,500 13,800

6,000

1,600 1,900

1,100 1,000

1,400

5,900

6,700

3,800

30,500

1,900 3,500

4,400

12,800

1,700

17,800

13,600

1,400

600

700 800 9,000

4,200

55,200

8,500

2,300

8,300

6,600

3,100

1,7

12,600

1,700

3,000

7,900

1,100

3,000

9,600

1,900

6,700 6,500

1,600

21,900

19,200

1,100

2,100

26,000

8,600

9,400

1,200

4,400

13,800

7,600

3,500

1,800

129,000

3,700 7,300

4,100

12,800

1,000

7,900

1,200

1,400

12,400 9,400

1,200

1,900 2,700

1,300

10,800

12,300

13,400

2,100

5,900 21,100

1,600

4,800 19,000

8,100

6,300

33,400

29,200

23,200

3,000

21,900

17,100

17,800

200

9,300 40,700

10,200

6,500

5,000

35,100 16,600

26,000

1,800

7,700

19,200

18,600

2,100

6,200

7,100 7,300

5,600

29,200

2,000

6,100 3,700

9,900

129,000

23,200

10,200

1,700

19,600

5,800

7,200

33,700

5,200

8,600

2,100

40,700

145,000

3,600

32,400

6,900 3,600

19,600

1,6

32,500

16,300 22,400

11,100

14,100

14,800

8,600

12,000

1,800

13,100

40,600 2,400

7,000

8,500

3,400

16,600 164,000

33,400

1,300

9,400

4,800

1,000

6,300

15,700

5,700

26,100

9,600

15,500

4,100 18,600

,300

14,000

5,000

103,000

22,100 1,500

2,100

3,000

72,800

26,300

75,600

7,800

44,100

34,500

1,700

7,000

6,500 4,000

13,300

7,500

64,100

15,900

33,700

5,200

3,300

14,400

22,100

114,000

7,100 1,300

7,000

6,700 5,400

57,100

46,100 4,500

58,700 2,100

37,500 24,100 23,700

5,600

6,100

4,500 24,200

6,900

1,400

6,900

26,500

91,200

128,000

6,900

23,100

9,400

5,900

12,200

22,800

2,300 10,000

58,000

12,500

88,500

5,100

25,400

24,100

2,500

14,500

6,600

32,400

8,700

3,400

6,400 33,200

4,100

8,200

17,500

16,500

8,300

49,300

2,900

5,100 16,400

1,600

51,900

13,200

2,300 800

2,400

13,200

2,200

1,900

27,100

900

11,900

2,500

2,900

12,700

6,600 6,000

2,700

13,700

16,100

1,100

11,400

3,300

8,400

5,900

20,200 1,100

44,900

17,600

12,400

110,000

5,600

1,700

5,800

8,700

10,200

5,800

4,400

15,500

5,700

2,800 17,600

2,400

500 18,400

800

46,100

51,900 9,900

26,200

7,200

12,400

10,000

3,400

6,600

3,600

9,600

10,000

4,400 4,600

12,400

13,600

11,700

3,900

45,900 27,700

1,600

8,800

2,000

12,400

5,500

10,700

7,800

19,600

4,300

8,300

51,200

27,700

9,100

3,800

22,400

98,000

1,000

4,500

34,500

26,100

2,100 1,400 14,000

19,600

900

8,100

7,200

8,700

4,700

23,400

2,500

23,000

13,500

13,400

5,900

2,000

800

10,500

2,300

8,600

5,400

31,100

15,900

2,400

800

1,600

2,000

4,900

3,100

900

1,100

43,000

17,400

16,300

3,600

1,200

1,800

2,400

1,600

500

1,700

2,500

9,600

2,100

3,000

27,800

90,100

10,000

11,600

900

2,400

34,500

11,600

6,700

4,900

2,700

1,600

10,400

28,900

1,600

2,000 13,300

9,400

46,100

13,300

20,400 7,800

7,100

8,100

2,000

1,600

41,600

700

7,000

7,800

1,600

4,300

10,400

800

1,300

8,600

1,500

39,000

2,500 1,200

23,400

20,900

4,300

103,000

44,100

22,100

14,300

2,700

600

2,300

5,700

9,000

3,500

4,100 7,300

900

8,200

5,300

21,800

1,900

37,700

3,400

7,800

7,000

17,300

6,700

64,100

4,000

11,300

15,900 8,200

1,600

6,800

114,000

24,200

10,600

25,100

4,500

2,700

15,600

9,700

5,900

11,100

2,900

3,500

10,100

4,400 8,900 3,900 11,300 8,100

37,400

3,300

54,500

5,400

1,600

5,100

3,100

9,300

19,300

3,400

35,200

3,600

7,600

11,300

7,300

20,300

22,900

65,300

3,300

2,200

20,300

3,900

9,600

8,000

300

5,800 7,700

17,300

24,000 19,600

18,100

62,500

4,500

3,100 7,800

2,900

7,100 13,400 53,900

1,400

7,200

3,200

4,400

8,300

7,000

5,500

17,200

1,700

3,500

2,000

11,700

36,600 1,500

6,800

11,300

11,400

14,400

13,800

8,100

2,300 1,900

1,400

1,700

1,700 5,700

8,100

1,200

1,000

400

16,200 6,900

15,200

2,600

400

1,400

14,700

6,600 2,600

2,100 2,500

7,500 6,700

88,500

200

5,200

2,400 1,500

2,400 8,300

1,300

10,900

8,100

5,000

10,100

45,000

11,000

900

1,500

1,700

700

300

700 11,400

3,300

2,500

4,100

2,300

1,400

1,100

3,200

2,100

6,300

4,100

128,000

1,100

1,700 1,000

4,000

1,200 12,400

9,400

5,200

1,400

1,100 8,600

9,400

7,600

1,400

600

37,300

3,600

1,800

9,600 2,700

1,700

1,400

5,000

1,600

1,200

8,300

1,400

3,900

2,000

1,500

2,200

6,600

Date: 12/8/2017

Legend

5,200

xx,xxx Projected 2040 Daily Traffic

LOS A or B LOS C LOS D LOS E

7,700

1,100

4 Miles

2,300

LOS F

700

1,700

2040 Traffic Forecast for A-Minor Arterials 1,400

1,900

1,000

1,500

1,500 300

1,400

11,000

2,600 Below are the forecasted Average Daily Traffic (ADT) rates for Oak Grove’s A-Minor Arterials for 2040 according 10,300 1,300 Plan: 9,600 to the Anoka County 2040 Transportation • Lake George Boulevard: Between Viking Boulevard and Bridge Street - 8,200 to 9,300 ADT • Cedar Drive: Between Viking Boulevard 229th Avenue - 2,400 to 1,200 ADT 7,000 200 and 400 1,100 400 • Viking Boulevard: West of Lake George Boulevard - 9,900 to 8,000 ADT 3,200 • Viking Boulevard: Between Lake George Boulevard and Cedar Drive - 9,600 to 9,400 ADT 300 5,800 700 13,800 • Viking Boulevard: East of Cedar Drive - 8,600 ADT 3,100 3,600 • Flamingo Street: Between Viking Boulevard and the City Boundary - 5,200 ADT

11,400

1,400

7,800

Source: Anoka County 2040 Transportation Plan https://www.anokacounty.us/379/Transportation-Plans-Studies 10,900

A-8

5,200 14,700

20,300

2,200

7,700

7,600

10,600 11,300

3,500 2,300

8,00

600 2,500

2040 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN

Freight Nodes and Infrastructure Oak Grove has several nodes that generate semitrailer based freight movement. The biggest generators are in the industrial area located in the southeast section of the community near Viking Blvd./HWY 22 and the Burlington Northern Santa Fe (BNSF) railroad. There are no regular or repeated issues with facilitating good movement of heavy commercial freight on the Cityâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;s roadways.

Oak Grove HCDT

According to the most current Minnesota Department of Transportation Heavy Commercial Daily Traffic (HCDT) Map (see map to the right) the only measured freight traffic is through traffic on Saint Francis Blvd. NW/State HWY 47. Any projected increase in heavy commercial traffic on this State HWY 47 would not have a measurable impact on the City of Oak Grove. The BNSF owns and operates a single track freight railway that runs north/south on the east side of the City. There are two very short spurs that serve industrial properties at Viking Blvd./Hwy 22.

1:125,000

December 10, 2017

City of Oak Grove

Weigh in Motion

1,000 - 4,999

Volume

500 - 999

Volume/Speed

250 - 499

Volume/Speed/Class

100 - 249

Vehicle C lass Locations

Less than 100

5,000 and greater

Route Labels

Counties

1 1.75

2 3.5

4 mi 7 km

City of Oak Grove

Source: Minnesota Department of Transportation

Source: Metropolitan Council System Statement

Commnity Indicators | A-9

Transit Market Areas

Anoka County Traveler Dial-A-Ride

As shown on the map below, the entirety of Oak Grove is designated as Market Area V. Transit Market Area V has very low population and employment densities and tends to be primarily Rural communities and Agricultural uses. General public dial-a-ride service may be appropriate here, but due to the very lowintensity land uses these areas are not well-suited for fixed-route transit service.

Anoka County Transit in conjunction with the Metropolitan Council, provides Transit Link dial-aride transit service for Oak Grove residents. For more information visit: https://www.anokacounty.us/331/ Traveler-Dial-a-Ride

Transitways & Transit Support Facilities The Metropolitan Councilâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;s Transit Investment Plan does not show any transitway investments or transit support facilities located or planned for Oak Grove in the Current Revenue Scenario.

Transit Capital Levy District Oak Grove is not within the Transit Capital Levy District.

Anoka County Medlink Anoka County Medlink coordinates volunteers who generously give their time and vehicle to provide rides to Anoka County residents. To be eligible for a ride you can be a veteran, a senior 60 years of age or older, or a client of Anoka County. Transportation is provided to clinics, Anoka County buildings and Veterans Administration medical facilities in and around the Twin Cities. Anoka County Medlink provides rides to and from medical, dental and social service appointments. Medical and dental trips may be made throughout the metro area while appointments with social services must remain within Anoka County. Passengers must be able to travel independently as volunteers are unable to provide assistance. For more information contact 763-324-3255 or go to: https:// www.anokacounty.us/335/Anoka-County-Medlink

Transit Market Areas Sherburne

City of Oak Grove

Anoka Wright

Ramsey

Washington

Hennepin

Carver

Scott

Dakota 0

A-10

20 Miles

Market Area I

Emerging Market Area III

Market Area II

Market Area IV

Emerging Market Area II

Market Area V

Market Area III

Freestanding Town Center

Nov 2014

Â§

Source: Metropolitan Council System Statement

2040 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN

Commnity Indicators | A-11

Bicycle and Walking REGIONAL TR

AIL

SAIN OAK

s Lake

SWANSON'S BROOKVIEW PARK

d Mu

RIVER MEADOWS WEST PARK

e Lak

SEELYE BROOK ESTATES PARK RUM RIVER MEADOWS PARK

PON

RAMBLIN' RUM ESTATES PARK

SEELYE BROOK HEIGHTS PARK SEELYE BROOK PRESERVE

L a

RUM RIVER PRESERVE PARK

WILD OAKS PARK FOXRIDGE PARK

OAK GROVE PRESERVE PARK

HICKEY LAKE PARK

NORTH ANOKA COUNTY REGIONAL

TR A

RUM RIVER REGIONAL TRAIL

WILL PA

y Lake cke Hi

WILL ROGERS ADDITION PARK HICKEY WOODS

Benjamin Lake RUM RIVER RIDGE PARK

M RIVER R RU EG ION A

Natural Trails Natural trails will supplement Oak Grove’s transportation trail system providing opportunities to explore the City’s many unique natural features. The Park, Open Space and Trail System Plan identifies trail corridor development standards and guidelines, trail related structures and amenities, and an implementation strategy. The 2006 Plan will guide the City’s efforts for trail planning and construction.

N o rri

Linking Trails Linking trails provide connections between residential neighborhoods and commercial areas and the City’s destination trails. Linking trails are located within road rights-of-way and utility easements. Linking trails allow for easier connections over physical barriers such as the Rum River on the west side of the City and the BNSF railroad on the east side of the City.

SUGAR HILLS

RUM RIVER NORTH COUNTY PARK

LT RA

Destination Trails The destination trails are the backbone of Oak Grove’s greenway trail system. This is the system of overland trails within the City’s greenway system that connect major destinations across the commnity (i.e., regional parks, local parks, commercial areas, adjoining cities). The destination trail corridors are intended to be paved trails located within the City’s greenway and open space system.

WICKSTROM FOREST PARK

NOWTHEN OAK GROVE

The 2006 Oak Grove Park, Open Space and Trail System Plan outlines the foundation for the City’s pedestrian and bicycle transportation network. The Trail Plan, illustrated on the following page, is comprised of three classifications of trails.

CEDAR CREEK CONSERVATION AREA

HILLCREST ACRES PARK

Rogers Lake

RUM RIVER CENTRAL REGIONAL PARK Printed By: cjanson, File: C:\Users\cjanson\Documents\ArcGIS\Projects\Oak Grove Comprehensive

A-12

2040 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN

Parks and Trails Network

T FRANCIS K GROVE FERN HILLS PARK

THE NDS PARK

SYCAMORE TERRACE PARK

LAKE GEORGE REGIONAL PARK

NORTH ANOKA COUNTY REGIONAL TRAIL

SHADE TREE COMMONS PARK

DUNLOP PROPERTY

k e

PINES 3RD ADDITION PARK

G e o r g e

City of Oak Grove Comprehensive Plan City of Oak Grove Municipal Boundary

RIDGE ARK

Proposed Local Trails NORTHRIDGE PARK

PINES 2ND ADDITION PARK

Existing Local Trails (hard)

DIANE GRABOW PARK ARROWHEAD PARK

Existing Local Trails (soft)

WALDEN ESTATES PARK

PRITCHARD PARK CEDARSIDE PARK

Proposed County Trails

BEAVER PONDS FOREST GLEN PARK

CHAR MAR ESTATES PARK

Existing County Trails (soft) Existing County Trails (hard) Snowmobile Trails

OAK GROVE CITY HALL PARK

SWAN LAKE ESTATES PARK

Proposed Bikeways County Parks

REGGI RIDGE PARK

SWAN LAKE AREA PARK

Lak

CEDAR ACRES PARK

LAKE PARK

JOHN LEE ESTATES PARK

GREEN ESTATES PARK

CEDAR RIDGE PARK

ROBERT C. BURMAN ESTATES PARK

City Parks Undeveloped Developed MN DNR WMA

Base data provided by Anoka County, MN DNR. Bikeways data posted by Met. Council on MN Geospatial Commons.

OAK GROVE ANDOVER

Plan\Oak Grove Comprehensive Plan.aprx

City of Oak Grove Anoka County, MN 0.25

0.5 Miles

Print Date: 8/14/2018

Commnity Indicators | A-13

Aviation According to the Metropolitan Councilâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;s System Statement for the community, the City of Oak Grove is not in an influence area of a regional airport. The closest regional airports are the Anoka County Regional Airport, located in Blaine, and the St. Cloud Regional Airport, located in St. Cloud. Still further south, the Minneapolis-St. Paul International Airport is the only remaining airport in the vicinity of Oak Grove. None of these airports are close enough to Oak Grove to pose any concern for future flight traffic. Oak Grove utilizes Section 109-471 of Oak Groveâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;s Code of Ordinances to assist in the protection of regional airspace from potential obstructions.

A-14

City of Oak Grove

CITY OF OAK GROVE

A.2 Housing

2040

An Existing Housing Assessment is the first step in identifying current housing needs for your community. COMPREHENSIVE This information meets the minimum data requirements for your Existing Housing Assessment. You are free to copy and paste this table directly into your Housing Element, recreate it using the same data, or incorporate it into a table with additional or alternative data using reliable sources. This table is not a comprehensive picture of your community’s housing stock, but a solid starting point to identify and address Existing Housing Assessment and Needs Analysis your existing housing needs. Please contact Council staff if you have any questions. Total housing units 1= 3,030 Table 1 Affordability in 2016

PLAN

Total households 2= 2,861

Units affordable to households with Units affordable to households Units affordable to households income at or below 30% of AMI with income 31% to 50% of AMI with income 51% to 80% of AMI 7 102 1,526 Table 2 Tenure in 2016

Ownership units 2,916

Rental units 114

Table 3 Housing Type in 2016 1

Single-family units 2,962

Multifamily units 68

Table 4 Publicly Subsidized Units

All publicly subsidized units 0

Other housing units 0

Publicly subsidized senior units 0

Table 5 Housing Cost-Burdened Households in 2016

Income at or below 30% of AMI 79 1

Manufactured homes 0 Publicly subsidized units for people with disabilities 0

Publicly subsidized units: All others 0

Income 31% to 50% of AMI 107

Income 51% to 80% of AMI 122

Source: Metropolitan Council System Statement

Source: Metropolitan Council, 2016 housing stock estimates. Single-family units include single-family detached homes and townhomes.

Multifamily include units in duplex, triplex,assessment and quadplex buildings as those in buildings with five or more units. grow in a pattern that to facilitate desired The series ofunits tables above is an fromas well continued Source: Metropolitan Council, 2016 household estimates. is MetroGIS compatible withDatasets the historical character of the the Metropolitan Council Cityfor of Source: Metropolitan Council of staff the estimates 2016Oak basedGrove’s on 2016 and 2017 Regional Parcel (ownership units), 2010-2014 Comprehensive Housing Affordability Strategy data from HUD (rental units and household income), and the Council's 2016 community. This character of growth, large-lot and/ existing housing stock. The assessment of the City’s Manufactured Housing Parks Survey (manufactured homes). Counts from these datasets were adjusted to better match the Council's of housingneeds units and households in 2016 as well as more current affordability, and income data from theby American Community rural acreages served private septic and private currentestimates housing includes examining totaltenure,or home value data from the Federal Housing Finance Agency, and rents from HousingLink's Twin Cities Rental Revue data. wells, has likely resulted in a housing product that on units, Survey, affordability, tenure, type, public subsidies, Source: U.S. Census Bureau, 2012-2016 American Community Survey five-year estimates; counts adjusted to better match the Council's 2016 housing stock estimates. average has a higher cost when compared to some the number of burdened households and ownerSource: HousingLink Streams data (covers projects whose financing closed by December 2016), http://www.housinglink.org/streams other communities andDepartment areas across the Minneapolis/ occupied housing location value. Housing cost burden refers to and households whose housing costs are at least 30% of their income. Source: U.S. of Housing and Urban Development, 2010-2014 Comprehensive Housing Affordability Strategy (CHAS) data, with counts adjusted to better match St. Paul Metro. Metropolitan Council 2016 household estimates. March 2018 Approximately 2,916 of the City’s estimated 3,030 The higher rate of owner-occupied housing units units, or 96%, are owner-occupied units. Therefore, 4% in Oak Grove and therefore a lower number of of the City’s 3,030 housing units are estimated to be, rental housing units, is likely due to the high cost of renter-occupied units. In comparison, Anoka County as a whole has an estimated 132,353 housing units providing utilities that would be required for rental housing providers. of which an estimated 105,401, or 80%, are owneroccupied units; Oak Grove’s rate of home Homeownership Rate in Oak Grove ownership is well above Anoka County’s rate. 2 3

5 6

98.2%

96.7%

Overall, Oak Grove’s existing makeup and costs of housing is likely a result of the community’s founding and history as a rural and agricultural community. Over the past several decades the community has seen mostly large-lot single-family development that is serviced by private well and septic systems. The City has

96.0%

94.2% 83.4%

81.2%

81.9% 71.4%

67.8%

Census 1990

Oak Grove

Census 20 0 0

Anoka County

79.9% 70.0%

Census 20 10

68.0%

ACS 20 12-20 16

Twin Cities Region (7-county)

Source: Metropolitan Council Community Profile

Commnity Indicators | A-15

Currently, the total estimated number of housing units in the City of Oak Grove is 3,030 units. A housing unit includes any single-family home, duplex (2-units), townhome, condo, apartment, manufactured homes or mobile homes. Rooms in group quarters, shelters, dormitory rooms, and care facilities rooms are not considered housing units as they require additional facilities outside the sleeping/living unit to support residential dwelling by families or individuals.

Oak Grove Affordability 0% 4%

46%

50%

Percentage of Units Affordable to Housholds at <30% AMI Percentage of Units Affordable to Housholds at 31% - 50% AMI Percentage of Units Affordable to Housholds at or below 30% of AMI 51%-80% AMI

Housing is generally considered “affordable” when the owner or renter’s monthly housing costs do not exceed 30% of their gross monthly income. While these numbers are important indicators of affordability, it is also important to note that some residents may be paying more than 30% of their income on housing by choice, rather than by necessity.

Percentage of Units Affordable to Housholds at > 80% AMI

Anoka County Affordability 5% 25%

16%

54%

Percentage of Units Affordable to Housholds at <30% AMI

Approximately 1,628 of the City’s 3,030 housing units are affordable to households with incomes of from 31% to 80% of the area median income (AMI). Approximately 7 housing units, or 0.8%, of the housing units in Oak Grove, are affordable to households with incomes at or below 30% of the AMI. This is a lower percentage than Anoka County; in which 5% of all housing units are affordable to households at or below 30% of the AMI. Additionally, 3% of the housing units in the City of Oak Grove are affordable for households earning 31%-50% of the AMI. Overall, Oak Grove has a much lower percentage of housing units affordable to households earning 50% or less of the AMI than Anoka County as whole. 98% of the housing units in Oak Grove are singlefamily units compared to 80% of the housing units in Anoka County. The remaining 2% of the housing units in the City are multi-family as compared to 20% of the housing units in the County.

Percentage of Units Affordable to Housholds at 31% - 50% AMI Percentage of Units Affordable to Housholds at or below 30% of AMI 51%-80% AMI Percentage of Units Affordable to Housholds at > 80% AMI

Oak Grove Housing Types 0% 0% 2%

98% Single-Family Units

Multi-Family Units

Manufactured Homes

Other Housing Units

Anoka County Housing Types 3% 0% 15%

82%

A-16

Single-Family Units

Multi-Family Units

Manufactured Homes

Other Housing Units

Source: Metropolitan Council Community Profile

2040 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN

The City of Oak Grove has no known subsidized housing units. The City welcomes new housing development that meets the needs of current and future residents and does not cause economically unsustainable burdens on public infrastructure, facilities, and services. Below is a map of owner-occupied residential properties. Multifamily and non-homestead credit properties have been removed. This map shows the estimated value (land+improvements) of owner-occupied properties across the community.

Summary of Existing Housing Needs Character, market needs, and quality are important considerations for housing growth in Oak Grove. Based on the data and analysis prior and public feedback from the Comprehensive Planning process, the City of Oak Grove has identified two goals and several polices that address housing needs for today and 2040.

Owner-Occupied Housing by Estimated Market Value Oak Grove Bethel St. Francis

Nowthen

Oak Grove

1/5/2018

East Bethel Ramsey

County Boundaries City and Township Boundaries

Andover

Owner-Occupied Housing Estimated Market Value, 2016 $243,500 or Less $243,501 to $350,000

Ham Lake

1 in = 0.96 miles

Source: MetroGIS Regional Parcel Dataset, 2016 estimated market values for taxes payable in 2017.

For example - throughout the public $350,001 to $450,000 Lakes and Rivers engagement process the need to improve Over $450,000 the quality of housing and need for better private property maintenance were mentioned. This Affordable Housing Needs need is documented in Chapter 2 and Appendix C. Enforcement of existing ordinance are the preferred Oak Grove does not have an allocation of affordable method of addressing this need. housing for 2040 because the City is not forecasted to have any residential growth that is sewer-serviced The Cityâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;s policies are further defined in Chapter 3: between 2021 and 2030, and therefore cannot plan Community Elements-Housing (Page 3-7). for high-density land to promote affordable housing. Streets

Note: Estimated Market Value includes only homesteaded units with a building on the parcel.

Goal H1: Strengthen community character by encouraging the maintenance and improvement of the existing housing stock and properties throughout the community. Goal H2: Retain and continue to attract people including young professionals, families and retirees in Oak Grove by supporting a range of housing options.

Source: Metropolitan Council Planning Handbook

Commnity Indicators | A-17

Projected Housing Needs and Affordability Projecting the community’s future housing needs is an important planning activity for the City of Oak Grove to undertake for 2040. The community has assessed its existing housing needs but also needs to look at how to accommodate future growth. The chart below shows the current estimated and forecast of population, housing and employment growth for the City of Oak Grove through 2040. Focusing on housing we see that the City is estimated to see an increase of 2,369 people and 1,356 new households from 2010 -2040

Source: Metropolitan Council Planning Handbook

The second chart, below, reflects what share of the Twin Cities Metropolitan Area’s forecasted affordable housing needs for 2030 are allocated to the community of Oak Grove. Oak Grove does not have an allocation of affordable housing for 2040 because the City is not forecasted to have any residential growth that is sewer-serviced between 2021 and 2030, and therefore cannot plan for high-density land to promote affordable housing. The Metropolitan Council encourages the City to consider the many tools that can be used to increase affordability options within the City’s context as a rural community.

Source: Metropolitan Council Planning Handbook

A-18

There are many undeveloped areas of Oak Grove and underdeveloped opportunities that may or may not play out. The community is landlocked and will not be expanding its boundaries. Currently, the undeveloped or underdeveloped areas where the City is guiding residential growth are primarily planned to be Rural Residential with a maximum density of 4 units/10 acres. This project land use type and density will allow the City to continue growing in concert with the rural residential character that the City’s residents value highly.

A.3 Parks and Trails

2040 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN

Regional Parks, Park Reserves, and Special Recreation Features Regional Parks System

City of Oak Grove, Anoka County r S uga Hills

Rum Riv

St. Francis Rum

Riv e

Rum River North Anoka County

Lake George m

R iv

Lake George Park This regional park is located within the city limits of Oak Grove, and it is a major asset to the community. This park is around 270 acres, and it includes areas for picnicking, swimming, hiking, biking, and boating. There are opportunities to view forests, wetland areas, and a lake all within this one park.

Nowthen

Oak Grove

Robert and Marilyn Burman WMA

Rum River

East Bethel

Ru mR

ive r

North Anoka County

Rum River Central Regional Park This regional park is a collaboration of many natural amenities including prairie, wetlands, forest, and of course, the river. The park is very large at 434 acres. There are opportunities for canoeing, kayaking, biking, hiking, camping, fishing, skiing, picnicking, and horseback riding all included in this park.

Ramsey 0

Rum River Central 0.5

Andover 1

Ham Lake 4

Miles

Regional Parks Existing In Master Plan

Regional Park Search Areas and Regional Trail Search Corridors

State Wildlife Management Areas (Publicly Accessible)

Search Areas

Scientific and Natural Areas (SNA) Other Parks and Preserves

Existing Regional Trails Planned Regional Trails Regional Trail Corridor Land

State Parks

Boundary Adjustments

Planned Parks and Reserves

Regional Trails

Minnesota Valley National Wildlife Refuge

Regional Trail Search Corridors Regional Trails - 2040 System Additions

Existing State Trails Street Centerlines (NCompass) Lakes and Major Rivers

Commnity Indicators | A-19

Regional Trails

Local Parks and Trail + Expansion

Rum River Regional Trail This is a regional trail that includes segments that are open to the public as well as planned segments that will be developed in the future. The regional trail travels through Anoka, Andover, Oak Grove and St. Francis. Connects Mississippi River Regional Trail, Central Anoka County Regional Trail, Rum River Central Regional Park, North Anoka County Regional Trail Search Corridor, Sugar Hills Regional Trail, and Lake George Regional Park. The regional trail alignment as shown in the Regional Parks System Map on A-17 is acknowledged in the City of Oak Grove’s future trail planning.

The 2006 Oak Grove Park, Open Space and Trail System Plan outlines the foundation for the City’s pedestrian and bicycle transportation network. The Trail Plan, shown to the right (page A-19), includes three classifications of trails discussed on page A-10. A full version of this map is available in Appendix B of this plan.

North Anoka County Regional Trail Search Corridor: The regional trail search corridor travels through Nowthen, Oak Grove, East Bethel, and Linwood Township as it connects Rum River Regional Trail, Lake George Regional Park, Martin-Island-Linwood Lakes Regional Park and East Anoka County Regional Trail. Anoka County will lead a planning process in the future to determine the alignment of the regional trail. The general search corridor shown in the Regional Parks System Map on A-17 is acknowledged in the City of Oak Grove’s future trail planning.

A-20

The City of Oak Grove contains over 35 local parks as shown and several extensive trails systems. The City plans to continually improve and expand both its trail system and park system to maintain the high quality of life these amenities provide the City’s residents and visitors. The City of Oak Grove’s Parks Commission is very active and is dedicated to continuing to improve the City’s recreational opportunities for all. Planned trails extensions are shown as dashed blue lines on the map to the right. New parkland is added and developed as the City continues to welcome rural residential subdivisions and development with parkland dedication as a function of the subdivision process.

2040 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN

WICKSTROM FOREST PARK

SUGAR HILLS

REGIONAL TRA

RUM RIVER NORTH COUNTY PARK

FERN HILLS PARK

s Lake

SWANSON'S BROOKVIEW PARK

d Mu

RIVER MEADOWS WEST PARK

e Lak

SEELYE BROOK ESTATES PARK RUM RIVER MEADOWS PARK

THE PONDS PARK

SYCAMORE TERRACE PARK

LAKE GEORGE REGIONAL PARK

RAMBLIN' RUM ESTATES PARK

SEELYE BROOK HEIGHTS PARK

SHADE TREE COMMONS PARK

DUNLOP PROPERTY

SEELYE BROOK PRESERVE

L a k e

RUM RIVER PRESERVE PARK

PINES 3RD ADDITION PARK

G e o r g e

TR A

WALDEN ESTATES PARK

PRITCHARD PARK CEDARSIDE PARK

y Lake cke Hi

HICKEY LAKE PARK

ARROWHEAD PARK

FOREST GLEN PARK

CHAR MAR ESTATES PARK

Snowmobile Trails

OAK GROVE CITY HALL PARK

SWAN LAKE ESTATES PARK

SWAN LAKE AREA PARK

CEDAR ACRES PARK

Lak

an Sw

CEDAR CREEK CONSERVATION AREA

JOHN LEE ESTATES PARK

GREEN ESTATES PARK

ROBERT C. BURMAN ESTATES PARK

Proposed Bikeways

HILLCREST ACRES PARK CEDAR RIDGE PARK

City Parks Undeveloped Developed MN DNR WMA

Base data provided by Anoka County, MN DNR. Bikeways data posted by Met. Council on MN Geospatial Commons.

GIO NA

LT RA

RUM RIVER RIDGE PARK

M RIVER R RU E

Existing County Trails (soft) Existing County Trails (hard)

HICKEY LAKE WOODS PARK

Rogers Lake

Proposed County Trails

BEAVER PONDS

County Parks REGGI RIDGE PARK

WILL ROGERS ADDITION PARK

Benjamin Lake

Existing Local Trails (soft) Existing Local Trails (hard)

DIANE GRABOW PARK

RUM RIVER REGIONAL TRAIL

NOWTHEN OAK GROVE

OAK GROVE PRESERVE PARK

City of Oak Grove

Proposed Local Trails NORTHRIDGE PARK

PINES 2ND ADDITION PARK

FOXRIDGE PARK

City of Oak Grove Comprehensive Plan

Municipal Boundary

WILL RIDGE PARK

WILD OAKS PARK

NORTH ANOKA COUNTY REGIONAL

RUM RIVER CENTRAL REGIONAL PARK

NORTH ANOKA COUNTY REGIONAL TRAIL

N o rri

Parks and Trails Network

SAINT FRANCIS OAK GROVE

OAK GROVE ANDOVER

Printed By: cjanson, File: C:\Users\cjanson\Documents\ArcGIS\Projects\Oak Grove Comprehensive Plan\Oak Grove Comprehensive Plan.aprx

City of Oak Grove Anoka County, MN 0.25

0.5 Miles

Print Date: 8/14/2018

Commnity Indicators | A-21

A.4 Water Resources Wastewater Infrastructure and Management Oak Grove has two public wastewater treatment systems. The first is located on the Southwest side of Lake George and serves 201 lots located on the west and northeast portions of Lake George. The other is in the northeast corner of the community and serves a total of 50 lots. According to the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (PCA) permitting and monitoring data the Lake George facility’s designed capacity is .086 million gallons pre day (GPD) and had a 2018 average flow of .026 mgd. The northeast system facility’s designed capacity is .025 mgd and had a 2018 average flow of .013 mgd. The City estimates that approximately 3,053 residences and businesses are served by Individual Sewage Treatment Systems (ISTS). There are no private package treatment plants or group subsurface systems. The majority of the subdivided lots in Oak Grove are 2.5 acres. This allows for the provision of primary and backup septic system drainfields. The City Code has adopted by reference rules of the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency, Minnesota Rules, Chapter 7080 for the standards and maintenance requirements of individual sewage treatment systems. Section 1004 of the City Code further regulates individual onsite sewage disposal systems requiring that each property owner shall have the septic tank on the owner’s property inspected and pumped biennially by a licensed septic pumper or as often as required by inspection. Oak Grove has grown without municipal utilities with the exception of a small area of municipal sanitary sewer surrounding Lake George and a municipal sewer system within The Ponds residential subdivision. These systems are shown on the map to the right. In the future, The Ponds’wastewater treatment facility will be decommissioned with the establishment of a sanitary sewage collection system connection to St. Francis. The anticipated change in treatment facility will not impact the existing or forecasted numbers of A-22

sewer or unsewered households in Oak Grove. There is also no change in the designed urban service area for the collection system currently servicing The Ponds. Private community treatment systems, likely package treatment plants and community drainfields, may be considered in the future on a case-by-case based at the request of a petitioner provided the following conditions are explored: 1. The proposed land use requesting the community treatment system will be in conformance with the City’s Future Land Use Plan. 2. Installation can occur based on the requirements of the manufacturer, City of Oak Grove, Anoka County and the PCA. 3. The system will be managed in accordance with the requirements of the manufacturer, City of Oak Grove, Anoka County and the PCA. 4. The system does not any place additional burden on the City of Oak Grove. The result of the City’s historic growth is a rural residential environment that is highly valued by community residents. The City’s primary objectives in its future planning are to maintain and enhance the City’s rural identity through the following efforts: 1. Preserve the City’s natural features and open space through environmentally sensitive development design. 2. Maintain a rural residential density of one unit per 2.5 acres to provide large residential lots that are capable of safely accommodating individual wells and septic systems, provide space between neighbors, and provide open space and yard area for the private enjoyment of the homeowner. 3. Minimize City investment in public infrastructure to manage City finances and to reduce the tax burden, connection fees and user fees for City residents.

2040 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN

Please See Appendix B for a Larger Wastewater Map

Commnity Indicators | A-23

Surface Water Resources the scenic values and resources of the River and regulates lot size, setbacks and vegetation alterations within that overlay boundary.

There are four lakes, one river, one creek and many wetlands within the City’s boundaries. Each of these natural features contributes to the aesthetics of the community and provides recreational opportunities and/or function as natural stormwater management basins.

Cedar Creek functions as a natural connection between two significant natural resources, the Rum River and the Cedar Creek Natural History Area. Currently the Creek is of good quality and provides a vast habitat for many species. Anoka County has adopted the Cedar Creek Greenway Corridor Plan in order to maintain the high quality habitat the Creek provides and the City of Oak Grove has committed to protecting this significant natural resource through zoning and subdivision regulations.

Each lake, wetland and stream plays an integral role in the City’s water resource management by serving as storage basins for stormwater during storm events and providing natural filtration for stormwater runoff. The majority of the existing lakes, wetlands and streams are within the Federal Emergency Management Agency’s 100 Year Floodplain boundaries.

The four lakes in Oak Grove represent the largest water bodies in the City aside from the wetland/marsh area sometimes referred to as Mud Lake, located north of Viking Blvd., west of Lake George Blvd. and east of Nightingale St. Lake George is the largest water body in the City, totaling 495 acres in area.

U V

The Rum River is designated by the State of Minnesota as a Scenic and Recreational Waterway. Development around the Rum River is regulated by the City’s Scenic River Regulations outlined in Section 1500 of the Zoning Ordinance. This Ordinance establishes a Scenic River Overlay District, conserves and protects 81

U V SAINT 24

U V

FRANCIS OAK GROVE

" )" )

103

! (

) ! (! ("

! (

H O L LY

R AV E N

! (

! ! ( ( ! (

! ( ! (

) ! " )" ( " )" )" )" )

! (

Impairments: Hg-F - Mercury in Fish Tissue

! ( ( !! ( ! (

! (

INGALE

! ( ! ( ! (

! (

e r i v

! (

Lake

" )! ( " )" ) )" " ) " ) )"

Ge or g

u m

! (

! (! ( ! (

U V ! (

! (

e SIMS

! (

" )

! (

! ( ! ( ! ( ! (

VERDE VALLEY

! (

" )

! (

! ( ( " )!

! (

" )

! (

U M ! (

! (

) ! ("

Stormwater Pipe Network

( ! ( ! ! (

! (

R Hickey Lake

Stormwater Ponds MPCA Impaired Waters (2012)

! (

IVE

Inlet Structures

! (

FLAMINGO

" )! (

! (

" ) " ) " )

( " )!

" )

! (! (

DEN

! ( " ) ( " )!

! (

" )

WAL

NOWTHEN OAK GROVE

Surface Water and Subsurface Stormwater Infrastructure City of Oak Grove Comprehensive Plan

! (

GRASS LAKE

! (

! ( ! (

! (

! ( ! ( ! (

! (

U V

221ST

! ( ! (

U V

" )

NIGHT

o o k

B r

UNIVERSITY

! ( IO

U V

! (

! ( ! ( " ) Z

! (

) ! ( ! ("

rri s L a k e

U V

! (

Waterbody River/Stream

197TH

! ( ! (

! (

Municipal Boundary ! (

! ( ! (

City of Oak Grove

! (

U V

! (

h o

Please See Appendix B for a Larger Wastewater Map

A-24

CEDAR

Base data provided by Anoka County. Water Utilites are derived from GPS collection and digitization of as-built information housed by MSA.

City of Oak Grove Anoka County, MN

RD EBI

U V

Printed By: cjanson, File: C:\Users\cjanson\Documents\ArcGIS\Projects\Oak Grove Comprehensive Plan\Oak Grove Comprehensive Plan.aprx

BLU

U V

OAK GROVE A N D O V E R 58

B r o o k

e y

U V

Rogers Lake

SWAN LAK

M a

Impairments: Nutrient/Eutrophication Biological Indicators

U V

e d

Swan Lake

0.25

0.5 Miles Print Date: 8/14/2018

2040 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN

Surface Water Management Surface Water Resources

Oak Grove, Anoka County Saint Francis

Norris Mud

George Grass

East Bethel

UPPER RUM RIVER

Nowthen

Oak Grove

mRive r

Hickey

oked Cro

Oak Grove is located within the Rum River Watershed and is a part of the Upper Rum River Watershed Management Organization (URRWMO). The URRWMO’s mission and activities are planned and regulated by the Watershed Management Plan. This plan is updated every ten years and the URRWMO is currently in the process of updating this plan and it will not be complete until June 2019. The City’s Local Watershed Management Plan (LWMP) complies with the 2019 draft URRWMO Plan. For more information and a copy of the City’s LWMP please see Appendix D of this plan. The City will continue to work with the URRWMO to protect groundwater supplies. The City will continue to enforce Chapter 109, Article VII - the Groundwater Protection Ordinance of the City Code. Chapter 109, Article VII , in conjunction with the City’s development regulations, establishes land use regulations, restrictions, and guidelines to protect groundwater resources within the boundaries of the URRWMO.

Br o

Swan

Benjamin

Rogers

Ramsey 0

LOWER RUM RIVER Ham Lake

Andover

0.5

Miles

Watershed Management Organization Boundaries

Impaired Lakes (2014 Draft MPCA 303(d) List)

Watershed Management Organization Type

Impaired Rivers & Streams (2014 Draft MPCA 303(d) List)

County

2014 Priority Lakes

Watershed District County Boundaries

Watershed Management Organization

City and Township Boundaries

Oak Grove also has its own stormwater management regulations located in Chapter 105 of the City Code. The purpose of the code is to promote, preserve and enhance the natural resources within the city and protect them from adverse effects occasioned by poorly sited development or incompatible activities through the following actions: • Regulating land disturbing or development activities that would have an adverse and potentially irreversible impact on water quality and unique and fragile environmentally sensitive land. • Minimizing conflicts and encouraging compatibility between land disturbing and development activities and water quality and environmentally sensitive lands; and • Requiring detailed review standards and procedures for land disturbing or development activities proposed for such areas, thereby achieving a balance between growth and development and protection of water quality and natural areas.

Other Lakes and Major Rivers Other Streams NCompass Street Centerlines

Surface Water and Groundwater Interaction

City of Oak Grove, Anoka County Bethel

St. Francis

Coopers

Norris

Mud

Grass George

East Bethel

Nowthen

Oak Grove Hickey

Swan

Benjamin

Rogers

Ramsey

Andover

Ham Lake Ward

0.5

Miles

Karst Features (DNR)

Surface water type (regional screening by Met Council)

Spring

Disconnected from the regional groundwater system

Sinkhole

Recharges aquifers

Calcareous Fens

Receives and discharges groundwater

Trout Streams (DNR)

Supported by upwelling groundwater County Boundaries City and Township Boundaries NCompass Street Centerlines Other Open Water Features

Source: Metropolitan Council Planning Handbook

Commnity Indicators | A-25

Water Supply Infrastructure and Management The City will continue to enforce Chapter 8, Article I, Sec 8-1 and other applicable sections of the City and State Codes that regulate water wells. The City requires all private wells to be located, constructed, maintained, and sealed in accordance with the water well construction code of the Minnesota Department of Health. City Code establishes the right of entry onto private property for the purpose of testing wells, water sources, and outlets of water used for drinking purposes, human consumption, or domestic purposes after giving reasonable notice to the property owner.

The majority of Oak Grove property owners are served by private wells. The City Code requires that private wells are located, constructed, maintained and sealed in accordance with or in a more thorough manner than the Water Well Construction Code of the Minnesota Department of Health. West Lake George is served by a public water system. The Ponds development is also served by public water, however, the water is purchased from the City of St. Francis. The expansion of the current public water supply systems beyond their current configurations is not anticipated between now and 2040.

The Metropolitan The Council encourages the City to expand its water conservation and efficiency program to help achieve the goals in the Master Water Supply Plan. Council staff are available to support these ongoing efforts. MO NR

U VS AOI AN KT 103

81 61

U V

City of Oak Grove Comprehensive Plan

QUIN

NGALE

Water Supply and Distribution

U V

221ST

NIGHTI

" )

FRANCIS GROVE H O L LY

ZION

ud M ke La

U V

" /

U V

Norris Lake

U V

3 " /

UNIVERSITY

R AV E N

U V

Water Distribution Network Structures

Lake

U V

! .

101

" /

Meter Station

! .

Production Well

SIMS

Water Main Utility Wellhead Protection Areas Y

Waterbody DEN

River/Stream

WAL

ckey Hi ke La

197TH

Municipal Boundary FLAMINGO

EV AL

NOWTHEN OAK GROVE

VERD

U V 22

Swan Lake

U V

Benjamin Lake

City of Oak Grove

CEDAR

D EBIR LAKE WAR D

BLU

U V

OAK GROVE 58 ANDOVER

U V

Rogers Lake

Printed By: cjanson, File: C:\Users\cjanson\Documents\ArcGIS\Projects\Oak Grove Comprehensive Plan\Oak Grove Comprehensive Plan.aprx

Please See Appendix B for a Larger Wastewater Map

A-26

JACKSON

SWAN LAKE

Base data provided by Anoka County. Sewer Locations are derived from GPS collection and digitization of as-built information.

City of Oak Grove Anoka County, MN 0

0.25

0.5 Miles

Print Date: 8/14/2018

A.5 Economic Competitiveness

2040 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN

Education and Income Education attainment data can provide insight into the quality of the existing labor force, including the availability of skilled and professional workers and the need for training opportunities. Data from the American Community Survey (2012-2016) shows that the percentage of Oak Grove residents with at least a high school degree or equivalent to be 92.7%, which is slightly lower than the county percentage which is 93.5%.

The percentage of residents holding a Bachelorâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;s degree or higher is also lower than the county percentage (16.2% vs 20.12%). The estimated annual wages of the residents of Oak Grove are directly in line with those of Anoka County for 2000 and 2016. The estimated wages of the Anoka County and Oak Grove continue to be slightly lower than those of the metro region.

Source: Metropolitan Council Community Profile

Commnity Indicators | A-27

Existing Labor Force A communityâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;s labor force includes all people over the age of 16 classified as employed or unemployed as well as member of the U.S. Armed Forces. Those not included in the labor force include students, homemakers, retired workers, seasonal workers not currently looking for work, institutionalized people, and those doing only incidental unpaid family work. According to 2010 Census data, two industries dominate the labor force in Oak Grove. Manufacturing, retail trade, and health care and social assistance are among the most common types of occupations held by residents of Oak Grove. Education is the next most common employment of the Cityâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;s residents.

In the most recent statistics, the unemployment rate of Oak Grove has decreased 17%, an overall difference of 1.1% between the 2010 rate of 6.3% and the 2015 rate of 5.2%. In Anoka County overall, the unemployment rate decreased at a slower rate, but this is to be expected with a larger population. Oak Grove is part of the population driving the unemployment rate of the county down, and this is a good thing.

Unemployment Rate, 2015 Unemployment Rate, 2010

Source: Metropolitan Council Community Profile

A-28

City of Oak Grove Anoka County 5.2% 6.2% 6.3% 6.7%

A.6 Resilience

2040 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN

Solar Resource Potential and Protection Gross Solar Potential

S A INT FRA NCIS B LV D NW

RAVEN ST NW

City of Oak Grove, Anoka County

221ST AVE NW

CEDAR DR NW

RIV

B LV

DN W

Oak Grove

NIGHTINGALE ST NW

LAKE GEORGE BLVD NW

SIMS RD NW

RUM

VIKING BLVD NW

FLAMINGO ST NW

The City of Oak Grove recognizes the importance of protecting access for solar collectors from potential interference by adjacent structures and vegetation. Ensuring that all properties have equal access to sunlight is a priority not only for potential solar energy systems, but for the protection of property and aesthetic values as well. Solar access protection is provided for by the uniform implementation of lot and building performance standards adopted as part of the Oak Grove Zoning Ordinance. Requirements such as minimum lot size, maximum building height, and yard setback standards are implemented for the purpose of creating separation between structures and allowing equal sunlight access such that a property is not in the shadow of an adjacent building.

181ST AVE NW

Oak Grove has a unique opportunity to pursue solar energy in the community. With the large amount of open space, and the high sun exposure the area may pursue solar energy opportunities. To the right is a map detailing the locations where solar potential is highest.

1/4/2017

0.5

Extent of Main Map

ANOKA

HENNEPIN

Miles

Gross Solar Potential (Watt-hours per Year) WASHINGTON

High : 1263640 RAMSEY

Low : 900001 Solar Potential under 900,000 watt-hours per year

CARVER

County Boundaries SCOTT

DAKOTA

City and Township Boundaries Wetlands and Open Water Features Source: University of Minnesota U-Spatial Statewide Solar Raster.

Gross and Rooftop Solar Resource Calculations The gross solar potential and gross solar rooftop potential are expressed in megawatt hours per year (Mwh/yr), and these estimates are based on the solar map for the City of Oak Grove. These values represent gross totals; in other words, they are not intended to demonstrate the amount of solar likely to develop within the City. Instead, the calculations estimate the total potential resource before removing areas unsuitable for solar development or factors related to solar energy efficiency. The gross solar generation potential and the gross solar rooftop generation potential for City are estimates of how much electricity could be generated using existing technology and assumptions on the efficiency of conversion. The conversion efficiency of 10% is based on benchmarking analyses for converting the Solar Suitability Map data to actual production, and solar industry standards used for site level solar assessment. -Metropolitan Council

Commnity Indicators | A-29

This page intentionally left blank

2040 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN

1 2 3 4 5 Appendix A Appendix B Comprehensive Plan Maps B is a compilation of the maps made for Appendix C Appendix various elements of the comprehensive plan. Appendix D Page Parks and Trails Network Map B-3 Distribution System Map B-5 Appendix E Water Stormwater System Map B-7 Sanitary Sewer System Map Existing Land Use Map 2040 Future Land Use Map

B-9 B-11 B-13

B-2

2040 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN

WICKSTROM FOREST PARK

SUGAR HILLS

REGIONAL TR

AIL

RUM RIVER NORTH COUNTY PARK

FERN HILLS PARK

s Lake

SWANSON'S BROOKVIEW PARK

RIVER MEADOWS WEST PARK

ake dL Mu

SEELYE BROOK ESTATES PARK RUM RIVER MEADOWS PARK

THE PONDS PARK

SYCAMORE TERRACE PARK

LAKE GEORGE REGIONAL PARK

RAMBLIN' RUM ESTATES PARK

SEELYE BROOK HEIGHTS PARK

SHADE TREE COMMONS PARK

DUNLOP PROPERTY

SEELYE BROOK PRESERVE

L a k e

RUM RIVER PRESERVE PARK

PINES 3RD ADDITION PARK

G e o r g e

WILL RIDGE PARK

FOXRIDGE PARK

OAK GROVE PRESERVE PARK

NORTHRIDGE PARK

TR A

ARROWHEAD PARK

WALDEN ESTATES PARK

PRITCHARD PARK

FOREST GLEN PARK

CHAR MAR ESTATES PARK

Snowmobile Trails

OAK GROVE CITY HALL PARK

REGGI RIDGE PARK

SWAN LAKE ESTATES PARK

SWAN LAKE AREA PARK

CEDAR ACRES PARK

LT RA

Lak

an Sw

RUM RIVER RIDGE PARK

M RIVER R RU EG ION A

Existing County Trails (soft) Existing County Trails (hard)

HICKEY LAKE WOODS PARK

Rogers Lake

Proposed County Trails

BEAVER PONDS

Proposed Bikeways County Parks

WILL ROGERS ADDITION PARK

Benjamin Lake

Existing Local Trails (soft) Existing Local Trails (hard)

CEDARSIDE PARK

y Lake cke Hi

HICKEY LAKE PARK

City of Oak Grove

Proposed Local Trails

DIANE GRABOW PARK

RUM RIVER REGIONAL TRAIL

NOWTHEN OAK GROVE

WILD OAKS PARK

City of Oak Grove Comprehensive Plan

Municipal Boundary

PINES 2ND ADDITION PARK

NORTH ANOKA COUNTY REGIONAL

RUM RIVER CENTRAL REGIONAL PARK

NORTH ANOKA COUNTY REGIONAL TRAIL

N o rri

Parks and Trails Network

SAINT FRANCIS OAK GROVE

CEDAR CREEK CONSERVATION AREA

JOHN LEE ESTATES PARK

GREEN ESTATES PARK

ROBERT C. BURMAN ESTATES PARK

Undeveloped Developed MN DNR WMA

Base data provided by Anoka County, MN DNR. Bikeways data posted by Met. Council on MN Geospatial Commons.

HILLCREST ACRES PARK CEDAR RIDGE PARK

City Parks

OAK GROVE ANDOVER

Printed By: cjanson, File: C:\Users\cjanson\Documents\ArcGIS\Projects\Oak Grove Comprehensive Plan\Oak Grove Comprehensive Plan.aprx

City of Oak Grove Anoka County, MN 0.25

0.5 Miles

Print Date: 8/14/2018

| B-3

This Page Intentionally Left Blank

B-4

2040 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN

MO NR

U VS AOI AN KT 103

81 61

U V

City of Oak Grove Comprehensive Plan

QUIN

NGALE

Water Supply and Distribution

U V

221ST NIGHTI

" )

UNIVERSITY

FRANCIS GROVE H O L LY

U V

ZION

ud M ke La

U V

" /

Norris Lake

U V

3 " /

R AV E N

U V

U V 81

Water Distribution Network Structures

Lake

101

U V

! .

" /

Meter Station

! .

Production Well

SIMS

Water Main Utility Wellhead Protection Areas Y

Waterbody DEN

Municipal Boundary

ckey Hi ke La

FLAMINGO

197TH

City of Oak Grove

U V 22

Swan Lake

U V

Benjamin Lake

River/Stream

WAL

EV AL

NOWTHEN OAK GROVE

VERD

CEDAR

D WAR D

LAKE

EBIR

U V

BLU

U V

OAK GROVE 58 ANDOVER

U V

Rogers Lake

Printed By: cjanson, File: C:\Users\cjanson\Documents\ArcGIS\Projects\Oak Grove Comprehensive Plan\Oak Grove Comprehensive Plan.aprx

JACKSON

SWAN LAKE

Base data provided by Anoka County. Sewer Locations are derived from GPS collection and digitization of as-built information.

City of Oak Grove Anoka County, MN 0

0.25

0.5 Miles

Print Date: 8/14/2018

| B-5

This Page Intentionally Left Blank

B-6

U V

2040 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN

U V SAINT 24

U V

FRANCIS OAK GROVE

" )" )

103

! (

" )

! (

) ! (! ("

! (

! ! ( ( ! (

! ( ! ( ! (

) ! " )" ( " )" )" )" )

! (

Impairments: Hg-F - Mercury in Fish Tissue

! ( ( !! ( ! (

! (

e r i v

! (

Lake

" )! ( " )" ) )" " ) " ) )"

Ge or g

! (

! (! ( ! (

u m

U V ! (

! (

e ! ( SIMS

City of Oak Grove Comprehensive Plan

! (

! ( ! (

! (

GRASS LAKE

! (

" )

! (

! ( ! ( ! (

! (

! ( ! (

! (

INGALE

! ( ! ( ! (

! (

NIGHT

" )

U V

221ST

! ( ! (

U V

o o k

B r

UNIVERSITY

! (

! ( ! (

H O L LY

R AV E N

! (

U V

rri s L a k e

U V

! ( ) ! ( ! ("

! ( ! ( ! (

VERDE VALLEY

! (

" )

! (

! ( ( " )!

! (

( " )!

) ! ("

U M ! (

! (

" ) " ) " )

! (

Stormwater Pipe Network

( ! ( ! ! (

! (

R Hickey Lake

Stormwater Ponds MPCA Impaired Waters (2012)

! (

IVE

Inlet Structures

! (

FLAMINGO

" )! (

! (

" )

! (! (

DEN

! ( " ) ( " )!

! (

WAL

NOWTHEN OAK GROVE

Surface Water and Subsurface Stormwater Infrastructure

Waterbody River/Stream

197TH

! ( ! (

! (

Municipal Boundary ! (

! ( ! (

City of Oak Grove

! (

U V

! (

Printed By: cjanson, File: C:\Users\cjanson\Documents\ArcGIS\Projects\Oak Grove Comprehensive Plan\Oak Grove Comprehensive Plan.aprx

CEDAR

Base data provided by Anoka County. Water Utilites are derived from GPS collection and digitization of as-built information housed by MSA.

City of Oak Grove Anoka County, MN

RD EBI

U V

BLU

U V

OAK GROVE A N D O V E R 58

B r o o k

U V

e y

Rogers Lake

Impairments: Nutrient/Eutrophication Biological Indicators

SWAN LAK

M a

U V

e d

Swan Lake

0.25

0.5 Miles Print Date: 8/14/2018

| B-7

This Page Intentionally Left Blank

B-8

2040 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN

| B-9

This Page Intentionally Left Blank

B-10

U V

" )

U V

M a L

221ST NIGHT

u ked

Norris Lake

U V

S A I N T F R A N C I S 103 OAK GROVE R AV E N

UNIVERSITY

U V

H O L LY

U V

UU V V

U V

2040 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN

Ge or g

U V

INGALE

Lake

Existing Land Use Map City of Oak Grove Comprehensive Plan

City of Oak Grove Municipal Boundary

U V 86

Rivers Waterbody

Generalized Land Use (2016) SIMS

Farmstead Seasonal/Vacation Single Family Detached Single Family Attached Multifamily DEN

Retail and Other Commercial WAL

Office Mixed Use Residential

U M

Industrial and Utility IVE R

197TH

FLAMINGO

ckey Hi ake L

NOWTHEN OAK GROVE

VERDE VALLEY

Extractive Institutional Park, Recreational or Preserve Golf Course Railway

U V

Agricultural

U V

Swan Lake

Water

Printed By: cjanson, File: C:\Users\cjanson\Documents\ArcGIS\Projects\Oak Grove Comprehensive Plan\Oak Grove Comprehensive Plan.aprx

EBI

U V

BLU

Rogers Lake

CEDAR

SWAN LAK

Undeveloped

OAK GROVE ANDOVER

Base data provided by Anoka County, Metropolitan Council.

City of Oak Grove Anoka County, MN 0

0.25

0.5 Miles

Print Date: 8/14/2018

| B-11

This Page Intentionally Left Blank

B-12

U V

U V 103

U V

Norris Lake

FRANCIS GROVE

R AV E N

UNIVERSITY

U S AOI AN KT V

H O L LY

U V

UU V V

U V

2040 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN

U V 74

221ST

" )

NIGHT

ud M ke La

U V

Agricultural Preserves Rural Residential

U V 86

R UM R VE RI

Golf Course Railway Corridor WAL

DEN

Municipal Boundaries City Parcels

FLAMINGO

ckey Hi ake L

NOWTHEN OAK GROVE

Utility (Closed Landfill)

Parks and Recreational Areas

U V 22

Swan Lake

U V

SWAN LAK

EBI

U V

BLU

U V

CEDAR

Rogers Lake

U V

Commercial

Institutional

197TH

Multifamily Residential

Industrial

SIMS

VERDE VALLEY

City of Oak Grove Comprehensive Plan Open Water

INGALE

Lake Ge or g

2040 Future Land Use Map

Printed By: cjanson, File: C:\Users\cjanson\Documents\ArcGIS\Projects\Oak Grove Comprehensive Plan\Oak Grove Comprehensive Plan Dec 2018.aprx

OAK GROVE ANDOVER

City of Oak Grove Anoka County, MN

Base data provided by Anoka County, Metropolitan Council. 0

0.25

0.5 Miles

Print Date: 1/16/2019

| B-13

This Page Intentionally Left Blank

2040 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN

1 2 3 4 5 Appendix A Appendix B Appendix C Complete Survey Results C is a compilation of complete results of Appendix D Appendix the online community survey. Appendix E Page C.1 Survey Results C-2

C.1 Survey Results

C-2

Complete Survey Results | C-3

C-4

Complete Survey Results | C-5

C-6

Complete Survey Results | C-7

C-8

Complete Survey Results | C-9

C-10

Complete Survey Results | C-11

C-12

Complete Survey Results | C-13

C-14

Complete Survey Results | C-15

C-16

Complete Survey Results | C-17

C-18

Complete Survey Results | C-19

This page intentionally left blank

2040 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN

1 2 3 4 5 Appendix A Appendix B Appendix C Appendix D Watershed Management Plans D contains information about the Upper Appendix E Appendix Rum River Watershed Management Organization Plan and the City of Oak Groveâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;s Local Watershed Management Plan.

Page

D.1 Upper Rum River Plan D-2 D.2 Local Watershed Management Plan D-3

D.1 UPPER RUM RIVER MANAGEMENT PLAN Upper Rum River Watershed Management Plan - 2019 The URRWMOâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;s mission and activities are guided by their Watershed Management Plan, which is updated every 10 years and a revised version is anticipated to be completed in June 2019. Additionally, each of the six URRWMO member municipalities must adopt a Local Water Management Plan that is consistent with the URRWMO Plan. The URRWMO is currently revising its watershed management plan. When that 2019 URRWMP is complete it will be adopted and added in this appendix (Appendix D). For more information visit: http:// urrwmo.org/watershed-management-plans-reports.html

The URRWMO is a joint powers organization including the Cities of St. Francis, Oak Grove, Nowthen, Bethel, and portions of East Bethel. A small corner of Ham Lake also falls within the URRWMO. The WMO Board is made up of representatives from each of these cities. This organization seeks to maintain the quality of area lakes, rivers, streams, groundwater, and other water resources across municipal boundaries. Resources of particular importance to the URRWMO include the Rum River, Seelye Brook, Ford Brook, Cedar Creek, and numerous ditches that drain to the Rum River. This stretch of the Rum River is designated as a state Scenic and Recreational Waterway. Lake George and East Twin Lakes, the primary recreation lakes in the watershed, are also of high priority, in addition to many smaller lakes and wetlands. D-2

D.2 LOCAL MANAGEMENT PLAN

2040 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN

City of Oak Grove - Local Watershed Management Plan (LWMP) The following pages contain the City of Oak Grove’s Local Watershed Management Plan - updated 2019.

Local Surface Watershed Management Plan City of Oak Grove Anoka County, MN July 2019 Prepared by: MSA Professional Services 60 Plato Blvd E Suite 140 St. Paul MN 55107 Phone: (612) 548-3132 www.msa-ps.com Project No. 10154055, © July 2019 MSA Professional Services, Inc.

| D-3

THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK

Table of Contents CHAPTER 1 – INTRODUCTION .............................................................................................................5 PLAN STRUCTURE ................................................................................................................................... 5 BACKGROUND ........................................................................................................................................ 6 PLAN SUMMARY ..................................................................................................................................... 7 STORMWATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN ..................................................................................... 7 CHAPTER 2 – PHYSICAL ENVIRONMENT ............................................................................................ 11 TOPOGRAPHY ....................................................................................................................................... 11 SOILS ..................................................................................................................................................... 11 WATER RESOURCES INVENTORY .......................................................................................................... 12 PROTECTED WATERS ............................................................................................................................ 12 WATER QUALITY ................................................................................................................................... 15 LAND USE.............................................................................................................................................. 15 UTILITIES ............................................................................................................................................... 15 CHAPTER 3 – MODELING, MONITORING AND ANALYSIS .................................................................... 21 GENERAL ............................................................................................................................................... 21 MODELING ............................................................................................................................................ 21 DRAINAGE SYSTEM ANALYSIS RESULTS................................................................................................ 21 ASSESSMENT OF PROBLEMS AND CORRECTIVE ACTIONS.................................................................... 23 MONITORING ....................................................................................................................................... 23 CHAPTER 4 – OBJECTIVES AND POLICIES ........................................................................................... 28 GENERAL ............................................................................................................................................... 28 OAK GROVE’S GOAL.............................................................................................................................. 28 WATER QUANTITY AND QUALITY ......................................................................................................... 28 GROUNDWATER AUGMENTATION....................................................................................................... 34 RECREATION, FISH AND WILDLIFE ........................................................................................................ 34 REGULATION AND IMPLEMENTATION ................................................................................................. 35 CHAPTER 5 – MANAGEMENT PLAN ................................................................................................... 36 GENERAL ............................................................................................................................................... 36 IDENTIFICATION OF PROBLEM AREAS .................................................................................................. 36 WATER QUALITY AND QUANTITY MANAGEMENT ............................................................................... 36 HYDROLOGY ......................................................................................................................................... 38 FLOOD PROTECTION ............................................................................................................................. 38 GROUNDWATER MANAGEMENT ......................................................................................................... 38 MAINTENANCE ..................................................................................................................................... 38 RECREATION, OPEN SPACE AND WILDLIFE MANAGEMENT ................................................................. 39 FINANCIAL CONSIDERATIONS............................................................................................................... 39

CHAPTER 6 – IMPLEMENTATION....................................................................................................... 41 GENERAL ............................................................................................................................................... 41 ADMINISTRATIVE PROCESS .................................................................................................................. 41 IMPLEMENTATION PRIORITIES ............................................................................................................. 41 IMPLEMENTATION PROGRAM ............................................................................................................. 42 strategies and implementation schedule ............................................................................................. 43 AMENDMENT PROCEDURES................................................................................................................. 53 SUBMITTAL AND REVIEW ..................................................................................................................... 54

LIST OF EXHIBITS Exhibit 1—Location Map ............................................................................................................................. 10 Exhibit 2—Generalized Topographic Features ........................................................................................... 17 Exhibit 3—Soils Map ................................................................................................................................... 18 Exhibit 4—Protected Waters and Wetlands ............................................................................................... 19 Exhibit 5—National Wetlands Inventory Map ............................................................................................ 20 Exhibit 6—Zoning Map................................................................................................................................ 25 Exhibit 7—Sub-basin Delineation Map ....................................................................................................... 26 Exhibit 8—Flow Chart ................................................................................................................................. 27 Exhibit 9—Storm Pond Map ....................................................................................................................... 40 Exhibit 10—Water Management Plan Process ........................................................................................... 55 Exhibit 11—Water Management Plan ........................................................................................................ 56

LIST OF TABLES Table 1—Minimum Control Measures for Oak Grove SWPPP ..................................................................... 8 Table 2—Protected Waters ........................................................................................................................ 12 Table 3—Protected Watercourses.............................................................................................................. 12 Table 4—Protected Wetlands ..................................................................................................................... 13 Table 5—National Wetland Inventory Labeling Guide ............................................................................... 14 Table 6—Peak Flow Rates for Rum River and Cedar Creek ........................................................................ 22 Table 7—Wetland Classification ................................................................................................................. 33 Table 8—Summary of Buffer Widths .......................................................................................................... 34 Table 9—URRWMO 2019 – 2028 Strategies and Implementation Schedule ............................................. 44 Table 10—URRWMO 2019 – 2028 Implementation Program Budget ....................................................... 51 Table 11—Oak Grove 2019 – 2028 Implementation Program and Budget ................................................ 53

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The City of Oak Grove Local Water Management Plan has been prepared in accordance with the State Statute 103.B, the Minnesota Rules Chapter 8410 and the Upper Rum River Watershed Management’s (URRWMO) 4th Generation Plan. The Plan is subdivided into six sections as listed: 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6.

Introduction Physical Environment Modeling, Analysis and Monitoring Objectives and Policies Management Plan Implementation

The City of Oak Grove has required developments to analyze the storm water impact to other properties from the construction of the development improvements. Converting the agricultural and wooded property to rural residential property has little impact on the rates or volumes of storm water runoff. Where the existing property does not discharge runoff during a 100-year, 24-hour storm event, developments are required to either provide for an overflow outlet or provide for two back-to-back 100year, 24-hour storms within the high water elevation of the non-discharging area. This plan includes a hydrologic computer model of the drainage basins within the City of Oak Grove. The modeling effort provides a tool for developers and for the City of Oak Grove in the design of infrastructure improvements. As the City of Oak Grove improves the municipal state aid street system, the model will be used to calculate the design flows for the cross culverts. With each development, the model may be modified and fine-tuned to show the overall impact on the drainage system to the outfall point such as the Rum River. Additional information is needed for the model from adjacent communities. A few inflow points exist from the cities of Andover, East Bethel and St. Francis. As they develop hydrologic data, the information may be added to the hydrologic model for Oak Grove. Objectives and policies to meet the intent of the Minnesota Statute 103B, Minnesota Rules Chapter 8410 and the Watershed Plan are included in this plan. The policies were compiled from various sources including the URRWMO Watershed 4th Generation Plan and published policies of other Twin Cities area communities. During the development of the original plan, Oak Grove’s Planning Commission reviewed the Objectives and Policies. The approved policies were forwarded to the City Council where they were approved for inclusion in the Local Water Management Plan. The additional Objectives and Policies in this updated Local Water Management Plan are included to comply with the updated Watershed Plan. The Plan itself is divided into three major divisions. Those divisions are coordination with other agencies, capital improvements, and a maintenance plan. Little or no public input was received at the annual public informational hearing held for the City’s Municipal Separate Storm Sewer Systems (MS4) Phase II annual report. The City also made a reasonable effort to reach out to local residents during the original drafting of the Local Surface Water Management Plan and received little or no feedback at that time as well. Because of previous planning efforts, the City now completes annual inspection and has a maintenance program. Through this annual program, noted deficiencies are noted. Any capital improvements required are incorporated into the City’s annual budgeting procedure. The section on Implementation includes the Plan Process divided into the three major divisions. The process requires that the City take regulatory actions, begin implementation, and develop a capital 3

improvement process. The recently approved URRWMO Watershed Management 4th Generation Plan commits the City to a number of local surface water management projects including: 1. Completion of the URRWMO annual activity reporting form. 2. Active participation on URRWMO Board and a member of the TAC. 3. Review and updating local ordinances. 4. Preparation of an inventory of drainage structures located along major open channel drainage systems that convey continuous flow. 5. Complete Stormwater BMP Assessment per URRWMO requirements. 6. Participate and support URRWMO watershed projects, including: a. Lake George Improvement Project b. Rum River Riverbank Stabilization c. Other Subwatershed Assessment Study (SWAS) projects located in Oak Grove The Watershed Plan and the Minnesota State Statutes require that the local plan be adopted and implemented within 120 days of the approval of the plan by the Watershed and the regulatory controls be implemented or amended within 180 days. This Local Surface Water Plan will be in effect after it has been approved by the URRWMO and adopted by the City Council of Oak Grove.

CHAPTER 1 –INTRODUCTION GENERAL The Upper Rum River Watershed Management Organization (URRWMO) prepared an updated Comprehensive Watershed Management Plan meeting the requirements of Minnesota Rules Chapter 8410 (the Metropolitan Area Local Water Management). The final adoption of the 4th Generation plan occurred in July 9, 2019. Member communities, including the City of Oak Grove, are required to update their Local Water Management Plans accordingly. PURPOSE The Metropolitan Surface Water Management Act was enacted into State Statute 103.B.235. Subject to the State Statute 103.B, the URRWMO prepared and received approval on their watershed plan. The Water Management Plan is effective from 2019-2028, after which the plan is subject to review and updating. The purpose of the Metropolitan Surface Water Management Act, as stated in the Minnesota Statute 103.B, is as follows: 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8.

Protect, preserve and use natural surface and groundwater storage and retention systems; Minimize public capital expenditures necessary to correct flooding and water quality problems; Identify and plan for means to effectively protect and improve surface and groundwater quality; Establish more uniform local policies and official controls for surface and groundwater management; Prevent soil erosion into surface water systems; Promote groundwater recharge; Protect and enhance fish and wildlife habitat and water recreational facilities; and, Secure the other benefits associated with the proper management of surface and groundwater.

PLAN STRUCTURE The URRWMO and the Minnesota Board of Water and Soil Resources (BWSR) dictate a certain structure for the local water management plans. Requirements from the URRWMO are included in the Watershed Management Plan. The Board of Water and Soil Resources requirements are specified in the Chapter 8410 Minnesota Rules. INTRODUCTION •

Purpose

PHYSICAL ENVIRONMENT • •

Waters and Wetlands Land and Water Resources Inventory 5

MODELING, MONITORING AND ANALYSIS • • •

Water Quality and Quantity Assessment of Problems Corrective Actions

OBJECTIVES •

Establishment of Goals and Policies

MANAGEMENT PLAN • • • • • •

Waters and Wetlands Erosion and Sediment Control Floodplain and Shoreland Management Groundwater Management Recreation, Open Space and Wildlife Management Financial Considerations

IMPLEMENTATION • • • •

Implementation Priorities Implementation Program Amendment Procedures Submittal and Review

APPENDIX •

Water Resource Management Related Agreements

As the table of contents illustrates, the above is a guide of where to find the required parts of the plan. The total plan includes more than the listed required sections noted above.

BACKGROUND The City of Oak Grove is located in the northwestern area of Anoka County and entirely within the borders of the URRWMO. Bordering communities include Nowthen on the west, St. Francis on the north, East Bethel on the east and Andover on the south. Each of the border communities is within the Upper Rum River Watershed except for Andover. Andover is in the Lower Rum River Watershed. The location of Oak Grove is illustrated on Exhibit 1—Location Map included in this section of the plan. Oak Grove is heavily populated with lakes, ponds, channels and wetlands. Included in the Physical Environment section are two exhibits that illustrate the National Wetlands Inventory and the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources Protected Waters and Wetlands. In years past, the Township of Oak Grove was agricultural property with a small community of Cedar adjacent to the railroad. Oak Grove is now a city with primarily rural residential development and some continued agricultural production land. The City has a few commercial areas and intends to provide for additional commercial growth in appropriate locations within the community.

The previous comprehensive plan for the City of Oak Grove identified an area that is to be guided for urban residential development. Generally referred to as the Metropolitan Urban Services Area (MUSA) extension, the 2,680 acre area was located in the southeast corner of the City, with Cedar Creek and Viking Boulevard NW (County Road 22) providing general borders. The MUSA extension has been removed and excluded from the 2040 comprehensive plan.

PLAN SUMMARY The Oak Grove Local Surface Water Management Plan includes the elements required by the URRWMO 4th Generation Plan. The Minnesota Statute 103B and the resulting Minnesota Rules Chapter 8410 guide the requirements of the Watershed Management Plan. The Plan includes procedures to protect, preserve and use natural surface, groundwater storage, and retention systems while minimizing public capital expenditures needed to correct flooding and water quality problems. The Watershed Management Plan identifies the means to effectively protect and improve surface and groundwater quality in the City of Oak Grove. It also establishes more uniform local policies and official controls for surface and groundwater management. Procedures are included to prevent erosion of soils into surface water systems, promote groundwater recharge, protect and enhance fish and wildlife habitat and water related recreational facilities, and to secure the other benefits associated with the proper management of surface and groundwater.

STORMWATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN In addition to the requirements of Chapter 8410 and the Watershed Management Plan, the City of Oak Grove is identified as one of Minnesotaâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;s mandatory Small MS4â&#x20AC;&#x2122;s and is required by the Clean Water Act to prepare a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Program (SWPPP). This permit authorizes MS4 operators to discharge stormwater with the goal to reduce the discharge of pollutants into receiving waters to the maximum extent practicable. The SWPPP outlines the steps the City of Oak Grove will take to reduce stormwater pollution and is commonly referred to as a Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP). The SWPPP was prepared in conjunction with the prior Local Surface Water Management Plan and addresses many topics that relate to surface water quality throughout the City. Many of the issues discussed in the Local Surface Water Management Plan are addressed in detail in the SWPPP. The following is a summary of the detailed sheets that have been developed in the SWPPP to address goals and timelines for each sub-topic.

Table 1â&#x20AC;&#x201D;Minimum Control Measures for Oak Grove SWPPP PUBLIC EDUCATION AND OUTREACH BMP ID BMP Title 1a-1 Distribute Educational Materials 1b-1 Implement an Education Program 1c-1 Education Program: Public Education and Outreach 1c-2 Education Program: Public Participation 1c-3 Education Program: Illicit Discharge Detection and Elimination 1c-4 Education Program: Construction Site Run-off Control 1c-5 Education Program: Post-Construction Stormwater Management in New Development and Redevelopment 1c-6 Education Program: Pollution Prevention/Good Housekeeping for Municipal Operations 1d-1 Coordination of Education Program 1e-1 Annual Public Meeting PUBLIC PARTICIPATION/INVOLVEMENT BMP ID BMP Title 2a-1 Comply with Public Notice Requirements 2b-1 Solicit Public Input and Opinion on the Adequacy of the SWPPP 2c-1 Consider Public Input ILLICIT DISCHARGE DETECTION AND ELIMINATION BMP ID BMP Title 3a-1 Storm Sewer System Map 3b-1 Regulatory Control Program 3c-1 Illicit Discharge Detection and Elimination Plan 3d-1 Public and Employee Illicit Discharge Information Program 3e-1 Identification of Non Storm Water Discharges and Flows CONSTRUCTION SITE STORMWATER RUNOFF CONTROL BMP ID BMP Title 4a-1 Ordinance or other Regulatory Mechanism 4b-1 Construction Site Implementation of Erosion and Sediment Control BMPs 4c-1 Waste Controls for Construction Site Operators 4d-1 Procedure for Site Plan Review 4e-1 Establishment of Procedures for the Receipt and Consideration of Reports of Stormwater Noncompliance 4f-1 Establishment of Procedures for Site Inspections and Enforcement POST-CONSTRUCTION STORMWATER MANAGEMENT IN NEW DEVELOPMENT AND REDEVELOPMENT BMP ID BMP Title 5a-1 Development and Implementation of Structural and/or Non-Structural BMPs 5b-1 Regulatory Mechanism to Address Post Construction Runoff from New Development and Redevelopment 5c-1 Long-Term Operation and Maintenance of BMPs 8

POLLUTION PREVENTION/GOOD HOUSEKEEPING BMP ID BMP Title 6a-1 Municipal Operations and Maintenance Program 6a-2 Street Sweeping 6b-2 Annual Inspection of All Structural Pollution Control Devices 6b-3 Inspection of a Minimum of 20 percent of the MS4 Outfalls, Sediment Basins and Ponds Each Year on a Rotating Basis 6b-4 Annual Inspection of All Exposed Stockpile, Storage and Material Handling Areas 6b-5 Inspection Follow-up Including the Determination of Whether Repair, Replacement, or Maintenance Measures are Necessary and the Implementation of the Corrective Measures 6b-6 Record Reporting and Retention of all Inspections and Responses to the Inspections 6b-7 Evaluation of Inspection Frequency IMPAIRED WATERS BMP ID BMP Title 7a-1 Impaired Waters Review Process 7b-1 Response to TMDL Waste Load Allocation 7c-1 Discharges to Waters with Prohibited or Restricted Discharges

THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK

CHAPTER 2 – PHYSICAL ENVIRONMENT TOPOGRAPHY The topography of Oak Grove ranges from very flat to gently undulating hills. In addition, the Rum River, Seelye Brook and Cedar Creek have carved valleys into the topography. The rolling terrain is generally in the western part of the City with the flat land on the east. This fits with the landforms described in the Watershed Plan. The western area of the watershed is the Twin Cities Formation with the eastern area comprised of the Anoka Sandplain Formation. Exhibit 2—Generalized Topographic Features shows the City map overlaid on the USGS quadrangle maps. The elevations in the City of Oak Grove range from a high elevation of about 930 along the west edge of the City to a low elevation of 850 along the Rum River at the south edge of Oak Grove. Most of the City is between elevations 900 and 920. As you can see, most of the marshy areas shown on the USGS map in the eastern side of the City are at about elevation 900 or slightly below. The topography of the eastern portion of Oak Grove varies from about 895 to 920 with a few hills in the 930-elevation range. Cedar Creek cuts a valley through the southern part of the City.

SOILS Oak Grove is contained within about three Soil Associations. These can be observed in the Watershed Plan Exhibit 3—Soils Map. This exhibit is a recreation of the General Soil Map from the Soil Survey of Anoka County, Minnesota, prepared by the United States Department of Agriculture, Soil Conservation Service. The westernmost soil association is the Heyder-Kingsley-Hayden Association. Moving to the east, the next soil association is the Hubbard-Nymore Association. The final association is the Zimmerman-Isanti-Lino Association. The Heyder-Kingsley-Hayden Association is present on part of the westernmost edge of Oak Grove in the central area. Characteristics of this association are gently undulating to steep topography. The soils are typically well drained, loamy glacial till. The Hubbard-Nymore Association is more prevalent along the western border and through the center of the City of Oak Grove. This association is characterized as nearly level to gently sloping topography. The soils are excessively drained sandy soils throughout. The Zimmerman-Isanti-Lino Association covers the majority of the City of Oak Grove. The topography of the association is nearly level to undulating. The soils are typified by fine-grained sands that range from excessively drained to somewhat poorly drained to very poorly drained. Soil types are an important factor in determining the amount of runoff that will occur from a particular rainfall. The soil types are numerous, but the soils fall into hydrologic groups of A, B, C or D. The most adept to infiltrate or absorb the rainfall is the A hydrologic group soil. It is not surprising to find that most A soils are primarily sand. In the area of Oak Grove, no hydrologic group C soils are indicated. The D soils found generally corresponded with wetland or marshy areas and are comprised of muck or peat soils.

WATER RESOURCES INVENTORY The City of Oak Grove has several water bodies within or partially contained within the corporate limits. Oak Grove has an extensive inventory of the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources (MNDNR) protected waters and wetlands. All protected watercourses in the City of Oak Grove shown on the Protected Waters Inventory Map for Anoka County, a copy of which is hereby adopted by reference. This inventory is listed in their Shoreland Ordinance. The inventory is repeated below.

PROTECTED WATERS Table 2—Protected Waters Number and Name Section 2-91: George Lake 9,10,15,16 2-92: Grass Lake 10,11,14,15 2-97: Mud Lake 21,22,27,28 2-98: Swan Lake 25 2-105: Mud Lake 6,7,1,12 2-106: Norris Lake 6,1 2-104: Rogers Lake 6,1,31,36

Township 33 33 33 33 33 33 32, 33

Range 24 24 24 24 24, 25 24, 25 24, 25

From Township 34 34 34

Range 24 23 25

Table 3—Protected Watercourses Name Rum River* Cedar Creek Seelye Brook*

Section 29 28 26

Section 12 6 8

To Township 31 32 33

Range 25 24 24

*The Rum River is designated as a Scenic River and Seelye Brook is classified as a designated tributary of the Rum River. All lands within the Rum River Scenic Land Use District adjacent to these rivers shall also be regulated by provisions of Article IX – Scenic River Regulations of the City of Oak Grove’s Code of Ordinances and amendments thereto and any other applicable ordinance provision, whichever is more restrictive.

Table 4—Protected Wetlands Number 2-94: Unnamed 2-95: Unnamed 2-96: Hickey Lake 2-99: Unnamed 2-276: Unnamed 2-285: Unnamed 2-293: Unnamed 2-346: Unnamed 2-348: Unnamed 2-352: Unnamed 2-356: Unnamed 2-357: Unnamed 2-358: Unnamed 2-362: Unnamed 2-367: Unnamed 2-369: Unnamed 2-371: Unnamed 2-375: Unnamed 2-376: Unnamed 2-383: Unnamed 2-384: Unnamed 2-385: Unnamed 2-386: Unnamed 2-387: Unnamed 2-749: Unnamed 2-388: Unnamed 2-225: Unnamed

Section 17, 20 20 20, 21, 28 30 6 7, 18 19 4 3, 10 1, 12 9 4, 9 NW 9 15 16, 21 29 29, 32 32 25, 36 4 3 3 3 36 36 1, 36 1, 36

From Township 33 33 33 33 33 33 33 33 33 33 33 33 33 33 33 33 33 33 33 33 33 33 33 33 33 32, 33 33, 34

Range 24 24 24 24 24 24 24 24 24 24 24 24 24 24 24 24 24 24 24 24 24 24 24 24 24 24 24

With the exception of Hickey Lake, the MNDNR lists each of the above named lakes as a protected water. Hickey Lake is listed as a protected wetland by MNDNR. MNDNR Protected Waters and Wetlands Map is included as Exhibit 4—Protected Waters and Wetlands. Exhibit 5—National Wetlands Inventory Map illustrates the National Wetlands Inventory (NWI) within the boundaries of Oak Grove. The labeling on the NWI is partially explained in the following:

R-Riverine

Table 5—National Wetland Inventory Labeling Guide System Subsystem Class

2-Lower Perennial

UB-Unconsolidated Bottom

Sub-class

1. Cobble-Gravel 3. Mud 2. Sand 4. Organic

RB-Rock Bottom

L-Lacustrine

1-Limnetic

P-Palustrine

2-Littoral

1. Bedrock 2. Rubble 1. Cobble-Gravel 3. Mud UB-Unconsolidated Bottom 2. Sand 4. Organic 1. Algal 4. Floating Vascular AB-Aquatic Bed 2. Aquatic Moss 5. Unknown Submergent 3. Rooted Vascular 6. Unknown Surface OW-Open Water (unknown bottom) RS-Rocky Shore 1. Bedrock 2. Rubble 1. Cobble-Gravel 4. Organic US-Unconsolidated Shore 2. Sand 5. Vegetated 3. Mud EM-Emergent 2. Nonpersistent RB-Rock Bottom 1. Bedrock 2. Rubble 1. Cobble-Gravel 3. Mud UB-Unconsolidated Bottom 2. Sand 4. Organic 1. Algal 4. Floating Vascular AB-Aquatic Bed 2. Aquatic Moss 5. Unknown Submergent 3. Rooted Vascular 6. Unknown Surface 1. Cobble-Gravel 4. Organic US-Unconsolidated Shore 2. Sand 5. Vegetated 3. Mud ML-Moss Lichen 1. Moss 2. Lichen EM-Emergent 1. Persistent 2. Nonpersistent 1. Broad-Leaved Deciduous 5. Dead 2. Needle-Leaved Deciduous 6. Deciduous SS-Scrub-Shrub 3. Broad-Leaved Evergreen 7. Evergreen 4. Needle-Leaved Evergreen 1. Broad-Leaved Deciduous 5. Dead 2. Needle-Leaved Deciduous 6.Deciduous FO-Forested 3. Broad-Leaved Evergreen 7. Evergreen 4. Needle-Leaved Evergreen OW-Open Water (unknown bottom)

As an example, a map symbol of L1UBH is a Laustrine, Limnetic with an Unconsolidated Bottom. The H at the end is a ‘modifier’ indicating the wetland is permanently flooded. The map symbol is for Lake George. All NWI maps have a legend that provides all the possible designations along with numerous modifiers.

WATER QUALITY Water quality for the various water bodies has been documented to varying degrees over the past several years by different agencies. The Metropolitan Council, Minnesota Pollution Control Agency, Minnesota Department of Natural Resources, Anoka Conservation District have all performed some of the monitoring and water quality documentation over the years. Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) implementation plans are a valuable source of information for solutions and projects to help address the TMDLs. Several water bodies within the City of Oak Grove are on the MPCA’s impaired water list. IMPAIRED WATERS Waterbody Rum River – Seelye Brook to Cedar Creek Rum River – Stanchfield Creek to Seelye Brook Cedar Creek – Headwaters to Rum River Seelye Brook – Headwaters to Rum River Mahoney Brook – T33 R24W S34, South Line to Cedar Creek Lake George

Pollutant or Stressor Mercury in Fish Tissue Mercury in Fish Tissue E. Coli E. Coli Fish Bioassessment Mercury in Fish Tissue

Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) studies for all impairments noted above, aside from Mahoney Brook, have been completed.

LAND USE The City of Oak Grove was incorporated in 1993. Prior to that time, the township was an agricultural area with some lake area development for cabins. As the metropolitan area expanded, Oak Grove began developing as a rural residential community. The development occurred as 2.5-acre parcels for the large rural residential lots with other areas developing 5 acre and larger lots as ‘hobby farms’. The current view of the Oak Grove City Council is to continue to develop as a rural residential area with a few notable exceptions throughout the City. The Ponds, located northeast of the intersection of Lake George Boulevard and 221st Avenue and bordered by the City of St. Francis to the north, is a Planned Urban Development (PUD) surrounding a golf course. The lot sizes for this development are typical of an urban residential development. This planned unit development originated as a settlement of an attempted detachment and annexation action brought by the developer of the project. Exhibit 6—Zoning Map shows the current zoning map for the City of Oak Grove.

UTILITIES Much of the early residential growth in Oak Grove was lake cabins around Lake George. As with many lakes, the cabins were set too close together and many of the septic systems failed. Due to the close proximity, new septic systems could not be constructed. Eventually, the City of Oak Grove (a township at the time) constructed community septic systems with collection systems. One system is referred to as the West Lake George System and the other is the Northeast System. In order to meet stringent Minnesota Pollution Control Agency discharge limits for the discharge of nitrogen to the groundwater, a pretreatment system and drain field was added to the community septic system. To comply with the State Disposal Permit issued in 2005, the City of Oak Grove constructed facilities to transport sewage from the 15

Northeast Collection System to the West Lake George Wastewater Treatment System for pretreatment and disposal. As part of a Lake George redevelopment, a senior citizen complex and a number of new single-family residential lots were added to the community septic system. A production well, ground storage reservoir and pumping station were constructed in 2004 to provide potable water and firefighting capability to the new lots and senior citizen complex. For The Ponds development, the City of Oak Grove purchases potable water from the neighboring City of St. Francis. Oak Grove is responsible for operating and maintaining The Ponds distribution system. The agreement for water service from the City of St. Francis is a joint powers agreement between the two cities. Wastewater from The Ponds development is collected and treated by a city-owned system. Earlier this year the City entered into a joint powers agreement with the City of St. Francis to accept and treat wastewater from The Ponds. By yearâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;s end, Oak Grove will construct a sanitary sewer line to convey wastewater from the existing Ponds wastewater treatment facility to St. Francisâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;s conveyance system. The City of Oak Grove will then start the process of decommissioning the wastewater treatment facility. No decisions have been made on the future use of the 20-acre wastewater treatment facility once decommissioned. The City of Oak Grove is served with electricity by Connexus. CenterPoint Energy serves most of the City with natural gas. Comcast is the cable television company that provides service to the more densely populated area of Oak Grove. Century Link provides the telephone service to the Oak Grove area.

CHAPTER 3 –MODELING, MONITORING AND ANALYSIS GENERAL Hydrology is the occurrence of precipitation, infiltration, runoff, evaporation, and transpiration. For developing the City’s local Water Management Plan, hydrology relates rainfall and/or snowmelt to runoff flow rates. Runoff rates were determined in order to analyze the hydraulics of Oak Grove’s drainage system. The City’s drainage system includes natural drainage ways, county ditches, roadside ditches, swales, ponds, culverts, rivers, lakes, etc. Past studies have analyzed the City’s drainage system through the use of computerized modeling with input including soil classification, land use, precipitation and hydraulic conditions. Problem areas were identified through modeling analysis, review of past reports and studies, discussions with the City’s staff and field investigation of the system conditions.

MODELING The City of Oak Grove is located entirely within the Upper Rum River Watershed. The Watershed has not designated a standard hydrologic model to be used. Technical Release 20 is a methodology developed by the Natural Resources Conservation Service (formerly the Soil Conservation Service) and is commonly referred to as TR-20. The TR-20 is a computerization of the National Engineering Handbook, Section 4 Hydrology. This program uses land use and soil type to relate the amount of rainfall runoff. Time parameters are used to determine flow rates at various points in time relative to the start of the rainfall. TR-20 is also capable of “routing” or combining the flows with substantial hydraulic data input to the model. The most common hydrology program in use in the Upper Midwest is TR-20. Many people talk about a hydrology modeling software called HydroCAD. The hydrology program or methodology in the HydroCAD program is TR-20. Enhancements by the software developers improve the ease of use of the TR-20 and add some hydraulic design capabilities. The analysis summary is as follows: • •

Minor Storm Major Storm

10-year frequency, 24-hour, MSE 3 Intensity distribution 100-year frequency, 24-hour, MSE 3 Intensity distribution

DRAINAGE SYSTEM ANALYSIS RESULTS The model assembled for the City of Oak Grove covers the entire area of Oak Grove with a few small exceptions at the perimeter. In many places, the model includes areas from bordering communities. This is common, as drainage areas seldom correspond with jurisdictional boundaries. In addition, major drainage ways enter Oak Grove from East Bethel, St. Francis and Andover. The model does not include the hydrology for flows entering Oak Grove from county ditches or the three main waterways; Rum River, Cedar Creek or Seelye Brook. As modeling information becomes available for neighboring municipalities from the URRWMO, the City will be able to refine their stormwater runoff model with this information. 21

The most current regulatory baseline for flood levels and flood flows has been published for the Rum River and Cedar Creek in the Flood Insurance Study (FIS) for the County of Anoka, Minnesota, and Incorporated Areas, December 2015. As a City, Oak Grove has used these flow rates to determine their Flood Insurance Rates and will consider them to be the authority until another study is conducted and the rates are modified. The table below presents the peak rates of the Rum River and Cedar Creek for the 10-year and the 100-year flood frequency. Table 6—Peak Flow Rates for Rum River and Cedar Creek Water Course Name 10-year Event Cedar Creek at the Rum River 529 cfs Cedar Creek at the East Bethel Border 454 cfs Rum River at the Cedar Creek Confluence 8,300 cfs Rum River at the Seelye Brook Confluence 8,080 cfs

100-year Event 1,160 cfs 900 cfs 14,000 cfs 13,600 cfs

The FIS also delineates the floodplains for the Rum River and Cedar Creek. The floodplain boundaries are shown on the Zoning Map (Exhibit 6—Zoning Map) for informational purposes. The maps provided with the FIS should be used for detailed information on the floodplain boundaries. In some cases, site topography is needed to determine whether a property is improperly included or excluded from the floodplain. The hydrologic system is illustrated on Exhibit 7—Sub-basin Delineation Map and Exhibit 8— Flow Chart. The larger basins that Oak Grove is part of include the Ford Brook Basin, the Seelye Brook Basin, the Cedar Creek Basin and the Rum River Basin. Ford Brook Ford Brook flows through Nowthen and discharges to the Rum River in Andover. Oak Grove has six subbasins that are in the Ford Brook basin. Sub-basins 101,102, 105 and 106 drain to lakes that are partially in Oak Grove. Basin 103 drains to a low area that does not appear to discharge with the runoff from a 100year, 24-hour storm. Sub-basin 104 drains via a ditch to Nowthen. Seelye Brook Seelye Brook discharges to the Rum River in the northwest corner of Oak Grove. About 1.2 square miles are included in the Seelye Brook Basin. The runoff from the sub-basin drains to the Seelye Brook along both sides of the brook. Rum River Most of the City of Oak Grove is included in the Rum River Basin. Several of the sub-basins are selfcontained during a 100-year, 24-hour storm. The wetlands or low areas provide adequate storage to hold the runoff. Sub-basins 305, 307, 309, 311, 312, 314, 315, 317, 319-21, 323, 325, and 326 were found to be non-discharging for the 100-year, 24-hour rainfall event. The flow diagram on Exhibit 8—Flow Chart continues to show how the self-contained sub-basins would discharge if they reach an outflow elevation. County Ditch 18 enters the City of Oak Grove from St. Francis into Sub-basin 301. County Ditch 18 continues through Sub-basin 301 to the Rum River. County Ditch 19 enters the City of Oak Grove from St. Francis as well. This enters Sub-basin 304 and continues through a circuitous route to the Rum River. It traverses Sub-basins 304, 318, 322, and 316. 22

Each of these sub-basins obviously drains via County Ditch 19. Sub-basin 306 drains to County Ditch 19 through Sub-basin 304 and Sub-basin 324 drains to the ditch where the ditch is adjacent to the sub-basin in Sub-basin 322. Sub-basins 302, 303 and 310 drain to Lake George. If Lake George is below the outflow elevation of 902; County Ditch 19 may flow into the lake. For the purposes of the model, Lake George is considered to be at overflow at the start of the rainfall event. When Lake George overflows; it drains to County Ditch 19, which discharges to the Rum River. Cedar Creek Cedar Creek discharges to the Rum River in Andover just south of the border with Oak Grove. Cedar Creek extends through Oak Grove and into East Bethel. Again, several of the delineated sub-basins in the Cedar Creek Basin do not discharge during a 100-year, 24-hour storm event. These are Sub-basins 404-7, 414, and 418. Sub-basins 410, 402 and 403 are along the course of Cedar Creek. Sub-basin 401 drains through Sub-basin 402 to Cedar Creek. Sub-basins 408, 409, 411, and 412 drain to Cedar Creek where the creek is adjacent to the sub-basins within Sub-basin 10. Sub-basin 413 drains via County Ditch 48 through Sub-basin 412. A channel that appears to be a west branch of County Ditch 48 enters Sub-basin 412 from Andover. In addition, Mahoney Brook enters Sub-basin 411 from Andover and continues to Cedar Creek. A few of the sub-basins in the Cedar Creek Basin discharge from Oak Grove to the neighboring communities. Sub-basin 415 discharges to Andover and reaches County Ditch 71. County Ditch 71, in turn discharges as Mahoney Brook back into Oak Grove. Sub-basins 416 and 417 cause a slight discharge into East Bethel. The low areas in each of these sub-basins may hold the runoff, but the low area spans the common border with East Bethel. If not, the flow reaches Cedar Creek and, again flows through Oak Grove.

ASSESSMENT OF PROBLEMS AND CORRECTIVE ACTIONS Past modeling of the hydrology of Oak Grove has not identified any problem areas. No public input was received at the annual public informational hearing held for the Cityâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;s Municipal Separate Storm Sewer Systems (MS4) Phase II annual report. The City also made a reasonable effort to reach out to local residents during the original drafting of the Local Surface Water Management Plan in 2000 and received little or no feedback at that time. The City Staff was consulted during the preparation of this plan and no problems were determined to exist in the surface water systems in the City of Oak Grove.

MONITORING The City of Oak Grove does not have a water quality monitoring plan or program in place. The City supports the efforts of the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources, Metropolitan Council, Minnesota Pollution Control Agency and the Anoka County Conservation District in monitoring the water quality of various water bodies in and around the Oak Grove area. A printout of the STORET water quality data for the water bodies in the City of Oak Grove is available upon request from MSA. Water quality monitoring will continue to be performed by those agencies and groups that have taken charge of those operations in the past. 23

The URRWMO has a cooperative agreement with the Anoka Conservation District (ACD) to a conduct water resources monitoring program that track trends in water quality over time within the watershed. Monitoring is focused on water quality in both lakes and streams in order to detect any changes or problems that might require corrective measures. The URRWMO coordinates with ACD to update the monitoring plan annually as necessary. Results of the historical monitoring efforts are available on the URRWMO website: http://www.urrwmo.org/monitoring The URRWMO has outlined a monitoring plan for major recreational bodies of water throughout the Watershed. Lake George and the Rum River have been designated as bodies of water in the City of Oak Grove that have high water quality and monitoring will be implemented to ensure that the water quality does not deteriorate. The City of Oak Grove has outlined these standards in the following section under Objective 3.

CHAPTER 4 –OBJECTIVES AND POLICIES GENERAL The objectives for Local Water Management Plans are required elements in the State Statutes. Recommended policies were determined to help develop the Oak Grove Water Management Plan. The objectives and policies were compiled from various sources, including the Upper Rum River Watershed Management Organization (URRWMO) 4th Generation Plan and the published policies of other communities in the general area of Oak Grove.

OAK GROVE’S GOAL The City of Oak Grove has maintained the natural drainage patterns throughout most of its development. The City’s goal is to foster continued optimum use of that natural drainage system while enhancing the overall water quality. The intent is to prevent flooding while using identified best management practices to enhance surface water quality with minimal capital expenditures by the City. The URRWMO is the official repository for water quality data for the watershed. Water quality data developed in the City of Oak Grove should be forwarded to the WMO. Erosion and sediment control are addressed in the City ordinance. The City of Oak Grove requires the submission and implementation of erosion and sediment control plans for land disturbances of one acre or more. These plans must comply with the MPCA’s General Stormwater Permit for Construction Activity permit requirements, Erosion Control Ordinance and the “Protecting Water Quality in Urban Areas”. The Oak Grove goal includes objectives and policies within the categories of Water Quantity and Quality, Groundwater Augmentation, Recreation, Fish and Wildlife, and Regulations. Objectives and Policies for those objectives follow below:

WATER QUANTITY AND QUALITY Objective 1: systems.

Protect, preserve and use natural surface and groundwater storage and retention

Policy 1.1: Establish 100-year flood levels based on critical storm events using NOAA Atlas-14 data. Policy 1.2: Prohibit encroachment that will reduce the capacity of floodplain and allow only uses permitted within the floodplain district to the extent that they are not prohibited by any other ordinance and provided they do not require structures, fill or storage of materials or equipment. Policy 1.3: Preserve the retention capacities of the present drainage systems. Policy 1.4: The City of Oak Grove is the local administrator of the Wetland Conservation Act (WCA). Alterations of wetlands are discouraged. Alteration may only be allowed on an individual basis 28

if the alteration can be accomplished within the regulations of all federal, state and local agencies that have jurisdiction over the particular wetland. Objective 2: problems.

Minimize public capital expenditures needed to correct flooding and water quality

Policy 2.1: All developments are required to show their impact on the hydrology of their sub-basin and must construct, or participate in a regional solution, to offset any adverse impact the development creates. At minimum, the following shall be submitted to the City for their review prior to issuance of a grading permit: • •

• •

•

Hydrologic modeling must indicate no increase in discharge rates from the 2-, 10- and 100-year rain events. The permanent stormwater management system must be designed such that the pre- and postproject runoff rate and volume from the 1- and 2-year, 24-hour precipitation events remains unchanged. In no case shall the development or redevelopment discharge more than 5.66 cfs per acre of surface area of the pond. All newly constructed storm water management ponds that are constructed as part of private development, shall be placed in drainage and utility easements dedicated to the City of Oak Grove. Skimmers, submerged outlets, or other devices in the construction of new pond outlets and the addition of skimmers to existing systems must be provided whenever feasible and practical. The designs shall provide for skimmers that extend a minimum of 4 inches below the water surface and minimize the velocities of water passing under the skimmer to less than 0.5 feet per second for 100-year rainfall events. Treatment of storm water to NURP guidelines is required prior to storm water discharge to a lake, stream, or wetland and prior to discharge from the site as part of development. The NURP guidelines for the design of storm water treatment basins are as follows: a. A permanent pool ("dead storage") volume below the principal spillway (normal outlet) which shall be greater than or equal to the runoff from a 2.5-inch storm over the entire contributing drainage area assuming full development. In no case should the dead storage be less than 1800 cubic feet of storage below the outlet pipe for each acre that drains to the basin. b. A permanent pool average depth (basin volume/basin area) which shall be > 3 feet, with a maximum depth of < 10 feet. c. An emergency spillway (emergency outlet) adequate to control the one percent frequency/critical duration rainfall event. d. Basin side slopes above the normal water level shall be no steeper than 4:1, and preferably flatter. A basin shelf with a minimum width of 10 feet and 1 foot deep below the normal water level is recommended to enhance wildlife habitat, reduce potential safety hazards, and improve access for long-term maintenance. e. To prevent short-circuiting, the distance between major inlets and the normal outlet shall be maximized. 29

A flood pool ("live storage") volume above the principal spillway shall be adequate so that the peak discharge rates from the 99% (1-year), 10% (10-year), and 1% (100-year) chance critical duration storms are no greater than pre-development watershed conditions. g. Reduction of peak discharges for the more frequent storms can be achieved through a principal spillway design that may include a perforated vertical riser, small orifice retention outlet, or compound weir.

Policy 2.2: Major storm water facilities shall be designed for the 100-year critical rainfall event. Policy 2.3: All minor drainage system analysis and design shall be based on the 10-year rainfall event. Policy 2.4: All hydrologic studies and drainage design shall be based on the ultimate development of the entire tributary area. Policy 2.5: New lateral ditches shall not be allowed to drain to Group I waters directly. They shall flow to wet detention ponds with other ‘best management practices’ prior to discharge. Policy 2.6: The lowest floor elevation of all development, including basements, shall be required to be at least 1 foot above the 100-year high water level or regional flood level for the adjacent water or wetland. Policy 2.7: Review and, if necessary, update erosion and sediment control ordinances to help ensure measures are similar to those of the MPCA Best Management Practices (BMPs) Policy 2.8

Review and, if necessary, update erosion and sediment control ordinances that require plans for land disturbance activities of one acre or more in size to conform to the general criteria set outlined in the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency "Protecting Water Quality in Urban Areas", Erosion Control Ordinance, and the NPDES Construction Site permit.

Policy 2.9

Review and, if necessary, update post-construction stormwater management ordinances to be compliant with all applicable Federal, State, and local standards.

Policy 2.10 Require the use of either the 24-hr NOAA Atlas-14 data averaged for the URRWMO (Table 23 within the URRWMO 4th Generation Plan) or the NRCS published countywide data for Anoka County, whichever is greater. Policy 2.11 Consider adopting stormwater standards more closely aligned with the MPCA’s Minimal Impact Design Standards (MIDS) or other green infrastructure practices. Policy 2.12 Prohibit illegal connections to the City’s storm water conveyance system. Objective 3:

Identify and plan for means to effectively protect and improve surface water quality.

Policy 3.1: Treat and/or control runoff to enhance water quality in order to reverse the upward trends in pollutants, especially nutrient and sediment loads.

Policy 3.2: Actively develop and implement a community education program relating to preserving and improving water quality. Policy 3.3: All construction plans developed for the improvement of water quality shall include a detailed plan for the maintenance access and a maintenance plan. Policy 3.4: Regional detention areas shall be utilized whenever possible to remove sediment and nutrients from runoff. Group II wetlands may be used if they are not identified to be protected. Policy 3.5: Review and, if necessary update illicit discharge ordinance and policy. Policy 3.6: Remain an active participant in the Upper Rum River Watershed Management Organization (URRWMO) and comply with the 2019-2028 4th Generation Watershed Management Plan. Policy 3.7: Consider the completion of a Subwatershed Assessment Study (SWAS) for one of Oak Groveâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;s water bodies. Objective 4: Establish more uniform local and official controls for surface and groundwater management. Policy 4.1: Anoka County is responsible for the maintenance of all County and Judicial ditches within the corporate boundaries of the City of Oak Grove. Oak Grove is responsible for the maintenance of other municipal ditches. Policy 4.2: The Minnesota Department of Natural Resources and the United States Army Corps of Engineers have regulatory authority relating to waters and wetlands identified on their respective inventories. Policy 4.3: The City is responsible for establishing and implementing a permitting program for all activities relating to drainage, wetlands, erosion control and water resources management. Policy 4.4: This Plan and all subsequent amendments shall be consistent with all other regulatory agencies. Policy 4.5: Review and, if necessary, update shoreland ordinance to ensure compliance with Minnesota Rules, Chapter 6120.2500 through 6120.3900. Policy 4.6: Review and, if necessary, update floodplain ordinance to ensure compliance with Minnesota Rules, Chapter 6120.5000. Policy 4.7

This Plan shall be amended as necessary to remain current.

Objective 5:

Prevent Erosion of soil into surface water systems.

Policy 5.1: All erosion and sediment control measures specified in the erosion control plan must be in place prior to the start of grading operations. Policy 5.2: Temporary sediment basins shall be constructed in areas of new development to prevent sediment from leaving the construction area. Policy 5.3: Grading areas shall be protected from runoff to reduce erosion. Policy 5.4: Streets and property adjacent to construction areas shall be kept free from sediment carried by construction traffic. Policy 5.5: The City shall maintain a street sweeping program to minimize sediment entering the drainage system. Policy 5.6: Establishment of temporary and permanent vegetation shall be required to minimize the time that a graded area remains in an exposed condition. Policy 5.7: Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plans (SWPPP) shall be required for all land disturbance activities. The erosion control plans shall be consistent with the criteria established the MPCA’s General Stormwater Permit for Construction Activity permit requirements, Erosion Control Ordinance and the “Protecting Water Quality in Urban Areas” Policy 5.8: All existing storm drain inlets and conveyance systems shall be adequately protected from sedimentation. Policy 5.9: Natural vegetation shall be preserved to the greatest practical extent. Policy 5.10 All construction activities adjacent to a wetland described in Table 7 shall include an unmowed native vegetation buffer strip. The minimum width of the buffer strip shall not exceed the widths indicated in Table 8 for the respective wetland type. Policy 5.11 Wetland excavations shall not be permitted if the following conditions exist: • • • • • •

• • •

Excavation in sedge meadow wetlands. Excavation in forested wetlands. Excavation in bogs. Excavations in wetlands identified as Natural Heritage Communities by the Minnesota County Biological Survey. Excavations in wetlands deemed natural community, supporting ecologically sensitive flora and fauna, based on field visit by the Soil and Water Conservation District. Excavations which do not provide diversity to the wetland basin or complex (e.g. excavation in the fringe of a type 3, 4, and 5 wetland with standing open water throughout much of the growing season). Wetlands which support a wide variety of plant species (i.e. approximately 50% of the area supports species which individually comprise <5% of the wetland). Wetlands that score high on the MnRAM vegetative diversity criteria. Excavations for the purpose of creating aesthetic reflecting pools. 32

Table 7— Wetland Classification High Priority Wetlands

Description

Targeted Wetland Functions

MnRAM Category

Water Quality Treatment

Downstream water quality protection Maintenance of wetland water quality

Wildlife Habitat

Vegetative diversity / integrity Maintenance of characteristic wildlife habitat structure Maintenance of characteristic amphibian habitat

Wetlands that highly perform one of the two target wetland functions (water quality treatment or wildlife habitat).

MnRAM Score is “high” for at least one of these two MnRAM categories AND

MNRAM Score is “exceptional” or “high” for one or more of these three MnRAM Categories

Moderate Priority Wetlands Wetlands that do not highly perform either of the two target wetland functions (water quality treatment or wildlife habitat).

Minor Priority Wetlands Wetlands created for stormwater management. These wetlands usually need periodic maintenance.

Use Wetlands Wetlands created for stormwater management. These wetlands usually need periodic maintenance.

Does not score “exceptional” or “high” for any of these MnRAM categories

Wetlands created for stormwater management. MnRAM scores are irrelevant.

MnRAM Score is “high” for at least one of these two MnRAM categories OR

MNRAM Score is “exceptional” or “high” for one or more of these MnRAM Categories

Policy 5.12 Review and, if necessary, revise the wetland buffer standards to comply with URRWMO’s updated standards. Their Technical Advisory Committee (TAC) has been tasked with revising wetland buffer standards. Policy 5.13 Require design, installation and inspection of individual sewage treatment systems in compliance with Minnesota Rules Chapter 7080. Policy 5.14 Annually inspect 20% of all storm water treatment basins, all stormwater outfalls, and sump catch basin/manholes.

Table 8â&#x20AC;&#x201D;Summary of Buffer Widths Wetland Class

Minimum Buffer

High Priority Wetlands Moderate Priority Wetlands Minor Priority Wetlands Use Wetlands

Structure Setbacks

Sequencing and Avoidance

50 ft

No impacts allowed without demonstrating significant public benefit.

20 ft

30 ft

WCA sequencing applies.

15 ft

30 ft

WCA sequencing applies.

10 ft

15 ft

WCA sequencing applies.

25 ft

Wetland Replacement Ratios

Excavation

Minnesota Wetland Conservation Act (WCA) ratios apply

All excavations>0.5 acres regulated per text

GROUNDWATER AUGMENTATION Objective 6:

Promote groundwater recharge.

Policy 6.1: The Minnesota Stormwater Manualâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;s Better Site Design shall be used as the guide, to the greatest extent feasible, for new development within the City. Open areas within all proposed development shall maximize infiltration wherever possible. Policy 6.2: Infiltration shall be the second preference for groundwater augmentation in addition the Better Site Design. The use of grassed waterways shall be encouraged where practical to maximize infiltration. Policy 6.3

Biofiltration, filtration, wetland treatment system, extended detention basins or NURP ponds shall be utilized, in no particular order of preference, to facilitate groundwater augmentation.

Policy 6.4: Anoka County shall be recognized as the lead agency regarding groundwater controls.

RECREATION, FISH AND WILDLIFE Objective 7:

Protect and enhance fish and wildlife habitat and water recreational facilities.

Policy 7.1: Coordinate with the county and municipalities to enhance water-based recreation. Policy 7.2: Maintain buffer zones of natural vegetation around ponds and wetlands as much as possible. Policy 7.3: Coordinate with the Department of Natural Resources to protect rare and endangered species. Policy 7.4: Coordinate with the Department of Natural Resources to enhance fish and wildlife habitats. 34

REGULATION AND IMPLEMENTATION Objective 8: Secure the other benefits associated with the proper management of surface and groundwater. Policy 8.1: The City of Oak Grove shall prepare and submit an annual status report to the URRWMO by June 1 of each year reviewing the status of their local plans, the status of the implementation of their plans, and a review of the implementation of the policies that are outlined in the URRWMO 4th Generation plan. The City shall follow the template set forth by the URRWMO. Policy 8.2

The programs and standards of this plan shall be implemented.

Policy 8.3: This plan and all subsequent amendments shall be consistent with the regulatory agencies. The regulatory agencies shall include, but not be limited to URRWMO, Anoka County, Minnesota Department of Natural Resources, U. S. Army Corps of Engineers, U. S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Minnesota Pollution Control Agency and U. S. Environmental Protection Agency. Policy 8.4: The City of Oak Grove shall support the policies of the URRWMO as published in the July 9, 2019 URRWMO 4th Generation Watershed Management Plan.

CHAPTER 5 –MANAGEMENT PLAN GENERAL Oak Grove has worked to both decrease the runoff problems and to reduce the pollutant loads of sediment and nutrients from developing areas. The community is developing as rural residential with lot sizes no less than 2 acres and generally in the range of 2.5 acres and larger. Research by the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency indicates that the soil loss from agricultural properties is very low compared to most other land uses with the exception of forests and undisturbed grasslands. Rural residential development also provides for little soil loss once the area is fully developed and established. During the construction period for development improvements and during the construction of the individual home sites, the soil loss can be as much as 20 times that of the agricultural uses that previously existed. In general, terms, the conversion of agricultural use to rural residential use will result in no increase, or a reduction in storm water runoff rates and volumes. The conversion of wooded areas must be looked at closely to determine the impact of the development. Maintaining the majority of the trees in the development process will help to maintain the predevelopment runoff rates.

IDENTIFICATION OF PROBLEM AREAS Problem areas were identified by several methods during the preparation of the local water management plan. Little or no public input is received at previous annual public informational hearing held for the City’s Municipal Separate Storm Sewer Systems (MS4) Phase II annual report. The City also made a reasonable effort to reach out to local residents during the original drafting of the Local Surface Water Management Plan and received little or no feedback at that time. Rural Residential development within the City should not significantly change the hydrology of the area. Conversion of tilled agricultural property with very low-density residential development can actually reduce the amount of rainfall that will run off as surface water. The hydrologic curve number for a woods grass combination in fair condition and A soils is 43. Rural residential areas with densities of 2 acres per residence and A soils have a curve number of 46. The same area, as tilled property, would have a curve number from the upper 50’s to the lower 70’s. The higher the curve number, the greater the ratio of runoff to infiltration of the rainfall.

WATER QUALITY AND QUANTITY MANAGEMENT The greatest threat to the surface water resources in Oak Grove is the erosion and downstream sedimentation from sites under development construction. Agricultural activities appear to provide a substantial source of sediment. The Minnesota Pollution Control Agency has collected data from the Minnesota River Valley and developing areas. Their conclusions are that the agricultural contribution to the pollutant load in the Minnesota River is not the most significant source. The City of Oak Grove has required that projects comply with the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System General Stormwater Permit for Construction Activities requirements. As required by the URRWMO 4th Generation Plan, Oak Grove has implemented and subsequently updated an Erosion and Sediment Control Ordinance.

The development of property for rural residential lots does not increase rates or volumes of runoff in the Oak Grove area within the present zoning controls. Concerns with the drainage design of each development are the protection of the new homes from groundwater and surface water flooding. Maintaining the natural runoff retention capabilities without degrading the surface or groundwater quality is also a concern. The City of Oak Grove reviews each proposed development with these concerns in mind. The Watershed Plan prevents the discharge of any surface water to a Group I wetland or water directly from any property that is developed. The management strategy in Oak Grove will continue to be implemented on a project-by-project basis. Each development will need to provide ponding or other acceptable best management practices for permanent erosion and sediment control in compliance with the Erosion and Sediment Control Ordinance. Another serious threat to surface water quality is aquatic species such as Purple Loosestrife, Eurasian Water Milfoil, Curly Leaf and Pond Weed. In effort to control these invasive species, the City of Oak Grove has passed a resolution establishing a Lake Improvement District (LID) for Lake George. The LID has been granted the authority to undertake the following activities to promote water quality in Lake George: • •

• • •

Acquire property, equipment or other facilities to improve navigation Undertake research to determine the condition and development of Lake George and the water entering it and to transmit the results of the studies to the MPCA and other interested authorities; Develop and implement a comprehensive plan to eliminate or reduce water pollution; Conduct a program of water improvement and conservation Make cooperative agreements with government agencies to effectuate water and related land resource programs.

Chemical spills also present a threat of surface water degradation but are considered minimal as compared to erosion and sediment discharge and invasive species infestation. Though the threat is minimal, the result can be equally as damaging to water quality of the surface water. The City of Oak Grove encourages businesses to implement a Spill Prevention, Control and Countermeasures Plan (SPCC Plan) in accordance with Minnesota Statute 115E and Federal Oil Pollution Act 33USCA Sec. 2701-2761 if they use, distribute or transport chemicals within the City. At minimum, the City requires plans to include the following steps if a spill occurs: • • • • •

Observe the safety precautions associated with the spilled material. Stop the source of the spill, if you can do so safely. Call 911 if fire or public safety hazards are created. Contain the spilled material. Dirt, sand, or any semi-impermeable material may be used to create a containment structure to prevent the material from flowing. Report the spill to the Minnesota Duty Officer at (651) 649-5451 or (800) 422-0798 any time, day or night.

Clean up the spilled material and dispose of the wastes properly. With the exception of used oil, waste generated from petroleum spills that have been reported and cleaned up immediately are exempt from Minnesota’s Hazardous Waste Rules. Waste generated from used oil spills must be sent to a facility for energy recovery.

HYDROLOGY The hydrologic model for the City of Oak Grove uses TR-20. The City of Oak Grove will require the use of TR-55, TR-20 or HydroCAD for the calculation of flow rates and volumes for land use changes. Any land development will be required to compare the pre-developed runoff rates and volumes to the proposed developed conditions. The volumes are critical for the design of the temporary and permanent erosion and sediment control facilities. In addition, the volumes are necessary to determine the flood stage protection elevations for habitable structures in the development. Calculation of a peak flow rate for the design of a particular drainage structure may use the ‘rational formula’. These include culverts or drainage swales and other facilities.

FLOOD PROTECTION Oak Grove will continue to manage their designated floodplains within the floodplain ordinance regulations. The Ordinance will be updated from time-to-time to stay current with the National Flood Insurance Program as administered by the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources. In Oak Grove, both the Rum River and Cedar Creek have detailed flood profiles developed through the Anoka County Flood Insurance Study. Floodplains are shown on County Ditch 18, 19, 48, 71, Seelye Brook and Mahoney Brook. Each of these floodplains is not based on detailed study. The difference is that the detailed study areas have flood elevations published on the Flood Insurance Rate Map. The areas that do not have a detailed study do not have a published flood elevation. In addition to the flood elevations provided by the Flood Insurance Study, Exhibit 9—Storm Pond Map shows the stormwater ponds in Oak Grove with the 100-year high water elevations as submitted during the plat review process. Other ponds may exist with flood elevations established.

GROUNDWATER MANAGEMENT The City of Oak Grove previously adopted a Groundwater Protection Ordinance. In the management of the surface runoff, the City of Oak Grove promotes the natural storage of rainfall runoff in the wetlands and depressions that are prevalent throughout the City. Many of the sub-basins do not drain to a watercourse or drainage way. These areas dissipate the runoff through infiltration and evaporation. Minnesota has a net excess rainfall, thus, a majority of the water infiltrates to groundwater. It is also a practice of the City of Oak Grove to require use of best management practices in the development improvements within the City. This helps to assure that the water that is infiltrating to the groundwater is of a quality that will not degrade the quality of the groundwater.

MAINTENANCE Exhibit 9—Storm Pond Map has set forth a maintenance schedule for the City of Oak Grove. These maintenance activities have been addressed in the City’s Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan. The following is a summary of maintenance activities that specifically promote surface water quality management.

Street Sweeping The City annually sweeps to remove sediment and debris from their streets. With the exception of a limited number of developments, the majority of the City’s street sections are rural. The roadside ditches utilized in the rural street sections provide additional adequate treatment. Developments that drain directly to a high use water body and/or high quality wetlands without pretreatment of stormwater runoff will be swept on a bi-annual basis. At this time, the City does not have any such developments. Facility Inspection According to the City of Oak Grove’s SWPPP, the City will inspect 20% of the outfalls, sediment basins, and ponds each year. The goal is to operate and maintain the City of Oak Grove’s stormwater system in a manner that reduces the discharge of pollutants to the maximum extent possible. Inspections will be documented and will be included in the annual report to the URRWMO. The structural pollution control devices, such as trap manholes, grit chambers, sumps, floatable skimmers and traps, separators, and other small settling or filtering devices shall be inspected on an annual basis.

RECREATION, OPEN SPACE AND WILDLIFE MANAGEMENT Oak Grove is the site of several County and City parks. Many of these parks are intended to remain as natural areas. The County-owned parks include Lake George Regional Park, Rum River Central Regional Park and Hillcrest Acres. The City parks are too numerous to list and are included in the City of Oak Grove Comprehensive Plan. Oak Grove’s comprehensive plan shows the City continuing to grow primarily as a rural residential area. The lot density is expected to range from one residence in 2.5 acres to large acreages.

FINANCIAL CONSIDERATIONS Minnesota Statute 103B calls for the Watershed Plans to be updated on an interval of 5 to 10 years. As the Watershed Plans are updated, the local surface water management plans will also need updating. The recently approved URRWMO 4th Generation Watershed Management Plan commits the City to a number of local surface water management projects including: 1. Completion of the URRWMO annual activity reporting form. 2. Active participation on URRWMO Board and a member of the TAC. 3. Review and updating local ordinances. 4. Preparation of an inventory of drainage structures located along major open channel drainage systems that convey continuous flow. 5. Complete Stormwater BMP Assessment per URRWMO requirements. 6. Participate and support URRWMO watershed projects, including: a. Lake George Improvement Project b. Rum River Riverbank Stabilization c. Other Subwatershed Assessment Study (SWAS) projects located in Oak Grove As projects are identified, the City of Oak Grove should amend this Local Surface Water Management Plan to include the project scope, schedule, and costs. The City of Oak Grove will either set aside funds each year for future projects and updates or budget the cost one year prior to the activity occurring. 39

40 37

CHAPTER 6 –IMPLEMENTATION GENERAL The Upper Rum River Watershed Management Organization (URRWMO) requires member communities include an implementation plan in the local water management plan. The City of Oak Grove has developed the implementation plan to meet the requirements of the Watershed Plan, the Minnesota Statute 103B, and the Minnesota Rules Chapter 8410. The implementation plan includes recommended administrative and amendment processes, the recommended regulation changes, recommended capital improvement programs, and potential methods of financing the plan. The plan priorities are included in Section 5 where the management strategy and recommended Capital Improvement Plan projects are detailed.

ADMINISTRATIVE PROCESS Once the Oak Grove Local Surface Water Management Plan is approved by URRWMO, the City shall adopt the Local Water Management Plan. All required local controls are in place to comply with URRWMO plan requirements. As new URRWMO or other regulatory requirements are implemented, the City will work to implement them in within six months of adoption.

IMPLEMENTATION PRIORITIES Prior Oak Grove Local Surface Water Management Plans (LSWMP) focused on implementing URRWMO plan requirements. Past URRWMO Plan requirements included studying the watershed to identify impairments to prioritize action items as well as establishing/updating local ordinances, controls, and standards. Within their current plan, efforts are now shifting to supporting the implementation of projects within the watershed to improve water quality. The City of Oak Grove’s priorities in this LSWMP are intended to align with the URRWMO’s July 9, 2019 4th Generation Watershed Management Plan. 1. Funding: Funding is necessary to take on actions at the levels required by the URRWMO. 2. Water Quality: Sampling programs by the WMO have suggested trends of increasing Total Phosphorus concentrations. Findings from the Rum River WRAPS has identified that Lake George and the Rum River as short and long term priorities (respectively) for water quality improvement. Lake George has strong evidence for declining water quality trends. The Rum River has a high value for fishing and recreational activities, is classified as a state wild & scenic recreational river. 3. Water Resources Inventory: The location, condition, and function of constructed stormwater management practices within the watershed are not documented in any way currently useful for planning. 4. Shoreline Protection: Erosion and sedimentation occurs on some streams in the City; notably the Rum River itself.

IMPLEMENTATION PROGRAM Surface water system improvements will be reviewed with the annual budget process. With the completion and the approval of the July 9, 2019 URRWMO’s 4th Generation Watershed Management Plan, the City will begin the implementation of the Plan. The URRWMO is responsible for developing and managing a capital improvement program (CIP), which includes the development and implementation of capital projects to address water quality, flooding, and other issues within the watershed. Their plan has projects that were identified primarily by the ACD, with the understanding that the URRWMO will contribute a portion of the funding required for implementation and assist in finding grants for the remaining costs. Grant matching money will be saved annually by the URRWMO, and dispersed as individual projects move forward. Two of the three projects are located in the City of Oak Grove; one to benefit Lake George the other for the Rum River. Lake George Past monitoring in Lake George has revealed declining water quality trends. Within the ten-year planning cycle, the URRWMO plan is to reduce watershed TP loading by 20lbs, so as to dampen the effects of wet years, which have 25% higher TP loadings and the poorest water quality. The City of Oak Grove supports URRWMO Lake George improvements efforts, will partake with their Technical Advisory Committee (TAC) to determine the scope of the Lake George Improvement project, and will actively participate in the design, construction, and any necessary subsequent city maintenance. The project prioritization is still ongoing at this time, but possible projects will include: • • • • •

Iron enhanced sand bench within the Lake George Regional Park Replace/repair Ditch 19 weir Numerous lakeshore restorations Wetland restorations, primarily north of the lake. Prevent increases in stormwater inflow to the lake by: o Requiring retention of stormwater in new developments o Keeping landlocked areas landlocked. o Consider MIDS or similar stormwater standards within the lake’s watershed o Ensure culverts are replaced with culverts of the same size and elevation o Minimize ditch cleaning that enhances water delivery to the lake.

Upon URRWMO project selection, the City of Oak Grove will amend this LSWMP to include the prioritized project in order to assist grant-funding efforts. The amended plan will describe the project, the measureable goals to be achieved, the estimated total project cost, outside funding sources, and the project partners. Rum River Riverbank Stabilization Portions of the Rum River are experiencing significant bank erosion, which leads to reduced water quality. Some bank erosion is natural, but healthy levels of erosion are relatively slow and on a small scale in stable river system. Erosion can be accelerated by a variety of factors and result in higher sediment loads within the stream. ACD conducted a streambank inventory in 2017 and another in 2018 to identify sites with high levels of erosion, and soliciting interest from private landowners to participate in future projects. In addition, erosion sites on public lands will be identified for the future for project development. Within their ten-year planning cycle, the URRWMO will install riverbank stabilization projects achieving 180 42

tons/yr of suspended solids reduction and 250 lbs/yr total phosphorus reduction. The City of Oak Grove supports URRWMO Rum River improvements efforts, will partake with their Technical Advisory Committee (TAC) to determine the scope of the Rum River Improvement project, and will actively participate in the design, construction, and any necessary subsequent city maintenance. Upon URRWMO project selection, the City of Oak Grove will amend this LSWMP to include the prioritized project in order to assist grant-funding efforts. The amended plan will describe the project, the measureable goals to be achieved, the estimated total project cost, outside funding sources, and the project partners. Plan Implementation includes: 1. Provide feedback to the URRWMO on their annual activity reporting form. 2. Active participation in URRWMO TAC. 3. Review and update their local ordinances in 2020. 4. Prepare an inventory of all drainage structures located along major open channel drainage systems that convey continuous flow per URRWMO requirements in 2021. 5. Complete Stormwater BMP Assessment per URRWMO requirements. 6. Participate and support URRWMO watershed projects, including: a. Lake George Improvement Project b. Rum River Riverbank Stabilization c. Other Subwatershed Assessment Study (SWAS) projects located in Oak Grove

STRATEGIES AND IMPLEMENTATION SCHEDULE Implementation Program Components This plan is geared toward actively participating and complying with the URRWMOâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;s 4th Generation Watershed Management Plan. The URRWMO created an implementation schedule to provide clarity of each required implementation activity: a strategy description, the responsible parties (e.g. URRWMO, Member Communities, or ACD), and timeframe for completion. Each activity is tied to one (or more) of the URRWMO goal statements, and was designed to be measureable. This allows the URRWMO to regularly assess their process towards each goal, identify success-stories and problems, and keep the organization on a defined timeline. Each strategy was assigned an ID, which is cross-referenced within the 10-year Implementation Budget to more adequately assess the costs associated with each activity. URRWMOâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;s Table 5-3 provides a list of all the proposed strategies and an implementation schedule for the URRWMO within the 2019-2028 planning cycle. That table was copied and inserted into this plan as Table 9.

THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK

Watershed Management Plan Upper Rum River WMO

Chapter 5 – Implementation Plan July 2019 Table 9: URRWMO 2019 – 2028 Strategies and Implementation Schedule (July 9, 2019 4th Generation Plan)

A: Water Quantity and Floodplain Management

Goal

Location

Strategy Type

Strategy Description

Time-line to reach goal

100% compliance

2020

Annual reports from communities documenting the volume of floodplain fill and compensatory storage.

100% compliance

Annually

2020

Annually

2026

Measurement Method

Goal/Target

A.1

Communities

Ordinance

Establish a uniform minimum runoff control standard for new development and redevelopment that incorporates current stand federal standards. Maintaining postdevelopment 2-, 10-, and 100-yr peak Minimum runoff control standard runoff rates at predevelopment levels. developed for the URRWMO & integrated into the approved Regulations table Review of local rate control and infiltration (Appendix D). Annual reports from requirements to confirm compliance with communities indicating ordinance URRWMO. If needed, the URRWMO Board compliance. will authorize the Watershed Coordinator to complete a review of updated ordinances to confirm they comply with the URRWMO’s Standards.

A.2

Communities

Inventory

Documentation of development projects that impact floodplains.

Review of local floodplain management ordinances to confirm compliance with federal, state and local standards. If needed, the URRWMO Board will authorize Annual reports from communities indicating the Watershed Coordinator to complete a ordinance compliance. review of updated ordinances to confirm they comply with the URRWMO’s Standards.

100% compliance

A.2

Communities

Ordinance

A.3

Watershed wide

Review

Prohibit new discharges from land locked basins unless an engineering study is completed to evaluate the effects of the outlet and design to mitigate impacts.

Annual report from the WMO documenting review process, discussion and decisions.

100% compliance

A.4 (B.5)

Communities

Inventory

Complete a physical inspection of all BMPs and identify deficiencies and potential retrofits.

Reports from each community identifying BMP locations, condition and potential improvements.

100% compliance

URRWMO

Goal Area

Community

Responsible Party

Interim 10-yr Mile-stone

Strategy ID †

Watershed Management Plan Upper Rum River WMO

Chapter 5 – Implementation Plan July 2019 Table 9: URRWMO 2019 – 2028 Strategies and Implementation Schedule (July 9, 2019 4th Generation Plan)

Goal

B.1 & B.2

Location

Communities

Strategy Type

Ordinance

Strategy Description

Measurement Method

Review of post-development stormwater treatment ordinances to confirm compliance with federal, state and local standards. If needed, the URRWMO Board Annual reports from communities indicating will authorize the Watershed Coordinator to ordinance compliance. complete a review of updated ordinances to confirm they comply with the URRWMO’s Standards. Annual review of water quality sampling to detect trends of increasing/decreasing water quality

B: Water Quality

B.3 & H.4

Watershed wide

Sampling

Goal/Target

100% compliance

Community

Goal Area

URRWMO

Responsible Party Time-line to reach goal

2020

Interim 10-yr Mile-stone

Strategy ID †

Annually

Review TP concentration in Lake George towards WRAPS goal

WRAPS Goal: TP=22.5µg/L

20 years

TP <24 µg/L

Review TP concentration in Pickerel Lake towards WRAPS goal

WRAPS Goal: TP=17.8µg/L

30 years

TP < 23 µg/L

WRAPS Goal: TP=18.7µg/L

20 years

TP= 20 µg/L

WRAPS Goal: TP=28.3 µg/L

WRAPS Goal: Geo Mean: 126/100 ml Individual 1,260/100 ml

35 years

Exceedance < 25%

>10 years

Measured decrease in TP

Review TP concentration in East Twin Lake Fund ongoing water quality sampling within towards WRAPS goal the watershed through partnership with ACD. Review TP concentration in Minard Lake towards WRAPS goal Review E.Coli concentration in East Twin Lake towards WRAPS goal

WRAPS Goal: Keep MSHA Review MSHA and TP concentration in Rum average scores at “good" River towards WRAPS goal rating. Reduce TP to fall below standard.

Watershed Management Plan Upper Rum River WMO

Chapter 5 – Implementation Plan July 2019 Table 9: URRWMO 2019 – 2028 Strategies and Implementation Schedule (July 9, 2019 4th Generation Plan)

Goal

Location

Strategy Type

Strategy Description

Measurement Method

Goal/Target

Time-line to reach goal

Interim 10-yr Mile-stone

Strategy ID †

10 years

Complete 1 project. Start a 2nd project

10 years

Complete 1 project. Start a 2nd project

10 years

Complete 1 project. Start a 2nd project

URRWMO

Goal Area

Community

Responsible Party

Provide funding for 2+ projects within 10-year planning period.

B.3

Lake George

Best Management Practices

B: Water Quality (continued) B.3 & F.1

Rum River

Best Management Practices

Partner and fund a portion of water quality Reduce watershed TP loading projects identified by ACD to improve water by 20 lbs (9%). Any new Annual report from ACD indicating progress. quality. development that drains directly to Lake George will Project description outlining TP load Note that the TAC will prioritize project require pre- and postreductions for each implemented project. selection (Lake George, Rum River bank development TP and runoff stabilization, projects identified within a volume and rates to be the SWAS). same. (refer to Lake George Qater Quality Improvement Asessment report)

Partner and fund a portion of bank stabilization projects along the Rum River. ACD completed a stream bank inventory in 2017 & 2018 to identify potential sites and Annual report from ACD indicating progress. interested private landowners. Potential to complete projects on public property as Project description outlining TSS and TP well. load reductions for each implemented project. Note that the TAC will prioritize project selection (Lake George, Rum River bank stabilization, projects identified within a SWAS). Partner and fund an urban stormwater retrofit project that provides water quality benefits to the Rum River.

B.3

Rum River/St. Francis

Best Management Practices

Annual report from partner agency/community indicating progress.

TAC will recommend the project(s) based on SWAS and amend this plan with specific Project description outlining TSS and TP details to allow for grant funding. If load reductions for each implemented additional SWAS's are completed, the TAC project. will incorporate new projects into consideration for prioritization.

Provide funding for 2+ projects within 10-year planning period Install riverbank stabilizations achieving 180 tons/yr of suspended solids reduction and 250 lbs/yr phosphorus reduction. 25 project sites have been identified (refer to 2018 ACD riverbank inventory guidance document).

Provide funding for 2+ projects within 10-year planning period. Install projects reducing TP by at least 3 lbs/yr and TSS by 500 lbs/yr.

Watershed Management Plan Upper Rum River WMO

Chapter 5 – Implementation Plan July 2019 Table 9: URRWMO 2019 – 2028 Strategies and Implementation Schedule (July 9, 2019 4th Generation Plan)

Goal

Location

Strategy Type

Strategy Description

Measurement Method

B.4

Watershed wide

Review

Review goals within WRAPS report, identify successful/under performing projects, and water quality sampling data. Revise WRAPS strategies based on progress.

At least 2 URRWMO board meetings focused on WRAPS progress towards goals. Participate in at least 50% of WRAPS meetings with partnering agencies.

B.5 (A.4)

Communities

Inventory

Complete a physical inspection of all BMPs and identify deficiencies and potential retrofits.

Reports from each community identifying BMP locations, condition and potential improvements.

100% compliance

C.1

Communities

Ordinance

Require member communities to enforce regulatory controls for new development and redevelopment construction projects.

Annual reports from communities indicating ordinance compliance.

100% compliance

C.2

URRWMO

Ordinance

TAC will meet to discuss and revise wetland Meeting minutes from TAC meeting and buffer standards. Standards will be revised standards documents. distributed to member communities.

B: Water Quality (continued)

Goal/Target

Revised strategies by 2022

Community

Goal Area

URRWMO

Responsible Party

Time-line to reach goal

Interim 10-yr Mile-stone

Strategy ID †

5 years

2026

2020

100% compliance

2020

Annual reports from communities indicating ordinance compliance. One URRWMO meeting that includes a presentation of all wellhead protection plans within the URRWMO and their major components as an educational exercise.

100% compliance

2020

100% compliance

2021

Inventory 100% complete

2022

C: Wetlands

D: Groundwater

D.1

Communities

Ordinance

Require member communities to review (and enforce) wellhead protection plans and infiltration standards.

E.1

Watershed wide

Review

Consider reassigning the jurisdiction over the county ditches within the watershed.

One URRWMO meeting that discusses current policies in regards to ditches and consider potential improvements.

E.2

Watershed wide

Inventory

Provide funding for watershed culvert inventory. Coordinate with ACD to ensure consistent data collection methodology.

Inventory completion.

E: Drainage Systems x

Watershed Management Plan Upper Rum River WMO

Chapter 5 – Implementation Plan July 2019 Table 9: URRWMO 2019 – 2028 Strategies and Implementation Schedule (July 9, 2019 4th Generation Plan)

Goal

F.1 & B.3

Location

Rum River

Strategy Type

Best Management Practices

Strategy Description

Partner and fund a portion of bank stabilization projects along the Rum River. ACD is completed a stream bank inventory in 2017 & 2018 to identify potential sites and interested private landowners. Potential to complete projects on public property as well.

Measurement Method

Goal/Target

Annual report from ACD indicating progress.

Provide funding for 2 projects within 10-year planning period

Annual reports from communities indicating compliance.

100% compliance

Community

Goal Area

URRWMO

Responsible Party

Time-line to reach goal

Interim 10-yr Mile-stone

Strategy ID †

10 years

Complete 1 project. Start a 2nd project

Note that the TAC will prioritize project selection (Lake George, Rum River bank stabilization, projects identified within a SWAS).

F: Reduce Erosion

F.2

Communities

Ordinance

Review of local erosion control ordinances to confirm compliance with federal, state and local standards. If needed, the URRWMO Board will authorize the Watershed Coordinator to complete a review of updated ordinances to confirm they comply with the URRWMO’s Standards.

100% compliance

G.1

URRWMO

Education

Update URRWMO website to include education materials on the prevention and control of aquatic and invasive species. Website updated. Materials provided by the Anoka County Parks Aquatic Invasive Species Prevention Program.

G.2

Communities

Ordinance

Review of local shoreland management ordinances to confirm compliance with federal, state and local standards.

G: Protect and Enhance Fish and Wildlife Habitat

All Goals

URRWMO

Administrative

H.1

Communities

Review

H.2

URRWMO

Grant Applications

Annual reports from communities indicating compliance.

Hire a Watershed Management Coordinator handle daily operations of the URRWMO Staff member hired and to represent the Board to municipalities, agencies and other water resource management entities.

H: Commission Operations and Programming

Staff member hired

Review of annual budget and funding from member communities.

Meeting minutes from annual meeting addressing the URRWMO budget, 10-year plan goals, and funding needs.

Annual meeting with revised budget to reach 10-year plan goals.

Proactively research grant funding opportunities to support URRWMO projects.

Grant application and URRWMO annual reports.

Five grant applications within 10-year planning period

2020

Annually

2028

Watershed Management Plan Upper Rum River WMO

Chapter 5 – Implementation Plan July 2019 Table 9: URRWMO 2019 – 2028 Strategies and Implementation Schedule (July 9, 2019 4th Generation Plan)

Goal

Location

Strategy Type

H.3

URRWMO

Education

Promote investment within the watershed by encouraging members of the public and Meeting attendance records. appointed officials from communities to attend URRWMO meetings.

H.3

URRWMO

Education

Update (overhaul) the URRWMO website to keep up with current technology and Website updated. security measures.

H.4 & B.3

Watershed wide

Sampling

Fund ongoing water quality sampling within Annual report from ACD on sampling. the watershed through partnership with Revise sampling schedule annually. ACD.

H: Commission Operations and Programming (continued) All Goals

H.1, A.1, A.2, A.3, A.4, B.1, B.2, B.3, B.4, B.5, C.2, D.1, E.2, F.1, F.2

Communities

URRWMO

Strategy Description

Measurement Method

Review

Each member city is required to prepare a local water management plan that conforms with the URRWMO Plan. The URRWMO will then review and, if appropriate, approve each local water management plan.

Review

Coordinate regular TAC meetings to review status of watershed planning efforts, Meeting minutes from gatherings, specifically as it relates to ordinance published on the URRWMO website. updates & compliance, proposed project selection, and assessment towards water quality goals.

Annual reports from communities status of plan review and status of approval with URRWMO.

Time-line to reach goal

2028

2020

Provide annual funding for sampling.

Annually

7-13

100% compliance

2020

At least one meeting annually, with additional meetings scheduled early on within the planning period (2019-2021) to accomplish specific tasks listed in Section 5.1.3

Annually

URRWMO

Goal Area

Community

Responsible Party

20% of URRWMO meeting attendees are not members of the board

100% compliance

Goal/Target

Interim 10-yr Mile-stone

Strategy ID †

†Some strategies appear twice within the table, and the ID is duplicated. These strategies were deemed to be of high importance to several goal areas, and therefore were repeated for emphasis. *Some services might be contracted to ACD or other qualified consultant by the URRWMO to fulfill this responsibility.

Implementation Program Budgets URRWMO’s Table 5-4 provides a comprehensive list of the projects, activities, and programs that comprise the URRWMO implementation program. That table was copied and inserted into this plan as Table 10. Each of the strategies listed within the previous Table 9 are cross-referenced to the budget to visualize how funds are allocated. Any annual activities were assigned a 2.5% inflation increase per year to account for rising project costs. Three (3) different projects were identified throughout the URRWMO planning process: Lake George Water Quality Projects, Rum River Bank Stabilization Projects and the St. Francis Stormwater BMP Retrofits. The URRWMO is committed to supporting these efforts by allocating a portion of its annual funds for grant matching. Many grant applications require that the grantee “match” a portion of the funds that the grant provides. By offering grant matching money, the URRWMO will improve the likelihood of a project receiving grant dollars. However, since the timing of the grant applications are unknown, the URRWMO decided to start saving a set amount each year. All of the estimated grant matching amounts for the aforementioned three projects were summed and divided over the 10-year planning cycle. This allows the URRWMO to save over time, and grant matching funds will be available as applications are submitted. In addition, if an implementation activity is completed under budget, the WMO will apply those remaining funds to address the next priority issue/project.

THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK

Watershed Management Plan Upper Rum River WMO

Chapter 5 – Implementation Plan July 2019

Table 10: URRWMO 2019 – 2028 Implementation Program and Budget (July 9, 2019 4th Generation Plan) 2019 Strategy ID

2021

2022

2023

2024

2025

2026

2027

2028

Annual Financial Report

(8)

$640

$656

$672

$689

$706

$724

$742

$761

$780

$799

Annual Report for BWSR

(16)

$1,280

$1,312

$1,345

$1,378

$1,413

$1,448

$1,484

$1,522

$1,560

$1,599

Each community committed to documenting local activities.

Facilitate Regular URRWMO Meetings

(40)

$3,200

$3,280

$3,362

$3,446

$3,532

$3,621

$3,711

$3,804

$3,899

$3,996

Assumed 4 hours for Coordinator to organize 10 meetings per year.

WMO

Watershed Management Coordinator 19, 21, 32

Semi-Annual TAC Cost for 2019 are based mee ng‡

Variable. See notes.

$3,200

$9,000

$6,560

$18,450

$6,724

$18,911

$1,723

$4,846

$1,766

$4,967

$1,810

$5,091

$1,856

$5,219

$1,902

$5,349

$1,949

$5,483

$1,998

on estimated hours at a rate of $80/hr Review Local Water Management Plans

(96)

Grant Applications

(45)

$3,600

$3,690

$3,782

$3,877

$3,974

$4,073

$4,175

$4,279

$4,386

$4,496

Misc. Administrative Activities

(20)

$1,600

$1,640

$1,681

$1,723

$1,766

$1,810

$1,856

$1,902

$1,949

$1,998

$2,300

$2,358

$2,416

$2,477

$2,539

$2,602

$2,667

$2,734

$2,802

$2,872

Annual Programs

Watershed Insurance

$7,872

24, 30

$1,200

$1,230

$1,261

$1,292

$1,325

$1,358

$1,392

$1,426

$1,462

$1,499

Public Education & Outreach, Contracted to ACD

$1,000

$1,025

$1,051

$1,077

$1,104

$1,131

$1,160

$1,189

$1,218

$1,249

$7,500

$800

$820

$841

$862

$883

$905

$928

$951

$975

$999

Website Maintenance and Updates

Next 10-year plan update

Assuming 2.5% inflation increase per year for annual activities. Assuming 20 hours for Coordinator to organize each of the meeting and $750 per $5,620 community per meeting. Assuming two TAC meetings in 2019, four meetings in 2020 and 2021, and one meeting per year for 2022-2028.

Assuming one (1) grant application per year.

Insurance dividends received annually should be placed in an account for future audits and watershed plan updates. Each audit is estimated to be approximately $1000.

Secretarial Services

7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, Water Quality Monitoring 13

Assuming 16 hours per community.

Audit in 2020 and 2025

Notes on budget items†

WMO

Description

2, 4, 18, 20, 27, 29

2020

Estimated hr/year

Reference Section 5.1.2 for more details on the Monitoring plan and funding schedule. $800 for annual maintenance with assumed 2.5% inflation increase per year.

$50,000

Watershed Management Plan Upper Rum River WMO

Chapter 5 – Implementation Plan July 2019

Table 10: URRWMO 2019 – 2028 Implementation Program and Budget (July 9, 2019 4th Generation Plan) 2019

Inventories/ Assessments

Projects

Strategy ID

Description

Estimated hr/year

Lake George water quality project

Rum River bank stabilization project

Projects from Adopted Subwatershed Assessment Studies (SWAS) (e.g. St. Francis Stormwater Retrofit)

Watershed Culvert Inventory

Stormwater BMP assessments

1, 3, 6, 23, 25

Subwatershed Assessment Studies (SWAS) for Waterbodies of Interest

WRAPS Review

Totals for URRWMO and Member Communities

Grant Funding

Assuming one (1) application per year, alternating an applications for a project and an application for a SWAS.

WMO

2021 MC

15,000

WMO

2022 MC

15,375

WMO

2023 MC

15,759

WMO

2024 MC

16,153

WMO

2025 MC

16,557

WMO

2026 MC

16,971

WMO

2027 MC

17,395

WMO

2028 MC

17,830

WMO

Notes on budget items† MC

Money will be used as the local match with principal funding from grants, completing one grant application per year. If grant funding is not secured for one specific year, the funds will be retained by the URRWMO and combined with future years' allocations for three years. If accumulated project funds meet 45K (or other amount determined by the board based on high-ranking projects), the following year(s)' budgets for this item may be reduced to zero. Note that projects will be prioritized and selected by the TAC overtime. If the project cost exceeds grant funding availability, the URRWMO will revise their budgeting appropriately to accommodate.

18,276

Current estimates are based on a 75K project/SWAS study, consisiting of 60K in grant funds with the URRWMO providing a 25% match (15K), and assuming 2.5% inflation increase per year to account for rising costs.

$20,000

Each community committed to completing culvert inventory, in accordance with guidance provided by TAC.

$20,500

$30,000

Municipal Ordinance Review

WMO

2020

$33,114

Assessments shifted to later within the 10-year cycle to assist in budgeting. Each community committed to ordinance review, in accordance with guidance provided by TAC. Assuming five (5) ordinances to review for six (6) communities.

$30,000

$15,375

$16,153

$16,971

Anticipated to apply for grant funding for SWAS in 2020 and complete the SWAS the following year. Current estimates are based on a 60K SWAS study. This cycle will repeat biennially.

$17,830

$3,500

$26,320

$9,000

$52,943 $68,450 $61,385 $39,411 $41,803

$60,000

$61,500

$4,846

$63,038

$62,314

$4,967

$64,613

$43,540 $35,091 $61,412

$66,229

$5,219

$67,884

$45,365

$5,349

$69,582

$64,141

$5,483

$71,321

$97,281 $38,734

$73,104

MC: Member Communities. Dollar amounts listed are cumulative for all communities. Values are only listed if the task is specifically for the URRWMO and not already within normal municipal budgeting. Estimated amounts will not be given to the WMO, but will be in-kind contributions. †Assume 2.5% inﬂa on increase per year for annual ac vi es ‡Technical Advisory Committee (TAC) to meet more frequently between 2019-2021. Activities to include (in no particular order): a) Development of a revised annual report form. Things to be included are details on regulatory activities – development plans (application of rate control, floodplain, wetland regulations, etc.) b) Revised wetland buffer standards c) Land Locked Basin standards (what is required in a report, what constitutes acceptable safeguards for opening a closed depression) d) Culvert inventory (scope, means) e) BMP assessments (scope, report form) f) Municipal ordinance revisions (construction site E/C, post-construction stormwater management, floodplain management, and shoreland zoning). g) Project prioritization and selection from Lake George Management Plan, St. Francis Stormwater Retrofit Analysis, Rum River Field Assessment and future SWAS's. h) Establish future SWAS's. i) Develop standards for local plans. Potentially compare these with the Lower Rum WMO standards.

Historically the City of Oak Grove’s financial contribution to the URRWMO has been 30% of their total budget. URRWMO Member Communities are also responsible for other activities outside the URRWMO’s budget including participation in TAC meetings, culvert inventories, ordinance reviews, BMP assessments, etc. The City of Oak Grove’s Implementation and Program Budget is provided in Table 11. It includes the cost estimates associated with ongoing maintenance activities combined with their participation and costs from the URRWMO’s implementation budget in Table 10. Table 11—Oak Grove 2019 – 2028 Implementation Program and Budget Annual Activity

2019

2020

2021

2022

2023

2024

2025

2026

2027

2028

Funding Source

Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan AcDviDes †

$25,000

$25,625

$26,266

$26,922

$27,595

$28,285

$28,992

$29,717

$30,460

$31,222

Maintenance Funds

URRWMO Annual Programs ‡

$9,400

$14,460

$12,350

$8,630

$8,790

$8,950

$9,120

$9,290

$9,460

$24,640

General Funds

URRWMO Projects ‡

$4,500

$4,620

$4,730

$4,850

$4,970

$5,100

$5,220

$5,350

$5,490

General Funds

Inventory / Assessments ‡

$4,620

$5,900

$5,100

$5,350

Maintenance Funds

Totals for City of Oak Grove

$34,400

$44,585

$47,856

$40,282

$47,135

$42,205

$48,312

$44,227

$20,160

$61,352

†Tasks include public educaWon, street sweeping as well as BMP, ouXall, pond, and stockpile inspection and repair. Assume 2.5% inflation increase per year for annual activities ‡ Budget amount determined by combining City porWon of URRWMO costs with City esWmates for Member Community tasks as identified in Table 10.

AMENDMENT PROCEDURES Normally, the City of Oak Grove will initiate any proposed amendment to the Local Surface Water Management Plan. The process will require the City to acknowledge a needed amendment. Amendments can be required to comply with amendments to the Watershed Plan, to comply with modifications in State Statutes, to comply with revisions in the State Rules, to correct errors in the present plan, or to meet changing needs within the City of Oak Grove. Any amendment will need to be considered by the City of Oak Grove. Upon the consideration of the City Council, any amendment will need to follow the Submittal and Review process described below.

SUBMITTAL AND REVIEW The Minnesota Rules Chapter 8410 and the Watershed Plan dictate the submittal and review process of the Local Water Management Plan. Oak Grove must consider and approve forwarding the Local Plan, or any amendment, to the Watershed for approval. The URRWMO is allowed 60 days to review the Local Plans. Within the 60 days, the URRWMO can approve, deny or request an extension from Oak Grove. If the Watershed fails to approve or deny the Plan within the 60 days and Oak Grove does not approve an extension, the Local Plan is deemed approved. Oak Grove must also forward a copy of the Local Plan to Anoka County and to the Metropolitan Council for review at the same time the Local Plan is submitted to the URRWMO. Anoka County and the Metropolitan Council have 45 days to review and submit comments to the Watershed. Neither the County nor the Metropolitan Council has the authority to deny the Local Plan. Once the Watershed has approved the Local Plan or amendment, by either action or the failure to act within the prescribed period, the City of Oak Grove must adopt the Local Plan or amendment within 120 days. The implementation of any regulatory controls required by the plan, or amendment to the plan, must be implemented within 180 days of the approval by the Watershed.

2040 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN

1 2 3 4 5 Appendix A Appendix B Appendix C Appendix D Appendix E Local Water Supply Plan

Appendix E contains the adopted Local Water Supply Plan for the City of Oak Grove. The plan was approved by the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources on September 6, 2017 and then adopted by the City of Oak Grove on February 2, 2018.

This page intentionally left blank

Water Usage in a Critical Water Deficiency, LMC Model Ordinance League models are thoughtfully developed by our staff for a city’s consideration. Models should be customized as appropriate for an individual city’s circumstances in consultation with the city’s attorney. Helpful background information on this model may be found in “Securing Payment of Utility Charges.”

This icon marks places where the city must customize the model. They offer additional provisions, optional language, or comments for your consideration. The icon, and language you do not wish to include, should be deleted from this model before use. Make other changes, as needed, to customize the model for your city. ORDINANCE NO. _____

AN ORDINANCE REGULATING NONESSENTIAL WATER USAGE UPON CRITICAL WATER DEFICIENCY AS AUTHORIZED BY MINN. STAT. § 103G.291, SUBD. 1 AND 2. This model ordinance was drafted in collaboration with the Minnesota Rural Water Association. Under Minnesota Statute section 103G.291, cities are required to adopt and enforce water conservation restrictions when the governor declares a critical water deficiency. Some cities may already have such restrictions in their water supply plans.

The City Council of _____, Minnesota ordains: SECTION 1. PURPOSE. This ordinance establishes water conservation restrictions; and the plan will be in effect at any time the governor declares by executive order a critical water deficiency, pursuant to Minnesota Statutes section 103G.291. SECTION 2. DEFINITIONS. 2.1 Clerk in statutory cities means the person assigned duties pursuant to Minn. Stat. § 412.151; or the city manager pursuant to Minn. Stat. § 412.601 – 412.751 or in charter cities as determined by city charter. 2.2 Department means the city water department. 2.3 Emergency means the declaration of a critical water deficiency by the governor. 2.4 Irrigation means the watering of shrubs, trees, sod, seeded areas, gardens, lawns, or any other outdoor vegetation, except outdoor vegetation utilized for agricultural purposes. 2.5 Notification to public means notification through local media, including interviews and issuance of news releases.

League of Minnesota Cities Model Ordinance: Water Usage in a Critical Water Deficiency

7/26/2017 Page 1

2.6 Public water supplier means the city or other entity that owns, manages, or operates a public water supply, as defined in Minn. Stat. ยง 144.382, subdivision 4. 2.7 Reclaimed water means water collected from rooftops, paved surfaces, or other collection devices and all water utilized more than once before re-entering the natural water cycle. 2.8 Water recirculation system means any system which enables a user to reuse water at least once prior to returning the water to the natural water cycle. SECTION 3. APPLICATION. 3.1 This ordinance applies to all customers of public water suppliers who own or control water use on any premises. 3.2 No person shall make, cause, use, or permit the use of water received from a public water supply for residential, commercial, industrial, governmental, or any other purpose in any manner contrary to any provision in this ordinance. 3.3 Mandatory emergency conservation measures shall be implemented based upon the declaration of a critical water emergency by the governor. SECTION 4. DECLARATION OF CRITICAL WATER DEFICIENCY. Upon the declaration of a critical water deficiency by the governor, the public water supplier shall immediately post notice of the emergency declaration at the usual meeting place of the city council, or the official city bulletin board. The city shall provide notification to the public as quickly as possible or through established water supply plans emergency response plans or procedures. SECTION 5. MANDATORY EMERGENCY WATER CONSERVATION MEASURES. Upon declaration of a water emergency and notification to the public, the following mandatory restrictions upon nonessential water use shall be enforced: (1) Outdoor irrigation of yards, gardens, golf courses, parklands, and other nonagricultural land, except for those areas irrigated with reclaimed water, is prohibited. (2) Washing or spraying of sidewalks, driveways, parking areas, tennis courts, patios, or other paved areas with water from any pressurized source, including garden hoses, except to alleviate immediate health or safety hazards, is prohibited. (3) The outdoor use of any water-based play apparatus connected to a pressurized source is prohibited. (3) Restaurants and other food service establishments are prohibited from serving water to their customers, unless water is specifically requested by the customer. (5) Operation of outdoor misting systems used to cool public areas is prohibited.

League of Minnesota Cities Model Ordinance: Water Usage in a Critical Water Deficiency

7/26/2017 Page 2

(6) The filling of swimming pools, fountains, spas, or other exterior water features is prohibited. (7) The washing of automobiles, trucks, trailers, and other types of mobile equipment is prohibited, except at facilities equipped with wash water recirculation systems, and for vehicles requiring frequent washing to protect public health, safety, and welfare. SECTION 6. VARIANCES. The City Clerk or their designee, is authorized to grant variances to this ordinance where strict application of its provisions would result in serious hardship to a customer. A variance may be granted only for reasons involving health or safety. An applicant may appeal the denial of a variance within five (5) days of the decision by submitting a written appeal to the City Clerk. The City Council shall hear the appeal at the next City Council meeting. The decision of the City Council is final. SECTION 7. VIOLATION. 7.1 Violations shall be determined and cited by the City Clerk or his/her designee. A violator may appeal the citation within five (5) days of its issuance by submitting a written appeal to the City. The City Council shall hear the appeal at the next City Council meeting. The decision of the City Council is final. Violators may be granted an administrative waiver if evidence is provided that equipment failure was the cause of the violation. A letter from a qualified vendor or equipment invoice will be required to show proof of equipment failure. 7.2 Upon discovery of a first violation, the violator shall be issued, either personally or by mail, a warning letter that sets forth the violation and which shall describe the remedy and fines for future violations. 7.3 Upon subsequent violations at the same location, the violator shall be issued, either personally or by mail, a citation that sets forth the violation and shall describe the remedy. Fines shall be added to the monthly water bill of the owner or current occupant of the premises where the violation occurred. The imposition of the fine shall in no way limit the right of the City to pursue other legal remedies. SECTION 8. ENFORCEMENT. The City Clerk or his/her designee is authorized to designate city employees or law enforcement personnel to enforce the provisions of this ordinance. SECTION 9. SEVERABILITY. If any provision of this ordinance or the application of any provision to a particular situation is held to be invalid by a court of competent jurisdiction, the remaining portions of the ordinance and the application of the ordinance to any other situation shall not be invalidated. SECTION 10. EFFECTIVE DATE. This ordinance becomes effective _____.

League of Minnesota Cities Model Ordinance: Water Usage in a Critical Water Deficiency

7/26/2017 Page 3

The effective date may be â&#x20AC;&#x153;from and after its passage and publicationâ&#x20AC;? or simply choose and insert any date after passage and publication of the ordinance.

Passed by the City Council of _______, Minnesota this _____ day of Month, Year. ___________________ Mayor Attested: ____________________ City Clerk

League of Minnesota Cities Model Ordinance: Water Usage in a Critical Water Deficiency

7/26/2017 Page 4

Local Water Supply Plan Template â&#x20AC;&#x201C;July 8, 2016

Local Water Supply Plan Template Third Generation for 2016-2018 Formerly called Water Emergency & Water Conservation Plan

Local Water Supply Plan Template â&#x20AC;&#x201C;July 8, 2016 Cover photo by Molly Shodeen

For more information on this Water Supply Plan Template, please contact the DNR Division of Ecological and Water Resources at (651) 259-5034 or (651) 259-5100.

This information is available in an alternative format upon request. Equal opportunity to participate in and benefit from programs of the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources is available to all individuals regardless of race, color, creed, religion, national origin, sex, marital status, public assistance status, age, sexual orientation, disability or activity on behalf of a local human rights commission. Discrimination inquiries should be sent to Minnesota DNR, 500 Lafayette Road, St. Paul, MN 55155-4049; or the Equal Opportunity Office, Department of the Interior, Washington, DC 20240.

Local Water Supply Plan Template –July 8, 2016

Table of contents INTRODUCTION TO WATER SUPPLY PLANS (WSP) ..............................................................6 Who needs to complete a Water Supply Plan ...................................................................................... 6 Groundwater Management Areas (GWMA) ......................................................................................... 6 Benefits of completing a WSP .............................................................................................................. 6 WSP Approval Process ......................................................................................................................... 7 PART 1. WATER SUPPLY SYSTEM DESCRIPTION AND EVALUATION .................................9 A.

Analysis of Water Demand ........................................................................................................... 9

Treatment and Storage Capacity ................................................................................................ 11 Treatment and storage capacity versus demand ................................................................12

Water Sources ........................................................................................................................... 12 Limits on Emergency Interconnections...............................................................................13

Future Demand Projections – Key Metropolitan Council Benchmark........................................... 13 Water Use Trends ..............................................................................................................13 Projection Method ..............................................................................................................14

Resource Sustainability .............................................................................................................. 14 Monitoring – Key DNR Benchmark.....................................................................................14 Water Level Data ...............................................................................................................15 Potential Water Supply Issues & Natural Resource Impacts – Key DNR & Metropolitan Council Benchmark ............................................................................................................16 Wellhead Protection (WHP) and Source Water Protection (SWP) Plans ............................19

Capital Improvement Plan (CIP).................................................................................................. 19 Adequacy of Water Supply System ....................................................................................19 Proposed Future Water Sources ........................................................................................20

Part 2. Emergency Preparedness Procedures ..........................................................................22 A.

Federal Emergency Response Plan ............................................................................................. 22

Operational Contingency Plan .................................................................................................... 22

Emergency Response Procedures............................................................................................... 22 Emergency Telephone List ................................................................................................23 3

Local Water Supply Plan Template –July 8, 2016 Current Water Sources and Service Area ..........................................................................23 Procedure for Augmenting Water Supplies ........................................................................23 Allocation and Demand Reduction Procedures .................... Error! Bookmark not defined. Notification Procedures ......................................................................................................27 Enforcement ......................................................................................................................28 PART 3. WATER CONSERVATION PLAN ...............................................................................30 Progress since 2006 ........................................................................................................................... 30 A.

Triggers for Allocation and Demand Reduction Actions .............................................................. 31

Conservation Objectives and Strategies – Key benchmark for DNR ............................................. 32 Objective 1: Reduce Unaccounted (Non-Revenue) Water loss to Less than 10% ..............32 Objective 2: Achieve Less than 75 Residential Gallons per Capita Demand (GPCD) .........34 Objective 3: Achieve at least a 1.5% per year water reduction for Institutional, Industrial, Commercial, and Agricultural GPCD over the next 10 years or a 15% reduction in ten years. .................................................................................................................................35 Objective 4: Achieve a Decreasing Trend in Total Per Capita Demand ..............................36 Objective 5: Reduce Peak Day Demand so that the Ratio of Average Maximum day to the Average Day is less than 2.6..............................................................................................37 Objective 6: Implement a Conservation Water Rate Structure and/or a Uniform Rate Structure with a Water Conservation Program ...................................................................37 Objective 7: Additional strategies to Reduce Water Use and Support Wellhead Protection Planning .............................................................................................................................39 Objective 8: Tracking Success: How will you track or measure success through the next ten years? ................................................................................................................................40

Regulation ................................................................................................................................. 40

Retrofitting Programs ................................................................................................................ 41 Retrofitting Programs .........................................................................................................41

Education and Information Programs ......................................................................................... 42 Proposed Education Programs ..........................................................................................42

Part 4. ITEMS FOR METROPOLITAN AREA COMMUNITIES..................................................46 A.

Water Demand Projections through 2040 .................................................................................. 46 4

Local Water Supply Plan Template –July 8, 2016 B.

Potential Water Supply Issues .................................................................................................... 46

Proposed Alternative Approaches to Meet Extended Water Demand Projections ...................... 46

Value-Added Water Supply Planning Efforts (Optional) .............................................................. 47 Source Water Protection Strategies ...................................................................................47 Technical assistance..........................................................................................................47

GLOSSARY ..............................................................................................................................48 Acronyms and Initialisms ................................................................................................................... 50 APPENDICES TO BE SUBMITTED BY THE WATER SUPPLIER ............................................52 Appendix 1: Well records and maintenance summaries – see Part 1C ............................................... 52 Appendix 2: Water level monitoring plan – see Part 1E ..................................................................... 52 Appendix 3: Water level graphs for each water supply well - see Part 1E ........................................... 52 Appendix 4: Capital Improvement Plan - see Part 1E .......................................................................... 52 Appendix 5: Emergency Telephone List – see Part 2C ........................................................................ 52 Appendix 6: Cooperative Agreements for Emergency Services – see Part 2C ..................................... 52 Appendix 7: Municipal Critical Water Deficiency Ordinance – see Part 2C .......................................... 52 Appendix 8: Graph showing annual per capita water demand for each customer category during the last ten-years – see Part 3 Objective 4 ............................................................................................... 52 Appendix 9: Water Rate Structure – see Part 3 Objective 6 ............................................................... 52 Appendix 10: Adopted or proposed regulations to reduce demand or improve water efficiency – see Part 3 Objective 7 .............................................................................................................................. 52 Appendix 11: Implementation Checklist – summary of all the actions that a community is doing, or proposes to do, including estimated implementation dates – see www.mndnr.gov/watersupplyplans .......................................................................................................................................................... 52

Local Water Supply Plan Template –July 8, 2016

DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES – DIVISION OF ECOLOGICAL AND WATER RESOURCES AND METROPOLITAN COUNCIL INTRODUCTION TO WATER SUPPLY PLANS (WSP) Who needs to complete a Water Supply Plan Public water suppliers serving more than 1,000 people, large private water suppliers in designated Groundwater Management Areas, and all water suppliers in the Twin Cities metropolitan area are required to prepare and submit a water supply plan. The goal of the WSP is to help water suppliers: 1) implement long term water sustainability and conservation measures; and 2) develop critical emergency preparedness measures. Your community needs to know what measures will be implemented in case of a water crisis. A lot of emergencies can be avoided or mitigated if long term sustainability measures are implemented.

Groundwater Management Areas (GWMA) The DNR has designated three areas of the state as Groundwater Management Areas (GWMAs) to focus groundwater management efforts in specific geographies where there is an added risk of overuse or water quality degradation. A plan directing the DNRs actions within each GWMA has been prepared. Although there are no specific additional requirements with respect to the water supply planning for communities within designated GWMAs, communities should be aware of the issues and actions planned if they are within the boundary of one of the GWMAs. The three GWMAs are the North and East Metro GWMA (Twin Cities Metro), the Bonanza Valley GWMA and the Straight River GWMA (near Park Rapids). Additional information and maps are included in the DNR webpage at http://www.dnr.state.mn.us/gwmp/areas.html

Benefits of completing a WSP Completing a WSP using this template, fulfills a water supplier’s statutory obligations under M.S. M.S.103G.291 to complete a water supply plan. For water suppliers in the metropolitan area, the WSP will help local governmental units to fulfill their requirements under M.S. 473.859 to complete a local comprehensive plan. Additional benefits of completing WSP template: · · · · · · ·

The standardized format allows for quicker and easier review and approval. Help water suppliers prepare for droughts and water emergencies. Create eligibility for funding requests to the Minnesota Department of Health (MDH) for the Drinking Water Revolving Fund. Allow water suppliers to submit requests for new wells or expanded capacity of existing wells. Simplify the development of county comprehensive water plans and watershed plans. Fulfill the contingency plan provisions required in the MDH wellhead protection and surface water protection plans. Fulfill the demand reduction requirements of Minnesota Statutes, section 103G.291 subd 3 and 4. 6

Local Water Supply Plan Template –July 8, 2016 ·

· ·

Upon implementation, contribute to maintaining aquifer levels, reducing potential well interference and water use conflicts, and reducing the need to drill new wells or expand system capacity. Enable DNR to compile and analyze water use and conservation data to help guide decisions. Conserve Minnesota’s water resources

If your community needs assistance completing the Water Supply Plan, assistance is available from your area hydrologist or groundwater specialist, the MN Rural Waters Association circuit rider program, or in the metropolitan area from Metropolitan Council staff. Many private consultants are also available.

WSP Approval Process 10 Basic Steps for completing a 10-Year Water Supply Plan 1. Download the DNR/Metropolitan Council Water Supply Plan Template www.mndnr.gov/watersupplyplans 2. Save the document with a file name with this naming convention: WSP_cityname_permitnumber_date.doc. 3. The template is a form that should be completed electronically. 4. Compile the required water use data (Part 1) and emergency procedures information (Part 2) 5. The Water Conservation section (Part 3) may need discussion with the water department, council, or planning commission, if your community does not already have an active water conservation program. 6. Communities in the seven-county Twin Cities metropolitan area should complete all the information discussed in Part 4. The Metropolitan Council has additional guidance information on their webpage http://www.metrocouncil.org/Handbook/Plan-Elements/WaterResources/Water-Supply.aspx. All out-state water suppliers do not need to complete the content addressed in Part 4. 7. Use the Plan instructions and Checklist document to insure all data is complete and attachments are included. This will allow for a quicker approval process. www.mndnr.gov/watersupplyplans 8. Plans should be submitted electronically – no paper documents are required. https://webapps11.dnr.state.mn.us/mpars/public/authentication/login 9. DNR hydrologist will review plans (in cooperation with Metropolitan Council in Metro area) and approve the plan or make recommendations. 10. Once approved, communities should complete a Certification of Adoption form, and send a copy to the DNR.

Local Water Supply Plan Template â&#x20AC;&#x201C;July 8, 2016 Complete Table 1 with information about the public water supply system covered by this WSP. Table 1. General information regarding this WSP

Requested Information DNR Water Appropriation Permit Number(s) Ownership Metropolitan Council Area Street Address City, State, Zip Contact Person Name Title Phone Number MDH Supplier Classification

Description 102044 Public Yes, Anoka County 21210 Old Lake George Boulevard NW Oak Grove, MN 55303 Matt Anderson Water Treatment Plant Operator (763) 286-2479 Municipal

Local Water Supply Plan Template –July 8, 2016

PART 1. WATER SUPPLY SYSTEM DESCRIPTION AND EVALUATION The first step in any water supply analysis is to assess the current status of demand and availability. Information summarized in Part 1 can be used to develop Emergency Preparedness Procedures (Part 2) and the Water Conservation Plan (Part 3). This data is also needed to track progress for water efficiency measures.

A. Analysis of Water Demand Complete Table 2 showing the past 10 years of water demand data. · ·

Some of this information may be in your Wellhead Protection Plan. If you do not have this information, do your best, call your engineer for assistance or if necessary leave blank.

If your customer categories are different than the ones listed in Table 2, please describe the differences below: Commercial, industrial, institutional and wholesale deliveries are not part of Oak Grove’s Water Demand.

Local Water Supply Plan Template –July 8, 2016 Table 2. Historic water demand (see definitions in the glossary after Part 4 of this template) Year

2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 Avg. 20072015

Pop. Served

Total Connections

Residential Water Delivered (MG)

C/I/I Water Delivered (MG)

61 85 88 88 88 88 91 96 114

2 5 6 6 6 6 7 9 15

1.701 2.246 1.757 1.954 2.307 2.412 1.823 2.206 3.121

N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A

2.170

MG – Million Gallons

Water used for Nonessential

0.243 0.212 0.248 0.220 0.181 0.166 0.179

Wholesale Deliveries (MG)

Total Water Delivered (MG)

Total Water Pumped (MG)

Water Supplier Services

Percent Unmetered/ Unaccounted

Average Daily Demand (MGD)

N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A

1.701 2.246 2.000 2.166 2.555 2.632 2.004 2.372 3.300

2.237 2.774 2.497 2.599 2.906 2.910 2.400 2.600 3.400

0.010 0.010 0.010 0.010 0.010 0.010 0.129 0.156 0.177

24.0% 19.0% 19.9% 16.7% 12.1% 9.6% 16.5% 8.8% 2.9%

0.005 0.006 0.006 0.006 0.007 0.007 0.006 0.007 0.010

0.024 0.026 0.020 0.016 0.017 0.018 0.023

2.331

2.700

0.058

30.0%

0.007

0.021

0.207

MGD – Million Gallons per Day

GPCD – Gallons per Capita per Day

See Glossary for definitions

Max. Daily Demand (MGD)

Date of Max. Demand

8/26/2009 7/28/2010 7/15/2011 8/22/2012 8/9/2013 8/20/2014 7/22/2015

Residential Per Capita Demand (GPCD)

Total per capita Demand (GPCD)

76.40 72.39 54.70 60.83 71.82 75.09 54.88 62.96 75.01

100.47 89.41 77.74 80.92 90.47 80.95 72.26 74.20 81.71

67.12

84.20

Local Water Supply Plan Template –July 8, 2016 Complete Table 3 by listing the top 10 water users by volume, from largest to smallest. For each user, include information about the category of use (residential, commercial, industrial, institutional, or wholesale), the amount of water used in gallons per year, the percent of total water delivered, and the status of water conservation measures. Table 3. Large volume users – With the exception of The Oak of Lake George, all other water users are single family homes.

Customer

1 THE OAK OF LAKE GEORGE 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

Use Category (Residential, Industrial, Commercial, Institutional, Wholesale) RESIDENTIAL

Amount Used (Gallons per Year)

Percent of Total Annual Water Delivered

Implementing Water Conservation Measures? (Yes/No/Unknown)

2,000,000

90%

B. Treatment and Storage Capacity Complete Table 4 with a description of where water is treated, the year treatment facilities were constructed, water treatment capacity, the treatment methods (i.e. chemical addition, reverse osmosis, coagulation, sedimentation, etc.) and treatment types used (i.e. fluoridation, softening, chlorination, Fe/MN removal, coagulation, etc.). Also describe the annual amount and method of disposal of treatment residuals. Add rows to the table as needed. Table 4. Water treatment capacity and treatment processes

Treatment Site ID (Plant Name or Well ID)

Year Constructed

Treatment Capacity (GPD)

Treatment Method

Treatment Type

Annual Amount of Residuals

Disposal Process for Residuals

Do You Reclaim Filter Backwash Water?

City of Oak Grove’s West Lake George WTP (on same 0.5 acre site as Well 1 and Well 2) Total

20062007

100 gpm

Pressure Filters

Fe/MN/AS Removal, fluoridation, and chlorination

150,000 gallons of backwash water per year

Adjacent Sanitary Sewer and conveyed to City of Oak Grove’s West Lake George WWTF 800’ south of WTP. WWTF outside the DWSMA.

72,000 gpd

1 1

Local Water Supply Plan Template â&#x20AC;&#x201C;July 8, 2016 Complete Table 5 with information about storage structures. Describe the type (i.e. elevated, ground, etc.), the storage capacity of each type of structure, the year each structure was constructed, and the primary material for each structure. Add rows to the table as needed. Table 5. Storage capacity, as of the end of the last calendar year Structure Name West Lake George Water Storage Tank Total

Type of Storage Structure Ground storage

Year Constructed

Primary Material

2005

Glass Coated Steel

Storage Capacity (Gallons) 45,000

45,000

Treatment and storage capacity versus demand It is recommended that total storage equal or exceed the average daily demand. Discuss the difference between current storage and treatment capacity versus the water supplierâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;s projected average water demand over the next 10 years (see Table 7 for projected water demand): Only three additional residential connections remain. The Average Daily Demand is 10,000 gpd. Storage Capacity is 45,000. Treatment capacity is 100 gpm.

C. Water Sources Complete Table 6 by listing all types of water sources that supply water to the system, including groundwater, surface water, interconnections with other water suppliers, or others. Provide the name of each source (aquifer name, river or lake name, name of interconnecting water supplier) and the Minnesota unique well number or intake ID, as appropriate. Report the year the source was installed or established and the current capacity. Provide information about the depth of all wells. Describe the status of the source (active, inactive, emergency only, retail/wholesale interconnection) and if the source facilities have a dedicated emergency power source. Add rows to the table as needed for each installation. Include copies of well records and maintenance summary for each well that has occurred since your last approved plan in Appendix 1. Table 6. Water sources and status Resource Type (Groundwater, Surface water, Interconnection)

Resource Name

MN Unique Well # or Intake ID

Year Installed

Capacity (Gallons per Minute)

Well Depth (Feet)

Groundwater

Wonewoc Sandstone Quaternary Buried Artesian

784851

2012

150

251

727863

2006

600

180

Groundwater

Status of Normal and Emergency Operations (active, inactive, emergency only, retail/wholesale interconnection)) Active

Emergency Only once Well #2 (784851) placed in operation. Note: There is no wholesale water supply interconnection with St. Francis for this municipal water system.

1 2

Does this Source have a Dedicated Emergency Power Source? (Yes or No)

Yes Yes

Local Water Supply Plan Template â&#x20AC;&#x201C;July 8, 2016 Limits on Emergency Interconnections Discuss any limitations on the use of the water sources (e.g. not to be operated simultaneously, limitations due to blending, aquifer recovery issues etc.) and the use of interconnections, including capacity limits or timing constraints (i.e. only 200 gallons per minute are available from the City of Prior Lake, and it is estimated to take 6 hours to establish the emergency connection). If there are no limitations, list none. Low water levels will automatically engage their Emergency Well. The City also has the ability to manually engage their Emergency Well. Water from this well would enter the water system untreated. It exceeds drinking water standards for arsenic. There are no other emergency connections available to the West Lake George Water System.

D. Future Demand Projections â&#x20AC;&#x201C; Key Metropolitan Council Benchmark Water Use Trends Use the data in Table 2 to describe trends in 1) population served; 2) total per capita water demand; 3) average daily demand; 4) maximum daily demand. Then explain the causes for upward or downward trends. For example, over the ten years has the average daily demand trended up or down? Why is this occurring? 1. Population served: The water system went online in 2007. Since that time the population served has steadily increased. The senior housing facility is full. Only three vacant lots remain. 2. Total per capita water demand: With the exception of the first year of operation, the total per capita water demand has remained relatively consistent over the life of the water system varying between 72 and 90 gpcd. 3. Average daily demand: The average daily demand has increased with population served from 5,000 to 10,000 gallons per day. 4. Maximum daily demand: Over the life of the system the annual maximum daily demand has varied between 35% and 58% of the available storage. Flows have increased as the population has grown. Only three more residential water connections remain. Therefore we anticipate water usage to remain level over the next decade and beyond.

Use the water use trend information discussed above to complete Table 7 with projected annual demand for the next ten years. Communities in the seven-county Twin Cities metropolitan area must also include projections for 2030 and 2040 as part of their local comprehensive planning. Projected demand should be consistent with trends evident in the historical data in Table 2, as discussed above. Projected demand should also reflect state demographer population projections and/or other planning projections.

1 3

Local Water Supply Plan Template –July 8, 2016 Table 7. Projected annual water demand

Year

Projected Total Population

Projected Population Served

2016 8545 114 2017 8558 123 2018 8571 123 2019 8584 123 2020 8600 123 2021 8690 123 2022 8780 123 2023 8870 123 2024 8960 123 2025 9050 123 2030 9500 123 2040 10400 123 GPCD – Gallons per Capita per Day

Projected Total Per Capita Water Demand (GPCD)

Projected Average Daily Demand (MGD) 82 0.010 82 0.011 82 0.011 82 0.011 82 0.011 82 0.011 82 0.011 82 0.011 82 0.011 82 0.011 82 0.011 82 0.011 MGD – Million Gallons per Day

Projected Maximum Daily Demand (MGD)

0.025 0.025 0.025 0.025 0.025 0.025 0.025 0.025 0.025 0.025 0.025 0.025

Projection Method Describe the method used to project water demand, including assumptions for population and business growth and how water conservation and efficiency programs affect projected water demand: There are currently 3 vacant lots that are planned to be served by the water system. The projected population served was estimated by projecting when the remaining connections will be placed into service and adding it to the number of existing persons on municipal water system. The projected per capita water demand of 82 gpcd matches with the average gpcd of the past 8 years. No additional connections for homes or businesses are anticipated. The DNR’s MPARS database reports 1,000 peopled served by the system. It will be corrected to match this plan on the next round of reporting. The Projected Municipal Water Use identified in future updates of the seven-county Twin Cities metropolitan area Master Water Supply Plan should be corrected to more closely align w/ Table 7.

E. Resource Sustainability Monitoring – Key DNR Benchmark Complete Table 8 by inserting information about source water quality and quantity monitoring efforts. List should include all production wells, observation wells, and source water intakes or reservoirs. Add rows to the table as needed. Find information on groundwater level monitoring program at: http://www.dnr.state.mn.us/waters/groundwater_section/obwell/index.html

1 4

Local Water Supply Plan Template –July 8, 2016 Table 8. Information about source water quality and quantity monitoring

MN Unique Well # or Surface Water ID

Type of monitoring point

Monitoring program

Frequency of monitoring

Monitoring Method

784851 (Well 2)

☒ production well ☐ observation well ☐ source water intake ☐ source water reservoir ☒ production well ☐ observation well ☐ source water intake ☐ source water reservoir

☒ routine MDH sampling ☒ routine water utility sampling ☐ other

☐ continuous ☐ hourly ☐ weekly ☒ monthly ☒ quarterly ☒ annually ☐ continuous ☐ hourly ☐ daily ☒ monthly ☐ quarterly ☐ annually

☒ SCADA ☐ grab sampling ☐ steel tape ☐ stream gauge

727863 (Well 1)

☐ routine MDH sampling ☒ routine water utility sampling ☐ other

☒ SCADA ☐ grab sampling ☐ steel tape ☐ stream gauge

Water Level Data A water level monitoring plan that includes monitoring locations and a schedule for water level readings must be submitted as Appendix 2. If one does not already exist, it needs to be prepared and submitted with the WSP. Ideally, all production and observation wells are monitored at least monthly. Complete Table 9 to summarize water level data for each well being monitored. Provide the name of the aquifer and a brief description of how much water levels vary over the season (the difference between the highest and lowest water levels measured during the year) and the long-term trends for each well. If water levels are not measured and recorded on a routine basis, then provide the static water level when each well was constructed and the most recent water level measured during the same season the well was constructed. Also include all water level data taken during any well and pump maintenance. Add rows to the table as needed. Provide water level data graphs for each well in Appendix 3 for the life of the well, or for as many years as water levels have been measured. See DNR website for Date Time Water Level http://www.dnr.state.mn.us/waters/groundwater_section/obwell/waterleveldata.html Table 9. Water level data

Unique Well Number or Well ID

Aquifer Name

Seasonal Variation (Feet)

727863 (Well 1)

Quaternary Buried Artesian

· ·

Water level at time of construction was 890.8 (12/2/2005). Collected water level data indicates the greatest depth was 887.95 on June 2, 2011. The highest water level elevation 892.35 on July 1, 2014. Water level on November 3, 2017 was 891.05.

1 5

Long-term Trend in water level data ☐ Falling ☒ Stable ☐ Rising

Water level measured during well/pumping maintenance N/A See Appendix 3.

Local Water Supply Plan Template –July 8, 2016 Unique Well Number or Well ID

Aquifer Name

Seasonal Variation (Feet)

784851 (Well 2)

Wonewoc Sandstone

· ·

Water level at time of construction was 891 (2/9/2012). No level data available prior to November 1, 2016. Collected water level data indicates the greatest depth was 890.3 on August 1, 2017. The highest recorded water elevation was 891.5 on June 2, 2017. Water level on November 3, 2017 was 891.3.

Long-term Trend in water level data ☐ Falling ☒ Stable ☐ Rising

Water level measured during well/pumping maintenance N/A See Appendix 3.

Potential Water Supply Issues & Natural Resource Impacts – Key DNR & Metropolitan Council Benchmark Complete Table 10 by listing the types of natural resources that are or could be impacted by permitted water withdrawals. If known, provide the name of specific resources that may be impacted. Identify what the greatest risks to the resource are and how the risks are being assessed. Identify any resource protection thresholds – formal or informal – that have been established to identify when actions should be taken to mitigate impacts. Provide information about the potential mitigation actions that may be taken, if a resource protection threshold is crossed. Add additional rows to the table as needed. See glossary at the end of the template for definitions. Some of this baseline data should have been in your earlier water supply plans or county comprehensive water plans. When filling out this table, think of what are the water supply risks, identify the resources, determine the threshold and then determine what your community will do to mitigate the impacts. Your DNR area hydrologist is available to assist with this table. For communities in the seven-county Twin Cities metropolitan area, the Master Water Supply Plan Appendix 1 (Water Supply Profiles, provides information about potential water supply issues and natural resource impacts for your community. Table 10. Natural resource impacts The figure below is from the City’s 2017 Wellhead Protection Plan (WHP). This plan is for Oak Grove’s Municipal Water System that is anticipated to serve 123 persons at full buildout. Lake George is on the only surface water feature noted in Figure 3 of Met Council’s 2015 Statement, within the water systems’s DWSMA. Based upon this information, the

1 6

Local Water Supply Plan Template –July 8, 2016 potential natural resource impacts include Lake George and the underlying aquifers. Lake George water levels are controlled by a DNR Dam so no impacts to wetlands, endangered species, etc. are anticipated. Resource Type

Resource Name

Risk

Risk Assessed Through

☐ River or stream

No River or Streams in Wellhead Protection Area.

☐ Flow/water level decline ☐ Degrading water quality trends and/or MCLs exceeded ☐ Impacts on endangered, threatened, or special concern species habitat or other natural resource impacts ☐ Other: _____ ☐ Flow/water level decline ☐ Degrading water quality trends and/or MCLs exceeded ☐ Impacts on endangered, threatened, or special concern species habitat or other natural resource impacts ☐ Other: _____ ☒ Flow/water level decline ☐ Degrading water quality trends and/or MCLs exceeded ☐ Impacts on endangered, threatened, or special concern species habitat or other natural resource impacts ☐ Other: _____ ☐ Flow/water level decline ☐ Degrading water quality trends and/or MCLs exceeded ☐ Impacts on endangered, threatened, or special

☐ GIS analysis ☐ Modeling ☐ Mapping ☐ Monitoring ☐ Aquifer testing ☒ Other: 2017 WHP

N/A

☐ Calcareous fen N/A

No Calcareous fen in Wellhead Protection Area.

☒ Lake

Lake George

☐ Wetland

No Calcareous fen in Wellhead Protection Area.

N/A

Describe Resource Protection Threshold*

☐ GIS analysis ☐ Modeling ☐ Mapping ☐ Monitoring ☐ Aquifer testing

1 7

Describe How Changes to Thresholds are Monitored

☐ Revise permit ☐ Change groundwater pumping ☐ Increase conservation ☐ Other

☐ GIS analysis ☐ Modeling ☐ Mapping ☐ Monitoring ☐ Aquifer testing ☒ Other: 2017 WHP ☐ GIS analysis ☐ Modeling ☐ Mapping ☐ Monitoring ☐ Aquifer testing ☐ Other: 2017 WHP

Mitigation Measure or Management Plan ☐ Revise permit ☐ Change groundwater pumping ☐ Increase conservation ☐ Other

Lower limit on acceptable aquifer level decline at Well #1 or Well #2 of 885.0.

☐ Revise permit ☐ Change groundwater pumping ☒ Increase conservation ☐ Other

☐ Revise permit ☐ Change groundwater pumping ☐ Increase conservation ☐ Other

Weekly monitoring of water levels in Well #1 and Well #2 of this system that will serve 123 persons at full buildout.

Local Water Supply Plan Template –July 8, 2016 Resource Type

☐ Trout stream N/A

Resource Name

There aren’t any trout streams that exist in close proximity to the Oak Grove municipal Wells.

☒ Aquifer

Wonewoc Sandstone

☐ Endangered, threatened, or special concern species habitat, other natural resource impacts

Lake levels controlled by a dam. No species, habitat or other resource impacts anticipated

Risk

Risk Assessed Through

concern species habitat or other natural resource impacts ☐ Other: _____ ☐ Flow/water level decline ☐ Degrading water quality trends and/or MCLs exceeded ☐ Impacts on endangered, threatened, or special concern species habitat or other natural resource impacts ☐ Other: _____ ☒ Flow/water level decline ☐ Degrading water quality trends and/or MCLs exceeded ☐ Impacts on endangered, threatened, or special concern species habitat or other natural resource impacts ☐ Other: _____ ☐ Flow/water level decline ☐ Degrading water quality trends and/or MCLs exceeded ☐ Impacts on endangered, threatened, or special concern species habitat or other natural resource impacts ☐ Other: _____

☒ Other: 2017 WHP

Describe Resource Protection Threshold*

☐ GIS analysis ☐ Modeling ☐ Mapping ☐ Monitoring ☐ Aquifer testing ☒ Other: 2017 WHP

Describe How Changes to Thresholds are Monitored

☐ Revise permit ☐ Change groundwater pumping ☐ Increase conservation ☐ Other

☐ GIS analysis ☐ Modeling ☐ Mapping ☐ Monitoring ☐ Aquifer testing ☐ Other: ___ ☐ GIS analysis ☐ Modeling ☐ Mapping ☒ Monitoring ☐ Aquifer testing ☒ Other: 2017 WHP

Mitigation Measure or Management Plan

Lower limit on acceptable aquifer level decline at Well #1 or Well #2 of 885.0.

☐ Revise permit ☐ Change groundwater pumping ☐ Increase conservation ☒ Other – Currently Monitoring Levels.

Weekly monitoring of water levels in Well #1 and Well #2 of this system that will serve 123 persons at full buildout.

☐ Revise permit ☐ Change groundwater pumping ☐ Increase conservation ☐ Other

N/A * Examples of thresholds: a lower limit on acceptable flow in a river or stream; water quality outside of an accepted range; a lower limit on acceptable aquifer level decline at one or more monitoring wells; withdrawals that exceed some percent of the total amount available from a source; or a lower limit on acceptable changes to a protected habitat.

1 8

Local Water Supply Plan Template –July 8, 2016 Wellhead Protection (WHP) and Surface Water Protection (SWP) Plans Complete Table 11 to provide status information about WHP and SWP plans. The emergency procedures in this plan are intended to comply with the contingency plan provisions required in the Minnesota Department of Health’s (MDH) Wellhead Protection (WHP) Plan and Surface Water Protection (SWP) Plan. Table 11. Status of Wellhead Protection and Surface Water Protection Plans

Plan Type WHP

SWP

Status ☐ In Process ☒ Completed ☐ Not Applicable ☐ In Process ☐ Completed ☒ Not Applicable

Date Adopted In progress

Date for Update May 2017

F. Capital Improvement Plan (CIP) Please note that any wells that received approval under a ten-year permit, but that were not built, are now expired and must submit a water appropriations permit. Adequacy of Water Supply System Complete Table 12 with information about the adequacy of wells and/or intakes, storage facilities, treatment facilities, and distribution systems to sustain current and projected demands. List planned capital improvements for any system components, in chronological order. Communities in the sevencounty Twin Cities metropolitan area should also include information about plans through 2040. The assessment can be the general status by category; it is not necessary to identify every single well, storage facility, treatment facility, lift station, and mile of pipe. Please attach your latest Capital Improvement Plan as Appendix 4. Table 12. Adequacy of Water Supply System

System Component

Planned action

Wells/Intakes

☒ No action planned - adequate ☐ Repair/replacement ☐ Expansion/addition

Anticipated Construction Year Complete maintenance on our pumps at least once every 7 years. No new well anticipated before 2040.

Notes

Inspect motor, pump, and column for our Primary Well (Well 2) every 7 years. Well may be cleaned out if it is not at original depth. Emergency Well (Well 1)

1 9

Local Water Supply Plan Template –July 8, 2016 System Component

Planned action

Anticipated Construction Year

Notes

inspection and maintenance as required. Water Storage Facilities

Water Treatment Facilities

Distribution Systems (pipes, valves, etc.)

☒ No action planned - adequate ☐ Repair/replacement ☐ Expansion/addition

Pressure Zones

☒ No action planned - adequate ☐ Repair/replacement ☐ Expansion/addition

Other:

☐ No action planned - adequate ☐ Repair/replacement ☐ Expansion/addition

No improvements anticipated in the next 10 years. No additional storage anticipated before 2040. No improvements anticipated in next 10 years. No additional treatment anticipated before 2040. No improvements anticipated in next 10 years. No additional trunk watermain anticipated before 2040. No improvements anticipated before 2040.

Inspect tank interior and exterior every 10 years.

Inspect treatment equipment and facilities every 5 years.

Flush system every other year.

Single zone system.

Proposed Future Water Sources Complete Table 13 to identify new water source installation planned over the next ten years. Add rows to the table as needed. Table 13. Proposed future installations/sources

2 0

Local Water Supply Plan Template –July 8, 2016 Source

Groundwater Surface Water Interconnection to another supplier

Installation Location (approximate) N/A N/A N/A

Resource Name

Proposed Pumping Capacity (gpm)

Planned Installation Year

Planned Partnerships

Water Source Alternatives - Key Metropolitan Council Benchmark Do you anticipate the need for alternative water sources in the next 10 years? Yes ☐ No ☒ For metro communities, will you need alternative water sources by the year 2040?

Yes ☐ No ☒

If you answered yes for either question, then complete table 14. If no, insert NA. Complete Table 14 by checking the box next to alternative approaches that your community is considering, including approximate locations (if known), the estimated amount of future demand that could be met through the approach, the estimated timeframe to implement the approach, potential partnerships, and the major benefits and challenges of the approach. Add rows to the table as needed. For communities in the seven-county Twin Cities metropolitan area, these alternatives should include approaches the community is considering to meet projected 2040 water demand. Table 14. Alternative water sources

Alternative Source Considered

☐ Groundwater ☐ Surface Water ☐ Reclaimed stormwater ☐ Reclaimed wastewater ☐ Interconnection to another supplier

Source and/or Installation Location (approximate) N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A

Estimated Amount of Future Demand (%)

2 1

Timeframe to Implement (YYYY)

Potential Partners

Benefits

Challenges

Local Water Supply Plan Template –July 8, 2016

Part 2. Emergency Preparedness Procedures The emergency preparedness procedures outlined in this plan are intended to comply with the contingency plan provisions required by MDH in the WHP and SWP. Water emergencies can occur as a result of vandalism, sabotage, accidental contamination, mechanical problems, power failings, drought, flooding, and other natural disasters. The purpose of emergency planning is to develop emergency response procedures and to identify actions needed to improve emergency preparedness. In the case of a municipality, these procedures should be in support of, and part of, an all-hazard emergency operations plan. Municipalities that already have written procedures dealing with water emergencies should review the following information and update existing procedures to address these water supply protection measures.

A. Federal Emergency Response Plan Section 1433(b) of the Safe Drinking Water Act, (Public Law 107-188, Title IV- Drinking Water Security and Safety) requires community water suppliers serving over 3,300 people to prepare an Emergency Response Plan. Do you have a federal emergency response plan? Yes ☐ No ☒ If yes, what was the date it was certified? With assistance from MRWA, the City is currently completing a WHP for this water system. Draft has been prepared, but not completed. Complete Table 15 by inserting the noted information regarding your completed Federal Emergency Response Plan. Table 15. Emergency Preparedness Plan contact information

Emergency Response Plan Role Emergency Response Lead Alternate Emergency Response Lead

Contact Person MATT ANDERSON TIM SMITH

Contact Phone Number 763/286-2479 612/819-9018

Contact Email MANDERSON@CI.OAKGROVE.MN.US TSMITH@CI.OAKGROVE.MN.US

B. Operational Contingency Plan All utilities should have a written operational contingency plan that describes measures to be taken for water supply mainline breaks and other common system failures as well as routine maintenance. Do you have a written operational contingency plan? Yes ☒ No ☐ At a minimum, a water supplier should prepare and maintain an emergency contact list of contractors and suppliers. NOTE: Draft WHP completed but not approved.

C. Emergency Response Procedures Water suppliers must meet the requirements of MN Rules 4720.5280. Accordingly, the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources (DNR) requires public water suppliers serving more than 1,000 people

2 2

Local Water Supply Plan Template –July 8, 2016 to submit Emergency and Conservation Plans. Water emergency and conservation plans that have been approved by the DNR, under provisions of Minnesota Statute 186 and Minnesota Rules, part 6115.0770, will be considered equivalent to an approved WHP contingency plan. Emergency Telephone List Prepare and attach a list of emergency contacts, including the MN Duty Officer (1-800-422-0798), as Appendix 5. A template is available at www.mndnr.gov/watersupplyplans The list should include key utility and community personnel, contacts in adjacent water suppliers, and appropriate local, state and federal emergency contacts. Please be sure to verify and update the contacts on the emergency telephone list and date it. Thereafter, update on a regular basis (once a year is recommended). In the case of a municipality, this information should be contained in a notification and warning standard operating procedure maintained by the Emergency Manager for that community. Responsibilities and services for each contact should be defined. Current Water Sources and Service Area Quick access to concise and detailed information on water sources, water treatment, and the distribution system may be needed in an emergency. System operation and maintenance records should be maintained in secured central and back-up locations so that the records are accessible for emergency purposes. A detailed map of the system showing the treatment plants, water sources, storage facilities, supply lines, interconnections, and other information that would be useful in an emergency should also be readily available. It is critical that public water supplier representatives and emergency response personnel communicate about the response procedures and be able to easily obtain this kind of information both in electronic and hard copy formats (in case of a power outage). Do records and maps exist? Yes ☒ No ☐ Can staff access records and maps from a central secured location in the event of an emergency? Yes ☒ No ☐ Does the appropriate staff know where the materials are located? Yes ☒ No ☐ Procedure for Augmenting Water Supplies Complete Tables 16 – 17 by listing all available sources of water that can be used to augment or replace existing sources in an emergency. Add rows to the tables as needed. In the case of a municipality, this information should be contained in a notification and warning standard operating procedure maintained by the warning point for that community. Municipalities are encouraged to execute cooperative agreements for potential emergency water services and copies should be included in Appendix 6. Outstate Communities may consider using nearby high capacity wells (industry, golf course) as emergency water sources.

2 3

Local Water Supply Plan Template –July 8, 2016 WSP should include information on any physical or chemical problems that may limit interconnections to other sources of water. Approvals from the MDH are required for interconnections or the reuse of water. Table 16. Interconnections with other water supply systems to supply water in an emergency Other Water Supply System Owner N/A

Capacity (GPM & MGD)

Note Any Limitations On Use

List of services, equipment, supplies available to respond

GPM – Gallons per minute MGD – million gallons per day Table 17. Utilizing surface water as an alternative source

Surface Water Source Name N/A

Capacity (GPM)

Capacity (MGD)

Treatment Needs

Note Any Limitations On Use

If not covered above, describe additional emergency measures for providing water (obtaining bottled water, or steps to obtain National Guard services, etc.) From Draft WHP: ALTERNATIVE WATER SUPPLY OPTIONS

1. Bottled water supplies, delivery and distribution: The City of Oak Grove has identified the following locations where they can obtain bottled water for distribution to their residents. Address: 1851 Bunker 1. Wal-Mart (Andover, MN)Lake Blvd; Phone: (763) 354-1559 2. Target (Andover, MN)Address: 2000 Bunker Lake Blvd; Phone: (763) 8520113 Address: 23122 St. Francis 3. King's County Market (St. Francis, MN)Blvd; Phone: (763) 753-3334

2 4

Local Water Supply Plan Template â&#x20AC;&#x201C;July 8, 2016

2. Requests for Assistance from the MN National Guard: All requests for National Guard equipment and/or staff must be initiated at the local law enforcement level. Police and sheriff departments have process and procedures to request support.

A. MN National Guard Emergency Surface Water Treatment Option: The MN National Guard has the ability to provide emergency treatment of surface waters for human consumption. The MN National Guard has the ability to provide Reverse Osmosis Water Purification Units capable of supplying up to 1500 gallons-per-hour, or 25 gallons-perminute of potable water. The ROWPU units may not be housed at Camp Ripley and are available, through a call-up of the National Guard, to any city in the state.

B. MN National Guard Emergency Transportation of Potable Water: The Minnesota National Guard can furnish equipment capable of hauling up to 2,000 gallons of potable water from another water supply to a city distribution point or facility in an emergency (see above for the notification process).

3. System interconnects with other water supplies. Not applicable

4. Emergency or backup wells: The Oak Grove-Lake George public water supply has an emergency well connected to their distribution system (Well #1). This well can be used to provide water for the system in the event that Well #2 is not in service, or the system is in need of additional water to meet demand. Well #1 pump is programmed to turn on in the event that the level in the outside tank is below 7 feet. Water provided from Well #1 would be treated with disinfectant chemicals.

5. Emergency treatment of water system. Shock chlorination will be utilized when emergency treatment of the water is necessary.

6. Source Management (blending). The Oak Grove-Lake George public water supply system has the ability to blend water from their wells. While the system isn't set up for this purpose, the valves may be manually overridden.

7. New well. Applicable only as a last resort. Allocation and Demand Reduction Procedures Complete Table 18 by adding information about how decisions will be made to allocate water and reduce demand during an emergency. Provide information for each customer category, including its priority ranking, average day demand, and demand reduction potential for each customer category. Modify the customer categories as needed, and add additional lines if necessary. Water use categories should be prioritized in a way that is consistent with Minnesota Statutes 103G.261 (#1 is highest priority) as follows:

2 5

Local Water Supply Plan Template â&#x20AC;&#x201C;July 8, 2016 1. Water use for human needs such as cooking, cleaning, drinking, washing and waste disposal; use for on-farm livestock watering; and use for power production that meets contingency requirements. 2. Water use involving consumption of less than 10,000 gallons per day (usually from private wells or surface water intakes) 3. Water use for agricultural irrigation and processing of agricultural products involving consumption of more than 10,000 gallons per day (usually from private high-capacity wells or surface water intakes) 4. Water use for power production above the use provided for in the contingency plan. 5. All other water use involving consumption of more than 10,000 gallons per day. 6. Nonessential uses â&#x20AC;&#x201C; car washes, golf courses, etc. Water used for human needs at hospitals, nursing homes and similar types of facilities should be designated as a high priority to be maintained in an emergency. Lower priority uses will need to address water used for human needs at other types of facilities such as hotels, office buildings, and manufacturing plants. The volume of water and other types of water uses at these facilities must be carefully considered. After reviewing the data, common sense should dictate local allocation priorities to protect domestic requirements over certain types of economic needs. Water use for lawn sprinkling, vehicle washing, golf courses, and recreation are legislatively considered non-essential. Table 18. Water use priorities

Customer Category

Allocation Priority

Residential Institutional Commercial Industrial Irrigation Wholesale Non-Essential TOTAL GPD â&#x20AC;&#x201C; Gallons per Day

1 N/A N/A N/A 2 N/A 3

Average Daily Demand (GDP) 6,000 N/A N/A N/A <1,000 N/A <1,000 7,000

Short-Term Emergency Demand Reduction Potential (GPD) N/A N/A N/A N/A <1,000 N/A <1,000 1,000

Tip: Calculating Emergency Demand Reduction Potential The emergency demand reduction potential for all uses will typically equal the difference between maximum use (summer demand) and base use (winter demand). In extreme emergency situations, lower priority water uses must be restricted or eliminated to protect priority domestic water requirements. Emergency demand reduction potential should be based on average day demands for customer categories within each priority class. Use the tables in Part 3 on water conservation to help you determine strategies. Complete Table 19 by selecting the triggers and actions during water supply disruption conditions.

2 6

Local Water Supply Plan Template –July 8, 2016 Table 19. Emergency demand reduction conditions, triggers and actions (Select all that may apply and describe)

Emergency Triggers ☒ Contamination ☒ Loss of production ☒ Infrastructure failure ☒ Executive order by

Governor ☐ Other: _____________

Short-term Actions ☒ Supply augmentation through Emergency Well ☒ Enforce a critical water deficiency ordinance to penalize lawn watering, vehicle washing, golf course and park irrigation & other nonessential uses. ☒ Water Sprinkling Ban ☐ Water allocation through____ ☐ Meet with large water users to discuss their contingency plan.

Long-term Actions ☒ Supply augmentation through Emergency Well ☒ Enforce a critical water deficiency ordinance to penalize lawn watering, vehicle washing, golf course and park irrigation & other nonessential uses. ☒ Water Sprinkling Ban ☐ Meet with large water users to discuss their contingency plan.

Notification Procedures Complete Table 20 by selecting trigger for informing customers regarding conservation requests, water use restrictions, and suspensions; notification frequencies; and partners that may assist in the notification process. Add rows to the table as needed. Table 20. Plan to inform customers regarding conservation requests, water use restrictions, and suspensions

Notification Trigger(s) ☒ Short-term demand reduction declared (< 1 year)

☒ Long-term Ongoing demand reduction declared

Methods (select all that apply) ☒ Website ☐ Email list serve ☐ Social media (e.g. Twitter, Facebook) ☐ Direct customer mailing, ☒ Press release (TV, radio, newspaper), ☐ Meeting with large water users (> 10% of total city use) ☒ Other: Door to door visits to the 15 water system connections. ☒ Website ☐ Email list serve ☐ Social media (e.g. Twitter, Facebook) ☐ Direct customer mailing, ☒ Press release (TV, radio, newspaper), ☐ Meeting with large water users (> 10% of total city use) ☒ Other: Door to door visits to the 15 water system connections.

2 7

Update Frequency ☒ Daily ☒ Weekly ☒ Monthly ☐ Annually

Partners · ·

☒ Daily ☒ Weekly ☒ Monthly ☐ Annually

· ·

Anoka County The local media would be considered a partner to help get information to customers. The MN Department of Health.

Local Water Supply Plan Template –July 8, 2016 Notification Trigger(s) ☒ Governor’s critical water deficiency declared

Methods (select all that apply) ☒ Website ☐ Email list serve ☐ Social media (e.g. Twitter, Facebook) ☐ Direct customer mailing, ☐ Press release (TV, radio, newspaper), ☐ Meeting with large water users (> 10% of total city use) ☒ Other: Door to door visits to the 15 water system connections.

Update Frequency ☒ Daily ☒ Weekly ☒ Monthly ☐ Annually

Partners • •

•

Anoka County The local media would be considered a partner to help get information to customers. The MN Department of Health.

Enforcement Prior to a water emergency, municipal water suppliers must adopt regulations that restrict water use and outline the enforcement response plan. The enforcement response plan must outline how conditions will be monitored to know when enforcement actions are triggered, what enforcement tools will be used, who will be responsible for enforcement, and what timelines for corrective actions will be expected. Affected operations, communications, and enforcement staff must then be trained to rapidly implement those provisions during emergency conditions. Important Note: Disregard of critical water deficiency orders, even though total appropriation remains less than permitted, is adequate grounds for immediate modification of a public water supply authority’s water use permit (2013 MN Statutes 103G.291) Does the city have a critical water deficiency restriction/official control in place that includes provisions to restrict water use and enforce the restrictions? (This restriction may be an ordinance, rule, regulation, policy under a council directive, or other official control) Yes ☒ No ☐ If yes, attach the official control document to this WSP as Appendix 7. If no, the municipality must adopt such an official control within 6 months of submitting this WSP and submit it to the DNR as an amendment to this WSP. Irrespective of whether a critical water deficiency control is in place, does the public water supply utility, city manager, mayor, or emergency manager have standing authority to implement water restrictions? Yes ☒ No ☐ If yes, cite the regulatory authority reference: City Mayor or Council has the right to impose reasonable restrictions on the use of the city water system when a shortage of water supply may be imminent.

2 8

Local Water Supply Plan Template â&#x20AC;&#x201C;July 8, 2016 If no, who has authority to implement water use restrictions in an emergency? N/A

2 9

Local Water Supply Plan Template –July 8, 2016 PART 3. WATER CONSERVATION PLAN

Priority 1: Significant water reduction; low cost

Priority 2: Slight water reduction, low costs (low hanging fruit)

Priority 2: Significant water reduction; significant costs

Priority 3: Slight water reduction, significant costs (do only if necessary)

Minnesotans have historically benefited from the state’s abundant water supplies, reducing the need for conservation. There are however, limits to the available supplies of water and increasing threats to the quality of our drinking water. Causes of water supply limitation may include: population increases, economic trends, uneven statewide availability of groundwater, climatic changes, and degraded water quality. Examples of threats to drinking water quality include: the presence of contaminant plumes from past land use activities, exceedances of water quality standards from natural and human sources, contaminants of emerging concern, and increasing pollutant trends from nonpoint sources.

There are many incentives for conserving water; conservation: · reduces the potential for pumping-induced transfer of contaminants into the deeper aquifers, which can add treatment costs · reduces the need for capital projects to expand system capacity · reduces the likelihood of water use conflicts, like well interference, aquatic habitat loss, and declining lake levels · conserves energy, because less energy is needed to extract, treat and distribute water (and less energy production also conserves water since water is use to produce energy) · maintains water supplies that can then be available during times of drought It is therefore imperative that water suppliers implement water conservation plans. The first step in water conservation is identifying opportunities for behavioral or engineering changes that could be made to reduce water use by conducting a thorough analysis of: · Water use by customer · Extraction, treatment, distribution and irrigation system efficiencies · Industrial processing system efficiencies · Regulatory and barriers to conservation · Cultural barriers to conservation · Water reuse opportunities Once accurate data is compiled, water suppliers can set achievable goals for reducing water use. A successful water conservation plan follows a logical sequence of events. The plan should address both conservation on the supply side (leak detection and repairs, metering), as well as on the demand side (reductions in usage). Implementation should be conducted in phases, starting with the most obvious and lowest-cost options. In some cases one of the early steps will be reviewing regulatory constraints to water conservation, such as lawn irrigation requirements. Outside funding and grants may be available for implementation of projects. Engage water system operators and maintenance staff and customers in brainstorming opportunities to reduce water use. Ask the question: “How can I help save water?”

Progress since 2006 Is this your community’s first Water Supply Plan? Yes ☒ No ☐

3 0

Local Water Supply Plan Template –July 8, 2016 If yes, describe conservation practices that you are already implementing, such as: pricing, system improvements, education, regulation, appliance retrofitting, enforcement, etc. In the event of a major system disruption, failure or an emergency, conservation procedures would be enacted by the Mayor, City Council or Water Operator. If no, complete Table 21 to summarize conservation actions taken since the adoption of the 2006 water supply plan. Table 21. Implementation of previous ten-year Conservation Plan

2006 Plan Commitments

Action Taken?

Change water rates structure to provide conservation pricing Water rates relatively high: Water: Base Rate -- $25.20 plus $4.80/1,000 gallons Water supply system improvements (e.g. leak repairs, valve replacements, etc.) The system is considered to be in good condition due to the relatively new nature of the system. Maintenance occurs as it is needed and no upgrades or expansions are planned at the current time. Regular inspection of reservoir, well, pump house: City staff conduct daily inspections of the wells and water plant. The inside of reservoir is inspected on a 10-year basis. Educational efforts The City annually posts their Consumer Confidence Reports on the city website, and the reports are mailed to the water supply system users. Water conservation articles regularly appear in the City’s quarterly newsletter. New water conservation ordinances

☒ Yes ☐ No

Rebate or retrofitting Program (e.g. for toilet, faucets, appliances, showerheads, dish washers, washing machines, irrigation systems, rain barrels, water softeners, etc.

☐ Yes ☒ No

Enforcement

☐ ☒ ☐ ☐

Describe other

☒ Yes ☐ No

☒ Yes ☐ No ☐ Yes ☒ No

Yes No Yes No

What are the results you have seen from the actions in Table 21 and how were results measured? Total per capita demand trending downward despite the addition of new residential households.

A. Triggers for Allocation and Demand Reduction Actions Complete table 22 by checking each trigger below, as appropriate, and the actions to be taken at various levels or stages of severity. Add in additional rows to the table as needed.

3 1

Local Water Supply Plan Template –July 8, 2016 Table 22. Short and long-term demand reduction conditions, triggers and actions

Objective Protect surface water flows N/A Short-term demand reduction (less than 1 year)

Triggers ☐ Low stream flow conditions ☐ Reports of declining wetland and lake levels ☐ Other: ______________ ☐ Extremely high seasonal water demand (more than double winter demand) ☒ Loss of treatment capacity ☐ Lack of water in storage ☒ State drought plan ☐ Well interference ☒ Other: Software Malfunction

Long-term demand reduction (>1 year)

☐ Per capita demand increasing ☐ Total demand increase (higher population or more industry)Water level in well(s) below elevation of _____ ☒ Other: Residential or Total per capita demand exceeds 100 gpd.

Governor’s “Critical Water Deficiency Order” declared

☒ Residential or Total per capita demand exceeds 100 gpd.

Actions ☐ Increase promotion of conservation measures ☐ Other: ____________ ☒ Enforce the critical water deficiency ordinance to restrict or prohibit lawn watering, vehicle washing, golf course and park irrigation & other nonessential uses. ☒ Supply augmentation through Emergency Well ☒ Manual operation of water system. ☐ Meet with large water users to discuss user’s contingency plan. ☒ Enforce critical water deficiency ordinance that can be quickly adopted to penalize lawn watering, vehicle washing, golf course and park irrigation & other nonessential uses. ☐ Enact a water waste ordinance that targets overwatering (causing water to flow off the landscape into streets, parking lots, or similar), watering impervious surfaces (streets, driveways or other hardscape areas), and negligence of known leaks, breaks, or malfunctions. ☐ Meet with large water users to discuss user’s contingency plan. ☐ Enhanced monitoring and reporting: audits, meters, billing, etc. ☒ Enforce critical water deficiency ordinance that can be quickly adopted to penalize lawn watering, vehicle washing, golf course and park irrigation & other nonessential uses.

B. Conservation Objectives and Strategies – Key benchmark for DNR This section establishes water conservation objectives and strategies for eight major areas of water use. Objective 1: Reduce Unaccounted (Non-Revenue) Water loss to Less than 10% The Minnesota Rural Waters Association, the Metropolitan Council and the Department of Natural Resources recommend that all water uses be metered. Metering can help identify high use locations and times, along with leaks within buildings that have multiple meters.

3 2

Local Water Supply Plan Template –July 8, 2016 It is difficult to quantify specific unmetered water use such as that associated with firefighting and system flushing or system leaks. Typically, water suppliers subtract metered water use from total water pumped to calculate unaccounted or non-revenue water loss. Is your five-year average (2005-2014) unaccounted Water Use in Table 2 higher than 10%? Yes ☒ (10-year) No ☒ (5-year) – The most recent 5-year Average below 10%. The 10-year average is above 10%. Better tracking of water use is credited for the reduction of unaccounted water within the system. What is your leak detection monitoring schedule? (e.g. monitor 1/3rd of the city lines per year) New system have not yet implemented a lead detection monitoring schedule. Small enough system to identify leaks if water usage suddenly increases. Water Audits - are intended to identify, quantify and verify water and revenue losses. The volume of unaccounted-for water should be evaluated each billing cycle. The American Water Works Association (AWWA) recommends that ten percent or less of pumped water is unaccounted-for water. Water audit procedures are available from the AWWA and MN Rural Water Association www.mrwa.com . Drinking Water Revolving Loan Funds are available for purchase of new meters when new plants are built. What is the date of your most recent water audit? Have not had to do a water audit. ☐ yearly ☒ other (specify frequency) Have not had to do a Frequency of water audits: water audit Leak detection and survey: ☐ every year ☐ every other year ☒ periodic as needed Year last leak detection survey completed: Have not had to do a water audit

If Table 2 shows annual water losses over 10% or an increasing trend over time, describe what actions will be taken to reach the <10% loss objective and within what timeframe Water loss <10% for past 5 years. Leak detection monitoring of all of the lines and meter testing of all of the meters will be initiated should the 2-year average of water loss exceed 10%. Metering -AWWA recommends that every water supplier install meters to account for all water taken into its system, along with all water distributed from its system at each customer’s point of service. An effective metering program relies upon periodic performance testing, repair, maintenance or replacement of all meters. AWWA also recommends that water suppliers conduct regular water audits to ensure accountability. Some cities install separate meters for interior and exterior water use, but some research suggests that this may not result in water conservation. Complete Table 23 by adding the requested information regarding the number, types, testing and maintenance of customer meters.

3 3

Local Water Supply Plan Template –July 8, 2016 Table 23. Information about customer meters

Customer Category

Number of Customers

Number of Metered Connections

Residential

Irrigation meters Institutional Commercial Industrial Public facilities (irrigation) Other TOTALS

Number of Automated Meter Readers 0

Meter testing intervals (years)

· ·

Replace every 30 years Test Meters if Unaccounted Water Use (2-year Average) exceeds 10%

· ·

Replace every 30 years Test Meters if Unaccounted Water Use (2-year Average) exceeds 10%

Average age/meter replacement schedule (years <10 years

<10 years

For unmetered systems, describe any plans to install meters or replace current meters with advanced technology meters. Provide an estimate of the cost to implement the plan and the projected water savings from implementing the plan. Oak Grove doesn’t have any unmetered systems. Table 24. Water source meters

Number of Meters Water source (wells/intakes) Treatment plant

1 per well 1 meter for backwash

Meter testing schedule (years) Yearly

Number of Automated Meter Readers

Average age/meter replacement schedule (years

All in SCADA

Replace every 15 years

Yearly

All in SCADA

Replace every 15 years

Objective 2: Achieve Less than 75 Residential Gallons per Capita Demand (GPCD) The 2002 average residential per capita demand in the Twin Cities Metropolitan area was 75 gallons per capita per day. Is your average 2010-2015 residential per capita water demand in Table 2 more than 75? Yes ☐ No ☒ What was your 2010 – 2015 five-year average residential per capita water demand? 68 g/person/day Describe the water use trend over that timeframe:

3 4

Local Water Supply Plan Template –July 8, 2016

The City tended to see higher water use in dryer years and less water use in wet years. A slight uptick in water use in 2015 might be related to the additional homes added to the water system and associated turf establishment.

Complete Table 25 by checking which strategies you will use to continue reducing residential per capita demand and project a likely timeframe for completing each checked strategy (Select all that apply and add rows for additional strategies): Table 25. Strategies and timeframe to reduce residential per capita demand

Strategy to reduce residential per capita demand ☐ Revise city ordinances/codes to encourage or require water efficient landscaping. ☐ Revise city ordinance/codes to permit water reuse options, especially for non-potable purposes like irrigation, groundwater recharge, and industrial use. Check with plumbing authority to see if internal buildings reuse is permitted ☐ Revise ordinances to limit irrigation. Describe the restricted irrigation plan: ☐ Revise outdoor irrigation installations codes to require high efficiency systems (e.g. those with soil moisture sensors or programmable watering areas) in new installations or system replacements. ☐ Make water system infrastructure improvements ☒ Offer free or reduced cost water use audits) for residential customers. ☐ Implement a notification system to inform customers when water availability conditions change. ☐ Provide rebates or incentives for installing water efficient appliances and/or fixtures indoors (e.g., low flow toilets, high efficiency dish washers and washing machines, showerhead and faucet aerators, water softeners, etc.) ☐ Provide rebates or incentives to reduce outdoor water use (e.g., turf replacement/reduction, rain gardens, rain barrels, smart irrigation, outdoor water use meters, etc.) ☐ Identify supplemental Water Resources ☒ Conduct audience-appropriate water conservation education and outreach.

Timeframe for completing work

City Staff available to conduct free water use audits to water systems users upon request.

Include water conservation education information into the City’s newsletter at least one time annually.

☐ Describe other plans

Objective 3: Achieve at least a 1.5% per year water reduction for Institutional, Industrial, Commercial, and Agricultural GPCD over the next 10 years or a 15% reduction in ten years.

N/A – 100% residential connections.

3 5

Local Water Supply Plan Template –July 8, 2016 Complete Table 26 by checking which strategies you will used to continue reducing non-residential customer use demand and project a likely timeframe for completing each checked strategy (add rows for additional strategies). Where possible, substitute recycled water used in one process for reuse in another. (For example, spent rinse water can often be reused in a cooling tower.) Keep in mind the true cost of water is the amount on the water bill PLUS the expenses to heat, cool, treat, pump, and dispose of/discharge the water. Don’t just calculate the initial investment. Many conservation retrofits that appear to be prohibitively expensive are actually very cost-effective when amortized over the life of the equipment. Often reducing water use also saves electrical and other utility costs. Note: as of 2015, water reuse, and is not allowed by the state plumbing code, M.R. 4715 (a variance is needed). However several state agencies are addressing this issue. Table 26. Strategies and timeframe to reduce institutional, commercial industrial, and agricultural and non-revenue use demand

Strategy to reduce total business, industry, agricultural demand ☐ Conduct a facility water use audit for both indoor and outdoor use, including system components ☐ Install enhanced meters capable of automated readings to detect spikes in consumption ☐ Compare facility water use to related industry benchmarks, if available (e.g., meat processing, dairy, fruit and vegetable, beverage, textiles, paper/pulp, metals, technology, petroleum refining etc.) ☐ Install water conservation fixtures and appliances or change processes to conserve water ☐ Repair leaking system components (e.g., pipes, valves) ☐ Investigate the reuse of reclaimed water (e.g., stormwater, wastewater effluent, process wastewater, etc.) ☐ Reduce outdoor water use (e.g., turf replacement/reduction, rain gardens, rain barrels, smart irrigation, outdoor water use meters, etc.) ☐ Train employees how to conserve water ☐ Implement a notification system to inform non-residential customers when water availability conditions change. ☐ Rainwater catchment systems intended to supply uses such as water closets, urinals, trap primers for floor drains and floor sinks, industrial processes, water features, vehicle washing facilities, cooling tower makeup, and similar uses shall be approved by the commissioner. Proposed plumbing code 4714.1702.1 http://www.dli.mn.gov/PDF/docket/4714rule.pdf ☐ Describe other plans:

Timeframe for completing work

Objective 4: Achieve a Decreasing Trend in Total Per Capita Demand Include as Appendix 8 one graph showing total per capita water demand for each customer category (i.e., residential, institutional, commercial, industrial) from 2005-2014 and add the calculated/estimated linear trend for the next 10 years.

3 6

Local Water Supply Plan Template –July 8, 2016 Describe the trend for each customer category; explain the reason(s) for the trends, and where trends are increasing. Residential is the only customer category. Water use has steadily increased as new water users have been added to the system. There are only 3 more residential connections anticipated for this system. We anticipate water use will level out after those remaining connections are added. Objective 5: Reduce Peak Day Demand so that the Ratio of Average Maximum day to the Average Day is less than 2.6 Is the ratio of average 2005-2014 maximum day demand to average 2005-2014 average day demand reported in Table 2 more than 2.6? Yes ☒ No ☐ Calculate a ten year average (2005 – 2014) of the ratio of maximum day demand to average day demand: No reliable max day information available for first 2 years of the system (2007 and 2008). The ratio of maximum day demand to average day demand for the past 7 years is 3.0. The 2.6 objective for this small system may be difficult to achieve (e.g. Watermain flushing nearly doubles water use. Water withdrawals for construction activities and firefighting activities for the greater Oak Grove community could easily quadruple water use. No new infrastructure to meet future water demands is anticipated. The position of the DNR has been that a peak day/average day ratio that is above 2.6 for in summer indicates that the water being used for irrigation by the residents in a community is too large and that efforts should be made to reduce the peak day use by the community. It should be noted that by reducing the peak day use, communities can also reduce the amount of infrastructure that is required to meet the peak day use. This infrastructure includes new wells, new water towers which can be costly items. Objective 6: Implement a Conservation Water Rate Structure and/or a Uniform Rate Structure with a Water Conservation Program Water Conservation Program Municipal water suppliers serving over 1,000 people are required to adopt demand reduction measures that include a conservation rate structure, or a uniform rate structure with a conservation program that achieves demand reduction. These measures must achieve demand reduction in ways that reduce water demand, water losses, peak water demands, and nonessential water uses. These measures must be approved before a community may request well construction approval from the Department of Health or before requesting an increase in water appropriations permit volume (Minnesota Statutes, section 103G.291, subd. 3 and 4). Rates should be adjusted on a regular basis to ensure that revenue of the system is adequate under reduced demand scenarios. If a municipal water supplier intends to use a Uniform Rate Structure, a community-wide Water Conservation Program that will achieve demand reduction must be provided. Current Water Rates Include a copy of the actual rate structure in Appendix 9 or list current water rates including base/service fees and volume charges below.

3 7

Local Water Supply Plan Template –July 8, 2016 Volume included in base rate or service charge: 0 gallons Frequency of billing:

☒ Monthly

☐ Bimonthly

Water Rate Evaluation Frequency: ☒ every year

☐ Quarterly

☐ Other: _________________

☐ every ___ years

☐ no schedule

Date of last rate change: 1/1/2016 Table 27. Rate structures for each customer category (Select all that apply and add additional rows as needed)

Customer Category Residential

Commercial/ Industrial/ Institutional N/A

Conservation Billing Strategies in Use * ☒ Monthly billing ☐ Increasing block rates (volume tiered rates) ☐ Seasonal rates ☐ Time of use rates ☐ Water bills reported in gallons ☐ Individualized goal rates ☐ Excess use rates ☐ Drought surcharge ☐ Use water bill to provide comparisons ☐ Service charge not based on water volume ☐ Other (describe) ☐ Monthly billing ☐ Increasing block rates (volume tiered rates) ☐ Seasonal rates ☐ Time of use rates ☐ Water bills reported in gallons ☐ Individualized goal rates ☐ Excess use rates ☐ Drought surcharge ☐ Use water bill to provide comparisons ☐ Service charge not based on water volume ☐ Other (describe)

Conservation Neutral Billing Strategies in Use ** ☒ Uniform ☐ Odd/even day watering

Non-Conserving Billing Strategies in Use *** ☐ Service charge based on water volume ☐ Declining block ☒ Flat ☐ Other (describe)

☐ Uniform

☐ Service charge based on water volume ☐ Declining block ☐ Flat ☐ Other (describe)

☐ Other * Rate Structures components that may promote water conservation: · Monthly billing: is encouraged to help people see their water usage so they can consider changing behavior. · Increasing block rates (also known as a tiered residential rate structure): Typically, these have at least three tiers: should have at least three tiers. o The first tier is for the winter average water use.

3 8

Local Water Supply Plan Template –July 8, 2016 The second tier is the year-round average use, which is lower than typical summer use. This rate should be set to cover the full cost of service. o The third tier should be above the average annual use and should be priced high enough to encourage conservation, as should any higher tiers. For this to be effective, the difference in block rates should be significant. Seasonal rate: higher rates in summer to reduce peak demands Time of Use rates: lower rates for off peak water use Bill water use in gallons: this allows customers to compare their use to average rates Individualized goal rates: typically used for industry, business or other large water users to promote water conservation if they keep within agreed upon goals. Excess Use rates: if water use goes above an agreed upon amount this higher rate is charged Drought surcharge: an extra fee is charged for guaranteed water use during drought Use water bill to provide comparisons: simple graphics comparing individual use over time or compare individual use to others. Service charge or base fee that does not include a water volume – a base charge or fee to cover universal city expenses that are not customer dependent and/or to provide minimal water at a lower rate (e.g., an amount less than the average residential per capita demand for the water supplier for the last 5 years) Emergency rates -A community may have a separate conservation rate that only goes into effect when the community or governor declares a drought emergency. These higher rates can help to protect the city budgets during times of significantly less water usage. o

· · · · · · ·

**Conservation Neutral** · Uniform rate: rate per unit used is the same regardless of the volume used · Odd/even day watering –This approach reduces peak demand on a daily basis for system operation, but it does not reduce overall water use. *** Non-Conserving *** · Service charge or base fee with water volume: an amount of water larger than the average residential per capita demand for the water supplier for the last 5 years · Declining block rate: the rate per unit used decreases as water use increases. · Flat rate: one fee regardless of how much water is used (usually unmetered).

Provide justification for any conservation neutral or non-conserving rate structures. If intending to adopt a conservation rate structure, include the timeframe to do so: Billing and management efficiency. System serves less than 125 people. Objective 7: Additional strategies to Reduce Water Use and Support Wellhead Protection Planning Development and redevelopment projects can provide additional water conservation opportunities, such as the actions listed below. If a Uniform Rate Structure is in place, the water supplier must provide a Water Conservation Program that includes at least two of the actions listed below. Check those actions that you intent to implement within the next 10 years. Table 28. Additional strategies to Reduce Water Use & Support Wellhead Protection

☐ ☐ ☐

Participate in the GreenStep Cities Program, including implementation of at least one of the 20 “Best Practices” for water Prepare a master plan for smart growth (compact urban growth that avoids sprawl) Prepare a comprehensive open space plan (areas for parks, green spaces, natural areas)

3 9

Local Water Supply Plan Template –July 8, 2016 ☒ ☐ ☐ ☒ ☐ ☐ ☒ ☐ ☐ ☐

Adopt a water use restriction ordinance (lawn irrigation, car washing, pools, etc.) Adopt an outdoor lawn irrigation ordinance Adopt a private well ordinance (private wells in a city must comply with water restrictions) Implement a stormwater management program Adopt non-zoning wetlands ordinance (can further protect wetlands beyond state/federal lawsfor vernal pools, buffer areas, restrictions on filling or alterations) Adopt a water offset program (primarily for new development or expansion) Implement a water conservation outreach program Hire a water conservation coordinator (part-time) Implement a rebate program for water efficient appliances, fixtures, or outdoor water management Other

Objective 8: Tracking Success: How will you track or measure success through the next ten years? City Engineer and Staff will annually update Table 2 – Historic Water Demand and note any trends. If necessary adjustments to practices and processes will be made to help assure water use remains reasonable. Tip: The process to monitor demand reduction and/or a rate structure includes: a) The DNR Hydrologist will call or visit the community the first 1-3 years after the water supply plan is completed. b) They will discuss what activities the community is doing to conserve water and if they feel their actions are successful. The Water Supply Plan, Part 3 tables and responses will guide the discussion. For example, they will discuss efforts to reduce unaccounted for water loss if that is a problem, or go through Tables 33, 34 and 35 to discuss new initiatives. c) The city representative and the hydrologist will discuss total per capita water use, residential per capita water use, and business/industry use. They will note trends. d) They will also discuss options for improvement and/or collect case studies of success stories to share with other communities. One option may be to change the rate structure, but there are many other paths to successful water conservation. e) If appropriate, they will cooperatively develop a simple work plan for the next few years, targeting a couple areas where the city might focus efforts.

A. Regulation Complete Table 29 by selecting which regulations are used to reduce demand and improve water efficiencies. Add additional rows as needed. Copies of adopted regulations or proposed restrictions or should be included in Appendix 10 (a list with hyperlinks is acceptable). Table 29. Regulations for short-term reductions in demand and long-term improvements in water efficiencies

Regulations Utilized ☐ Rainfall sensors required on landscape irrigation systems

4 0

When is it applied (in effect)? ☐ Ongoing ☐ Seasonal ☐ Only during declared Emergencies

Local Water Supply Plan Template –July 8, 2016 Regulations Utilized ☐ Water efficient plumbing fixtures required

☒ Critical/Emergency Water Deficiency ordinance ☒ Watering restriction requirements (time of day, allowable days, etc.)

☐ Water waste prohibited (for example, having a fine for irrigators spraying on the street) ☐ Limitations on turf areas (requiring lots to have 10% - 25% of the space in natural areas) ☒ Soil preparation requirement s (after construction, requiring topsoil to be applied to promote good root growth) ☐ Tree ratios (requiring a certain number of trees per square foot of lawn) ☐ Permit to fill swimming pool and/or requiring pools to be covered (to prevent evaporation) ☐ Ordinances that permit stormwater irrigation, reuse of water, or other alternative water use (Note: be sure to check current plumbing codes for updates)

When is it applied (in effect)? ☐ New development ☐ Replacement ☐ Rebate Programs ☒ Only during declared Emergencies ☐ Odd/even ☐ 2 days/week ☒ Only during declared Emergencies ☐ Ongoing ☐ Seasonal ☐ Only during declared Emergencies ☐ New development ☐ Shoreland/zoning ☐ Other ☒ New Development ☐ Construction Projects ☐ Other ☐ New development ☐ Shoreland/zoning ☐ Other ☐ Ongoing ☐ Seasonal ☐ Only during declared Emergencies ☐ Describe

B. Retrofitting Programs Education and incentive programs aimed at replacing inefficient plumbing fixtures and appliances can help reduce per capita water use, as well as energy costs. It is recommended that municipal water suppliers develop a long-term plan to retrofit public buildings with water efficient plumbing fixtures and appliances. Some water suppliers have developed partnerships with organizations having similar conservation goals, such as electric or gas suppliers, to develop cooperative rebate and retrofit programs. A study by the AWWA Research Foundation (Residential End Uses of Water, 1999) found that the average indoor water use for a non-conserving home is 69.3 gallons per capita per day (gpcd). The average indoor water use in a conserving home is 45.2 gpcd and most of the decrease in water use is related to water efficient plumbing fixtures and appliances that can reduce water, sewer and energy costs. In Minnesota, certain electric and gas providers are required (Minnesota Statute 216B.241) to fund programs that will conserve energy resources and some utilities have distributed water efficient showerheads to customers to help reduce energy demands required to supply hot water. Retrofitting Programs – New homes already have them. Complete Table 30 by checking which water uses are targeted, the outreach methods used, the measures used to identify success, and any participating partners.

4 1

Local Water Supply Plan Template –July 8, 2016 Table 30. Retrofitting programs (Select all that apply)

Water Use Targets ☐ Low flush toilets, ☐ Toilet leak tablets, ☐ Low flow showerheads, ☐ Faucet aerators; ☐ Water conserving washing machines, ☐ Dish washers, ☐ Water softeners;

Outreach Methods ☐ Education about ☐ Free distribution of ☐ Rebate for ☐ Other

Partners ☐ Gas company ☐ Electric company ☐ Watershed organization

☐Education about

☐ Gas company ☐ Electric company ☐ Watershed organization

☐Free distribution of ☐Rebate for ☐Other

☐ Rain gardens, ☐ Rain barrels, ☐ Native/drought tolerant landscaping, etc.

☐Education about ☐Free distribution of ☐Rebate for

☐ Gas company ☐ Electric company ☐ Watershed organization

☐Other

Briefly discuss measures of success from the above table (e.g. number of items distributed, dollar value of rebates, gallons of water conserved, etc.):

C. Education and Information Programs Customer education should take place in three different circumstances. First, customers should be provided information on how to conserve water and improve water use efficiencies. Second, information should be provided at appropriate times to address peak demands. Third, emergency notices and educational materials about how to reduce water use should be available for quick distribution during an emergency. Proposed Education Programs Complete Table 31 by selecting which methods are used to provide water conservation and information, including the frequency of program components. Select all that apply and add additional lines as needed.

4 2

Local Water Supply Plan Template –July 8, 2016 Table 31. Current and Proposed Education Programs

Education Methods

General summary of topics

#/Year

Frequency ☐ Ongoing ☐ Seasonal ☐ Only during declared emergencies ☒ Ongoing

Billing inserts or tips printed on the actual bill

Consumer Confidence Reports

☐Seasonal ☐Only during declared emergencies ☐Ongoing

Press releases to traditional local news outlets (e.g., newspapers, radio and TV)

☐Seasonal ☐Only during declared emergencies ☐Ongoing

Social media distribution (e.g., emails, Facebook, Twitter)

☐Seasonal ☐Only during declared emergencies ☐Ongoing

Paid advertisements (e.g., billboards, print media, TV, radio, web sites, etc.)

☐Seasonal ☐Only during declared emergencies ☐Ongoing

Presentations to community groups

☐Seasonal ☐Only during declared emergencies ☒ Ongoing ☐ Seasonal

Staff training

☐Only during declared emergencies ☐Ongoing

Facility tours

☐Seasonal ☐Only during declared emergencies ☐Ongoing

Displays and exhibits

☐Seasonal ☐Only during declared emergencies ☐Ongoing

Marketing rebate programs (e.g., indoor fixtures & appliances and outdoor practices)

☐Seasonal

4 3

Local Water Supply Plan Template –July 8, 2016 Education Methods

General summary of topics

#/Year

Frequency ☐Only during declared emergencies ☐ Ongoing ☒ Seasonal

Community news letters

☐Only during declared emergencies ☐Ongoing

Direct mailings (water audit/retrofit kits, showerheads, brochures)

☐Seasonal ☐Only during declared emergencies ☐Ongoing

Information kiosk at utility and public buildings

☐Seasonal ☐Only during declared emergencies ☐Ongoing

Public service announcements

☐Seasonal ☐Only during declared emergencies ☐Ongoing

Cable TV Programs

☐Seasonal ☐Only during declared emergencies ☐Ongoing

Demonstration projects (landscaping or plumbing)

☐Seasonal ☐Only during declared emergencies ☐Ongoing

K-12 education programs (Project Wet, Drinking Water Institute, presentations)

☐Seasonal ☐Only during declared emergencies ☐Ongoing

Community events (children’s water festivals, environmental fairs)

☐Seasonal ☐Only during declared emergencies ☐Ongoing

Community education classes

☐Seasonal ☐Only during declared emergencies

4 4

Local Water Supply Plan Template –July 8, 2016 Education Methods

General summary of topics

#/Year

Frequency ☐Ongoing

Water week promotions

☐Seasonal ☐Only during declared emergencies Website (include address:

☐Ongoing

)

☐Seasonal ☐Only during declared emergencies ☐Ongoing

Targeted efforts (large volume users, users with large increases)

☐Seasonal ☐Only during declared emergencies ☐Ongoing

Notices of ordinances

☐Seasonal ☐Only during declared emergencies ☐Ongoing

Emergency conservation notices

☐Seasonal ☐Only during declared emergencies ☐Ongoing

Other:

☐Seasonal ☐ Only during declared emergencies

Briefly discuss what future education and information activities your community is considering in the future: Oak Grove is planning to add the Anoka County link: https://www.knowtheflow.us/ to the City’s website, http://www.ci.oak-grove.mn.us/

4 5

Local Water Supply Plan Template –July 8, 2016

Part 4. ITEMS FOR METROPOLITAN AREA COMMUNITIES Minnesota Statute 473.859 requires WSPs to be completed for all local units of government in the seven-county Metropolitan Area as part of the local comprehensive planning process. Much of the information in Parts 1-3 addresses water demand for the next 10 years. However, additional information is needed to address water demand through 2040, which will make the WSP consistent with the Metropolitan Land Use Planning Act, upon which the local comprehensive plans are based. This Part 4 provides guidance to complete the WSP in a way that addresses plans for water supply through 2040.

A. Water Demand Projections through 2040 Complete Table 7 in Part 1D by filling in information about long-term water demand projections through 2040. Total Community Population projections should be consistent with the community’s system statement, which can be found on the Metropolitan Council’s website and which was sent to the community in September 2015. Projected Average Day, Maximum Day, and Annual Water Demands may either be calculated using the method outlined in Appendix 2 of the 2015 Master Water Supply Plan or by a method developed by the individual water supplier.

B. Potential Water Supply Issues Complete Table 10 in Part 1E by providing information about the potential water supply issues in your community, including those that might occur due to 2040 projected water use. The Master Water Supply Plan provides information about potential issues for your community in Appendix 1 (Water Supply Profiles). This resource may be useful in completing Table 10. You may document results of local work done to evaluate impact of planned uses by attaching a feasibility assessment or providing a citation and link to where the plan is available electronically.

C. Proposed Alternative Approaches to Meet Extended Water Demand Projections Complete Table 12 in Part 1F with information about potential water supply infrastructure impacts (such as replacements, expansions or additions to wells/intakes, water storage and treatment capacity, distribution systems, and emergency interconnections) of extended plans for development and redevelopment, in 10-year increments through 2040. It may be useful to refer to information in the community’s local Land Use Plan, if available. Complete Table 14 in Part 1F by checking each approach your community is considering to meet future demand. For each approach your community is considering, provide information about the amount of

4 6

Local Water Supply Plan Template –July 8, 2016 future water demand to be met using that approach, the timeframe to implement the approach, potential partners, and current understanding of the key benefits and challenges of the approach. As challenges are being discussed, consider the need for: evaluation of geologic conditions (mapping, aquifer tests, modeling), identification of areas where domestic wells could be impacted, measurement and analysis of water levels & pumping rates, triggers & associated actions to protect water levels, etc.

D. Value-Added Water Supply Planning Efforts (Optional) The following information is not required to be completed as part of the local water supply plan, but completing this can help strengthen source water protection throughout the region and help Metropolitan Council and partners in the region to better support local efforts. Source Water Protection Strategies Does a Drinking Water Supply Management Area for a neighboring public water supplier overlap your community? Yes ☐ No ☒ If you answered no, skip this section. If you answered yes, please complete Table 32 with information about new water demand or land use planning-related local controls that are being considered to provide additional protection in this area. Table 32. Local controls and schedule to protect Drinking Water Supply Management Areas

Local Control

Schedule to Implement

Potential Partners

☐ None at this time ☐ Comprehensive planning that guides development in vulnerable drinking water supply management areas ☐ Zoning overlay ☐ Other:

Technical assistance From your community’s perspective, what are the most important topics for the Metropolitan Council to address, guided by the region’s Metropolitan Area Water Supply Advisory Committee and Technical Advisory Committee, as part of its ongoing water supply planning role? ☐ Coordination of state, regional and local water supply planning roles ☐ Regional water use goals ☐ Water use reporting standards ☐ Regional and sub-regional partnership opportunities ☐ Identifying and prioritizing data gaps and input for regional and sub-regional analyses ☐ Others: ___________________________________________________________________

4 7

Local Water Supply Plan Template â&#x20AC;&#x201C;July 8, 2016

GLOSSARY Agricultural/Irrigation Water Use - Water used for crop and non-crop irrigation, livestock watering, chemigation, golf course irrigation, landscape and athletic field irrigation. Average Daily Demand - The total water pumped during the year divided by 365 days. Calcareous Fen - Calcareous fens are rare and distinctive wetlands dependent on a constant supply of cold groundwater. Because they are dependent on groundwater and are one of the rarest natural communities in the United States, they are a protected resource in MN. Approximately 200 have been located in Minnesota. They may not be filled, drained or otherwise degraded. Commercial/Institutional Water Use - Water used by motels, hotels, restaurants, office buildings, commercial facilities and institutions (both civilian and military). Consider maintaining separate institutional water use records for emergency planning and allocation purposes. Water used by multifamily dwellings, apartment buildings, senior housing complexes, and mobile home parks should be reported as Residential Water Use. Commercial/Institutional/Industrial (C/I/I) Water Sold - The sum of water delivered for commercial/institutional or industrial purposes. Conservation Rate Structure - A rate structure that encourages conservation and may include increasing block rates, seasonal rates, time of use rates, individualized goal rates, or excess use rates. If a conservation rate is applied to multifamily dwellings, the rate structure must consider each residential unit as an individual user. A community may have a separate conservation rate that only goes into effect when the community or governor declares a drought emergency. These higher rates can help to protect the city budgets during times of significantly less water usage. Date of Maximum Daily Demand - The date of the maximum (highest) water demand. Typically this is a day in July or August. Declining Rate Structure - Under a declining block rate structure, a consumer pays less per additional unit of water as usage increases. This rate structure does not promote water conservation. Distribution System - Water distribution systems consist of an interconnected series of pipes, valves, storage facilities (water tanks, water towers, reservoirs), water purification facilities, pumping stations, flushing hydrants, and components that convey drinking water and meeting fire protection needs for cities, homes, schools, hospitals, businesses, industries and other facilities. Flat Rate Structure - Flat fee rates do not vary by customer characteristics or water usage. This rate structure does not promote water conservation. Industrial Water Use - Water used for thermonuclear power (electric utility generation) and other industrial use such as steel, chemical and allied products, paper and allied products, mining, and petroleum refining.

4 8

Local Water Supply Plan Template –July 8, 2016 Low Flow Fixtures/Appliances - Plumbing fixtures and appliances that significantly reduce the amount of water released per use are labeled “low flow”. These fixtures and appliances use just enough water to be effective, saving excess, clean drinking water that usually goes down the drain. Maximum Daily Demand - The maximum (highest) amount of water used in one day. Metered Residential Connections - The number of residential connections to the water system that have meters. For multifamily dwellings, report each residential unit as an individual user. Percent Unmetered/Unaccounted For - Unaccounted for water use is the volume of water withdrawn from all sources minus the volume of water delivered. This value represents water “lost” by miscalculated water use due to inaccurate meters, water lost through leaks, or water that is used but unmetered or otherwise undocumented. Water used for public services such as hydrant flushing, ice skating rinks, and public swimming pools should be reported under the category “Water Supplier Services”. Population Served - The number of people who are served by the community’s public water supply system. This includes the number of people in the community who are connected to the public water supply system, as well as people in neighboring communities who use water supplied by the community’s public water supply system. It should not include residents in the community who have private wells or get their water from neighboring water supply. Residential Connections - The total number of residential connections to the water system. For multifamily dwellings, report each residential unit as an individual user. Residential Per Capita Demand - The total residential water delivered during the year divided by the population served divided by 365 days. Residential Water Use - Water used for normal household purposes such as drinking, food preparation, bathing, washing clothes and dishes, flushing toilets, and watering lawns and gardens. Should include all water delivered to single family private residences, multi-family dwellings, apartment buildings, senior housing complexes, mobile home parks, etc. Smart Meter - Smart meters can be used by municipalities or by individual homeowners. Smart metering generally indicates the presence of one or more of the following: ·

· ·

Smart irrigation water meters are controllers that look at factors such as weather, soil, slope, etc. and adjust watering time up or down based on data. Smart controllers in a typical summer will reduce water use by 30%-50%. Just changing the spray nozzle to new efficient models can reduce water use by 40%. Smart Meters on customer premises that measure consumption during specific time periods and communicate it to the utility, often on a daily basis. A communication channel that permits the utility, at a minimum, to obtain meter reads on demand, to ascertain whether water has recently been flowing through the meter and onto the

4 9

Local Water Supply Plan Template –July 8, 2016 premises, and to issue commands to the meter to perform specific tasks such as disconnecting or restricting water flow. Total Connections - The number of connections to the public water supply system. Total Per Capita Demand - The total amount of water withdrawn from all water supply sources during the year divided by the population served divided by 365 days. Total Water Pumped - The cumulative amount of water withdrawn from all water supply sources during the year. Total Water Delivered - The sum of residential, commercial, industrial, institutional, water supplier services, wholesale and other water delivered. Ultimate (Full Build-Out) - Time period representing the community’s estimated total amount and location of potential development, or when the community is fully built out at the final planned density. Unaccounted (Non-revenue) Loss - See definitions for “percent unmetered/unaccounted for loss”. Uniform Rate Structure - A uniform rate structure charges the same price-per-unit for water usage beyond the fixed customer charge, which covers some fixed costs. The rate sends a price signal to the customer because the water bill will vary by usage. Uniform rates by class charge the same price-perunit for all customers within a customer class (e.g. residential or non-residential). This price structure is generally considered less effective in encouraging water conservation. Water Supplier Services - Water used for public services such as hydrant flushing, ice skating rinks, public swimming pools, city park irrigation, back-flushing at water treatment facilities, and/or other uses. Water Used for Nonessential Purposes - Water used for lawn irrigation, golf course and park irrigation, car washes, ornamental fountains, and other non-essential uses. Wholesale Deliveries - The amount of water delivered in bulk to other public water suppliers.

Acronyms and Initialisms AWWA – American Water Works Association C/I/I – Commercial/Institutional/Industrial CIP – Capital Improvement Plan GIS – Geographic Information System GPCD – Gallons per capita per day

5 0

Local Water Supply Plan Template –July 8, 2016 GWMA – Groundwater Management Area – North and East Metro, Straight River, Bonanza, MDH – Minnesota Department of Health MGD – Million gallons per day MG – Million gallons MGL – Maximum Contaminant Level MnTAP – Minnesota Technical Assistance Program (University of Minnesota) MPARS – MN/DNR Permitting and Reporting System (new electronic permitting system) MRWA – Minnesota Rural Waters Association SWP – Source Water Protection WHP – Wellhead Protection

5 1

Local Water Supply Plan Template –July 8, 2016

APPENDICES TO BE SUBMITTED BY THE WATER SUPPLIER Appendix 1: Well records and maintenance summaries – see Part 1C Appendix 2: Water level monitoring plan – see Part 1E Appendix 3: Water level graphs for each water supply well - see Part 1E Appendix 4: Capital Improvement Plan - see Part 1E Appendix 5: Emergency Telephone List – see Part 2C Appendix 6: Cooperative Agreements for Emergency Services – see Part 2C Appendix 7: Municipal Critical Water Deficiency Ordinance – see Part 2C Appendix 8: Graph showing annual per capita water demand for each customer category during the last ten-years – see Part 3 Objective 4 Appendix 9: Water Rate Structure – see Part 3 Objective 6 Appendix 10: Adopted or proposed regulations to reduce demand or improve water efficiency – see Part 3 Objective 7 Appendix 11: Implementation Checklist – summary of all the actions that a community is doing, or proposes to do, including estimated implementation dates – see www.mndnr.gov/watersupplyplans

5 2

Local Water Supply Plan Template â&#x20AC;&#x201C;July 8, 2016

APPENDICES Appendix 1: Well Records and Maintenance Summaries Appendix 2: Water Level Monitoring Plan Appendix 3: Water Level Graphs for each Water Supply Well Appendix 4: Capital Improvement Plan Appendix 5: Emergency Telephone List Appendix 6: Cooperative Agreements for Emergency Services Appendix 7: Municipal Critical Water Deficiency Appendix 8: Graph showing annual per capita water demand for each customer category during the last ten-years Appendix 9: Water Rate Structure Appendix 10: Adopted or proposed regulations to reduce demand or improve water efficiency Appendix 11: Implementation Checklist â&#x20AC;&#x201C; summary of all the actions that a community is doing, or proposes to do, including estimated implementation dates

5 3

Local Water Supply Plan Template â&#x20AC;&#x201C;July 8, 2016

Appendix 1: Well Records and Maintenance Summaries Well Records and Maintenance Summaries: The Well Records for each well is attached. No maintenance has been performed since installation.

5 4

Local Water Supply Plan Template â&#x20AC;&#x201C;July 8, 2016 Well #1

5 5

Local Water Supply Plan Template â&#x20AC;&#x201C;July 8, 2016

Well #2

5 6

Local Water Supply Plan Template â&#x20AC;&#x201C;July 8, 2016

Appendix 2: Water Level Monitoring Plan Water Level Monitoring Plan for the City of Oak Grove 1. Purpose of the Water Level Monitoring Plan The purpose of the Water Level Monitoring Plan is to document the water level for the Cityâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;s wells. In 2017 the City modified their SCADA to show water depths of both wells to track the seasonal variation in water levels and the long-term trends for each well. The City is now collecting level data on a weekly basis. 2. Data Collection Method The water level is measured by recording the depth to water in feet from the top of the casing. The depth to water is measured by SCADA. 3. Measurement Frequency and Timing Prior to recent SCADA modifications, the depth to water of Well #1 was recorded on the last day of every month. The City is now recording water levels in both wells every Monday.

5 7

Local Water Supply Plan Template â&#x20AC;&#x201C;July 8, 2016

Appendix 3: Water Level Graphs for each Water Supply Well Water Level Graphs for Water Supply Well #1 and Well #2. Table reflects all available water level data. Note: In 2017 the City modified their SCADA in 2017 to show water level depths for both the Primary Well (Well #2) and Emergency Well (Well #1).

Water Level Graph 893 892 891 890 889 888 887 886 885

Well 1 DD Elevation

Well 2 DD Elevation

5 8

Local Water Supply Plan Template â&#x20AC;&#x201C;July 8, 2016

Appendix 4: Capital Improvement Plan

Capital Improvement Plan Wells:

No improvements planned in the next 5 years.

Water Storage Facilities:

No improvements planned in the next 5 years.

Water Treatment Facilities:

No improvements planned in the next 5 years.

Distribution System:

No improvements planned in the next 5 years.

5 9

Local Water Supply Plan Template â&#x20AC;&#x201C;July 8, 2016

Appendix 5: Emergency Telephone List Appendix 5: Emergency Telephone List City of Oak Grove Emergency Telephone List

Emergency Response Team

Name

Work Telephone

Alternate Telephone

Matt Anderson

763-286-2479

763-434-1441

Tim Smith

612-819-9018

763-434-1441

Matt Anderson

763-286-2479

763-434-1441

Tim Smith

612-819-9018

763-434-1441

Loren Wickham

763-404-7075

612-270-2272

Name

Work Telephone

Alternate Telephone

State Incident Duty Officer

Minnesota Duty Officer

800/422-0798 Out State

651-649-5451 Metro

County Emergency Director

Terry Stoltzman

763-421-4760

911

Minnesota Duty Officer

800/422-0798 Out State

651-649-5451 Metro

Mark Korin

763-753-7389

n/a

Curt Hallermann

763-528-0733

n/a

James Stuart

763-427-1212

911

Police Chief

n/a

911

Ambulance

n/a

911

Mercy (Coon Rapids)

763-236-6000

911

n/a

911

Emergency Response Lead

Alternate Emergency Response Lead Water Operator Alternate Water Operator Public Communications

State and Local Emergency Response Contacts

National Guard Mayor/Board Chair Fire Chief Sheriff

Hospital Doctor or Medical Facility

6 0

Local Water Supply Plan Template â&#x20AC;&#x201C;July 8, 2016

State and Local Agencies MDH District Engineer MDH State Testing Laboratory

Name

Work Telephone

Alternate Telephone

Isaac Bradlich

651-201-3971

n/a

Drinking Water Protection

651-201-4700

n/a

Minnesota Duty Officer

800/422-0798 Out State

651-649-5451 Metro

800-657-3864

n/a

MPCA DNR Area Hydrologist

Kate Drewry

651-259-5753

n/a

County Water Planner

Bart Biernat

763-422-6985

n/a

Name

Work Telephone

Alternate Telephone

Connexus Energy

763-323-2600

CenterPoint Energy

612-372-4664

Century Link

800-244-1111

n/a

Integra

952-746-6900

952-905-3109

Gopher State One Call

Utility Locations

800-252-1166

651-454-0002

Highway Department

Anoka County Highway

763-754-3520

Name

Work Telephone

Alternate Telephone

Andover

763-755-5100

n/a

Andover

763-755-5100

n/a

Name

Work Telephone

Alternate Telephone

MN Rural Water Association

800-367-6792

Utilities Electric Company Gas Company Telephone Company

Mutual Aid Agreements Neighboring Water System Emergency Water Connection Materials

Technical/Contracted Services/Supplies MRWA Technical Services

6 1

n/a

Local Water Supply Plan Template â&#x20AC;&#x201C;July 8, 2016 Well Driller/Repair

E. H. Renner

763-427-6100

Trout Well

320-251-5090

E. H. Renner

763-427-6100

Trout Well

320-251-5090

3-Way Electric (Joe Green)

612-865-3262

Aircon Electric

763-757-2120

Greenway Excavating (Andy)

612-267-4909

n/a

Chemical Feed

Larsco

763-421-3319

n/a

Meter Repair

DSG (Brad Simms)

952-300-0352

n/a

Mid America

763-478-8041

Duncan Co.

612-331-1776

n/a

Ferguson Waterworks

763-560-5200

n/a

Plant and Flanged

763-792-3870

Pace Analytical Services, Inc.

612-607-6400

n/a

MSA Professional Services (Chuck Schwartz)

612-548-3141

651-272-0041

Name

Work Telephone

Alternate Telephone

News Paper

Anoka County Record

763-220-0411

n/a

Radio Station

WCCO (830 AM)

612-370-0611

n/a

KBEK 95.5 FM

844-200-5235

Troy Ferguson (I.S.D. 15)

763-753-7041

Pump Repair

Electrician

763-390-8204

n/a

Plumber Backhoe

Generator Valves Pipe & Fittings

Water Storage Laboratory Engineering firm

Communications

School Superintendent Property & Casualty Insurance

6 2

n/a

Local Water Supply Plan Template â&#x20AC;&#x201C;July 8, 2016 Critical Water Users Hospital

Name

Work Telephone

Alternate Telephone

Mercy Hospital

763-236-6000

911

Graceful Living Senior Care

651-408-1438

n/a

Critical Use: Nursing Home Critical Use: Public Shelter Critical Use:

6 3

Local Water Supply Plan Template â&#x20AC;&#x201C;July 8, 2016

Appendix 6: Cooperative Agreements for Emergency Services Cooperative Agreements for Emergency Services â&#x20AC;&#x201C; None at this time.

6 4

Local Water Supply Plan Template â&#x20AC;&#x201C;July 8, 2016

Appendix 7: Municipal Critical Water Deficiency Municipal Critical Water Deficiency Note: Below is the current ordinance that addresses critical water deficiency. The city will adopt the critical water deficiency ordinance/control within the next 6 months and must submit it to the DNR as an amendment to the water supply plan. Sample ordinance can be found at: https://www.lmc.org/media/document/1/waterusageinacriticalwateremergency.docx Within 30 days following the adoption of your community's local comprehensive plan, of which this local water supply plan is a part, adopt and submit copies of the local controls identified here to the Metropolitan-Council, as required by Minnesota Statutes 473.865. Oak Grove Code of Ordinances Sec. 24-28. - Restricted hours for sprinkling.

(a) Restrictions on waterusage.Whenever it is determined by either the mayor or the city council that a shortage of water supply may be imminent, either may act in accordance with the procedures described in subsections (b) and (c) of this section to limit the uses of city water and the times and hours during which water from the city water supply may be used. (b) Action by city council.The city council may act by resolution to limit water usage. The resolution shall state in detail the restrictions imposed on water usage and the charge for instances of noncompliance. The restrictions shall become effective 24 hours after passage of the resolution. The city council shall take such action as is reasonably practicable to inform the general public of the imposition of the restrictions on water usage and of the charges and other penalties which could be imposed for violation of such restrictions and post notice of the water restrictions in public places where other city notices are posted.

(c) Action by the mayor. The mayor may act by filing with the city clerk a written certification that there is an imminent shortage of water supply. The certification shall specify in detail the restrictions on water usage and the charge for instances of noncompliance and shall become effective 24 hours after being filed. The city clerk shall endorse on each filing the time and date of filing. The mayor shall take such action as is reasonably practicable to inform the general public of the imposition of restrictions on water usage and of the charges and other penalties for violation of such restrictions and post notice of the water restrictions in public places where other city notices are posted.

6 5

Local Water Supply Plan Template â&#x20AC;&#x201C;July 8, 2016 Restrictions imposed by the mayor may be revoked by written directive from the mayor to the city clerk, who shall endorse on such directive the date and time of receipt, or by action of the city council. (d)

Penalties.

(1) For each instance of noncompliance with water usage restrictions imposed by this section, a charge set by the city annually in its fee schedule shall be assessed against the property on which the violation occurred and added to the water bill for such premises. The amount of the charge shall be specified by the city council in its resolution and the mayor in mayor's certification to the city clerk.

(2) Failure to comply with water usage restrictions after two warnings shall be cause for the discontinuance of water service.

(3)

Failure to comply with water usage restrictions shall be a petty misdemeanor punishable by the maximum fine allowed by law for such offenses.

(Prior Code, ch. 1746; Ord. No. 06-08)

6 6

Local Water Supply Plan Template â&#x20AC;&#x201C;July 8, 2016

Appendix 8: Graph showing annual per capita water demand for each customer category during the last ten-years Graph showing annual per capita water demand for each customer category during the last ten-years (Only Residential Water Use)

Residential Water Delivered (MG) 4

3.5

2.5

1.5

0.5

6 7

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

Local Water Supply Plan Template â&#x20AC;&#x201C;July 8, 2016

Appendix 9: Water Rate Structure Appendix 9: Water Rate Structure Water: Base rate--$25.20 plus $4.80/1000 gallons

6 8

Local Water Supply Plan Template â&#x20AC;&#x201C;July 8, 2016

Appendix 10: Adopted or proposed regulations to reduce demand or improve water efficiency Adopted or proposed regulations to reduce demand or improve water efficiency Note: Below are adopted regulations currently in place to reduce demand and improve water efficiency. Oak Grove Code of Ordinances Sec. 24-28. - Restricted hours for sprinkling.

(d) Restrictions on waterusage.Whenever it is determined by either the mayor or the city council that a shortage of water supply may be imminent, either may act in accordance with the procedures described in subsections (b) and (c) of this section to limit the uses of city water and the times and hours during which water from the city water supply may be used. (e) Action by city council.The city council may act by resolution to limit water usage. The resolution shall state in detail the restrictions imposed on water usage and the charge for instances of noncompliance. The restrictions shall become effective 24 hours after passage of the resolution. The city council shall take such action as is reasonably practicable to inform the general public of the imposition of the restrictions on water usage and of the charges and other penalties which could be imposed for violation of such restrictions and post notice of the water restrictions in public places where other city notices are posted.

(f)

Action by the mayor. The mayor may act by filing with the city clerk a written certification that there is an imminent shortage of water supply. The certification shall specify in detail the restrictions on water usage and the charge for instances of noncompliance and shall become effective 24 hours after being filed. The city clerk shall endorse on each filing the time and date of filing. The mayor shall take such action as is reasonably practicable to inform the general public of the imposition of restrictions on water usage and of the charges and other penalties for violation of such restrictions and post notice of the water restrictions in public places where other city notices are posted. Restrictions imposed by the mayor may be revoked by written directive from the mayor to the city clerk, who shall endorse on such directive the date and time of receipt, or by action of the city council.

6 9

Local Water Supply Plan Template â&#x20AC;&#x201C;July 8, 2016 (e)

Penalties.

(2) Failure to comply with water usage restrictions after two warnings shall be cause for the discontinuance of water service.

(3)

Failure to comply with water usage restrictions shall be a petty misdemeanor punishable by the maximum fine allowed by law for such offenses.

(Prior Code, ch. 1746; Ord. No. 06-08)

From City Public Works Design Manual

PART II DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION STANDARDS

2.21

Materials

Topsoil. Topsoil shall meet the MnDOT requirements for topsoil borrow. On-site materials typically do not meet these requirements and must be imported as needed. Subdividers shall submit the necessary tests to show compliance with these requirements. A minimum of 4â&#x20AC;? of topsoil is required in all areas.

7 0

Local Water Supply Plan Template –July 8, 2016

Appendix 11: Implementation Checklist – summary of all the actions that a community is doing, or proposes to do, including estimated implementation dates Implementation Checklist – summary of all the actions that a community is doing, or proposes to do, including estimated implementation dates Once the remaining 3 empty lots are developed, the City of Oak Groves’ small municipal system will be fully developed. Listed below is a table summarizing the actions Oak Grove is proposing to complete within the next five years to reduce irrigation usage.

Proposed Action

Implementation Date

Continue to post the City’s Consumer Confidence Reports on the city website, and the reports are mailed to the water supply system users. Offer free water use audits to residential customers Include water conservation education information into the City’s newsletter Modify SCADA to show Primary Well (Well #2) and Emergency Well (Well #1) water depth. Add Anoka County website link, https://www.knowtheflow.us/ to City’s website.

Currently Implemented

Currently Implemented Currently Implemented Currently Implemented

December 2017

7 1