This is 5
blast from
a
was originally posted on the my past It of perhaps in
2023 I'm admittedly very guilty
sept
not putting
as mucheffort as I ought to interms of visibility and formatting Carelessthen and have since i think101 learned mylesson
I was rather
I do think it is important for me to repost this and tidy
it up
I will leave it un modified for the most part except for some
Crucialities in respectof preserving an archiveons sense of OMGlookhow muchI'vechangedsincethen
I often use the term Penrose'ian exactly in attempts to describe d ftp.ie.IY tn Icaita'ftp.itehet.am iiers irg.II1 Has apart p
of my vocabulary
n
One may even put it into theadjacent concept of Lorenz'ian Chaoscomplexity
a systemwhich ishighlysensitiveto
in the initial condition e.gf.gg it is propagated farenough
Oresultsin a vastly differentoutputwhen
evenslight perturbations of the initiaffondition Evenminorchanges
e
e.g
g Takethe Weather
if
Oftenthis earns it the catchy name
Them
ii iii.ita.mn iiii.fi Ee iE it iiiiii iEiif iiiii i i iiiit iiiiii nt
t
ia
insome
And I want to apply all of that into the interpretation of
style
in every creative endeavor of the HumanExistence Neil in Jan15ᵗʰ2024
integgiates
ftp.f
ef
Ntransformation
Centalliff
yes
Ultimately the paradox at theheatofsuch.atantalizinge beauty in style is in to
saythat something is
Objective good at aSubjectivemanner
Lets bring in the musicians shall i Hiiiii
finds
iiiii
we
i.in
iiiiiiiiiii iiiiiiii iii ii.it it pleasing bc it's not a choice I
1
É
g
whno
outfumusffthing
it
therTsaprsonat.sn style tly Linearly independent so can all
of beauty attached to each musician buteven they be optimized independently tobeobjectivelygood irregardless of what
iiiiiii iiii iiiiiii qq.ef eE.de net m
kinematics
ÉÉÉÉeaxioms
fmz.gg If
i
determinismproofpropagation
ggyggggzggpm me
Can Both be simultaneously this measure great and in
Style has no mutual exclusivity attached to it
new motifs of patterns