Eiiii.LI
It
KIIF.FItIIEIEIn REEEEE.is
ffmtgfhff.tt
andwebsiteneilssciencejournal.com thepremiseis assuch hatLoveisnotsomucha resultit'saprecondition an ffffffffffff.fi f
chIamobsessedwithLoveSMaths.infactoutofal lofmys
thatsimpleassumption profit ima
byNaturebutastimegoesonitbecomesincreasinglyevidentthat this ifeng.nl if ihetpi meas Themeasureofgreatnessinascientificideaistheextenttowhichit fromthegroundup ittakes370pagestoconstructallof whenyougetitright it Iiiii iiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii.it
yqyqyqqqyqyqqjqqyqqqy.ggqq.iqyqyyyyqqpqyqqyqfyyqqyzy.ggqq.yyqyyyyy.gg
you me onesimplyinvestsbeliefandobservesitsimplications ZizerputsthisintoaratherbeautifulsentimentthatLovehasnowhy's HayanysuchwhyattachedtoitisofanexpostfactooriginForexample
yyyyyyygqyggygqy.gg
yyyyqq.gg
Let'sintroduceGodel'slegendaryincompleteness thereareactually in
iketosuitwhateveroutcomeonepleases IthinkthisisratherbeautifulwhenplacedintotheLove Mathisomorphismthatnosuc outmatesexistOnecanconstructthesufficientaxiomsofLovebetweenanyone Moreparticularly Godel'sfirstincompletenesstheorem oesassuchTherewillalwaysbeastatementthatwhiletruecannotbeprovedOnecanseethisratherneatlybysupposingthatwe Hachtoeverynumbern astatementandton I itscorrespondingproofOnecanseethattherewillalwaysbealonelystatemen GodelusesthistocreatetheGodelsentence alinewhichcanbereadandeasilyunderstoodbythebrain as beingtruebutsimulty get p ftp.ottiansitoitrattitheand understandthatyesthisistrue Icanclearlyseethatitsatisfiestherulesandyetnotreally
eg statementftp.o itateiet ffifIstiiementfgpitstatement
fyfyfff
tmtf t
iiti.it iiiiiiiiiiii www.anfqqyyqqqjqfy.qyyqyyqqyq.iq
iiiiiiiiiiiii
h h it t ᵈ d É f
t
it
iii
i
Perhaps Godelesque'ianstatementwouldbe Don'tbesadit'soversmilethatithappened Mathematicianandheartsoulascomputationalalgorithmicproofchecker onecansee tologicallyseeastrueandyetexceedingly difficulttoimplementintoone'sheart Oh marvelousmind I knowyouseethisto insteadsmileAndyet I cannotseemtoimplementitto
nonetheless I tooamfrowning
anysufficientlyeffective consistentaxiomaticsystemcannotproveitsownconsistency
If itcanproveitsown consistency it is inconsistent nowatfirstglancethismayappearseverelycounterintuitive butwithsomeratherhandwaveybutcommonplaceparables I uspectthatitmaybecomeimmediatelyfamiliareventrivialtojustabouteverydomainofourlogicalrealityForexample inthe 815.7 at it init hehe t.thciaiiY.ie Ynati Psiy'tianya.IT iiiiI.mutiiiYiaia t.tnstn tfiei acencytotheerror404 ntIpaadoxevokedbyourbrainsinmakingofapersonwhosayseverythingIsayis alie 1 I usingthecontentsofabooktoselfreferentiallyjustify
Fadjacentnotion I discoveredrecentlyisthesuffix
Nowwiththefamiliarityofthisaxiomaticnatureofknowledgew cannowcallintoquestiontheabilitytoaskWhy Itsoftensai
ontologicallypuzzlingthanthequestionitself Ihadagreatconversationwithone
ed suchdearMathematicianfriendwhichwentalittlebitsomethinglikethis
ÉÉ ffff É
Li
i e i ie i i.fi d i n i ti e
iii ii i iii iiiiiiiiiiiii.itiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii
Éfi ifhffh ih ffi i f fif f Éi.itiiii fiitf
C's
getusedtothem
n'eng.intsf fcttnhs I Y h's mini oweroflinguisticanalysisasshowntousrecentlyw thesetransformermodelLLM'sWherebywe ispossibletoparseoutalotofconceptualinformationpurelyonthebasisofSyntacticstructureword 591S p eiiiiijalisk.EEved n ffetiY.tahftp.femaI9atn'aYtiaIygiveifprettyfinkamtin.fi dhem ftp.ffffffiffmfffff ff f ffffffifth fffff f
samenoteofPhysmaticsthatphysicaltruthsonlyever tifulofMathematicalclothingIt isasifNaturehasthefinesthigh
ftpfffffhffahffffight
Itwouldcuriouslyappearthatdespitetheinventiveaspectofourgodelian withpreendowedrestrictionsconditionsthatseemtojustpopoutofthefifth p atheist pit.it ietniafnimiEai'YotoYskiiEr'efeIftheir y wethatonegetsoutoflearningthisoddlyexistentialfactBecauseweknowwhyWeconstructed ffffÉÉfÉfÉfff ÉÉf yfyÉffÉÉÉfÉ Éff É j a manyofwhichareknowntobeintercausalimplicationsofoneanotherbutalsootherswhichseem nffff.in E hhfhhfff fffhfffhffh.fi fffffffffffffffhffff.fi
greatestofMathematicaldiscoveriesweremadeinconjecturingadeepbloodtiesbeneathtwoobjectswhich air miniiei.vesiiiietiisYiiiiiiisiiiaPiieiiietiii seitisi.ina iPatnhintiiiiiiiiiiisiaiiiiii iiiiniiiYou ventivenessmerelytopreordainedguideddiscoveriesFascinatingobjectsinthesandlaidandhiddentherebysomebodyelseforustofindIt isthi nsationtheMathematicianliketheArchaelogistexperiencesinunderstandingthattheartifactstheyexcavatewerenotinventedbytheirshovel
i y physics iii
hi FIathi.fYs in aborateperfectlycoincidentalcrimeThisisknown stheanthropicprinciplexfinetuningproblem hereincontextofWigner'swhyisMathematicsso reasonablyeffectiveatdescribingtheworld this Tcommentdescribesflavorfully Itisachickenegg questionofexpostfactoisminconsideringour perceptionsofperfectlyfinetunedcoincidencesas amatterofexactlythatarbitrarycoincidenceof whichourconsciousagencyofobservationhasbeen
iii in isfisEnefint s pecificity ofallthefundamentalforcescausaltoiiiiiiiiiiiiii.fi
isnne.nmswmE.n ene.untaemetmaa ndifitwerebut9 weakerthestarswouldnothavevomitedoutanyelementsheavierthandeuterium Iftheweakforcehadbeenjustabout coalesceIftheEMcouplingconstantwere 0.2atomswouldnothaveformedandifitwerejustdifferentbyatooththatstars ffffff.LIffffuff fffffff.fifffffff
fiff fifth argecreature AllofthiseventuallysumsuptothefactthatIt0hasabondangle104.5boilingpointof3730Kspecificheat apacity 4.18451g 293 andthatif itweren'texactlythatLifewouldnothaveemergedasweknowit itatall nsciouslyawareofallofthefailedattempteduniverseswhichwerebornanddiedwithouteverhavingconducedanyconsciousagentstowithe WhileitmaybequarreledaboutwhethersuchconceptsasfinetunedcoincidencesexistinMathematics weknowsomewhatcertainlytha heylikelydoexistincosmologyphysicsThislineofquestioningrequiresustodeducewhichofthesecoincidencesareanthropicallycausative ndwhichareunrelatedtoaplausibilityofconsciousemergence Forexample itissomewhatdebatedonwhetherornottheangularsize incidenceofthesunbeing 400 largerbutalso 400 fartherthanthemoon causingthemtoappear insizeintheskywasinanyway
b m intentanti p iiiiii iii iii iii iii iii iii iiiis eind.iniiiiatasmiift ke umerous othercosmologicalcoincidences ofthisnatureandthedifficultyliesinstratificationofwhichareimplicatedinanunderlying simplyhumanprojectionsoflookingforzebrasinabarnofinfinitehorses Oneratherastoundingexample withoneanothernamelythatofthevacuumenergydensityakathecosmologicalconstantAandthedark ff.fmfhffhhf ftp.fifffffffffffifIf.FI ff
1mThisleadsonetothequestionofwhynow infathomingthatweliveinanextraordinarily beingassignedarandomlocker 0999999999999aconstantandhappeningtogetanumberthat I É h f f hI fth talk df.tn 1 8 11
eldNotonlyistheretheoddfeatureofitsspontaneoussymmetrybreaking fitjusthappeningtochooseonespotinthepotentialwelloverinnumerable therchoices It isthenevenmoreremarkabletolearnofthefinetuned parameterbuffetoftheotherparticlesmassesOnelearnsthatactuallywedo May7 fffffffigiggifffffiffffff fff
i fifffffffffffhf ÉÉÉfg allofrealityasweknowitwillsimplyblipoutandceasetoexistOfcoursesuchaprobabilityissoinordinatelylowthatit anthropicprincipleandthenatureofconsciousnessourbrainswanttoentertainit'sunlikely butitcouldWhatif and he evenfurther howwouldweknowWewouldn'tevenbetheretowitnessit sowho'stosayithasn'thappenedbefore
t.e.in
iii
f
fishy
f ÉÉ Éf
Thisnotionoffindingthemoststablelowestenergystate is aconceptsoubiquitousthatitoftengoessotrivially underappreciatedforitsprofundity Nature in acapacitynotlimitedtophysicsappearstobeanexpertoptimizerat allthingsalwayschoosingtheshottestpath initsmostelegantformulation Whetherthatistheevolutionaryselfor hydrodynamicfigureor asoapbubblechoosing a sphericalformtominimizemeansurface tension orperhapsfermat'sprincipleingoverningthepathoflighttravellingthroughdiffering forcretinsnotshortesttravelAgainfascinatinglythisprincipleofoptimizationneedno sotooofthemetaphysicallandscapeofideology IttorecallOckham'srazorofparsimon simplestexplanation ismostoftenthecorrectone hatideasoftruthtooseekthepathoptimaOfWherewhenhowwhy itisoftensaidthatscienceisincapableofanswerin
In isbsiethiotb.ie int'e'taEieatgiin'aelinftptt a tng.YhsYiYhiabs pr haya Yu's hits astheyare butinfacthavea reasoningofwhy IntroducingtheLagrangianofvariationalcalculusandtheprincipleofminimal Iionaryactionconsiderthefollowingfunctional likeafunctionoffunctionstakesinputstheandf x andspitsoutaIRnumber tobedefined Stheaction S f L xfinsfinsdiewherewewanttofindsomeftha willextremizethefunctional5giventheboundaryconstraints f a A fb
v 1295 tominimizethefunctionalTey L ff ofthetimeittakes ball roll pathneednotalwaysbethestraightone Itiscrucialheretounderstand seekingthe ofdistanceortimeinphysicalspacebut functionalisthephysicallaw Itcanbesaid thatwehavethatnaturehaschosen are actionandofSchrodinger'sequation quantummechanicalrandomwalkwasreally byDiracwhenherealized
jjt.fi emotions
m me off Ef If f ftp o If Ifif
Itinerant iiiiiiiii i iiii ii.fi iiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii.itiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii iii i i iiiieii.iqiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii
2g Figeneralizedforce F ma
forastrollonthelawnFeynmanwanders
