Inventing Invention, the birth of Love: Gödel's Theorem of Theoretics

InventingIvention EIiiffie.ie

iiiii.f.i.ae iiitheBirthoiiiii.ii fgiii.ie iiiiiiiiiiiil

fi

i.ff.i

fiiiiiiii.i.it

iiiiiiiiiii.iii.io.no iiiiiiiifiÉiiiiiiÉ heorenf iiij.tt

i.i.i.i if.ie

Eiii.iii

a.iiiii.iiiii.si.fi

iii i'iiiearn

heoreticstheoriiiiiiyy.si

EIIiiiaii.is

proving and p

Improve abilities iiiiiiiiiiiii.it

FTin

Riaiiii

Eiiiiiiii

PITY

iiiiiiiii.i

iiiiiiiiiiiiii.it

iii.is

t.fiiii

ft.theifii.im iifiii iiiiiii.iii.iii.io

ing iiiiiiiig

iiiii.iiii.iii.ir

pi

iiiii iiii fiitiiiiiiii

iii EIIEIIEI.es

Before I begin I'd highly suggest familiarizing yourself with a concept

I have long enjoyed dissecting Love isMath More particularly

Love is the axiom The closest non mathematical analogue I can

I

feyouanhape.tnf F

in

to

it

hitchhikethat

pmyf

neednotnecessarilyberealistically true

ftp fffffff

fffffffffp.fi

investments axioms as possible to generatethe findingcreating as little initial

most freestatements as possible

T.TT

Forexample.J

is a concept that NI humancan

fffffffffff.fi

iiiiii i.IE FIE

É p.tkat

tÉÉ

ÉÉÉÉÉtaÉ

É

i IeIhte

It is an axiomatic choice

É

ÉÉÉÉÉ

pow

It it

p

Interesting for now wecan

iI ii i i.fi iii.thereisan Enter Godel

iii iiit.fi

t

onwhichtostand

observer in Mathematics what.it

the

ÉÉÉÉÉÉ

É uyq.n.LI

You may have discovered it accidentally as a child gine you

stfme.tt

f

could give eat

some arbitrary numbers such that

e.g statement Iproof Statementffproof

É

statement

You'd see that there'll always be some

statement whiletrue that can never be proved It lacks a

iii

as the presence of this asymmetry

with no rationale heritage

proof

Theorem3

e

Sir Roger Penrose actually takes it

a

step further He says

Yes and in fact we know what that lonely statement

is

It's Understanding

Itrust Liar so

a

who says I'mnotlying

t.EE mi.Eatthju inn f

For example 4 4 16 can be taken as

a

statement but it can

that

is 16 understand

itiiiiiitiii 11 2

or

Algorithmic Computation

of doing Mathematics

HEygqqiyg.ge the human Brain's capability to

4 4 16

is something that exists Beyond

It is a miracle that humans are Tapable

Whatever it is exists far beyond Hence Godel's quote either Mathematics is too big for the Human mind

Or the Human mind is MORE than machine

e

f

thftible

dy

sense

number of reasons and

yet for a andsee in theirmind's eye at that look onecan

iiiii

I

µ

now as you read that the no Evenfurther 1

especially

non computational

IS A

Algorithmic

Process

TheBrain andmaybefurther Consciousness intrinsicability to understandandperform mathematics

Dehaene Seeing the Mind S an awesome neuro art Picturebook

is noncomputational

EI.IE

t

tT

f

fyyyyyyy.gg

The prisoner's

Dilemma

has been fairly investigated in

forthe quantitative analysis

terms

Novelfindings on rational trust

of evolutionary Biology as follows 2011PNASpaper The game is still come out of this e.g FreemanDyson's

fiI ii iiit'i

s JohnNash

Jrs

Nash equilibrium

I Ya It

onechoiceanassumption

men

i1

i i t.tt f iiffiii IE 6am

origin

this

T.tv

thin setthatthis

the Heart

may

object

Eitiissiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiif I cannotseemtoimplementit to the

1iiiii iiiiiiiiiiii i butnonetheless I too am frowning thatit is

LL

f

Iy.de.dnd 1ILovedt Love 06.9a

ffe.ttih

Marriage

I think I'd very much like

to pursue a theoretical

edgeto Love It's a deeply fascinating

topic with so many facets of analysis However unfortunate of its modern dilution soaped and cliche'd withLameandsappyTVshowsetc

Evenfrom a Neurobiological standpoint on the basis of functional anatomyI'venot encountered

many Newo enthusiasts who shrugs it offas

Ohit's justsimple evolutionary guiding pressure

iii

iiii

iiii.ii.i.i.ie iiiiii

fascinating

iiiiiiiiii'iiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii.it

ftp.ii Malestnteimalet

iiiiiii

iii n.ie

naffe truly

jt.isEietn j.tmeiIIe'thing

aidaninter

it ii i iiiiiiiiiiiiii.it

p

i i iiiI

iii

iiiiiiiI iii.iqiii a

fiiiE i i ii

Virus

promote