Iiia.aeii a.ie i
iiiii
ii iiiiiiiii iiii iiiiiifIi.i
iiiiii
i.it iii
ii
I T.f.ie
fiftffifig.it It
g
In Geek speak onemaysay Discovery in Science is not necessarily
about forming new
ideological
butrather thefacilitation of idealogical neuroplasticity About the building and tearing down at bridges Disprove a theorem
Break a Law etc
Connect two disparate Concepts
Predict a
Synapses
deunification phenomenonetc
ff
iifii.fi ifE ID
up
Unification
e.g Electromagnetism Wh ai Darwin Mendelian
genetics etc
you can even have interesting situations like
to Prove
prove
ff I
IfÉ
Or a Mathematician's A
ftp.iiiin
fhessio.itHardy
Gambit
proof
by Contradiction
1Tiparethischiftythnontsianethifff
I.IDispanIffffathfiisforthiffan
Unpopular Opinion Crafted pieces should be but Wang quality
the literature
allowed in Not
only the Saying every
W as in
t
m
e
g
it is a Mo
literature
hn
g
Math feastafyjf.fi
f
So who cares it
JT etc it'simaginarythen
waysworthwhiletotakeold disproven ideas
and continue to propagate them forone
miiii
themselves t.i.is
kiiE.name
e.fiiiiiiti
Atf g for another we may be able to treat it as a Cosmological
if we understand the particular
f y
boundary conditions
e.g ty.int i
E ii
removable discontinuity
in which it fails
t.it
x i
if 1 eÉIÉEif_ but
A
but
model has aflaw
ITEM
yahoo.aguuy.a.am
FThatDriveIs
me insane Butonlybecause I LOVELEARNING
been approximating onthesame converging is really nodifferentI've deepdreamy fundamentalobjectthiswholetime I realized Schoolmade easy waspartof theproblem LaGrangian off is TheWholeEducationalSystem I don'treallybuyanyof it anymore Ican'ttrustthe thereferenceof this or thenormalityto that Thisishowthingsarenormallydone Yeahwellthat'sweirdusually
III
Neils science journal
Yeah well
the thing is Broken
Normal
and
got us here Normal won't fix it
the
That's why fundamental Stochasticity Emerges the way
P to stochastic
macrospective
shhh variances in speciation of
Evolutionary Biology
It's clear there's
supposed to be a continuous spectrum of structure thus function You can't discretize a style
or command a particular interpretation We'remeanttoDiversify
q to think We
of reallyanyart scienceincluded as a or even perhaps in a Penrose'ian sense of infinitely non repeating tiling of a plane the sense that subjectto
In
mathematical complexity it's
computationally irreducible
There's probably no way to tell beforehand whether
something might or mightn't be optimizable
throw
m
aÉ yyf
pgynyyyyyyyyyy.gg qq.gg yyyyyyyyyya
mu
theylike
Axioms Tobe Commanded
Allpossiblestyles Imagine allthepossible vectors
of
communication
ff f ded
fffxf.IE sfff
Maybe we one day submit Grandtheorem.suin form of Drawings Songs Poetry
As
Fine
till
Irregardless of theinitialffonditions
of style Aren't
it Iif
EEI.inaffmaticians
once did
we ought to embrace that the science is not independent of the scientist To hug
Maybe
truth yes but maybe too in embracing each unique spoil of an interpretory fingerprint
Maybe
if instead of centralized journals
Dare I say Springer Elsevier
What it every Academician just own
tasteful interpretations
etc
ran their
No rules No Guidelines m
Neilsicieniejournal
pqianasscience Ehsteinssg.mg.gg
Thomas science journal
sciencejournal
Maybe you could even
watch their thoughts
like
novel Maybe some of them figure out ways to represent work maybe a podcast of a Lab a
livestream
a fluorescence Art Gallery etc
I think Scientifin Writing has fallen in the times It has not grown in potential over time in fact most may argue that it has shrunk
IÉ
III
É
i If
so
discretizing
Neil into a
giant connectomies map of my thoughts using each piece as a
giant knot
a
basis neuron may produce
There is an interesting stat
about Wikipedia As of Jan6 2024 there is only 1 dead end article
Meaning that you can traverse the entirety of
Wikipedia
by way of only hyperlink
Ultimately it's
a
knot topology question
Can one's brain be Unraveled in the same 26082
Nfhs
are there
Continuous
way
isolated ideas
Discontinuous
Do interesting loops form
Any themes emerge
As Feynman suggests
Perhaps such
a
perspective may be
helpful not only to Nature But too of the thinkers who study her