EE
EE
iiiiiii iiiiite.iniaee iiiiiiiiiiiii.si EEEIII.TTIiiint
gsi
si
iii fi I.ie
ogig
and N Bouba s Kiki Flames Our Words Our
EE
Ways
name
iifiiiiiiji
si
Convergent tendencies in Belief
iI
Éiiiiiii
ifiiffdiii.f.gg effed
A
I P
This topic
is insane So insane that I
probably
have the largest
disbeliefbelief dialectica I've ever had about anything especially
this
since writing
Unpopularopiniont
2024s
atted pieces shouldbe
L.fi
WIFE
iii i ii iii iiiii
Hiiiii
i.i.iii.io
5ᵗʰ
supp
can safelytraverse w that map because
filstonthe
Letunbe
but instead to judge it on the
of freestatement products
how Exactly wherethe
bandaging
amount
youget
ÉIIffy
LikeKenWilson's conception ÉÉÉÉ of a
effectivefiel .IE ÉffffÉfÉffIIÉ t.FI
Axiomsare insome ways beyond trustfaith
intheassumption Youcanneverprove anaxiom
1 i Iitandsa
That is to Present a
say
perhaps as
suggestion to
a
it.weassume
then
Lawyer might
say
It get
G.fi
i
fire
jtii
on
I can neither confirm nor Deny these statements and infact
implore you to see this topic from beyond the shallow standpoint
belief of factusfiction Real vs Unreal trueus untrue etc and to instead suspend and look at it as Axioms judged entirely on the propagation of logicand its resultant conclusions rather than its explicit
meaning
Let's begin here
EFET
nfzyf yyyygy.gg
yyy
Neurobiological and Biochemical context
iiii
placebo
in
fakepainkiller
It will get increasingly more and more
iiiii
iii iii iiiiii.ie
i.iii
i
iii iiiiiiiii.iti'Eiiiiiiii ient
1
g
i
iiii
i iiiiiiiiiiiiiiit.it iiii
Most interestingly we findthat the Brain's synaptic.intastmctrelandthrestofitsdownstremactors are
quite literally Synthesizing some cocktail of endogenous pi eqgeam.gethat perform legitimate of Biochemistry increasing K conductance hyperpolarize i.e harderforsynapsetoreachdepolarizationthreshold numbing
function
Whetherthis endogenous mechanism of silencing thenociceptive pathway is as effective as a legitimat B iochemis is notaptThe exogenous pilldosageofMorphine isanotherquestion But to saythis placebopill is faire measurable neuropeptides srealThethought conception deception does indeed promote the synthesis andactivity of real
In thissense notonly can wesaythattrueunassailedthought results in a material
Biochemical prominence
butthatyou can say this placebopillDOESindeed work butonlyso long as onebelieves it
This is a prettytrivial concept to most Neurobiologists it has sparked manysuchinterpretationssuch
t
f
ÉÉÉÉhÉÉÉÉ ÉÉ
fi
i iiiii f
www literally yes itisquite understanding_ is forthe of
toBiologicalfamiliars
hadyesterday
responsible
ÉÉÉÉ onÉ
endocrinological concert
f
tosaythatthe Dinnryou that determined yourmoodemotionsthoughtsyouwore
mechanistically appropriate
neuropeptides
and acton thebiochemical pathways of synapses to promoteLTP in Synapticplasticity
iii
ii.iiiii.ie iii iiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii.ie In thismodernera of Newobiochemistry we understand that the
L
Here one might note that is interesting that we seem to Principle of placebo as
a
by ratherthan as a feature Weseem to
have no difficulty in understanding and accepting that
1k TheMind but havetrouble
Molecules
entertaining
the
This also shouldn't be too outlandish to believe considering that
810,000cellsarebeingreplacedsecond cocktail of hormones Neuropeptides thatthe derived fromourthoughtbehavior is notonly of suggestion w ithinmeans etc It is well Biochemistry cellular cause dfutafimpacti.ve ofour discussBoubaKiwi the DorianGrayeffectetc Mechanics Statistics concepts introduce would some of that I believe is beneficiallyessentialasanidea framework to
first
Next I wantto
like
1 Centrallimit theorem
ftp.t he
IEIIIia
LawoflargeNumbers
S t.itoaidnia
fetz.gg ffifffftffffiffffffff.fi'fff
But
2 Brownian Randomness
ftp.ndtffffmhf
ftpff.my
thefactthateach ofthese molecules mustbeobeyingtherandomness water of thermodynamical despiteeachindividualstochasticeventbeingentirelyrandom fluctuations these realizes Einstein deterministic writing a arebothtrue as patternbeginstoemerge asyouaccumulate n x a famous 1905 individualrandomness convergesuponsome where Brownianrandom paper on this walk hefiguresthat Revealingthatthe
underlying consistency
asthener
An invisibleplan ifyouwill
hpt puff m tt hpetm thfnefftheatu here o
oneis ableto modelthemovements of the pollengrainbased on integration ofall ofthoseunitconstituent watermolecules Again one maysaypoetically that a method beginsto
samples Theidea x̅ willapproach u asyourun N isthat appearfromthe thermodynamic madness thetruepopulationaverage m becauseeatnewabsence
p.fiwYYEignfgbait I
they I
semeygtf.it haf tn
principle
igscios.this
One of them is Bouba the other is
Kiki Guess which is which Bouba Kiki
I_
2
4M
t.fi i.tf
Itg
somehow we almost universally intuit
This is
a very Chomsky'ian
I
I
efhthenhfe.P
e
notion of Linguistics as a
part of some Synesthesiac package of multidimensional information hidden inside language Hispoint being that syntactics notonlyconveymoreinformation than just the words themselves and thatthis emergent property of language activelyand powerfully shapes the way we think
and even more Unbelievably it works w faces
Guess this guy's name F
No seriously
f
the correct answer here
is chosen 38
of the time
Muchmoretharandon chance Thecorrect answer is Dan
Idmorthanjustguessing names correctly
LLL
They even
I
TT
fggygyyygyyyygyyg yggggy.gg
g
connection here to that somestrange stochasticguidingforce of
I whittle It selntfhfdethhtnihhgh.la of he
One might evenrelate that to the Lorenz attractors in chaostheory a sensitivesystemwhere a fiterent
aunt
I
timepropagation Andyetevenso iiiiiiiiif
f i i iii ii
lets get back I
t.int
Physics QM observer
eefff.gs
ti
ian.n9
Mathematics
É
f ff.i
Itlacks a
É
ÉÉ
ÉÉ
asdiscussedpreviously
i
fff É É ÉÉiifif ÉiÉii i
ÉÉÉfÉ
iffifii ihh f
f
ii iii
I
417
F
PersonB sticksto
n
i iiiiiiiii
Theoretic Origin Game
Fiitiitiititiitiiiiiiiiiiiiiiffitiitiitiitiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiitii
iiiiiiiiiiiiii.IEiiiiiiiii.fii iiiii
n
tf FIiia.it
l
iiiiiiiii
É
fffff
h
fh
hihh
iiiii iiiii É Éii iiiiiiiÉ
iiiiid i
f
f
IT
Fonstatomequestionsare
Every
iii ii i ii i
µ Map i fifii.i.iii.in.intii
h iii i iii
iiiiii.it
iii
not so much the discovery of anything new Persay ratherjust a classification schemato Organize what is already known and perhaps as
I
Id ate.ttntb delmhrea
h h hd d df
Kastrup e.g Platopopper'sDemcationetc f
i i i iii fii.in
Eli
i
hit
Delusion
Accidental Manifestation
Imprintation Subjective interpretation µ
Coincedence Causal Synchronicity
Ultimately the Question is
Bug
or
Feature