• How Clean are Hong Kong’s Clothes?
Corporate Social Responsibility in 26 Companies Oxfam releases Transparency Report II O.N.E Person, Kalina Tsang • Iraq – survey of 1,700 women • India – life for women after the tsunami in 2004 • ASEAN reform and the ASEAN People’s Center • The ageing of China’s society – a policy review
09 20 ril Ap
Time files. March 2009 marks the
rights of poor people, I am concerned
Another challenge arises with
second Transparency Report that
about the millions of factory workers
corporate donations. To practice
Oxfam Hong Kong has launched on
who struggle for a living in developing
w ha t we p re a ch , O x fa m ha s a
the garment industry in Hong Kong.
beiNg TRANSPARENt an essential part of being responsible
countries: low wages, long working
rigorous procedure for gathering
I feel encouraged. Good progress
hours, forced overtime, no proper
information about companies who
has been made since the first report
contracts, and many other abuses
wish to donate to us; my team is
in 2006. Back then, the majority of the
along the supply chain. As Hong Kong
responsible for reviewing the social,
companies were reluctant to respond
is a leading investor in Asia’s garment
environmental and human rights
to our survey, and with the highest
industry, it makes strategic sense to
records of a prospective corporate
Transparency rating being only 10
focus on this sector. Better labour
donor. The repor t s we compile
points out of 100, the results were
standards do make a difference,
include recommendations whether
We have trust in a good person,
in Hong Kong. Perhaps the workers
alarming. This time, the highest score
and companies should disclose these
Oxfam should accept funding or not.
and we have more trust in a good
– mostly women – are barely paid
is 70 and more and more companies
better policies so that investors and
Oxfam does not accept donations
system. In the world of finance, Hong
enough to suppor t themselves ,
have been in dialogue with us. In both
consumers can be aware of where their
from a corporation whose business
Kong people are very familiar with
let alone a family. Perhaps the
reports, Oxfam used the most rigorous
money is going.
is undermining the principle and
disclosure of corporate financial data.
factory pollutes. Perhaps there are
It is important for civil society
effectiveness of poverty alleviation: we
Many residents, within and outside
many injuries due to sub-standard
research methodologies to accurately
to push for higher standards, and
are particularly concerned about the
of the financial circles, are investors
equipment. While workers contribute
I remember when I first started
to endorse good CSR , not good
production and financing of weapons,
who make their decisions based on
time and energy to produce the
meeting with the companies. I was
public relations. Oxfam Hong Kong
as well as sub-standard social and
analysis of these data. Companies are
goods, often creating extra value,
almost always asked why Oxfam
wants to be constructive and to work
environmental practices and policies.
expected to provide the information
which eventually brings profits to the
is working on corp orate so cial
alongside companies in their efforts
Declining donations certainly affects
in a transparent manner, not just
company, do they themselves benefit
responsibility (CSR) with the garment
to improve. So, while we challenge
our income, yet we must uphold
because certain laws and regulations
proportionately? Some of us here in
sector in particular. Was it my intention
the practices of certain companies
our ethics and principles. A specific
require them to do so, but also
Hong Kong may benefit, if we have
to request donations? I would answer
even though we know we will face a
example of social responsibility within
because so many members of the
shares in the company, or if we buy
that CSR is not only philanthropy,
strong response from them when they
the agency is that companies making
general public rely on the data.
the products, which are good value
which can be seen to be primarily an
see their low Transparency rating, we
t-shirts for the organisation and its
Yet, corporate transparency is
act of charity. As a champion of the
also hope that a low score can be an
events must demonstrate good labour
broader than revealing financial
Oxfam Hong Kong calls on garment
impetus, an opportunity, for change.
standards and practices – certainly no
information. To be able to trust in
companies to be more transparent.
My experience over the years has
‘sweatshops’ are allowed!
a company, to be able to evaluate
Two years ago, when we undertook
TS Ka AN lin a G
benchmark corporate practices.
By Wong Kwok Ho
for the money.
shown me that there are huge gaps,
The fiscal year in Hong Kong
whether it is run ethically or
the first transparency research on the
or even a strong mistrust in some
has come to a close. In 2009-10, we
not, requires more information.
disclosure of labour practices by Hong
cases, between the NGO community
will launch a second CSR Survey of
Companies should also report their
Kong garment companies, the results
and the corporate world. It has
the Hang Seng Index Constituent
social and environmental impacts,
were disappointing. The majority of
taken me many, many meetings with
Companies as well as Good Fashion:
including labour standards. Imagine
companies scored zero, indicating that
some companies to reach a common
A Guide to being an Ethical Clothing
a manufacturing company which has
they had virtually no system at all for
understanding of terms, working
Company. Watch this space.
factories in a developing country.
such information disclosure. In the
Perhaps the working conditions there
latest research, we revisited the issue
are not as satisfactory as workplaces
once again, this time with a larger
methods and principles. It has been worth it.
Kalina Tsang coordinates Oxfam’s private sector engagement efforts. She is based in Hong Kong.