1 INTRODUCTION
26 CONCEPT & PLANNING
53 RECOMMENDATIONS
2
NEIGHBORHOOD OVERVIEW
27
CONCEPT DIAGRAM
54
ACTION PLAN
3
PURPOSE AND MISSION
28
MAJOR THOROUGHFARE EVALUATIONS
55
ACTION PLAN & CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN
4
PLANNING BACKGROUND
29
CENTRAL AND ADAMS AVENUE
56
CAPITAL PROJECTS MAP
5
THE STORY
30
31ST STREET
57
WATER LINES EXHIBIT
6
THE WHAT
31
25TH STREET
58
WASTEWATER LINE EXHIBIT
7
THE WHY
32
BARTON AVENUE
8
THE HOW
9 9
DEMOGRAPHICS & COMMUNITY INPUT
33
21ST STREET
34
ENHANCEMENT FOCUS AREA
35
CORRIDOR ANALYSIS
10
DEMOGRAPHIC PROFILE
36
CORRIDOR ISSUES
11
DEMOGRAPHIC TAKEAWAYS
37
ACCESS MANAGEMENT
12
SURVEY AND PUBLIC ENGAGEMENT
38
MODEL BLOCK
39
MODEL BLOCK CONCEPT
13 INVENTORY & ANALYSIS 14
REGIONAL MAP
40
25TH STREET ENHANCEMENT
15
PLAN AREA MAP
41
CENTRAL ADAMS CORRIDOR SIGNAGE
16
PHOTO INVENTORY
42
25TH STREET REVISIONING
17
FUTURE LAND USE & MAJOR THOROUGHFARE PLAN
43
25TH STREET ADAPTIVE REUSE
18 ZONING
44
DISTRICT IDENTITY
19
EXISTING PROPERTY CONDITIONS
45 21st STREET INFILL PLAN
20
SIDEWALK ANALYSIS
46 21st STREET INFILL CONCEPT
21
OPPORTUNITIES & CONSTRAINTS
47
BUSINESS/TECH PARK
22
CENTRAL & ADAMS AVENUE CORRIDOR PLAN
48
BUSINESS/TECH PARK CONCEPT
23
ANALYSIS SKETCH NORTH 27TH STREET
49
PARK ACCESS ANALYSIS
24
ANALYSIS SKETCH 25TH STREET
50
RAIL LINE LINEAR PARK
25
CENTRAL AVENUE OVERPASS PARK
51
LIGHTING PLAN
52
LIGHTING ZONES
TEMPLE, TEXAS
TABLE OF CONTENTS
introduction
CENTRAL
1
Central
The Central District has stood as the gateway to the heart of Temple for decades. Its many restaurants, stores and services have welcomed travelers on I-35 as a respite from a long journey or as a convenient inroad to downtown and the rest of the city. Recent highway improvements have created a much more enjoyable experience for these travelers, while future enhancements promise to add beauty to the improved form and function of the area. The district represents far more to the City than a well-traveled exit from a busy highway. It represents the spirit and pride of Temple. This sentiment is especially evident when the community fills the seats at Wildcat Stadium, which stands in the center of the district. During any given Friday night home game, a sea of Wildcat blue floods the streets in a show of support and togetherness. The strong feeling of community pride is shared by natives and transplants alike. Everyone who lives in this community knows that the future leaders of Temple will come from this institution – and from the heart of this neighborhood.
2
TEMPLE, TEXAS
NEIGHBORHOOD OVERVIEW
PURPOSE
The City of Temple is dedicated to fostering cohesive, distinct, vibrant, safe and attractive neighborhoods, where citizens take pride and are engaged with their community. These objectives will be accomplished through the work of the City’s Neighborhood Team. Through a process of collaboration and communication, the City’s Neighborhood Team will strive to 317 ensure continued improvements to Temple’s neighborhoods, as well as access to a wide variety of housing types that are safe, accessible and affordable.
35
363 TEXAS
TEXAS
36
TEXAS
Bellaire Garden
NEIGHBORHOOD SERVICES
Northwest Hills
NEIGHBORHOOD PLANNING
Historic
Central I-35 Midtown
n aw dl W oo
East Downs
Downtown
TEXAS
Silo Crestview
Birdcreek
MISSION
YOUR NEIGHBORHOOD TEAM
363
Ferguson Park
Midtown
Temple Heights
Jackson Park
TMED
35
Working alongside residents in each neighborhood, our mission is to identify neighborhood concerns, values, vision and goals. Through this process, the City will develop long-range plans for each Neighborhood Planning District to include: • City Capital Improvement Projects • Private Investment & Economic Development Opportunities • Community Development Block Grant Projects A strong emphasis will be placed on improving the quality of life in each neighborhood while increasing access to affordable housing.
US
190
Temp le
City L
imits
Barnhardt
95
TEXAS
PURPOSE AND MISSION
CENTRAL
3
PLANNING BACKGROUND The Central District is one of 18 planning districts within the City of Temple. Each district plan has a similar planning process that is intended to complement the City’s Comprehensive Plan with a more focused effort at the neighborhood level. This plan looks at the existing conditions and engages residents to derive genuine information and direction from the district. While using the best practices for planning, the results of each plan define specific recommendations that are unique to each planning area.
4
TEMPLE, TEXAS
PLANNING BACKGROUND
The Story
CENTRAL
5
CENTRAL IS... GATEWAY MIX OF USES BUSTLING IMAGE OF TEMPLE The Central District is the definitive sense of arrival for visitors to Temple. It is the preeminent point of entry for people who are traveling to either downtown or the Temple High School campus.
6
TEMPLE, TEXAS
THE WHAT
There is no one overriding activity or land use in the Central District with residential, commercial, and Temple High School all being large influencing factors. The mix of land uses has resulted in less distinct defining characteristics for the neighborhood.
The area’s businesses, places of worship, and high school are all contributing destinations in making the Central District an activity node. Vehicular traffic is a dominant force, but the pedestrian presence is also abundant.
The Central Avenue and Adams Avenue corridors are a main travel route within the City and as such, are definitive to the image of Temple. The adjoining buildings, street conditions, landscaping, and signage are elements that influence perceptions of the community.
SAFE TRAVEL
APPEARANCE
IDENTITY
STUDENTS & TEACHERS
COHESIVE USES THE WHY
CENTRAL
7
OPPORTUNITY • Promote the plan area’s mix of land uses to support an ideal place to live, have a business, and be a student. • Capitalize on prominence of the Central Avenue and Adams Avenue corridor to improve overall Temple image. • Support the transformative vision for the Central District.
CLARITY • Improve visual appearance and reduce traffic conflicts along the Central Avenue and Adams Avenue corridor.
GROWTH • Encourage increased housing choice in the plan area. • Realize economic potential of Central Avenue and Adams Avenue corridor. • Support Temple High School as an important economic engine for the population of Temple.
STREETSCAPE • Improve the context-sensitive nature of the streets in the plan area. • Promote increased pedestrian focus throughout the plan area. • Emphasize the importance of landscaping and street trees as aesthetic contributions to the overall image of Temple.
STRATEGIC CONSIDERATIONS This planning effort is intended to complement the focus areas and initiatives laid out in Temple By Design, the 2020 Comprehensive Master Plan. The strategic considerations identified above highlight key features of the plan area that are intended to help guide unique recommendations for the Central District. These resulting recommendations will be compiled into an Action Plan which include references to the specific Comprehensive Plan Initiatives they are intending to help realize. This planning effort includes a public engagement and visioning process to determine recommendations which ultimately lead to a series of corresponding capital improvement projects. 8
TEMPLE, TEXAS
THE HOW
Demographics & Community Input CENTRAL
9
DEMOGRAPHIC PROFILE
Central Census Block Group
Total Population and Median Age
Census Tract 020702 Block Group 1 Plan Area Boundary
740
A look into demographics will help frame the characteristics of the plan area’s population. That information can be used to guide recommendations for policies and changes to the built environment. This information is derived from the American Community Survey 2014-2018 5-year for block group 1, census tract 207.02, Bell County Texas. The plan boundary aligns with the geographic boundary of the census tract, allowing for a direct use of the information.
People
Nuge
45.4
nt Av
Median Age
enue
Race and Ethnicity
1.9%
6.4% 1.1%
Population Breakdown by Age Cohort
83.5%
7.2%
85 years+ 80 to 84 years 75 to 79 years 70 to 74 years
Ai
rp
65 to 69 years
or
tA ve
nu
Adam
60 to 64 years
e
55 to 59 years
t
s Ave
Stree
nue
31st
50 to 54 years 45 to 49 years 40 to 44 years Cent
35 to 39 years
ral A venu
35
Adam
e
30 to 34 years
s Ave
nue
25 to 29 years 20 to24 years 15 to 19 years
Stree
t
10 to 14 years
25th
5 to 9 years Under 5 years 0
Aven u
eH
10
TEMPLE, TEXAS
DEMOGRAPHIC PROFILE
20
40
60
80
100
White Black
American Indian
Some other race
Two or more races
62% Hispanic
Housing Rent vs. Own
42.9%
$24,563 Median Household Income
Own
57.1% Rent
Educational Attainment
Financial Characteristics
37.8%
Households Below Poverty Line
25.0%
Means of Transportation to Work
33.7%
Less Than High School
High School/GED
40.5%
0%
Some College/ Associates
Bachelors or Higher
5.6%
0%
Bicycle, Motorcycle, Other
Transit
14.5% 79.9% Walk
Car/Truck
Employment of Residents by Industry 11.3%
9.2%
2.1% 17.2%
13.2%
DEMOGRAPHIC TAKEAWAYS The following are a few summary conclusions derived from reviewing the plan area’s demographics: • • •
10.4%
7.1% 6.1% 18.4%
Transportation, Warehousing, and Utilities Retail Trade
Manufacturing Construction Agriculture
• • •
Population largest age cohort is 45-49 years, as a whole, the population is older with a median age of 45.4 years. The neighborhood is predominately white and Hispanic ethnicity. Educational attainment is low, likely influencing the high rate of households living below the poverty line. The plan area has a high rental rate, especially considering absence of multi-family in the plan area. Plan area’s largest employers are Professional, Scientific, Management, and Administrative. While a vast majority of the population commutes with car or truck, a significant portion walks, which draws attention to the importance of pedestrian infrastructure.
4.9% Arts, Entertainment, Recreation, Accommodation, and Food Service Educational Services, Healthcare, and Social Assistance Professional, Scientific, Management, and Administrative
Finance, Insurance, and Real Estate Other Services
Employment in the fields of Wholesale Trade, Information, and Public Administration were not represented.
DEMOGRAPHIC TAKEAWAYS
CENTRAL
11
SURVEY
PUBLIC ENGAGEMENT
The survey had 18 responses from residents of the Central District. This small sample size limits the ability to draw meaningful conclusions, as one response has substantial influence. With that in mind, the following highlights responses to a few survey questions.
The planning process for the Central District began just as the shutdown was issued for the pandemic. The Neighborhood Planning Team was challenged to develop alternative community engagement methods so that crucial feedback could still be gathered from the residents. After much thought and brainstorming, the group developed a virtual “Family TV Night” kick-off event in which the staff recorded an 11 minute video to play on Facebook, YouTube and the City’s Government Access Channel 10. To get the word out about the event, the staff created a package for each household that included microwave popcorn, candy, crayons, surveys and an activity for the kids. The packages were delivered with instructions about how to tune in to watch the show, which was called NPD News (Neighborhood Planning District News). Residents were encouraged to return their surveys for a chance to win gift certificates for downtown merchants. A second show was recorded announcing the winners. The virtual kick-off event received many views and several surveys were returned.
What is the biggest asset of your neighborhood?
The Neighborhood Planning Team owes the Central District a debt of gratitude for helping us create a community engagement tool that we intend to use for all future plans.
If you could change one thing about your neighborhood, what would it be?
COVID-19 Impact The ability to conduct in-person public engagement was effectively eliminated because of disease prevention considerations. As such, the public open house event of the planning process was canceled. This event provides key contributions to public engagement as it raises neighborhood awareness, increases public survey participation, and provides an opportunity for information sharing directly from neighborhood residents. The planning team worked hard to make up for what was lost with door to door (socially distanced) solicitation, broadcast media, and social media outreach. 12
TEMPLE, TEXAS
SURVEY AND PUBLIC ENGAGEMENT
Inventory & Analysis
CENTRAL
13
s diu
3M
ile
Ra
Regional Map
This exhibit provides a regional context for the plan area as well as important destinations such as schools, grocery, and parks & open space.
Plan Boundary
Mayborn Convention Center
Midtown Neighborhood Temple Heights Neighborhood
35
363
Downtown Neighborhood
TEXAS
Jefferson Elementary School
Historic Neighborhood Medical Institution Education Institution
Kennedy-Powell Elementary School
Major Retail / Grocery
Walker Park Park
Parks & Open Space Existing Major Entry/Exit
I-35 Central Connector Neighborhood
Lamar Middle School Miller Park
Jackson Park
Central Neighborhood Whistle Stop Park
Target
35
Scott & White Santa Fe Center
Temple Heights Neighborhood
14
TEMPLE, TEXAS
Downtown Neighborhood
1/2
R Mile
H.E.B.
ile R 2M
adiu
s
ile R 1M
adiu
s
Sammons Golf Course
adiu
s
Temple High School
REGIONAL MAP
Jones Park
Midtown Neighborhood
Baker Field
Temple Downtown Core Santa Fe Plaza Santa Fe Market Trail
MLK Festival Grounds
Plan Area Boundary
Historic Neighborhood
Plan Boundary Downtown Neighborhood Temple Heights Neighborhood
Downtown Neighborhood Midtown Neighborhood
Midtown Neighborhood Historic Neighborhood Temple ISD
SF
BN
y wa
il Ra
Temple High School TISD
35
Temple Heights Neighborhood
This exhibit is intended to show the plan area boundaries and important points of interest. 0’ 125’ 250’
500’
PLAN AREA MAP
CENTRAL
15
Nugent Ave. Photo Inventory Legend
xx
Photo View Callout BN SF
Historic District
ay ilw Ra
31st St.
Downtown District Midtown District
Temple Heights District I-35 Midtown District
01
02
03
04
05
06
07
08
09
10
11
12
Houston Ave.
Bray St.
Temple High School
Jack White St.
35
Stadium Rd.
Calhoun Ave.
Calhoun Ave.
12
HEB 11
06
04
10
19th St.
Barton Ave.
Adams Ave.
09 08
Central Ave. 21st St.
03
Avenue A
23rd St.
33rd St.
07
Avenue B 29th St.
01 Avenue C
35th St.
TISD 05
Avenue D
02
25th St.
27th St.
31st St.
W Avenue E
PHOTO INVENTORY
The images displayed on the right are taken from the Central District plan area. These images assist in providing context to the character of the neighborhood’s built environment. Images were selected to show neighborhood assets, concerns, opportunities, conditions, etc. 16
TEMPLE, TEXAS
PHOTO INVENTORY
This exhibit shows the Future Land Use Plan and Major Thoroughfare Plan for the Central District from the 2020 Comprehensive Plan.
MTP Class & Future Land Use Major Arterial Minor Arterial Neighborhood Collector Thoroughfare Connector Trail Local Connector Trail Urban Residential Corridor Mixed-Use Industrial Plan Area Boundary Temple ISD
SF
BN
y wa
il Ra
Temple High School
HEB
TISD
35
0’ 125’ 250’
500’
FUTURE LAND USE & MAJOR THOROUGHFARE PLAN
CENTRAL
17
Zoning District
This exhibit shows the location and breakdown for the Central District zoning.
Single-Family 2 (SF-2)
Two Family (2F)
Single-Family 3 (SF-3)
Multi-Family 1 (MF-1)
Manufactured Home (MH)
Neighborhood Services (NS)
Office-1 (O-1)
Commercial (C)
Office-2 (O-2)
Light Industrial (LI)
General Retail (GR)
Heavy Industrial (HI)
Plan Area Boundary Temple ISD
SF
BN
y wa
il Ra
Temple High School
HEB
TISD
ial erc
36 c %
% 3
r
m res om 5 ac 11 33%
ce s e
35
C
8a c
Of fi
TEMPLE, TEXAS
1.5 acres 0.5%
Zoning Breakdown
Multi-Family
Ind u 123 str a
%
18
F 89 ac 27 r .5
es
s re
ily am
ial
Sin gle
ZONING
0’ 125’ 250’
500’
This exhibit shows the conditions of properties in the neighborhood and provides an overview of residential structure health. A = Great Shape B = Minor Cosmetic Repair Needed C = Major Cosmetic Repair and/or Minor Structural Repair Needed D = Major Structural Repair Needed F = Structural Repair Needed Beyond the Worth of the Property and/or Dangerous Structure For examples of property conditions ratings see Appendix, Property Conditions
SF
BN
y wa
il Ra
Temple High School
HEB
Property Conditions Legend
TISD
Religious Institution Vacant Parcel Commercial Parcel Temple ISD BNSF Railway Rental Property Duplex Property
Parcel Rating: A-Rated Parcel B-Rated Parcel C-Rated Parcel D-Rated Parcel
35
F-Rated Parcel Plan Area Boundary
0’ 125’ 250’
EXISTING PROPERTY CONDITIONS
500’
CENTRAL
19
Sidewalk Analysis
This exhibit shows the existing pedestrian infrastructure and how it currently serves the Central District properties.
Sidewalk Condition Excellent (Brand New) Very Good (Like New) Good (Very Minor) Fair (Minor) Poor (Extensive) Very Poor (Very Extensive) Future Sidewalk Parcel Next to Sidewalk Parcel 1 Block to Sidewalk (400’) Plan Area Boundary
y wa l i a
Temple ISD
SF
BN
R
Temple High School
HEB
TISD
35
0’ 125’ 250’
20
TEMPLE, TEXAS
500’
SIDEWALK ANALYSIS
Opportunities and Constraints Create pedestrian sidepaths along Central and Adams Concern about these dead-end streets Consolidate uses to general retail in this zone
Religious Institution Education Institution
Access issues
Parks/Open Space Utility Easements Consolidated Zone
y wa l i a
FR
S BN
Temple ISD Plan Area Boundary
Integrate pedestrian crossing over railroad
BNSF Railway Co.
Alley Existing Drainage Channel
Busy intersection Improve pedestrian access to HEB
Neighborhood Entry Enhanced Pedestrian Crossing
Temple High School
Make the school feel connected to the surrounding uses/neighborhood
HEB
Texas Wildcat Parking and Storage Yard
TISD
TISD transportation
Low Point + 698’
High Point + 748’
High Point + 744’
Improve intersection crossings as a gateway into West Temple
35
Improve intersection crossings as a gateway into downtown
Integrate pedestrian crossing over railroad
Low Point + 680’ This exhibit reviews the Central District and highlights specific opportunities and constraints that are found within the plan area.
0’ 125’ 250’
500’
OPPORTUNITIES & CONSTRAINTS
CENTRAL
21
Plan Background The Central and Adams Avenue Corridor Plan was developed in 2019 to provide guidance for this key access route to Downtown Temple. The Central District Plan will follow the direction and recommendations put forward as part of that planning effort.
The Plan’s Key to Success Improve corridor coherence through uniform and consistently scaled signage.
Delineation and Enhancement of Intersections An improvement to the Central and Adams Corridors intersections will be essential to increase pedestrian comfort. Increased crosswalk delineation through parking and paving variation will contribute to traffic calming and increased pedestrian awareness by drivers. Additionally, intersection enhancements will contribute to an improved sense of place by providing opportunities for the application of distinct character elements of lighting and signage.
The Plan’s Goals and Objectives The following are the goals and objectives of the Central and Adams Avenue Corridor Plan: Goal 1: Create a gateway corridor in and out of downtown Goal 1 Objectives • Initiate an arrival and exit sequence in and out of Downtown Temple. • Create unique gateway features that help easily identify the beginning and end of the corridor. • Utilize wayfinding and markers to inform users of places of interest. Goal 2: Create safe and efficient transportation Goal 2 Objectives • Create crosswalks and ADA ramps at intersections. • Convert one-way streets at key intersections to two-way streets. • Calm/slow traffic by changing materials at intersections, lining street with street trees, and converting traffic to two-way. Goal 3: Connect Temple to downtown Goal 3 Objectives • Enhance streets to adjoining neighborhoods and districts. • Propose unique and usable sidewalk/trails to downtown. • Overcome the limited pedestrian connectivity across the bridges leading into downtown. • Connect other places of interest. Goal 4: Enhance Gateway Corridor with unified aesthetic Goal 4 Objectives • Use similar materials and signage throughout the corridor. • Start a uniform street lighting that is evenly spaced. • Create overlay suggestions concerning buffer zones, signage, building setbacks, materials, and street trees.
22
TEMPLE, TEXAS
Streetscape Environment The corridor currently has a scattered and barren feel. More recent development contributed to improvements with enhanced streetscape and reduction of driveway widths and number of curb cuts.
CENTRAL & ADAMS AVENUE CORRIDOR PLAN
Application of Gateways The connection between I-35 and Downtown Temple through the Central and Adams Corridor naturally promotes the application of gateway monuments. The overpass at the railroad provides a book end of the Central District and the beginning of the Downtown District and lends itself to clear delineation along the neighborhood boundary.
North 27th Street North 27th Street is one of the streets that connects Temple High School to Adams Avenue. The Adams and Central Corridor has a number of businesses and churches and is the only route to downtown from the Central District. Currently, the street is without a sidewalk and lacks a hard delineation between parking lots and the street pavement. Overall Plan Area Takeaways: • Harsh pedestrian environment • Sidewalk is not present • Landscaping is absent • Great potential as a pedestrian connection from Adams and Central Corridor to Temple High School
BEFORE LOCATION KEY Nugent Ave.
BNSF Railway
31st St. Houston Ave. Bray St.
35
Temple High School
Jack White St.
Stadium Rd.
Calhoun Ave.
Calhoun Ave.
19th St.
Barton Ave.
Adams Ave.
Central Ave.
23rd St.
Avenue B 29th St. 31st St.
W Avenue E
Avenue D
SUPPLEMENTAL IMAGES
25th St.
27th St.
35th St.
AFTER
Avenue C
21st St.
33rd St.
Avenue A
ANALYSIS SKETCH NORTH 27TH STREET
CENTRAL
23
25th Street 25th Street is currently home to both residential and commercial uses. The street is one of two connections to the area south of the Central District. It has relatively low traffic considering its four lane capacity. Overall Plan Area Takeaways: • Opportunity to apply streetscape improvements • Lane reduction and provision of on-street parking will help with cultivating a neighborhood focused commercial area • Pedestrian improvements are much needed
BEFORE LOCATION KEY Nugent Ave.
BNSF Railway
31st St. Houston Ave.
SUPPLEMENTAL IMAGES
Bray St.
35
Temple High School
Jack White St.
Stadium Rd.
Calhoun Ave.
Calhoun Ave.
19th St.
Barton Ave.
Adams Ave.
Central Ave.
23rd St.
Avenue B 29th St.
TEMPLE, TEXAS
ANALYSIS SKETCH 25TH STREET
W Avenue E
Avenue D 25th St.
31st St.
24
27th St.
35th St.
AFTER
Avenue C
21st St.
33rd St.
Avenue A
Central Avenue Overpass Park The Central Avenue Overpass Park concept is intended to provide needed park space for the Central District. The addition of this park could encourage infill development by providing nearby recreational offerings. The overpass itself provides shelter from the elements making it an opportune space for a sports court or gathering space. Overall Plan Area Takeaways: • Adds park space to plan area • Addresses underutilized space • Potential for a catalyst effect
BEFORE LOCATION KEY Nugent Ave.
BNSF Railway
31st St. Houston Ave. Bray St.
35
Temple High School
Jack White St.
Stadium Rd.
Calhoun Ave.
Calhoun Ave.
19th St.
Barton Ave.
Adams Ave.
Central Ave.
23rd St.
Avenue B 29th St. 31st St.
W Avenue E
Avenue D
SUPPLEMENTAL IMAGES
25th St.
27th St.
35th St.
AFTER
Avenue C
21st St.
33rd St.
Avenue A
CENTRAL AVENUE OVERPASS PARK
CENTRAL
25
Concept & Planning
26
TEMPLE, TEXAS
Concept Diagram Plan Area Boundary Key Pedestrian Loop Connection to High School
Opportunity vocational and/or techonology park to compliment existing and expand student training programs
Continuous Rail Buffer/Trail
Trail
Improved image entering downtown and add housing choice with Multi-Family Development Allow for single-family use homes to transition to neighborhood shops and services
Commercial/Retail Adaptive Reuse Multi-Family Housing Park/Open Space Office Enhanced Intersection
y wa l i a
FR
S BN
Neighborhood Marker
Neighborhood Marker
Neighborhood Shops/ Services
Temple High School
Partnership opportunity with TISD on shared parking with the area businesses.
TISD
Auto-oriented Corridor
Enhanced Intersection
This concept provides land use guidance for a new future for the Central District, starting with a new vision for 25th Street as the heart and social center of the neighborhood. The unification of Adams Avenue and Central Avenue is proposed to improve the function and aesthetic appeal of this key Temple corridor. Lastly, a diversified and enhanced vocational environment adjacent to Temple High School is proposed to strengthen the school’s role as an economic engine for the future prosperity of Temple residents.
35
0’ 100’ 200’
To Sammons Community Center 400’
CONCEPT DIAGRAM
CENTRAL
27
This exhibit shows a series of streets and establishes classifications to meet the needs of the Central District. The following are the key takeaways:
Street Recommendations MTP Classifications Major Arterial
• 25th Street is downgraded from a minor arterial to a community collector. • A priority pedestrian corridor designation is established to improve focus on maintaining sidewalk infrastructure around the high school and along Avenue A. • 21st Street is designated as Neighborhood Collector, while Avenue D’s designation is expanded to the whole street within the plan area.
Minor Arterial Community Collector Neighborhood Collector
Calhoun Ave.
23rd St.
Avenue B
Avenue A
Barton Ave.
Stadium Rd.
Houston Ave.
Temple High School
Central Ave.
HEB
25th St.
27th St.
TISD 29th St.
31st St. Calhoun Ave.
Bray St.
Jack White St.
31st St.
Nugent Ave.
W Avenue E
S
Avenue D
21st St.
Avenue C
w ail R F
Priority Pedestrian Corridor
Adams Ave.
ay
BN
Plan Designations
19th St.
35
33rd St.
35th St.
0’ 100’ 200’
28
TEMPLE, TEXAS
MAJOR THOROUGHFARE EVALUATIONS
400’
t Stree 31st
Adam
s Ave
CHARACTER IMAGERY
nue
CL CL
6'-0” Sidewalk
11'-6" Planting Strip
11'-0"
6'-0”
11'-6"
11'-0"
Planting Strip Sidewalk Central and Adams Avenue Through Lanes
11'-0" Through Travel Lanes
80’ Existing 11'-0" R.O.W. Through Travel Lanes
11'-0"
11'-6" Planting Strip
6'-0” Sidewalk
11'-0"
11'-6" Planting Strip
6'-0” Sidewalk
80’ Existing R.O.W.
Central and Adams Avenue Through Lanes
CL CL
6'-0” Sidewalk
11' Left Turn Lane
11'-0"
11'-0" Through Travel Lanes
11'-0"
11' Right Turn Lane
6'-0” Sidewalk
6'-0” Sidewalk
11' Left Turn Lane
11'-0"
11'-0" R.O.W. 80’ Existing Through Travel Lanes
11'-0"
11' Right Turn Lane
6'-0” Sidewalk
Central and Adams Avenue Turn Lanes Central and Adams Avenue Turn Lanes
80’ Existing R.O.W.
Central and Adams Avenues Central and Adams Avenues are oneway major arterials running through the plan area that connects Downtown Temple to I-35. Reducing the number of travel lanes from its current configuration to three dedicated through lanes with complementary deceleration/ turn lanes is intended to improve both look and function. This occurs through reduction of conflict from pedestrian, vehicle, and parking. Key Characteristics: • Maintain high vehicular traffic flow. • Increase consistency of trees along the corridor. • Three continuous travel lanes with designated turn lanes as needed. • Maintain right-of-way to enhance landscape areas, street trees, and pedestrian environment.
CENTRAL AND ADAMS AVENUE
CENTRAL
29
31st
Stree
t
CL
Adam
s Ave
5’-0”
6'-0"
CHARACTERExisting IMAGERY 31st Street
12’-0”
12’-0”
12’-0”
12’-0”
6'-0"
5’-0”
CL
6'-0" 5'-0" Sidewalk Planting Strip
12'-0"
TEMPLE, TEXAS
12'-0" Travel Lanes
80’ Existing R.O.W.
31st Street 30
12'-0"
31ST STREET
12'-0"
6'-0" Planting Strip
nue
5'-0" Sidewalk
31st Street 31st Street is an important major arterial that runs through the plan area. This street currently acts as an auto-oriented corridor for the area, with commercial property on both sides of the street. The street has four travel lanes and no onstreet parking. Key Characteristics: • Sidewalks should be a minimum of 5’ and maintain reasonable distance from street while limiting encroachment into planting strip. • Parking is provided off-street. • Maintain right-of-way to enhance landscape areas, street trees, and pedestrian environment.
t Stree 31st
CL
Adam
s Ave
CHARACTER IMAGERY
5'-0"
7’-0”
23’-0”
23’-0”
7’-0”
nue
5'-0"
Existing 25th Street
CL
6'-0" Sidewalk
25th Street
12’-0” Planting Strip
8’-0” Parking
12’-0”
12’-0” Travel Lanes
80’ Existing R.O.W.
8’-0” 5'-0" Parking Planting Strip
10’-0” Sidepath
2'-0" 5'-0" Buffer Sidewalk
25th Street 25th Street is a community collector that is intended to be a vibrant social corridor in the plan area. This street provides key access for both vehicle and pedestrian traffic. The street is intended to be at neighborhood scale through an increased focus on the pedestrian realm where the street environment interacts with adjacent neighborhood shops and services. Key Characteristics: • Enhance landscape buffer between parking and sidewalk for better pedestrian experience. • Traffic calming measures, such as changes to paving material or addition of rumble strips, are appropriate at intersections. • On-street parking on both sides of road. • Maintain right-of-way to enhance landscape areas, street trees, and pedestrian environment. • Extension of 25th Street Trail, which currently exists to the south along 25th Street just south of Avenue M. 25TH STREET
CENTRAL
31
31st
Stree
t
CL
Barto
n Av
15’-0”
CHARACTER Existing IMAGERY Barton
Cent
15’-0”
ral A venu
e
CL
TISD Property
5’-0” 5’-0” Sidewalk Planting Strip
Barton Avenue
32
TEMPLE, TEXAS
BARTON AVENUE
15’-0”
15’-0” Travel Lanes
60’ Existing R.O.W.
enue
Delivery and Service Area
Barton Avenue Barton Avenue runs along the south side of Temple High School and should be considered a priority pedestrian corridor. This streets location near the school makes walkability and safety a high priority. Key Characteristics: • Maintain as low vehicular traffic street. • Intersections should highlight pedestrian presence through increased visibility. • Maintain right-of-way to enhance landscape areas, street trees, and pedestrian environment.
31st
Stree
t
CL
Adam
s Ave
CHARACTER IMAGERY
5'-0"
Typical Street Existing
10’-0”
15’-0”
15’-0”
10’-0”
5'-0"
CL
Proposed Infill
Proposed Infill 5'-0" Sidewalk
21st Street Re-envision
8’-0” Parking
12’-0”
Travel Lanes
12’-0”
80’ Existing R.O.W.
8’-0” Parking
nue
21st Street 21st Street is a proposed Neighborhood Collector Street that is re-envisioned to serve the proposed residential housing infill. This street should have on-street parking where appropriate, as well as enhanced landscaping to improve the pedestrian experience. Key Characteristics: • Enhanced focus on pedestrian realm including sidewalk infill/maintenance and landscaping. • Streets should balance vehicle traffic demands and pedestrian safety. • Maintain right-of-way to enhance landscape areas, street trees, and pedestrian environment.
5'-0" Sidewalk
21ST STREET
CENTRAL
33
Residential Growth. The isolation caused by the railroad tracks and I-35 has fragmented the Central District from surrounding districts. Increasing residential population within the neighborhood will increase opportunities and demand for more variety in neighborhood services. The Central District is a potential location to provide increased residential capacity for spill-over demand from downtown Temple as it continues to grow in popularity.
Business/Tech Park. This area is currently a mix of residences, business, and storage yards resulting in an incoherent built form. The proximity to Temple High School and access to the key corridors of Adams Avenue and Central Avenue make it an ideal location for vocational training and workforce development. Calhoun Ave.
19th St.
y
wa
ail FR
21st St.
23rd St.
S
BN
HEB
25th St.
Temple High School
29th St.
31st St.
Bray St.
31st St.
Nugent Ave.
W Avenue E
TISD
Avenue D
Avenue C
Avenue B
Avenue A
Central Ave.
Adams Ave.
Barton Ave.
Stadium Rd.
Houston Ave.
27th St.
35
Active Street. Adams Avenue, Central Avenue, 31st Street, and 25th Street are all currently an underwhelming pedestrian environment. With the retail and service commercial land uses already in place, increasing the appeal of these streets is necessary to improving the appeal and function of the neighborhood. Additionally, these corridors are key connections into the surrounding neighborhood districts, specifically downtown.
33rd St.
35th St.
Enhancement Focus Map Active Street Residential Growth Business/Tech Park
34
TEMPLE, TEXAS
This exhibit is intended to provide land use priorities and direction for the built environment by assigning the types of enhancement that should define future investment.
ENHANCEMENT FOCUS AREA
0’ 125’ 250’
500’
Active Street
ADAMS AND CENTRAL CORRIDOR ANALYSIS
35
ELEMENTS
Driveways: • Adams Avenue has plentiful driveway cuts along the length of the corridor • Driveways along Central Avenue are less abundant, however still prevalent • Driveway spacing is inconsistent • Driveway widths vary from single drive lane to length of frontage and limited application of shared driveway
Sidewalks: • Predominantly adjacent to roadway • Frequently interrupted by driveways • Paving condition of sidewalks is poor • Direct sidewalk connection to businesses is often lacking
Parking: • Parking spaces directly accessed from Adams Avenue require drivers to back into traffic • Little to no buffer between sidewalks and parking lots are common • Parking lot configurations limit shared parking opportunities
BARTON AVENUE
ADAMS AVENUE
AVENUE
Inventory
21st STREET
23rd STREET
25th STREET
27th STREET
29th STREET
31st STREET
AVENUE A
33rd STREET
TAGE ROAD
Sidewalk
I-35 FRON
CENTRAL
Driveway Direct Street Accessed Parking Landscaping Crossing Arterial
Streetscape: • Planting strips virtually non-existent along Adams Avenue • Street trees more prevalent along Central Avenue, but often located in small planting areas • Streetscape enhancements are necessary to soften harshness of existing built environment and help create a sense of arrival
CORRIDOR ANALYSIS
Intersections: • Offset intersections create safety concerns when trying to navigate across Adams Avenue • 29th Street and 25th Street terminate at Adams Avenue and 27th Street terminates at Central Avenue • Crosswalk markings are worn or absent limiting the effective delineation of the pedestrian realm
Crossing Collector Crossing Local Project Boundary Terminus Intersection Offset Intersection
CENTRAL
35
Active Street
ADAMS AND CENTRAL CORRIDOR ISSUES
02 25th Street Terminus 25th Street terminates at Adams Avenue, leading into the HEB parking lot.
01 Parking along Corridor Several businesses have head in or angled parking directly off of Adams Avenue, causing drivers to have to back into traffic. BARTON AVENUE
35
ADAMS AVENUE
01
03 Continuous Driveways Businesses have multiple driveways that extend the length of frontage, interrupting sidewalks and disrupting traffic flow.
06 02
AVENUE
03
04 Infill Newer infill development illustrates sharp contrast and improvement over many of the corridor’s sites. 36
TEMPLE, TEXAS
CORRIDOR ISSUES
21st STREET
27th STREET
29th STREET
31st STREET
33rd STREET
TAGE ROAD I-35 FRON
AVENUE A
23rd STREET
05
04
25th STREET
CENTRAL
05 Limited Streetscape The few planting areas along the corridor that exist are often undersized.
06 Sidewalks Sidewalks are directly adjacent to the roadways, creating an unpleasant pedestrian experience.
Active Street
ADAMS AND CENTRAL CORRIDOR ACCESS MANAGEMENT
35
BARTON AVENUE
CONFLICT POINT REDUCTION FORE BE
31 9
AF
ADAMS AVENUE
TER
FORE BE
22 10
Access Management Basics Municipalities have the authority to implement subdivision and zoning regulations which provide a basis for street access. Access management mechanisms such as: shared access, cross access, lot width, driveway throat length, internal street circulation, and thoroughfare planning are an extension of a city’s subdivision and regulatory authority. The above exhibit is for diagrammatic purposes and does not constitute a City of Temple directive.
Access Management
21st STREET
23rd STREET
25th STREET
27th STREET
29th STREET
31st STREET
AVENUE A
33rd STREET
ONTAG
E ROAD
TER
I-35 FR
AF
CENTRAL AVENUE
Proposed Closed Driveway Open Driveway
Conflict Points When considering improvements to a corridor’s function and safety, it is important to identify uncontrolled interactions between travel lanes, driveways, and sidewalks. These areas are where hazards and safety concerns for vehicle/vehicle and vehicle/pedestrian interaction arise. Additionally, these ingress and egress points can have significant impacts on the continuous flow of traffic, making congestion worse.
Access Management Results: The following are resulting benefits of access management: • Increased pedestrian comfort levels with more continuous sidewalks and landscape • Reduced vehicle ingress/egress conflict • Increase pedestrian safety considerations • Overall improvement in built environment harmony • A plan to work with business and property owners improve the function and access to the street system ACCESS MANAGEMENT
Shared Driveway Streetscape Removed Road Intersection Enhancement Suggested Infill Existing Building Project Boundary
CENTRAL
37
Active Street
MODEL BLOCK
Nugent Ave.
BNSF Railway
Adams Avenue 31st St. Houston Ave. Bray St.
35
Temple High School
Jack White St.
Stadium Rd.
Calhoun Ave.
Calhoun Ave.
19th St.
Adams Ave.
Central Ave.
Avenue B 29th St. 31st St.
38
TEMPLE, TEXAS
Planting Strip
MODEL BLOCK
Parking Lot Landscaping
Infill Business
Avenue D 25th St.
27th St.
35th St.
Model Block Adjusting how future development occurs along the Central and Adams Corridor will be important to improve both the image and functionality of this corridor. Reducing the number of driveways and pushing the buildings back from the street will create a more comfortable environment for pedestrians and drivers. Key Characteristics: • Reduced number of driveways • Increased shared parking spaces • Building setback creates room for enhanced landscaping and more continuous sidewalk
Avenue C
W Avenue E
Location Key
Central Avenue
23rd St.
Avenue A
21st St.
33rd St.
29th Street
25th Street
Barton Ave.
Active Street
Key Considerations:
Parking. Shared parking can maximize site efficiency with services, retail, office, and restaurants having different timetables for parking demand.
Building Placement. Locating buildings along a similar plane will create more consistent space for parking and better access opportunities.
Access. Sharing driveway curb cuts allows increased area for parking and improved circulation within the parking lot.
Landscaping. Add street trees and landscaping to better improve the pedestrian environment and make the site more welcoming.
Signage. Signs are an essential component to any business operation, and they should be scaled to the appropriate size.
MODEL BLOCK CONCEPT
CENTRAL
39
Key Considerations:
40
TEMPLE, TEXAS
Reduce Conflict. Add a median to improve the function, orientation, and safety of this section of 25th Street.
25TH STREET ENHANCEMENT
Central Avenue
Adams Avenue
Active Street
25th Street
Building Street Engagement. Buildings should engage the pedestrian realm being directly accessible from adjacent sidewalk.
Access. Tie into adjacent parking lots where possible and share driveways as a means to improve overall safety and reducing conflict points.
Landscaping. Landscape enhancements are important to promoting overall improved character of the Adams and Central Corridor.
Active Street
CENTRAL AND ADAMS CORRIDOR SIGNAGE Corridor Signage Creating regulations for cohesive signage along the Central and Adams Corridor will be important to improve both the image and functionality of this corridor. Reducing the overall number of signs and creating guidelines for factors such as sign size and materiality will help create a vibrant commercial corridor that welcomes people into Downtown Temple. Any signage regulating plan should be applied to the length of the entire Central and Adams Avenue Corridor from I-35 through downtown area. Key Characteristics: • Reduced overall number of signs • Unified materials • Required landscaping • 10’ maximum height for major business signs • 6’ maximum height for non-major business signs • Lighting required for all signage
MAJOR BUSINESS SIGN
MULTI-TENANT SIGN
Note: These recommendations should extend beyond the plan area boundary along the rest of the Central/Adams corridor and into downtown.
SINGLE-TENANT SIGN CENTRAL ADAMS CORRIDOR SIGNAGE
CENTRAL
41
Active Street 25th Street Revisioning Adaptive Reuse Infill Existing Building
23rd Street
Central Avenue
25th Street
Avenue E
Avenue D
Avenue A
Avenue B
Avenue C
27th Street
0’ Key Considerations:
42
TEMPLE, TEXAS
Right Sizing 25th Street. 25th Street is currently a 4 lane thoroughfare with an autocentric character. The street should be scaled to better fit the surrounding neighborhood.
25TH STREET REVISIONING
Infill Commercial. Commercial infill is on the eastern side of 25th Street and should be scaled to the street with parking in the rear.
Adaptive Reuse. Residential structures on the west side of 25th Street can transition over time while maintaining their residential character.
Parking. Additional on-street parking and a shared parking lot along 27th Street between Avenue C and Avenue D are intended to capture parking demand from businesses.
Multi-modal. Better serve the transportation choice through the extension of 25th Street Trail, which currently exists just south of Avenue M.
25
50
100
Active Street
Key Considerations:
Parking. On-street parking is provided through the reconfiguration of 25th Street.
Front Yard. Yard space can serve as seating areas, gathering spots, temporary merchandise display, or other elements of the business to activate the space.
Access. Curb cuts along 25th Street are discouraged. Utilize rear alley for service areas and parking.
Landscaping. Landscaping should be abundant and contribute to the overall corridor aesthetic. Effort should be made to maintain pervious surfaces.
Signage. Signs should be pedestrian in scale and reflect the site’s building aesthetics.
25TH STREET ADAPTIVE REUSE
CENTRAL
43
Active Street EXISTING STREET SIGNS
S 25th
ALTERNATE STREET SIGN
S 25th
STREET SIGN TOPPERS
ST 100
ST SS25th 25th 100
C e n t r a l Di s t r i ct
S 25th
Central District
ST 100
ST 100
Central District
CD
BANNER OPTIONS
CD
25th Street Shops
Central District
Central
CD
District
DISTRICT IDENTITY 44
TEMPLE, TEXAS
DISTRICT IDENTITY
Central
C D District
Overpass Park
Central Avenue
Adams Avenue
Residential Growth
02 01
Rail Line Linear Park 21st Street
03
Housing Units Before
04
34 300 A ft e r
0’ 50’ 100’
200’
Residential Growth
Residential infill is a key catalyst to activating the Central District. It’s close proximity to downtown makes it an ideal location to see new applications of housing choice. Key Characteristics:
• • • •
Higher density housing Access to overpass and rail line linear park Increased housing options Creates a defined edge going into downtown
01
02
03
04
21st STREET INFILL PLAN
CENTRAL
45
Residential Growth
Key Considerations:
46
TEMPLE, TEXAS
Housing Choice. The plan area would add multi-family and attached single-family units to complement the area’s existing single-family housing stock.
21st STREET INFILL CONCEPT
Park and Open Space. The increase in housing units would correspond with additional publicly accessible park land.
Access. As a means to avoid congestion of Central Avenue, on-street parking and alley access are provided on 21st Street, Avenue A and 19th Street.
Height Transitions. To ensure compatibility between the different housing types, it is necessary to use a step down approach, where buildings incrementally decrease in height.
Street Engagement. New housing units in the plan area are intended to engage the street with the use of porches, stoops, and patios facing the street or a communal green space.
28.8
Industrial Commercial
20. 6
Composition of Focus Area Residential Industrial
Commercial
100’ Industrial Buffer
5 0.6
Inconsistent Use
%
’ of
BARTON AVE
ADAMS AVENUE
23rd ST
tri
al
Res i
00
in ith
L ntial ots W e d
21 27
CALHOUN AVE
DOWNS AVE
ELM AVE
FRENCH AVE
21st STREET
CENTRAL AVENUE
19th ST
1
Key Takeaways: • Industrial use accounts for most of the land area • There is inconsistency between use and zoning • The buffering of land uses would be very consumptive • Redevelopment would help unify the focus area • Complement vocational opportunities to nearby Temple High School and the proposed increase in residential to the south of this focus area
%
Residential
19th STREET
Transitioning to a Better Functioning Built Environment The exhibit to the right shows that industrial is the major land use within the focus area and that buffering or transitioning efforts are not possible with the level of intermingling uses and lack of available space. Phasing out the residential component within the focus area is likely the most appropriate option. The use of land banking could assist transitioning this area to a Business Park style of development. Additionally, this area could assist in expanding Temple High School vocational partnerships. The business park could provide incubators for a variety of industry, craft, technology, and other creative occupations.
Business/Tech Park Analysis
%
Compatibility Among Land Uses The portion of the plan area that lies between 23rd Street, Adams Avenue, and the rail line is comprised of a variety of land uses. The composition includes uses that are considered to be incompatible with each other, specifically residential and industrial. The resulting effect is a compromised housing environment which often leads to disinvestment and code compliance issues. There are a number of parcels with inconsistency between the zoning and its actual land use, creating additional uncertainty.
BARTON AVENUE
Business/Tech Park
Indus
0’ 50’ 100’
200’
Addressing Incompatibility Reducing incompatible uses can be accomplished through the application of buffers, transition of zoning districts, and phasing out the less prominent use. A buffer includes: • Set distance of open space • Berms or sound walls • Mix of shrubs and tree plantings ranging in size and scale
Transitioning includes: • Sequencing of zoning districts • High to low use intensity spectrum • Building height step down
Phasing out includes: • Rezoning of properties • Gradual transition of existing non-conforming uses • Land banking can be used to speed up transition and promote orderly redevelopment BUSINESS /TECH PARK
CENTRAL
47
Business/Tech Park BUSINESS/TECH PARK USES
Business/Tech Park Concept Infill Existing Building
Elm Avenue
French Avenue
21st Street
01
Adams Avenue
02
Barton Avenue
Calhoun Avenue
19th Street
03
23rd Street
0’ 50’ 100’
01 Flexible Programming Accommodating a variety of business and creative industry should balance accessibility, safety, and engagement. 48
TEMPLE, TEXAS
BUSINESS/TECH PARK CONCEPT
02 Legibility Site development that is unified and easy to navigate reduces clutter and promotes harmony.
200’
03 Display Space Allow opportunities for assembly and display to occur outside business.
Park Access Park Access Analysis Neighborhood Park Neighborhood Park Service Area
Optimist Park
Residential Home
Rail Line Barrier Raised Rail Crossing At Grade Rail Crossing
35 Bart
Calh o
on A venu
e
Ada
Currently, there is not a park within the boundary of the Central District. Access to a neighborhood park is complicated by the rail line found on the eastern boundary of the plan area. Standards of location and acreage for a neighborhood park are derived from the Temple Parks Master Plan. Neighborhood parks should be accessible within 1/2 mile, provided at a ratio of 1-2 acres per 1,000 people, and are typically 3 acres in size. The exhibit to the left shows the residential properties located within the Central District plan area and their relationship to nearby neighborhood parks. Highlighted is the degree to which the rail line is a barrier and the points that provide access past that barrier. Even with these access points, the accessibility of the neighborhood park is an obstacle that needs to be addressed; either by provision of more park land within the plan area or crossing enhancements along the routes to existing neighborhood parks.
02
Property adjacent to rail line that is currently vacant, but has potential for providing much need open space.
un A venu
e
ms A venu
e
Cen tral A v
enue
01
Aven u
eE
Aven u
Stre e
01
21st
t Stre e
02
t Stre e
Aven u
25th
27th
Stre e
t
eC
23rd
Aven u
t Stre e 29th
Stre et
eB
31st
33rd
Stre e
t
Aven u
t
eA
Whistle Stop Park
Space under the Central Avenue overpass has the potential to be utilized as recreational or gathering space.
03
The rail line crossing at 25th Street could be improved to increase pedestrian safety and comfort.
eD
03
Jones Park
PARK ACCESS ANALYSIS
CENTRAL
49
35
Temple High School
RAIL LINE LINEAR PARK
Sound Wall 8’-0”
Roadway
10’-0” Min. Trail
10’-0” Varies Landscape Buffer
BNSF R.O.W Varies
Rail Line Linear Park Working with the railroad company to develop a greenspace buffer, parklets, and a trail along the railroad tracks in the Central District plan area would create a safe and functional recreation in an area that is without a neighborhood park.
Rail Line Buffer and Park
50
TEMPLE, TEXAS
RAIL LINE LINEAR PARK
Vacant Parcel 40’ Rail Line Buffer Trail Central District Boundary
TISD
Key Characteristics • An 8’-0” sound wall follows the railroad R.O.W to improve pedestrian safety and comfort. • The trail follows the rail road corridor with pocket parks located along the trail where appropriate. • Trail does not heavily encroach on the railroad R.OW.
New Park/Open Space
HEB
10’-0” Varies Planting Strip
Rail Grade
CHARACTER IMAGERY
Lighting Plan
This exhibit provides lighting recommendations for the plan area. Further explanation of the different lighting zones can be found on the following page.
Calhoun Ave.
19th St.
General Street Zone Multi-Family Zone Intersection Zone
y
wa
Neighborhood Zone
ail FR
21st St.
23rd St.
S
BN
Avenue D
Schematic Lighting Zone
Trail Zone
25th St.
Avenue C
HEB Temple High School
TISD 29th St.
31st St. Calhoun Ave.
Jack White St.
Bray St.
31st St. Nugent Ave.
W Avenue E
Avenue B
Avenue A
Central Ave.
Adams Ave.
Barton Ave.
Stadium Rd.
Houston Ave.
27th St.
35
33rd St.
35th St.
0’ 125’ 250’
LIGHTING PLAN
500’
CENTRAL
51
LIGHTING ZONES
GENERAL STREET ZONE The General Street Zones are the pedestrian and vehicular corridors of the neighborhood. These streets see the largest portions of vehicular and pedestrian traffic both in and out of the district. As such, these corridors should have ample lighting and maintain high operating standards, while not overpowering residential properties.
MULTI-FAMILY ZONE The Multi-Family Zone is intended to encourage special attention to apartments and group housing. Spacing should be done in a manner to maximize safety by provision of lighting in common areas, parking lots, entrances, and pedestrian paths. Lighting Notes:
Lighting Notes: Lamp Size
15,000 Lumens, 150 Watts
Spacing
120’ poles staggered
*Average Foot-candles
0.6
See section 6.7.7.J of the City of Temple’s UDC for on premise lighting requirements.
*Information informed by Highway Illumination Manual, Texas Department of Transportation, 2018
NEIGHBORHOOD ZONE The Neighborhood Zone is the primary single-family residential portion of the district. This zone needs to balance lighting for safety concerns while maintaining residential privacy.
TRAIL ZONE The Trail Zone is intended to be a highly visible and active linkage. The lighting should be pedestrian scaled and well lit as to encourage extended use.
Lighting Notes: Lighting Notes: Lamp Size
9500 Lumens, 100 Watts
Minimum Spacing
150’ poles staggered
*Average Foot-candles
0.4
Spacing
90’
Average Foot-candles
0.65
*Information informed by Highway Illumination Manual, Texas Department of Transportation, 2018
INTERSECTION ZONE The Intersection Zone highlights key pedestrian crossings along the Central Avenue and Adams Avenue. The traffic associated with the major arterial requires an increase in lighting to ensure both pedestrian and vehicular safety. Lighting Notes: Lamp Size
30,000 Lumens, 250 Watts
Spacing
1 light pole at each respective corner, 4 total.
*Average Foot-candles
2.0
*Information informed by Highway Illumination Manual, Texas Department of Transportation, 2018
52
TEMPLE, TEXAS
LIGHTING ZONES
BUSINESS/COMMERCIAL CONSIDERATIONS The use of Backlight, Uplight, and Glare (BUG) ratings should be considered for business or commercial properties to promote dark sky principles and reduce off site lighting impact on adjacent properties, especially near a residential neighborhood.
Recommendations
CENTRAL
53
Central District Action Plan This section of the plan summarizes the recommendations derived from the project findings into the Central District Action Plan. These actions follow to the direction put forth in the City’s Strategic Plan and Temple By Design, 2020 Comprehensive Master Plan. In accordance with those plans, the actions are organized by the focus areas Smart Growth, Public Safety, Places and Spaces, and Highperforming Organization. The recommendations in the Action Plan will reference the respective Comprehensive Plan initiative they help to realize. The Action Plan will identify the implementation method, priority, and department involvement.
SMART GROWTH INITIATIVES
Action Type
Comprehensive Plan Initiative
Priority
Involved Departments
SMART GROWTH INITIATIVES
DD.2
Encourage redevelopment along Adams Avenue and Central Avenue Corridor. Buildings should be located adjacent to sidewalk and right-of-way screening parking lots. Improved landscaping, street trees, and pedestrian environment should be a priority.
Coordination, Program, Regulation
1.3.7
21st Street Infill. Address zoning regulations to allow for construction of desired housing types. Compliment this effort with incentives to promote housing choice, such as urban apartment/condos, townhouse, and other attached single-family.
Coordination, Program, Regulation
1.3.7
ST.2
IS.1
Medium
Medium
Planning
Adams Avenue. Collaborate with TXDOT to plan, design, and construct improvements and/or enhancements to Adams Avenue. This includes enhancement to key intersections. Intersection improvements should promote traffic calming measures and ensure ADA compliance.
Capital
2.2.2 2.2.3
1.2.5
Medium
Public Works
Parks and Trails PT.1
Central Avenue Overpass Park. Acquire land and develop park near Central Avenue overpass.
Capital
1.4.6
Medium
Parks
PT.2
Rail Line Linear Park and Trail. Acquire land and develop off-street trail with sound wall and series of parklets next to rail line. Work with BNSF on locating trail and sound wall.
Capital
1.4.1
High
Parks, City Manager Office
Coordination
3.1.4
High
TEDC, Planning, Finance
Action Type
Comprehensive Plan Initiative
Priority
Involved Departments
Improve neighborhood relations by evaluating patrol techniques and work with residents to develop neighborhood-specific plans for addressing crimes and other issues of concern within the Central District.
Coordination, Program
4.1.4
High
Police, Transform Temple
Encourage increased activity with the existing Neighborhood Watch Program.
Coordination, Program
4.1.4
Medium
Police, TISD
EP.1
PS.1 Medium
Public Works
PS.2 Capital
21st Street. Reconstruct 21st Street including the realignment of the 21st street and Adams Avenue intersection and connecting to 23rd Street at the north terminus. Intersection improvements should promote traffic calming measures and ensure ADA compliance
ST.5
23rd Street and 27th Street. Remove 23rd Street and 27th Street between Central Avenue and Adams Avenue.
ST.6 ST.7
2.2.2 2.2.3
Medium
Public Works
Medium
Capital
2.2.2 2.2.3
Medium
Public Works
Capital
2.2.2 2.2.3
Low
Public Works
Neighborhood Collector. Reconstruct sidewalks along Avenue D.
Capital
2.2.2 2.2.3
Low
Public Works
Pedestrian Priority Corridors. Construct/reconstruct sidewalks along Houston Avenue, Barton Avenue, Avenue A, and 23rd Street.
Capital
2.2.2 2.2.3
Medium
Public Works
ST.8
Implement a sidewalk condition evaluation on a 5 year cycle to assess for ADA compliance and connectivity. Schedule repairs and additions through the CIP plan or identify funding through other programs.
Policy, Study
2.3.3
High
Planning, GIS, Public Work
ST.9
Repair and add sidewalk in areas identified as part of conditions evaluation.
Capital
2.3.3
High
Public Works
ST.10
Tree and Landscape Program. Encourage street trees and enhanced landscaping along Central Avenue and Adams Avenue Corridor.
Program
2.2.5
Medium
Planning, Public Works
ST.11
Make sure district’s alleys are considered/included as part of any future city wide alley conditions evaluation and improvement program.
Program
2.2.6
Medium
Planning, Public Works
TEMPLE, TEXAS
Capital
Work with TEDC to explore options for the expansion of commercial development along the Adams Avenue and Central Avenue Corridor.
Planning
2.2.2 2.2.3
54
Involved Departments
Police Safety
Central Avenue. Collaborate with TXDOT to plan, design, and construct improvements and/or enhancements to Central Avenue. This includes enhancement to key intersections. Intersection improvements should promote traffic calming measures and ensure ADA compliance.
Capital
ST.4
21st Street Utility Upgrade. Design and reconstruct utilities along 21st Street.
PUBLIC SAFETY INITIATIVES
25th Street. Reconstruction 25th Street from four lane to two lane with on-street parking and sidepath. Improve rail crossing at southern portion of plan area.
ST.3
Priority
Economic Growth
Streets and Thoroughfares ST.1
Comprehensive Plan Initiative
Infrastructure Systems
Design and Development DD.1
Action Type
ACTION PLAN
Public Works
Fire Safety FS.1
Develop a program through the Temple Fire Dept to check/ install smoke detectors in the Central District.
Coordination, Program
4.2.7
Medium
Fire, Community Development
FS.2
Promote CERT program in the Central District to help residents better prepare for manmade or natural disasters and other neighborhood-wide events.
Coordination, Program
4.2.7
Medium
Fire, Planning
Action Type
Comprehensive Plan Initiative
Priority
Involved Departments
Policy
5.1.4
Low
Public Works
Coordination, Regulation
5.1.3 5.1.6
Medium
Community Development, Planning
Coordination, Program
5.2.3
High
Community Development
PLACES AND SPACES INITIATIVES Community Branding CB.1 CB.2
Street Signs. Select and implement street sign family, sign toppers and banners, to be used in the plan area. Work with businesses to develop and implement corridor sign standards.
Unique Assets
UA.1
Work with the Utility Billing Office to identify new residents in the Central District so that a "Welcome to the Neighborhood" packet can be sent to them. This packet should include contact information, bulk trash pickup schedule, code compliance rules and regulations, and other useful information.
PLACES AND SPACES INITIATIVES
Action Type
Comprehensive Plan Initiative
Priority
Involved Departments
HIGH-PERFORMING ORGANIZATION INITIATIVES
NGD.1
Regulation
7.1.1
Medium
Planning
DR.1
NGD.2
Accessory Dwelling Units (ADU). Evaluate the plan area for the appropriateness of ADUs in the Central District.
Study
7.1.1
Medium
Planning
Sub-Area Planning
NGD.3
Promote all homeownership opportunities, classes and reinvestment programs to include outside organizations, HOME and CDBG.
High
Community Development
Program
7.1.2
NSR.1
Business/Tech Park. Amend the Future Development Plan for the Business/Tech Park concept area boundary. Address zoning regulations to allow for flexibility for creative, industrious, and innovative uses throughout focus area.
Regulation
7.2.1
Medium
Planning
NSR.2
25th Street Revisioning. Address zoning to allow adaptive resuse of residential structures and encourage infill of property on eastern side to 25th. This infill should promote building up to the front property line. Include the development of a parking lot between Avenue C and Avenue D adjacent to 27ths Street to allow for shared parking opportunity.
Regulation, Capital, Partnership
7.2.1
High
Planning, TISD
NSR.3
Budget to allow for land banking as property become available for both residential growth and business/tech park focus areas along 21st Street corridor.
Program, Capital
7.2.8
High
Planning, Finance
NSR.4
Create financial incentives, such as matching grants, for existing development in the Central District to eradicate distressed conditions and encourage employment opportunities through provision of neighborhood-serving mixed-use and commercial developments.
Program, Capital
7.2.4 7.2.5 7.2.8
NSR.5
Create a Community Development Program to promote financial incentives that encourage rehabilitation and investment in existing residential. Special incentives should be offered to developers to encourage the addition of affordable housing units.
Program
NSR.6
Actively seek out absentee owners of abandoned or blighted properties and require needed repairs to be performed, the building to be secured, and administer minimum maintenance standards.
Program
NSR.7
Develop and promote a rental registration program to include incentives for property improvements and maintenance for both tenants and owners.
NSR.9
NSR.10
Conduct a lot by lot assessment of the homes and property in the Central District to develop a list of issues that the City’s Transform Temple department could help address.
Involved Departments
Policy
8.1.6
High
Planning, Community Development
SAP.1
Develop a yearly report to track progress on Central Neighborhood District Action Plan.
Policy
8.2.1
High
Planning
SAP.2
Review and update the Temple CIP project list to include the projects identified in the Central District Capital Improvement Plan.
Policy
8.3.2
High
Planning
SAP.3
Develop task force for coordination of neighborhood district planning initiatives. This task force should focus on identifying partnerships and secondary funding sources.
Coordination
8.2.3
High
Planning
Neighborhood Stabilization and Redevelopment
Task the Neighborhood Coalition with scheduling and promoting block parties and events, such as National Night Out, and share information about the Tool Library Trailer and Track Temple app.
Priority
Establish a Neighborhood Alliance and a neighborhood champion to streamline communications on activities impacting the neighborhood, such as zoning cases, variance requests, applicable plat requests, Capital Improvement Plan projects, etc.
Neighborhood Duplex. Encourage development for duplex construction that is more harmonious with single-family environments. Promote UDC Section “Two-Family Dwelling with Single-Family Lot Width” development standards, i.e. concrete ribbon driveways, front setbacks, etc.
NSR.8
Comprehensive Plan Initiative
Development Review
Neighborhood Growth and Diversity
Develop a community outreach program to educate the public about code compliance rules and regulations.
Action Type
7.2.4
High
Planning, Finance
High
Community Development, Planning, Transform Temple
Central District Capital Improvement Plan The following list of projects was derived from the concepting and recommendations formulated as part of the planning process. The projects identified correlate with the actions found in the Central District Action Plan. Projects may be a single action or a combination of actions. The opinion of the probable cost was developed uniquely for each particular project and includes the cost of construction, contingency, land/right-of-way acquisition, and professional services. Action prioritization in regards to project implementation should be followed; however, if circumstances arise that increase the urgency or cost savings for the realization of the project, deviations from the recommended action priority is appropriate. Project
Program
Program
Coordination
Program
7.2.3
7.2.7
7.2.3
7.2.9
7.2.5
High
Community Development, Transform Temple
Medium
Transform Temple. Community Development
Medium
Medium
High
Action
Opinion of Probable Cost
Implementing Department
1.
Central Avenue
ST.1
$2.9 Million
Public Works
2.
Adams Avenue
ST.2
$2.7 Million
Public Works
3.
25th Street
ST.3
$3.7 Million
Public Works
4.
21st Street
ST.4
$6.3 Million
Public Works
Transform Temple, Community Development
5.
Avenue D
ST.6
$800,000
Public Works
6.
23rd Street
ST.5, ST.7
$1 Million
Public Works
7.
Barton Avenue
ST.7
$1 Million
Public Works
Community Development, Transform Temple
8.
Houston Avenue
ST.7
$600,000
Public Works
9.
Avenue A
ST.7
$800,000
Public Works
10.
27th Street Parking Lot
NSR.2
$1.9 Million
Public Works
Transform Temple, Community Development
11.
Central Avenue Overpass Park
PT.1
$3.2 Million
Parks
12.
Rail Line Linear Park
PT.2
$5.1 Million
Parks
ACTION PLAN & CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN
CENTRAL
55
Adams Avenue $2.7 Million OPC
19th St.
ay
S
BN
21st Street
23rd Street $1.0 Million OPC
Avenue D 23rd Street
21st St.
Avenue A $800,000 OPC
27th Street Barton Avenue Barton Avenue Houston Avenue
25th Street $3.7 Million OPC
HEB
HoustonAAvenue Avenue Houston Avenue $600,000 OPC
25th St.
Barton Avenue $1 Million OPC
Avenue A
Central Ave.
Barton Ave.
Adams Ave.
27th Street Parking Lot $1.9 Million OPC
Stadium Rd.
Central Avenue 25th Street Parking Lot Overpass Park Central Avenue Rail Line Linear Overpass Park Park Rail Line Linear Park
Temple High School
Houston Ave.
Avenue A Parking Lot 27th Street
Avenue D $800,000 OPC
23rd St.
Avenue C
25th Street
21st Street $6.3 Million OPC
w ail R F
Avenue B
Adams Avenue
27th St.
TISD Avenue D
Central Avenue
Central Avenue $2.9 Million OPC
Calhoun Ave.
Projects and OPC Map
Rail Line Linear Park $5.1 Million OPC
W Avenue E
Central District
Central Avenue Overpass Park $3.2 Million OPC
56
TEMPLE, TEXAS
Calhoun Ave.
Jack White St.
Bray St.
Nugent Ave.
31st St.
35
CAPITAL PROJECTS MAP
33rd St.
35th St.
29th St.
31st St.
" W
6" W
6" W
12" W
20" W
6" W
12" W
6" W
12" W
6" W
6" W
6" W
20" W
12" W
6" W
12" W
6" W
6" W
6" W
6" W
6" W
6" W
12" W
20" W
20" W 6" W
6" W
8" W
12" W
18" W
20" W
20" W 6" W
20" W
20" W
8" W
14" W
12" W 8" W
6" W
12" W
6" W
6" W
8" W
8" W
6" W
12" W
6" W
6" W
6" W
6" W 6" W
8" W
12" W
6" W
12" W
6" W 6" W
6" W
6" W
6" W
8" W
500
8"
W
8"
W
6" W
250
8" W
0
W
8" W
8"
HORIZONTAL SCALE IN FEET
WATER LINES EXHIBIT
CENTRAL
57
8" WW
8"
WW
8" WW
WW 6"WW 15"
12" WW KB-04
12"→12"
6" WW
8" WW 10" WW
WW
WW
6" WW 10" WW
-02
WW
8" WW
8" WW
KB
6" WW
10"
WW
6" WW
8" WW
6" WW 6" WW
6" WW
WW
6" WW
6" WW
8" WW
6" WW
6" WW
6" WW
6" WW
WW
6" WW
6" WW
6" WW
6" WW
6" WW
6" WW
6" WW 8" WW
6"
WASTEWATER LINE EXHIBIT 15"
WW
15"
WW
WW 15"
15"
WW
6" WW
WW
6" WW
HORIZONTAL SCALE IN FEET
6" WW
6" WW
WW " 10
6" WW
12" WW
TEMPLE, TEXAS 6" WW
58
500
6" WW
8" WW
8" WW
6" WW
250
10" WW
6" WW
6" WW
6" WW
12"
6" WW
W 10" W
8" WW
6" WW
0
8" WW
8" WW
8" WW
6" WW
6" WW
10" WW
6" WW 6" WW
6" WW
2" FM
6" WW
6" WW
6" WW 8" WW
10"
15"
8" WW 10"
6" WW
10"
→ 10"
6" WW
6"
10" WW KB-02
6"
19th St. Lift Station
8" WW
6" WW
6" WW
6" WW
10"→12"
WW
6" WW
6" WW
6" WW
6" WW
6" WW
6" WW
8" WW
6" WW
6" WW
6" WW
WW 6" WW 15"
6" WW
6" WW
6" WW
6" WW