CPU[AI] STUDIO 1 PORTFOLIO NORTHERN GATEWAY DEVELOPMENT Group Member Jiao Xie Junjie Su Siyu Xie Menghan Chen
N-3.4
ABSTRACT CPU&AI atelier works as a consultant for Manchester City Council on the Northern Gateway development in Studio 1 study. From a future city perspective, we will examine the development of the Northern Gateway area and address some parts of the MCC identified objectives. Inside our design proposal, we decide to focus on the relation between an Urban complex system and the natural environment and exploring how to use urban green space as the main element to design the urban form, to achieve the vision of a sustainable and livable ecological city. Instead of using concepts, we studied many theories related to urban design, which help us understand and regenerate the new greenoriented urban system. The proposal will be achieved by using a patch theory, green corridor, and grid-plot strategy approach to integrate green spaces into urban form. We also studied related parameters in urban development and how they could be transferred into spatial elements, this enables a generative computational tool based on translating network analysis to a spatial outcome.
C ON T E NT 1 INTRODUCTION
4 DESIGN STRATEGY
6 INPUT PARAMETER
1.1 Introduction on CPU[AI] ST1 BRIEF 1.2 Northern Gateway SRF 1.3 Challenge Selection 1.4 Global Goals 1.5 Wellbeing, biodiversity and Greenspaces 1.6 Design Focus 1.7 Design Workflow 1.8 Thesis Statement
4.1 Design Consideration 4.2 Loop of the Urban System 4,4 Complex Adaptive System (CAS) 4.4 Precedent of Application 4.5 Theory approach of CAS 4.6 Ecology Corridor 4.7 Approach of Ecology Corridor 4.8 First Design Rule 4.9 Grid-plot Strategy 4.10 Research on Grid-plot Strategy 4.11 Approach of Grid-plot Strategy 4.12 Second Design Rule
6.1 Parameter Analysis on Roads 6.2 How Roads Influence Urban Form 6.3 Parameter Analysis on Land Use 6.4 How Land Use Influence Urban Form 6.5 Parameter Analysis on Green Spaces 6.6 How Parameters Influence Each other 6.7 Parameter Summary
2 SITE ANALYSIS 2.1 Urban Research Document 2.2 Location 2.3 Climate 2.4 Population 2.5 Land Use 2.6 Green Space 2.7 Section Summary
3 DEFINE THE PROBLEM 3.1 Local Goals 3.2 Green Space in Site 3.3 Patch Dynamic Theory 3.4 How Patch Influence the City 3.5 Urban Heat Island (UHI) 3.6 Urban Heat Island Impact 3.7 Section Summary
5 DESIGN GENERATION PROCESS 5.1 Design Development Step 1 5.2 Design Development Step2 5.3 Research on Dwelling 5.4 Type and Size Mix of Housing 5.5 Detailed Typologies 5.6 Residential Building Typology 5.7 Commercial Building Typology 5.8 Amenities and Infrastructure Requirement 5.9 Design Development Step3 5.10 Design Development Step4
7 EVALUATION & SUMMARY 7.1 Proposal Workflow 7.2 Proposal Evaluation 7.3 Summary 7.4 Forecast to ST2 & ST3
8 APPENDIX 8.1 Urban Research Document on History 8.2 Typology Research Document 8.3 Reference List
0.3B
N-3.4
1 INTRODUCTION Introduction on the CPU[AI] group and Studio 1 outputs
0.3B
0.3B
N-3.4
N-3.4
S ITE ANAL YSIS
D E F I N E P RO BLEM
0.3B
04
N-3.4
0.3B
0.3B
N-3.4
1.1 INTRODUCTION ON CPU[AI] ST1 BRIEF TTS
LOCAL P-34.34-3
CPU[AI] Overview
CONTROL P-34.34-3
W 41°24'12.2" E 23°44'54.4" PE-3 NVGT B
FIX
TTS
LOCAL P-34.34-3
CONTROL P-34.34-3
FIX
TTS
W 41°24'12.2" E 23°44'54.4" PE-3 NVGT B
LOCAL P-34.34-3
CONTROL P-34.34-3
W 41°24'12.2" E 23°44'54.4" PE-3 NVGT B
FIX
TTS
CONTROL P-34.34-3
W 41°24'12.2" E 23°44'54.4" PE-3 NVGT B
TTS
LOCAL P-34.34-3
CONTROL P-34.34-3
FIX
W 41°24'12.2" E 23°44'54.4" PE-3 NVGT B
Complexity, Planning and Urbanism (CPU) develops new theoretical approaches and computational tools using a complexity science framework (systems, self-organisation, emergence, intelligence, structural change, adaptation) for the design, management, governance and understanding of future cities related to climate change, citizen participation, development strategies, resilient interventions, policy making and urban morphology. Computational methods are used to expand the realms of static design methods and theory by enabling a temporal and dynamic process. s Y Y M R R es N IS EG oc LE TE MA Pr AT YS TIO OB N UM ME IX S TR A AL UC PR TIO & S R ND RA AN N OD HE N NE PA PE T E TIO IG TR GE T T E S AP UA IN SI GN PU FIN AL SI DE IN DE DE EV
CPU[AI] ST1 BRIEF CPU will study the Northern Gateway development as a consultant for MCC. We will examine the development from a future city perspective. We will address some parts of the identified MCC focus areas above in Studio 1, Studio 2 and Studio 3.
CPU[AI] ST1 AIMS 1. Understanding of the complex drivers of change in a major redevelopment project. 2. A supporting engagement with Manchester City Council and the Strategic Development Team on Manchester's largest development project. 3. Learn about theories for computational process/approach - towards spatial dynamics. Modelling / analysis for design 4. Develop your own computational constructs/tools for your own design problems. 5. Analyse and engage with current urban trajectories of change (technological disruptions, futures, environments) 6. An understanding and creation of residential and commercial architectural typologies as computational types. 7.Development of an ability to communicate multiple aspects of large urban design proposals. 8.Demonstration of the ability to work in teams with a specific key role. 9. Understand how to work with urban transformations and different timescales.
CPU[AI]
Resource: Manchester City Council, 2020, The Northern Gateway Strategic Planning Framework http://northerngatewaymanchester.co.uk/
06
LOCAL P-34.34-3
07
FIX
TTS
LOCAL P-34.34-3
CONTROL P-34.34-3
W 41°24'12.2" E 23°44'54.4" PE-3 NVGT B
FIX
1.1 INTRODUCTION ON CPU[AI] ST1 BRIEF TTS
LOCAL P-34.34-3
CONTROL P-34.34-3
W 41°24'12.2" E 23°44'54.4" PE-3 NVGT B
FIX
TTS
LOCAL P-34.34-3
CONTROL P-34.34-3
FIX
TTS
W 41°24'12.2" E 23°44'54.4" PE-3 NVGT B
LOCAL P-34.34-3
CONTROL P-34.34-3
W 41°24'12.2" E 23°44'54.4" PE-3 NVGT B
s Y Y M R R es N IS EG oc LE TE MA Pr AT YS TIO OB N UM ME IX S TR A AL UC PR TIO & S R ND RA AN N OD HE N NE PA PE T E TIO IG TR GE T T E S AP UA IN SI GN PU FIN AL SI DE IN DE DE EV
CPU[AI]
FIX
TTS
Examine the development from a future city perspective and address some parts of the identified MCC focus areas above in the academic works.
TTS
LOCAL P-34.34-3
CONTROL P-34.34-3
FIX
W 41°24'12.2" E 23°44'54.4" PE-3 NVGT B
- Manchester City Council is the Local Authority of the Northern Gateway Area. - The development of the Northern Gateway builds upon previous and ongoing regeneration projects by the MCC to deliver change in neighbourhoods and communities such as NOMA, Ancoats and New Islington. - MCC have created The Northern Gateway Strategic Planning Framework (SRF) as a guide to the development and to form part of the Council's planning policy.
Far East Consortium International Limited - Backer and developer specialising in residential and hospitality - Investment and delivery partner of the Northern Gateway Development appointed by MCC in 2017] - FEC are working together with MCC as a Joint Venture to deliver the regeneration of the land controlled by the investment partnership.
- The local community, businesses, landowners and key stake holders were all consulted in 2018 on the SRF.
08
CONTROL P-34.34-3
W 41°24'12.2" E 23°44'54.4" PE-3 NVGT B
Manchester city council (MCC)
Consultant
LOCAL P-34.34-3
09
FIX
TTS
LOCAL P-34.34-3
CONTROL P-34.34-3
W 41°24'12.2" E 23°44'54.4" PE-3 NVGT B
FIX
Northern Gateway Resource: Manchester City Council, 2020, The Northern Gateway Strategic Planning Framework http://northerngatewaymanchester.co.uk/
1.2 NORTHERN GATEWAY SRF TTS
LOCAL P-34.34-3
CONTROL P-34.34-3
W 41°24'12.2" E 23°44'54.4" PE-3 NVGT B
FIX
TTS
LOCAL P-34.34-3
CONTROL P-34.34-3
FIX
TTS
LOCAL P-34.34-3
CONTROL P-34.34-3
FIX
TTS
LOCAL P-34.34-3
W 41°24'12.2" E 23°44'54.4" PE-3 NVGT B
TTS
LOCAL P-34.34-3
W 41°24'12.2" E 23°44'54.4" PE-3 NVGT B
Manchester Northern Gateway STRATEGIC REGENERATION FRAMEWORK (SRF)
CONTROL P-34.34-3
W 41°24'12.2" E 23°44'54.4" PE-3 NVGT B
FIX
CONTROL P-34.34-3
FIX
W 41°24'12.2" E 23°44'54.4" PE-3 NVGT B
TTS
LOCAL P-34.34-3
CONTROL P-34.34-3
FIX
W 41°24'12.2" E 23°44'54.4" PE-3 NVGT B
The Northern Gateway Strategic Regeneration Framework ("SRF") has been prepared by Manchester City Council ("MCC") to guide the future development of one of the largest regeneration projects in the UK.
s Y Y M R R es N IS EG oc LE TE MA Pr AT YS TIO OB N UM ME IX S TR A AL UC PR TIO & S R ND RA AN N OD HE N NE PA PE T E TIO IG TR GE T T E S AP UA IN SI GN PU FIN AL SI DE IN DE DE EV
The Northern Gateway is a unique opportunity to deliver transformational regeneration on an unprecedented scale in Manchester and help fulfil Manchester's potential as a truly innovative, sustainable and world-class city. It has the potential to revitalise existing communities and provide a catalyst for the regeneration of neighbourhoods in the north of the city. The regeneration of the Northern Gateway has the potential to unlock significant residential-led development that will positively contribute to Manchester's growth agenda and that of the wider city region. The Northern Gateway Strategic Regeneration Framework ("SRF") sets out how Manchester City Council ("MCC") will work with partners and local communities to deliver this ambition.
Vision The Vision for the Northern Gateway is to deliver a series of vibrant, sustainable and integrated residential neighbourhoods within the extended city centre of Manchester. These neighbourhoods will provide a range of housing options in a high-quality, well managed environment, with high levels of connectivity that link the growth of the city centre with surrounding Manchester communities. This will include the delivery of a range of affordable housing products to meet the needs of residents on a range of incomes. The Northern Gateway SRF will support longterm growth and promote economic, social and cultural uses to support the creation of high performing and sustainable new communities where people choose to live, work, and play. Resource: Manchester City Council, 2020, The Northern Gateway Strategic Planning Framework http:// northerngatewaymanchester.co.uk/
012
128
013
1.3 CHALLENGE SELECTION TTS
LOCAL P-34.34-3
CONTROL P-34.34-3
FIX
W 41°24'12.2" E 23°44'54.4" PE-3 NVGT B
TTS
LOCAL P-34.34-3
CONTROL P-34.34-3
FIX
TTS
CONTROL P-34.34-3
LOCAL P-34.34-3
CONTROL P-34.34-3
W 41°24'12.2" E 23°44'54.4" PE-3 NVGT B
s Y Y M R R es N IS EG oc LE TE MA Pr AT YS TIO OB N UM ME IX S TR A AL UC PR TIO & S R ND RA AN N OD HE N NE PA PE T E TIO IG TR GE T T E S AP UA IN SI GN PU FIN AL SI DE IN DE DE EV
1. How can a balance between public and private spaces foster a sense of community and belonging in new urban morphology. Ensure public spaces are active throughout the day and evening and do not adversely interfere with a residential setting (in terms of noise, ASB etc.)?
FIX
TTS
LOCAL P-34.34-3
W 41°24'12.2" E 23°44'54.4" PE-3 NVGT B
TTS
W 41°24'12.2" E 23°44'54.4" PE-3 NVGT B
LOCAL P-34.34-3
FIX
CONTROL P-34.34-3
FIX
W 41°24'12.2" E 23°44'54.4" PE-3 NVGT B
TTS
LOCAL P-34.34-3
CONTROL P-34.34-3
FIX
W 41°24'12.2" E 23°44'54.4" PE-3 NVGT B
The Challenge We Choose
2.The distribution of facilities, amenities and community spaces is an essential aspect of successful residential development. How do we design to ensure this aspect of sustainability in urban strategy and design.
4.How can a network of high-quality open and public spaces support well-being and enhanced diversity. Integrating green spaces/public realm towards wellness and mitigation of climate change? Ecologies? How can you integrate green environments and the City River Park ecosystem?
6. How to design zero-carbon future cities (is urban morphology adequate). How do you understand the environmental impact of future cities.
5. How can you design for sustainable movement and minimise motorised transport use? Consider last mile/3 mile responses including transport oriented design, walk-ability, cycling and technological disruptions (CAV).
3. How can a new urban development be designed to change and adapt with its residents (from students to young professionals, families and aging)
014
Here are 6 challenges that provide some perspective for us to view the Northern Gateway development project. We have chosen challenge 4 to explore how to use urban green space as the main element to design the urban form, so as to achieve the vision of a sustainable and livable ecological city. 015
1.4 GLOBAL GOALS TTS
LOCAL P-34.34-3
CONTROL P-34.34-3
W 41°24'12.2" E 23°44'54.4" PE-3 NVGT B
FIX
TTS
LOCAL P-34.34-3
TTS
LOCAL P-34.34-3
CONTROL P-34.34-3
W 41°24'12.2" E 23°44'54.4" PE-3 NVGT B CONTROL P-34.34-3
FIX
TTS
LOCAL P-34.34-3
CONTROL P-34.34-3
FIX
W 41°24'12.2" E 23°44'54.4" PE-3 NVGT B
FIX
W 41°24'12.2" E 23°44'54.4" PE-3 NVGT B
UN Sustainable Development Goals We studied the UN Sustainable Development Goals in order to gain a clear understanding of the challenge we selected. The 4 related goals can help us sharpen focus on more specific aspects and inform the problem formulation.
s Y Y M R R es N IS EG oc LE TE MA Pr AT YS TIO OB N UM ME IX S TR A AL UC PR TIO & S R ND RA AN N OD HE N NE PA PE T E TIO IG TR GE T T E S AP UA IN SI GN PU FIN AL SI DE IN DE DE EV
3 6
Ensure healthy lives and promote well-being for all at all ages
9
Build resilient infrastructure, promote inclusive and sustainable industrialization and foster innovation
15
Build resilient infrastructure, promote inclusive and sustainable industrialization and foster innovation
3.9 By 2030, substantially reduce the number of deaths and illnesses from hazardous chemicals and air, water and soil pollution and contamination
Ensure healthy lives and promote well-being for all at all ages 6.6 By 2030, protect and restore water-related ecosystems, including mountains, forests, wetlands, rivers, aquifers and lakes
9.1 Develop quality, reliable, sustainable and resilient infrastructure
15.1 By 2020, ensure the conservation, restoration and sustainable use of terrestrial and inland freshwater ecosystems and their services, in particular forests, wetlands, mountains and drylands, in line with obligations under international agreements Resource: UN Sustainable Development Goals https://sdgs.un.org/
016
017
1.5 WELLBEING, BIODIVERSITY AND GREENSPACES TTS
FIX
TTS
LOCAL P-34.34-3
CONTROL P-34.34-3
W 41°24'12.2" E 23°44'54.4" PE-3 NVGT B
FIX
TTS
LOCAL P-34.34-3
W 41°24'12.2" E 23°44'54.4" PE-3 NVGT B
The importance of green space
CONTROL P-34.34-3
FIX
W 41°24'12.2" E 23°44'54.4" PE-3 NVGT B
improve increase
In terms of the relationship between biodiversity and wellbeing, the greenspaces seem like a bridge to link them by other agencies.
biodiversity
green spaces
protect
biodiversity
unemployment
community safe
quality air
social interaction
car emmision
inhabitats
c l i m a t e
increase
plants
species
protect
damage
heart attrack
increase
improve
decrease
improve
reduce
green spaces
wellbeing
increase
wellbeing
improve
protect
reduce the risk
climate change
daily activities
expanded population
crime rate increase
s Y Y M R R es N IS EG oc LE TE MA Pr AT YS TIO OB N UM ME IX S TR A AL UC PR TIO & S R ND RA AN N OD HE N NE PA PE T E TIO IG TR GE T T E S AP UA IN SI GN PU FIN AL SI DE IN DE DE EV
In short, it is necessary to focus on the development of the green spaces since it could not only provide habitats for species to increase richness of living beings, but also enhance wellbeing by offer a good quality living surroundings.
decrease
enhance
increase
CONTROL P-34.34-3
increase
LOCAL P-34.34-3
FIX
W 41°24'12.2" E 23°44'54.4" PE-3 NVGT B
protect
TTS
W 41°24'12.2" E 23°44'54.4" PE-3 NVGT B
CONTROL P-34.34-3
mitigate
FIX
W 41°24'12.2" E 23°44'54.4" PE-3 NVGT B
LOCAL P-34.34-3
TTS
accelerate
CONTROL P-34.34-3
FIX
mitigate
LOCAL P-34.34-3
CONTROL P-34.34-3
encourage
TTS
LOCAL P-34.34-3
pollute
urbanisation negative impact
Resource:Manchester City Council, 2012, Biodiversity action plan 2012-2016. http://www.wildaboutmanchester.info/www/images/ stories/Biodiversity%20Action%20Plan%202012%20-%2016.pdf
positive impact
poverty condition
018
019
1.6 DESIGN FOCUS TTS
LOCAL P-34.34-3
CONTROL P-34.34-3
W 41°24'12.2" E 23°44'54.4" PE-3 NVGT B
FIX
TTS
LOCAL P-34.34-3
TTS
LOCAL P-34.34-3
CONTROL P-34.34-3
FIX
W 41°24'12.2" E 23°44'54.4" PE-3 NVGT B CONTROL P-34.34-3
TTS
LOCAL P-34.34-3
CONTROL P-34.34-3
FIX
W 41°24'12.2" E 23°44'54.4" PE-3 NVGT B
FIX
W 41°24'12.2" E 23°44'54.4" PE-3 NVGT B
Introduction of Our Design Focus
s Y Y M R R es N IS EG oc LE TE MA Pr AT YS TIO OB N UM ME IX S TR A AL UC PR TIO & S R ND RA AN N OD HE N NE PA PE T E TIO IG TR GE T T E S AP UA IN SI GN PU FIN AL SI DE IN DE DE EV
Green Space
Community
Accessibility
Biodiversity
Our design focus is 1. The role of green space in the urban system, its cover area and its relationship with buildings 2. The role of the community in the urban system, how to improve the life experience of residents through the design of the community 3. Accessibility of residents to urban public spaces and infrastructure 4. How to protect and improve biodiversity through urban design while meeting the needs of residents
Resource: https://unsplash.com/photos/31-pOduwZGE?utm_source=unsplash&utm_medium=referral&utm_ content=creditShareLinkhttps://unsplash.com/photos/5pUuHGEnUDM?utm_source=unsplash&utm_ medium=referral&utm_content=creditShareLink https://unsplash.com/photos/x5PfV1ssuF4?utm_source=unsplash&utm_medium=referral&utm_ content=creditShareLink https://unsplash.com/photos/31-pOduwZGE?utm_source=unsplash&utm_medium=referral&utm_ content=creditShareLink
020
021
1.7 DESIGN WORKFLOW TTS
LOCAL P-34.34-3
CONTROL P-34.34-3
FIX
TTS
LOCAL P-34.34-3
W 41°24'12.2" E 23°44'54.4" PE-3 NVGT B
CONTROL P-34.34-3
TTS
LOCAL P-34.34-3
CONTROL P-34.34-3
FIX
TTS
LOCAL P-34.34-3
W 41°24'12.2" E 23°44'54.4" PE-3 NVGT B
FIX
TTS
W 41°24'12.2" E 23°44'54.4" PE-3 NVGT B
LOCAL P-34.34-3
CONTROL P-34.34-3
W 41°24'12.2" E 23°44'54.4" PE-3 NVGT B
Location of Design Process Introduction
FIX
CONTROL P-34.34-3
FIX
W 41°24'12.2" E 23°44'54.4" PE-3 NVGT B
TTS
LOCAL P-34.34-3
CONTROL P-34.34-3
FIX
W 41°24'12.2" E 23°44'54.4" PE-3 NVGT B
s Y Y M R R es N IS EG oc LE TE MA Pr AT YS TIO OB N UM ME IX S TR A AL UC PR TIO & S R ND RA AN N OD HE N NE PA PE T E TIO IG TR GE T T E S AP UA IN SI GN PU FIN AL SI DE IN DE DE EV
THEORETICAL FRAMEWORK
Patch Theory
CAS Theory
Grath Theory/ Space Syntax
Chapter 1
Chapter 1
Chapter 1
IDENTIFY THE PROBLEMS
APPROACH OF TACKLING THE PROBLEMS
Design Consideration
Challenge 4 Chapter 1
Chapter 1
Ecology Corridor Strategy
Focus Chapter 1
Chapter 1
Grid-plot Strategy
Site Analysis Chapter 1
Chapter 1
IDENTIFY THE PLANNING PARAMETER
IDENTIFY THE EVALUATION CRITERIAS
COMPUTATIONAL PLANNING TOOL
Criteria 1
Planning System
Chapter 1
Chapter 1
Chapter 1
Building Typology Parameter
Criteria 2
Evaluation System
Chapter 1
Chapter 1
Chapter 1
Reserved Data from Site
Urban Planning Parameter Chapter 1
Criteria 3 Chapter 1
Problem Definition
Criteria 4
Chapter 1
Chapter 1
022
023
FINAL OUTCOME: NORTHERN GATEWAY FUTURE SCENARIO
THESIS STATEMENT Urban sprawl and neglect of urban green space have caused landscape fragmentation and urban heat islands, which further affect the quality of neighbourhoods. For this situation, we aim to explore a new connected urban open space network with a large proportion of green space. It will allow citizens to have more access to green amenities as well as enjoy a livable and sustainable neighbourhood. This will be achieved by using a patch theory and green corridor approach to integrate green space into urban form, which enables a generative computational tool based on translating network analysis to a spatial outcome.
024
025
0.3B
INTROD UCTION
N-3.4
0.3B
NODE 00.30-2
1G-2
TTS
0.3B
P-34.34-3
2 SITE ANA LYSIS
N-3.4
Key analysis of Northern Gateway 0.3B
0.3B
N-3.4
DEFIN E T HE PROBLEM
D E SI GN ST R ATEGY
0.3B
0.3B
N-3.4
026
N-3.4
N-3.4
027
0.3B
N-3.4
2.1 URBAN RESEARCH DOCUMENT TTS
LOCAL P-34.34-3
CONTROL P-34.34-3
W 41°24'12.2" E 23°44'54.4" PE-3 NVGT B
FIX
TTS
LOCAL P-34.34-3
Urban Research Document Overview
CONTROL P-34.34-3
FIX
TTS
W 41°24'12.2" E 23°44'54.4" PE-3 NVGT B
TTS
LOCAL P-34.34-3
CONTROL P-34.34-3
FIX
TTS
LOCAL P-34.34-3
CONTROL P-34.34-3
FIX
W 41°24'12.2" E 23°44'54.4" PE-3 NVGT B
The whole CPU group members have together done one Urban Research Document which is statistical data analysis supported and based on the research on either whole Manchester city or the northern gateway. U OD TR IN N IO CT
Historicial Analysis
TE SI AL
AN E
IS
FIN
YS
DE
E
TH
GN
M
SI
LE
DE
OB
PR
Environmental Analysis
ST s
TP
es
oc
PU
Pr
IN
N
TIO
RA
NE
GY
GE
TE
GN
SI
RA
DE
Demographics Folder
AM
AR N
TIO
ER
UA
ET
AL
EV
Covid and Brexit
&
IX
ND PE
Y
AR
MM
SU
AP
Infrastructural Analysis Housing Analysis Northern Gateway SRF
Please click the link below to view the whole document: https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/1YmMI7IFEjkdp_pp59HYESk-mRy130lwD?fbclid=IwAR0KPp_SNuskXaA7cxyrtzFjNjdBQ3zFS_ n-tM5cHvSuvC5xMQRe2cypDrA
028
CONTROL P-34.34-3
W 41°24'12.2" E 23°44'54.4" PE-3 NVGT B
W 41°24'12.2" E 23°44'54.4" PE-3 NVGT B
Interactive frequency analysis of urban space
LOCAL P-34.34-3
029
FIX
TTS
LOCAL P-34.34-3
CONTROL P-34.34-3
W 41°24'12.2" E 23°44'54.4" PE-3 NVGT B
FIX
2.2 LOCATION TTS
LOCAL P-34.34-3
TTS
LOCAL P-34.34-3
CONTROL P-34.34-3
W 41°24'12.2" E 23°44'54.4" PE-3 NVGT B CONTROL P-34.34-3
W 41°24'12.2" E 23°44'54.4" PE-3 NVGT B
FIX
TTS
LOCAL P-34.34-3
CONTROL P-34.34-3
FIX
TTS
LOCAL P-34.34-3
CONTROL P-34.34-3
FIX
W 41°24'12.2" E 23°44'54.4" PE-3 NVGT B
FIX
W 41°24'12.2" E 23°44'54.4" PE-3 NVGT B
Location Site Analysis on the Location
N IO CT
U OD TR IN TE SI AL
AN E
IS
FIN
YS
DE
E
TH OB
PR
GN
M
SI
LE
DE
ST s
TP
es
oc
PU
Pr
IN
N
TIO
RA
NE
GY
GE
TE
GN
SI
RA
DE
The Northern Gateway is an area to the north of Manchester City Centre comprising of approximately 155 hectares of predominately brownfield or underused land . The area identified for the development is surrounded by established neighbourhoods such as Ancoats and New Islington. Manchester City Council describes the Northern Gateway Development as the single largest opportunity for residential-led growth and transformational redevelopment in Manchester . The area of the development is one-third the size of the city centre. It is hoped that 15,000 new homes will be created through the development over the next 15- 20 years which will be a significant contribution towards the Manchester Residential Growth Strategy.
AM
AR N
TIO
ER
UA
ET
AL
EV
&
IX
ND PE
Y
AR
MM
SU
AP
Resource: Manchester City Council, 2020, The Northern Gateway Strategic Planning Framework http://northerngatewaymanchester.co.uk/
030
031
2.3 CLIMATE TTS
LOCAL P-34.34-3
TTS
LOCAL P-34.34-3
CONTROL P-34.34-3
W 41°24'12.2" E 23°44'54.4" PE-3 NVGT B CONTROL P-34.34-3
FIX
TTS
LOCAL P-34.34-3
W 41°24'12.2" E 23°44'54.4" PE-3 NVGT B
CONTROL P-34.34-3
FIX
TTS
LOCAL P-34.34-3
CONTROL P-34.34-3
FIX
W 41°24'12.2" E 23°44'54.4" PE-3 NVGT B
FIX
W 41°24'12.2" E 23°44'54.4" PE-3 NVGT B
Site Analysis on the Climate
Annual Temperature & Precipitation According to the recording of annual average temperature, on average, the warmest month is August and the coolest month is January.
N IO CT
U OD TR IN
The rainfall had a dramaic increased trend from the end of 2019, which started to over 100mm as the monthly record. The upward trend still can be applied to the current rainfall situation in Great Manchester area.
TE SI E
IS
FIN
YS
DE
AL
AN
Overall Temperature & Precipition Projection
E
TH OB
PR
GN
M
SI
LE
DE
ST s
AM
AR N
TIO
ER
UA
ET
AL
EV
&
IX
ND PE
Y
AR
MM
SU
AP
By the 2040s, deadly heatwaves such as the one in 2003 when UK temperatures peaked at 38.5°C will be the norm, leading to a tripling in heat-related deaths. Regarding to the environmental imapcts, the consideration of future urban developement and building design should mainly focus on providing the better solution to urban area flooding and better control of comfortable internal temperature. Resource: (1)Manchester Historical Weather, 2020, https://www.worldweatheronline.com/manchesterweather-history/greater-manchester/gb.aspx (2)The Royal Meteorological Society Journal of Climate Science, 2020, https://resin-cities.eu/ greatermanchester/ (3)Report warns of severe future effects of climate change on the UK, 2016, https://www.manchester.ac.uk/ discover/news/severe-future-effects-of-climate-change/ (4)Cavan, G. 2020, ‘Climate change projections for Greater Climate change projections for Greater Manchester Climate change projections for Greater.’
032
Monthly Temperature and Rainfall in Manchester
Site Problem
TP
es
oc
PU
Pr
IN
N
TIO
RA
NE
GY
GE
TE
GN
SI
RA
DE
Winter precipitation is expected to increase significantly, while the summer will decrease. And there will be a greater number of cooling degree days in winter, comparing with a decreasing number of heating degree days in summer.
Overall Temperature & Precipitation Projection in Manchester
38.5 C°
&
Lead to
+ 100mm
Flood Risk
Extreme Weather
033
2.4 POPULATION TTS
LOCAL P-34.34-3
CONTROL P-34.34-3
FIX
TTS
LOCAL P-34.34-3
CONTROL P-34.34-3
FIX
TTS
LOCAL P-34.34-3
W 41°24'12.2" E 23°44'54.4" PE-3 NVGT B
TTS
LOCAL P-34.34-3
W 41°24'12.2" E 23°44'54.4" PE-3 NVGT B
CONTROL P-34.34-3
CONTROL P-34.34-3
FIX
W 41°24'12.2" E 23°44'54.4" PE-3 NVGT B
FIX
W 41°24'12.2" E 23°44'54.4" PE-3 NVGT B
Site Analysis on Population
The Prediction of Population in Manchester in the future 3100
64.8%
Prediction Total population in Manchester
3000
Existing Problem
64.0%
Predicted maximum total population
63.2%
2800
62.4%
2700
61.6%
2600
60.8%
2500
60.0%
N IO CT
U OD TR IN
2900
1.5M
Great Manchester's population will reach 3m people by 2036
Great Manchester will have 1.5m jobs by 2036
TE SI
3M
AL
AN E
IS
FIN
YS
DE
E
TH OB
PR
GN
M
SI
LE
DE
ST
2038
2037
2036
2035
2034
2033
2032
2031
2030
2029
2028
2027
2026
2025
2024
2023
2022
2021
2020
2019
2018
2017
2016
2015
2014
2013
2012
2011
2010
2009
2008
2007
2006
2005
2004
2003
2002
2001
2000
1999
1998
1997
1996
1995
1994
1993
1992
AM
15,000
N
TIO
ER
UA
ET
AL
EV
AR
1991
s
TP
es
oc
PU
Pr
IN
N
TIO
RA
NE
GY
GE
TE
GN
SI
RA
DE
Boost
& Y
AR
IX
ND PE
AP
MM
SU
Percentage of population aged from 16 to 64 in Manchester in the future
Northern Gateway will provide approximately 15,000 new homes over the next 15-20 years
Lead Change in
......... 2018 63.7% of total population
2023 63.4% of total population
034
2028 63.2% of total population
2033 62.7% of total population
2038 61.9% of total population
2043 61.7% of total population
Land Use Infrastructure Public Space
035
Nothern Gateway Resource: Manchester City Council, 2020, The Northern Gateway Strategic Planning Framework http://northerngatewaymanchester.co.uk/
2.5 LAND USE TTS
LOCAL P-34.34-3
TTS
LOCAL P-34.34-3
CONTROL P-34.34-3
FIX
W 41°24'12.2" E 23°44'54.4" PE-3 NVGT B
CONTROL P-34.34-3
FIX
TTS
LOCAL P-34.34-3
W 41°24'12.2" E 23°44'54.4" PE-3 NVGT B
Site Analysis on Land Use
CONTROL P-34.34-3
TTS
LOCAL P-34.34-3
CONTROL P-34.34-3
FIX
W 41°24'12.2" E 23°44'54.4" PE-3 NVGT B
FIX
W 41°24'12.2" E 23°44'54.4" PE-3 NVGT B
Brownfield Land
Building Land
N IO CT
U OD TR IN
In this section, we analyse and compare the land use of the existing area and also the proposal plan of Manchester City council. By looking at the comparison, we can conclude that there will be less green land and brownfield land in the future if we adopt the plan from the city council. However, due to the development of the area % we are wondering if there and also the increase in the population, 100 90 is a plan that could provide more green land and plazza while 80 maintaining the high capacity of a growing number of residents.. 70
Brownfield Land 29%
12%
Green Land
8% 24%
Green Land
57%
Building Land
63%
TE SI
60 50 40 30
AL
AN E
IS
FIN
YS
DE
Site Problem
TH E
20 10 0
OB
PR
GN
M
SI
LE
DE
ST s
TP
es
oc
PU
Pr
IN
N
TIO
RA
NE
GY
GE
TE
GN
SI
RA
DE
Comparision of land use between existing & proposed % 100 90
Existing Proposed
AM
AR N
TIO
ER
UA
ET
AL
EV
&
IX
ND PE
Y
AR
MM
SU
AP
80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0
Building Land
Green Land
& Green
Brownfield Land
& Building
Brownfield
Enough Public Space? Land Use in the existing Northern Gateway Area
Resource: Manchester City Council, 2020, The Northern Gateway Strategic Planning Framework. http://northerngatewaymanchester.co.uk/
038
Proposed Land Use in the future Northern Gateway Area
039
2.6 GREEN SPACE TTS
LOCAL P-34.34-3
CONTROL P-34.34-3
W 41°24'12.2" E 23°44'54.4" PE-3 NVGT B
FIX
TTS
TTS
LOCAL P-34.34-3
CONTROL P-34.34-3
FIX
TTS
LOCAL P-34.34-3
W 41°24'12.2" E 23°44'54.4" PE-3 NVGT B LOCAL P-34.34-3
CONTROL P-34.34-3
CONTROL P-34.34-3
FIX
W 41°24'12.2" E 23°44'54.4" PE-3 NVGT B
FIX
W 41°24'12.2" E 23°44'54.4" PE-3 NVGT B
Location Site Analysis on Green Space
Based on the previous research of the land use situation, we then focus on the green land research on the site. Here we found that some of the habitat areas are having trouble accessing the green space area very easily. And what is more, the connection between the green space area is limited.
Habitable Area 2.5k
m
Site Problem
U OD TR IN N IO CT
Green Area
Habitable Area
TE SI E
IS
FIN
YS
DE
AL
AN
2.7km
E
TH
Green Area
OB
PR
GN
M
SI
LE
DE
Green Area
ST
Green Area
3.1km
s
TP
es
oc
PU
Pr
IN
N
TIO
RA
NE
GY
GE
TE
GN
SI
RA
DE
Habitable Area
AM
AR N
TIO
ER
UA
ET
AL
EV
&
IX
ND PE
Y
AR
MM
SU
AP
Legend
Habitable Area
Green Area
Accessbility
Woodland Site Boundary
040
041
Connectivity
Site Problem
2. 6 SE C TI O N SU MMARY Flood Risk
Extreme Weather
Land Use
Infrastructure Public Space
Building
Brownfield Green Space
Accessbility
As we analyse the site, we find that one of the most important issues is the loss of green land. With the development of the city, more and more land is being used in construction which occupies the proportion of green space area at the same time. The decreasing area of the green space not only limits the accessibility for residents to arrive but also separates a continuous green space network system.
Connectivity
042
043
0.3B
N-3.4
I N T R O D U CTI O N
0.3B
N-3.4
0.3B
N-3.4
044
SIT E A NALYSIS
0.3B
NODE 00.30-2
1G-2
TTS
P-34.34-3
3 DEF INE THE PROBLEM
0.3B
0.3B
N-3.4
NODE 00.30-2
Analyse the current situation and local/global goals 0.3B
0.3B
N-3.4
DESIGN STRATEGY
C O M PU T A T I ON AL METHO D N-3.4
0.3B
N-3.4
0.3B
N-3.4
N-3.4
3.1 LOCAL GOALS TTS
LOCAL P-34.34-3
CONTROL P-34.34-3
W 41°24'12.2" E 23°44'54.4" PE-3 NVGT B
FIX
TTS
LOCAL P-34.34-3
CONTROL P-34.34-3
W 41°24'12.2" E 23°44'54.4" PE-3 NVGT B
TTS
LOCAL P-34.34-3
Green and Blue Infrastructure Strategy for Manchester
CONTROL P-34.34-3
FIX
TTS
LOCAL P-34.34-3
CONTROL P-34.34-3
FIX
W 41°24'12.2" E 23°44'54.4" PE-3 NVGT B
FIX
W 41°24'12.2" E 23°44'54.4" PE-3 NVGT B
By looking at the goals from manchester city council (MCC), the document can inform us what aspects of green space do they address most. This could be references for us to analyse the site, and help us define specific urban phenomenon pointing to problem.
N IO CT
U OD TR IN TE SI AL
AN E
IS
FIN
YS
DE
E
TH OB
PR
GN
M
SI
LE
DE
ST
3 4
Improve connectivity and accessibility to green and blue infrastructure within the city and beyond
s
TP
es
oc
PU
Pr
IN
N
TIO
RA
NE
GY
GE
TE
GN
SI
RA
DE
1 2
Improve the quality and function of existing green and blue Infrastructure, to maximise the benefits it delivers
AM N
TIO
ER
UA
ET
AL
EV
AR
Appropriate green and blue infrastructure as a key component of new developments to help create successful neighbourhoods and support the city’s growth
&
IX
ND PE
Y
AR
MM
SU
AP
Improve and promote a wider understanding and awareness of the benefits that green and blue infrastructure provides to residents, the economy and the local environment Resource: Manchester city council. 2015. Manchester's Great Outdoors - a Green and Blue Infrastructure
046
047
3.2 GREEN SPACE IN SITE TTS
LOCAL P-34.34-3
CONTROL P-34.34-3
FIX
TTS
LOCAL P-34.34-3 TTS
LOCAL CONTROL P-34.34-3 P-34.34-3
CONTROL FIX P-34.34-3
FIX
Interupting the communication of biodiversity W 41°24'12.2" E 23°44'54.4" PE-3 NVGT B
W 41°24'12.2" W 41°24'12.2" E 23°44'54.4" E 23°44'54.4" PE-3 NVGT B PE-3 NVGT B
TTS
LOCAL P-34.34-3
TTS
LOCAL P-34.34-3
CONTROL P-34.34-3
W 41°24'12.2" E 23°44'54.4" PE-3 NVGT B CONTROL P-34.34-3
FIX
TTS
LOCAL P-34.34-3
CONTROL P-34.34-3
FIX
W 41°24'12.2" E 23°44'54.4" PE-3 NVGT B
FIX
W 41°24'12.2" E 23°44'54.4" PE-3 NVGT B
N IO CT
U OD TR IN
As we have focused our problem on the green and blue infrastructure and the biodiversity problem. Firstly, we have looked into the different types of GBI in the Northern Gateway and analyse how the biodiversity is displayed around here.
TE SI AL
AN E
IS
FIN
YS
DE
E
TH OB
PR
GN
M
SI
LE
DE
Around here, we found that human construction has influenced the connection and communication of biodiversity here. In some ways, it did interrupt species moving from one space to another space.
ST s
TP
es
oc
PU
Pr
IN
N
TIO
RA
NE
GY
GE
TE
GN
SI
RA
DE
Irk River
Abandoned Grassland
Grassland
Woodland
AM N
TIO
ER
UA
ET
AL
EV
AR
So research about how to reconnect these contexts and improve the biodiversity in the GBI in the Northern Gateway is needed.
&
IX
ND PE
Y
AR
MM
SU
AP
Resource: Williams, J. 2018, https://www.manchestereveningnews.co.uk/news/greatermanchester-news/northern-gateway-collyhurst-plan-manchester-14901992 Williams, J. 2018, https://www.manchestereveningnews.co.uk/news/greatermanchester-news/st-catherines-park-manchester-council-14877580 Harrison, A. 2013, http://annieharrisonartist.blogspot.com/2013/02/following-irk. html
048
049
3.3 PATCH DYNAMIC THEORY CONTROL P-34.34-3
FIX
TTS
LOCAL P-34.34-3
CONTROL P-34.34-3
TTS FIX
LOCAL P-34.34-3
Introduction and Why Patch Dynamic W 41°24'12.2" E 23°44'54.4" PE-3 NVGT B
W 41°24'12.2" E 23°44'54.4" PE-3 NVGT B
CONTROL P-34.34-3
W 41°24'12.2" E 23°44'54.4" PE-3 NVGT B
FIX
TTS
LOCAL P-34.34-3
CONTROL P-34.34-3
CONTROL P-34.34-3
FIX
TTS
W 41°24'12.2" E 23°44'54.4" PE-3 NVGT B
LOCAL P-34.34-3
CONTROL P-34.34-3
FIX
W 41°24'12.2" E 23°44'54.4" PE-3 NVGT B
FIX
W 41°24'12.2" E 23°44'54.4" PE-3 NVGT B
Basic Constitution of Patch Dynamic Matrix
N IO CT
U OD TR IN
Patch dynamics, in ecology, a theoretical approach positing that the structure, function, and dynamics of an ecological system can be understood and predicted from an analysis of its smaller interactive spatial components (patches). In addition to its significance as a theoretical approach, the term patch dynamics may be used to refer simply to changes that occur over time in the spatial patterns of ecosystem components.
Patch B
Corridor
Matrix
Cor
Patch A
Basic System of Patch Dynamic
r
LOCAL P-34.34-3
LOCAL P-34.34-3
rido
TTS
TTS
Patch C
Enough natural enermy
Habitat
Matrix
TE SI AL
AN E
IS
FIN
YS
DE
How Patch Dynamic work
E
TH OB
PR
GN
M
SI
LE
DE
ST
Enough nutrition Macroscale Type: Biome Boundary Size: 10,000-1,000,000 km2
More chance to propagate
Biodiversity
Provide
s
TP
es
oc
PU
Pr
IN
N
TIO
RA
NE
GY
GE
TE
GN
SI
RA
DE
About the patch dybamic, there are three elements in the theory which are patch, corridor and matri x . And through th e c om bi n a ti on of these elements, it can form an ecosystem.
AM
AR N
TIO
ER
UA
ET
AL
EV
&
IX
ND PE
Y
AR
MM
SU
AP
Among the patch dynamic system, it provides habitats, nutrition, natural energy and more chances to propagate, which can be used to improve biodiversity. Thus, in the following section, we will base on this theory to define the ecological problem in the Northern Gateway.
Patch Mesoscale Type: patch mosaic Size: 100-10,000 km2
Matrix
Mosaic
Patch
Patch
Corridor Corridor Matrix
Patch
Resource: Witkowski, ETF. 2006, Hierarchical patch-dynamic approach, https://www. researchgate.net/figure/A-hierarchical-patch-dynamic-approach-to-the-studyof-the-grassland-savanna-boundary_fig1_264954364 Forman. 1995, Patch Corridor Matrix Model, https://learn.opengeoedu.de/en/ monitoring/landschaftstrukturmasse/grundlagen/landschaftsstruktur/patchkorridor-matrix-modell
Patch
Microscale Type: individual grass and tree Size: 100 cm2 -1 km2
Wu, J. 2019, Patch dynamics https://www.britannica.com/science/patchdynamics
050
051
3.4 HOW PATCH INFLUENCE THE CITY TTS
LOCAL P-34.34-3
CONTROL P-34.34-3
FIX
TTS
LOCAL P-34.34-3
CONTROL P-34.34-3
FIX
TTS
Why Patch Decrease and Its Influence on City W 41°24'12.2" E 23°44'54.4" PE-3 NVGT B
W 41°24'12.2" E 23°44'54.4" PE-3 NVGT B
LOCAL P-34.34-3
CONTROL P-34.34-3
W 41°24'12.2" E 23°44'54.4" PE-3 NVGT B
To apply the patch theory into the NG analysis, we should have a reaserch about how the patch play a part in the city.
FIX
TTS
LOCAL P-34.34-3
CONTROL P-34.34-3
TTS
LOCAL P-34.34-3
CONTROL P-34.34-3
W 41°24'12.2" E 23°44'54.4" PE-3 NVGT B
FIX
TTS
LOCAL P-34.34-3
CONTROL P-34.34-3
FIX
W 41°24'12.2" E 23°44'54.4" PE-3 NVGT B
FIX
W 41°24'12.2" E 23°44'54.4" PE-3 NVGT B
Increasing Population
N IO CT
U OD TR IN
Habitat Fragmentation
TE SI AL
AN E
IS
FIN
YS
DE
E
TH OB
PR
Increasing Housing
GN
M
SI
LE
DE
First of all, we listed three reasons to answer the question why the patch in the city nowadays are decreasing. It is because of the quick development of the society, growing number of the population which need more land to build the house or apartment. Thus, more and more green land are replacing by the skyscrapers.
ST s
TP
es
oc
PU
Pr
IN
N
TIO
RA
NE
GY
GE
TE
GN
SI
RA
DE
AM
AR
Boost
N
TIO
ER
UA
ET
AL
EV
However, the decreasing of the patch has already asked the human being to payback. Land fragmentation and urban heat island are the two main problems, which both play a vital role to maintain the biodiversity.
&
IX
ND PE
Y
AR
MM
SU
AP
Increasing Construction
Urban Heat Island Resource: Williams, J. 2018, https://www.manchestereveningnews.co.uk/news/greatermanchester-news/northern-gateway-collyhurst-plan-manchester-14901992 Williams, J. 2018, https://www.manchestereveningnews.co.uk/news/greatermanchester-news/st-catherines-park-manchester-council-14877580 Harrison, A. 2013, http://annieharrisonartist.blogspot.com/2013/02/following-irk. html
Decreasing Construction
052
053
3.4 HOW PATCH INFLUENCE THE CITY TTS
LOCAL P-34.34-3
CONTROL P-34.34-3
FIX
TTS
LOCAL P-34.34-3
W 41°24'12.2" E 23°44'54.4" PE-3 NVGT B
TTS
LOCAL P-34.34-3
CONTROL P-34.34-3
W 41°24'12.2" E 23°44'54.4" PE-3 NVGT B
FIX
Fragmentation
TTS
LOCAL P-34.34-3
CONTROL P-34.34-3
FIX
TTS
W 41°24'12.2" E 23°44'54.4" PE-3 NVGT B
LOCAL P-34.34-3
CONTROL P-34.34-3
FIX
TTS
LOCAL P-34.34-3
W 41°24'12.2" E 23°44'54.4" PE-3 NVGT B
CONTROL P-34.34-3
FIX
W 41°24'12.2" E 23°44'54.4" PE-3 NVGT B
FIX
W 41°24'12.2" E 23°44'54.4" PE-3 NVGT B
Contiguous Habitat fragmentation is a process of discontinuity in a large area inhabited by a set of species which causes population fragmentation.
CONTROL P-34.34-3
Fragmented
Fragmented
Analysis of the fragmentation in the site
Interior Habitat
N IO CT
U OD TR IN TE SI AL
AN
12
10
V.S.
11
9 8
E
IS
FIN
YS
DE
The fragmentation process affect species mainly due isolation restricting emigration and immigration of species. When populations become small and isolated, they also become vulnerable to stochastic effects increasing the likelihood of extinctions.
E
TH OB
PR
GN
M
SI
LE
DE
ST
5
Edge Habitat Large number of small patches contain less species
s
TP
es
oc
PU
Pr
IN
N
TIO
RA
NE
GY
GE
TE
GN
SI
RA
DE
Robert in his reaerch reported that small numbers of large patch have more species than large number of small patches.
AM
AR N
TIO
ER
UA
ET
AL
EV
&
IX
ND PE
Y
AR
MM
SU
AP
According to the fragmentation analysis of the Northern Gateway, we can see that the road system had separated the GBI into various size of the patches. Among the patches here, the north side one are more connected than the south one, which means the biodiversity in the north is richer than in the south.
Small number if large patches contain more species
1 2
Fragmentation
Resource: Canadian Centre for Translational Ecology, 2019, https://ccte.ca/resources/ fig5.1.html
Northrop, R. 2019, http://blogs.ifas.ufl.edu/hillsboroughco/2019/12/16/ urban-natural-areas-2-habitat-fragmentation/ De Lima Filho, J. Vieira, R.J.A.G. De Souza, C.A.M. 2020, https://www. sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378437120307950 Fletcher, R.J. Didham, R.K. Banks-Leite, C. 2018, https://www.sciencedirect. com/science/article/pii/S0006320718305779
054
Interior habitat with interior species
Interior habitat and interior species decrease
Edge habitat with edge species
Edge habitat with edge species increase
055
4 3
7
6
3.5 URBAN HEAT ISLAND (UHI) TTS
LOCAL P-34.34-3
CONTROL P-34.34-3
W 41°24'12.2" E 23°44'54.4" PE-3 NVGT B
FIX
TTS
LOCAL P-34.34-3
CONTROL P-34.34-3
FIX
TTS
CONTROL P-34.34-3
FIX
TTS
LOCAL P-34.34-3
W 41°24'12.2" E 23°44'54.4" PE-3 NVGT B
TTS
W 41°24'12.2" E 23°44'54.4" PE-3 NVGT B
LOCAL P-34.34-3
LOCAL P-34.34-3
CONTROL P-34.34-3
W 41°24'12.2" E 23°44'54.4" PE-3 NVGT B
FIX
CONTROL P-34.34-3
FIX
W 41°24'12.2" E 23°44'54.4" PE-3 NVGT B
TTS
LOCAL P-34.34-3
CONTROL P-34.34-3
FIX
W 41°24'12.2" E 23°44'54.4" PE-3 NVGT B
UHI in Manchester 1.2
The urban heat island intensity (UHII), the difference in temperature between an urban site and a rural site, is a measure of the urban heat island (UHI) effect.
1.0 0.8 0.6 0.4
There is a clear UHI effect in Manchester. It is most pronounced at night time and decreases considerably at daytime, although only disappearing completely for a few hours at most.
0.2 0
U OD TR IN
1995
2000
2005
2010
N IO CT
UHI Yearly averages plus trend line for Manchester UK
TE SI E
It also, and perhaps surprisingly, shows a consistent mean annual increase of around 0.02°C per annum for the 15 years. With the advent of future climate change this is a worrying trend as the UHII will add to the increase in air temperature in urban areas.
1.0
IS
FIN
YS
DE
AL
AN
1.2
E
TH PR
GN
M
SI
LE
DE
OB
0.8
0.4
TIO
RA
NE
GY
GE
TE
GN
SI
RA
DE
ST
0.6
0
AM
AR
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10 11 12
13 14 15
16 17 18
19 20 21
22
23 24
The average diurnal variation for all the data, 1996–2011
N
TIO
ER
UA
ET
AL
EV
&
0.95
IX
ND PE
Y
AR
MM
SU
AP
So, the impact of HEI in manchester and the way to mitigate HEI need to be considered. One of the effective way is to increase the amount of vegetation, which means more green space needed to cool down the urban environment.
s
TP
es
oc
PU
Pr
IN
N
0.2
0.90
UHI
0.85
-3- -1
0.80 0.75
-1-1
0.70 0.65
1-3
0.60 0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Resource: G.J. Levermore et al, 2018, The increasing trend of the urban heat island intensity, Urban Climate, pp 360-368. Manchester’s Urban Heat Island, 2009, https://www.metlink.org/other-weather/ urban-heat-islands/manchester-urban-heat-island/
Average monthly UHI over the year showing a seasonal effect
3-5
056
057
3.6 URBAN HEAT ISLAND IMPACT TTS
LOCAL P-34.34-3
CONTROL P-34.34-3
W 41°24'12.2" E 23°44'54.4" PE-3 NVGT B
FIX
The Influence of UHI
TTS
LOCAL P-34.34-3
CONTROL P-34.34-3
FIX
TTS
LOCAL P-34.34-3
CONTROL P-34.34-3
FIX
TTS
W 41°24'12.2" E 23°44'54.4" PE-3 NVGT B
N IO CT
U OD TR IN
Rapid urbanisation cause changes in the natural landscape. In high-density cities, GBI is gradually replaced by skyscrapers, traffics and infrastructure. The modified land surface (such as dark pavement and roofing) in the urban areas affects the storage and transfer of heat, which causes cities to be as much as 5°C hotter than adjacent areas.
CONTROL P-34.34-3
FIX
TTS
W 41°24'12.2" E 23°44'54.4" PE-3 NVGT B
TTS
W 41°24'12.2" E 23°44'54.4" PE-3 NVGT B
LOCAL P-34.34-3
LOCAL P-34.34-3
CONTROL P-34.34-3
LOCAL P-34.34-3
CONTROL P-34.34-3
FIX
W 41°24'12.2" E 23°44'54.4" PE-3 NVGT B
FIX
W 41°24'12.2" E 23°44'54.4" PE-3 NVGT B
88°F 92°F
85°F
86°F
Urban heat island
TE SI
Vicious circle
AL
AN
Gradual warming
Vicious circle 85°F
E
IS
FIN
YS
DE
This phenomenon is called the urban heat island (UHI) effect.
E
TH OB
PR
GN
M
SI
LE
DE
ST s
TP
es
oc
PU
Pr
IN
N
TIO
RA
NE
GY
GE
TE
GN
SI
RA
DE
AM
AR N
TIO
ER
UA
ET
AL
EV
&
More energy use
85°F
Dark roads and asphalt parking lots retain heat
IX
ND PE
85°F
Y
AR
MM
SU
AP
Most species need optimum temperatures to colonize, utilize and thrive in their ecosystems. When there is the existence of high temperatures due to urban heat island (UHI), harsh and cruel ecological surrounding is created which limits the essential activities of the organisms such as metabolism, breeding and reproduction. There are some other specific problems such as competition from exotic species, the spread of disease and pests, increased summer drought stress for wetlands and woodland.
Higher emissions Air quality problems
Dark rooftops retain heat Lack of trees means less shade and less evapotranspiration to help cool the air
Higher water temperatures Impaired water quality
Heat trapped by buildings keeps urban cores warmer at night Waste heat from factories, buildings and vehicles adds to the heat island effect
Resource: C. Natálie et al., 2017, Effects of settlement size, urban heat island and habitat type on urban plant biodiversity, Landscape and Urban Planning, pp 15-22. Image:D.S.Lemmen and F.J.Warren, Climate Change Impacts and Adaptation
Impermeable surfaces reduce surface moisture
Biodiversity Human health
058
059
3.7 SECTION SUMMARY
CHALLENGE AND FOCUS
KEY SITE ANALYSIS
CURRENT SITUATION & LOCAL GOALS
SHORT TERM GOAL
LONG TERM GOAL
IMPROVING WELLBEING IN NORTHERN GATEWAY BY PUBLIC GREEN NETWORK
A GENERAL COMPUTATIONAL TOOL
GROWING POPULATIONG
COMMUNITY
CONNECTIVITY LOSS OF GREEN SPACE
GREEN SPACE
FRAGMENTATION
ACCESSIBILITY
BUILDING CONSTRUCTION
ACCESSIBILITY BIODIVERSITY
COULD BE USED BY ANY STAKEHOLDER
URBAN HEAT ISLAND
BIODIVERSITY
CLIMATE CHANGE
DESIGN PROBLEM HOW TO DESIGN A CONNECTED PUBLIC GREEN NETWORK THAT IS HIGHLY INTEGRATED WITH URBAN BLOCKS AND ACCESSIBLE TO RESIDENTS SO AS TO ENHANCE THE HUMAN WELL-BEING AND BIODIVERSITY 060
061
COULD BE APPIED TO ANY SITE
0.3B
N-3.4
S I T E A N ALY S I S
0.3B
N-3.4
062
DEFIN E T HE PROBL EM
0.3B
N-3.4
0.3B
NODE 00.30-2
1G-2
TTS
0.3B
N-3.4
P-34.34-3
4 DESIGN STRATEGY
0.3B
NODE 00.30-2
Introduce the strategies which are in accordance with goals and considerations
DESIGN GENERATION PROCESS 0.3B
0.3B
N-3.4
0.3B
N-3.4
I N PU T P ARAMETER
0.3B
N-3.4
N-3.4
N-3.4
4.1 DESIGN CONSIDERATION TTS
LOCAL P-34.34-3
W 41°24'12.2" E 23°44'54.4" PE-3 NVGT B
FIX
TTS TTS
LOCAL LOCAL P-34.34-3 P-34.34-3
CONTROL CONTROL P-34.34-3 P-34.34-3 FIXFIX
TTS
WW 41°24'12.2" 41°24'12.2" E 23°44'54.4" E 23°44'54.4" PE-3 PE-3 NVGT NVGT B B
LOCAL P-34.34-3
CONTROL P-34.34-3
LOCAL P-34.34-3
CONTROL P-34.34-3
FIX
TTS
LOCAL P-34.34-3
W 41°24'12.2" E 23°44'54.4" PE-3 NVGT B
CONTROL P-34.34-3
FIX
W 41°24'12.2" E 23°44'54.4" PE-3 NVGT B
FIX
W 41°24'12.2" E 23°44'54.4" PE-3 NVGT B
2k m
Brief
CONTROL P-34.34-3
TTS
An Accessible Green Space Network
2k m
3 km
A Green Space Network
2 km
N IO CT
U OD TR IN
This project will create a high quality network of green spaces and all communities will be linked by this network, which improve the accessibility in the Northern Gateway. Also, the pedestrain and cycly path will be extended to encourages residents to travel ecofriendly, and inhabitabts have easy acesses to any green spaces in the Nrothern Gateway. Thus, people' wellbeing will be enhanced, meanwhile the biodiversity in the site will be improved greatly.
TE SI AL
AN E
IS
FIN
YS
DE
E
TH OB
PR
3 km
GN
M
SI
LE
DE
ST
Site Boundary
N
TIO
Irk River Small Green Space
s
TP
es
oc
PU
Pr
IN
2 km
RA
NE
GY
GE
TE
GN
SI
RA
DE
Legend
AM
AR N
TIO
ER
UA
ET
AL
EV
Green Corridor New Green Space
&
IX
ND PE
Y
AR
MM
SU
AP
Big Green Space Green Infrastructure
Existing
Existing Community New Community
0.4 km
Proposed
Green spaces lacking connection
5 Min Walking Distance
Define green space network Create new green space area Improved cross connectivity
Existing
Proposed
Green infrastructures lacking accessbility for communities
Create new communities to access closely Provide more green infrastructure in the green space network for residents to access within 5 min walking distance
0.4 km 064
065
4.2 LOOP OF THE URBAN SYSTEM TTS
Existing loop
LOCAL P-34.34-3
CONTROL P-34.34-3
W 41°24'12.2" E 23°44'54.4" PE-3 NVGT B
FIX
TTS
LOCAL P-34.34-3
CONTROL P-34.34-3
FIX
TTS
LOCAL P-34.34-3
CONTROL P-34.34-3
FIX
TTS
LOCAL P-34.34-3
CONTROL P-34.34-3
W 41°24'12.2" E 23°44'54.4" PE-3 NVGT B
TTS
LOCAL P-34.34-3
W 41°24'12.2" E 23°44'54.4" PE-3 NVGT B
CONTROL P-34.34-3
FIX
W 41°24'12.2" E 23°44'54.4" PE-3 NVGT B
TTS
LOCAL P-34.34-3
CONTROL P-34.34-3
FIX
W 41°24'12.2" E 23°44'54.4" PE-3 NVGT B
FIX
W 41°24'12.2" E 23°44'54.4" PE-3 NVGT B
+
N IO CT
U OD TR IN TE SI AL
AN E
IS
FIN
YS
DE
E
TH OB
PR
GN
M
SI
LE
DE
ST
CONTINUOUS GROWTH OF THE URBAN SYSTEM
ECONOMY GROWTH
POPULATION GROWTH
+ HEALTH & WELLBEING
BRING STRESS
+ URBAN DEVELOPMENT
Increase
URBAN HEAT ISLAND
Decrease
POLLUTION
oc
PU
Pr
IN
N
TIO
RA
NE
GY
GE
TE
GN
SI
RA
DE
The existing urban system cycle shows that in the process of continuous urbanization, urban commercial, industrial and residential land also increases, so the natural environment area is greatly reduced. Urban expansion has brought about water pollution and air pollution in green areas. While urban development brings wealth to residents, it also increases residents psychological pressure. The reduction in the area of the natural environment cannot meet the needs of residents. The physical and mental health of residents in the tight commercial and industrial land is badly influenced. Green spaces cannot meet the needs of species, destroying the migration and ecological environment of species.
Increase
es s
TP AM
AR N
TIO
ER
UA
ET
AL
EV
Damage
&
Accessible
Connect Fragmented area to make it more stable
IX
ND PE
Y
AR
MM
SU
AP
How the design could integrate into the loop
Mitigate
GREEN SPACES
In our design, we are committed to creating a new public open space network with large porpotion of greenspace in the city to ensure the accessiblity of residentes, improve biodiversity, stabilize the natural environment structure, and solve some urban expansion problems. This network can improve the wellbeing index of residents by optimizing the living environment, and alleviate the problems of urban heat island effect and environmental pollution through design approach.
Decrease
Mitigate
Damage
Enhance Improve
066
HABITAT
BIODIVERSITY
OPEN SPACENETWORK 067
Mitigate
4.3 COMPLEX ADAPTIVE SYSTEM (CAS) LOCAL P-34.34-3
CONTROL P-34.34-3
W 41°24'12.2" E 23°44'54.4" PE-3 NVGT B
FIX
TTS
Introduction
LOCAL P-34.34-3
CONTROL P-34.34-3
FIX
TTS
W 41°24'12.2" E 23°44'54.4" PE-3 NVGT B
LOCAL P-34.34-3
CONTROL LOCAL TTS P-34.34-3 P-34.34-3 FIX
W 41°24'12.2" E 23°44'54.4" PE-3 NVGT B
CONTROL P-34.34-3
W 41°24'12.2" E 23°44'54.4" PE-3 NVGT B
LOCAL P-34.34-3
CONTROL P-34.34-3
FIX
W 41°24'12.2" E 23°44'54.4" PE-3 NVGT B
FIX TTS
LOCAL P-34.34-3
CONTROL LOCAL TTS P-34.34-3 P-34.34-3 FIX
W 41°24'12.2" E 23°44'54.4" PE-3 NVGT B
CONTROL P-34.34-3
TTS
LOCAL P-34.34-3
CONTROL P-34.34-3
FIX
W 41°24'12.2" E 23°44'54.4" PE-3 NVGT B
FIX
W 41°24'12.2" E 23°44'54.4" PE-3 NVGT B
Human
'[Complex Adaptive Systems] change and reorganise their component parts to adapt themselves to the problems posed by their surroundings.' (Holland, 1992)
N IO CT
U OD TR IN TE SI YS
E
IS
FIN E
TH OB
PR
GN
M
SI
LE
DE
ST s
TP
es
oc
PU
Pr
IN
N
TIO
RA
NE
GY
GE
TE
GN
SI
RA
DE
AM
AR N
TIO
ER
UA
ET
AL
EV
&
CS is a system composed of many heterogeneous agents, which are nonlinearly interconnected, while the final emergence of the system is completely different than the individual element`s performance. The CS can be an economic system, social structure, computer or automobiles, for instances.
Changing external environment INFO IN
Changing external environment
COMPLEX ADAPTIVE BEHAVIOR
Aggregation Agent Actions
EMERGENCE
Y
AR
MM
IX
ND PE
INFO OUT
SIMPLE SELF-ORGANIZED LOCAL RELATIONSHIP
INFO IN
Adaption Non-linearity development
Target Diversity
Character Tagging
Resource: 1. Holland, J.H. (1992). Complex Adaptive Systems . 2. Nel, D. (2016) Exploring a complex adaptive systems approach to the study of urban change 3. Wikipedia. (2020) Complex adaptive system
068
Reflection of human activities on Buildings; transportation systems; Water/electric system
Self-organization
Element flow (Loop)
SU
AP
The complex Adaptive System (CAS) is a specific type of complex system with some key differing features. CAS has the ability to learn and adapt from past conditions that it has encountered. Due to this feature, CAS evolution is more advanced with respect to the CS. Due to its capacity to learn from the past experiences, CAS continuously adapts itself to new constraints and circumstances, resulting in a better performance therefore, the effect of urban form on the energy performance of the city as single entity via complex system analysis has been investigated.
City Agents
INFO OUT
POSITIVE FEEDBACK AMPLIFYING
AL
AN DE
Complexity theory seeks to understand how complex systems work. One of the ways that complexity theory does this is by understanding properties and mechanisms that allow complex systems to function and survive. Cities can be described as complex adaptive systems as they are undeniably complex and exhibit the same properties that can be found in any CAS. (Nel,D. 2016)
Human groups
NEGATIVE FEEDBACK DAMPENING
TTS
TTS
069
Absorb information Information Loop Feedback Allocating resources Energy Loop Feedback Variety resulting from continuous adaptation of agents Control the complex system of the city by means of architects
4.4 PRECEDENT OF APPLICATION TTS
LOCAL P-34.34-3
CONTROL P-34.34-3
W 41°24'12.2" E 23°44'54.4" PE-3 NVGT B
FIX
TTS
LOCAL P-34.34-3
CONTROL P-34.34-3
FIX
TTS
Precedent of the application of Complex Adaptive System (CAS)
N IO CT
U OD TR IN
The following is a simplified case study based on an urban design workshopa held in Barcelona, Spain. This design workshop's main concern was devoted to quality enhancement of space and energy performances within two residential blocks of the Barcelona Exiample. It consisted of refurbishing courtyard spaces and connecting them to the urban green open space network (open space subsystem).
TE SI
LOCAL P-34.34-3
CONTROL LOCAL TTS P-34.34-3 P-34.34-3 FIX
W 41°24'12.2" E 23°44'54.4" PE-3 NVGT B
CONTROL P-34.34-3
W 41°24'12.2" E 23°44'54.4" PE-3 NVGT B
FIX TTS
LOCAL P-34.34-3
CONTROL LOCAL TTS P-34.34-3 P-34.34-3 FIX
W 41°24'12.2" E 23°44'54.4" PE-3 NVGT B
CONTROL P-34.34-3
LOCAL P-34.34-3
Impact help reach better performances and energy demands Impact Shadow
YS IS
E E
TH OB
PR
GN
M
SI
LE
DE
NEW AGENT
EXISTING AGENT
ST s
TP
es
oc
PU
Pr
IN
N
TIO
RA
NE
GY
GE
TE
GN
SI
RA
DE
MACROSCOPIC SCALE
AM
AR N
TIO
ER
UA
ET
AL
EV
&
IX
ND PE
Y
AR
MM
SU
AP
Impact generates electrical energy; intercept unpleasant solar radiation PHOTOVOLTAIC PANEL
071
CONTROL P-34.34-3
W 41°24'12.2" E 23°44'54.4" PE-3 NVGT B
MICROSCOPIC SCALE
Resource: Manesh, S.V. Tadi, M. (2011) 'Sustainable urban morphology emergence via complex adaptive system analysis: sustainable design in existing context'. Procedia Engineering, 21. pp.89-97.
070
TTS
FIX
AL
FIN
To deal with this problem, in the most sustainable way, a new residential building location was proposed to be placed right next to the old existing building. The presence of a new building adjacent to the old building prevented the unwelcomed solar radiation incident from the west side without future costly isolation treatment. In the other words, not only had requested residential spaces been provided, but also the new residential building helped the old one to consume less energy for cooling systems in summer time.
FIX
W 41°24'12.2" E 23°44'54.4" PE-3 NVGT B
AN DE
Additionally, enhancing energy performances of the entire blocks was on request along with a project demand to design new residential flats. The superficial energy performances of a building in the Example block was revealed through investigations carried out during the study phase. Usage of poor constructional technology and location, which had caused building exposure to unwelcomed west solar radiation, had soared energy demands of old building, particularly in summer time.
CONTROL P-34.34-3
W 41°24'12.2" E 23°44'54.4" PE-3 NVGT B
TTS
W 41°24'12.2" E 23°44'54.4" PE-3 NVGT B
LOCAL P-34.34-3
WHOLE SYSTEM
FIX
4.5 THEORY APPROACH OF CAS TTS
LOCAL P-34.34-3
CONTROL P-34.34-3
W 41°24'12.2" E 23°44'54.4" PE-3 NVGT B
FIX
TTS
LOCAL P-34.34-3
CONTROL P-34.34-3
TTS
CONTROL P-34.34-3
FIX
TTS
LOCAL P-34.34-3
W 41°24'12.2" E 23°44'54.4" PE-3 NVGT B
FIX
TTS
LOCAL P-34.34-3
W 41°24'12.2" E 23°44'54.4" PE-3 NVGT B
CONTROL P-34.34-3
FIX
W 41°24'12.2" E 23°44'54.4" PE-3 NVGT B
Possible application of CAS on the design problem
LOCAL P-34.34-3
TTS
LOCAL P-34.34-3
CONTROL P-34.34-3
FIX
Changing external environment INFO IN
RESIDENT RESIDENT
COMMUNITY
GREEN SPACE
N IO CT
U OD TR IN TE SI AL
AN E
IS
FIN
YS
DE
E
TH OB
PR
GN
M
SI
LE
DE
ST s
TP
es
oc
PU
Pr
IN
N
TIO
RA
NE
GY
GE
TE
GN
SI
RA
DE
RESIDENT
COMMUNITY
Population increase/decrease Floating population
INFO IN PUBLIC OPEN SPACE
RESIDENT
HUMAN ACTIVITIES SIMPLE SELF-ORGANIZED LOCAL RELATIONSHIP HUMAN Agents cannot be controlled
Adaptive when facing emergence
INFO OUT ENERGY OUT Could be absorbed by agents directly INFO OUT ENERGY OUT
Agents which could be controlled OTHER PUBLIC SPACES
EMERGENCE
GREEN SPACE
INFLUENCE EACH OTHER
Changing external environment
URBAN PUBLIC SPACECOMMUNITY SYSTEM
RESOURCE IN
PUBLIC OPEN SPACE
AM
AR
INFO IN RESOURCE IN
GREEN SPACES WATER ECOSYSTEM
INFO OUT ENERGY OUT
N
TIO
ER
UA
ET
AL
EV
'Macroscopic patterns emerge from the dynamic and nonlinear interactions of the systems low-level (microscopic) adaptive agents. The emergent patterns are more than the sum of their parts, thus the traditional reductionist methodology fails to describe how the macroscopic patterns emerge.'
RESOURCE IN
RESIDENT INFLUENCE EACH OTHER
RESIDENT
FIX
W 41°24'12.2" E 23°44'54.4" PE-3 NVGT B
W 41°24'12.2" E 23°44'54.4" PE-3 NVGT B
ASSUMPTION: The Public open space systems as an urban complex system
As metioned before, the CAS consists of different heterogeneous members, or agents, which are connected to each other in non-linear ways. An agent within the context of the city can be a building, open space, people, etc. which comprise the city. Behavioral changes of individual agent do not affect the final emergence or performance of the system directly, while a single system emergence forms by combination of all agents' performances as a whole.
CONTROL P-34.34-3
&
IX
ND PE
Y
AR
MM
SU
AP
RESIDENT
Due to the presence of different types of agents and different nonlinear relations between them, complex systems also need many different subsystems in order to link these agents. The multiple subsystems add infinitely more layers of complexity as they influence one another. Each subsystem affects other agents and subsystems either directly or indirectly and this feature is one of the most important characteristics of complex adaptive systems.
GREEN SPACE
RESIDENT
COMMUNITY
PUBLIC OPEN SPACE
Changing external environment
RESIDENT
Orinigal environment which could be preserved
PUBLIC OPEN SPACE PUBLIC OPEN SPACE RESIDENT
Resource: Manesh, S.V. Tadi, M. (2011) 'Sustainable urban morphology emergence via complex adaptive system analysis: sustainable design in existing context'. Procedia Engineering, 21. pp.89-97.
072
COMMUNITIES COMPLEX NETWORK
GREEN SPACES WATER ECOSYSTEM Impact on the whole system
Impact
Impact
Newly proposed GBI
073
Impact COMMUNITIES Impact
E CO LO G Y CO RRI DO R Resource: Ford, A. 2013, https://www.esa.org/esablog/research/landscapeconnectivity-corridors-and-more-in-issues-in-ecology-16/
4.6 ECOLOGY CORRIDOR TTS
LOCAL P-34.34-3
CONTROL P-34.34-3
W 41°24'12.2" E 23°44'54.4" PE-3 NVGT B
FIX
TTS
LOCAL P-34.34-3 TTS
LOCAL CONTROL P-34.34-3 P-34.34-3
CONTROL P-34.34-3 FIX
FIX
TTS
W 41°24'12.2"W 41°24'12.2" E 23°44'54.4"E 23°44'54.4" PE-3 NVGT B PE-3 NVGT B
LOCAL P-34.34-3
TTS
LOCAL P-34.34-3
CONTROL P-34.34-3
W 41°24'12.2" E 23°44'54.4" PE-3 NVGT B CONTROL P-34.34-3
FIX
TTS
LOCAL P-34.34-3
CONTROL P-34.34-3
FIX
W 41°24'12.2" E 23°44'54.4" PE-3 NVGT B
FIX
W 41°24'12.2" E 23°44'54.4" PE-3 NVGT B
Introduction & why Ecology Corridor
The benefits of ecology corridor
N IO CT
U OD TR IN TE SI AL
AN E
IS
FIN
YS
DE
E
TH OB
PR
GN
M
SI
LE
DE
Urban ecological corridor refers to a linear or ribbon ecological landscape, which has the functions of natural habitat, green open space or human habitat isolation in the artificial eco-environment of the city or urban area. Ecological corridor has integrated ecological, social, cultural and other functions. Ecological corridor was originally proposed to connect isolated habitats ofwild animals by establishing migration corridors, so as to achieve the purpose of wildlife protection. International Union for the Conservation of Nature (IUCN) in 1980 applied the concept of ecological corridor to global conservation strategy.
1
Reduce fragement
2
Reduce Isolation
ST s
TP
es
oc
PU
Pr
IN
N
TIO
RA
NE
GY
GE
TE
GN
SI
RA
DE
3
AM
AR
4
Provide More Activities
N
TIO
ER
UA
ET
AL
EV
Provide more access
&
IX
ND PE
Y
AR
MM
SU
AP
Corridor Patch
5
Improve Biodiversity
Resource: Peng, J. Zhao,H. Liu, Y. 2017, 'Urban ecological corridors construction: A review', Acta Ecologica Sinica, 37(1).
076
077
6
Energy
Boost Energy Flow
4.7 APPROACH OF ECOLOGY CORRIDOR TTS
LOCAL P-34.34-3
CONTROL P-34.34-3 TTS
W 41°24'12.2" E 23°44'54.4" PE-3 NVGT B
LOCAL FIX P-34.34-3
Apply to Our Site
CONTROL P-34.34-3 TTS
LOCAL P-34.34-3 FIX
W 41°24'12.2" E 23°44'54.4" PE-3 NVGT B
CONTROL LOCAL P-34.34-3 TTSFIX P-34.34-3
CONTROL P-34.34-3
W 41°24'12.2" E 23°44'54.4" PE-3 NVGT B
W 41°24'12.2" E 23°44'54.4" PE-3 NVGT B
FIX
TTS
LOCAL P-34.34-3
TTS
LOCAL P-34.34-3
CONTROL P-34.34-3
W 41°24'12.2" E 23°44'54.4" PE-3 NVGT B CONTROL P-34.34-3
FIX
TTS
LOCAL P-34.34-3
CONTROL P-34.34-3
W 41°24'12.2" E 23°44'54.4" PE-3 NVGT B
FIX
TTS
LOCAL P-34.34-3
CONTROL P-34.34-3
FIX
W 41°24'12.2" E 23°44'54.4" PE-3 NVGT B
FIX
W 41°24'12.2" E 23°44'54.4" PE-3 NVGT B
Combine our design problem with the ecology corridor. We are trying to apply the ecology corridor to connect all the communities and green space together in Northern Gateway to generate a green network to provide more access for people and improve biodiversity at the same time. U OD TR IN N IO CT
log o c E
y
C orrid
or
TE SI AL
AN E
IS
FIN
YS
DE
E
TH
Green Space
OB
PR
Corridor
oc s
TP
es
rid or
AM
AR
Eco
N
TIO
ER
UA
ET
AL
EV
lo
gy
PU
Pr
IN
N
TIO
RA
NE
GY
GE
TE
GN
SI
RA
DE
ST
Ecolog Cor y
GN
M
SI
LE
DE
Green Space
&
IX
ND PE
Y
AR
MM
SU
AP
Community
Ecology Corridor Proposal Community Existing Community Existing Green Space
078
079
4.8 FIRST DESIGN RULE TTS
LOCAL P-34.34-3
CONTROL P-34.34-3 TTS
W 41°24'12.2" E 23°44'54.4" PE-3 NVGT B
Setting Rules
LOCAL FIX P-34.34-3
CONTROL P-34.34-3 TTS
LOCAL P-34.34-3 FIX
W 41°24'12.2" E 23°44'54.4" PE-3 NVGT B
CONTROL LOCAL P-34.34-3 TTSFIX P-34.34-3
CONTROL P-34.34-3
W 41°24'12.2" E 23°44'54.4" PE-3 NVGT B
W 41°24'12.2" E 23°44'54.4" PE-3 NVGT B
TTS
LOCAL P-34.34-3
CONTROL P-34.34-3
FIX
W 41°24'12.2" E 23°44'54.4" PE-3 NVGT B
TTS
LOCAL P-34.34-3
CONTROL P-34.34-3
FIX
W 41°24'12.2" E 23°44'54.4" PE-3 NVGT B
FIX
Corridor Number
Based on the previous research on the ecology corridor and what we propose to apply it to our site, In this section, we are setting the ecology corridor rules that can make sure our design system later can have a continuous green corridor that can connect not only the communities, but also the green space on the site. Urban Model
Urban PLot
N IO CT
U OD TR IN
Our Goal
TE SI AL
AN E
IS
FIN
YS
DE
E
TH OB
PR
GN
M
SI
LE
DE
ST s
TP
es
oc
PU
Pr
IN
N
TIO
RA
NE
GY
GE
TE
GN
SI
RA
DE
AM N
TIO
ER
UA
ET
AL
EV
AR
Legend
& Y
AR
IX
ND PE
AP
MM
SU
Corridor Green Space Plot Access Point Tree
080
Rule 1
Rule 2
Consideration
Make sure the green space is in the inner side of urban plot
Make sure each access point on each urban plot is head on head to each other
As we can see, the corridor number in the whole network will affect the plot access point
081
G RI D-PL OT STR A TE G Y Resource: Google Earth, 2020. https://www.planetizen.com/node/54477
4.9 GRID-PLOT STRATEGY TTS
Introduction
LOCAL P-34.34-3
CONTROL P-34.34-3
W 41°24'12.2" E 23°44'54.4" PE-3 NVGT B
FIX
TTS
LOCAL P-34.34-3 TTS
LOCAL CONTROL P-34.34-3 P-34.34-3
CONTROL P-34.34-3 FIX
FIX
TTS
LOCAL P-34.34-3
W 41°24'12.2" W 41°24'12.2" E 23°44'54.4" E 23°44'54.4" PE-3 NVGT B PE-3 NVGT B
CONTROL P-34.34-3
TTS
LOCAL P-34.34-3
CONTROL P-34.34-3
FIX
W 41°24'12.2" E 23°44'54.4" PE-3 NVGT B
TTS
LOCAL P-34.34-3
CONTROL P-34.34-3
FIX
W 41°24'12.2" E 23°44'54.4" PE-3 NVGT B
FIX
W 41°24'12.2" E 23°44'54.4" PE-3 NVGT B
N IO CT
U OD TR IN TE SI AL
AN E
IS
FIN
YS
DE
E
TH OB
PR
GN
M
SI
LE
DE
ST s
TP
es
oc
PU
Pr
IN
N
TIO
RA
NE
GY
GE
TE
GN
SI
RA
DE
AM
AR N
TIO
ER
UA
ET
AL
EV
&
IX
ND PE
Y
AR
MM
SU
AP
Site Make sure each urban plot will have a access point on each sides
084
Place Grid
Divide site
Offset Plot
Place Building
Make sure each urban plot will have a access point on each sides
Make sure each urban plot will have a access point on each sides
Make sure each urban plot will have a access point on each sides
Make sure each urban plot will have a access point on each sides
085
4.10 RESEARCH ON GRID-PLOT STRATEGY TTS
LOCAL P-34.34-3
CONTROL P-34.34-3
W 41°24'12.2" E 23°44'54.4" PE-3 NVGT B
FIX
TTS
LOCAL P-34.34-3
Various grid apply in cities
CONTROL P-34.34-3
FIX
TTS
W 41°24'12.2" E 23°44'54.4" PE-3 NVGT B
LOCAL P-34.34-3
CONTROL P-34.34-3
FIX
TTS
LOCAL P-34.34-3
W 41°24'12.2" E 23°44'54.4" PE-3 NVGT B
TTS
LOCAL P-34.34-3
CONTROL P-34.34-3
W 41°24'12.2" E 23°44'54.4" PE-3 NVGT B CONTROL P-34.34-3
FIX
TTS
LOCAL P-34.34-3
CONTROL P-34.34-3
FIX
W 41°24'12.2" E 23°44'54.4" PE-3 NVGT B
FIX
W 41°24'12.2" E 23°44'54.4" PE-3 NVGT B
N IO CT
U OD TR IN
Previous studies using acial maps and topological distances (Hillier et al, 1993) have shown that movement flows throughout the city are strongly affected by the urban grid, which naturally creates a system in which journeys tend to pass through the most accessible locations. In such studies, the shortest path between two locations is interpreted as the least number of changes of direction between them.
TE SI AL
AN E
IS
FIN
YS
DE
E
TH OB
PR
GN
M
SI
LE
DE
ST s
TP
es
oc
PU
Pr
IN
N
TIO
RA
NE
GY
GE
TE
GN
SI
RA
DE
In this section, we have researched different grid systems that have been applied in different cities. And we can conclude that different sizes of grid will generate different sizes of plots and the length and width of plot will influence building design and context.
AM
AR N
TIO
ER
UA
ET
AL
EV
&
200
500
1000m
Conclusion Different size of grid will generate different size of plots
IX
ND PE
Y
AR
MM
SU
AP
0
Tolyatti, RU 180x60m
0
200
500
Vancouver, CA 200x110m
Tver, (Yuzhny), RU 215x115m
Houston, US 100x100m
Sacramento, US 120x120m
Lima, PE 130x130m
Length and width of plot influence building design and context
1000m
Resource: Deutinger, T. Marques, A.R. 2012, http://td-architects.eu/projects/show/ grid-city/
086
087
4.11 APPROACH OF GRID-PLOT STRATEGY TTS
LOCAL P-34.34-3
CONTROL P-34.34-3
W 41°24'12.2" E 23°44'54.4" PE-3 NVGT B
FIX
Apply to Our Site
TTS
LOCAL P-34.34-3
CONTROL P-34.34-3
FIX
TTS
LOCAL P-34.34-3
W 41°24'12.2" E 23°44'54.4" PE-3 NVGT B
CONTROL P-34.34-3
FIX
W 41°24'12.2" E 23°44'54.4" PE-3 NVGT B
TTS
LOCAL P-34.34-3
TTS
N IO CT
U OD TR IN TE SI AL
AN E
IS
FIN
YS
DE
400m Walkin
CONTROL P-34.34-3
W 41°24'12.2" E 23°44'54.4" PE-3 NVGT B CONTROL P-34.34-3
FIX
TTS
LOCAL P-34.34-3
CONTROL P-34.34-3
FIX
W 41°24'12.2" E 23°44'54.4" PE-3 NVGT B
FIX
W 41°24'12.2" E 23°44'54.4" PE-3 NVGT B
Goal 1: apply the grid to make residents access the green space within walking distance
After analysing the grid precedents in various cities, we are trying to apply a grid-plot strategy to our site here. As we have mentioned before, we are trying to use the ecology corridor to connect the community and the green space, and the grid-plot system can have a deep influence on that. Different sizes of the grid will lead to various accessibility for residents within walking distance. What is more, it can also lead to the various types of green space that form in the mater plan. Thus, we have set two goals here,
LOCAL P-34.34-3
Goal 2: apply the grid to make sure there are various size green space
g Distance
E
TH OB
PR
GN
M
SI
LE
DE
ST
100m
oc
PU
Pr
IN
N
TIO
RA
NE
GY
GE
TE
GN
SI
RA
DE
s
TP
es
100m
AM
AR N
TIO
ER
UA
ET
AL
EV
&
IX
ND PE
Y
AR
MM
SU
AP
Communities
Large Grid-Access
088
Patches
Medium Grid-Access
Corridor
Small Grid-Access
Large Grid- Diverse
Medium Grid- Diverse
089
Small Grid- Diverse
FIX
TTS
LOCAL P-34.34-3
CONTROL P-34.34-3
FIX
TTS
W 41°24'12.2" E 23°44'54.4" PE-3 NVGT B
LOCAL P-34.34-3
CONTROL P-34.34-3
FIX
TE SI AL
AN E
IS
FIN
YS
DE
E
TH
GN
M
SI
LE
DE
ST
TTS
LOCAL P-34.34-3
CONTROL P-34.34-3
FIX
W 41°24'12.2" E 23°44'54.4" PE-3 NVGT B
120m
90m
210m
180m
150m
Rule 4: Mix Use Grid 210m 90m Grid/Plot Size: 90-210m
400m
400m
400m
400m
400m
400m
400m
s
TP
es
oc
PU
Pr
IN
N
TIO
RA
NE
GY
GE
TE
GN
SI
RA
DE
Thus, we set our rule to combine the different size of grids here to form various types of plots to meet the accessibility requirement.
FIX
90m
60m
60m
Grid/Plot Size
OB
PR
Street Width 30m
N IO CT
U OD TR IN
We found that as the grid/plot became bigger, the less accessible for residents to reach their destinations within walking distance. However, when we combine the different size of the grid, the accessbility is increasing.
CONTROL P-34.34-3
W 41°24'12.2" E 23°44'54.4" PE-3 NVGT B
W 41°24'12.2" E 23°44'54.4" PE-3 NVGT B
As we have analyzed the urban precendents before, here we choose a series size of the grid/plot to analyse how various kinds of grid/plot affect the accessibility for the residents.
LOCAL P-34.34-3
W 41°24'12.2" E 23°44'54.4" PE-3 NVGT B
Setting Rules based on Grid-plot strategy W 41°24'12.2" E 23°44'54.4" PE-3 NVGT B
TTS
210m
CONTROL P-34.34-3
FIX
180m
LOCAL P-34.34-3
CONTROL P-34.34-3
120m
TTS
LOCAL P-34.34-3
150m
4.12 SECOND DESIGN RULE
TTS
AM
AR
Access Evaluation
N
TIO
ER
UA
ET
AL
EV
&
IX
ND PE
Y
AR
MM
SU
AP
400m
5 Min Walking distance
Accessibility
090
Accessibility
Accessibility
Accessibility
Accessibility
Accessibility
091
Accessibility
TTS
LOCAL P-34.34-3
CONTROL P-34.34-3
FIX
TTS
LOCAL P-34.34-3
W 41°24'12.2" E 23°44'54.4" PE-3 NVGT B
CONTROL P-34.34-3
FIX
TE SI AL
AN E
IS
FIN
YS
DE
E
TH
GN
Grid/Plot Size
M
SI
LE
DE
OB
PR
Street Width 30m
N IO CT
U OD TR IN
We found that as the grid/plot became bigger, the green space on the site would be more diverse. However, when we consider the accessbility in the previous analysis together, we have made a two-win decision. We combine the small size of the grid and the bigger one together to meet both the accessibility and diversity requirements.
FIX
W 41°24'12.2" E 23°44'54.4" PE-3 NVGT B
TTS
LOCAL P-34.34-3
W 41°24'12.2" E 23°44'54.4" PE-3 NVGT B
As we have analyzed the urban precendents before, here we choose a series size of the grid/plot to analyse how various kinds of grid/plot affect the accessibility for the residents.
CONTROL P-34.34-3
CONTROL P-34.34-3
FIX
W 41°24'12.2" E 23°44'54.4" PE-3 NVGT B
90m
60m
120m
210m
180m
150m
Rule 4: Mix Use Grid 210m 90m
210m
Setting Rules
FIX
LOCAL P-34.34-3
180m
W 41°24'12.2" E 23°44'54.4" PE-3 NVGT B
TTS
120m
CONTROL P-34.34-3
FIX
90m
LOCAL P-34.34-3
CONTROL P-34.34-3
W 41°24'12.2" E 23°44'54.4" PE-3 NVGT B
60m
TTS
LOCAL P-34.34-3
150m
4.12 SECOND DESIGN RULE
TTS
Grid/Plot Size: 90-210m
ST
400m
400m
Green SpaceType
Green SpaceType
Green SpaceType
400m
400m
400m
400m
s
TP
es
oc
PU
Pr
IN
N
TIO
RA
NE
GY
GE
TE
GN
SI
RA
DE
400m
AM
AR N
TIO
ER
UA
ET
AL
EV
&
IX
ND PE
Y
AR
Diverse Evaluation
MM
SU
AP
Communities Green Space
092
Green SpaceType
Green SpaceType
093
Green SpaceType
Green SpaceType
0.3B
N-3.4
D E FI N E THE P RO BLEM 0.3B
N-3.4
094
0.3B
N-3.4
DESIGN S TRATEGY
0.3B
NODE 00.30-2
1G-2
TTS
P-34.34-3
5 DESIGN GENERATION PROCESS 0.3B
0.3B
N-3.4
N-3.4
NODE 00.30-2
Explore the generation process that would consist of different parameters towards the design proposal 0.3B
0.3B
N-3.4
INPUT P ARAMETER
E V A L U A T I O N & S U MMARY N-3.4
0.3B
N-3.4
0.3B
N-3.4
5.1 DESIGN DEVELOPMENT STEP 1 TTS
LOCAL P-34.34-3
CONTROL P-34.34-3
W 41°24'12.2" E 23°44'54.4" PE-3 NVGT B
FIX
TTS
LOCAL P-34.34-3
CONTROL P-34.34-3
FIX
TTS
W 41°24'12.2" E 23°44'54.4" PE-3 NVGT B
TTS
CONTROL P-34.34-3
W 41°24'12.2" E 23°44'54.4" PE-3 NVGT B LOCAL P-34.34-3
CONTROL P-34.34-3
W 41°24'12.2" E 23°44'54.4" PE-3 NVGT B
STEP 1 What Remains in Site
LOCAL P-34.34-3
FIX
TTS
LOCAL P-34.34-3
CONTROL P-34.34-3
FIX
TTS
LOCAL P-34.34-3
CONTROL P-34.34-3
FIX
W 41°24'12.2" E 23°44'54.4" PE-3 NVGT B
FIX
W 41°24'12.2" E 23°44'54.4" PE-3 NVGT B
The first step is to analyze the existing infrastructure that we want to remain. The main considerations are as follows: railways, the necessary road network system (the primary road and the access points for the surrounding urban road network), and the listed buildings with historical value . N IO CT
U OD TR IN TE SI AL
AN E
IS
FIN
YS
DE
E
TH OB
PR
GN
M
SI
LE
DE
ST s
TP
es
oc
PU
Pr
IN
N
TIO
RA
NE
GY
GE
TE
GN
SI
RA
DE
AM
AR N
TIO
ER
UA
ET
AL
EV
&
ST PATRICK'S CHURCH
Y
AR
IX
ND PE
AP
MM
SU
UNION BRIDGE
Access points for the surrounding urban road network
MARBLE ARCH INN
Listed Building
POLICE AND FIRE STATION
Retained Primary Road
8 CABLE STREET
Existing Primary Road
FORMER MIDLAND BANK
Railway Site Boundary
096
097
5.1 DESIGN DEVELOPMENT STEP 1 TTS
LOCAL P-34.34-3
CONTROL P-34.34-3
FIX
TTS
LOCAL P-34.34-3
W 41°24'12.2" E 23°44'54.4" PE-3 NVGT B
CONTROL P-34.34-3
FIX
TTS
W 41°24'12.2" E 23°44'54.4" PE-3 NVGT B
TTS
CONTROL P-34.34-3
FIX
TTS
LOCAL P-34.34-3
W 41°24'12.2" E 23°44'54.4" PE-3 NVGT B LOCAL P-34.34-3
CONTROL P-34.34-3
W 41°24'12.2" E 23°44'54.4" PE-3 NVGT B
STEP 1 What Remains in Site
LOCAL P-34.34-3
FIX
TTS
LOCAL P-34.34-3
CONTROL P-34.34-3
CONTROL P-34.34-3
FIX
W 41°24'12.2" E 23°44'54.4" PE-3 NVGT B
FIX
W 41°24'12.2" E 23°44'54.4" PE-3 NVGT B
Existing natural resources are also analysed in order to select which part should be retained. The main considerations are as follows: retain the planned green space with accessibility and the green space next to river irk, and clear most of unutilised grassland between communities. N IO CT
U OD TR IN TE SI AL
AN E
IS
FIN
YS
DE
SANDHILLS
VILLAGE PARK
E
TH OB
PR
GN
M
SI
LE
DE
ST TIO
RA
NE
GY
GE
TE
GN
SI
RA
DE
s
TP
es
oc
PU
Pr
IN
N
ST CATHERINE'S WOOD
AM
AR N
TIO
ER
UA
ET
AL
EV
RIVER IRK
&
IX
ND PE
Y
AR
MM
SU
AP
Intersection with the surrounding city context River Irk Retained Green Space Existing Green Space Site Boundary
098
099
5.2 DESIGN DEVELOPMENT STEP 2 TTS
LOCAL P-34.34-3
CONTROL P-34.34-3
FIX
W 41°24'12.2" E 23°44'54.4" PE-3 NVGT B
TTS
LOCAL P-34.34-3
STEP 2 Set References for Secondary Road
CONTROL P-34.34-3
FIX
TTS
W 41°24'12.2" E 23°44'54.4" PE-3 NVGT B
LOCAL P-34.34-3
TTS
LOCAL P-34.34-3
CONTROL P-34.34-3
W 41°24'12.2" E 23°44'54.4" PE-3 NVGT B CONTROL P-34.34-3
W 41°24'12.2" E 23°44'54.4" PE-3 NVGT B
FIX
TTS
LOCAL P-34.34-3
CONTROL P-34.34-3
FIX
TTS
LOCAL P-34.34-3
CONTROL P-34.34-3
FIX
W 41°24'12.2" E 23°44'54.4" PE-3 NVGT B
FIX
W 41°24'12.2" E 23°44'54.4" PE-3 NVGT B
Based on those retained access points for the surrounding urban road network , the start points of new secondary road can be determined. Then, new roads should continue the direction in which urban roads come into the site. N IO CT
U OD TR IN TE SI AL
AN E
IS
FIN
YS
DE
E
TH OB
PR
GN
M
SI
LE
DE
ST s
TP
es
oc
PU
Pr
IN
N
TIO
RA
NE
GY
GE
TE
GN
SI
RA
DE
AM
AR N
TIO
ER
UA
ET
AL
EV
&
IX
ND PE
Y
AR
MM
SU
AP
Access points for the surrounding urban road network Reference line for secondary roads
0100
0101
Research and calculation of housing and amenities demands Resource: Google Earth, 2020. https://www.planetizen.com/node/54477
5.3 RESEARCH ON DWELLING CONTROL P-34.34-3
FIX
TTS
LOCAL P-34.34-3
W 41°24'12.2" E 23°44'54.4" PE-3 NVGT B
Private Rented Sector
CONTROL P-34.34-3
FIX
TTS
W 41°24'12.2" E 23°44'54.4" PE-3 NVGT B
LOCAL P-34.34-3
CONTROL P-34.34-3
FIX
W 41°24'12.2" E 23°44'54.4" PE-3 NVGT B
The demand for privately rented homes continues to grow. Affordability remains the key driver for tenants when choosing their accommodation, both in terms of the actual property and the location. Demand is growing among all age groups and income profiles, with a myriad of reasons for renting.
TTS
LOCAL P-34.34-3
CONTROL P-34.34-3
N IO CT
U OD TR IN E
IS
FIN
YS
DE
AL
AN
Owner Occupied
12 10 8 6 4 2 0 -2 -4 -6 -8 -10 -12
Pu
Pu
Co
Bu
rp
rp
os eb
eb
w
uil
uil
t fl
t
se
at, hig
low
ise
se
ise
se
h-r
-ri
ce
se
ra
ou
at,
dh
ter
t fl
ou
he
ge
Fla
dh
tac
lar
ted
alo
er
os
nv
ng
he
-de
tac
mi
h-r
-ri
Local Authority
10 8 6 4 2 0 -2 -4 -6 -8 -10 -12
De
Se
m/
hig
low
Y
IX
ND PE
Housing Association
Pu
Pu
rp os
er
eb
eb
w
uil
uil
t fl
t
at, hig
-ri
ise
se
ise
se
h-r
low
ce
-ri
h-r
se
ra
hig
se
ce
low
ou
at,
se
t fl
ou
Fla
dh
ted
alo
os
nv
ng
rp
Co
Bu
he dh
ter
at,
at,
ou
ra
0105
tac
he
ge
t fl
t fl
ce
lar
ra
uil
uil
t
dh
ter
se
Fla
ou
tac
m/
ter
eb
eb
ted
-de
diu
mi
De
Se
Me
os
os
er
dh
w
he
alo
all
rp
rp
nv
ng
Sm
Pu
Pu
Co
Bu
tac
he
ge
ce
lar
ra
tac
m/
ter
-de
diu
all
mi
De
Se
Me
Sm
0104
ce
at,
at,
se
ce
AR
MM
SU
AP
Reference: English Housing Survey Profile and condition of the English housing stock, 2018-19 Mult-housing 2019 PRS Research
diu
t fl
t fl
t
se
ou
ra
&
- The proportion of purpose built low rise flats owned by housing associations decreased from 46% in 1996 to 35% in 2018. Conversely there was an increase in the proportion semi-detached houses (10% to 18%) and bungalows (6% to 10%).
ra
uil
uil
Fla
ou
dh
ter
ER
N
TIO
Sources: 1996: English House Condition Survey, dwelling sample 2018: English Housing Survey, dwelling sample
Me
eb
eb
ted
w
dh
he
ge
ET
UA
23 20 22 20 1 2 20 20 20 9 1 20 18 20 17 20 16 20 15 20 14 20 13 20 12 20 1 1 20 10 20 9 0 20 08 20 7 0 20 06 20 5 0 20 4 0 20 3 0 20 02 20 1 0 20 0 0 20 9 199 8 199 7 199 6 199 5 199 4 199 3 199 2 199 1 199
AM
AR
AL
EV
Sources: Knight Frank Research. 1980 to 1991: DOE Labour Force Survey Housing Trailer; 1992 to 2008: ONS Labour Force Survey; 2008-09 onwards: English Housing Survey, full household sample
- The proportion of converted flats in the private rented sector fell from 19% in 1996 to 11% in 2018 while purpose built low rise flats rose from 17% to 23% and high rise flats increased from 1% to 4%.
ter
os
os
er
alo
he
tac
lar
s
TP
es
oc
PU
0%
- In the private rented sector, the proportion of homes built post 1980 rose from 8% in 1996 to 27% in 2018.
all
rp
rp
nv
ng
Sm
Pu
Pu
Co
Bu
-de
tac
mi
m/
20%
Private Rented
10%
Pr
IN
N
TIO
RA
NE
GY
GE
TE
GN
SI
RA
ce
ST
ra
M
ter
LE
GN DE
30%
De
Se
diu
all
OB
PR
SI
Owned Social Rented Private Rented
Me
E
TH
DE
40%
FIX
Change in dwelling type, from 1996 to 2018
FORECAST
70% 50%
CONTROL P-34.34-3
W 41°24'12.2" E 23°44'54.4" PE-3 NVGT B
Sm
% of all households
TE SI
In 2018, there were 24.2 million homes in England. - Most homes (63%) were owner occupied, 20% were privately rented and 7% and 10% were owned by local authorities and housing associations respectively.
LOCAL P-34.34-3
TTS
FIX
80% 60%
FIX
W 41°24'12.2" E 23°44'54.4" PE-3 NVGT B
Growth of the Private Rented Sector (Historic and forecase tenure distribution in England)
Changes in dwelling type
CONTROL P-34.34-3
W 41°24'12.2" E 23°44'54.4" PE-3 NVGT B
percentage points
LOCAL P-34.34-3
LOCAL P-34.34-3
percentage points
TTS
TTS
5.4 TYPE AND SIZE MIX OF HOUSING TTS
LOCAL P-34.34-3
CONTROL P-34.34-3
FIX
W 41°24'12.2" E 23°44'54.4" PE-3 NVGT B
TTS
LOCAL P-34.34-3
CONTROL P-34.34-3
FIX
TTS
W 41°24'12.2" E 23°44'54.4" PE-3 NVGT B
LOCAL P-34.34-3
CONTROL P-34.34-3
TTS
LOCAL P-34.34-3
CONTROL P-34.34-3
FIX
TTS
LOCAL P-34.34-3
W 41°24'12.2" E 23°44'54.4" PE-3 NVGT B
FIX
W 41°24'12.2" E 23°44'54.4" PE-3 NVGT B
TTS
LOCAL P-34.34-3
CONTROL P-34.34-3
CONTROL P-34.34-3
FIX
W 41°24'12.2" E 23°44'54.4" PE-3 NVGT B
FIX
W 41°24'12.2" E 23°44'54.4" PE-3 NVGT B
Indicative new accommodation type and size mix for Greater Manchester
Research on the housing mix
50%
The Northern Gateway SRF represents a significant opportunity for large-scale brownfield regeneration that can support approximately 15,000 new homes and increase the supply of housing, at higher densities and in a sustainable location at the heart of the extended city centre.
Scenario 1: Applying the 2011 size and type and tenure mix to the Greater Manchester household projections: This scenario assumes no change to the size and type or tenure of dwelling mix until 2035.
45% 40%
N IO CT
U OD TR IN
Scenario 2: Continuing the 2001-2011 change to the Greater Manchester household projections: This scenario assumes that the changes in housing type and size and tenure between 2001 and 2011 would be continued until 2035.
35% 30%
TE SI AL
AN E
IS
FIN
YS
DE
E
TH OB
PR
GN
M
SI
LE
DE
ST s
TP
es
oc
PU
Pr
IN
N
TIO
RA
NE
GY
GE
TE
GN
SI
RA
DE
AM
AR
25% 20%
Scenario 3: Applying the 2011 size and type and tenure mix found in London to the Greater Manchester household projections: This scenario assumes that Greater Manchester achieves a density, type and tenure mix comparable with that of a global city such as London by 2035 and so models a household type, size and tenure mix more similar to that of the capital.
15% 10% 5% 0%
Detached or Semi-detached house or bungalow - 3 beds or fewer
N
TIO
ER
UA
ET
AL
EV
Based on the guideline from SRF, we have done the research on the mix of housing types in Manchester city, The Census provides the most comprehensive source of data on accommodation type (in terms of dwelling type and size), household composition and age of the head of the household. The 2001 and 2011 Censuses presented accommodation types and number of rooms/bedrooms differently, and so to ensure read across and comparability.
&
IX
ND PE
Y
AR
MM
SU
AP
In order to understand the different possible impacts on the future new housing type and size mix for Greater Manchester, three scenarios were applied to the household projections for both dwelling type and size and tenure. The following tables provide percentage ranges showing the indicative mix of the type and size of new homes required for Greater Manchester until 2035.
15%
Detached or Semi-detached Terraced house or bungalow Terraced house or bungalow house or bungalow - 4 beds - 2 beds or fewer - 3 beds or more or more Scenairo 1 Lower
Scenairo 1 Upper
Scenairo 2 Lower
Scenairo 2 Upper
Scenairo 3 Lower
Scenairo 3 Upper
10%
15% 10%
10% 10% 45%
Flat maisonette or apartment- 2 beds or more
10%
15%
10%
Flat maisonette or apartment- 1 bed
10%
Flat maisonette or apartment- 2 beds or more 20%
15% 15%
15% 30%
30% 15%
Flat maisonette or apartment- 1 bed Terraced house or bungalow - 3 beds or more Terraced house or bungalow - 2 beds or fewer Detached or Semi-detached house or bungalow - 4 beds or more Detached or Semi-detached house or bungalow - 3 beds or fewer
Reference: Greater Manchester Strategic Housing Market Assessment, 2019 Scenairo 1
0106
Scenairo 2
Scenairo 3
0107
15,000 15,000 15,000 15,000 15,000 15,000
× × × × × ×
30% 20% 15% 10% 10% 15%
= = = = = =
4,500 3,000 2,250 1,500 1,500 2,250
Research on typologies Resource: King, T. 2020, https://thenorthernquota.org/news/people-renting-homes-manchesterincreased-risk-eviction-says-solicitor
5.5 DETAILED TYPOLOGIES TTS
LOCAL P-34.34-3
CONTROL P-34.34-3
W 41°24'12.2" E 23°44'54.4" PE-3 NVGT B
FIX
TTS
LOCAL P-34.34-3
CONTROL P-34.34-3
FIX
TTS
CONTROL P-34.34-3
FIX
TTS
LOCAL P-34.34-3
W 41°24'12.2" E 23°44'54.4" PE-3 NVGT B
TTS
W 41°24'12.2" E 23°44'54.4" PE-3 NVGT B
LOCAL P-34.34-3
LOCAL P-34.34-3
CONTROL P-34.34-3
W 41°24'12.2" E 23°44'54.4" PE-3 NVGT B
FIX
CONTROL P-34.34-3
FIX
W 41°24'12.2" E 23°44'54.4" PE-3 NVGT B
TTS
LOCAL P-34.34-3
CONTROL P-34.34-3
FIX
W 41°24'12.2" E 23°44'54.4" PE-3 NVGT B
Typologies
Low-rise buildings
Shopping
Residential Building
Hospital
Street Retail Shops
Detached House
Commercial Building
High-rise buildings
Residential Building
Residential Building
N IO CT
U OD TR IN
Public Services
Mid-rise buildings
TE SI AL
AN E
IS
FIN
YS
DE
E
TH OB
PR
GN
M
SI
LE
DE
ST s
TP
es
oc
PU
Pr
IN
N
TIO
RA
NE
GY
GE
TE
GN
SI
RA
DE
Apartment
Office block
Apartment
AM N
TIO
ER
UA
ET
AL
EV
AR
Perimeter Block for commercial use
&
IX
ND PE
Y
AR
MM
SU
AP
School
Fire station
Semi-detached House
Street Retail Shops
Shopping Complex
Terraced House
0110
Apartment
0111
Commercial Building
5.6 RESIDENTIAL BUILDING TYPOLOGY TTS
LOCAL P-34.34-3
CONTROL P-34.34-3
W 41°24'12.2" E 23°44'54.4" PE-3 NVGT B
FIX
TTS
LOCAL P-34.34-3
CONTROL P-34.34-3
FIX
TTS
LOCAL P-34.34-3
W 41°24'12.2" E 23°44'54.4" PE-3 NVGT B
CONTROL P-34.34-3
FIX
TTS
N IO CT
U OD TR IN
Compared to the rest of the country, homes in Manchester are more likely be terraced or semidetached and have one or two bedrooms, and less likely to be detached, bungalows or flats, or to have four or more bedrooms. However,the requirement of housing is increasing along with the population. The requirement on affordable housing of flats or high-rise apartments grows because of the development of economy and educational industry.
TTS
LOCAL P-34.34-3
CONTROL P-34.34-3
FIX
TTS
LOCAL P-34.34-3
FIX
W 41°24'12.2" E 23°44'54.4" PE-3 NVGT B
FIX
6m 13
6m
CONTROL P-34.34-3
W 41°24'12.2" E 23°44'54.4" PE-3 NVGT B
6m
6m
CONTROL P-34.34-3
W 41°24'12.2" E 23°44'54.4" PE-3 NVGT B
W 41°24'12.2" E 23°44'54.4" PE-3 NVGT B
Residential Building Dimensions
LOCAL P-34.34-3
m
6m
12m
7m 13
m
8m
5m
TE SI
9m
5m
9m
AL
AN E
IS
FIN
YS
DE
E
TH
Detached Building
OB
PR
GN
M
SI
LE
DE
ST s
TP
es
oc
PU
Pr
IN
N
TIO
RA
NE
GY
GE
TE
GN
SI
RA
DE
AM
AR
Semi-Detached House (with courtyard)
AKA: Single Family Dwelling Standalone residential unit 1 Family- 2 Adults; 1-3 Children £290,700
AKA: Double family dwelling, Shared household 4 Adults, 2 to 6 Children
Semi-Detached House
Terraced Housing
AKA: Double family dwelling, 4 Adults, 2 to 6 Children
AKA: Row Houses 2-3 Adults, 1 to 2 Children £151,300
£198,500
.5
m
10m
Low-rise apartment 2-4 people per flat £149,500
£198,500
N
TIO
ER
UA
ET
AL
EV
Detached houses have the advantage of not sharing party walls with neighbours, You could make more noise in your property without attracting complaints. A semidetached house is a single family duplex, divided by one shared wall. The semi-detached typology is the most costeffective way of building in the mid 18th century.
23
&
IX
ND PE
Y
AR
MM
SU
AP
Terraced housing is a row of attached dwellings which share side walls with one another. They are favoured due to their efficient use of space, especially in cities and high density urban areas where land is more expensive. 2
Apartment buildings have technical and economic advantages in areas of high population density, and have become a distinctive feature of housing accommodation in virtually all densely populated urban areas around the world.
60
m
0m
5 Perimeter Block for residential use
m 60
1-4 people per flat
60
Shared household 1-6 people per flat
m
60
m
AKA: Residential tower block 1-6 people per flat m
20
0113
m
High-rise apartment
Mid-rise apartment
20
0112
80
0m
m
5.7 COMMERCIAL BUILDING TYPOLOGY TTS
LOCAL P-34.34-3
CONTROL P-34.34-3
W 41°24'12.2" E 23°44'54.4" PE-3 NVGT B
FIX
TTS
LOCAL P-34.34-3
CONTROL P-34.34-3
FIX
TTS
LOCAL P-34.34-3
W 41°24'12.2" E 23°44'54.4" PE-3 NVGT B
CONTROL P-34.34-3
FIX
The requirement for commercial is also increasing on the newly-purposed Northern Gateway area. It requires variety of commercial type in different areas.
LOCAL P-34.34-3
CONTROL P-34.34-3
FIX
TTS
LOCAL P-34.34-3
W 41°24'12.2" E 23°44'54.4" PE-3 NVGT B
TTS
W 41°24'12.2" E 23°44'54.4" PE-3 NVGT B
Commercial Building Dimensions
TTS
LOCAL P-34.34-3
CONTROL P-34.34-3
CONTROL P-34.34-3
FIX
W 41°24'12.2" E 23°44'54.4" PE-3 NVGT B
FIX
W 41°24'12.2" E 23°44'54.4" PE-3 NVGT B
20 12
N IO CT
U OD TR IN
Highstreet retail is widespread in Central Manchester, It is the most common commercial format. It is flexible to accommodate different types of commercial activities such as retails, offices and hotels.
m
9m
6m
60
6m
TE SI AL
AN E
IS
FIN
YS
DE
E
TH OB
PR
GN
M
SI
LE
DE
ST
m
m 60 Perimeter Block for commercial use
High Street Retail
High Street Retail (Retrofit)
AKA: Street shop Private or brand retailers Companies or private business groups £15,000 (£15,000/sq. ft) to £450,000 (£165.02/sq. ft)
Private or brand retailers Companies or private business groups £15,000 (£15,000/sq. ft) to £450,000 (£165.02/sq. ft)
Office building
180
s
TP
es
oc
PU
Pr
IN
N
TIO
RA
NE
GY
GE
TE
GN
SI
RA
DE
Perimeter blocks are typically found in densely populated areas in city centres. They tend to have a very dominant ‘fort-like’ public exterior facade and open up to a private, open courtyard space in the centre.
m
AM
AR N
TIO
ER
UA
ET
AL
EV
&
IX
ND PE
Y
AR
MM
SU
AP
Commercial complex is a large enclosed shopping centre which is limited to pedestrians. Both openair and enclosed centers are commonly referred to as shopping complex. Mall primarily refers to either a shopping mall – a place where a collection of shops all adjoin a pedestrian area – or an exclusively pedestrianized street that allows shoppers to walk without interference from vehicle traffic.
15m
40
High-rise commercial buildings are buildings that are used for commercial purposes, and include office buildings, warehouses, and retail buildings. In urban locations, a commercial building may be multifunctional.
40
m
35
AKA: Street shop Private or brand retailers Companies or private business groups £15,000 (£15,000/sq. ft) to £450,000 (£165.02/sq. ft)
m
m
m
Shopping Complex
0114
2
90
3m
17m Low-rise office bui;ding AKA: Street shop Private or brand retailers Companies or private business groups £15,000 (£15,000/sq. ft) to £450,000 (£165.02/sq. ft)
35
m
17m High-rise commercial building
0115
45
m
60
m
Skyscraper High-rise buildings of unusual height
m
5.8 AMENITIES AND INFRASTRUCTURE REQUIREMENT TTS
LOCAL P-34.34-3
CONTROL P-34.34-3
FIX
W 41°24'12.2" E 23°44'54.4" PE-3 NVGT B
TTS
LOCAL P-34.34-3
CONTROL P-34.34-3
FIX
TTS
W 41°24'12.2" E 23°44'54.4" PE-3 NVGT B
LOCAL P-34.34-3
CONTROL P-34.34-3
W 41°24'12.2" E 23°44'54.4" PE-3 NVGT B
FIX
TTS
LOCAL LOCALCONTROL CONTROL P-34.34-3 TTS P-34.34-3P-34.34-3 P-34.34-3 FIX
FIX
TTS
LOCAL P-34.34-3
W 41°24'12.2" W 41°24'12.2" E 23°44'54.4" E 23°44'54.4" PE-3 NVGT PE-3 B NVGT B
CONTROL P-34.34-3
TTS
LOCAL P-34.34-3
CONTROL P-34.34-3
FIX
LOCAL P-34.34-3
TTS
W 41°24'12.2" E 23°44'54.4" PE-3 NVGT B
FIX
TTS
W 41°24'12.2" E 23°44'54.4" PE-3 NVGT B
LOCAL P-34.34-3
CONTROL P-34.34-3
FIX
TTS
LOCAL P-34.34-3
W 41°24'12.2" E 23°44'54.4" PE-3 NVGT B CONTROL P-34.34-3
FIX
TTS
LOCAL P-34.34-3
W 41°24'12.2" E 23°44'54.4" PE-3 NVGT B
CONTROL P-34.34-3
CONTROL P-34.34-3
FIX
TTS
LOCAL P-34.34-3
W 41°24'12.2" E 23°44'54.4" PE-3 NVGT B
CONTROL P-34.34-3
FIX
W 41°24'12.2" E 23°44'54.4" PE-3 NVGT B
FIX
W 41°24'12.2" E 23°44'54.4" PE-3 NVGT B
N IO CT
U OD TR IN TE SI
10
10
40-50
80
100
150
250
1000
2000
2500
2500
3500
Ratio
1:1000
1:2000
1:3000
1:1500
1:3500
1:3500
1:3500
1:8000
1:3500
1:8000
1:8000
1:8000
Total Requirement number
37
18
12
24
10
10
10
4
10
3
3
4
Total Area
370
180
480
1920
1000
1500
2500
4000
20000
7500
7500
14000
Type
Bus Station
Public Toilets
Medical Facility
Convenience Store
Park
Cafes
Restaurants
Railway Station
Religious Buildings
Fire Station
Sports Facility
Educational Facility
E
IS
FIN
YS
DE
AL
AN
Minimum plot area (m²)
E
TH OB
PR
GN
M
SI
LE
DE
ST s
TP
es
oc
PU
Pr
IN
N
TIO
RA
NE
GY
GE
TE
GN
SI
RA
DE
AM
AR N
TIO
ER
UA
ET
AL
EV
&
IX
ND PE
Y
AR
MM
SU
AP
Define the overall area of different types of amenities by calculation the required number of each type and multiply by the minimun scale of those.
0116
0117
5.9 DESIGN DEVELOPMENT STEP 3 TTS
LOCAL P-34.34-3
CONTROL P-34.34-3
W 41°24'12.2" E 23°44'54.4" PE-3 NVGT B
FIX
TTS
LOCAL P-34.34-3
CONTROL P-34.34-3
FIX
TTS
LOCAL P-34.34-3
TTS
CONTROL P-34.34-3
FIX
W 41°24'12.2" E 23°44'54.4" PE-3 NVGT B
Step 3 Existing Amenities and decide the concentration
CONTROL P-34.34-3
FIX
W 41°24'12.2" E 23°44'54.4" PE-3 NVGT B
TTS
LOCAL P-34.34-3
Point of interest in Northern Gateway area
W 41°24'12.2" E 23°44'54.4" PE-3 NVGT B
LOCAL P-34.34-3
CONTROL P-34.34-3
TTS
LOCAL P-34.34-3
CONTROL P-34.34-3
FIX
W 41°24'12.2" E 23°44'54.4" PE-3 NVGT B
FIX
Radiation range of amenities outside Northern Gateway area
W 41°24'12.2" E 23°44'54.4" PE-3 NVGT B
N IO CT
U OD TR IN TE SI AL
AN E
IS
FIN
YS
DE
E
TH OB
PR
GN
M
SI
LE
DE
ST s
TP
es
oc
PU
Pr
IN
N
TIO
RA
NE
GY
GE
TE
GN
SI
RA
DE
AM
AR N
TIO
ER
UA
ET
AL
EV
This step of the study investigated the existing conditions of the external infrastructure and amenities of the site, and studied the extent to which they can radiate to the Northern Gateway area within a walking range of 400 meters. According to the survey results, most of the infrastructure and amenities outside the site are concentrated in the southwest of the site, that is, the area near the Manchester city center and the railway station has the highest density. There is also a part near the residential area in the northeast, and the density in the northwest and southeast is very low. In the design, it is necessary to focus on the internal areas that cannot be reached outside the external site and distribute more infrastructure and facilities to meet the needs of residents.
Attraction
Commercial
Education & health
Manufacturing and production
Public infrastructure
Retail
Sport and entertainment
Transport
&
Accommodation
IX
ND PE
Y
AR
MM
SU
AP
Accommodation Attraction Commercial Education & health Manufacturing and production Public infrastructure Retail Sport and entertainment Resource: Point of interest, 2020. https://digimap.edina.ac.uk/
1000m
0118
Transport
0119
5.10 DESIGN DEVELOPMENT STEP 4 TTS
LOCAL P-34.34-3
CONTROL P-34.34-3
W 41°24'12.2" E 23°44'54.4" PE-3 NVGT B
FIX
TTS
LOCAL P-34.34-3
CONTROL P-34.34-3
FIX
TTS
W 41°24'12.2" E 23°44'54.4" PE-3 NVGT B
LOCAL P-34.34-3
TTS
CONTROL P-34.34-3
FIX
TTS
W 41°24'12.2" E 23°44'54.4" PE-3 NVGT B CONTROL P-34.34-3
W 41°24'12.2" E 23°44'54.4" PE-3 NVGT B
Step 4 Simulate the amenities and infrastructure
LOCAL P-34.34-3
FIX
TTS
LOCAL P-34.34-3
CONTROL P-34.34-3
LOCAL P-34.34-3
CONTROL P-34.34-3
FIX
W 41°24'12.2" E 23°44'54.4" PE-3 NVGT B
FIX
W 41°24'12.2" E 23°44'54.4" PE-3 NVGT B
N IO CT
U OD TR IN TE SI AL
AN E
IS
FIN
YS
DE
E
TH OB
PR
GN
M
SI
LE
DE
ST
200m
300m 400m 500m
200m
s
TP
es
oc
PU
Pr
IN
N
TIO
RA
NE
GY
GE
TE
GN
SI
RA
DE
The simulation takes the residence as the center of the circle, requiring different types of functional facilities within the corresponding radius. Since different residential areas with a certain distance may have overlapping scopes, a reasonable distribution of necessary public infrastructure can achieve the effect of improving resource utilization efficiency and promoting sustainable development. The service range of the required area of different types of infrastructure remains basically unchanged, but the number will fluctuate within the site, becoming one of the variables affected by other parameters. This characteristic can be used as a reference factor in the comparison link.
AM
AR N
TIO
ER
UA
ET
AL
EV
300m
& MM
SU Y
AR
IX
ND PE
AP
400m 500m 600m 700m
200m 300m
800m 400m
500m 600m 700m
0120
800m
0121
600m
700m
800m
0.3B
D E SI GN S TRATEGY 0.3B
N-3.4
N-3.4
0122
0.3B
DESIGN GENERATION PROCESS 0.3B
N-3.4
NODE 00.30-2
1G-2
TTS
0.3B
N-3.4
P-34.34-3
6 INPUT PARAMETER
0.3B
NODE 00.30-2
Explore the parameters and their influence on each other ang the urban complex system
E VAL UA T ION & SUMMARY
0.3B
0.3B
N-3.4
0.3B
N-3.4
A P P EN D I X
0.3B
N-3.4
N-3.4
N-3.4
PARAMETER ANALYSIS Resource: Otto, F. 2012, http://www.evolo.us/adaptive-urban-fabric/
6.1 PARAMETER ANALYSIS ON ROADS TTS
LOCAL P-34.34-3
CONTROL P-34.34-3
W 41°24'12.2" E 23°44'54.4" PE-3 NVGT B
Urban roads
FIX
TTS
LOCAL P-34.34-3
CONTROL P-34.34-3
FIX
TTS
LOCAL P-34.34-3
TTS
FIX
TTS
W 41°24'12.2" E 23°44'54.4" PE-3 NVGT B
FIX
TTS
LOCAL P-34.34-3
LOCAL P-34.34-3
CONTROL P-34.34-3
CONTROL P-34.34-3
FIX
W 41°24'12.2" E 23°44'54.4" PE-3 NVGT B
FIX
W 41°24'12.2" E 23°44'54.4" PE-3 NVGT B
2.25 2.25 0.25 0.75-1.50 0.25 0.25
1.50-3.75
pedestrain
0.25
pedestrain
N IO CT
U OD TR IN
As the urban document analysis, private vehicles have dominated the main transport methods in Northern Gateway currently, and encouraging walking or cycling is necessary to achieve ecofriendly life and mitigate the heat island effect in urban.
CONTROL P-34.34-3
W 41°24'12.2" E 23°44'54.4" PE-3 NVGT B CONTROL P-34.34-3
W 41°24'12.2" E 23°44'54.4" PE-3 NVGT B
LOCAL P-34.34-3
2.50
TE SI
2.50
AL
AN E
IS
FIN
YS
DE
E
TH OB
PR
GN
M
SI
LE
DE
ST
0.25 1.00
cycle
0.25 1.00 0.25
secondary road
0.25
s
TP
es
oc
PU
Pr
IN
N
TIO
RA
NE
GY
GE
TE
GN
SI
RA
DE
In addition, by extending pedestrain and cycle way and building network of green spcaes, publics have easy access to those places easily. This also sometimes enhance residents' wellbeing to some extent.
AM
urban road strategies
3.45
N
TIO
ER
UA
ET
AL
EV
AR
3.45
cycle
& AR
MM
SU
0.50
Y
IX
ND PE
AP
0.50
2.50
0.50
bus
bus
0.25
1.75
vehicle
0.25
main road
Resource: Neufert, P. n.d., Architects’ Data.
0126
2.50
0127
0.50
6.2 HOW ROADS INFLUENCE URBAN FORM TTS
LOCAL P-34.34-3
CONTROL P-34.34-3
W 41°24'12.2" E 23°44'54.4" PE-3 NVGT B
Urban roads
FIX
TTS
LOCAL P-34.34-3
CONTROL P-34.34-3
FIX
TTS
LOCAL P-34.34-3
W 41°24'12.2" E 23°44'54.4" PE-3 NVGT B
CONTROL P-34.34-3
FIX
W 41°24'12.2" E 23°44'54.4" PE-3 NVGT B
TTS
LOCAL P-34.34-3
TTS
LOCAL P-34.34-3
CONTROL P-34.34-3
FIX
TTS
LOCAL P-34.34-3
W 41°24'12.2" E 23°44'54.4" PE-3 NVGT B CONTROL P-34.34-3
CONTROL P-34.34-3
FIX
W 41°24'12.2" E 23°44'54.4" PE-3 NVGT B
FIX
W 41°24'12.2" E 23°44'54.4" PE-3 NVGT B
Urban roads Secondary road
main road
U OD TR IN N IO CT
100
18m m
TE SI AL
AN E
IS
FIN
YS
DE
E
TH OB
PR
GN
M
SI
LE
DE
ST s
TP
es
oc
PU
Pr
IN
N
TIO
RA
NE
GY
GE
TE
GN
SI
RA
DE
14m
AR AM N
TIO
ER
UA
ET
AL
EV
60m
& SU Y
AR
MM
IX
ND PE
AP
21m
80m
60m 12m
60m
0128
60m
m 0 0 2
80m
Due to the different size of plots, the mian roads and secondary road would be variable from 18meter to 21 meter, 12meter to 14 meter respectively. By extending the width of pedestrain and bicycle path, inhabitants could be encouraged to walk or cycle, which could mitigate the heart island effect in urban and enhance their wellbeing in some degrees.
0129
6.3 PARAMETER ANALYSIS ON LAND USE TTS
LOCAL P-34.34-3
CONTROL P-34.34-3
W 41°24'12.2" E 23°44'54.4" PE-3 NVGT B
FIX
TTS
LOCAL P-34.34-3
CONTROL P-34.34-3
FIX
TTS
W 41°24'12.2" E 23°44'54.4" PE-3 NVGT B
LOCAL P-34.34-3
CONTROL P-34.34-3
FIX
TTS
TTS
CONTROL P-34.34-3
FIX
TTS
LOCAL P-34.34-3
W 41°24'12.2" E 23°44'54.4" PE-3 NVGT B LOCAL P-34.34-3
W 41°24'12.2" E 23°44'54.4" PE-3 NVGT B
Population and functional buildings
LOCAL P-34.34-3
CONTROL P-34.34-3
CONTROL P-34.34-3
FIX
W 41°24'12.2" E 23°44'54.4" PE-3 NVGT B
FIX
W 41°24'12.2" E 23°44'54.4" PE-3 NVGT B
MARKET
X population
Based on the document conducted by City Coucil and cencus in Manchester, the current population in city center in 2019 was 37,000 and it is projected to growth to 185,000 in 2023. The area of Northern Gateway is 155 hectares.
2
commercial area
N IO CT
U OD TR IN TE SI AL
AN E
IS
FIN
YS
DE
E
TH OB
PR
commercial area
X population
current population in city center around 37,000 in 2019
GN
M
SI
LE
DE
Besides, given the guidof architects data, the different areas for per person could be calculated approximately, which provide dimensions for controls in later computational model.
2-4m per inhabitat
total area approximate 340,000m2
amenity area
1-2m 2 per inhabitat
amenity area
total area approximate 170,000-340,000m2
ST s
TP
es
oc
PU
Pr
IN
N
TIO
RA
NE
GY
GE
TE
GN
SI
RA
DE
AM
2
30-40m per green spaces area inhabitat
N
TIO
ER
UA
ET
AL
EV
AR
X population
&
IX
ND PE
Y
AR
MM
SU
AP
green spaces area
total area approximate 255,000-420,000m2
projection housing provision 15,000 in next 15 to 20 years 2
15-37m per inhabitat residential area
Resource: Neufert, P. n.d., Architects’ Data. RIBA, 2020, RIBA Sustainable Outcomes Guide
0130
X population
residential area
total area approximate 1,275,000 -3,145,000m2
0131
different functional fields scale
6.4 HOW LAND USE INFLUENCE URBAN FORM TTS
LOCAL P-34.34-3
CONTROL P-34.34-3
W 41°24'12.2" E 23°44'54.4" PE-3 NVGT B
FIX
TTS
LOCAL P-34.34-3
CONTROL P-34.34-3
FIX
TTS
W 41°24'12.2" E 23°44'54.4" PE-3 NVGT B
CONTROL P-34.34-3
W 41°24'12.2" E 23°44'54.4" PE-3 NVGT B
Population and functional buildings
30-40m 2 per inhabitat
LOCAL P-34.34-3
projected population
1-2m2 per inhabitat
FIX
TTS
LOCAL P-34.34-3
CONTROL P-34.34-3
FIX
W 41°24'12.2" E 23°44'54.4" PE-3 NVGT B
projected population
15-37m2 per inhabitat
projected population
2-4m 2 per inhabitat
projected population
N IO CT
U OD TR IN TE SI AL
AN E
IS
FIN
YS
DE
E
TH OB
PR
GN
M
SI
LE
DE
ST s
TP
es
oc
PU
Pr
IN
N
TIO
RA
NE
GY
GE
TE
GN
SI
RA
DE
AM
AR N
TIO
ER
UA
ET
AL
EV
&
IX
ND PE
Y
AR
MM
SU
AP
approximate green spaces total area 255,000-420,000m2
approximate amenity total area 170,000-340,000m2
approximate residential total area 1,275,000-3,145,000m2
approximate commercial total area 340,000m2
In city center, the current population is around 37,000, and the Northern Gateway is projected to provided 15,000 new households in the next 15 to 20 years. The site area is 155 hectare. Based on the projected population and the different functional area for per person, the approximate area for residental buildings, commercial buildings, green spaces and amenity could be caulated and showed as above.
Resource: Neufert, P. n.d., Architects’ Data. RIBA, 2020, RIBA Sustainable Outcomes Guide
0132
0133
6.5 PARAMETER ANALYSIS ON GREEN SPACES TTS
LOCAL P-34.34-3
CONTROL P-34.34-3
W 41°24'12.2" E 23°44'54.4" PE-3 NVGT B
Green spaces
FIX
TTS
LOCAL P-34.34-3
CONTROL P-34.34-3
FIX
TTS
W 41°24'12.2" E 23°44'54.4" PE-3 NVGT B
LOCAL P-34.34-3
CONTROL P-34.34-3
FIX
TTS
LOCAL P-34.34-3
W 41°24'12.2" E 23°44'54.4" PE-3 NVGT B
CONTROL P-34.34-3
FIX
LOCAL P-34.34-3
TTS
CONTROL P-34.34-3
FIX
TTS
W 41°24'12.2" E 23°44'54.4" PE-3 NVGT B
TTS
LOCAL P-34.34-3
W 41°24'12.2" E 23°44'54.4" PE-3 NVGT B
CONTROL P-34.34-3
FIX
W 41°24'12.2" E 23°44'54.4" PE-3 NVGT B
TTS
LOCAL P-34.34-3
LOCAL P-34.34-3
CONTROL P-34.34-3
FIX
W 41°24'12.2" E 23°44'54.4" PE-3 NVGT B CONTROL P-34.34-3
FIX
W 41°24'12.2" E 23°44'54.4" PE-3 NVGT B
N IO CT
U OD TR IN
Through the diagram, the green spcaes should be emphasised as the decrease of green spaces have some adverse impacts on the biodiversity. Beisdes, the building coverage area should shrink and increase the density of buildings to maxmise green spaces.
TE SI AL
AN E
IS
FIN
YS
DE
building coverage area +
E
TH
green space area -
green space area -
the density of buildings +
OB
PR
GN
M
SI
LE
DE
ST s
TP
es
oc
PU
Pr
IN
N
TIO
RA
NE
GY
GE
TE
GN
SI
RA
DE
biodiversity -
biodiversity +
AM
AR N
TIO
ER
UA
ET
AL
EV
& SU Y
AR
MM
network diversity +
the distance between green spaces +
allocate equally -
IX
ND PE
AP
the number of green spaces +
Resource: Neufert, P. n.d., Architects’ Data.
0134
0135
6.6 HOW PARAMETERS INFLUENCE EACH OTHER TTS
LOCAL P-34.34-3
CONTROL P-34.34-3
FIX
W 41°24'12.2" E 23°44'54.4" PE-3 NVGT B
TTS
LOCAL P-34.34-3
CONTROL P-34.34-3
FIX
TTS
W 41°24'12.2" E 23°44'54.4" PE-3 NVGT B
Relationship between Variable parameters
LOCAL P-34.34-3
CONTROL P-34.34-3
W 41°24'12.2" E 23°44'54.4" PE-3 NVGT B
FIX
TTS
LOCAL P-34.34-3
CONTROL P-34.34-3
FIX
W 41°24'12.2" E 23°44'54.4" PE-3 NVGT B
TTS
LOCAL P-34.34-3
CONTROL P-34.34-3
FIX
TTS
W 41°24'12.2" E 23°44'54.4" PE-3 NVGT B
TTS
LOCAL P-34.34-3
CONTROL P-34.34-3
W 41°24'12.2" E 23°44'54.4" PE-3 NVGT B
FIX
TTS
LOCAL P-34.34-3
LOCAL P-34.34-3
CONTROL P-34.34-3
FIX
W 41°24'12.2" E 23°44'54.4" PE-3 NVGT B CONTROL P-34.34-3
FIX
W 41°24'12.2" E 23°44'54.4" PE-3 NVGT B
N IO CT
U OD TR IN TE SI AL
AN E
IS
FIN
YS
DE
E
TH OB
PR
GN
M
SI
LE
DE
ST
building coverage area +
green spaces area +
green spaces area -
building density +
building density -
the number of green spces -
green spaces area -
the number of green spces +
the diversity of green space network-
the distance between green spces the equality of green space-
s
TP
es
oc
PU
Pr
IN
N
TIO
RA
NE
GY
GE
TE
GN
SI
RA
DE
building coverage area -
AM
AR N
TIO
ER
UA
ET
AL
EV
&
IX
ND PE
Y
AR
MM
SU
AP
0136
green spaces area +
the distance between green spces +
the diversity of green spces network+ the equality of green spces +
0137
6.7 PARAMETER SUMMARY TTS
LOCAL P-34.34-3
CONTROL P-34.34-3
FIX
TTS
LOCAL P-34.34-3
W 41°24'12.2" E 23°44'54.4" PE-3 NVGT B
CONTROL P-34.34-3
FIX
TTS
LOCAL P-34.34-3
CONTROL P-34.34-3
FIX
TTS
W 41°24'12.2" E 23°44'54.4" PE-3 NVGT B
TTS
LOCAL P-34.34-3
W 41°24'12.2" E 23°44'54.4" PE-3 NVGT B
CONTROL P-34.34-3
FIX
Parameters summary
CONTROL P-34.34-3
FIX
W 41°24'12.2" E 23°44'54.4" PE-3 NVGT B
TTS
LOCAL P-34.34-3
W 41°24'12.2" E 23°44'54.4" PE-3 NVGT B
total area required to meet demands in the next 15 to 20 years
collect data
LOCAL P-34.34-3
CONTROL P-34.34-3
FIX
W 41°24'12.2" E 23°44'54.4" PE-3 NVGT B
input varable parameters
evaluate
outcome masterplan
MARKET
X N IO CT
U OD TR IN TE SI AL
AN
commercial area 340,000m2
amenity area for per person
amenity area 170,000-340,000m2
residential area for per person
green spaces area 255,000-420,000m2
building coverage area
green spaces
building density
green spaces
green spaces number
the network adversity of green spaces
green spaces allocation
the allocation equality of green spaces
E
IS
FIN
YS
DE
commercial area for per person
E
TH
GN
M
SI
LE
DE
OB
PR
X
ST s
TP
es
oc
PU
Pr
IN
N
TIO
RA
NE
GY
GE
TE
GN
SI
RA
DE
AM
AR N
TIO
ER
UA
ET
AL
EV
&
X
IX
ND PE
Y
AR
MM
SU
AP
projected population
X residential area 1,275,000 -3,145,000m2
green spaces for per person
urban road strategy
The process statrs with collecting projected population data and other basic spacial data related, by doing so, the total area required for next 15 to 20 years could be caulated approximately. During the process, input varable parameters interacted with each other, but they all could affect the green spaces in terms of their scale, network diversity and allocation eauqlity. negative impact
0138
positive impact
0139
0.3B
N-3.4
DESIGN GENERATION PROCESS 0.3B
N-3.4
0140
0.3B
N-3.4
IN P UT P ARAM ETER
0.3B
NODE 00.30-2
1G-2
TTS
0.3B
P-34.34-3
7 EVALUATION & SUMMARY 0.3B
N-3.4
NODE 00.30-2
TTS
C OMP UT A T IONAL METHOD
0.3B
0.3B
N-3.4
0.3B
N-3.4
A P P EN D I X
0.3B
N-3.4
N-3.4
P-34.34-
N-3.4
7.1 PROPOSAL WORKFLOW TTS
LOCAL P-34.34-3
CONTROL P-34.34-3
W 41°24'12.2" E 23°44'54.4" PE-3 NVGT B
FIX
TTS
LOCAL P-34.34-3TTS
LOCAL CONTROL P-34.34-3 P-34.34-3
W 41°24'12.2" E 23°44'54.4" PE-3 NVGT B
CONTROL FIXP-34.34-3
FIX
W 41°24'12.2" E 23°44'54.4" PE-3 NVGT B
TTS
LOCAL P-34.34-3
TTS
LOCAL P-34.34-3
CONTROL P-34.34-3
W 41°24'12.2" E 23°44'54.4" PE-3 NVGT B CONTROL P-34.34-3
FIX
TTS
LOCAL P-34.34-3
CONTROL P-34.34-3
FIX
W 41°24'12.2" E 23°44'54.4" PE-3 NVGT B
FIX
W 41°24'12.2" E 23°44'54.4" PE-3 NVGT B
Proposal 1
Proposal 2
Proposal 3
N IO CT
U OD TR IN TE SI AL
AN E
IS
FIN
YS
DE
Proposal 5
Proposal 4
E
TH OB
PR
GN
M
SI
LE
DE
ST s
TP
es
oc
PU
Pr
IN
N
TIO
RA
NE
GY
GE
TE
GN
SI
RA
DE
1, 2, 3 ... N
AM
AR N
TIO
ER
UA
ET
AL
EV
Testing
&
IX
ND PE
Y
AR
MM
SU
AP
Proposal 6
0142
Proposal 7
0143
Proposal N
7.1 EVALUATION TOOL TTS
LOCAL P-34.34-3
CONTROL P-34.34-3
FIX
TTS
LOCAL P-34.34-3
W 41°24'12.2" E 23°44'54.4" PE-3 NVGT B
Location Space Syntax
CONTROL P-34.34-3
TTS
LOCAL P-34.34-3
CONTROL P-34.34-3
FIX
TTS
LOCAL P-34.34-3
CONTROL P-34.34-3
W 41°24'12.2" E 23°44'54.4" PE-3 NVGT B
FIX
W 41°24'12.2" E 23°44'54.4" PE-3 NVGT B
FIX
W 41°24'12.2" E 23°44'54.4" PE-3 NVGT B
Theory apply in our model
N IO CT
U OD TR IN TE SI AL
AN E
IS
FIN
YS
DE
E
TH OB
PR
GN
M
SI
LE
DE
ST
Extract 2
Extract 2
12 3
11
4
1
6
7
11
2 3
10 7
AM N
TIO
ER
UA
ET
AL
EV
AR
4
&
IX
ND PE
Y
AR
MM
SU
AP
As for our design, we apply space syntax as a tool to evaluate the accessibility and connectivity between the communities and green space of different generative proposals.
4
11 12
13
5
6
Evaluate
10
5
4
Evaluate
4
2
4
2
4 3 3
7 7
4
4
4
Demonstrate
3
4
2
12 3
11
1
5
0144
10
8
13 4
3 9
10
9
Resource: Porta, S. (2006) Color Sketch of the basic steps in the space syntax https://www.spacesyntax.org/
Demonstrate
6
7
8
4
7
4
Green Space Empty Space Irk River Community
7
2
5
2
7
7
4
4
1
Connectivity Analysis Graph
9
8
12
9
High connect
Abstract
1 6
5
6
3 1
4
11
12
Compare
2 7
Low connect
10
Abstract
5
High access
3
8
13
8
Low access
9
10
9 1
Integration Analysis Graph R= 400 Metric
6
7
s
TP
es
oc
PU
Pr
IN
N
TIO
RA
NE
GY
GE
TE
GN
SI
RA
DE
The Space syntax is a series of theories and technologies about space and society. Its core view is that space is not the background of social economic activities, but a part of the development of social economic activities. Space syntax theory is a new language to describe architecture and urban spatial patterns. Its basic idea is to divide the scale and space of space and analyze its complicated relationship. The space referred to in the space syntax has other objects that can be measured by mathematical methods as described in Euclidean geometry, and it also describes the external attention, geometry, and actual distance of the space. It fully focuses on the local accessibility of space, and highlights the overall accessibility and relevance of space.
Using Space Syntax to evaluate our proposals
7
11
12 6
4
5
0145
7.2 PROPOSAL EVALUATION TTS
LOCAL P-34.34-3
CONTROL P-34.34-3
W 41°24'12.2" E 23°44'54.4" PE-3 NVGT B
FIX
TTS
LOCAL P-34.34-3TTS
Four Evaluation Criterias
LOCAL CONTROL P-34.34-3 P-34.34-3
CONTROL FIXP-34.34-3
W 41°24'12.2" E 23°44'54.4" PE-3 NVGT B
FIX
W 41°24'12.2" E 23°44'54.4" PE-3 NVGT B
TTS
LOCAL P-34.34-3
CONTROL P-34.34-3
TTS
LOCAL P-34.34-3
CONTROL P-34.34-3
FIX
TTS
LOCAL P-34.34-3
W 41°24'12.2" E 23°44'54.4" PE-3 NVGT B
CONTROL P-34.34-3
FIX
W 41°24'12.2" E 23°44'54.4" PE-3 NVGT B
FIX
W 41°24'12.2" E 23°44'54.4" PE-3 NVGT B
Optional Outcomes
As we generate a lot of planning proposals, we will put them into an evaluation system to assess which one is the one suited to our planning goals. Thus, in our evaluation system we set up four criteria to evaluate our proposals.
Proposal 1
N IO CT
U OD TR IN TE SI AL
AN E
IS
FIN
YS
DE
E
TH OB
PR
GN
M
SI
LE
DE
ST s
TP
es
oc
PU
Pr
IN
N
TIO
RA
NE
GY
GE
TE
GN
SI
RA
DE
AM
AR N
TIO
ER
UA
ET
AL
EV
&
Proposal 3
1, 2, 3 ... N
02
Solar Radiation of the Green Space
03
Accessbility to the Green Space
04
Biodiversity of the Green Space
Compare the green space area of each proposals and select the one which has the largest area of green space
Due to the influence of the shadow from the building, we will rate the solar radiation of each proposals
Evaluation System
IX
ND PE
01
Proposal 5
Proposal 4
Y
AR
MM
SU
AP
The first criteria is the area of the green space in the whole proposal, which means having the most green city. And the second one is the solar radiation of the green space. This criteria can help us to find a sunny green space for the residents. The third one is the accessibility to the green space which used to help us to assess how convenient the inhabitants can get to the nearest green space area. And the final one is the biodiversity of green space. This criteria is used to evaluate what influence the new green space can have on the local species. After all the evaluation process, we will have our final outcome.
Proposal 2
Area of Green Space
Final Outcome Proposal N
0146
Using the space syntax to rate the accessbility of the green corridor from the community.
By comparing the various types and size of the green space, we then can have a cursory rate of the biodiversity
0147
7.3 GOING FORWARD TTS
LOCAL P-34.34-3
CONTROL P-34.34-3
FIX
TTS
LOCAL P-34.34-3TTS
W 41°24'12.2" E 23°44'54.4" PE-3 NVGT B
Flowchart
LOCAL CONTROL P-34.34-3 P-34.34-3
W 41°24'12.2" E 23°44'54.4" PE-3 NVGT B
TTS
LOCAL P-34.34-3
CONTROL P-34.34-3
FIX
W 41°24'12.2" E 23°44'54.4" PE-3 NVGT B CONTROL FIXP-34.34-3
FIX
W 41°24'12.2" E 23°44'54.4" PE-3 NVGT B
TTS
LOCAL P-34.34-3
CONTROL P-34.34-3
TTS
LOCAL P-34.34-3
CONTROL P-34.34-3
FIX
W 41°24'12.2" E 23°44'54.4" PE-3 NVGT B
FIX
W 41°24'12.2" E 23°44'54.4" PE-3 NVGT B
This flowchart shows a rough concept of how we intend to develop our computational tool.
Start
NO
Test run
Set initial starting point parameters
Output green patch map
N IO CT
U OD TR IN
Input amenity, demographic and density parameters
Initial density map
Generate a prototype model
Meet all the criterion?
TE SI
Input road parameters
E
IS
FIN
YS
DE
AL
AN
Input site data
E
TH OB
PR
GN
M
SI
LE
DE
ST s
TP
es
oc
PU
Pr
IN
N
TIO
RA
NE
GY
GE
TE
GN
SI
RA
DE
AM
AR N
TIO
ER
UA
ET
AL
EV
&
IX
ND PE
Y
AR
MM
SU
AP
0148
0149
YES
Output the final model
End
FORECAST TO ST2 & ST3 Inside Studio 2 & Studio 3, we will continue to explore our design approach. In Studio 2, we will focus on the development of green-oriented public open space network in urban complex system. We will transfer the design strategy and approach into the Northern Gateway area in a more practical way and develop a computational approach towards the spatial generation of our thesis. Inside Studio 3, we will try to explore the design strategy into wider area not just focus on urban design development. We will create multiple interaction and communication possibilities to visualize the urban parameters and how they could influence the urban complex system.
0.3B
I N PU T P ARAMETER 0.3B
N-3.4
N-3.4
0152
0.3B
E VA LUA T ION & SUMMARY 0.3B
N-3.4
NODE 00.30-2
1G-2
TTS
0.3B
N-3.4
P-34.34-3
8 APPENDIX NODE 00.30-2
TTS
N-3.4
P-34.34-
0.3B
N-3.4
Urban Research Document Historical Analysis
INTRODUCTION TTS
LOCAL P-34.34-3
CONTROL P-34.34-3
W 41°24'12.2" E 23°44'54.4" PE-3 NVGT B
TTS
LOCAL P-34.34-3
CONTROL P-34.34-3
FIX
W 41°24'12.2" E 23°44'54.4" PE-3 NVGT B
FIX
TTS
LOCAL P-34.34-3
CONTROL P-34.34-3
TTS
LOCAL P-34.34-3
CONTROL P-34.34-3
FIX
W 41°24'12.2" E 23°44'54.4" PE-3 NVGT B
FIX
W 41°24'12.2" E 23°44'54.4" PE-3 NVGT B
Changing from a small town in the Middle Ages into the second largest city in the United Kingdom, Manchester has been through a ups and downs history without any doubts and so did the Northern Gateway. Thus, in this section, we will examine how the Northern Gateway Area changes along with Manchester history.
N IO CT
U OD TR IN TE SI AL
AN E
IS
FIN
YS
DE
E
TH OB
PR
GN
M
SI
LE
DE
ST s
TP
es
oc
PU
Pr
IN
N
TIO
RA
NE
GY
GE
TE
GN
SI
RA
DE
AM
AR N
TIO
ER
UA
ET
AL
EV
&
IX
ND PE
Y
AR
MM
SU
AP
Roman Manchester
Middle Age
16th Century
17th Century
18th Century
19th Century
20th Century
21st Century
Manchester began when a wooden fort was built by the Roman army on a plateau about 1-mile south of the present cathedral about 80 CE. The Romans called it Mamucium (breast shaped hill) probably because the plateau resembled a breast.
At the time of the Domesday Book in 1086 a village called Mamecester existed. In time the name changed to Manchester.At the time of the Normans in the 11th century Manchester was a small village but things changed in the 12th century. The population of England grew and trade and commerce grew rapidly. Many new towns were founded. The village of Manchester was made into a town in the early 13th century.
During the 16th century, Manchester grew steadily larger and more important. By the late 16th century it may have had a population of 4,000. However Manchester still wasn't a particularly large town. It may have been important locally but it wasn't very important nationally. John Leland once described it 'Manchester, on the south side of the Irwell is the fairest, best built, busiest and most populous town in Lancashire'.
In the 17th century Manchester was famous for wool and also for cotton. Then in 1642 came civil war between king and parliament. Manchester sided with parliament and the people erected wooden posts linked by chains around the town to stop royalist cavalry.
In the early 18th century Manchester probably had a population of around 10,000. It was still a medium sized town. However in the late 18th century the industrial revolution began. The population of Manchester soared and by the end of the century it had reached 70,000.
In the early 19th century Manchester became world-famous as a manufacturing center. Wool, silk, and cotton were manufactured and vast numbers of working people worked 12 hour days in the mills. There was also a papermaking industry and iron foundries. By 1851 the population of Manchester had reached 186,000. In 1853 Manchester was made a city. The town hall was built in 1877.
In the early 20th century there was some new industries included flour milling, biscuits in Manchester. The old industry of cotton went into a steep decline. Engineering also suffered during the depression of the 1930s though it revived during World War II. In the second half of the century manufacturing industry declined and was replaced by service industries such as education and finance.
In the 21st century Manchester is a flourishing city. Although the old manufacturing industries have declined service industries are thriving. In 2018 the population of Manchester was 547,000.
0156
0157
NEW CROSS TTS
LOCAL P-34.34-3
TTS
LOCAL P-34.34-3
CONTROL P-34.34-3
FIX
TTS
W 41°24'12.2" E 23°44'54.4" PE-3 NVGT B CONTROL P-34.34-3
W 41°24'12.2" E 23°44'54.4" PE-3 NVGT B
Trade A hub of social activity and trade
FIX
TTS
LOCAL P-34.34-3
CONTROL P-34.34-3
LOCAL P-34.34-3
CONTROL P-34.34-3
FIX
W 41°24'12.2" E 23°44'54.4" PE-3 NVGT B
FIX
W 41°24'12.2" E 23°44'54.4" PE-3 NVGT B
Penny A centre of production for penny broadsides in the 18th and 19th century
Print A hive of print business activity
N IO CT
U OD TR IN TE SI AL
AN E
IS
FIN
YS
DE
E
TH OB
PR
GN
M
SI
LE
DE
ST s
TP
es
oc
PU
Pr
IN
N
TIO
RA
NE
GY
GE
TE
GN
SI
RA
DE
AM
AR N
TIO
ER
UA
ET
AL
EV
&
IX
ND PE
Y
AR
MM
SU
AP
1781
1787
1798
Industrialisation
Name Change
St George's Church
From 1781, Manchester's rapid industralisation had seen the city expand at an astonishing rate, and this process of urbanisation gave birth to the roads, houses, and businesses of the New Cross Area.
By 1787, New Cross Street's name had changed into Swan Street, but the name for the area stuck. Nowadays, some store are even named after the New Cross Street.
Initial clusters of buildings were located facing Newton Lane (now Oldham Road), with the centrepiece of the site being St George’s Church (constructed in 1798).
0158
1839
The Oldham Road Railway Station
The Oldham Road Railwaay Station opend as a passenger station in 1839 before becoming a goods-only station in 1844.
1870s
1900s
1968
1970s
1977
Gas Works
Goods Depot
Railway Station Closed
Church Demolished
The 20th Century continuted to see the growth of the Manchester & Leeds Goods Depot with Oldham Road Station and an adjacent potato market thriving until the 1960s.
The Oldham Road Rail Station closed in 1968.
Wing Yip & Royal Mail Office
Following the arrival of the railway station, there was an increase in housing stock. Alongside this, a Gas works was introduced into the New Cross Area.
Since the rail station closed, the New Cross Area has been the location of two major commercial and employment uses within the City; the Wing Yip Wholesalers and Supermarket, and the large Royal Mail sorting office.
0159
Records indicate St George’s Church was demolished in 1977.
NEW CROSS
CONTROL P-34.34-3
FIX
TTS
LOCAL P-34.34-3
W 41°24'12.2" E 23°44'54.4" PE-3 NVGT B CONTROL P-34.34-3
1807 1807
FIX
SITE
Listed in the 1781 Manchester and Salford Trade Directory, New Cross Street seemingly took its name from the point at which the road met three other significant thoroughfares, Oldham Street, Oldham Road, and Great Ancoats Street.By 1787, New Cross Street’s name had changed into Swan Street, but the name for the area stuck.
1840 1840
1900 1900
1870 1870
1980 1980
TE SI AL
AN E
IS
FIN
YS
DE
E
TH OB
PR
GN
M
SI
LE
DE
ST s
TP
es
oc
PU
Pr
IN
N
TIO
RA
NE
GY
GE
TE
GN
SI
RA
DE
AM
AR N
TIO
ER
UA
ET
AL
EV
&
IX
ND PE
Y
AR
MM
SU
AP
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
4.8%
11.7%
32%
36.5%
41.2%
37%
0.5%
64%
34%
30.5%
38.5%
34.5%
94.7%
24.3%
18.3%
17.3%
4.6%
26%
15.7%
15.7%
15.7%
2.5%
The land use in New Cross Area from 19th century to 20 century
House
N IO CT
U OD TR IN
At the beginning of the 19th century, New Cross largely comprised open ground; Initial clusters of buildings were located facing Newton Lane (now Oldham Road), with the centrepiece of the site being St George’s Church. Development continued to grow slowly in the area during the early 19th Century; with the introduction of Rochdale Road seeing developments cluster along this artery. And with Manchester’s rapid industrialisation during the 19th century, and the Oldham Road Railway Station opened in 1839, housing stock was increasing quickly. Also, more and more squares were applied to the construction trend. The area developed throughout the 19th and early 20th century as a distinctive, tightly grained, mixed-use district, with a grid street pattern. However, due to the huge damage from World War II, industrial development started to decline in the 20 century which led to the reduction of the house stock and the abandonment of empty places. What was worse, the demolition of the Oldham Station deepened the recession of this area. Thus, we can conclude that the industrial structure and the railway infrastructure had played a vital role in the development of this area during the 19th and early 20 century.
1824 1824
Site
W 41°24'12.2" E 23°44'54.4" PE-3 NVGT B
% 100 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0
1807
1824 Buildings
1840 Road
1870 Open Space
Resource: https://images.manchester.gov.uk/ http://manchesterplace.org.uk/wp-content/ uploads/2016/06/New_Cross_NDF_Vol.1_ Executive_July_29_2015_Final.pdf
0160
1900
1980 Railway
Buildings
LOCAL P-34.34-3
Road
TTS
Open Space
FIX
Railway
W 41°24'12.2" E 23°44'54.4" PE-3 NVGT B
FIX
W 41°24'12.2" E 23°44'54.4" PE-3 NVGT B
Road
CONTROL P-34.34-3
CONTROL P-34.34-3
Empty Place
LOCAL P-34.34-3
LOCAL P-34.34-3
Railway
TTS
TTS
0161
COLLYHURST TTS
LOCAL P-34.34-3
TTS
LOCAL P-34.34-3
CONTROL P-34.34-3
FIX
TTS
LOCAL P-34.34-3
W 41°24'12.2" E 23°44'54.4" PE-3 NVGT B CONTROL P-34.34-3
FIX
W 41°24'12.2" E 23°44'54.4" PE-3 NVGT B
TTS
LOCAL P-34.34-3
CONTROL P-34.34-3
CONTROL P-34.34-3
FIX
W 41°24'12.2" E 23°44'54.4" PE-3 NVGT B
FIX
W 41°24'12.2" E 23°44'54.4" PE-3 NVGT B
Sand stone
Coal
Terrace housing
Sandstone rock of Early Permian age, making it about 280 million years old.
Coal was discovered nearby and houses were built to house coal workers.
Collyhurst was first developed as a residential community in the early 20th century.
N IO CT
U OD TR IN TE SI AL
AN E
IS
FIN
YS
DE
E
TH OB
PR
GN
M
SI
LE
DE
ST s
TP
es
oc
PU
Pr
IN
N
TIO
RA
NE
GY
GE
TE
GN
SI
RA
DE
AM
AR N
TIO
ER
UA
ET
AL
EV
&
IX
ND PE
Y
AR
MM
SU
AP
Before 19th
1840s
Late 19th
Early 20th
1960s
21th
Red Sandstone Quarries
Coal was discovered
Heavily industrialised
Terrace housing
De-industrialisation
New regeneration plans
Red sandstone dug from Collyhurst Quarry was used to construct many buildings in and around Manchester, and it is known as ‘Collyhurst Sandstone’. Stone was transported the short distance into Manchester by river on barges or rafts.
Houses were built to house coal workers at the newly-created St George’s Colliery. A chemical works was also built on Collyhurst Clough, leading to further employment opportunities. Collyhurst began to expand rapidly.
By the late 19th century, Collyhurst was heavily industrialised, and Corn mills, a brick-making works, a paper mill, a rope works and dye factories had been constructed.
Collyhurst was first developed as a residential community in the late 19th century, when terrace housing for Manchester’s newly urbanised workforce was built on the former grounds of Collyhurst Hall.
0162
The population of Collyhurst has declined over time since the Second World War, and many of the former Victorian terraced houses have been abandoned and fallen into disrepair. Then a major programme of urban renewal, including ‘slum’ clearance programmes and the rebuilding of new council housing estates, took place across Manchester.
0163
2 different redevelopment programme for Collyhurst was produced in 2006 and 2011 but scrapped respectively. MCC and FEC published a Strategic Regeneration Framework (SRF) outlining development plans for the Northern Gateway in 2018. There will be residential-led neighbourhoods, providing a medium to higher density and mixed housing offer.
COLLYHURST TTS
LOCAL P-34.34-3
TTS
LOCAL P-34.34-3
CONTROL P-34.34-3
FIX
TTS
LOCAL P-34.34-3
W 41°24'12.2" E 23°44'54.4" PE-3 NVGT B CONTROL P-34.34-3
W 41°24'12.2" E 23°44'54.4" PE-3 NVGT B
FIX
TTS
LOCAL P-34.34-3
CONTROL P-34.34-3
CONTROL P-34.34-3
FIX
W 41°24'12.2" E 23°44'54.4" PE-3 NVGT B
FIX
W 41°24'12.2" E 23°44'54.4" PE-3 NVGT B
1840
1870
1920
1900
1950
1980
Site
The name Collyhurst means ‘wooded hill’. It is first referenced in records as grazing or pasture land at the time of the Norman invasion in 1066.
TE SI AL
AN E
IS
FIN
YS
DE
Buildings
The land use in Collyhurst Area from 19th century to 20 century % 100 90
E
TH OB
PR
GN
M
SI
LE
DE
s
TP
es
oc
PU
Pr
IN
N
TIO
RA
NE
GY
GE
TE
GN
SI
RA
DE
ST
80 70 60 50 40 30
AM
AR N
TIO
ER
UA
ET
AL
EV
By the late 19th century, Collyhurst was heavily industrialised, and Corn mills, a brick-making works, a paper mill, a rope works and dye factories had been constructed. Collyhurst was first developed as a residential community in the early 20th century, when terrace housing for Manchester’s newly urbanised workforce was built on the former grounds of Collyhurst Hall.
20 10 0
1840
1870 Buildings
1900 Road
1920 Open Space
1950
1980 Railway
&
Resource: https://images.manchester.gov.uk/ https://www.manchestereveningnews.co.uk/ news/nostalgia/nostalgia-collyhurst-sourceagriculture-coal-11145359
7.7% 7.7%
31.7% 31.7%
32.1% 32.1%
27.6% 27.6%
13.3% 13.3%
3.9% 3.9%
15.6% 15.6%
39.3% 39.3%
38.6% 38.6%
32.5% 32.5%
24.6% 24.6%
86.2% 86.2%
64.2% 64.2%
15.7% 15.7%
15.1% 15.1%
22.4% 22.4%
35.3% 35.3%
2.3% 2.3%
2.3% 2.3%
10.1% 10.1%
10.1% 10.1%
6.8% 6.8%
4.9% 4.9%
Open Space Railway
IX
ND PE
Y
AR
MM
SU
AP
The population of Collyhurst has declined over time since the Second World War, and many of the former Victorian terraced houses have been abandoned and fallen into disrepair. In the 1950s and 1960s, a major programme of urban renewal, including ‘slum’ clearance programmes and the rebuilding of new council housing estates, took place across Manchester. In Collyhurst, the privately owned Victorian terraced streets, flats and tenements were demolished, replaced by a new type of urban environment, with housing built and owned by Manchester City Council.
2.4% 2.4%
Road
N IO CT
U OD TR IN
The area stayed largely rural until the early 19th century, when it began to expand rapidly.Coal was discovered nearby and houses were built to house coal workers at the newly-created St George’s Colliery. A chemical works was also built on Collyhurst Clough, leading to further employment opportunities.
0164
0165
THE LOWER IRK VALLEY TTS
LOCAL P-34.34-3
CONTROL P-34.34-3
FIX
W 41°24'12.2" E 23°44'54.4" PE-3 NVGT B
TTS
LOCAL P-34.34-3
CONTROL P-34.34-3
FIX
TTS
CONTROL P-34.34-3
FIX
LOCAL P-34.34-3
TTS
W 41°24'12.2" E 23°44'54.4" PE-3 NVGT B
TTS
W 41°24'12.2" E 23°44'54.4" PE-3 NVGT B
LOCAL P-34.34-3
LOCAL P-34.34-3
CONTROL P-34.34-3
FIX
CONTROL P-34.34-3
FIX
W 41°24'12.2" E 23°44'54.4" PE-3 NVGT B
TTS
W 41°24'12.2" E 23°44'54.4" PE-3 NVGT B
LOCAL P-34.34-3
CONTROL P-34.34-3
FIX
W 41°24'12.2" E 23°44'54.4" PE-3 NVGT B
Cotton
Cotton was being imported at a rate of 1,000 tonnes a year by 1751.
Cotton
Greens
Cotton was stood at 45.2 thousand tonnes by 1816.
unmanaged greenspaces has potential to provides high-quality recreational spaces.
N IO CT
U OD TR IN TE SI AL
AN E
IS
FIN
YS
DE
E
TH OB
PR
GN
M
SI
LE
DE
ST s
TP
es
oc
PU
Pr
IN
N
TIO
RA
NE
GY
GE
TE
GN
SI
RA
DE
AM
AR N
TIO
ER
UA
ET
AL
EV
&
IX
ND PE
Y
AR
MM
SU
AP
1249
1363
1381
18th
1830
19th
1970
Fishries were forbidden
Woollens and linens trade
Union Bridge
In the beginning of Industy Revolution
Industrial Expansion
Rail Construction
City Planning
There was a mill by the Irk at witch the tenants of the manor ground their corn. And its fisheries were controlled by the lord of the manor. King Henry III Claimed that the water of Irk and its bank were the Lord’s soil, on which it was unlawful to fish.
Traditionally textile manufacture began in 1363 with the arrival of Flemish weavers. By the reign of Elizabeth I wool and linen production was important, followed by manufacture of fustians, a mix of linen and cotton.
The Union Bridge was recorded in 1381, listing in 1994, and now closed. A single, low segmental arc with no parapet and iron railings.
In prior to the Industry Revolution, the Lower Irk Valley was named as ‘ Angel Meadows’ derived from the views the Irk Valley provided for the owners of Georgian properties situated along the elevated Angel Street.The Irk Valley quickly transformed from a rural valley into an urban slum; inhabited by workers of the factories located along the bank of Irk River.
The Irk River had more mill seats upon it than any other stream of its length in the Kingdom. The rapid expansion resulted in the Irk River being made to run through a culvert, which is still in operation today.
Demand for rail infrastructure led to the development of the Manchester-Leeds railway viaduct which passed through Collyhurst and into Manchester Victoria station and remains as a key feature of the Lower Irk Valley. Due to the rail construction, the Lower Irk Valley made ground and cause some contamination.
The majority of planning applications have historical been to either demolish disused and vacant factory buildings with a view to redevelop the cleared land to form surface car parking, or find an alternative use for those old warehouse, such as offices, workshops or students accommodations.
0166
0167
THE LOWER IRK VALLEY LOCAL P-34.34-3
CONTROL P-34.34-3
W 41°24'12.2" E 23°44'54.4" PE-3 NVGT B
FIX
TTS
LOCAL P-34.34-3
CONTROL P-34.34-3
LOCAL P-34.34-3
CONTROL P-34.34-3
FIX
TTS
LOCAL P-34.34-3
W 41°24'12.2" E 23°44'54.4" PE-3 NVGT B
FIX
TTS
W 41°24'12.2" E 23°44'54.4" PE-3 NVGT B
LOCAL P-34.34-3
CONTROL P-34.34-3
FIX
W 41°24'12.2" E 23°44'54.4" PE-3 NVGT B
FIX
W 41°24'12.2" E 23°44'54.4" PE-3 NVGT B
TTS
LOCAL P-34.34-3
CONTROL P-34.34-3
FIX
W 41°24'12.2" E 23°44'54.4" PE-3 NVGT B
1824
1840
1870
1890
1920
1980
Site
The southern extent of the Lower Irk Valley interfaces with the northern boundary of the NOMA Estate and Cheetham Hill Road, and is delineated to the south by a railway viaduct that provides rail and Metrolink services to and from Manchester’s Victoria Station.
CONTROL P-34.34-3
The land use in Lower Irk Valley Area from 19th century to 20 century
TE SI AL
AN
% 100 90 80 70 60 50 40 30
E
IS
FIN
YS
DE
Buildings
N IO CT
U OD TR IN
In the medieval time, There was a mill by the Irk at witch the tenants of the manor ground their corn , and its fisheries were controlled by the lord of the manor . Throwing corries and other offensive matter were forbidden, and water for Manchester was drawn from the river before the Industrial Revolution.
E
TH M
GN ST
s
TP
es
oc
PU
Pr
IN
N
TIO
RA
NE
GY
GE
TE
GN
SI
RA
DE
1870
1900
AM N
TIO
ER
UA
ET
AL
EV
AR
Buildings
1980
1920 Road
Railway
River
&
IX
ND PE
Y
AR
MM
SU
AP
13.6%
12.4%
37.4%
25.5%
16.8%
Resource: https://confidentials.com/ manchester/a-short-history-of-manchester-therise-and-fall-of-cottonopolis
6%
12.8%
10%
14%
17.4%
18.2%
81.4%
70%
75.6%
44.7%
36.7%
57.6%
3.5%
2%
3.9%
20.4%
7.4%
Open Space
LE
SI
20 10 0
12.6%
Railway
OB
PR
DE
Traditionally textile manufacture began in 1363 with the arrival of Flemish weavers. But it was with the manufacture of pure cottons in the mid 18th century that Manchester became significant. With the industrial expansion, a large number of textile-related mills ran, which also brought numerious workers and population influx. However, the majority of them were poverty, living in high dense accommodation along side the Irk River. This led to the Lower Irk Valley directed transformed to urban slums. Since 20th centiry, this kind of situation was improved and some flats disused or transformed to offices or car parks. The Lower Irk Valley is currently dominated by a poor-quality natural environment and public realm that is reflective of the marginal economic uses that predominate, along with the large areas of underutilised brownfiled former industrial land.
Road
TTS
TTS
0168
0169
FORECAST OF NORTHERN GATEWAY TTS
TTS
LOCAL P-34.34-3
CONTROL P-34.34-3
FIX
TTS
LOCAL P-34.34-3
CONTROL P-34.34-3
W 41°24'12.2" E 23°44'54.4" PE-3 NVGT B
Buildings
FIX
TTS
LOCAL P-34.34-3
LOCAL P-34.34-3
W 41°24'12.2" E 23°44'54.4" PE-3 NVGT B
CONTROL P-34.34-3
FIX
TTS
LOCAL P-34.34-3
W 41°24'12.2" E 23°44'54.4" PE-3 NVGT B CONTROL P-34.34-3
FIX
CONTROL P-34.34-3
FIX
W 41°24'12.2" E 23°44'54.4" PE-3 NVGT B
TTS
LOCAL P-34.34-3
W 41°24'12.2" E 23°44'54.4" PE-3 NVGT B
CONTROL P-34.34-3
FIX
W 41°24'12.2" E 23°44'54.4" PE-3 NVGT B
Textile manufacturing
Road
Engineering and elecrical goods
Open Space
Knowledge intensive jobs
Railway
Industrial structure
River %
land use
Prediction
100
%
population
22
1400000
20
N IO CT
U OD TR IN TE SI
18
80
16
70
14
60
12
50
10
40
8
30
6
20
4
10
2
E
IS
FIN
YS
DE
AL
AN
90
Prediction
1200000
1000000
800000
600000
400000
E
TH OB
PR
GN
M
SI
LE
DE
200000
ST
1801 1811 1821 1831 1841 1851 1861 1871 1881 1891 1901 1911 1921 1931 1941 1951 1961 1971 1981 1991 2001 2011 2021 2031 2041 2051
s
TP
es
oc
PU
Pr
IN
N
TIO
RA
NE
GY
GE
TE
GN
SI
RA
DE
0
0
1820
1830
1840
1850
1860
1870
1880
1890
1900
1910
1920
1930
1940
1950
1960
1970
1980
1990
2000
2010
2020
2030
2040
2050
0
industrial revolution
war
WW1
WW2
AM
early early financial 1980s 1990s crisis recesion recesion
N
TIO
ER
UA
ET
AL
EV
AR
1810
&
IX
ND PE
Y
AR
MM
SU
AP
Second industrial revolution
WW1
Resource: Census 1911; Census 1951; Nomis Census of Employment; Nomis Business Register and Employment Survey. https://digimap.edina.ac.uk/
WW2
Third industrial revolution
Early 1980s Reces sion
Early 1990s Reces sion
Finan cial Crisis
Forecasted land use and industiral structure in Northern Gateway Based on the historical development of the Northern Gateway, the building stock in this area will decline continuously for more and more people will move out in the future. What is more, there will be more and more space being abandoned, leaving the area lacking vitality. Manchester is now experiencing a process of reinvention, having seen a 24 per cent growth in jobs between 1991 and 2013, including 77,000 more jobs in private sector knowledge-intensive service industries. It also had the second fastest growing city centre of all British cities between 1998 and 2008. The scale of the deindustrialisation challenge was such that the city still has some way to go; in 2013 Manchester still had 90,000 fewer jobs than it did in 1951. However, its recent successes suggest that it is on a new pathway of knowledge-based economic growth.
0170
Resource: https://secure.manchester.gov.uk/downloads/download/4220/population_reports
Forecasted population It was the industrial revolution that kick-started large scale immigrants, beginning with Irish migrants taking up work in the mills and followed by the Jewish migrants fleeting persecution in Eastern Europe. In the 1841, the war had seen the decrease of the population slightly, also the WW2 posed some impacts on the population increase. Meanwhile, number of students overseas gradually since 1880s. During span from 1980s to 2000s, the population increase influenced by the recessions and financial crisis.
0171
LISTED BUILDINGS TTS
LOCAL P-34.34-3
CONTROL P-34.34-3
W 41°24'12.2" E 23°44'54.4" PE-3 NVGT B
FIX
TTS
LOCAL P-34.34-3
Location of Listed Building
TTS
LOCAL P-34.34-3
CONTROL P-34.34-3
FIX
TTS
LOCAL P-34.34-3
W 41°24'12.2" E 23°44'54.4" PE-3 NVGT B CONTROL P-34.34-3
CONTROL P-34.34-3
FIX
W 41°24'12.2" E 23°44'54.4" PE-3 NVGT B
FIX
W 41°24'12.2" E 23°44'54.4" PE-3 NVGT B
1
Listed Building
N IO CT
U OD TR IN TE SI AL
AN E
IS
FIN
YS
DE
E
TH OB
PR
GN
M
SI
LE
DE
ST
2
4
3
5
s
TP
es
oc
PU
Pr
IN
N
TIO
RA
NE
GY
GE
TE
GN
SI
RA
DE
Northern Gateway experienced vigorous development during the Industrial Revolution, with a dramatic increase in population. Many factories, residences and religious buildings were built at that time. After World War II, many buildings were destroyed, industry stagnated, and the population decreased. Many historic buildings have been demolished or repaired, and public spaces have been converted into green spaces and other natural environment areas. The remaining factories and wharehouses have also changed their functions. The only six listed buildings in this area indicate to a certain extent that they have been influenced by the times and have gradually changed with the changes of the times.
AM
AR N
TIO
ER
UA
ET
AL
EV
1 Union Bridge
&
IX
ND PE
Y
AR
MM
SU
AP
6 Roman Catholic Church of St Patrick
4 Marble Arch Inn 3 Former Goulden Street Police and Fire Station 2 8, Cable Street 5 Former Midland Bank
0172
6
0173
LISTED BUILDINGS TTS
LOCAL P-34.34-3
CONTROL P-34.34-3
FIX
W 41°24'12.2" E 23°44'54.4" PE-3 NVGT B
TTS
LOCAL P-34.34-3
TTS
LOCAL P-34.34-3
CONTROL P-34.34-3
FIX
TTS
LOCAL P-34.34-3
W 41°24'12.2" E 23°44'54.4" PE-3 NVGT B CONTROL P-34.34-3
CONTROL P-34.34-3
FIX
W 41°24'12.2" E 23°44'54.4" PE-3 NVGT B
FIX
W 41°24'12.2" E 23°44'54.4" PE-3 NVGT B
C19
C19
1870
1888
1914
1936
Union Bridge
8, Cable Street
Former Goulden Street Police and Fire Station
Marble Arch Inn
Former Midland Bank
Roman Catholic Church of St Patrick
Location: (New Cross) Date: Mid to later C19
N IO CT
U OD TR IN TE SI AL
AN E
IS
FIN
YS
DE
E
TH OB
PR
GN
M
SI
LE
DE
ST s
TP
es
oc
PU
Pr
IN
N
TIO
RA
NE
GY
GE
TE
GN
SI
RA
DE
AM
AR N
TIO
ER
UA
ET
AL
EV
&
IX
ND PE
Y
AR
MM
SU
AP
Warehouse or industrial building.Brick with some stone dressings. Rectangular. Four storeys, gable to road, 3 x 10 windows. Central segmental-headed doorway and segmental-headed windows, all these with stepped jambs in the form of simplified pilasters with moulded heads and feet; moulded brick band over top floor; rebuilt gable with central window, moulded bands to coping, and added or rebuilt chimney on left slope. Long sides similar, but with simpler windows (those to basement blocked). Rear gable wall has tiered loading doorways to right. Location: Danzic Street, Manchester This building on the corner of Cable Street and (Lower Irk Valley) Chadderton Street has the appearance of a Date: Probably C18 or very early C19 wharehouse or factory and examination of an 1888 Union Bridge is a small public road bridge over the map of the area indicates that it was home to T Barlow River Irk and is now closed. Sandstone ashlar. Single Brothers Umbrella Factory. Today there is an empty low segmental arch with plain voussoirs no parapet, lot beyond the old factory on the Oldham Road side of the building. but iron railings to south side. 1
2
0174
Location: Gould Street, Manchester (New Cross) Date: 1888
Location: Former Goulden Street, Manchester (New Cross) Date: 1870 Red brick with some sandstone ashlar, hipped slate roofs. Rectangular plan on island site incorporating office and domestic block on west side, cell range to south of this, with tall chimney stack, and fire engine garage on east side, all within a curtain wall. Curtain wall with sandstone ashlar plinth, rusticated quoins to the angles, plain cornice and parapet carried round. 3
Public house. Dated 1888 in gable to Gould Street. Buff brick with polished pink granite to ground floor, hipped slate roof. Corner site. Two storeys; 5 bays to Gould Street with splayed corner and 2-bay return to Rochdale Road. The ground floor has a moulded plinth and a frieze and cornice carried round; a corner entrance recessed in a 3-sided granite-columned porch with “Caernarvon” arches over; further entrances to the centre and left end of the Gould Street facade, both round-headed with 2-centred arched hoodmoulds; and “Caernarvon” arched windows, those to Gould Street coupled, with central colonettes. The 1st floor has similarly-shaped windows, that in the centre of the Gould Street facade under a pentice canopy and a gable with a terracotta panel dated 1888 and flanked by very tall corniced chimneys, 3 square-headed windows to the corner, and an enriched eaves cornice of red terracotta carried round. Interior with original decorative features including much faience work.
Location: Gould Street, Manchester (New Cross) Date: 1914 Bank, now office. Portland stone (roof concealed). Irregular plan on corner site, with semi-circular south end to Oldham Road. Classical style. Two storeys; rusticated ground floor, coupled Ionic pilasters at Location: Gould Street, North Yorkshire 1st floor, panelled frieze, dentilled modillion cornice Manchester and balustraded parapet. Pilaster doorcase with (Collyhurst) cornice on consoles surmounted by voluted keyblock; Date: Founded in 1832, rebuilt in 1936 round-headed windows at ground floor with run-out voussoirs, square-headed windows at 1st floor with Roman Catholic Church dating 1936, by H. moulded architraves including ornamental balconies Greenhalgh. It features red brick with white stone and cornices mounted on cartouches. dressings and a slate roof.
4
5
0175
6
SUMMARY
TTS
LOCAL P-34.34-3
CONTROL P-34.34-3
FIX
TTS
W 41°24'12.2" E 23°44'54.4" PE-3 NVGT B
TTS
LOCAL P-34.34-3
CONTROL P-34.34-3
W 41°24'12.2" E 23°44'54.4" PE-3 NVGT B
FIX
TTS
LOCAL P-34.34-3
CONTROL P-34.34-3
LOCAL P-34.34-3
CONTROL P-34.34-3
FIX
W 41°24'12.2" E 23°44'54.4" PE-3 NVGT B
FIX
W 41°24'12.2" E 23°44'54.4" PE-3 NVGT B
N IO CT
U OD TR IN TE SI AL
AN E
IS
FIN
YS
DE
E
TH OB
PR
GN
M
SI
LE
DE
ST s
TP
es
oc
PU
Pr
IN
N
TIO
RA
NE
GY
GE
TE
GN
SI
RA
DE
AM
AR N
TIO
ER
UA
ET
AL
EV
&
IX
ND PE
Y
AR
MM
SU
AP
Based on the analysis of existing historical data and maps of Northern Gateway and the whole of Manchester, we have concluded the historical and cultural backgrounds that affect the changes in urban forms and the natural environment. We used this diagram to show the continuous causal relationship between each category. Through the calculation of the area of various urban areas, we have obtained the changes in the proportion of different urban elements in Northern Gateway from the beginning of the 19th century to the end of the 20th century and used the data obtained to support our analysis and conclusions: changes in cities from the 1800s remains following the city’s cultural and economic background. In the Northern Gateway area during and after World War II, the economy declined, industry stagnated, many houses were abandoned and resources were wasted. It shows that the urban design that only follows the social, cultural, and economic needs cannot maintain a normal state or minimize the damage caused by some extreme risks. It may be necessary to consider the sustainability of urban design and the resilient urban future. Based on the forecast of various data on the economy, population, employment situation, and the impact of these factors on urban changes, we have made a forecast for the proportion of rivers, vacant land, construction land and roads in this area in the next 30 years. It is predicted that in the next 30 years, the natural environment will receive attention, the proportion of rivers and open land will continue to increase, while the proportion of human construction land and roads and other public land will continue to decline, which is consistent with the global strategy of sustainable development of. However, the decline in the ratio of construction land may not meet the work and living needs of the people. In the design, it is necessary to consider how to improve the quality of life conditions using sustainable ways and use urban space as efficiently as possible to meet the demands of citizens.
Evidences and data from Nrothern Gateway recorded history Social cultural and economy background City changes reflected in historical maps Continuous relationship on the elements of each category Data from analysis on historical mapto support the development of the city
Public Building
start at the end of 18c St George's Church in 1798
Residential Building
Dwelling Requirement
Factory & Wharehouse
Construction of Industrial premises
Buildings
Demolish of some Religious buildings
Many houses were destroyed by bombs
Terrace housing Urban Slums Industrial stagnation
Construction of Railway
Urban Form Natural Environment
Road & Railway
Land transportation extended
The Oldham Road Railway Station in 1839
River flow
Canal system extended Man-made river diversion
River has been polluted during Industrial Revolution
Urban form and environmental changes driven by Social cultural and economic background
Economy Development
Job Position
Immigration Population Increase
The working class population has increased dramatically Widening gap between rich and poor The working class is oppressed
Demand Increase
On environment: pollution On economy: improve
1761 Bridgewater Canal bringing coal from mines at Worsley to central Manchester
16c Immgration Cotton from Netherlands to the UK Middle 17c Lancashire: Cotton Spinning Industry
Textile Manufacture
Location Transportation Resources
south Lancashire and north Cheshire 1853 Peak Develop wide range of industries
Red sandstone Coal Mine
Development of Manchester city as trading and industry center
Market
the world's largest marketplace for cotton goods
Trading Center
Before 1800s
Demolish and abandoned of terrace housing and slums Increase of apartments
Increase of student apartments and affordable housing
Function conversion
Change into offices or other public space
Interference on traffic Oldham Road rail station closed in 1968
Began to pay attention to rivers and tackle pollution problems
Gas Industries Goods Depot Corn mills Brick-making works Paper mill Rope works Dye factories
Design on walkable city and minimize minimise motorised transport use for low-carbon life Form Urban landscape around the river and green spaces
Revolve the Irk River to build Manchester’ s unique city river park
Impact
Decline in import and export trade Economic frustration Textile Manufacture fall Traffic Declines Port Close Population declined
Policy The UK maintained economic stability ensure employment control inflation ensure people's living standards More importantly, ensure the normal operation of the economy provide strong economic support for the war
Second World War
Industrial Revolution Industrialisation
Period of stagnant economic development
1860s
1940s
Timeline
0176
Construction of cultural buildings and infrastructure
Large number of urban housing demolished and transform into Green area Impact
Manufacturing industry develop
14c Immgration Textile Industry from France to the UK
Transportation for the war and food supply
Green land reclamation transformed into urban land
Green Area & open space
Construction of cultural buildings
St George’ s Church demolished in 1977
Construction of Religious building
0177
Policy
Curb inflation improve the macroeconomic operating environment advocate the concept of a free society
Reduce greenhouse gas emissions Develop renewable energy Build "zero energy development system" green community Promote garbage sorting and recycling Increase greening
Deindustrialisation Regeneration
Sustainable urban development
Later 1980s
21C
Policy
Typology Study Low-rise Apartment
TYPOLOGY STUDY TTS
LOCAL P-34.34-3
CONTROL P-34.34-3
W 41°24'12.2" E 23°44'54.4" PE-3 NVGT B
FIX
TTS
TTS
LOCAL P-34.34-3
CONTROL P-34.34-3
W 41°24'12.2" E 23°44'54.4" PE-3 NVGT B LOCAL P-34.34-3
CONTROL P-34.34-3
FIX
TTS
LOCAL P-34.34-3
CONTROL P-34.34-3
FIX
W 41°24'12.2" E 23°44'54.4" PE-3 NVGT B
FIX
W 41°24'12.2" E 23°44'54.4" PE-3 NVGT B
Low-rise Apartment Introduction Name: Low-rise apartments Definition: Low-rise apartment is always defined as an enclosed structure below 35 metres which is divided into regular floor levels and separated into several apartments on each floor. U OD TR IN N IO CT
Price: £110,000 to £320,000 (to buy in Greater Manchester)
TE SI AL
AN E
IS
FIN
YS
DE
E
TH OB
PR
GN
M
SI
LE
DE
ST s
TP
es
oc
PU
Pr
IN
N
TIO
RA
NE
GY
GE
TE
GN
SI
RA
DE
Characteristics: Low-rise apartments sometimes offer more privacy and negotiability of rent and utilities than high-rise apartments, although they may have fewer amenities and less flexibility with leases.
AM
AR N
TIO
ER
UA
ET
AL
EV
&
IX
ND PE
Y
AR
MM
SU
AP
0180
0181
TYPOLOGY STUDY TTS
LOCAL P-34.34-3
CONTROL P-34.34-3
FIX
W 41°24'12.2" E 23°44'54.4" PE-3 NVGT B
TTS
TTS
LOCAL P-34.34-3
CONTROL P-34.34-3
FIX
TTS
LOCAL P-34.34-3
W 41°24'12.2" E 23°44'54.4" PE-3 NVGT B LOCAL P-34.34-3
CONTROL P-34.34-3
CONTROL P-34.34-3
FIX
W 41°24'12.2" E 23°44'54.4" PE-3 NVGT B
FIX
W 41°24'12.2" E 23°44'54.4" PE-3 NVGT B
Low-rise Apartment Parameters
Variations in Size
Variations in Size Typical Layout
Small Size Apartment
Small Size Apartment
Core
E
IS
FIN
YS
DE
AL
AN
m
15.2m
15.2m 23.5
Core
Apartment 1
Apartment 2
Apartment 1
9.
m
TH E
Building Parameters
OB
PR
ST s
TP
es
oc
PU
Pr
AM
AR N
TIO
ER
UA
ET
AL
EV
&
23.5
m
Largre Size Apartment
Largre Size Apartment
Width(m): 17 Depth(m): 47 Height(m): 32.6 Number of Floors: 8 Floor to Ceiling Heights (m): 2.75 Number of Cores: 2 Total Apartments: 80
Width(m): 17 Depth(m): 47 Height(m): 32.6 Number of Floors: 8 Floor to Ceiling Heights (m): 2.75 Number of Cores: 2 Total Apartments: 80
47m
0182
Overall Depth (m)Overall Width (m)
Overall Width (m) 9.6
17
23.5
m
9
20
21.0 24.5
23.5
35
1
50
20
20
50
Number of Floor 5
12
15
35
1
Number of Core Floor to Ceiling Height (m)
4
1
Glazing Foor Area Ratio (%)
2.5
5
4
1
50
0m
.
100
17
1
12
2
Glazing Foor Area Ratio (%) 47m
7 8
Number of Core
2.75
2
50
47
5 15.2 7 8 21.0 24.5
2.75
1
9
20
Floor to Ceiling Height (m)
0m
17
47
m
.0
17
Overall Depth (m)
Number of Floor Overall Height (m)
15
2.5
9.6
23.5
Overall Height (m)
.
17
Building Parameters
The parameters of the low residential apartment are driven by case studies found in the Manchester Thearea, parameters where aof the low residential apartment are driven by case studies found in the Manchester area, where a mixture of point and line low rise blocks are found together. mixture of point and line low rise blocks are found together.
15.2
IX
ND PE
Y
AR
MM
SU
AP
Width(m): 17.0 Depth(m): 23.5 Height(m): 21.0 Number of Floors: 7 0m .Floor 7 to Ceiling Heights (m): 2.75 1 Number of Cores: 1 Total Apartments: 24
24.5m
IN
N
TIO
RA
NE
GY
GE
TE
GN
SI
RA
DE
Width(m): 17.0 Depth(m): 23.5 Height(m): 21.0 Number of Floors: 7 Floor to Ceiling Heights (m): 2.75 Number of Cores: 1 Total Apartments: 24
Medium Size Apartment 21.0m
GN
M
SI
LE
DE
Medium Size Apartment
Apartment 2
6m
23.5
21.0m
TE SI
Width(m): 9.6 Depth(m): 23.5 Height(m): 15.2 Number of Floors: 5 6m Floor to Ceiling Heights (m): 2.75 . 9 Number of Cores: 1 Total Apartments: 8
24.5m
N IO CT
U OD TR IN
Width(m): 9.6 Depth(m): 23.5 Height(m): 15.2 Number of Floors: 5 Floor to Ceiling Heights (m): 2.75 Number of Cores: 1 Total Apartments: 8
Typical Layout
100
0183
5
TYPOLOGY STUDY TTS
LOCAL P-34.34-3
CONTROL P-34.34-3
W 41°24'12.2" E 23°44'54.4" PE-3 NVGT B
FIX
TTS
TTS
LOCAL P-34.34-3
CONTROL P-34.34-3
FIX
TTS
LOCAL P-34.34-3
W 41°24'12.2" E 23°44'54.4" PE-3 NVGT B LOCAL P-34.34-3
CONTROL P-34.34-3
CONTROL P-34.34-3
FIX
W 41°24'12.2" E 23°44'54.4" PE-3 NVGT B
FIX
W 41°24'12.2" E 23°44'54.4" PE-3 NVGT B
Low-rise Apartment Site Relation
45 Road
Road
Apartment
Road
Daylight
Privacy
Relation to Road
Apartment
According to the UK housing standard, urban planning policy in Manchester, we research how the low-rise apartment respond to the city including the relationship with the road, the influence of neighbourhood and the environmental factors.
21m
。
Apartment
New Building
U OD TR IN N IO CT
Road
TE SI AL
AN E
IS
FIN
YS
DE
45 degree horizontal area to protect the daylight of the existing building
Front window to front window
The width facing towards the road
E
TH OB
PR es s
TP AM
AR
。
N
TIO
ER
UA
ET
AL
EV
45
Apartment
Road
Road
Road
New Building
oc
PU
Pr
IN
N
TIO
RA
NE
GY
Road
TE
GE
Apartment
RA
GN
SI
Apartment
ST
DE
Apartment
GN
M
SI
LE
DE
28m
& SU Y
AR
MM
N
Resource: https://www.newcastle-staffs.gov.uk/sites/default/files/IMCE/Planning/Planning_ Policy/NonLocal/Space%20About%20Dwellings%20SPG.pdf https://www.adur-worthing.gov.uk/media/media,98782,en.pdf Manchester City Council -MANCHESTER RESIDENTIAL QUALITY GUIDANCE (2017) projections for Greater Manchester Climate change projections for Greater.’
Road
Apartment
10-15m
Apartment
Road
IX
ND PE
AP
45 degree verticl area to protect the daylight of the existing building
Back to back distance
The Depth facing towards the road
30
W Road The Building facing the corner
0184
Road Front / Back distance to the side
。
30
。
S Up to 30 degrees west or east to gain the maximum benefits from solar
0185
E
TYPOLOGY STUDY TTS
LOCAL P-34.34-3
CONTROL P-34.34-3
FIX
TTS
TTS
LOCAL P-34.34-3
CONTROL P-34.34-3
FIX
W 41°24'12.2" E 23°44'54.4" PE-3 NVGT B LOCAL P-34.34-3
W 41°24'12.2" E 23°44'54.4" PE-3 NVGT B
CONTROL P-34.34-3
TTS
LOCAL P-34.34-3
CONTROL P-34.34-3
FIX
W 41°24'12.2" E 23°44'54.4" PE-3 NVGT B
FIX
W 41°24'12.2" E 23°44'54.4" PE-3 NVGT B
Low-rise Apartment Urban Patterns
Series
Open Perimeter Block
Perimeter Block
No limitataion to the single plot
Maintain the back to back distance 28m
Maintain the back to back distance 28m
Maintain the back to back distance 28m and the front to front distance 21m
N IO CT
U OD TR IN
Single Plot
TE SI AL
AN E
IS
FIN
YS
DE
E
TH OB
PR
GN
M
SI
LE
DE
ST s
TP
es
oc
PU
Pr
IN
N
TIO
RA
NE
GY
GE
TE
GN
SI
RA
DE
AM
AR N
TIO
ER
UA
ET
AL
EV
28m
&
IX
ND PE
Y
AR
MM
SU
AP
28m 28m
0186
21m
28m
0187
TYPOLOGY STUDY TTS
LOCAL P-34.34-3
CONTROL P-34.34-3
FIX
TTS
TTS
LOCAL P-34.34-3
CONTROL P-34.34-3
FIX
W 41°24'12.2" E 23°44'54.4" PE-3 NVGT B LOCAL P-34.34-3
W 41°24'12.2" E 23°44'54.4" PE-3 NVGT B
Low-rise Apartment Structure
CONTROL P-34.34-3
TTS
LOCAL P-34.34-3
CONTROL P-34.34-3
FIX
W 41°24'12.2" E 23°44'54.4" PE-3 NVGT B
FIX
W 41°24'12.2" E 23°44'54.4" PE-3 NVGT B
Typical type building
Foundation-Plinth
Primary Structure
Wall Material
Roof type
N IO CT
U OD TR IN TE SI AL
AN E
IS
FIN
YS
DE
E
TH OB
PR
GN
M
SI
LE
DE
ST
Source: R. Chudley
Low-rise apartment in Vitorian period
A strip foundation is a foundation providing a continuous longitudinal ground bearing.
Source: Google Map
Source: R. Chudley
Low-rise apartment in modern architecture period
A pad footing is an isolated foundation to spread and transfer a concentrated load to the earth.
s
TP
es
oc
PU
Pr
IN
N
TIO
RA
NE
GY
GE
TE
GN
SI
RA
DE
Source: Google Map
Source: https://theconstructor.org/
Load Bearing Structure
Brick
Stone
Gable Roof
Plaster
AM
AR N
TIO
ER
UA
ET
AL
EV
&
IX
ND PE
Y
AR
MM
SU
AP
0188
Source: https://theconstructor.org/
Concrete frame Structure
Concrete
Metal structural cladding
Tile
Flat Roof
0189
Typology Study Low-rise Office
TYPOLOGY STUDY TTS
LOCAL P-34.34-3
CONTROL P-34.34-3
W 41°24'12.2" E 23°44'54.4" PE-3 NVGT B
FIX
TTS
TTS
LOCAL P-34.34-3
CONTROL P-34.34-3
W 41°24'12.2" E 23°44'54.4" PE-3 NVGT B LOCAL P-34.34-3
CONTROL P-34.34-3
FIX
TTS
LOCAL P-34.34-3
CONTROL P-34.34-3
FIX
W 41°24'12.2" E 23°44'54.4" PE-3 NVGT B
FIX
W 41°24'12.2" E 23°44'54.4" PE-3 NVGT B
Low-rise Office Introduction Name: Low-rise commercial buildings Definition:
N IO CT
U OD TR IN
Characteristic: Low rise offices offer more privacy and negotiability of rent and utilities than high-rise offices. Typical for the Northern Quarter, low rise offices are easier to maintain and easier to put out fires.
TE SI AL
AN E
IS
FIN
YS
DE
E
TH OB
PR
GN
M
SI
LE
DE
ST s
TP
es
oc
PU
Pr
IN
N
TIO
RA
NE
GY
GE
TE
GN
SI
RA
DE
AM
AR N
TIO
ER
UA
ET
AL
EV
&
IX
ND PE
Y
AR
MM
SU
AP
0192
0193
TYPOLOGY STUDY LOCAL P-34.34-3
CONTROL P-34.34-3
FIX
TTS
W 41°24'12.2" E 23°44'54.4" PE-3 NVGT B
LOCAL P-34.34-3
CONTROL P-34.34-3
FIX
TTS
LOCAL P-34.34-3
W 41°24'12.2" E 23°44'54.4" PE-3 NVGT B LOCAL P-34.34-3
CONTROL P-34.34-3
Low-rise Office Parameters
CONTROL P-34.34-3
FIX
W 41°24'12.2" E 23°44'54.4" PE-3 NVGT B
FIX
W 41°24'12.2" E 23°44'54.4" PE-3 NVGT B
TE SI AL
AN
Small Size Office
Small Size Office
Width(m): 17.0 Depth(m): 38.4 Height(m): 12.0 Number of Floors: 3 Floor to Ceiling Heights (m): 3.8 Number of Cores: 1
Width(m): 17.0 Depth(m): 38.4 Height(m): 12.0 Number of Floors: 3 Floor to Ceiling Heights (m): 3.8 Number of Cores: 1
38.
4m
m 7.0
Typical Layout Lobby
Open Office
12.0m
Lobby
Office
38.
4m
1
E
IS
FIN
YS
DE
Variations in Typical Size Layout
12.0m
N IO CT
U OD TR IN
Variations in Size
Open Office
TTS
TTS
W.C.
.0m
E
TH OB
PR
GN
M
SI
LE
DE
ST
Building Parameters
parameters of the office present only a few of the possible configurations for an office space. Offices are quite The parameters of the office present only a few of the possible configurations for an office space. Offices areThequite flexible spaces depending on their occupation. flexible spaces depending on their occupation.
es
oc s
TP
Overall Depth (m)
AM
AR N
TIO
ER
UA
ET &
0m
Overall Height (m)
m 7.0
12
1
IX
ND PE
Y
AR
MM
SU
45
54.
0m
19.6
Largre Size Office
Width(m): 17.0 Depth(m): 54.0 Height(m): 19.6 Number of Floors: 5 Floor to Ceiling Heights (m): 3.8 Number of Cores: 2
Width(m): 17.0 3.8 Depth(m): 54.0 Height(m): 19.6 Number of Floors: 5 3 Floor to Ceiling Heights (m): 3.8 Number of Cores: 2 Glazing Foor Area Ratio (%)
Floor to Ceiling Height (m)
0m
Overall Height (m) 5
12
1
9
7
Number of Core
Floor to Ceiling Height (m)
3
45
65
35 3
21
1
100
1
7
2 6
5
1
1 1
5
Number of Core
85
m 7.0
65
19.6
3.8 3
54
Number of Floor
Glazing Foor Area Ratio (%)
0m 85
1
0194
Number of Floor
1
54.
m 7.0
15
2 6
38.4
35
1 21
9
Largre Size Office
54.
m 7.0
Overall Depth (m)
Overall Width (m) 54 17
38.4
19.6m
AP
54.
19.6m
AL
12.0m
Pr
PU EV
Width(m): 17.0 Depth(m): 54.0 Overall Width (m) Height(m): 12.0 17 Number of Floors: 3 Floor to Ceiling Heights (m): 3.8 15 Number of Cores: 2
12.0m
N
TIO
RA
NE
IN
Width(m): 17.0 Depth(m): 54.0 Height(m): 12.0 Number of Floors: 3 Floor to Ceiling Heights (m): 3.8 Number of Cores: 2
GY
GE
TE
GN
SI
RA
DE
Medium Size Office
W.C.
17
Building Parameters
Medium Size Office
Office
100
0195
5
TYPOLOGY STUDY FIX
TTS
TTS
LOCAL P-34.34-3
CONTROL P-34.34-3
W 41°24'12.2" E 23°44'54.4" PE-3 NVGT B LOCAL P-34.34-3
Low-rise Office Site Relation
CONTROL P-34.34-3
FIX
W 41°24'12.2" E 23°44'54.4" PE-3 NVGT B
FIX
W 41°24'12.2" E 23°44'54.4" PE-3 NVGT B
According to the UK housing standard, urban planning policy in Manchester, we research how the low-rise office respond to the city including the relationship with the road, the influence of neighbourhood and the environmental factors.
Fire/Access
Privacy
Relation to Road
Fire and rescue service vehicle access to buildings not fitted with fire mains
B
A
Road
Office
C
D
E
Total floor area of Building(m2)
F
Office
U OD TR IN
20m
Road
W 41°24'12.2" E 23°44'54.4" PE-3 NVGT B
FIX
Ofiice
CONTROL P-34.34-3
CONTROL P-34.34-3
Road
LOCAL P-34.34-3
LOCAL P-34.34-3
Dwelling
TTS
TTS
L
K
N
M
H
G
N IO CT
Road
Provide vehicle access to:
Up to 11 Over 11
See paragraph 15.1 15% of perimeter
2000-8000
Up to 11 Over 11
15% of perimeter 50% of perimeter
8000-16,000
Up to 11 Over 11
50% of perimeter 50% of perimeter
16,000-24,000
Up to 11 Over 11
75% of perimeter 75% of perimeter
Over 24,000
Up to 11 Over 11
100% of perimeter 100% of perimeter
Perimeter=AB+BC+CD+DE+ EF+GH+MN+KL
TE SI AN AL E
IS
FIN
YS
DE
Different size of the office building should provide fire vehicle access to 15%-100% of perimeter
Front window to front window
The width facing towards the road
Height of floor of above ground(m2)
Up to 2000
E
TH OB
PR Relationship between building and hardstandng/access roads for high reach fire appliances
GN
M
SI
LE
DE
Overhead obstructions to be avoided in this zone
Road
Office
Office
Road
Road
Office
Road
10-15m
Face of building at fround level or vertical plane of projecting upper storey
C
s
TP
es
oc
PU
Pr
IN
N
TIO
RA
NE
GY
GE
TE
GN
SI
RA
DE
ST
Turntable Hydraulic ladder dimension (m) platform dimension (m)
AR AM
B
4.9
2.0
B. MIN width of hardstanding
5.0
5.5
C. MIN distance of further edge of hardstanding from building
10.0
7.5
D. MIN width of unobstructed space (for swing of appliance platform)
N/A
2.2
Obstruction
N
TIO
ER
UA
ET
AL
EV
A
D
A. MAX distance of near edge of hardstanding from building
&
Back to back distance
The Depth facing towards the road
Y
AR
IX
ND PE
Road The Building facing the corner
0196
20m
Road
Road
Resource: https://www.newcastle-staffs.gov.uk/sites/default/files/IMCE/Planning/Planning_ Policy/NonLocal/Space%20About%20Dwellings%20SPG.pdf https://www.adur-worthing.gov.uk/media/media,98782,en.pdf Manchester City Council -MANCHESTER RESIDENTIAL QUALITY GUIDANCE (2017) projections for Greater Manchester Climate change projections for Greater.’
Office
Office
20m
Apartment
Dwelling
Road
AP
MM
SU
Relationship between building and hardstanding/ access roads for high reach fire appliances
Office
Parking
Road Front / Back distance to the side
At least one parking bay designated for disabled people
0197
TYPOLOGY STUDY TTS
LOCAL P-34.34-3
CONTROL P-34.34-3
W 41°24'12.2" E 23°44'54.4" PE-3 NVGT B
FIX
TTS
TTS
LOCAL P-34.34-3
CONTROL P-34.34-3
W 41°24'12.2" E 23°44'54.4" PE-3 NVGT B LOCAL P-34.34-3
Low-rise Office Urban Patterns
CONTROL P-34.34-3
FIX
TTS
LOCAL P-34.34-3
CONTROL P-34.34-3
FIX
W 41°24'12.2" E 23°44'54.4" PE-3 NVGT B
FIX
W 41°24'12.2" E 23°44'54.4" PE-3 NVGT B
Series
Perimeter Block
No limitataion to the single plot
Series of office reach 75m
Maintain the back to back distance 10-15m
N IO CT
U OD TR IN
Single Plot
TE SI AL
AN E
IS
FIN
YS
DE
E
TH OB
PR
GN
M
SI
LE
DE
ST oc
PU
Pr
IN
N
TIO
RA
NE
GY
GE
TE
GN
SI
RA
DE
s
TP
es
15m
AM
AR N
TIO
ER
UA
ET
AL
EV
&
75m
IX
ND PE
Y
AR
MM
SU
AP
15m
0198
0199
TYPOLOGY STUDY TTS
LOCAL P-34.34-3
CONTROL P-34.34-3
FIX
TTS
TTS
LOCAL P-34.34-3
CONTROL P-34.34-3
W 41°24'12.2" E 23°44'54.4" PE-3 NVGT B LOCAL P-34.34-3
W 41°24'12.2" E 23°44'54.4" PE-3 NVGT B
Low-rise Office Structure
CONTROL P-34.34-3
FIX
TTS
LOCAL P-34.34-3
CONTROL P-34.34-3
FIX
W 41°24'12.2" E 23°44'54.4" PE-3 NVGT B
FIX
W 41°24'12.2" E 23°44'54.4" PE-3 NVGT B
Typical type building
Foundation-Plinth
Primary Structure
Wall Material
Roof type
N IO CT
U OD TR IN TE SI AL
AN E
IS
FIN
YS
DE
E
TH OB
PR
GN
M
SI
LE
DE
ST
Source: R. Chudley
Low-rise office in Vitorian period
A strip foundation is a foundation providing a continuous longitudinal ground bearing.
s
TP
es
oc
PU
Pr
IN
N
TIO
RA
NE
GY
GE
TE
GN
SI
RA
DE
Source: Google Map
Source: https://theconstructor.org/
Load Bearing Structure
Brick
Stone
Gable Roof
Plaster
AM
AR N
TIO
ER
UA
ET
AL
EV
&
IX
ND PE
Y
AR
MM
SU
AP
Concrete
Source: Google Map
Source: R. Chudley
Low-rise office in modern architecture period
An individual footing is an isolated foundation to spread and transfer a concentrated load to the earth.
0200
Steel
Source: https://theconstructor.org/ https://www.structuremag.org/
Concrete frame Structure or Steel frame Structure
Flat Roof Tile
Glass
0201
Typology Study Low-rise Shopping Complex
TYPOLOGY STUDY TTS
LOCAL P-34.34-3
CONTROL P-34.34-3
W 41°24'12.2" E 23°44'54.4" PE-3 NVGT B
FIX
TTS
TTS
LOCAL P-34.34-3
CONTROL P-34.34-3
W 41°24'12.2" E 23°44'54.4" PE-3 NVGT B LOCAL P-34.34-3
CONTROL P-34.34-3
FIX
TTS
LOCAL P-34.34-3
CONTROL P-34.34-3
FIX
W 41°24'12.2" E 23°44'54.4" PE-3 NVGT B
FIX
W 41°24'12.2" E 23°44'54.4" PE-3 NVGT B
Low-rise Shopping Complex Introduction Name: Low-rise commercial buildings Definition: (Commerce) a large enclosed shopping centre which is limited to pedestrians.
N IO CT
U OD TR IN TE SI AL
AN E
IS
FIN
YS
DE
E
TH OB
PR
GN
M
SI
LE
DE
ST s
TP
es
oc
PU
Pr
IN
N
TIO
RA
NE
GY
GE
TE
GN
SI
RA
DE
Characteristics: Both open-air and enclosed centers are commonly referred to as shopping complex. Mall primarily refers to either a shopping mall – a place where a collection of shops all adjoin a pedestrian area – or an exclusively pedestrianized street that allows shoppers to walk without interference from vehicle traffic.
AM
AR N
TIO
ER
UA
ET
AL
EV
&
IX
ND PE
Y
AR
MM
SU
AP
0204
0205
TYPOLOGY STUDY TTS
LOCAL P-34.34-3
CONTROL P-34.34-3
FIX
TTS
TTS
LOCAL P-34.34-3
CONTROL P-34.34-3
FIX
TTS
LOCAL P-34.34-3
CONTROL P-34.34-3
W 41°24'12.2" E 23°44'54.4" PE-3 NVGT B LOCAL P-34.34-3
W 41°24'12.2" E 23°44'54.4" PE-3 NVGT B
CONTROL P-34.34-3
FIX
W 41°24'12.2" E 23°44'54.4" PE-3 NVGT B
FIX
W 41°24'12.2" E 23°44'54.4" PE-3 NVGT B
Low-rise Shopping Complex Parameters
Variations in Size Layout Typical
Small Size Shopping Complex
Small Size Shopping Complex
65
.2m
TE SI
m
19
Office
Width(m): 19 Depth(m): 65.2 Height(m): 12.3 Number of Floors: 4 Floor to Ceiling Heights (m): 3 Number of Cores: 2
Store
Store
Store
AL
AN E
IS
FIN
YS
DE
E
TH PR
.2m Office
Store
ST RA s
TP
es
oc
PU
Pr
AM
AR N
TIO
ER
UA
ET
AL
EV
& Y
AR
m 19
Store
Width(m): 36.4 Depth(m): 160 Height(m): 10.5 Number of Floors: 3 Floor to Ceiling Heights (m): 3.5 Number of Cores: 6
Store
Office
Store
Office
Store
Office
Building Parameters
10.5 12.3
7
10
16
0m
Overall Depth (m) 65.2
12
5m
75
0206
m Number 75 of Floor 3
1
65.2
36.4 75
10.5 12.3
4
30
1
16
0m 6
Number of Floor 24.8
3 30
3.5 3
5
1
7
2
6
6
1
m
.4
5
Number of Core
70
36
4
1
7 Ratio (%) Glazing Foor Area
1
180
5
Number of Core 4
160
60
Floor to Ceiling7 Height (m) 2
125
160
10
70
.
19
Overall Height (m) 180
60
Glazing Foor Area Ratio (%)
36
Overall Depth (m)
125
24.8
Floor to Ceiling Height (m) Width(m): 36.4 Depth(m): 160 3.5 5 Height(m): 10.5 Number of Floors: 3 Floor to Ceiling Heights (m):33.5 Number of Cores: 6
4m
Overall Width (m)
15
Overall Height (m)
5m
IX
ND PE
AP
MM
SU
5m
10.5m
IN
N
TIO
RA
NE
GY
GE
TE
GN
SI
24.8m
M
GN DE
24.8m
LE
SI
12
Width(m): 75 Overall Width (m) Depth(m): 125 19 36.4 Height(m): 24.8 Number of Floors: 5 Floor to Ceiling Heights (m):15 5 Number of Cores: 4
Largre Size Shopping Complex
Largre Size Shopping Complex
Store
The parameters of the shopping complex present only a few of the possible configurations. Nowadays, shopping complex Medium Size Shopping The parameters of the shopping complex present only a few of the possible configurations. Nowadays, shopping complex are quite flexible spaces depending on their products. Complex are quite flexible spaces depending on their products.
OB
DE
Width(m): 75 Depth(m): 125 Height(m): 24.8 Number of Floors: 5 Floor to Ceiling Heights (m): 5 Number of Cores: 4
Office
Store
65
Building Parameters
Medium Size Shopping Complex
Office
Store
Office
Store
Store
10.5m
N IO CT
U OD TR IN
Width(m): 19 Depth(m): 65.2 Height(m): 12.3 Number of Floors: 4 Floor to Ceiling Heights (m): 3 Number of Cores: 2
Typical Layout
Store
12.3m
12.3m
Variations in Size
100
100
0207
4
6 7
TYPOLOGY STUDY TTS
LOCAL P-34.34-3
CONTROL P-34.34-3
W 41°24'12.2" E 23°44'54.4" PE-3 NVGT B
FIX
TTS
TTS
LOCAL P-34.34-3
CONTROL P-34.34-3
FIX
TTS
LOCAL P-34.34-3
CONTROL P-34.34-3
W 41°24'12.2" E 23°44'54.4" PE-3 NVGT B LOCAL P-34.34-3
CONTROL P-34.34-3
FIX
W 41°24'12.2" E 23°44'54.4" PE-3 NVGT B
FIX
W 41°24'12.2" E 23°44'54.4" PE-3 NVGT B
Low-rise Shopping Complex Site Relation According to the UK housing standard, urban planning policy in Manchester, we research how the lowrise shopping complex respond to the city including the relationship with the road, the influence of neighbourhood and the environmental factors.
Fire/Access
Privacy
Relation to Road
Fire and rescue service vehicle access to buildings not fitted with fire mains
B
Road
Shopping Complex
Parking
Road
Shopping Complex
Dwelling
Road
A
U OD TR IN
15m
C
D
Shopping Complex L
K
N
M
E
Total floor area of Building(m2)
F
H
G
N IO CT
Road
Provide vehicle access to:
Up to 11 Over 11
See paragraph 15.1 15% of perimeter
2000-8000
Up to 11 Over 11
15% of perimeter 50% of perimeter
8000-16,000
Up to 11 Over 11
50% of perimeter 50% of perimeter
16,000-24,000
Up to 11 Over 11
75% of perimeter 75% of perimeter
Over 24,000
Up to 11 Over 11
100% of perimeter 100% of perimeter
Perimeter=AB+BC+CD+DE+ EF+GH+MN+KL
TE SI AN AL E
IS
FIN
YS
DE
Different size of the shopping complex should provide fire vehicle access to 15%-100% of perimeter
Front window to front window
The width facing towards the road
Height of floor of above ground(m2)
Up to 2000
E
TH OB
PR Relationship between building and hardstandng/access roads for high reach fire appliances
Parking
Pr
Road
Turntable Hydraulic ladder dimension (m) platform dimension (m)
Face of building at fround level or vertical plane of projecting upper storey
es
oc s
TP
C
AM
AR
A
D
B
A. MAX distance of near edge of hardstanding from building
4.9
2.0
B. MIN width of hardstanding
5.0
5.5
C. MIN distance of further edge of hardstanding from building
10.0
7.5
D. MIN width of unobstructed space (for swing of appliance platform)
N/A
2.2
Obstruction
N
TIO
ER
UA
ET
AL
EV
Parking
5m
Shopping Complex
N
PU
Shopping Complex
Parking
Road
GY
TIO
RA
NE
Road
TE
GE
IN
Road
RA
GN
SI
Parking
Parking
ST
DE
Parking Shopping Complex
GN
M
SI
LE
DE
Overhead obstructions to be avoided in this zone
&
Back to back distance
The Depth facing towards the road
Y
AR
IX
ND PE
Parking
Parking Road The Building facing the corner
0208
Shopping Complex
Road
Resource: https://www.newcastle-staffs.gov.uk/sites/default/files/IMCE/Planning/Planning_ Policy/NonLocal/Space%20About%20Dwellings%20SPG.pdf https://www.adur-worthing.gov.uk/media/media,98782,en.pdf Manchester City Council -MANCHESTER RESIDENTIAL QUALITY GUIDANCE (2017) projections for Greater Manchester Climate change projections for Greater.’
Parking
15m
Road Front / Back distance to the side
Road
Office
7m
Apartment
Dwelling
Shopping Complex
Road
AP
MM
SU
Relationship between building and hardstanding/ access roads for high reach fire appliances
Shopping Complex
Parking
At least one parking bay designated for disabled people Recommended standard of 10.0 car spaces per 1,000 square feet of net retail area
0209
TYPOLOGY STUDY TTS
LOCAL P-34.34-3
CONTROL P-34.34-3
W 41°24'12.2" E 23°44'54.4" PE-3 NVGT B
FIX
TTS
TTS
LOCAL P-34.34-3
CONTROL P-34.34-3
FIX
TTS
W 41°24'12.2" E 23°44'54.4" PE-3 NVGT B LOCAL P-34.34-3
CONTROL P-34.34-3
LOCAL P-34.34-3
CONTROL P-34.34-3
FIX
W 41°24'12.2" E 23°44'54.4" PE-3 NVGT B
FIX
W 41°24'12.2" E 23°44'54.4" PE-3 NVGT B
Low-rise Shopping Complex Urban Patterns
Series
Perimeter Block
No limitataion to the single plot
Different series of shopping complexs form a big shopping area
When there are enough shopping complex and stores gathering, the area then can become a high street
N IO CT
U OD TR IN
Single Plot
TE SI AL
AN E
IS
FIN
YS
DE
E
TH OB
PR
GN
M
SI
LE
DE
ST s
TP
es
oc
PU
Pr
IN
N
TIO
RA
NE
GY
GE
TE
GN
SI
RA
DE
15m
AM
AR N
TIO
ER
UA
ET
AL
EV
& Y
AR
IX
ND PE
AP
MM
SU
15m
Parking
0210
Parking
Underground Parking
0211
TYPOLOGY STUDY TTS
LOCAL P-34.34-3
CONTROL P-34.34-3
FIX
TTS
TTS
LOCAL P-34.34-3
CONTROL P-34.34-3
FIX
W 41°24'12.2" E 23°44'54.4" PE-3 NVGT B LOCAL P-34.34-3
W 41°24'12.2" E 23°44'54.4" PE-3 NVGT B
CONTROL P-34.34-3
TTS
LOCAL P-34.34-3
CONTROL P-34.34-3
FIX
W 41°24'12.2" E 23°44'54.4" PE-3 NVGT B
FIX
W 41°24'12.2" E 23°44'54.4" PE-3 NVGT B
Low-rise Shopping Complex Structure
Foundation-Plinth
Typical type building
Primary Structure
Roof type
Wall Material
N IO CT
U OD TR IN TE SI AN E
IS
FIN
YS
DE
AL
Brick
Stone
E
TH OB
PR
GN
M
SI
LE
DE
ST
Source: R. Chudley
Renewal low-rise shopping complex
An individual footing is an isolated foundation to spread and transfer a concentrated load to the earth.
s
TP
es
oc
PU
Pr
IN
N
TIO
RA
NE
GY
GE
TE
GN
SI
RA
DE
Source: Google Map
Source: https://theconstructor.org/ http://www.ketchum.org/
AM
AR
Flat Roof Plaster
Shell Roof
Glass
N
TIO
ER
UA
ET
AL
EV
Concrete frame Structure and Shell Structure
&
IX
ND PE
Y
AR
MM
SU
AP
Flat Roof
Source: R. Chudley
Source: Google Map
Low-rise shopping complex in modern architecture period
A raft foundation is a foundation continuous in two directions, usually covering an area equal to or greater than the base area of the structure.
0212
M shape Roof
Source: https://www.structuremag.org/ http://www.ketchum.org/ http://heartlandstructures.com/
Shell Structure Steel frame Structure Arch Structure Space grid Structure
Concrete
Steel
Glass
Curve Roof
0213
8.3 REFERENCE LIST TTS
Reference List
LOCAL P-34.34-3
CONTROL P-34.34-3
W 41°24'12.2" E 23°44'54.4" PE-3 NVGT B
FIX
TTS
LOCAL P-34.34-3
CONTROL P-34.34-3
TTS
LOCAL P-34.34-3
CONTROL P-34.34-3
W 41°24'12.2" E 23°44'54.4" PE-3 NVGT B
FIX
TTS
LOCAL P-34.34-3
CONTROL P-34.34-3
FIX
W 41°24'12.2" E 23°44'54.4" PE-3 NVGT B
FIX
W 41°24'12.2" E 23°44'54.4" PE-3 NVGT B
N IO CT
U OD TR IN TE SI AL
AN E
IS
FIN
YS
DE
E
TH OB
PR
GN
M
SI
LE
DE
ST s
TP
es
oc
PU
Pr
IN
N
TIO
RA
NE
GY
GE
TE
GN
SI
RA
DE
AM
AR N
TIO
ER
UA
ET
AL
EV
&
IX
ND PE
Y
AR
MM
SU
AP
Cavan, G. (2020) ‘Climate change projections for Greater Climate change projections for Greater Manchester Climate change projections for Greater.’ Canadian Centre for Translational Ecology. (2019) [Online] [Accessed 15th October 2020] https://ccte.ca/resources/fig5.1.html De Lima Filho, J. Vieira, R.J.A.G. De Souza, C.A.M. (2020) Effects of habitat fragmentation on biodiversity patterns of ecosystems with resource competition, Volume 564, [Online] [Accessed 15th October 2020] https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378437120307950 Fletcher, R.J. Didham, R.K. Banks-Leite, C. (2018) Is habitat fragmentation good for biodiversity? Biological Conservation, 226. [Online] [Accessed 15th October 2020] https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0006320718305779 Harrison, A. (2013) [Accessed 12th October 2020] http://annieharrisonartist.blogspot.com/2013/02/following-irk.html Holland, J.H. (1992). Complex Adaptive Systems. Knight Frank, (2019) Mult-housing 2019 PRS Research. Levermore, G.J. (2018) The increasing trend of the urban heat island intensity, Urban Climate, pp 360-368. Manchester City Council. (2015) Manchester's Great Outdoors - a Green and Blue Infrastructure Strategy for Manchester. Manchester City Council. (2019) Greater Manchester Strategic Housing Market Assessment. Manchester City Council. (2020) The Northern Gateway Strategic Planning Framework. [Online] [Accessed 11th October 2020] http:// northerngatewaymanchester.co.uk/ Ministry of Housing Communities & Local Government, (2019) English Housing Survey Profile and condition of the English housing stock, 2018-19. Manesh, S.V. Tadi, M. (2011) 'Sustainable urban morphology emergence via complex adaptive system analysis: sustainable design in existing context'. Procedia Engineering, 21. pp.89-97. Natálie, C. (2017) Effects of settlement size, urban heat island and habitat type on urban plant biodiversity, Landscape and Urban Planning, pp 15-22. Nel, D. (2016) Exploring a complex adaptive systems approach to the study of urban change Neufert, P. (n.d.) Architects’ Data, Third Edition, Blackwell Science. Northrop, R. (2019) Urban Natural Areas #2 – Habitat Fragmentation, [Online] [Accessed 15th October 2020] http://blogs.ifas.ufl.edu/ hillsboroughco/2019/12/16/urban-natural-areas-2-habitat-fragmentation/ Peng, J. Zhao,H. Liu, Y. (2017) 'Urban ecological corridors construction: A review', Acta Ecologica Sinica, 37(1). Report warns of severe future effects of climate change on the UK, (2016) [Online] [Accessed 11th October 2020] https://www.manchester.ac.uk/discover/news/severe-future-effects-of-climate-change/ Report warns of severe future effects of climate change on the UK. (2016) [Online] [Accessed 11th October 2020] https://www.worldweatheronline.com/manchester-weather-history/greater-manchester/gb.aspx RIBA, 2020, RIBA Sustainable Outcomes Guide The Royal Meteorological Society Journal of Climate Science [Online] [Accessed 11th October 2020] https://resin-cities.eu/greatermanchester/ Wikipedia. (2020) Complex adaptive system. [Online] [Accessed 20th October 2020] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Complex_adaptive_system Williams, J. (2018) [Accessed 12th October 2020] https://www.manchestereveningnews.co.uk/news/greater-manchester-news/northern-gatewaycollyhurst-plan-manchester-14901992
Williams, J. (2018) [Accessed 12th October 2020] https://www.manchestereveningnews.co.uk/news/greater-manchester-news/st-catherines-parkmanchester-council-14877580 Wu, J. (2019) 'Patch dynamics' [Online] [Accessed 15th October 2020] https://www.britannica.com/science/patch-dynamics
Image List Accessibility. (2019) [Online] [Accessed 12th October 2020] https://unsplash.com/photos/x5PfV1ssuF4?utm_source=unsplash&utm_medium=referral&utm_content=creditShareLink Biodiversity. (2019) [Online] [Accessed 12th October 2020] https://unsplash.com/photos/31pOduwZGE?utm_source=unsplash&utm_medium=referral&utm_content=creditShareLink Community. (2019) [Online] [Accessed 12th October 2020] https://unsplash.com/photos/5pUuHGEnUDM?utm_source=unsplash&utm_medium=referral&utm_content=creditShareLink Ford, A. (2013) Landscape connectivity. [Online] [Accessed 21th October 2020] https://www.esa.org/esablog/research/landscape-connectivity-corridors-andmore-in-issues-in-ecology-16/ Forman. (1995) Patch Corridor Matrix Model [Online] [Accessed 15th October 2020] https://learn.opengeoedu.de/en/monitoring/landschaftstrukturmasse/ grundlagen/landschaftsstruktur/patch-korridor-matrix-modell Google Earth. (2020) [Online] [Accessed 21th October 2020] https://www.planetizen.com/node/54477 Deutinger, T. Marques, A.R. (2012) Grid City, [Online] [Accessed 21th October 2020] http://td-architects.eu/projects/show/grid-city/ King, T. (2020) [Online] [Accessed 1th November 2020] https://thenorthernquota.org/news/people-renting-homes-manchester-increased-risk-eviction-sayssolicitor Lemmen, D.S. and Warren, F.J. (n.d.) Climate Change Impacts and Adaptation Manchester City Council. (2019) The Northern Gateway Strategic Planning Framework. [Online] [Accessed 11th October 2020] http:// northerngatewaymanchester.co.uk/ Green Space. (2020) [Online] [Accessed 12th October 2020] https://unsplash.com/photos/31pOduwZGE?utm_source=unsplash&utm_medium=referral&utm_ content=creditShareLink Manchester’s Urban Heat Island, (2009) [Online] [Accessed 19th October 2020] https://www.metlink.org/other-weather/urban-heat-islands/manchesterurban-heat-island/ Otto, F. (2012) Adaptive Urban Fabric, [Online] [Accessed 5th November 2020] http://www.evolo.us/adaptive-urban-fabric/ Porta, S. (2006) Color Sketch of the basic steps in the space syntax. [Online] [Accessed 5th November 2020] https://www.spacesyntax.org/ Streeter, R. (2020) Wanted: Better Neighborhoods. [Online] [Accessed 1th November 2020] https://www.city-journal.org/high-amenity-neighborhoods-civilsociety Witkowski, ETF. (2006) Hierarchical patch-dynamic approach [Online] [Accessed 15th October 2020] https://www.researchgate.net/figure/A-hierarchicalpatch-dynamic-approach-to-the-study-of-the-grassland-savanna-boundary_fig1_264954364