December 19, 2019 |
NEWS | QSALTLAKE MAGAZINE | 9
ISSUE 307 | Qsaltlake.com
Facebook on the hot seat Over 50 LGBTQ and health nonprofit organizations, including the Human Rights Campaign, GLAAD, amfAR, and the Gay Men’s Health Crisis are asking Facebook to take down ads by a personal injury attorney firm. The firm is looking for people using Truvada who believe their health has been compromised by the drug’s use. The law firm’s ads suggest Truvada has harmful side effects, including issues related to bone density and kidney function. Truvada has been shown to be up to 99% effective in HIV prevention when used correctly. The groups claim the ads are, “causing significant harm to public health,” because information may incite public mistrust in PrEP. Facebook says the ads do not violate any policies and the information has not been found to be false by the company’s third-party fact-checkers. The warning on the packages does mention kidney and liver issues as possible side effects.
Filipino gay agenda in California Two gay men with antecedents hailing from the Philippines, though on different sides of the political spectrum, are poised to be highly placed public officials in California. San Diego city council member Todd Gloria is a leading candidate for San Diego mayor in the 2020 election. Patrick Bumatay, considered to have a conservative judicial philosophy, was confirmed by the U.S. Senate to the California 9th Circuit Court of Appeals. Gloria’s election would make San Diego the largest U.S. city to elect an openly gay man as mayor. Bumatay becomes the highest-ranking federal judge from the LGBTQ com munity. Q
LGBTQ: Utah Rep. Chris Stewart’s ‘Fairness For All Act’ isn’t Republican Congressman Chris Stewart represents Utah’s 2nd District in the U.S. House of Representatives. In a recent op-ed piece in The Salt Lake Tribune, Stewart wrote, “LGBT advocates and faith groups have joined with me to introduce the Fairness for All Act — legislation intended to balance the legitimate rights of both LGBT and religious communities. “In contrast with the House-passed Equality Act,” he continued, “this legislation accomplishes the protection of our LGBT communities from housing, employment and other forms of discrimination without compromising the religious liberties of America’s faith communities. During a recent press conference, support came from the American Unity Fund, which is dedicated to advancing the cause of freedom for LGBT Americans, as well as support from The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints, which was represented by Elder Ronald A. Rasband. Governor Gary Herbert also offered his support, noting that “there is room in our pluralistic society for people of good will to disagree on these issues but still coexist and be treated fairly.” “This bill is the way to build bridges between diverse communities,” Margaret Hoover, the president of the American Unity Fund, told the Tribune. “It is the kind of bill and approach that represents the best of our traditions as Americans by bringing diverse coalitions together, individuals, people of faith,
LGBTQ people and allies. This bill promotes civic pluralism, which is what we are at our heart, the best of America.” On the other side of the aisle, the Human Rights Campaign, said last week that Stewart’s bill takes the wrong approach and legally allows religious groups to discriminate. “The so-called Fairness for All Act is an unacceptable, partisan vehicle that erodes existing civil rights protections based on race, sex and religion, while sanctioning discrimination against lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender and queer people,” said HRC president, Alphonso David. Troy Williams, the executive director of Equality Utah, spun a more positive tone toward the bill, calling it a “milestone” even if it doesn’t add up to everything his group wants. “Representative Stewart and many conservative faith organizations now recognize that LGBTQ Americans must be included in and protected by our nation’s civil rights laws,” Williams said. “Although Equality Utah was not involved in drafting the Fairness for All Act, and we have significant concerns about some of the bill’s provisions, we look for-
ward to beginning a dialogue with the bill’s sponsor.” But again, at a national level, the American Civil Liberties Union said about the act, “In reality, the bill facilitates the Trump administration’s ongoing efforts to give a green light to those who would turn LGBTQ people away from jobs, health care, housing, even taxpayer-funded programs, simply because of who they are. The bill also weakens some longstanding protections in federal and state laws for everyone, not just LGBTQ people. The ACLU also pointed to three ways the act really isn’t “fair for all”. One, it creates a different Standard for anti-LGBTQ discrimination; and second, it grants a license to discriminate in child welfare; thirdly, it will undermine existing protections from the Courts, noting that within the next several months, the Supreme Court is poised to rule in a trio of cases concerning the existing rights of LGBTQ people under federal law. This new bill would undermine a potentially favorable ruling in those cases by authorizing discrimination in many contexts where it would be prohibited under existing law. Q
