S Burgan Dissertation Analysis (Ch 1 - 5) SUMMARY
Estimated Page Count
70
60
57
60
50
# of Pages
40 30
31 21
20
Project Management
Average
45
50 25
# Dis
Ch 1
Ch 2
Ch 3
Ch 4
Ch 5
Total
7
13
40
19
40
25
136
21
64
48
65
47
186
20
47
22
48
18
156
39
63
49
105
39
224
11
45
21
31
20
127
19
71
40
50
28
158
17
48
19
52
20
157
30
80
30
89
41
207
High 30
Organizational Change
Average
Diffusion Research
Average
Miscellaneous Case Studies
Average
High
20
20 10
6
8
High
0 1
2
3 4 5 Dissertation Chapters Calculated Page Count Estimated Page Count
10
High
15
45
20
43
21
144
Average High
27
70
42
77
39
194
Qualitative study
Calculated Page Count
21
57
31
60
30
199
Case Study
Estimated Page Count
20
50
25
45
20
160
Research Design Legend
Average Average
Quantitative study
31
Mixed Methods
SUBJECT: Project Management 1 Williams - Barriers to Improvement and Adoption
Research Design
University
Date
Ch 1
Ch 2
Ch 3
Ch 4
Ch 5
Total 91
Quantitative
Cappella University
2009
11
23
11
32
14
Mixed Methods
University of Phoenix
2008
18
24
15
30
11
98
3 Cholip - Strategy Implementation
Quantitative
Alliant International University
2008
18
37
21
49
41
166
4 Mirsa - Adopting Agile Software Development
Quantitative
Carleton University
2007
8
56
10
65
47
186
Qualitative
University of Phoenix
2007
21
35
10
18
15
99
6 Kendra - Organizational Design to Project Management
Quantitative
Benedictine University
2003
6
64
16
36
28
150
7 Pinto - Project Implementation
Quantitative
University of Pittsburgh
2 Grantham - Adoption of Project Management Standards
5 Latonia - Impact of Organizational Culture on Project Management
SUBJECT: Organizational Change 1 Wittenstein - Factors Influencing Readiness for Change 2 Rahschulte - Understanding How to Change 3 Brown - Continuous Improvement in Six Sigma Approaches
1986
6
44
48
50
16
164
Average
13
40
19
40
25
136
High
21
64
48
65
47
186
Research Design
University
Date
Ch 1
Ch 2
Ch 3
Ch 4
Ch 5
Total
Quantitative
George Washington University
2008
39
37
21
23
39
159
Qualitative
Regent University
2007
20
41
18
50
8
137
Qualitative
University of Missouri-Rolla
2006
27
63
12
39
17
158
Quantitative
Brigham Young University
2004
5
61
13
13
8
100
5 Signer - Leading Change Initiatives
Qualitative
University of Southern California
2002
18
58
20
105
23
224
6 Basu - Transforming Organizations through Process Improvement
Qualitative
University of Memphis
4 Thornley - Process Improvement Affecting the Use of PM
SBurgan-Dissertation Analysis (PUBLIC 12.30.10)
2000
12
21
49
60
15
157
Average
20
47
22
48
18
156
High
39
63
49
105
39
224
Page 1
S Burgan Dissertation Analysis (Ch 1 - 5) SUBJECT: Diffusion Research
Research Design
University
Date
Ch 1
Ch 2
Ch 3
Ch 4
Ch 5
Total
Quantitative
Indiana Wesleyan University
2010
15
69
22
35
10
151
2 Bell - Mixed Methods Study of Technology Integration
Mixed Methods
Walden University
2009
19
71
12
35
21
158
3 Morrow - Implementation of a Injury Prevention Program
Mixed Methods
Wayne State University
2009
11
35
24
30
25
125
Quantitative
Cappella University
2009
11
23
11
32
14
91
1 Griffith - Transformational Leadership and Change Readiness
4 Williams - Understanding Barriers to Improvement and Adoption 5 Powell - Case Study of Course Management Adoption 6 Dengler - Quantitative Evaluation of Transformational Change 7 Fullmer - Implementation of a Technological Innovation 8 Thornley - Understanding Process Improvement of PM Practices
SUBJECT: Miscellaneous Case Studies
Case Study
Northern Illinois University
2008
8
22
9
32
20
91
Quantitative
Benedictine University
2006
14
63
40
14
26
157
Case Study
Wilmington College
2006
7
61
18
50
14
150
Quantitative
Brigham Young University
2004
4
12
29
23
28
96
Average
11
45
21
31
20
127
High
19
71
40
50
28
158
Research Design
University
Date
Ch 1
Ch 2
Ch 3
Ch 4
Ch 5
Total
1 Holiday - The Role of Organizational Change in Sustainability
Case Study
George Washington University
2010
19
27
18
54
28
146
2 Chism - Organizational Development and Transformational Change
Case Study
Capella University
2007
30
80
21
25
10
166
3 Bertucci - Mixed Methods Brain-Compatible Education
Case Study
Johnson & Wales University
2006
25
63
11
28
20
147
4 Gobeille - Six Sigma Mentoring on Project Success
Case Study
University of Phoenix
2006
24
28
30
35
15
132
5 Shuman - Distance Learning Implementation in an Urban University
Case Study
Old Dominion University
2000
12
34
17
67
8
138
6 Wood - Self-Regulation in a Distance Learning Environment
Case Study
Florida State University
1999
7
34
29
89
32
191
7 Hight - Transition to Community-Based Educational Program
Case Study
University of Wyoming
1996
10
31
9
55
10
115
8 Rodriguez - Decision Making in an Urban School District
Case Study
New Mexico University
1992
17
78
28
70
14
207
Case Study
University of Oklahoma
1988
12
66
16
59
41
194
Quantitative
University of North Carolina
1999
16
42
15
41
19
133
Average
17
48
19
52
20
157
High
30
80
30
89
41
207
9 Allen - Levels of Financial Support 10 Freemyer - Impact of Mentoring Training
SBurgan-Dissertation Analysis (PUBLIC 12.30.10)
Page 2