Advances in Water Resource and Protection (AWRP) Volume 2, 2014 www.seipub.org/awrp
A Comparative Study of Drinking Source Water Protection Management System Li Ye1, Bian Hongfeng*2, Chen Hongshan3, Feng Jiang4 State Environmental Protection Key Laboratory of Wetland Ecology and Vegetation Restoration, School of Environment Northeast Normal University, Changchun ,130117, China 1,2,3,4
liy570@nenu.edu.cn; 2*bianhf108@nenu.edu.cn; 3 chenhs161@nenu.edu.cn; 4fengj@nenu.edu.cn
1
Abstract Source water protection (SWP) is the first protective barrier for the safety of potable water that ensures cost‐effective subsequent treatment process and lowers the implementation difficulty. There is a big gap of SWP and management among different countries. This paper suggests that building optimal model based on diversified protection targets can meet the needs of various regional characteristics, and also can provide a better understanding of SWP. Keywords Source Water Protection; Management ;Difference; Integrate
Introduction The potable water safety has a bearing on the human health and long‐term development. There are one ‐five people in the risk of the water shortage problems, and 300‐400 million are dying from contaminated water annually all round the world (Chen, X., 2010). The containment of the source water pollution is imminent. Source water protection is crucial for the entire water supply chain, which is the key of water security. Multi‐country’s practical experience shown working to optimize the source problem is more efficient than to rehabilitate, it should be paid close attention to protecting source water during drinking‐water management. Concerning the legislative, institutional and policy system, the application of technology, professional guidance and education, it is necessary to protect source water from multi‐factor, multi‐angle and multi‐ target, Which can prudently propel management decisions so as to ensure the feasibility and effectiveness on operation of the project. In the last century, it has accumulated lots of experiences in the development of water conservation in the US, Japan, Australia, China and some European countries. This paper presents a result of comparative analysis on potable water source in maintenance and management so as to get new ideas to develop the framework and
adjustment measures. TABLE 1 ABOUT WATER CONSERVATION LAWS REGULATIONS
coun‐ try
laws and regulations
coun‐ try
Water act Water Management Act Groundwater source protection zone ordinance Germ‐ 1994 Japan any Reservoir water source protection zones Regulations Water source protection zones Regulations 1975 Safe Drinking Water Act1974 Clean Water Act 2006 The State of emergency law China U.S. The federal water pollution control act amendment1972 Drinking water safety law amendments1996
Can‐ ada EU
laws and regulations River Act Water Pollution Control Act Water Resources Development Promotion Law Water Resources Development Public Corporation Act Water Pollution Control Act Water act Environmental Protection Law Soil and Water Conservation Act Water Pollution Control Act Urban water management regulations
Safe Drinking Water Act Water and pollution Singa‐ Water pollution control system sustainable pore and drainage development method Drinking Water Directive
Laws and Regulations Legislation of SWP is extremely important for human activities, zoning division, potable water quality standards, exploitation and legal responsibilities. There are a few countries with special legislation in protecting source water, and only a small part out of the SWP terms. By comprising the existing laws and regulations, we found many differences among countries in emphasis on source water conservation. (Table 1 lists relative laws and regulations (Wang, R, 2012; Hou, J., 2009; Xu, Q, X., 2003). Facing serious source water pollution and water crisis, we need to innovate new event‐driven policies to deal
75