SCV Business Journal May 2020

Page 1

Contact: Perry Smith Business Editor Phone: 661-287-5599

S A N TA C L A R I TA VA L L E Y

BUSINESS JOURNAL BJ INSIDE SPOTLIGHTS B4 A message from the SCV Chamber B5 SCV Chamber advocacy B5 SCV Chamber spotlight B8 VIA discusses ‘building bridges’ B9 The List: Biotech in the SCV NEWS & FEATURES B1 Budget impacts B2 COC Makerspace donation B2 Uncertainty continues B3 Realtors adjust SCV BUSINESS VOICES B1 SCV Voices: Poole, Shaffery & Koegleh B3 SCV Voices: SCV Economic Development Corp. B6 SCV Voices: Audiology Associates B7 SCV Voices: SunPower by Green Convergence B10 SCV Voices: Henry Mayo B10 SCV Voices: Mission Valley Bank FROM THE EXPERTS B2 Ken Keller: Better days ahead

B6 Paul Butler: A few thoughts

about ‘fringe benefits’

B7From the Assessor: 2020

property tax assessments

B9 SCV Econowatch

Email: psmith@signalscv.com Mail: 26330 Diamond Place Suite 100 Santa Clarita, CA 91350 SATURDAY, MAY 2, 2020 · WWW.SIGNALSCV.COM · B1

CITY, BUSINESSES BRACE FOR BUDGET HIT BY EMILY ALVARENGAA Signal Staff Writer

A

s numerous businesses remain closed as a result of the “Safer at Home” directive for the coronavirus pandemic, SCV officials project the city’s revenue funds will suffer the consequences. “Currently, we estimate a loss of revenue reaching in the double digits of percentage drop, and that is without a doubt going to impact our city,” Mayor Cameron Smyth said during a live stream update Wednesday. This drop is expected to come primarily from sales tax revenue, where Smyth said Santa Clarita could see a loss of at least 10%, or $3.7 million, based on the sales tax revenue that was projected at a flat $37 million during the first look into the 2020-21 fiscal year budget back in February. In addition, the city expects to see a “significant decrease” in its transient occupancy tax revenue, which comes from taxes charged to transient guests in hotels and services, with another double-digit drop in revenue, meaning at least 10% — which would equate to about $330,000, based on projections. Even so, when city officials met in February to discuss the new budget, City Manager Ken Striplin said that Santa Clarita is “very well-positioned” to remain a strong economy should another recession occur in the coming years, as the city continues to follow a conservative budget philosophy: “The decisions made in good times are more important than the decisions made during bad times.” “Early conservative budget practices, coupled with our healthy 20% operating reserve and AAA credit rating, are prime examples of how our organization is very well-positioned for correction in the economy should that occur,” Striplin added. “The conservative budget process and practices that we employee here in

While businesses like The Old Town Junction restaurant in Newhall is finding new ways to operate online, the hit that most restaurants, hotels and retail locations are facing is also expected to create new challenges for city of Santa Clarita officials. PHOTO BY BOBBY BLOCK / THE SIGNAL Santa Clarita … has positioned the city to thrive for years to come.” While talks of pandemic were almost certainly not on their minds, this 20% emergency operating reserve, which totaled $17.6 million for the current budget, has put Santa Clarita in a position to absorb the impact of this economic downturn, officials agree. “We’re probably in a lot better shape than other cities in that we never spend more than we take,” Councilwoman Marsha McLean said. In addition, Santa Clarita is expected to receive $885,759 from the Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security, or CARES, Act, which Smyth said will be used to fill the gaps from the decline of revenue. Although it may cushion the blow, officials agree that the city expects to see a significant impact to its budget, which is set to be completely redone in a

“hold-the-line” form before it is adopted by the end of June, Smyth added. With this, the city does not expect to expand programs or projects, though key projects, such as the new sheriff’s station and Canyon Country Community Center, will not be impacted as they have already been funded, nor are a decline in services expected, according to Smyth. “Certainly if the state or county chooses to extend the current orders, we will see a greater impact, and we know that even as Santa Clarita and other areas continue to slowly open, it’s not going to be an automatic return to normal … and revenues will not climb back to normal right away,” Smyth added. “So, while there will be additional revenue coming in, it will be decreased, but hopefully that will soften the impact.” While the city expects to release See IMPACT, page B2

SCV BUSINESS VOICES

ANOTHER BITE AT THE ‘APPLE:’ DISCUSSING COMPENSABLE TIME BRIAN E. KOEGLE Partner, Poole Shaffery & Koegle

O

ver the last several years, California courts have issued several rulings dealing with “compensable time” — specifically, when an employer is required to pay its employees for “hours worked.” The latest clarification comes from the highest court in the state in a ruling that surprised many with its broad reach and expansion of what is deemed to be “compensable time worked.” In Frlekin v. Apple Inc., the California Supreme Court departed from the long-standing rule under federal law that an employee’s time spent waiting for bag checks or screenings was NOT compensable under the Fair Labor Standards Act (Integrity Staffing Solutions Inc. v. Busk). In the Integrity decision, the U.S. Supreme Court determined that security screenings weren’t a part of employees’ “principal activities,” and thus that time spent in screenings was NOT compensable. However, in distinguishing the (2014) Integrity decision, the California high court cited to the hours worked provision of the California Wage Orders, and held that: “The level of the employer’s control over its employees, rather than the mere fact that the employer requires the employees’ activity, is determinative concerning whether an activity is compensable.” According to the California court, compensable “hours worked” include “the time during which an employee is subject to the control of an employer and includes all the time the employee is suffered or permitted to work, whether or not required to do so.” Of further concern, the Supreme Court rejected Apple’s request for this decision to only apply looking forward. Rather, the court determined that Apple misapplied existing California law (the Wage Orders), and, as a result, Apple could not claim “reasonable reliance” on the existing federal law. Consequently, Apple will be held responsible for the claims of unpaid minimum and overtime wages, will be required to pay penalties for the previous underpayments and will be required to pay the plaintiffs’ attorneys’ fees. The Supreme Court’s decision in Frlekin stands as a warning that every business in California should be working with competent legal counsel, trained to understand the nuances of California wage and hour laws, before implementing any policies or procedures. Brian Koegle is a partner in the employment and labor law department of Poole & Shaffery, LLP. He leads the transactional and litigation teams for the labor and employment division of the business law firm. For more information on Poole Shaffery & Koegle, call (855) 997-7522, or visit pooleshaffery.com.

EMPLOYMENT LAWS HAVE CHANGED FOR 2020

Minimize Your Risk of Exposure Today!

Call 661-290-2991 today to schedule your consultation!

Santa Clarita 25350 Magic Mountain Parkway, Second Floor | Santa Clarita, CA 91355 661-290-2991 · POOLESHAFFERY.COM

SANTA CLARITA | LOS ANGELES | VENTURA COUNTY SAN FRANCISCO | ORANGE COUNTY | SAN DIEGO


Turn static files into dynamic content formats.

Create a flipbook
Issuu converts static files into: digital portfolios, online yearbooks, online catalogs, digital photo albums and more. Sign up and create your flipbook.
SCV Business Journal May 2020 by Signal - Issuu