THE SIGNAL · FRIDAY, FEBRUARY 21, 2020 · C1
VOTER Every Vote Counts
GUIDE Welcome to The Signal’s 2020 primary election voter preview. In this special section, we’ve invited candidates for local legislative races to provide voters with information on their qualifications and their positions on some of the key issues facing the Santa Clarita Valley and northern Los Angeles County in this year’s elections.
who did respond are presented in the same order in which they appear on the March 3 ballot. The full text of the questions for each race are listed in the introduction for each race, and those questions are represented by brief summaries above each candidate’s response.
We hope this election preview helps you make informed decisions Each candidate was invited to provide a 75-word opening statement, as you cast your votes in the March 3 election. Be sure to vote! and 75-word answers to five questions for each race. Candidates who — The Signal Editorial Board did not respond to the invitation do not appear in this issue, and those Candidates for 25th Congressional District
More than a dozen candidates are campaigning to represent the 25th Congressional District, and technically the March 3 ballot includes two separate elections for the 25th: There’s the regular primary election, in which the top two finishers will face off in the November general election. And, there is the special election, in which the top two finishers from the March 3 ballot will face each other in a special May 12 election to fill the remainder of former Rep. Katie Hill’s term, after Hill resigned last fall.
Here are the five questions that were posed to the candidates:
2. If elected, on which specific committees would you like to serve, and why?
5. Who’s one current politician you think is doing a good job, and why?
Getro Elize
QUESTION 3: Boise Decision on Homelessness I would disagree with the decision on the grounds that it has become a blight on our city streets. We should be able to provide emergency housing for anyone who needs it. But it doesn’t address the bigger issues that we have. Anyone could be a paycheck away from being homeless, with the rising cost of living and housing affordability in L.A. County. We should be able to provide emergency housing for anyone who needs it. QUESTION 4: Top Priorities for 25th District First, I would tackle the ongoing homeless problem in L.A. County. What we have on our hands is a humanitarian crisis. I would get together with state and local officials, nonprofits, volunteers and tackle this issue head-on. Second, I want to address the lack of jobs in the north Antelope Valley area. We can quickly solve this problem by creating sustainable jobs in those areas. What I mean by that is, jobs that cannot leave or be outsourced. My solution to this is to create a fullservice county hospital in this area. What this would do is address overcrowded hospitals that we currently have and it would create at least 4,000 full-time career-
oriented jobs. Lastly, would be our infrastructure. If you have ever driven on our highways you will notice that it needs repairs. Highways like the 14 freeway, and areas like Palmdale and Lancaster or any other areas where semi-trucks barrel down the road need constant repairs. I would make sure that our infrastructure will be well-maintained and accessible at all times. QUESTION 5: Politician You Admire I would have to say Bernie Sanders. He is a man of integrity and his values concerning the citizens of America have been consistent for 40 years.
mittees directly impacts the lives of the residents of the 25th Congressional District, and during my time in Congress, I was able to navigate complex committee structures to introduce many pieces of citizendriven legislation. QUESTION 3: Boise Decision on Homelessness At the local level, we need to get real with the homeless crisis affecting us. We must punish crime, not ignore it. We must end suffering, not condone it. We must reduce homelessness, not promote it. We need to look at and adopt solutions that have worked in other localities around the country such as bridge shelters, where you bridge the gap between living on the street, and instead of simply saying build more housing, working with landlords and apartment owners to rent out vacant units to the homeless. This is a creative and faster way to put a roof over someone’s head, instead of building more housing. QUESTION 4: Top Priorities for 25th District Our veterans — I will work to provide cutting-edge medical care for veterans and expand health care program options.
Our infrastructure — I will work on securing more funding from the federal government to relieve traffic on Interstate 5. I want to make sure our residents spend less time commuting, and more time in their community. Our small businesses — I will work on making sure our small businesses are better able to compete for federal contracts. QUESTION 5: Politician You Admire Kevin Faulconer — As mayor of San Diego, Kevin is the only Republican in California currently at the helm of one of our major cities. During his tenure, San Diego is the only large city where the homelessness epidemic has gone down. What is San Diego doing that other places in California aren’t doing? Focusing on local solutions, instead of state- and federal-led ones, to address and not just simply look at problems.
to find common ground on issues such as lowering the price of prescription drugs and protecting the Social Security and Medicare benefits our seniors have earned. If any individual threatens the interests of our country and the 25th District, I will not hesitate to act. QUESTION 2: Committee preferences House Committee on Armed Services; House Committee on Education and Labor; and House Committee on Veterans Affairs. QUESTION 3: Boise Decision on Homelessness The issue of homelessness is a problem California can no longer allow to go unaddressed. First and foremost, we must increase funding for shelters throughout the state to raise the number of beds available. During my time in the Assembly, I participated in ride-alongs with the Los Angeles Police Department and saw firsthand how the mental health challenges faced by many individuals who are homeless make it difficult to transition those individuals even when shelters have beds available. For that reason, we must also invest in critical wrap-around services, such as mental health care and social services with an eye to
ultimately place these individuals in long-term housing solutions. QUESTION 4: Top Priorities for 25th District Three of my top local priorities for federal funding will be: — Federal infrastructure investment, including investment in Highway 14 and Interstate 5. — Federal investment in water infrastructure, enabling local agencies to maximize water recycling and stormwater capture efficiency. — Fully funding education mandates, including IDEA for special education as well as necessary increases to Title I and II education programs. QUESTION 5: Politician You Admire I admire any elected official who is willing to work across the aisle and build consensus in the best interest of their community and country. Hyper-partisanship has left Washington paralyzed, and we must return to a focus on effective leadership.
My name is Getro Elize and I am running to address the needs of the citizens of the 25th District. I want to tackle the homeless problem that plagues our district with practical solutions. I will work to cancel student loan debt and to make sure every American has access to education, and not only to those who can afford it. I will focus on our local issues such as economic growth to create jobs and infrastructure expansion. QUESTION 1: On President Trump Thank you for the question. I would accept the outcome of the election and get to work on fixing real problems for the people of the 25th District. Currently, the problem that plagues our party is the fact that we can’t find common ground with our Republican counterparts. QUESTION 2: Committee preferences Once elected, I would like to join the committee of Veteran Affairs. As you know I am a veteran, and for far too long we are ignored once our service to this country is completed. I would put forth legislation to assist military personnel one year from their discharge date to help them transition to a full-time job, access to education, medical and mental health services, and housing services.
Steve Knight A native of Southern California, a U.S. Army veteran, an 18-year veteran with the Los Angeles Police Department and proven leader on the local, statewide and national level, Steve has helped keep families and neighborhoods safe, increase job opportunities for all residents and protect the rights and principles cherished by those for whom he provides a voice. Steve lives in Palmdale with his wife, Lily, and their two sons, Christopher and Michae. QUESTION 1: On President Trump The Senate made its ruling and it’s time for Congress to move on and get things done. Voters will have the ability in November to cast their vote for the person they feel is most qualified to represent them in the White House and in the halls of Congress. If I’m elected to fill the remainder of Katie Hill’s term, I will immediately focus on three priorities: our veterans, our aerospace industry and our small businesses. QUESTION 2: Committee preferences When I was in Congress, I served on the House Armed Services Committee, the Science, Space, and Technology Committee, and the Small Business Committee. If elected to Congress again, I want to serve on these three committees. The jurisdiction of these com-
Christy Smith I am proud to call this community my home. I’ve lived here for nearly 40 years, and raised my two daughters here with my husband, Phil. I understand the needs of our community and that is why I am running for Congress; to advocate for common-sense solutions that make our district safer, stronger and more prosperous. This district deserves a representative with integrity and dedication to the community. I would be honored to earn your vote on March 3. QUESTION 1: On President Trump Throughout this race, I have promised the residents of the 25th District that I will work with anyone in service of their best interest. I fully intend to keep that promise once I am elected. I have been deeply disturbed by the president’s conduct, especially his willingness to subvert the integrity of our elections to benefit himself politically, and supported his impeachment. I also believe Senate Republicans made a grave error in judgment when they blocked the testimony from key witnesses that the American people deserved to hear. I am not, however, running to impeach the president; I am running to fix Washington and improve the lives of my future constituents. I will work
1. If you are elected, and President Donald Trump is re-elected, will you continue to investigate and seek Trump’s impeachment during your term, or would you accept the outcome of the election and work on other issues, such as infrastructure, health care, opioid addiction, etc.?
3. The Boise decision leaves in place earlier rulings that state homeless persons can’t be punished for sleeping outside on public property in the absence of adequate alternatives. What’s your take on this decision? 4. What would be your top-three local priorities for federal funding if you’re the representative for the 25th Congressional District? Please be specific.
C2 · FRIDAY, FEBRUARY 21, 2020 · THE SIGNAL
Ken Jenks I’ve been a Santa Clarita resident and homeowner for 30 years. My children were raised in Santa Clarita, as well as my three grandchildren. I am a meritorious U.S. Marine Corps campaign service medal veteran. I entered the Marine Corps at 17 years of age. I had a productive career in telecommunications. I’m running to end my career the way it started: service to our country and all of my family, friends and neighbors. QUESTION 1: On President Trump President Trump is doing a great job. I ask all in our district to support our president while he is in office this term and if he is elected again. Our Constitution and voting rights are too important to let differences or judgment erode what so many have fought and died for. I didn’t for for Obama, but he was my president while he was in office.
Aníbal Valdéz-Ortega Aníbal Valdéz-Ortega was raised in the Antelope Valley and attended public schools through earning his associate’s degree at Antelope Valley College. He transferred to UCLA and majored in history and Chicano studies, earning high college honors. He worked as a community organizer working for low-income tenants and minorities. He earned his law degree from Loyola Law School and now has his own law firm where he focuses on helping the people. QUESTION 1: On President Trump We believe that more documents and incriminating information will develop. This is especially true given that John Bolton’s book will soon be released. As a congressman, I will have an oath to the U.S. Constitution, and any attacks upon it by the president require a thorough investigation and potential impeachment. Necessary domestic projects such as infrastructure, health care and the opioid epidemic will continue to receive the attention required. We will not see holding the president accountable as a reason not to focus on the country’s many needs. QUESTION 2: Committee preferences I would like to serve on the Intelligence Committee and the Committee on the Judiciary.
Cenk Uygur I’m running to get money out of politics. Too many politicians take money from corporations, PACs, lobbyists, and special interests and then serve their donors, not their voters. This is why we don’t have health care, high enough wages, or affordable housing. I am the only major candidate not taking any corporate, PAC, or lobbyist money. My job is not to serve my donors, it’s to serve you and only you! QUESTION 1: On President Trump If Trump continues to break the law while in office, I will support impeachment 100%. If the Republican Party actually wants to compromise — for example, on criminal justice reform — I will be very happy to have that conversation. However, if they continue to enable crony capitalism on behalf of their donors, pass more tax cuts for the rich, and put the tax burden on the average American taxpayer, I will fight them tooth and nail. QUESTION 2: Committee preferences I would like to serve on the same committees that Katie Hill did — Armed Services, Oversight and Reform, and Science, Space, and Technology. This district earned those committee assignments, and I will demand we retain them.
Mike Garcia As a patriot, former Navy fighter pilot, aerospace executive and father, I am running for Congress to ensure our nation does not become as dysfunctional as our state of California. This isn’t about party politics. It’s about doing the right thing for the nation and being represented by someone who is serving for the right reasons and is qualified for the job. And yes, we should have term limits for Congress! QUESTION 1: On President Trump The impeachment process has reached its conclusion and now Congress has to move on with the business of providing meaningful legislation for Americans. Congress should be working with the president to address the debt, providing a better and cheaper health care plan and addressing critical issues such as national security and homelessness. QUESTION 2: Committee preferences The House Armed Service Committee and the House Appropriations Committee. With my extensive
QUESTION 2: Committee preferences Thirty-five years as a leader in telecommunications, engineer through vice president, creating jobs, building companies; doubleundergrad concentrations in electronics and computer science, a master’s in engineering management, and a world No. 3 executive MBA, can serve on any number of committees. Space, science and technology, financial services, ways and means, appropriation and others, I will work in a bipartisan manner and collaborate with those I serve with. QUESTION 3: Boise Decision on Homelessness
QUESTION 4: Top Priorities for 25th District Homeland security, sovereignty, and education and training for the trades. QUESTION 5: Politician You Admire State Sen. Shannon Grove, R-Bakersfield. Shannon is the minority leader … tough job in California.
Punishing a homeless person is like pouring salt on a wound. It is cruel. A helping hand works much better. That said, for criminal behavior, we must stick to the rule of law. QUESTION 3: Boise Decision on Homelessness I believe that the nation’s poor need among the most help in our society and in our communities. As an attorney I believe that the Boise decision is the correct decision but I am alarmed on the attack on civil rights in this country, which seems to largely benefit the business and upper classes. A renewed investment in mental health and providing housing for the lower classes and poor must take place immediately. QUESTION 4: Top Priorities for 25th District First, I would address the district’s need to enroll more students in college by working toward making college affordable for students who want to pursue two- and four-year colleges. Second, I would focus on making affordable green energy a focus in our district, where there is an abundance of sun and wind. Third, I would tackle the homelessness issue by initiating emergency funds to create task forces to find affordable housing, provide job training, substance abuse help and limit the amount of rent increases in alignment with the new state rent control bill. QUESTION 5: Politician You Admire
The politician I felt did the best job sadly passed away recently. Rep. Elijah Cummings represented a public servant who best focused on the people and the needs of the district. Moreover, he was able to reach across the aisle and work with the other parties to do what was best for the country. If elected to Congress I would strive to make my tenure an inspiration for children to one day pursue and would work to make every day an accomplishment that would make Rep. Cummings proud.
QUESTION 3: Boise decision on homeless We must provide humane shelter to the homeless. What would Jesus have done — ban the homeless, or take care of them? We allocated a lot of money to take care of the homeless, but I am concerned that it has been diverted to the real estate and construction donors of California politicians. If we clean up corruption, it solves this problem. Let’s make sure the money goes to the homeless and not in donors’ pockets! QUESTION 4: Top Priorities for 25th District We must secure truly universal health care without co-pays, deductibles or premiums for the people of the 25th Congressional District. I will prioritize bringing high-paying solar and wind energy jobs to the district so people don’t have to drive to L.A. every day for work. Finally, I will fight for affordable housing so residents are no longer priced out of their homes and forced to move. QUESTION 5: Politician You Admire Rep. Ro Khanna. He fought for and got higher wages for the workers of Amazon. He fought to protect the
Constitution and keep the war powers with the legislative branch. He’s fighting for universal health care for everyone and not just the wealthy. He is fighting to get the corrupting influence of money out of politics so legislators represent the voters and only the voters!
background not only in the military but also more than a decade of working with Congress and the Pentagon, I am well-versed in the defense budget and acquisition process and I am able to hit the ground running with both of these committees. QUESTION 3: Boise Decision on Homelessness We need to treat our homeless population with dignity and respect. But at the same time laws must be enforced. There are solutions to provide shelters for homeless people who truly want the help through charities, churches and nonprofits. We need to address the mental health and substance abuse elements aggressively and help those who need it. QUESTION 4: Top Priorities for 25th District Ensure firefighting air assets from the Air National Guard are made available when a local fire begins. This currently isn’t happening. Invest in additional capacity for Interstate 5 and
Interstate 405 to mitigate traffic with our growing populations. Ensure the (Department of Defense) budget remains above $750 billion. The defense contracts in our district are the backbone of our economy and its growth. QUESTION 5: Politician You Admire Rep. Jim Jordan, R-Ohio, is who I would emulate. He’s serving and leading for the right reasons. He’s bold, and his actions and decisions are in the best interest of the nation. He is not motivated by party politics or a personal agenda.
Candidates for 21st Senate District
Four Democrats are challenging incumbent Republican Scott Wilk to represent the 21st Senate District, which includes most of the Santa Clarita and Antelope valleys. The top two candidates will face off in the November general election. Here are the five questions that were posed to the candidates: 1. Why do you think so many businesses and residents are leaving California for other states?
2. What is your position on Assembly Bill 5: Is it a good law, or should it be repealed? 3. What is your position regarding Proposition 13 for business property taxes and residential property taxes? 4. What specific action or policy would you like to see to further address homelessness in your district? 5. Is the Boise decision, which leaves in place earlier rulings that state homeless people can’t be punished for sleeping
outside on public property in the absence of adequate alternatives, good or bad for local governance, and why?
THE SIGNAL · FRIDAY, FEBRUARY 21, 2020 · C3
Candidates for 21st Senate District
Scott Wilk I was born and raised in the 21st Senate District. My wife, Vanessa, and I raised our family here. We have a great state that is headed in the wrong direction because of failed Sacramento policies. Our community believes in common sense, something that is missing in Sacramento. In the State Capitol, I will always stand for you even if I have to stand alone. QUESTION 1: On Businesses Leaving California What could cause someone to leave such a beautiful state? Only one thing – government. High taxes and over-regulation have led to a lack of affordable housing, poor roads and a homeless epidemic that have families fleeing California for other states. One-party rule has led to a top-down, command-and-control government that is neither efficient nor compassionate. My own daughter and her family recently left due to the affordability crisis. We must change course! QUESTION 2: AB 5, Independent Contractor Law
as they please. It was a gross overreach by the majority party to expand a court ruling. AB 5 has cost thousands of people their jobs through no fault of their own. What is even more infuriating is powerful special interests received exemptions for their industries while ordinary Californians are left holding the bag. AB 5 must be repealed and replaced by a fair standard. QUESTION 3: Proposition 13 (Property Taxes) I oppose this deceptive attempt to gut Proposition 13. 1978’s Prop. 13 has stood the test of time, protecting homeowners and businesses alike by limiting property taxes. Proposition 13 has been a huge benefit to those on fixed incomes and young people just getting started. I see no reason to change what’s working simply because greedy Sacramento politicians want more tax dollars for their pet projects. KEEP YOUR HANDS OFF OF PROPOSITION 13!
Homelessness is our state’s No. 1 challenge. Simply put, we must increase our housing supply. But offering shelter is only a first step. If it’s not coupled with wraparound services for addiction and mental health, a housing-first strategy will ultimately fail. I’ve authored legislation that calls for a statewide strategic plan to end homelessness that includes benchmarks to ensure we are making progress and spending tax dollars both effectively and efficiently. QUESTION 5: Boise Decision on Homelessness No one wants to “punish” the homeless. But leaving in place the status quo is simply bad policy. The city of Los Angeles, for example, through its own failed policies, has had outbreaks of Third World diseases like typhoid and typhus. Do we really want to hamstring local government’s ability to deal with such outbreaks? California needs a comprehensive statewide policy to deal with the homeless crisis, one like I have proposed in Senate Bill 333.
QUESTION 4: Homelessness Solutions
Assembly Bill 5 robs people of their ability to work
Kipp Mueller Growing up, my father was a house painter and my mother was a community college counselor. Today, I’m a partner at a workers’ rights law firm, representing employees in the High Desert against large corporations. I’m also a pro bono attorney representing asylum seekers in Adelanto. I started and sold a small business after working for President Obama’s Department of Justice and the Santa Clara District Attorney’s Office consumer fraud and sex crime units. QUESTION 1: On Businesses Leaving California As someone who started and sold a small business in California, I know firsthand how expensive and difficult it is to do. I support lowering the minimum franchise tax for small businesses, and will work tirelessly to diversify our local economy and help businesses grow. For residents, costs of living are too high. We need to bring down mortgage, rent and health-care prices, and we need to raise wages. QUESTION 2: AB 5, Independent Contractor Law I believe wholeheartedly in encouraging innovation and protecting our free market economy from unnecessary interference. However, without basic standards
and rules in the workplace, workers are at times exploited, which was what led to AB 5. The legislation needs some adjustments, including carve-outs for various professions such as freelance journalists, musicians and others. I support AB 5 with modifications. We can simultaneously protect workers and protect businesses with the right approach. QUESTION 3: Proposition 13 (Property Taxes) When it comes to residential property taxes, we need to protect Proposition 13. The last thing that middleclass families need today is higher taxes. In fact, middle-class families need a tax break in California. However, Proposition 13 was never intended to shield large corporations from paying their fair share of taxes. Our schools are seriously underfunded, our teachers and faculty underpaid. I support more funding for our schools and large corporations paying their fair share will help greatly. QUESTION 4: Homelessness Solutions The average homeless person creates public costs of $62,500 a year due to frequent contact with our criminal justice system and with hospitals. That’s far
more expensive than the cost not only to subsidize housing for the homeless, but also to provide case managers and wrap-around services. Studies show that the “housing first” model reduces public cost by about 50-70%, reduces chronic homelessness by up to 90%, and substantially reduces crime rates as well. QUESTION 5: Boise Decision on Homelessness Criminalization of homelessness, without addressing the root causes of homelessness, only exacerbates the problem. Rather than fleecing taxpayers by repeatedly and endlessly processing homeless people in and out of our criminal justice system and our emergency rooms, we should work toward housing our homeless population and providing wrap-around services. I cannot stress this enough: Studies have shown that this will save taxpayers money and dramatically reduce crime. It is the right thing to do.
Candidates for Los Angeles County Supervisor, 5th District
Two challengers are seeking to unseat incumbent Supervisor Kathryn Barger in Los Angeles County’s 5th District, which includes a wide swath of northern L.A. County that encompasses the Santa Clarita Valley. If no candidate wins more than 50% of the vote in the primary, the top two will go to a runoff in the November general election. Here are the five questions that were posed to the candidates: 1. What do you think are specific areas
Kathryn Barger As your supervisor, I am committed to ensuring services and programs to significantly improve the quality of life for our local community. My years of experience have included a multitude of initiatives that support public safety, economic development, and infrastructure; and enhanced services for foster children, seniors, veterans, those with mental illness and the homeless. Equally important, I collaborate to solve problems and address issues in a fiscally responsible way with stakeholders and partners. QUESTION 1: City-County Teamwork I am very proud of the working relationship I have established with the city toward our shared goals. We worked together to help build the new senior center. We partnered on public safety, and I have committed funding for the new sheriff ’s station, along with the new Fire Station 104. Last year I directed county departments to help alleviate congestion in Castaic, and we partnered to provide the expansion of the Newhall Ranch Road bridge.
Darrell Park I am a proud Democrat, environmentalist, community activist and entrepreneur, and I am running for L.A. County supervisor so we can fix the problems facing our community. My opponent told the Santa Clarita Valley Signal that “America needs President Donald Trump’s approach .” I couldn’t disagree more. Los Angeles County needs new leadership. As supervisor I will work to provide the homeless with safe, permanent and supportive housing, and improve our environment by investing in green technology. QUESTION 1: City-County Teamwork Greater cooperation will improve a number of county services. We can ensure access to health care for everyone in our community, including our neighbors experiencing homelessness, by deploying an extensive network of mobile health clinics to all corners of the district. Greater coordination between cities and the county can also spur local economic development by investing billions of L.A. County’s dollars into small businesses like solar, micro-grids, sustainable construction and organic agriculture.
where the city and county can work better to address challenges in the Santa Clarita Valley? 2. What do you think are the Santa Clarita Valley’s three most immediate needs and why?
4. Is the Boise decision, which leaves in place earlier rulings that state homeless persons can’t be punished for sleeping outside on public property in the absence of adequate alternatives, good or bad for local governance, and why?
3. Traffic congestion continues to be among the top issues across the region. What can be done to improve the issue in the 5th District?
5. What specific action or policy would you like to see to further address homelessness in the SCV?
QUESTION 2: SCV’s Most Immediate Needs The three most immediate needs for the Santa Clarita Valley include: ongoing traffic safety improvements to address local community concerns and additional congestion relief throughout the region; public safety with support to local law enforcement and the Fire Department to protect property and life; and economic development with quality local employment opportunities and safe and effective growth through communitysupported local housing projects. QUESTION 3: Traffic I have spent years building regional partnerships which have helped bring hundreds of millions of dollars to the Santa Clarita Valley for major transportation projects to address congestion throughout the region. Some of these projects will begin construction as early as this year and include: new HOV and dedicated truck lanes along Interstate 5 through the SCV; significant
upgrades to Metrolink service in the region; and fixes to bottlenecks on Highway 14. QUESTION 4: Boise Decision on Homelessness I supported a reassessment of Boise to gain clarity on the role of local government in dictating where individuals can or cannot sleep. The homeless crisis presents public safety and health risks in its current state. The county is not interested in criminalizing homelessness. But we should have the ability to move individuals out of harm’s way when it comes to fire risks or public health dangers, or into available beds and/or housing units. QUESTION 5: Homelessness Solutions I’m incredibly proud to have been a partner in transitioning Bridge to Home’s winter shelter into a yearround bridge housing program that provides individuals with the support they need to stabilize and re-enter society. Permanent housing is the next component of the housing continuum that we are now working to address. Options include a supportive housing program that can provide ongoing services for individuals in need, or simple affordable housing.
QUESTION 2: SCV’s Most Immediate Needs Homelessness because it is not only a humanitarian crisis; it is a financial crisis as well. Currently we are spending $40,000 per person on the street in emergency medical, police and firefighter services. Quickly and effectively converting to green energy because doing so will greatly stimulate the local economy and improve our abysmal air quality. Ending government corruption and waste because we deserve leadership we can be proud of. QUESTION 3: Traffic Darrell will work to implement the following: — Free public transportation anywhere in L.A. County — reduces traffic by up to 9%. — Every bus will be a high-speed electric bus by 2023. — Creation of world’s fastest internet network to reduce need for long commutes. — Creation of 100,000 smallish truly affordable
housing units annually in walkable communities. — L.A. County will become world leader in autonomous driving to cut travel time by up to 30%. QUESTION 4: Boise Decision on Homelessness The Boise decision is not only good for local governments, it is also the right public policy decision and the right moral decision. A lasting solution to homelessness cannot be achieved by criminalizing homelessness. Using taxpayers’ money to arrest and incarcerate homeless individuals is wasteful, and this does not include court and probation costs. The Boise decision should be viewed as a catalyst for local governments to create safe, permanent, supportive housing. QUESTION 5: Homelessness Solutions First, I will donate 50% of my salary until 99% of the homeless in the 5th District are in permanent supportive housing. To achieve this goal, we don’t have to reinvent the wheel. Utah has done amazing things to solve its homeless problems that can be replicated. I will guarantee work opportunities for formerly homeless, fund mental health services and help homeless veterans and homeless moms to become entrepreneurs through intensive mentoring programs and loan guarantees.
C4 · FRIDAY, FEBRUARY 21, 2020 · THE SIGNAL
Candidates for 38th Assembly District
There’s no incumbent on the ballot for the 38th Assembly District, which includes most of the Santa Clarita Valley in addition to Simi Valley and portions of the San Fernando Valley. Current Assemblywoman Christy Smith is vacating the seat as she runs for election to represent the 25th Congressional District. Five Democrats and two Republicans are competing to represent the 38th, and the top two candidates will face off in the November general election.
Lucie Lapointe Volotzky I have been a business owner in the San Fernando Valley for over 30 years. I came here from Canada in 1987 and have worked hard to live the American Dream. I love freedom and liberty and know that the free market is the only system that offers a level playing field for anyone who wants to work hard and achieve success. California’’s policies are adversarial to that great principle. QUESTION 1: On Businesses Leaving California Oppressive taxation and regulation along with failure to provide the safety and infrastructure needs that are the state’s primary responsibility. QUESTION 2: AB 5, Independent Contractor Law Drivers should be given the choice whether to be employees or independent contractors. They should be offered low-cost health insurance. QUESTION 3: Proposition 13 (Property Taxes) I want Prop. 13 left alone.
Suzette Martinez Valladares I operate a nonprofit early childhood education center where every day I see the impact of California’s skyrocketing cost of living. Previously, I served as executive director of Southern California Autism Speaks. My career has been about serving and empowering others, and challenging the status quo when change is needed. I was born in Sylmar and have lived in this area all my life. I currently live in Newhall with my family. QUESTION 1: On Businesses Leaving California The primary reason so many businesses and residents are leaving California is a direct result of failed policies from a state political leadership that is disconnected from the everyday lives of Californians. The result is a skyrocketing cost of living that squeezes families and seniors out of options. We need leadership that connects to the people, not the special interests, and to bring political balance to Sacramento.
Brandii Grace Brandii Grace grew up combating extreme poverty and homelessness with her grandmother, a disabled military veteran. As a video game designer, Brandii overcame misogyny in the tech industry and built an award-winning company. As a respected STEM educator, Brandii led a teacher union movement and went to Washington, D.C., to successfully pass federal worker protections. Brandii now serves as a member of Porter Ranch’s elected Neighborhood Council to end homelessness and ensure no other children have to suffer as she did. QUESTION 1: On Businesses Leaving California While more people fled California in the mid-1990s and 2000s, what’s changed is the demographics of who is leaving. Recent statistics show that people coming to our state tend to be older, richer, and more educated (we brought in more college graduates than other states); those leaving tend to be low-income workers displaced by the growing cost of living and lack of affordable housing. This is a serious problem. We need plumbers, mechanics and garbage collectors!
Annie Cho I am running for the 38th Assembly District to bring common sense and real-world experience to Sacramento. I have a combination of government, private sector and life experience that will make me a thoughtful and effective representative. I am a successful businesswoman; a working mom; an immigrant who worked two jobs to put herself through CSULA; and a member of the sandwich generation who has “graduated” from providing child and elder care. QUESTION 1: On Businesses Leaving California Businesses and residents are leaving California due to several issues that have a negative impact on quality of life such as extremely high housing costs, traffic congestion and homelessness. These same issues raise the cost of doing business. Other states with less regulation and competitive relocation incentives such as corporate income tax credits, sales tax exemptions and reductions, payroll rebates, and property tax abatements, exemptions and reductions also motivate businesses to leave California.
Here are the five questions that were posed to the candidates: 1. Why do you think so many businesses and residents are leaving California for other states? 2. What is your position on Assembly Bill 5: Is it a good law, or should it be repealed? 3. What is your position regarding Proposition 13 for business property taxes and residential property taxes?
4. What specific action or policy would you like to see to further address homelessness in your district? 5. Is the Boise decision, which leaves in place earlier rulings that state homeless people can’t be punished for sleeping outside on public property in the absence of adequate alternatives, good or bad for local governance, and why?
QUESTION 4: Homelessness Solutions I want to see the government work more closely with the experts — those nonprofit executives from the missions and homeless outreach who really know the population and have the experience in serving them. Here in Los Angeles, they have been completely marginalized from the process… but it is all about money, so developers have become the experts. Sad. QUESTION 5: Boise Decision on Homelessness Bad. Allowing people to live in such a substandard way sets a precedent and desensitizes people into being apathetic about a subculture of individuals who need help. The bigger question should be, why aren’t the officials going to those who know and understand the problem for their expertise?
QUESTION 2: AB 5, Independent Contractor Law Assembly Bill 5 was hurried and terribly, poorly crafted legislation that ineffectually addressed the Dynamex ruling and stripped individuals of personal autonomy over their labor. The reclassification of employees without any consideration of their wishes was excessive, unnecessary overreach by the government. Furthermore, it has radically and adversely affected women in the labor force. It should be fully repealed and AB 1928 is a great bill attempting to do just that.
sive approach to addressing homelessness, including mental health and substance abuse treatment. Housing is just one component of the overall solution. This requires local, state and particularly federal partnership. QUESTION 5: Boise Decision on Homelessness For many local governments this decision is deeply problematic, particularly those lacking resources to help the homeless populations in their area.
QUESTION 3: Proposition 13 (Property Taxes) Prop. 13 should be protected for both business and residential property taxes. QUESTION 4: Homelessness Solutions The most effective specific action and policy to address homelessness within the district is a comprehen-
QUESTION 2: AB 5, Independent Contractor Law Assembly Bill 5 is well-intentioned, but incomplete. AB 5 was trying to stop big businesses from dodging paying taxes and necessary employee benefits by intentionally misclassifying some employees as “contract workers.” Unfortunately, AB5 failed to provide an option for employees to “opt out” and remain contract employees if that’s what they wanted. Had that provision been added, many of the legitimate problems and concerns of AB 5 would vanish. QUESTION 3: Proposition 13 (Property Taxes) For years, large corporations – like Disney – have been taking advantage of loopholes to avoid paying the same basic property taxes your favorite local restaurant already pays. I fully support closing the loopholes that give mega corporations huge tax breaks that aren’t available to small businesses and residents. QUESTION 4: Homelessness Solutions
My “Day One Agenda” includes a list of policies to address homelessness. Anyone can read them by searching for my Facebook page @GraceForAssembly. Some examples I’ll list here: We need to implement high taxes on foreign investors who are buying up our affordable housing just to park their money here as tax shelters. We also need to increase incentives for developing affordable mixed-use and mixed-income housing and work closer with communities before starting new projects. QUESTION 5: Boise Decision on Homelessness Recently, a homeless man wrapped in a thin blanket politely asked if I knew where he could find shelter from the bitter cold. I called 211 and was told that, despite the freezing temperatures, there were no shelters available. A few years ago, I took in a single mother and her two small children who were turned away from a family shelter. Our government isn’t providing adequate shelter for its most vulnerable citizens. Hopefully, this decision will help them do the right thing.
QUESTION 2: AB 5, Independent Contractor Law Lots of unintended consequences — the author has already introduced a followup bill. I appreciate the concerns of the businesses who are affected by this legislation and would be open to any improvements that could be made that would not come at the expense of workers. QUESTION 3: Proposition 13 (Property Taxes) I will always fight to protect Prop. 13’s benefits for homeowners. I should point out that the Prop 13 on the March ballot has nothing to do with the split-roll; it’s a capital bond for K-12 schools and UC, CSU and higher education infrastructure and greatly needed. QUESTION 4: Homelessness Solutions We must help those who are one paycheck away from becoming homeless so they do not end up on the streets; ensure tenants don’t get evicted without just
cause; apply triage to homeless women and children to keep families together; identify and place homeless veterans; efficient and effective coordination of services and resources between levels of government; streamline housing projects including micro-units and accessory dwelling units, and develop wrap-around transitional services. QUESTION 5: Boise Decision on Homelessness The Boise decision is incredibly burdensome on local government, but it is morally right. Criminalizing homeless does not solve the underlying problems. We need government/nonprofit/private sector partnerships that have innovative new approaches and practical solutions. Providing a bed is not the cure-all to ending homelessness. People need help to get back on their feet. Mental health services and addiction treatments, in particular, should be more available and accessible to homeless people.
THE SIGNAL · FRIDAY, FEBRUARY 21, 2020 · C5
Dina Cervantes I, Dina Cervantes, am running to serve the community I have called home for over 20 years. Formerly, labeled “at-risk youth,” I organized students to fight for affordability, quality and access to California’s education. My state Assembly campaign received endorsements from community leaders, unions and the top education officer in the state, Superintendent Tony Thurmond. If elected, I will fight to protect public education, for our families to have access to health care, good jobs and a clean environment. QUESTION 1: On Businesses Leaving California Keep Santa Clarita residents and businesses in California by supporting a strong and diverse economy for local businesses. Hard-working families stay when the business environment of local employers like Six Flags Magic Mountain, Princess Cruises, College of the Canyons, Henry Mayo Newhall Hospital and school districts are supported. In the Assembly, I will fight for local businesses and our families to have access to health care, high-wage jobs, retirement security and
Kelvin Driscoll I reside in Santa Clarita with my wife, Javaneh, daughter Ava and our dog, Abraham Lincoln. This election represents the opportunity to fully fund our education system, address our homeless and housing crisis, and combat climate change and the prevalence of wildfires in our communities. There’s no greater driving force than ensuring that my daughter — and all children — learn in safe schools, and live in thriving communities where working-class families can afford to buy a home. QUESTION 1: On Businesses Leaving California California is losing business and residents to states that allCalifornia’s economy is a dynamic force. We are the fifth largest economy in the world and we have record budget surpluses. This challenge represents an opportunity. California is a great place to live, but the high cost of living is driving the middle and lower classes out of our state. Our leaders in Sacramento and here locally in the 38th Assembly District need to work hand-in-hand to address housing affordability and focus on creating more middle-class “mortgage-
access to a quality education. QUESTION 2: AB 5, Independent Contractor Law As a businesswoman myself, I understand how Assembly Bill 5 impacts small businesses, independent contractors and our state economy. An issue many are concerned with is that AB5 excludes many independent contractor categories and can potentially hurt our gig economy. I will work with local business leaders and chambers of commerce to enact state legislation that supports our economy so small business owners, like myself, and independent contractors all thrive in California. QUESTION 3: Proposition 13 (Property Taxes)
Closing this loophole isn’t just good for California; it’s good for business. QUESTION 4: Homelessness Solutions We need to unlock initiatives that increase our state’s affordable housing, invest in local infrastructure projects and spur business development. I support efforts such as the city of Santa Clarita’s Community Plan to Address Homelessness. As chief of staff in the city of Long Beach, I worked with constituents, developers and local government to address homelessness and will continue this work in the Assembly. QUESTION 5: Boise Decision on Homelessness
Today, homeowners pay 72% of all property taxes collected. I support reforming Prop. 13 so corporations and commercial properties are assessed on a regular basis. Taxing undervalued commercial properties at their actual value would generate needed funding and create a level playing field. Funds can be used for education, parks, streets, public transportation, health clinics, emergency rooms, libraries and public safety.
As assemblywoman representing the 38th Assembly District, I’ll work with good local initiatives mentioned before, such as the city of Santa Clarita’s Community Plan to Address Homelessness. Veterans, mental health patients, women, children and the most vulnerable shouldn’t have to sleep outside in absence of adequate housing alternatives. I’ll continue working with local community developers, business owners, landlords, schools, social service agencies and community activists to ensure adequate housing alternatives are created for the most needy among us.
paying” jobs.
class families to other states?
QUESTION 2: AB 5, Independent Contractor Law I have heard many concerns from residents in the 38th District about Assembly Bill 5. I share those concerns but am optimistic that the Assembly is working to amend the legislation and remove restrictions that are impacting tens of thousands of contract employees across the state, including those I am looking to represent in the 38th. This is an opportunity to bring everyone back to the table to re-evaluate AB5 — determine its gaps and identify solutions. QUESTION 3: Proposition 13 (Property Taxes) To solve our education funding problem, we must stabilize school funding. Since the enactment of Proposition 13, California has tumbled from 14th to 43rd in per-pupil student funding. Our 43rd place in the national rankings is unacceptable. Regarding the Prop. 13 business property taxes initiative, I am concerned about taxpayer protections and cost controls. Would passage systematically increase the cost of living in California, and thus exacerbate the exodus of middle-
QUESTION 4: Homelessness Solutions My experiences in the nonprofit, mental health and public sector uniquely qualify me to lead on this issue in Sacramento. Peggy Edwards of Bridge to Home has endorsed our campaign. Bridge to Home offers housing navigation, health care and mental health services to assist our homeless neighbors. All levels of government must work closer with our local nonprofit and business partners to solve this challenge. I have the experience and wherewithal to facilitate these partnerships. QUESTION 5: Boise Decision on Homelessness San Diego Mayor Kevin Faulconer captures the sentiments of many: “California needs to decide that it’s not acceptable to condone living outdoors. It’s not compassionate to enable the brutal life found in tent cities. It’s not responsible to turn a blind eye to drug abuse. And it’s not humane to let people with severe mental illness wander the streets without effective treatment.” We must ensure that we have adequate shelter to house our homeless neighbors.
Candidates for 36th Assembly District
Seven Democrats are challenging Republican incumbent Tom Lackey to represent the 36th Assembly District, which includes the Antelope Valley and some eastern portions of the Santa Clarita Valley. The top two candidates will face off in the November general election. Here are the five questions that were posed to the candidates: 1. Why do you think so many businesses
Tom Lackey My name is Tom Lackey and I represent California’s 36th Assembly District, which includes Antelope Valley and Santa Clarita Valley. I have served the people of California for nearly 30 years as a California Highway patrolman as well as a member of the Antelope Valley Crime Task Force. Since being elected to the state Assembly in 2014, I have authored numerous bills signed into law including training peace officers, payment plans for parking tickets, and creating a tax fund for suicide prevention. QUESTION 1: On Businesses Leaving California The amount of regulation and rising cost of building permits our state requires in order for developers to build homes or any residential buildings is disincentivizing. These high costs get passed down to businesses looking to succeed. Additionally, local governments are being squeezed from every direction for funding and, as a result, local governments are tacking on higher fees and taxes and squeezing hard-working families even more. People simply cannot afford to live here anymore.
Steve Fox I served as your state Assemblyman from 2012 to 2014. I co-authored a $600 million bond for housing for veterans. I want to make it where veterans can go to any medical facility for free. I authored a $420 million aerospace tax credit to create jobs. I will lower property tax and gas tax. I want to eliminate the share of costs when you see a medical provider. I will protect Social Security. QUESTION 1: On Businesses Leaving California High taxes, stiff fees and fines. They should be allowed to keep their own tax dollars used to grow their business. QUESTION 2: AB 5, Independent Contractor Law Drivers should be given the choice whether to be employees or independent contractors. They should be offered low-cost health insurance. QUESTION 3: Proposition 13 (Property Taxes) Editor’s note: No answer provided.
and residents are leaving California for other states? 2. What is your position on Assembly Bill 5: Is it a good law, or should it be repealed? 3. What is your position regarding Proposition 13 for business property taxes and residential property taxes?
ness in your district? 5. Is the Boise decision, which leaves in place earlier rulings that state homeless people can’t be punished for sleeping outside on public property in the absence of adequate alternatives, good or bad for local governance, and why?
4. What specific action or policy would you like to see to further address homeless-
QUESTION 2: AB 5, Independent Contractor Law I did not support Assembly Bill 5 for the simple reason that it had no clear-cut criteria for what allowed workers to be exempt and what did not allow workers to be exempt. We have seen the disastrous result that has stemmed from this law. People are out of work, and families are now being told what they can and cannot do to earn a living. QUESTION 3: Proposition 13 (Property Taxes) For starters, we must make the distinction between Prop. 13 (1978) that protects homeowners from rising property taxes, and the school-bond Prop. 13 on the March 3 ballot. I will always protect the 1978 Prop. 13 law. It is necessary to provide certainty to taxpayers in order to protect residents and business owners from the fast-rising costs in California. QUESTION 4: Homelessness Solutions I would like to see more direct funding for cities to address homelessness and resources provided directly QUESTION 4: Homelessness Solutions Those who are down on their luck, give them new training and minimum-wage jobs. Those who are mentally ill should be sent to a hospital. QUESTION 5: Boise Decision on Homelessness Move homeless somewhere they can get help, but not interfere with the health and safety of the general public.
into the Antelope Valley where the homelessness crisis has become increasingly worse. We must include critical components like providing services and offering shelter or else these efforts will be for nothing. Also, as a member of the Select Committee on Homelessness, we are working on creating bipartisan legislation to address the crisis in the state as a whole. QUESTION 5: Boise Decision on Homelessness There should be a deeper conversation surrounding homelessness. We need to address issues such as mental health, funding and resources, and the public health issues homelessness poses. My priority is to ensure all of my constituents are protected.
C6 · FRIDAY, FEBRUARY 21, 2020 · THE SIGNAL
Candidates for 36th Assembly District
Diedra Greenaway Diedra Greenaway is a Democrat who began her career as an auditor for the U.S. Department of Defense in El Segundo. Greenaway has continued to work in state and local government. She retired as an adviser from CSUN, where she also served as a union steward for Academic Professionals of California. Her background in local government includes service as the vice president for Northridge East Neighborhood Council and as an L.A. city elected budget advocate. QUESTION 1: On Businesses Leaving California There are a few reasons why business is leaving California: Taxes, bad laws and regulations. California has been among America’s most extensive taxers and regulators of business. When businesses leave, the middle class shrinks. California is one of the most beautiful states in the union but is also a fiscal and economic disaster. Regulations make it difficult to build affordable housing and, therefore, pricing has soared for both apartments and single-family homes. In my opinion, businesses and residents are leaving California due to lack of housing affordability, high utilities and labor costs, and heavy regulations over jobs and prosperity. And then there’s homelessness. California has 25% of the nation’s
Ollie McCauley I have created jobs providing higher pay for employees, actively promoting education and supporting teachers. My company has put employees and subcontractors to work in multiple states and seven countries. I believe that California has put excessive and unnecessary taxes and regulations on both employers and employees. I have worked as a police officer, served as the chair of the California Juvenile Justice Task Force, and acquired my bachelor’s, master of law and doctorate degrees. QUESTION 1: On Businesses Leaving California California is losing business and residents to states that allow a person to keep more than 50% of what they work so hard to earn. Due to excessive and unnecessary taxes and regulations on both employers and employees, California residents are seeking relief in other states. A secondary cause for people leaving California is the high cost of health care. When a state takes everything a small business makes, the people will seek relief elsewhere.
Eric Ohlsen I am a veteran and a father and a proud resident of the Antelope Valley. I am campaigning to hold members of our Legislature accountable to their own campaign promises to get money out of politics. Now that Democrats have a supermajority, where is their anti-corruption bill? I also believe that by developing a cohesive plan for growth we can create jobs and address the challenges of housing, transportation, infrastructure and the environmental crisis. QUESTION 1: On Businesses Leaving California I think that many businesses are leaving because of bureaucracy and cost of doing business in California. It gives an advantage to large corporations and hurts small business owners. Residents are leaving because the housing crisis has created a situation where the cost of living has not balanced with the standard of living, and we need to address that. QUESTION 2: AB 5, Independent Contractor Law I disagree with Assembly Bill 5. I feel like it was poorly written and it makes life significantly harder for
Mike Rives My name is Michael P. Rives. I was born into a military family in Long Beach. I have associate’s, bachelor’s and master’s degrees. I worked at the Veterans Administration as a cancer patient administrator. I am retired. I was able to get a Social Security branch in one of my campaigns. My goals are to get more state funds for north L.A. County and plan the response when we have a major earthquake. I am a moderate Democrat. QUESTION 1: On Businesses Leaving California People are leaving California because of the deterioration of the quality of life. The taxes are the highest anywhere, the highways and freeways are jam-packed and half of the population does not work. The government in Sacramento seems to be at war with its citizens and passes laws that favor those who do not contribute anything to society while neglecting the people who pay taxes and work. QUESTION 2: AB 5, Independent Contractor Law Assembly Bill 5 is a mess. There may have been good intentions to make life better for some workers and fol-
homeless population, which is a contributing factor of the increase of public health and environmental issues. QUESTION 2: AB 5, Independent Contractor Law As a former union steward for the Academic Professionals of California (APC unit 4), I strongly support Assembly Bill 5. It ensures labor protections and benefits that all employees should be entitled to such as health insurance subsidies, overtime pay, workers’ compensation, unemployment benefits and guaranteed minimum wage. QUESTION 3: Proposition 13 (Property Taxes) Prop. 13 is crucial for California. It raises the taxes for large commercial properties while keeping limits in place for homeowners. If passed, it will bring billions of dollars to schools and local governments that employ union workers. I support Prop. 13. QUESTION 4: Homelessness Solutions There is no quick and easy way to address the housing crisis in California. However, in addressing the housing crisis within the 36th district, we need to address the factors that cause homelessness. These factors
include substance abuse, mental illness, physical and developmental disabilities, individuals who have experienced domestic violence, our youth who have aged out of the foster care system, unemployment, and lack of affordable housing. Smart economic growth and equitable development approaches can help address disparities in low-income and minority communities. It reinvests in existing neighborhoods and provides housing choices for all income levels. By implementing smart economic growth development and utilizing a coordinated approach that delivers services, housing and assistance to the most vulnerable, and creating a crisis response system that works, we can begin the real work that needs to be done to end homelessness. QUESTION 5: Boise Decision on Homelessness The crime is not that the homeless are sleeping on public property. If anything, the crime is that we do not provide adequate shelter and needed services for the homeless. Community members, stakeholders and business owners are being punished by higher crime rates. Regarding governance, I strongly believe that our federal, state and local government entities are failing the homeless. The state of California should call for an audit of the county of Los Angeles, the city of Los Angeles and the Los Angeles Homelessness Service Authority and reveal where the Measure H and Proposition HHH funds have
QUESTION 2: AB 5, Independent Contractor Law Assembly Bill 5 did not give California workers the opportunity to decide whether they were being exploited or whether they enjoyed the flexibility and independence of their careers. It is a huge expense to small businesses as well, further disadvantaging them in the marketplace. In addition, it oppresses small political candidates and issue campaigns, forcing them to hire their campaign staff and signature gatherers instead of using volunteers or independent contractors. Should be repealed! QUESTION 3: Proposition 13 (Property Taxes) The proposed changes to California’s property tax laws will adversely impact our state’s already struggling small business communities because many of them rent space in commercial properties now targeted for higher taxes. The (separate) $15 billion bond is a debt that could potentially remain on the books for decades. The proposition’s diversion of public funds away from essential services and unfunded pension liabilities creates unacceptable dangers to California’s fiscal stability.
QUESTION 4: Homelessness Solutions Thousands of men, women and children in the 36th Assembly District lack adequate shelter. They are the most vulnerable among us. Our area’s growing homeless crisis requires new and innovative solutions.One specific action we can take right now is extending hate crime protection for the homeless. They should be a protected class of people. Thugs who abuse the homeless should face enhanced sentences to punish and deter their crimes. QUESTION 5: Boise Decision on Homelessness The Boise decision restricting laws that ban sleeping and camping on public property has been criticized as courts decide public policy questions best handled by local governments. People without a place to live necessarily sleep outside when they have no alternative. The Boise ordinance criminalized that necessity. However, the court’s opinion was narrow, allowing municipalities to bar obstructions of public rights of way, balancing local governance against potentially cruel punishments. It does not preclude democratic politics.
independent contractors who want to remain independent — contractors like freelance journalists, artists, performers and Uber drivers, to name a few. The intent behind it was honorable, but it was poorly written and they should try again instead of doubling down by trying to uphold it in court. QUESTION 3: Proposition 13 (Property Taxes) My problem with Prop. 13 is that it creates a situation where a municipality’s revenue does not reflect the rising costs of its operations, and must therefore cut costs any way possible in order to account for annually increasing shortfalls. Typically the easiest budgets to slash are social services and education. Prop. 13 has hamstrung local governments and deprived them of necessary civic revenue. It’s important that we remind homeowners that no proposed change will have any effect on residential property. QUESTION 4: Homelessness Solutions I would support the use of community development block grants that require that money go to something
specific instead of letting funds get diverted to developers that disguise it behind building low-income housing, but does not actually achieve their goal of affordability. Also using similar funds to implement urban density initiatives, which would maximize the impact of housing, and mass transit solutions by creating more walkable cities in our district. QUESTION 5: Boise Decision on Homelessness I think that the Supreme Court declining to rule on the Boise decision ultimately helps the Antelope Valley. It makes loitering bans, like the one in Santa Clarita, contingent on providing adequate resources before enacting harassing policies to push the homeless problem from one community into another, of which the Antelope Valley has found itself on the tail end of.
low a court decision. It has turned into a whole slew of waivers for this group and that group (of course, lawyers are exempt). There are bills in the Assembly and the Senate to correct some of the damage. I think the law should be re-examined entirely. It conflicts with federal law and may be thrown out by a federal court sooner than later. QUESTION 3: Proposition 13 (Property Taxes) Proposition 13 (on March 3 ballot) is a money grab by the wealthy and investors. Imagine for $15 billion we are going to pay $11 billion in interest for 35 years. I suppose that is going to be tax-exempt interest, too. The money will come from the general fund revenues. The state is flush with money now. What happens when the boom is over and we have to pay the interest? Guess who is going to pay? QUESTION 4: Homelessness Solutions I want to meet with the nonprofits and the local governments in my district and ask them what do you need? Then, I am going to find out why the county is not giving north L.A. County more money and can
we get some of the money that Gov. Gavin Newsom is going to allocate for homelessness. When you have the money, you can move forward and make plans. QUESTION 5: Boise Decision on Homelessness I admire any elected official who is willing to work aYou cannot have people living on the streets. The governor should call a state of emergency and get them into tent cities and then evaluate them and place them in treatment, a place to live, jail, or deport them. As of now, we have a health crisis worldwide and having people living in unsanitary conditions jeopardizes the health of all citizens. This is the USA, not some Third World country.
VOTER GUIDE
Vote March 3, 2020