YES2020 MPlan Advanced Professional Planning Studio 2/2 (Alaniz Uribe) by ucalgarySAPL

MONTGOMERY Land Use + Development Study EVDP644.Advanced Professional Planning Studio Winter/2020

Calgary, Canada / 1 May 2020

contents Acknowledgments 1 The Project 3 The Reports: 5 Montgomery Neighbourhood Redevelopment Plan by Ana Barbalho, Irene Borgonia and Ravi Siddhartha Montgomery. Gateway to the Rockies by Lauren Armeneau, Bryce Devereaux and Bryana Parahoniak Montgomery, the Way Forward by Michael Ge, Lilit Houlder and Gerrit Scheffel Re-Imagining Montgomery. Community Development Plan by Cong Gu, Jolene Moran and Azadeh Rasouli Yazdi

acknowledgments UNIVERSITY OF CALGARY School of Architecture, Planning and Landscape Students: Lauren Armeneau Ana Barbalho Irene Borgonia Bryce Devereaux Michael Ge Cong Gu Lilit Houlder Jolene Moran Bryana Parahoniak Azadeh Rasouli Yazdi Gerrit Scheffel Ravi Siddhartha Instructor: Francisco Alaniz Uribe - Assistant Professor / RPP, MCIP STEERING COMMITTEE Montgomery Community Association Janice Mackett Laura Kornfeld Neal Greywall Marilyn Wannamaker The City of Calgary John Hall - Coordinator, Community Planning - Centre West / RPP, MCIP CivicWorks Ben Bailey - Urban Planner / RPP, MCIP A special thanks to the City of Calgary, which through the Urban Alliance facilitated the acquisition of valuable data.

Guided Site Visit Montalban Park, Montgomery

Community Workshop Montgomery Community Hall

)

the project The Advance Professional Planning studio is the the capstone studio for the Master of Planning at the University of Calgary. The studio focuses on current land use and development issues. In collaboration with community-based organizations the studio selects a project site that acts as the case study for the term. In the summer of 2019 the Montgomery Community Association (MCA) identified the need for a comprehensive study that could address the existing and forthcoming issues associated with land use and development in the neighbourhood. As part of the Urban Alliance, a partnership between the City of Calgary and the University of Calgary, and in collaboration with the Federation of Calgary Communities (FCC), the School of Architecture, Planning and Landscape (SAPL) worked together with the MCA to develop a study that could become the foundation for future land use and development guidelines that can help in the communityâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;s decision-making process. Our Approach Our approach included background research, inventory and analysis, and an iterative concept development process. The students undertook an in-depth analysis of the community and its surrounding area, and in consultation with the community they derived issues, opportunities and constraints that drove and set the stage for the development of concepts and strategies. These proposed strategies and concepts were based on findings from the analysis and were supported by extensive technical and precedent research. The work of the students is reviewed by a project Steering Committee that includes members from the Montgomery Community Association, The City of Calgary Community Planning Department and an external professional planner advisor. There are three phases of reviews where students get feedback that helps them adjust and refine their proposals. Public consultation is a fundamental part of the planning process. It is always the intent of this studio to incorporate community consultation as a key part of the project. Originally the project planned for three opportunities for input a citizen-lead walking tour, a community workshop and a final open house. Unfortunately due to the Covid19 pandemic the final open house had to be canceled. The time line for the project was compact and limited to the academic winter term. The project extended from the beginning of January to the end April of 2020. The diagram in the opposite page shows the different groups involved, review dates and public participation opportunities. SAPL Group Steering Committee

SAPL Group Steering Committee Stakeholders

SAPL Group Steering Committee Stakeholders Community

SAPL Group Steering Committee

SAPL Group Steering Committee Community

Project Start Up and Background

Inventory and Analysis

Synthesis of Issues Opportunities and Constraints

Preliminary Concepts and Guidelines

Final Concepts and Guidelines

Walkabout/Site visit meeting with Steering Committee Early January

Stakeholders Meetings Review of Findings by Steering Committee Early February

Analysis Workshop Community Hall Early March

Draft Presentations to Steering Committee Mid March

Final Presentaiton to Steering Committe Final Open House- Community Hall Mid April

the reports Montgomery Neighbourhood Redevelopment Plan by Ana Barbalho, Irene Borgonia and Ravi Siddhartha Montgomery. Gateway to the Rockies by Lauren Armeneau, Bryce Devereaux and Bryana Parahoniak Montgomery, the Way Forward by Michael Ge, Lilit Houlder and Gerrit Scheffel Re-Imagining Montgomery. Community Development Plan by Cong Gu, Jolene Moran and Azadeh Rasouli Yazdi

ForYou C O N S U LT I N G

MONTGOMERY

Neighbourhood Redevelopment Plan

Issued 2020.04.24

Prepared For

Montgomery Community Association

Prepared By

ForYou Consulting

Project Team

Ana Barbalho Irene Borgonia Ravi Siddhartha

Acknowledgment

Prof. Francisco Alaniz Uribe

Steering Committee

Ben Bailey; Civic Works Neal Greywall; Planning Committee Member John Hall; City of Calgary Laura Kornfeld; Montgomery Community Association Janice Mackett; Montgomery Community Association Planning Committee Chair Marilyn Wannamaker; Montgomery Community Association

Special Thanks

Table of Contents 1.0

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

2.0

FORYOU TEAM

3.0

INTRODUCTION TO MONTGOMERY 3.1 Site Introduction 3.2 Project Understanding 3.3 Legal Framework 3.4 Historic Context 3.5 Historic Evolution 3.6 Methodology + Approach 3.7 Work Plan 3.8 Budget

3 4 5 6 7-8 9 - 12 13 - 14 15

4.0 ANALYSIS

4.1 4.2 4.3 4.4 4.5 4.6 4.7 4.8 4.9 4.10

The People The Land Getting Around Montgomery Traffic Analysis Mobility Choices Places to Play Places to Live Current Challenges Future Opportunities Future of Montgomery

5.0

PUBLIC ENGAGEMENT

4.1 4.2 4.3

6.0

DESIGN CONCEPTS

Community Workshop Feedback Summary Design Principles Moving Forward

16 - 17 18 - 19 20 - 21 22 23 24 - 25 26 - 29 30 31 32

33 - 34 35 36

6.1 Strategies for Community Building 6.2 Designs to Get People Moving 6.3 Enhancing Public Spaces For People of All Ages 6.4 A Bold Move: Montgomery Gateway

37 - 52 53 - 78 79 - 98

7.0 CONCLUSION

103 - 104

8.0 REFERENCES

105

99 -102

ForYou C O N S U LT I N G

ForYou

C O N S U LT I N G

1.0 EXECUTIVE S U M M A R Y Montgomery is an established community in North West of Calgary, close to Shouldice Athletic Park, the University of Calgary, and with access to Bow River, providing beautiful natural environments, lovely vistas, and a community with historical significance. The community expects to undergo a significant urban transformation over the next 15 to 20 years due to population increase and demographic shift, offering several challenges and opportunities. Although a recent Montgomery Area Redevelopment Plan (ARP) exists, this document aims to supplement the ARP and guide the community to lead its planning process by providing alternatives in creating a lively, healthy, and attractive community for all ages. This document provides design interventions and policy recommendations on Land Use, including introducing various housing options, mobility networks for active transportation, public realm improvements, and strategies for parks and open spaces. This document is a product of an academic exercise based on a participatory approach and an Urban Alliance between the Students & Faculty of School of Architecture, Planning, and Landscape and Federation of Calgary Communities. It includes site and statistical data analysis, research, steering committee recommendations, and community feedback received during a community workshop, all forming the foundation for the design and policy recommendations contained within this document. This document intends to guide the future development of Montgomery and support the community in making informed decisions.

ForYou C O N S U LT I N G

ForYou

C O N S U LT I N G

2.0 F O R | Y O U T E A M ForYou Consulting is a multi-disciplinary planning & design firm that believes in creating happy and healthy communities while specializing in community engagement. With a collaborative approach and visionary planning interventions ForYou Consulting is proud and true to their company mandate to design for a happier world. The Principals of ForYou Consulting have been practicing in Calgary for 2 years and have brought with them the knowledge and experience from different parts of the world. The dynamic and energetic team is the most valuable resource that elevate community consultation to the next level. ForYou Consulting builds teamwork that inspires one another in order to push the creative limits of the clientâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;s vision and contribute to designing for a happier world.

Ana Barbalho

ForYou Consulting Principal B. Arch + Urbanism Master of Planning Candidate 10 years of architectural experience in Brazil

Irene Borgonia

ForYou Consulting Principal B. Evds Landscape + Urbanism Master of Planning Candidate 1 year of interior experience in Canada

Ravi Siddhartha

ForYou Consulting Principal B. Arch Master of Planning Candidate 10 year of architectural experience in India

ForYou C O N S U LT I N G

3 . 0 INTRODUCTION TO MONTGOMERY 3.1 Site Introduction 3.2 Project Understanding 3.3 Legal Framework 3.4 Historic Context 3.5 Historic Evolution 3.6 Methodology + Approach 3.7 Work Plan 3.8 Budget

3 4 5 6 7-8 9 - 12 13 - 14 15

ForYou

C O N S U LT I N G

3.1

S I T E INTRODUCTION Montgomery is an inner-city neighbourhood located within the Northwestern quadrant of Calgary. The site had been fully developed by the 1960s and is rich with history and local heritage. Through the partnership of the Urban Alliance The University of Calgary School of Architecture, Planning, and Landscape had been granted the position as a liaison between The City of Calgary and Montgomery. ForYou Consulting had been granted the responsibility to create a statutory Neighbouhourhood Redevelopment Plan for strategic growth towards 2042. The following section outlines a preliminary site assessment, work plan, methodology breakdown, and schedule of the process.

R E G I O N A L G A T E W A Y Montgomery is considered a gateway community to the Rocky Mountains. The following chart indicates the ease of accessibility for regional amenities and surrounding municipalities. The unique location of the community also benefits from the local amenities and has an existing recreational infrastructure that links the northwestern community to Edworthy Park, The University of Calgary, and Downtown Calgary. The site provides plenty of services for the residents. Strategic neighbourhood redevelopment of Montgomery is required to fully enhance the identity of a gateway community.

Edworthy Park

Market Mall

Bicycle

4min

10min

12min

14min

30min

1h 20

Public Transit

15min

30min

16min

35min

1h 20

Private Vehicle

~20min ~5min

~8min

~6min

~30min

40min

Vehicle

1h 30

Banff

University Foothills Downtown of Calgary Hospital

Chestemere

45min

Airport

Cochrane

Airdrie

Okotoks

30min

40min

45min

Airdrie

TOWN OF COCHRANE

TOWN OF BANFF

TOWN OF CANMORE CHESTERMERE

Calgary

TOWN OF OKOTOKS

ForYou

C O N S U LT I N G

3.2

P R O J E C T UNDERSTANDING The purpose of the Neighbourhood Redevelopment Plan is to provide neutral consultation between The City of Calgary and the community of Montgomery for future development and neighbourhood transformation projects that can support and sustain economic growth within the community. Similar to other inner-city neighbourhoods of Calgary, Montgomery is in the transition to revitalize the area. The area is currently being subjugated to numerous infill projects and one of Calgaryâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;s newest Business Revitalization Zone due to the presence of two main streets. Montgomery is a changing community, the establishment of the Montgomery History Committee in 2006 reflects The Board Members of the Community Associationâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;s pride towards their history. Despite its annexation and development pressures of gentrification, Montgomery maintains its independent and original character. H O U S I N G C R I S I S

The issue of housing affordability is a prevalent issue throughout Calgary. As indicated in the following infographic there is a higher percentage of homeowners that spend over 30% of their monthly income towards housing, whereas there is a lower percentage of renters spending over 30% of their monthly income compared to Calgary.

26% Montgomery 24% Calgary Home owners

28% Montgomery 36% Calgary Renters

12% Montgomery 10% Calgary Aged 65+

15% Montgomery 9% Calgary 0 - 14

DEMOGRAPHIC T R E N D S

A major challenge within most inner-city neighbourhoods is the increasing displacement towards the aging population. New developments that marketing towards single-family homes lacks diverse demographics to support a sustainable neighbourhood. The result of traditional community planning has lead to an excessive amount of empty-nester inner-city communities.

M O B I L I T Y C H O I C E S

At first glance, it is evident that Montgomery is a typical Calgary community that had been designed for the scale of the automobile. The following infographic illustrates the distribution of transportation modes. with the predominant method of circulation being personal vehicular usage, despite the presence of a regional recreational network.

6% Car Share 69% Personal Vehicle

14% Public Transit 5%

Walk

Bicycle

Other

ForYou

C O N S U LT I N G

3.3

L E G A L FRAMEWORK As stated within the Montgomery Area Redevelopment Plan, 2.4

Montgomery continues to be a predominately low-density residential community with a small-town character. However, some sensitive intensification has occurred in the form of good-quality medium-density residential development located near to the Bowness Road/46 Street Main Street Area. This development extends the range of housing types available in the community, as well as increasing the local customer base for nearby businesses. New buildings are pedestrian-oriented and integrate well with nearby low-density residential areas. In the areas of significant slope, new houses have a building form which steps down to follow the existing land contours. Bylaw 17P2017

Guiding Municipal Documents Calgary Municipal Development Plan The proposal and subsequent interventions shall align with the Calgary (MDP) Municipal Development Plan. Utilizing the guiding document to direct and support decisions to manage strategic growth.

Other municipal documents that will be taken into consideration are:

Calgary Transportation Plan Montgomery Area Redevelopment Plan

Guidebook for Great Communities:

North Hill communities Heritage communities Westbrook communities Open Space Plan

ForYou

C O N S U LT I N G

3.4

H I S T O R I C C O N T E X T Community Character Development

1906

Land purchased by James Shouldice whom created an economic draw via ranch lands. Residents drawn to its small-town charm and mountain views had soon lead to its development into a small community

1910

100 acres of land donated along the Bow River to the City of Calgary designating it as park space

1943

Name change from Shouldice Terrace to Montgomery

1962

Annexed by the City of Calgary: shared infrastructure cost of sewer and water lines

1962

Montgomery Community Association established

2006

Montgomery History Committee established

The transformation of Montgomery predominately stems from development pressures and associated gentrification from their two Main Street Revitalization programs. Anchors such as the University of Calgary, University District, Foothills Hospital and Alberta Children Hospital, as well as proximity to the Rocky Mountains and Downtown Calgary classify Montgomery as a strategic location for inner-city neighbourhood redevelopment.

History|of S m a l l To w n | P r i d e

ForYou

C O N S U LT I N G

3.5

H I S T O R I C EVOLUTION Changes highlighted and fully developed by 1960’s The community of Montgomery is situated along a flat facing slope of the Bow River Valley escarpment which creates beautiful scenic environments that offer a view of the last eastern stand of Douglas Fir trees within Edworthy Park. The foundations of the community such as the traditional grid street pattern, welldefined community boundaries, large stock of mature trees, and a high proportion of public space as well as the neighbourhood’s transformation create a distinctive neighborhood that is important to all residents. Although the community reflects its neighbourhood transformation, it still bears resemblance to its history.

1924

1911 Shouldice Residence

1933 Crematorium 1972 Torn Down

Westward view in the early 50’s

1948

1931 Shouldice Bridge

Shouldice family farmed on the land originally owned by O.A. Critchley

1989

ForYou

C O N S U LT I N G

1957

1950 Streetcar at Shouldice

2001

1969

1979

1959 Zoning Map

1960 Military Map

2010

2019

Traditional grid street network fully established

Showing map showing city limit and two major roads

ForYou

C O N S U LT I N G

3.6

METHODOLOGY +APPROACH Project Start

Analysis + Research

Synthesis of Issues + Identification of Key Challenges

Site Visit Identification of Focal Points Base Maps Identify Preliminary Key Challenges History, Demographics and Economics Environmental Assessment and Climate Study Land Use and Housing Diversity Existing Policies Urban Morphology, Road Networks, and Open Areas Pedestrian Movement and Connections / Networks 3D Physical Mode

Community Engagement Assess Needs and Concerns from the community

Draft Proposal / Preliminary Concepts

Print Posters Present to Steering Committee Suggest Design / Policy Intervention / Concepts addressing Key Challenges Take Feedback From the community

Final Proposal

Final Open House Final Presentation to Steering Committee Final Report containing all the Analysis, Drawings, Maps, and Proposals

ForYou

C O N S U LT I N G

The ForYou Consulting proposes strategies for potential redevelopment and the improvement of the Montgomery community with a focus on land use planning, urban design and development requirements. 1. Site Visit:

The team proposes to visit the site multiple times and have boots on the ground while observing the pedestrian patterns, open spaces, built environment and stud the urban morphology. We will be commencing the project with proper understanding of the project via base mapping, photo inventory and reviewing the existing legal framework, policies and plans.

The team has made some preliminary assessment for the key challenges and

2. Analysis

hope to further refine or replace these as the project moves forward.

The next step for the team is to do further research and analysis of the site for its environment, history, demographic & economic profile, land use, housing typology, public realm inventory and other relevant study that will help in framing the right questions for the community engagement exercise. This analysis will be presented to the steering community for their feedback and suggestions.

a) Community Profile

i) Historic Evolution ii) Census Data: Demographics, and Economics iii) Newspaper and Media

b) Environmental Assessment

i) Hydrology ii) Topography iii) Public and Open Spaces

iv)

Climate Study (shadow and wind)

c) Urban Infrastructure

i) Land Use Designations ii) Development Permits iii) Urban Morphology iv) Road Networks v) Road Hierarchy

d) Guiding Policy Documents

i) Review of critical planning documents ii) Municipal Development Plan iii) Calgary Transportation Plan iv) Montgomery Area Redevelopment Plan v) New Community Guidebook

3. Community Engagement: Phase One

a) b) c) d) e)

Posting of consultation meetings on community boards and online website Community engagement meeting held within the Montgomery Community Association Preliminary stakeholder consultation Public and special event canvasing Public design charettes

ForYou

C O N S U LT I N G

4. Identify Key Challenges and Issues

a) Observations of potential issues from initial site assessment revised in correspondence to community engagement

5. Construction of Physical Model

Illustrate design interventions to stimulate engagement with community members and steering committee

6. Draft Consultation Report / Design

The ForYou consulting team will prepare a physical model of the space that will encourage better dialogue with the members of the community during the community engagement process. We propose to use various known theories of public engagement including designing the place and the engagement process that will encourage better participation and interaction. This may involve posters, other forms of media and presentation methods while constantly taking notes and encouraging feedback. A sticky note exercise may be conducted for feedback.

After interacting with the community and assessing their needs and concerns, the team will distill the information and prioritize the key challenges and start the brain storming sessions that will help in addressing these challenges. A draft conceptual design addressing the land use, housing, commercial, open spaces, density and amenities and other relevant requirements will be presented to the steering community for their inputs and guidance. The draft design may include posters, 3D computer generated models and other presentation methods that will effectively communicate the design ideas.

Present to steering committee

7. Community Engagement: Phase Two The members of the team will be working cohesively and interacting / reporting to the Project Manager periodically, while taking valuable guidance. Subsequent to the presentation of the draft to the steering committee and further interaction with the community members during the second community engagement exercise, the team will further refine the design proposals as per the suggestions and feedback.

a) b)

Present design / policy intervention to preliminary stakeholders and community members â&#x20AC;&#x153;What we heardâ&#x20AC;? Report

ForYou

C O N S U LT I N G

8. Final Consultation Report

A final design proposal will be presented to the steering committee and an open house will be conducted in the Montgomery community association for final review. A document in the form of report along with posters will be presented to the audience.

Final content compilation

9. Final Consultation Presentation

a) b)

Steering Committee presentation Community Open House

10. Project Wrap-Up

â&#x20AC;&#x153;Lessons learnt reportâ&#x20AC;?

Project team party

The team hopes to complete these tasks in the next 14 weeks and the key dates and milestones have been highlighted in our Project Schedule. The team is expecting to spend 709 hours of work on this project, equally divided among the three members. A detailed budget is presented for the project. We at ForYou consulting are positive that we will be able to exceed your expectations and deliver this project for a better future of Montgomery community.

a Interaction & Reporting to the Senior Partner - Desk Crits b Interaction & reporting with Steering Committee Consultingmembers Community c Interaction withForYou

ForYou

C O N S U LT I N G

Legend

S. No.

Month / Weeks Day / Dates Dates

January - Week 1

January - Week 2

egend: Work Days Days of Work Milestone Desk Crit / interaction with Senior Partner Milestones Interaction with Steering Committee External Interaction Crit with the Community members 1

Proposal Report a Prepare Proposal for the Project b Submit the Proposal

1.2

1.3

1.4

Community Consultation

Steering Committee Consultation

1.5

1.6

a b c a b c d a b c d a b c d e

2 a

3.7 WORK PLAN

b c d e

Research and Analysis Project Understanding and Orientation Site Visits, Base mapping, photo inventory Community Profile Historic evolution Census Data: Demographic & economic profile Newspaper and Media Environmental Assessment Hydrology Topography Green Spaces, Public & Open Spaces Climate study and analysis (Shadow and Wind) Urban Infrastructure Land Use Designations Development Permits Urban Morphology Road Networks and Hierarchy Guiding Policy & legal Documents Review of applicable planning documents Municipal Development Plan Calgary Transportation Plan Montgomery Area Development Plan - ARP New Community Guidebook Presentation of the Analysis

Community Engagement: Phase One Posting of consultation meetings on community boards and online website Community engagement meeting held within Preliminary Stakeholder Consultations Public and special event canvasing Public design charettes

Model Construction of a physical model to illustrate design a interventions to encourage engagement with community members and steering committee

Development of Design Intervention / Policy revision: Work on the proposed design intervention for the identified challenges and issues b Hold group discussions and brain storming sessions Try different options and identify the most appropriate c solutions a

6 a 7

Draft Consultation Report / Designs Prepare drawings, illustrations, design interventions on posters and present to the steering committee for

Community Engagement: Phase Two Present draft design / policy intervention to stakeholders a and community members b Record and report the feedback Final Consultation Report / Design Prepare a final report containing the revised design / policy proposals including all the work from the beginning b Screen Tests a

Final Presentation Present the final report / design interventions / policy a proposals to the steering committee b Community open house for final presentation c Final Documentation Submission

Project Wrap-Up a "Lessons Learnt" report b Project team success party

Reporting a Interaction & Reporting to the Senior Partner - Desk Crits b Interaction & reporting with Steering Committee c Interaction with Community members

Legend:

Days of Work

January - Week 3

February - Week 4

February - Week 5

Mon Tue Wed Fri Mon Tue Wed Fri Mon Tue Wed Fri Mon Tue Wed Fri Mon Tue Wed Fri Mon 13

ForYou

C O N S U LT I N G

MONTGOMERY NIGHBORHOOD DESIGN STUDY 5

February - Week 6

March - Week 8

February - Week 7

March - Week 9

March - Week 10

March - Week 11

Mar / Apr - Week 12

April - Week 13

April - Week 14

April - Week 15

Fri Mon Tue Wed Fri Mon Tue Wed Fri

Sat Mon Tue Wed Fri Mon Tue Wed Fri Mon Tue Wed Fri Mon Tue Wed Fri Mon Tue Wed Fri Mon Tue Wed Fri Mon Tue Wed Fri

Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu

ForYou Consulting

Personnel Ana Barbahlo Irene Borgonia Ravi Siddhartha

S. No. 1

2020 Hourly Rates Proposal Report a Prepare Proposal for the Project b Submit the Proposal

1 1.2

1.3

1.4

1.5

1.6

a a b c a b c d a b c d

$1,300.00

$15.00

$1,315.00

$600.00

$30.00

$630.00

8 8 8

$400.00 $400.00 $400.00

8 4 8 16

$400.00 $200.00 $400.00 $800.00

8 8

8 8 8 8

$400.00 $400.00 $400.00 $400.00

8 8 4

8 8 8

8 8

$30.00

$700.00

$10.00

$710.00

$900.00

2 4 4

6 12 12

$300.00 $600.00 $600.00

$300.00 $600.00 $635.00

$1,200.00

$300.00

$2,700.00

$1,300.00

$900.00

$1,600.00

$1,400.00

Community Engagement: Phase Two Present draft design / policy intervention to stakeholders and community members b Record and report the feedback

$1,400.00

$300.00

Final Consultation Report / Design Prepare a final report containing the revised design / policy proposals including all the work from the beginning b Screen Tests

$600.00

140

$7,000.00

$60.00

$7,060.00

4 2

12 2

$600.00 $100.00

$40.00

$600.00 $140.00

Community Engagement: Phase One Posting of consultation meetings on community boards and online website Community engagement meeting held within Montogomery Community Association Preliminary Stakeholder Consultations Public and special event canvasing Public design charettes

Identification of Key Challenges and Issues Identification of potential issues from initial site a assessment revised in correspondence to community engagement b Prioritize critical areas of possible interventions Model Construction of a physical model to illustrate design a interventions to encourage engagement with community members and steering committee Development of Design Intervention / Policy revision: Work on the proposed design intervention for the identified challenges and issues b Hold group discussions and brain storming sessions Try different options and identify the most appropriate c solutions

3.8 BUDGET

$600.00 $600.00 $300.00 $600.00 $500.00 $180.00

Draft Consultation Report / Designs Prepare drawings, illustrations, design interventions on posters and present to the steering committee for

$600.00 $600.00 $300.00 $600.00 $500.00 $150.00

Total Fees

12 12 6 12 10 3

c d e

Expeneses & Disbursements

CAD$ 50.0

2 2 2 8 2 1

Subtotal fees

CAD$ 50.0

8 2 2 2 6 1

Total Hours

CAD$ 50.0

2 8 2 2 2 1

a b c d e

ForYou MONTGOMERY NIGHBORHOOD DESIGN STUDY 15 DETAILED BUDGET C O N S U L T I N G

Final Presentation Present the final report / design interventions / policy proposals to the steering committee b Community open house for final presentation c Final Documentation Submission a

$35.00

$100.00

$2,800.00

$1,300.00 $50.00

$950.00 $1,600.00

$60.00

$1,460.00

$1,400.00 $10.00

$310.00

Project Wrap-Up a "Lessons Learnt" report b Project team success party

$700.00

$15.00

$715.00

Reporting a Interaction & Reporting to the Senior Partner - Desk Crits b Interaction & reporting with Steering Committee c Interaction with Community members

8 2 6

24 6 18

$1,200.00 $300.00 $900.00

$15.00 $15.00 $15.00

$1,215.00 $315.00 $915.00

231 32.6% $11,550.00

247 34.8% $12,350.00

231 32.6% $11,550.00

709

Total Hours % of efforts Sub Total Costs Expenses (Travel, Meals, Printing, materirls, etc.) Standard disbursements TOTAL PROFESSIONAL FEES EXCLUDING TAXES

GRAND TOTAL INCLUDING TAXES @ 5%

$35,450.00 $500.00 $35,950.00

$37,747.50

Disclaimer:

The budget proposed has been calculated for academic purposes exclusively. The Montgomery Neighbourhood Redevelopment Plan and all provided deliverables are voluntary services from ForYou Consulting.

ForYou C O N S U LT I N G

4.0 A N A L Y S I S 4.1 4.2 4.3 4.4 4.5 4.6 4.7 4.8 4.9 4.10

The People The Land Getting Around Montgomery Traffic Analysis Mobility Choices Places to Play Places to Live Current Challenges Future Opportunities Future of Montgomery

16 - 17 18 - 19 20 - 21 22 23 24 - 25 26 - 29 30 31 32

ForYou

C O N S U LT I N G

4.1

T H E | | | | | | P E O P L E The character of the community relies solely on the people who reside within its boundary. The following section details the demographic analysis of Montgomery and reveals trends in household composition and age distribution. The purpose of analyzing the trends of neighbourhood transformation is to better understand the drivers for change and identify what amenities or housing/infrastructure options are missing in order to create a more inclusive community designed for people of all ages. Household Income 1991 -2006

Montgomery Household Income 80%

Legend

70% 70%

2016 2011 2006 2001 1996 1991

60% 60%

The following graph illustrates three wage tiers indicating the socio-economic diversity of households within Montgomery.

Household Composition 1991 - 2006

50% 50%

40% 40%

30% 30%

20% 20%

10% 10%

0% 0%

$10,000 50,000

<10,000

10,000 - 19,999

20,000 - 29,999

30,000 -39,999

40,000 - 49,999

1991

50,000 - 59,999

1996

2001

$70,000 80,000 60,000 - 69,999

2006

2011

70,000 - 79,999

2016

80,000 - 89,999

$100,000 150,000

90,000 - 99,999

100,000 - 149,999

>150,000

40% 35% 30%

The following graph illustrates a 25-year analysis of household composition trends.

25%

The findings indicate there is a need for diverse housing options as the household composition predominately favours non-traditional family sizes. An increase in single-parent families also indicates the requirement to focus on amenities and childcare services close to where people live.

20% 15% 10% 1991

1996

2001

2006

2011

2016 Household Composition

2016

Trends in Household Composition

90%

Legend

70%

Male; Single Parent

Single Person

50%

Female; Single Parent

Children >18 at home

30%

Married Couples

Children <18 at home

10% 1991

1996 2001 2006 2011

2016

Trends in Single Parent Families

ForYou

C O N S U LT I N G

Age Distribution 1991 - 2016 The following graph depicts age distribution for Montgomery, it is also representative of most inner-city communities within Calgary. The findings illustrate the challenge of creating neighbourhoods that support diverse housing choices that welcome diverse demographics and thus creating sustainable neighbourhoods. The following graph identifies two critical findings, a decrease in children and an increase in seniors.

40% 35% 30% 25% 20% 15% 10% 5%

According to Montgomeryâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;s ARP, the population declined by 26% from 1968-2003. Overall, the population decline in Montgomery is typical of many Calgary inner-city communities reflecting the lifecycle transition from families with children to empty nesters. Due to the development pressures of the Business Revitalization Districts the population has been steadily increasing.

1991

1996

2001

Legend 0 - 19 years old 20 - 34 years old 35 - 64 years old > 65 years old

2006

2011

Rate of Change between 1991 - 2016

2016

0 - 19 years old -25% > 65 years old44%

Gender + Age Distribution 2016 Community demographic suggests that Montgomery is in transition. According to Census data, seniors over 65 years old make up 23% of the population, which is twice as high compared to the city average of 11%. The community contains an aging population and fewer children as compared to the rest of the city.

Calgary 19% 0 - 14 11% >65

100+ 95 - 99

Montgomery 15% 0 -14 23% >65

90 - 94 85 - 89 80 - 84 75 - 79 65 - 69 55 - 59 50 - 54 45 - 49 40 - 44 35 - 39 30 - 34 25 - 29 20 - 24 15%

10%

15%

ForYou

C O N S U LT I N G

4.2 T H E | | | | | | L A N D Flooding + Stormwater Drainage Montgomery is a community that can be characterized by its proximity to nature. Over half of its border is encompassed by the Bow River escarpment. Due to the presence of Shouldice Park, a large portion of land susceptible to flooding is contained within the regional amenity. Stormwater analysis of predicted drainage paths identifies water runoff aligned to follow the street network orientation as illustrated in the navy line beginning on 45th St. and Bowness Rd. and flowing into the Bow River adjacent to George Gell Park. The flooding and stormwater analysis conclude Montgomery as a prospective community for redevelopment as it is less likely to take critical damage during a flood.

0.5Km

Bow River 2013 Flood Level 1:50 Flood Line 1:100 Flood Line 1:200 Flood Line

*Most Likely Predicted Drainage Path 2

Residential development between 19th Ave and Home Road is considered at risk during the event of a 1:100 flood, But with strategic planning of land north of 16th Ave, the damage can be manageable. Minimal storm water run-off damage onto residential development

ForYou

C O N S U LT I N G

Slope Stability Montgomery offers plenty of scenic value due to its high 1100m elevation that overlooks the unique landscape of the Bow River and Edworthy Park, as well as adjacent Calgary communities. The following slop stability analysis identifies areas that are considered undevelopable. Fortunately, the natural curvature of the landscape had limited development 1110 1110 and 1065 lead to the conservation of land1110 that is predominantly 1110 1080 located within 1065 Montalban Park which is centrally located to 1065 1105 the residential district of the community.1110 1090 1065

1105

1110

1065 1110

0.5Km

5m interval Contour x

1070

1095 1115 1120

1075 1065

0 - 2% Poor Drainage 2 - 15% Ideal for built/recreational development

20 - 33% development discourage - LAI geothecinial evaluation for slope

1110

1085

Elevation

15 - 20% Maintain slope stability

1115 1120

1070

1115

1115 1075 1080

1110

1100 1130 1110 1125

1105

1060

1085

1130

1100 1060

1165 1170 1175 1185 1195

1065

1090

1210

1115

1065

1135 1145

1150 1155 1160

1225

1215

1205

1190

1180

1120

1060 1060 1070

1060

1055

Undevelopable land centrally located within the residential urban blocks. The steep slope had lead to the location of the community open space known as Montalban Park. The programming and design of the identified park are significant for the community, as Montgomery is challenged by having less community open space compared to Calgary.

ForYou

C O N S U LT I N G

4.3 G e t t i n g | A r o u n d Montgomery 5 Minute Walkshed

Grocery and Transit Node

The following analysis illustrates a 5-minute walkshed of major community nodes within Montgomery.

The location of the transit node services residents of Montgomery as well as adjacent communities such as Bowness due to the presence of a major grocery store. The following walkshed illustrated only a portion of residents can freely utilize the services.

The purpose of the study is to analyze the walkability of the community and to identify areas that are either lacking services and amenities or there is a surplus of overlapping walksheds that require enhancements to the public realm. The following study identifies an unbalance of services located within the southern section of Montgomery. It is a challenge moving forward as most of the residential blocks are located within the Northern hemisphere. Further enhancements within the center of the residential blocks are required in order to strategically plan for an inclusive community.

Schools There are two schools located within Montgomery. Although it is only Terrace Road Elementary that can be considered a service for the residents as it is a K-6 public school and is centrally located. The Charter High school is a private school that typically admits students across the city.

Legend Montgomery_Outline School Terrace Road Lines bufferTerraceRoadSchool ParksSites

Access to River Pathway Montgomery is a desirable neighbourhood to live in due its connection to the regional river pathway. The following analysis identifies entrances into the community and the extent of residential development that can easily access the amenities.

Legend Lines buffer river3 Montgomery_Outline ParksSites

Montalban Park As identified within the slope stability analysis, further enhancements to Montalban Park is critical in order to create services towards the northern section of Montgomery. Amenities located beyond the edge of the community are compromised due to the road conditions of 32nd Ave and Shaganappi Trail and require further public realm improvements.

Legend Lines ParkDogWalkshed parkDogDot Montgomery_Outline ParksSites

ForYou

C O N S U LT I N G

Home Rd NW

Assessment of Road Infrastructure The community not only faces the challenge of being divided by the Trans Canada Highway but the imposing condition of the existing infrastructure as well. As illustrated within the sections, the road network had been designed for the automobile with minimal space for the sidewalks. The imposing conditions of the public realm compromise residents who wish to live an active lifestyle.

Tra n

ana

sR es

Bo d NW

Road Hierarchy Skeletal Road Arterial Street Parkway Collector

PRODUCED BY AN AUTODESK STUDENT VERSION

Urban Boulevard Neighbourhood Boulevard Residential Street

0.5Km

PRODUCED BY AN AUTODESK STUDENT VERSION Regional Path

14.66

Property line

0 1 2 3 4 5

5.76

Property line

2.43

Neighbourhood Boulevard

Park

Vehicular Road

PRODUCED BY AN AUTODESK STUDENT VERSION

Urban Boulevard

PRODUCED BY AN AUTODESK STUDENT VERSION PRODUCED BY AN AUTODESK STUDENT VERSION

Amendment Land use Bylaw to reduce property line setback

Side walk

2.54

1.77

1.21

Parking

Vehicular Road 14.19

18.79

0 1 2 3 4 5

Parking Side walk

1.62

Parking

8.95

ForYou

C O N S U LT I N G

4.4 T R A F F I C A N A L Y S I S Home Rd NW

TRAFFIC VOLUME AND INCIDENT HEAT MAP Tra n

Further analysis of the road condition is required in order to fully gauge the quality of pedestrian safety within Montgomery.

ana

Bo NW

The purpose of the following map is to identify areas that require strategic intervention and planning. An intersection that has been identified is between 16th Avenue/Trans Canada Highway and 49 Street NW. This area is considered a critical location for intervention due to its purpose of connecting residents to regional open spaces. The intersection is considered a gateway into Montgomery, yet the restriction of pedestrian circulation compromises the vibrancy of the community.

0.5Km

25000 - 50000 15000 - 25000 10000 - 15000 5000 - 10000 Bike Trail

3+ Incidents 2 Incidents 1 Incidents Traffic Lights Pedestrian Crosswalk

ForYou

C O N S U LT I N G

4.5 M O B I L I T Y C H O I C E S Home Rd NW

TRANSIT SERVICES The purpose of the following map is to showcase the extent of public transit services.

Tra n

The concentration of transit routes is located along 16th Avenue and Bowness Road Main Streets.

ana

There is a limitation of north-south connections, the route outlined along Home Road and 48 Street NW illustrates an imbalance of services towards the eastern section of the community.

Bus Schedule Further analysis regarding bus schedules reveals extremely limited timeframes of scheduled stops.

Bus Schedule

Bus Route 1 Route 305 Route 40 Route 53 Route 408 Route 422

Peak Hour Off Peak Weekend 12 min 15 min 35 min 20 min 30 min 30 min

20 min X 35 min 30 min 30 min 60 min

25 min X 35 min 30 min 45 min 60 min

0.5Km

40 Bus Route 305 Bus Route 1 Bus Route 53 Bus Route 408 Bus Route 422 Bus Route

3+ Bus Stops 2 Bus Stops Bus Stop 305 Express Stops

ForYou

C O N S U LT I N G

4.6 P L A C E S | T O | P L A Y

Open Space Typologies

7 1

The following map illustrates the open space typology. the visual representation of the regional open space exceeding the community open space as well as the fragmented community open space is a concern moving forward.

2 6 4

The targeted demographic that has been taken into consideration for the existing landscape design of the community space have been identified below. 0

6 Paraplegic

Teenagers

Adults

Seniors

Heritage - Special Spaces School Playgrounds

5 Children

Regional Open Space Community Open Space

0.5Km

ForYou

C O N S U LT I N G

Urban Forest The urban forest is a critical component for many inner-city communities. The presence of street trees not only offers aesthetic value within the public realm but also provides shade and shelter. The network of street trees reveals a gap within the urban forest. It is bordered by Montgomery Town Square, the transit hub, a major grocery store, and 16th Avenue NW. The walkshed analysis had identified this location as an important node for the community and is considered pivotal in the redevelopment of Montgomery.

0.5Km

Urban Forest

Gaps

Commercial Node

ForYou

C O N S U LT I N G

4.7 P L A C E S T O | L I V E PROPERTY ASSESSMENT The following map analyzes the 2019 property assessment of homes within Montgomery. The criteria have been divided into three tiers: properties under $300,000 as affordable homes, properties between $300,000 and $500,000 as of the average throughout Calgary, and over $500,000 as a highvalue assessment. It has been analyzed that there are minimal affordable homes within the community and are typically found along the southeast edge close to the cloverleaf. Most homes within Montgomery are considered highly valued.

0.5Km

< $ 300, 000 $ 300, 000 - $ 500, 000 > $ 500, 000

Trends in Affordability Spends <30% of monthly income on housing and utilities Spends >30% of monthly income towards housing and utilities

100%

50%

0% 1991 1996 2001 2006 2011 2016

Home Owner

0% 1991 1996 2001 2006 2011 2016

Renter

ForYou

C O N S U LT I N G

PERIOD OF HOUSING CONSTRUCTION The following map illustrates the period the housing construction within Montgomery. As earlier stated the community had been fully developed by the 1960s, as supported by the following graph illustrating the comparison of construction with Calgary. Hard barriers and edge conditions such as the Bow River and Shaganappi Trail restrict residential development north of the Trans Canada Highway. And in response to economic drivers and an increase in population within the area, Montgomery has been under redevelopment pressures. It has been analyzed that infill development predominantly occurs between the two main streets.

0.5Km

> 1960 1961 - 1980 1981 - 1990 1991 - 2000 2001 - 2005 2006 - 2010

Comparison of the age of homes

2011 - 2018 2006 - 2010 2001 - 2005 1991 - 2000

Legend

1981 - 1990 0 0.1250.25 1961 - 1980

Mont_Bldgs_2005-09 Mont_Bldgs_2000-05 Mont_Bldgs_1990-2000 Mont_Bldgs_1960-80

0.5

0.75

1 Km

> 1960

Mont_Bldgs_<1960 5mContour

30%

Calgary

20%

10%

20%

30%

Montgomery

ForYou

C O N S U LT I N G

HOUSING TYPOLOGIES The following section illustrates the different forms of housing found in Montgomery. The primary housing types have been categorized into; single-family detached, duplex, fourplex, townhouse, multiresidential, and mixed-use buildings. As the demand for redevelopment increases, a diversity of a housing mix is required to adequately house residents of all ages and household compositions. As illustrated within the massing model of Montgomery, the predominant housing form remains as single-family detached, with a scattering of duplexes along the main streets and close to the Bow River.

Massing of Housing Typologies

Duplex

Single Family Detached

Fourplex

Townhouse

Multi Residential

Mixed Use Duplex

Single Detached

Fourplex

Townhouse

Multi residential

Mixed Use

ForYou

C O N S U LT I N G

DENSITY INCREASE

Land Use Districts

As per Area Redevelopment Plan

The following section compares the present density to the increase proposed within the Montgomery Area Redevelopment Plan. The Ciy of Calgary projects an estimated increase of 40% within the community, which is aligned to be located along the two main streets.

Present Density

Future Density

40%

Increase Estimated

If Montgomery undergoes development as per the Area Redevelopment Plan

Land Use Max Bldg. Districts Height R-C1S R-C1N R-C2 R-CG

8.6 - 10m 8.6 - 20m 8.6 - 10m 8.6 - 10m

M-C1 M-CG

9 -14m 12m

M-X1 MU-1 MU-2

14 16 - 22m 16-22m

C-C1 C-COR2 C-O

10m 16 - 22m 10 - 12m

ForYou

C O N S U LT I N G

4.8 C U R R E N T CHALLENGES The following map illustrates the current challenges that have been manifested through preliminary site analysis. Further public consultation is required in order to fully understand the dynamic needs of the community. The primary challenge that has been identified is the lack of quality within the public realm. The current state of mobility and access to services is an injustice to the unique amenities found within Montgomery. Amenities such as Shouldice Park, extensive river pathway systems, the paralleling main streets along 16th Avenue and Bowness Road are not fully utilized by the residents.

Requires pedestrian friendly infrastructure to accommodate the aging in place citizens

Disconnected from surrounding communities

Dangerous crosswalks

Community divided by the Trans Canada Highway

Land allocation for community open space under Calgaryâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;s standard of 10%

2 2

Compromised Intersections 3

Compromised Connectivity Cluster of Amenities Community Open Space 16th Avenue as a Community Divider

ForYou

C O N S U LT I N G

4.9

F U T U R E OPPORTUNITIES The primary opportunities that have been identified are the identity of a gateway community, as well as the extensive amount of amenities. Strategic planning is required as to preserve the historic value of Montgomery. The unique characteristic of paralleling main streets and its connection to regional amenities are drivers for economic growth, and if strategically managed can elevate the quality of living and create a more inclusive community for residents of all ages.

Regional shopping destination and employment hub

Possible gateway

Main Streets

Regional destination offering an increase in footfall

* * 4

Diverse amenities and employment sector

Community anchor with high scenic value

Commercial Cluster

Vehicular Extensions Destinations School Viewshed Recreational Trail Community Main Street Regional Main Street

ForYou

C O N S U LT I N G

4.10 F U T U R E | O F MONTGOMERY 2042 Population Increase 59% Calgary 54% Montgomery Current: 3975 Predicted Growth: >6000 Buildings within Montgomery A

esidenti ed R al

107 NonResidential Buildings

1st 2nd

Generation

142 Approved Residential Development 10 Laneway Houses 6 Secondary Basement Suites

Approved Residential Increase The following map depicts approved redevelopment that supports an increase in density. The current pattern of infilled housing is scattered throughout the community. The main take away from the analysis is to strategically plan and manage the growth that supports the demand for diverse amenities and programming of special places within Montgomery.

3rd

Ch a

2268 Residential Buildings

ov pr

Generation Status People living in Montgomery are most likely to stay within the community

New Residential Buildings

Employment Growth

ForYou C O N S U LT I N G

5.0 P U B L I C ENGAGEMENT 5.1 5.2 5.3

Community Workshop Feedback Summary Design Principles Moving Forward

33 - 34 35 36

ForYou

C O N S U LT I N G

5.1

COMMUNITY W O R K S H O P The following sections depict the details and approaches of engagement with the citizens of Montgomery. The importance of public participation is critical to understand the perspective of the residents in which we are planning for a more inclusive community for all ages. To prepare for the community workshop the students of Advance Professional Planning Studio have contributed to creating a 1:1000m scaled massing model, as to cultivate a more dynamic consultation process. The students had also consolidated section 4.0 Analysis into posters to aid in the discussion. Students had then broken into small groups with the residents and had questioned their opinions regarding the constraints and opportunities of their community.

ForYou

C O N S U LT I N G

Massing Model The massing model had been created to provide a physical representation of the current density within Montgomery. The construction of the model had taken two weeks and required the students to prepare files to laser cut the buildings at a 1:1000m scale and manually assemble the pieces based on the height of the buildings that had been calculated via Google Earth.

Community Workshop The community workshop had an attendance of approximately 18 residents. The facilitated discussions had been divided into 6 small groups and had provided excellent feedback of the communityâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;s concerns towards future development and density increase. Through the workshop, the students were able to identify special areas that residents found important to preserve and enhance moving forward.

Where Do You Live Map

ForYou

C O N S U LT I N G

5.2

F E E D B A C K S U M M A R Y Feedback from the community workshop has been summarized within the following map. The content is pivotal in creating strategies to manage growth and to develop strategies that enhance the identity of its rich history, beautiful landscapes, and a gateway to Calgary. The main finding was the residentâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;s desire to enhance the paralleled main streets and to create a distinctive gateway along with the transit-grocery store node by diverting pass-through traffic from Bowness Road onto 16th Avenue. This action aims to create a pedestrian-oriented community along the Bowness Main Street and provides the opportunity of the name change into Montgomery Road. The main principles that had manifested from the analysis and community feedback are the need for housing options based on demographics trends, a comprehensive multi-modal network that improves the walkability and access to amenities, as well as connect local and regional open spaces that include programming for recreation and community buildings.

Legend Program open spaces Re-design Bowness Road to divert traffic onto 16th Re-design roads for people Enhance connections between the 2 Main StreetsÂ Existing bike trails Design/enhance cyclist network Enhance connection in between community nodes Implement safer intersections between cars and people Opportunity for commercialÂ Opportunity for resting stages

ForYou

C O N S U LT I N G

5.3

D E S I G N PRINCIPLES M O V I N G | F O R W A R D

Analysis and Assumptions

Community Participation

The analysis had identified the need for strategically planning for an inclusive community for all ages. Main constraints of the existing community is the lack of diverse housing and decreasing affordability, and the need to create enchantment towards the public realm that promote active lifestyle for residents of all ages. The community workshop had provided pivotal information on what the residents of the community feel are important. The first-hand insight is considered a priority in planning. The driving principles moving forwards had been a manifestation of extensive analysis and community feedback. Creating Identity

Driving Principles

Housing Options

Vibrant and Safe Public Spaces

Land Use

Housing Options + Commercial Services

Open Spaces

Parks, Recreation + Identity

strategies for

A Community For All Ages

MOBILITY

Active Lifestyles + Public Realm

ForYou C O N S U LT I N G

6.0 D E S I G N CONCEPTS 6.1 6.2 6.3 6.4

Strategies For Community Building Designs to Get People Moving Enhancing Public Spaces For People of All Ages A Bold Move: Montgomery Gateway

37 - 52 53 - 78 79- 98 99 -102

ForYou

C O N S U LT I N G

6.1

S T R A T E G I E S | F O R

COMMUNITY B U I L D I N G Land Use

Housing Options + Commercial Services

Open Spaces

Parks, Recreation + Identity

strategies for

A Community For All Ages

MOBILITY

Active Lifestyles + Public Realm

Montgomery is a community with places to live, dine and play, offering a strong sense of identity situated within the beautiful landscape along the Bow River. In the early 1950s, the community of Montgomery was centered around a small strip mall on Bowness Road between 45 St. and 46 St., and since then has grown due to socio-economic diversity associated with the diverse commerce, residents, and culture along the paralleling Main Streets. The neighbourhood transformation features a mixture of the old and new heritage and a land-use framework that supports diversity. It is essential to remind the Team that by 2048 the population growth in Montgomery will be 54%. Meaning we are going to have a population of over 6000 residents. Cross analysis of Federal Census Data, indicated the need for over 1200 new dwelling units.

ForYou

C O N S U LT I N G

After exploring relevant policy documents including the Municipal Development Plan (MDP), Montgomery Area Redevelopment Plan (ARP) and analyzing the information from â&#x20AC;&#x153;What we heardâ&#x20AC;? from the community engagement process, our team noticed that in order to achieve the numbers of dwelling units needed for the future, they would have to acknowledge and densify in strategic areas. The team decided to subdivide these strategic areas into three Phases for implementing the project (1, 2, and 3). As you can see, this densification is mainly located on the Bowness Road, an area the community felt the density would be appropriate since it would not change the neighbourhood character that is mostly single-family housing. We respected this piece of information given by the residents and decided to follow that idea where they will have mix-use buildings, commercial and residential that will be described on the following policies to come. Phase 1 is the activation of the Main Street, phase 2 will bring new homes to the community and phase 3 is the bold move on the Montgomery Town Square. The Map L-01 shows our proposed land use concept which forms the base for developing the area from the ARP together with the three implementation phases.

P.L: 1.0

Proposed Zoning Changes Policies P.L: 1.1

No new single detached houses should be built on the areas that are not zoned for them

P.L: 1.2

Building heights must follow the land use bylaw and the Proposed Zoning

P.L: 1.3

Laneway Housing is allowed on R-C1s, R-C1N and R-C2 and must be smaller than the primary unit. The building height has a maximum of 7 meters; the building should not cover 20% of the parcel. One parking stall is required for each suite

P.L: 1.4

Secondary suites are permitted on R-CG, R-C1s, R-C1N and R-C2

P.L: 1.5

Parking should be underground or in their lot

P.L: 1.6

Building heights must follow the land use bylaw and the Proposed Zoning

ForYou

C O N S U LT I N G

P.L: 1.7

Automobile-oriented business are not permitted

P.L: 1.8

Commercial and residential entrances should face the public sidewalk

P.L: 1.9

Parking should be on the back alley or underground

P.L: 1.10

The buildings should accommodate people of all ages.

P.L: 1.11

A rooftop garden or terrace is encouraged.

Proposed Land Use VARNA CR NW

59 ST NW

34 AV NW

VARBOW PL NW

CR NW

VARNA

BOWBANK

33 AV NW

PL NW

34 AV

33 AV NW

6240 31 AV NW

VARMOOR RD NW BOW CREST NURSING HOME

32 AV NW

39 ST NW

63 ST NW

BOWWOOD DR NW

VARNA CR NW

VARSCONNA PL NW

BOWNESS RD NW

ATER CR

VARTOWN PL NW

BOWW

32 AV NW

BOWWATER CR NW

NW CR

SHELDON PL NW

M Y RD

48 ST NW

KOVITZ

AV NW

NW NW

ITH

CR NW

48 ST NW

BOW

AV NW

MACKAY RD NW

NW RD EW VI W

K ST

T CR ON

AV NW

THIRS

T CR ON NW

NORFORD

39 ST NW

M T CR ON

SHAGANAPPI TR NW

29 AV NW

TA ON

Y OOL CALGAR SCH SSORI

30 AV NW

MONTE

TA ON

NW 52

EL CR

67 ST

TA ON

LBA

NTA

LEB

N AV

31 AV NW

BOWNESS RD NW

63 ST NW

32 AV NW

HOME RD NW

RSITY

NW AV

S RD

NES

RREN

32 AV NW

13 AV

ITH

13 AV

IVE UN

RIN

T DR

MCL

RRA

Y AR ITY LG UN CA MM URCH CO CH

NSE

MONTALBAN

SHOULDICE POOL

CR NW

ALE

BOWD

NW NW

DIAN

13 AV

CIF

BOWNESS RD

IC RA

ILW

T RD

E LIF AL W LIC CH NE GE UR AN EV EE CH FR

49 ST NW

S RD

NES

TERRACE ROAD ELEMENTARY SCHOOL

DR GORDON TOWNSEND SCHOOL

19.5979

21 AV NW 45

CHANGE PAVILLION

AV NW

NES

MONTGOMERY RECREATION CENTRE

S RD NW

AV NW

HOME RD NW

17 44

SHOULDICE ARENA G

20 AV

G G

NORTH PART OF LSD 32

G G

Y AV

FFCA - HIGH SCHOOL CAMPUS

TERE

MON G

& PART OF LSD 6

NES W

(TR

S RD

S CA AN

G G

)

ELECTRIC SUBSTATION NO 15

MON TGOM ERY AV NW

IC RA

G G

MON TGOM

ERY

G G

N PA

ILW

AV NW

MONTGOMERY AV

OMERY

BV NW

VETERANS CLUB

SHAGANAPPI TR NW

MONTG

MACKAY RD NW

MONTGOMERY RD NW

DIA

CIF

EDWORTHY ST SW

CK VW

16 AV

PATRI

R-C2

PATTERSON DR SW

G G

M EDWORTHY ST SW

SW DR

CE RU G

NW I TR NA AN AG SH

WNE

NA DR

TI PA SW

Map L-01: Proposed Land Use â&#x20AC;&#x201C; Phase 1

T DR IN

Phase 3

PROMINENCE PT SW

S RD WN BO

EDWORTHY ST SW

Phase 2

SID

SW E PH INENC

Phase 1

T DR

ESS WN BO RD NW

EDWORTHY ST SW

CIFIC

PROMINENCE PA SW

DIAN

ILW

A HL TIN

PROMINENCE HL SW

PATTERSON

PL SW ME

A DR TIN

PATTERSON BV SW

SON

PATTERSON RI SW

TER

PAT

EDWORTHY ST SW

PROM

GR SW

RY ME GO NW NT VW

BA SW

100

PATINA

ERSO

PATT

A LN TIN

N CR

M-CG M-X1 MU-1 MU-2 C-C1 C-COR2 C-O

Y VW

RSO

TTE

GR SW

400 PATINA PL SW

200

PATINA

PATINA DR SW

MACKAY RD NW

PROMINENCE WY SW

ON TG

N DR

PATTERSON PA SW

GA PATTERSON MT SW

PA 100

PATTERSON HL SW

DA HI)

RSO

RSO MT SW

(TRAN S CANA

TTE

PA 200 PATTERSON

EDWORTHY ST SW

PATTERSON PA SW

PATTERSON HL SW

R-CG M-C1

69 G

N BV

ERSO

41 ST NW

K VW

R-C1s and R-C1N

RIC

PAT

PATT

MACKAY RD NW

S RD

ICK

NES

BRICKBURN ESTATES

ForYou

C O N S U LT I N G

Typology This section will exemplify the various types of residential, commercial and mix-use typologies as proposed on L.Map01 together with their allowed heights.

R-C1s h= 8.6m - 10m

R-C1N h= 8.6m - 10m

Image L-01

R-CG h= 8.6m - 11m

Image L-02

M-C1 h= 9m - 14m

Image L-05

MU-1 h= 16m - 22m

Image L-07

C-C1 h= 10m

Image L-08

C-COR2 h= 16m - 22m

Image L-10

Image L-03

M-CG h= 12m

Image L-04

M-X1 h= 14m

R-C2 h= 8.6m - 10m

Image L- 11

Image L-06

MU-2 h= 16m - 22m

Image L-09

C-O h= 10m - 12m

Image L- 12

ForYou

C O N S U LT I N G

P.L: 2.0

Phase 1 (2020 - 2031) Currently, the neighbourhood Main Street is underutilized due to a lack of commercial options, together with sidewalks which are unsuitable for walking. Phase 1 will be located in four blocks on Bowness Road with 46th St NW, which we called the “Heart of Montgomery”. The community will benefit from this phase, where we create a mass of mix-use with commercial buildings at grade level and residences on the top which will support and attract new commercial options that will better serve the neighbourhood, also contributing to social vitality. With this move, we will be able to allocate 600 homes for newcomers.

Objectives: • • • •

Activate streetscape in Montgomery Main street, as per requests from the community engagement. Attract new commercial business. Encourage walking and cycling within the community. Public ground floor to contribute to social vitality.

Challenges: •

Redevelopment of old commercial located in the area

ForYou

C O N S U LT I N G

VARNA CR NW

59 ST NW

34 AV NW

VARBOW PL NW

CR NW

VARNA

BOWBANK

33 AV NW

PL NW

34 AV

33 AV NW

6240 31 AV NW

VARMOOR RD NW BOW CREST NURSING HOME

32 AV NW

39 ST NW

63 ST NW

BOWWOOD DR NW

VARNA CR NW

VARSCONNA PL NW

BOWNESS RD NW

ATER CR

VARTOWN PL NW

BOWW

32 AV NW

BOWWATER CR NW

NW CR

SHELDON PL NW

Y RD

48 ST NW

NW RD VI EW

KOVITZ

AV NW

ITH

CR NW

ST NW

48 ST NW

BOW

T CR ON

AV NW

K ST

29 AV NW

NORFORD

THIRS

39 ST NW

T CR ON

BO W

EL CR

M W

TA ON

LB TA ON M

NA TA ON M

NW MONTE

LEB

30 AV NW

Y OOL CALGAR RI SCH SSO

AC M

67 ST ST

N AV

LBA

NTA

SHAGANAPPI TR NW

31 AV NW

MACKAY RD NW

BOWNESS RD NW

BO W

63 ST NW

32 AV NW

HOME RD NW

NW AV

NW AV NW

SS NE

RREN

32 AV NW

13 AV

ITH

13 AV

ITY

IVE UN

RIN

AU MCL

AT DR

Y AR ITY LG UN CA MM URCH CO CH

NSERR

MONTALBAN

SHOULDICE POOL

CR NW

ALE

BOWD

DIAN

13 AV

IC RA CIF

BOWNESS RD

AY ILW

19 AV

E LIF AL W LIC CH NE GE UR AN EV EE CH FR

49 ST NW

T RD OR SH

SS NE

TERRACE ROAD ELEMENTARY SCHOOL

DR GORDON TOWNSEND SCHOOL

RD NW

19.5979

21 AV NW

CHANGE PAVILLION

AV NW

MONTGOMERY RECREATION CENTRE

RD NW

AV NW

HOME RD NW

17 44

SHOULDICE ARENA G

20 AV

G G

NORTH PART OF LSD 32

G G

FFCA - HIGH SCHOOL CAMPUS

REY AV

G G

MONTE

& PART OF LSD 6

G G

S RD

S CA AN

(TR

NES

)

ELECTRIC SUBSTATION NO 15

MON TGOM ERY AV NW

IC RA

MON TGOM

ERY

G G G G

G G

N PA

ILW

AV NW

MONTGOMERY AV

OMERY

BV NW

VETERANS CLUB

SHAGANAPPI TR NW

MONTG

MACKAY RD NW

MONTGOMERY RD NW

DIA

CIF

EDWORTHY ST SW

41 ST NW

R-C1s and R-C1N G

EDWORTHY ST SW G

CK VW

PATRI

16 AV

PATTERSON DR SW

(TRAN S CANA

DA HI) G

G G

ON TG

RSO

EDWORTHY ST SW

N DR

CE RU SP

TTE

ERSO

PATT

WN BO

NW NA

AG SH

SW E PH INENC

400 PATINA PL SW

EDWORTHY ST SW

WNE

G G

T DR IN

50 NA

PA PL SW G

PROMINENCE PT SW

TI PA

PATTERSON BV SW

SA BO

SW G

CO AC

P.L: 2.0

Map L-02: Proposed Land Use â&#x20AC;&#x201C; Phase 1 G

SID

ESS WN BO RD NW

A DR TIN

T DR

PATTERSON RI SW

EDWORTHY ST SW

PROMINENCE PA SW

A HL TIN

PROMINENCE HL SW

I TR

CIFIC

N ME

DIAN

ILW

A LN TIN

TER

PROM

GR SW

PATINA DR SW

PAT

100

PATINA

M-CG M-X1 MU-1 MU-2 C-C1 C-COR2 C-O

CA EDWORTHY ST SW

PROMINENCE WY SW

GR SW

PATTERSON PA SW

GA PATTERSON MT SW

BA SW

RY ME GO NW NT VW

PL SW

N CR

200

PATINA

PA 100

PATTERSON HL SW

RSO

RSO MT SW

PATTERSON

TTE

PA 200 PATTERSON

R-CG M-C1

PATTERSON PA SW

Y VW

TTE

S RD

PATTERSON HL SW

EDWORTHY ST SW

R-C2

N BV

ERSO

K VW

RIC

PAT

PATT

MACKAY RD NW

S RD

ICK

NES

BRICKBURN ESTATES

Policies and Design Guides P.L: 2.1

Buildings on the Bowness Road should be Mix Use (MX-1, MU1 and MU2) and shall follow mixed-use policies

P.L: 2.2

Maximum of five-floors or four floors on selected site as seen on L.Map02

P.L: 2.3

All building should have access to the street front

P.L: 2.4

A rooftop garden or terrace is encouraged

ForYou

C O N S U LT I N G

R.L: 2.0

P.L: 2.5

Parking should be underground with access from the back lane at the rear of the units or in the back lane. Except for some street parking for retail

P.L: 2.6

Mix use building upper floor should have setbacks along the retail street to create a human-scale environment

P.L: 2.7

No balconies should overhang the sidewalk

P.L: 2.8

Front setbacks on the Northside of the street (Bowness Road) must be 5 meters. Setbacks on the Southside of the street (Bowness Road) must be 3 meters. Relaxation may be proposed with a substitution of a patio on particular locations

P.L: 2.9

Restaurant and Coffee shops patios are encouraged

P.L: 2.10

All ground-level retail shall have clear glass on at least 60% of their facades

P.L: 2.11

Buildings should have diverse architecture design to be inviting and with human-scale making the street more interesting

P.L: 2.12

Grants or relocation will be offered for local business owners for the demolition and construction of the new buildings

Recommendations R.L: 2.1

Weather protection should be continuous along the retail or mix-use frontage. The design should have precautions to make sure the snow does not fall within pedestrian walkways.

R.L: 2.2

Signage is to be aesthetic and should be mounted perpendicular to retail frontage so is visible to pedestrians

R.L: 2.3

Buildings should be designed with energy efficiency requirements

ForYou

C O N S U LT I N G

Phase 1 Details As seen in Section AA’, the density and height of the Main street will transition to lower elevations as we go into the community. On figure before and after image, you can see how the density will be like on the Bowness Road.

A’

Image L- 13

Image L- 15

Image L- 14 Plan view – Proposed Bowness Road - Phase 1

Before

After

5 Floors (16.50m)

2 Floors (9m) 7.50

14.10

17.10

3 Floors (12m)

6.00

11.10

2 Floors (8.60m)

11.10

4 Floors (13.50m)

3 Floors (12m)

19 AV NW

Section AA’

Bowness Road NW

17 AV NW

ForYou

C O N S U LT I N G

P.L: 3.0

Phase 2 (2031-2048) To be able to allocate the rest of the population that will live in Montgomery, Phase 2 comes to with more options of residential building and a few mix-use buildings close to the Safeway site. It will enhance even more the community’s economics and social vitality. We also intend to take out all the exiting motels on 16 Av, and we propose a hotel close to the park and the river walk. With this move, we will be adding and extra 554 new homes by 2048.

Objectives: • •

Add new dwellings to complete the predicted growth Enhance the community’s economic and social vitality

Challenges: • •

Redevelopment of old commercial located in the motel’s areas Redevelopment of existing housing

ForYou

C O N S U LT I N G

VARNA CR NW

59 ST NW

34 AV NW

BOWWATE

ST NW VARMOOR RD NW

BOW CREST NURSING HOME

32 AV NW

39 ST NW

63 ST NW

BOWWOOD DR NW

VARNA CR NW

6240 31 AV NW

VARSCONNA PL NW

VARBOW PL NW

CR NW

VARNA

BOWBANK

33 AV NW

PL NW

34 AV

33 AV NW

VARTOWN PL NW

BOWNESS RD NW

R CR NW

32 AV NW

BOWWATER CR NW

NW CR

SHELDON PL NW

Y RD

48 ST NW

NW RD EW VI

K ST THIRS

T CR ON

KOVITZ

AV NW

NW ST

ITH SM

CR NW

48 ST NW

BOW

T CR ON

39 ST NW

WMO

M W

29 AV NW

D AV

NORFOR

EL CR

CR NA

TA ON M

NW 52

LEB

30 AV NW

Y OOL CALGAR RI SCH SSO MONTE

AC M

67 ST ST

N AV

LBA

NTA

SHAGANAPPI TR NW

31 AV NW

MACKAY RD NW

BOWNESS RD NW

63 ST NW

32 AV NW

HOME RD NW

NW AV

ITH

NW AV

S RD

NES

RREN

32 AV NW

13 AV

Y AV

SIT

IVER UN

RIN

MCL

RAT

Y AR ITY LG UN CA MM URCH CO CH

NSER

MONTALBAN

SHOULDICE POOL

CR NW

ALE

BOWD

DIAN

13 AV

CIFIC

BOWNESS RD

ILW

T RD

E LIF AL W LIC CH NE GE UR AN EV EE CH FR

49 ST NW

S RD

NES

TERRACE ROAD ELEMENTARY

DR GORDON TOWNSEND SCHOOL

SCHOOL

19.5979

21 AV NW

CHANGE PAVILLION

AV NW

S RD

NES

MONTGOMERY RECREATION CENTRE

AV NW

HOME RD NW

17 44

SHOULDICE ARENA G

20 AV

G G

NORTH PART OF LSD 32

G G

FFCA - HIGH SCHOOL CAMPUS

REY AV

G G

MONTE

& PART OF LSD 6

S RD

NES

)

ELECTRIC SUBSTATION NO 15

MON TGO MER Y AV NW

PACIF

IC RA

ILW

MON TGO

MER

G G

Y AV NW

MONTGOMERY AV

OMERY

BV NW

VETERANS CLUB

SHAGANAPPI TR NW

MONTG

MACKAY RD NW

MONTGOMERY RD NW

DIAN

EDWORTHY ST SW

41 ST NW

CK VW

16 AV

R-C1s and R-C1N PATRI

NW (TRAN S CANA

DA HI)

N BV

ERSO

PATT

EDWORTHY ST SW

K VW

RIC

PAT

MACKAY RD NW

S RD

ICK

NES

BRICKBURN ESTATES

PATTERSON DR SW

EDWORTHY ST SW

G G

M EDWORTHY ST SW

N DR

G G

CE G

W NE SS

EE TR

400 PATINA PL SW

I TR

WNE

T DR IN PO

0 50 NA TI PL G

SW DR

PROMINENCE PT SW

PA G

Map L-03 – Proposed Land Use – Phase 1 G

ESS WN BO RD NW

SID

PP AG SH

EDWORTHY ST SW

SA T DR

A DR TIN

Y ST

EDWORTHY ST SW

PATTERSON BV SW

CIFI

PROMINENCE PA SW

A HL TIN

PROMINENCE HL SW

DIAN

ILW

PATTERSON RI SW

PL SW N ME

RSO

PATTERSON

TTE

A LN TIN

RY ME GO NW NT VW

C RA

PROM INEN CE PH

GR SW

PROMINENCE WY SW

TERS

PAT

PATTERSON PA SW

100

PATINA

MT SW

PATINA DR SW

N CR

EDWORTHY ST SW

M-CG M-X1 MU-1 MU-2 C-C1 C-COR2 C-O

PATTERSON

BA SW

TTER

GR SW

100

PATTERSON HL SW

SW HL

200

PATINA

AN NA

200

MT SW

SO TTER SW GR

R-CG M-C1

PATTERSON

PATTERSON PA SW

PATTERSON HL SW

R-C2

ON TG

TTER

MACKAY RD NW

ForYou

C O N S U LT I N G

P.L: 3.0

Policies and Design Guides

P.L: 3.1

Parking should be underground with access from the back lane at the rear of the units or at the back lane

P.L: 3.2

Front setbacks should not be less than 3 meters or more than 5 meters

P.L: 3.3

Maximum of three-floors or four floors on selected site as seen on Map L-03

P.L: 3.4

All building should have access to the street front

R.L: 3.0 R.L: 3.1

Buildings should be designed with energy efficiency requirements

R.L: 3.2

Balconies should be designed as a part of the building and not an â&#x20AC;&#x153;add on.â&#x20AC;?

ForYou

C O N S U LT I N G

Phase 2 Details As seen in section AA again, the building on Bowness Road will have three to four floors and will lower when going into the neighbourhood. The before and after image shows how the density will be.

A’

Image L- 16

Plan view – Proposed Bowness Road - Phase 2

Before

After

3 Floors (12m)

2 Floors (8.60m)

19 AV NW

Section AA’

3 Floors (12m)

Bowness Road NW

2 Floors (8.60m)

17 AV NW

ForYou

C O N S U LT I N G

P.L: 4.0

Phase 3 - Special Site Until now, our proposals have strategically identified areas for redevelopment that will act as a catalyst for growth and how to maintain the neighbourhood character within the residential areas. With this phase, we are proposing an aggressive approach to the redevelopment of Montgomery Town Square. Where we have identified it as transformational in creating a gateway into Calgary and the community. In this area, we are transforming a commercial land use to mix use where we intend to retrofit the Safeway site and add residential to support and bring life to the Town Square. With this move, we will be able to allocate 84 homes for newcomers.

Objectives: • Bring life to the Town Square • Enhance the community’s economic and social vitality Challenges: • Redevelopment of old commercial located in areas

P.L: 4.0

Policies and Design Guides P.L: 4.1

Parking should be underground with access from the back lane at the rear of the units or at the back lane

P.L: 4.2

30% of the land should be dedicated to open space

P.L: 4.3

Buildings should have a maximum of five floors.

P.L: 4.4

Grants will be offered for local business owners for the demolition and construction of the new buildings

ForYou

C O N S U LT I N G VARNA CR NW

59 ST NW

34 AV NW

BOWWATE

ST NW

6240 31 AV NW

VARMOOR RD NW

BOW CREST NURSING HOME

32 AV NW

39 ST NW

63 ST NW

BOWWOOD DR NW

VARNA CR NW

VARSCONNA PL NW

VARBOW PL NW

CR NW

VARNA

BOWBANK

33 AV NW

PL NW

34 AV

33 AV NW

VARTOWN PL NW

BOWNESS RD NW

R CR NW

32 AV NW

BOWWATER CR NW

NW CR

SHELDON PL NW

KA AC

M Y RD

48 ST NW

NW NW ST

AV NW

NW NW

ITH

CR NW

48 ST NW

AV NW

MACKAY RD NW

K ST

THIRS KOVITZ

BOW

T CR ON

39 ST NW

SHAGANAPPI TR NW

NW T CR ON

VI EW

EL CR

TA ON

BO W

LEB

CR NA

29 AV NW

D AV

NORFOR

T CR ON

TA ON

W BO

TA ON

30 AV NW

Y OOL CALGAR SCH SSORI NTE

67 ST ST

N AV

LBA

NTA

31 AV NW

D OO W W BO

BOWNESS RD NW

63 ST NW

32 AV NW

HOME RD NW

NW AV

RREN

32 AV NW

S RD NES W BO

13 AV

ITH

13 AV

Y AV

SIT

IVER UN

ST RIN

AU MCL

AT DR

Y AR ITY LG UN CA MM URCH CO CH

NSERR

MONTALBAN

SHOULDICE POOL

CR NW

ALE

BOWD

DIAN

13 AV

50 G

PA CIFIC

BOWNESS RD

AY ILW

19 AV

S RD NES W BO

T RD

E LIF AL W LIC CH NE GE UR AN EV EE CH FR

49 ST NW

OR SH

TERRACE ROAD ELEMENTARY SCHOOL

DR GORDON TOWNSEND SCHOOL

19.5979

21 AV NW

CHANGE PAVILLION

AV NW

S RD NES W

MONTGOMERY RECREATION CENTRE

AV NW

HOME RD NW

17 44

SHOULDICE ARENA G

20 AV

G G

NORTH PART OF LSD 32

G G

FFCA - HIGH SCHOOL CAMPUS

REY AV

G G

MONTE

& PART OF LSD 6

S RD

NES

)

ELECTRIC SUBSTATION NO 15

MON TGO MER Y AV NW

IC RA

G G

MON TGO

MER

G G

N PA

ILW

Y AV NW

MONTGOMERY AV

OMERY

BV NW

VETERANS CLUB

SHAGANAPPI TR NW

MONTG

MACKAY RD NW

MONTGOMERY RD NW

DIA

CIF

EDWORTHY ST SW

41 ST NW

R-C1s and R-C1N

16 AV

PATRI

CK VW

N BV

ERSO

PATT

EDWORTHY ST SW

K VW

RIC

NW (TRAN S CANA

DA HI)

PAT

MACKAY RD NW

S RD

ICK

NES

BRICKBURN ESTATES

PATTERSON DR SW

EDWORTHY ST SW

G G

M EDWORTHY ST SW

G G

TERS

PAT

I TR PP

T DR IN

0 NA

TI PL SW G

PROMINENCE PT SW

PA DR

PA SW

Map L-04: Proposed Land Use â&#x20AC;&#x201C; Phase 3 G

SID

AN AG SH

EDWORTHY ST SW

400 PATINA PL SW

WNE

AC H

SW INEN CE PH

ESS WN BO RD NW

A DR TIN

PATTERSON BV SW

RC T DR

PATTERSON RI SW

CIFI

PROMINENCE PA SW

A HL TIN

PROMINENCE HL SW

EDWORTHY ST SW

Y ST

A LN TIN

DIAN

ILW

PROM

N ME

PROMINENCE WY SW

PATINA DR SW

RSO

PATTERSON PA SW

GR SW

TTE

C RA

100

PATINA

MT SW

RY ME GO NW NT VW

PL SW

EDWORTHY ST SW

M-CG M-X1 MU-1 MU-2 C-C1 C-COR2 C-O 100

PATTERSON

N CR

GR SW

PATTERSON

BA SW

TTER

200

PATINA

MT SW

200

PATTERSON HL SW

Y VW

SO TTER SW GR

R-CG M-C1

PATTERSON

L SW

N DR

PATTERSON PA SW

PATTERSON HL SW

ON TG

TTER

MACKAY RD NW

R-C2

ForYou

C O N S U LT I N G

Massing and Shadow Analysis As the land use proposed is to create density in the neighbourhood with buildings of a maximum of five floors, the team decided to do a shadow analysis. From the study, the buildings proposed will not create a lot of shadows on the street, even in the wintertime.

December 21

9:00 am

12:00pm

3:00pm

March 21

June 21

ForYou

C O N S U LT I N G

Changes In Density 2020

2048

ForYou

C O N S U LT I N G

6.2

D E S I G N S | T O | G E T

P E O P L E M O V I N G Land Use

Housing Options + Commercial Services

Open Spaces

Parks, Recreation + Identity

strategies for

A Community For All Ages

MOBILITY

Active Lifestyles + Public Realm

Introduction to Mobility and Public Realm Improvements Mobility options directly contribute to the quality of life by providing opportunities and choices for the people to reach from point A to Point B. The street itself is used by people of all ages in many ways. Automobile drivers use for fast movement of people and goods, seniors and kids walk to their destinations and bicyclists ride for work or for exercise. The streetscape itself is a place where many of the activities happen and considerable amount of time is spent by people on the street. As streets play diverse roles for different users, it is critical that each street is studied and designed for its intended purpose differently. Mobility is not just about moving people and goods and its design impacts our well being and quality of life.

Guiding Principles

Moving away from automobile focused streets to a network serving multiple modes for ages that provides a safe, welcoming, attractive, comfortable and functional for all users. Following the complete streets policy (TP021) and guide from the City of Calgary and the existing ARP of Montgomery along with community engagement is used to make informed recommendations.

ForYou

C O N S U LT I N G

Feedback from the Community

Montgomery community recognizes the need to enhance the public realm for aging population and introducing traffic calming measures within the community. Certain intersections are identified as critical and the need to design safer pedestrian pathways and crossings are mentioned during our interaction with the community. 16th Avenue or Trans-Canada is identified as a major roadway that divides the community and reducing speed and traffic on this road was stressed. Bowness road is identified as a second major road within the community which requires land use change to accommodate higher density. The demographic shift and moving towards sustainable modes of transport also requires that the streets should move away from auto centric design to a multi modal design for all ages.

P.M: 1.0

Policies and Sections ForYou Consulting recognizes the need to address safety, speed and quality of streets through traffic calming measures. We propose integration of cycling and pedestrian pathways with existing infrastructure and transportation network. We propose that each street be designed differently based on its need and purpose. Following winter city guidelines to create a more walkable and healthier community by improving the public realm. P.M: 1.1

P.M: 1.2

Transit

Identifying a key location to create a Transit Hub for the community that integrates all modes of transport. Creating improved bus shelters with heating and bike racks.

16th Avenue & Trans Canada P.M: 1.3

This policy supports converting 16th Avenue into an Urban Boulevard with reduced width of lanes for slower and safer traffic movement, tree plantation with bioswales on either sides, wider pedestrian pathways of 2.0m and green median of 3.0m wide that acts as a traffic refuge island for safer pedestrian crossings.

ForYou

C O N S U LT I N G

P.M: 1.0

Policies and Sections Bowness Road P.M: 1.4

The plan recommends narrowing the lanes along the Bowness Road to two 3.5m wide lanes and leaving the remaining space for other modes of transport.

P.M: 1.5

Adding a cycle lane of 1.5m with a buffer of 0.5m is proposed on either side of the road.

P.M: 1.6

Pedestrian pathway width to be increased to a minimum of 2.0 m.

P.M: 1.7

This plan supports streetscape improvements in line with the ARP policy T5 for the purpose of area revitalization, traffic calming and improved public realm.

P.M: 1.8

Planting trees along either side of the road is proposed in this plan.

P.M: 1.9

Bus bays with improved bus shelters are proposed.

P.M: 1.10

No street parking along the Bowness road is proposed to allow for active street frontage. All street parking is to be accessed from secondary streets with parking at the rear.

Pathways and Bikeways Implementation Plan P.M: 1.11 P.M: 1.12

P.M: 1.13

This plan supports the Policy T7 within the existing ARP

Cycle pathway Underpass

A cycle pathway underpass is proposed across the 16th Avenue from home road connecting the North of the community with the river. Bike lockers are to be provided next to identified important bus stops and bike racks near all open spaces and parks.

ForYou

C O N S U LT I N G

P.M: 1.0

Policies and Sections The Woonerf P.M: 1.14

This plan proposes Woonerf along the 46th Street NW in front of the Seniors Lodge and the School. This road transformation will facilitate an increased interaction and reduce the traffic and speed, creating a backyard for the community. It also invites people to explore Montalban Park.

The Neighbourhood Street P.M: 1.15

All other neighborhood streets such as the example of the 43rd Street NW shown below, this plan proposes a multi use streets or shared streets with all modes of transport, tree plantations on either side, defined street parking and bulb outs for easier and shorter pedestrian crossings.

P.M: 1.16

Roundabouts are proposed for reducing the speed of the traffic within the neighbourhood street.

The Montgomery Street Plaza P.M: 1.17

To activate the community this plan proposes a Community Street Plaza, called the Montgomery Plaza on the intersection of Bowness Road and 46th street North West.

ForYou

C O N S U LT I N G

R.M: 1.0

Design Guidelines We are proposing design interventions for mobility on four key uses: Cycling, Driving, Public transit and Walking. The design interventions that we propose for four of these mobility points will make our community truly for all ages.

Increased cycle use by the community members will create a more active and healthy community. We propose to either improve the existing bike lanes or create new bike paths on these identified routes. These routes connect to the existing river bike pathway as well as interconnect the community to important destinations and open spaces. Cycles can be used for leisure and for actual transiting for work. These bike routes can in future be used for e-bikes and scooters to allow other members of the community who do not cycle to partake in this mode of travel. We propose a two way bike paths along the home road (Image M-01) connecting the river bike pathway and protected bike paths along the Bowness road. We also propose underpass for road crossings to facilitate easier connectivity.

Image M-01

ForYou

C O N S U LT I N G

People in our community drive, so adding traffic calming measures for the benefit of residents and kids will be useful and locations for car-pool / car-sharing parking will provide sustainable options. Traffic Calming measures are also proposed on the home road, Bowness road, 16th Avenue and 46th Street NW. Traffic calming can be implemented using green islands at intersections or using shapes & colors painted on the road surface and visually reducing road widths (Image - M03) or bulb-out. This increases pedestrian visibility, shortens the crossing distance, slows the turning vehicles and visually narrows the roadway. Finally a pedestrian refuge island is proposed on the 16th Avenue (Image M-02) to aide in crossing this wide stretch of the road.

Image M-02

Image M-03

ForYou

C O N S U LT I N G

For accessing locations and destinations out of the community, public transit is an important mode of transport. Improving public transit facilities such as creating a local community transit hub (Image M-04) that integrates other modes of transit will provide better connectivity with the city. Adding additional facilities such as heating, advance information system, ticketing and call for help phones and making them mobility friendly will help community members access public transit easily. Adding bike storages (Image M-05) near important transit stops will integrate biking and public transit as well as integrating bike racks with bus shelters will support the bike pathways and encourage use of bikes within the community.

Image M-04

Image M-05

ForYou

C O N S U LT I N G

Improving walkability within the community is important for a healthy community. We propose improved pedestrian pathways and public realm improvements along the identified routes. These routes connect important destinations within the community such as the river walk, Safeway, school, market mall and the open spaces within the community. These pedestrian routes act as collector routes for other streets. Mixed use streets or woonerf (Image M-07) which allows all modes of traffic without any priority and also act as a method for traffic calming is proposed in front of the school and seniorâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;s lodge for improved outdoor space. Improving the intersections for safe, easy and all-season crossings for pedestrian is important to improve walkability. We have identified critical intersections that need improved crossings. One such is on the home road and we propose using raised and marked crossings (Image M-06) on neighborhood streets and to reduce the width of the road by using curb extensions.

Image M-06

Image M-07

ForYou

C O N S U LT I N G

The Mobility Network Plan

We propose a mobility network that interacts and supports each to create an active transport system for a healthy community. Our proposals include adding new bike lanes, reducing speeds, improving pedestrian pathways and public realm in line with Winter city guidelines.

Improved Transit Shelters New / Improved Bike Lanes Existing River Bike Pathway Improved Pedestrian pathways Traffic Calming Zones Improved Pedestrian Crossings

ForYou

C O N S U LT I N G

Mobility and Public Realm Design Proposals in Detail

ForYou

C O N S U LT I N G

P.M: 2.0 Diverting Traffic along Crowchild and Stoney Trail

We propose to reduce the traffic on the 16th Avenue by diverting some of the heavy traffic along the Crowchild and Stoney trail. This helps in creating an Urban Boulevard along the 16th Avenue and bridging the community.

R.M: 2.0

R.M: 2.1

It is recommended to reduce the traffic on the 16th Avenue by diverting some of the heavy traffic along the Crowchild and Stoney trail. This helps in creating an Urban Boulevard along the 16th Avenue, reducing traffic and speed and making the pedestrian crossings safer while improving the public realm, making it attractive for retail and shopping.

ForYou

C O N S U LT I N G

P.M: 3.0 Urban Boulevard along 16th Avenue Proposed Design 1

Improved pedestrian crossing on home road and 16th Avenue

Underground Bike Pathway connecting the North of the community with the river. The underground section to have a skylight midway and will not be longer than 90m.

Boulevard tree plantation with bioswales on either side of the roads.

Green Median with pedestrian refuge island for easier pedestrian crossings.

Wide Pedestrian Pathways of minimum width 2.0m

5 6 4

Reduced lane widths with strategic wider lane on outer end for reduced traffic speeds. Defined Bus bays with heated and improved bus shelters with bike storage facilities. No street parking on 16th Avenue

4 0

15m

30m

60m

Our Proposal along the 16th Avenue includes creating a buffer from the traffic, wider pedestrian pathway and Bike underpass that connects the North of the community to the river.

Image M-08

2 Bikepath underpass

Image M-09

3 Bioswale along 16th Avenue

ForYou

C O N S U LT I N G

Section B-Bâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;

Section A-Aâ&#x20AC;&#x2122; The road sections AA of 26 meters Right of Way and Section BB of 36 meters Right of Way shows how this urban boulevard can be effectively created for balancing mobility options and giving pedestrians a safer and buffered pathway and refuge island for easier road crossings.

ForYou

C O N S U LT I N G

P.M: 3.0

Policies for 16th Avenue Urban Boulevard P.M: 3.1 P.M: 3.2 P.M: 3.3 P.M: 3.4 P.M: 3.5 P.M: 3.6

This plan proposes Wide pedestrian pathway of atleast 2.0 m on either side of the road. No street Parking. Reducing lane widths for reducing speeds. Creating a green median that acts as a refuge island for easier pedestrian crossings and reducing speeds. Active street frontage with land use change that supports retail stores at grade level and canopies for improved shelter in winter. Tree Plantation with bioswales on either sides of the existing street.

Before

After These images of before and after of the 16th Avenue depicts the tree buffer and improved pedestrian pathway, improved public realm and interaction with shops.

ForYou

C O N S U LT I N G

P.M: 4.0 Community Boulevard along the Bowness Road Proposed Design 1

Reduced Lane widths for slower traffic

No Street Parking on Bowness Road

Buffered Cycle Pathway

Wide Pedestrian Pathway

Tree plantation with space for street furniture

At grade / table top crossing with bulbouts for easier pedestrian crossings.

7 3

6 1

Bus bays with heated bus shelters and bike racks along with advanced information system.

4 5

Active street frontage for increased interaction between retail and pedestrians.

7 8

15m

30m

60m

Based on our proposal of Phase 1 of Land Use change along the Bowness road, we propose a Community Boulevard with improved public realm and active transport options such as wider pedestrian pathways and protected bike paths (Image M-11). Outdoor spaces should be enjoyed year round. We propose to follow the winter city guidelines for improved public realm. Some of these proposals are creating warm and festive lighting (Image M-12) on the community boulevard during the winter months and can be used as advertisements as well. Canopies and Arcades offers a combination of shelter and light and protect pedestrians from winter weather while street oriented architecture provides relief islands for shoppers (Image M-10) and street facing main entrances supports pedestrian use.

ForYou

C O N S U LT I N G

Section B-B’

The road sections AA of 20 meters Right of Way and Section BB of 32.9 meters Right of Way shows the integration of active transport options with narrower vehicle lanes for reduced traffic speeds.

Section A-A’

Image M-10

Image M-11

Image M-12

ForYou

C O N S U LT I N G

P.M: 4.0

P.M: 4.1 P.M: 4.2 P.M: 4.3 P.M: 4.4 P.M: 4.5 P.M: 4.6 P.M: 4.7

This plan proposes to reduce the lane widths to reduce traffic speeds on the Bowness road. Adding a buffered cycle pathway. Wide Pedestrian Pathway of atleast 2.0m width. Tree lined boulevard with street furniture. At grade / table top crossing and bulbouts for pedestrian crossings. No street parking along the Bowness Road for active retail frontage. Patio space for retail outlets.

Before

After These images of before and after of the Bowness Road visualizes our proposal for an active street front, wider pedestrian pathway, buffered cycle pathway creating a great public realm.

ForYou

C O N S U LT I N G

P.M: 5.0 The Montgomery Plaza

To activate the community we propose a Community Street Plaza, called the Montgomery Plaza on the intersection of Bowness Road and 46th street North West.

P.M: 5.0

P.M: 5.1

P.M: 5.2

This plan suggests creating a public space at the intersection of Bowness Road and 46th Street NW on the North side of the road. The public space will be like a street Plaza and compliment the businesses and will connect all the buildings at grade. Land use policy is suggested to have flagship buildings using Architecture that compliments this public space.

ForYou

C O N S U LT I N G

P.M: 5.3 P.M: 5.4

Patio space to be encouraged along with street furnishing. The plaza is to be landscaped in line with community needs and all year accessibility.

These two rendered perspective of the proposed Montgomery Plaza depicts the enhanced public realm, flagship corner buildings and a place that becomes the heart of the community.

ForYou

C O N S U LT I N G

P.M: 6.0 The Woonerf on 46th Street NW Proposed Design 1

Multi-Use street or Woonerf is proposed.

Landscape and street trees are planted within the road space to reduce traffic speeds and encourage the space to act like the communityâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;s backyard.

Street games such as basketball and other such games for kids and young adults are designed part of the woonerf.

Roundabouts are created for traffic calming and filtering the traffic. Furnishing that supports year round use and leads to increased interaction between the community residents are suggested.

5 4 0

15m

30m

60m

Moving away from the Montgomery Plaza towards the Montalban Park, we propose Woonerf along the 46th Street NW in front of the Seniors Lodge and the School. This road transformation will facilitate an increased interaction and reduce the traffic and speed, creating a backyard for the community. It will also invite people to Montalban Park, acting as a connector from the Montgomery Plaza or retail zone to the open space.

Image M-13

Image M-14

ForYou

C O N S U LT I N G

Section A-A’

P.M: 6.0

The road sections AA of 24 meters Right of Way shows the Woonerf Street with shared street, curved automobile pathway, space for landscaping, furnishing, play areas and trees on the road. P.M: 6.1

P.M: 6.2

P.M: 6.3 P.M: 6.4

This plan proposes to make the 46th street in front of senior’s lodge and school into a woonerf, which acts as a community backyard for increased interaction between the community residents. Create street games for kids and young youths to encourage them to play on the street and increase their interaction with senior’s and other residents of the area. Landscape design on the street with furnishing is proposed for residents to spend more time outdoors. Entrance to the woonerf street should be via a roundabout intersection that will reduce the traffic speeds.

ForYou

C O N S U LT I N G

Before

After These images of before and after of the 46th Street shows how the proposed Woonerf street will function for its many activities and improved interactions between the residents, moving away from Auto centric street design to reclaiming the street for residents.

ForYou

C O N S U LT I N G

P.M: 7.0 A Neighbourhood Street Proposed Design 1

Bulbouts with reduced lane widths for pedestrian crossings.

Defined and clear street parking, preferably at different level or with different material.

Wider pedestrian pathway with minimum width of 2.0m.

5 3

Trees with green space buffer between street parking and pedestrian pathway. Multi-use lane or shared lanes with other modes of transport such as cyclists and e-scooters. Roundabout for traffic calming.

2 4

15m

30m

60m

Other neighborhood streets such as this example of the 43rd Street NW, we propose a multi use streets or shared streets with all modes of transport and bulb outs for easier pedestrian crossings.

5 4

ForYou

C O N S U LT I N G

Before

After

These images of before and after of the Neighborhood Street shows the improved pedestrian realm with narrower multi-use lanes for reduced speeds and defined street parking.

P.M: 7.0

P.M: 7.1 P.M: 7.2 P.M: 7.3

All neighbourhood streets to become multi-use for all modes of transport including cyclists and e-scooters. Defined and clear street parking with bulbouts for reduced street width that eases crossings. Wide pedestrian pathways with minimum width of 2.0 m after a green / tree buffer of minimum 2.5 m.

ForYou

C O N S U LT I N G

Conclusion of Mobility and Public Realm Improvement

The Urban Boulevard along 16th Ave

The Woonerf

The Community Boulevard

The Neighbourhood Street

The Montgomery Plaza

ForYou

C O N S U LT I N G

Mobility Summary Map

Concluding Remarks: These mobility and public realm improvements including the Urban Boulevard, the Community Boulevard, the Montgomery Plaza, the Woonerf and the neighbourhood street will make Montgomery an active and vibrant community for all ages.

ForYou

C O N S U LT I N G

6.2

E N H A N C I N G | P U B L I C | S PA C E S

FOR|PEOPLE OF|ALL|AGES Land Use

Housing Options + Commercial Services

Open Spaces

Parks, Recreation + Identity

strategies for

A Community For All Ages

MOBILITY

Active Lifestyles + Public Realm

The City of Calgary has regulated 10% of land allocation to be dedicated to the use of supplying local and community park needs, whereas the community of Montgomery represents community space servilely under the 10% requirement. The primary challenges identified from the community workshop and steering committee feedback have been instrumental in the development of strategic growth. The following section illustrates key strategies that aim to enhance the open space system within Montgomery under guidance from the Open Space Plan. The social and demographic trends of all current and future Calgarians illustrate the increase of the aging population, diverse cultures, and high population growth rates. The following policies aim to enhance the existing open spaces to incorporate programs for all age and demographic backgrounds and be functional throughout the changes seasons. The Neighbourhood Redevelopment Plan will guide the development within the following sections: P.O: 1.0

Open Space High-Level Planning

P.O: 2.0

Celebrating Heritage

P.O: 3.0

Enhancing Community Open Space

P.O: 4.0

Regional Riverwalk Connections

P.O: 5.0

Branding and Wayfinding

ForYou

C O N S U LT I N G

P.O: 1.0

Open|Space High-Level Planning Policies and Design Guidelines The vision of an inclusive community designed for all ages stems from the demographic analysis. A major challenge of the open spaces is the steep incline found throughout the community parks. The current landscape design of the parks is not suited for most residents to enjoy, therefore the objective of the section is to incorporate diverse programming into the spaces and improve the desirability for utilization for residents of all ages. P.O: 1.1 Alterations to the Open Space System shall follow the recommendations and policies within the Neighborhood Redevelopment Plan and have a designated Landscape Architect throughout the entire process. P.O: 1.2

As the primary goal for creating a community designed for all ages it is important to include diverse and flexible programming within the open space system, as well as a max 8% grading of all pathways.

P.O: 1.3

It is important to include winter design strategies that consider snow build-up, stormwater runoff, provide shelter and shade.

P.O: 1.4

As identified within the site analysis, the amenities within the community are predominately within the southern quadrant of Montgomery, it is important to allocate space for pop-up commercial strategies or restaurant/cafe buildings located in open spaces with a high heritage value

P.O: 1.5 Montgomery is considered a gateway into a Calgarian community, it is crucial to enhance all recreational and regional connections as well, an enhancement to the community connection to Market Mall, University District, Edowrthy Park, Bowmont Park, and Bowness must include proper signage and wayfinding strategies.

ForYou

C O N S U LT I N G

P.O: 2.0

Celebrating Heritage Policies and Design Guidelines The heritage of Montgomery is amiss and often left unnoticeable within the current design of the community open spaces, yet it is a vital component for the residents to celebrate. Most of the residents living within Montgomery feel that their community retains the small-town character that is deeply rooted by its history of James Shouldice creating an economic draw into the area. The main strategy to embrace the heritage of Montgomery is to create an interactive heritage and learning centre within the original location of the Shouldice home. The primary challenge moving forward is enhancing the desirability of the open space for residents of the community to visit and enjoy the siteâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;s true potential. Similarly, development along this node is a crucial strategy in activating community interaction. As indicated in our phasing strategy within the land-use proposal, we are selective in planning for key locations that will serve as a catalyst and once again generate an economic draw into the community. P.O: 2.1

Development proposals submitted for the designated C-C1 zoning must not exceed 6m in height and shall be sensitive as to not obstructive to the view from 32nd Street.

P.O: 2.2

Development proposals submitted for the designated C-C1 zoning must include public washrooms for both the users of the regional recreational pathways and the proposed food and beverage amenity.

P.O: 2.3

Development proposals submitted for the designated C-C1 zoning must be of highquality design standards and provide flexible outdoor programming for the patio.

Image O-01: Viewing Cafe The cafe must be located at the top of the hill and within be visible to vehicular drivers along 32nd Ave.

Glass Etch of Shouldice Home

P.O: 2.4

A portrayal of the original Shouldice house must be integrated within the interactive outdoor learning hub.

Signage and informational board to be positioned within the original location of Shouldice Home.

ForYou

C O N S U LT I N G

Design Guidelines & Recommendations R.O: 2.1

Proposed Design 1

Cafe enclosed by a shelterbelt similar to the condition of the original location of Shouldice Home

Interactive Outdoor Learning Hub, with plaques about the native vegetation, and an etched art installation to pay homage to the original architecture of Shouldice Home

The goal of the interactive outdoor learning hub is to provide opportunities for the visitor of the space to become intrigued with the design and feel compelled to learn more about the history of the site, and further learn more about what Montgomery has to offer currently. A suggestion of an interactive LED wall is an example to engage the visitor to have fun while learning.

Image O-02: Interactive LED Wall Proposals of installation must include open design concepts with an interactive feature as a means to celebrate heritage.

Bowmont Park Market Mall + U of C

Resting + Viewing station along pathway intersections Main Wayfinding Landmark: Vertical structure with solar panel lights that provides information regarding places to be within Montgomery

Secondary Wayfinding Signage: A simple post with directional arrows for amenities throughout Montgomery Proposed Tree

Proposed Recreational Trail

Existing Pathway

Proposed Resting Station

Existing Resting + Viewing Station

Cafe

ForYou

C O N S U LT I N G

P.O: 3.0

Enhancing Community Open Space Policies and Design Guidelines Montalban Park is identified as the central community open space that is heavily underutilized, as per the community workshop findings. Strategic planning and design interventions are outlined with the purpose to increase accessibility for residents of all ages. Challenges • Existing North-South Trail graded at a slope of 14.7%; extremely inaccessible for most residents • Ungraded East-West pathways limit the usage of community space • Underutilized Programming; few resting stages, off-leash dog park has no clear boundary, lack of play structure/all wheels infrastructure • Privacy issue for residential lots located at the southwest corner of the park • Preservation of permeable landscape to prevent stormwater run-off onto residential properties south of the park Opportunities • Excellent viewsheds of downtown Calgary, Bowness, and the last eastern stand of Douglas Fir trees from Edworthy Park • Location ideal for creating a community based central park • Lack of elementary schools and an off-leash dog park within the University District can increase pedestrian footfall

Existing Conditions Park Boundary Graded Trail Pedestrian Desire Lines

Inventory of one North-South trail graded at a 14.7% slope

Community Garden

Off-leash dog park

Pedestrian connection to University District

ForYou

C O N S U LT I N G

P.O: 3.1

Include diverse programming that is functional throughout all seasons: for example, walking for pleasure, gardening, bicycling, picnicking, and tobogganing/sledding.

P.O: 3.2

Accessibility and redesign of pathways must meet universal accessible grading of 8%. Trails must incorporate wayfinding strategies that include solar-powered lighting as to increase the perception of safety at night.

P.O: 3.3

Small gathering places throughout the park and along graded pathways must include new plantings and structures that will increase shade coverage and add to the scenic value.

P.O: 3.4

Any development must not impede the viewshed of adjacent communities and Edworthy Park.

P.O: 3.5

Primary gathering spaces must-have versatile designs that can accommodate pop-up commercial events such as food trucks, farmers market, and future potential of a cafe.

P.O: 3.6

Any new development within adjacent properties must include a high quality of open space and architectural details in order to add to the scenic value of the park.

Viewing Platform

Off-Leash Dog Park

Interactive Playground

Community Garden

Shared Spaces

Terrace Road Elementary

Schematic Design Improve gateway connections Tall vegetation or shelterbelt to preserve the privacy of homeowners Proposed curvilinear + extend pathways to meet 8% grading requirement

Off-Leash Dog Park Shared Space to be located along the North edge of the park to preserve sight-lines Interactive playground located near Terrace Road Elementary Off-Leash Dog Park to attract residents of University District

ForYou

C O N S U LT I N G

Design Guidelines & Recommendations Shared Spaces are intended for the enjoyment of Montgomery residents as well as adjacent communities such as Varsity, University District, and Bowness.

Off-Leash Dog Park

R.O: 3.1

The community garden entrance must include a public washroom, compost bins, shaded seating areas, and permeable buildings to provide shade, shelter, and indoor winter programs such as a classroom or an art gallery.

R.O: 3.2

The University District entrance must include proper signages indicating the seasonal programming within Montalban Park, as well as some form of vertical public art to act as a landmark and alleviate the public realm within Montgomery.

R.O: 3.3

All trails within the park must be properly graded at an 8% incline and include wayfinding strategies and information plaques regarding the communityâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;s history illuminated along the path.

R.O: 3.4

The viewing platform must be located along the North edge of Montalban Park as to capitalize on the existing scenery, as well as include allocated spaces for pop-up commercial events.

R.O: 3.5

The viewing platform must include hardscape surfaces to accommodate a high percentage of users and provide an ample amount of moveable furniture and shaded areas.

R.O: 3.6

Entrance into the off-leash dog park must have adequate signage of the delineated area as to prevent any confrontational issues.

R.O: 3.7

The off-leash dog park must be fully enclosed with double-gated entries, and include bins with compostable doggy bags.

Image O-03: Rainbow Garden A precedent of a community garden with open space programming as a tool to unify over 300 new incoming families within the community. Taking into consideration the cultural diversity of the residents, the Rainbow Gardens creates a common space for people to plant and learn from the expertise around the world and all within their community.

Image O-04: Barcelona Pavilion The pavilion within the community garden entrance must include modern architectural details similar to the Barcelona Pavilion designed by Mies Van Der Rohe. The main details the pavilion must preserve is the transparent boundary between exterior and interior spaces. The main communal gathering within the enclosed section must have transparent material to fully capitalize on the excellent sightlines Montalban Park has to offer, as well as to increase the perception of safety.

ForYou

C O N S U LT I N G

Interactive Playgrounds

R.O: 3.8

The interactive design must be usable for residents of all ages who wish to play within their community. The design must interact with the natural curvature of the slope as to incorporate tobogganing and bike trails for allseason activities.

R.O: 3.9

Must include interactive and illuminated art sculptures that are generated via solar energy. Image O-05 Olympic Village

Concluding Remarks: The redesign of Montalban Park shall activate recreational activity for residents of all ages. The goal to incorporate diverse programming and to introduce a new pathway system that is universally friendly is essential in realizing the full potential of the central park.

Visualization of the Proposed Programming

Recreational trails directly adjacent to residential zoning must include tree plantings on either side of the sidewalk, as well as in grade street lighting. All pathways must be designed for both cyclists pedestrian movement.

Proposed Design

Proposed Tree

Mon

talba

n Av

Recreational Trail Main Wayfinding Landmark

Montalban Dr.

Secondary Wayfinding Landmark Curb Extensions Community Garden Garden Plots Plaza - Water Station Pavilion Enclosed Space: Public Bathroom + Community Space Exterior Shade + Shelter

Section 1-A

Pavilion Recreational Trail

Retaining Wall + Recreational Trail

ForYou

C O N S U LT I N G

Viewing Platform

Must include flexible open spaces that can accommodate pop-up commercial events such as a farmers market, community movies in the park viewing, etc. The overall quality of the design is dependent on the creativity of flexible seating that does not require major cut and fill soil extraction. Image O-06: Central Park Public Domain

Interactive Park

Temporary Art Installations along the natural curvature of Montalban Park. Image O-07: Cool Gardens - Annual Design Comp

Off-Leash Dog Park

Inclusion of a dog agility course elements to the design. Image O-08: Dog Agility Course

an D

lb onta

23 Ave. NW Proposed Tree

Recreational Trail

Main Wayfinding Landmark

Secondary Wayfinding Landmark

Open Pavilion

Cafe

ForYou

C O N S U LT I N G

P.O: 4.0

Regional Riverwalk Connections Policies and Design Guidelines Montgomery has the most desirable connections to the regional riverwalk network within Calgary. Access to the riverwalk allows easy connections to Bowmont Park, Shouldice Park, and downtown Calgary. The revision of these entryways into the community is critical in alleviating the public realm within the community. Challenges • Flooding and compromised soil stability • Lack of pedestrian infrastructure connecting the riverwalk to Montgomery • Existing land-use and development adjacent to regional riverwalk does not have active street frontage and is a predominantly low density residential • Lack of signage, shelter, and lights along the recreational trails Opportunities • Provides regional recreation movement throughout Calgary • Majority of Montgomery’s boundary is serviced by the aesthetic view of the Bow River • Recreational programming such as kayaking and canoeing is permitted at the launch station near the Canadian Tire Paraplegic Park • Due to the flow of the river, the straight path along the southeast quadrant of Montgomery has minimal flooding and damage from erosion

Existing Conditions Recreational Trails

Main Pedestrian Entrance + Connection to Shouldice Park Main Pedestrian Entrance + Connection to George Gell Park

Two leveled Pathway on top of dike

2nd level of pathway abruptly stops, creating an opportunity to redesign infrastructure and connect to the peninsula

1 3 4

ForYou

C O N S U LT I N G

P.O: 4.0

Regional Riverwalk Connections Policies and Design Guidelines P.O: 4.1

All landscape designs and redevelopment of the riverwalk must not impede the flow of the Bow River, instead, all designs must include a floodable and adaptive feature to protect flooding within the community. Programming of interventions must be supported via flood modeling to identify flood zone levels.

P.O: 4.2

Any redevelopment along the riverwalk must include high-level landscape design features as well as support an increase of density as stated within the section Policies for Landuse.

P.O: .4.3

All trails and interventions must be versatile and include diverse programming that is functional throughout the year.

P.O: 4.4

All â&#x20AC;&#x2DC;resting stagesâ&#x20AC;&#x2122; within the design must include solar-powered light fixtures and incorporate adequate wayfinding strategies to connect to the economic drives within Montgomery.

Visualization of the Proposed Programming Proposed Design 1

Vertical sculpture to indicate entrance into Montgomery

Two-tiered pathway separating joggers/ cyclist and leisure pedestrian activity

Plaza

A peninsula of native vegetation accessible by a swinging bridge

Riprap along the riverbank to prevent soil erosion and create a cohesive design towards the node within Shouldice Park.

Montgomery Community Association

1 George Gell Park

2 5

Proposed Recreational Trail

Existing River Pathway

Extensions to a node within Montgomery

ForYou

C O N S U LT I N G

Design Guidelines & Recommendations

The entrance must be incorporate a design that exceeds the treeline along the riverwalk Image O-09: JD Riverfront Park

R.O: 4.1

The entry point to the riverwalk perpendicular to Home Street is identified as a major gateway into the community and Shouldice Park. Design proposals within the node must include a plaza that provides shelter, as well as a vertical element that exceeds the treeline in order to create a visible gateway throughout the riverwalk.

R.O: 4.2

Design features of the plaza/entry must allocate space for parking, as well as incorporate adequate signs indicating â&#x20AC;&#x2DC;places to beâ&#x20AC;&#x2122; throughout Montgomery.

Road buffered with perennial shrubs Image O-10: JD Riverfront Park

Include ramps for the transition between tiered pathways

R.O: 4.3

The two-tiered pathway system indicated within the proposed design map must include design features that separate the fast recreational movement of joggers and cyclists with the leisure activity located along the bottom of the riverbank.

R.O: 4.4

The pathways must be adjoined by a universal accessible ramp including a maximum slope of 8% and handrails.

R.O: 4.5

The edges of the pathway must be buffered by native vegetation or perennial shrubs to alleviate the aesthetic of the public realm.

ForYou

C O N S U LT I N G

Proposed Design A Closer Look 3

Plaza

A peninsula of native vegetation accessible by a swinging bridge

Riprap along the riverbank to prevent soil erosion and create a cohesive design towards the node within Shouldice Park.

George Gell Park

Downtown

5 4

Peninsula of Native Vegetation

Proposed Recreational Trail

Viewing Platform

Existing River Pathway

Extensions to a node within Montgomery

R.O: 4.6

Inviting lighting is critical to establishing an atmosphere that feels friendly, warm, and safe for users of the site at night. Creative implementation of solar-powered lights is to be encouraged.

R.O: 4.7

The plaza must also take into consideration the connection to George Gell Park.

R.O: 4.8

The material of the swinging bridge must be made from light materials as to decrease the amount of debris and waste upon the occurrence of flooding.

R.O: 4.9

Connection to the peninsula must be adjoined by a platform attached to a mature tree, and above the 1:200 floodwater elevation

R.O: 4.10

The proposals of the treehouse platform may take into consideration a series of outlooks throughout the peninsula.

R.O: 4.11

Peninsula of native vegetation is to be implemented in order to improve the resiliency and the impacts of fluctuating water levels, as well as providing valuable habitat for vulnerable species.

R.O: 4.12

The design of the landscape must provide mental restoration and relaxation spaces both within the peninsula and riverwalk. These entail a variety of pathways within natural areas.

ForYou

C O N S U LT I N G

Proposed Design A Closer Look within the Shouldice Node 1

Beach design to allow for leisure activities next to the Bow River

Cohesive design for river pathway and Bowmont Park, ie: materials for railing and colouring of riprap Beach Design Existing River Pathway

Illuminated seating for increased perception of safety

Plaza to have no stairs, grading at a maximum 8%, and include bicycle parking throughout the space Image O-11: JD Riverfront Park

Viewing platform within peninsula to be adjoined by a mature tree Image O-12: Treehouse - Viewing Station

Must include similar design elements and riprap as the beach design node within Shouldice Park Image O-14: Mulini Beach

The swinging bridge will be made of light materials, as to avoid major repairs from flooding Image O-13: Swinging Bridge

ForYou

C O N S U LT I N G

P.O: 5.0

Branding and Wayfinding Policies and Design Guidelines The open space system and economic drivers within Montgomery are fragmented and located in different quadrants throughout the community. The main strategy in incorporating a wayfinding system with a hierarchy of signages is to alleviate the sense of identity for the residents, as well as to enhance an economic draw to the amenities found within Montgomery. The genius loci within the community of Montgomery creates intricate possibilities for social interaction and is currently left unnoticed. Challenges • Fragmentation of community open spaces and economic drivers of the transit-Safeway hub, the Bowness Main Street, 16th Avenue Main street, and Shouldice Park • Imbalance of services towards the southern section of the Montgomery Opportunities • A high value of scenic landscapes from Edworthy Park, Bowmont Park, and the riverwalk • Regional draw into Shouldice Park creates an opportunity for exploration within Montgomery ForYou Consulting has assessed Montgomery as one of the most unique inner-city communities Calgary has to offer and has developed policy implementation and design guidelines as to how to alleviate the branding and wayfinding throughout the community and alleviate the special qualities that have manifested over from its rich heritage.

History + Identity

Material + Graphics

Colour Palette

Formula for creating an effective brand within Montgomery

ForYou

C O N S U LT I N G

River Pathway Regional Parks Community Parks Bowness Main Street 16th Avenue Main Street Montgomery Town Square

Sections of Economic Drivers: The first step in creating an adequate brand throughout the community is to identify the key areas that have distinctive characteristics. From this process, ForYou Consulting has identified 6 main economic drivers within Montgomery. The next step in identifying areas that are special places to be is to allocate a cohesive colour palette that had been extracted from the Montgomery welcome sign. Similarily materials and textures of the proposed signs will take inspiration from the current material palette found throughout the community which is a mixture of wood, and metal sculptures.

ForYou

C O N S U LT I N G

1 2

Active Transportation Network In order to create a wayfinding and signage strategy for the parks and open spaces system, it is crucial to identify the active transportation network and design a wayfinding network from the findings.

Proposed Design: Wayfinding Network 1

Entrance into a community open space

Branding within the local amenities such as Bowness Road Main Street

Branding within the regional amenities and create a spark of interest for exploring the amenities within Montgomery

ForYou

C O N S U LT I N G

P.O: 5.0

Branding and Wayfinding Policies and Design Guidelines

Image O-15: Painting Pavements

Phase One of implementation:

Image O-16: Painting Trails

Image O-17: Wooden Flags - Directional Arrows

P.O: 4.1

All colours implemented within Phase One: Tactical Urbanism must adhere to the recommended colour palette of the economic sectors.

P.O: 4.2

Implementation will occur within community open spaces and will procreate clear signages that will help improve the awareness of the fragmented community parks and allow easy navigation for the residents.

P.O: 4.3

Implementation will require initial marketing of pop-up events for the community to participate in painting pavements and creating wooden blocks for flags indicating specific programming within the community open spaces.

P.O: 4.4

The success and community support of integration shall encourage the preceding phases to adopt a wayfinding network throughout Montgomery.

ForYou

C O N S U LT I N G

P.O: 5.0

Branding and Wayfinding Policies and Design Guidelines Phase Two at the Local Scale:

Image O-18: ‘Park-ing Day’

P.O: 4.5

The incorporation of signs must take into consideration the size, location, context, and heritage of the ‘places to be’.

P.O: 4.6

All installations within the economic sectors must adhere to the recommended colour palette and include materials that can be found throughout the sector.

P.O: 4.7

Phase Two of implementation will occur at the commercial community scale, design installations such as ‘Park-ing Day’ is encouraged.

P.O: 4.8

Phase Two of implementation targets Bowness Road Main Street, Montalban Park, and the original location of Shouldice Home as stages for required intervention.

P.O: 4.9

Installations such as banners, art sculpture for main entrances as well as tree lights are encouraged to alleviate the public realm to become ‘places to be’.

Image O-19: Bike Park

Bowness Road Main Street: Local Commercial Wayfinding

Montalban Park: Community Open Space Wayfinding

ForYou

C O N S U LT I N G

P.O: 5.0

Branding and Wayfinding Policies and Design Guidelines Phase Three at the Regional Scale: P.O: 4.10 Phase Three of the implementation will require installations that project a playful and positive image of Montgomery. Creative bicycle parking, as well as signboards, are encouraged.

Image O-20: Sculpture - Cyclist Parking

Image O-21: Example of Sign

Image O-22: Example of Sign to coordinate with colour palette

P.O: 4.11 All signs located within the regional scale must include a map of â&#x20AC;&#x2DC;places to beâ&#x20AC;&#x2122; within Montgomery as well as provide directional arrows for all amenities that are 600m from the node. P.O: 4.12 Primary information boards must incorporate a brief overview of the heritage of Montgomery, and entice users of the site to explore the main destinations within Montgomery. P.O: 4.13 Primary information boards and directional arrows must include a solar-powered feature to increase the perception of safety for users at night. P.O: 4.14 Trash, recycle, and compost bins are to be posted along with every node there is a primary information board.

Riverwalk: Regional Open Space Wayfinding

ForYou

C O N S U LT I N G

6.4

MONTGOMERY G A T E W A Y Land Use

Housing Options + Commercial Services

Open Spaces

Parks, Recreation + Identity

strategies for

A Community For All Ages

MOBILITY

Active Lifestyles + Public Realm

The projected population increase for Montgomery conflicts with the current land use of the community. Strategic proposals for the special site identified at the Montgomery Town Square located along Home Street and Bowness Road must be redeveloped in order to accommodate a community designed for all ages. The focus on the central node aims to put the importance of designing universally accessible community centers. Taking advantage of the existing transit hub and the major grocery store that serves adjacent communities, the indicated urban block encompassing Montgomery Town Square will become vital in creating a center for the community. The redesign of Montgomery Town Square is a special study area in which we are proposing an aggressive approach for the redevelopment of single-use commercial into a vibrant mixed-use plaza. ForYou Consulting has identified the site as transformational in creating a gateway into Calgary and Montgomery. In order to redesign Montgomery Town Square into a ‘place to be, for all ages’, we have identified major circulation issues that have led to our strategy of diverting pass-through traffic from Bowness Road onto 16th Ave. The main outcome is to alleviate traffic on Bowness Main Street, as well as to put priority for people within the streetscape.

ForYou

C O N S U LT I N G

Issues: • •

Major traffic collision along 49th Street High volume of pass-through traffic creates a speedway down Bowness Road

Opportunities: •

•

Create a distinct road hierarchy between 16th Ave and Bowness Road Creates a people first movement between Bowness Main Street and Montgomery Town Square The reconfiguration of the road allows for the opportunity to rename Bowness Road Main Street into Montgomery Road

100

ForYou

101

C O N S U LT I N G

Visualization of the Proposed Programming The indicated collage was created to propose potential solutions for the redevelopment of Montgomery Town Square. As indicated within the collage, the change in land-use from single story commercial into mixed-use will automatically increase the footfall within the site and increase the perception of safety. Main strategies for the redesign of Montgomery Town Square are the: • Redesign of the plaza to have places to rest and ample seating and shelter • Redevelopment of commercial buildings into 5 floors mixed-use • Incorporate active streetscape and patio space around the entire perimeter of buildings as to increase eyes on the street

Phase Two: Increasing places to live, shop, and dine close to Montgomery Town Square

Retrofitting the strip mall into a mixed-use building, and putting more eyes on the street

POTENTIAL NAME CHANGE INTO MONTGOMERY ROAD

Redesigning Safeway to allow residential units on the top, and make active streetscape facing the plaza

BOWNESS ROAD

ForYou

C O N S U LT I N G

102

ForYou C O N S U LT I N G

7 . 0 CONCLUSION

ForYou

C O N S U LT I N G

7.0

F o r Y o u | C o n s u l t i n g

CONCLUSION The following section summarizes key driving principles that have manifested from the policies and design guidelines as illustrated in section 6.0 as well as the synthesis of analysis and community feedback.

Strategies for

A Community For All Ages

The main purpose of ForYou Consulting is to introduce playful and innovative solutions to manage growth as well as explore the full potential of the economic drivers within Montgomery. It is our firm’s belief that Montgomery is a key community in rebranding all inner-city communities throughout Calgary as desirable places to live.

Land Use

Housing Options + Commercial Services

• • • •

Strategic Phasing Phase One: Catalyst of community growth via a focus on Bowness Road Main Street and important open spaces Phase Two: The response in managing growth Phase Three “ A Possibility” to Redevelop Montgomery Town Square and divert pass-through traffic onto 16th Ave

MOBILITY

• •

The people first movement Active transportation and improving the public realm by making the community wakable for all ages

Open Spaces

• • • •

Versatile designs with programs for all ages Creating Montalban Central Park Enhancing Riverwalk Gateway Branding and Wayfinding of public spaces

Active Lifestyles + Public Realm

Parks, Recreation + Identity

103

ForYou

C O N S U LT I N G

Regional Connections Pedestrian + Cyclist Improvement 16th Ave Urban Boulevard Bowness Neighbourhood Boulevard Improved Recreational Connections Wayfinding Network Open Space Programming Phase One: Strategic Planning Phase Two: Development Response Phase Three: Special Site M-C1 Multi Residential, Contextual M-CG Multi Residential M-X1 Mixed Use (3 Floors) MU-1 Mixed Use (4 Floors) MU-2 Mixed Use ( 5 Floors) C-C1 Commercial

104

ForYou C O N S U LT I N G

ForYou

C O N S U LT I N G

8.0 REFERENCES Documents: The City of Calgary. (2003). Open Space Plan. https://www.calgary.ca/CSPS/Parks/Documents/Planning-and-Operations/open-space-plan.pdf Montgomery Community Association. (2017). Montgomery Area Redevelopment Plan. https://693c5830-e556-4c38-87ff-f52ef3d20515.filesusr.com/ugd/ c900c7_d43e95fe2b3845478d732078284854b1.pdf Trust, West Camoys Development. 2016. “University District Urban Design Manual with the City of Calgary.” Calgary. * ForYou Consulting had refered to previous consulting firms neighbourhood redevelopment plan as a reference: https://grad.ucalgary.ca/future-students/ explore-programs/planning-mplan-course

Images: Image L-01: https://rlp.jumplisting.com/photos/9/63/33/10/9633310_25641693_lg.jpg Image L-02: https://nathankoenigsberg.ca/featured/2030-35-street-sw-calgary-ab/ Image L-03: https://www.designrulz.com/design/2014/01/semi-detached-home-calgary-residence-by-beyond-homes/ Image L-04: https://www.zolo.ca/capitol-hill-calgary-real-estate/1954-12-street-northwest Image L-05: http://www.trleng.ca/projects/residential/multi-family/ Image L-06: https://www.bdcnetwork.com/aia-honors-three-multifamily-projects-2017-housing-awards Image L-07: http://www.dialogdesign.ca/projects/roar_one-housing-complex/ Image L-08: https://urbanize.la/post/construction-begins-mixed-use-development-9001-santa-monica-boulevard Image L-09: http://www.dialogdesign.ca/projects/vancouverpubliclibraryandywca/ Image L-10: https://www.post-gazette.com/life/homes/2014/10/11/Buying-Here-Braddock-2/stories/201410120031 Image L-11: https://www.cleveland.com/life-and-culture/erry-2018/08/291fd1b16a6229/clevelands-first-ac-hotel-open.html Image L-12: https://www.rentfaster.ca/ab/calgary/rentals/office-space/brentwood/non-smoking/332672 Image L-13 https://www.dezeen.com/2019/10/15/john-ronan-affordable-housing-chicago-library/ Image L-14: https://www.dezeen.com/2019/10/15/john-ronan-affordable-housing-chicago-library/ Image L-15: http://www.dialogdesign.ca/projects/raymond-block/gallery/3/ Image L-16 - https://www.worldarchitecturenews.com/article/1672466/union-flats-one-largest-completed-housing-developments-northern-california Image M-01: http://wattconsultinggroup.com/project/pandora-two-way-cycle-track-victoria-bc/ Image M-02: http://pedbikesafe.org/PEDSAFE/countermeasures_detail.cfm?CM_NUM=22 Image M-03: https://www.newcivilengineer.com/latest/innovative-traffic-calming-measures-for-school-30-08-2016/://www.pinterest.ch/ pin/291537775872905433 Image M-04: http://www.prairiedesignawards.com/2014/ct_northpointe_bus_shelter.html Image M-05: https://www.toronto.ca/services-payments/streets-parking-transportation/cycling-in-toronto/bicycle-parking/ Image M-06: http://pedbikesafe.org/PEDSAFE/countermeasures_detail.cfm?CM_NUM=22 Image M-07: Argyle street project - https://www.timeout.com/chicago/blog/the-argyle-streetscape-project-is-finally-complete-082516 Image M-08: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ESOs3mp8uwk Image M-09: http://www.saveitlancaster.com/whats-new/ Image M-10: https://www.edmonton.ca/city_government/documents/PDF/WinterCityDesignGuidelines_draft.pdf Image M-11: https://lancasteronline.com/news/local/roundabouts-mostly-stuck-in-the-slow-lane-in-lancaster-county/articlef04bf936-e32c-11e6-8c18dfec46a4aeeb.html Image M-12: https://www.edmonton.ca/city_government/documents/PDF/WinterCityDesignGuidelines_draft.pdf Image M-13: https://www.chicago.gov/city/en/depts/cdot/supp_info/traffic_calming.html Image M-14: https://nacto.org/publication/urban-street-design-guide/streets/residentialImage O-01: https://www.archdaily.com/369956/coffee-house-light-4-space Image O-02: http://www.upperfortgarry.com/information/discovering-ufg/ Image O-03: https://news.umanitoba.ca/rainbow-gardens-supports-immigrant-families/ Image O-04: https://divisare.com/projects/338931-ludwig-mies-van-der-rohe-maciej-jezyk-barcelona-pavilion Image O-05: https://www.cntraveler.com/stories/2012-08-02/athletes-olympic-east-village-apartments-photos Image O-06: http://landezine.com/index.php/2019/11/central-park-public-domain-by-turf-design-studio/ Image O-07: http://www.coolgardens.ca/PAST-PROJECTS Image O-08: doggy signage + https://www.pinterest.ca/pin/97531148167794458/ Image O-09: https://landezine-award.com/jd-riverfront-park/ Image O-10: https://landezine-award.com/jd-riverfront-park/ Image O-11: small plaza - http://landezine.com/index.php/2019/07/erie-street-plaza-by-stoss/ Image O-12: https://www.pinterest.ca/pin/46443439879514397/ Image O-13 https://www.pinterest.ca/pin/536139530613232387/ Image O-14 http://landezine.com/index.php/2014/11/mulini-beach-by-studio-3lhd/ Image O-15: https://www.pinterest.ca/pin/540361655293287320/ Image O-16: https://www.pinterest.ca/pin/310818811785629498/ Image O-17: https://www.pinterest.ca/pin/365987907221193800/ Image O-18: https://www.pinterest.ca/pin/836614068249067044/ Image O-19: https://www.pinterest.ca/pin/97601516897092571/ Image O-20: https://www.pinterest.ca/pin/519110294550844910/ Image O-21: https://www.pinterest.ca/pin/334040497362545326/ Image O-22: https://www.pinterest.ca/pin/17381148543153882/

105

F o r Yo u C O N S U L T A N T S

FORYOU CONSULTANTS Thank You Note, We have enjoyed collaborating with the residents of Montgomery and sincerely appreciate the time spent learning about their community. With your assistance, we enthusiastically look forward in creating a community designed for all ages within Montgomery. Sincerely,

Ana Barbalho Irene Borgonia Ravi Siddhartha

ADAPT consulting + design

MONTGOMERY Gateway to the Rockies

Lauren Armeneau Bryana Parahoniak Bryce Devereaux

EVDP 644 - Francisco Alaniz Uribe PROFESSIONAL PLANNING PRACTICE

Thank you to Our Professor, Francisco Alaniz Uribe And the Steering Committee: John Hall - City of Calgary Ben Bailey - CivicWorks Janice Mackett - Montgomery Community Association, Planning Committee Chair Marilyn Wannamaker - Montgomery Community Association Laura Kornfeld - Montgomery Community Association

TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY................................................................. 01 2.0 PROJECT INTRO............................................................................. 03

2.1 About the Project 2.2 Meet the ADAPT Team 2.3 Historic Context 2.4 Regulatory Framework 2.5 Site Context

2.6 Methodology

3.0 ANALYSIS.......................................................................................... 13

3.1 Demographics 3.2 Environmental Analysis 3.3 Land Use 3.4 Transportation 3.5 Housing Typologies 3.6 Densif ication 3.7 Open Space

3.8 Functional Analysis

4.0 WHAT WE HEARD........................................................................ 26

4.1 Community Workshop 4.2 Feedback

4.3 Community Wish List

5.0 DESIGN GUIDELINES & INTERVENTIONS.......................... 30

5.1 Community Growth and Development 5.2 Mobility 5.3 Open Space & The Public Realm

5.4 Special Sites

6.0 MOVING FORWARD.................................................................... 103 7.0 REFERENCES.................................................................................. 105

1.0 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Montgomery is an inner-city Calgary neighbourhood with a rich history and abundance of opportunity. As Calgary grows, Montgomery faces pressures to densify and intensify. As a gateway community facilitating signif icant traff ic in and out of the City, Montgomery faces unique pressures. ADAPT Consulting + Design has developed this document to provide strategies and suggestions for the Montgomery Community Association. Based on analysis, observation, and engagement with community members, ADAPT proposes a series of strategies for community growth and development, mobility, open spaces, and special sites. Each topic will be explored in depth and supported with policy f rameworks. This document will start by outlining our teamâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;s vision, background about the project and community, and the f indings of our extensive analysis. Based on our f indings we identif ied some key issues including unsafe pedestrian environments, disruptive roadways, mistaken identity with Bowness, and pressure for densif ication. As a response to these issues we focused on creating an accessible, safe and connected public realm, with multiple mobility options, a diverse land use plan that supports growth without changing community identity, and an open space network that is adaptable, connected, and accommodating.

Page 2 of 107

2.0 PROJECT INTRO

2.1 ABOUT THE PROJECT This collaboration between the School of Architecture, Planning, and Landscape, and the Montgomery Community Association began in January 2020 as part of the Advanced Professional Planning Studio for second year planning students. The project gives planning students experience working closely with an existing community to develop strategic solutions to real problems. This document is not only an academic project, but also acts as a reccommendation document for the community association. Other community partners include the Department of Neighbourhood Services f rom the City of Calgary, and the Federation of Calgary Communities. The unique experience of this project helps prepare students to enter the world of professional planning, and fosters a relationship with Calgary communities. Throughout this process, some assumptions were made: • We assumed that the feedback we received f rom engagement attendees and community association members was representative of they greater Montgomery community • We assumed that there was no budget • We anticipated a need for approximately 1000-1500 housing units by 2042 We began by analyzing the existing conditions of Montgomery through site visits, document review, and map analysis, identifying opportunities and constraints within the community. From those we identif ied three main values that would propel our plan forward – sustainable growth, diversity, and connectivity. Those values led us to developing a vision for our plan that – by 2042 Montgomery will be a vibrant community that offers choice and provides connections between people and places. These values and vision are the foundation to our redevelopment plan, which aims to bring the community of Montgomery together.

Page 4 of 107

2.2 MEET THE ADAPT TEAM

BRYCE DEVEREAUX

BRYANA PARAHONIAK

SENIOR URBAN PLANNER BSc., MPlan

JUNIOR URBAN PLANNER BKin., MPlan

URBAN PLANNING TECHNOLOGIST BA., MPlan

Bryce graduated from the School of Architecture, Planning, and Landscape at the University of Calgary. With an undergraduate degree in geography and geomatics, he is interested in the intersection between urban design, technology, and mobility. Bryce has prior experience in regional and city planning, which has allowed him to gain experience in public consultation, performing technical analysis to support policy development, and reviewing development applications. He believes in social, environmental, and economic sustainability for all communities.

Bryana is a second year Master of Planning student at the University of Calgary. With an undergraduate degree in Kinesiology, she has a passion for exploring the connections between the built environment and public health and using this information to develop healthy communities. She has experience working as a planning assistant in a municipal planning and development department. Bryana is an advocate for positive change and equity in our communities.

Lauren is a soon-to-be graduate from the School of Architecture, Planning, and Landscape at the University of Calgary. Growing up in Calgary, she has a strong grasp of the City context. Her interests lie in urban design, and the public realm. Lauren believes in social and environmental equity for all communities.

Page 5 of 107

LAUREN ARMENEAU

THE ADAPT APPROACH

ADAPT Consulting & Design was established in 2010 and has since Become a leading urban design f irm, focusing on the redevelopment of existing communities. ADAPT prides itself on being a company dedicated to bringing new life to communities, ensuring aging communities become desired places, as they once were and thus, ensuring sustainable growth of our cities. The success of the company is largely due to its commitment to extensive community and stakeholder engagement through all stages of a project, which ensures citizens concerns are addressed and helps to ensure change is seen as positive in the community. The work of ADAPT strives to improve citizens quality of life, ensure sustainable growth of cities and create vibrant, exciting places for people to live, work and play. ADAPT is composed of a small team of planning experts, all of whom, exemplify a diverse skill set composed of not only planning skills, but also design, communication and public engagement skills. Each team member has a diverse skill set and brings unique attributes, but the team shares the same overall planning values of socioeconomic equity, creative and innovative design of public spaces, use of existing buildings and inf rastructure to ensure sustainable growth of cities, and health and wellness of communities.

SUSTAINABLE GROWTH

+ CONNECTIVITY

+ DIVERSITY

Page 6 of 107

2.3 HISTORIC CONTEXT The land Montgomery is built on was originally purchased by James Shouldice in 1906 for ranching purposes. It it here that the Shouldice family established their roots and built a twenty-five room brick mansion on top of the hill that Home Road now runs adjacent to. In 1910, the Shouldice family donated 100 acres of land along the Bow River to the City of Calgary and it became dedicated park space. This area is currently home to the Shouldice Athletic Park, which serves as a regional recreation area for the City of Calgary. The designation of the area to park space started to bring a lot of people to the area and by 1911, the community known as Shouldice Terrace was established. In 1943, the post office requested that the community change its name and the Shouldice family chose the name Montgomery in honor of a “Bernard Law Montgomery” who was a celebrated military leader from Great Britain, who played an important role in World War 1 & 2. Montgomery was home for approximately sixty dwellings by 1947, but it wasn’t until 1949 that natural gas started to be installed for homes to have heat. After mortgages became available in the 1950’s, the community grew to approximately 1069 homes by 1947. This population led to Montgomery being designated as a town in 1958 at which time, they also elected their first Mayor. The community finally got water and sewer connections by 1959 and by this time, Montgomery was in need of a community destination and provincial funds helped to build the Montgomery Recreation Centre, which is now known as the Community Centre. The community association currently leases the building, parking lot and two rinks to the City, which are all a part of the regional athletic park. On August 15th, 1963 Montgomery was annexed by the City of Calgary, the community had grown to a population of around 5000 with a variety of stores, services and homes and there was a need for more infrastructure to support the growing population. At the time, Montgomery was not happy about joining the City of Calgary, as they didn’t want to lose their small town charm and pride or mountain views. However, in the years after becoming a part of Calgary, Montgomery seen the build out of two more important community facilities, the Shouldice Arena and the Town Hall, both of which are still used in the community today. The Town Hall has seen many different uses over the years, but was always an important building in the community and today it is home to the City of Calgary Community & Neighbourhood Services & Bowmont Seniors Assistant Association. By 1995 Shouldice Athletic Park was fully built out and being used for many sporting events. In more recent years, Montgomery has tried to create an identity by implementing bright colored signage at the East entrance to the community and on the front of the community centre. The Montgomery Business Revitalization Zone was established in 2011 and has tried to continue with building an identity through new street signs and banners. This revitalization zone has also spurred efforts to improve the commercial districts. The most influential development in the community to date is the “Notable” building, which was the first of its density and type in Montgomery with the intention to initiate redevelopment and revitalization of the community, which is the overall intent of this strategic action plan.

Page 7 of 107

A Snapshot in Time

Page 8 of 107

2.4 REGULATORY FRAMEWORK ADAPT is committed to adhering to the Municipal Government Act (MGA) and incorporating the goals of any existing policy plans that will affect the project; therefore, the team will ensure the overall goals of Calgaryâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;s Municipal Development Plan and of Calgaryâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;s Guidebook for Great Communities are being integrated into the strategic plan. The goals of the Municipal Development Plan that will be considered when developing strategies for the community are; a prosperous economy, compact city, great communities, good urban design, connecting the city, greening the city and managing growth and change. The principles and goals of the Guidebook for Great Communities that will be considered are; opportunity & choice, health & wellness, social interaction, the natural environment, economic vitality, and identity and place. The Area Redevelopment Plan for Montgomery will also be considered throughout this project and its goals for the community, which includes; revitalization of the Bowness Road/46 Street Main Street Area as mixed-use core, encouraging a range of quality medium density housing types adjacent to the mixed-use commercial core, remove the Land use Bylaw setback requirements on Bowness Road, encourage traff ic calming and street tree planting on Bowness Road, encourage attractive community gateways, ensure quality low-density residential redevelopment and where appropriate, slope adaptive design, maintain and enhance existing parks, protect floodplain/floodway for passive recreation and possible pedestrian overpass, encourage two-way bike and pedestrian routes.

Office Consolidation 2018 December

THE CITY OF CALGARY

Municipal Development Plan

Adopted by Council September 2009

calgary.ca | call 3-1-1

Page 9 of 107

2.5 SITE CONTEXT banff

115 minute drive

Overview

city exit

8 minute drive

silversprings golf course

WinSport 7 minute drive

7 minute drive

montgomery

The community of Montgomery is located in Calgaryâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;s northwest quadrant. It is geographically situated along a south-facing valley and north of the Bow River - creating some beautiful views and enjoyable riverfront access. Montgomery has a rich history. It was named after Bernard Law Montgomery and worked as its own stand-alone town until annexed by the City of Calgary in 1963.

Airport

30 minute drive

university of calgary 8 minute drive

downtown 12 minute drive

foothills medical centre 7 minute drive

market mall 5 minute drive

montgomery

Page 10 of 107

montgomery

The community is well connected due to its proximity to several regional amenities and Highway 1 acessibility. Montgomery connectivity has made it into a inner cifty neighbourhood, being only a 12 minute drive outside dowtown Calgary. Montgomery is an amenity rich community and provides plenty of opportunity. Therefore, when redevelopment occurs, itâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;s important to ensure Montgomery identiy is reflected.

2.6 METHODOLOGY

Community Analysis Environmental Analysis •

The team will be responsible for obtaining any environmental analyses that the City of Calgary may have on the area such as: • Geotechnical Analysis • Soil Analysis • Vegetation Surveys • Tree Identification • Archaeological Findings

•

As an inner-city community Montgomery will have a long history to research. This will include aerial photo analysis to highlight physical growth from a birdseye-view. Any historical buildings or sites of importance in the community will be inventoried and researched. We will also research any written history of the community to best understand the community’s character, and to highlight important events or evolutions.

Project Planning and Initial Research Base Mapping •

Generating maps to communicate basic information including road networks and dimensions, block patterns, parcel sizes, and building footprints. This information provides a preliminary understanding of the community before more significant engagement takes place.

Photo Inventory/Site Visit •

The initial site visit supplements the understanding of the community gained through research and base mapping. This will consist of exploring main streets and landmarks, taking photographs, and learning from a community member as our guide. It’s important to get boots on the ground as early as possible to get a sense of the community and its members.

Review of Legal Framework and Existing Plans: •

Municipal Development Plan Calgary Transportation Plan Calgary’s Guidebook for Great Communities Plans specific to Montgomery include: Montgomery Area Redevelopment Plan Montgomery Community Association – Strategic Business Plan

Initial Research Research regarding the Montgomery community in the initial phase will be done to identify key characteristics, and issues facing the community. This could involve historic analysis, news article reviews, and preliminary demographic research. More depth will be achieved in the analysis phase.

Project Proposal •

•

Existing planning policy will guide the formulation of our strategy. Plans will be reviewed, and key elements will be identified to ensure adherence to all existing policy. Plans that encapsulate development in all of Calgary include: • • • • • •

•

Land Use and Functional Analysis

The final deliverable of this phase will be a project proposal which outlines our intentions and guides our progress throughout this project. This is important because it will inform each step of the project and help to keep us accountable and on track.

Page 11 of 107

Analysis of land uses will most likely materialize as a map which identifies the mix of residential, commercial, industrial, institutional, and natural areas. The balance (or imbalance) of these uses can directly impact movement within the community and reveal the accessibility of resources.

Infrastructure Analysis •

The team will be responsible for collecting any data possible on the water and sewer capacity for the area, as well as, quality of the streets and traffic counts.

Housing and Building Typology •

Building typologies and uses directly influence the public realm, street environment, and community demographic. Here we will analyze the range of housing available, including single-detached homes, townhomes, row housing, and higher density typologies. A range of housing type and tenure attracts a diverse population.

Public Realm Inventory and Walkability •

Taking inventory of park space, and other public realm elements will help quantify the balance between public and private space, identifying gaps or potential areas of improvement. Montgomery encompasses multiple major park spaces which will play a major role in this calculation. Walkability will be assessed through the generation of walksheds, through participant observation, and through engagement with community members.

Community Profile - Socio-demographics •

The socio-demographic profile of Montgomery will include analysis based on age, gender, family unit, income, housing type and tenure, ethnicity, and many other indicators. This quantitative analysis will paint a picture of the community which will be supplemented through the engagement process.

Physical Model Construction • • •

Preparation of Digital Files: After identifying the direction and vision of the physical model, there will need to be preparation of digital files to utilize resources such as laser cutters or CNC machines. Material Selection: Materiality of the model will be important and directly relate to the machinery used, and the budget allotted. Assembly

Open House / Workshop •

The open house workshop will take place on February 29th with members of the Montgomery community to review the progress we have made and to discuss the findings of our analysis. This workshop will involve: • Review Analysis and Workshop with Community Members • Community Mapping • Discussion of Issues, Opportunities and Constraints • Conceptual Design

Conceptual Design •

•

After the open house we will begin to formulate conceptual design guidelines and strategic steps for the community to accomplish goals identified throughout the analysis and engagement process. Some themes that will be addressed in this design include: • Land use and density • Mobility • Housing diversity • Neighbourhood commercial corridors • Open space system including street network and pedestrian movement • Urban design This is the draft design; it is still subject to change pending input from the Montgomery community.

Project Planning & Initial Research Project Proposal Due January 17

Community Analysis Presentation February 7

The draft design document will be presented as a PowerPoint presentation to the steering committee on March 20th. The steering committee will provide input based on experience within the community, the city, and the urban planning industry.

Revisions to Concept Design •

After the presentation to the steering committee, revisions will be made to the document based on the input and feedback provided.

Final Presentation Page 12 of 107

Environmental Analysis Historic Evolution Land Use Infrastructure Analysis Housing Typology Public Realm/Walkability Socio-demographics

Physical Model Model Due February 25

Open House / Workshop Feb. 29

Conceptual Design Draft Due March 27

Concept Design Review •

Base Mapping Photo Inventory/Site Visit Review Legal Framework Initial Research

Final Presentation Apr. 20

Final Documents Due April 22

Land Use & Density Open Space System Commercial Corridors Housing Diversity Mobility Strategy Urban Design Guidelines

3.0 ANALYSIS

3.1 DEMOGRAPHICS POPULATION

AVERAGE HOUSEHOLD SIZE

In line with general statistics that older communities often see a decline in population, Montgomery is no different, as they have seen population decline over the years. This also correlates to the fact that Montgomery has a slightly lower than average household size at 2.4 persons per household compared to Calgaryâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;s average of 2.8 persons per household. Neighbourhoods often see life-cycles like this because years ago the neighbourhood was home to many young and growing families and then those kids grow up and leave home and the dynamics of the neighbourhood start to change. Although there is approximately 12% of the population in Montgomery over 65 years of age, census data does show an increase in children and individuals aged 25-39 in recent years and we know that this age group values different things then the current aging population. With all of this being said, population projections do expect Montgomery to see an increase in population of approximately 55% by 2042. Considering all of these facts, this redevelopment plan looks to implement strategies that will support these demographic shifts and provide a variety of opportunities for Montgomery residents.

Average Household Size 2.90%

2.70% 2.60% 2.50%

2.30% 2.20% Montgomery

Population in Private Households - Calgary 1,400,000

6,000

1,200,000 1,000,000

4,000

Population

5,000

3,000 2,000

800,000 600,000 400,000

1,000 0

Calgary

CALGARY POPULATION TREND

Population in Private Households - Montgomery

CURRENT POPULATION

200,000

1986

1991

1996

2001

Census Year

Page 14 of 107

2.4

2.40%

MONTGOMERY POPULATION TREND

3, 975

2.8

2.80%

2006

2011

2016

1986

1991

1996

2001

Census year

2006

2011

2016

HOUSING DEMOGRAPHICS PERCENTAGE OF DWELLINGS CONSTRUCTED IN OR BEFORE 1960

Montgomery 60% Percentage of Dwellings

Montgomery is still home to many of its original homes constructed in or before 1960, which means a significant percentage of the housing stock is nearing the end of its lifecycle and requiring major repairs, this is another indication that the neighbourhood is due for redevelopment. Redevelopment is necessary in order to meet the MDP’s objective to, “reinforce the stability of Calgary’s neighbourhoods and ensure housing quality and vitality of its residential areas (City of Calgary, 2009). Montgomery has seen redevelopment pressures in recent years with new dwelling construction about six percent higher than Calgary as a whole. This is reflected with a significant increase in semi-detached dwellings and a shift in housing tenure from owner households to rental households. ADAPT’s redevelopment plan implements strategies that will allow for sensitive intensification and provide a range of housing options to ensure present day demands are being met.

Montgomery Calgary

50%

35%

40% 30% 20% 10% 0% 1986

1991

1996

Single-detached House Row house

AFFORDABILITY Montgomery is a desirable neighbourhood because of its close proximity to downtown, the University, Foothills Campus, Market Mall, the Bow River and the mountains. This location comes at a high cost, with an average home costing approximately half a million dollars. The ADAPT team looks to address this issue with land use strategies that will allow for a range of housing types and tenures, that address the need for densification, but also provide options for people at every stage of life, for all life styles and include people of all economic and demographic backgrounds to live within the community.

$557, 885 $421 Page 15 of 107

Average Price of a Home

Average Price / SqFt

10%

2001

2006

2011

2016

Census Year Semi-detached house or duplex Apartment

PERCENTAGE OF DWELLINGS CONSTRUCTED FROM 2011-2016

Montgomery

Calgary

16%

10%

TRANSPORTATION Like most of Calgary, Montgomery is a community built for the automobile, with large parking lots at the front of buildings and wide streets. Montgomery also has the Trans Canada highway running through it, which poses as a significant barrier for the community, making pedestrian and cycling connectivity challenging. With this being said, Montgomery does have a slightly higher rate of individuals cycling to work compared to Calgary as a whole and this is likely due to the Bow River pathway running along the southern edge of the community. ADAPT’s redevelopment plan implements strategies to shift to a more pedestrian-oriented design and provide connectivity through the community by providing a variety of travel options that are safe for users of all ages and abilities.

Montgomery

14% 6% 69%

Car, Truck, Van as Driver

Car, Truck, Van, as Passenger

Public Transit

Walked

Bicycle

Other method

Calgary

2% 5% 16% 5% 71%

Car, Truck, Van as Driver

Car, Truck, Van, as Passenger

Public Transit

Walked

Bicycle

Other method

3.2 ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS floodlines

overview Due to the proximity to the Bow River, Montgomery is susceptible to flooding. In 2013, the water table, Shouldice Park, and the seniors home were flooded. However, the 2013 flood was a third of how far a 200-year flood could reach. Therefore, careful consideration is needed for the areas that are at risk.

quick facts: 0.1km2 of Montgomery flooded in 2013.

erosion

overview Montgomery shares its boundary with the Bow River. Therefore, natural changes in the rivers edge occurs. However, during major events, such as a flood, large changes can occur causing slope failure. After the 2013 flood, two large portions of Montgomery rivers edge have been selected for riverbank re-stabilization projects.

quick facts: 3.7km Montgomery River Edge. 1.9km Shouldice River Edge.

2013 Floodline 100 year Floodline 200 year Floodline Bow River Flood Fringe 2015 Floodway 2015 Montgomery Building footprints Montgomery Community Boundary 0

Page 16 of 107

0.25

0.5

1 Km

3.2 ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS slope

N 10

0 112

1120

111

1070

overview

urban forest

overview

70 10

Montgomery is geographically located along a south-facing valley. This drastic change in elevation lends itself to spectacular views of the Rocky Mountains, COP, and the entire community. However, large changes in elevation over short distances can present challenges for drainage, development, accessibility, and mobility.

At first glance, Montgomery seems to have a large amount of trees. However, most of these trees are located in the public/private parks within the community. Leading to a mis representation of how many trees are within the public realm. Redevelopment and public realm improvements should look to increase their street tree capacity.

quick facts: 0

110

quick facts:

112 0

0.5km2 of Montgomery area greater than 15% slope.

113

0 114

70% are mature in size. 78% Deciduous and 22% Evergreen

115 1160 0

1.7km2 of Montgomery less than 15% slope.

1070

120

0 117

1210

111

1190

Tree Diameter (cm) 0 - 14 15 - 33 34 - 57 58 - 114 115 - 250

110

118

Montgomery_Boundary

Slope Percentage (%)

Hydrology

0-5

Montgomery_Buildingfootprints

6 - 15

Montgomery_Contours10m

16 - 25

Montgomery_Contour5m

26 - 35 0

Page 17 of 107

0.25

Montgomery Boundary Hydrology 0.5

1 Km

0.25

0.5

1 Km

3.3 LAND USE

COMMERCIAL LAND USE

Office

Hospitality

Strip Mall Retail

â&#x20AC;&#x2DC;Big Boxâ&#x20AC;&#x2122; Retail

Gas Station

Mixed-Use

Commercial land use in Montgomery is concentrated along the two main streets (Bowness Road, and 16 Avenue). There are many auto-oriented uses such as gas stations, drive-thru food, auto shops, and stores with large parking lots. 16 Avenue traffic also brings travel-based uses such as hotels, and car rental shops. Much of the office space is used for medical offices and clinics. Light Industrial

Page 18 of 107

3.4 TRANSPORTATION movement network

overview

transit

overview

The street network suggest a diversity of streets, however, the streets are all oriented towards the movement of vehicles. This creates challenges for other modes of transportation such as walking or cycling. The community, however, is well situated along the Regional Pathway, but does not provide safe or well connected routes to the Regional Pathway or within the community itself.

The transit network provides several routes throughout the community, however, the western portion of the community has far less option compared to the eastern part of the community. Also, bus stop infrastructure is outdated or non-existent. This creates unpleasant transit experience and discourages people from using their local transit services.

quick facts:

quick facts: 12 Bus Routes

7.8km Bike Paths

4.8km Pathways Transit Network

Movement Network Skeletal Arterial Urban Boulevard Neighbourhood Boulevard Collector Residential Pathways Bike Paths

95% Streets and 5% Roads.

Page 19 of 107

47 Bus Stops

0.25

0.5

1 Km

BRT Regular School BRT Montgomery Boundary Bow River

All bus routes are within 600m walk.

0.25

0.5

1 Km

3.4 TRANSPORTATION traffic volume

overview 21000

9000

7000

15 00

0 35

00 230

Traffic Volume 2018

Montgomery Boundary Hydrology

0.5

quick facts:

Trans Canada Hwy and Bowness Rd remain major thoroughfares. Traffic volume increase along Home Rd and 48 St NW.

6000 - 10000 10000 - 20000 20000 - 30000 30000 - 40000

0.25

Montgomery has an extremely strong grid network and block lengths. This creates the foundation for a strong walkable and cycleable community. To increase more sustainable modes of transportation and to support land use, densification, community amenities, and public realm improvement should be considered in the blue highlighted area on the map.

quick facts:

33000

overview

Large volume of traffic use both 16 Ave NW and Bowness Rd NW, however, this divides the community and creates challenges for pedestrians and cyclist. In recent years, there has been an increase in cut through traffic along Home Rd NW and 48 St NW. This poses challenges to the inner community safety for other modes of transportation.

12000

10000

walkshed

8% Street Access 20% of people live within 600m of each community destination.

Walkshed Roads Walkshed Buildings Walkshed Buffer Montgomery Boundary Bow River

1 Km

Page 20 of 107

0.25

0.5

1 Km

3.5 HOUSING TYPOLOGIES Special Cases:

Single Detached - 76%

Row House - 1%

Semi-Detached - 22%

The current housing stock of Montgomery is majority (76%) singledetached housing. This is common for historical, inner-city communities and still reflects our societyâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;s value for home-ownership. The singledetached homes range from brand new multi-storey homes, to small older-style bungalows. Many of the newer infill developments consist of semi-detached and row-style housing. Based on our observation, we expect the number of this middensity development to increase.

LANEWAY HOUSING:

Low and mid-rise developments are scarce in Montgomery, however the ARP proposes zoning for much higher densities. Mixed-use developments such as the NOtaBLE restaurant provide opportunity for higher density living and accessible amenity space.

Affordable housing in Montgomery can be found along the Bow River Pathway in the Southern tip of the community. Affordability is an important element in building a diverse, and inclusive community.

Laneway housing is a great way to increase density while maintaining the existing stock of single family homes. Difficulties surrounding laneway homes include safety concerns in unlit laneways, and lack of curb appeal in laneway infrastructure.

AFFORDABLE HOUSING:

Low-Rise - 0.4% SENIORS HOUSING:

The Montgomery ARP aims to preserve the areas small-town character, and to encourage high quality, thoughtful intensification. High Rise - 0.3%

Page 21 of 107

Seniors housing in Montgomery is found in along the Bow River at Bow Manor, and in the heart of the community at Silvera Seniors Living. It is important that seniors housing is accessible, and safe. The Montgomery Community Association keeps seniors very involved and provides many opportunities for interaction.

3.6 DENSIFICATION

44 Street NW

16 Ave NW

17 Ave NW

CURRENT DENSITY

Currently, Montgomery is a low density neighbourhood with single-detached housing making up 47% of its gross developable area. Montgomery has 4.3 units per gross residential acre. The Area Redevelopment Plan (ARP) includes zoning for a much higher density in the future. For example, building height allowance along 16 Avenue is permitted up to 22 meters as per the ARP. This level of density has not been well-received by the community, and has caused uncertainty for residents.

DENSITY COMPARISON: MONTGOMERY

2,509 people/km2

BELTLINE

8,999 people/km2

BOWNESS

2,214 people/km2 ARP Proposed height along 16 Avenue

Page 22 of 107

SHADOW STUDY

Shadow studies are important to analyze the impact of built form on the public realm. This is especially important in Winter cities like Calgary. Areas of heavy shadow can create extra cold conditions in the Winter. By analyzing the extent of shadows, buildings can be adjusted to minimize these impacts, or extra measures can be taken. Shadow studies often use days with unique sun patterns such as the solstice. For our purposes we use days that are more reflective of a typical Spring or Winter day.

16 Avenue NW

ness

NOtaBLE

Bow

March 21

12 pm

9 am

43 Street NW

November 21

Page 23 of 107

4 pm

3.7 OPEN SPACE Outdoor Rereation/Sports Facilities Civic Spaces/Gardens Undesignated Natural/Semi-natural Historic Landmark/Resource

Playgrounds

Institutional and Public Buildings Off-Leash Dog Parks Walking and Biking Trails Playgrounds

Bow River Pathway

MCA “in the works” 1) George R. Gell Park Upgrades 2) New Pump Bike Park

Local Parks

Community Garden

37.79 Ha Regional Park Space

Schoolyards

Page 24 of 107

Shouldice Park

5.8% Local Park Space

1 2

At first glance, Montgomery appears to have a sufficient supply of green space. However, a significant amount of this space is privately owned and not accessible to the public. Large off-leash parks make for a very dog friendly neighbourhood, however much of the local park space has minimal programming. The Hextall Bridge and old Shouldice House site offer opportunities to explore the community’s rich history. The Montgomery Community Association is currently exploring landscape interventions in George Gell Park, and plans to implement a pump bike park by the Junior High School. The River pathway system is a major asset to the community.

3.8 FUNCTIONAL ANALYSIS When analyzing the functionality of Montgomery in its current state, it is clear that the neighbourhood presents many opportunities but must also overcome several constraints. The community is currently divided by a major highway which has had signif icant impacts on the functioning of Montgomery. Firstly, the intersection of vehicular, and pedestrian traff ic is troublesome, and often uncomfortable. Also, residents on opposite sides of the highway are not only physically separated, but also identify differently to their community. The highway facilitates a lot of traff ic into and out of Calgary, making it very busy, and bringing “highway” commercial uses along the corridor, such as gas stations, hotels, and car rental kiosks. These types of activities, which accommodate the passer-by over the Montgomery resident, complicate the functionality of the community. Signif icant regional destinations also bring traff ic through the community. Montgomery has 4 major community gateways, via 16 Avenue, Bowness Road, and 32 Avenue NW. These entrances are not always clear, and can lead to confusion or misidentif ication of the Montgomery community as part of Bowness. The community boundaries of the Bow River and Shaganappi Trail are clear and concrete. The opportunities and constraints of this community will be explored further in the next section, What We Heard.

Market Mall

LEGEND Bow River Regional Destinations Local Destinations Local Trafﬁc Regional Trafﬁc

Shouldice Recreation Park

Alberta Children’s Hospital

Bow River Pathway Barrier to Movement Noise Pollution Intersection of Movement (Pedestrain & Vehicle) Community Gateways

Page 25 of 107

Edworthy Park

4.0 WHAT WE HEARD

4.1 COMMUNITY WORKSHOP A major component of this project is the engagement with community members and stakeholders. On February 29th we held a public workshop at the Montgomery Community Centre. We put up posters with our analysis results and sticky notes for community feedback. We also had a large community model showing the current density of Montgomery. Community members were asked to sit with us at tables around a large Montgomery Map. We asked a series of questions, and asked residents to write and illustrate the map with markers. Key topics included: • • • • • • • • • • •

Inf ill and densif ication Transit Walking and cycling Driving and parking Traff ic Calming Housing typologies Commercial land use Special places Laneway housing and secondary suites Open spaces Streetscape improvements

Topics were broken into two main categories; 1) today’s challenges, and 2) future opportunities. At each table we discussed each category for 35 minutes with a 15 minute report back. The experience brought to light several important issues and opportunities which are represented in the f inal report. A second engagement session was planned to reveal our f inal plans to community members. However, due to the Covid-19 Pandemic, and restrictions for gathering this event had to be canceled. We hope to have an opportunity to share our work with the community at some point in the near future if the social distancing conditions are lifted.

Page 27 of 107

4.2 FEEDBACK MOBILITY

3 2 1 2 3 4

1. 16 Avenue NW • Concerns with walking, safety, and fast speeds • Unsafe conditions at 43 Street, 46 Street, and Home Road crossings Opportunity for densification • • Issues of crime 2. Home Road • Fast speeds • Limited visibility • Unsafe conditions at Bowness Road and 52 Street crossings • Poor walking conditions • Concerns about increased traffic 3. Bowness Road • Opportunity for infill between 42 and 47 Street NW • Poor walking conditions • Poor public realm around NOtaBLE • Not enough transit 4. 17 Avenue NW • Lost yards and tree canopy as a result of infill development • Needs traffic calming interventions

OPEN SPACES

1. Shouldice Terrace Park • Historical Significance not clear 2. Safeway & Town Square • Opportunity for redevelopment • Town Square underutilized 3. Montalban Park • Steep slopes • No sidewalk along park or E/W pathway makes park inaccessible for strollers

LAND USE Special Places

Page 28 of 107

• • • • •

New infill development “cookie-cutter” and lacking variety Limited growth along 16 Avenue New housing forms are not affordable Desire opportunities for aging in place Affordable Housing is nearing end of life-cycle

4.3 COMMUNITY WISH LIST Based on our engagement with Montgomery residents, we identified the following wishlist: •

Safe pedestrian realm along main streets

•

Extensive pathways and connections within and between open spaces

•

More housing options and range of affordability

•

Increased tree canopy

•

More comprehensive transit network

•

Traffic calming

•

Thoughtful densification along 16 Avenue and Bowness Road

•

Walkable and safe pedestrian realm

•

Clear connection to Montgomery’s rich history

•

A town square that is used for community gathering

Page 29 of 107

5.0 DESIGN GUIDELINES & INTERVENTIONS

5.1 COMMUNITY GROWTH & DEVELOPMENT

5.1 COMMUNITY GROWTH & DEVELOPMENT CURRENT OPPORTUNITIES

CURRENT CHALLENGES

The project commenced with the ADAPT team carrying out a thorough analysis of the Montgomery community and surrounding area. The basis for the final design interventions were the opportunities and challenges identified in the maps to the left, along with the communities feedback. This led the team to develop three core values to guide their design interventions. 1| Sustainable Growth The final design interventions address sustainable growth by focusing density in strategic areas and creating spaces that are adaptable through changing seasons and over time. 2| Diversity The final design interventions address diversity by proposing zoning changes and land use amendments that allow for a diversity of uses and housing typologies. Along with the development of a diversity of amenity spaces. 3| Connectivity The final design interventions address connectivity by improving the public realm through the development of pedestrian and cycle friendly corridors, which connect people to places.

Page 32 of 107

CURRENT LAND USE OVERVIEW The map to the left was created by the ADAPT team during the analysis phase, using Google Earth street views. It is important to note, that this map differs from a typical zoning map because it is more accurate in representing what is actually on the ground today. As is visible in the map, the most prominent land use in the Montgomery community is residential followed by commercial. Initial build out of Montgomery began in the early 1900’s with approximately sixty homes built by 1947. This community started to be developed because at the time, the area was not a part of Calgary and land was much cheaper then in the city. Montgomery was annexed by the City of Calgary on August 15, 1963, as it needed more infrastructure to support the growing population. The community valued their small town charm and mountain views. Today we see a community that is still predominantly composed of low-density residential, but is no longer keeping up with present day demands. The community has lost its once “small town charm” due to many of the buildings coming to the end of their life-cycle and aging infrastructure. The community says they have started to see a lot of redevelopment in Montgomery and it’s not that they are against it, but they do feel that most of the densification should occur along the main streets, Bowness Road & 16th Avenue NW. They also reported that a lot of the fourplexes and duplexes going in are very “cookie cutter” and do not preserve the neighbourhood character. The community hopes for a wider variety of housing typologies that demand a higher quality design. They also reported that some of the current infill designs are not indicative of an inviting public realm and that they value things like front porches, which create a neighborly community feel. Concerns on affordable housing in the community and aging in place were also brought to the teams attention during engagement sessions. The fact that Montgomery is in close proximity to a regional destination, Market Mall and the developing University District, which will bring a lot of housing to the area, makes competition a concern. However, the fact that Montgomery is the gateway community into the city and also home to a regional athletic park, ensure there is an opportunity for the community to support a vibrant and active core, so long as, there is an increase in density to support this mixed use/commercial core. These two elements, an active/vibrant core and increasing density are two of the primary land use goals of this strategic redevelopment plan.

Page 33 of 107

PROPOSED LAND USE VISION FOR 2042

One of the City of Calgaryâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;s development goals is to limit suburban greenfield developments by striving to house 50% of population growth into developed communities within Calgary. The Municipal Development Plan outlines the importance of neighbourhood redevelopment in achieving sustainable growth by taking advantage of existing infrastructure, amenities, schools and parks. Sensitive densification and redevelopment of existing low-density residential communities can provide a variety of housing choices, which also helps to provide more affordable housing options. Neighbourhoods go through life-cycles and therefore, in order to ensure viability of a neighbourhood it must undergo redevelopment at different stages in order to ensure itâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;s meeting the present day demands of its residents and the surrounding area. ss

w Bo ad Ro W N

W tN

e re

16 ue

en Av

The vision for Montgomery is to respond to their current redevelopment pressures and create a vibrant and active core for the community by being strategic with densification. Densification will be focused around 16th Avenue NW, 46 Street NW & Bowness Road NW. This density will help support an active commercial area and gentle densification throughout the community will allow for more housing diversity and affordability.

W N

The following section will outline the land use strategies being implemented to achieve these desired outcomes. The sections will also address important policy implications and design guidelines that will further support these outcomes, and promote positive change.

OBJECTIVES

1. To create a vibrant mixed-use and commercial core for Montgomery, around 16th Avenue, 46th Street and Bowness Road NW. 2. To encourage growth and change by offering a greater range of housing choices 3. To offer an attractive, engaging, accessible and comfortable public realm 4. To create a community that meets present day demands and that is adaptable to meet demands of future generations

POLICY

-Building design should be of high quality and prioritize detail -A street wall must be created along Bowness Road and 16th Avenue NW -Buildings with the tallest height should be placed nearest 16th Avenue NW -Building design along 16th Avenue and Bowness Road NW should prioritize public realm -Parking must be located at the rear or underground along Bowness and 16th Avenue to ensure a high-quality pedestrian-oriented area -New developments over 9 meters must perform shadow studies to assess, whether or not there will be an impact on surrounding properties and if so, how it might be mitigated through building design -Buildings over 10 meters should incorporate stepbacks into their design to create massing similar to adjacent properties

Page 34 of 107

RESIDENTIAL LAND USE

OVERVIEW Today we see many of the original single-detached homes still making up the majority of the communityâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;s housing stock. Thirty-five percent of the current housing stock was built in 1960 or before, which means many of these single-detached dwellings are requiring repairs and nearing the end of their life-cycle. Another issue with this housing typology is that, it is no longer meeting demands being created by overall changing demographics. The values of millenials are significantly impacting housing and retail demands. This generation values experience over material goods and are very conscientious of the environment. There is no longer the same demand for large singledetached homes and the once idealistic â&#x20AC;&#x153;white picket fenceâ&#x20AC;? mentality. This is because millennials are not having the same size families, they are looking to have less of an ecological footprint and want more maintenance free living, so they can travel. This coupled with the location of Montgomery being in close proximity to downtown, the University of Calgary, Foothills campus and Market Mall, all put strong redevelopment pressures on the community. The vision for Montgomery is to respond to these redevelopment pressures and create a vibrant and active core for the community. This will be accomplished by being strategic with densification. Densification will be focused along 16th Avenue NW., 46th Street NW and Bowness Road NW. Densification will follow a gradient of building heights with the highest occurring along 16th Avenue and tapering off into the community. The majority of building heights in our proposed residential land use plan, do not exceed 4 storeys. This accurately responds to community feedback, as they indicated that they are okay with densification along the main streets and that they would rather see more medium density buildings over high-density towers. Design guidelines on buildings will also ensure that adjacent housing is respected, along with neighbourhood character. The overall aim of the proposed residential land uses, is to develop a strategic plan that allows the neighbourhood to be responsive to growth patterns of the community and city as a whole, while also providing its current residents with an exciting new neighbourhood node, which will offer a lot of amenity and make the neighbourhood an exciting place to be.

Page 35 of 107

LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL OVERVIEW The large amount of single family housing in Montgomery provides a significant opportunity for residential infill and intensification. Low density residential will remain as the dominant land use in the Montgomery community; however, it is recommended that all low-density residential displayed in the map to the right, include the Residential - Contextual One/ Two Dwelling District (R-C2) along with R-C1 and R-C1s. The ADAPT team feels semi-detached homes and duplexes fit seamlessly into the low-density fabric because of their ability to be designed with a very similar size, look and feel to that of a single-detached home. Including secondary suites, laneway units, semi-detached homes and duplexes in all of the low-density residential areas, will allow for a diversity of housing options, which in return, also provides more affordable options for those wanting to live in a neighbourhood that provides them with access to jobs, schools and amenities. This land use identifies with the “Neighbourhood Housing Local” outlined in Calgary’s Guidebook for Great Communities and should align with those outlined policies, along with the policy outlined for each land use district in the Land Use Bylaw.

OBJECTIVES 1. Increase density while ensuring neighbourhood character is retained 2. Diversify low-density housing options

POLICY -Low density development, which includes the R-C1, R-C1s and R-C2 districts are permitted in all areas shown in the map to the right. -Low density areas are not permitted to be rezoned

HEIGHT 1-2 storeys (3-6m) ALLOWABLE TYPOLOGIES Typology

Possible Land Use District

Single Detached Home

R-C1

Secondary Suite

R-C1s

Laneway Unit

R-C1s

Semi-Detached & Duplexes

R-C2

DENSITY It is anticipated that this land use will contribute approximately 656 units by 2042. Page 36 of 107

LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL

SINGLE-DETACHED HOMES (R-C1) INTENT Allow for singe-detached infill developments to support famillies still wanting this housing option Lane

POLICIES -A variety of architectural styles are permitted (traditional or modern), so long as the design is of high quality and prioritizes detail. -All developments must have front yard landscaping, that contributes to an attractive public realm -Where there is a laneway, no front garages or parking pads are permitted, all parking must be at the rear

Street

Image retrieved from: Google Earth

MODERN

Image retrieved fromhttps://www.urbancoreventures.com/infillhousing

TRADITIONAL

SECONDARY SUITES (R-C1s)

INTENT Utilize existing infrastructure to provide an affordable housing option for renters, while also providing financial benefit for the home owner. Increases neighbourhood density without altering current housing forms

Principle Dwelling

POLICIES

Private Entrance

-Secondary suites are permitted in both the R-C1 and R-C2 Districts -Secondary suites shall have their own seperate entrance -One additional parking space must be provided for the suite

Secondary Suite Lane Extra Parking Space

Page 37 of 107

Image retrieved from: https://canmore.ca/municipal-services

FRONT ENTRY

Image retrieved from: www.todayscalgaryhomes.com/

REAR ENTRY

LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL

LANEWAY UNITS (R-C1s) INTENT Provides a housing option for a diverse group of people, without altering neighbourhood character.

POLICIES

Street Laneway Unit Parking

Lane Landscaping Retrieved from: http://www.lanefab.com/laneway-house-built-projects/

LANDSCAPING

Retrieved from: http://www.lanefab.com/laneway-house-built-projects/

GROUND FLOOR

-Laneway units are permitted on any R-C1 lots with a laneway -Laneway units must be of high quality design and respect privacy of neighbouring properties -The unit must not be taller than the primary dwelling and must provide some at grade living space -One additional parking space must be provided for the laneway unit -A landscaped setback is required to face the laneway -Existing trees/vegetation must be retained where possible and at least one new tree planted as part of the landscaping

SEMI-DETACHED/DUPLEXES (R-C2)

INTENT

Provides a more affordable ground oriented housing option for families and those wanting to downsize, while still maintaining neighbourhood character Lane

POLICIES

Minimal Setback Street

Page 38 of 107

Retrieved from: https://www.victoria.ca/EN/main/residents/planning-development

MODERN

Retrieved from: http://www.kdbdesignstudio.ca/portfolio-view

TRADITIONAL

-A variety of architectural styles are permitted (traditional or modern), so long as the design is of high quality and prioritizes detail -All developments must have front yard landscaping that contribute to an attractive public realm -Exiting trees/vegetation must be retained where possible

MEDIUM-LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL OVERVIEW Medium-low density residential will be composed of townhouses, fourplexes, rowhouses and 3-4 storey apartment buildings. The ADAPT team feels that, these housing typologies help to support the development of a vibrant neighbourhood core. These forms also present a good option to help with the densification gradient from higher building heights to low-density residential. Community feedback indicated their major concern with this land use to be, a lack of architectural style and parking concerns. The proposed plan will outline additional guidelines to try and mitigate these issues. This land use identifies with the “Neighbourhood Housing Minor” outlined in Calgary’s Guidebook for Great Communities and should align with those outlined guidelines, along with the policy outlined for each land use district in the Land Use Bylaw.

OBJECTIVES

1. Ensure a seamless density transition from higher building heights to low-density residential. 2.This land use should help to support the commercial uses and help to activate the community node between 16th Avenue, 46th Street & Bowness Road NW. 3. Provide a diversity of medium-low density housing types. 4. Ensure building design respects neighbouring land uses and character

POLICY

-Medium-low density residential districts are not permitted to be rezoned -3-4 storey apartment buildings should be placed closest to the community node and 16th Avenue

HEIGHT 2-4 storeys (6-12m) ALLOWABLE TYPOLOGIES Typology

Possible Land Use District

Townhouses & Fourplexes

M-CG

Rowhouses

M-G

3-4 Storey Apartment Buildings M-C1

DENSITY

Page 39 of 107

It is anticipated that this land use will contribute approximately 272 units by 2042.

MEDIUM-LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL

TOWNHOUSES, FOURPLEXES & ROWHOUSES (M-CG/(M-G) INTENT Provides more affordable ground oriented housing options for families and those wanting to downsize,

POLICIES

Retrieved from: https://www.avenuecalgary.com/city-life

ROWHOUSES

Retrieved from: https://www.letstalkrichmond.ca/richmond

FOURPLEX

-A variety of architectural styles must be used in order to maintain character and avoid “cookie cutter” like designs -All units should have their own at grade amenity space -Areas facing the streets must be landscaped to contribute to an attractive public realm -Existing trees/vegetation should be retained where possible and where trees are removed, new ones must be planted -One parking stall per unit must be offered in the form of a rear garage or parking pad

3-4 Storey Apartment Building (M-C1) INTENT Provides a mix of housing options suitable for a range of income levels and lifestyles.

POLICIES

Retrieved from:https://www.buzzbuzzhome.com/us/uptown-place-residences

MODERN

Page 40 of 107

Retrieved from: https://vancouver.ca/home-property-development

TRADITIONAL

-A variety of architectural styles must be used in order to maintain character and avoid “cookie cutter” like designs -Areas facing the streets must be landscaped to contribute to an attractive public realm -There must be hard landscaping around the building to ensure accessibility -There must also be soft landscaping near the building to contribute to an attractive public realm -Parking must be at the rear of the building or underground to contribute to the neighbourhoods pedestrian-oriented design

MEDIUM-HIGH DENSITY RESIDENTIAL OVERVIEW Medium-high density residential has been strategically placed in only one location, as seen on the map to the right. This density is intended to function as a buffer between the taller buildings along 16th Avenue and the lower building heights moving into the neighbourhood, with the intention of creating a densifcation gradient This land use will also help to provide a consumer base, workforce and housing near the commercial corridor along 16th Avenue NW and the community node along 46th Street and Bowness Road NW. This land use identifies with the “Neighbourhood Housing Major” outlined in Calgary’s Guidebook for Great Communities and should align with those outlined guidelines, along with the policy outlined for this land use district in the Land Use Bylaw.

OBJECTIVES 1. Ensure there is enough density to support and activate the commercial corridor along 16th Avenue NW and mixed-use/commercial node along 46th Street and Bowness Road NW. 2.Ensure there is a density gradient from 16th Avenue NW into the neighbourhood

POLICY

-Medium-high density residential is only permitted adjacent to 16th Avenue NW -Design elements must be incorporated that help the building to match surrounding building massing

HEIGHT 4-6 storeys (12-18m) ALLOWABLE TYPOLOGIES Typology

Possible Land Use District

4-6 Storey Apartment Buildings M-C2

DENSITY It is anticipated that this land use will contribute approximately 176 units by 2042.

Page 41 of 107

MEDIUM-HIGH DENSITY RESIDENTIAL 4-6 Storey Apartment Building (M-C2)

INTENT To provide a mix of housing options suitable for a range of income levels and lifestyles. A housing option that is in close proximity to transit and commercial/ mixed-use areas, which provide an array of public services and amenities.

POLICIES -Building design most include elements such as stepbacks and use of colour to create massing similar to adjacent properties -Building design must provide some form of high quality public space -Parking must be concealed at the rear of the building -Design must take into account exiting trees and vegetation -Design must incorporate trees and landsccaping in order to contribute to a high quality pedestrian realm

Retrieved from:https://www.vancouvernewcondos.com/properties/regan-west-marcon

Regan West - Coquitlam, Canada Marcon

6 Storey - Massing

Retrieved from:https://www.claudejobin.com/listings/ottawa-condos-sale-hintonburg

The Eddy - Ottawa, Canada Christopher Simmonds Architecture

Page 42 of 107

AFFORDABLE HOUSING

Montgomery’s current purpose built affordable housing is located on the South side of the community along the Bow River. The City of Calgary has not had a budget for the maintenance of these buildings therefore, they have become quite run down and the area has become undesirable and does not blend in with the rest of the community.

CURRENT

The goals of this site should be: - to create buildings that seamlessly blend in with the rest of the neighbourhood -to provide amenity space for each individual suite, but also a communal amenity space -the design should contribute to an attractive public realm -the landscaping design should strongly compliment the Bow River and pathway system, creating an inviting public realm

OVERVIEW The City of Calgary has outlined in many of it’s documents, the goal to provide inclusive and equitable housing options in all of their communities. Montgomery community feedback did indicate a need for more affordable housing and a significant upgrade to their current affordable housing site along the Bow River. Although other strategies being proposed in this redevelopment plan will help to provide affordable housing, this specific site can be for a developer who is committed to purpose built rental. Affordable housing is essential in meeting Calgary’s goals of equity and diversity.

Page 43 of 107

POTENTIAL

SENIORS HOUSING

Montgomery currently has seniors housing on the South side of the community along the Bow River, which is a great location in terms of seniors having access to the beautiful Bow River and pathway system, as research indicates how important it is to seniors health to be active on a regular basis. However, this location is not in close walking distance to other services and amenities and the other seniors housing site outlined on this map is.

CURRENT

The other location presently home to seniors housing is in the middle of the neighbourhood, offering a much better loation in terms of seniors being able to walk to the neighbourhood node along Bowness Road for various services and amenities. The ADAPT team envisions redevelopment of this site into something more of a medium density and similar design to whatâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;s being built at University District, where an independent seniors living facility is being connected to an assisted living facility using a plus 30. This type of design would allow for an enjoyable social life and provide the opportunity to age in place.

OVERVIEW Census data indicates that a large portion of the population is aging, therefore, it is important to consider seniors housing in order to create inclusive communities and provide the option for seniors to be able to age in place. Current research supports the importance of integrating seniors into our communities, as this provides benefits for both the young and old. Montgomery residents reported that they value their seniors population and keep them very involved in many community intiatives and events. This led the ADAPT team to ensure seniors housing was addressed as part of their strategic redevelopment plan. POTENTIAL

Page 44 of 107

MIXED USE - LOW OVERVIEW

The City of Calgary’s Municipal Development Plan indicates that, the majority of density should be placed along main streets, transit streets, or major connector streets. The MDP states that intensification of developed areas should be focused around specific nodes and corridors, as this helps to respect neighbourhood character. Development of these nodes and corridors, provides destinations where people can come together to socialize and also have access to services and retail amenities. The mixed-use low designation we are proposing has a maximum height of 13.5m (that includes a 4.5m meter active ground floor). This height is being used to create a sense of enclosure and a sense of place on Bowness Road and 46th Street NW. It is intended that these buildings will serve the individuals living in the buildings, the Montgomery neighbourhood, and surrounding communities. This land use identifies with the “Neighbourhood Housing Minor & Neighbourhood Commercial Minor” outlined in Calgary’s Guidebook for Great Communities and should align with those outlined guidelines, along with the policy outlined for this land use district in the Land Use Bylaw.

OBJECTIVES

1. Create a mixed use node on Bowness Road and 46 Street NW 2. Create a high quality environment that provides services and amenities through a comfortable, accesible and engaging pedestrian realm 3. Offer a more compact retail experience 4.Develop an area that acts as a strong social function for the community

POLICY

-the “Active Frontage” modifier from Calgary’s Guidebook for Great Communities must be applied to both sides of Bowness Road from 45th Street NW to 47th Street NW

HEIGHT 2-4 storeys (7.5-13.5m) ALLOWABLE TYPOLOGIES Typology

Possible Land Use District

2-4 Storey Mixed Use Building

MU-2

DENSITY It is anticipated that this land use will contribute approximately 378 units by 2042. Page 45 of 107

MIXED USE - LOW

These before and after images show potential for a mixed use-low building at the corner of Bowness Road & 47 Street NW. You can see the design is of high quality, respects neighbourhood character and offers a comfortable and accessible pedestrian-oriented environment.

BEFORE

AFTER

POLICIES -Buildings must be located in such a way to create a defined and continuous pedestrian oriented and permeable street wall with active uses at street level -The street wall can be broken at times to provide pedestrian connections or small plaza spaces, so long as, they are of a high quality design and significantly enhance the public realm -Building design must differentiate residential floors from the active ground level street wall, using stepbacks or other architectural design elements -Design must be detail oriented to provide a high quality pedestrian environment (facade treatments, landscaping and street furniture) -Parking must be at the rear of a building or concealed to ensure a pedestrian-oriented street -Buildings must respect adjacent land uses by using design elements such as, stepbacks, different roof lines etc., to ensure massing and character matches that of the adjacent land uses -Corner buildings should act as a gateway feature by using different architectural elements -Street trees and landscaping is required to enhance the public realm -No automobile uses are permitted Unique to mixed use-low is that, street level commercial uses must be smaller scale boutique retail shops, restaurants, or coffee shops with residential located above. Page 46 of 107

MIXED USE - MEDIUM-HIGH OVERVIEW

As discussed in the mixed use-low section, density should be focused in nodes and along corridors to create destinations within a neighbourhood and community. The mixeduse medium-high designation we are proposing is strategically being place along the commercial corridor because its max building height of 20 meters is in align with the max allowable height along the 16th Avenue main street. This land use would not belong in other areas of the community. This land use identifies with the “Neighbourhood Commercial Major” & “Neighbourhood Housing Major” outlined in Calgary’s Guidebook for Great Communities and should align with those outlined guidelines, along with the policy outlined for this land use district in the Land Use Bylaw.

OBJECTIVES

1.Contribute to an active and vibrant commercial corridor along 16th Avenue NW 2.Create a high quality environment that provides a range of amenities, services and employment 3.Contribute to a high quality pedestrian realm that is accessible, comfortable and engaging

POLICIY

-the “Active Frontage” modifier from Calgary’s Guidebook for Great Communities should be applied to this land use designation

HEIGHT 4-6 storeys (13.2-19.8m) ALLOWABLE TYPOLOGIES Typology

Possible Land Use District

4-6 Storey Mixed Use Building

MU-2

DENSITY It is anticipated that this land use will contribute approximately 69 units by 2042. Page 47 of 107

MIXED USE - MEDIUM-HIGH

A mixed use medium-high density building placed on the corner across from George Gell Park and at the entrance to the community from the East would act as a gateway feature, as well as, provide the â&#x20AC;&#x153;eyes on the street concept for the park. The active ground floor would also be a prime location for amenities tailored to users of the Bow River pathway system and the park.

BEFORE

AFTER

POLICIES

*Mixed-use medium-high policies align with the medium-low policies outlined below: -Buildings must be located in such a way to create a defined and continuous pedestrian oriented and permeable street wall with active uses at street level -The street wall can be broken at times to provide pedestrian connections or small plaza spaces, so long as, they are of a high quality design and significantly enhance the public realm -Building design must differentiate residential floors from the active ground level street wall, using stepbacks or other architectural design elements -Parking must be at the rear of a building or concealed to ensure a pedestrian-oriented street -Buildings must respect adjacent land uses by using design elements such as, stepbacks, different roof lines etc., to ensure massing and character matches that of the adjacent land uses -Corner buildings should act as a gateway feature by using different architectural elements -Every new development is required to contribute street trees and landscaping to enhance the public realm *Automobile uses must be limited and only have access from a street or lane, the building must still contribute to a permeable, aesthetically pleasing and pedestrian-oriented street wall

Page 48 of 107

Residential Floors

Commercial Ground Floor

COMMERCIAL LAND USE OVERVIEW

The community identified many issues with the current commercial uses in Montgomery, indicating that many of the uses are automobile oriented or housed in buildings that are nearing the end of their life-cycle and do not contribute to a comfortable or inviting public realm. It is important that the densification this plan is proposing, is supported by amenity improvements and the goal is to create destinations that provide a high quality, vibrant, accessible and comfortable environment for people to access services and amenities. This land use identifies with the “Neighbourhood Commercial Minor & Major” outlined in Calgary’s Guidebook for Great Communities and should align with those outlined guidelines, along with the policy outlined for these land use district in the Land Use Bylaw.

OBJECTIVES

1. Ensure commercial uses at the entrances to the community create a visually engaging and welcoming gateway 2. Create destination rich main streets, that will attract not only Montgomery and nearby neighbourhoods, but regional visitors as well

POLICIY

-the “Active Frontage” modifier from Calgary’s Guidebook for Great Communities should be applied to this land use designation

HEIGHT Varies (Max 20m) ALLOWABLE TYPOLOGIES - BOWNESS ROAD NW. Typology

Possible Land Use District

Commercial - Community District

C-C1

Commercial - Community 2

C-C2

ALLOWABLE TYPOLOGIES - 16TH AVENUE NW. Typology

Possible Land Use District

Commercial - Corridor 2 District

C-COR2

Commercial - Office District

C-O

*This redevelopment plan does not include commercial land use into its projected housing numbers, as it proposes 16th Avenue to be a primarily commercial corridor, however, if there were a need for more housing, the commercial/residential buildings should only be permitted on street corners intersecting with 16th Avenue from 45th Street to Home Road NW Page 49 of 107

COMMERCIAL/MIXED USE BOWNESS ROAD & 46TH STREET NW OVERVIEW Bowness Road commercial uses no longer support Montgomery residents and do not offer a pleasant main street experience. Building setbacks along Bowness Road do not support a pedestrian-oriented environment and the street lacks a sense of place and vibrancy. This plan intends for the commercial uses along Bowness Road and 46th Street NW to be smaller scale boutique retail shops, restaurants, or coffee shops, with offices located above. The intent is to create a neighbourhood node that serves as a vibrant community gathering space with a comfortable, engaging and accessible public realm. It is important for 46th Street to be a part of this node, as it is an important connection between the main streets. This mixed use/commercial node should be a destination for Montgomery residents, as well as, surrounding communities.

OBJECTIVES

*Should align with objectives identified in th mixed use-low section and: 1.Attract new commercial business that compliment Montgomeryâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;s small town character and benefit the Montgomery neighbourhood 2.Uses should support the major commercial street along 16th Avenue 2.Create a visually appealing, engaging and accessible pedestrian oriented street 3.Create a street wall of active frontages and ground level destinations 4.Provide inviting public spaces for people to gather

POLICY

Policy aligns with those outlined under Mixed Use-Low

BEFORE Page 50 of 107

AFTER

DENSIFICATION OF BOWNESS ROAD SHADOW STUDY 9:00AM

MARCH 21st

NOVEMBER 21st

Page 51 of 107

12:00PM

4:00PM

COMMERCIAL/MIXED USE - 16TH AVENUE NW OVERVIEW

The commercial uses along 16th Avenue are mostly auto-mobile oriented and the buildings are at the end of their lifecycle. Infrastructure is aging and it does not present as a safe or enjoyable pedestrian-oriented street. The uses intended for 16th Avenue are uses that will contribute to Montgomery being a gateway into the city and will be designed in a way that ensures a high quality pedestrian-oriented environment. Uses are also intended to serve regional visitors to the Shouldice Athletic Park and even possibly those to Canada Olympic Park, offering places to stay, dine, shop and socialize. This corridor is also intended to house mostly offices on the upper floors, providing opportunities to house a range of employment sectors.

OBJECTIVES

*Should align with objectives identified in the mixed use medium-high section and: 1. Create a vibrant and destination rich main street that reflects being a gateway to Calgary 2.Attract new commercial business that compliment Montgomery, but also serve as regional destinations 3.Shift uses from auto-mobile oriented to pedestrian-oriented 4.Provide opportunities to house a variety of employment sectors

POLICY

Policy aligns with those outlined under Mixed Use Medium-High

BEFORE Page 52 of 107

AFTER

DENSIFICATION OF 16TH AVENUE NW SHADOW STUDY 9:00AM

MARCH 21st

NOVEMBER 21st

Page 53 of 107

12:00PM

4:00PM

PROPOSED DENSITY

DENSITY GRADIENT (BASED ON MAX ALLOWABLE HEIGHTS) 1:1000

Page 54 of 107

5.2 MOBLITY

STREET NETWORK STREET NETWORK MAP

OVERVIEW The City of Calgary transportation decisions place the priority for moving people, as follows: 1. 2. 3. 4. 5.

Walking Cycling Transit Carpooling Automobiles

Throughout Montgomery, however, the priority has been placed on the vehicle, thus creating a lack of diversity in streets. This prioritization on automobile movement has created several challenges for the context of the street, the adjacent land use, sustainable modes of travel, and overall street experience for pedestrians and cyclist. Therefore, a complete streets approach has been implemented to balance streets as both a link and a place to shift towards a street network that offers a wider range of viable transportation choices. The proposed street network looks to extend the Urban Boulevard and Neighbourhood Boulevard along 16 Ave NW and Bowness Rd, respectively. Additionally, the proposal looks to establish two new residential boulevards along 46 St NW and 52 St NW to provide several key connections and improve overall functionality for all modes of transportation.

OBJECTIVES 1. 2. 3.

A network of streets that aligns with land use directions and ensures efficient movement of all modes A network of streets that provides travel options that are safe for users of all ages and abilities A network of streets that are vibrant and attractive places

POLICY • •

Street Network Skeletal Arterial Urban Boulevard Neighbourhood Boulevard Collector Residential Boulevard Residential Proposed Page 56 of 107

• • • • •

Street design shall be implemented by type, location, and design parameters according to the proposed street network map Priority on public realm improvements shall implemented according to the proposed street network map Street shall be designed by considering the context, right-of-way, and land use Intersections and crossings shall be designed to accommodate the safety needs of all users Street design shall incorporate or maintain natural green infrastructure Traffic shall be managed to improve safety and neighbourhood livability Parking shall be managed in all neighbourhoods

The following section will provide and introduce each intervention proposed along with their design considerations and policies to achieve the desired outcome.

STREET NETWORK | 16 AVE NW IMPROVEMENTS CORRIDOR OVERVIEW & DESIGN CONSIDERATIONS

OVERVIEW

16 Ave NW, or Hwy 1, is a major thoroughfare; not only for the community, but also for the City of Calgary. 16 Ave NW is an important street as it serves approximately 35,000 vehicles per day, provides a corridor for goods movement, and acts as a regional/ local commercial attraction. However, its importance to the city as a major thoroughfare and goods movement corridor comes with set of issues for the community of Montgomery. These issues were exposed through our analysis and public engagement process. For Montgomery, the road acts as a barrier and divides the community from north to south. This barrier does not create a pleasant welcoming experience of Montgomery and is difficult for the residents to cross. Therefore, a new design is proposed for of the street, intersections, and crossings to alleviate these issues.

16 Ave NW A

N W

CONDITIONS SECTION (A - A1)

DESIGN CONSIDERATIONS

After

Sidewalk 3m

Buffer 1.5 m

Lane

3.5m

Lane

3.5m

Median 3m

Sidewalk 1.5 m

Plaza 10 m

Lane

Buffer 1.5 m

Parking lot 12 m

Buffer 1.5 m

Page 57 of 107

Sidewalk 1.5 m

Before

This section of 16 Ave NW has an extremely large rightof-way, which provides a great opportunity to better support the commercial land use by improving safety and the overall street experience, while maintaining its functionality. PL

Improvements: • • • • • •

Lane

3.5m

Buffer 1.5 m

Sidewalk 3m

Larger sidewalks Green infrastructure Seating Plaza space Median Crosswalk lighting

STREET NETWORK | 16 AVE NW IMPROVEMENTS INTERSECTION OVERVIEW & DESIGN CONSIDERATIONS A

16 Ave NW & Home Rd

16 Ave NW & 43 St NW (Option #1)

DESIGN CONSIDERATIONS 16 Ave NW and Home Rd Overview 16 Ave NW and Home Rd is a crucial junction and the busiest intersection in Montgomery. It is the first intersection coming east into the city and provides access to Shouldice Park and Montgomery. However, through our analysis and public engagement, the intersection demonstrated that it lacks the ability to balance its multifunctionality. Traffic builds from all sides of the intersection and it is a long and unpleasant crossing for pedestrians and cyclist. Improvements: • •

After

Before

After

Before

Due to its importance for connectivity and its sever safety concerns, three options are proposed for this section. Improvements (Option #1): • •

Crosswalk lighting Median for protection and to provide a resting area

PRECEDENTS 1

Roundabout

Pedestrian Underpass

Placemaking

Roundabout to improve traffic flow and act as traffic calming measure Pedestrian and cyclist tunnels to provide a safe and unique crossing

16 Ave NW & 43 St NW Overview The traffic lights at 16 Ave NW and 43 St NW are the first pedestrian-controlled lights entering Montgomery from the East. This is a critical crossing for many pedestrians and cyclist trying to catch a bus on the south side of 16 Ave NW, or, to connect with the Regional Pathway or the Bow River. Throughout our analysis and public engagement; however, we discovered the crossing length is long and cars tend to be speeding in this area – creating uneasiness for pedestrian and cyclist.

Page 58 of 107

Source: https://www.pinterest.ca/ pin/776589529482190019/

Source: https://www.archdaily.com/780990/cuyperspassage-benthem-crouwel-architects

Source: https://hypebeast.com/2015/11/ time-and-space-herman-kuijers-illuminated-passages-in-the-netherlands

STREET NETWORK | 16 AVE NW IMPROVEMENTS INTERSECTION OVERVIEW & DESIGN CONSIDERATIONS A

16 Ave NW & 43 St NW (Option #2)

16 Ave NW & 43 St NW (Option #3)

DESIGN CONSIDERATIONS Improvements (Option #2): • • •

After

Before

PRECEDENTS 1

Pedestrian Median

Cycling Movement

Pedestrian Movement

4 Playground

Unique underground tunnel Fully separated pedestrian and cyclist tunnel Placemaking opportunities

Improvements (Option #3): • • • • • •

Multifunctional Sky park Fully separated pedestrian and cyclist crossing Playground opportunities Gateway feature Identity structure Opportunity to reconnect with nature

Page 59 of 107

Source: https://www.pinterest.ca/ pin/776589529482190019/

Source: https://www.archdaily.com/522669/bicycle-snake-dissing-weitling-architecture/53b35536c07a80eb1c000277_bicycle-snake-dissing-weitling-architecture_dsc_5739-jpg/

Source: https://www.dezeen.com/2017/05/22/mvrdvseoullo-7017-conversion-overpass-highway-road-parkgarden-high-line-seoul-south-korea/

Source: https://worldlandscapearchitect.com/2011-project-review-april-june/

STREET NETWORK | 16 AVE NW IMPROVEMENTS CORRIDOR OVERVIEW & DESIGN CONSIDERATIONS A

OVERVIEW 16 Ave is a crucial thoroughfare that serves high volumes of traffic and is a dedicated goods movement corridor. However, through this portion of 16 Ave NW, there is a much narrower right-of-way but still the same issues – acting as a barrier, unpleasant street experience, and difficult to cross. Therefore, careful consideration was needed for the new design to ensure these issues were address.

16 Ave NW

N W

Improvements:

CONDITIONS

• Street trees • Green infrastructure • Larger sidewalks • Seating • Median • Crosswalk lighting

After

3m PL

Buffer 1.5 m

Lane

3.5m

Lane

3.5m

Median 3m

Sidewalk 1.5 m

Sidewalk

Lane

Buffer 1.5 m

Page 60 of 107

Sidewalk 1.5 m

Before

SECTIONS (A - A1)

Parking lot 6m

Lane

3.5m

Buffer 1.5 m

Sidewalk 3m PL

STREET NETWORK | 16 AVE NW IMPROVEMENTS INTERSECTION OVERVIEW & DESIGN CONSIDERATIONS 16 Ave NW & 46 St NW (Option #1)

After

DESIGN CONSIDERATIONS 16 Ave NW and 46 St NW

After

Before

16 Ave NW & 46 St NW (Option #2)

Before

PRECEDENTS 1

Bike Lane

Median

Tunnel

16 Ave NW and 46 St NW is a crucial intersection in order to support the vibrancy of the commercial district and create strong connection along the residential boulevard from Shouldice Park, through the Central Plaza, to Montalban Park. However, as discovered through our analysis and engagement session, this crossing was inconvenient, long, and uncomfortable. Therefore, to ensure these concerns are addressed, two new design options are provided. Improvements (Option #1): • • •

Crosswalk lighting Median Bike lane

Improvements (Option #2): • • •

Crosswalk light Median Underground pedestrian and cyclist tunnel

Page 61 of 107

Source: https://twitter.com/Dale_Bracewell/status/1030111734902616064/photo/1

Source: https://archinect.com/plant/project/pottery-road-bicycle-and-pedestrian-crossing

Source: https://www.archdaily.com/780990/cuyperspassage-benthem-crouwel-architects

STREET NETWORK | BOWNESS RD IMPROVEMENTS CORRIDOR OVERVIEW & DESIGN CONSIDERATIONS 19 St NW

Bowness Rd is an important street for Montgomery as it serves approximately 15, 000 vehicles per day. Bowness is also a main street for the community, connecting its community hub and unique sites to the surrounding communities of Parkdale and Bowness. The issues with Bowness Rd; however, stem from its width to volume ratio. These issues lead to speeding problems, discomfort while crossing the street, and an overall unpleasant experience for its users. In order to address these concerns, careful considerations were made throughout the new design to slow traffic, protect its users, and improve the overall experience.

43 St NW

46 St NW

52 St NW

OVERVIEW

CONDITIONS SECTIONS (A - A1)

Improvements:

Page 62 of 107

Sidewalk PL

2.5m

Sidewalk PL

2.5m

Parking

Lane

Parking

3.5m

Bike Lane 1.5m

Parking 2.5m

Lane

3.5m

Buffer 1m

After

Before

• • • • • •

Bike Buffer Lane 1.5m 1.5m

Sidewalk 2.5m

Parking inlets to maintain parking Buffers Green infrastructure Protected bike lanes Street trees Wider sidewalks

STREET NETWORK | 46 ST NW IMPROVEMENTS CORRIDOR OVERVIEW & DESIGN CONSIDERATIONS

OVERVIEW 46 St NW is a crucial North-South street for Montgomery as it serves and connects several key destinations, such as Montalban Park, Summit Kids School, Central Plaza, commercial district, and Shouldice Park. The issues associated with 46 St NW are its dedication to the vehicle, unpleasant street experience, and undesirable intersection crossings at Bowness Rd and 16 Ave NW. Therefore, to ensure that each issue is addressed, several elements are included in the new design to provide more transportation options, improve safety, and enhance the street experience.

CONDITIONS

Improvements:

SECTIONS (A - A1)

After

Cycle Track

3.5m

Buffer

Parking 2.5m

Lane

3.5m

Parking 2.5m

Buffer 2m

Sidewalk 3m

Buffer .5m

Sidewalk

Lane

Buffer 1m

Buffer .5m

Buffer

Lane

1.5m

Parking 2.5m

Sidewalk

3.5m

1.5m

Page 63 of 107

Buffer

Sidewalk

Before

• Parking inlet to maintain parking • Green infrastructure • Street trees • Wider sidewalks • Cycle track for all ages and abilities • Buffers

STREET NETWORK | 52 ST NW IMPROVEMENTS CORRIDOR OVERVIEW & DESIGN CONSIDERATIONS

OVERVIEW 52 St NW is a critical cycling street for Montgomery and acts as a connector for the Regional Pathway and to the northern portion of the community. The issue with 52 St NW is the one-way aspect of this road. This makes it intimidating for contraflow cyclist, increases vehicle speeds, and creates confusion for drivers. In order to alleviate these concerns, the street will be returned to a two-way street to improve the balance of the right-ofway, reduce speeds, and increase pedestrian and cyclist safety.

CONDITIONS

Improvements:

After

3.5m

Parking 2.5m

Lane

3.5m

Buffer

Parking 2.5m

1.5m

Cycle Track

Lane

Sidewalk

1.5m

Buffer

Cycle Track

1.5m

Sidewalk

Buffer

Sidewalk

Page 64 of 107

• • •

Sidewalk

Before

SECTIONS (A - A1)

Buffer 2m

Street trees Parking inlets Two-way street

CYCLING NETWORK CYCLING NETWORK MAP OVERVIEW As the City of Calgary looks to shift their priorities to pedestrians and cyclists, the community of Montgomery is well-positioned to make this shift. The community already boasts double the percentage of cyclists compared to other Calgary communities, and is well positions with the Regional Pathway that passes through the community. If pedestrian and cycling facilities were upgraded, built in the strategic locations, and created for all ages and abilities, the community of Montgomery would see improved connectivity resulting in a higher numbers of people choosing to cycle or walk to their destinations. The newly proposed cycling and pedestrian network provides more options, improved connectivity, and a better overall street experience. This will be achieved through newly created cycle tracks along Bowness Rd and 46 St NW; the addition of the shared street lanes along 21 Ave NW, upper 52 St NW, and Montalban Dr; and the extension of the multi-use track along 32 Ave NW down to 52 St NW.

OBJECTIVES 1. 2. 3.

A cycling and pedestrian network that is connected regionally and locally to major destinations A cycling and pedestrian network that provides travel options that are safe for users of all ages and abilities A cycling and pedestrian network that is effective, vibrant, and attractive

POLICY • • •

Cycling Network Multi-use Cycle Track On-Street Shared Street Proposed

Page 65 of 107

• •

Cycling and pedestrian design shall be implemented by type, location, and design parameters according to the proposed cycling and pedestrian network map Design shall consider the context, right-of-way, and adjacent land use Cycling, pedestrian, intersections, and crossings facilities shall be designed to accommodate the safety needs of all users Cycling and pedestrian facilities shall incorporate or maintain green infrastructure Cycling and pedestrian facilities shall be consistently designed and connect to places people want to go

The following section will provide and introduce each intervention proposed for the cycling and pedestrian network along with their design considerations to achieve the desired outcome.

CYCLING NETWORK | BOWNESS RD IMPROVEMENTS CORRIDOR OVERVIEW & DESIGN CONSIDERATIONS A

B m

43 St NW

46 St NW

52 St NW

19 St NW

OVERVIEW

Improvements:

CONDITIONS

Before

After

PERSPECTIVES

Page 66 of 107

Bowness Rd is an important street for Montgomery as it serves approximately 15, 000 vehicles per day and is also a main street for the community connecting with its community hub and unique sites, and to the surrounding communities of Parkdale and Bowness. The issues with Bowness Rd; however, stem from its width to volume ratio – leading to speeding problems, discomfort while crossing the street, and overall unpleasant experience. In order to address these concerns, careful considerations were made throughout the new design to slow traffic, protect its users, and improve the overall experience.

PLANVIEW

• • • • • •

Parking inlets to maintain parking Buffers Green infrastructure Protected bike lanes Street trees Wider sidewalks

CYCLING NETWORK | BOWNESS RD IMPROVEMENTS INTERSECTION OVERVIEW & DESIGN CONSIDERATIONS A

Bowness Rd & 46 St NW

Bowness Rd & Home Rd

2 2

DESIGN CONSIDERATIONS Bowness Rd & 46 St NW

PRECEDENTS 1

Pedestrian Refuge

Protected Bike Lanes

Corner Island Protection

Bowness Rd and 46 St NW is a crucial intersection in order to support the vibrancy of the central plaza and create safe and efficient crossings for all modes of transportation. Therefore, several safety elements are included to ensure a more enjoyable and accessible intersection for all ages and ability. Bowness Rd & Home Rd Bowness Rd and Home Rd is a key intersection for two important local streets and for the unique site and transit station. Both roads accommodate higher volume of traffic, therefore, the new design incorporates safety measures to create a safer and more enjoyable crossing experience for all its users. Improvements: • • • • •

Protected bike lanes Pedestrian refuge facilities Island corner infrastructure Street trees Curb extensions

Page 67 of 107

Source: https://twitter.com/Dale_Bracewell/status/1030111734902616064/photo/1

Source: https://bikeportland.org/2019/02/19/biking-through-vancouver-bcs-protected-intersection-295729

Source: https://altaplanning.com/projects/200-west-cycle-track-design-and-protected-intersection/

CYCLING NETWORK | BOWNESS RD IMPROVEMENTS CORRIDOR OVERVIEW & DESIGN CONSIDERATIONS C

Bowness Rd & 52 St NW

Bowness Rd & 43 St NW

1 2

3 2

DESIGN CONSIDERATIONS Bowness Rd & 52 St NW

PRECEDENTS 1

Pedestrian Refuge

Curb Extensions

Bike Paint

Bowness Rd and 52 St NW is an important crossing for Montgomery and for the Regional Pathway. The crossing is a main connector for the continuation of the Regional Pathway and connects the community to several Shouldice Park amenities. In order to ensure convenient and safe crossing, several new design elements are provided. Bowness Rd & 43 St NW Bowness Rd and 43 St NW is a key intersection for those entering the community off the Regional Pathway. 43 St NW offers a shared street facility; however, crossing Bowness Rd can be challenging due to width of the road and vehicle speeds. Therefore, several new safety elements are included in the new design. Improvements: • • • • •

Bike paint Crossing lights Curb extensions Pedestrian refuge facilities Corner island infrastructure

Page 68 of 107

Source: https://twitter.com/Dale_Bracewell/status/1030111734902616064/photo/1

Source: http://www.street-plans.com/jc-walks-pedestrian-enhancement-plan-jersey-city-nj/

Source: https://altaplanning.com/projects/200-west-cycle-track-design-and-protected-intersection/

CYCLING NETWORK | 46 ST NW IMPROVEMENTS CORRIDOR OVERVIEW & DESIGN CONSIDERATIONS

N W Rd e om

17 Ave NW

21 Ave NW

19 Ave NW

OVERVIEW

D 46 St NW

46 St NW is a crucial North-South street for Montgomery as it serves and connects several key destinations, such as Montalban Park, Summit Kids School, Silvera Seniors Living, Central Plaza, commercial district, and Shouldice Park. The street, however, lends itself to only the vehicle making the street experience unpleasant and unsafe for other modes of transportation. To create and connect the major destinations along this street several elements are included in the new design to provide more transportation options, improve safety, and enhance the street experience. Improvements:

CONDITIONS

Before

After

PERSPECTIVES

Page 69 of 107

PLANVIEW

• • • • • •

Protected cycle track Wider sidewalks Street trees Bike paint Curb extensions Pedestrian refuge facilities

CYCLING NETWORK | 46 ST NW IMPROVEMENTS INTERSECTION OVERVIEW & DESIGN CONSIDERATIONS A

46 St NW & Home Rd

46 St NW & 17 Ave

2 3 1 3

DESIGN CONSIDERATIONS 46 St NW & Home Rd

PRECEDENTS 1

Curb Extensions

Protected Cycle Track

Bike Paint

46 St NW and Home Rd is an important crossing due to large volumes of traffic entering and leaving Shouldice Park. This can make crossing to connect with the shared bike facility along Home Rd challenging. Therefore, several elements are proposed to increase awareness for drivers and safety for cyclist and pedestrians. 46 St NW & 17 Ave NW 46 St NW and 17 Ave NW is a key intersection between the commercial district and the Central Plaza. In order to ensure safety, comfortability, and vibrancy several new design measures were added to the improve this intersection. Improvements: • • • •

Wider sidewalks Curb Extensions Bike Paint Street trees

Page 70 of 107

Source: http://www.street-plans.com/jc-walks-pedestrian-enhancement-plan-jersey-city-nj/

Source: https://www.elmens.com/business/how-buffered-bike-lanes-offer-additional-safety-value-to-cyclists/

Source: https://www.citynews1130.com/2019/06/22/province-millions-bike-lanes/

CYCLING NETWORK | 46 ST NW IMPROVEMENTS INTERSECTION OVERVIEW & DESIGN CONSIDERATIONS C

46 St NW & 19 Ave NW

46 St NW & 21 Ave NW

2 1

DESIGN CONSIDERATIONS 46 St NW & 19 Ave NW

PRECEDENTS 1

Curb Extensions

Protected Cycle Track

Crosswalk Material

46 St NW and 19 Ave NW is an important intersection being adjacent to Silvera Senior Homes and is along the block of Summit Kids School. In order to provide safe and accessible crossing for the main users of this intersection (kids and seniors) – several safety elements are included. 46 St NW & 21 Ave NW 46 St NW and 21 Ave NW is a key intersection for the Summit Kids School. All at once, large volumes of vehicles and kids arrive and use this intersection. Therefore, several new design elements are proposed in order to manage the safety, improve traffic, and increase driver’s awareness. Improvements: • • • • •

Curb extensions Crosswalk materiality change Protected cycle track Bike Paint Street trees

Page 71 of 107

Source: http://www.street-plans.com/jc-walks-pedestrian-enhancement-plan-jersey-city-nj/

Source: https://www.elmens.com/business/how-buffered-bike-lanes-offer-additional-safety-value-to-cyclists/

Source: http://www.vlanpaysages.ca/projets/rue-chabanel/

CYCLING NETWORK | 32 AVE NW IMPROVEMENTS CORRIDOR OVERVIEW & DESIGN CONSIDERATIONS A

32 Ave NW is a critical street within Montgomery that provides access to surrounding communities and acts as a cut through for those want to access Market Mall, the University of Calgary, or out of the city to the West. 32 Ave NW also provides a multi-use trail that abruptly ends at 48 St NW and fails to connect to any other cycling infrastructure in Montgomery. Therefore, in order to make great use of this well protect cycling facility, we propose to extend the multi-use trail to connect with the shared street facility on 52 St NW.

48 St NW

Home Rd NW

32 Ave NW

Overview

Improvements: • •

CONDITIONS

Before

After

PERSPECTIVES

Page 72 of 107

PLANVIEW

Connection to Montgomery Cycling Network Protect multi-use trail

CYCLING NETWORK | 32 AVE NW IMPROVEMENTS INTERSECTION OVERVIEW & DESIGN CONSIDERATIONS A

32 Ave NW & Sheldon Pl NW

32 Ave NW & 48 St NW

1 2 3

1 2

DESIGN CONSIDERATIONS 32 Ave NW & Sheldon PL NW

PRECEDENTS 1

Curb Extensions

Protected Bike Lanes

Bike Paint

32 Ave NW and Sheldon PL NW crossing is crucial section to provide safety elements in order to maintain flow of cyclist and pedestrians. Although Sheldon PL NW is a small residential road, safety elements are provided due to the higher volume of traffic along 32 Ave NW. 32 Ave NW & 48 St NW 32 Ave NW and 48 St NW is an important intersection due to the crossing of the multi-use trail and the high volume of cut through traffic using 48 St NW. Therefore, in ordered to ensure safety for the users of the multi-use trail several safety elements are included in the new design. Improvements: • • • • •

Curb Extensions Protected multi-use trail Green paint Pedestrian refuge facilities Island corner infrastructure

Page 73 of 107

Source: http://www.street-plans.com/jc-walks-pedestrian-enhancement-plan-jersey-city-nj/

Source: https://bikeportland.org/2019/02/19/biking-through-vancouver-bcs-protected-intersection-295729

Source: https://www.citynews1130.com/2019/06/22/province-millions-bike-lanes/

CYCLING NETWORK | 21 AVE NW IMPROVEMENTS CORRIDOR OVERVIEW & DESIGN CONSIDERATIONS A

B 46 St NW

47 St NW

48 St NW

21 Ave NW

OVERVIEW 21 Ave NW is an important East-West residential road that connects to 52 St NW cycle track, Regional Pathway, Summit Kids School, Montgomery Hill, and the High School. However, the connectivity of 21 Ave NW is challenged by challenging intersections along Home Rd NW and 48 St NW. Therefore, in order to create seamless travel along this residential street, several new design elements are included to increase safety, slow vehicle speeds, and increase visibility. Improvements:

CONDITIONS

Before

After

PERSPECTIVES

Page 74 of 107

PLANVIEW

• • • • •

Bike Signs Sharrows Bike Paints Medians for pedestrians Curb extensions

CYCLING NETWORK | 21 AVE NW IMPROVEMENTS INTERSECTION OVERVIEW & DESIGN CONSIDERATIONS A

21 Ave NW & 48 St NW

21 Ave NW & 47 St NW

1 1 3 3

DESIGN CONSIDERATIONS 21 Ave NW & 48 St NW

After

Before

After

Before

PRECEDENTS 1

Curb Extensions

Pedestrian Median

Bike Paint

21 Ave NW and 48 St NW is a key intersection to ensure safe and comfortability travelling along 21 Ave NW. Due to larger volumes of cut through traffic along 48 St NW, vehicle speeds and volumes makes this intersection uncomfortable for its users. Several new safety elements have been included in the new design in order to increase safety, slow vehicles down, and increase visibility. 21 Ave NW & 47 St NW 21 Ave NW and 47 St NW intersection is a busy intersection during school drop offs and pickups. Due to large influxes of vehicles and kids walking to school, width of crossing for pedestrians and vehicle speed make this intersection uncomfortable for its users. Therefore, in order to establish a comfortable intersection to navigate for all its users, several new design elements are included to increase safety, slow vehicles, and increase visibility. Improvements: • • • •

Curb extensions Pedestrian medians Bike paint Sharrows

Page 75 of 107

Source: https://www.fhwa.dot.gov/planning/css/

Source: https://archinect.com/plant/project/pottery-road-bicycle-and-pedestrian-crossing

Source: https://www.citynews1130.com/2019/06/22/province-millions-bike-lanes/

CYCLING NETWORK | MONTALBAN DR IMPROVEMENTS

r nD

a alb

nt Mo

Av e

N W

CORRIDOR OVERVIEW & DESIGN CONSIDERATIONS

23 St NW

OVERVIEW Montalban Drive NW has a low volume of traffic, however, serves the community with amazing views of COP, the Rocky Mountains, and of the Montgomery itself. Other than providing a scenic cycling route, Montalban Drive NW will serve as a connector from Mackay Rd NW to 52 St NW and eventually be a strong connection with University District. Due to its lower volume of traffic, small interventions are needed to ensure safety to its users. Improvements: • • •

CONDITIONS

Before

After

PERSPECTIVES

Page 76 of 107

PLANVIEW

Sharrows Bike paint Bike signs

CYCLING NETWORK | MONTALBAN DR IMPROVEMENTS INTERSECTION OVERVIEW & DESIGN CONSIDERATIONS A

Montalban Dr & 48 St NW

23 Ave NW & 52 St NW

1 1

DESIGN CONSIDERATIONS

PRECEDENTS

Montalban Dr & 48 St NW Montalban Dr and 48 St NW is a unique intersection that requires careful consideration due to large volume of cut through traffic using 48 St NW. In order to protect cyclist and pedestrians, new safety elements are provided to slow vehicles down and increase visibility.

Pedestrian Median

Painted Bike Lane

Curb Extensions

23 Ave NW & 52 St NW 23 Ave NW and 52 St NW intersection is currently closed to vehicles to on the southern portion of 52 St NW. This is a great opportunity to provide a shared street facility and open 52 St NW but also provide protection to those coming down from the multi-use trail on 32 Ave NW and crossing 52 St NW. Improvements: • • • • • • •

Medians Pedestrian refuge facilities Curb extensions Bike median infrastructure Sharrows Bike paint Bike route signs

Page 77 of 107

Source: https://archinect.com/plant/project/pottery-road-bicycle-and-pedestrian-crossing

Source: https://www.elmens.com/business/how-buffered-bike-lanes-offer-additional-safety-value-to-cyclists/

Source: http://www.street-plans.com/jc-walks-pedestrian-enhancement-plan-jersey-city-nj/

CYCLING NETWORK | 52 ST NW IMPROVEMENTS CORRIDOR OVERVIEW & DESIGN CONSIDERATIONS 52 St

N W

• • • •

After Before Page 78 of 107

Av e

The upper portion of 52 St NW has low traffic volumes and is closed to vehicle access at 23 Ave NW. The bottom portion of 52 St NW has a cycle track but fails to connect with the upper portion of Montgomery. Therefore, a shared street facility is proposed in order to provide a strong connection from the cycle track on 52 St NW to the multi-use trail on 32 Ave NW. Improvements:

W N

CONDITIONS PERSPECTIVES

OVERVIEW

PLANVIEW

Sharrows Bike Paint Bike route signs Bike median infrastructure

CYCLING NETWORK | 52 ST NW IMPROVEMENTS INTERSECTION OVERVIEW & DESIGN CONSIDERATIONS A

52 ST NW & HOME RD

52 ST NW & 22 AVE NW

2 2

1 3

DESIGN CONSIDERATIONS 52 St NW & Home Rd

PRECEDENTS 1

Bike Infrastructure

Bike Paint

Curb Extensions

The crossing at 52 St NW and Home Rd is crucial as it provides connections to shared street facilities of 52 St NW and 21 Ave NW. However, for this crossing there are safety concerns of vehicle speeds. To alleviate this concerns, several new safety elements have been added to the new design proposed. 52 St NW & 22 Ave NW The crossing at 52 St NW and 22 Ave NW is an important spot for cyclist to catch their breath as they must climb the last steep portion of 52 St NW. Therefore, a comfortable crossing is needed to ensure a short rest is achieved. Several safety elements are included to ensure crossing at comfortable speeds can be achieved by cyclist or pedestrians. Improvements: • • • •

Bike signs Sharrows Bike paint Bike median infrastructure

Page 79 of 107

Source: https://archinect.com/plant/project/pottery-road-bicycle-and-pedestrian-crossing

Source: https://bikeportland.org/2019/02/19/biking-through-vancouver-bcs-protected-intersection-295729

Source: http://www.street-plans.com/jc-walks-pedestrian-enhancement-plan-jersey-city-nj/

5.3

OPEN SPACES

OPEN SPACE & THE PUBLIC REALM CURRENT ANALYSIS 2

1 3

Montgomeryâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;s open space network faces challenges due to its diff icult topography, creating steep slopes that limit mobility, and development. From a glance, Montgomery would appear to have a large amount of green spaces. However, a large portion of this space is privately owned, and not accessible to the public. The school, and Shouldice Park athletic f ields are only utilized during certain times of day, and are restricted to particular uses. The City of Calgary aims for 10% of local park space per community, and Montgomery only has 5.8%. The Bow River hugs this community along the South and West side. Despite this unique opportunity, the riverf ront spaces appear to be underutilized. Pathway systems promote movement within parks, but major roadways and dangerous crossings limit connectivity, and pedestrian movement between open spaces. This report will recommend two large-scale, community-wide strategies: 1) wayf inding, and 2) street tree planting. The goal of these strategies is to increase connectivity and movement within the community. Small-scale, site-specif ic interventions will take place in three key park spaces: 1) Montalban Park 2) The historic Shouldice House site 3) Riverf ront access point along off-leash dog area

Underutilized Restricted Steep Connectivity Issue

Page 81 of 107

The following section will outline each strategic intervention, and the desired outcomes. Design guidelines, and policy implications will be introduced to further support these outcomes, and promote positive change.

OPEN SPACE KEY OBJECTIVES

1. Increase connectivity between open spaces 2. Highlight historic significance and unique community features 3. Minimize the impact of slopes to make parks more accessible 4. Facilitate activities for all seasons 5. Maximize Bow River frontage 6. Create a green network promoting movement within the community

Page 82 of 107

SITE 1: MONTALBAN PARK

DOG PARK INFRASTRUCTURE

OVERVIEW Montalban Park is a local park, located in the Northeast corner of Montgomery. The park is designated as an offleash area. Currently there is one path existing cutting f rom North to South in the center of the park. The park is characterized by a signif icant slope f rom North to South. The linearity of the park presents an opportunity for connection to other open spaces, including the Montgomery Community Garden in the East, and University District in the West.

Existing North-South Path

Proposed Outdoor Exercise Park

http://bestfountainideas.com/dog-drinking-fountain/dogpark-drinking-fountains/

â&#x20AC;&#x2DC;Aâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;

PEDESTRIAN INFRASTRUCTURE DESIGN CONSIDERATIONS For Montalban Park we propose the introduction of more comprehensive pathway system to help issues of mobility due to the steep slope. The path system is based on topography, minimizing the slope, and desire lines as seen by worn grass patterns. The paths will be asphalt, matching the materiality of the existing path. This will also help to hold the ground and minimize erosion along the steep slope. To maximize the opportunity for connectivity, we propose a crosswalk, and gate connection to the Community Garden.

Proposed East Access Point for Community Garden

Benches faced to maximize views

http://custompark.com/furnishings/park-benches.php

Bear-proof garbage and recycling https://www.minnpost.com/cityscape/2014/02/its-time-get-moving-outdoor-playgrounds-senior-set/

Page 83 of 107

https://www.cbc.ca/news/Canada/Calgary/bear-proof-garbage-binsmade-in-lethbridge-1.4542351

E/W PATHWAY

SEASONAL PROGRAMMING 1

https://calgaryhomes.ca/blog/calgarys-best-toboggan-runs.html

https://outsider.ie/lifestyle/easy-backyard-activities/

SECTION ‘A’ 36.7% Average Slope

24.7 m

165 m Page 84 of 107

OVERVIEW

SITE 2: SHOULDICE TERRACE PARK

We propose to call this park Shouldice Terrace Park, paying homage to the original community name - Shouldice Terrace. The Shouldice Family played a significant role in Montgomeryâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;s history, their family home was located in this area. This Park is fortunate to border the Bow River and its high elevation offers great views towards the John Hextall Bridge. Calgaryâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;s regional pathway system runs through the park bringing many commuters, and travelers through the site. Home Road runs along the East side of the park. This steep road often has fast moving traffic, and problematic road sharing between vehicles and cyclists.

We propose to call this park Terrace Park, paying homage to the original community name - Shouldice Terrace.

DESIGN CONSIDERATIONS

Existing Lookout

Increased Planting

Seasonal Parking Lot Interventions Picnic Area

https://gehlpeople.com/projects/parklets/

Page 85 of 107

The focal point of this site will be an open pavilion constructed to highlight the historical significance of this park. The pavilion will take inspiration from the original Shouldice House, pictured below. The hope for this intervention is that it will draw people to linger within the site, not just moving through it. The Pavilion could be used as a public barbecue and gathering area. To access the pavilion we propose increased path connections along desire lines apparent by worn grass patterns. Planting along the East side will help create a buffer between the park and Home Road traffic. The current gravel parking lot does not offer any added value to the site. By paving the lot and adding some plantings, it creates the opportunity for seasonal parking lot interventions, using planters, tables, seating, or even a stage for live entertainment.

PAVILION PRECEDENTS

LOCAL PARK SPACE POLICIES Local Parks Shall...

Backyard BBQ Pavilion - Emmitsburg, Maryland

https://www.washingtonpost.com/lifestyle/magazine/countryhouse-or-city-house-theres-a-way-to-extend-living-space-outdoors/2015/06/23/900b4f5a-0006-11e5-805c-c3f407e5a9e9_story.html

•

Be flexible and support a wide range of recreational activity

•

Provide opportunities for activities in all seasons

•

Be connected, and accessible by active transport

•

Align with community identity, and foster social cohesion between community members

•

Use hardy, native species for planting

•

Be connected to other open spaces via pedestrian and cyclist routes

•

Be marked using clear signage, that reinforces the space as a part of Montgomery

•

Accommodate local community gatherings, and events

•

Utilize safety measures such as street lighting

•

Provide suff icient opportunities for proper disposal of garbage or recyclables

The designation of ‘local parks’ refers to publicly owned open space that can be accessed by all people, at all times. This includes Montalban Park (1), George Gell Park

(2), Shouldice Terrace Park (3), Montgomery Town Square (4), and a few other unnamed

parks. 4

Historic Pavilion - Gordon Island, Ontario

https://www.historicplaces.ca/en/rep-reg/place-lieu.aspx?id=10048

Page 86 of 107

Local Parks in Montgomery

SITE 3: RIVERFRONT ACCESS

THE INTERVENTION: OVERVIEW

Boat Launch

One of the most distinct features of Montgomery is its amount of riverfront access. The community is wrapped in a blanket that is the Bow River. Compared to other communities with the kind of access, Montgomery has had less flood damage due to the topography. The River creates many opportunities for recreation, and adds value to the community. It would be beneficial for the community to utilize the full potential of their riverfront access. To help with this goal we propose a possible riverfront intervention, along with policies to guide future development along the Bow.

DESIGN CONSIDERATIONS Area of Intervention

Slow Waters Fast Waters

Page 87 of 107

We propose a natural pool area along the slow moving banks of the Bow River. This is envisioned to be a cross between Calgaryâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;s existing shallow swimming areas, and natural hot springs like Lussier Springs in BC. The Bow River is by no means a hot spring, but is a glacier fed river, this means the intervention will be used in the Summer months when the still waters will be heated by the sun, but remain cool enough to refresh people on hot days. The pools will be constructed similarly to the hot springs using natural river rocks to keep down costs, and risks that come with the unpredictability of the river.

PRECEDENTS

ABOUT THE BOW: During the Summer months the flow rate increases within a range of 70-400 m3/s. The waters along the inner curve in Montgomery will move slower. The average water temperature in July is 19.1 degrees Celsius, this is about 5 degrees cooler that your average lap pool. Water levels peak in the Summer time. In 2018 they peaked in June at just over 1.6 meters. (https://wateroffice.ec.gc.ca/)

RIVERFRONT POLICIES Lussier Hot Springs, British Columbia https://www.flickr.com/photos/robertdownie/32340593778

Riverf ront Spaces Shall... •

Maximize access to the River

•

Maximize views to the River

•

Utilize best practices for stormwater and erosion control

•

Utilize flood resistant inf rastructure and plan for 100 year flood potential

•

Enhance pedestrian pathways and linkages

•

Not contribute sedimentation or pollution to the river

•

Provide accessible spaces for people of all mobility

•

Promote year-round activities and attractions

•

Optimize usage of the river

Riverf ront Development Shall... •

Promote land uses that will increase pedestrian traff ic and add value to the riverf ront

Edworthy Park, Calgary

•

Include entrance or orientation towards the river

http://blog.buzzbishop.com/Calgary/best-beaches-in-calgary/

•

Remain conscious of river wildlife and their habitat

•

Provide suff icient lighting for safe pedestrian environments

Page 88 of 107

WAYFINDING OVERVIEW The Montgomery Community faces challenges with community identity. Proximity to Bowness, and the fact that one of their main streets is called â&#x20AC;&#x2DC;Bowness Roadâ&#x20AC;&#x2122; often creates misunderstanding. The physical division created by 16 Avenue also creates a social division between residents on either side. In hopes to improve connectivity and strengthen the identity of Montgomery, we propose the introduction of a comprehensive, and cohesive wayf inding intervention.

DESIGN CONSIDERATIONS This intervention will promote pedestrian movement within Montgomery, and between local park spaces. A cohesive signage design will reinforce the community identity and make it known when one is entering or exiting the community. Signs will be used to illustrate proposed routes, possible destinations, and can include historical/environmental facts. By increasing pedestrian movement in the community we hope to bridge the gaps created by some major roadways, and reconnect all people of Montgomery in solidarity.

existing pathways proposed connections

Welcome to MONTGOMERY Wayfinding at Nose Hill Park - Calgary

Page 89 of 107

Rotary Greenway Sign - Montgomery

STREET TREE PLANTING OVERVIEW During our time in Montgomery it was observed that the street tree coverage could be improved. This was also an issue mentioned by residents during our engagement process. This observation was confirmed by data gathered from the City of Calgary. When compared to Sunnyside, another historic Calgary community, Montgomery has 1,000 less street trees per km squared. The maps and images below illustrate the scarcity of trees in Montgomery. We propose to increase these numbers drastically, to create a more appealing pedestrian environment, and to facilitate the creation of a green network. (Image Source: https://maps.calgary.ca/ TreeSchedule/) Empty Tree Well Along 16 Ave Montgomery - 1,212 trees per km2

BEFORE

Sunnyside - 2,212 trees per km2

AFTER

GOALS: 1. Increase street tree cover to match Sunnyside (2,212 per km2) by 2050 2. Increase street appeal for pedestrian and cyclists 3. Fill empty tree wells 4. Provide break from wind, snow, and sound 5. Create a green network between open spaces 6. Provide an enjoyable environment along main streets and commercial corridors 7. Create more habitat for urban wildlife 8. Create value for the community, and landowners

Page 90 of 107

PLANTING STRATEGY: We propose a three phase planting strategy based on planting priority. Each street is designated as either first, second or third priority.

Priority

Top priority streets are those which are high traffic pedestrian, or cycling routes, and those that connect open spaces. These streets should be targeted first for street planting as they play a significant role in the functionality of the community.

Page 91 of 107

Priority

The second priority streets are based on those which are seen to have less tree cover based on data gathered from the City, and our own observation. These are residential streets, many of which have lost trees as parcels become redeveloped.

Priority

The third priority group is made of residential streets that are lower traffic, and have an existing tree canopy which is considered sufficient at this time. The goal is for planting to happen on all streets, and as the other streets become more green, the need for trees on these streets will increase.

POLICIES

PLANTING PALETTE:

Green Ash • Fast growing • Hardy • 18 m tall • 12 m spread

Elm • Fast growing • Provides shade • 25 m tall • 12 m spread

Street Trees Shall... • Be species which are known to endure our harsh Winters • Be planted 6 m apart • Be planted according to priority strategy • Be planted in uniform tree wells • Be upkept as needed

Setback & Spacing Guidelines

Brandon Elm • Grows fast • 15 m tall mature • 6 m spread

Bur Oak • Slow growing • Tolerant • 14 m tall • Withstands Chinook The edge of tree wells are to be 2.5 m away from each other

Balsam Poplar • Grows fast • 25 m tall mature • Native to Alberta

Laurel Leaf Willow • Supports wildlife • Wind/Snow break • Fast growing • 13 m tall, 13 m spread

Dropmore Linden • Grows slow • 10 m tall mature • Attracts Pollinators

Swedish Columnar Aspen • Provides wind, snow, and sound breaks • Good for privacy screen • 12 m tall, 2 m spread

Adapted from Standard Specifications for Landscape Construction, City of Calgary (2012)

2.5 m

6m Based on City of Calgary’s “Top Tree Species for Calgary” (2018) Page 92 of 107

1:200

OTHER OPEN SPACE POLICIES Regional Park Space Policies

Regional Parks Shall... • Work to maximize activity year-round at diverse times of day • Include safety measures such as lighting, and proper storage of park equipment • Work with the community to integrate regional, and privately owned spaces to best serve Montgomery Shouldice Recreation Park is the key regional park space in Montgomery.

Undesignated Open Space Policies

Undesignated Open Spaces Shall... • Minimize use of mowers, and fertilizer • Consider planting of native species that attract pollinators to create pollination corridors The adjacent map does not illustrate all examples of undesignated open space as many of these spaces are very small. Despite their size, they still pose opportunities, and should be considered. Some examples of these undesignated spaces include...

Regional Open Space Undesignated Open Space

Montgomery Medians

Page 93 of 107

OPEN SPACE IN THE WINTER CITY 1. All parks shall be designed to minimize the impact of prevailing winds, and to maximize the hours of sunlight 2. Use colour where possible to liven the winterscape 3. Incorporate programming and activities for Winter months 4. Design to minimize pooling water f rom snowmelt 5. Invest in street inf rastructure as it is worn down in winter months 6. Create opportunities for micro-climates 7. Prioritize snow clearance on pedestrian pathways 8. Choose tree and plant species that are known to endure cold Winters and Chinook winds

WINTER IMPACT ON PUBLIC INFRASTRUCTURE

Long periods of cold and wet climate creates rust and degradation of infrastructure

Page 94 of 107

Asphalt becomes broken down from salt and gravel build up in Winter. This creates dangerous walking conditions.

Winter winds creates a need for additional public infrastructure such as this bus shelter. These elements are important in promoting use of public transit methods

5.4 UNIQUE SITES

Page 95 of 107

UNIQUE SITES SITE LOCATIONS OVERVIEW Montgomery includes several large unique sites that provide a wonderful opportunity for the community. However, both the Safeway Block and Central Plaza, are challenged by poor existing conditions – large swaths of parking, poor accessibility for all modes of transportation, unattractive public realm, unengaging commercial frontages, and limited outdoor space. In order to re-imagine these unique sites, it will require site-specific policy direction to appropriately respond to the existing uses, unique characteristics, site size, and local context. Both sites provide an opportunity to deliver a diverse set of housing options, several local amenities, and increase neighbourhood vibrancy – helping to shape a complete community.

Objectives 1. 2. 3. 4. 5.

Provide a mix of housing Reinforce neighbourhood identity Provide retail and active frontages Improve public realm Provide open space

Policies • • • • •

Emphasize mixed-use buildings for the majority of the sites to enhance vibrancy and neighbourhood identity Integrate public spaces for people to gather and socialize to create a sense of place Integrate public open space within Safeway Block with winter design considerations Ensure frontage improvements strengthen neighbourhood integration and provide an enhanced public realm Integrate and improve walking, cycling, and transit connections through the site

The following section will provide proposed site graphics for illustrative purposes only and are intended to provide high level direction on site organization and expected building forms.

Safeway Block Central Plaza

Page 96 of 107

SAFEWAY BLOCK | SITE IMPROVEMENTS SITE OVERVIEW & DESIGN CONSIDERATIONS BEFORE

AFTER

DESIGN CONSIDERATIONS For the Safeway Block â&#x20AC;&#x201C; the big moves are to provide a variety of housing (approximately 100 new units), additional vehicle access, strategic park relocation, retail and commercial frontages, upgraded transit station, and improved public realm.

Page 97 of 107

SAFEWAY BLOCK | SITE IMPROVEMENTS SITE GRAPHICS A

PRECEDENTS

TRANSIT STATION

Active frontages and seating provide a welcoming entry into the site (Brussels, Belgium).

Source: https://www.theguardian.com/travel/2020/ feb/08/10-of-the-coolest-neighbourhoods-in-europeparis-berlin-rome

Source: https://www.to-experts.com/en/projects/detailview-references/pvc-coated-polyester-membrane-roof/

1 3

DESIGN CONSIDERATIONS â&#x20AC;˘ â&#x20AC;˘

Create a more welcoming entry into the site, this can be accomplished by providing active frontages and seating tied into the bus shelter. Create a more enjoyable transit experience, this can be accomplished by providing a bus shelter and bike storage for winter comfort and for those who need to make their final connection.

Page 98 of 107

Bus shelter provides comfort in the winter months and a more pleasant transit experience. (Augsburg, Germany).

Source:https://www.broxap.com/the-stirling-cycle-hub. html

Bike storage provides a safe and more complete transportation station for those making their final connections. (Stirling, Scotland)

SAFEWAY BLOCK | SITE IMPROVEMENTS SITE GRAPHICS B

PRECEDENTS

PLAZA ENTRY

Plaza with active edges creates an enjoyable environment entering the site (Warsaw, POL).

Source: https://www.pinterest.ca/warsawpolandplaza

Newly located park has amazing sun exposure and wind protection creating year long opportunities (Vancouver, BC).

Source: http://www.vancouversun.com/Besides+affordable+housing+Community+Amenity+Contributions+directed+things+such+building+libraries+community+centres+parks+like+Nelson+Park+downtown+Vancouver/10461519/story.html

DESIGN CONSIDERATIONS • • •

Emphasis should be on creating an inviting entry into the site, this can be accomplished by providing an engaging plaza with active frontages Provide park that provides good sun exposure and is protected by North-westerly winter winds Provide mixed-use buildings to accommodate a variety of housing and to support public spaces

Page 99 of 107

Source: https://www.spacelist.ca/listings/192788/bc/ vancouver/for-lease/retail/2328_cambie-2328_cambie_street

Mixed use developments creating a pedestrian friendly environment (Vancouver, BC).

CENTRAL PLAZA | SITE IMPROVEMENTS SITE OVERVIEW & DESIGN CONSIDERATIONS BEFORE

AFTER B

DESIGN CONSIDERATIONS For the Central Plaza â&#x20AC;&#x201C; the big moves are to provide parking inlets, a linear plaza, a variety of housing, retail and commercial frontages, the same use of materiality for the road and sidewalks, and an improved public realm.

Page 100 of 107

CENTRAL PLAZA | SITE IMPROVEMENTS SITE GRAPHICS A

STREET EXPERIENCE

PRECEDENTS 1

Source: https://www.flickr.com/photos/deeproot/36610584574/in/album-72157686573287750/

2 2

DESIGN CONSIDERATIONS Provide parking inlets to accommodate space for all other modes of transportation Traffic calming measures should be implemented, such as same materiality across entire block Street trees, seating, and active frontages should be provided to create an attractive and engaging street

Page 101 of 107

Parking inlets maintain parking spots and room for other transportation options (Sydney, Australia).

Source: http://peopleforbikes.org/blog/tech-talk-19beautiful-ways-to-protect-bike-lanes-photos/

• • •

Single bike lane allows for wider sidewalks, street trees, and bioswales (Seattle, U.S.).

Source:https://archinect.com/news/gallery/46844712/6/ european-prize-for-urban-public-space-2012-announces-joint-winners

Pedestrian friendly material across the entire street to alter the balance of the right-of-way in traffic (London, UK)

CENTRAL PLAZA | SITE IMPROVEMENTS SITE GRAPHICS B

LINEAR PLAZA

PRECEDENTS 1

Street trees and good sun exposure creates comfortable and pleasant microclimate all year round. (Copenhagen, DNK)

Source: https://dac.dk/en/knowledgebase/architecture/ vester-voldgade-2/

Linear open space provides opportunity for patios that are well sheltered and attractive (Buenos Aires, Argentina).

3 Source:https://www.pinterest.ca/ pin/347692033710762960/

DESIGN CONSIDERATIONS • • •

Provide street trees and seating that acts as a barrier and an oasis for users to reconnect with nature Provide a linear open space for patios that takes advantage of the good sun exposure Provide active frontages and seating in order to create an attractive and engaging environment

Page 102 of 107

Source: https://www.theguardian.com/travel/2020/ feb/08/10-of-the-coolest-neighbourhoods-in-europeparis-berlin-rome

Active frontages and seating to allow people to linger or stay (Brussels, Belgium).

6.0 MOVING FORWARD

Moving forward our hope is for the Montgomery Community to use this document in support of their community vision, to offer innovative and exciting ideas, and to spark exciting plans for the future. We believe in the potential for Montgomery to grow in a way that supports existing residents, while welcoming new-comers. This opportunity to work with the Community Association and other planning professionals has enriched our education and will be carried with us moving forward. Although thes unprecidented times made for an unusal ending to the project, we hope to share our vision with the broader Montgomery community when it is safe to do so. We look forward to watching Montgomery grow. Thank you to our steering committee, Professor Francisco Alaniz Uribe, and to all community members for the insightful feedback.

Lauren Armeneau

Page 104 of 107

Bryce Devereaux

Bryana Parahoniak

7.0 REFERENCES

REFERENCES Airbnb. (n.d.). Vacation Rentals, Homes, Experiences & Places. Retrieved 2020, from https://www. airbnb.ca/rooms/731219?locale=en&_set_bev_on_new_domain=1587085673_OTE4YTA1NDlkN2Uw&source_impression_id=p3_1587085673_wuTMm/9W7VCj7tl4&guests=1&adults=1 Apartments. (2020, April 24). The Link Minneapolis Tower Apartments - Minneapolis, MN. Retrieved from https://www.apartments.com/the-link-minneapolis-tower-minneapolis-mn/19jdjf5/ AvenueCalgary. (2018, December 5). 11 New Development Trends In Calgary. Retrieved from https://www.avenuecalgary.com/city-life/11-new-development-trends-in-calgary/ Booking. (2020). LEVEL Furnished Living Yaletown-Richards, Vancouver, Canada. Retrieved from https://www.booking.com/hotel/ca/level-furnished-living-false-creek.en-gb.html?aid=356994&label=gog235jc-1BCAMY9QMoJzjZA0gzWANoJ4gBAZgBCbgBF8gBFNgBAegBAYgCAagCA7gCu9jw8wXAAgE&sid=c76aee656ab67528dd20bdd9fd3db59d&lp_sr_snippet=1 Britishcolumbia. (n.d.). Sites & Buildings - Retail, For Lease. Retrieved from https://www.britishcolumbia.ca/invest/opportunities/sites-and-buildings/abbotsford-ground-floor-retail/ BuzzBuzzHome. (2015). Uptown Place Residences. Retrieved from https://www.buzzbuzzhome. com/us/uptown-place-residences

City of Calgary. (2014). Complete Streets Policy. http://www.calgary.ca/CA/city-clerks/Documents/ Council-policy-library/TP021-Complete-Streets-Policy.pdf City of Calgary. (2018). Top Tree Species for Calgary. https://www.calgary.ca/CSPS/Parks/Pages/ Planning-and-Operations/Tree-Management/Top-Tree-Species-for-Calgary.aspx CityofCalgary. (2019, December 14) Retrieved from https://twitter.com/cityofcalgary/status/1205895757842268160 City of Calgary. (March, 2020). Guidebook for Great Communities. https://www.calgary.ca/PDA/ pd/Documents/Current-studies-and-ongoing-activities/guidebook/Guidebook-for-Great-Communities_proposed.pdf City of Chilliwack. (2010). Downtown Land Use and Development Plan. Chilliwack, BC. Retrieved from https://www.chilliwack.com/main/attachments/Files/2790/Chilliwack DLUDP Final Draft. pdf City of Edmonton. (October, 2016). Winter Design Guidelines. https://www.edmonton.ca/city_ government/documents/PDF/WinterCityDesignGuidelines_draft.pdf

CalgaryHomeBoys. (2020). South West Calgary Townhomes Homes For Sale. Retrieved from https://www.calgaryhomeboys.com/south-west-calgary-semi-detached.php

City of Edmonton. (August, 2017). Breathe: Edmontonâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;s Green Network Strategy. https://www. edmonton.ca/city_government/documents/PDF/Breathe_StrategicPlan_2017_Part4_GreenNetworkPolicies.pdf

Calgary Transit. (2017). Statistics for 2017. http://www.calgarytransit.com/about-us/facts-and-figures/statistics

City of Parksville. (2013). Plan Parksville: A Vision for Our Future. Parksville, BC. Retrieved from http://www.parksville.ca/cms/wpattachments/wpID505atID7059.pdf

Canmore. (2019, March 19). Town of Canmore - Council Clips â&#x20AC;&#x201C; March 19, 2019. Retrieved from https://www.canmore.ca/town-hall/town-council/council-meeting-recaps/820-council-clipsmarch-19-2019 -canmore red front entrance

CityofVancouver. (2020). Laneway housing. Retrieved from https://vancouver.ca/people-programs/laneway-houses-and-secondary-suites.aspx

Chang, K. (2018, September 27). Why Business And Leisure Travelers Alike Will Fall For The Porter Portland. Retrieved from https://www.forbes.com/sites/katiechang/2018/09/27/why-businessand-leisure-travelers-alike-will-fall-for-the-porter-portland/#ebad5e84d16b Chan, K. (2020, February 27). 10-storey office and retail building coming to No. 3 Road and Leslie Road corner. Retrieved from https://dailyhive.com/vancouver/4700-no-3-road-richmond

CityofVictoria. (n.d.). Secondary Suites. Retrieved from https://www.victoria.ca/EN/main/residents/planning-development/development-services/secondary-suites.html Dailyhive. (2018, September 10). This new development brings 22 exclusive townhomes to South Burnaby. Retrieved from https://dailyhive.com/vancouver/new-development-arcola-south-burnaby-townhomes-for-sale

City of Burlington. ( 2014, March 10). Urban Design Guidelines for Mixed Use Activity Areas [PDF file]. Retrieved from https://www.burlington.ca/uploads/21041/Doc_636035613423635960.PDF

Denis, J. S. (2018, September 20). Vancouver council approves duplex zoning throughout the city. Retrieved from https://www.thestar.com/vancouver/2018/09/20/vancouver-council-approves-duplex-zoning-throughout-the-city.html

City of Calgary. (2009). Calgary Transportation Plan. http://www.calgary.ca/Transportation/TP/ Documents/CTP2009/calgary_transportation_plan.pdf

Goyer, M. (2015 20). Hendon Condominiums: New Presale in Phinney Ridge. Retrieved from https://www.urbnlivn.com/2015/11/20/hyde-condominiums-new-presale-in-phinney-ridge/

City of Calgary. (2012). Standard Specifications for Landscape Construction: Trees, Shrubs, and Groundcover. https://www.calgary.ca/CSPS/Parks/Documents/Planning-and-Operations/ Tree-Management/landscape-specs-trees.pdf?noredirect=1

Homebuilders Association Vancouver. (2019, June 20). Award-winning housing: Choices in gentle densification. Retrieved from https://havan.ca/award-winning-housing-choices-in-gentle-densification/

Page 106 of 107

houzz. (n.d.). Calgary - Parkhill Modern Contemporary Semi-Detached Infill Duplex. Retrieved from https://www.houzz.com/photos/calgary-parkhill-modern-contemporary-semi-deta

Robinson, A. (2019, November 21). St. John’s native highlights affordable housing solutions in Edmonton: The Telegram. Retrieved from https://www.thetelegram.com/news/local/st-johns-native-highlights-affordable-housing-solutions-in-edmonton-378727/

Huduser. (n.d.). Celadon at 9th and Broadway: Maximizing the Potential of an Affordable Housing Site: HUDUSER. Retrieved from https://www.huduser.gov/portal/pdredge/pdr_edge_inprac- Reid, A. (2017, October 3). Second development moves ahead at old Surrey Public Market site. Retice_091415.html trieved from https://www.peacearchnews.com/news/second-development-moves-ahead-at-oldsurrey-public-market-site/ InhabitVancouverGroup. (2014). 1644 E GEORGIA ST in Vancouver: Grandview VE Townhouse for sale (Vancouver East) : MLS®# V909790. Retrieved from http://www.inhabitvancouver.com/my- Sisson, P., & Walker, A. (2017, September 6). Reimagining our roads. Retrieved from https://www. curbed.com/2017/9/6/16257078/street-redesign-urban-planning listings.html/listing.v909790-1644-e-georgia-st-vancouver-v5l-2b2.45958913 Jobin, C., & Hoyle, M. (2020). Ottawa Condos for Sale Hintonburg 607-1000 Wellington Street $479,900. Retrieved from https://www.claudejobin.com/listings/ottawa-condos-sale-hintonburg-607-1000-wellington-street-479900/ Kd.BDesignStudio. (n.d.). North Vancouver Duplex #2. Retrieved from http://www.kdbdesignstudio.ca/portfolio-view/new-home-2/

Sylvan Lake. (January, 2019). ReImagine Sylvan: Sustainable Waterfront Area Redevelopment Plan. https://www.sylvanlake.ca/uploads/1057/Doc_636833461777177527.pdf?ts=636846261334756658 Taylor, D. (2018, February 17). 32-Units Above Retail Planned for Alma & 10th Corner. Retrieved from http://www.vancouvermarket.ca/2018/02/17/32-units-above-retail-planned-for-alma-10thcorner/

landefab. (n.d.). 11th & Carnarvon Laneway House. Retrieved from http://www.lanefab.com/laneThe City of Calgary. (2009). Calgary’s Municipal Development Plan. Calgary, AB. Retrieved from way-house-built-projects/11th-carnarvon-laneway-house https://www.calgary.ca/PDA/pd/Pages/Why-City-Planning.aspx Leung, A. (2016, February 8). The Key to Green Cities and Mindsets: Densification. Retrieved from https://meetingoftheminds.org/the-key-to-green-cities-and-mindsets-densification-14887

The City of Calgary. (2008). Land Use Bylaw. Calgary, AB. Retrieved from https://www.calgary.ca/ PDA/pd/Documents/Calgary-Land-Use-bylaw-1P2007/land-use-bylaw-1p2007.pdf

The City of Calgary. (2012). Montgomery Area Redevelopment Plan. Retrieved from file:///C:/Users/ Long, Z. (2016, August 26). Amazon is opening a bookstore in Lakeview. Retrieved from https:// bryan/Desktop/Final Studio/Montgomery_AreaRedevelopmentPlan.pdf www.timeout.com/chicago/blog/amazon-is-opening-a-bookstore-in-lakeview-082616?utm_ content=buffer4af93&utm_medium=social&utm_source=pinterest.com&utm_campaign=bufToronto. (2018, January). Townhouse and Low-Rise Apartment Guidelines [PDF file]. Retrieved fer from https://www.toronto.ca/wp-content/uploads/2018/05/7f47-city-planning-townhouse-lowrise-apartment-guidelines-2018.pdf Marchassociates. (n.d.). Englewood South Residential. Retrieved from https://www.marchassociates.com/mixed-use-residential-englewood-south Urban Core Ventures. (2018). Infill Housing: Urban Core Ventures: Victoria BC. Retrieved from https://www.urbancoreventures.com/infillhousing MissingMiddleHousing. (2020). Diverse choices for walkable neighborhood living. Retrieved from https://missingmiddlehousing.com/ Uren, A. (2018, March 23). Will the fourplex solve Minneapolis’ housing problem? Retrieved from https://bringmethenews.com/life/will-the-fourplex-solve-minneapolis-housing-problem Mullaney, T. (2019, October 30). 3 Innovative Senior Housing Projects That Hold Lessons For Nonprofits. Retrieved from https://seniorhousingnews.com/2019/10/30/3-innovative-seVancouver New Condos. (2018, February 2). 6-storey contemporary building. Retrieved from nior-housing-projects-that-hold-lessons-for-nonprofits/ https://www.vancouvernewcondos.com/tag/6-storey-contemporary-building NashvillePost. (2018, November 26). 12South building sells for $28.3M. Retrieved from https:// www.nashvillepost.com/business/development/commercial-real-estate/article/21033670/ 12south-building-sells-for-283m Newwestheritage. (n.d.). New Westminster Heritage Preservation Society. Retrieved from https://newwestheritage.org/home/heritage-conservation-area/infill-housing-in-new-west/

WestviewProjects. (n.d.). Westview Projects. Retrieved from http://westviewprojects.com/our-work/ new-construction-2/ WeWork. (2020). Station Square - Office Space in Burnaby. Retrieved from https://www.wework. com/buildings/station-square--vancouver

Redfin. (2020). Redfin Estimate for 308 N 68th St #407. Retrieved from https://www.redfin.com/ Zolo. (n.d.). 506 - 6933 Cambie Street. Retrieved from https://www.zolo.ca/vancouver-real-estate/6933-cambie-street/506 WA/Seattle/308-N-68th-St-98103/unit-407/home/148732005 Page 107 of 107

MONTGOMERY the way forward

ACKNOWLEDGMENT THANK YOU!

Our Team Inner City Consultants is a group of aspirational student planners at the University of Calgary in the area of urban planning and design in Calgary, Alberta. Consisting of three senior student planners at the School of Architecture, Planning and Landscape, we have a common passion in creating better cities for urban dwellers. Through our practice, we bring forward evidence-based analysis and community-focused design to meet our clients’ objectives.

A sincere thank you to our steering committee members for their time and offering valuable feedback for this project. Additionally, we would like to thanks the University of Calgary, The City of Calgary and the Montgomery Community Association for their support on this project. We also appreciate the public for their participation during the community engagement process.

Steering Committee Montgomery Community Association Janice Mackett (Planning Committee Chair) Marilyn Wannamaker Laura Kornfeld Neal Greywall University of Calgary Professor Francisco Alaniz Uribe

Michael Ge

Gerrit Scheff el

Lilit Houlder

With a background in Civil Engineering, Michael remarkably balances his time on the team as an engineering consultant and a policy planner. He uses his experience in transportation planning as a way to improve our streets and he takes great pride in helping communities achieve their vision with feasible solutions. It takes special skill to simultaneously accommodate both pedestrians and drivers in a dense urban setting - and Michael did it. In addition to being an absolute foodie, Michael enjoys weekend staycations in his favorite neighbourhood in Calgary - the Beltline.

Gerrit is a planner who has ample experience in corporate finance, urban design, and community engagement. His past work in a corporate environment has shaped him to be an effective project manager in taking a high-quality and timely approach with the projects we work on where he utilizes his interpersonal and networking skills. You won’t find him in Calgary on the weekends - frequent ski trips to mountains with his family (and the family Yorkie) are what he lives for. After all, there is a reason he lives in Parkdale - it’s on a straight road to several of the provinces best ski resorts!

Lilit’s foundations in architecture have paved the way to pursue urban planning as her main passion. She has previously worked as a municipal planner in northern Alberta and an urban designer for a private consulting firm. Lilit is a firm believer that cooperation and innovation are an integral part of success in urban design, seeking out like-minded people who thrive to think outside the box. Having made a permanent home in Sunnyside, Lilit has strategically placed herself in the vicinity of one of the best bakeries in the city, and fulfilled her dream of living in a 10-minute neighbourhood.

The City of Calgary John Hall CivicWorks Ben Bailey

TABLE OF CONTENTS Executive Summary X Introduction 1 Analysis 9 Public Engagement

Design Concepts

Vision and Principles

Land Use

Main Streets

Town Centre

Open Space

Mobility

98 112

Conclusion References

117

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY THE BIG PICTURE The community of Montgomery is an established inner-city neighbourhood in northwest Calgary. Situated along 16 Avenue (Trans-Canada Highway), a major regional transportation corridor, Montgomery is the gateway to Calgary from the west and also the gateway to the Rocky Mountains from the east. Montgomery is located on the Bow River and enjoys amenities like the Regional Bow River Pathway and Shouldice Athletic Park. As Montgomery continues to age and the City of Calgary seeks to densify established neighbourhoods, the community has been experiencing consistent redevelopment pressure. The Montgomery Community Association has partnered with the Federation of Calgary Community and the Master of Planning Program at the Faculty of Architecture, Planning and Landscape at the University of Calgary to create a land use concept plan for the community between January and April in 2020. Through the study process, Inner-City Consultants has worked with the community to create a land use concept plan for the future of Montgomery - The Way Forward. The plan is guided by five key planning and design principles: » » » » »

Memorable Open Spaces Strategic Community Growth Vibrant Main Streets Reinvented Town Centre Multi-Modal Connections

The evidence-based and community-focused study process includes several key components: » Community analysis of policy, history, demographics, environment, mobility, and land use; » Public and community engagement; » Community vision, principles, and strategies; » Design concepts for open space, mobility, land use, main streets, and town centre; This report documents the study process along with our findings, recommendations, and conclusions that can be used by the community of Montgomery. We believe it will help contribute to an even better Montgomery in the future. X

INTRODUCTION context

INTRODUCTION CONTEXT

At Inner City Consultants, we value the lived experience of urban dwellers and strive to improve the quality of life through an integrated approach of land use planning, urban design, effective mobility and meaningful engagement. Our mission is to create a community for everyone.

Â? Â&#x201A;

Montgomery is an established community located along the Tran-Canada Highway. It is about 6 kilometers away from Calgary downtown and 120 kilometers away from Banff National Park. As an inner city community in the northwest quadrant of Calgary, it is close to many regional and local destinations and facilities, including Calgary International Airport, Nose Hill Park, University of Calgary, Canada Olympic Park, Foothills Hospital, and others.

Â Â&#x20AC; Â&#x20AC;

Â?Â? Â?

Â Â?

This study is an academic project from the Faculty of Architecture, Planning and Landscape at the University of Calgary, but at the same time it is also a real-world project, which can be used by the community of Montgomery to guide their long-term planning and growth endeavors. From January to April 2020, Inner City Consultant worked with the project steering committee, the community association and the community members to the communityâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;s vision and design concepts with policies and strategies for implementation.

Enclosed by Shaganappi Tr to the east, the Bow River to the west and south, and 32 Ave to the north, Montgomery was established as a hamlet before being annexed to Calgary in 1963. Mostly built out in the 1950â&#x20AC;&#x2122;s, the community experienced population loss between mid 1960â&#x20AC;&#x2122;s and early 2000â&#x20AC;&#x2122;s due to a demographic transition from families to empty nesters. Currently, Montgomery has about 4,000 residents with low-density housing (single detached, semi-detached, and duplex) accounting for over 80% of the housing stock. However, the population is projected to increase by 50% by the year 2040 due to an influx of new residents. Situated by the Bow River, Montgomery offers excellent views and great recreational amenities. For instance, the Shouldice Park provides residents and visitors opportunities for active outdoor recreation.

INTRODUCTION LEGAL FRAMEWORK Several statutory and non-statutory documents from The City of Calgary were reviewed to understand the legal and policy framework that applies to Montgomery. The documents include the Municipal Development Plan, Calgary Transportation Plan, The Guidebook for Great Communities, South Shaganappi Community Area Plan, and Montgomery Area Redevelopment Plan.

STAKEHOLDERS Stakeholder engagement was a key component of this project to develop the community design concept for the community of Montgomery. Through stakeholder engagement, we received valuable feedback and diverse ideas from the community, which helped shape our vision and design interventions for the community. For this project, the following were identified as key stakeholders: Montgomery Community Residents Montgomery Community Association Federation of Calgary Communities The City of Calgary Developers and Local Business Owners

MUNICIPAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN (MDP) One of the strategic goals for Calgary’s developed communities is to shape a more compact urban form (MDP Volume 1 2.2) by intensifying and diversifying Major Activity Centres (MAC) and Main Streets, as well as encouraging transit oriented development. Categorized as a developed community, Montgomery is one of the inner city neighbourhoods that is facing redevelopment and intensification. Additionally, the community is close to what MDP defines as a Community Activity Centre (Market Mall) to the north and a Major Activity Centre (University of Calgary, Foothills and Alberta Children’s hospitals) to the east.

CALGARY TRANSPORTATION PLAN (CTP) Bowness Road is an integral road for Calgary’s future, serving the city’s Primary Transit Network as well as being designated a Main Street and a Neighbourhood Boulevard to support retail and mid-density residential developments. Parallel to Bowness Road is the Trans-Canada Highway, an Urban Boulevard providing transportation connectivity to the surrounding communities and activity centres. Stretching along the north bank of the Bow River and on the south edge of the community, the Bow River Pathway serves as a Primary Cycling Network for both commuting and recreational purposes. This community has two main streets running through its core with Bowness Road envisioned for active and pedestrian-friendly streets. THE GUIDEBOOK FOR GREAT COMMUNITIES (GGC) This document, once finalized and approved by Council, will help direct Calgary’s future growth and changes for better health, interaction, ecology, economic opportunity and identity. It directs growth to Main Streets and Activity Centres, offers tools to responsibly manage growth along Bowness Road and other key corridors and nodes in Montgomery, and transitions Montgomery from “local” to “minor” housing and commercial levels of activity using urban design principles and policies. Policies on building design and frontage, transition in scale and activity, site design and amenities will help shape Montgomery’s future.

SOUTH SHAGANAPPI COMMUNIT Y AREA PLAN (SSCAP) As part of the SSCAP vision, eight communities, including Montgomery, are set to become sustainable, low carbon, diverse, and mixeduse by 2040. Presented are interventions to future population growth including increase in the diversity of housing typologies and jobs, and an increase in community amenities and educational facilities achieved by utilising the Major Activity Centre (University of Calgary) east of the site.

MONTGOMERY AREA REDEVELOPMENT PLAN (ARP) The ARP for the community of Montgomery seeks to preserve its small town character by maintaining low-density housing to the north of Bowness Road, while adding moderate density to the south of Bowness Road. Boasting three commercial zones (Trans-Canada Highway Commercial Area, Montgomery Shopping Centre, and Bowness Road Commercial Area), the ARP seeks to revitalize Bowness Road with its Clean & Green concept using traffic calming and street tree planting. The ARP identified three community gateways (southeast and northwest entrances along Bowness Road and Trans-Canada Highway), which must be redesigned to entice throughtraffic and outside visitors.

PROJECT UNDERSTANDING Since 2006, Montgomery has seen some redevelopment activities, but the community transformation has been slow. This project will take an evidence-based and community-focused approach to look at the past and present of the community and prepare a comprehensive land use concept to address the needs of the community. Through our analysis and community engagement, the preliminary key objectives are defined as follows: » Establish guidelines for the appropriate redevelopment and densification » Identify and promote character identity that recognizes the community’s heritage » Enhance mobility and safe linkages for pedestrians » Assess options for enhancing the community’s open space system » Create strategies for housing redevelopment with focus on diverse housing types A few key issues were identified in this stage for the community of Montgomery to facilitate the community analysis and strategy developments. They are highlighted in this section. Community Growth and Redevelopment In the mid-late 2000s, Montgomery experienced population decline, which led to the closure of the public high school in the community; and not until recently, the population in Montgomery started increasing again. To ensure sustainable residential and commercial growth, it is critical to intensify the community to provide the sufficient resident base for retail success. However, as a primarily low-density community, it is essential to intensify strategically to match the existing small-town feel. Recognizing that there is a higher percentage of low-income population, it is paramount to ensure that the redevelopment strategy increases housing diversity and affordability.

Main Street and Community Identity

Safe Mobility for All Ages and Abilities

Both 16 Avenue and Bowness Road are designated as Main Streets, but both streets are filled with auto-oriented strip mall developments that lack active street frontages. With parking located in the front of businesses, pedestrian safety is threatened by vehicles crossing the sidewalk at regular intervals. With these two streets serving the dual functions of thoroughfare and vibrant main streets, it is critical to balance the needs of movement and placemaking and transform them into high-quality public realm to ensure Montgomery remains a desirable destination.

Within the residential neighbourhood area, the street network generally follows a grid street pattern, providing great connectivity for pedestrians and cyclists. However, 16 Avenue traverses through the heart of the community, which generally acts as a barrier to pedestrians. Walkability has been largely overlooked, especially across 16 Avenue, where only one fully signalized pedestrian crossing was provided at Home Road.

Community Access and Connectivity

Although the community offers many parks and open spaces, the majority are located on the outer edge of the community, which does not best serve the community residents; for instance, the Shouldice Athletic Park is located on the southern edge, where 16 Avenue acts as a significant barrier for pedestrians, especially people with mobility challenges. A large portion of the open space is also passive open space in nature, such as Montgomery Hill. Other challenges exist in Montalban Park, which is located on a significant slope, limiting accessibility to residents and also open space programming. Therefore, it is essential to create a quality park and open space system in the community that enhances park programming, offers accessibility to all ages and abilities, and creates better pedestrian and cyclist connectivity.

Montgomery is physically segregated from the surrounding communities on most sides. To the west, it was separated by Bow River, with only two roadway accesses of 16 Avenue and Bowness Road. To the south, there is no vehicular access across the Bow River except for a pedestrian bridge. To the east, Shaganappi Trail cuts through Montgomery Hill limiting vehicular and pedestrian access. In Montgomery, wide high-speed roads such as Bowness Road and 16 Avenue create a physical divide between blocks, which becomes problematic in creating pedestrian-oriented main streets.

Park and Open Space System

INTRODUCTION METHODOLOGY

Meeting

During the Project Initiation stage, we will collect all background data (including GIS data, ortho and air photo data), create base maps (including subdivision, building block, and land parcels), conduct site visits for photo inventory, and review relevant policy framework documents (including Municipal Development plan, Calgary Transportation Plan, Guidebook for Great Communities, and Montgomery Area Redevelopment Plan).

Stage 2 Community Analysis During the Community Analysis stage, we will take an evidence-based approach to better understand the community of Montgomery. First, we will conduct a guided site visit with members of the community association to identify the issues the community is currently facing. Secondly, we will conduct a thorough scan of the community from different perspectives, which includes the following: Environmental analysis including topography, flood risk, urban forest, land cover, etc. Review of the historic evolution through the comparison of historical ortho and air photos Inventory of land use, housing, building typology, and amenities (park, pathway, school, etc.) Review of mobility network for all modes of transportation, including walking, cycling, transit, vehicles, as well as goods movement Evaluation of public realm and walkability including block size, street furniture, street tree, etc. Socio-demographic analysis of population, its growth, its composition, age distribution, etc. Lastly, we will synthesize all findings from the site visit and analyses to create a community analysis report, which forms the foundation that will support our design concept in the later stage.

January

Montgomery: Community Design Concept

Presentation P February



Report R

March 24

April 23

Stage 1 - Project Initiation Base mapping Legal framework review Photo inventory Project schedule

Stage 2 - Community Analysis Site visit



Environmental analysis Historic evolution scan Inventory of land use, housing, building typology, and amenity Mobility network review Public realm and walkability evaluation Socio-demographic analysis Community analysis synthesis

Stage 3 - Community Workshop Focus group interview



Build physical model Community mapping of issues, opportunities, and constraints Host community workshop

Stage 4 - Draft Design Concept Land use and density Housing Public realm and placemaking Community main streets and nodes Parks and open space Mobility network Draft design concept presentation to steering committee

Stage 5 - Final Design Concept Policy development



Revise and finalize design concept Final open house

Open House

Workshop W

Week Starting 13

Stage 1 Project Initiation



Design concept documentation

 R

INTRODUCTION

PROJECT INITIATION STAGE 1

BASE MAP LEGAL FRAMEWORK REVIEW PHOTO INVENTORY

JANUARY 17 BASE MAP

Stage 3 Community Workshop

COMMUNITY ANALYSIS JANUARY 29 SITE VISIT FEBRUARY 7 COMMUNITY ANALYSIS REPORT

STAGE 2

SITE VISIT ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS HISTORIC EVOLUTION SCAN INVENTORY OF LAND USE, BUILDING TYPOLOGY, AMENITY MOBILITY NETWORK REVIEW PUBLIC REALM & WALKABILITY SOCIO-DEMOGRAPHIC ANALYSIS COMMUNITY ANALYSIS SYNTHESIS

COMMUNITY WORKSHOP FEBRUARY 12 FOCUS GROUP INTERVIEW FEBRUARY 25 PHYSICAL MODEL FEBRUARY 29 COMMUNITY WORKSHOP

DRAFT DESIGN CONCEPT MARCH 20 DRAFT DESIGN CONCEPT

STAGE 4

LAND USE & DENSITY HOUSING PUBLIC REALM & PLACEMAKING COMMUNITY MAINSTREETS & NODES PARKS & OPEN SPACES MOBILITY NETWORK DRAFT DESIGN CONCEPT PRESENTATION

With the identified issues, opportunities and constraints, as well as the design objectives, we will generate the draft design concept which will include several key areas, namely land use, open space and mobility. We will propose a land use and intensification strategy to facilitate sustainable community growth. To attract investment and promote community identity, a public realm and placemaking plan will be created for the community main streets and nodes. We will propose improvements to the mobility network for all modes of transportation. Additionally, we will develop a parks and open space system to enhance the local open space and its connectivity to the regional open space system. These components together will form the draft design concept, which will be presented to the steering committee for review and feedback.

Stage 5 Final Design Concept

FINAL DESIGN CONCEPT

STAGE 5

POLICY DEVELOPMENT REVISE & FINALIZE DESIGN CONCEPT FINAL OPEN HOUSE DESIGN CONCEPT DOCUMENTATION

During the Community Workshop stage, we will focus on soliciting community feedback through stakeholder consultation, including a focus group interview with the steering committee and a community workshop with the community residents. To facilitate the stakeholder consultation, we will build a 3D physical model of the community, which will be placed at the community workshop. The identified issues, opportunities, and constraints will be captured during a public mapping exercise, which will guide the objectives of our design interventions in the later stage.

Stage 4 Draft Design Concept STAGE 3

FOCUS GROUP INTERVIEW BUILD PHYSICAL MODEL MAPPING OF ISSUES, OPPORTUNITIES, CONSTRAINTS HOST COMMUNITY WORKSHOP

METHODOLOGY

APRIL 15 FINAL PRESENTATION APRIL 19 FINAL OPEN HOUSE APRIL 22 FINAL REPORT

With the feedback from the steering committee, we will revise and finalize the design concept and also develop appropriate policies and guidelines to enable the implementation of the design concept. The final design concept will be revealed to the steering committee, other committee members, and the general public in the final open house. All deliverables through this process will be documented including the background data review, community analysis, stakeholder and public engagement, the design process and concept, and the policies for implementation. 7

ANALYSIS current state

HISTORY

REVITALIZATION

2009 Shouldiceartificialturffieldsopens 2010 4-storeymixed-usebuildingoffBownessRoadbuilt 2011 MontgomeryJuniorHighSchoolcloses 2013 CalgaryFlooddamagedtheShouldicePark

STAGNATION

1964 MontgomeryCommunityAssociationestablished 1972 Shouldiceresidencedemolished 1975 BowRiverPathwayOpening 1976 PedestrianBridgetoEdworthyParkOpening 1978 InitiationoftheNeighbourhoodImprovementProgram

RAPIDGROWTH

1952 TerraceRoadElementarySchoolopens 1953 MontgomeryJuniorHighSchoolopens 1958 Montgomeryincorporatedastown,Safewayopens 1963 CalgaryannexesMontgomery

SLOWBEGINNING

1906 JamesShouldicepurchasesShouldiceTerrace 1911 JamesShouldiceresidencebuilt, Streetcaropens 1913 HextallBridgetoBownessopens 1914 Landboomcollapsesanddevelopmenthalts 1943 NamedchangedtoMontgomery

TIMELINE Slow Growth (1900s - 1940s) In 1906, James Shouldice purchased Shouldice Terrace (the name of Montgomery community back then). In 1911, he built his residence at the north end of Home Road, near 52 Street. Although planned for more growth, economic conditions caused development to halt. In 1943, the community changed its name to Montgomery. Rapid Growth (1950s - 1960s) In the 1940s and 1950s, the community experienced rapid growth, especially with residential development. In the same era, Terrace Road Elementary School and Montgomery Junior High School opened as a result of the rapid growth and increased population. Incorporated as a town in 1958, the community welcomed a major grocery store Safeway to Montgomery. Near its full buildout, the community had limited capacity to expand, but needed additional sources of revenue to support its municipal services. As a result, through negotiation with the City of Calgary, Montgomery was annexed to Calgary as a neighbourhood. Stagnation (1960s - 1990s) In 1972, the Shouldice residence was demolished. During the 1970s, the Bow River pathway and other pathway structures were built as the City experienced an economic boom, which led to continuous expansion of Calgary city limits. As an established inner-city neighbourhood, Montgomery experienced little growth. With the rundown of municipal infrastructure, the Neighbourhood Improvement Program was initiated in Montgomery. Revitalization (2000s - Now) During the 2000s, additional recreational and sporting facilities were built in Montgomery. At the same time, the community started to experience infill development pressure as the Cityâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;s growth strategy shifted to prioritize redevelopment of established neighbourhoods. 11

HISTORY

1948

1969

1995

2019

EVOLUTION In 1948, the majority of the community was built along the Bowness Road / 16 Avenue corridor. The Shouldice residence was built at the north end of present day Home Road. In 1969, the community was close to full build-out. At this time, the Trans-Canada Highway / 16 Avenue corridor had been built and Bowness Road was realigned in the community. In 1995, further development occurred along and south of the 16 Avenue corridor. Additionally, more development can be seen along the Bow River by the west end of the community. In 2019 we can start to see some signs of community redevelopment near the community centre and also the Shouldice Athletic Park. Collectively, it can be concluded that the community experienced rapid growth in the 1950s and 1960s and since then, there has been spots of redevelopment efforts in Montgomery. With many residential dwellings near the end of the building life cycle, the community is standing at a crossroad as to how the community could revitalize.

Montgomery Calgary

Population Pyramid

PROFILE

Minority Population

36% 31%

DEMOGRAPHICS

Total Population

17%

3,975 7%

Population

Indigenous

Mode of Travel to Work

Median Household Income

This section details the findings of community demographics using the City of Calgary community demographics data from 2016.

17%

Montgomery has a total population of 3,975. The community has a notably high representation of seniors, but the age group of 30-39 still represents the highest proportion of the population. In comparison to the City average, the community has an above average indigenous population, but lower visible minorities and immigrants.

Visible Immigrants Minorities

Household Occupancy

Travel Patterns

$85,000

$97,000

PEOPLE PER HOUSEHOLD

4.1

Housing Age

Housing Type Single Detached Duplex Rowhouse Multi-Residential

3.3 2.6 2.2

Similar to the City average, over 70% of Montgomery residents drive to work. About 14% of residents use public transit as the community has Routes #1 and #305 that travel directly to Calgary downtown. With convenient connections to the Bow River pathway, the community has a higher percentage of people who bike to work when compared to the City average. Household

Housing Affordability Rental

Subsidized Housing

Low Income

The median household income in Montgomery is $85,000, lower than the City average of $97,000. From 1968 to 2016, the household size of both Calgary and Montgomery has decreased, with the average household size of Montgomery sitting at 2.2. Digging deeper into its composition, it is found that the almost 70% of households have 2 people or less. Housing About 60% of housing in the community was built prior to the 1980s. The higher number of homes built post-2000 suggest redevelopment activities in Montgomery. The community has a higher percentage of duplex and semi-detached housing than the City average. The community also a has higher percentage of rental, subsidized housing and low income, especially in the children and seniors demographics. 13

ENVIRONMENT FLOOD & SLOPE An environmental analysis is an important first step to understanding the key physical constraints and opportunities that face the community of Montgomery. The community is situated along the north bank of the Bow River and runs along the steep northern slope of the Bow River valley. The potential for flooding and presence of undevelopable areas due to slope are fundamental characteristics that inform all future planning decisions in Montgomery.

Observations: Âť Most of the flooding will occur within the Shouldice Park boundary which justifies this land use as appropriate and should remain; Âť The berm constructed along Montgomery Boulevard is necessary to protect residential development south of 16 Avenue from flooding; Âť Montalban Park and Montgomery Hill are mostly undevelopable due to a slope greater than 15 degrees;

Opportunities: Âť Flood resilient design strategies can be created for future development that may be affected by a significant flood event; Âť Slope adaptive design strategies can be created for future development that is located on a slope;

Flood 1:20Year Flood(5%) 2013Flood

Slope

1:50Year Flood(2%)

Slope<5%

1:100Year Flood(1%)

Slope5%-15%

1:200Year Flood(0.5%)

Slope>15%

ENVIRONMENT OPEN SPACE Parks and open space are an integral part of the community by providing areas for leisure and recreation, a network of habitat for flora and fauna, and holding important historic and natural resources. We identified and classified the parks and open spaces within Montgomery to gain an understanding of how the community functions and what opportunities it provides residents. Observations: » The river front provides a natural corridor for people to enjoy and for wildlife to traverse; » Grasslands and natural forested areas have been maintained along the riverfront and areas of steep terrain to provide a relaxing escape for Montgomery residents; » Shouldice park is a regional draw for organized sports, but does not offer Montgomery residents leisurely access to the facilities; » There are large tracts of underutilized open space created by arterial roadways at both the north and south ends of Shaganappi Trail; Opportunities:

Grassland

» Create a safe, accessible, and enjoyable pedestrian network linking the major parks and open spaces within the community; » Enhance the historical significance of the Shouldice Residence site through programming; » Design programmed areas within Montalban Park and George Gell Park to create a unique and enjoyable experience for visitors; » Continue with waterfront improvements to enhance the pedestrian realm and create safe access to the river;

Forrest /Shrubland NamedParks SportsField PublicSpace

ENVIRONMENT URBAN FOREST Conducting an inventory of City managed trees provides a strong indicator for the quality of the public realm throughout the community. The map shows the spatial patterns of public trees in Montgomery, with the most common types identified as popular (33%), spruce (18%), ash (11%), and elm (8%). Our research shows that for the community of Montgomery has a total of 3,578 public trees, which translates to 1,212 trees per square kilometer. As a mature inner-city neighbourhood, Montgomery could benefit from planting additional trees, especially as part of the community redevelopment efforts. Observations: » The public parks are well populated with trees, along with several streets, particularly in the areas to the north of the community; » Many streets in the in the heart of the community such as Bowness Road are lacking a consistent pattern of street trees; Opportunities: » Through implementing street tree planting in alignment with a universal design strategy, the quality of Montgomery’s public realm can be improved;

MOBILITY CLASSIFICATION

Montgomery faces a unique situation where there exists two main streets within the community, 16th Avenue and Bowness Road. 16th Avenue transitions from a Skeletal Road to Urban Boulevard while traversing the community, which is intended to slow traffic and elevate the priority of the pedestrians, cyclists, and transit. Similarly, Bowness Road transitions from an Arterial Street to a Neighbourhood Boulevard classification intended to support mixed-use development and prioritize pedestrians and cyclists. Both of the main streets are classified as goods movement routes which allows for truck traffic.

our erH ksp r ruc Hou 47T per cks Tru 94

Observations: Âť 16 Avenue acts as a significant physical barrier that bisects the community in two parts, north and south; Âť The design of both 16 Avenue and Bowness Road fail to create a safe and enjoyable experience for pedestrians and cyclists; Âť Collector roads such as Home Road and 48 St are wide and located on steep slopes, which allow vehicles to travel faster than posted speed limits;

Skeletal Arterial Street UrbanBoulevard NeighbourhoodBoulevard Collector

Opportunities: Âť Design the mainstreets to physically elevate the priority and safety of the pedestrian and cyclist appropriately throughout the community; Âť Create stronger pedestrian connections across 16 Avenue; Âť Move trucking traffic off of Bowness Road to 16 Avenue; Âť Introduce traffic calming measures on both mainstreets and all collector roads throughout the community;

VOLUME & SAFETY

VehicleTraffic 18

Collision

Opportunities: Âť Redesigning problem intersections will increase the legibility and safety for pedestrians, cyclists, and vehicles; Âť Strategic traffic calming measures on streets experiencing high volumes of cut-through traffic can act as a deterrent;

Observations: Âť The intersections at Home Road and Bowness Road, as well as Home Road and 16 Avenue see a high number of vehicle and pedestrian incidents, in part due to the skewed angle; Âť Significant shortcutting traffic exists on Home Road, 52 Street, and 48 Street;

The Trans-Canada Highway (or 16 Avenue) is the primary goods movement route across the country and acts as the main east-west thoroughfare in Montgomery and the City of Calgary. This road services up to 53,000 vehicles per day which is a significant volume of traffic bisecting the community. Bowness Road acts as an Arterial road to the neighouring community of Bowness, and therefore sees a significant volume (up to 15,000 vehicles per day) of traffic as well. Home Road experiences a high volume of shortcutting traffic (up to 10,000 vehicles per day) as people traverse the community to reach regional destinations such as Shouldice Athletic Park.

MOBILITY

MOBILITY TRANSIT

The eight bus routes servicing Montgomery are listed below with the service frequency identified: Âť Route 305 (Bowness - Downtown) 15 min Âť Route 1 (Bowness - Forest Lawn) 15 min Âť Route 31 (Dalhousie - Lions Park) 25 min Âť Route 53 (Brentwood - Gree ood) 30 min Âť Route 408 (Valley Ridge - Brentwood) 30 min Âť Route 422 (Dalhousie - Montgomery) 30 min Âť Route 40 (Crowfoot - North Hill) 35 min Âť Route 65 (Market Mall - Downtown) 40 min

Route#1andRoute#305 Route#40 Route#31

The community is serviced by eight bus routes that connect residents to the downtown, light-rail-transit (LRT), and other regional employment, health, and commercial centres. The community is not directly serviced by LRT which provides the highest level of transit service across the City of Calgary.

Observations: Âť Frequency of bus routes poses a challenge to Montgomery residents as many routes run at intervals greater than twenty minutes; Âť The 305 Express Bus runs during peak hours to and from the cityâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;s downtown, but only stops once within Montgomery at the intersection of Bowness Road and Home Road; Opportunities: Âť Creation of a covered Transit Hub at the intersection of Bowness Road and Home Road will allow for expanded transit service and a comfortable user experience;

Route#53 Route#408 Route#65 BusStop

MOBILITY CYCLING Montgomery enjoys exceptional access to Calgaryâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;s Regional Pathway system which runs along the riverfront through much of the city. The Regional Pathway provides some of the best cycling access to downtown in the city, and this advantage should be leveraged with the improvement of cycling facilities throughout the neighbourhood. Observations: Âť The only separated bicycle track exists on 52 Street; Âť The Regional Pathway is disjointed through Shouldice Athletic Park; Âť Main streets are not serviced by dedicated bicycle infrastructure;

Trail /Pathway

On-street BikeLane/Shared

CycleTrack

Opportunities: Âť Provide dedicated cycling infrastructure to Bowness Road which will connect the community east-west along the amenity rich main street; Âť Create a safe and accessible open space network through principles of universal design that include cycling infrastructure upgrades throughout the community; Âť Improve the quality of the Regional Pathway through Shouldice Athletic Park to a fully separated cycling pathway, which is currently a low-quality shared roadway;

MOBILITY PEDESTRIAN Using available traffic count data from The City of Calgary, the 6-hour pedestrian crossing volumes at intersections were calculated and presented. This diagram highlights the intersections where higher pedestrian crossing volumes were observed. Observations:

Âť Along the 16 Avenue corridor, the highest volumes were observed at 46 Street, 44 Street, and 43 Street, where pedestrian-actuated pedestrian crossing beacons were installed; Âť Along the Bowness Road corridor, the highest volumes were observed at 46 Street and 43 Street; Âť The recently constructed intersection at Shaganappi Trail and University Avenue also experienced high pedestrian volume, indicating a pedestrian desire line between Montgomery and the new University District; Âť High pedestrian volume was also observed near the Foundations for the Future High School;

Opportunities:

Âť Enhance crosswalk facility quality and pedestrian permeability across 16 Avenue at various crossing locations; Âť Reduce traffic speed through policy and roadway design interventions along key corridors and at key intersections to improve pedestrian safety; Âť Enhance the 46 Street pedestrian connection from the riverfront and Shouldice Athletic Park through main streets and Terrace Road Elementary School to Montalban Park and University District;

>300Pedestrian >200Pedestrian >100Pedestrian 21

MOBILITY

CROSS SECTIONS Cross sections are shown for three locations in Montgomery. Bowness Road and 16 Avenue represent the main streets in the community that will likely require the most design interventions and 19 Avenue represents a typical neighbourhood local road.

19 Avenue is a typical residential local road with one travel lane each direction and parking on the curb lane. Mono-walks are provided where pedestrian space is allocated right next to vehicular space instead of a separate walk where pedestrians are protected from vehicles by a boulevard.

As a major east-west transportation corridor in Montgomery and the City of Calgary, 16 Avenue has 2 travel lanes each direction and provides high travel capacity for automobiles. Similarly, the space is disproportionally allocated to automobiles, and only limited space is provided for the pedestrians and cyclists. As a designated main street in Calgary, 16 Avenue could be redesigned to provide better public realm for pedestrians.

As the cross section shows, Bowness Road has a very wide travel lane width with on-street parking on the curb lane. This encourages high travel speed and negatively impacts pedestrian safety. In contrast, as a main street, there is a significant lack of space for other users, including pedestrians and cyclists.

Schools

MOBILITY

Grocery Store

WALKSHED Walkshed analyses were conducted for key community amenities to understand the range of accessibility of these key community services to the local residents by walking. The analyses were performed for the two schools, Terrace Road Elementary School and the Foundations for the Future High School, as well as the Safeway grocery store. Thanks to the grid street network in Montgomery, the community has good accessibility to these amenities by walking within 400 and 600 meters. The 16 Avenue corridor by the Athletic Shouldice Park acts as a barrier to walking mobility.

400mRadius

600mRadius

Overlap

CROSSING QUALITY

Main Street Crossing

120 people crossing Bowness Road per Hour

90 people crossing 16 Avenue per Hour

Although walkshed analysis treats street network equally, roadways are different for crossing pedestrians due to the quality of pedestrian crosswalk. In particular, with the available traffic count data from the City, the pedestrian crossing volumes at 16 Avenue and Bowness Road are further explored. It was found that about 120 people cross Bowness Road per hour during the traffic data collection period, and 65% were found to cross at the enhanced crosswalks with traffic signals and flashing beacons instead of marked and unmarked crosswalks. In comparison, 90 people cross 16 Avenue per hour and 96% were found to cross at the enhanced crosswalks.

Â Â? Â? Â? Â Â?Â?Â? Â? Â?

As both main streets carry high traffic volumes, we can conclude that pedestrians prefer to cross at safer crossings. Furthermore, with a total of four travel lanes on 16 Avenue, a much higher percentage of pedestrians will only use enhanced crosswalks.

Use enhanced pedestrian crosswalks with traffic signals and flashing beacons instead of marked and unmarked crosswalks

LAND USE ZONING The current zoning in the community shows a mix of different land use districts, including low-density residential, multi-residential, Direct Control, commercial, mixed-use and special purpose districts. As the zoning map shows, much of the community is designated as R-C1 with pockets of R-C2 and R-C1s re-designations as applications for secondary suites continue to increase. A review of the residential land use to expand the flexibility of the R-C1 designation would create a streamlined development. The multi-residential and mixed-use districts are mostly concentrated along Bowness Road. The major commercial land uses are zoned along the commercial corridor (C-COR2) on 16 Avenue and in the Montgomery Square by the Safeway site. These land use designations concentrate higher density and commercial amenities along the two main streets in Montgomery.

The detailed zoning breakdown with maximum density and height is provided on the next page, which also included land use breakdown for each individual parcel.

The special purpose districts include a variety of uses that differ from the traditional residential, commercial, industrial, mixed-use districts. They could include natural areas, schools, parks, community services, recreation, and future urban development areas. In Montgomery, they are reserved for natural areas, recreational facilities, and community services including schools and senior housings.

LAND USE LAND USE

R-C1(S) R-C1N R-C2 R-CG

Residential Commercial -Retail

Commercial -Office

Commercial -FoodServices

Medical

Commercial -Professional Services

CommunityUses(School, Church, etc.)

Commercial -Accommodation

Mixed-Use

Commercial -AutomotiveService

Industrial Light

Â Â? Â Â? Â Â? Â Â Â?

C-Of 1.0h10 C-Of 1.0h12 C-C1 C-COR2 f 1.0h12 C-COR2 f 3.0h16 C-COR2 f 4.5h22

Â? Â? Â?Â? Â? Â

Â? Â ÂÂ&#x20AC; Â&#x201A;Â? Â ÂÂ&#x20AC; Â&#x201A;Â? Â ÂÂ&#x20AC; Â? Â ÂÂ&#x20AC; Â Â ÂÂ&#x20AC; Â Â&#x201A; Â ÂÂ&#x20AC;

Â Â? Â Â? Â Â? Â Â? Â Â&#x192;Â? Â?

M-CG(d) M-CG M-C1 M-X1

Â&#x201E; Â&#x201E; Â&#x2026; Â?Â?

Â Â Â Â Â&#x2020; Â Â&#x2020;

Â Â? Â Â? Â Â? Â Â?

MU-1 f 3.0h16 MU-1 f 4.5h22 MU-2 f 3.0h16 MU-2 f 4.5h22

Â&#x2021; Â&#x2C6; Â&#x2030; Â&#x2021; Â&#x2C6; Â&#x2030;

Â&#x192; Â Â&#x192;

Â Â&#x192;Â? Â? Â Â&#x192;Â? Â?

S-UN S-SPR S-CS S-R S-CI S-CRI S-FUD

Â&#x160; Â Â&#x2026; Â&#x2039; Â&#x152; Â?Â? Â? Â&#x17D; Â&#x20AC; Â&#x2C6; Â?Â? Â? Â&#x2026; Â&#x2C6; Â&#x17D; Â?Â? Â? Â&#x20AC; Â? Â&#x17D; Â&#x20AC; Â&#x2030; Â&#x160; Â Â&#x2C6; Â?

Â Â?

Â&#x2018;Â&#x2019; Â&#x201E; Â&#x20AC; Â? Â&#x20AC; Â&#x201C; Â&#x160; Â&#x201D; Â?Â Â&#x20AC; Â?Â? Â&#x201C; Â Â Â?Â Â&#x20AC; Â? Â Â&#x20AC; Â? Â?Â&#x2022;Â&#x20AC; Â&#x2013; Â&#x152; Â&#x20AC; Â&#x201E; Â&#x160;Â&#x20AC; Â&#x2013;Â? Â&#x2014; 25

LAND USE TYPOLOGY On the individual parcel level, we also reviewed the housing typology for residential uses. It is noted that commercial buildings are not reviewed for typology. Four housing typologies were found in Montgomery, including single-detached, semi-detached / duplex, rowhouse, and multi-family. The map highlights that the majority of the community is made of single-detached units, with semi-detached located sparsely across the community, and rowhouse and multi-family concentrated along the main streets and the riverfront.

We also identified current development permit applications to understand the redevelopment trends in the community. It is found that gentle intensification is occurring across the community with semi-detached, rowhouse, basement suite and laneway housing applications, and higher-density multi-family infill is mostly happening along and in between the two main streets.

Semi-Detached

Rowhouse

Multi-Family

SingleDetached

HousingTypology

Current Development Permits

SingleDetached

Multi-FamilyInfill

Semi-Detached

Semi-Detachedor RowhouseInfill

Rowhouse

LanewayHouse

Multi-Family

Basement Suite

LAND USE AMENITIES

An inventory of amenities in the community of Montgomery was also conducted to understand what is being offered and what might be lacking from the community that could benefit from our policy and design interventions.

Although commercial food services are being offered, the community lacks high-quality dining venues as several key fast food chain stores can be found, such as Tim Hortonâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;s and KFC that benefit passthrough travelers rather than local residents. The community offers accommodation services along 16 Avenue mostly in the form of motels.

Due to its proximity to hospitals and several established senior housing and services, several medical clinics are located in the community. This helps serve the aging population in the community where they can be easily accessible by walking.

The community also has businesses that service automobiles, particularly six gas stations can be found along the two main streets. Many natural amenities also can be found in the community, including dog parks, playgrounds, boat launch, etc.

Commercial -FoodServices Commercial -Accommodation Commercial -AutomotiveService

Medical CommunityUses(School, Church, etc.) Natural Amenities

LAND USE CURRENT DENSITY The 3D model shows the current density in the community. It is important to recognize that this map shows the current land use and built form of individual parcels, and it does not reflect the zoning that indicates the maximum allowable density. The majority of Montgomery currently is occupied by low density residential districts, which includes single-detached dwelling, duplex, semi-detached dwelling, and rowhouse. The 4-storey mixed-use apartment building at Bowness Road and 45 Street stand out along the Bowness Road, which signals the recent higher-density infill along the main street. Additionally, some big box commercials, strip malls, and auto-oriented businesses are also observed along the Bowness Road and 16 Avenue corridor. Lastly, the Shouldice Athletic Park occupies a significant portion of the land area in the southwest of the community, which is isolated from the community by the high-speed high-volume 16 Avenue corridor.

LAND USE MAXIMUM DENSITY In contrast, this map highlights the maximum allowable density according to the current zoning approved by the Calgary Land Use Bylaw. The most significant difference is highlighted in the main street area, bounded by Bowness Road to the north, Monterey Avenue and Bow River to the south, 49 Street to the west, and 42 Street to the east. It is noted that this model represents the allowable maximum building height and each parcel likely will have smaller building footprint as it goes through further land development plans in a later stage. This graph clearly signals the Cityâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;s intention to intensify along and in between the main street corridors of Bowness Road and 16 Avenue. As a first step, the City has recently completed a Bowness Road Streetscape Master Plan and is moving into construction soon, and is currently undergoing a 16 Avenue Corridor Study and Streetscape Master Plan. According to the Cityâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;s population projection, by 2042, the population in Montgomery is expected to grow by over 50%. The majority of population growth is anticipated to be located in the main street areas.

LAND USE

Bowness Road

16 Avenue

Current Density

Maximum Allowable Density

FUTURE DENSITY To further illustrate the difference between the current density and maximum allowable density, perspective overlays are presented. On Bowness Road at the 46 street intersection, currently the parcels are occupied by strip malls and auto-oriented commercial with parking facing the street and directly driveways off Bowness Road. With the maximum allowable density and other land use requirements for the current zoning, the built form and street feel can be changed significantly. The building can be as high as 6-stories with reduced building setback. This creates a better sense of enclosure that helps to transform Bowness Road to a more vibrant street. On 16 Avenue near the intersection of 45 Street, the parcels are currently occupied by auto-oriented commercials in standalone buildings, which creates a highway-like feeling that discourages pedestrian movements. With the maximum allowable density, the sense of enclosure can be significantly improved.

SUMMARY FUNCTIONAL MAP

Through the detailed community analysis, we have summarized how the community serves its residents and interacts with the surrounding communities in this functional map. The community offers good access to amenity spaces, including the Bow River, Shouldice Athletic Park, and community and neighbourhood parks, such as Montalban Park. Along the Bow River also lies the popular Bow River pathway that Calgarians and Montgomery residents enjoy.

The community has good access to various commercial and employment opportunities along the main street area. Bounded by 16 Avenue, Bowness Road and Home Road, the community is home to a Safeway grocery store, that provides products to meet the daily needs of local residents.

Â Â?Â?Â?

16 Avenue and Bowness Road are two key east-west transportation corridors that carry the highest amount of vehicular traffic in the community. Home Road acts as a key north-south transportation route through the community. Looking beyond the community boundary, the community is close to a major activity centre - Market Mall to the north, that meets the communityâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;s shopping needs. To the east, it is close to the University of Calgary, the up and coming University District as well as the Foothills Hospital, which have all influenced the demographics and businesses and services in Montgomery.

SUMMARY

ISSUES There are several functional issues that our analysis has revealed, which will guide our proposed design and policy interventions.

Environmentally speaking, there is a steep slope in the northeast of the community that runs diagonally from the Bow River to Montgomery Hill. This poses challenges for infill developments that are slope adaptive and interventions for Montalban Park improvements. Additionally, there is significant flooding risk near the southwest of the community, which is currently zoned for special purposes, such as natural areas and parks. 16 Avenue acts as a significant community barrier that bisects the north and south ends of the community and only offers limited opportunities for pedestrian crossing and safe vehicular ingress and egress. Bowness Road is classified as a truck route that carries notable truck traffic, which is mismatch for its neighbourhood boulevard classification and neighbourhood character. Due to natural topography and lack of connectivity, Montgomery is segregated from the University District and Market Mall to the north. It also experiences shortcutting traffic on several neighbourhood streets, including Home Road, 48 Street, and 52 Street. The slopes on these streets contribute to traffic speeding and negatively impacting pedestrian safety. The Bow River pathway in the community is fragmented in the Shouldice Athletic Park area, which forces cyclists to share a road that could experience high vehicular traffic during game days and special events. Due to the functionality and design of 16 Avenue and Bowness Road, the commercial uses are auto-oriented and do not best serve the needs of the local residents. Lastly, the public spaces and amenities in the community are underutilized to bring the community together for social interactions.

Â? Â?

SUMMARY OPPORTUNITIES In addition to the identified issues, we also recognize several assets and opportunities for the community that we can capitalize on and even address some of the identified issues. To create vibrant main streets and enhance the community identity, we suggest upgrading the main streets of 16 Avenue and Bowness Road by improving the public realm and creating a main street connector on 46 Street. Additionally, a town centre can be reinvented at the existing Safeway grocery store to elevate its prominence. This allows for strategic intensification around the town centre and in close proximity to the Terrace Road Elementary School.

Â?

Â? Â?

With its proximity to the Bow River, we recommend to provide enhanced riverfront design to activate the area as a key community amenity. We also propose to upgrade this key recreational and mobility cycling corridor to an all ages and abilities cycling facility where they are completely separated from vehicular traffic.

Taking advantage of the river, Shouldice Athletic park and Bow River Pathway, we propose to create a landmark waterfront destination at the south end of Home Road to enhance the public spaces south of 16 Avenue.

Â?

We also propose to enhance the cycling connections within Montgomery to connect to the regional pathways in the City, for instance, cycling connections can be improved on Home Road, 21 Avenue, and Bowness Road where they also serve key community destinations.

ENGAGEMENT conversations

ENGAGEMENT PROCESS Due to the global pandemic of COVID-19, the only engagement activity that occurred was the community workshop on Saturday, February 2020. The workshop participants were placed at six tables and they were asked a set of questions by members of our team. At the end of discussions on issues and opportunities, there was a group report back session where each table presented their main findings from the discussions. The discussion sessions were very productive as the community residents shared their issues and opportunities with the project team. After the community workshop, many residents also stayed longer to view the study findings from each project group and asked questions and provided further feedback on the analyses. As part of the study process, a physical model was also made for the community and it was placed in the centre of the community workshop venue for residents to view.

ENGAGEMENT WHAT WE HEARD The workshop focused on themes of challenges (issues and opportunities) and future possibilities (assets and opportunities). An example of community feedback from one of the discussion tables was presented here. » What are the main issues today with current infill and densification practices? » What are the main issues with future densification along the main corridors (16 Avenue, Bowness Road)? » Where do you catch transit? What are your main concerns with transit? » Where do you walk and/or cycle? » What are your main concerns for driving and parking? » Are there streets that would benefit from traffic calming (for example where there is speeding)? » What kinds of housing types are missing in the community? » What kind of commercial land uses do you think are missing in the community? » What are the special places in the neighbourhood? » Where would you like to walk/bike? What are your main concerns for walking/cycling? » What are the outside resources/amenities your community should connect to? » What areas do you consider appropriate for infill and sensible densification? » Do you see an opportunity for more creative housing types (unique multifamily buildings)? » Are you supportive of laneway housing and secondary suites? What issues would need to be addressed for these to be a successful addition to your community? » What kinds of improvements would you like to see to the parks and open spaces? » What kind of streetscape improvements do you think are necessary and where? 38

Land Use / Housing » Supportive of densification, such as duplex and laneway housing, which could see laneway getting paved; Rowhouse might be a bit too much density in a low-density residential area » Increase density around school, along 16 Avenue and Bowness Road » Better for density to be spread out in the community than focused on just one corridor / area » Street parking could be issue for major densification developments » 4-story maximum density / building heights are appropriate for the community » Social housing area could be redeveloped into complexes when buildings reach end of life Amenities / Commercial Businesses » Special place in the community is the dog park, businesses along Bowness Road, Dale Hodges Park access (previous Shouldice residence on Home Road), and Safeway » Montgomery could use more coffee shops, brewery, dog-friendly businesses, restaurants, water park, ice cream shop, boutique stores, and art gallery » Important to have local businesses that are destinations where residents can hang out » The rafting business by Bow River has a lot of garbage, needs garbage bin » Would like to see positive change with the motel, maybe a hotel, affordable housing, etc. » Streetscape improvements – more trees, patio for commercial businesses, streetlights (52 St and Bowness Road), pedestrian crossings (Home Road and Bowness Road), street furniture » More active uses for Shouldice Park & Ride lot than an empty parking lot

Transportation » Use Bus #1 frequently and it is convenient to go to downtown, but there is a time point at Home Road so need to catch the bus earlier; have used Bus #40 to go to Brentwood only occasionally » Bus #305 is not really faster than #1 due to congestion » Use Bow River Pathway a lot for walking and cycling, more to the south » There is ice on the sidewalk when going for run in winter » Traffic signals on 16 Ave could use improvements, particularly at Home Road and 49 Street » 4-storey development on Bowness Road doesn’t have parking on site causing parking issues » 52 Street has shortcutting traffic speeding through, needs traffic calming with speed bumps » Pedestrian crossings at Bowness Road, 16 Avenue and Home Road are major issues » Paving Bowness Road and Bow River Pathway for driving, cycling and walking » Need signal or merge lane on 16 Ave to improve traffic, especially at 49 Street » Bowness Road / 48 Street is also a dangerous intersection » The topography at the north end of the community limit the walking mobility of senior residents Parks and Open Space » Improve parks by upgrading equipment in the playground areas, adding more trees, picnic tables, and more sitting areas » More sitting opportunities along the Bow River » More active use and programming for park space in general » Like the Shouldice Park as it brings vibrancy to the community

ENGAGEMENT SUMMARY Using the valuable feedback provided by the community residents, we have summarized the findings and identified the community characteristics, issues and opportunities that the community is facing. Some of the engagement discussion materials are shown here. Characteristics » Community spirit; » “Little town” characteristics; » Lower-income; » Withstood gentrification; » Diverse - ethnicity, income, education, occupation; » University employees; Issues » Noise from development; » Sidewalks in disrepair; » Shortcutting traffic; » Steep slops in the pedestrian realm; » Parking; » Housing affordability; » Walkability; Opportunities » Addition of the young population; » Proximity to Market Mall, hospitals, riverfront and downtown; » High visitor traffic and commercial corridor; The engagement findings together with the evidence-based analyses were used to inform our vision and guiding principles for the community as well as our design interventions which are explained in further details in the following sections.

DESIGN CONCEPTS our vision for the future

DESIGN CONCEPTS VISION

Montgomery: Your Emergent Community Memorable Open Spaces

Multi-Modal Connections

Community Growth

Vibrant Main Streets

Reinvented Town Centre 43

DESIGN CONCEPTS LAND USE

OVERVIEW

LAND USE

OBJECTIVES & STRATEGIES

ZONING INVENTORY

As a mature inner-city neighbourhood, the community of Montgomery is experiencing redevelopment pressures in its low-density residential neighbourhood and along Bowness Road. This section takes a holistic look at the existing land use pattern in the community and proposes different strategies to make the envisioned future Montgomery possible. With our proposed land use concept, we focus on strategic intensification within the community that does not contradict the existing neighbourhood character, enhancing the attractiveness of community-oriented commercial businesses, especially along the identified main streets. The following land use strategies are proposed to improve the quality of the residential and commercial uses in Montgomery: » Modest intensification in the mature residential area to ensure future development or infill is context sensitive and respects the adjacent land parcels; » Promotes community-oriented and pedestrian-friendly commercial businesses that activate the commercial streets and improves the public realm; » Creates a Town Centre in the heart of the community to enhance the identity and character of Montgomery; » Appropriate building heights to allow for street activation of the main streets and the neighbourhood; » Encourages housing diversity of various uses and forms to create a community that welcomes everyone;

Low Density Residential Districts They encompass several codes (R-C1, R-C1N, R-C1s, R-C2, R-CG). Built forms primarily include singledetached, semi-detached, duplex, and rowhouse.

R-C1, R-C1N, R-C1s

R-C2

R-CG

M-CG

M-C1, M-X1

C-C1, C-O

C-COR1, C-COR2

MU-1, MU-2

Multi-Density Residential Districts They encompass several codes (M-CG, M-C1, M-X1). Built forms primarily include duplex, rowhouse, townhouse, and apartment. Commercial Districts They encompass several codes (C-C1, C-O, C-COR1, C-COR2). Built forms include single-use commercial or office buildings, but C-COR1 and C-COR2 also allow for mixed-use developments. Mixed Use Districts They have two codes (MU-1, MU-2) designated for mixed-use developments. It is important to recognize that the two mixed-use codes have more specific requirements on the mix of uses. Special Purpose Districts They include several zoning codes (S-UN, S-SPR, S-CS, S-R, S-CI, S-CRI, S-FUD) designated for schools, parks, open space, community services, institutions, among other special uses. Direct Control (DC) Districts It is a customized land use designation with a list of allowable uses and a set of rules specific to a particular development. Most DC designations include a cross-reference to the rules of one of the standard designations of the Land Use Bylaw.

Zoning Existing R-C1 R-C2 R-CG M-CG M-C1 M-X1 C-O C-C1 C-COR2 MU-1 MU-2 DC Special Purpose

LAND USE EXISTING ZONING Residential Currently, north of 19 Avenue, the majority of the existing residential area is zoned as R-C1 and R-C2, consistent with the current build form. R-CG is mostly found along 19 Avenue and further south near the 16 Avenue and Bowness Road interchange. For simplicity, a few parcels zoned as R-C1s and R-C1N are noted as R-C1 as they are of similar use and form. The multi-residential zoning codes of M-CG, M-C1, and M-X1 are found between the two main streets. Limited number of parcels are zoned M-X1 which includes supportive commercial on the ground floor. Commercial & Mixed-Use Three commercial zoning codes of C-C1, C-O and C-COR2 are currently used. C-C1 is designated for community commercial, C-O is used for office commercial, and C-COR2 is mainly designed for commercial corridor on 16 Avenue, which allows parking in front of the building with direct street access. Another corridor commercial code, C-COR1 differs from C-COR2 in that it promotes active street frontage with parking in the back. MU-1 and MU-2, are found along Bowness Road and 46 Street. Although both support mixed-use, MU-2 requires active street frontage, whereas MU-1 allows mix of uses across several buildings. Special Purpose & Direct Control (DC) For the purpose of this exercise, all Special Purpose codes have remained as is. Additionally, no new DC is proposed for new parcel and most DC parcels remained as is, except where new uses and built forms are proposed.

LAND USE ZONING STRATEGY

Zoning Change R-CG M-CG M-C1

Based on the analyses, we propose several strategies to modernize the zoning in Montgomery to facilitate strategic community growth. Residential » Majority of the R-C1 and R-C2 zones remain as is and it is expected that infill from R-C1 to R-C2 will occur as individual parcels redevelop, therefore no zoning change was developed; » Modest intensification of mature residential area along collector roads and around schools from R-C1 and R-C2 to R-CG; » Residential intensification near the Town Centre and Bowness Road to M-CG and M-C1 due to better access to transit and commercial and employment opportunities; » Major redevelopment in the Town Centre to allow for higherdensity mixed-use development to create a unique identity for Montgomery; Commercial & Mixed-Use » The MU-1 and MU-2 zones along Bowness Road remain as is; » C-O and C-C1 are replaced with MU-1 and MU-2 to allow for better mix of uses within a building or across several buildings. This also reduces the restriction of allowable commercial businesses to let the market to dictate the best uses; » C-COR1 is used to replace C-COR2 along 16 Avenue to elevate pedestrian experience and improve public realm with continuous active street frontage; » Additional MU-1 zones are proposed on 46 Street between Home Road and 16 Avenue to create a continuous mixed-use corridor from the riverfront to Bowness Road to strengthen the connectivity of active street frontage all the way to the riverfront;

C-COR1 MU-1 MU-2

Zoning Proposed R-C1 R-C2

LAND USE PROPOSED ZONING

R-CG M-CG M-C1 C-COR1 MU-1 MU-2 DC Special Purpose

The proposed zoning simplified the land use zoning codes used in Montgomery and offers density and height transition where practical. The following policies are recommended for implementation: » All developments shall follow the land use designations shown on the Proposed Zoning Map; » All developments building heights shall follow the Proposed Building Height Map and requirements listed in the land use bylaw; » All commercial and mixed-use development shall follow the land use bylaw on the maximum density; » Vehicle and bicycle parking provision shall meet the land use bylaw. Where parking bylaw relaxation is requested, a parking study shall be conducted and approved by the General Manager of Transportation prior to approval; » Buildings with heights over 14 meters need to perform a shadow study analysis to ensure overshadowing can be minimized where reasonably possible; » No new single-detached dwelling shall be built in multi-residential and mixed-use zones (MC-1, MC-2, MC-G, MU-1, MU-2, C-COR1); » Direct driveway access from the main streets to the commercial and mixed-use zones are not permitted except approved by the General Manager of Transportation; » For MU-1, MU-2 and C-COR1 zones, all residential units shall be located above the first story; » All commercial and mixed-use building and frontage designs shall accommodate all ages and abilities; » Innovative building and public infrastructure designs are encouraged, such as net-zero building, green roofs, rain garden, LED street lighting;

LAND USE EXISTING HEIGHTS This section summarizes the maximum allowable heights based on the existing land use zoning codes. It is noted that the Calgary land use bylaw lists more detailed height restrictions for some of the land use codes based on their proximity to certain uses, such as low density residential districts, etc., but for the purpose of this exercise, the general height restriction is being applied. Based on our analysis, the maximum allowable heights are determined in the following: » » » » » » » » » » » » » » » »

R-C1: R-C1N: R-C1s: R-C2: R-CG: M-CG: M-C1: M-X1: C-C1: C-O: C-COR1: C-COR2: MU-1: MU-2: DC: Special Purpose:

10 meters; 10 meters; 10 meters; 10 meters; 11 meters; 12 meters; 14 meters; 14 meters; 10 meters; h in C-O f#h#; h in C-COR1 f#h#; h in C-COR2 f#h#; h in MU-1 f#h#d#; h in MU-2 f#h#d#; defined in the DC bylaw; not defined;

The map shows that the buildings with higher maximum allowable heights are located primarily in the community core area between 19 Avenue and the riverfront.

Height Existing 10 11 12 14 16 20 22

Height Change -8m -6m

LAND USE HEIGHT STRATEGY

-2m -1m +1m +2m +4m +6m +10m

Through our community workshop and the feedback received from the community, we understand that the community is mostly concerned with building heights when it comes to intensification, which suggests that with proper consideration of building heights, intensification could be well received by the community. Therefore, our maximum allowable building height has been primarily determined through shadow study to evaluate sun exposure on the public realm, among other key design considerations. Upon review of the existing land use zoning, our proposed design interventions, and also community desires and feedback, we have identified the corridors of 16 Avenue and Bowness Road as appropriate for intense densification. Using the findings of the shadow study for the three main streets and considering the community feedback and our analysis, we have identified the following building height strategies to achieve our goals: Âť Lower the maximum allowable building heights along all three main streets to maximize sun exposure to activate the streets; Âť Gentle increase of building heights in the residential intensification area along major collector roads, transit routes, and around major community destinations; Âť Most significant height increase is proposed at the proposed Town Centre as it is envisioned to transition from a big box commercial store with abundance of parking stalls to a mixed-use, vibrant, transit-supported development that establishes itself as the centre of the community; The map shows how the maximum allowable building heights are in comparison to the maximum allowable building heights of the current zoning codes. This analysis shows that the projected population growth can be achieved without intense building height increase due to concentrated intensification. 53

LAND USE PROPOSED HEIGHT

Height Proposed 10 11 12

With the proposed strategies to identify building heights, the proposed maximum allowable building heights are shown in the map.

14 16 20

It can be observed clearly from the map that: Âť The maximum building heights of 20 meters are found in the Town Centre and along the riverfront. These are the two key areas identified that can positively contribute to building the community identity and character and activate the community by drawing visitors passing by the community; Âť The next highest building heights of 16 meters and 14 meters are found along Bowness Road, 16 Avenue, 46 Street, and around the Town Centre. They are zoned for both multi-residential and mixeduse developments that will form the population base to support the local commercial businesses; Âť The remaining low-density residential area will consist of residential buildings with heights of 10 to 12 meters that are compatible to the existing neighbourhood character; It is important to note that the maximum allowable building heights do not mean that all buildings will be built to the maximum height. We expect that individual parcels will evolve and get redeveloped in different times and building heights will likely vary due to different uses and forms of these buildings. Using the proposed zoning and maximum allowable building height, the expected housing unit increase is calculated for residential, mixeduse and commercial zones. It is expected that not all redevelopments will be built to maximum height and the most intense built form. A total of additional 1,296 is expected, and they are distributed as follows: C-COR1 192 units, MU-2 320 units, MU-1 154 units, M-C1 170 units, M-CG 180 units, R-CG 100 units, and R-C2 180 units.

Live Work Units Eagle Rock, Los Angeles

LAND USE HOUSING DIVERSITY

Â? Â?

Through our analysis, we found that the majority of housing stock in Montgomery is single detached dwelling, but the City and the community are growing more diverse, with smaller household size and changing demographic profile.

6 5

2 Â? Â

ÂÂ&#x20AC;

Triple Mixed Use Development Vancouver, Canada

Â? Â?

Â? Â?Â Â?

Â Â?Â?

Â? Â

Laneway Housing Hillhurst, Calgary

Co-Housing Winston Heights, Calgary

Rental Housing Edmonton, Canada

Mixed Income Housing Edmonton, Canada

Therefore, through our proposed land use zoning and maximum allowable building heights, we aim to increase housing diversity in use, form and height to welcome the anticipated increasingly diverse population. We have proposed several different housing types that are less commonly seen in Montgomery, but could benefit the community greatly and are shown spatially: Âť Laneway Housing: it is a gentle intensification in the same lot of a parcel zoned for R-C1 and R-C2. It makes aging in place possible for multi-generations to live in the same area, and could also serve as a start-up housing for a young family; Âť Co-housing: it can be situated in a R-CG zone at a corner lot to allow for social connections by sharing the same housing amenities, such as kitchen and yard; Âť Live Work Units: it can be located in R-CG and M-CG zones to allow for a community-oriented family-style business to serve the needs of the community, which in turns helps strengthen the community identity and character; Âť Triple Mixed Use: ideally located on the 16 Ave corridor, it can take advantage of the high through traffic volume on 16 Ave as a goods movement corridor, it could accommodate a range of general / light industrial uses that matches the community character; Âť Rental Housing: ideally located in M-CG or M-C1 zones, it supports people with different housing needs, such as students, but also lower-income families through the provision of 1, 2 and 3 bedroom apartments; Âť Mixed-Income Housing: ideally placed in the Town Centre, it supports lower-income individuals and families and supports similar functions of affordable housing but encourages social connections; 55

LAND USE

Zoning Proposed

HOUSING DIVERSITY

R-C1

Assumptions

R-C2

MU-2 150 units in town centre M-CG Maximum 4-story along main streets Average height of buildings = 3.5-storeys M-C1 C-COR1 70% of buildings will have residential units R-CG

MU-1 MU-2 DC

MU-1 Maximum 4-storeys Average building height = 3-storeys

Special Purpose

C-COR1 Maximum 4-storeys 16 buildings with 8 units per floor along 16 Avenue 50% of buildings will include residential units M-C1 50% apartments with average height = 3-storeys 50% townhouse

Units 350

Total 56

Zone MU-2

150

MU-1

190

C-COR1

170

M-C1

180

M-CG

100

R-CG

R-C2

R-C1

1260 Additional Units

M-CG 30% redeveloped in 20 years (36 parcels) Avg 6 units per redeveloped parcel R-CG 30% redeveloped in 20 years (65 parcels) Add 1.5 units per developed lot R-C2 30% infill over 20 years Add 1 unit per infill R-C1 30% infill over 20 years Add 1 unit per infill

DESIGN CONCEPTS MAIN STREETS

MAIN STREETS MAIN STREETS AS SOCIAL STREETS

Vision + Strategies Montgomery is home to two city-designated Main Streets - Bowness Rd and 16 Ave, however, to establish an accessible and enjoyable street network, our team proposes to designate 46 St as a Main Street Connector road that will not only link the two Main Streets, but also create an enjoyable path towards the Riverfront. 46 St will not be officially designated as a Main Street, however, the design will treat it as such. This corridor is designated as the Main Street Improvement Zone; parcels within this zone are subject to commercial and mixed-used intensification.

The intensification zone is a sustainable way to manage growth in population while leaving the majority of the neighbourhood as low-density residential. Programming within the Main Street Improvement Zone will establish a sense of community and culture in the neighbourhood, contributing to a growing awareness of neighbourhood identity. This will be accomplished by providing programming with peak uses throughout different parts of the day, and collaborative spaces that will encourage interaction between users. These spaces can be promoted through land use bylaws, addressing co-working and live/

work spaces, co-op art studios, maker spaces, etc. Additionally, wayfinding efforts are encouraged along the Main Street Improvement Zone, linking pedestrians to other key sites across the community, including the Town Centre, Montalban Park, and the Riverfront closest to the zone. Lastly, the Main Streets are part of the Universal Design Street Network (see Mobility section) and are subject to similar street design elements that encourage a safe, accessible, and comfortable walking and cycling environments.

AM to PM ACTIVITY HOW CAN WE ACCOMMODATE THIS LIFESTYLE?

NOON-4 PM

4 PM - 10 PM

WALK TO WORK

LATE LUNCH

AFTER WORK DINNER/DRINKS

LUNCH/COFFEE BREAK

BREAK STROLL

PICK UP GROCERIES ON THE WAY HOME

TRIP TO FARMER’S MARKET

MEETING AT LOCAL CAFE

EVENING ENTERTAINMENT WALK TO STORES

9 AM - NOON

Beale Street - Memphis

Walla Walla - Washington

downtown art

temporary closure to vehicles pedestrian only music culture & activity

LOCAL ECONOMY

CULTURE + COMMUNITY

CO-WORKING OFFICES

LOCAL RETAIL/SPECIALTY

MAKER SPACES

LOCAL CAFES

LIGHT INDUSTRIAL WORKSHOPS

FARMER’S MARKETS

LIVE/WORK UNITS

LIVE MUSIC VENUES

BOUTIQUE HOTELS

ART GALLERIES

RESTAURANTS/BAR

ART STUDIOS Kensington - Calgary

village atmosphere

community events/festivals

weekend experience

farmer’s market

local businesses community events

boutique hotels

MAIN STREETS

Section A’-A”

BOWNESS RD

Height to width ratio: 1:2 Sense of enclosure: comfortable

The Bowness Rd Main Street Boundary mainly concentrated in the core block between 46 St and 45 St, however, it includes corner properties of the outer blocks. This is due to the already established commercial uses in these corner sites (46 St & Bowness, and 45 St & Bowness), ensuring no disturbance to the residential character outside of that area.

Bowness Rd

2.0

2.1

3.3

A’

A’’

22.9

It is important to note the widened pedestrian realm along the north side of Bowness Rd. This side has the most sun exposure. Front parking (including street parking) has been relocated to the rear side of the properties, widening the pedestrian realm. Front driveways will no longer fragment the sidewalk, as pedestrians will enjoy the continuous pathways. Additional design features include speed bumps as vehicles enter this zone, cycle lanes, bike parking, and vehicular parking on the south. The continuous tree boulevard with an approximate width of 1.5m will create a safety buffer between pedestrians and traffic.

2.1

6.0

These design interventions will signal to the drivers to reduce their speed, and even discourage shortcutting traffic through the neighbourhood.

Building massings and their effects on the public realm were considered in the design guidelines. Developments on the south side of Bowness Rd will not have any negative shadowing impacts on the north sidewalk if a step back is applied on the fourth storey. Developments on the north side of Bowness Rd will reversely feature fourth storey step backs along the back of the property. With residential parcels abutting the laneway, it is important to ensure no negative shadowing from the commercial development. Additionally, a 10m setback is proposed along the rear, with mandatory parking.

Shadowing was considered for peak-time usage: during morning work breaks, lunch, and late afternoon (after work). The proposed massing ensures a favourable environment for the users during those peak times, and maximum sun exposure. Developments along both sides of the Main Street will require ground floor commercial frontage with future deliberations about the appropriate scale of permeability. While commercial uses will be allocated for the ground floors, office, residential, or flex spaces can be found in from second storey up.

The sense of enclosure (height to width ratio) created by the public realm and building heights are human-scale and comfortable for pedestrian users. This is a significant change from the current sense of enclosure: buildings are moved to the property lines (with no minimum setbacks required along street frontages) and parking is moved to the back, reduce the distance between buildings.

March 19 10 AM, 12 PM, 4 PM

January 21 10 AM, 12 PM, 2 PM

Bowness Rd - North

Supporting Policy

Bowness Rd - South

2.1 No minimum setbacks required along a street frontage, except on the south side of Bowness Rd where room for public realm must be considered Â&#x2021; Â&#x2030; Â&#x2021; 2.2 Minimum Â&#x201E; Â&#x2026; 1.2m setback from side property line Â&#x2020; Â&#x2021; Â&#x2C6; Â&#x2026; Â&#x2030; Â&#x2021;

Bowness Rd NW

45 St NW

46 St NW

Bowness Rd NW

45 St NW

Bowness Rd NW

45 St NW

46 St NW

June 21 10 AM, 12 PM, 4 PM

46 St NW

Shadow Analysis

Â Â? Â?

Â? Â? Â Â? Â Â&#x20AC; Â&#x201A;Â? Â&#x192;

2.3 10m setback in the read of the property facing lane (on north side of Bowness Rd) to mitigate shadowing 2.4 Maximum 12m height on the street frontage, after which a minimum 3m step back going to maximum 16m height 2.5 Commercial street frontage on ground

Bowness Rd ACTIVE STREET FRONTAGE WITH HIGH PERMEABILITY

STREET SIGNAGE FOR WAYFINDING & NEIGHBOURHOOD IDENTIFYING

VISIBLE CROSSWALK & SPEED BUMP

WIDE SIDEWALKS FOR OPTIMAL SUN EXPOSURE + ACTIVE STREETS

MONTGOMERY

STREET PARKING ALONG STORE FRONTS - PEDESTRIAN BUFFER

STREET FURNITURE & BIKE PARKING

PROTECTED BIKE LANES WHEN NO STREET PARKING IS PRESENT 64

MAIN STREETS Section B’-B”

46 ST

Height to width ratio: 1:2.5 Sense of enclosure: comfortable

While not an officially-designated Main Street, 46 St will act as a key connector between 16 Ave and Bowness Rd, ensuring a continuous path with similar land use policies and street design features.

46 St

Due to traffic flows that are the lowest of the Main Streets, 46 St is a favourable environment for a pedestrian only street during temporary closure to vehicular access. Events such as farmers markets or street festivals can be held on this street. Similar to Bowness Rd and 16 Ave, streets are characterized by wide sidewalks, speed bumps, and raised crosswalks. However, 46 St features a cobbled roadway (not sidewalks) for a comfortable pedestrian atmosphere when the street is closed to vehicles. A comfortable sense of enclosure continues along as the street reaches 16 Ave.

5.5

2.1

3.0

2.1

6.5

B’

B’’

24.3

46 ST - West

Supporting Policy

46 ST - East

2.6 No minimum setbacks required along a street frontage

Â&#x2021; Â&#x2030; Â&#x2021; Â&#x2021; Â&#x2030; Â&#x2021;

2.7 Minimum 1.2m setback from side property line

Â&#x201E; Â&#x2026; Â&#x201E; Â&#x2026; Â&#x2020; Â&#x2021; Â&#x2C6; Â&#x2020; Â&#x2021; Â&#x2C6; Â&#x2026; Â&#x2030; Â&#x2021; Â&#x2026; Â&#x2030; Â&#x2021;

2.8 Minimum 3m setback from lane if adjoining residential parcel

E NW

2.10 Commercial street frontage on ground floor facing main streets

S 46

16 AV

2.9 Maximum 14m height

Â Â? Â? Â Â? Â?

Â? Â? Â Â? Â Â&#x20AC; Â&#x201A;Â? Â&#x192; Â? Â? Â Â? Â Â&#x20AC; Â&#x201A;Â? Â&#x192;

Shadow Analysis March 19 10 AM, 12 PM, 4 PM

June 21 10 AM, 12 PM, 4 PM

46 St NW

17 Ave NW

Building massings will mirror developments along Bowness Rd, however no step backs will be necessary along this road due to minimal shadowing on the public realm. West side of 46 St allows for higher developments than the east side, however, the sense of enclosure remains comfortable in this case.

46 St NW

17 Ave NW

46 St NW

This street is the least affected by shadowing due to its north-south orientation, creating a favorable atmosphere for events during various times of the day. Commercial street frontages will characterize the ground floor land use, and buildings may be developed with no minimum setbacks when fronting on a street.

January 21 10 AM, 12 PM, 2 PM

Sunfest on 9 Ave Main Street - Inglewood, Calgary

46 St

PUBLIC FURNITURE+ BIKE RACKS

WAYFINDING SIGNAGE

IDENTITY-BUILDING PUBLIC ART TEMPORARY ROAD CLOSURE TO MAXIMIZE THE PUBLIC REALM DURING EVENTS MONTGOMERY

MONTGOMERY

Y R E M O G

T N MO

COBBLED STREETS FOR SLOWER SPEEDS AND STREETSCAPE DESIGN PROTECTED BIKE LANES WHEN NO STREET PARKING IS PRESENT

MAIN STREETS

Section C’-C” Height to width ratio: 1:2 Sense of enclosure: comfortable

16 AVE

16 Ave

16 Ave is the most car-oriented of the three Main Streets. It is important to note that while a Main Street characteristic is assigned, it also acts as a major highway that connects pass-by traffic to key regional destinations like Banff. We recognize that there is a large amount of through-traffic during peak times, but an opportunity exists to attract this through traffic into the community. Through successful street design, and identity building features such as wayfinding, public art, etc., Montgomery can be recognized as a gateway community.

5.5

2.1

3.5

3.3

3.5

3.3

C’

C’’

32.8

3.5

2.1

6.0

A median (such as the one on Memorial Dr) will be incorporated into the street design, as well as a tree boulevard on either side of 16 Ave. Similar to other Main Streets, this will encourage traffic to slow down and recognize that they are driving through Montgomery. Identifiers such as unique plantings can be used to create a visual node along the road: a successful example of that are the street pots along Zoo Drive on the way to the Calgary Zoo.

Road Planting - Zoo Rd, Calgary

Road Median - Memorial Dr, Calgary With the larger-scale developments in the area, 16 Ave will have comfortable levels of sun exposure, creating a favorable environment for an enjoyable outdoor experience. Similar analysis times for sun/shadow studies were used the previous two streets, as same peak times are expected as on Bowness Rd and 46 St. South side of 16 Ave will allow for a 16m maximum development height, however, a front step back at the fourth storey will be required. Due to a favorable pedestrian realm, front setbacks are not required, and properties can be developed to the property lines. On the north, buildings can only reach a maximum of 14m in height, and a rear step back on the top floor is required. A 10m setback in the rear will also ensure the availability of parking, and minimal shadowing on residential properties abutting the laneway.

Shadow Analysis

16 Ave NW

16 Ave - South

ey r e nt

16 Ave - North

ey r e nt

o Supporting Policy M

Â Â? Â? Â Â? Â?

ey r e nt

o M

2.10 No minimum setbacks required along a street frontage 2.11 Minimum 1.2m setback from side property line

Â&#x2021; Â&#x2030; Â&#x2021; Â&#x201E; Â&#x2026; Â&#x2020; Â&#x2021; Â&#x2C6; Â&#x2026; Â&#x2030; Â&#x2021;

Â? Â? Â Â? Â Â&#x20AC; Â&#x201A;Â? Â&#x192; Â? Â? Â Â? Â Â&#x20AC; Â&#x201A;Â? Â&#x192;

Â Â?Â? Â?Â?

44 St NW

Â&#x2021; Â&#x2030; Â&#x2021; Â&#x2021; Â&#x2030; Â&#x2021; Â&#x201E; Â&#x2026; Â&#x201E; Â&#x2026; Â&#x2020; Â&#x2021; Â&#x2C6; Â&#x2020; Â&#x2021; Â&#x2C6; Â&#x2026; Â&#x2030; Â&#x2021; Â&#x2026; Â&#x2030; Â&#x2021;

16 Ave NW

o M

January 21 10 AM, 12 PM, 2 PM

45 St NW

44 St NW

March 19 10 AM, 12 PM, 4 PM

45 St NW

44 St NW

June 21 10 AM, 12 PM, 4 PM

2.12 10m setback from lane (if adjoined by a residential parcel) to mitigate shadowing 2.13 Maximum 14m height 2.14 Commercial street frontage on ground floor

16 Ave

STREET SIGNAGE FOR WAYFINDING & NEIGHBOURHOOD IDENTIFYING

STREET PARKING ALONG STORE FRONTS - PEDESTRIAN BUFFER

MONTGOMERY

WIDE SIDEWALKS FOR PUBLIC ACTIVITY

RAISED MEDIAN WITH STREET TREES, LIGHTS, & FLORAL IDENTIFIERS

FLUCTUATING HEIGHTS ALONG 16 AVE (MAX 16M)

DESIGN CONCEPTS TOWN CENTRE

Town Centre SITE ANALYSIS 6

The Town Centre site is currently a commercial node adjacent to Montgomery Square and bounded by Bowness Road to the north, 16th Avenue to the South, Home Road to the east, and 49th Street to the west. Currently the siteâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;s anchor tenant is Safeway which creates a regional draw for residents of Montgomery and surrounding communities for groceries and other daily shopping needs.

The space is dominated by car oriented uses, such as parking lots and strip mall shopping. The quality of buildings within the site appear ready for replacement in several cases.

Montgomery Sqaure is a large open space but offers very little in terms of programming or comfort for visitors. When observing the site, it seems that most people traverse the site without stopping to relax and enjoy the space. 1

The intersection at Bowness Road and Home Road is a very busy one with an awkward design due to the shift of the street grid network. Our analysis revealed that the intersection experiences several traffic related incidents every year, prompting us to investigate design improvements.

Finally, we recognize that the site acts as the communityâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;s transit service hub where many transit users have the opportunity to switch bus lines to reach their final destination. Creating a covered transit hub that increases the capacity to provide elevated bus service is a strong opportunity we see for the site.

Parking Lot Anchor Tenant Open Space Utility Right of Way Bus Bay Problem Intersection 76

Large Parking Lot- Safeway

Strip Mall Development- Bowness Rd

Auto Oriented Uses- Bowness Rd

Parking lots create an uncomfortable environment for pedestrians and encourage shoppers to drive from store-to-store rather than walk. This mode of shopping results in destination shopping and can negatively impact foot traffic for businesses.

Strip mall developments create undesireable edge conditions that do not support certain businesses like restaurants or coffee shops. Parking in front also reduces the visibility of shops from the public realm reducing the chance that customers will stumble upon locally owned businesses.

Auto-oriented land uses such as gas stations take up large parcels of developable land and prioritize the movement of vehicles rather than people. These uses are not conducive to creating a vibrant Town Centre.

Open Space- Montgomery Square

Intersection at Home Rd & Bowness Rd- Montgomery

Bus Stop- Bowness Rd

Montgomery Square is a large open space at the heart of the community. On two sides it is bordered by roads, and the final third side is bordered by a blank wall. The square suffers from lack of active edges and interesting programming to entice visitors to stay and enjoy the space.

The intersection at Bowness Road and Home Road is large and has somewhat awkward as the roads do not intersect in a grid pattern. This intersection is the site of several vehicle and pedestrian incidents yearly.

Bus stops along Bowness Road have small bus bays and bus shelters. The area acts as a transit hub as riders often switch bus lines at this location.

Town Centre PLAN VIEW This plan is intended to provide a vision for what could be in a space that offers so much potential as a hub of activity in Montgomery.

The plan outlines a mixed-use commercial node with an adjacent transit hub capable of providing frequent bus service to the community. Providing residential units with the Town Centre is important to leverage an investment in improved transportation infrastructure, however, we believe restricting building heights to no more than 6-storeys is important for maintaining community context. The introduction of shared streets through the Town Centre elevates the priority of the pedestrian above that of the vehicle, which can create a much more enjoyable human experience. The plan relocates Montgomery square into the heart of the space where the buildings have been designed to provide a sense of enclosure while maintaining sun exposure to the public square and proposed steps inspired by Downtown Crossing in Boston. The plan promotes low-rise, courtyard style development and traffic calming measures such as a traffic circle at the intersection of Home Road and Bowness Road.

Mixed Use Development - Santana Row, San Jose, California

Transit Station - Bern, Switzerland

Shared Street - Brighton, United Kingdom

Vertical mixed-use with ground floor commercial is proposed to create active street frontage and an interesting pedestrian experience. Providing residential or office units above will help to provide the required intensity to support the vibrant Town Centre.

A covered transit station can encourage ridership due to a more comfortable year-round experience. This investment in transit infrastructure could be made possible if the Town Centre was to be built-out in full.

Shared streets can elevate the priority of the pedestrian and create provide the opportunity for high quality public realm. Vehicle access to the Town Centre can be limited to off-peak hours, or closed completely during special events.

Downtown Crossing Plaza - Boston, Massachusetts

Courtyard - Bo01, Malmo, Sweden

Traffic Circle - New Hampshire

High quality public realm design will encourage people to linger in spaces, while programmable spaces would offer an opportunity to organize events and build community. The steps shown above achieve both objectives simultaneously.

Courtyards can serve a very important function within the Town Centre by providing shelter from traffic noise off of 16th Avenue and a semi-private space for residential tenants.

A traffic circle at the intersection of Bowness Road and Home Road can be an effective tool for traffic calming, improved vehicle flow and road alignment over the existing condition.

Town Centre WINTER CITY DESIGN

It is imperative that winter city design considerations are at the forefront of the Town Centre build-out. This space should be designed as a hub of commercial activity that is safe and enjoyable during all seasons.

(City of Edmonton, 2016, p. 7)

The City of Edmontonâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;s Winter City Design Guidelines (2016) were referenced when considering policy and design recommendations. This images below visualize some for the important nuances of high quality winter city design.

(City of Edmonton, 2016, p. 20)

Town Centre Street Wall

BUILDING HEIGHT, MASSING & ORIENTATION

Live/Work Units

Building height, massing, and orientation are integral to creating an enjoyable, human scale Town Centre. Winter city considerations, active frontages, shadowing, community context, and shelter from wind and traffic noise are all important factors that are considered within this plan.

Courtyard Infill

POLICY Residential Commercial Professional

There are several policy recommendations that we propose specifically as it relates to building height, massing and orientation within the Town Centre: » A maximum height of 6-storeys is recommended to reduce shadowing and to maintain an appropriate density transition into the community; » Buildings over 4-storeys should be required to include a podium or stepback to reduce downdrafts and create an active and enclosed street frontage; » Courtyard design should be promoted to create sheltered sun-traps that will be comfortable throughout all seasons; » Buildings should be oriented to block north-west wind, and provide sound shelter from the busy 16 Avenue corridor; » Ground floor commercial uses should be encouraged within the core Town Centre to compliment the shared street design; » A continuous street wall should be encouraged as an important design element in creating a comfortable sense of enclosure;

Podium

Direct Sunlight

Shadow Study

Spring Equinox (March 19, 2020)

10 am

The shadow study was conducted on the spring equinox to give an understanding of the average daylight, and to make proposals for building and massing height. The buildings were then oriented and spaced to allow for direct sunlight to reach building faces of adjacent buildings.

12 pm

4 pm 81

Town Centre MONTGOMERY SQUARE Montgomery Square is the central public space within the Town Centre that should provide both a space for unorganized activity and programmed events and gatherings. By moving the Square into the heart of the Town Centrefrom its current location, it can benefit from active edges and a sense of enclosure and comfort that the buildings provide. Appropriate uses along the edge of the Square would be coffee shops, restaurants, and retail. Land uses such as banks and other professional services should be located off the Square as they often create fast walking and determined customers. The steps inspired by Downtown Crossing in Boston provide an interesting way to increase the available seating that is exposed to sunlight throughout the darker months. It also provides an ampheatheatre-like area that can hold community events and gatherings. The covered transit hub is adjacent to Montgomery Square as well and is expected to generate a significant amount of foot traffic within the area. The square and surrounding businesses provide a place for transit users to shop, eat, socially intereact while they wait for their bus.

Section B’ - B’’

Town Centre SITE SPECIFIC DESIGN

Vertical mixed-use allows for a vibrant mix of businesses and residences in a relatively small area. The idea that one could live in Montgomery’s Town Centre and meet all their daily needs without the need for vehicle ownership is supported by this form of development.

Enclosed courtyards oriented toward the sun create peaceful and warm open spaces that will encourage visitors to spend time outdoors during all seasons.

Section A’ - A’’

The shared streets throughout the Town Centre elevate the priority of the pedestrian above that of the vehicle. Quality paving stones, narrow streets with speed bumps, and street trees and benches help to reduce natural driving speeds.

Underground parking is essential to handle the volume of vehicles to support the expected commercial and residential activity in the Town Centre

DESIGN CONCEPTS OPEN SPACE

OPEN SPACE OVERVIEW Montgomery is characterized by a steep slope in the northeast part of the site, and flat areas in the south. The community is bounded by the Bow River to the south and west, featuring a popular riverfront stroll among the local residents.

Natural Area - Montgomery Hill

Â&#x20AC;Â? Â

Â? Â Â

The communityâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;s cycling and pathway network along the riverfront is part of a larger regional and national networks of the Calgary Bow River Pathway system, and the Trans Canada Trail (The Great Trail) that connects Canadian cities from the east to the west. Additionally, Montgomery has four major open space typologies that include: â&#x20AC;˘ â&#x20AC;˘ â&#x20AC;˘ â&#x20AC;˘

Â ÂÂ? Â&#x20AC; Â?

Â? Â

Regional - Shouldice Athletic Park Â

Â&#x20AC;Â? Â

Â? Â

Natural Areas - Montgomery Hill Regional Parks - Shouldice Athletic Park Community Parks - Shouldice Park Neighbourhood Parks - Montalban Park

Â? Â? Â? Â&#x20AC;Â&#x201E;Â Â? Â&#x20AC;Â? Â

Â? Â? Â? Â

Community - Shouldice Park

Â?Â&#x20AC;

Â&#x2026;

Neighbourhood parks were the most underutilized ones in the community, featuring a lack of programming - in some cases due to steep slopes. Four of these neighbourhood parks were chosen to be redesigned with appropriate programming for local users and visitors. These parks include:

Â&#x201A;Â&#x201A;Â&#x192; Â? Â&#x20AC;Â?

Â? Â

Â&#x2026; ÂÂ?

Neighbourhood - Montalban Park

Â?Â? Â?Â? Â Â?Â?

The proposed Universal Design Street Network (see Mobility section) and the Cycling Network connect these major parks and other key areas in the community. As seen on the map, the Cycling network is situated on the edges of Montgomery and along major routes within it, including 52 St, Home Rd, and 43 St, which are primary points of access to the riverfront and the Bow River Pathway.

Â&#x20AC;

the former site of the James Shouldice Ranch (The Lookout) Montalban Park George Gell Park Riverfront area.

Â Â? ÂÂ? Â&#x2020;Â&#x2021;

â&#x20AC;˘ â&#x20AC;˘ â&#x20AC;˘ â&#x20AC;˘

Â? Â? Â? Â?

OPEN SPACE THE LOOKOUT 1

Situated on the former site of the James Shouldice Ranch, this park is located on the northwest edge of Montgomery, and currently acts as a gateway to the Bow River Park for local residents. The objective is to create an accessible and vibrant open space that features its historical significance. The parkâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;s adjacency to the Bow River Pathway is an opportunity to attract visitors to this space and a possible platform to educate about Montgomeryâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;s identity and historical significance. Existing trees have been retained on the site, with the proposed network of trails designed to bypass them. Trees along the pavilion will allow users to spend time in shaded areas.

Viewing Platform - Sea to Sky Trail, BC 1

existing viewing platform

2 2018 China House Vision Exhibit 2

The first design intervention is the addition of a viewing platform to the north edge of the site that will complement an existing one below, on the southwest edge of the park. The two viewing platforms are separated by a steep slope, and each one can be accessed easily by visitors at either elevations. The proposed viewing platform faces the Bow River and the adjacent community of Bowness. The second design intervention is an addition of a pavilion adjacent to the existing parking lot.

Section Aâ&#x20AC;&#x2122; - Aâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;â&#x20AC;&#x2122;

The lot will provide accessibility to vehicles going to the pavilion. Visitors will be given the convenience to stay and rest - a feature that the analysis found lacking in Montgomery.

The three features of this park (two viewing platforms and the pavilion) will be connected by a series of trails following the lines of topography - this will ensure that users encounter the easiest possible inclines during their walks.

Other opportunities that the pavilion will include are: seating, public washrooms, community kitchen, fire pits, and an event space. Addition of activities both indoors and outdoors will ensure the usage of space in the winter season. Further learning opportunities about the history of James Shouldice and his ranch will take place in this development.

As seen in the cross section below, there is an elevation gain of 40m from the Bow River to the top of the hill. While trails on this site may be challenging to some visitors, they can act as a training course to those who love to exercise outdoors and hike in the city. However, the allocation of trails ensures that a wide variety of users (age and ability) can use this space.

OPEN SPACE MONTALBAN PARK Montalban Park is a popular space for dog walking - majority of the community to the north of the park utilizes this space. It is also a popular short-cutting route towards the south of the community, and while there is only one paved trail, there are several desire lines that show the most popular shortcutting routes. Similar to The Lookout, this park has a steep slope along the walking paths which discourage many users, however, the community school two blocks south of the park may bring an influx of young users who may prefer challenging and active environments.

3 1

The objective for this space was to meet the needs of local residents, which include: • • • •

establishing an efficient and accessible north-south route treating the steep slope as an opportunity for special programming providing quiet spaces for local residents (dog walking, strolls) providing active spaces for young users

It is important to note that there are no existing sidewalks along Montalban Park. A pedestrian crosswalk is proposed at the south foot of the stairs to mitigate this challenge. Additionally, majority of the existing trees remain on the site, however, two trees are proposed to be removed from the park for the addition of a stair landing on the southern edge. Toboggan Hill - Beloit Wl 5

The first design intervention features a toboggan hill going down the steep axis of the park. In the summer, sledding can become summer tubing, or a slip and slide hill ensuring an active space throughout the seasons. Tobogganing, sledding, and tubing are popular activities that cater to families in the area. This is an additional opportunity for residents to build their sense of identity and community by socializing and participating in activities with their neighbours. Directly above the hill will be a zip line platform (second intervention) that will be open all year.

Currently, the only paved trail in Montalban Park does not get cleared in the winter. Additionally, it builds a layer of ice, creating dangerous conditions for winter cyclists. The third design intervention proposes stairs along a currently popular shortcutting route, with a rail built in for convenient bike transportation and several resting spots along the way. While ensuring an accessible route, the stairs can also be a popular exercise feature among residents outside of the winter months.

The fourth design intervention also takes advantage of the steep slope. A small amphitheatre is proposed along the south edge of the park. Programming for informal and community-led events will complement the quiet neighbourhood. It has been placed in a location enclosed by trees from the residents to the south, and a steep hill from the residents to the north, ensuring a lack of noise disturbance.

Zip line - Ralph Klein Park, Calgary, AB

Wooden Stairs - Crescent Heights, Calgary

Meinig Amphitheatre - Sandy, Oregon

Section Bâ&#x20AC;&#x2122; - Bâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;â&#x20AC;&#x2122;

1112.50 1107.50 30.0 m

1102.50 1097.50 1092.50 1087.50

17.5 m

107.6 m

1082.50

18.0 m

OPEN SPACE GEORGE GELL PARK George Gell Park situated on the southeast end of Montgomery, adjacent to Trans Canada Hwy (16 Ave) to the south, and residential parcels along the rest of the edges. Its existence along a major traffic route does not give opportunity for a quiet open space. It is proposed that this park should be the most active and multi functional of the entire community. Flat topography allows for a wide variety of possible uses. Enclosed by coniferous species of poplar and spruce trees along 16 Ave, a safe buffer is created for the users.

The objectives for the redevelopment of this park are as follows: • Catering to all ages: children, adults, elderly • Catering to a variety of demographics: families, single users, large groups, small groups, etc. • Providing an active, lively, and social environment

1 2

The first design intervention features an outdoor beach volleyball court with space for seating and observing the games. It is located on the current playground site.

E AV

The second design feature is a community garden with over 20 planting beds and space to store tools.

NEW TREES

The third design feature is a rain garden on the southeast corner of the park. This is the quietest area, where users can stroll and observe shrubs, perennials, and flowers native to the region. A wall of coniferous trees (poplar and spruce) is planted along the east edge of the park to ensure an intimate enclosure and visual separation form the highway. The fourth design intervention is a naturalized playground situated directly across from a residential area, and further away from the highway. The playground can be seen from many points across the park, and from abutting residential areas. This may allow families to observe their children from nearby locations, without any existing trees blocking the view. 93

Three gazebos have been placed adjacent to major areas of the park: â&#x20AC;˘ west of naturalized playground â&#x20AC;˘ east of beach volleyball court â&#x20AC;˘ along the rain garden path Gazebos can accommodate both, large and small groups of people. Additionally, benches have been placed along the paths to ensure resting spots, and opportunities to observe other activities taking place.

Fire pits have been placed across the park and in close proximity to the programmed spaced - this will allow residents to participate in several activities throughout the day without having to leave the park. While located along the highway on one side, it functions as the backyard of local residents to the north and west. This atmosphere and variety of active uses will contribute to the sense of community and identity.

Beach Volleyball - Garden Park, Edmonton

Naturalized Playground - Westmoreland Park, Portland, OR

Rain Garden - McDougal Park, Calgary

Community Garden - East Village, Calgary

This park accommodates many users: gardening can be enjoyed by the elderly, hobbyists, and families who want to educate their children about food; beach volleyball can accommodate any users who have an active lifestyle or enjoy sports; the rain garden can attract those who enjoy a peaceful atmosphere or are nature enthusiasts, and the naturalized playground is an active space for children and families to spend their afternoon.

Naturalized Playground - Columbia Tech Centre, Vancouver WA

Naturalized Playground - Reeds Crossing Discovery Park, Hillsboro, OR

3 1

OPEN SPACE

Strandbar Herrmann - Vienna, Austria

Pathway Lighting - Ottawa, Canada

RIVERFRONT The riverfront site is located at the south end of Home Road. The space is currently underutilized as a gravel park & ride lot. We propose condensing and paving this lot, creating space for an urban beach. To complete this destination, we propose an addition of public washrooms and a seasonal snack bar. Creating stepped access to the waterfront similar to Calgaryâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;s East Village will allow visitors to take advantage of the natural gravel bars that exist at the site. A separated pedestrian pathway is proposed along the east side of Home Rd, where public art installations and street lighting will create an engaging pathway to the beach destination, while providing a sense of safety and comfort.

River Access - East Village, Calgary

Public Art - Contemporist

Precedents have been noted from different countries around the world. Natural beach area is an important feature, as over development around the riverfront is discouraged in this case. Using the power of the river stream, the design team proposed to use this environmental feature to create a surfing area. More calm aquatic experience can be seen in the swimming area.

River Surfing - Cunovo, Slovakia

DESIGN CONCEPTS MOBILITY

OVERVIEW Objectives & Strategies With easy access to 16 Avenue, a major east-west mobility corridor, frequent transit service, especially routes #1 and 305# directly to downtown, and Bow River Pathway right adjacent to the community, Montgomery has great mobility options. Therefore, our objectives are to further enhance the rich options that the community provides, build a multi-modal community. Considering the higher population of seniors, we also want to prioritize pedestrian movements over the automobile to encourage community mobility. With our proposed land use concept, we focus on enhancing the attractiveness of sustainable mobility, especially along the key corridors and Town Centre. This section will discuss the strategies we will deploy to achieve these objectives.

Â? Â Â&#x192; Â? Â Â?Â?ÂÂ?

Different scales of strategies are considered for improving the mobility in the community of Montgomery. They include the following:

Â?Â? Â&#x201A; Â&#x192;Â?Â&#x20AC; Â Â

Âť Applying Universal Design principles to ensure mobility options are provided for everyone, especially for people with reduce mobility; Âť A combination of traffic calming techniques to discourage short-cutting traffic and manage short-cutting traffic speed; Âť Create a multi-modal community by enhancing sustainable transportation modes, including walking, cycling, and transit; Âť Using Urban Design techniques to enrich the experience of sustainable mobility;

ROADWAY

Â&#x2026;Â&#x2020;

Â? Â Â&#x192; Â? Â Â? Â Â

Â&#x201E;

Â?Â? Â?Â?

Based on our analysis and community feedback, we understand that the community needs a transportation network that is more friendly to vulnerable road users, including pedestrians, cyclists, and transit users. Therefore, we propose several design interventions from the transportation network level to demote the importance of automobile and promote sustainable transportation. Road Classification We propose to extend the urban boulevard section of the 16 Avenue corridor west to 49 Street as we are transforming the Safeway site to a Town Centre that will be pedestrian friendly. Additionally, we propose to make the entire Bowness Road corridor neighbourhood boulevard to match their neighbourhood character by removing the arterial road classification. It is important to propose appropriate road classifications as they define the roadway design standards, access management, and more importantly, the hierarchy of vulnerable road users in the mobility spectrum. Truck Route To maintain the neighbourhood character of Bowness Road, we propose to remove the truck route designation from Bowness Road. This is a critical change as truck route designation requires several design standards that negatively impacts pedestrian friendliness of a street, such as the design of turn radius at an intersection. With a truck route of 16 Avenue close by, there is no need for Bowness Road. Pedestrian Permeability To improve pedestrian permeability across the barrier of 16 Avenue, we propose to add two traffic signals at 46 Street and 43 Street. 46 Street will act as the key connector of two main streets of 16 Avenue and Bowness Road with a direct cycling connection from the riverfront and Shouldice Athletic Park to Montalban Park and extended into University District. 43 Street is an existing key cycling connection from the riverfront to the FFCA school across 16 Avenue, while it also serves as a gateway feature at the east end of the community to visually cue through traffic that they have entered a urban community.

Â? Â Â Â

Â? Â&#x20AC;Â? Â? Â&#x201A; Â Â

101

Curb Extention Strathcona County

ROADWAY

Rectangular Rapid Flashing Beacon Princeton, New Jersey

TRAFFIC CALMING

Curb extensions physically reduce the crossing distance for pedestrians and cyclists and their exposure to vehicular traffic. At the same time, a narrower road causes drivers to intuitively reduce their travel speed. Before investing in a permanent curb extension design, the community could also contact The City to install a temporary traffic calming (TC) curbs. Raised Crosswalk Vancouver

RRFB is an effective pedestrian crossing safety improvement strategy in Calgary and beyond where the rapidly flashing lights draw drivers’ attention immediately. It is well suited for Home Road and 52 Street as this location expects high pedestrian and cycling crossing volumes due to access to parks, transit stops and schools. 3D Crosswalk Ísafjörður, Iceland

Through our analysis and community workshop, we understand there are significant traffic shortcutting and safety issues, so we propose several traffic calming measures. Policy Intervention We will make Montgomery the first 30km/h community in Calgary and also reduce Bowness Road’s speed to 40 km/h to discourage shortcutting traffic. Research shows that probability of fatality for a EFFECTS OF SPEED - 41 pedestrian colliding with a vehicle travelling at 50 km/h is ~85%, while the probability is only 10% when colliding with a vehicle at 30 km/h. lower maximum speeds). If, on the other hand, the car is struck from the rear, whiplash injuries It is important to recognize that speed limit changes require strong leading to long-term impairment may occur even at impact speeds of 15-20 km/h (Elvik et al 2004). political support. For instance, Edmonton City Council voted to lower Figure2.5. Probability of fatal injury for a pedestrian colliding with a vehicle speed limit in residential streets to 40 km/h on March 11, 2020. 100%

A raised crosswalk signals to drivers the presence of pedestrians. We propose their installation on Home Road and 19 Avenue. However, it is recognized that this might present minor challenges for the City Transportation department in terms of winter maintenance.

The 3D crosswalk is strategically chosen for 48 Street and 19 Avenue as it is located close to the senior housing and school. This is a low cost option for effective pedestrian crossing safety improvement that can even be community led.

80% 60% 40% 20%

Five-Leg Intersection Traffic Circle

Traffic Diverter Design 48 St

40 Speed

OP ST

70 km/h

Physical Design Intervention

STOP

Source: Interdisciplinary Working Group for Accident Mechanics (1986); Walz et al. (1983) and Swedish It is important to recognize that while policy intervention can be Ministry of Transport (2002).

effective to a degree, we also need physical design interventions to

STOP

A traffic circle is recommended along 48 Street where there is a complicated five-leg intersection which poses visibility challenges for drivers. The traffic circle can reduce vehicle speed, improve pedestrian crossing, and improve community east-west connectivity. 102

The traffic diverter concept can be applied to the intersection of 48 Street and 23 Avenue by creating deviation of 48 Street from a straight line roadway to a minor roadway with stop control. With added stop control of three seconds, traffic will come to a stop with significant reduction of travel speed and a vehicle will have to again travel some distance to regain their speed.

Inencourage addition to the increasedchange. risk to vulnerable users,we there is increased risk of serious injury behavior For 52road Street, propose to reverse to occupants of light vehicles in collisions with a heavier vehicle (Broughton, 2005). This is because the one-way street travel direction to use the natural uphill slopeand even small the energy that is released in the collision is absorbed mainly by the lighter vehicle differences in mass can make a significant difference. Current trends in vehicle design are leading to northbound to reduce speed. For Home Road and 48 Street, there are many larger and heavier cars, while light vehicles are continuing to be produced, thus increasing the difference in mass of the new vehicles being manufactured. mass difference of a factor of 3 is not an several design interventions that could be Aapplied to several locations exception for vehicles on the road, especially between older and newer cars. The difference in mass (designs locations shown on larger the map and graphics) and these between a car andand a heavy goods vehicle is even and can easily be 20 times greater.

interventions can even be used in combination to further enhance its effectiveness.

Effects of speed on the visual field

As shown in Figure 2.6, the visual field of the driver is reduced when the speed increases. At 40 km/h, the driver has a field of vision covering 100°, which allows obstacles on the roadside, or other potential hazards, to be seen. At 130 km/h, the field of vision covers around 30°, which reduces considerably the capability of the driver to assess potential danger.

TRANSIT

OVERVIEW

The community of Montgomery has several bus routes serving the community. These routes connect the community to Calgary Centre City, nearby LRT stations, including Dalhousie, Lions Park, Brentwood, and Crowfoot, as well as major activity centres, such as Market Mall.

Â?Â

Â? Â?

Âť Transit centre: create a transit hub at the Town Centre (existing Safeway site) where all transit routes will service; Âť Route 305: promote it to an all-day transit service with an additional stop at 43 Street on Bowness Road to improve its reach; Âť Route 65: extend its route into the heart of Montgomery via Home Road and 48 Street and stop at the transit hub; Âť Route 422: extend transit service south to river front and increase transit coverage by creating a loop using 46 Street; Âť Route 53: divert transit route from Home Road to 48 Street to reduce duplicated coverage on Home Road and increase coverage further east of the community;

To improve the transit network and route services in Montgomery, we propose the following specific strategies:

There are mainly two types of transit services, the frequent / primary transit including Routes 1 and 305, and regular transit routes at a lower frequency, including Routes 31, 30, 53, 65, 408 and 422. Particularly, it is noted that Route 305 only runs during the AM and PM peak hours and Routes 31 and 65 only travel by Montgomery but do not directly serve the community well.

Â Â Â? Â Â? Â

103

TRANSIT

Transit Walkshed Improvement

SERVICE COVERAGE We recognize that the existing transit routes do not service the east end of the community very well. Therefore, one of our key transit service improvements is to extend local transit routes on 46 Street to service the east end. 46 Street is chosen for a few reasons:

Route 305

Route 53

Â Â? Â?

Route 422 Calgary Transit MAX Teal - Mount Royal University Stop

Route 65

Âť CT generally runs transit service on collector road or higher and 46 Street is a collector road; Âť 46 Street is the key connector of two Main Streets of 16 Avenue and Bowness Road, and the transit route can run directly to south of 16 Avenue to connect the two parts of Montgomery; Âť It is close to the elementary school and senior housing as well as can provide direct transfer to the frequent transit services of Routes 1 and 305 at Bowness Road; The recommended local transit service can improve the walkshed of the transit routes and covers more of the community. It also increases the percentage of people serviced by transit within walking distance due to increased density along Bowness Road and 16 Avenue.

King County Metro Transit Bike Park & Ride - Washington

FACILITIES It is key to provide high-quality transit facilities, especially for frequent transit routes such as Routes 1 and 305. Our recommendation to elevate Route 305 to all-day service warrants facility upgrades similar to the Calgary MAX lines.

High quality transit stop facility for three stops on Route 305 at Home Road, 46 Street, and also 43 Street. The amenities could include: heated bus shelter during winter, outside seating bench and garbage bin, and electronic display board to show real-time bus arrival information.

Bike Park and Ride provides secure bike parking to residents from Montgomery and surrounding communities who wish to integrate their commute with biking and transit. This is ideally located at the transit hub as it is connected to the cycling facilities on Bowness Road and Home Road.

Additionally, to promote integrated multi-modal transportation, it is proposed to add a secure bike parking facility at the transit hub. To ensure seamless co-existence of cycle track and bus stop, we also propose to design a floating bus stop on Bowness Road.

CYCLING OVERVIEW Â&#x201E; Â&#x192;Â? Â&#x20AC;

Through our analysis, we found that most cycling routes are on the outer edges of the community of Montgomery, thus they do not offer convenient cycling connections for the residents in Montgomery. Therefore, we propose additional cycling connections to truly create a cycling network that links the parks and open spaces, key destinations in the community including schools and main streets, and connect to amenities outside the community, including nearby parks and natural areas, and the up-and-coming University District.

Â Â ÂÂ ÂÂ?Â&#x20AC;

Â&#x201E; Â&#x192;Â? ÂÂ?Â&#x20AC;

Â? Â Â? Â&#x192; Â? Â Â&#x201E;

Proposed cycling infrastructure includes physically-separated protected cycle track, off-road multi-use pathway, painted or buffered on-street bike lane, and shared street with signage and sharrows.

Â&#x201E; Â&#x192;Â? Â Â&#x201E; Â? ÂÂ?Â&#x20AC;

The proposed routes are intended to increase cycle network connectivity. Key improvements include:

Â? ÂÂ&#x192; Â? Â? Â Â&#x2021;Â&#x2C6; Â

Âť Bow River Pathway: pathway is proposed to offer complete off-road multi-use pathway that is designed for all ages and abilities in the long term; Âť Bowness Road: cycle track is proposed to make Bowness Road a Complete Street that offers high-quality sustainable transportation; Âť 21 Avenue: on-street bike lane is proposed to connect Shouldice Lookout and the elementary and high schools; Âť 23 Avenue / Montalban Avenue / Montalban Drive: on-street bike lane is proposed to connect Shouldice Lookout and Montalban Park to the University District; Âť 46 Street: on-street bike lane is proposed to connect the riverfront through the main streets and the elementary school to Montalban Park and eventually to the University District; Âť MacKay Road: on-street bike lane is proposed to act as a cycling connector to Bowness Road and eventually to Edworthy Park, which acts as an alternative connection of 43 Street;

Â Â?Â? Â? Â? Â&#x2020; Â&#x192; Â&#x2026; ÂÂ?Â&#x20AC;

Â&#x201A; Â Â&#x192;Â Â? Â Â&#x201A; Â? Â&#x201E; Â&#x201A; Â? Â Â&#x2026; Â?Â&#x2020; Â&#x201E;Â?

Â? Â?Â?Â? Â?

Â Â Â

105

Cycle Track Downtown Calgary

Bow River Pathway Calgary

On-Street Bike Lane Surrey, BC

2.0

2.1

CYCLING

Shared 3.3 Street 2.1 22.9 Portland, OR

6.0

3.3

5.5

2.1

3.0

2.1

24.3

CORRIDOR DESIGNS

16 Avenue NW

46 Street

Montalban Drive

5.5

2.1

3.0

2.1

5.5

6.5

24.3

Tactical Urbanism - Seattle, WA

47 Street

2.1

3.0 5.5

24.0

2.1 3.5

6.5 3.3

3.5 32.8

3.3

In this section, the on-street bike lanes on 46 Street and Montalban Drive are highlighted. 46 Street is a collector road with active street frontages on both sides connecting two main streets of Bowness Road and 16 Avenue, where Montalban Drive is local road providing cycling connectivity through the community.

MONTGOMERY

Through community conversations, we understand that Montalban Park lacks a sidewalk on the north end (south side of Montalban Drive) potentially due to maintenance concerns. Therefore, we recommend the implementation of a Tactical Urbanism project to install a temporary sidewalk with the simple use of temporary bollards, paint and signage. It is cost effective and allows for immediate implementation, as one of the key benefits of tactical urbanism.

5.5

2.1

3.0 2.1

MONTGOMERY

MERY

106

» Cycle Track: provides cyclists their own right-of-way and full protects cyclists from higher-speed motor vehicles. It could be on the road ground level or be elevated to the 47 sidewalk Street level, depending on the local context; » Pathway: provides full protection of cyclists and pedestrians from vehicular traffic and could have mixed right-of-way for both pedestrians and cyclists or separately; » On-Street Bike Lane: it could be painted or buffered on-street bike lane, dependent on road traffic volume, available right-of-way, and cyclist user characteristic (age, experience, etc.), and curbside management (parking, boulevard, etc.); » Shared Street: cyclists don’t have their right-of-way and they share the road with vehicular traffic. This usually only applies to low9.0 5.5 6.0 2.1 3.5 volume roadway, such as a neighbourhood local road or 20.0road with significantly constrained right-of-way;

TACTICAL URBANISM

G MONT

The four types of cycling infrastructure are illustrated and further discussed:

9.0 20.0

5.5

UNIVERSAL DESIGN OVERVIEW We also propose to adopt universal design to create a complete community for everyone. This includes people who are physically or visually impaired, the elderly, and families with children. While it is our ultimate goal to apply universal design on all community routes, the following major pedestrian corridors are prioritized to gain community support:

Â Â Â Â Â Â Â? Â?

Â&#x20AC;Â&#x201A;

Âť Main Streets: Bowness Road, 16 Avenue, and 46 Street are three main / commercial streets identified through our design that will generate high pedestrian activities; Âť Around Terrace Road Elementary School and Shouldice Seniors Community: they will best serve children and the elderly, which encourages more physical activities and promotes healthy living; Âť Home Road: this is a key north-south corridor connecting from the proposed Town Centre and Transit Hub to the popular Shouldice Athletic Park and the redesigned riverfront with the Landmark Beach. It will be well used by the community residents and people using the recreational, sports facilities and transit services; Âť Bow River Pathway and Connections: pathways are part of active and healthy lifestyles of Calgarians and universal design will encourage more local residents to access these natural amenities;

Â Â? Â?

Â Â Â Â? Â?

Â? Â? Â Â Â

107

UNIVERSAL DESIGN ELEMENTS 1

Wide Sidewalks

Painted Crosswalks

Bike Lanes

Raised Crosswalks + Yellow Stripes

Cobbled Streets

Raised Medians

Universal design could include a diverse range of design elements and this section highlights a few that are applicable to Montgomery:

Lighting

Audible Cues

Bowness Road

2 4 8

16 Avenue

6 7

108

» Wide Sidewalks: It can accommodate higher pedestrian volumes and create a barrier-free pedestrian corridor for people using mobility devices. » Bike Lanes: It provides better social equity to people who cannot afford private vehicles, improves health, and reduce greenhouse gas emission. » Painted Crosswalks: It is a low-cost option to inject art and fun into the pedestrian experience and could be a celebration of identity, culture and history. » Cobbled Streets: Suggested to be used sparsely, it highlights the key streets in the community that improves safety and adds to community identity. » Raised Crosswalks + Yellow Stripes: Tailored to people who are visually/physically impaired, this allows for safer and easier mobility and promotes physical and social well-being. » Raised Medians: It provides physical protection for crossing pedestrians and also slows vehicular traffic with physical barriers. » Audible Cues: This helps people who are visually impaired to safely cross busy signalized intersections. » Lighting: Street lighting during nighttime improves pedestrian awareness of the surrounding and increases sense of personal safety, as well as promotes the vitality of the community.

UNIVERSAL DESIGN

3.3

2.1

3.3

2.1

6.0

5.5

2.1

3.0

2.1

Bus Stop

5.5

6.5

2.1

3.5

24.3

22.9

BOULEVARD A boulevard is an important element of roadway design that can serve vital functions if properly designed. Street Trees

Street trees can bring a wide range of benefits, which could include better air quality, physical and social well-being, enhanced street aesthetics, lowered noise from streets, slowed vehicular traffic, cooler Montalban Drive air and shade, stormwater management, among others.

Tree Lined Street - Edmonton, AB

47 Street Curbside Bioswale - New York, NY

47 Street

Our analysis indicated a generally lack of street trees for a mature community like Montgomery, in comparison to other mature neighbourhoods, such as Sunnyside. Therefore, our goal is to double the tree counts in the community through street re-design as Montgomery goes through the community life-cycle. Other Functions 2.1

It is important to recognize that, in addition to street trees, the 6.5 3.0 3.0 2.1 boulevard also serves other important functions, especially on a 24.0 non-residential street. The boulevard could accommodate a variety of infrastructure, such as bus stops, benches, bike racks, utility boxes, fire hydrants, and even commercial outdoor patio spaces.

5.5

9.0

5.5

20.0

Boulevard Perspective

Snow Storage

From the environmental management perspective, it also serves the stormwater management function, which could be in the form of a bioswale. Additionally, for Calgary particularly, it is also a key component of winter city design principles for snow storage.

109

3.3

Wayfinding Implementations

Identity building Examples - Beltline, Calgary

UNIVERSAL DESIGN

WAYFINDING

Wayfinding encompasses all the ways in which people understand their surroundings and navigate from place to place. Therefore, wayfinding is important as it creates community identity and fosters a sense of place. For instance, to celebrate the identity and history of Montgomery, a Janeâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;s Walk could be organized by the community that highlights the unique landmarks in Montgomery.

Â Â? Â?

7 Â Â? Â?

Â?

Â? Â

Â?Â?

The following principles and strategies are recommended for effective wayfinding designs for Montgomery:

Wayfinding Palettes 2

110

For Montgomery, we propose implementing wayfinding strategies to several key categories, including pathways, cycling routes, main streets, town centre, transit hub and routes, and recreational and sports amenities. To enhance the community identify, we also propose a range of public art installations that could become landmarks in Montgomery. As examples, a few identity building examples in Beltline are shown here.

Âť Wayfinding network is designed to connect people to places in Montgomery, such as two main streets of 16 Avenue and Bowness Road, Shouldice Athletic Parks, the Montgomery Transit Hub; Âť Wayfinding signage is placed at key decision points to guide people to their destinations and also discover new places, such as Harry Boothman Bridge across Bow River, Bow River Pathway at Shouldice Lookout; Âť Wayfinding signage design should have high readability with consistent colors and styles and limited amount of information (maximum 3 destinations per sign), use landmarks to provide orientation cues, be designed for people of all ages and abilities (including children and people with mobility challenges) using proper signage height and easy-to-understand messages and graphics;

CONCLUSION the way forward

114

CONCLUSION THE WAY FORWARD As an inner-city established community, Montgomery is facing redevelopment pressure as The City of Calgary continues to grow. This land use design concept plan is prepared to guide the growth of Montgomery as a reemergent community in Calgary by creating memorable open spaces, multimodal connections and diverse mobility options, strategic community growth, vibrant main streets, and reinvented town centre. This document will help shape the future of the community, create a blueprint for the way forward by identifying the vision, guiding principles, strategies, and policies for the community. This study has reference many planning and design principles throughout the process, which includes but is not limited to tactical urbanism, universal design, complete street, complete community, aging in pace, new urbanism, green infrastructure, winter city design, inclusive planning, among others. We, at Inner City Consultant, would like to thank the community association, the steering committee, the community members for their time, efforts and inputs throughout the study process.

115

REFERENCES inspirations

References Documents » Municipal Development Plan. City of Calgary. 2009. » Calgary Transportation Plan. City of Calgary. 2009. » The Guidebook for Great Communities. City of Calgary. 2020. » South Shaganappi Community Area Plan. City of Calgary. 2011. » Montgomery Area Redevelopment Plan. City of Calgary. 2017. » A Hunt for History Montgomery Memories. Montgomery Community Association and The Calgary Foundation. 2006. » Montgomery Community Profile. City of Calgary. 2016. https://www.calgary. ca/CSPS/CNS/Documents/community_social_statistics/communityprofiles/montgomery.pdf » Montgomery Population Projection. City of Calgary. 2016. https://www. calgary.ca/CSPS/CNS/Documents/community_social_statistics/ Montgomery_pp.pdf » Calgary Top Tree Species. https://www.calgary.ca/CSPS/Parks/Pages/ Planning-and-Operations/Tree-Management/Top-Tree-Species-for-Calgary. aspx » Open Data Sources. City of Calgary via the University of Calgary SANDS Archives. » Calgary Road Classification and Truck Route Maps. City of Calgary. https://www.calgary.ca/Transportation/TP/Pages/Planning/Forecasting/ Forecasting-Toolbox.aspx » Calgary Traffic Count Data. City of Calgary. https://trafficcounts.calgary.ca/ » Calgary Traffic Collision Data. City of Calgary. https://data.calgary.ca/ Transportation-Transit/Traffic-Incidents/35ra-9556/data » Calgary Transit Schedules and Maps. City of Calgary. https://www. calgarytransit.com/schedules-maps » Calgary Land Use Bylaw Maps. https://www.calgary.ca/PDA/pd/Pages/ Calgary-Land-Use-bylaw-1P2007/Land-Use-bylaw-1P2007-maps.aspx » Calgary Development Map. City of Calgary. https://developmentmap. calgary.ca/?redirect=/pdmap » Shouldice Park. City of Calgary. https://www.calgary.ca/CSPS/Parks/ Pages/Locations/ -parks/Shouldice-Park.aspx » Historical Resources - Hextall Bridge. City of Calgary. https://www.calgary. ca/PDA/pd/Pages/Heritage-planning/Discover-Historic-Calgary-resources. aspx?dhcResourceId=698 » Prairie Sky Co-Housing. https://prairieskycohousing.wordpress.com/ » Wayfinding Design Principles. http://www.ai.mit.edu/projects/infoarch/ publications/mfoltz-thesis/node8.html » Edmonton Approved 40km/h Speed Limit. https://globalnews.ca/

news/6661390/edmonton-council-40-lower-speed-limits/ » Calgary Land Use Bylaw. http://lub.calgary.ca/ » Speed Management. Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development. 2016. » City of Edmonton. (2016). Winter Design Guidelines: transforming edmonton into a great winter city. Retrieved from https://www.edmonton. ca/city_government/documents/PDF/WinterCityDesignGuidelines_draft. pdf Images » City of Calgary Orthophotos. SANDS Archives. » Aerial Images from Google and Google Earth. » City of Calgary Historical Images. https://maps.calgary.ca/CalgaryImagery/ » James Shouldice Residence. http://cdm280501.cdmhost.com/cdm/ref/ collection/p280501coll7/id/993 » Ralph Klein Park Playground. https://calgaryplaygroundreview.com/ralphklein-park-playground/ » TransLink Wayfinding. http://appliedwayfinding.com/projects/translink/ » Beltline Murals. https://www.avenuecalgary.com/city-life/guide-to-calgarybump-murals/ » Calgary City Centre Wayfinding. http://www.calgarycitynews.com/2012/06/ city-of-calgary-launches-new-city.html » Rotary / Mattamy Gree ay. https://www.parksfdn.com/the-rotarymattamygree ay-1 » Calgary Public Art. https://curiocity.com/calgary/lifestyle/project-bikerack-is-calgarys-newest-public-art/ » Curbside Bioswale. https://archpaper.com/2015/04/new-york-city-use-90bioswales-help-clean-brooklyns-gowanus-canal/ » Housing Typology - Apartment. https://newhomelistingservice.com/ alberta/calgary/walden-place/3978 » Raised Crosswalk. https://chi.streetsblog.org/2013/01/31/eyes-on-thestreet-icy-potholed-downtown-alleys-need-raised-crosswalks/ » Bus Stop. https://www.citylab.com/transportation/2016/03/the-best-placefor-a-bus-stop/472188/ » Boulevard for Snow Storage. https://twitter.com/CyclistBartek/ status/940642832922107905 » Housing Typology - Single Detached. https://www.calgaryhomeboys.com/ calgary-detached-homes-for-sale.php » Safeway. https://canada247.info/explore/alberta/division_no_6/calgary/ northwest_calgary/safeway-montgomery-403-288-3219.html

» Temporary Sidewalk. https://twitter.com/dongho_chang/ status/748609256455168000 » Tree Lined Street. https://www.flickr.com/photos/bencito_ traveller/4755235891/ » Secure Bike Parking. https://www.soundtransit.org/blog/platform/parkride-new-secure-bike-parking-lockers-headed-to-station-near-you » Raised Crosswalk. https://twitter.com/dstn_m/ status/1000423833751511040 » Chinook Arc. https://creativemachines.com/sculpture/chinook-arc » Housing Typology - Rowhouse. https://engagerndsqr.com/faq » Live Work Unit. http://ktgy.com/e-r-b-fresh-live-work-concept-bringsshopkeeper-units-los-angeles/ » Floating Bus Stop. https://twitter.com/dongho_chang/ status/1216195058032136193?lang=en » Mixed Income Housing. https://www.gecarchitecture.com/londonderry » Riverwalk Wayfinding. https://www.cygnus.group/our-work/riverwalkpathway/ » 3D Crosswalk. https://www.boredpanda.com/3d-pedestriancrossing-island/?utm_source=google&utm_medium=organic&utm_ campaign=organic » Naturalized Playground. https://gree orkspc.com/ourwork/westmorelandpark-nature-based-play » Amphitheater. https://gree orkspc.com/ourwork/2018/8/28/meinigamphitheater » Natural Play Area. https://gree orkspc.com/ourwork/2018/8/21/columbiatech-centure-nature-play-area » Natural Discovery Park. https://gree orkspc.com/ourwork/2018/10/11/ discovery-park » Housing Typology - 3 Bedroom Apartment. https://killamreit.com/ apartments/calgary-ab/treo-sherwood » Santana Row. Federal Realty. (n.d.). Design for Walkability: an initiative to retrofit suburban communities. Retrieved from http://www. designforwalkability.com/casefive » Transit Station. Flickr. (2015). Near the Train Station in Bern, Switzerland. Retrieved from https://www.flickr.com/photos/toshio1/17020521127 » Steps. Horner, John. Howeler+Yoon. (2016). Downtown Crossing Plaza. Retrieved from http://www.howeleryoon.com/work/101/downtowncrossing-plaza » Shared Street. Project for Public Spaces. (2017). What is shared space? Retrieved from https://www.pps.org/article/what-is-shared-space 119

References » Bo01 Malmo Sweden. Baltic Urban Lab. (n.d.). Vastra Hamnen area – bo01 – waterfront regeneration in Malmo. Retrieved from https://www. balticurbanlab.eu/goodpractices/v%C3%A4stra-hamnen-area-bo01waterfront-regeneration-malm%C3%B6 » Traffic Circle. New Hampshire Department of Transportation. (n.d.). Roundabouts. Retrieved from https://www.nh.gov/dot/org/ projectdevelopment/highwaydesign/roundabouts/ » Viewing Platform. Sea to Sky Gondola. (n.d.). Spirit viewing platform. Retrieved from https://www.seatoskygondola.com/attractions/viewingplatforms/ » China House Vision 2018. https://www.dezeen.com/2018/10/02/chinahouse-vision-exhibition-beijing-design-week-future-homes/ » Inglewood Sunfest: Inglewood, Calgary. (n.d.). Retrieved from https://www. todocanada.ca/city/calgary/event/inglewood-sunfest/ » Wien Strandbar herrmann. Flickr. https://www.flickr.com/ photos/7301946@N03/419321312 » RiverWalk, AvenueCalgary. https://www.pinterest.ca/ pin/488288784570331204/ » Pathway Lighting. https://ncc-ccn.gc.ca/our-plans/showcase-illuminationproject-richmond-landing-shoreline-access#&gid=1&pid=3 » Contemporist Wafinding Public Art. https://www.pinterest.ca/ pin/521362094332173057/ » River Surfing, Cunovo Wave. http://riverbreak.com/spots/cunovo-riversurfing-bratislava/

120

RE-IMAGINING MONTGOMERY COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT PLAN

M G

MGR Planning & Consulting Jolene Moran

Cong Gu

Azadeh Rasouli

Prepared for Montgomery Community Association as part of University of Calgaryâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;s course EVDP644-Advance Professional Planning Project, Winter 2020

Prepared by MGR Planning & Consulting

Team Members Cong Gu Jolene Moran Azadeh Rasouli Yazdi

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

Faculty Instructor Prof. Francisco Alaniz Uribe

We would like to share our heartfelt thanks to everyone who lent their time and effort to the creation of this plan. In particular, we would like to extend our special thanks to the following: The Steering Committee: City of Calgary John Hall

April 24, 2020

CivicWorks Ben Bailey Montgomery Community Association Janice Mackett, Planning Committee Chair Marilyn Wannamaker Laura Kornfeld Neal Greywall

M G

Community members that attended our workshop

MGR Planning & Consulting Jolene Moran

Cong Gu

Azadeh Rasouli

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Executive Summary 01 Introduction.........................................5 Our Team Project Understanding Legal Framework Site and Context Overview Methodology

02 Site Analysis.......................................11 Historic Context Demographics Physical and Environmental Analysis Land Use Mobility and Connectivity Open Space Functional Analysis Summary

03 Public Engagement......................54 Neighbourhood Walk Community Workshop Summary of Opportunities and Constraints

04 Vision...................................................57

06 Connectivity and Mobility...............77 Overview Vehicle Network- Road Diets Transit Network Cycling Network Pedestrian Network Summary

07 Park and Open Space.......................98 Overview Green Network Green Infrastructure Phytoremediation on Contaminated Land Re-energizing the Riverfront New Spaces for Places Summary

08 Place-making Anchors..................129 Heritage Home Site 16th Ave Crossing Main Street Core on Bowness Road

09 Conclusion.........................................140 10 References.........................................141

05 Land use, Density & Built Form...58 Overview Residential and Mixed Use Development Commercial Land Use Districts Massing Shadow Analysis Guidelines for the Built Form Summary

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

MGR Planning and Consulting is pleased to present a Community Re-Development Plan for Montgomery, in the north west quadrant of Calgary. As The City continues to grow, inner city communities play a role in smart development and sustainable growth. We have taken the plan past the development phase to Re-Imagine Montgomery and propose some features, designs and strategies which may be realized in the short term, while others are more long term. We feel both are needed, can work together with phasing and as the community population grows to The City of Calgary estimates for 2042. The following document outlines past and current settings in the community, as well as a comprehensive site analysis with suggestions for future growth and development. This Community Re-Development Plan will aid in placement of sustainable land use, efficient mobility and connectivity and the efficient use of public realm. Our intention is to aid the community in decision making and provide future options for adapting current spaces to benefit all community members. We have also dreamed big for Montgomery to make it the Place to be, with special sites of interest, Place-Making Anchors. Practical solutions combined with future dreams are presented and will move Montgomery into the future.

INTRODUCTION

01 INTRODUCTION

1.1 TEAM INTRODUCTION MGR Planning and Consulting Jolene Moran Anthropologist, Biologist and Urban Planner / BSc., MPlan Jolene is a second year Master of Planning student at the University of Calgary. She has a background in public engagement, wildlife husbandry and management and experience studying in Switzerland. She brings with her a focus on bridging people with nature in the city.

M Azadeh Rasouli Yazdi Cong Gu Transportation Engineer, Urban Planner, Urban Designer/ BSc., MEng, MPlan Cong is a second year Master of Planning student at the University of Calgary. She has a background in transportation planning and consulting and experience studying in the United States, Switzerland and China. She is interested in how to connect people to places.

Community Redevelopment Plan

Architect, Landscape Architect and Urban Planner / BSc., MLA, MPlan

Azadeh is a second year Master of Planning student at the University of Calgary. She has a background in architecture and landscape architecture, with experience studying in Iran. She is interested in the psychology of human behaviour and how to design an inclusive community for all.

1.2 PROJECT INTRODUCTION The community of Montgomery is located in the north west quadrant of The City of Calgary and is considered an inner city community (Land Use Planning and Policy, 2005). Situated along the Bow River escarpment, and the Bow River, Montgomery has close access to numerous natural environments (Montgomery Community Association, 2019). Montgomery was an independent town, annexed by The City in 1963 (Montgomery Community Association, 2019). Montgomery has a population of roughly 4,000 residents as measured in 2016 by The City Census. Montgomery covers an area of three km squared and has a density of 1,290/ km squared (City of Calgary). The residents in Montgomery are varied, with 15% of the population between the ages of 0-14, which is slightly lower than the Calgary statistic of 19% (City of Calgary, 2016). Looking at seniors over 65, Montgomery has 12% which is two percent higher than Calgary (City of Calgary, 2016). The mean age of residents in Montgomery is 40 (Great News, n.d.) Our assumptions are as per the Calgary City Census Data, Montgomery can expect to see a population increase of 54% by 2042, to roughly 6, 200 people (City of Calgary, 2016). This projected population for Montgomery would actually not be new. Back around 1960, Montgomery had a population of around 6,000 residents. Regardless, Montgomery does need to accommodate new community members and those people will expect quality housing, services, amenities, adequate transportation and public spaces with parks and open space. Further assumptions include the need to stay the course with adapting to climate change. With possible extreme future weather patterns, we must be thinking about resilience and planning ahead. Offering alternate options for residents to commute to work, rather than driving a personal vehicle, to planting more street trees in the community along Main Street to link the urban canopy, to subdividing lots and having shared spaces with laneway housing options, we need to be forward thinking and look at alternate solutions. Trans Canada highway, or 16th Ave NW runs east-west through the community. This major thoroughfare is one site of two busy streets in Montgomery. Early in Montgomeryâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;s development the

primary road into the community acted as a generator for growth and establishment. However now this highway is seen as a separator and divides the community. This highway leads west out of Calgary to the mountains and is a gateway to The City moving east. The second busy street is Bowness Road. Trans Canada highway is a commercial corridor with many auto-centred uses. Bowness Road has a Main Street portion running between 43rd St and 46th St. NW. It is a challenge for any community to maintain a vibrant street realm with one Main Street and is even harder with two such streets two blocks away from each other, in the same community. The need to set good policy to establish these areas as regional and local destinations is important for Montgomery moving into the future. The City has identified these two streets as critical to future growth.

possible targeted development. Over four months we completed a process including a detailed analysis, a community workshop and draft plan presentations. Final completed recommendations are presented in this booklet. Our team vision is to work towards building inclusive, sustainable and resilient communities.

Montgomeryâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;s ARP states the communityâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;s residential vision for the future is to maintain a predominately low-density community feel, while building up to a form of good quality, medium density, along Bowness Road and 46th St. NW (Land Use and Planning Policy, 2005). This is a challenge as to maintain a vibrant and busy Main Street and Commercial Corridor, a larger population base would be beneficial to support the local businesses. Thus we need to strategically and sensitively plan where we can allocate 2,000 additional people to accommodate the future growth, while maintaining the community character and feel of the small town that residents have come to expect and enjoy. Montgomery has a great many natural areas close by, but the pathways and trails are needing links and improved connectivity to allow residents and regional users to better access and enjoy the parks and open spaces. There is also a critical need to create gathering places, within the public realm for residents to enjoy. Naturalizing boulevards with vegetation, improved amenities and services will be necessary for current residents to share in the future with new residents. This community plan is a joint effort with several contributing partners. The Montgomery Community Association is looking to explore options and possibilities regarding the future of the neighbourhood for planning growth. As such, The University of Calgary has partnered with the community association to consider MGR Planning + Consulting

01 INTRODUCTION

1.3 LEGAL FRAMEWORK Calgary's Municipal Development Plan

The Guidebook for Great Communities

The MDP is a statutory planning document that defines the vision for Calgaryâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;s growth and development over the next 30 to 60 years. It aims to build a city with a variety of housing types in unique communities. It works together with the Calgary Transportation Plan to provide multiple transportation options. It aims to create an environment that is financially sustainable, while protecting the natural environment and supporting a prosperous economy.

This document aims to implement the MDP and bridge higher level policies with local area plans and site-specific planning applications. The policies in the Guidebook are based on the following principles: opportunity and choice, health and wellness, social interaction, the natural environment, economic vitality, identity and place.

Calgary Transportation Plan CTP is a long-term plan that provides policy direction for how transportation options will be delivered to people for the next 60 years. CTP provides guidance for improving services in existing, new and developing communities, help the movement of people and goods throughout the city, enhance safety on roads, make walking, cycling and public transit a better option.

Community Redevelopment Plan

South Shaganappi Communities Sustainability Plan The Plan is governed by the seven underlying principles: strengthen the integrity of South Shaganappi by creating communities that enhance the quality of life; sustain community viability; high aesthetic standards; increase connectivity for pedestrians and cyclists; provide for mobility; achieve positive community benefits, integrity, and viability through gradual redevelopment that ensures adequate respect for context; assure community support for redevelopment by engaging citizens in a fair, open, transparent, and honest development process.

Montgomery Area Redevelopment Plan The Montgomery Area Redevelopment Plan is a statutory document. It is a planning document that sets out comprehensive land use policies to help guide the future of the community and must be considered in conjunction with other applicable statutory plans, bylaws and policy documents.

1.4 SITE AND CONTEXT OVERVIEW The subject study area is Montgomery, a desirable inner city community located in the north west quadrant of Calgary. It is an older, well established neighbourhood, with roots going back to early pioneers who settled in the area around 1880. This community is strategically located close to several important employment centres, including Market Mall, The AB Childrenâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;s Hospital, The Foothills Hospital and The University of Calgary. Montgomery also has several prime recreational amenities with its boundary, including the Shouldice Athletic Park and Aquatic Centre. Further unique features in the community include the physical environment with the Bow River and the slopes of the Bow River escarpment. The community is fortunate to have some green spaces. While Montgomery has a classic grid pattern in its street design, its auto-centred nature has created a less inviting pedestrian and cycling realm. Increasing development pressures include the need to accommodate more mixed uses and a variety of housing options.

NoseHill Park

Market Mall

Montgomery

Airport Childrenâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;s H. U of C Foothills H.

16th Ave Downtown

Our approach is multi-faceted with numerous steps and phases to our project. These are detailed in our Methodology.

Manchester

Our analysis and community engagement process has revealed Montgomery is made up of a diverse population with strong ties to the neighbourhood. A number of residents have lived here for an extended period of time. This is expressed in their fondness for the community. Through our analysis we have decided with pressures for redevelopment, residents need a variety of places to live, the ability to connect to services and access to parks and open spaces. As such, our community recommendations are divided into four sections; housing and development, mobility and connectivity, and public realm including parks and open space. An additional section on special sites is added to offer design ideas regarding improvements around the community for three areas of public realm.

Deerfoot Trail

Destinations Montgomery

MGR Planning + Consulting

01 INTRODUCTION

1.5 METHODOLOGY

Project Start Up

Learning about the site required the use of many tools, including maps. Information such as grid layout, road networks, block patterns, and building footprints can be revealed with the use of maps. A look at historical photos revealed changes in the neighbourhood patterns. Walking the site numerous times gave us clarity on the community prior to the workshop.

Inventory & Analysis

Further research included gathering a detailed breakdown of numerous materials. This included researching community issues. Next, we studied the physical environment such as topography, vegetation and slopes. A historic evolution included a timeline to reveal changes in Montgomery. A detailed evaluation of the census data to gain a picture of the community through demographics was conducted. A study of land use revealed the portion of the community where low density residential land use is focused. We further looked at housing typologies and zoning. A road network analysis, plus a look at the sidewalks, pathways, trails and cycle network was analyzed. We looked at the transit services in the area, plus the pedestrian network. Finally, we looked at public realm, combined with the parks and open space.

Community Redevelopment Plan

Synthesis

Model Construction: We built a physical model of the community which we were able to present to the community during the workshop. Open House We met with the steering committee members and some community members at an open house workshop to hear from the residents of Montgomery what they feel is going on in their neighbourhood. We bought large printed maps plus the physical model for the residents to work with. This engagement workshop hosted about 20 community members who each spent 2 hours with us, answering focused questions and telling us their side and story. We made sure to listen to their issues, hopes and concerns plus write down and record their comments. We focused on issues, constraints and opportunities. Finally, we had a few minutes at the end to reveal our poster analysis to a few residents.

Preliminary Concepts

After listening to the communities needs and wants during the open house, we were able to begin designing and planning interventions to help provide solutions to problems. We could also offer plans that were tailored to the communityâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;s requests and goals. Areas considered in our plans were Land Use and Density, Housing Typology, Mobility for pedestrians, cyclists and vehicles, Commercial Areas, and public realm, parks and open space. At this stage our design phase switched gears and due to health concerns with Covid19, we were now adapting to working from home rather than in school. From here our initial work plan was modified and group collaboration occurred over Skype, Zoom and by phone. We presented our concept designs via a PowerPoint MP4 and the steering committee was able to give us feedback on the beginning designs. From there we were encouraged to pursue our ideas and take those initial ideas to follow them through.

Final Concepts & Guidelines

We completed our final designs and put them together in a final PowerPoint MP4, which were played for a steering committee and our classmates. We received feedback on our community plans from numerous Montgomery Planning Committee Members, and Professional Planners working in various capacities throughout Calgary.

SITE ANALYSIS

02 SITE ANALYSIS

2.1 MONTGOMERY HISTORICAL CONTEXT

1924 Shouldice Ranch

Timeline 1911 Shouldice Park Electric Streetcar Line opened

Source: Glenbow Archives

1877 Eagle Rib, a Blackfoot Chief is one of many to sign Treaty 7

Shouldice Bridge is built, the only existing Pratt through truss bridge remaining in Calgary

1906

1915 Calgary Streetcar

Shouldice family purchase a ranch six miles west of Calgary

Source: Glenbow Archives

1926 School group near Shouldice Bridge

1912 Car driving up Brickburn Hill, revealing Bow River and Shouldice Bridge

Source: MGR

1946 General Sir Bernard Montgomery, for whom the community is named

1956 Montgomery Jr. High School built

Source: Glenbow Archives

Source: MGR

1943

1957

Shouldice Terrace and Town of Shouldice have post office issues resulting in local area renaming to Montgomery

Bowness Rd. direction is diverted, changes to highway which divides the community

Source: Glenbow Archives

Shouldice family home, a 25 room red brick mansion is build in 1911

Source: Glenbow Archives

1879 Mary & James Shouldice wed

1930

Source: Glenbow Archives

J. Shouldice is a pioneer rancher, one of the first in AB to breed Hereford cattle- Calgary, n.d.

1910

1952 Terrace Road Elementary School built

1937 Shouldice home converted into Calgaryâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;s first crematorium

1910 J. Shouldice donates 100 acres of ranch to The City of Calgary to be dedicated for park space

Community Redevelopment Plan

1921 Shouldice Park Italian Band

1931 View of Shouldice Bridge

Source: Glenbow Archives

1952 New home built in Montgomery

Source: Glenbow Archives

1962

1992 The Montgomery Recreation Centre is renamed the Montgomery Community Centre

1972

Montgomery Recreation Centre was built

Former Shouldice mansion and crematorium is torn down due to slope instability

1982 Archie Henderson of Montgomery plays in the NHL for the Hartford Whalers

Source: MGR

2002 Shouldice Park is renovated, adding picnic tables, pathways and landscaping

Montgomery is designated a town

1958 Safeway built

Source: MGR

1964 Bow River and Shouldice Bridge

Source: pintrest.com

Source: Glenbow Archives

Montgomery is annexed by The City of Calgary as Montgomery Mayor Kemp hands keys to Calgary Mayor MacEwan

1980 The former outdoor Shouldice Pool is renovated, enclosed and a dive tank is added

Source: MGR

2018 Shouldice Park boat ramp redevelopment opens

Source: MGR

2013 Significant 1-100 yr. flood occurs in Calgary, affecting parts of Montgomery, temporarily closing Shouldice Bridge

1986 A new Shouldice Bridge is built and the old one is used by pedestrians and cyclists

1971 Dairy Queen opens

1963

Source: Glenbow Archives

1979 Vast growth in Shouldice Athletic Park

2013 Montgomery Place building is completed along Main Street Bowness Rd.,with condos on top of small retails and restaurants, changing the street character

Source: Glenbow Archives

1958

Source: MGR

2018 Shouldice playground is upgraded to an accessible, inclusive space

Source: calgaryjournal.ca

Source: MGR Source: MGR

Source: MGR

1997 Safeway and Montgomery Shopping Centre redevelop to resolve circulation issues

Source: MGR

MGR Planning + Consulting

02 SITE ANALYSIS

2.1 HISTORICAL CONTEXT Historical Evolution On the Ground

The area now known as Montgomery was settled in the late 1880â&#x20AC;&#x2122;s. One family in particular, the Shouldice family established in this area in 1906. They became well known for ranching as agricultural pioneers. Over time the area grew and developed, seeing large growth shortly after 1952, when two schools in the area were built. The grid pattern and density developed around the schools and the main road, Bowness Road paired with Shouldice Bridge which generated development through accessibility.

Community Redevelopment Plan

The Shouldice Bridge and main road facilitate movement in the area, with the Shouldice mansion built.

1924

The Shouldice Bridge and main road act as generators for development in Montgomery, enabling density to establish.

1948

The completion of two schools in the area encourages the residents of Montgomery to set down family roots. Density continues to establish around the schools in a grid pattern.

1957

The community character changes when Bowness Rd. splits with the building of Safeway and with the expansion of Trans Canada Highway which evolves from a generator to a community separator.

1962

Further density is apparent with Bow Landing condos, Shouldice Terrace affordable housing and Bow View Manor seniorâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;s care centre being constructed.

1995

Changes around the Safeway parking lot and building orientation facilitate loading docks and ease of traffic flow. Shouldice Park has the addition of an inclusive playground.

2019

When Bowness Road splits after Safeway is built in 1958, and Trans Canada Highway cuts through the community, we see the road system turning from a community generator to a separator, around 1962. This is still happening today, the north and south sides of the community are divided by the highway. Our historical analysis revealed while Montgomery is rich in history, it is largely not celebrated, with two exceptions- the historic bridge and the named park space. This is a missed opportunity and can add pride, character and identity to the community.

MGR Planning + Consulting

02 SITE ANALYSIS

2.2 COMMUNITY PROFILE

Projected Local Population Growth

Community Profile: Who Lives in Montgomery? 2016 Census Data Snap Shot

Projected Population Increase in Calgary and Montgomery

62%

Population

Families with Children at Home

3975 (Montgomery)

56%

71%

66%

People by Age Range 15-64

Employment Rate

73%

66%

New Canadians 17%

Percent of Population

1, 222, 390 (City)

---- Increase by Over 50% in the Next 20 years

Calgary Montgomery

Source: Calgary Census Data 2016

Calgaryâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;s Population increases by 57% to an estimated 1.9 million. Montgomeryâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;s Population increases by 54% to an estimated 6,200.

22%

Households spending =>30% on shelter 23%

Age Breakdown ----High Share of Working-Age Population Demographic Changes in Population by Age Breakdown in Montgomery

$97,329

Indigenous Peoples

Median Household Income

$84,860 Source: Calgary Census Data 2016

Percent of Population

Age in Years

A comparison of Montgomery residents to Calgary residents.

Source: Calgary Census Data 2016

High proportion of working-age people, 43% of the population in 2016.

Community Redevelopment Plan

2.2 COMMUNITY PROFILE Household Composition

Shelter Affordability

Structural Type of Dwelling

----Majority of Population are Married Couples

Demographic Changes in Household Composition

----An Increase in Ownersâ&#x20AC;&#x2122; Spending on Shelter

Renters vs Owners Spending +30% of Household Income on Shelter

----Majority of Dwellings are Single Detached Homes

Occupied Private Dwellings by Structural Type in Montgomery

Type of Dwelling

Percent of Population

Census Year

Percent of Housing Type

Source: Calgary Census Data 2016

Recent trend of increase in home ownersâ&#x20AC;&#x2122; spending over 30% of income on shelter and a spike up 6% in 2016.

Roughly 40% of residents in Montgomery are married couples.

By 2016, single family homes are on the decline, formerly as high as 56% of the housing stock, falling to 32% of the housing stock.

Source: Calgary Census Data 2016

Household Income

Average Value of Dwelling

Housing Construction Year

----Significant Increases in Home Prices

Average Value of Dwelling in Calgary and Montgomery

Occupied Private Dwellings by Period of Construction

----Middle and Lower Incomes are Decreasing

Demographic Changes in Household Income

----Large Amount of Old Housing Stock

Construction Year

Value in Canadian $

Percent of Population

Income in Canadian $

Source: Calgary Census Data 2016 Source: Calgary Census Data 2016

Trend of higher incomes over $60,000 are significantly increasing, in over 50% of the population in 2016.

Over the last 25 years, the cost of homes in Montgomery has increased by $365,000.

Source: Calgary Census Data 2016 Percent of Housing Stock

Montgomery has a large percentage of housing stock built before 1980.

MGR Planning + Consulting

02 SITE ANALYSIS

2.2 COMMUNITY PROFILE Over the last 25 years the price of homes has increased significantly in Montgomery by $365,000.

Summary of Community Profile

Current Montgomery Population= 3,974 2042 Montgomery Population= 6,200

A look at the population and break down of who lives there is important to inform what systems and amenities to plan for the people living there.

Observations Lower incomes are decreasing while the higher incomes are increasing. Montgomery has a large working age population, fewer children and a number of seniors. Montgomery has a large stock of older single family homes.

Montgomery has a high proportion of working-age people, 43% are between the ages of 15-64.

MONTGOMERY

Conclusion With the future population increase, Montgomery must plan for an additional 2000 community members. The census date reveals the increasing cost of living in Montgomery is pushing out some of the population, a case of gentrification. A large portion of single-family homes were built before 1980 and provide opportunities for renovation and redevelopment, providing variety and choice for homeowners.

By 2016, single family homes are on the decline in Montgomery, formerly as high as 56% of the housing stock, falling to 32% of the housing stock.

Montgomery has a large portion of old housing stock, 60% of the dwellings were built before 1980.

As the cost of living in Montgomery increases, the amount of people with lower and middle incomes under $59,000 continues to decline.

Community Redevelopment Plan

The majority of the people living in Montgomery are married couples making up 39% of the population.

Montgomery has a trend for fewer children with 22% of families having children under 18 living at home.

2.3 PHYSICAL ENVIRONMENT

Montgomery has a significant slope along the north east part of the community where the escarpment runs into the river valley.

Topography 32nd Ave

er Riv

. St

05 11

MacKay Rd

e Av

d sR

Bo th

MacKay Rd

e Av

d sR

ve tA

21s

e Av

ve tA 21s

e Av

Shouldice Athletic Park

00 10 90

th 16

. St

s es wn

Shouldice Athletic Park

t 48

A’

1120

Bow

s es wn Bo

Home Rd

iver wR

Contour

32nd Ave

Home Rd

Slope of Area (%)

Bow R iver

1060 1070

Edworthy Park

250m

500m

250m

500m

106

1070

1065

Edworthy Park

1118m 1110m

Montalban Park

1100m 1090m 1080m 1070m

Bow River

1057m

The Height was Magnified 7X 0

0.25km

0.5km

0.75km

1km

1.25km

1.5km

1.75km

A’

2km

MGR Planning + Consulting

02 SITE ANALYSIS

2.3 PHYSICAL ENVIRONMENT Topography 32nd Ave

d sR

Fla

d sR

MacKay Rd

ve tA

21s

17-20

e Av

Northeast (22.5-67.5)

5-10

East (67.5-112.5)

Edworthy Park

Southeast (112.5-157.5)

Too steep for parking

South (157.5-202.5)

17-20

Too steep for driving

Southwest (202.5-247.5)

20-25

Limited climbing without stairs

25-30

N 0

250m

500m

33+ When a slope is greater than 17 %, it is not safe for driving. But such ALLYYC_HighwayRoadsMajorOnly slope has potential to be redeveloped as public space (with stairs) as shown on the map.

<VALUE

Bow R iver

Flat (-1)

0-5

16-17

<VALUE> North (0-22.5)

10-15 16-17

5-10

d sR

0-5

MacKay Rd

ve tA

21s

Bo ve hA

16t

DEM_small

10-15

Shouldice Athletic Park

Legend

Bow R iver

Max_Slope

x_Slope

e Av

. St

Hydrology

StreetNetwork

etNetwork

Legend

S th

Shouldice Athletic Park

d sR es wn

Home Rd

er Riv w Bo

32nd Ave

es wn Bo

er Riv w Bo

Slope Aspects

Home Rd

Slope of Road (%)

Community Redevelopment Plan

West (247.5-292.5) Northwest (292.5-337.5)

250m

500m

North (337.5-360)

Over 80% of the site has a great south, southwest or west facing sun exposure.

2.3 PHYSICAL ENVIRONMENT Water Flood

Predicted Natural Drainage Path

Environmentally Sensitive Area

32nd Ave

Home Rd

d sR

t 48

d sR

MacKay Rd

ve tA

d sR

e Av

Bow R iver

Bo th

MacKay Rd

Shouldice Athletic Park

d sR

ve tA

21s

t 46

e Av

h 6t

MacKay Rd

e Av

d sR

ve tA

21s

Shouldice Athletic Park

S th

e Av

er Riv Bo

h 6t

Bow

er Riv Bow

Home Rd

t 48

Shouldice Athletic Park

32nd Ave

Legend

Riparian Areas

Bow R iver

Bow R iver

zone_name

Edworthy Park Edworthy Park

2013 Flood Affected Area N 0

250m

500m

Areas affected in Montgomery by the most recent 2013 flood are shown in the gray cross hatch. These appear largely along the Shouldice Athletic Park Boat Launch under the Trans Canada bridge.

Inner Riparian Zone

Large drainage volume, erosion risk

Middle Riparian Zone Outer Riparian Zone

N 0

250m

Edworthy Park

Potential Outermost Riparian Zone

500m

Legend

There are four sites of erosion risk along the Bow Riparian Areas River in Montgomery. <all other values>

N 0

250m

500m

Montgomery has an extensive Riparian Zone due to its location along the river.

zone_name Inner Riparian Zone Middle Riparian Zone Outer Riparian Zone Potential Outermost Riparian Zone

MGR Planning + Consulting

02 SITE ANALYSIS

2.3 PHYSICAL ENVIRONMENT Urban Forest + Natural Area

View from Montalban Park

Summary of Physical Environmental System Analysis An environmental analysis is important to look at the physical components that influence the site and inform our team of areas we can highlight and bring to front.

32nd Ave Home Rd

Observations The slope of Montalban Park is significant and must be considered prior to developing around this area. Knowing Calgary is in a prairie ecosystem, water is precious and looking at water flow and stormwater management running off the slope should be considered. There is a large gap in the tree canopy in Montgomery along the urban corridors while the river park system has good tree canopy coverage.

t 48

MacKay Rd

ve tA

e Av

d sR

uldice etic

21s

e Av

Bow R iver

Conclusion Areas prone to flood and erosion should be studied and avoided for development. The environmentally sensitive riparian areas along the river in Shouldice Park are an excellent buffer for future flooding and should be preserved. The direction of the dominant slope is creating a unique opportunity for sun exposure and grand views.

Edworthy Park

N 250m

500m

We can see Montgomery has a fair tree canopy along the river park system, but more trees are needed within the urban context.

There is a grand view from Montalban Park to the south and west.

Community Redevelopment Plan

2.4 ZONING, LAND USE AND BUILT FORM Current Zoning

According to bylaw 1P2007, this map represents the current land use districts in the community. In the next section, a detailed explanation of each district is provided.

R-C1 R-C1s R-C1N R-C2 R-CG

Contextual dwelling Contextual one dwelling (suite) Contextual doweling - narrow parcel one Dwelling Duplex and semi-detached Rowhouse, duplex semi-detached (grade oriented infill)

M-C1 M-CG M-X1 M-U1 M-U2

Multi-residential contextual Multi-residential grade oriented Multi-residential commercial Mixed use (general) Mixed use

C-C1 C-COR2 C-O

Commercial Commercial corridor Commercial office

Direct control

S-R S-SRP S-FUD S-CS S-CRI S-UN S-CI

Special purpose – recreation district Special purpose – school and parks Special purpose – Future urban development Special purpose – community service Special purpose – city and regional infrastructure Special purpose – urban nature Special purpose – community institution district

N 0

250m

500m MGR Planning + Consulting

02 SITE ANALYSIS

2.4 ZONING, LAND USE AND BUILT FORM Current Zoning R-C2

R-C1 R-C1s

Residential – Contextual One / Two Dwelling (RC2) District The Residential – Contextual One / Two Dwelling District is intended to accommodate existing residential development and contextually sensitive redevelopment in the form of Duplex Dwellings, Semi-detached Dwellings, and Single Detached Dwellings in the Developed Area. Bylaw 1P2007

Contextual One Dwelling (R-C1) (R-C1s) District The Residential – Contextual One Dwelling District is intended to accommodate existing residential development and contextually sensitive redevelopment in the form of Single Detached Dwellings in the Developed Area. Parcels designated R-C1s are intended to accommodate a Secondary Suite as a permitted use on the same parcel as a Single Detached Dwelling. Bylaw 1P2007

N 0

250m

500m

250m

500m

R-C1N

R-CG

Residential – Contextual Narrow Parcel One Dwelling (R-C1N) District The Residential – Contextual Narrow Parcel One Dwelling District is intended to accommodate existing residential development and contextually sensitive redevelopment in the form of Single Detached Dwellings in the Developed Area on narrow or small parcels. Bylaw 1P2007

The Residential – Grade-Oriented Infill (R-CG) District: Accommodates existing residential development; accommodates grade-oriented development in the form of Rowhouse Buildings, Duplex Dwellings, Semi-detached Dwellings and Cottage Housing Clusters. Accommodates Secondary Suites and Backyard Suites with new and existing residential development; provides flexible parcel dimensions and building setbacks that facilitate integration of a diversity of gradeoriented housing over time; and accommodates site and building design that is adaptable to the functional requirements of evolving household needs. Bylaw 1P2007

N 0

250m

Community Redevelopment Plan

500m

N 0

250m

500m

2.4 ZONING, LAND USE AND BUILT FORM Current Zoning M-C1

M-X1

The Multi-Residential – Contextual Low Profile District: Is intended to apply to the Developed Area; has Multi-Residential Development that will typically have higher numbers of Dwelling Units and traffic generation than low density residential dwellings and M-CG District; provides for Multi-Residential Development in a variety of forms; has Multi-Residential Development of low height and medium density; allows for varied building height and front setback areas in a manner that reflects the immediate context. Bylaw 1P2007

The Multi-Residential – Low Profile Support Commercial District: Is intended to provide for Multi-Residential Development with support commercial uses in the Developed Area and the Developing Area; has Multi-Residential Developments that will typically provide higher numbers of Dwelling Units and traffic generation than low density residential dwellings, and the M-G and M-CG Districts; provides for Multi-Residential Development in a variety of forms; includes a limited range of support commercial multiresidential uses, restricted in size and location within the building. Bylaw 1P2007

N 0

250m

500m

250m

500m

M-CG

N 0

250m

500m

M-U1 The Mixed Use – General District is intended to: Be located along commercial streets where both residential uses and commercial uses are supported at grade facing the commercial street; accommodate a mix of residential and commercial uses in the same building or in multiple buildings throughout an area; and respond to local area context by establishing maximum building height for individual parcels. The Mixed Use – General District should only be located where a local area plan, or other policy, supports land use and development aligned with the purpose statements in subsection. Bylaw 1P2007

The Multi-Residential – Contextual GradeOriented District: Is intended to apply to the Developed Area ; has Multi- Residential Development that will typically have higher numbers of Dwelling Units and traffic generation than low density residential dwellings; has Multi- Residential Development designed to provide some or all units with direct access to grade; provides for Multi- Residential Development in a variety of forms; has Multi- Residential Development of low height and low density; allows for varied building height and front setback areas in a manner that reflects the immediate context. Bylaw 1P2007

N 0

250m

500m

MGR Planning + Consulting

02 SITE ANALYSIS

2.4 ZONING, LAND USE AND BUILT FORM Current Zoning M-U2

C-COR2

Mixed Use – Active Frontage is intended to: Be located along commercial streets where active commercial uses are required at grade to promote activity at the street level; promote developments with storefronts along a continuous block face on the commercial street; accommodate a mix of commercial and residential uses in the same building; respond to local area context by establishing maximum building height for individual parcels. The Mixed Use - Active Frontage District should only be located where a local area plan, or other policy, supports land use and development aligned with the purpose statements in subsections. Bylaw 1P2007

The Commercial – Corridor 2 District is intended to be characterized by: Commercial development on both sides of streets; buildings located varying distances from streets; limited automotive uses; primary access for motor vehicles to parcels from streets and lanes; parking located on any of the front, side or rear of buildings; pedestrian connections from public sidewalks, to and between buildings; opportunities for residential and office uses to be in the same building; varying building density established though maximum floor area ratios for individual parcels; and varying building height established through maximum building height for individual parcels. Bylaw 1P2007

N 0

250m

500m

250m

500m

C-C1

C-O

The Commercial – Community 1 District is intended to be characterized by: Small to mid-scale commercial developments; developments located within a community or along a commercial street; one or more commercial uses within a building; motor vehicle access to sites; pedestrian connections from the public sidewalk to and between the buildings; building location, setback areas and landscaping that limit the effect of commercial uses on nearby residential districts; and opportunities for residential and office uses to be in the same building as commercial uses. Bylaw 1P2007

The Commercial – Office District is intended to be characterized by: Buildings containing select uses that contribute to locations of high employment; a limited number of other uses that support Offices; locations along or near major roads and transit facilities; pedestrian connections; varying building density established through maximum floor area ratios for individual parcels; and varying building height established through maximum building height for individual parcels. Bylaw 1P2007

N 0

250m

Community Redevelopment Plan

500m

N 0

250m

500m

2.4 ZONING, LAND USE AND BUILT FORM Current Zoning S-R

S-FUD

The Special Purpose – Recreation District is intended to:

The Special Purpose – Future Urban Development District is intended to: Be applied to lands that are awaiting urban development and utility servicing; protect lands for future urban forms of development and density by restricting premature subdivision and development of parcels of land; provide for a limited range of temporary uses that can easily be removed when land is redesignated to allow for urban forms of development; and accommodate extensive agricultural uses prior to development to urban uses. Bylaw 1P2007

Accommodate a range of indoor and outdoor recreation uses; provide for complementary uses located within buildings occupied by indoor and outdoor recreation uses; and be applied to parcels of various sizes with a greater range of use intensities. The Special Purpose – Recreation District should not be applied to land dedicated as reserve pursuant to the Municipal Government Act or its predecessors. Bylaw 1P2007

N 0

250m

500m

250m

500m

S-SRP

S-CS

The Special Purpose – School, Park and Community Reserve District is intended to: Provide for schools, parks, open space, and recreation facilities; and have parcels of various sizes and use intensities. The Special Purpose - School, Park and Community Reserve District should only be applied to land dedicated as school reserve, municipal school reserve, community reserve, public reserve, and reserve pursuant to the Municipal Government Act or its predecessors. Bylaw 1P2007

The Special Purpose – Community Service District is intended to: Accommodate education and community uses located in buildings; accommodate a limited range of small scale, public indoor and outdoor recreation facilities; and have limited application to parcels that are not designated reserve pursuant to the Municipal Government Act or its predecessors. Bylaw 1P2007

N 0

250m

500m

N 0

250m

500m

MGR Planning + Consulting

02 SITE ANALYSIS

2.4 ZONING, LAND USE AND BUILT FORM Current Zoning S-CRI

S-CI

The Special Purpose – City and Regional Infrastructure District is intended to provide for: Infrastructure and utility facilities; vehicle maintenance, work depots and training centres related to facilities and systems for public transportation; and uses operated by Federal, Provincial and Municipal levels of government. Bylaw 1P2007

The Special Purpose – Community Institution District is intended to: Provide for large scale culture, worship, education, health and treatment facilities; provide for a wide variety of building forms located throughout the city; and be sensitive to the context when located within residential areas. Bylaw 1P2007

N 0

250m

500m

S-UN The Special Purpose – Urban Nature District is intended to: Be applied to lands that have either been set aside for the purpose of preserving existing characteristics of a natural plant or animal community or which are undergoing naturalization; provide for natural landforms, vegetation, and wetlands; and limit development to improvements that facilitate passive recreational use. The Special Purpose - Urban Nature District should be applied to land dedicated as environmental reserve pursuant to the Municipal Government Act or its predecessors. Bylaw 1P2007 N 0

250m

Community Redevelopment Plan

500m

250m

500m

2.4 ZONING, LAND USE AND BUILT FORM Current Land Use Home Rd

er Riv w Bo

32nd Ave

s es wn

S th

MacKay Rd

ve tA

e Av

d sR

Bo th

Shouldice Athletic Park

21s

e Av

Bow R iver

Open space Edworthy Park Residential- Low Residential-Medium and Low Residential-Medium Mixed Commercial Recreational Institutional

N 0

250m

500m

Single detached Duplex Fourplex Multi-residential Recreational Institutional / Office Mixed-Commercial Industrial

MGR Planning + Consulting

02 SITE ANALYSIS

2.4 ZONING, LAND USE AND BUILT FORM Current Building height 32nd Ave Home Rd

er Riv es wn Bo

Bow

S th

d sR

th 16

e Av

h 6t

MacKay Rd

e Av

d sR

ve tA

21s

Shouldice Athletic Park

Bow R iver

1 Level 1 and 1/2 Storeys 2 Storeys Edworthy Park 2 Storeys/1 Storeys Combo 3 Level Split 4 Level Split 5 Level Split Bilevel Bungalow/ 1 Storey

N 0

250m

500m

Map revealing allowed building heights based on current zoning in green. White shows the actual building on the ground.

Community Redevelopment Plan

2.4 ZONING, LAND USE AND BUILT FORM Housing Typology

32nd Ave

Single-family House

Duplex

S th

MacKay Rd

e Av

d sR

ve tA

21s

Fourplex Bow R iver

dworthy Park

Single-detached Duplex Fourplex Multi-family N 0

250m

Multi-family House

500m MGR Planning + Consulting

02 SITE ANALYSIS

2.4 ZONING, LAND USE AND BUILT FORM Zoning and Building Typology

C-O

C-COR2

Height 10 – 12m

currently no housing

C-C1

Height 16 – 22m

Height 10m

currently no housing

Single family

M-U2 Height 16 – 22m

Duplex

M-U1

M-X1

M-CG

Height 9 – 14 m

R-CG

R-C2

R-C1N

Height 8.6 – 11m

R-C1s

Height 14m

Height 12m

Townhouse Rowhouse Fourplex

M-C1

Multi-family low-rise

R-C1

Height 8.6 – 10m

Multi-family medium-rise

40m 15m

38m

40m

84m 40m

Community Redevelopment Plan

2.4 ZONING, LAND USE AND BUILT FORM Zoning and Housing Typology

R-CG

R-C2

R-C1N

R-C1s

R-C1

Single family 805 units 45% of the total units

Typical built form and parcel size

40m 15m

Existing examples in the community

MGR Planning + Consulting

02 SITE ANALYSIS

2.4 ZONING, LAND USE AND BUILT FORM Zoning and Housing Typology

M-C1 Duplex 235 units 13% of the total units

Typical built form and parcel size

40m 15m

Existing examples in the community

Community Redevelopment Plan

R-CG

R-C2

R-C1N

R-C1s

R-C1

2.4 ZONING, LAND USE AND BUILT FORM Zoning and Housing Typology

M-U2

M-U1

M-X1

M-CG

M-C1

R-CG

Townhouse Rowhouse fourplex 510 units 28% of the total units

3 Typical built form and parcel size

40m

Existing examples in the community

MGR Planning + Consulting

02 SITE ANALYSIS

2.4 ZONING, LAND USE AND BUILT FORM Zoning and Housing Typology

M-U2 Multi-family low-rise Combined with next category 245 units 13% of the total units

Typical built form and parcel size

Existing examples in the community

Community Redevelopment Plan

38m

40m

M-U1

M-X1

M-CG

M-C1

2.4 ZONING, LAND USE AND BUILT FORM Zoning and Housing Typology

M-U2

M-U1

M-X1

M-CG

Multi-family medium-rise Combined with Previous category 245 units 13% of the total units

5 Typical built form and parcel size

84m 40m

Existing examples in the community

MGR Planning + Consulting

02 SITE ANALYSIS

2.4 ZONING, LAND USE AND BUILT FORM Zoning and Commercial Typology

C-O

Existing examples in the community

Old Strip Mall

C-COR2

Dairy Queen

Mixed Retail with Condos Above Old commercial complex

Days Inn Motel Medical Centre

Community Redevelopment Plan

Gas Station

C-C1

2.4 ZONING, LAND USE AND BUILT FORM Summary of Zoning, Land Use and Built Form Analysis

We need to balance the need for density to support the livelihood in the community along a commercial street and Main Street, with the communities desire for maintaining a low density residential form, of primarily single family homes. The current zoning map reveals what is able to be developed with greater density than what is currently on the ground.

Conclusion Build form is divided, separated by the Trans Canada Highway. Along the highway we see predominately commercial uses on either side. Some density radiates out from there and gradually steps down into the community.

The current land use map reveals what is actually built on the ground.

We find a large portion of Montgomery, about half is zoned for single family homes, at R-C1 for which secondary suites are prohibited. This discourages residents from adding secondary suites, which can help with affordability issues.

Observations

A few parcels have been re-designated as RC1S and they are accommodating laneway housing or secondary suites.

- Density is concentrated along the commercial corridors of 16th Ave and Bowness Road. - Density is not being realized to its full potential, currently by only half. - We see no residential use along 16th Ave. - The gas stations have low height.

The areas along Bowness Road are great opportunities to add sensitive densification in Montgomery with great amenities.

MGR Planning + Consulting

02 SITE ANALYSIS

2.5 MOBILITY & CONNECTIVITY Traffic Volume

10000

18000

16000

18000

Bow Riv

22000 0

2010

37 0

Edworthy Park

34000

2200

e Av

230 ve tA

MacKay Rd

Edworthy Park

0 N

2005

Edworthy Park

21s 0 0d 00 0s0R 13 3e7s

Bow Riv

36000

2001

e Av Shouldice Athletic Park

0 270

e Av

Bow Riv

MacKay Rd

38000

d sR es

01st A 0 002 00 Rd 40 ness

e Av

0 340 22000 00

er 00 Riv

2100

e Av

d sR

Shouldice Athletic Park

. St

MacKay Rd

ve 0 t A 00

0wn 00Bo

21s

e Av

Shouldice Athletic Park

t 48

d sR es

th 16

S th

410

Bow t.

220

d sR

er Riv

12000

h 8t

Home Rd

430 Bow

18000

32nd Ave

Home Rd

24000

12000

0 00 17

er Riv

Home Rd

Bow

0 00 18

340

32nd Ave

29000

17000

12000

11000

32nd Ave

Home Rd

32nd Ave

19000 19000

120

11000

12000

13000

340

18000

100

11000

22000

13000

0 23000 2300

36000

31000

34000

3100

Road and Street Network

N 250m

S th

35000

5000

18000

MacKay Rd

10000

12000

28000

110

22000

10000

16000

11000 21000

10000 12000

15000

32nd Ave

9000

40000

Bow

ve tA

MacKay Rd

21s

e Av

d sR

33000 23000

Bow Riv

2015

35000

Bow R iver

15000

33000

e Av

MacKay Rd

Shouldice Athletic Park

d sR

Bow Riv

e Av

0Ave 0 010st 700 122 3

27000

240

d sR

Shouldice Athletic Park

8000 7000

e Av

9000

16000

er Riv

Home Rd

390 Bow

Home Rd

32nd Ave

d sR

ve tA

21s

500m

35000

250m

Edworthy Park

2018

Edworthy Park

35000

N 0

Skeletal Roads/ Highway Arterial Roads Collector Roads

Edworthy Park

Residential Roads Pathway N 0

250m

500m

Community Redevelopment Plan

250m

500m

N 0

250m

500m

250m

500m

on Bowness Bowness Road Road on 2.5 MOBILITY & CONNECTIVITY 8.5 8.5

Road Sections

2.5 2.5

4.7 4.7

2.5 2.5

2.1 2.1

3.2 3.2

ROW18.2 18.2 ROW

32nd Ave

Home Rd

er Riv e wn Bo

Bow

A-A’

Bowness Road & 45- 46 St. NW

t 48

on Bowness Bowness Road Road aa on

MacKay Rd

e Av

d sR

B-B’

ve tA

A-A’

Shouldice Athletic Park

21s

e Av

1.3 1.3

Bow R iver

Edworthy Park

N 0

B-B’

250m

500m

Building Frontage Sidewalk Street Tree Parking Lane Travel Lane Surface Parking Lot Property Line

2.5 2.5

1.2 1.2

2.5 2.5

4.7 4.7

2.5 2.5

1.2 1.2

5.5 5.5

3.0 3.0

1.5 1.5

ROW17.2 17.2 ROW

16th Ave & 45- 46 St. NW

21.0 21.0

6.2 6.2

1.4 1.4

2.4 2.4

4.0 4.0

2.8 2.8

1.4 1.4

8.0 8.0

ROW25.2 25.2 ROW

MGR Planning + Consulting

02 SITE ANALYSIS

2.5 MOBILITY & CONNECTIVITY Road Sections 20 Ave NW & 47- 48 St. NW

C-C’

Home Rd

Bow

er Riv e wn Bo

Area Area

32nd Ave

C-C’

9.7

1.3

2.3

e Av

9.7

D-D’

1.3

2.3

4.6

d sR

MacKay Rd

ve tA

Bo 16

Shouldice Athletic Park

21s

e Av

ROW 12.2 4.6

2.3

Bow R iver

2.3

1.3

10.5

1.3

10.5

ROW 12.2

Edworthy Park

N 0

250m

500m

Area on Bowness Road Building Area on Bowness Road Frontage Sidewalk Street Tree Parking Lane Travel Lane Surface Parking Lot Property Line

l Area on Bowness Road Community Redevelopment Plan al Area 42on |Bowness Road

D-D’

8.5 8.5

Bowness Road & 42- 43 St. NW

1.3 1.3

2.5 2.5

4.7 4.7

4.7 ROW 18.2 ROW 18.2

4.7

2.5 2.5

2.1 2.1

3.2 3.2

2.5 MOBILITY & CONNECTIVITY Transit System

Bus Route #1

Bus Route #53

Bus Route #40

Bus Route #408

The following maps show the bus routes as serviced in Montgomery.

MGR Planning + Consulting

02 SITE ANALYSIS

2.5 MOBILITY & CONNECTIVITY Bus Route #422

Bus Route #695

Bus Stops

40 422 695

408

BRT Route #305

2.5 km

The purple dots show the bus stops in Montgomery.

Community Redevelopment Plan

2.5 MOBILITY & CONNECTIVITY 32nd Ave

er Riv es wn Bo

Bow

Home Rd

Walking Accessibility

d sR

th 16

BRT Stations Walkshed

600 m walkshed from Terrace Road . School St th

Walkshed from 32nd600m Ave

d sR es

th e Av

er Riv

t 48

d sR

S th

wn Bo

Bow

Bow R iver

Edworthy Park

MacKay Rd

ve tA

21s

wn d sR

MacKay Rd

e Av

d sR

ve tA

21s

e Av Shouldice Athletic Park

Bow R iver

e Av

d sR

Bow R iver

600 m walkshed from Foundations for theSt. Future Charter Academy, High School th 48 Campus

Home Rd

er Riv Bo

e Av

Bow

Shouldice Athletic Park

MacKay Rd

500m

32nd Ave

d sR

ve tA

21s

N 250m

h 6t

e Av

t hS

Schools in Montgomery

Home Rd

MacKay Rd

ve tA

Shouldice Athletic Park

32nd Ave

21s

e Av

Edworthy Park

Edworthy Park Bow R iver

N 0

250m

Edworthy Park

500m

250m

500m

67% of the residential areas are within 600 m walkshed from two BRT stations.

250m

500m

The walkshed analysis using 600 m of the Terrace Road School and Foundations for Future Academy Campus reveal the Terrace Road School is well centred in the community.

MGR Planning + Consulting

02 SITE ANALYSIS

2.5 MOBILITY & CONNECTIVITY Walking Accessibility 600m Walkshed from Grocery Store (Safeway) 32nd Ave

d sR

Bow R iver

MacKay Rd

e Av

d sR

Shouldice Athletic Park

t 21s

e Av

d sR

e Av

MacKay Rd

t 21s

e Av

There is mediocre walking access around the grocery store and community association, considering the importance in the community of these two locations.

th 16

Shouldice Athletic Park

d sR

er Riv es wn Bo

Bow

Home Rd

er Riv es wn Bo

Bow

600m Walkshed from Montgomery Community Hall 32nd Ave

Bow R iver

Edworthy Park

N 250m

500m

600m Walkshed from Food Service

32nd Ave

d sR

e Av

More than 60% of Montgomery borders the river, but only a small portion of locals have walkable river access, due in part to the Athletic Park.

d sR

s ne

MacKay Rd

ve tA

21s

w Bo

Shouldice Athletic Park

MacKay Rd

s es

ve tA

21s

e Av

Shouldice Athletic Park

S th

A walkshed analysis reveals the majority of the community have a variety of food service options which are walkable.

er Riv Bo

Bow

Home Rd

er Riv

500m

600m Walkshed from River Access

32nd Ave

Bow

250m

Bow R iver

Edworthy Park

N 0

250m

500m

Community Redevelopment Plan

250m

500m

2.5 MOBILITY & CONNECTIVITY 32nd Ave

Home Rd

Walking Safety S

d sR

Traffic Incidents Heat Map

Dangerous Intersections

th 16

er Riv w Bo

h 8t

t 16

15 incidents

d sR

s es

e Av th

es wn

e Av

6 incidents

MacKay Rd

t 21s

t 46

e Av Shouldice Athletic Park

Home Rd

es wn Bo

32nd Ave

S th

MacKay Rd

ve tA

Incident time: 11/17/2018 09:02:53 PM One pedestrian was involved.

d sR

ve hA

13 incidents

16t

Edworthy Park

5 incidents

Shouldice Athletic Park

21s

e Av

Bow R iver

N 0

250m

500m

Source: data.calgary.ca

Areas of greater concern shown in red on the heat map

5 incidents

Bow R iver

Incident time: 01/08/2020 05:43:30 PM One pedestrian was involved, multiple lanes were blocked.

5 incidents Edworthy Park

Intersection with high rate of traffic incidents (since 2017) Traffic incidents that involved a pedestrian N 0

250m

500m

Factors that may cause pedestrian incidents: • Crosswalk is too wide without middle median rest stops. • The pedestrian signal phase is too short. • Obstructed views of the intersection. • Vehicular speed over limit. • Poor street lighting.

MGR Planning + Consulting

02 SITE ANALYSIS

2.5 MOBILITY & CONNECTIVITY Cycling System

Summary of Mobility & Connectivity Analysis

Existing Cycling Network

Bicycle Count

A review of the mobility and connectivity is critical to understand how all road, pathway and sidewalk users can get to their daily needs.

Observations • The road system is highly prioritized in Montgomery, with Trans Canada highway and Bowness Road cutting through the neighbourhood. • Pedestrians and cyclists are second class citizens with limited access to numerous services and limited transit. • Despite the classic grid block pattern, pedestrians feel cut off physically from the north to the south side of the community.

32nd Ave Home Rd

er Riv Bo

Bow

d sR

t 48

16 e Av

MacKay Rd

e Av

https://maps.calgary.ca/BicycleCount2016/

d sR

ve tA

21s

Shouldice Athletic Park

Conclusion

h 6t

Bow R iver

Designated Bike Lane

Huge strides have been made in cycle track implementation. As such, Montgomery is fairly connected with its surroundings, via the bicycle network.

Edworthy Park

Shared pathway

N 0

Community Redevelopment Plan

250m

500m

Road sections are revealing wide travel lanes with little enclosure for human scale. Wide travel lanes can easily adapt to bike lanes and wider sidewalks. There are numerous points of conflict with traffic incidents along several roads occurring frequently, which should be addressed. The Main Streets initiative can bring attention to pedestrians and focus on creating a place for gathering. There is a large opportunity to design and plan improved river access for all residents and regional users.

2.5 PUBLIC REALM Green Space + Amenities

Sports Area Inventory

13 Ball Diamonds 1 Batting Cage 32nd Ave

Home Rd

er Riv

10 Soccer Fields (5 in schools)

Bow

While Montgomery has a large portion of park space, it is largely programmed in sports fields throughout Shouldice Athletic Park. This is not accessible to all residents.

S th

d sR

16 t

MacKay Rd

1 Basketball Court

e Av

d sR

ve tA

21s

e Av Shouldice Athletic Park

3 Football Fields

t hS

Bow R iver

1 Tennis Court

Park Sport Area Natural Area Off-Leash Area

Edworthy Park

Pathway Playground Seating 0

200M

N 0

250m

500m

MGR Planning + Consulting

02 SITE ANALYSIS

2.5 PUBLIC REALM Open Space Typology

Summary of Public Realm Analysis 2.5% 2.6%

Parks, Open Spaces and Public Realm are important systems which add to the social, economic and environmental well-being of a community and its residents.

32nd Ave

Home Rd

iver R w

81.3%

Observations

S th

d sR

16 t

MacKay Rd

There are few spaces for public gathering and a lack of public realm.

e Av

d sR

ve tA

21s

e Av Shouldice Athletic Park

There is a limited amount of local and neighbourhood parks.

t hS

Bow R iver

Edworthy Park

N 0

Community Redevelopment Plan

250m

500m

â&#x20AC;˘ While the community has ample park space, it is deceiving, as it is concentrated in one type, which is not very diverse or integrated. â&#x20AC;˘ The pathways, trails and cycle systems need improvement for local users to get to open spaces easier and safer.

Conclusion Green infrastructures can be added to service stations to help combat pollution. The lack of public gathering spaces offers the chance to retro-fix and breath new life into underutilized spaces.

2.6 FUNCTIONAL ANALYSIS Kevin Lynch argues that for any given city, a corresponding set of mental images exist in the minds of the people who experience that city. Contributing to those images are five qualities which Lynch identifies as Paths, Edges, Districts, Nodes, and Landmarks.

Bowmont park

Home Rd

iver R w Pool

Boat ramp

Montalban Park

Bowmont Community Centre

S th

Church

4 Shopping Center and district

d sR

Dairy Queen

32nd Ave

Elementary school

Field Goal Posts

th e Av

ve tA

Montgomery Place

Jr. High school

e Av

d Bow sR

Commercial district

MacKay Rd

Community hall

Shouldice Athletic Arena Park

21s

. St h t district Main street 46

Recreational Area

a ro d

Natural e

dge of th

River Boe w River

Edworthy Park

N 0

200M

250m

500m

MGR Planning + Consulting

02 SITE ANALYSIS

2.7 Summary

CONSTRAINT

River access Bike node View opportunity Very steep slope Major commercial destination Bike lane Safety concern Transit stop (BRT) Potential for social gathering Social gathering place Sub neighbourhood park Community disconnection Barrier 2013 flood Winter programing opportunity Noise pollution Off-leash park

OPPORTUNITY

Unique potential of sun exposure in the visual connectors and on the hill

Access to River and the walking path

No specific pedestrian circulation is happening between key destinations Opportunity for proposing new programs in Montalban Park

Visual connection to the main street along the local streets, visual connection paired with walkable paths At the initial phases of community development, 16th Ave played a role as the generator of the community. After changing into a highway, the character of the street changed into the separator of the community.

Accessibility to mountains and exiting Calgary

As a gateway to the city, it is not inviting enough

Along the highway are Auto-oriented uses associated with a highs-peed road rather than a local main street

Community Redevelopment Plan

Easy accessibility to downtown The community centre is not walkable as a gathering area

Strengthen the link between the north and south sides of the community along Trans-Canada highway.

The paradox of speed and road design

PUBLIC ENGAGEMENT

03 PUBLIC ENGAGEMENT

3.1 THE PROCESS Public engagement is an important part of the planning process. It can include several phases over the span of multiple weeks or a few months. Our timeline began with a site walking tour hosted by a few members of the Montgomery Community Association Planning Committee. The next phase included a Community Workshop. The final phase was to be an Open House, which may still occur, depending on the changing situation surrounding the Covid19 crisis. The public engagement process is our opportunity to gain local knowledge from those that live there and experience their community daily. Such insights may not be captured in analysis.

3.2 NEIGHBOURHOOD WALK On January 29 we began our public engagement with a meeting of the Montgomery Community Association Planning Committee. Following introductions at the community hall, we toured the neighbourhood, walking the streets and using a boots on the ground approach to see and hear the community issues, dreams and needs for future planning. This gave us an opportunity to learn about the community, from the community. We traveled around numerous sites, moving through residential streets, Main Street, around Montalban Park and up the escarpment to the heritage home site. We came back down to Trans Canada highway felt the challenges of crossing 16th Ave to return back to the community centre. During the tour we took notes and photos to record important sites.

Community Redevelopment Plan

On February 29, our class had the opportunity to host a community workshop in the Montgomery Community Hall.

3.3 COMMUNITY WORKSHOP FEEDBACK

32nd Ave

Home Rd

On February 29 our class had the opportunity to host a community workshop in the local hall. Planning committee members attended, plus local residents. We broke up into small groups with two students per table to facilitate community member feedback around two - 25 minute discussion points: community opportunities and constraints. We had large site maps printed out at each work table for the residents to mark, draw and write their ideas and concerns. Following this we had a few minutes for community members to look over our initial analysis posters.

What We Heard Map

iver R w wn

t. 7

d sR

t 48

d sR

e Av

Bo 9

ve tA

Shouldice 12 Athletic Park

MacKay Rd

21s

e Av

1. Disconnected parks/ river access 2. Need for gathering places 3. Underutilized parks/ lack of programming 4. Amazing view 5. More trees around playground are needed 6. Lack of river access 7. Cut-through traffic 8. 16th Ave is a barrier 9. Main Street is not a pleasant walk 10. Unsafe pedestrian crossing 11. 16th Ave is not human-scaled 12. Community Hall is not accessible 13. 16th Ave feels unsafe and too fast 14. Problem with noise and pollution during the development process of the neighbouring parcels 15. More density and lack of parking area 16. The community members prefer to see no added density in the low-density area 17. Adding density along Bowness Road is desired 18. Weak pedestrian connection to Bowmont natural area 19. The desire path towards University District 20. Lack of some public amenities like library and gym 21. Steep and slippery slope for students walking to school

t hS

Bow R iver 2

Edworthy Park

N 0

250m

500m

MGR Planning + Consulting

04 Through place-making we will strive to find a balance between density, connectivity and open space.

VISION

Our vision for the future of Montgomery is a connected, resilient and dynamic community, a great place for all to live. Our goals are to connect through place-making and find a balance between sensitive and strategic density placement, connectivity and open space. We will create space for a range of housing types, improve connections and mobility for all and enhance the open space to highlight Montgomeryâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;s identity. We envision building a complete community by joining existing residents needs with identified future city plans and developments. The City of Calgary has a Main Streets Plan for Bowness Road and a Commercial Corridor Plan for 16th Ave (Land Use Planning & Policy, 2012). These areas are identified as areas of future significant importance and as vital community assets (Land Use Planning & Policy, 2012). As such these locations need consideration and attention now, to grow with the community. As an inner city neighbourhood, Montgomery has pressures to densify and support the goals of the MDP. We will endeavour to suggest ways Montgomery can sensibly increase with strategic placement of a variety of housing options to include a diverse population creating a dynamic community. We will suggest and create transportation infrastructure to improve circulation, mobility and create improved connectivity for Montgomery, regionally and locally. Finally, we will offer sustainable and resilient designs regarding public realm, parks and open space to add to the existing green spaces and ensure they carry us into the future.

LAND USE, DENSITY & BUILT FORM

05 LAND USE, DENSITY & BUILT FORM

5.1 OVERVIEW Montgomery is predominantly a low density residential community. The current built form and density is not enough to support business along the main streets and create a vibrant public realm. There is a lack of a transition from low density housing all the way to the commercial areas. Coherence and continuity in the built form is not well defined. New infill developments are happening within the community and we need to redirect this added density in a way that it will contribute to the future goals. In this section, we look forward to achieving a good neighborhood in terms of the built form by pursuing these main policy and goals.

Goals • Providing more housing and commercial choice to attract a diverse population. • Create continuity and coherence in the built form • Providing enclosure and creating active human scale environment on the main street. • Encourage densification within the existing fabric by adding laneway housing and secondary suits • Considering the character and scale of the residential areas in the process of commercial development

General Policy • • Design guideline Distributing density by adding to the missing middle housing typology • Strategically placing of density along the main street corridors to encourage movement and active life on the street and support local businesses

Community Redevelopment Plan

Built form in Montgomery

5.1 OVERVIEW Legal Framework Calgary's Municipal Development Plan The MDP is a statutory planning document that defines the vision for Calgaryâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;s growth and development over the next 30 to 60 years. It aims to build a city with a variety of housing types in unique communities.

Low Density Residential Housing Guidelines for Established Communities This document is to be used as a supplementary guide to the Land Use Bylaw and the Montgomery Area Redevelopment Plan. It places strong emphasis on encouraging quality and character street and community development based on design elements.

The Guidebook for Great Communities This document aims to implement the MDP and bridge higher level policies with local area plans and site-specific planning applications. The policies in the Guidebook are based on the following principles: opportunity and choice, health and wellness, social interaction, the natural environment, economic vitality, identity and place.

MGR Planning + Consulting

05 LAND USE, DENSITY & BUILT FORM

5.2 RESIDENTIAL AND MIXED USE DEVELOPMENT The current population of residents in Montgomery is 3,975 people and there are 1,785 private dwellings occupied. Considering the population growth rate of 54%, by 2042, Montgomery will house 2,150 more residents. According to the census data, the average household size in Montgomery is 2.22 People per household. This means that nearly 970 new residential units should be added to accommodate the population change. We need to make sure that with the new housing policies, this number will be realized.

Newmarket, Ontario

greatplacesincanada.ca

Newmarket, Ontario

greatplacesincanada.ca

Policy and Goals • Providing more housing and commercial choice to attract a diverse population. • Adding density while maintaining the low density and small-town character of the neighbourhood • Adding to the missing middle housing typology • Encouraging a range of housing types for all ages, household sizes, household types and incomes. • Maintaining the unique view • At the workshop session the community members mentioned that they are not ready or willing to accept significant density added to the community, therefore we have decided to limit the height of the buildings to six storeys.

Milan’s Chinatown, Italy

www.mydomaine.com

Gulch, Nashville

www.mydomaine.com

Site-Specific Policy for Bowness Road Main Street • • Design Mixingguideline housing and commercial use on Bowness Road Main Street to support local shops

Downtown Toronto www.mydomaine.com

Community Redevelopment Plan

New Orleans, Louisiana

localtours.com

5.2 RESIDENTIAL AND MIXED USE DEVELOPMENT Change in the overall proportion of housing types compare between 2011 and 2016

5.2.1 Calculating Building Types and Units

Structure type 2011 Based on federal data

2016

Change in proportion based on federal data

To create a good urban form, the new units should be distributed within the community in a sensitive and strategic way. The single family buildings will be transformed into duplexes, townhouses, rowhouses or multi-family buildings. For those owners who are not willing to destroy the current building on the lot and rebuild a new one, we propose developing laneway houses or secondary suites. This is a gentle way of adding more units to the current low density residential area.

Single-detached house

38%

31%

-7%

Duplex

+1%

Semi-detached house

11%

16%

+5%

Row house

23%

Apartment -5 storeys

+1%

Apartment +5 storeys

12%

11%

-1%

Main Street Bowness will be the intensification corridor as discussed with the members of the community. We propose having commercial use at grade along Bowness Road, but there will be no residential mixed use building along 16th Ave. because of the noise, pollution and safety concerns. In order to achieve a reasonable proportion of housing typology mix, we need to consider the development trends in the community and balance the outcomes with the density that can create a desired urban form.

Change in the overall proportion of housing types compare between 1991 and 2016

We looked at the proportion of building structures between 1991, 2011 and 2016 in Montgomery and we studied the changes in theses proportions. After that, we projected this change on the current proportion of housing mix. The other method we used to calculate the distribution of units between housing types was by considering the growth rate of the number of units in each category from 2011 to 2016. Most reliable results were from the comparison of type proportions from 1991 to 2016. The number of anticipated duplexes was relatively high based on the results from this comparison. We decided to redistribute a portion of duplexes in multifamily units.

Structure type 1991 Based on federal data

2016

Change in proportion based on federal data

Single-detached house

47%

31%

-16%

Duplex

+6%

Semi-detached house

16%

+9%

Row house

24%

23%

-1%

Apartment -5 storeys

+4%

Apartment +5 storeys

11%

Target housing density heat-map MGR Planning + Consulting

05 LAND USE, DENSITY & BUILT FORM Development Trends Structure type Number of new units based on number growth rate from 2011 to 2016

Number of units 2011

Number of units 2016

Number of units changed

Change rate

Number of new Number of new units based on the units modified rate (970 total)

Single-detached house

925

830

-95

-10.3%

-83

Duplex

465

655

+190

+40.8%

+262

Row house and threeplex and Fourplex

555

615

+60

+10.8%

+67

Multi-family low-rise

190

225

+35

+18.4%

+40

Multi-family medium-rise

295

286

Number of new units based on Percentage growth rate from 2011 to 2016

Number of new units based on Percentage growth rate from 1991 to 2016

Structure type

2016 based on City data

Growth rate from 2011 to 2016

Estimation by 2042

Estimated number of units (total=2,755)

Current number of Number of new units units by 2042

Modified number of new units

Single-detached house

45%

-7%

38%

1,049

805

244

Duplex

37%

+5%

42%

1,157

655

502

Rowhouse, threeplex and fourplex

137

169

Apartment

14%

+1%

15%

413

245

168

299

Structure type

2016 Based on City data

Growth rate from 1991 to 2016

Estimation by 2042

Estimated number of units (total=2,755)

Current number of Number of new units units by 2042

Modified number of new units

Single-detached house

45%

-16%

29%

798

805

-7

Duplex

37%

+15%

52%

1432

655

777

127

Rowhouse, and threeplex and fourplex

-1%

110

270

Apartment

14%

+4%

18%

495

245

250

600 (300, 280)

Balancing the development trends in the community and good built form 62

Community Redevelopment Plan

The results from this method of estimation is not close to population projections in 2042

5.2 RESIDENTIAL AND MIXED USE DEVELOPMENT Low density Low height

5.2.1 Calculating Building Types and Units

Building Typology We need to scale the amount of density that we are proposing to where we are locating, this is called density modeling. Itâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;s a method of translating built form density to land use density specifically residential land use. A connection should be made between the built form that we are proposing and the numbers of the new units. To calculate the area required for each housing type we can use to methods, one is for the low density residential and the other method is for the multi-family buildings.

Method 1, Low-Density No Single-family unit will be added. The owners might decide to rebuild a single-family building in their lot and we encourage them to incorporate secondary suites or laneway houses. There is a trend of developing semi-detached and duplexes in the community and we anticipate this trend to continue. The older homes that are not in a good shape are in the priority for semi-detached development. The semidetached will add one unit to the lot and the rowhouse will add approximately three units to the lot. By multiplying the number of available parcels we can calculate the number of added units for these building typologies.

40m 15m

Low/Medium density Low /Medium height

40m 15m

40m

Medium density Medium height

40m

38m

84m 40m

Single family

Duplex

Townhouse Rowhouse fourplex

Multi-family low-rise

M u l t i -f a m i l y medium-rise

600m2

1,600m2

1,520m2

3,360m2

Number of units in each building

Number of total new units needed

127

270

300

280

Number of new buildings needed

127

Aprox 67

Aprox 20

Aprox. 4

Available area in the community

50,400 m2

58,200 m2

34,200 m2

Equals to how many single detached parcels?

Aprox 2.5

Aprox 5.6

Coverage area on the parcel for multi-family

583 m2

2,550 m2

Type name Average lot size

111,000 m2

15m

40m

Typical single-family parcel size as a measuring reference: 600m2

Precedent in Montgomery

MGR Planning + Consulting

05 LAND USE, DENSITY & BUILT FORM

Method-1

Estimated number of units needed 127 unit

Semi-detached and duplex infill: how many single detached parcels can change? (not narrow parcel) adding 1 unit per parcel :189 Total units added: 189

270 unit

Row-houses infill: how many single-detached parcels can change? Adding 3 units per parcel (not narrow parcel): 84 Total units added: 262

A Method-2

300 unit

Multi-family low-rise infill (4 storeys): how many single detached parcels can change? (not narrow parcel): 97 = 38 parcel Available

2 1 2

280 unit

Multi-family Med-rise infill (6 storeys): how many single detached parcels can change? (not narrow parcel) 57 = 10 parcel Available

C D

2 3

Area of intensification

2 3

Method 2, Medium-Density We have assumed that the average unit size in the multi-family buildings is 150m2 and we know the building footprint of the multi-family precedents in the community. By dividing the numbers we can calculate the number of units in each storey and by multiplying that number to the number of storeys can calculate the average total number of units in each building. We also know the approximate number of single-family lots that each building covers and using those numbers we can calculate the area needed for the total number of buildings.

N 0

Community Redevelopment Plan

250m

500m

5.2 RESIDENTIAL AND MIXED USE DEVELOPMENT

Area allocated to each building type in the block Duplex

Rowhouse Fourplex

Multifamily low-rise

Multifamily MedRise

9000m2

600m2

4800m2

5400m2

600m2

3600m2

9000m2

600m2

3600m2

6000m2

600m2

4200m2

2400m2

10200m2

1200m2

4200m2

3600m2

1200m2

3600m2

1800m2

1200m2

4200m

4800m2

5400m2

600m2

6600m2

5400m2

7800m2

600m2

4800m2

3600m2

600m2

5400m2

2400m2

3600m2

5.2.2 Area allocation

Bowness rd

This map demonstrates the available area for each building typology in the intensification corridor. Some of the existing buildings are or single-family or they have been newly redeveloped. These lots are

crossed on the map and they are not in the priority for adding density. Some blocks contain several colors and they can accommodate different building types. MGR Planning + Consulting

05 LAND USE, DENSITY & BUILT FORM

5.2 RESIDENTIAL AND MIXED USE DEVELOPMENT 5.2.3 Distribution Of Buildings Along the Main Street

Bowness rd

In this map you can see one alternative way of placing the buildings needed along main street Bowness. As discussed earlier we need a few number of multi-family medium rise and all of them are mixed with commercial at grade to create a active frontage to the street. Other multi-family low-rise, townhouse and rowhouses are distributed in the intensification area are shown.

An example of multi-family medium-rise that occupies a land equal to approximately 5.6 typical single-family lots An example of multi-family low-rise that occupies a land equal to approximately 2.5 typical single-family lots An example of combination of rowhouses that occupies a land equal to approximately 3 typical single-family lots

Community Redevelopment Plan

5.3 COMMERCIAL Goals According to the commercial land use, the main goals are: • Creating a commercial destination in local and city scale along both 16 Ave. and Bowness Road. • Diversifying the businesses and by doing so, enhancing the resilience of the community. When the community has a diverse commercial combination, businesses can support each other and the community remains active during the day, the week and the year. • Supporting small local and independent shops. By doing so we can contribute to the identity of the community. Encouraging local business might be opposed by the regulations of some stores like Safeway if they are located in the close proximity, but we need to consider that small retails are essential for achieving a lively main street. • Encouraging more cafes, restaurants and food services. At the moment, community members are asking for more places to gather and eat. • Renew older or vacant businesses. Along both Bowness road and 16th Ave, there are some vacant commercial spaces, revitalizing these areas and rebuilding older shops to provide affordable commercial space, can play a significant role in bringing life to the street. • Creating active frontages and permeable enclosure along Bowness Road Main Streets.

2 1 3

C-O

C-COR2

C-C1

M-U2

M-U1

In the pictures there are some measures for creating a better commercial and mixed-use environment: 1. Adding the pedestrian friendly mixed use neighbourhood node on Bowness road. 2. Providing a business link between 16 Ave. and Bowness Road via 46 St. This corridor will further continue within the community and towards Montalban park and we are proposing a small parcel of mixed use at the end of 46th St. 3. Reducing the allowable height on 16th Ave. to 18m for more consistency with the overall massing of the community 4. Creating a connected body of commercials along 16th Ave. 5. Revitalizing the Safeway area 6. Adding businesses to the intersection on 16th Ave and 43rd St. 7. Adding mixed use district to 19th St. The current land use codes of MU1 and MU2 can accommodate all these goals along Bowness Road and we do not need to recommend land use changes there.

Existing and proposed commercial spaces MGR Planning + Consulting

05 LAND USE, DENSITY & BUILT FORM

5.4 LAND USE DISTRICTS In order to achieve a better urban environment, we need to apply changes to the current land use policies. These maps summarize the land use changes discussed in previous sections. R-C1 R-C1s R-C1N R-C2 R-CG M-C1 M-CG M-X1 M-U1 M-U2 M-U1

M-U1

C-C1 C-COR2 C-O

M-U1

h18

R-C2

C-COR2

R-C2

C-COR2

S-R S-SRP S-FUD S-CS S-CRI S-UN S-CI

C-COR2

N 0

Proposed Land use map 68

Community Redevelopment Plan

250m

500m

Proposed Land use map

250m

500m

5.5 MASSING Main Street Bowness Road

The main change in the built form will happen in the intensification area and along Bowness Road. The main goal was to provide enclosure and creating human scale environment on the main street. The diagrams are representing the overall massing of the proposed density. Lack of continuity and coherence is one of the issues with the overall massing along the main streets in Montgomery. One of the purposes for distributing the density instead of concentrating it in towers is creating a better urban fabric. Studying the precedents of massing distribution reveals that both density and shape of the building contribute to the quality of the public realm. Better articulation and arrangement of the buildings creates a more unified whole compared to separated large boxes.

The overall massing on Bowness road

Massing Precedents

archdaily.com

Myuniversitydistrict.ca

MGR Planning + Consulting

05 LAND USE, DENSITY & BUILT FORM

5.6 SHADOW ANALYSIS

10:00 AM

12:00 PM

16:00 PM

Main Street Bowness Road

ss Rd

Mar 21

Jun 21

Rd w

Dec 21

ss Bo

Community Redevelopment Plan

The shadowing impact of the building heights should be studied in the intensification area along Bonewss Road. Assuming the proposed massing, the table shows the shadow casted on Bowness Road on 21st of March, June and December. There are three factors that are contributing to achieving more sun exposure on the public realm: Placing most of the multi-family mixed-use buildings on the north side of the street, the proposed setbacks on the upper floors and limiting the building heights to six storeys. Community member were concerned about building height and shadowing of the future developments. The existing MU1 and MU2 codes on the street allow for maximum of 22 meters height, but regarding the future density requirements, we have decided to not include buildings taller than six storeys.

5.7 GUIDELINES FOR THE BUILT FORM 5.7.1 Parcel Typology in the Intensification Area

Parcel Type

Parcel width

Parcel depth

Area

Shape

Access to street

Access to back lane

Typical parcel

15m

40m

600m2

Rectangle

Yes

Narrow parcel

7.5m

40m

300m2

Rectangle

Yes

Consolidated

Varies

40m

Varies

Rectangle

Yes

Proposed consolidation

Varies

40m

Varies

Rectangle

Yes

Irregular parcel

Varies

Irregular

Yes

Multifamily low-rise

Multifamily Med-rise

Zone A

Duplex

Rowhouse

Zone A Zone B Zone C Zone D

Zone B

Zone C Zone D Bowness rd

Typical parcel Narrow parcel Consolidated Proposed consolidation Irregular parcel

Corner lot

Not in priority for development

MGR Planning + Consulting

05 LAND USE, DENSITY & BUILT FORM

5.7 GUIDELINES FOR THE BUILT FORM 5.7.1 Parcel Typology in the Intensification Area

The intensification area is a mix of different parcel types and each type can accommodate different buildings: • Typical parcel is a 40m by 15m parcel and it is the DNA of all the parcels in Montgomery. • Narrow parcel is half of the typical parcel with 7.5m frontage. • Consolidated parcels are those which have already been consolidated for additional density. • Proposed consolidation is for the parcels that are located in areas with higher potential for added density. • Irregular parcel, there are 10 irregular parcels in the whole intensification that are not rectangle shaped • Corner lots are the parcels located on the four corners of the block. Rowhouses are encouraged for the corner lots. In general and compared to the rest of the parcels on the block, corner lots can accommodate more density. Corner buildings will provide a distinct architectural appearance with a high level of detailing that continues around the corner, with articulated facades oriented towards both streets. Corner buildings should frame intersections well. These sites can help to enhance visual connectivity and orientation within the community. There are four zones indicated on the map. Based on the density distribution, each zone can include different building types: • Zone A, the densification happens in the form of duplex infill in this zone. • Zone B, duplexes and rowhouses will be replaced with singlefamily detached houses in zone B. • Zone C, this zone is a mixture of rowhouses and multi-family low rise buildings. • Zone D, mixed use buildings in the form of rowhouses, multifamily low and medium-rise will intensify this zone.

Height in the intensification area and along 16th Ave up to 10 m up to 11m up to 12m up to 14m up to 16m up to 18m

N 0

Community Redevelopment Plan

250m

500m

5.7.2 Laneway housing

Current laneway housing in the neighbourhood

Laneway housing is encouraged in the single-detached or duplex parcels for adding more density and yet maintaining the low-density character of the neighbourhood. There are a few parcels re-designated as R-C1s and they are accommodating laneway housing. We anticipate this trend to continue in the future, as we did not face any rejection from the community regarding this housing type.

General Guideline for Laneway Housing • Laneways should be pedestrian oriented with high quality pavement. • The suite should respect the privacy of the neighbours. • The design of the laneway housing and the main dwelling on the site should be integrated. • Laneway house should have direct access to the lane. • Landscaping should contribute to the quality of the final product. The location of the laneways in the residential area 32nd Ave

Vancouver

Toronto

Home Rd t.

t 48

MacKay Rd

ve tA

e wn

dice tic

21s

e Av

t 46

vancourier.com

e Av

Guelph

lga-ap.com

Vancouver

landlord.net

Toronto

Bow R iver

Edworthy Park

N 0

250m

500m

guelphmercury.com

vancouver.ca

blogto.com

MGR Planning + Consulting

05 LAND USE, DENSITY & BUILT FORM

5.7 GUIDELINES FOR THE BUILT FORM 5.7.3 Design Guidelines

This section aims to present the rules and regulations in order to: • • • • •

• • •

Provide design criteria that ensures a consistently high standard of architectural design. Provide assurances of a level playing field to Developers and Homebuilders and The City. Establish a positive and memorable visual image for built form within new developments and contribute to the quality of life. Promote harmonious and attractive developments. Establish the appropriate siting of buildings, having regard for dwelling type, size, architectural style and location within the community. To ensure compatibility among buildings. To assist builders, designers and home buyers in achieving problem free construction. To provide a framework for the physical layout, massing and relationships of built form to ensure a quality living environment with an identifiable image.

Vision and Principles: • • • • • • • •

Environmental sustainability Healthy community (pedestrian and cyclist comfort) Crime Prevention Through Environmental Design (CPTED) Low-Impact Development Sense of Community Creating a strong public realm and varied streetscape Walkable and pedestrian-oriented development Human scaled environment

Texture palette

General Guideline • New development should be designed in a manner which is responsive to the local context • Building location and orientation should maintain 5 hours of consecutive sunlight on one side of the street. (Milton III-75 land limited Architectural control Guidelines,2018) • Materials used for the front facade should be carried around the building or at a minimum to the side building facades. (Sanderling Property ,2012) • Contrasting materials, patterns, textures, lighting and color should be incorporated to create interest, focus, unity, and compatibility for building entrances and accent areas or features. • Harmonious variety of massing and architectural expression among publicly exposed building elevations is encouraged (Clarington General Architectural Design Guidelines, 2011) • Through the use of alternative facade treatments, massing, roof line, materials, colors. • Buildings adjacent or opposite one another should be compatible in massing and height. Extreme variation in massing should be avoided. • Effective built form transitions should be applied within single buildings, between buildings on a site, on a block, and across areas of the City. • Built form transitions are applied to reduce the shadow, view and overlook impacts for adjacent residents, open spaces and future building occupants. • Materials used for the front facade should be carried around the building or at a minimum to the side building facades. • Contrasting materials, patterns, textures, lighting and color should be incorporated to create interest, focus, unity, and compatibility for building entrances and accent areas or features. • Transitions to adjacent properties should also consider existing building open space separation distances.

Source: MGR, Inspired by Aspen lakes Architectural design guidelines

Color palette

Source: MGR, Inspired by Aspen lakes Architectural design guidelines

Community Redevelopment Plan

5.7.3 Design Guidelines General Guideline • Building should be designed to suit the site topography conditions. • Building setbacks should define the street edge and create a visually ordered street scape. • Garages shall be subordinate to the overall building facade to contribute to a comfortable pedestrian environment. (Town of Aurora architectural control process, 2012) • Buildings should be sited to define the street edge. This is typically achieved by placing the habitable portion of the dwelling close to the minimum front yard setback to promote a pedestrian-friendly sense of scale and provide enclosure to the public space of the street. • Controlled variation in front yard setbacks is desirable on long, straight street blocks to provide visual relief, where lot depths permit. Haphazard variation in setbacks should be avoided. (St. James Plantation Design Guidelines, 2018) • The setbacks of new development should respect the established street pattern. • Parcel coverage for new development should include all proposed and future accessory buildings. • One on-site parking spaces should be provided for each new dwelling unit. • The privacy of adjacent residences should be respected in the placement of windows. (Clarington General Architectural Design Guidelines, 2011) • New developments in established communities should enhance the street scape, through the retention of healthy mature trees and planting. Any mature trees which cannot be retained should be replaced at a value consistent with what has been removed. (St. James Plantation Design Guidelines, 2018)

Guidelines for Each Typology

General Guideline for Rowhouse

General Guideline for Duplex

• Contains three or more Dwelling Units, located side by side and separated by common party walls extending from foundation to roof (Bylaw 1P2007) • One façade of each Dwelling Unit directly faces a public street (Bylaw 1P2007) • Each Dwelling Unit has a separate direct entry from grade to an adjacent public sidewalk or an adjacent public street (Bylaw 1P2007) • No Dwelling Unit is located above another Dwelling Unit and may contain a Secondary Suite within a Dwelling Unit in a district where a Secondary Suite is a listed use and conforms to the rules of the district. • The maximum density is 50 units per hectare (Bylaw 1P2007) • The minimum parcel area is 160.0 square metres for a parcel containing an individual Dwelling Unit in a Rowhouse Building or Townhouse. (Bylaw 1P2007) • The maximum parcel coverage is 60.0 per cent of the area of the parcel for each Rowhouse Building or Townhouse. (Bylaw 1P2007) • The minimum building setback from a front property line is 2.0 metres for a laned parcel (Bylaw 1P2007) • The minimum building setback from any side property line is 1.2 metres. (Bylaw 1P2007) • For a corner parcel, the minimum building setback from a side property line shared with a street is 1.2 metres (Bylaw 1P2007) • There is no requirement for a building setback from the property line on which a party wall is located that separates two or more Dwelling Units. (Bylaw 1P2007) • The maximum building height is 11.0 metres. (Bylaw 1P2007)

• The maximum parcel coverage is 45.0 per cent of the area of a parcel. (Bylaw 1P2007) • The minimum building setback from a front property line is 3.0 metres. (Bylaw 1P2007) • For a laned parcel, the minimum building setback from any side property line is 1.2 metres.(Bylaw 1P2007) • There is no requirement for a building setback from the property line upon which the party wall is located.(Bylaw 1P2007) • For a corner parcel, the minimum building setback from a side property line shared with a street is 1.2 metres. (Bylaw 1P2007) • Where a corner parcel shares a side property line with a street, building setback from that side property line is 1.2 metres. (Bylaw 1P2007) • The maximum building height is 10.0 metres. (Bylaw 1P2007) Material palette

Source: MGR, Inspired by Aspen lakes Architectural design guidelines

MGR Planning + Consulting

05 LAND USE, DENSITY & BUILT FORM 5.7.3 Design Guidelines

Guideline for Mixed Use Multi-Family Medium-Rise

Guidelines for Each Typology

• Residential units are not allowed on the ground floor (Bylaw 1P2007) • Buildings are typically between four and six storeys in height (Bylaw 1P2007) • Provide a defined street wall typically two to six storeys in height and proportional to the width of the street (Bylaw 1P2007) • Have building façades with multiple uses and frequent entries at grade facing the commercial street; (Bylaw 1P2007) • Have significant proportions of transparent glazing on building façades for street facing uses located at grade (Bylaw 1P2007) • Designed to be compatible with active, street-oriented commercial uses (Bylaw 1P2007) • Signs may be located in any setback area (Bylaw 1P2007) • Where the widest dimension of a balcony faces a property line shared with another parcel, the minimum setback of a balcony from the shared property line is 4.0 metres. (Bylaw 1P2007) • Each unit must have at least one window or door with a glazed area with a minimum dimension of 1.0 metre. (Bylaw 1P2007) • The minimum height of the ground floor of a building is 4.0 metres as measured vertically from the floor to the ceiling. (Bylaw 1P2007) • For a Dwelling Unit, there is no minimum height of the ground floor of a building. (Bylaw 1P2007) • Units and individual uses located at grade with an exterior wall facing a street must provide individual, separate, direct access to grade, an entrance that is visible from the street; and sidewalks that provide direct exterior access to the unit or the use. (Bylaw 1P2007) • The length of the building façade that faces the commercial street must be a minimum of 80.0 per cent of the length of the property line it faces. (Bylaw 1P2007) • Lobbies or entrances for upper floor uses must not occupy more than 20% of the at grade façade facing a street. (Bylaw 1P2007) • The third story should have a 3 meters setback from the main street. (Bylaw 1P2007) • The façade of a building located on the floor closest to grade and facing a street must provide windows with glass that occupy a minimum of 65.0 per cent of the façade between a height of 0.6 metres and 2.4 metres. (Bylaw 1P2007) • A public sidewalk must be located along the entire length of each property line shared with a street. (Bylaw 1P2007) • Mid-Rise buildings should be no longer than 80 metres in length. Longer buildings must be broken up by building components that are sufficiently set back or of different heights to visually appear as two separate buildings from grade. (Bylaw 1P2007) • Parking should be underground or at rear yards. (Bylaw 1P2007)

Guideline for Multi-Family Residential Low-Rise • A unit in a Multi-Residential Development that is located on the floor closest to grade must have an individual, separate, direct access to grade and an entrance that is visible from the street that the unit faces. (Bylaw 1P2007) • The minimum building setback from a property line shared with a lane is 1.2 metres. (Bylaw 1P2007) • The minimum building setback from a property line shared with another parcel is 1.2 metres. (Bylaw 1P2007) • The maximum building height is 12.0 metres. (Bylaw 1P2007)

Guideline for Mixed Use Multi-Family Low-Rise • The maximum floor area ratio is 3.0 (Bylaw 1P2007) • The minimum density for building is 60 units per hectare and there is no maximum density for parcels (Bylaw 1P2007) • The minimum building setback from a property line shared with a street for a street-oriented multi-residential building is zero metres. (Bylaw 1P2007) • The minimum building setback from a property line shared with a lane is 1.2 metres. (Bylaw 1P2007) • The minimum building setback from a property line shared with another parcel is 1.2 metres. (Bylaw 1P2007) • The maximum building height is 16.0 metres. (Bylaw 1P2007) • Parking should be placed away from main street. (Bylaw 1P2007) • Trees should separate parking lots from residential units (Bylaw 1P2007) • No garages should face Main Street (Bylaw 1P2007)

Community Redevelopment Plan

5.8 SUMMARY To have access to affordable housing is a basic need. Through our analysis we found that prices of homes increased dramatically in the last 25 years in Montgomery. With a growing population and The City of Calgary’s Census estimates to expect more than 2000 new residents, the community is looking for solutions to plan ahead for the much needed housing (2016). Montgomery currently has a low density form for residential land use and the community would like to preserve that character and feel of a small town. We put forth solutions to aid in this desire, while strategically and sensitively placing density where it can be supported. We strived to achieve a diverse housing mix to offer a diverse population. We put forth policy to place density along the Main Street corridors and provide for the missing middle. We further strived to increase density via laneway housing and secondary suites. This is a way to effectively add double occupancy within one parcel, while maintaining the low density form the residents are wanting to preserve.

MOBILITY & CONNECTIVITY Source: https://calgary.ctvnews.ca/i-ve-definitely

06 MOBILITY & CONNECTIVITY

6.1 OVERVIEW Improving how a community travels to itsâ&#x20AC;&#x2122; destinations is vital. No one wants to send more time than necessary to travel to the final location. The sooner you arrive, the more time you have to carry on with your day. This chapter will explore how Montgomery moves and connects through roads, transit, cycling and pedestrian possibilities. Following The City of Calgaryâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;s Transportation Sustainability Triangle, we will be placing pedestrians first, by offering solutions for improved safety and reduced dependency on private vehicle use. We will further be promoting cycling and transit use, by offering policy to aid in these three modes of transport.

Cycling

Walking

Several policy documents and guidebooks relevant to mobility will be introduced. A review of the findings of the analysis phase is presented in a map. Following the community feedback is summarized with specific mobility concerns. Finally proposed interventions paired with policy and guidelines will recommend the way for future improvements in Montgomery. Source: MGR

Source: https://www.macleans.ca

Transit

Source: Calgary Transportation Plan, 2009 Source: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8Z33vb7rEok

Community Redevelopment Plan

6.1 OVERVIEW 6.1.1 Legal Framework

Developed Areas Guidebook Municipal Development Plan: Volume 2, Part 3

Developed Areas Guidebook

Complete Streets Policy and Guide

The Calgary Cycle Plan This document focuses on strategies in Calgary to increase active transport via cycling.

This is an important tool to support municipal development and community building with references to established community mobility policies.

With more specific policies around street use for safety of all traffic modes and creating multi-modal streets partnering will with the CTP.

Calgary Transportation Plan

Calgary Main Streets Initiative

Calgary Universal Design Handbook

This document offers a long range comprehensive plan and looks to focus on walkable streets, public transit and overall sustainable choices.

Focused on improving 24 specific areas around The City to attract local events such as shopping, dining, and socializing through urban design improvements.

This handbook explains and outlines what access for everyone looks like, while also providing policy which supports universal design.

MGR Planning + Consulting

06 MOBILITY & CONNECTIVITY

6.1 OVERVIEW 6.1.2 Challenges and Opportunities Maps Montgomery Challenges Map

Montgomery Opportunities Map Our preliminary analysis of Montgomery revealed a few key challenges regarding mobility. These begin with the Trans Canada Highway, or 16th Ave which divides the community in half and creates a significant barrier for pedestrians or cyclists to cross. This highway also has an auto focus and is cause for excessive speeding. Multiple intersections have significant issues regarding safety for pedestrians with numerous traffic accidents. There is a lack of pedestrian focus along Bowness Road Main Street. Finally the community of Montgomery as a gateway into Calgary has a lack of presence when people first drive in along the Trans Canada. Our same analysis revealed some exciting opportunities for Montgomery around mobility. First, a few opportunities include the regional traffic entering either downtown or heading west to the mountains. Capturing this group of people to stop and stay a short while in Montgomery would greatly benefit the local businesses. Next, we see the opportunity to link 16th Ave, Bowness Road Main Street and Montalban Park creating a connected route for recreating, shopping or visiting in Montgomery. We see a great chance to build a better link to the river for recreational users and at the same time improve existing cycling and pedestrian networks.

Challenges: 16th Ave separating N & S Poor intersection safety Auto focused on 16th Ave Lack of gateway entrance Lack of pedestrian focus Excessive speeds

Community Redevelopment Plan

Opportunities: Gateway to downtown Create link 16th Ave & Main Street Gateway to mountains Create river connections Improve cycling & pedestrian links

6.1 OVERVIEW 6.1.4 Key Goals

6.1.3 Community Feedback Map What we heard about mobility in Montgomery map

To ensure the positive flow of vehicles while improving safety through traffic calming for the benefit of all users.

Part of our project process included a community workshop where we listened to the residents and community association members. We heard a variety of concerns, which we have mapped. Some of our analysis findings paired with the community comments, such as the barrier 16th Ave creates in dividing the community. We also heard 16th Ave prevents ease of access to the river and is unsafe for pedestrians. We further heard 16th Ave prevents access to the community hall and the speeds traveled on it are far too fast. The community feels 16th Ave and Main Street are not pleasant to walk along, especially 16th Ave which is not human-scaled. One a last note, the community commented on the large amount of cut-through traffic which travels on Bowness Road, Home Road and 48th St., creating an unpleasant residential experience.

To reduce cut through traffic, while maintaining 16th Ave as a major transportation corridor. To encourage and support the use of public transit by improving the amenities at bus stops. To encourage and support cycling and walking through improving links and connections in the community and on to further destinations. To encourage and support Main Street Montgomery as a destination for local and regional shopping, retail and restaurant options.

After listening to the community, we have set out some mobility goals necessary to create better connectivity and improve mobility.

Lack of river access Cut-through traffic 16th Ave is a barrier Main Street is not a pleasant walk Unsafe pedestrian crossing 16th Ave is not human-scaled Community Hall is not accessible 16th Ave feels unsafe and too fast

MGR Planning + Consulting

06 MOBILITY & CONNECTIVITY

6.1 OVERVIEW

Key interventions in Montgomery map

6.1.5 Key Interventions After listening to the community members, we have a great amount of information to pair with our analysis. This helps us to build a better picture of prioritizing issues and laying out strategies for improvements. A map of the key interventions needed can be seen on this page. We will seek to address the community issues around mobility through a series of interventions. Many of the interventions involve improving pedestrian and cycling safety, plus improving links for better connectivity.

6.1.6 Key Issues Trans Canada highway also known as 16th Ave NW presents as a significant barrier and separates the north and south sides of the community. A concern regarding the speed and width of 16th Ave, Trans Canada highway with a focus on auto-oriented uses, rather than an inviting public realm. A lack of safety for pedestrians and cyclists moving around the community. Many streets in Montgomery are used as traffic corridors, rather than ensuring the safety and comfort of residential use. A lack of access and connectivity to the river.

Pedestrian Islands Tabletop Crossings Curb Bollards Lane Narrowing Proposed Bike Lane Proposed Walking Trail Proposed River Access

Community Redevelopment Plan

6.2 VEHICLE NETWORK/ ROAD DIETS 6.2.1 Lane Narrowing A roadway configuration, or a road diet is a transportation planning tool generally described as an adjustment of vehicle lanes to reallocate the extra space to other uses or travel modes (US.... Department of Transportation, 2016). This may result in extra sidewalks, cycle lanes, turn lanes, transit use, medians or pedestrian refuge islands (U.S. Department of Transportation, 2016). Road diets can improve safety, efficiency and quality of life for all users (U.S. Department of Transportation, 2016). The benefit of planning ahead with such interventions is road diets can be relatively low cost, provided they are introduced at the same time as scheduled resurfacing maintenance and reconstruction (U.S. Department of Transportation, 2016).

We propose lane narrowing on Home Road, Bowness Road and 16th Ave, NW. Each of the roads have had a number of traffic incidents revealed during our analysis. Narrowing roads gently guides motorists to slow their driving speed, thereby empowering pedestrians and increasing safety. The goal is to change the character of the auto-centric 16th Ave to an urban commercial boulevard and change the feel of Bowness Road to a true Main Street. Lane narrowing is suggested for the length of 16th Ave, Trans Canada highway, beginning from Home Road moving east through to 43 St. NW. Lane narrowing makes room for pedestrian refuge islands, and planted medians, as shown here in these precedents.

Planted Central Median

Before

After

Roads to apply lane narrowing in Montgomery

â&#x20AC;˘

Pedestrian Refuge Islands

Lane narrowing

Adams Street, Brooklyn, NYC

Source: https://www.brooklynpaper.com/green-begetsgreen/

Planted Sidewalk Buffer

Source: https://nacto.org

â&#x20AC;˘

Rochester, MN

Source: http://www.sehinc.com/news

MGR Planning + Consulting

06 MOBILITY & CONNECTIVITY

6.2 VEHICLE NETWORK/ ROAD DIETS 6.2.1 Lane Narrowing Before - Trans Canada Highway/ 16th Ave NW A-Aâ&#x20AC;&#x2122; As traffic has increased along the Trans Canada highway, many personal vehicles have chosen to short cut and travel through Montgomery via residential roads. This creates a poor street environment and mediocre public realm within the community. A combination of different road reconfigurations can work together to increase pedestrian and cycling safety, plus enhance the quality of the neighbourhood.

Map revealing main streets used by regional drivers to travel through the neighbourhood and intersections in need of pedestrian refuge islands in Montgomery.

After

Locations of potential pedestrian refuge islands Locations of commonly used cut-through streets 84

Community Redevelopment Plan

6.2 VEHICLE NETWORK/ ROAD DIETS 6.2.1 Lane Narrowing

Goals

Trans Canada Highway runs through Montgomery and divides the community in half. The pedestrian realm needs multiple interventions including narrowing the width of the lanes, adding pedestrian refuge islands, adding a centre median, increasing the sidewalk widths and adding a buffer of green space between the traffic lanes and the sidewalks. The result of adding all these measures will change 16th Ave into a pedestrian friendly urban boulevard.

• Improve local and regional connectivity. • Slow the speed of traffic in the community. • Prioritize intersections for and around schools including entrances leading to schools. • Reduce regional traffic short-cutting through the neighbourhood. • Improve safety for all users. • Improve efficiency of vehicle transportation.

With 13 traffic incidents at the intersection of Home Road and 16th Ave, the need to make significant improvements regarding safety is great. Having narrower lane widths will slow the speed of traffic. Adding pedestrian islands creates a safe place for people, mid-crossing the street and island crossings shorten the distance pedestrians must span.

General Policy for Vehicle Network • • Design guideline All streets must be designed and upgraded to ensure safe access or all modes of transport and people. Including: pedestrian and cycling uses with traffic-calming measures or infrastructure. • Road intersections identified in this document must be addressed and improved through various design interventions.

Site-Specific Policy for 16th Ave NW • • Design guidelineof all vehicle lanes to a width of 3.5 metres. The narrowing • The addition of pedestrian refuge islands and a centre median 3.0 m wide to be filled with native vegetation. • The addition of a buffer 2.5 m wide along each side of 16th Ave to be planted with native vegetation. • The widening of sidewalks on either side of 16th Ave to 2.0 m.

After - Trans Canada highway/ 16th Ave NW A-A’

A-A’

Before - Trans Canada highway/ 16th Ave NW A-A’

MGR Planning + Consulting

06 MOBILITY & CONNECTIVITY

6.2 VEHICLE NETWORK/ ROAD DIETS 6.2.2 Traffic Calming Planted Curb Bollards Traffic calming measures such as curb extensions physically and visually narrow the road and help to slow vehicles (National Association of City Transportation Officials, N.D.). They are important for many reasons as curb extensions shorten the crossing distance for pedestrians and expand their visibility (National Association of City Transportation Officials, N.D.). Curb extensions can have multiple applications and can be used in residential streets, downtown or in neighbourhood settings (National Association of City Transportation Officials, N.D.). Raised crosswalks not only help with traffic calming, they are a great winter friendly design. As they elevate the pedestrian out of snow and wet on the street, tabletop crosswalks prevent wet feet in snowy conditions. Raised crosswalks further the comfort level of pedestrians and can encourage year-round active transportation. Curb extension can be used for extra neighbourhood space with plantings, seating and other street furnishings. This space can be allocated for socializing and gathering rather than empty streets.

Source: https://www.sfbetterstreets.org/find-project-types

Needing Intervention

Proposed tabletop crossings Proposed curb extensions

Map revealing the locations of needed curb extensions and tabletop crossings in Montgomery.

Source: MGR

Community Redevelopment Plan

1.5

2.5

2.0

Property Line

2.5

Sidewalk

6.2.2 Traffic Calming

Parking lane

Bike lane

2.0

Bowness Road & 46th St. NW B-Bâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;

Bike lane

Parking lane

6.2 VEHICLE NETWORK/ ROAD DIETS

Sidewalk

Property Line

BownessRd.43St.Section

Before

Main Street Bowness Rd

Raised crosswalks, or tabletop crossings slow vehicles down by providing a short, slight elevation in the street. Three tabletops are suggested along the main shopping area of Main Street to improve safety and the public realm. This block measures 166 m, not unreasonable for pedestrians to wait to get to the end of the street to cross at a crosswalk. But the point is for people to take back this street as a place to people, not cars and create a more friendly feel and environment.

5.0

3.0

5.0

3.6

ROW 26.0m

After

Tabletop Crossing

After

1.5

2.5

3.0

Property Line

1.5

Sidewalk

Bike lane

2.5

Parking lane

3.0

Bike lane

Sidewalk

Property Line

BownessRd.46St.Section

Source: https://www.helpcodiheal.com

1.0

3.0

10.0

1.0

ROW 33.0m

MGR Planning + Consulting

06 MOBILITY & CONNECTIVITY

6.2 VEHICLE NETWORK 6.2.2 Traffic Calming

Site-Specific Policy for Main Street Bowness Road NW

B-B’

• Design guideline • The travel lanes along Bowness Rd will be narrowed, to 3.0 m. • A cycle track lane will be added on either side with a width of 1.5 m. • A width of 2.5 m will be retained for parallel car parking along the Main Street shopping area. • The sidewalk will be widened to 3.0 m to improve public realm. • The addition of three raised crossings, beginning at the corner of 46th St. and Bowness Rd and ending at 45th St. and Bowness Rd. • These crossings will be evenly spaced through the block. • These crossing must be elevated to the height of the adjacent sidewalk and footpath.

Key Map for Section After - Bowness Road & 46th St. NW B-B’

Before - Bowness Road & 46th St. NW

Community Redevelopment Plan

6.2 VEHICLE NETWORK 6.2.2 Traffic Calming While safety should be a priority all the time, it is especially critical in locations where children frequent. Speed bumps and crosswalk murals can be effective around schools. Speed bumps are a small raised areas in the road, typically placed every 100-200 m. Speed bumps are effective in slowing vehicle speed in residential areas, and reduce frequency and severity of collisions.

46th St. & 21st Ave Terrace Road School Painted crosswalk murals help with visibility and colourful crosswalks lead to safer intersections and neighbourhoods. They can help build community pride and identity if students help paint them in and around their school.

Speed Bump

Speed bumps are a small raised areas in the road, typically placed every 100-200 m. Speed bumps are effective in slowing vehicle speed in residential areas, and reduce frequency and severity of collisions. We designed speed bumps are effective in local area roads, and should not be used on major collector roads where primary bus routes or primary emergency response vehicles need to travel. https://www.hrg-inc.com/reduce-speeding

Crosswalk Mural

Site-Specific Policy for Terrace Rd School, 21st Ave 46-47th St, NW • and Design guideline • Four speed bumps should be installed at a height of 10 cms and 60 cms long running along 46th and 47th St and 21st Ave NW. • Two crosswalk murals should be painted at the corners of 21st Ave and 46th St, NW and 21st Ave and 47th St, NW.

Location of proposed crosswalk murals Location of proposed speed bumps

Map revealing areas suggested speed bumps and painted mural crosswalks in Montgomery.

Site-Specific Guideline for Terrace Rd School, 21st Ave and 46-47th St, NW Source: https://www.npr.org/2019/07/16/741814860/walking-on-painted-keyscreative-crosswalks-meet-government-resistance

Music students in Rochester, N.Y. cross the walk they paint every year prior to a large jazz festival hosted annually.

• The crosswalk murals should be painted annually, as part of a school credit class and program, with students and teachers working together. • The design and theme of the mural should reflect the school spirit and pride.

MGR Planning + Consulting

06 MOBILITY & CONNECTIVITY

6.3 TRANSIT NETWORK Montgomery is serviced by seven bus routes, including a BRT Route 305. Unfortunately, there is not a LRT line in this area. As such, many destinations require transferring between two buses, or a bus then a train or more combinations to arrive at the last mile. The BRT is quite accessible in most areas of Montgomery, however it offers only limited service at peek hours during weekdays. The overall Transit Score for Montgomery is low with less than 50% of the residents having adequate access to public transit. By offering increased frequency of routes and better more direct connections to necessary amenities, residents will be able to better access the region to complete their daily needs.

Transit Stop Amenities Smart Charging

Covered Bike Storage

Map revealing areas suggested needing additional transit amenities and a local transit centre in Montgomery Source: https://www.marketsmiths.com

Source: https:// bke_transit_storage/ottawa.

Goals Transit Network goals include:

Heated Bus Shelter

• Promote pubic transit, cycling and walking as a mobility option for people. • Improve amenities and infrastructure near and surrounding the transit stops.

General Policy for Transit Network

Local Transit Centre with Additional Amenities Proposed Heated Bus Shelters and Smart Charging Stations

Community Redevelopment Plan

Source: https://www.thestar.com

• Design guideline • Transit will provide a local transit centre at Montgomery Square. • Transit must provide stops and infrastructure meeting with pedestrian and cycling routes and needs. • Transit must provide improved amenities as per the map, to increase customer comfort, especially during the winter months.

6.4 CYCLING NETWORK While Calgary boasts as having the most extensive urban pathway system in North America, we can always look to improve areas of need (City of Calgary, 2018). Montgomery as several areas which could benefit from the addition of cycling infrastructure and pathway improvement. One popular and major cycling route is the Rotary/Mattamy Greenway. This pathway is a larger system which connects and encircles the outer perimeter of The City of Calgary. The addition of cycling links in Montgomery will connect the system to better serve residents and visitors, allowing them improved access to local amenities, like river access and the future bike and pump track.

Pump Track

Shared Lane

Map revealing regional pathway, current cycle track and proposed cycle link improvements for Montgomery. Source https:// https://www.calgary.ca/Transportation/TP/

Source https:// https://www.pinterest.ca/pin/54324739229763460/

Snow Clearing With the Chinooks in Calgary, it is reasonable to cycle yearround. Support for year-round cycling will include covered, secure bike locking stations along Bowness Road, where the shared cycle lanes will be added, at the transit centre. Bike locking stations will help with first and last mile connections, enabling riders to travel part of their commute on the transit and part on their bike. In addition to amentities, we will pair these measures with policies, which will speak to city snow removal and clearing on cycle lanes. Source https://www.mec.ca/en/explore/get-ready-for-winter-riding:

Regional Shared Pathway Current Cycle Track Current Shared Bike Lane

Proposed Shared (backup) Flood Bike Lane Proposed Bike Links

MGR Planning + Consulting

06 MOBILITY & CONNECTIVITY

after

6.0

2.5

2.0

3.5

3.0

3.5

Sidewalk

Plant Buffer

Sidewalk

Before

Property Line

• Improve local and regional connectivity, to amenities, public transit, and parks and open space. • Provide infrastructure that meets the needs of a range of cyclists. • Design cycling routes that accommodate a range of cyclists of all abilities. • To promote and encourage active transport, specifically cycling in Montgomery. • Improve cycling safety. • Support year-round cycling.

Centre Median Plants

Bowness Road & 43th St. NW C-C’ 16Ave.46St.Section

Plant Buffer

Goals

Property Line

6.4 CYCLING NETWORK

2.0

2.5

12.5

ROW 28.5m

Site-Specific Policy for Bowness Road, beginning at St,guideline running west through to 52nd St, NW • 42nd Design

3.0

ROW 26.0m

Community Redevelopment Plan

1.5

2.5

2.0

Property Line

1.5

Sidewalk

2.5

Parking lane

2.0

Bike lane

3.0

Parking lane

5.0

Sidewalk

BownessRd.43St.Section After

Property Line

• Along this stretch of Bowness Road, a one-way cycling lane must be implemented, running one lane along both sides of the street. • The cycle lane must be 1.5 m wide. • The cycle lane must be painted and marked as other cycle lanes in The City of Calgary, including a sign indicating a cycling lane begins here, and white painted line on the pavement denoting the lane width and the diamond shape caution symbol with a bicycle icon on the pavement.

5.0

3.6

6.4 CYCLING NETWORK General Policy for Cycle Network • Design guideline • One-way cycle lanes must be added along Bowness Rd, on each side of the travel lane. • Cycling routes must be added as noted in the cycle map. • Cycle routes must provide an uninterrupted path free of obstructions. • Cycle routes must be well lit. • Cycle routes must be designed to facilitate year round access. Cycle routes must provide amenities every 3 km to securely park and mend bikes. • It will be illegal to park in a designated cycle lane. • Roads with cycle lanes must be plowed within 24 hours of a snow event, following the completion of the snow falling.

C-C’

General Guideline for Cycle Network • It is suggested gravel be cleared from cycling lanes at minimum two times per year to improve safety. • It is suggest bike pathways use permeable building materials to allow moisture to shed. • It is suggested bike pathways be plowed within 36 hours of a snow event, following the completion of the snow falling. • It is suggested to institute a local signage and wayfinding system to allow Montgomery residents and visitors to navigate better along the cycle routes. • Secure covered bike parking is suggested to be added in Montgomery square next to the BRT transit stop, across from the Bowmont civic office. • Public bike parking facilities are suggested to be added along Main Street Bowness and should be covered to facilitate year round cycling.

After - Bowness Road & 43 St. NW Section C-C’ Bike Lane Addition

Before - Bowness Road & 43 St. NW

MGR Planning + Consulting

06 MOBILITY & CONNECTIVITY

6.5 PEDESTRIAN NETWORK Pedestrians include all sidewalk users. Pedestrian connectivity is largely a product of the grid plan and block pattern of the community. Montgomery has a classic, highly regular grid block pattern which speaks well for basic connectivity. The rectangular block configuration creates many even streets and intersections. The uniform block structure enables travel in any direction between intersections. Yet, there are instances in Montgomery where we find gaps in the sidewalk infrastructure and a lack of barrier free sidewalks. We also find a lack of easily accessible pathways to the river, plus a number of desired trails in Montalban Park or other areas that need improvement.

In many cases, the sidewalks are narrow, with no buffer between pedestrians and the traffic, or a poor quality buffer like along Trans Canada highway. Some locations actually lack sidewalks. While Montgomery is found within a grid block pattern it has a mediocre walk score of 53 (Walk Score, 2020). Essentially this means only half of the population can successfully navigate around Montgomery.

Goals Pedestrian Network goals include:

Map revealing regional pathway, with needed pedestrian pathway upgrades for Montgomery.

• Improve regional and local connectivity. • Provide infrastructure that meets the needs of all pedestrians. • Design pedestrian routes that accommodate the needs of range of pedestrians of all abilities. • Promote and encourage active transport, specifically walking in Montgomery. • Improve pedestrian safety.

No Sidewalk

General Policy for Pedestrian Network • Design guideline • All Pedestrian routes must be barrier free. • Pedestrian routes must have sidewalks on both sides of the street. • Pedestrian routes must be added as noted on the pedestrian map: -Sidewalk infrastructure -River access infrastructure -Pedestrian trails infrastructure • Pedestrian routes must provide an uninterrupted path free of obstructions. • Pedestrian routes must be well lit. • Pedestrian routes must be designed to facilitate year round access. • Pedestrian sidewalks must be no narrower than 1.5 m. • Where property lines allow, sidewalks must not be narrower than 2.5 m.

General Guideline for Pedestrian Network • Pedestrian routes are suggested to install a buffer between the road and sidewalk to increase safety. • It is suggested to institute a local signage and way-finding system to allow Montgomery residents and visitors to navigate better to the six river access routes.

Site-Specific Guideline for Montalban Park Boat ramp & hand launch Regional Pathway Proposed Sidewalks Proposed River Access Proposed Pedestrian Trails

Community Redevelopment Plan

• Pedestrian trails along desire trails as marked on the map must be improved with a hard-packed gravel trail system, linking to the existing pedestrian network.

Source: MGR

6.6 LOOPS FOR GROUPS 6.6.1 Cycling Strategy Grand View Loops for groups is a neighbourhood strategy to promote the amazing cycling opportunities and destinations in Montgomery. Combining the new network of cycling links suggested previously with a neighbourhood wayfinding system, residents can easily access and successfully travel one of two routes. Route A is a loop designed for more advanced riders, which includes riding up hills and gaining access to the grand view. Route B is a loop designed for more beginner riders, including seniors and families with children. Each loop has key destinations highlighted and marked. Map revealing suggested loops for two cycling group users: advanced and beginner, with key destinations. 10

2 7

Loops for groups is a strategy to connect residents to key recreation destinations. It promotes a healthy lifestyle and getting active. Cycling Travel Distance Route A / Advanced distance = 5.5 km Route B / Beginner distance = 3.0 km Key Montgomery destinations: 1. View of community, city, mountains and off-leash park from Montablan Park. 2. Hill climb. 3. Bike and pump track. 4. Climbing tunnel. 5. River access. 6. Commercial Street, coffee and donut stop. 7. Community Hall, playground and picnic area. 8. River access and off-lease dog park. 9. River access, boat launch, picnic area and rest stop. 10. Hill climb. 11. Community garden.

Goals Loops for cycling groups goals include: • Foster and encourage Montgomery residents to recreate and cycle around their community. • Promote a healthy and active lifestyle for Montgomery residents. • Increase community pride among local residents. 1

Source: MGR

General Guideline for Loops for Cycling Groups • Cycling routes should be marked using the suggested unified local wayfinding trail sign directional posts with map signage. • Cycling routes should be marked at Montgomery gateways on a map sign for regional users to locate the community specific loops for groups. • The Montgomery Community Association should have a link on their website providing the full details of the loops for groups cycling routes for all users to reference.

Key Destinations Advanced cycling route Beginner cycling route MGR Planning + Consulting

06 MOBILITY & CONNECTIVITY

6.6 Loops for Groups 6.6.2 Walking Strategy Loops for groups is a neighbourhood strategy to promote the amazing walking opportunities and destinations in Montgomery. Combining the new network of walking links suggested previously with a neighbourhood wayfinding system, residents can easily access and successfully travel one of three routes. Route A is a loop designed for more advanced walkers, which includes traveling up hills and gaining access to the grand view. Route B has two levels and loop designed for more beginner walkers, including seniors and families with children. Each loop has key destinations highlighted and marked on the map.

Loops for groups is a strategy to connect residents to key recreation destinations. It promotes a healthy lifestyle and getting active. Walking Travel Distance Route A / Advanced distance = 4.5 km Route B / Beginner 1 distance = 2.0 km Beginner 2 distance = 1.1 km Key Montgomery destinations: 1. View of community, city, mountains and off-leash dog park from Montalban Park. 2. Hill climb. 3. Main Street. 4. Commercial Street, coffee and donut stop. 5. Community Hall, playground and picnic area. 6. River access and off leash-dog park. 7. River access and boat launch. 8. Inclusive playground, picnic area and rest stop. 9. Hill climb. 10. Community garden.

Goals Loops for walking groups goals include: • Foster and encourage Montgomery residents to recreate and walk around their community. • Promote a healthy and active lifestyle for Montgomery residents. • Increase community pride among local residents.

Key Destinations Advanced walking route Beginner 1 walking route Beginner 2 walking route Community Redevelopment Plan

River Walk

Map revealing suggested loops for three walking group users: advanced and beginner.

Source: MGR

General Guideline for Loops for Walking Groups • Walking routes should be marked using the suggested unified local wayfinding trail sign directional posts with map signage. • Walking routes should be marked at Montgomery gateways on a map sign for regional users to locate the community specific loops for groups. • The Montgomery Community Association should have a link on their website providing the full details of the loops for groups walking routes for all users to reference.

6.6 LOOPS FOR GROUPS

6.7 SUMMARY

6.6.3 Wayfinding Strategy-- Identity Strengthening The Loops for Groups will feature a unified wayfinding system with matching trail sign posts paced through the various loops. Map signage will also be a part of the system, with a combined built in bench and unique neighbourhood identity. The map signs will be placed at gateways and through the community for regional and local users to access and successfully navigate. Finally, the community association will feature a link on their website to the Loops for Groups Map, with complete trail and loop information.

Main Street Montgomery will be highlighted and the importance of pedestrians will reflect in the unified contrasting paving material covering the site. The desire trails around Montalban Park and through the Heritage Home Site will become formal pathways with a granular treatment.

Goals Loops for groups goals include: • Improve local and regional connectivity. • Foster and encourage Montgomery residents to recreate and walk around their community. • Promote a healthy and active lifestyle for Montgomery residents. • Increase community pride among local residents. Source: https://www.pinterest.ca/ pin/298011700317810392/

Source: https://www.pinterest.ca/pin/362891682456819144/

General Guideline for Loops for Groups Main Street - pavers

Source:https//Driveways_51.pavers

Desire trails - granular

https://www.tripadvisor.ca/Attraction

• Loops should be marked using the suggested unified local wayfinding trail sign directional posts with map signage. • Loops should be marked at Montgomery gateways on a map sign for regional users to locate the community specific loops for groups. • The Montgomery Community Association should have a link on their website providing the full details of the loops for groups for all users to reference.

With the expected increase in Montgomery’s population, and having reviewed plans for making space for new residents to find accommodation, improvements will be needed to upgrade the mobility and connectivity networks. Our analysis revealed a number of traffic issues, including high traffic speeds, automobile oriented design, highway separating the community and problems with several intersections regarding pedestrian safety. We have suggested several modes to combat these issues, including road diets, with lane narrowing, plus a series of traffic calming measures. These issues were forefront with the community and those concerns are valid. Our suggestions and options vary and are site and intersection specific. The objective is to apply in some cases more than one intervention as needed. These measures are to take back the community from the auto focus and place priority on pedestrians and empower them to feel confident to cross the street safely. Our next focus included measures to improve transit and cycling. To enable year-round comfort while waiting for the bus or commuting via bike to work, Montgomery residents need more options as there is not an LRT route available. Offering improved amenities, additional bike lanes and addressing snow clearing priorities will begin to further support active transport in Montgomery. Our final focus was to improve pedestrian access with adding missing sidewalks and overall links with pathway systems within Montgomery and on to destinations outside of Montgomery. Our Loops for Groups Strategy focuses on joining people to local community destinations, from the Main Street to the community garden.

MGR Planning + Consulting

PUBLIC REALM

7.1 OVERVIEW 7.1 .1 Introduction

7.1.2 Legal Framework

The public realm is defined as the places that are accessible to the public. It embraces a wide range of spaces including parks, open spaces, streets, plazas, and other spaces that allow the public to use freely. The public realm supports pedestrian and multi-modal transportation, encourages social activities and involvement, strengthens the identity of a place, and provides protection to the environment and ecosystem. This chapter provides policy suggestions and design guidelines for a systematic approach for Montgomery to create a connected, diverse, and resilient public realm network. Public realm resources in Montgomery include Shouldice Park, Shouldice Athletic Park, Montalban Park, George Gell Park, Montgomery Hill, a small portion of Bowmont Park, Tourmaline Outdoor Fitness Park, Montgomery Town Square, streets, semi-private areas in commercial use and other natural, cultural, historic and recreational features or amenities.

Triple Bottom Line Policy Framework

Open Space Plan

Environmental Policy

A policy which directs municipal administration analyze and ensure the economic, environmental, and social value of their policies and programs.

A non-statutory document which frames the policy on open space for The City of Calgary, at a very broad level.

Policy guiding The City regarding the promoting and nurturing of an environmentally sustainable city, for citizens and the regional collective community.

While these resources are highly concentrated (most are closed to the riverfront), there is a potential to build interconnected public realm systems with decentralized placemaking anchors linked by green corridors, and trails. This chapter comprises the following sections: Green Network, Green Infrastructure Strategy, Phytoremediation on Contaminated Land, Re-energizing the Riverfront and New Spaces for Places. Parks Urban Forest Strategic Plan The City provides information on achieving a sustainable urban forest including public and private trees.

Other documents include: • Sustainable Development Guidelines for Trees, Shrubs, and Groundcovers • Tree Protection Bylaws • Corporate Public Art Policy • Stormwater Source Control Practices Handbook • Stormwater Management and Design Manual • Watershed Management Plans • City-Wide Stormwater Targets • LID Technical Guidance Manual • Bird Friendly Urban Design Guidelines • Biodiversity Policy • The Riparian Action Program: A blueprint for resilience • Riparian Strategy: Sustaining Healthy Rivers and Communities

MGR Planning + Consulting

07 07 PUBLIC PUBLIC REALM REALM

7.1 OVERVIEW 7.1.3 Synthesis of Previous Phase

River Bank Erosion 2013 Flood Affected Area Petroleum Pollution Area

100

Steep Slope (> 20%)

Amazing View Spot

Predicted Drainage Path

Underutilized Parks/ Areas

What We Found

What We Heard

• • • • • •

• • • • •

Scarce local parks (5%). (Most of the open spaces are regional attractions) Disconnected open space River bank erosion Steep slope Serious petroleum pollution Untreated stormwater

Community Redevelopment Plan

Disconnected parks/ river access Need gathering places Underutilized parks/ lack of programming Amazing view More trees around playground are needed

7.1 OVERVIEW 7.1.4 Key strategies and goals: Build a green network To connect various green space including parks, open spaces, plaza, corridors and civic spaces to create a continuous green network within and beyond the community. Create decentralized but accessible and connected public realm. To add to the public realm for more equitable distribution throughout the entire community, and make sure they are easily accessible and within walking distance for all community members. Reclaim spaces for people To revitalize underutilized spaces, create opportunities for year-round activities and improve the life quality in Montgomery. Integrated design To integrate the public realm with natural corridors, green infrastructure, active transportation and pathway system. Enhance resilience To protect the water source, environment and ecosystem and increase Montgomeryâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;s resilience to extreme weather. Promote native species To promote and nurture native species which usually requires minimum maintenance and saves water resources.

Prioritized Street Tree Infill Stormwater Infrastructure Public Rain Garden Phytoremediation Site Re-energizing the Riverfront New Spaces for Places

MGR Planning + Consulting

101

07 PUBLIC REALM

7.2 GREEN NETOWRK 7.2.1 Regional Connectivity

7.2.2 Community Connectivity The Rotary/ Mattamy Greenway is pathway which encircles the entire City of Calgary. It is extensive and links the parks, amenities and services, including river valleys, and natural areas. This connected parkway and pathway is an important part of the interconnected mobility system enabling park users to travel and visit parks and amenities outside of one’s own neighbourhood. It can be used by all year round for recreation or for commuting to work.

Major Green Corridor Minor Green Corridor Montogomery Trail

• The Rotary/ Mattamy Greenway

102

Community Redevelopment Plan

• Major Green Corridors (Bowness Rd, 46th St) • Minor Green Corridors (Home Rd, 48th St, 43th St) • Montgomery Trail

First, we propose to create two major green corridors along the Bowness Road and 46th Street to build connections between the community and the Rotary/ Mattamy Greenway and link different types of the public realm. Both of the Bowness Road and 46th Street will have a segment to be redeveloped as the main streets of Montgomery which are expected to have high pedestrian movement. It is a great opportunity to incorporate the green space and a range of public realms along these two roads to build physical and visual connections to make the regional green space connected with the community setting. It will also help to provide safe and pleasant walking links between the key destinations within the community at the same time strengthen the main street character and add identity to Montgomery. Secondly, we propose two minor green corridors along Home Road and 48th Street. The minor green corridors focus on linking important local destinations such as historical home site, Motalban Park, Montgomery Community Hall and Montgomery Town Square with the major green corridors. Finally, we propose a set of Loops for Groups, a Montgomery trail system in previous chapter to further enhance the local and regional active transport access as a supplement to the public realm network. (please see detail in Chapter 6.6)

7.3 GREEN INFRASTRUCTURE 7.3.1 Background

7.3.3 Introduction

As Montgomery is redeveloping and growing, plants are gradually removed and the soil is covered with asphalt, concrete, and buildings with rooftops. With many auto-oriented services distributed along 16th Ave, a huge amount of areas in Montgomery have impervious surfaces. These impervious surfaces do not allow water to infiltrate into the ground. When rainfall or melt snow runs off these surfaces, it floods buildings, streets, and waterways, increases riverbank erosion along the Bow River, picks up pollutants like automobile oil, petroleum herbicides and pet waste and collects them in the Bow River.

A collection of green infrastructure interventions will be recommended and assigned according to the applied location. The scope of interventions varies from community scale (pavement) to individual building scale (residential house).

To mitigate the pollution and negative environmental impact on Montgomery, we propose a series of green infrastructure strategies within the community. Green infrastructure refers to constructed facilities that use natural systems to treat stormwater, reduce runoff quantity, expand wildlife habitat, provide shade, and mitigate urban heat island effects.

7.3.2 Key Goals Aim to develop networks of green infrastructure and create other benefits at all spatial scales in Montgomery by providing various green infrastructure facilities.

Green infrastructure interventions for the contaminated sites will be discussed in chapter 7.4.

General Policy for Green Infrastructure • Design guideline • Propose an appropriate green infrastructure plan considering at the community scale or city scale then tailor it to the specific site. • Propose appropriate green infrastructure strategies based on the consideration of local topography, predicted drainage paths, available space, street trees, aesthetic demand, and placemaking. • Incorporate multiple benefits of green infrastructures and have them become assets to Montgomery. • Landscape architects and planners should work with engineers in the early phase to maximize the potential of green infrastructures.

7.3.4 Limitation Some of the characteristics of Montgomery may limit the performance of green infrastructure and require slight design modifications. The limitation factor includes: • The limited water source for Irrigation • Space Constraints on street and retrofitting project site • Pollution from the contaminated site (please see detail in chapter 7.4)

General Guideline for Green Infrastructure Calgary, including Montgomery has limited water resources which may be an obstacle to creating green infrastructure. Therefore, the following principles of xeriscaping may be applied to conserve water sources: • Plant species according to their water demands. • Use plant species which require less water; native species and drought-tolerant plants. • Use efficient irrigation systems: by making seasonal adjustments to rainfall and by plant type. • Make soil improvements by adding organic materials to preserve moisture, support vegetation and aid in treating stormwater runoff. • Use mulches, organic materials aid in pollution filtration plus create a weed barrier.

Site-Specific Guideline for Green Infrastructure Most of the green infrastructure implementation in Montgomery would be retrofitting or redevelopment projects which pose a challenge of fitting green infrastructures in limited spaces. To overcome this challenge: • It is suggested to use an integrated design approach and choose green infrastructure features that can serve multiple purposes. For example, integrate the rain garden and bioretention planter into curb extension, pedestrian refuge, and other traffic calming facilities. • It is suggested to choose the appropriate green infrastructure feature strategically according to available space. For example, choose a biofiltration planter instead of a bioretention swale to apply on a narrow road.

MGR Planning + Consulting

103

07 PUBLIC REALM

7.3 GREEN INFRASTRUCTURE 7.3.5 Stormwater Infrastructure on a Roadway

New York, US

Portland, US

Source: https://www.flickr.com/photos/lifebegreen/433154031/

Walled Bioretention Planter A walled bioretention planter is a type of stormwater infiltration facility with vertical walls or fences on one side or multiple sides. It usually has a flat bottom and is flexible with size and depth (National Association of City Transportation Officials). Advantages apply to where it has high multi-modal movement. It also provides snow-storage space and acts as a buffer to protect pedestrians from road spray in the winter (The City of Edmonton, 2016). Considering the characters and demand of the streets and topography conditions, we propose to implement walled bioretention planters on Bowness Road along the commercial segment, 46th Street commercial segment, and 16th Ave (49th Street to 43rd Street). These three segments of roads are on the major drainage path which collects most of the runoff from the community. Walled bioretention planters offer greater capacity within the cross-section for stormwater detention and infiltration than other roadside green infrastructures. In addition, these three segments host frequent pedestrian traffic and wide sidewalks which lead to the needs of the seating, protective buffers, and add space to store shoveled snow in winter. Walled bioretention planters are highly adaptable to this urban context and are able to cater to all demands these three streets have. 104

Community Redevelopment Plan

Source: https://www.flickr.com/photos/lifebegreen/433154031/

Seattle, US https://nacto.org/publication/urban-street-stormwater-guide/stormwater-elements/green-stormwaterelements/bioretention-swale/

Biofiltration Planter

Bioretention Swale

In some situations, where infiltration is not successful, walled planters can be built with impermeable bases with an underdrain pipe to facilitate drainage and filter water runoff. Biofiltration planters treat water quality and decrease runoff volumes and may be used more in limited right of ways(NACTO).

Bioretention swales are low, planted landscaped hollows with inclined sides. They are designed to capture, treat, and infiltrate stormwater runoff as it moves downstream. Bioretention Swales are more economically wise but need s more space to implement. The large size of the swale can also be a part of a strategy to provide pedestrians a safe buffer along roads and to reclaim spaces for people(NACTO).

Considering the characters and demand of the streets and topography condition, we propose to implement a series of biofiltration planters along 42nd Street, 43rd Street, Home Road, a segment of Bowness Road, and a segment of 17th Ave (See map).

Considering the characters and demand of the streets and the topography condition, we propose to implement bioretention swale on 52nd Street, 48th Street, and a segment of Montalban Avenue (See map). These selected segments of roads are part of the walking loops we proposed in the previous chapter (see chapter 6.) where we would like to reclaim spaces from right-ofway for safety, livability, and biodiversity. The bioretention swale implementation will help to build a buffer with a wide range of vegetation and more street trees. This increases the green space, adds wildlife habitat, and provides a more comfortable and safer walking environment to encourage loop walking.

Stormwater Infrastructure Strategy on Roadways

General Guideline for Walled Bioretention Planter • The planter bottom is suggested to be at least 1.2 meters wide to nurture vegetation health(NACTO). • Street trees are suggested to be incorporated into the walled bioretention planter to fill the gap of the tree canopy and provide shade in summer. • Seating is suggested to be incorporated on the wall or fence sides to improve the quality of the public realm.

General Guideline for Biofiltration Planter • It is suggested to implement biofiltration planters on limited rights-of-way or where there is limited space.

General Guideline for Bioretention Swale • It is suggested to design the slopes of the inclined sides considering the potential for erosion, the ability to establish plants, and if it is easy to have them maintained. • It is suggested to design the bioretention swale to accommodate street trees.

Stormwater Infrastructure

MGR Planning + Consulting

105

07 PUBLIC REALM

7.3 GREEN INFRASTRUCTURE Current Urban Forest

Addition Street Trees in Step 1 (in 5 Years)

7.3.3 Street Trees

Source: https://www.flickr.com/photos/lifebegreen/433154031/

Street trees are the most multifunctional green infrastructure features among the whole green infrastructure system. They mitigate the urban heat island effect through evapotranspiration and shading which contributes enormously to stormwater management. Street trees can also visually narrow the roadway and in that way slow the traffic and improve safety(NACTO). In addition to their immense social and aesthetic value, street trees provide quantifiable economic and ecological value to the community, by having a connected canopy system throughout the community and city (The Trees and Design Action Group, 2016).

Existing Street Tree

Addition Trees in Step1

Current Street Tree Coverage

Addition Street Trees in Step 2 (in 10 Years)

From the previous analysis, we found the street trees in Montgomery are too sparse to benefit the community. There is an urgent request from the feedback we got in the workshop with the community, to help build community identity. While street trees will tremendously improve the quality of place and local distinctiveness as Cullen states in, The Concise Townscape, “Of all the natural aids to townscape the tree is surely the most ubiquitous (…) For just as trees have different characteristics, fastigiate or drooping, geometric or fluffy, polished or velvet, so these qualities may be used in dramatic conjunction with buildings, either to extend the conception or to offset it as a foil.” (Cullen, 1961). In response to the need of this integrated and sustainable infrastructure, we proposed a strategic plan for the next ten years to bring more street trees to Montgomery, through a two-step plan. First, in the first five years, complete the initial implementation of street trees by adding along green corridors as we proposed previously including Bowness Road, 16th Avenue, Home Road, 48th Street, 46th Street, and 43rd Street and MacKay Road. Second, in ten years fill the gaps among the tree canopy and add more trees to the streets that have low tree density. 106

Community Redevelopment Plan

Street with Proper Tree Density Street with Lower Tree Density

Addition Trees in Step2

Street Tree Strategy General Policy for Street Tree • Design guideline • Plant a range of tree species to be more resistant to disease, pests and climate change, plus improve the yearround visual impression(TDAG, 2016). • Add a tree maintenance program to support the tree canopy system (The City of Calgary) • Ensure thoughtful attention to large tree species regarding their benefits and long-term influence • Endorse and plant trees to improve public and private land benefits including social, environmental, aesthetics and economic value • Use an integrated design plan to include stormwater management infrastructures, lighting, street trees and street fixtures wholly

General Guideline for Street Tree • It is recommended to include flowering trees and prominent fall coloured trees to enable seasonal tree variety and changes. • Promote community grasp and understanding of the value of trees through a tree adoption program

Street with Proper Tree Density Street with Lower Tree Density Proposed Adding Trees in 5 years Proposed Adding Trees in 10 years

N 0

250m

500m

MGR Planning + Consulting

107

07 PUBLIC REALM

7.3 GREEN INFRASTRUCTURE 7.3.4 Rain Garden Rain gardens are designed hollows in the ground planted to capture and permeate stormwater. Rain gardens reduce stormwater runoff through storage, permeation and evapotranspiration. Held solids are eliminated through physical separation by plants and soils. Contaminants, like dense metals or nutrients are alleviated through organic action (the University of Tennessee, Knoxville, Landscape Architecture Program).

Rain Garden Location

General Guideline for Rain Garden https://www.cityofredlands.org

• It is suggested to apply rain gardens into a property’s low areas, however avoid locations which stay consistently damp. • It is suggested to apply rain gardens in south exposure and full sun to allow drying out between rain events.

Rain Garden in Residential Front Yard

Rain Garden

Calgary, Canada Source: Fickr

Rain Garden in Bridgeland Park

108

Community Redevelopment Plan

7.3.5 Rainwater Harvesting

7.3.6 Permeable Pavement Rainwater harvesting includes gathering and stockpiling rainfall from rooftops for use as a water source at a future time, as needed(UT). Commercial rainwater storage can have a considerable influence on decreasing runoff by storing stormwater. Commercial rainwater storage cisterns may be located below grade, or at grade level or even inside structures. Some may be designed as garden elements to advertise the collection of rainwater. A variety of uses for the rainwater include non-potable uses like area irrigation or water features like ponds.

Source: Flickr

Commercial Rainwater Harvesting

Residential rainwater collecting is a saving routine that aids in runoff reduction. This routine is user friendly and cost effective. Rain barrels and other storage tanks have a variety of options in size and shape to match the resident’s demands. They can be decorative, or just a storage device. Collecting rainwater can counterbalance irrigation demands.

General Policy for Rainwater Harvesting • Design guideline • Rainwater collecting systems storage containers should match the volume of estimated rainfall. • The end use for rainwater collected must be considered along with the roofing substance it was collected off. • Rainwater collection containers need to be designed with an overflow to a permeable area, like a rain garden. • One must consult with an expert concerning permitted uses for commercially collected rainwater.

Ventura, US Source: nacto.org

The high volume of impenetrable surface around cities is a large supplier of urban stormwater issues. Reducing the amount of impermeable surfaces with permeable substances reduces runoff and permits water to creep into roads and pathways. Porous asphalt, pervious concrete, permeable interlocking concrete pavers and grid pavers allow stormwater to seep under the road surface and can be used on any portion of the road considering the surface conditions.

General Guideline for Permeable Pavement • It is suggested to apply permeable pavement on bikeways, parking lanes, and streets with lower vehicle traffic volumes and limited heavy vehicles. • It is suggested to apply porous concrete on sidewalks and pathways to increase infiltrative area. • It is suggested to apply reinforced turf products for overflow parking, fire lanes, and event spaces.

Source: Flickr

Residential Rain Barrel MGR Planning + Consulting

109

07 PUBLIC REALM

7.3 GREEN INFRASTRUCTURE 7.3.7 Configuration Home Road, NW Biofiltration Planter After

Before

110

Community Redevelopment Plan

Street Tree

Biofiltration Planter

Permeable Pavement

7.3 GREEN INFRASTRUCTURE Before

7.3.7 Configuration Alley

Standing Water in the Alley

After

Bioretention Swale

Permeable Pavement

MGR Planning + Consulting

111

07 PUBLIC REALM

7.3 GREEN INFRASTRUCTURE 7.3.7 Configuration George Gell Park, NW Picnic Table After

Before

112

Community Redevelopment Plan

Rain Garden

Permeable Pavement

7.4 PHYTOREMEDIATION ON CONTAMINATED LAND

ESSO Smart Stop 37807

SHELL Montgomery Gas Station

CO-OP Montgomery Gas Station

7-ELEVEN 16 Avenue Northwest Gas Station

7.4.1 Overview

Due to the character of 16th Avenue, Montgomery features a range of typical auto-oriented land use including six gas stations, auto services and heavily used surface parking with potential petroleum contamination. The earliest business license of a gas station that can be tracked was issued in 1994, which means some of these lands have been generating a large amount of contaminants for at least 25 years and are still producing more contaminants daily. The accumulation of contaminants can become a threat to adjacent residentâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;s health and have long-term impacts on water source as it is so close to the Bow River.

4 3

1 5 6

Gas Station Retrofitting Gas Station Redevelopment

HUSKY Montgomery Gas Station

CENTEX Montgomery Gas Station

MGR Planning + Consulting

113

07 PUBLIC REALM

7.4 PHYTOREMEDIATION ON CONTAMINATED LAND To ease the pollution and benefit both the community and overall environmental system, we propose to adopt phytoremediation technologies for the following reasons: - Phytoremediation is capable in assisting remediating common toxics in urban brownfields including polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons, oils, greases, and heavy metals (Kennen, 2015). - Phytoremediation is a cost effective and attractive option for urban brownfield areas to treat multiple contaminants simultaneously (Raskin and Ensley, 2000) - Phytoremediation can be tailored as site-specific solutions as it has minimal disturbance of the site.

General Policy for Phytoremediation • Design guideline • Special study must be carefully completed, so contaminants in the soil will not be mobilized, and in that way expand contamination range and increase the health risk(Kennen, 2015). • To achieve phytoremediation landscape design, landscape architects should collaboratively engage with other site engineering disciplines and take an integrated design approach at the initial phase rather than carrying out landscape design after the initial civil and environmental engineering design has taken place (Kennen, 2015).

General Guideline for Phytoremediation

“A typical gas station patron might spill 0.01

percent of the fuel he or she buys. A midsized gas station sells about 100,000 gallons of fuel in a month, which works out to 10 gallons of fuel dripping onto the ground every month – per gas station. About 10 percent of each drop of gasoline remained in the concrete after 4 hours, the researchers reported at the 2015 American Geophysical Union Fall Meeting in San Francisco. For diesel, however, a much larger proportion of each drop lingered in the concrete: about 70 to 90 percent.

”

(lhwang, 2015)

114

Community Redevelopment Plan

• Mixed species: Habitat corridors for foraging and ecological connectivity become feasible with the introduction of mixed species. A more diversified microbiology promoted by mixed species will also likely stimulate rhizodegradation.

General Guideline for Contaminated Auto-oriented Site Retrofitting • Provide ample phytoremediation landscaping, in combination with building orientation, to enhance the streetscape and define the street edge. • The sidewalk along the site should be raised to curb level. • Provide a minimum 3.0 metre wide phytoremediation landscape area along the edge of a site where parking areas, driveways or stacking lanes are adjacent to a public street. Use trees, shrubs, hedgerows and other phytoremediation landscaping to screen cars from view while allowing eye level visibility into the site. • Select the plants species considering their tolerance to petroleum pollutant or other sort of pollutants and the urban setting such as road salt in winter.

7.4 PHYTOREMEDIATION ON CONTAMINATED LAND 7.4.2 Phytotechonologies

Interception Hedgerow Description: A single row of trees tap into the water to help degrading contaminated groundwater. The goal is the partial removal of contamination in the small amount of space plated as the groundwater penetrates through the surface. The groundwater plume won’t be captured and often there is only partial remedy for contaminants (Kennen, 2015). Source: (Kennen, 2015)

Target: Groundwater (up to 6 meters/20 feet deep)

Green Roof General Guideline • For gas stations, auto-repair shops, dry cleaners, urban industrial site perimeters, it is suggested to place interception Hedgerow around the property perimeter to degrade organic pollutants within the on-site groundwater. It can be served as aesthetic buffer to mitigate views, define boundaries or inhibit access. Ecological functions such as habitat and wildlife corridors can be achieved through mixed species. • It is recommended to use mixed species in phytoremediation. Habitat passages for scavenging and ecological linking are possible using a variety of species. Having a variety of species will promote a varied microbiology and activate the process of rhizodegradation, degradation of contaminants around plant roots. Source: (Kennen, 2015)

Description: Evapotranspiration of water from roofs is maximized. Contaminant removal is rarely provided; the goal is to prevent contaminant mobilization (Kennen, 2015). Target: The water vector – rainwater/stormwater

General Guideline • Green roofs are suggested to only be considered for minimizing stormwater, not contaminant removal (Kennen, 2015). • A green roof system is recommended for buildings and infrastructure with flat or slightly sloped roofs. An effective way to reduce the possibility for the water to catch and mobilize contaminants during precipitation is to minimize the stormwater run-off from the buildings.

MGR Planning + Consulting

115

07 PUBLIC REALM

7.4 PHYTOREMEDIATION ON CONTAMINATED LAND 7.4.2 Phytotechonologies

Degradation Hedge and Living Fence Description: Woody shrub species transplanted to break down contamination in the earth up to 1.2 metres deep. Contaminant break down is achieved without collecting the plant (Kennen, 2015). Target: Surface soils (0–1.3 meters/0–4 feet deep) Degradation Hedges utilize shrub species to define areas and degrade contaminants. It has the same degradation functioning as Degradation Bosque typology. The Difference is Degradation Hedges target surface soil while Degradation Bosques tackle deep contamination. Source: (Kennen, 2015)

Source: (Kennen, 2015)

116

Community Redevelopment Plan

General Guideline

Degradation Cover

• It is suggested to plant degradation bushes around the outer property line of gas stations, auto-repair shops, dry cleaners, urban industrial sites to break down organic pollutants in the area groundwater. The hedge buffer can offer aesthetic values to enhance the views and establish the area perimeter. • A variety of species should be chosen to offer ecological advantages for wildlife and habitat pathways inside a city. • Degradation bushes can be partnered with interception hedgerows and other systems around area perimeters, to boost the degradation of contaminants in a localized site.

Description: Degradation Cover uses dense, deep-rooted non-woody plants to eliminate contaminants, without collecting the plant, in surface loam up to 1.5 metres deep (Kennen, 2015). Target: Surface soils (0–1.5 meters/0–5 feet deep) Deep-rooted, drought-resistant and easy-to-establish/ maintain prairie grass species are often used to stimulate rhizosphere activities with their thick, fibrous root zone. Being more effective than monocultures, mixed-species covers encourage a diverse environment and the system benefits from the addition of nitrogen-fixing species like legumes (Kennen, 2015).

7.4 PHYTOREMEDIATION ON CONTAMINATED LAND 7.4.2 Phytotechonologies

General Policy • Design guideline • Stormwater Filters should be paired with AirFlow Buffers for prevention of stormwater contamination. • In order to achieve desired removal performance, careful study of precedents and collaboration with remediation scientists is necessary because the rate and concentration of contamination passing through the system are determinants of contaminant removal.

Source: (Kennen, 2015)

Stormwater Filter Air-Flow Buffer

Source: (Kennen, 2015)

Description: The leaf surfaces of plants capture airborne particles, correcting the air quality of downwind sites. Without degradation, particles will ultimately invade stormwater as a possible pollutant, for which other phytotypologies can provide remediation (Kennen, 2015). Target: Air Particles are part of air pollution that can be removed by vegetation. Automobiles generate particles. Studies have shown that airborne particle content negatively correlate to distance from roadway and vegetation coverage. As particles are physically captured by leaves, they are only isolated, not degraded. The particles could enter the stormwater under certain circumstances (Kennen, 2015).

Description: Vegetation and loam eliminate and capture contaminants from stormwater. Organic pollutants may be degraded and nitrogen contamination in water may be turned into a gas and enter the air. Inorganic contaminates may be held and stay onsite in the earth. The goal is to eliminate contaminants from stormwater at the cause, prior to diffusion in groundwater or other water sources (Kennen, 2015). Target: Stormwater A range of stormwater infrastructure including bioretention swales, vegetated filter strips, rain gardens and detention basins are particular to exact contaminants, climate, stormwater flow volume and speed and location space. As stormwater infrastructure strategies have been discussed in detail previously, they will not be covered here. MGR Planning + Consulting

117

07 PUBLIC REALM

7.4 PHYTOREMEDIATION ON CONTAMINATED LAND 7.4.2 Phytotechonologies

General Guideline • It is suggested that the species for the stabilization mat should be carefully selected to withstand contaminants, with additional amendments to enhance plant growth and toxin-binding. • Species choice should be decided by contaminants in the area.

Source: (Kennen, 2015)

Stabilizatioin Mat

Degradation Bosque

Description: Chosen plant species store contaminants within, to prevent them from drifting. No removal occurs. The goal is to minimize the potential of contaminant contact to people and the environment (Kennen, 2015). Target: Soil

Description: Woody plant species with deep roots which break down contamination sites within the soil layers. The plant need not be collected for contaminant elimination (Kennen, 2015). Target: Deep soils (0–3 meters/0–10 feet deep) Degradation Bosques target soil contamination up to 3 meters (10 feet) below the surface. Pollutant is broken into smaller, less toxic substances in the root, stems or leaves, or volatilized and released into the air. Degradation Bosques are used to treat recalcitrant organic compounds that are unbreakable by natural attenuation. Species selection can influence degradation rates. Microbial profile varies as each species releases different root exudates. Petroleum, chlorinated solvents and pesticide in the soil, before they reach the groundwater, can be cleaned by Degradation Bosques. They can also stimulate microbiology to volatilize nitrogen deep in the soil. Some nitrogen will be metabolized by the plant into the biomass (Kennen, 2015).

118

Community Redevelopment Plan

7.4 PHYTOREMEDIATION ON CONTAMINATED LAND 7.4.3 Vegetation Recommendation Petroleum Degradation Plant Recommendation

Petroleum-Tolerant Plant Recommendation

Buffalo Grass

Blue Grass

Smooth Brome

Green Ash

Daylily, Happy Returns

Flax

Green Ash

Poplar species and hybrids

Daylily, Scarlet Orbit

Spiked Speedwell, Sunny Blue Border

Bur Oak

Willow

Cattail

Dwarf Globe Blue Spruce

Dwarf Mugo Pine

MGR Planning + Consulting

119

07 PUBLIC REALM

7.4 PHYTOREMEDIATION ON GAS STATIONS 7.4.4 SHELL Gas Station Retrofitting

CONTAMINATES IN AIR

Located on 16th Avenue, SHELL gas station has four wide entrance/ exits. It reflects a typical auto-oriented design approach which interrupts the sidewalk and creates many potential conflict points between vehicle and pedestrian in such a short distance. Site retrofitting is desperately needed to protect the residents who live in proximity, the citizens who reply on the Bow River as the main water source, the pedestrians who passby the gas station in daily life, and children, elderly, and people of all ages who have lung conditions such as asthma.

120

Community Redevelopment Plan

CONTAMINATES IN THE RUNOFF AND SOIL

7.4 PHYTOREMEDIATION ON GAS STATIONS

Degradation Hedge/ Define the Edge

7.4.4 SHELL Gas Station Retrofitting

We propose to Only keep two entrances/exits to the site for vehicles to decrease disturbing the pedestrians and cyclists. Replace two entrances with a 4-6 metres wide phytoremediation landscape area.

Street Tree Interception Hedgerow

Minimize Auto Entrance

Air-Flow Buffer Green Roof

Degradation Bosque Degradation Cover

Stormwater Filter

Build a stormwater filter close to the most contaminated area to capture the runoff before the pollutants mobilize into the drainage system located near the intersection to eliminate the source contamination. Implement continuous degradation hedge between the site and the sidewalks to treat soil, define site boundary and mitigate unpleasant views from the gas station driveway. Plant trees around the site working as air-flow buffer to help collecting particulates out of the air. Apply degradation cover and degradation bosque to stabilize and remove contaminants and create a wide protective buffer between the gas station and residential lands.

MGR Planning + Consulting

121

07 PUBLIC REALM

7.4 PHYTOREMEDIATION ON GAS STATIONS 7.4.5 HUSKY Gas Station Redevelopment

Before

“Montgomery ARP - “Automobile Oriented Uses

Policy C13. Automobile oriented uses, including automotive sales, automotive rentals, automobile workshops, car washes, gas stations, and drive through services/ restaurants should not be permitted in the Bowness Road/46 Street Commercial Main Street Area. These uses are not conducive to the creation of a pedestrian friendly shopping and service area. Bylaw 17P2017” (City of Calgary, January 2020)

”

The City of Calgary has a Main Streets initiative along Bowness Road from 43rd Street to 46 Street, NW. The goal is to integrate the street with the community and city. This further aligns with the Complete Streets Policy for a connected and safe walking and cycling network. The Main Street Plan is for a long term vision of a community hub, a memorable destination for the community. As such we propose the elimination of the Husky Gas Station in two phases. The goal is to realign Montgomery Main Street with the Montgomery ARP and Policy C13, see above. The City wishes to include plazas, parks, streets, and buildings to address public right of way and interface. Our plan will proceed through phase one including phytoremediation of the gas station site. The second phase, some time after the site has been remediated, will include a mixed-use building with special shops on the ground floor and residential living above. Contamination will bring potential risk to the future land users, so it must be remediated before the transformation. Instead of applying traditional remediation methods which may cost up to 2 million dollars to treat gas station lands, we suggest taking a phytoremediation approach to allow the vegetation to fix the polluted soils during the first stage. During this period, Stage One, the site will be converted into a pocket natural park and bring extra assets to the Main Street while the population will grow naturally. Until such time as the land is completely remediated and the local population has grown to encourage another medium density development, the project will turn to Stage Two and redeveloped as a four- six storey building.

122

Community Redevelopment Plan

7.4 PHYTOREMEDIATION ON GAS STATIONS Degradation Bosque

7.4.5 HUSKY Gas Station Redevelopment Multi-Mechanism Buffer Stabilization Cover

After- Stage 1

Small Fountain

Permeable Pavement

Bench

Petroleum-Tolerant Bioretention Swale

Street Tree

After- Stage 2

In these images we see how the phasing will proceed for the Husky Gas Station Retrofit.

MGR Planning + Consulting

123

07 PUBLIC REALM

7.5 RE-ENERGIZING THE RIVERFRONT The riverfront area in Montgomery is an amazing asset but is currently an underutilized and underdeveloped site. It could be a regional and local draw, a jewel in the community with a few improvements. While Montgomery is a gateway to the city, as a current gateway it is not brought into focus. Many people flock to have river front amenities in other Calgary neighbourhoods, thus this should be put forward as a real amenity.

https://www.asla.org/2014awards/002.html

In the image on next page we see how we have designed a riverfront intervention with features for public including flood proof universally accessible stairs.

Storm outflow

Pathway crossing/ Important cycling converging point

2 Major river access for Montgomery

2 4 3

3 Steep riverbank & dilapidated, dangerous stairs

4 Serious riverbank erosion (O2 Planning + Design Inc.)

5 Degraded riverbank & poor vegetative cover

Steep riverbank and dangerous stairs 124

Community Redevelopment Plan

7.5 RE-ENERGIZING THE RIVERFRONT

STAIRS UNDERPASS CONNECTION WADING POOL

PEBBLE BEACH

FLO A BRID TING GE

STA

IRS

WA DIN G

PO OL

MGR Planning + Consulting

125

07 PUBLIC REALM

STAIRS UNDERPASS CONNECTION FLO A BRID TING GE

WADING POOL

PEBBLE BEACH

Bench

Pebble Beach

IRS

WA DIN G

PO OL

Riparian Vegetation Restoration

Flood-proof Floating Bridge

Light

STA

Wading Pool

Pathway

Flood-proof Stairs/ Riverbank Stabilization

Our goals are to provide the community with improved riverfront interface and access. The first phase will include improving the pedestrian and cycling access from George Gell Park. This will be discussed in our Place-Making Anchors Chapter. The second phase will include stabilizing the riverbank, which is currently subject to erosion and has a steep slope. The area will receive re-enforced bank walls, and two sets of flood proof river access stairs, with an accessible ramp for all users. The current stairs are unacceptable, at best. This area will also have pathway improvements.

This view shows the pebble beach and one stair access. 126

Community Redevelopment Plan

7.6 NEW SPACES FOR PLACES Montgomery Community Hall Canopy, Skating Rink

Summer

Winter

Day Source: www.theforks.com

Source: www.theforks.com

Night

The Montgomery Community Association should be an accessible resource for all community members. It offers residents vital programming and a host of services. It is a much needed gathering place for all residents. Due to its location across from Trans Canada Highway, it is not easy to arrive at for all users, especially pedestrians. The limitations of crossing Trans Canada highway will be addressed in the Mobility Chapter, with lane narrowing and pedestrian islands. But once residents have arrived at the community centre, there is a huge potential, with the hall, the local playground, the green space, access to the river and athletic park amenities. The community centre greenspace could benefit by adding some established and programmed site specific areas to add to the services the hall will offer.

Source: www.theforks.com

10m

MGR Planning + Consulting

127

07 PUBLIC REALM

7.6 NEW SPACES FOR PLACES

7.7 SUMMARY

Montgomery Community Hall Gentle Toboggan Hill

As a gathering place the amenities we will add will make the community centre the Place to be in Montgomery. The addition of seasonal themed activities will include an outdoor ice skating plaza, a gentle toboggan hill, a covered festival tent to host events plus a space for movies in the park.

Summer

Winter

Day Source: MGR

Source: curiocity.com

Source: www.metrocontinuingeducation.ca/

Night

Source: www.calgarymlc.ca/

10m

128

Community Redevelopment Plan

Having planned and made space for new residents to find accommodation, and upgraded the transportation infrastructure, improvements will be needed to upgrade the public realm, parks and open spaces. Our analysis revealed while Montgomery has community pride and spirit, they do not have places to embody it. The lack of public gathering space and usable park space is misleading as Shouldice Athletic Park is within Montgomery. However, this space is not available to all residents, only those who pay for the field access. Therefore, we have strived to create and design additional spaces for residents and regional visitors alike. One space is a gas station retrofit with removing the Husky station from Main Street to have a plaza and park space. One issue the community members brought up was a challenge with accessing the river. We strived to design a user friendly, flood proof plan for a river interface off 16th Ave and 43rd St. We also wanted to connect the green systems through a green network and with green infrastructure. Using street tree plantings to connect the urban canopy and a range of stormwater interventions, we hope to filter out pollutants before they flow to the river. One other area of concern is the large number of gas stations in Montgomery. We are looking to offer solutions to help with decreasing the pollutants around these areas through phytoremediation to create a better street for users other than the private automobile. Our phytoremediation strategy is key to improving the health of residents, visitors and the environment.

PLACE-MAKING ANCHORS

08 PLACE-MAKING ANCHORS

8.1 PLACE-MAKING ON HERITAGE HOME SITE Plan View of Heritage Garden The site of the former Shouldice Mansion has great views, and historical significance. As such we propose a heritage rock garden, picnic pavilion and walking trail to commemorate this location. The plan will host an open air pavilion with interpretive signs in the building recounting important historical facts on Montgomery. The signage will continue through the rock garden along the trails, informing visitors of the various heritage perennials. Our hope is to add to the identity of Montgomery as a great destination for recreation.

3 4

9 Location of Heritage Garden

8 7

Garden Highlights: 1. Picnic Pavilion 2. White Garden 3. Fragrant Garden 4. Melliferous Garden 5. Native Garden 130

6. Tulip Garden 7. Childrenâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;s Garden 8. Pollinator Garden 9. Showy Garden

Community Redevelopment Plan

Pedestrian Trail

10 m

8.1 PLACE-MAKING ON HERITAGE HOME SITE Heritage Site After- View of Terraced Rock Garden

The steep hillside can be reinforced and stabilized with a series of terraced rock stairs guiding visitors up the slope. Plants will be chosen that thrive in sunny dry exposure, with hardiness in mind. A select few of the species for the garden can be found in the plant palette on the following page. Plants will also be chosen with flowering season in mind to ensure a range of months have blooms. This site is the convergence of several paths, including the separated cycle track. The planned trails will link up with existing paths at the entrance to Bowmont Park and flow seamlessly through and around the garden, showcasing the various themed gardens. This garden will honor the early pioneers who challenged Calgary Chinooksâ&#x20AC;&#x2122; and grew perennials to complement their kitchen gardens. The gardens will be planned around the Heritage Caragana Hedge and bring new life to the area. Heritage Site Before

MGR Planning + Consulting

131

08 PLACE-MAKING ANCHORS

8.1 PLACE-MAKING ON HERITAGE HOME SITE Heritage Garden Plant Palette

132

SPRING BLOSSOMS

SUMMER BLOSSOMS

FALL BLOSSOMS

Hepatica, Hepatica

Golden Columbine, Aquilegia

Aster, Aster novi-belgii

Grape Hyacinth, Muscari

Peony, Paeonia

Crocus, Colchicum autumnale

Wild Ginger, Asarum canadense

Hollyhock, Alcea rosea Nigra

Garden Phlox, Phlox paniculata

Community Redevelopment Plan

8.1 PLACE-MAKING ON HERITAGE HOME SITE Heritage Site After- View of Picnic Pavilion This site has an amazing view and the picnic pavilion will be placed to capture and frame the view. The pavilion will offer shade, shelter, and seating for seasonal events. The hope is to encourage families to visit and stop for a short rest while recreating in the area. The white garden - #2, is planned to be at the entrance of the pavilion and placed at the best view overlooking the river. This will become the spot to take family and wedding photos.

Heritage Site Before

MGR Planning + Consulting

133

08 PLACE-MAKING ANCHORS

8.2 PLACE-MAKING ALONG 16TH AVE. The climbing wall in the underpass The River is an important destination in the community. A strong connection to the river should be provided to create a â&#x20AC;&#x153;PLACEâ&#x20AC;? to linger and to build community identity, not just providing access to the river. The intersection of 16th Ave. and 43rd street is the location where the residents come out of the community and walk or bike towards the riverfront. We are proposing an underpass with mobile food shops on both sides. Zoning on the adjacent parcels is proposed to be modified to accommodate small retails next to the entrances. Fitness facilities such as a small scale climbing and bouldering wall will be installed in the underpass to support the recreational loop. Public art and interactive lighting is part of the design. To accommodate the at grade crossing on 16th Ave. the pedestrian-activated signal will be replaced with a traffic light and a two meters pedestrian refuge will be added to the intersection as shown in the pictures.

Birdseye view of the interventions 134

Community Redevelopment Plan

Birdseye view of the interventions

Location of the interventions on the map

8.2 PLACE-MAKING ALONG 16TH AVE.

Before The underpass will be located in the underutilized George Gell park

After Light installation in the underpass, Alabama

reprogrammingthecity.com

Climbing wall and fitness facilities in the underpass, Oslo

reprogrammingthecity.com

Climbing wall and fitness facilities in the underpass, Oslo

reprogrammingthecity.com

Landscape architecture at the entrance of the underpass, Arizona

reprogrammingthecity.com

Artistic pavement of the underpass, Arizona

reprogrammingthecity.com

MGR Planning + Consulting

135

08 PLACE-MAKING ANCHORS

8.3 PLACE-MAKING ON MAIN STREET

Before

Bowness Road Commercial Core Render 1 Render 2

After

Main Street has strategic importance for the future of the community. We propose to transform the Main Street into a green Main Street with extensive plantings, and a flexible space for short-term installations. Seasonal changes will bring changes in the activities on the street, offering year-round and day or night events.

136

Community Redevelopment Plan

Before

8.3 PLACE-MAKING ON MAIN STREET Bowness Road Commercial Core

Street and plaza facilitate year-round programmings

Summer

Winter Crokicurl

Night Market

Lighted Seesaw (Temporary Installation)

Day

Viking Chess

Site-Specific Policy for Main Street

• Patios are encouraged. Heating facilities- outdoor freestanding patio radiant heaters, fire pits and heated awnings are suggested to encourage outdoor seating and patio use yearround. • The creation of passive spaces (instead of strictly defined areas like sports fields) along Main Streets to have flexibility to support temporary public space installations and various programmes all year-round are encouraged.

Night

• • Design guideline To create an attractive, vibrant street, all elevations facing the street can not have blank facades. Varied roof forms and detailing, with a variety of materials, colors and textures, columns and pattern windows, plus other architectural designs are a must. • Building fronts must have canopies and awnings to add resilience to climate change. • No auto-oriented services will be allowed. • Unified pavements, planters, streetlights, benches, and other street furniture are to be implemented to create an identified character for Main Street Montgomery. • Extensive upgrades and plantings of vegetation along Main Street will be necessary. This will coincide with the Street Tree Planting Plan.

Site-Specific Guideline for Main Street

MGR Planning + Consulting

137

08 PLACE-MAKING ANCHORS

8.3 PLACE-MAKING ON MAIN STREET Bowness Road Commercial Core

After Render 1

In the images on the left and on next page, we see how Main Street will transform into an active, lively and pedestrian oriented ‘Place’ and offer year-round activities to draw local and regional visitors.

Before Render 2

Before Render 1

138

Community Redevelopment Plan

After Render 2

MGR Planning + Consulting

139

09 CONCLUSION

Montgomery is a unique inner-city neighbourhood, a gateway community for Calgary full of potential and opportunity. To best manage these opportunities, a collaborative effort should be made to safeguard future development and guide it in the direction which is sensitive to the complexities of designing a complete community, one that is inclusive, connected, dynamic and resilient. Our Community Redevelopment Plan is a blueprint to achieve this desired result. It outlines how land use, mobility and connectivity, public realm and community anchors can be unified in the community to complete community building and model best practices design. With design interventions, Montgomery will be inspired and empowered to redevelop in a sensitive and strategic manner with amenities for all residents to enjoy. These amenities will not only cater to the current residents, but attract future families.

... Source: jennieguenard.com

10 REFERENCES AMEC Environment & Infrastructure. (2012). Design Guidelines For Erosion And Flood Control Projects For Streambank And Riparian Stability Restoration. Retrieved from https://www.calgary.ca/_ layouts/cocis/DirectDownload.aspx?target=http%3a%2f%2fwww. calgary.ca%2fUEP%2fWater%2fDocuments%2fWaterDocuments%2fDesign_Guidelines_For_Streambank_Stability_and_ Riparian_Restoration.pdf&noredirect=1&sf=1 Aspen Lakes Communities LTD. (2013). Aspen Lakes Architectural Design Guidelines. Retrieved from https://aspenlakesliving.com/ files/controls.pdf City of Calgary. (2009). Calgary Transportation Plan. Retrieved from City of Calgary: https://www.calgary.ca/Transportation/TP/ Documents/CTP2009/calgary_transportation_plan.pdf City of Calgary. (2018). Pathways and bikeways. Retrieved from Parks and recreation: https://www.calgary.ca/CSPS/Parks/Pages/ Pathways/Pathways-in-Calgary.aspx City of Calgary. (2018). The City of Calgary Community ProfilesMontgomery. Retrieved from The City of Calgary: https://www.calgary. ca/CSPS/CNS/Pages/Social-research-policy-and-resources/ Community-profiles/Bowness-Profile.aspx Green Infrastructure Ontario Coalition. (2017). A Green Infrastructure Guide for Small Cities, Towns and Rural Communities. Retrieved from https://d3n8a8pro7vhmx.cloudfront.net/greenbelt/pages/5202/ attachments/original/1504021812/Green_Infrastructure_Final. pdf?1504021812 John G. Williams Limited Architect. (2011). Clarington General Architectural Design Guidelines. Retrieved from https://www. clarington.net/en/do-business/resources/Development-Guidelines/ Architectural-Guidelines.pdf Kennen, K. K. (2015). Phyto : Principles and resources for site remediation and landscape design. Retrieved from https:// ebookcentral-proquest-com.ezproxy.lib.ucalgary.ca/lib/ucalgaryebooks/detail.action?docID=2039009

City of Calgary. (2012, June). Montgomery Area Redevelopment Plan. Retrieved from City of Calgary: https://www.calgary.ca/_layouts/cocis/ St. James Plantation Property Ownersâ&#x20AC;&#x2122; Association. (2018). St. James DirectDownload Plantation Design Guidelines. Retrieved from https://cdn.ymaws.com/ www.stjamespoanc.org/resource/collection/5689E861-9CAB-48B4Lhwang. (2015). Tiny fuel spills at gas stations can contaminate soil. 89C6-D9AB98A180D2/OCTOBER_2019_DESIGN_GUIDELINES.pdf Retrieved from https://blogs.agu.org/geospace/2015/12/17/tiny-fuelspills-at-gas-stations-can-contaminate-soil/ The City of Calgary. (n.d.). Riparian Strategy: Sustaining Healthy Rivers and Communities. Retrieved from https://www.calgary.ca/UEP/Water/ Milton III-75 Land limited. (n.d.). ArchitecturAl control Guidelines. Documents/Water-Documents/Calgary_Riparian_Strategy.pdf Retrieved from https://www.milton.ca/en/business-and-development/ resources/development-documents/18001-Coscorp-Milton-ACGThe City of Calgary. (2003). Open Space Plan. Retrieved from https:// June8-18.pdf www.calgary.ca/CSPS/Parks/Documents/Planning-and-Operations/ open-space-plan.pdf?noredirect=1 National Association of City Transportation Officials. (N.D.). Curb Extensions. Retrieved from Urban Street Design Guide : https://nacto. The City of Calgary. (2007). Parks Urban Forest Strategic Plan . org/publication/urban-street-design-guide/street-design-elements/ Retrieved from https://www.calgary.ca/CSPS/Parks/Documents/ curb-extensions/ Management-Plans/Urban-Forestry-Strategic-Plan.pdf?noredirect=1 National Association of City Transportation Officials. (n.d.). Urban Street Stormwater Guide. Retrieved from https://nacto.org/ publication/urban-street-stormwater-guide/stormwater-elements/ O2 Planning + Design Inc. (n.d.). PHASE ONE MAPS-BOW RIVER,RIPARIAN AREAS MAPPING PROJECT FOR THE CITY OF CALGARY. Retrieved from https://www.calgary.ca/_layouts/cocis/ DirectDownload.aspx?target=http%3a%2f%2fwww.calgary.ca%2fU EP%2fWater%2fDocuments%2fWater-Documents%2fBow_River_ Riparian_Map.pdf&noredirect=1&sf=1 Port of San Francisco. (2016). San Francisco Stormwater Management Requirements and Design Guidelines. Retrieved from https://sfport. com/stormwater-management-requirements-and-design-guidelines Project for Public Spaces. (2018). Road Diet Case Study: Historic Madison Road gets Contemporary. Retrieved from A New Guide to Balancing Mobility and Humanity on Main Street: https://www.pps.org/ article/road-diet-historic-madison-road-gets-contemporary Sanderling Property Owners Association, Inc. (2012). THE POLICIES AND PROCEDURES OF THE ARCHITECTURAL CONTROL COMMITTEE. Retrieved from http://www.sanderlingpoa.org/wp-content/ uploads/2015/04/ACC-Policies-and-Procedures-3-26-2012.pdf

The City of Calgary. (2011). Triple Bottom Line Policy Framework. Retrieved from https://www.calgary.ca/_layouts/cocis/ DirectDownload.aspx?target=http%3a%2f%2fwww.calgary. ca%2fCA%2fcmo%2fDocuments%2fTBL%2520Framework. pdf&noredirect=1&sf=1 The City of Calgary. (2012). Sustainable Development Guidelines for Trees, Shrubs and Groundcovers. Retrieved from https://www. calgary.ca/CSPS/Parks/Documents/Planning-and-Operations/TreeManagement/landscape-specs-trees.pdf?noredirect=1 The City of Calgary. (2016). 2016 Bicycle and Pedestrian Count. Retrieved from https://maps.calgary.ca/BicycleCount2016/ The City of Calgary. (n.d.). City-Wide Stormwater Targets . Retrieved from https://www.calgary.ca/UEP/Water/Pages/Watersheds-andrivers/Erosion-and-sediment-control/Low-Impact-Development.aspx The City of Calgary. (n.d.). Environmental Policy . Retrieved from https://www.calgary.ca/UEP/ESM/Documents/ESM-Documents/ environmental_policy.pdf?noredirect=1

The City of Calgary. (n.d.). https://www.calgary.ca/CSPS/Parks/ Documents/Planning-and-Operations/Tree-Management/ Tree-Protection/tree-protection-plan-guide.pdf. Retrieved from https://www.calgary.ca/CSPS/Parks/Documents/Planning-andOperations/Tree-Management/Tree-Protection/tree-protectionplan-guide.pdf The City of Calgary. (n.d.). Low Impact Development. Retrieved from https://www.calgary.ca/UEP/Water/Pages/Watersheds-and-rivers/ Erosion-and-sediment-control/Low-Impact-Development.aspx The City of Calgary. (n.d.). Open Space Plan. Retrieved from https://www.calgary.ca/CSPS/Parks/Documents/Planning-andOperations/open-space-plan.pdf?noredirect=1 The City of Calgary. (n.d.). Stormwater Management Report. Retrieved from https://www.calgary.ca/UEP/Water/Documents/ Water-Documents/stormwater_report.pdf The city of calgary. (n.d.). The Riparian Action Program: A blueprint for resilience. Retrieved from https://www.calgary.ca/UEP/Water/ Documents/Water-Documents/Riparian-Action-Program-Report. pdf The City of Calgary. (n.d.). Triple Bottom Line Policy. Retrieved from https://www.calgary.ca/CA/cmo/Documents/TBL%20Framework. pdf The City of Edmonton. (2016). Winter Design Guidelines. Retrieved from https://www.edmonton.ca/city_government/documents/ PDF/WinterCityDesignGuidelines_draft.pdf The Trees and Design Action Group. (2016). Trees in Hard Landscapes: A Guide for Delivery. Retrieved from http://www.tdag. org.uk/trees-in-hard-landscapes.html the University of Tennessee, Knoxville, Landscape Architecture Program. (n.d.). Low Impact Development: Opportunities for the PlanET Region. Retrieved from https://issuu.com/utkcoad/ docs/2013_0807_-_lid_opportunities Town of Aurora. (2012). Town of Aurora architectural control process. Retrieved from https://www.aurora.ca/en/business-anddevelopment/development-planning.aspx

U.S. Department of Transportation. (2016, July 29). Road Diets Case Studies. Retrieved from Safety: http://safety.fhwa.dot.gov/road_ diets Walk Score. (2020). Montgomery Calgary Area. Retrieved from Walk Score .

Archdaily.com Myuniversitydistrict.ca reprogrammingthecity.com greatplacesincanada.ca mydomaine.com localtours.com blogto.com vancouver.ca lga-ap.com guelphmercury.com www.vancourier.com o2design.com nacto.org issuu.com flickr.com landezine-award.com asla.org www.pwdplanreview.org waterbydesign.com.au www.epa.gov planningforhazards.com urbandesign.org.au