Tourism Management Perspectives 16 (2015) 67–75
Contents lists available at ScienceDirect
Tourism Management Perspectives journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/tmp
Tourist carrying capacity of Santana cave (PETAR-SP, Brazil): A new method based on a critical atmospheric parameter Heros Augusto Santos Lobo ⁎ Department of Geography, Tourism and Humanities, Federal University of São Carlos (DGTH/UFSCar), Brazil
a r t i c l e
i n f o
Article history: Received 24 September 2014 Received in revised form 28 May 2015 Accepted 11 July 2015 Available online xxxx Keywords: Carrying capacity Show cave Sustainable tourism Cave microclimate Ecotourism
a b s t r a c t This article presents a method used to identify thresholds to tourist carrying capacity of Santana cave (CCSC), in Brazil, and their results. The method comprised three steps: the delimitation of the tourist path; the projection of tourist scenarios; and the verification of the scenarios based on a critical atmospheric parameter: the air temperature. The impacts from visitation were up to 1.1 °C and stabilized in 264.1 min, in average. The results were related to the recovery of the critical factor and were compared to the projected scenarios, which were considered as acceptable. Thus, the suggested CCSC was based in groups of 24 visitors with an entrance interval of 30 min in working days and 18 visitors within 20 min in weekends and holidays. The conclusion reinforces the need to understand the tourist carrying capacity as a dynamic tool, not just to limit, but also to improve the tourist visitation. © 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
1. Introduction Carrying capacity is a conceptual and practical way for tourist planning and management, which aims to identify the acceptable level of intensity of the anthropogenic changes caused by the tourists in one specific area, although its application also indicates the ideal conditions of tourist use (Cifuentes-Arias, 1992; Mexa & Coccossis, 2004; Stankey, Cole, Lucas, Petersen, & Frissell, 1985). In modern times, carrying capacity is used as a dynamic technique. The results of its application are subjected to variations due to the circumstances that are involved in the analysis of the variables that were considered, as well as due to the different levels of intensity and frequency of its use and to the fragility and vulnerability of the environment (Mexa & Coccossis, 2004; Šebela & Turk, 2014a). Carrying capacity is currently used to decide which is the limit to visitation in a determined period of time inside caves (Cigna & Forti, 2013; Hoyos, Soler, Cañavera, Sánchez-Moral, & Sanz-Rubio, 1998), based on the principle of not to cause any irreversible change in the dynamics of the natural environment (Cigna & Burri, 2000; Gillieson, 1996). Therefore, the resulting carrying capacity (stricto sensu) depends on the inputs of visitors and the responses (impacts) on selected environmental variables, also considering the natural variation of the environment (Fernández-Cortés, Calaforra, & Sánchez-Martos, 2006a) and its seasonal cycles (Lario & Soler, 2010; Šebela & Turk, 2014b). The ⁎ Universidade Federal de São Carlos, Campus Sorocaba, Departamento de Geografia, Turismo e Humanidades, Rodovia João Leme dos Santos (SP 264), Km 110, Bairro Itinga, CEP 18052-780 Sorocaba, SP, Brazil. E-mail address: heroslobo@ufscar.br.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tmp.2015.07.001 2211-9736/© 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
environment does not have a default response to the inputs of visitors. The impacts may vary, taking into account the different levels of exchange of mass and energy in the different environments of show caves (Calaforra, Fernández-Cortés, Sánchez-Martos, Gisbert, & Pulido-Bosch, 2003; De Freitas, 2010; Lobo, Perinotto, & Boggiani, 2015). There also is a degree of tolerance to be observed on the impacts, provided that they don't definitely change the general state of conservation of the cave's natural system and its dynamics (Lobo et al., 2013). Due to this tolerance, the carrying capacity principle should also allow a flexible tourist use of a cave, rather than just limit the visitation rate (Lobo et al., 2013; Navarro Jurado et al., 2012). To establish definitive numbers of visitors is a utopia because in most of the cases the environment does not provide direct and linear responses to the impacts to which it is subjected (De Freitas, 2010; Mexa & Coccossis, 2004). There are nearly 1500 most notorious show caves opened to the public worldwide (Duckeck, 2015). In some caves, like Postojna (Slovenia), Mammoth (United States), Nerja (Spain) and Jenolan (Australia), the annual number of visitors reaches 500,000. By mid-1980, show caves were designed and managed in a massive and hyper-structured way, with a low control of the environmental impacts (Cigna & Burri, 2000; Gillieson, 2011). After the 1990s, a new perspective of tourism emerged with a focus on a sustainable use of caves. In practical terms, this enhanced sustainable view was implemented through initiatives to minimize the visitation impacts, to improve the construction techniques of the inside and outside infrastructures, to use new inert materials and energy saving light systems and to increase environmentally educational practices (Cigna & Forti, 2013; De Freitas, 2010; Gillieson, 2011). In this context, the annual total number of tourists has decreased in some important show caves, as a result of the