UPLB Perspective Volume 37, Issue 1

Page 1

NEWS NEW FACULTY REGENT page 02

FEATURES

Students lobby for check-and-balance mechanism

Roman Assessment

CULTURE

page 05

Uniberso 2

page 06

CEB members Prof. Vicente Ballaran (left) and Estel Lenwij Estropia (right) cast votes after the second dry run for the 2011 automated USC-CSC elections.

The Central Electoral Board (CEB) approved, last January 7, the proposal for the full-automation of the upcoming University Student Council-College Student Council Elections on February 23 to 24.

‘Lacks consultation’ The approval of the proposal for the elections “lacks consultation“ of the USC with the students as discussed in the CSL meeting last Jan. 13, where students reacted over the proposal to automate the USC-CSC elections.

liaison officer, the program has security features such as security key and authentication codes for each election officer logged in to the system. YSES was able to come up with the program Automated Student Council Election System.

Students, however, lobbied that there be print out of the summary of votes by the students as check-and-balance mechanism to establish the credibility of the program in its initial application in the automated elections, as also discussed in the fourth and fifth Council of Student Leaders meeting.

Some student councils and organizations, as well, claimed of not being consulted by the USC prior to the submission of the said proposal to the CEB for approval. In the CSL meeting, former USC Chairperson Leo ‘XL’ Fuentes stressed the violation of Article 2 of the USC constitution, stating its duty to ‘uphold and ensure democratic participation and representations in any policy-making body which directly affects student rights and welfare particularly in the university’.

All computers that will be used for the elections are to be managed by election officers using their accounts. However, the interface containing the results will not be accessed by the election officer and YSES since the system is encrypted.

With this as agendum, the CEB convened last February 18 to deliberate on the necessity and possibility of the plan for checkand-balance mechanism. Logistical and financial concerns were taken into consideration as well.

EDITORIAL

“Sa ngayon, kinakaharap ng UPLB ang kauna-unagang isang full automated elections kaya’t umalma ang mga estudyante dahil sa kawalan ng check-and-balance o countercheck mechanism,“ said Diana Marie Mula, incumbent Vice-Chairperson and Officer in Charge of USC. She furthered that even the programmers, Young Software Engineers’Society approves of the check-and-balance mechanism to establish the credibility of their program among the students. She also cited the case of UP Diliman where the program for automated elections was tested for three years before it finally garnered the trust of the students. Agreed within the board is for the USC to create a working budget proposal, canvassing guidelines, and other specific details as to how the proposal for having print out alongside automated elections will work. The CEB, comprised of Office of Student Affairs (OSA) Director, Students’ Organizations Activities Division (SOAD) Head, College Secretaries, College Student Councils (CSC), USC, and the UPLB Perspective, is the body concerned with the preparation and conduct of the USC-CSC elections.

ANd the struggle continues page 12

words&photo | Kris Vernadette Domo layout | Trista Isobelle Gile

“Kung may bagong pamamaraan ng pagboto, hindi naman tayo tumututol doon. Pero, ‘yung konseho kasi ay nagbibigay premium sa democratic participation with regard to decision-making. Dapat ine-engage ‘yung mga mag-aaral, lalo’t malaking usapin ‘yung shift mula manual patungo sa automated elections, “Fuentes said. Ernest Francis Calayag, USC chairperson (on-leave) said, on the other hand, “Siyempre, we’ll never disregard any opinion or take on the matter. However, in the part of USC, this is a program that’s the sole purpose is to really serve the student body (sic).” Elections Program In the deliberations on what program will be used for the elections, Calayag claimed to have sent invitations in making the program to computer programming organizations in the Institute of Compute Science (ICS), through which only YSES responded. According to Alexis Marion Lagante, YSES automated elections development team project manager and

Dry-runs The first dry-run to test the program for automated elections was held at PC laboratory 5 at ICS last January 18, 2011, from 8 am to 12 noon, where 86 students participated. However, the CEB requested for a second dry-run because the first lacked counter measure on checking the accuracy of the program since there were no ballots or other sources of data which can be used to check against the results acquired by the program. The second dry-run was conducted last January 27 from 9am to 5pm, participated by 189 students at the College of Development Communication, College of Veterinary Medicine, Graduate School, College of Engineering and Agro-Industrial Technology as minor precincts, and College of Arts and Sciences at the Physical Science building as major precinct. During the dry run, students were asked to log in using their Systemone accounts. An authentication was needed to proceed to the voting process. Pictures and names of the candidates were flashed on the screen where students can select their preferred

(CEB approves...p.03)

vo lu m e 37

issue 1 F EBRUARY 21, 2011


Turn static files into dynamic content formats.

Create a flipbook
Issuu converts static files into: digital portfolios, online yearbooks, online catalogs, digital photo albums and more. Sign up and create your flipbook.