Public Private Partnerships (PPP)

Page 1

Public Private Partnerships (PPP)

March 2012, Nathalie Leroy


Overview

Slide I.

Why public-private partnerships?

II.

What we mean by public-private partnerships

III.

The public-private partnership in Berlin

IV.

Slide 2


I.

Why public-private partnerships?

Slide 3


Overarching objectives for the municipality

To ensure excellent public utility services for citizens, businesses and industries

To maintain municipal control over pricing and fees, as well as investment policy

To preserve and create competitive jobs

To modernize by means of capital investments in municipal infrastructure

Slide 4


Reasons for public-private partnerships

Reduction in public debt and/or deficits by obtaining an advantageous purchase price or by reducing municipal subsidies (e.g. in the area of public transport)

Sustained improvements in efficiency by drawing on the expertise of private partners (purchasing, IT, technology, marketing, communications, legal, etc.)

Involvement of the private partner to help expand the business operations of the municipality beyond municipal borders

Public engagement of the private partner in the municipality

Slide 5


Adapting the PPP model to meet specific requirements

Depending on the requirements of the municipality, public-private partnerships can be adapted flexibly. For example, at the time the partnership is created, decisions can be made about how to distribute the gains in efficiency resulting from reorganization to the various participants (the municipality, customers, employees, private partners): to

stabilize cash flows to municipal budgets despite ever more difficult market conditions. to

preserve competitive rates in order to maintain the viability of the utility business (long-term stability of prices and fees).

Slide 6


II.

What we mean by public-private partnerships

Slide 7


Our basic ideas about public-private partnerships (PPP) Veolia Environnement is a partner for municipalities 

150 years of experience with public-private partnerships speaks for itself  We have been active in Germany for over 20 years, and have some 22,000 employees engaged as service providers  We assume business risks in order to assure the efficient provisioning of services  Responsibility for public services remains in the hands of the municipalities

PPP model allows the systemic disadvantages of public organizational structures to be overcome  By generating economies of scale  By bringing in operational and technical know-how  By leveraging market opportunities

Continuous efficiency improvement through incentive models  Incentive models reward the private partner for good service and penalize poor service  Building a foundation for long-term, high-quality services at affordable prices  Veolia can be judged by the quality of its service Slide 8


“Fair play” is the foundation for successful public-private partnerships

Clear role assignments make for a trustful collaboration

“Public Sector” 

The municipality has sole responsibility for setting objectives and conditions

Control for the performance of contracted services

Sovereignty over water rights and investment policy

Control for setting prices and fees

“Private Partner” 

Brings its extensive know-how to the

collaboration 

Assumption of operational risks (thus guaranteeing fixed fee proceeds)

Implementation of its labor management system with measurable targets

Establishment of incentive mechanisms is part of the cooperative model Slide 9


Level of operative responsibility for the private partner

Public-private partnerships are a flexible instrument – adapted to the needs of municipalities

Full privatization Full transfer Concession contract

PPP models provided by Veolia

With financing/ transfer of capital

BOT Model Lease/operational lease model

Operational management

Management Without financing/ transfer of capital

Service contracts Consulting 2

5

10

20

30

Contract period

Source: Water Guidelines, Document N°. 547, German Federal Ministry of Economics and Labor, Berlin 2005

Slide 10


Overview

Slide

III.

The public-private partnership in Berlin

Slide 11


The partial privatization model for Berlin’s water utilities company (BWB) was determined by the state of Berlin in 1999 Today’s partial privatization model was determined by the parties in power at that time and the responsible Senate administrations, and was approved by a majority of the Berlin Parliament.

Veolia and RWE won the international bidding process based on the partial privatization model defined by the state of Berlin.

Partial privatization solved major renovation and investment problems faced by the state of Berlin

The state of Berlin guaranteed the private partners that it would uphold the legal conditions of partnership over the long term.

*

* Der Spiegel, 40/1998

 Veolia und RWE submitted the winning bid in an open bidding process Slide 12


Sources: Company Annual Reports

In the process of dismantling inefficient structures, it was in the best interests of all the Berlin utility firms to slim down

 In accordance with its labor agreements (the so-called “contract of confidence”), BWB was barred from laying off workers for operational reasons

Slide 13


In Berlin, all guarantees related to services agreed upon in 1999 have been fulfilled or exceeded to date 

Price moratorium: Cap on water rates through 2003

Employee commitment/ Contract of confidence: The private investors pledged to preserve employee rights and to refrain from layoffs for operational reasons. While this commitment was still binding, its term was extended to 2014

Center of Competence for Water: Founding of a non-profit research institution for assuring the highest levels of water quality and to undertake research projects

VEOLIA-Stiftung (The VEOLIA Foundation): Establishment of a non-profit foundation to support projects for preserving the environment, to create jobs, and promote social integration

Creating new jobs: Veolia Wasser Germany and Vivendi Universal Germany relocated their main headquarters to Berlin as a way of emphasizing the importance of the site for Veolia

SVZ (Schwarze Pumpe secondary recycling center): The private partners suffered significant debts during restructuring (as of December 31, 2009: €260 million)

 Veolia has gone beyond the call of duty in providing contractually guaranteed

services and has taken on additional public and social responsibilities in Berlin Slide 14


Veolia takes social responsibility

 Veolia has made good on it’s commitment to support Berlin with sponsorships and donations amounting to €17.8 million over the past 10 years

Slide 15


Research – Networking – Communication The Berlin Center of Competence for Water Objective: Applied research about water in cooperation with regional partners Veolia Wasser is the founder and majority shareholder of the Berlin Center of Competence for Water (KWB), an international center for water research and knowledge transfer in Berlin. At the center, scientists and experts work together with universities, research institutions, and corporations to identify practical solutions for water management. Since its inception in 2011, the KWB has over spent over €30 million on more than 50 projects.

Research areas:  Groundwater:

well management and near-natural processes for water purification

 Water

and wastewater technology: process optimization in biological wastewater treatment

 Combined

wastewater and environmental effects: Monitoring, modeling, and prediction of contaminant input in surface water

Research budget: approx. €3 - 4 million per year

Since January 2006: Sponsorship of an endowed Professor of Urban Water Management at TU Berlin

www.kompetenz-wasser.de

Slide 16


The KWB in Figures Team 27 employees: from the fields of hydrogeology, process engineering, environmental technology, civil engineering, chemistry, and biology

Research volume: Project expenditures in the order of â‚Ź 31.2 million; Financing by Veolia: â‚Ź 1.8 million/year Over 50 Projects Research partners 50 national and international partner institutions Training 150 doctoral candidates, graduate students, and trainees Page 17


Berlin shareholding model

State of Berlin 50.1 % Veolia and RWE 49.9 %

RWE

Veolia

50%

50%

RVB

State of Berlin

50.1% 49.9%

100%

Silent Partnership I

BWH 49.9%

Silent Partnership II

BWB 

BWB = Berliner Wasserbetriebe AÖR

BWH = Berlinwasser Holding AG

RVB = RWE / Veolia Berlinwasser Beteiligungs GmbH

Legal participation

Economic participation

100 %

Competitive business

Page 18


Partial Privatisation Key Points Key Points 

Division between „regulated“ and competitive business

Instant payment of purchase price EUR 1.7 bn

Fixed prices until 2003 (in total: 4.32 EUR/m³)

Contractually guaranteed investments (EUR 250 m per year)

No dismissals until 2014

Founding of a centre of competence for water

Founding of a youth foundation (Veolia Foundation)

19


Management and control opportunities for the state of Berlin

The state and the private partners have an equal number of votes on the BWB Supervisory Board. The State of Berlin appoints the Chairman of the Board (currently, Senator von Obernitz) The State of Berlin nominates two of the four Management Board members. The remaining two members are nominated by the private partners. The Chairman of the Management Board is selected by the board and casts a vote in the event of a tie.

Increases in water prices can only be implemented with the agreement of the state’s representatives on BWB’s Supervisory Board. The rates must be approved by the Senate Administration for Health, the Environment, and Consumer Protection. The State of Berlin is under no legal obligation to compensate for water price increases that are not approved.

As majority owner, the state has substantial opportunities to participate in the management of BWB.

Supervisory Board

Management Board

Committees

Consortium Committee

Guarantors Meeting

Economic Committee

Personnel Committee

Mediation Committee

Directive Committee

Executive Committee

Committee Special Affairs

Investors

Employees

Berlin

Chair

Slide 20


Growth in tariffs for drinking water and wastewater has fallen significantly below projections made by BWB prior to partial privatization €/m³

Actual tariffs BWB vs. planned tariffs 1997 - 2010

6.00

5.60

Planned tariffs by 1997*

5.20

4.80

Actual tariffs since partial privatization

4.40

4.00 1997

1998

1999

2000

2001

2002

2003

2004

2005

2006

2007

2008

2009

2010

 The actual lower real increase in the tariffs was only made possible by efficiencies initiated by the private partner

 Rising tariffs are attributable to the negative growth in consumption and to major cost factors

* Forward projection of the planning only by inflation since 2007

Slide 21


Income in € / thousands

2007

2008

2009

2010

Special utilization fee (Concession fee)

14,800

14,800

23,955

17,855

Groundwater abstraction fees and wastewater fees

63,334

67,163

65,004

66,072

Profit distribution to the State of Berlin

148,849

110,141

132,675

121,582

Total income for the State of Berlin

226,983

192,104

221,633

205,509

Profit transfer to RWE and Veolia after taxes

169,115

118,484

122,259

112,340

* Source: Annual Reports BWB and Veolia data

Division of income between the state and the private partners

 The State of Berlin is deriving substantial profits. Since partial privatization, it has gained profits of €3.5 billion from the public-private partnership

Slide 22


BWB has made a large contribution to relieving budgetary stress

Earning from all shareholdings held by the state of Berlin and shares in BWB* Millions of â‚Ź 600

400 200

Shareholding proceeds for Berlin (all investments)

0 2002

2003

2004

2005

2006

2007

2008

2009

-200 -400

Berliner Wasserbetriebe ** (Berlin water utilities company)

-600 -800

* Source: Shareholding reports of the state of Berlin ** After payment of dividends to the private partners and without taxes, concession fees, or water abstraction charges

Slide 23


Investments in the quality of water and wastewater treatment

800

In millions of €

700

future slight increases in the level of self-financed investments

600

500 400 300 200 100 0

1990

1992 Water

1994 Wastewater

1996

1998

2000

2002

2004

2006

2008

2010

Self-investment and outside investments

In the 12 years since partial privatization, €3.56 billion has been invested in water and wastewater treatment by BWB. All commitments for capital investments have been exceeded.

BWB continues to make larger annual investments per m³ of water than other German water companies

 The investments become part of the fixed assets that remain usable over the long term and can be depreciated over long time periods.

 At least 25% of annual revenues must be reinvested. Slide 24


Investments in water and wastewater systems create jobs and promote employment in Berlin 

Most of the annual capital investments of €280-290 million in water and wastewater systems directly benefit contractors in the region

In 2009, under the management of the private partner, 85% of total goods and services purchased by BWB (amounting to €324 million) were obtained from within the region

BWB spending assures a steady income and employment for large numbers of individuals in the region

Slide 25


Berlin benefits from a high level of water-supply reliability

Ost Gesamt West

Source: WIK study

Pipe breakage rates at BWB

since the partial privatization the rate of pipe bursts within BWB's grid has sank by 27%

within the same time frame the quota of water loss has been decreased to an average of 5,2%

 Maintaining the security of supply is in Veolia’s interest, because if unpurified water were to enter Berlin’s drinking water supply today, it would require expensive reprocessing Slide 26


Berlin’s drinking water and wastewater treatment are of the highest quality

Berlin enjoys drinking water of outstanding quality

BWB has invested over €900 million in the last 10 years in modernizing the drinking water infrastructure

Berlin’s wastewater treatment meets the highest quality requirements and has further improved since partial privatization

The purification processes used by BWB result in quality levels that far exceed European norms

 Since partial privatization, BWB has grown into a leading utility company in matters of water quality and excellence in wastewater treatment

Slide 27


Since partial privatization, BWB has become a trendsetter in the training of young employees

Quelle: WIK Studie

Growth in the training rate and number of trainees

Training rate in %

Trainees

ďƒ¨ The training rate at BWB has steadily increased under management by the private partners

ďƒ¨ The training rate across all of Veolia Wasser’s firms in Germany is over 8% Slide 28


We have been able to mitigate price increases driven by falling demand for water

Drinking water Waste water

Increased expenses arising after reunification – due to higher capital investments – had to be covered through increased rates and fees. 80% of such costs were unrelated to the quantity of water consumed.

To calculate water prices, capital expenses were applied to the quantities of water consumed.

Since 1989, drinking water consumption has fallen by 45%. As a result, fixed costs (which account for 80% of BWB’s operational costs) have to be distributed despite a significantly smaller quantity of water, resulting in increased prices per liter or m3.

 The annual per capita expenditures* for water and wastewater in Berlin has not risen since partial privatization.

*adjusted for inflation

Slide 29


Willingness to update the contractual agreements

 For Veolia, the fact that contracts established for long periods might need to be adjusted in the face of new developments and the wishes of the partners is nothing unusual. Adjustments have already taken place on multiple occasions in Berlin.

 When requests for modifications were expressed by the State of Berlin, the private partners offered to open negotiations with the State of Berlin in November 2009.

 The BKartA (German Federal Anti-Trust Office) monitors the appropriateness of drinking water prices. Moreover, legal clarification is pending as to whether the Anti-Trust Office should be responsible in the first place for this kind of price monitoring at BWB.

 New negotiations with the Land of Berlin are pending. The aim is to clarify the terms of

cooperation following the withdrawal of RWE, the other contractual partner. Veolia is broadly prepared to engage in dialogue and negotiations about this matter. Negotiations are to address, among other things, future changes in rates as well as the ongoing qualitative development of BWB – for example, in relation to sustainability and environmental protection.

Slide 30


Thank you for your attention! Kontakte: Veolia Wasser GmbH Lindencorso Unter den Linden 21 10117 Berlin Tel. 030 20 629 56-0 Fax 030 20 629 56-31 Berlin@veoliawasser.de

Niederlassung Leipzig: Sachsenpark Walter-Köhn-Straße 1a 04356 Leipzig Tel. 0341 24 176-0 Fax 0341 24 176-443 Leipzig@veoliawasser.de

Büro Braunschweig: Taubenstraße 7 38106 Braunschweig Tel. 0531 383-3929 Fax 0531 383-3930 Braunschweig@veoliawasser.de

www.veolia.com www.veolia.de www.veoliawater.com www.veoliawasser.de

Büro Neu-Isenburg: Dornhofstraße 34 63263 Neu-Isenburg Tel. 06102 29 99-15 Fax 06102 29 99-76 NeuIsenburg@veoliawasser.de


Turn static files into dynamic content formats.

Create a flipbook
Issuu converts static files into: digital portfolios, online yearbooks, online catalogs, digital photo albums and more. Sign up and create your flipbook.