AI 1415 LEAD Full Report

LEAD Evolving LEAD to improve every experience we deliver inside the organisation as part of our Leadership Development Model.

Final report of LEAD Project and Piloting Results

AIESEC International 14.15

1.

The Role of LEAD 2.

Evolution of LEAD 3.

Network Implementation 4. Key Learnings from First Pilots 5. Current State of 2nd Piloting 6.

KPI Achievement 7.

Tips & BCP’s 8.

Resources & Materials 9.

Recommended Next Steps

1. The Role of LEAD LEAD aims to support the Inner Journey by catalysing our leadership development qualities throughout all the experiences we deliver.

VALUE DELIVERY

Imagine how much more powerful can the experiences we deliver be if we were consciously developing the 4 leadership qualities in all ELD programs, no matter how short or long the xp is!

2. Thought Process and LEAD Evolution Timeline 2014 August IC Taiwan

November GLC

2015 November LEAD Summit

february IPM SEA

march XPRO's

april Post XPRO's

May GLC 2.0

In this section you can find the detailed activities that led to what LEAD is now.

June/july End of AI Term

2. Thought Process and LEAD Evolution Timeline 2014 August IC Taiwan

November GLC

2015 November LEAD Summit

february IPM SEA

march XPRO's

april Post XPRO's

May GLC 2.0

LEAD presented as a companion throughout the conference, contributing to the experience and not as a separate activity. Launch of Gen2015 customised assessment for MCP’s 14/15 LEAD development journey.

June/july End of AI Term

2. Thought Process and LEAD Evolution Timeline 2014 August IC Taiwan

November GLC

2015 November LEAD Summit

february IPM SEA

march XPRO's

april Post XPRO's

May GLC 2.0

June/july End of AI Term

First “Global LEAD Conference” organised with Dey Dos Popcorn Academy to explore a continuous LEAD experience in a conference and re-define the role of LEAD in our current AIESEC context with the delegates.

2. Thought Process and LEAD Evolution Timeline 2014 August IC Taiwan

November GLC

2015 November LEAD Summit

Entities: MoC, Greece, Portugal, Egypt, India, Ukraine Outputs in aies.ec/lead

february IPM SEA

march XPRO's

april Post XPRO's

May GLC 2.0

June/july End of AI Term

After GLC 2014, 7 delegates where invited to AI Office for a LEAD Summit in which the final definition of LEAD as a catalyst of our Leadership Development Model was created as well as LEAD frameworks for each ELD program and tools to deliver them. These entities would also be responsible for taking it back to their entities and piloting the new frameworks in small scale.

2. Thought Process and LEAD Evolution Timeline 2014 August IC Taiwan

November GLC

2015 November LEAD Summit

february IPM SEA

march XPRO's

april Post XPRO's

May GLC 2.0

Launch of the new LEAD frameworks and first workshops on how to understand and use them.

The IPM Agenda was also based on LEAD elements to foster “learning by doing” and the delegates’ development as core of the conference.

June/july End of AI Term

2. Thought Process and LEAD Evolution Timeline 2014 August IC Taiwan

November GLC

2015 November LEAD Summit

february IPM SEA

march XPRO's

april Post XPRO's

Continued education to membership through XPRO’s platform in a practical way.

Virtual launch of a 2nd round of Piloting Entities to coach and track

May GLC 2.0

June/july End of AI Term

2. Thought Process and LEAD Evolution Timeline 2014 August IC Taiwan

November GLC

2015 November LEAD Summit

february IPM SEA

march XPRO's

This second edition of Global LEAD Conference had the aim of exploring a space for delegates to have an intense leadership journey and also learn how to transfer these experiences back to their teams and members. Basically, a TtT for LEAD.

april Post XPRO's

May GLC 2.0

June/july End of AI Term

2. Thought Process and LEAD Evolution Timeline 2014 August IC Taiwan

November GLC

-

2015 November LEAD Summit

february IPM SEA

march XPRO's

april

May

Post XPRO's

Follow-up on Pilot Entities Creation of LEAD delivery booklet to support entities Inputs and Feedback from network Collection of BCP’s and videos for showcasing

GLC 2.0

June/july End of AI Term

3. Network Implementation After the launch of LEAD frameworks, the main focus was education through conferences and virtual webinars on how to implement them.

There was also gathering of the entities’ main challenges and inputs which can be consolidated in these 4 main ones.

Timeline for Pilot Implementation 1.

Education on how to customise, co create and engage the LC’s in delivering the frameworks.

2.

Spaces for GCP Sharing, showcasing and sharing ideas between entities.

3. Network Implementation KPI’s to Assess LEAD Implementation

GCDP gip

3.

Lack of knowledge and skills to facilitate and deliver LEAD spaces.

4.

Evaluating and assessing KPI’s for LEAD implementation

NPS, LDM assessment, IXP

NPS, LDM assessment

tmp

NPS, Retention Rate, Leadership Pipeline, Productivity, LDM assessment

tlp

NPS, Retention Rate, Leadership Pipeline, Productivity, LDM assessment

Most entities in the global network have the intention of implementing the LEAD program and only 40 of them have had global support with piloting program, thus it is important to have more direct approach to ensure their frameworks are aligned to the LDM.

W H E N +A R E+YO U+P L ANNI NG +T O+A D OPT +T H E+N E W+ L E A D +F R A MEWO RKS+P R ESE NTED +AT+I P M ?+ ( A I E S .E C/ LEAD ) 8% 20% 18% 11%

11% 32%

Already(adopting(them By(the(end(of(Q1(2015 By(the(end(of(May(2015 During(MC(to(MC(Transition During(the(next(MC(Term Other((please(specify)

SOGA Q1 2015 results

4. Key Learnings from First Pilots Challenges

Suggested Solutions

Skills to deliver LEAD

More access to platforms like GLC or LEAD Partners for skill development

HR needed to deliver activities Access to Resources & BCP’s Difficulty in identifying LDM skill set in LEAD activities

Focus on specific activities for first pilots and Revise “value delivery” structures in LC to allocate more resources where needed Continue updating global LEAD resource hub (aies.ec/lead) with more education material and EY showcasing. More examples Have a more simple and specific bottomline for each activity/touchpoint or for the whole framework

Tracking LC’s for implementation

Focus on some LC’s first for trials (if your EY has too many LC’s). Co-Create with your LC’s, have a clear tracking tool and empower your members

LEAD Co-Delivery

Only for EY partners of BIG cooperation. Ensure simplicity, clarity in role division and tracking tool. Recommended to pilot in small scale

5. Current State of 2nd Pilots Main Challenges found along the process: -

Engaging and downscaling to LC’s Lack of capacity to deliver Difficulty in tracking its implementation Skill training to members who will deliver activities Coordination and alignment with exchange timelines Clarity of LEAD and role of MC’s/LC’s and Functions in delivery Implementation aligned to OD Model / Growth Model

In the following pages you will be able to find the current state of piloting entities in each ELD program of choice.

Please refer to the “Implementation Checklist (8-week timeline)” (p.12) to understand what phase they are in.

5. Current State of 2nd Pilots

5. Current State of 2nd Pilots

5. Current State of 2nd Pilots

5. Current State of 2nd Pilots Inputs from pilot entities to simplify and support the implementation process: 1.

A customised framework-checklist per cluster/tier 2. Consultancy with more regular frequency and more initiatives like GLC 3.

Sharing of specific action steps that are GCPs -with numerical results and other validation 4. Implementation more focused on which tools to use at each stage 5. Advice on how to build supporting system to make activities happen

Webinars and BCP Showcasing are the 2 more relevant sources of support for the network.

6. Key Performance Indicators Unfortunately, due to lack of analytics in 14/15 term it was not possible to have a proper KPI tracking. However, we recommend as LEAD KPI’s to be: NPS LDM assessment Retention Rate IXP

Which would need to be selected and customised depending on the chosen ELD program for the LEAD implementation.

INDICATOR

Planned

Achieved

%

Entities continuing in LEAD piloting 15/16

30

20

66.67%

LEAD launch and education

DONE

DONE

100%

7. Tips…

Good implementation activities by piloting entities that are recommended to follow: AIESEC in Russia -> LC’s creating their TMP/TLP LEAD Program By allowing this space, LC’s are directly engaged and have clarity on purpose of LEAD implementation. MC/EB National Programme AIESEC in France -> Recording Videos for education Webinar for OGX network AIESEC in Lebanon -> Co Creating between LC’s IPS and OPS were co created between LC’s, responsibilities were divided for content creation and then put together for standardised materials.

AIESEC in Ukraine -> Continuous Communication Bi-weekly personal chats with LCVP’s and chats with LCP’s to have their support and ensure their delivery of EB LEAD.

7. …and BCP’s World Citizen IGCDP LEAD in IPS - AIESEC in Serbia Their LEAD for iGCDP consists on IPS where there are LEAD Sessions and EP coaches are provided for each intern, which are responsible for the development of the intern while doing an internship in Serbia. All activities are aligned to the LDM. IGCDP LEAD in Regional IPS - AIESEC in Greece IPS was designed with refreshed agenda which tackled different aspects of leadership qualities (LDM) through various inner journey/lead elements, with clear understanding about the importance of the intern’s work and interns were very engaged after IPS, interacting within the intern network and developing close relationships.

Empowering Others TMP/TLP LEAD in Coaching - AIESEC in Serbia Apart from sessions on national and local conferences, they also provide coaching for all TMP/TLP members (VP to TLP, TLP to TMP). It consists on three parts: team, professional, personal - all based on the LDM elements. Find the coaching framework here

7. ‌and BCP’s Solution Oriented National Conference Delivery - AIESEC in Guatemala Changing the agenda and delivery of national conferences to shape specific behaviours and national culture the entity needs. AIESEC in Guatemala created an agenda with blocks of different challenges that activated members towards team work and solution orientation to face the different activities during the conference. Find the agenda here.

Self Awareness EB LEAD (TLP LEAD) in Conferences - AIESEC in Egypt Successful implementation of LEAD through 2 national conferences.

For each conference there was a defined LEAD flow and the LEAD faci used hosted spaces where delegates appreciated the development flow and there was positive feedback. The delivery is coming from the implementation of the framework customised to their reality and setting delivery objectives for each touchpoint. Click here to find the tool.

8. Resources & Materials Please help yourself to explore more LEAD materials in the following links:

LEAD Strategic Meeting 2014 Outputs Online Resource Center Global LEAD Conference 2014 Outputs Global LEAD Conference 2015 Outputs Guide to boost LDM through LEAD

9. Recommended Next Steps 1.

2.

3.

4.

5.

6.

Cluster pilot entities regarding current situation for better tracking Select “Pioneer Entities” in piloting that will be source of bcp’s, showcasing, education to other entities…

Analyse correlation of kpi’s with LEAD implementation in pioneer entities Continue platform of virtual and physical education for entities Research need to evolve the frameworks based on results of KPI analysis and/or evolution of ELD programs (mta 2020) Continue with GLC or find new platform to educate network on how to deliver LEAD

For further information or clarification, please contact Ana Sofia Espejo (AIVP TM 14.15)

AIESEC International 14.15