January/February 2015 - Pellet Mill Magazine

JANUARY/FEBRUARY 2015

Plus: Eyeing Export Markets Page 14

AND:

Digging Into Dutch Demand Page 26

www.biomassmagazine.com/pellets

Europe’s Pellet Capital

How German Producers Built a Foundation for Broader European Pellet Production and Consumption Page 20

5($&+ 1(: &86720(56 0$.( 025( 6$/(6

67$< 723 2) 0,1' 3/$&( <285 1$0( 21 7+( :$//

3(//(7 352'8&(5 0$3 $'9(57,6(0(17

$GYHUWLVH QRZ RQ 3HOOHW 0LOO 0DJD]LQHuV 8 6 &DQDGD 3HOOHW 3URGXFHU 0DS ,W LV WKH HDVLHVW DQG PRVW FRVW HIIHFWLYH ZD\ WR JHW \RXU QDPH SURGXFW DQG RU VHUYLFH LQ IURQW RI 3HOOHW 3URGXFHUV DV ZHOO DV RWKHU LQGXVWU\ SURIHVVLRQDOV IRU PRQWKV DW D WLPH 7KLV PDS LV H[WUHPHO\ SRSXODU EHFDXVH LW LGHQWLILHV PRUH WKDQ H[LVWLQJ SHOOHW SODQWV DV ZHOO DV WKRVH XQGHU FRQVWUXFWLRQ 3URGXFWLRQ IDFLOLWLHV DUH FRQYHQLHQWO\ FRORU FRGHG E\ VWDWXV IRU TXLFN UHIHUHQFH

5($&+ 352)(66,21$/6 $OO %LRPDVV 0DJD]LQH VXEVFULEHUV $OO 3HOOHW 0LOO 0DJD]LQH VXEVFULEHUV 3HOOHW PLOO RZQHUV RSHUDWRUV PDQDJHPHQW $OO PDMRU UHODWHG FRQIHUHQFHV

)5(( /,67,1*

5HFHLYH PRQWKV RI )5(( DGYHUWLVLQJ RQ %LRPDVV 0DJD]LQHuV KRPHSDJH

$'9(57,6( 72'$< /,0,7(' 63276 '($'/,1( 0$5&+

1HHG PRUH LQIRUPDWLRQ RQ DGYHUWLVLQJ RSSRUWXQLWLHV"

VHUYLFH#EELLQWHUQDWLRQDO FRP ZZZ %LRPDVV0DJD]LQH FRP

Contents »

Pellet Mill Magazine

JANUARY/FEBRUARY 2015 | VOLUME 5 | ISSUE 1

Advertiser Index

4 2015 International Biomass Conference & Expo 19 Agra Industries 24 AMANDUS KAHL GmbH & Co. KG 11 American International TN LLC 29 Andritz Feed & Biofuel A/S 32 Astec, Inc.

Page 14

31 BBI Project Development 7 Biomass Industry Directory 22 CPM Roskamp Champion 28 Evergreen Engineering

FEATURES

15 Gould Equipment/Trans Tech.

14

16 GreCon, Inc.

Global demand for pellets requires disciplined production and logistics strategies from producers eager to participate in the market.

By Anna Simet

23 Industrial Bulk Lubricants 2 Pellet Mill Map 10 Tramco, Inc. 25 Vecoplan LLC

EXPORT

All That Glitters

20

18 Victam International B.V.

FOREIGN PRODUCTION

Deutschland’s Sleeping Giant

Germany’s pellet industry, Europe’s largest, is in a state of flux, due to feedstock dynamics and the globalization of production.

By Katie Fletcher

26

NEW MARKETS

A Dutch Dilemma

Netherlands could be Europe’s next big buyer of industrial pellets, but that industry opportunity may also bring onerous certification requirements.

By Tim Portz

DEPARTMENTS 05 EDITOR’S NOTE

The European Front

By Tim Portz

06 INDUSTRY EVENTS 08 TESTING GROUNDS

Quality Considerations for European Markets

By Chris Wiberg

09 INDUSTRIAL INSIGHT

A Call for Transparency in Dutch Sustainability Rulemaking

By Seth Ginther

10 BUSINESS BRIEFS 12 NEWS 30 MARKETPLACE JANUARY/FEBRUARY 2015 | PELLET MILL MAGAZINE 3

The Largest Biomass Conference in North America

At the 2014 event in Orlando…

100% of exhibitors rated the

quality of leads positive

98% of exhibitors said

INCREASE EXPOSURE

Limited Number of Sponsorships Available.

Don't Wait, Become a Sponsor Today

they’d return

98% of exhibitors rated

their ROI as positive “The Biomass Conference was an excellent networking event with technical information relevant to the industry.”

– Amy Theis, Fauske & Associates

“Overall the conference was a positive experience and an opportunity to find our place in the Biomass Industry.”

Surround Yourself with Biomass Decision Makers Don’t Wait, Get Your Premium Booth Now

By purchasing a booth you are surrounding yourself with industry professionals who are looking for solutions to their challenges. Contact us at service@bbiinternational.com or 866-746-8385.

– Steve Hoagland, Pantron Automation

“This is a very important conference for me. Wouldn't miss it.”

– William Perritt, RISI

866-746-8385 | service@bbiinternational.com

#IBCE15 - Follow Us: twitter.com/biomassmagazine

Editor’s Note »

The European Front

Tim Portz

VICE PRESIDENT OF CONTENT & EXECUTIVE EDITOR tportz@bbiinternational.com

With this issue of Pellet Mill Magazine, the title moves to a a six-issue per year, theme-based format. Our hope was that adding two issues to the editorial calendar would allow us to dive deeper into specific topic areas with each issue.

The decision is already bearing fruit.

Katie Fletcher’s page-20 feature exploring Germany, Europe’s largest producer of wood pellets, likely would not have made the cut in a quarterly format.

While incredibly interesting, the story likely would have had to make way for a story more directly connected to the issues that North American producers face daily. The article is a must-read, however, and our North American producer readers will recognize in it many of the same challenges they face here: securing feedstock, seeing demand come in fits and starts, and managing rising production costs.

Anna Simet’s story, “All That Glitters” juxtaposes the disparate experiences two North American producers have had folding foreign markets into their operational strategy. One, British Columbia’s Pinnacle Renewable Energy Group, made it central to theirs and haven’t looked back. Pinnacle CEO Rob McCurdy allows that playing in the export space isn’t easy, telling Simet, “There are so many pieces to it, and they all have to be done well.” In other instances, producers like Trae Fuels discover that domestic markets offer plenty of opportunity, free of the risk and uncertainty some producers experience in their earliest forays into foreign markets.

Finally, in my page-26 feature “A Dutch Dilemma,” I dig into the ongoing development of a pellet market in the Netherlands with equal parts promise and pause. The promise is easy enough to articulate. The Dutch, hoping to improve upon their relatively low levels of renewable energy production, have engineered a feed-in tarriff program that most analysts agree would create a 3.5 million-tonannual pellet demand. The pause and uncertainty stem from an ongoing debate about the sustainability requirements the Dutch NGOs are endeavoring to drive into the regulatory aspects of this new program. North American producers stand by the sustainable nature of their forest management practices, but are leery of forest certification requirements, which add a layer of administrative cost that erodes already thin margins.

This issue of Pellet Mill Magazine clearly indicates that all producers, even those who have decided against selling into European markets, are impacted by the market dynamics and public debate unfolding there. We are wise to pay attention.

JANUARY/FEBRUARY 2015 | PELLET MILL MAGAZINE 5

Industry Events »

Le Salon Bois Energie 2015 MARCH 19-22, 2015

Editorial

Parc Expo Nantes, France Dedicated to the entire wood energy chain, this event is the international meeting point for the French market. With 20 countries registered, features will include exhibitors from across Europe, indoor operational stoves and fireplaces, outdoor wood fuel machinery demonstrations, conferences, innovation awards, a study tour and conference program for professionals and weekend conferences for the public. Innovations are introduced into the market at the Salon Bois Energie that provide key insights into future trends for wood energy, and the most significant product and service breakthroughs are recognized and rewarded at the event. +33 (0)3-84-86-89-30 | www.boisenergie.com

PRESIDENT & EDITOR IN CHIEF Tom Bryan tbryan@bbiinternational.com VICE PRESIDENT OF CONTENT & EXECUTIVE EDITOR Tim Portz tportz@bbiinternational.com CONTRIBUTING EDITOR Anna Simet asimet@bbiinternational.com NEWS EDITOR Erin Vogele evoegele@bbiinternational.com COPY EDITOR Jan Tellmann jtellmann@bbiinternational.com STAFF WRITER Katie Fletcher kfletcher@bbiinternational.com

International Biomass Conference & Expo

Art

APRIL 20-22, 2015

ART DIRECTOR Jaci Satterlund jsatterlund@bbiinternational.com

Minneapolis Convention Center Minneapolis, Minnesota Organized by BBI International and produced by Biomass Magazine, this event brings current and future producers of bioenergy and biobased products together with waste generators, energy crop growers, municipal leaders, utility executives, technology providers, equipment manufacturers, project developers, investors and policy makers. It’s a true one-stop shop—the world’s premier educational and networking junction for all biomass industries.

866-746-8385 | www.biomassconference.com

GRAPHIC DESIGNER Raquel Boushee rboushee@bbiinternational.com

Publishing & Sales

CHAIRMAN Mike Bryan mbryan@bbiinternational.com CEO Joe Bryan jbryan@bbiinternational.com VICE PRESIDENT OF OPERATIONS Matthew Spoor mspoor@bbiinternational.com BUSINESS DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR Howard Brockhouse hbrockhouse@bbiinternational.com SENIOR ACCOUNT MANAGER Chip Shereck cshereck@bbiinternational.com ACCOUNT MANAGER Jeff Hogan jhogan@bbiinternational.com SALES & MARKETING DIRECTOR John Nelson jnelson@bbiinternational.com CIRCULATION MANAGER Jessica Beaudry jbeaudry@bbiinternational.com MARKETING & TRAFFIC COORDINATOR Marla DeFoe mdefoe@bbiinternational.com

Subscriptions to Pellet Mill Magazine are free of charge—distributed quarterly—to Biomass Magazine subscribers.To subscribe, visit www.BiomassMagazine.com or you can send your mailing address to Pellet Mill Magazine Subscriptions, 308 Second Ave. N., Suite 304, Grand Forks, ND 58203. You can also fax a subscription form to (701) 746-5367. Back Issues & Reprints Select back issues are available for $3.95 each, plus shipping. Article reprints are also available for a fee. For more information, contact us at (866) 746-8385 or service@bbiinternational.com. Advertising Pellet Mill Magazine provides a specific topic delivered to a highly targeted audience. We are committed to editorial excellence and high-quality print production. To find out more about Pellet Mill Magazine advertising opportunities, please contact us at (866) 746-8385 or service@bbiinternational.com. Letters to the Editor We welcome letters to the editor. Send to Pellet Mill Magazine Letters to the Editor, 308 2nd Ave. N., Suite 304, Grand Forks, ND 58203 or email to sretkaschill@bbiinternational.com. Please include your name, address and phone number. Letters may be edited for clarity and/or space.

6th AEBIOM Bioenergy Conference 2015 MAY 4-6, 2015

Radisson Blu Royal Hotel Brussels, Belgium The AEBIOM Bioenergy Conference, organized by the European Biomass Association, addresses bioenergy, the largest renewable energy source in Europe, by providing occasion for discussion and networking among industry leaders and policy makers. Expected to be present are 300 industry representatives. Co-organizers are the European Pellet Council, the Industrial European Pellet Suppliers and the International Biomass Torrefaction Council. +32 2 318 40 34 | www.aebiom.org/conference

International Fuel Ethanol Workshop & Expo JUNE 1-4, 2015

Minneapolis Convention Center Minneapolis, Minnesota The FEW provides the global ethanol industry with cutting-edge content and unparalleled networking opportunities in a dynamic business-to-business environment. The FEW is the largest, longest running ethanol conference in the world—and the only event powered by Ethanol Producer Magazine.

866-746-8385 | www.fuelethanolworkshop.com

Please recycle this magazine and remove inserts or samples before recycling TM

COPYRIGHT © 2015 by BBI International

6 PELLET MILL MAGAZINE | JANUARY/FEBRUARY 2015

One FREE Listing per Company directory.biomassmagazine.com bkd`mhmf|

),1'

%52:6( &$7(*25,(6 %52:6( &203$1,(6

find it online at

ÂŤ Testing Grounds

Quality Considerations for European Markets

BY CHRIS WIBERG

Iâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;d like to highlight some of the quality requirements for selling wood pellets into European markets but, more importantly, point out some specific differences between U.S. and European quality, logistical and consumer needs that producers should be aware of when selling into the European markets.

For wood pellet producers who sell their entire production into the European markets, it is actually quite simple.

You can simply dedicate your entire operation to the needs of your European customers. This may include the use of specific operating equipment such as a 6 mm die instead of the U.S. standard one-fourth inch die or perhaps purchasing testing equipment that conforms to EN methods instead of ASTM methods. You would likely need to adopt the 3.15 mm round hole sieve as your definition of fines instead of the one-eighth inch-square hole sieve used in the U.S., as well as numerous other items that are standard to the European markets. The challenge is that there are numerous pellet producers here in the U.S. who primarily sell their product into domestic markets, but are now seeking opportunities in European markets. Or, perhaps they are servicing one sector of the European market and now want to sell into other sectors, which may have different requirements.

In these situations, it is tempting to take the approach that you make what you make and hope your product will be considered acceptable for the markets you are interested in.

Several differences, however, if not accounted for, can result in a poorly performing product, limiting your ability to sell into these markets.

Here are some examples: Traditionally, European residential heating markets have highly favored, blond pellets, very light in color. U.S. producers have struggled over the years to make pellets blond enough for European buyers. Fortunately, this requirement seems to be loosening up a bit allowing for some hardwood/softwood blended products, but it continues to be challenging for hardwood producers to pass the color test. Additionally, the top pellet quality class in Europe is A1 grade, which has an ash limit of 0.7 percent. U.S. softwood producers can certainly achieve this limit, but it is much more challenging with hardwood and is a parameter that should be closely monitored. It is also relatively common for European distributors to demand a limit of 0.5 percent even though the grade requirement is 0.7 percent.

8 PELLET MILL MAGAZINE | JANUARY/FEBRUARY 2015

There are a few physical properties that make a difference depending on the specific market within Europe.

Many European retailers seem to appreciate a true 6.0 mm pellet. The U.S. standard die is 0.25 inches, which is equivalent to 6.35 mm. After production, pellets typically expand a little yielding a pellet closer to 6.5 mm. This may not seem like a huge difference, but it can give retailers pause. European retailers are also very conscientious of pellet length and length distribution. They prefer an average length of around 1.5 to 2.0 cm with not too many small ones and not too many long ones, and absolutely no pellets greater than 45 mm. Durability is also significant and complicated. For all European markets, the published durability limit is 97.5. For the bagged market, this is fine and it is considered acceptable for bulk industrial markets as well. For bulk residential delivery, the published limit is also 97.5, however distributors for this market typically try to find product that has a durability between 98.5 and 99.0. This is due to the pneumatic conveyance used for this market and a strong desire to reduce fines. To achieve these very high durability numbers and low fines, most European producers who serve this market use additives such as corn starch. In the U.S. additives are not commonly used, so durability tends to be lower.

There are also significant transportation and logistical issues to consider. Standard U.S. pallet and packaging, truck sizes and fork lifts are all different in Europe. To complicate this even more, the pallet size and stack height that is needed to optimally fill a shipping container does not match standard U.S. or European packaging systems. One of the largest hurdles to shipping bagged product in containers to European markets is getting the right-sized pallets and packaging for all stages of transport and delivery. I have no helpful hints here as to what works best. It is just something that I highly recommend you research thoroughly if attempting this model.

This all boils down to understanding the needs of your customer. If you take the time to understand the needs of the European buyers, you will find that by making some changes to your process to accommodate them, you may find that your product is much more likely to find a buyer.

Author: Chris Wiberg Manager, Biomass Energy Laboratory 218-428-3583 cwiberg@tpinspection.com

Industrial Insight Âť

A Call for Transparency in Dutch Sustainability Rulemaking

BY SETH GINTHER

The industrial wood pellet industry has spent the past several years working closely with policymakers at the European Union level and within its member states on developing sustainability criteria for solid biomass.

Transparency in these processes is key to effective policymaking. In fact, the World Trade Organization agrees with that concept, and one of the tenets of its Technical Barriers to Trade Agreement is that the signatory countries to the TBT will undertake any regulatory standards making process, including sustainability criteria, in an open and transparent manner with public consultation and input.

In that vein, when the United Kingdom, a signatory to the TBT, developed its sustainability criteria for solid biomass, it did so by involving all stakeholders, keeping the process open to the public. The U.K. government went about its work in a very public manner issuing a number of consultations through the U.K. Department of Energy and Climate Change. The public was provided with drafts of various proposals and was given time to provide comment on those proposals. That process culminated with the most robust set of sustainability criteria on solid biomass ever enacted, and those criteria ensure delivery of a sustainable product, while also being reasonable and workable within North American forest products markets.

Let's contrast that process and its result with earlier this year, when the Netherlands began its process of creating sustainability criteria for solid biomass. Unlike the U.K. government, Netherlands, which is also a signatory to the TBT and therefore legally required to have a transparent rulemaking process, decided to establish its sustainability crite-

ria for solid biomass through a closed and secretive process that does not allow for any stakeholder consultation or public engagement or comment.

The Dutch government has failed to publish any form of public stakeholder consultation at any point over the past several months, nor has it released an official draft of any proposal, making it impossible for civil society to comment on those drafts.

Instead, civil society has been forced to rely upon a secretive expert group on sustainability to try to reach an agreement on criteria. As of this writing, that secretive expert group has failed to reach an agreement and we understand that Minister Henk Kamp, the Dutch Minister for Economic Affairs will have to make some decisions on his own. We now call on Minister Kamp to do what he should have done all alongâ&#x20AC;&#x201D;abide by the binding obligations of the TBT and open up the process for establishing sustainability criteria for solid biomass.

We call upon the Netherlands to open the process to all stakeholders and the public. We stand ready to work closely with the Netherlands on developing sustainability criteria that satisfies both environmental and economic considerations. To move forward with the current closed process only harms the credibility of the Dutch government in the global marketplace and hinders the ability of the Netherlands to meet its EU-mandated renewable energy targets.

Author: Seth Ginther Executive Director U.S. Industrial Pellet Association 804-771-9540 sginther@hf-law.com

JANUARY/FEBRUARY 2015 | PELLET MILL MAGAZINE 9

Business Briefs

PEOPLE, PRODUCTS & PARTNERSHIPS

Forest2Market announces change to sales team Forest2Market has promoted Gordon Culbertson to the director of international business, where he will work to establish relationships and identify new business partners across the Culbertson globe. He previously served as manager of the Pacific Northwest region. Peter Coutu has been appointed sales director of North America. In his new role, Coutu is responsible Hearn for customer account management and sales of all subscription services in the U.S. and Canada. He previously served as sales manager. Forest2Market has also announced Suzanne Hearn, vice president of marketing and sales, retired at the end of

September. She joined Forest2Market in 2006 and has been responsible for the launch of the company’s bioenergy and lumber practices.

Forest2Market began transitioning Hearn’s Leslie responsibilities to other staff members last summer. Peter Coutu, director of North American Sales, will lead forest products industry sales, while Peter Stewart, president and CEO, is now overseeing Forest2Market’s lumber service, Mill2Market. Tracy Leslie has been named director of forest biomaterials and sustainability services.

In this role, she is responsible for opening new markets for Forest2Market data subscriptions and analytic services. She joins Stan Parton, manager of bioenergy sector sales. The new team will expand the use of Forest2Market’s product offerings into existing bioenergy markets as well as emerging markets in biofuels, biochemicals and sustainability.

10 PELLET MILL MAGAZINE | JANUARY/FEBRUARY 2015

Morbark promotes team member Morbark Inc. has promoted Larry Voelker as vice president of engineering and product development.

Voelker previously served as director of engineering and was Voelker responsible for the planning and implementation of all engineering activities and providing the strategic technical leadership in continuous improvement of equipment and process capability. Prior to joining Morbark, Voelker held positions at QuickSet International, IMM Inc. and AAR Mobility Systems.

Andritz announces wireless heat sensor Andritz Inc. and SST Wireless Inc. are collaborating to produce a customized version of SST’s wireless heat sensor technology for deployment on Andritz’s wood pelletizers

as an OEM option. The system will include SST’s high-temperature sensors that are installed directly onto the rollers to provide real-time monitoring of critical temperatures.

Andritz will install a complete system at its Muncy, Pennsylvania, facility to demonstrate the technology and establish best practices and recommendations to reduce downtime and accidents caused by overheating of rollers and bearing shafts.

Vermeer announces management changes As part of its family succession planning process, Vermeer Corp. has announced that third-generation family member Jason Andringa will serve as the company’s next president and CEO, efJason Andringa fective Nov. 1, 2015. On Nov. 1 of last year, he assumed the role of president and chief operating officer for one

year, before transitioning to president and CEO. He previously served as president of forage and environmental solutions.

Mary Andringa, current president and CEO, assumed the role of CEO Mary Andringa and chair of the board on Nov. 1. She will transition exclusively to chair of the board Nov. 1, 2015. Bob Vermeer, current chairman of the board, will assume the role of chair emeritus.

Viridis Energy adds to management team Viridis Energy Inc. has appointed Tim Knoop as senior vice president of operations.

Knoop will oversee the company’s Canadian west coast and east coast manufacturing operations

Knoop

with the goal of heightening cost efficiencies and fortifying the company’s operational framework in preparation for its expansion strategy. Prior to joining Viridis, he served as general manager of Pacific Bioenergy, as well as director of Nazbec, a joint venture between Pacific Bioenergy and Nzko.

Drax Group announces retirement of chairman Drax Group plc has announced that Charles Berry is expected to retire as a nonexecutive director and chairman of the board effective in April, following the conclusion of the company’s next annual general meeting. He was appointed to the board as a nonexecutive director in December 2005 and was appointed chairman in 2008. The board has commenced a search process to find a successor.

SHARE YOUR INDUSTRY NEWS: To be included in the Business Briefs, send information (including photos and logos, if available) to Business Briefs, Pellet Mill Magazine, 308 Second Ave. N., Suite 304, Grand Forks, ND 58203.

You may also email information to evoegele@bbiinternational.com.

Please include your name and telephone number in all correspondence.

JANUARY/FEBRUARY 2015 | PELLET MILL MAGAZINE 11

Pellet News UK DECC outlines bioenergy investments in annual statement U.K. Department UK bioenergy investments of Energy and Climate Estimated investment 2010-2013 £6.3 billion Change Secretary Edward Davey recently delivered Estimated investment 2014-2020 £5-5.9 billion his annual energy stateEmployment level 2012-2013 up to 14,700 ment to Parliament. As Installed capacity (Q2 2014) 4.3 GW part of the statement, Under construction 0.8 GW Davey said that record Awaiting construction 3.8 GW investments of £45 billion ($70.99 billion) in In planning 0.5 GW electricity generation and SOURCE: U.K. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY AND CLIMATE CHANGE networks since 2010 have put the nation on target to through 2020, supporting up to 14,700 meet its future low carbon jobs. By that time, the report predicts requirements. The renewables investbiomass could provide the equivalent ment includes £6.3 billion specifically of 10 percent of the nation’s current invested in biomass and bioenergy power supply, which is enough to since 2010. power approximately 8 million homes.

A report that accompanied the In 2013, biomass and waste accounted statement indicates the U.K. is expectfor about 4 percent of inland energy ed to invest an additional £5 billion to consumption in the U.K. £5.9 billion in biomass energy projects

Enviva files IPO, announces acquisition of Green Circle Enviva has filed a registration statement with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission for a proposed $100 million initial public offering (IPO) and announced plans to acquire Green Circle Bio Energy Inc. The IPO was filed by Enviva Partners LP. While Enviva operates five pellet plants, including those in Wiggins and Amory, Mississippi; Ahoskie and Northampton, North Carolina; and Southampton, Virginia, SEC filings indicate Enviva Holdings LP, Enviva Partners’ sponsor, will retain ownership of the Southampton facility. Green Circle Bio Energy and its 650,000-ton-per-year facility in Cottondale, Florida, is being acquired

by Enviva Development Holdings LLC. That facility is expected to be contributed to Enviva Partners. As

EPA releases updated biogenic carbon framework, issues guidance memo The U.S. EPA released a revised framework for assessing biogenic carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions from stationary sources in November. The revised framework is undergoing additional public review. The agency has also issued a memo providing regulatory guidance on how the updated framework will impact the Clean Power Plan and Prevention of Significant Deterioration Program.

The memo outlines the EPA’s current thinking with regard to the treatment of biogenic emissions under the CCP and PSD program. Notably, it indicates the EPA plans to propose revisions to the PSD rules to include an exemption from the best available control technology requirement for greenhouse gas emissions from waste-derived feedstocks and from nonwaste biogenic feedstocks derived from sustainable forest or agricultural practices.

In response to the EPA’s announcements, Biomass Power Association President Bob Cleaves said the agency had never before made such a clear and emphatic endorsement of biomass. Cleaves said EPA is describing waste-derived materials and forest-derived materials as having “minimal or ... no net atmospheric contribution of biogenic CO2 emissions,” and called the declaration “a very positive and very clear statement.”

Northeast Wood Products expands production capacity

such, Enviva Partners LP is expected to own the Amory, Wiggins, Ahoskie, Northampton and Cottondale facilities upon the close of the IPO. In addition to the Cottondale plant, Green Circle previously announced the proposed development of a 500,000-ton-per-year plant in Mississippi. Morton Neraas, president and CEO of Green Circle, recently told Biomass Magazine that at the present time, it is not anticipated any changes will be made to the project due to the change in ownership.

12 PELLET MILL MAGAZINE | JANUARY/FEBRUARY 2015

Less than a year from when it entered the wood pellet industry in mid-2014, Northeast Wood Products is expected to have acquired nearly 350,000 tons of annual production capacity.

In June, the company, the majority shareholder of which is the Mohegan Tribe of Connecticut, announced that it had acquired Pennington Seed Co.’s 65,000-metric-ton-per-year pellet plant in Peebles, Ohio, related equipment and assets at the company’s Kenbridge, Virginia, facility, and was in process of acquiring Pennington’s 65,000-metric-ton-per-year pellet plant in Ligonier, Indiana. The Ligonier transaction closed in the latter half of the year.

The company also recently closed machinery assets of Tennessee Hardwood in Kempton, Tennessee, which accounts for approximately 120,000 tons of annual capacity. According to Guy Mozzicato, president of Northeast Wood Products, another small acquisition is the works. Once that transaction is complete, the company will have an estimated 350,000 tons of annual production capacity.

Pellet News » Highland Pellets to develop Arkansas plant

Canfor plans 2 British Columbia pellet projects Canfor Corp. plans to collocate pellet plants at its sawmill sites in Chetwynd and Fort St. John, British Columbia. The facilities will have a combined capacity of 175,000 metric tons of pellets per year. The pellet plants will be constructed and operated in partnership with Pacific Bioenergy Corp.

A long-term agreement is in place with a power utility customer for the sale of pellets produced at the plants. The total investment of $58 million will include electrical self-generation capacity of 3 MW from a combined-heat-andpower (CHP) plant located at the Chetwynd site. The CHP system is supported through BC Hydro's Power Smart Load Displacement Program.

The feedstock to the plants will come primarily from the associated sawmill at each site, though some additional

material will come from other Canfor mills and the open market, said Corinne Stavness, director of public affairs and responsibility with Canadian Forest Products Ltd. Construction was scheduled to begin in the fourth quarter with the plants scheduled to commence production during the third and fourth quarters of this year.

Highland Pellets LLC has announced plans to build a 500,000-ton-per-year pellet plant in Pine Bluff, Arkansas. The $130 million plant is expected to begin production in March 2016.

Marshall Chapin, chief operating officer with Highland, said the company chose the location because of the availability of resources.

“The Pine Bluff area has an abundant and sustainable fiber basket, which can reliably support our fiber needs, and it has both rail and barge access for redundancy of logistics,” he said.

Although off-take agreements and feedstock partners are confidential, the company said it is working with industry partners including a leading forestry company to provide sustainable fiber feedstock and Cooper/ Consolidated for management of the logistics supply chain for export. Highland did indicate its fiber supply is fully contracted for 10 years.

Rentech pellet mills, Atikokan Generating Station begin operations

Consortium for Advanced Woodto-Energy Solutions launches

In late October, Rentech Inc. announced the startup of its Atikokan wood pellet facility. Commissioning and startup of the Wawa facility was expected to begin before the end of the year. All major equipment at the Wawa facility was in place in October, and certain critical items, including the drying system, bark furBETTER WITH BIOMASS: The Atikokan Generation Station has completed its transition from coal to biomass. nace and both log cranes PHOTO: ANNA SIMET were commissioned and operational at that time. pellets domestically to Ontario Power Rentech noted delays Generation’s Atikokan Generating in deliveries by certain vendors prolonged construction and startup of the Station, which began operations in Septwo Canadian plants. The first shipment tember. The facility is the largest plant of pellets to Drax is expected to occur in North America to be fueled with 100 percent biomass. during the second quarter.

Rentech will also supply wood

The Georgia Southern University Herty Advanced Materials Development Center in Savannah, Georgia, U.S. Endowment for Forestry and Communities, and the USDA Forest Service Forest Products Laboratory in Madison, Wisconsin, recently announced the launch of the Consortium for Advanced Wood-to-Energy Solutions. The consortium’s goal is to spearhead development of commercially viable, advanced wood-to-energy products that can be produced from low-value trees and forest residues that can compromise forest health and increase the frequency of wildfires.

AWES’s initial focus will be on torrefaction.

“Our initial work will center on determining the commercial viability of torrefaction—the ‘roasting’ of wood in a low-oxygen environment—to create an energy-dense product that can more easily be shipped, stored and used to produce renewable energy,” said Alexander Koukoulas, president and CEO of Herty.

According to information released by Georgia Southern University, founding partners will seek the participation of public and private institutions in the consortium.

JANUARY/FEBRUARY 2015 | PELLET MILL MAGAZINE 13

ÂŤ Export

THE WHOLE PICTURE: Pinnacle's Westview Terminal in Prince Rupert British Columbia connects Pinnacle's production with waiting global markets. Rail cars can be unloaded at 1,000 tons per hour (tph) and ships can be loaded at 2,000 tph.

Pellets are moved from the four storage silos onto waiting vessels along a shuttle conveyor moving at 500 feet per minute.

PHOTO: PRINCE RUPERT PORT AUTHORITY

14 PELLET MILL MAGAZINE | JANUARY/FEBRUARY 2015

Export Âť

All That Glitters While domestic demand soars and export challenges remain daunting, small and midsized North American producers may choose to leave bustling foreign markets to the big guys.

BY ANNA SIMET

JANUARY/FEBRUARY 2015 | PELLET MILL MAGAZINE 15

« Export

W

hen brothers Jim and Rob Swaan founded Pinnacle Renewable Energy Group over 20 years ago with the commissioning of its Quesnel, British Columbia, mill, they likely never imagined that one day the company would reach over 1 million metric tons of capacity from six plants spread across the province. Today, Pinnacle manufactures 56 percent of Canada’s total pellet production, and, according to CEO Rob McCurdy, a seventh plant is in the works.

“It’s in environmental approval, and most of the engineering work is done,” he says.

Most of Pinnacle’s production is sent to large European customers, with a smaller portion to Asia. “The Draxes of the world,” McCurdy says. “We do sell some into the European heating market, but the majority goes to power plants.”

Armed with the better part of a decade’s worth of exporting experience, Pinnacle knows the ropes and has armed itself with enviable investments that have enabled the company to achieve huge successes in its overseas endeavor—specifically, construction of its own port facility in Prince Ruppert.

The $42 million Westview terminal was built on the site of an abandoned grain terminal, designed specifically to receive wood pellets transported by rail from Pinnacle’s facilities for loading into bulk cargo vessels.

It includes private rail storage tracks, a wood pellet receiving and unloading building, a conveyor and ship loader system, and four silos with an expandable storage capacity of 50,000 metric tons. The terminal can unload rail cars at 1,000 metric tons per hour and has a vessel loading rate of 2,000 metric tons per hour.

16 PELLET MILL MAGAZINE | JANUARY/FEBRUARY 2015

Prior to completion of the Westview terminal in late 2013, there was only one port in British Columbia, in Vancouver.

Now, Pinnacle sends 60 percent of its exported product through its own terminal, and the remainder through the Port of Vancouver. Though Westview is able to accommodate Panamax vessels, McCurdy says Pinnacle ships mostly in Supramax ships.

“With our new port, we have lower rail costs to port for many of our plants, and less demurrage costs since our port is wood pellet specific, whereas the port in Vancouver has wood chips competing for the ship docking space.”

Though Pinnacle has put together a model that has seemingly made exporting a breeze, McCurdy admits that it is far from it. “All of the pieces of the puzzle have to work to make it work economically,” he says. “That’s whether it’s for export or domestic [sale], but to export, you need good customers, your shipping logistics to work well, a port, shipping to the port and the plant, and a fiber supply. All of those pieces of the puzzle have to fit together and work properly, or it doesn’t make sense.”

He notes that overseas conversions of big power stations takes years of planning, so the large customers often seek other large, established producers to source pellets from. And while there is competition, he notes that the business is not as easy to get into as people think. “There are so many pieces to it, and they all have to be done well.”

From McCurdy’s perspective, one challenge for a small producer is balancing payment and shipping schedules. “To make the logistics work you need a big ship, and that might take two or three months of their capacity, so it’s tough to get into a business where you make one shipment a quarter, and your payment comes once a quarter—that’s a real lumpy cash flow.”

While it’s easier for big producers to deal with the big customers, small and midsized producers have and continue to dabble in exporting—some with success, and others not. Plenty may still be on the

fence, receiving inquiries on a regular basis, but determining which inquiries are legitimate, and which customers are reputable, can be difficult. For those reasons, as well as the turn the domestic market has taken, keeping business at home may be more appealing.

That’s the case for Trae Fuels, which purchased Ensign-Bickford Renewable Energies’ 120,000-metric-ton Bumpass, Virginia, plant in June 2013. After a stint of trying its hand in the export market, the challenges involved, as well as a domestic market surge, has removed much of the luster that attracted the company’s attention to European and other overseas markets.

Domestic Charm

Trae Fuels has shipped containers overseas, but demand in the U.S. has drawn the company’s attention away from those pursuits for now, says Chris LaRocco. “Previously, the domestic industry was pretty much decimated—there were a couple years of soft winters and overcapacity in the marketplace, but last year was a breakout year. The industry is now at a point where it can make money.”

LaRocco says parent company Envirotech purchased the Bumpass plant with hopes of getting into the European bulk utility-grade market, but found that prices were below what it could get to pencil out.

“We thought we might be minutely profitable because of our location [near a port], but we’re not big enough to be a direct supplier to the utility,” he says. “We transitioned back to 100 percent bagged product, which the plant was built for anyway, and lucky for us, the domestic heating markets exploded. We got in at the right time, and the market here is more robust than it has been in a long time. We can do some bulk, but we’re not pursuing it.”

Not having a direct avenue to a desired buyer means looking to brokers to help move product, but LaRocco says it’s difficult to weed out nonreputable players—on both the broker and customer end. “One challenge to the export side is that there are a lot of brokers rushing to the wood

EUROPE-BOUND: The Darya Ganga bulk carrier loads 30,000 tons of wood pellets before departing the Westview Terminal at the Port of Prince Ruppert.

PHOTO: PRINCE RUPERT PORT AUTHORITY

JRXOG HTXLSPHQW

JANUARY/FEBRUARY 2015 | PELLET MILL MAGAZINE 17

ÂŤ Export pellet market,â&#x20AC;? he says. â&#x20AC;&#x153;The reality is that when we run a credit check, most of these companies who want to buy the pellets, they donâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;t have any credit history. Weâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;ve also run into contracts for which the buyers havenâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;t obligated themselves to adhering. There are still too many charlatans in the mix; weeding out whom to do business with in Europe is difficult, especially for producers who are stateside. There are a lot of challenges with these emerging markets, in part because of all of the players who have gravitated toward it.â&#x20AC;?

For example, in Trae Fuelsâ&#x20AC;&#x2122; experiences, the customer has backed away from initial price offerings once contract negotiations had begun in some cases, or changed terms to request paid freight costsâ&#x20AC;&#x201D;and not just by newcomers, but a reputable, well-known conglomerate looking to get into the pellet business. â&#x20AC;&#x153;We got so frustrated that it pushed us [to focus on domestic sales],â&#x20AC;? LaRocco said. â&#x20AC;&#x153;Theyâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;d want us to carry the freight costâ&#x20AC;Śitâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;s interesting because we just came out of period where things werenâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;t so good and produc-

9 ELRPDVV ,VODQG 3DJH

THE LEADING SHOW FOR BIO-ENERGY AND BIOMASS PELLETING 9 â&#x20AC;&#x201C; 11 JUNE 2015 â&#x20AC;˘ COLOGNE EXHIBITION HALLS, COLOGNE, GERMANY

ers were giving everything awayâ&#x20AC;&#x201D;freight, baggingâ&#x20AC;&#x201D;just trying to stay in business, to now, this explosion and shortage in supply.â&#x20AC;?

So, for smaller producers who have been figuring out ways to get a finger in the exporting pie, the tide may be changing.

At least, it is for Trae Fuels. Acknowledging the importance of keeping its options openâ&#x20AC;&#x201D;thus allocating a certain amount of production that can be available to overseas marketâ&#x20AC;&#x201D;LaRocco says the domestic market is more attractive right now. â&#x20AC;&#x153;Weâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;re staying stateside for now. Weâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;ll entertain only those who are legitimate, established businesses overseas, or someone stateside who has the capacity and credentials to take it overseas. We're looking for legitimate, statewide brokers who have the wherewithal to handle negotiations, storage, shipping, all of it, leaving enough room at the table for themselves to make money, but paying us at the gate.â&#x20AC;?

For David Mancinelli, a small, stateside broker, the export woes small and mediumsized pellet producers are well-understood.

He points out the challenges that brokers such as him faceâ&#x20AC;&#x201D;those who know the ropes, but are often edged out of the market by the bigtime brokers who, though boasting well-known titles, may not have much knowledge of the industry or provide intimate communication that producers are likely more comfortable with.

Overseas Obstacles

Visit Europeâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;s leading exhibition for bio-energy and biomass pelleting.

See the worldâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;s foremost producers and suppliers of biomass pelleting technology all under one roof.

Specialist conference: AEBIOM Biomass & Biomass Pelleting 2015 Co-located with:

GRAPAS INTERNATIONAL 2015 â&#x20AC;&#x201C; The flour milling and grain processing show FIAAP INTERNATIONAL 2015 â&#x20AC;&#x201C; The worldâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;s largest feed production exhibition

For further information please contact: Victam International BV PO Box 197, 3860 AD Nijkerk, The Netherlands T: ++31 (0)33 246 4404 F: ++31 (0)33 246 4706 E: expo@victam.com For floorplan, application form and further information please visit:

www.victam.com

Free online visitor registration is available from 1 Feb 2015 See us on Twitter, Facebook, Linkedin and Google+ or scan the QR code:

18 PELLET MILL MAGAZINE | JANUARY/FEBRUARY 2015

Mancinelli has been in the pellet business for 10 years, mostly selling livestock bedding through Colorado-based Premier Livestock. Over the years, he has branched off into fuel pellets, and not surprisingly, heâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;s commonly contacted by those in pursuit of pellets. â&#x20AC;&#x153;But Iâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;ve found that many mills donâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;t want to bother with exporting, the small and midsized producers,â&#x20AC;? he says. â&#x20AC;&#x153;And there are many reasons they donâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;t want to.â&#x20AC;?

On broker challenges, Mancinelli says letters of credit (LOC) and guaranteed payment for product, are obvious hurdles, and problems that heâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;s run into. â&#x20AC;&#x153;The LOC can apply at several different times, one being when the product gets to the shipping port, the other when [product] arrives at the des-

Export Âť tination port. The wording has to be very exact in the LOC because it can cause problems. You donâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;t want to take possession of something if you donâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;t know itâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;s real or there. And anyone can have a site say â&#x20AC;&#x2DC;We can get you 10,000 tons of pellets, go ahead and pay for the first 10,000 and weâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;ll see what happens from there.â&#x20AC;&#x2122; As a broker, anyone can tell me they need pellets and I can ship them, and then never get paid. And it has happened. Not to myself, but I know of cases that it has. Itâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;s a catch-22 to figure out who to deal with, when youâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;re shipping them over here.â&#x20AC;?

Also related to payment, Mancinelli says that Korean buyers typically want pellets at very discounted prices, which is often not possible. â&#x20AC;&#x153;I think theyâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;re realizing right now that thereâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;s a high demand in the U.S. for fuel pellets, and theyâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;ll have to pay more or they wonâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;t get them. I think as Korea starts to adopt more standards like Europe has, weâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;re going to see a big change in that market.â&#x20AC;?

Perhaps the largest challenge producers and brokers such as Mancinelli face are freight costs. Mancinelli notes that it isn't necessarily the overseas freight, but instead the cost of getting product to an outbound port. â&#x20AC;&#x153;Freight is more of a problem than the pellet cost. Pellet costs in the U.S. vary quite a bit, but in most cases, they can be found at a reasonable price. Even in Florida, they have to be shipped to Georgia to get them freighted out. Midsized mills in Tennessee, Alabama and Mississippi, by the time we get to the ports, the freight most definitely kills us.â&#x20AC;?

Freight costs aside, Mancinelli says one idea to help small and midsized producers become comfortable with exporting may be to form exporting co-ops. â&#x20AC;&#x153;In this scenario, I would find a group of mills that may have 200 to 1,000 tons per month of pellets for overseas shipments,â&#x20AC;? he explains. â&#x20AC;&#x153;Most overseas accounts are looking for 2,000 to 4,000 tons per month, and that scares smaller mills for a couple of reasonsâ&#x20AC;&#x201D;one because it hasnâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;t worked out with past experiences, and the other is that they arenâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;t guaranteed a customer will continue to pay the same price for the amount of pellets promised each month, and get burned.â&#x20AC;?

Though itâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;s a concept Mancinelli is investigating and working on, it has yet to come to fruition.

No matter the size, numerous factors come into play when it comes to determining the most profitable market for producer and broker products and services, and business models may change as global markets continue to grow and evolve. While Trae Fuels leaves its options open, but has found a niche in the U.S. market for the foreseeable future, if it weren't for the explosion of global markets, Pinnacle would look quite different than it does today.

The company isnâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;t likely to change focus, and will leave smaller producers to satisfy domestic markets. â&#x20AC;&#x153;Industrial export is the market weâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;re in,â&#x20AC;? McCurdy adds. â&#x20AC;&#x153;If it wasnâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;t for export markets taking off, we wouldnâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;t be close to the size we areâ&#x20AC;&#x201D;we couldnâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;t do what weâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;re doing today on the domestic market, thatâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;s for sure.â&#x20AC;?

Author: Anna Simet Managing Editor, Pellet Mill Magazine asimet@bbiinternational.com 701-738-4961

$*5$

,QGXVWULHV <285 (3& &2175$&725

)520 '(6,*1

72 )$%5,&$7,21

72 &203/(7,21

$*5$ +$6 &86720 '(6,*1(' %,20$66 62/87,216 )25 <28

::: $*5$,1' &20

JANUARY/FEBRUARY 2015 | PELLET MILL MAGAZINE 19

« Foreign Production

INDUSTRY BEGINNINGS: Markus Mann is the CEO of Westerwälder Holzpellets.

The company owns Germany’s first industrial 40,000 metric-ton-capacity pellet plant in Langenbach installed in 2001.

PHOTO: WESTERWÄLDER HOLZPELLETS GMBH

20 PELLET MILL MAGAZINE | JANUARY/FEBRUARY 2015

Foreign Production »

Deutschland’s

Sleeping Giant Although Germany’s pellet supply and demand has steadily increased over the years, recent factors have impacted growth.

BY KATIE FLETCHER

I

n 1910, the great-grandfather of German pellet producer Markus Mann added a small sawmill operation to his wood-turning business. More than a decade later, the eldest son of the wood turner, Mann’s Grandfather Emil, founded a transport company that trucked wood and other raw material in the region. Emil’s daughter Anna and her husband grew the small woodturning company and sawmill into a larger operation, known today as Koch GmbH. The sawdust and woodchips from this operation feed one of three pellet plants that Mann’s company, Westerwälder Holzpellets GmbH, runs today.

Westerwälder installed its first pellet plant in 2001 in Mann’s home village next to the family sawmill in Langenbach. In 2006, the company installed a 48,000-ton-per-year pellet plant in Oberhonnefeld, and four years later built another similarsized plant in Hosenfeld. Westerwälder’s capacity has grown from 2,000 tons of pellets in 2001 to 184,000 tons in 2013.

Growth of this family-owned pellet company mirrors the evolution of the entire German pellet industry. Now the largest wood pellet producer in Europe, Germany got its start in the mid-1990s with pellet boilers from Austria and very small operations like Mann’s. In 1996, pellets were approved as solid fuel and introduced to the German market two years later. At the beginning of the millennium, there was a parallel between the number of pellet

heating system installations and pellet production.

That continued until 2006, when demand for pellets outgrew capacity, mainly due to high oil prices.

Over 100,000 pellet heating systems were installed through 2007.

The rapid growth caused a shortage of pellets in 2006. “This led to a great uncertainty in Germany, and people started hesitating to invest in a pellet boiler or stove, as they thought they might not get enough pellets in the winter time,” says Barbara Pilz, former editor-in-chief of the German trade magazine Pellets—Markets and Trends and project manager of the international trade conference Pellets Industry Forum. “That shortage led to a decline in demand of pellet heating systems. At the same time, new pellet production was being built up to cover the expected demand in the future.”

According to Martin Bentele, CEO of the German Wood Fuel and Pellet Association (DEPV) and German Pellet Institute (DEPI), booming demand of alternative energy, combined with the high price of fossil fuels in the late 2000s and the vast amount of raw material from sawmills, is what led to Germany becoming the largest pellet manufacturing presence in Europe.

It is estimated that 2.15 million tons of pellets were consumed in Germany in 2014, approximately 60 percent in pellet stoves and pellet boilers smaller than 50 kW. DEPV estimated that at the end of 2014 there would be 116,500 residential pellet

JANUARY/FEBRUARY 2015 | PELLET MILL MAGAZINE 21

LARGE PELLET PRESENCE: German Pellet’s 250,000 metric-ton-per-year Wismar mill is located in the vicinity the Port of Wismar for importing fiber and exporting pellets, which is important for the pellet plant apart from the nearby wood processing industries and sawmill.

PHOTO: GERMAN PELLETS

stoves installed in the country, 321,000 residential and commercial pellet boilers smaller than 50 kW and 10,500 strictly commercial applications greater than 50 kW, some with combined-heat-and-power facilities.

These statistics reinforce one of the biggest differences between the German and North American pellet industries. The German pellet market is focused largely on the residential sector, while the North American pellet industry has grown rapidly in recent years by targeting the European utility market.

Once larger producers entered the scene, Germany began producing for other countries in Europe. Germany’s largest producer, German Pellets, began production in 2005 in the port city of Wismar in northern Germany. Anne Leibold and her husband Peter Leibold founded German Pellets with development of the greenfield investment of Wismar Pellet Mill.

Besides the Wismar plant, GP controls 19 more, 14 of which are in Germany, three in Austria, one in Belgium, one in Wood22 PELLET MILL MAGAZINE | JANUARY/FEBRUARY 2015

ville, Texas, and another under construction in Urania, Louisiana. The Woodville plant has up to 500,000-metric-tons annual production output, and a few of the company’s large plants in Germany produce 250,000 metric tons. Others range between 75,000 to 150,000 metric tons. In total, the company is capable of producing approximately 2.6 million metric tons of pellets annually, and its German mills make up approximately 50 percent of the German pellet market. GP is one of the few pellet producers in Germany to produce pellets for both commercial consumers and utilities.

Leibold says that from the beginning GP has followed an international strategy for sales and production, even when sourcing fiber. “Our core market brands are German Pellets, Firestixx and Hot’ts, but we have several others for different markets and distribution channels,” she says.

GP exports its pellets to Denmark, Belgium, the Netherlands, France, Italy, Austria and the United Kingdom. According to Leibold, in general, the main markets

Foreign Production » for residential pellets in Europe are Germany, Italy, France, Austria and Denmark.

The U.K. is the main market for industrial pellets.

Westerwälder exports about 20 percent of its annual production to France, Switzerland and Italy. “There is no delivery to industrial like they have in Holland or Great Britain like Drax; no cofiring in Germany,” Mann says. “My 184,000 tons ran 99 percent into residential or school buildings, medium-sized heating systems.”

According to the DEPV, in 2013, Germany imported 387,295 tons of pellets and exported 666,988. Germany's largest customer was Denmark with 93,000 tons, followed by Belgium at 43,000 tons. Out of the 666,988 tons of exported pellets, less than 100,000 went to non-European countries. The main countries exported to were Austria, Denmark and Italy at 161,000, 121,000 and 100,000 tons, respectively.

In second quarter 2014, 17 percent of German pellet production was exported, mainly to neighboring countries. Increased trade has led the industry to adopt a new pellet certification system. In 2010, the ENplus certification system for wood pellets based on the EN 14961-2 was introduced and implemented by DEPI. The standard was created in order to offer the same pellet quality throughout Europe.

Bentele says that quality has been emphasized with ENplus, and a training program for installers. “A constant challenge for us is quality, both for pellets and installers’ work,” Bentele says. “We have qualified both groups to offer a modern, comfortable and environmentally friendly heating system to their customers.”

Westerwälder’s and GP’s pellets are ENplus certified.

Industry Insight

Westerwälder and GP are joined by about 40 other pellet producers in Germany with an estimated 55 to 60 production sites, many located near sawmills in the densely-wooded, low mountain ranges of Germany.

About 90 percent of German pellet production comes from sawmill industry

residues. Only about 10 percent of round wood is sawed. German sawmills cut approximately 35 million to 40 million cubic meters of round wood, resulting in 13 million to 15 million cubic meters of sawmill residues that could annually supply 1 million pellet heating systems.

Germany has the capacity to produce 3.5 million tons, but the current output is between 2 million and 2.2 million tons annually. Years ago, the industry grew quickly due to the rise in oil prices, amongst other factors, but recent events have led to a rise in sawmill residue price. Mann estimates the total cost of producing bulk pellets by the ton is between 171.50 and 181.50 euros ($215 and $228), whereas the market price for bulk is in the 165 to 175 euros-per-ton range. “Due to the relatively high raw-material cost, not everybody is producing at 100 percent,” Mann says.

The increased price is partially attributed to a lack of sawmill residue in 2013 due to a reduction in sawmill activity in the country. In the first half of 2014, however, sawmill activity bounced back and pellet producers were able to buy residues at a lower cost. “That, in combination with full storages due to the warm winter, led to a decrease in pellet prices from spring on,” Pilz says.

According to Pilz, pellet traders have had storages full since the beginning of 2014 and have been unable to sell enough pellets to gain their economic return.

“Quite some exigency in the German market at the moment,” Pilz says.

Overproduction has also occurred as a result of many plants built around five years ago. Over the past few years, this, combined with the sawmill residue shortage, has led some producers to bankruptcy or consolidation. “The market did not develop as fast as everyone thought after the great interest in pellet heating systems in 2005 and 2006,” Pilz says.

Sleeping Giant

Last years' warm winter led to decreased pellet demand, and Germans to postpone installing new pellet heating systems. “I am very astonished that the people JANUARY/FEBRUARY 2015 | PELLET MILL MAGAZINE 23

PELLET TRADE: German Pellets USA has a storage facility with loading system at the harbor of Port of Arthur in Texas. As part of a 25-year contract to export wood pellets to Europe the facility receives approximately 100 trucks every 24 hours. The Woodville pellet plant and port facilities are certified to ENplus.

PHOTO: GERMAN PELLETS

KAHL Wood Pelleting Plants

Quality worldwide.

AMANDUS KAHL USA Corporation · 380 Winkler Drive, Suite 400, Alpharetta · GA 30004-0736 Phone: 770-521-1021 · sales@amanduskahlusa.com AMANDUS KAHL GmbH & Co. KG · SARJ Equipment Corp., Mr. Rick B. MacArthur · 29 Golfview Blvd., Bradford, Ontario L3Z 2A6 Phone: 001-905-778-0073 · rbmacarthur@sympatico.ca · www.akahl.us

Foreign Production Âť are thinking so short term and they are not investing now,â&#x20AC;? Mann says.

Mann believes now is a good time to install with low interest rates and the looming outcome of the Russia-Ukraine gas disputes. â&#x20AC;&#x153;I think a big thing that could cause an explosion in the market would be higher oil prices due to the gas crisis with Russia.â&#x20AC;? â&#x20AC;&#x153;What we are facing at the moment, especially this year, is that people just postpone changing their heating system as long as itâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;s possible and theyâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;re putting their money in bathrooms,â&#x20AC;? Pilz says.

She adds that as long as an old boiler functions, consumers often think their money is better spent elsewhere. Bathrooms are one upgrade people are doing, and in Germany, the people who install boilers also install bathrooms. â&#x20AC;&#x153;For them, it does not matter if they do not sell boilers, as long as they have business,â&#x20AC;? Pilz says.

According to DEPV, 6 million oil heating boilers can be replaced in the long run. â&#x20AC;&#x153;They have whatâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;s called the sleeping giant in Germany, there are so many old boilers and stoves in cellars and hardly anybody is going to replace them at the moment, even though it is really needed because they are so old,â&#x20AC;? Pilz says. â&#x20AC;&#x153;Everybody is waiting. If there is high demand, we might run out of pellets and therefore need some imports, but if pellet prices go up, it might incentivize new production in Germany with other raw materials.â&#x20AC;?

Pilz believes there is potential in other wood sources for pellet production. â&#x20AC;&#x153;Besides using fast-growing trees, there would also be the option of using whole trees instead of sawmill residues, in order to increase the amount of pellets being produced in Germany,â&#x20AC;? Pilz says. â&#x20AC;&#x153;It only depends on the price of pellets.â&#x20AC;?

Although it is hard to predict which way the industry will turn, price is the main driver. According to Leibold, the cost of wood pellets as heating fuel is around 30 to 40 percent lower than petrol or gas, depending on the country. Other market drivers are the broad environmental consciousness of European consumers and government assistance. â&#x20AC;&#x153;The German Market Incentive Program supports the replacement of old

fossil boilers with modern pellet boilers and pellet stoves that support central heating with at least 2,400 euros ($3,000),â&#x20AC;? Bentele says.

There has, however, been a lack of consistent funding, which has left some to postpone changing heating systems in the hopes that subsidies might go up. â&#x20AC;&#x153;A lot of people in Germany think it would be better to stimulate the renewable heating market by a feed-in tariff like the British implemented,â&#x20AC;? Pilz says.

A challenge in Germany is raising the

exchange rate of insufficient fossil fuel or outdated biomass heating systems with new wood pellet systems. â&#x20AC;&#x153;When the energy transition takes up speed in the heating market, weâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;ll see a moderate yearly growth of both installations and pellet production,â&#x20AC;? Bentele says.

Author: Katie Fletcher Staff Writer, Pellet Mill Magazine 701-738-4920 kfletcher@bbiinternational.com

%XLOGLQJ $ 3HOOHW 3ODQW"

&DOO 9(&23/$1 6\VWHP &RPSRQHQWV Â&#x2021; 0DWHULDO 5H 6L]LQJ Â&#x2021; 0DWHULDO &RQYH\LQJ Â&#x2021; +DPPHUPLOOLQJ *UHHQ RU 'U\ Â&#x2021; 6FUHHQLQJ Â&#x2021; 6WRUDJH

9HFRSODQ ([SHUWLVH

$V DQ HTXLSPHQW PDQXIDFWXUHU ZH NQRZ ZKDW WHFKQRORJLHV PDWFK EHVW DQG FRPELQH ZLWK RQH DQRWKHU WR PD[LPL]H SURGXFWLYLW\ ,Q DGGLWLRQ ZH ZRUN ZLWK UHOLDEOH SDUWQHUV ZKRVH HTXLSPHQW TXDOLW\ DQG FDSDFLW\ ZH NQRZ )URP WKLV KXJH OLVW RI HTXLSPHQW ZH GHVLJQ D FRPSOHWH 3HOOHW 3ODQW FXVWRPL]HG WR \RXU QHHGV EXW WKDWÂśV QRW DOO :H DOVR SD\ SDUWLFXODU DWWHQWLRQ WR WKH FRQWUROV VKLSSLQJ LQVWDOODWLRQ ZLULQJ FRPPLVVLRQLQJ DQG VWDUW XS DQG LW GRHVQÂśW VWRS WKHUH 2XU VHUYLFH DQG VXSSRUW H[SHUWLVH LV VHFRQG WR QRQH 9HFRSODQ RIIHUV WHFKQLFDO VXSSRUW FRPELQHG ZLWK RXU 9HFR /LYH 6HUYLFH ZKLFK HQDEOHV RXU (QJLQHHUV WR VHUYLFH \RXU SODQW IURP DOO RYHU WKH ZRUOG

vecoplanllc.com

(336) 891-0858 JANUARY/FEBRUARY 2015 | PELLET MILL MAGAZINE 25

« Netherlands

ENVIABLE INFRASTRUCTURE: In so many ways, the Netherlands provides a market opportunity optimized for North American pellets. The country is home to the Port of Rotterdam, arguably Europe’s most important trade hub. Pellets can be efficiently transloaded from ocean-going vessels onto barges that connect the port to not only much of the country, but to potential pellet buyers beyond the Dutch borders.

PHOTO: FREEK VAN ARKEL

26 PELLET MILL MAGAZINE | JANUARY/FEBRUARY 2015

Netherlands »

A Dutch Dilemma The Netherlands’ under-debate energy policies could create an additional 3.5 million tons of annual pellet demand or introduce inefficiencies that will put the market out of reach for most North American producers.

BY TIM PORTZ

T

he Netherlands, just twice the size of Massachusetts with roughly 17 million citizens, lags well-behind most of its fellow European Union member countries in growing the renewable share of its overall energy portfolio. Renewables comprise just 4 percent of total energy consumed and the Dutch government continues to work towards a policy environment that will more than triple its share by 2020. As 2014 drew to a close, the pellet industry watched from some remove as a working group populated by the Dutch government, non-governmental organizations (NGOs) and the country’s utilities tried to reach consensus on the particulars of a new policy framework, as well as the sustainability requirements that affect co-firing of woody biomass with coal. Optimistically, the policy may yield an annual Dutch pellet demand of nearly 3.5 million tons per year, but without a voice on the assembled working group, industry insiders are concerned that misguided sustainability requirements may blunt its market-generating intent.

Reasons for Excitement

The enthusiasm and excitement around the promise of new Dutch pellet demand is easy to understand. Pellet producers see the new policy discussions as a way to rekindle demand initially created in the mid-2000s when a different feed-in subsidy, the MEP premium, was passed and implemented. The program was closed in 2006 and the contracts that it created have expired or will in 2015.

The Netherlands is also well positioned from an infrastructure perspective. The country serves as an important trade hub for Western Europe, bolstered by the region’s largest and busiest ports. The port of Rotterdam is a massive complex covering over 46 square miles that remains Europe's busiest port. The port is connected to an impressive system of rivers and waterways that can be leveraged to deliver pellets efficiently by barge. Finally, because of the now-shuttered MEP program, co-firing with wood pellets has an antecedent in the Netherlands. RWE/Essent’s Amer

power plant is one example of a large coal station with deep experience in co-firing biomass. The facility began co-firing with biomass in earnest in 2001, ultimately growing its annual consumption to nearly 800,000 tons by 2010. The successful deployment of biomass co-firing at Amer serves as a strong proof of concept for the owner’s of the country’s other coal assets.

All together, there are seven coal stations in the Netherlands with a total capacity of nearly 7,000 MW. According to Peter-Paul Schouwenberg, Manager Environment-Regulatory Affairs at RWE, the NGO’s that are participating in the policy formation are generally opposed to coal stations, and are willing to entertain biomass co-firing only because of the strategy's ability to reduce CO2 emissions. Additionally, NGOs, energy companies, and Dutch policy makers all believe that robust sustainability criteria must be followed.

State of Play

The policy instrument driving all of this excitement, the SDE-plus (Stimuleringsregeling duurzam energieproductie), is a production-based subsidy that bridges the revenue gap for power producers between fossil-fuel based energy and a renewable alternative, including biomass co-firing. The SDE-plus is the policy manifestation of a comprehensive energy vision statement published in September of 2013 called the Energy Agreement for Sustainable Growth. This agreement offered a road map to both reduce energy consumption and increase the energy share of renewables in the country to 14 percent by 2020, aligning the Dutch trajectory with broader EU climate change mitigation targets. The agreement was developed in the tradition of a bottom-up consensus-building approach common in the Netherlands, known as the polder model. This same model was used to develop the SDE-plus program, and continues to be used to develop the sustainability requirements for biomass that Dutch power generators will have to adhere to in order to receive their production subsidies.

“We set up an expert group between utilities, NGOs

JANUARY/FEBRUARY 2015 | PELLET MILL MAGAZINE 27

« Netherlands and government who have been working on the sustainability criteria since January of the year (2014). They should be ready by the end of this year,” says Schouwenberg. “The expert group included government, the Ministry of Economic Affairs and the Ministry of Infrastructure and Environment. All utilities were involved including EON, Vattenfall, EDF-Suez, Eneco, RWE/Essent. From an NGO perspective, it was the WNF, the Dutch branch of the World Wildlife Fund, Greenpeace, and the Dutch NGO Natuur & Milieu.”

While this collaborative approach is responsible for creating a policy environment incentivizing pellet-derived power, industry proponents feel there is a danger in the market ending up out of reach because of misguided sustainability requirements uninformed by the voices of North American pellet producers or the forest products industry that supplies them with wood fiber.

“Let’s talk about the process of the establishing a sustainability criteria. In strong contrast, and I can’t overstate this enough, in strong contrast to the process we watched unfold in the United Kingdom, which was open, transparent, and had an incredibly high level of stakeholder engagement, the Dutch have gone in the complete opposite direction,” says Seth Ginther, executive director of the U.S. Industrial Pellet Association.

The risk, Ginther points out, extends well beyond the Dutch pellet market. “We want as open and free a market as possible.

We want to tear down the barriers to entry and any obstacles that are put in the way so we have a truly open and commoditized market. Part of doing that is harmonizing sustainability criteria. The European Union has decided not do that at the EU level and has left these decisions to the member states.

What you end up with is member states doing different things and if they’re not careful, inevitably it ends up creating a fragmented set of policies that de-harmonizes everything.

All that does is hinder trade.”

To fully appreciate the challenge that Ginther and others see, it is helpful to examine the world’s largest globally traded commodities. Fossil fuels like coal and crude oil and agricultural products like corn, wheat 28 PELLET MILL MAGAZINE | JANUARY/FEBRUARY 2015

and cotton are all efficiently traded at massive volumes. This efficiency can be attributed to the commodity’s common attributes.

As a result, these commodities can always be found in the global marketplace, traded and re-traded with ease. As countries begin to place restrictions on these commodities trade becomes less efficient. Look no further than the growing trade restrictions on the genetically modified agricultural products. As these restrictions grow, the requirements for keeping these commodities separated from their non GMO equivalents introduce new costs for producers and traders.

Recognizing the risks that Ginther and others have articulated, a group of European utilities that are or will be using wood pellets has formed the Sustainable Biomass Partnership. The organization was formed by the utilities to drive the European Union member countries toward a harmonized set of sustainability requirements.

“The whole idea was to try and get some conformity throughout the various countries that use wood pellets,” says Arnold Dale, vice president of bioenergy at the global forest products trading firm Ekman. “Now we have the Dutch saying, ‘No. We don’t want to look at what other people are doing, we want to come up with our own dedicated system.’

My fear is it’s going to be very, very strict and difficult for manufacturers to comply with, or if not difficult, certainly time-consuming.

They’re going to be asking the most detailed questions and demanding minutiae about the supply of the raw materials to the wood pellet manufacturers. I do worry about that.”

Certification Bottleneck

The concerns for Ginther and his constituents do not stem from management practices they believe will be required. Industry advocates and their partners in the forestry sector point to a robust collection of federal and state laws and long-followed best management practices already in place.

Instead, industry concern hinges on sustainability programs that mandate forest certification. Certification, not widely practiced in North America, adds cost for landowners and these increased costs strain the economics of managing forests. While no formal an-

Netherlands Âť nouncement has yet been made public, the momentum in the policy discussions from the Dutch seem to be leaning toward certification. â&#x20AC;&#x153;If you look at the energy agreement, it certainly indicates that we should develop sustainability criteria based on existing forest management systems to bracket the Forest Stewardship Council and the NTA (Netherlands Technical Agreement) 8080, â&#x20AC;? says Schouwenberg. The NTA 8080 is a certification scheme that includes carbon emissions reductions, land use changes, biodiversity and the working conditions along the biomass supply chain.

The challenge for pellet producers if the Dutch implement a policy that demands certified content will be finding enough wood fiber grown on certified lands. According to a report published on the Forest Stewardship Council website as of November 2014, just 35 million acres of U.S. forests are currently certified, or just under 5 percent of total forest acres. The problem is more vexing when certification levels in the prime pellet producing region in the U.S., the southeast, are considered. â&#x20AC;&#x153;At best, the level of certified content in the U.S. Southeast is at 1 percent right now,â&#x20AC;? says Ginther.

At the heart of the entire debate is the belief held by NGOs that increased demand for wood pellets will result in deforestation.

NGOs see certification as the only way to ensure that this unintended consequence can be avoided. The pellet industry, North American foresters, global forest products traders and the utilities pursuing co-firing to generate lower carbon power see it differently. â&#x20AC;&#x153;The real story here is the U.S. small landowner,â&#x20AC;? offers Ginther. â&#x20AC;&#x153;The fascinating thing is that when you look at what the Dutch are attempting to do with their sustainability, they are working to ensure that forests are regenerated and replanted. However, by creating too tight of criteria, calling for forest-level certification, what the policy will actually do is have an adverse effect on what theyâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;re trying to do. It will actually lead to less of that because they have reduced the market opportunities for these landowners.

Thatâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;s a fascinating concept to me.â&#x20AC;?

This Just In

In the final days of the 2014, Pellet Mill Magazine was provided a copy of a letter authored by H.G.J. Kamp, the Dutch Minister for Economic Affairs. The letter, written to the Chair of the Dutch House of Representatives on December 24, 2014, establishes while Dutch NGOs and Dutch utilities were able to agree on sustainability criteria, they were not able to agree on an implementation timetable or the certification process.

In the letter, Kamp acknowledges the difficulty in devising a plan that would â&#x20AC;&#x153;achieve an ambitious set of sustainability criteria while creating an investment climate that gives companies the confidence to investâ&#x20AC;?.

Kamp then outlines a step-wise plan that would result in â&#x20AC;&#x153;all of the biomass used as fuel for co-firingâ&#x20AC;? being able to clearly demonstrate sustainability at the â&#x20AC;&#x153;forest-siteâ&#x20AC;? level. Kamp's plan begins immediately requiring that fiber coming from forest tracts larger than 1000 hectares (2400 acres) having to demonstrate sustainability via certification.

Over time, the size of the tracts required to prove sustainability drops to 2000 acres in 2020 and 1200 acres in 2022. Materials coming from tracts smaller than 1200 acres will be â&#x20AC;&#x153;demonstrated at the pellet mill levelâ&#x20AC;?.

The decision is not irreversible as Kamp notes in the letter, but he reminds the Dutch house that final regulations for the SDE-plus program need to be published by the end of January 2015.

The ability of the Dutch to achieve their renewable targets hinges on the ratification of the sustainability criteria. â&#x20AC;&#x153;The Dutch have a 14% renewable energy target for 2020,â&#x20AC;?

Ginter says. â&#x20AC;&#x153;Iâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;ve been told if they canâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;t agree on a doable sustainability program, they will only be able to achieve 8 or 9 %. I believe the Dutch are painting themselves into a corner where they will not be able to attain their renewable energy targets in 2020 if North American producers are not allowed to participate in the market.â&#x20AC;?

Author: Tim Portz Executive Editor, Pellet Mill Magazine tportz@bbiinternational.com 701-738-4969

:PVS HMPCBM FRVJQNFOU TVQQMJFS GPS UIF CJPNBTT JOEVTUSZ

"/%3*5; JT POF PG UIF XPSMEnT MFBEJOH TVQQMJFST PG UFDIOP MPHJFT TZTUFNT BOE TFSWJDFT SFMBUJOH UP FRVJQNFOU GPS UIF CJP NBTT QFMMFUJOH JOEVTUSZ 8F PGGFS TJOHMF NBDIJOFT GPS UIF QSPEVDUJPO PG TPMJE BOE MJRVJE CJPGVFM BOE XBTUF QFMMFUT 8F IBWF UIF BCJMJUZ UP NBOV GBDUVSF BOE TVQQMZ FBDI BOE FWFSZ LFZ QSPDFTTJOH NBDIJOF JO UIF QFMMFU QSP EVDUJPO MJOF

"/%3*5; 'FFE #JPGVFM " 4 &VSPQF "TJB BOE 4PVUI "NFSJDB BOESJU[ GC!BOESJU[ DPN 64" BOE $BOBEB BOESJU[ GC VT!BOESJU[ DPN

XXX BOESJU[ DPN JANUARY/FEBRUARY 2015 | PELLET MILL MAGAZINE 29

« Marketplace

Ă / /ŶƚĞƌŶĂƟŽŶĂů ĞǀĞŶƚ

2FWREHU

+LOWRQ 2PDKD 2PDKD 1(

ZZZ $GYDQFHG%LRIXHOV&RQIHUHQFH FRP

Used MEC Rotary Dryers for sale.

2 Complete Triple Pass MEC (13' x 60') Rotary drying systems with: • McConnell Sawdust burner • Material discharge cyclone • All Air handling Equipment • All documentation Systems are complete and still installed indoor.

Used under 12 years, always serviced by MEC Located in Bancroft, Ontario, Canada Price CAD $600,000 per system.

George Hasenberger 613-242-1612 georgeh@ontariologs.ca

5$: 0$7(5,$/ 6833/< &+$,1 0$1$*(0(17 62/87,216

6SRQVRUVKLSV 'ULYH 5HFRJQLWLRQ DQG 5HWXUQ RQ ,QYHVWPHQW *DLQ ([FOXVLYH ([SRVXUH %RRN <RXU 6SRQVRUVKLS 7RGD\ IRU

6SHFLDOL]LQJ LQ )RUHVWU\ %LRIXHO ,QGXVWULHV %LRIXHO ,Q

LQIR#DOGDWDVRIWZDUH FRP ZZZ DOGDWDVRIWZDUH FRP

0DNH \RXU SODQV WR DWWHQG WKH 1DWLRQDO $GYDQFHG %LRIXHOV &RQIHUHQFH ([SR LQ 2PDKD 1( 8QGHUVWDQG WKH ODWHVW WHFKQLTXHV EHLQJ GHYHORSHG LQ WKH LQGXVWU\ DQG FRQWLQXH EXLOGLQJ UHODWLRQVKLSV WKDW ODVW &RQWDFW XV WRGD\ WR PDNH \RXU UHVHUYDWLRQV (PDLO VHUYLFH#EELLQWHUQDWLRQDO FRP 3KRQH

DŽƌĞ dŚĂŶ :ƵƐƚ ZĞƐƵůƚƐ DŽƌĞ dŚĂŶ :ƵƐƚ ZĞƐƵůƚƐ tŽŽĚ WĞůůĞƚƐ YƵĂůŝƚLJ ŶĂůLJƐŝƐ ŝŽŵĂƐƐ &ƵĞůƐ YƵĂůŝƚLJ ŶĂůLJƐŝƐ ŽŶƐƵůƟŶŐ ^ĞƌǀŝĐĞƐ ^ĞƌǀŝŶŐ ďŽƚŚ ŝŶƚĞƌŶĂƟŽŶĂů ĂŶĚ ĚŽŵĞƐƟĐ ŵĂƌŬĞƚƐ͕ dǁŝŶ WŽƌƚƐ dĞƐƟŶŐ ŚĂƐ ϯϰ LJĞĂƌƐ ŽĨ ĨƵĞůƐ ƚĞƐƟŶŐ ĞdžƉĞƌŝĞŶĐĞ͘ tĞ ĂƌĞ /^K ϭϳϬϮϱ ĂĐĐƌĞĚŝƚͲ ĞĚ ƚŚƌŽƵŐŚ W:> ĨŽƌ ďŽƚŚ ^dD ĂŶĚ Eͬ E ƐƚĂŶĚĂƌĚƐ ŝŶ ďŝŽŵĂƐƐ ĂŶĂůLJƐŝƐ͘ tĞ ĂƌĞ ĂůƐŽ ĂĐĐƌĞĚŝƚĞĚ ďLJ ƚŚĞ ŵĞƌŝĐĂŶ >ƵŵďĞƌ ^ƚĂŶĚĂƌĚƐ ŽŵŵŝƩĞĞ ĂƐ Ă ƚĞƐƟŶŐ ůĂďŽƌĂƚŽƌLJ ĨŽƌ ƚŚĞ WĞůůĞƚ &ƵĞůƐ /ŶƐƟƚƵƚĞ͛Ɛ ZĞƐŝĚĞŶƟĂůͬ ŽŵŵĞƌĐŝĂů ĞŶƐŝĮĞĚ &ƵĞů ^ƉĞĐŝĮĐĂƟŽŶ WƌŽŐƌĂŵ͘

W͗ ϴϬϬ ϯϳϯͲϮϱϲϮ

ϭϯϬϭ E ϯƌĚ ^ƚ ^ƵƉĞƌŝŽƌ t/ ϱϰϴϴϬ

ǁǁǁ͘ƚǁŝŶƉŽƌƚƐƚĞƐƟŶŐ͘ĐŽŵ

30 PELLET MILL MAGAZINE | JANUARY/FEBRUARY 2015

3URGXFHG E\

VISION WE CLARIFY YOUR VISION AND HELP CREATE WHAT IS INVISIBLE TO OTHERS.

Are You Looking to Develop a Bioenergy Project?

BBI Project Development can provide the information and answers you need to move your project forward whether you are starting from project conception or looking to modify an existing facility.

Our experience and knowledge in the conventional and advanced biofuels and bioenergy industries is unsurpassed. After all, Biomass is our Business.

Engineering and Project Development services offered: • Conceptual and Preliminary Designs for Advanced Biofuels • Process Modeling • Technology Due Diligence • Bank/Independent Engineer • Engineering Studies • Feasibility Studies • Business Plans • Project Management • Feedstock Resource Assessments and Procurement Plans • Product and Co-product Marketing Plans • Site Selection and Site Development • EPC Contractor Selection and Contract Negotiations • Coordination of Permitting • Strategy and Assistance for Raising Equity • Assistance in Obtaining Debt Financing • Economic Impact Analysis

Contact Us Today. 866-746-8385 - service@bbiinternational.com

www.BBIProjectDevelopment.com

ASTEC

: 2 2 ' 3 ( / / ( 7 3 / $ 1 7 6

+D]OHKXUVW *HRUJLD 86$

0RGXODU GHVLJQ ZLWK UHSOLFDWHG 73+ UDWHG ³OLQHV´ 2QH VRXUFH IRU HTXLSPHQW DQG FRQVWUXFWLRQ 1R DGG RQ HTXLSPHQW QHHGHG WR UHGXFH 92& HPLVVLRQV 4XLFN VHWXS DQG VWDUWXS ZLWK JXDUDQWHHG SURGXFWLRQ VXSSRUW SDUWV DQG VHUYLFH $Q\ KDUG ZRRG RU VRIW ZRRG VSHFLHV

$ WHF $V WHF WH F ,QF QF LV LVV D PHP HPEH EHHU U RII WKHH $VWHF VWHHFF ,QG VW GXV XVWU WULH LHV LH HV V ,QF Q IDP D LOL \ \ RII FRP RPS SDDQL Q HV HV D EL ELOOOOOLR RQ GR ROOOODU DU SHU HU \HD H U U FR FRUS US SRU RUDW D LR DW LRQ Q KHHDG Q D TX XDU D WHHUHHG G LQ Q &KD KDWW DWWWDQ QRR R J JDD 71 71 1 86 8 $ $