Daniel Lam Sample of Work 2018

CULTIVATING COMMUNITIES ZAGREB, CROATIA IARD OXFORD BROOKES 2016 WEST WADDY ADP AWARD WINNER 2017 An urban farm regeneration strategy that utilises the existing skills developed from the historic agricultural industry and responds to Croatian cultures. Adaptive reuse of abandoned military barracks with glass roof and thermal mass to extend the seasons and maximise growth. Produce is distributed to the local food network of cafes, restaurants and markets. Community allotments, greenhouses and social spaces allow for a bottom up community development.

THE PEOPLE’S REPUBLIC OF DALSTON RIDLEY ROAD MARKET, HACKNEY OXFORD BROOKES UNIVERSITY 2017/18 A theoretical proposal of a socio-cultural revolution in response to the closing of Ridley Road Market. Told through a story of squatting and revolution that gained the traders independence from London. Key themes: Exchange, Facilitation, Appropriation, Autonomy, Revolution and Memory.

NEW EVEREST NEPAL DS1 OXFORD BROOKES 2017 A visual critique of Neoliberalism and Verticality in the modern city.

The story of the drawing is the lower classes on a journey towards New Everest. Through closer inspection one can see that the new world does not touch the mountain. From afar the new world looks accessible, but it is not. The modernist and postmodernist ideologies that facilitated the creation of New Everest are visualised at the back of the boat. The imagery is appraising the american dream ethos. 2 week exercise.

MODEL MAKING Top The People’s Republic of Dalston Bottom Feed The City, Room in The Landscape and Bournemouth Pier

THE GATHERING PLACE BORNEO, MALAYSIA ARKITREK 2015 Design and build volunteer workshop with the aim to reconnect the young members of the Rungus Tribe with their culture, heritage and nature on Bukit Gumantong. The building consisted of flexible communal spaces, private sleeping spaces, a compost toilet, rainwater harvesting, school teaching space and a fire pit.

The team of volunteers designed through community consultation and participation. We collaborated and connected with young tribe members during the construction process. Locally sourced materials and construction methods enabled a socially, culturally and environmentally sensitive design.

RIBA Stages 2-7

01

03

04

02

06

05 + 11

Outline of existing house

Outline of neighbour's garage behind

08

09

04

01

12

02

03

05

07

Outline of existing house

09

Existing RL +59.55

EL +57.42

FF FFL +54.62

eaves

54.50

P002 61.68

ridge

eaves

56.60 s55.92

h57.04

GF FFL +51.98

s58.35

h59.41

s53.25

h54.36

s55.92

h57.04

Design Response

4.04 Concept

50.0m DATUM

Design Response

Design Response

50.0m DATUM

eaves

54.80

Building line of neighbour's house.

56.45

ridge

Existing pitched roof garage next door.

Design Response

8

tw52.0

Proposed rooflight 54.39

eaves

Proposed Material Key 01 | Zinc Roof 02 | Fibre cement cladding 03 | Timber shading 04 | Vertical timber screening 05 | Grey aluminium windows and doors 06 | Grey timber door 07 | Dark grey render 08 | Rooflight 09 | Concealed RWP's 10 | Opacified glazing 11 | Obscured glazing 12 | Glass balustrade

tw54.53

58.55

ridge

Outline of existing house

top

Proposed South Elevation

60.10

ridge

59.65

4

56.90

2

(1:100)

8m

top

59.70

1

eaves

eaves

0

Notes: Unless otherwise stated, this drawing isProject: for information only. Do not scale. Use figured dimensions only. Check all dimensions General Notes: 126 Lower Road on site and advise of any discrepancies before commencing work on site.

Digital Transmissions: This data is supplied only as a means to aid you in the production of your work, the data should always be 5 Pine Court Business Centre | 36 Gervis Road checked against the hard copy of the drawing.Subject: Some of the data may East have been produced by importing data from external sources, Elevation Proposed Bournemouth | Dorset | BH1 3DH discrepancies may have occurred during this procedure. FootprintArchitects cannot accept responsibility for any discrepancies within 0 1 2 the CAD data file. No third party shall issue footprint architects data/drawings without the written approval of FootprintArchitects.

Tel: 07725310271 | 01202 585526 Planning Scale: 1:100@A3 Status:for Date: Julythird 16 party as a result of cannot accept responsibility any loss incurred by any FootprintArchitects check all data for viruses but email: enquiries@footprintarchitects.co.uk installing data.

Drawing: Project Ref: 7181 7181 - P010 web: www.footprintarchitects.co.uk

Revisions:

General Notes:

56.90

stated, this drawing is for information only. Do not scale. Use figured dimensions only. Check all dimensions discrepancies before commencing work on site. s data is supplied only as a means to aid you in the production of your work, the data should always be copy of the drawing. Some of the data may have been produced by importing data from external sources, occurred during this procedure. FootprintArchitects cannot accept responsibility for any discrepancies within d party shall issue footprint architects data/drawings without the written approval of FootprintArchitects. all data for viruses but cannot accept responsibility for any loss incurred by any third party as a result of

point matching

eaves

56.90

ridge

59.50

osed East Elevation

54.45

roof

Proposed garage

01. Existing House Form

Proposed roof

02. New house form based on 05. Mimic new house to create existing alignment secondary form

03. New form updating the existing

54.10 roof

tw54.31

Pro 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12 Revisions:

4

(1:100)

04. Garage roof brought down 07. Insert to secondary form reduce impact on neighbours

Project:

126 Lower Road

5

Subject: Proposed South Elevation

8m

06. Remove pitched roof to reduce impact and rotate form to angle views towards the garden and away from neighbouring properties

Scale: 1:100@A3

Status:

Project Ref: 7181

Drawing: 7181 - P008

08. Cut aways formed to create external spaces

Planning

Date: July 16

54.25

roof

eaves

56.65

s57.39 s57.39

vel ux

vel ux

h57.95 h57.95

58.95

ridge

58.55

ridge

ridge

59.12

footprintarchitects Tel: 01202 585526 | www.footprintarchitects.co.uk

10 126 Lower Road | Planning Design and Access Statement

11 E m a i l :

126 Lower Road | Planning Design and Access Statement

enquiries@footprintarchitects.co.uk

126 Lower Road | Planning Design and Access Statement

© Copyright: All Rights Reserved

footprintarchitects Tel: 01202 585526 | www.footprintarchitects.co.uk

12 E m a i l :

enquiries@footprintarchitects.co.uk

126 Lower Road | Planning Design and Access Statement

© Copyright: All Rights Reserved

footprintarchitects Tel: 01202 585526 | www.footprintarchitects.co.uk

13 E m a i l :

enquiries@footprintarchitects.co.uk © Copyright: All Rights Reserved

footprintarchitects Tel: 01202 585526 | www.footprintarchitects.co.uk

Email: enquiries@footprintarchitects.co.uk © Copyright: All Rights Reserved

Proposed Site Plan Revisions:

General Notes:

Project:

126 Lower Road

N

Notes: Unless otherwise stated, this drawing is for information only. Do not scale. Use figured dimensions only. Check all dimensions on site and advise of any discrepancies before commencing work on site.

Digital Transmissions: This data is supplied only as a means to aid you in the production of your work, the data should always be checked against the hard copy of the drawing. Some of the data may have been produced by importing data from external sources, discrepancies may have occurred during this procedure. FootprintArchitects cannot accept responsibility for any discrepancies within the CAD data file. No third party shall issue footprint architects data/drawings without the written approval of FootprintArchitects.

FootprintArchitects check all data for viruses but cannot accept responsibility for any loss incurred by any third party as a result of installing data.

0

2

4

8

(1:200)

16m

5 Pine Court Business Centre | 36 Gervis Road Bournemouth | Dorset | BH1 3DH

Subject: Proposed Site Plan Scale: 1:200@A3

Status:

Project Ref: 7181

Drawing: 7181 - P002

Planning

Date: July 16

Tel: 07725310271 | 01202 585526 email: enquiries@footprintarchitects.co.uk web: www.footprintarchitects.co.uk

LOWER ROAD SALISBURY FOOTPRINT ARCHITECTS 2016 FPA was appointed by a private residential client to design a complete renovation of an existing house. The concept for the proposal is based on views down the driveway and rear garden towards the river. It is divided into two material types: timber and fibre cement tiles. These enclosures create well lit spaces throughout. The form purposely juxtaposes the surrounding fields, whereas the materials blend the design into the context.

RIBA Stages 2-3

STOKEWOOD LEISURE CENTRE BOURNEMOUTH FOOTPRINT ARCHITECTS 2015 I completed Concept and Planning stage packages for this open plan gym extension to locally listed gym and swimming pool.

I liased with Bournemouth Council the client, planning authority and building regulations officer. The charred timber comes from the idea: to ‘stoke’ wood, whilst simultaneously referencing a historic fire that burnt down the original buildings before they were replaced. (Photos FPA Copyright) RIBA Stages 2-4

SPATIAL INVENTORY SELF INITIATED PHOTOGRAPHY @Spatial_Inventory A personal photography project combining the concepts of philosopher Henri Lefebvre and architect John Pawson. I collect photos of observations in the everyday and in my travels. The aim is to summarise situations and space into visual concepts.

// The Annual 2017/18 //

// OSA X //

// The Annual 2017/18 //

// OSA X //

// OSA X //

oxarch photography compEtition

Through our physical being, we create a two way process of interacting in which we are challenging the space surrounding us rather than observing it, and learning to navigate its boundaries through sensory cues.

The OxArch photography competition run by the school’s architectural society challenges students to push their photography skills further.

Students submit photographs taken from excursions and compete for a cash prize. This year unit trips have included Brussels, Cuba, Berlin, Ibiza and Georgia offering worthy inspiration.

the street as the three dimensional environment is unveiled through sensations, enabling us to measure the boundaries of our space and with what and whom we share it. Each sense is activated differently, but they come together as a whole to read and navigate the given environment. Where ‘sound measures space and makes its scale comprehensible1, for example, we can understand the magnitude of a cathedral by how noise is carried away and echoed throughout the space, or judge the distance of a moving vehicle by the intensity of its sound.

3

PEOPLE PLACES

choice

will

be

displayed

Alex Newton

// EIDOLON, EIDOLON //

With an understanding of Merleau Ponty’s Primacy of Perception and the underlying idea that we are embodied beings, physically constrained to the space in which we inhabit, it is evidential that we cannot operate objectively from the external world. We rely on the senses as the first point of contact with our surroundings, using them to absorb any information of a given place. In a city situation, we become immersed in the smells, sounds and feelings of

This article explores the boundaries between life and death and the animate and inanimate, aiming to investigate strategies of representing these liminal states. At the heart of it lies the uncanny, a concept widely associated with Freud and which describes a realm where we may encounter uncertainty, dread and disorientation. I am interested in images that exist in this strange hinterland where we are confronted with a transformed reality, and where “the distinction between the imagination and reality is effaced”1.

thE continual and unSettling Shift BetwEen animation and Stasis contriButeS to thE diSruption of thE Filmic reprEsEntation of time as Flow and lendS thE Figure thE uncanny and jerky movementS of an automaton.

// ALEX NEWTON //

In an age where the image of place is dominated by a frontal perspective perception, our awareness of the spatial relationship between person and space has noticeably declined.

Visual prioritising has resulted in a decreased understanding of what it is like ‘to feel’ in our surroundings and there runs a risk of design falling short of our needs by failing to note the haptic realm in which we experience the space around us.

There is a general understanding of a client when designing architecture or public space, but more often than not this focuses on the logistics

editor’s

Eidolon, Eidolon

of a programme or the final selling image rather than the way in which spaces will reveal themselves to the individual, and therefore a pleasant sensory experience is often lacking.

// CHARLOTTE HART //

// PEOPLE PLACES //

The City as an Extension of the Self

and

24

// PHOTOGRAPHY COMPETITION //

Through our physical being, we create a two way process of interacting in which we are challenging the space surrounding us rather than observing it, and learning to navigate its boundaries through sensory cues. This demonstrates the necessity of placemaking that is empathetic to the human scale. More recent city development has seen a loss of this characteristic,

2

The winner, runners-up throughout the issue.

wa l k i n g

Runner Up: Daniel Lam DS1 MarchD Part 2 Studio Trip: Paris

The Beauty of Ev MATT JORDAN

OSA LAUNCH

ARTIFICE

6:30 PM 27/02 & 01/03 student hub 3rd floor +cheese & wine Provided

VIRTUAL AUGMENTED TERRESTRIAL

OSA MAGAZINE OXFORD 2017-18 Oxford School of Architecture Magazine is a student run printed magazine. I joined the magazine after I my article Skateboarding, Subculture and Society was published. After this, I began editing articles, laying out pages and working on the graphics. This gave me experience in publishing, graphics, writing and professional printing.