Handbook for Recognising and Planning Green Infrastructure

Page 59

Handbook for recognising and planning green infrastructure

Table 3: The range of assessments and weights that are used in the method shown. Values depend on the considered criteria (data layers). Each sub-unit is given a final (benchmarked) value on the basis of the weighted summation method.

Suitabilty due to existing land use

Ecosystem service

Biodiversity

SELECTED LAYERS / CRITERIA

PROTECTING REGIME / LAND USE

MIN

MAX

IMPORTANCE

NORM. WEIGHT

OVERALL

1

Natura 2000

0

1

5

0.104

2

Protected area

0

1

4

0.083

3

Natural values - area

0

1

4

0.083

4

Natural values - spot

0

1

4

0.083

5

Eco important area

0

1

1

0.021

6

Bathing water

0

1

4

0.083

7

Water supply protecting area

0

1

6

0.125

8

Water and riparian land

0

1

2

0.042

9

Flood hazard area

0

1

3

0.063

10

Protecting forest

0

1

2

0.042

11

Cultural heritage

0

1

1

0.021

12

Existing land use

0

1

12

0,250

0.25

Min score

0

1

Max score

0

1

0.375

0.375

61


Turn static files into dynamic content formats.

Create a flipbook
Issuu converts static files into: digital portfolios, online yearbooks, online catalogs, digital photo albums and more. Sign up and create your flipbook.