Letterpress, The Allure of the handmade By David Jury Page 6 ‘Letterpress, because of it’s remarkable commercial longevity- over 550 years, tends to be associated with tradition. The history of printing was driven by proven, sensible formulae within the print trade, Eventually, however, forces from outside the trade began to question these established norms and to influence the appearance and the function of type’ Page 8 Since the latter years of the nineteenth century, there has been an antiestablishment movement that has sought, for commercial, political, social or aesthetic reasons to debunk conventions. There can be few activities more reliant upon, and more bound by convention than typography, and printed typography, until the middle of the twentieth century largely meant letterpress’ ‘Antiestablishment attitudes naturally test the boundaries of taste and also the technical ingenuity of those utilising letterpress, traditionally considered the least flexible of printing processes’ ‘Letterpress printers vigorously protected their craft (and their commercial viability) and perhaps inadvertently, shrouded their activities in an aura of mystery, even romance. The reality was that it was physically demanding, medically dangerous, and often tedious. ‘ ‘Precious few escaped the confines of the print works, truth is tat few probably ever had the inclination to. The concept of the designer as a free agent, capable of initiating change was incomprehensible until a degree of autonomy was achieved in the 1950’s and 1960s. Even early independent typographers, such as Charles Ricketts in England and Daniel Berkely Updike did not wish to stray away from the norm: most had received a significant part of their training in the printing office’ It required the single-minded, more selfish attitude of individuals from outside the print fraternity to really make an impact upon the appearance and function of letterpress. Undoubtedly, William Morris (poet, designer craftsman, socialist writer, and leader of the arts and crafts movement) was the first of these, but, and in the sharpest possible contrast, he was followed by the consciously unstructured working methodologies of the avant garde artists in their own way, very different ways broke down barriers. Their contrasting ideological tensions seem to be reflected in the letterpress process itself, the requirement for order and planning, and the inherent rigidity of the physical components contrasting with an outcome which aims to be fluid, natural and unstrained. Page 10, The Nature Of Letterpress ‘For the worker, machine production has meant a heavy, almost deadly loss in the value of experience, and it is entirely wrong to put it on a pedestal. That is, ‘modern’ is by no means the same as saying that it has no vaue or that it is good much more than saying it is evil.’ Jan Tschichold The Need for control ‘There was a time when the output from mass production was generally of a worse quality tan anything made my hand’ If handmade no longer equates exclusively with quality, what advantages does ‘handmade’ bring to printed matter? The most universal automation of commercial printing is designed to minimize the need for human intervention and, in this way, to reduce the possibility of errors and serious flaws in quality. Page 12, Half way down ‘Digital technology, in which the processes of design and print have become virtually one, has largely negated the interpretive role of the commercial printer. As certaintiy of outcome becomes ever more reliable, the printing house is slowly becoming more akin to a sophisticated copyshop. Predictability, of course, is a huge advantage when attempting to maximize efficiency because it enables costs o be