Remedial Planning Report: Kg. Datuk Keramat - Urban Planning Studio 7 (Phase 3)

BID4001

PLANNING STUDIO VII: DEVELOPMENT APPRAISAL 2020/2021 (SEMESTER 1)

Prepared for:

Associate Professor Dr. Melasutra Md Dali Dr. Peter Aning Tedong

Mr. Afzal Bin Azhari

LECTURERS

FACULTY OF BUILT ENVIRONMENT

UNIVERSITY OF MALAYA 50603 KUALA LUMPUR

Prepared by:

Ahmad Fariz Al Hazmi 17171848/1

DEPARTMENT OF URBAN AND REGIONAL PLANNING

FACULTY OF BUILT ENVIRONMENT

UNIVERSITY OF MALAYA 50603 KUALA LUMPUR

Submission Date

21st January 2021

INTRODUCTION

5.0 REMEDIAL CONCEPTUALIZATION

2.0 CASE STUDY OVERVIEW:

DATUK KERAMAT

3.0 SUMMARY: APPRAISAL & AUDIT

4.0 ISSUES AND PROBLEMS

6.0 ALTERNATIVE DEVELOPMENT CONCEPTS

Alternative Concept 1 : Chromatic

Kampung

Alternative Concept 2: Low Carbon Urban Kampung

Alternative Concept 3 : Kampung Kami Datuk Keramat

Concept Evaluation

Justification

7.0 REMEDIAL PROPOSAL: KAMPUNKAMI

KERAMAT

CONCLUSION

LIST OF FIGURES

Figure 2.1 : Key Plan

Figure 2.2 : Location Plan

Figure 2.3 : Site Plan

Figure 2.4 : Demographic Profile (2010)

Figure 2.5 : Accessibility

Figure 2.6 : Surrounding Development

Figure 3.1 : Hybrid Assessment Tool Designation

Figure 3.2 : 7 Hybrid Dimensions

Figure 3.3 : Current Land Use

Figure 3.4 : Landmark and Node

Figure 3.5 : Unclear Edges

Figure 3.6 : Housing Types

Figure 3.7 : Housing Condition

Figure 3.8 : Formal and Informal Commercial

Figure 3.9 : Water Supply

Figure 3.10 : Telecommunication

Figure 3.11 : Institution and Public Facilities

Figure 3.12 : Catchment Area Open Space and Recreation

Figure 3.13 : Road Networks

Figure 3.14 : Public Transit Distribution

Figure 3.15 : Pedestrian Networks

Figure 3.16 : Increasing Rainfall Amount

Figure 3.17 : Topography Plan

Figure 3.18 : Original Design of IRDA house

Figure 3.19 : Songkok Art

Figure 3.20 : Resale Analysis

Figure 4.1 : Traffic congestion

Figure 4.2 : Low Walkability

Figure 4.3 : Flood Occurrence

Figure 4.4 : Lack of Identity and Image Quality

Figure 5.1 : Kampung Sunter Jaya Location

Figure 5.2 : Urban Farming in Kampung Sunter Jaya

Figure 5.3 : Placemaking By Community

Figure 5.4 : Children Friendly Street

Figure 5.5 : Narrow alleys

Figure 5.6 : Kampung Placemaking

Figure 5.7 : Kampung Cleaning

Figure 5.8 : Kampung Pelangi Before

Figure 5.9 : Kampung Pelangi After

Figure 5.10 : Pasar Bunga Kalisari

Figure 5.11 : Thematic Urban Kampung Regeneration

Figure 5.12 : Mural by the local

Figure 5.13 : Sungmisan Urban Village

Figure 5.14 : Sungmisan village community gathering

Figure 5.15 : Village School

Figure 5.16 : Community Cafe

Figure 5.17 : Sungmisan Village

Figure 5.18 : Community Garden in village school

Figure 6.1 : Public Plaza

Figure 6.2 : Colorful Kampung

Figure 6.3 : Placemaking

Figure 6.4 : Shared Street and Curbless street

Figure 6.5 : People Street

Figure 6.6 : Blue Corridor

Figure 6.7 : Solar Farm

Figure 6.8 : Green Network

Figure 6.9 : Community Connector street

Figure 6.10 : Active Green Corridor

Figure 6.11 : Children Friendly

Figure 6.12 : Sustainable Design

Figure 7.1 : Project 1 Component

Figure 7.2 : Streetscape Improvement

Figure 7.3 : Bicycle storage

Figure 7.4 : Streetscape Improvement

Figure 7.5 : Mix use activity

Figure 7.6 : Community Library

Figure 7.7 : Mix use activity

Figure 7.8 : Mix use activity

Figure 7.9 : Community Hangout Point

Figure 7.10 : Community Hangout Point

Figure 7.11 : Pasar Keramat Regeneration

Figure 7.12 : Hang Tuah History

Figure 7.13 : Pasar Keramat Regeneration

Figure 7.14 : Urban Design Improvement

Figure 7.15 : Kampung Morten

Figure 7.16 : Urban Design Improvement

Figure 7.17 : Children Friendly Streetscape

Figure 7.18 : Kg. Sunter Jaya Placemaking

Figure 7.19 : Alley Placemaking

Figure 7.20 : Alley Placemaking

Figure 7.21 : Placemaking

Figure 7.22 : Safe School Zone and Intersections

Figure 7.23 : Safe School Zone and Intersections

Figure 7.24 : Active Green Corridor

Figure 7.25 : Everyday Park and Weekend Park

Figure 7.26 : Weekend park

Figure 7.27 : Everyday Park and Weekend Park

Figure 7.28 : Urban Gardening

Figure 7.29 : Urban Gardening

Figure 7.30 : WSUD and rainwater harvesting

Figure 7.31 : House rainwater harvesting

Figure 7.32 : WSUD raingarden

Figure 7.33 : House rainwater harvesting

Figure 7.34 : Community Solar Farm

Figure 7.35 : Solar farm

Figure 7.36 : Community Solar Farm

LIST OF CHARTS

Chart 3.1 : Perception

Chart 3.2 : Population Projection

Chart 3.3 : Water Quality Index

Chart 3.4 : Importance of Pasar Keramat

Chart 3.5 : Median Sale Price

Chart 3.6 : Average Sale Price

LIST OF TABLES

Table 3.1 : Hybrid Assessment Scoring

Table 3.2 : Classification of Commercial

Table 3.3 : Commercial Guideline Compliance

Table 3.4 : Types of Community Facilities

Table 3.5 : Open Space Guideline Compliance

Table 3.6 : Air Quality Index

Table 3.7 : AQI Level

Table 3.8 : Market Study

Table 3.9 : Hybrid Indicator Assessment Matrix

Table 6.1 : Concept Evaluation

Table 6.2 : SWOT Analysis

Table 7.1 : Remedial SWOT Analysis

Table 7.2 : Remedial Proposal Assessment

Table 7.3 : Remedial Proposal Assessment Matrix

LIST OF PLANS

Plan 1 : Alternative Concept 1

Plan 2 : Alternative Concept 2

Plan 3 : Alternative Concept 3

Plan 4 : Master Plan

1.O

INTRODUCTION

1.1 Introduction

The planning remedialreport for Kampung Datuk Keramat is an outcome from the previousdevelopment appraisalandaudit report of Kg. Datuk Keramat. Prior tothe preparation of this planning remedial report, key issues and problems are identifiedin the development appraisalandaudit report. Therefore, this report discusses the appropriate development concept plan for Kg. Datuk Keramat by formulating strategies, projects, and programs to mitigate and minimize specific issues and problems.

This introduction chaptercomprises of the aimand objectivesof the report, the scope of study, and the methodology which to be elaborated in the following sections.

1.2 Aim and Objectives

To produce a planning remedial proposal for Kampung Datuk Keramat.Aim

Objectives:

1 2 3

To identify the most applicable development concept plan for the case study area in regards with the key issues and problems.

To develop strategies, projects and programs for the remedial proposal.

To assess the remedial proposal with the designated hybrid indicator assessment tool.

1.3 Scope of Study

The planning remedialreport seeks to enhance the existing condition and performance of Kampung Datuk Keramat as an urban traditional village with the main basis of the findings discussed in the previousdevelopment appraisal andaudit report in terms of physical, social, transportation and traffic, environmental, heritage and market aspects. Furthermore, this report covers on the selection of the overall theme and principles,benchmarking analysis, development of strategies and concepts, hence, to produce a remedial proposal compromising of projects and programsderived from the strategies, and lastlyis the remedial assessment.

1.4 Methodology

Overall Theme Planning Principles

Benchmarking

Planning Strategies Planning Concepts

Remedial Proposal

Remedial Assessment

Inception Report Development Appraisal and Audit Report

Planning Remedial Report 1 2 3

Preliminary study Data Collection Appraisal and audit Identification of issues and problems

Selection of overall theme and principles Benchmarking analysis & strategy development Identification of alternative concept

The planning remedialreport is prepared at stage 3 of the overall process. It is started with the selection ofoverall theme and principles,benchmarking analysis and strategy development, identification of alternative concept, formulation of remedial frameworks which includes the proposedproject, program and/or measures and lastly the remedial proposal is to be analyzed using SWOT andassessed with the Hybrid indicator assessment as formulated in stage 2.

Formulation of remedial frameworks

Remedial SWOT Analysis & Assessment

2.O CASE STUDY OVERVIEW: KG. DATUK KERAMAT

Figure

Figure

2.1 Site Background

Kampung Datuk Keramat of 275 acres, is a large zone in the Titiwangsa constituency, falling within the boundary of the Federal Territory of Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia. It islocated at the northeast of downtown Kuala Lumpur and share the boundary with the district of Ampang in Selangor tothe east. The Klang River runsroughly from northeast tothe west andactsas a natural divider of Keramat and Ampang. Lastly, Kg. Datuk Keramat islocated under the jurisdiction of Kuala Lumpur City Hall (DBKL).

Behind The Name

Kg. Datuk Keramat has traditionally been a Malay majority area. However, this area was formerly known as Kampung Tangga Cina. There are two versions of the name of this Kampung Tangga Cina, Formerly, this area is a tin mine. Many Chinese livein the area by working as miners and from there comes the name Kampung Tangga Cina. The presence of a `sacred 'grave in the settlement caused the residents to start calling the area as Kampung Datuk Keramat. Many do not know thatthe name Kampung Datuk Keramat was taken in conjunction with the presence of a sacred grave there. The location of the grave islocated next tothe Pasar Keramat. Various superstitious practices are practiced there because they believe itis sacred. Regardless of race, everyone comes to ask for wishes and no less worship. That is whywhen people ask where to go, their answer is to go to Kg. Datuk Keramat. Thus, this name sticks until it is called Kampung Datuk Keramat. But the ownerof the tomb still cannot be identified until today.

2.2 Development Evolution

1857-1940

(Early Settlement)

The earliest settlement in Kg. Datuk Keramat may have existed as early as 1857 as a tin mining area in the Selango as a village area of multiple Malay ethnic such as Jawa, Bawean, Bugis, Minangkabau etc. The socio-economic activities of the villagers at that time were more towards subsistence farmingsuch as growing vegetables, sweet potatoes, sweet potatoes, and so on.

1955-1957

(MRL Announcement)

In 1957, Kampung Datuk Keramat was announcedas Malay Reserve Land area under the Enactment 3(1) (F.M.S Cap. 142). This village was situated in both Mukim Setapak and Ampang. In this year, the area was 170 acres, and has about 639 housing units which includes 317 squatter houses, and 200 housing units builtby the Housing Trust.

1960-1970 (Rapid Squatters)

This village settlement had rapidly developed as squatter’s areaand became oneof the main squatters’ area in Kuala Lumpur. There were different squatter areas based, among the villages were:

• Kg. Kinabalu

• Kg. Dato’ Keramat

• Kg. Bumiputera

• Kg. Berembang

• Kg. Keramat Hujung

• Kg. Bukit Keramat

• Kg. Kilat

N.T.S

2004-2020 (Modern Day)

Kg. Datuk Keramat

Landed Residential Development

High Rise Residential Development Other Development Open Space Cemetery

Kg. Datuk Kermaat has experienced rapid development as itslocationin the capital city, Kuala Lumpur, and it has expanded into Taman Keramat. Kampung Datuk Keramat is now a mixed development area with great accessibilityand variety of amenitiesand public facilities provision. The area nowhas 3 high riseresidential properties; however, this development is said to slowly change the landscape of the area.

N.T.SAnnounced as Malay Reserved Land (MRL)

N.T.S

Figure

The demographicprofile as shown in Figure 2.4 is data in 2010, thetotal population is nearly six thousands people in Kampung Datuk Keramat. In which, the proportion of male and female group is almost equal where female population is 50.3% meanwhile for the malegroup is 49.7%. Furthermore, as for the populationby race, Malay groupmakes up the highest proportion of the population with 3,970 people, meanwhile the Chinese group is the lowest proportion in the population.

2.4 Accessibility

Figure

Kg. Datuk Keramat is strategically located on the northeastern of downtown Kuala Lumpur, the area is served with great accessibility in term of road connection and public transit. The Ampang-Kuala Lumpur Elevated Highway and JalanJelatek provides connectivity to Ampang and Kuala Lumpur citycenter. Kg. Datuk Keramat is also well served with public transit,there are 3 accessible Kelana Jaya line LRT transit stations (Dato’ Keramat, Damai station, and Jelatek station) as well as with 5 publicbuses of different routes.

Kampung Datuk Keramat is closed proximity with the existing well developed and matured neighbourhood such as Condominuim One Jelatek, Seri Maya Condominium and Pangsapuri Berembang Indah. Another nearby development is Petronas TwinTower that is within approximately 2-kilometer radius.

Kampung Datuk Keramat is also nearby to several government offices such as Jabatan Ukur dan Pemetaan Malaysia and Angkatan Pertahanan Awam Malaysia. There arealso several hospitalsnearby the study area such as Hospital Kuala Lumpur and HSC medical Centre.

This indicates that Kampung Datuk Keramat is an infill neighborhood surrounded by other developments which may give advantages tothe study area.

APPRAISAL AND

Overview: Hybrid Assessment Tool

Derived from the Development Appraisal and Audit Report, a new custom hybrid assessment tool is produced to suit the unique condition of the study area, Kg. Datuk Keramat, asan urban traditional village locatedin the middle of urbanized area of Klang Valley. There are 5 different assessment selected for the designation of this hybrid assessment tool in which MURNInet rating system are used as the foundation of the overall structure and scoringsystem (Figure 3.1).

There are 7 dimensionsproduced which reflect various important aspects of an urban traditional village shown in Figure 3.2.

ASSESSMENT

Figure 3.1:

Development

PROSPEROUS

LAND

ACCESSIBLE

ACCESSIBILITY

3.2:

ENVIRONMENTAL

Hybrid

Development Appraisal

SCALE DESCRIPTION

3.2 Physical Study

3.2.1 LAND USE

Kg. Datuk Keramat has existed since the early 20th century. The area has experienced rapid development, hence, itis now considered as a matured neighborhood wherein the residential development alone makes up half of thetotal land use area,as shown in Figure 3.3. Meanwhile, industry and infrastructure have the least proportion of thetotal land use area. In addition, the area also seems to have minimal area of vacant lots. The commercial development and public facilities are mostly concentrated at the center or around the pasar keramat area. The summary of each land use category to be elaborated in the chapter 3.

Housing and Settlement 54.64%

Road Network 21.76%

Water Bodies 7.67%

Public Facilities 5.72%

Open Space and Recreation 4.36%

Commercial 2.16%

Transportation 1.86%

Vacant Land 0.79%

Infrastructures 0.54%

Industries 0.49%

N.T.S

3.2.2 URBAN DESIGN

Based on the assessment that has been made, the urban design quality is not too strong in Kg. Datuk Keramat. It does not achieveall the criteria, especially the accessibility to a place. The pedestrian walkway and road users will not experience a good design of the place because of a fewfactors such as the narrowness of the road whichwill endanger the user,unconnected walkway and others. However, in the study area, there are mixed commercial activities that can fulfil people’s needs.

N.T.S

Landmark

Node Path

There is no clear edges or boundaries that separate Kg. Datuk Keramat and Selangor state.

In, Kg. Datuk Keramat, there are few districts that can be obviously visible which are commercial activities such asat Pasar Keramat area,and mixed retail business. For the residential, there arearea of the bungalow houses, village and terrace house, and new development of housing. As Kg. Datuk Keramat, Kuala Lumpur located next to Setiawangsa , JalanJelatek is the boundary that separates thesetwo area.

Figure 3.4: Landmark and Node Source: Development Appraisal & Audit Report

Figure 3.5: Unclear Edges Source: Development Appraisal & Audit Report

HOUSING

A. Housing Types

Kampung Datuk Keramat is an urban traditional village in Kuala Lumpur with 275 acresand 53.36% of residential. The development of housing in Datuk Keramat consists of the mixture of high rise and landed type of housing. The high rise housing consist of flat, condominium andapartment. Meanwhile for the landed housing, it consist of singlestorey detach house, 2 and 3 storey detached house andalso informal houses.

RISE HOUSING

HOUSING

Housing Condition

The condition of most of the house in Kampung Datuk Keramat is good except for a number of informal houses. This is presumablydue tothe design, structure and materials choice. For example, almostall of the detached houses are in a good condition because it can be seen that the design looks modern with the material used are mostly bricks which shows thatthe age of the building are relatively low compared tothat of the informal houses.

3.2.4 COMMERCIAL

A. Types of Commercial

The commercial activities in Kg. Datuk Keramat can be classified into 12 types where mostly are carried out at residential areas. In which the most commoncommercial activities identified is Retail Business. In addition Pasar Lama Datuk Keramat is the main commercial attraction in the study area.

B. Formal and Informal Commercial

The existing commercial activities in Kampung Datuk Keramat can be categorized into two economic sector of which are formal business with 55% and informal business with 45 of thetotal businesses.

Formal Businesses

Table

Classification of Commercial

CLASSIFICATION PERCENTAGE

Retail Business 54.34%

Personal & Household Services 15.23%

Food Centre 1.45%

Market 0.72%

Business Services & Professional 1.45%

Private Education 6.53%

Private Health Service 0.72%

Gas Stations 0.72%

Residential Buildings & Commercial Accommodation

2.90%

Figure 3.8: Formal and Informal Commercial

Source: Development Appraisal & Audit Report

Businesses

C. Guideline Compliance

Table 3.3: Commercial Guideline Compliance

TYPES OF COMMERCIAL LOCATION COMPLIANCY

Terrace Shop/ Shop Office/ Strata Shop Beside Al Akram Mosque

Detached and Semi Detached Shop Tree Steak House and Ayam

Gepuk Pak Gembus (Semi D)

Net Auto Sdn. Bhd. (Detached)

Boarding Home 1.45%

Vehicle Service 13.77%

Sport Centre 0.72%

Source: Development Appraisal and Audit Report

Business Complex

Gas stations

Market

Private University

UTC Keramat

Petron Jalan Datuk Keramat

Pasar Lama Datuk Keramat

UniKL Business School

Source: Development Appraisal and Audit Report

3.2.5 INFRASTRUCTURE AND UTILITIES

Based on the assessment for infrastructure and utilities, overall performance is adequateand efficient service for the residents. However, it will be up tothe customer to use it wisely for instance the water supply. This is due to decrease the water demand as Malaysia’s water demandbecome increasing because of excessive using by customers. For the others infrastructure such as waste management, sewerage, and telecommunication network, allachieve higher results. This indicates that Kg. Datuk Keramat receive a well infrastructure services.

A. Water Supply

Water treated for Kg, Datuk Keramat is supplied by Bukit Nanas Water Treatment Plant. Kg. Datuk Keramat requires 1.97 million litres of water supply perday.

Water supply disruption case

Reasons:

1. Pipe Leakage

2019 4 Cases

2020 7 Cases

2. Water supply polluted

3. Water rationing

C. Waste Management

The method used for solid waste disposal of the whole city of Kuala Lumpur including Kg. Datuk Keramat is through sanitary landfilllocatedin Bukit Tagar, Selangor . Each house in Kg. Datuk Keramat has beenprovided 120L rubbish binby Alam Flora Sdn. Bhd . The provision of rubbish bin can help the residents tothrow away their household waste andalso can ease the collecting waste services by the contractor.

D. Telecommunication

Based on the Figure 3.10 Yes telecommunication company provides the highest 4G network services in Kuala Lumpur. What can be analyse here is Kuala Lumpur almost covered by 4G network.

Broadband coverage area: 91.8%

UNIFI MAXIS CELCOM

U MOBILE YES

Unifi Maxis Celcom DiGi U Mobile YES

Figure .3.9: Water Supply

Source: Development Appraisal & Audit Report

B. Electric Supply

The range of maximum demandbased on thetype of houses in Kg. Datuk Keramat need to be supplied as much 6,053 kW. Based on the desktop study, Kg. Datuk Keramat do nothave an issue regarding inadequate electric supply.

Figure 3.10: Telecommunication

Source: Development Appraisal & Audit Report

E. SewerageSystem

Kg. Datuk Keramat is served by Bunus Regional Sewage Treatment Plant. It islocated at the north-west of the site. Based on the desktop research, all the houses are receiving the sewage treatment systemservices.

3.2.6 INSTITUTIONS AND PUBLIC FACILITIES

There are a total of 6 components for public facilities identified in Kg. Datuk Keramat; Religious Facilities, Recreational & Sport Facilities, Safety and Security Educational Facilities, Cemetery and Community Facilities.

However, Kg. Datuk Keramat islacking of certain types of facilities such as hospital, clinics, fire station, public library and secondaryschools. Thus, itisimportant to ensure the residents can have a full access to all ranges of services and facilities without having to depend on surrounding neighbourhoods. In addition, the accessibility tothe public facilities in Kg. Datuk Keramat definitely has to be improved by adapting a universal design such as having tactile paving equipped on the pedestrian walkways so that it can serve all kind of community with diverse abilities to ensure that no one isleft behind and inclusivityis present in the neighbourhood.

Table 3.4:

CATEGORY

Religious

Sport

Community

Safety

Cemetery

Figure

N.T.S

3.2.7 OPEN SPACE AND RECREATION

In Kampung Datuk Keramat there are 3 types ofopen spaces and recreation neighborhood park,playground and play lot as shown in the figure X.X below. There areapproximately only 3.84% of thetotal land use equals to 10.55 acres outof 275 acre. Table X.X below is the guideline assessment for open space and recreation in the site study area.

Table 3.5: Open Space Guideline Compliance

ELEMENT

Neighborhood Park

PLANNING STANDARD AND GUIDELINE: EXISTING CONDITION COMPLIANCE

5 acre

3,000 12,000 people

Playground

Play Lot

1.5 acre

1000 3000 people

0.5 acre

300 1000 people

10.50 acre

1 neighborhood park in the site study area.

0.36 acre

1 playground area in the site study area

0.15 acre

1 play lot area nearby to the site study area (within 500 m walking distance)

Comply with guidelines

Not comply with guidelines

Not comply with guidelines

• Playground

Active open space

0.36 acre

• Playlot

Active open space

0.15 acre

Source: Development Appraisal and Audit Report

Neighborhood Park

Active and Passive open space

10.50 acre

meter radius

meter radius

Study Area

Figure 3.12: Catchment Area Open Space and Recreation

Development Appraisal and Audit Report

Demographic and Social Study

A. Community Perception

The study is carried out to understand public perception on living environment in Kampung Datuk Keramat, where there are total of 30 respondents. There are 4 categories of perception. Firstly, half of the respondents disagree thatthe provided facilities andamenities isinadequate. Similarly, half of the respondents believe that the study area is only safe during the daylight. As for liveability, the respondents were askedaboutanyavailable community activities in the study area, but more than half of the respondents stated thatthere is no community activities carried out. Lastly, for walkability, only small amount of the respondents who choose to walk for daily commuting. (Chart 3.1)

B. PopulationProjection

The populationprojection is calculated from year 2010 to 2040 by using the average annual growth rate from the Kuala Lumpur Structure Plan 2020. The population will continuously increase from 5,967 in 2010 to 10,806 in 2040 which indicates a total additions of 4,839 people. The survival rate and fertility rate areassumed constant in this method. (Chart 3.2)

3.1: Perception

Development Appraisal

both daylight

safe both

Report

and night

Population Projection

transportation

3.4 Transportation and Traffic Study

Kg. Datuk Keramat asan urban traditional village in Kuala Lumpur, is well served with road network (Figure 3.13) and public transit connectivity. The study area stillshows the characteristic of a village which the roads tend to be too narrow andare not in compliance with the current standard guideline. Therefore, traffic congestions are common to occur especially at Pasar Keramat intersections because of the commercial activitiesandat Bukit Keramat intersections due tothe highdensitydevelopment, this is evenexacerbated by the presence ofon street parking.

Moreover, the study area isintegrated with the public transportation system of Kuala Lumpur, where there are 3 LRT Kelana Jaya line stations accessible from study areaas well as the variety of bus services (Figure 3.14). However, even thoughthe major roads arealready provided with pedestrian walkway, but the lack of crosswalks at the intersections create a discontinuity of walkway in the study area (Figure 3.15). The absence of cycling facilities in the study area shows thatthe lifestyle of this transport mode is not common among the residents.

Lastly, the identifed of both on street and off street parkingprovision indicates thatthe study area shows less contribution in the efforts of reducing private vehicle dependency to lower the carbon emission for a more sustainable city.

N.T.S

Source: Development Appraisal and Audit Report

N.T.S

Figure 3.14: Public Transit Distribution

Source: Development Appraisal and Audit Report

N.T.S

Figure 3.15: Pedestrian Networks

Source: Development Appraisal and Audit Report

3.5 Environmental Study

A. ClimaticChange

The climatechange has resulted in the increment of rainfall intensity. The phenomenon starts with the rising temperature of the surrounding, heats up the sea and increasing the rate of condensation, hence, increasing the amount of rainfall. This increasing amount of rainfall is said to be the main caused of flashfloods occurrence in the study area.

B. Topography

The highest topographythat isidentified ranges from73m at the eastern north of Kampung Datuk Keramat tothe lowest at 33m. Meanwhile, the available water body in the study area is the Klang river on the south and a lake of TamanTasik Datuk Keramat on the east.

Highest Topographic Point

N.T.S

Lowest Topographic Point

Figure 3.16:

Source:

Figure

Source:

73m 33m

C. Environmental Quality

Water Quality Index

water quality in Kg Datuk Keramat

under class

and mildly polluted.

slightly

b. Air Quality Index

3.6 shows the number of days that records the data on the air quality index for Kampung Datuk Keramat for 2018 until 2020. From thetable it can be observed that most days in 2018 and 2020 recorded good to moderate air quality index reading for most days. For 2019, the air quality index readingranges from good to very unhealthy. However, majority of days for the year still recorded good to moderate air quality index reading.

3.6 Heritage and Cultural Study

A. Malay Reserve Land Status

Latest information obtained by DBKL during their detailed review on Kuala Lumpur Structure Plan 2040 is Kg. Datuk Keramat hasnever been under the category of Malay Reserved Land. Although according to previous study it was announcedas MRL in 1955 (Ani Ahmad, 2000). Thus, Malay reserve land status of Kg, Datuk Keramat is uncertain.

B. Heritage Building: Residential

Kg Datuk Keramat has established a residential area called 'RIDA' builtby the Lembaga Kemajuan dan Perusahaan Kampung (now MARA) to develop the economy of the Malays. This house was first occupied in December 1957. After 43 years, there have been some changes that have occurred tothe original structure of the house.Based on the Figure x.x , itis a reflection of the original design of the ‘RIDA’ housing. It is a village and has been organized in an order. That is why Kg. Datuk Keramat today is a well-organized condition compared to other village areas.

C. Cultural Identity

Pasar Keramat was the main market in Kuala Lumpur in the past and still receives many visitors today. For most of residents who stays in Kg. Datuk Keramat, Pasar Keramat is the most historical place for them in the area. Chart 3.4 shows majority of the respondents (83.30%) consider Pasar Keramat is important for the locals. This is because they can easily get foods, fishes, groceries and many other things at the nearest of their houses.

Chart 3.4: Importance of Pasar Keramat

Source: Development Appraisal and Audit Report

Kedai Songkok which islocatedin Mini UTC Keramat is a shop that still keeps heritage craft alive. The maker, Bachtiar Mustafa, 82 decided totake up thetrade after he learnt to make the songkok during the 1980s in Kg. Baru. Before the shop was in Mini UTC Keramat, Bachtiar opened his first Kedai Songkok in Pasar Keramat. He opened the shop for more than 40 years in Kuala Lumpur.

Figure 3.18: Original Design of IRDA house in Kg. Datuk Keramat Source: Development Appraisal and Audit Report

Figure 3.19: Songkok Art Source: Development Appraisal and Audit Report

Market Study

The median sale price for residential property in Kampung Datuk Keramat is at RM382 PSF or RM584,859 per units (Chart 3.5). In addition, the average sale price is relatively lower thanthe state average sale price (Chart 3.6). Furthermore, there is a variety of property types in Kg. Datuk Keramat with the different range of residential property Market sale price. In terms of landed property, zone B of the study area has relatively higher sale price compared to landed residential property at zone A. (Table 3.8) Lastly, asan older neighborhood and an urban traditional village, Kg. Datuk Keramat has a comparatively lower sale price of the landed residential property compare to other neighborhoods. This can be proved throughthe declining of sale price in the resale analysis, which even both landed and stratified property show a declination of sale price (Figure 3.20).

PROPERTYPROPERTY

RM210 (PSF)

Median Sale In Keramat

RM584,859/unit RM382 (PSF) RM700,000/unit RM484 (PSF)

Average Sale Price Psf

Detached House

3.8 Hybrid Indicator Assessment Matrix

Hybrid

HYBRID DIMENSION 1: HERITAGE IDENTITY AND URBAN DESIGN

THEME INDICATORS SCORE

HU1 –Traditional Village Criteria HU1 P1 Land Use Activity 1/3

HU1 P2 Malay Reserve Land 0/3

HU1 P3 Traditional House Architecture 1/3

HU1 P4 Visual Quality and Attraction 2/3

HU2 Cultural Identity and Urban Design Quality

HU2 P1 Cultural Identity and Sense of Place 1/3

HU2 P2 Access To Place 0/3

HU2 P3 Lifestyle 3/3

TOTAL 8/21

PERCENTAGE 38.1% Low Quality

HBYRID DIMENSION 2: OPTIMAL LAND USE

THEME INDICATORS SCORE

LU1 –Land Use Change

LU2 – Urbanization Development

Non Development Areas

Rate of Urbanization 3/3

Public Open Space Provision 1/3

LU3 –Land Use Pattern

TOTAL 9/12

PERCENTAGE

Moderate Optimality

KT1

HYBRID DIMENSION 3: PROSPEROUS COMMUNITY THEME INDICATORS SCORE

TOTAL

PERCENTAGE

HYBRID DIMENSION 4: COMMERCIAL ACCESSIBILITY

Community

THEME INDICATORS SCORE

CT1

TOTAL

PERCENTAGE

HYBRID DIMENSION 5: UNIVERSALLY ACCESSIBLE INSTITUTIONS AND PUBLIC FACILITIES

THEME INDICATORS SCORE

PF1 Healthy Communities

PF2

Public

PF2

PF2

PF3 Public Park Development

PF3-P2

School Location

Design

Park

TOTAL

PERCENTAGE

Accessible

HYBRID DIMENSION 6: EFFICIENT INFRASTRUCTURE AND TRANSPORTATION

THEME INDICATORS SCORE

IT1 - Utility Efficiency

IT1 P1 The Volume of Daily Domestic Water Usage per Capita 1/3

IT1 P2 Decreasing in Disruption of Water Supply Case 1/3

IT1 P3 Decreasing in Disruption of Electric Supply Case 3/3

IT1 P4 Broadband Coverage Rate 3/3

IT2 –Waste Management System IT2 P1 Recycling Activities and Services 2/3

IT3 –Sewerage System IT3 P1 The Percentage of Residential Gets Sewerage Service 3/3

IT4 –Linkage, Transportation and Transit IT4 P1 Location and Linkage 3/3

IT4 P2 Number of Integrated Public Transit 2/3

IT4 P3 Public Transit Stops 1/3

IT4 P4 OKU Accessible Transit Stops 0/3

IT5 P6 Cycling Facilities 0/3

IT4 P6 Neighborhood Walkability 1/3

IT4 P7 Safe Streets 3/3

IT4 P8 Reduce Parking Demand 0/3

TOTAL 23/42

PERCENTAGE 54.76% Moderate Efficiency

HYBRID DIMENSION

ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY

Development Appraisal and Audit Report

The overall score indicates a total of 73 scores outof 116, which is equivalent to 63%. This obtained score indicates the sustainabilitystatus of Kg. Datuk Keramat at moderate level.

The assessment shows that Kg. Datuk Keramat obtains the lowest score in Dimension 1 that is 38.1%, in which the study area has a low quality of heritage identity and urban design. The study area does nothave a strong and distinctive identity, the characteristic as a traditional village may not be clearly visible due tothe lack of traditional architectural village houses.

Therefore, in order to obtain the higher sustainability status, the development of urban traditional village of Kg. Datuk Keramat must take into consideration its identity and enhance the social cohesion of the community.

4.O

SUMMARY: KEY ISSUES & PROBLEMS

4.1 Main Issues

Based on the previous analysis on appraisalandaudit report, there are several main issuesidentifiedin Kampung Datuk Keramat; mobility issue, social and safety issue, environmental issue and the issue of identity and image quality. These main issues has resulted in further impacts. Each of these issues will bepresented in the abbreviation of “IP” as summarized in the next following sections. The knowledge of the existing issues will help in justifyinng the need of the remedial planning for Kg. Datuk Keramat.

IP1 – M1 : Traffic Congestion

4.2 IP1 - Mobility Issue

Traffic congestion in Pasar Keramat Area

IP1 MOBILITY ISSUE

IP1 – M2 : Low Walkability

IP2 – S1 : Lack of Public Space for Social Engagement

IP2 – S2 : Mismatch of Land Use

IP2 –SOCIAL & SAFETY ISSUE

IP2 – S3 : Lack of Guideline for Informal Houses

IP2 – S4 : Inadequate Provision And Non inclusive Design Of Public Facilities

IP3 – E1 : Flash Flood

IP3 ENVIRONMENTAL ISSUE

IP3 E2 : Disruption of Water Supply

IP4 - LACK OF IDENTITY AND IMAGE QUALITY

Figure 4.1: Traffic congestion

Source: Google Traffic

IP1–M1: Traffic Congestion

In Kg. Datuk Keramat, traffic congestioncommonly occurs at the intersections of Pasar areaand Bukit Keramat area. The traffic congestion occurs due tothe busier commercial activities, the smaller road width and on-street parking as well as higher densities. This traffic congestion does not only create the discomforts tothe neighborhoods, but it also contributes tothe more carbon emissions.

No provision of crosswalk in intersections

IP1–M2: Low Walkability

The low walkability identifiedis due to several factors;

• No enough provision of crosswalk facilities at the intersections;

• Illegal parking and commercial activities on the pedestrian walkway, it creates discontinuity and discomforts for the pedestrians;

Figure 4.2: Low Walkability

Source: Google Map

• Non inclusive design of walkway, on consideration of the OKU groups and this will lead to the inequity.

4.3 IP2 –Social and Safety Issue

IP2–S1: Lack of Public Space for Social Engagement

The land use in Kg. Datuk Keramat seems to focus on the residential areaand only 4.36% of the areaare open spaces. The open spaces provision is not even following the DBKL guidelines which are 10% of the total developments area. Furthermore, based on the conducted survey, the majority of respondents are on the average level of satisfactions for the provisions ofopen space and recreations area.

IP2–S2: Mismatch of Land Use

A traditional village should provide adequate open spaces and recreations area to promote the social engagement of the residents.

IP2–S3: Lack of Guideline for Informal Houses

Many of the informal houses are builtby the ownerof the landitself based on their preference of type of house and affordability. Most of the informal houses were built not complying tothe guidelines stated in Uniform BuildingBy Law and planning guideline due tothe limitation of reinforcement as the landis a private land. The legal title has become the barrier for the local authority totake legal action or fined the house owner.

Many of the houses built neglected the guidelines for setback which could put the lives of the residents at stake if accidents happen in their housing area.

IP2–S4: Inadequate Provision And Non-inclusive Design Of Public Facilities

There are some mismatch of land use between official data andactual condition on the site. For instance, the residents of the study use their residential area for commercial activity.

This mixed use aspect can be a potentialbut without a properplanning this issues can lead to many other problems. Such as traffic congestions, improper waste management and floods.

Kg. Datuk Keramat lacks certain type of public facilities such as hospital, clinics fire station,secondaryschool and public library. Even thoughthese facilities can be found in the other neighborhood surrounding Kg. Datuk Keramat, but there are possibilities thatthe facilities in the surrounding neighbourhood isin full capacity and cannotcater the needs of population in Kg. Datuk Keramat.

Besides, the accessibility of most of the public facilities in Kg. Datuk Keramat are clearly designed with no consideration of the disable community. This might prove to be an obstacle to DBKLvision which isinclusivity.

4.4 IP3 – Environmental Issue

IP3–E1: FlashFlood

The cause of flashfloods occurrence in Kg. Datuk Keramat:

• To be related with the development of the highways located to the southern part of the study area.

• Clogged drainage and outdated drainage system in the study area.

The issueis alreadyacknowledged by the local authorityand a pump house project has beendeveloped at the affectedareas. However, the latest flashfloods incident once again strike on 17th November 2022.

IP3–E2: Disruption of Water Supply

Flood occurrence under the development of highways.

Figure 4.3: Flood Occurrence

Source: New Straits Times

4.5 IP4 - Lack Of Identity And Image Quality

There are several factors contributing tothe issue on lack of identity and image quality.

• High population density in the study area, traditional village area is considered denser when the population is more than 300 people in 1 km sq.

• Uncertainty of Malay Reserve Land status, although the landis owned by Malays, the land status in Kg Datuk Keramat is uncertain when DBKL found out thatthe Malay Reserve Land status is actually not declared yet.

• No preservation oforiginal architectural design of the Malay traditional houses in Kg. Datuk Keramat

• No preservation of Pasar Keramat views from the street level. Pasar Keramat as the landmarkis not too visible as peoplepass throughthe street.

• Less social engagement opportunity. The residents are lesslikely to engage as itlacks ofoutdoor spaces.

Water interruption oftenoccurred almost every month started from July in the year 2020. Most of the factor that causing the interruptionsis because of the pollution in raw water such as the river followed bypipe leakage.Based on the conducted survey, the respondents agree that polluted water supply always occur in Kg. Datuk Keramat.

This issue will further havenegative impact on the health of the residents.

No View Preservation of Pasar Keramat

Figure 4.4: Lack of Identity and Image Quality

Source: Google Map

CONCEPTUALIZATION

EVERYDAY URBAN KAMPUNG-ISM

• A concept to define the meaning of urban spaces to everyday life in the urban kampung.

• It mainly concerns with specific activities of the daily life of the urban kampung community.

• A concept where the improvement of public spaces is a result of bursting kampung community life.

5.1 Defining Everyday Urban Kampung-ism

Derived from the approach of everyday urbanism, Everyday Urban Kampung-ismis a concept that emphasizes the meanings of kampung's everyday lifein everyday spaces. Everyday spaces are the physical realm for an everyday public activity that exists between different other realms; home, institutions, commercial, and workplace. In another word, everyday space is the connective tissuethat bindsdaily lives together. Therefore, Everyday Urban Kampung ism focuses on building everyday spaces to celebrate the richness and vitality of urban kampung daily activity.

Other than everyday spaces, everyday urban kampung-ism also focuses on everyday time which acknowledges the multiple ways in which everyday lifeis highly structured by time. This includes the natural time; night and day, the season, the religious time; Friday prayer, or Tarawih prayerduring Ramadhan, and schedules of modern life; working day, the weekend, vacation, and holidays.

Furthermore, the idea of urban kampung is where a kampung lifestyle, which is based on the community togetherness and high degree of sense of place, is stillstanding out and revived in the phenomenon of rapid urban development. Therefore, the quality of daily life experience is the key aspect in defining urban kampung.

Finally, the kampung community is the key point in the Everyday Urban Kampung-ism, a development of urban kampung must be communitybased,bottom up, democratic, and with a high degree of social equity and publicparticipation. Therefore, Everyday Urban Kampung ism must be able to domesticate the urban kampung spaces for the local community through the refamiliarization of the everyday spaces and urban kampung environment to make it more like home and a softer place that is more inhabitable. Hence, it can enhance the sense of togetherness between the community, as well as the sense of placebetween the communities and their Kampung, thus,the rich urban kampung lifestyle will continue tothrive and flourish.

PRINCIPLES

COLLECTIVE LIFESTYLE & PUBLICNESS

GREEN COMMUNITY & ACTIVE MOBILITY

SUSTAINABLE ENVIRONMENT

CULTURAL IDENTITY & SENSE OF PLACE

5.2 Underlying Principles

Collective Lifestyle & Publicness

A strong relationship within the community differentiates the Kampung community from the community. This relationshiprefers tothe collective which means the Kampung communities share motivated to work togetherto achieve a common goal strong interaction can develop towards meaningful lasting neighborship and build trust between community. Therefore, to revive this collective kampung lifestyle, the principle of publicness isimportant to the quality of kampung spaces can be a means interaction and enhance social cohesion.

Green Community & Active Mobility

Similarly, the green community in this context refers tothe community works togetherto increase the quality of their kampung environment as well as to help in mitigating the impacts of climatechange thatthreatensthe urban kampung that is alreadyat risk tothe impacts of the worsening urban climate environment.Besides, active mobility of the kampung community includes walking and cycling, isimportant to minimize the carbon footprints in the urban kampung. This mode of mobility shall be practicedby the local community in their daily life activities or at least totravel around the neighborhood.

Sustainable Environment

To create a more livable urban kampung environment, the development of the urban kampung must highly take into account environmental sustainability. To become an urban kampung that is environmentally sustainable, the provision of moregreen areas must beput at the utmost priority in terms of development. This principle is also correlated with the principle of the green community. Wherein, by creating a more environmentally sustainable urban kampung, will increase the awareness of the community as well as it will motivate the local community to move towards a greener living.

Cultural Identity and Sense of Place

The sense of togetherness is significant in the kampung community, therefore,the common interest that can unite the community is their cultural identity. Cultural identity of thetraditional urban kampung can be tangible such as public market or intangible such as festival,food, etc. This is important for the people’s sense of self and how they relate to othersor the sense of belonging towards each other. Additionally, the sense of place is as significant, itis the relationship between the urban kampung physical environments with the local people. If the locals appreciate their places, they cancomfortably livein their places.

5.3 International Benchmarking

5.3.1 KAMPUNG SUNTER JAYA,JAKARTA, INDONESIA

Kampung Sunter Jaya (RW 01), is an urban kampung in Tanjung Priok district, North Jakarta, Indonesia. The urban kampung is approximately 15.6 hectares area with a total population around 13,000 people or 3,000 households.

Kampung Sunter Jaya (RW 01) has been awardedas a National ProKlim (Program Kampung Iklim / Climate Kampung Program) and becomes a role model to be implementedin 31 other urban kampungs in South Jakarta (Wartakota, 2019).

Behind the successfulstory of Kampung Sunter Jaya, the urban kampung is well known for have the citizens who were enthusiastic and willing to actively run the program together. The active mobility and public transportation arealso the primarypreference of the locals for their mode of transportation.

The urban kampungs islocated just adjacent tothe Sunter lake on the north which is known to bedirty, unsafe, and uncomfortable. The successstorystarted in 2008, where the head of RW 01 (Village Citizen Association 01) with the local community started the greenmovement to make the urban kampung become a comfortable place to livein One of the program that is still conducted until nowadays is the urban farming where the community grow plantation either forfood or medicine in front of their own houses. Hence, Kampung Sunter Jaya became a pilot area for National Climate Village program.

Figure 5.1: Kampung Sunter Jaya Location Source: ITDP

Figure 5.2: Urban Farming in Kampung Sunter Jaya Source: Liputan6.com

Thereafter, the urban kampung community started to see the potential of their neighborhood to become a tourism destination in Jakarta. The water feature of the Sunter Lake is anadded point for Kampung Sunter Jaya as a tourism object. Therefore, the local community, with their own initiative, they always ensure the cleanliness of their kampung, and even they enthusiastically started to decorate their own kampung to become more attractive for visitors.

Nowadays, the unique elements of this urban kampung is the walls of the kampung houses are decorated with mural and/or hydroponics plantation. Therefore, throughthis placemaking for urban kampung, the alleyand small narrow roads in Kampung sunter Jaya has became more children friendly, comfortable and more interesting. In which this alsoallows the children to play outside safely. Other thanthat,the local community also initiated to do the catfishcultivation; hence, the visitors will have the opportunity totastethe catfish steak made by the local womenwhile accompanied by Betawis traditional beverage called Bir Pletok (A Mixture of spices) and enjoy the interactions between the residents, thus, it became the localidentityin terms of culinary.

Therefore, the successstory of Kampung Sunter Jaya proves thatthe participation of the community and their strongsense of togetherness are kampung

Figure

Kampung Cleaning

Figure

Figure

Figure

Friendly

Figure

Placemaking By

5.3.2 KAMPUNG PELANGI, SEMARANG, INDONESIA

Kampung Pelangi or Rainbow Village, is an urban village settlementsituated in the capitalcity of Central Java’s province, Semarang, in Indonesia. Semarang is a developing metropolitan urban area which becomes the fifth largest city in Indonesia, the city is divided into 16 subdistricts and 117 urban villages in which Kampung Pelangi is oneof them.

Prior tothe name of “Kampung Pelangi”, the original name of the urban kampung was “Kampung Gunung Brintik”. The urban kampung that is situated along the bank river was a dirty and disorganized slum area with various issuesin terms of the social, accessibilityand other issues.

Initially, the government of Semarang city was solely renovating the Pasar Bunga Kalisari (Kalisari Flower Market) that is just situated across the urban kampung. However, the government noticed thatthe image of slum area of the urban kampung as a background of the Pasar Bunga is unfavorable, although the Pasar Bunga is beatifiedbut the background of the slum area gives disadvantages. Therefore, the government realized the potential of the urban kampung regeneration through thethematic concept, where the Pasar Bunga gives an identity of “colorful” concept. Thus, in 2017, the first step to regenerate the urban kampungs is bypainting the houses with a selection of colorful rainbow colors. In the process of regenerating the urban kampung, there are also other improvement such as the drainage and infrastructures. Therefore, this urban kampung regeneration with the concept of rainbow village will be able to enhance the prosperity of the residents and to be a tourism destination.

Figure 5.8: Kampung Pelangi Before Source: IDN Times

Figure 5.9: Kampung Pelangi After Source: IDN Times

Figure 5.10: Pasar Bunga Kalisari Source: Google

Kampung Pelangi is oneof the successful project and become the role model of the government’s program to improve the all urban kampungs in Semarang that is called as “thematic kampung program”. TheThematic Kampung program aims to promote Gotong Royong (Mutual Cooperation) as the backbone of sustainable development of urban kampung in which the community is expected to be the activeactors of urban poverty alleviation programs in Semarang. Therefore, this program required coordination acrossagencies on social, cultural, economic and infrastructure aspects. The main idea of this Thematic Kampung program is to showcase the identity or meaning of its community by highlighting its social, economic and cultural potential. Therefore, thetheme determination is based on the cultural identity and potential of urban kampung community.

The regeneration of urban kampung Pelangi is conducted throughthe community empowerment and environmental improvement,in which throughoutthe process, the community getsmore knowledge on the characteristic of their urban kampung identity and potential and they can realize the potentialproblems that encounters within their area such as the poordwelling. Thus, the citizens of Kampung Pelangi initiated to paint their own wallswith the partnership with a painting businesses.

Therefore, this Kampung Pelangi is a good practice of how the culture becomes the backbone of sustainable development and urban kampung regeneration. By optimally benefit the cultural identity andactivity of the urban kampung community, it provides an opportunity to improve the overall sustainability and prosperity of the urban kampung.

The philosophy of thematic kampung program is based on “gotong-royong” culture of collaboration: the government provides a stimulus in the form of concept and financing, and then the community takes over.

Figure 5.11: Thematic Urban Kampung Regeneration Source: Culture 21

Figure 5.12: Mural by the local Source: Culture 21

5.3.3SUNGMISAN URBAN VILLAGE, SEOUL, SOUTH KOREA

Sungmisan urban village (Seongmisan Maeul) is a small neighborhood in the northwest Seoul of about 700families. Seoul has experienced the impacts rapid urbanization and redevelopment process where switching apartments every two or three years has became thetrend and lifestyle of the Seoul people, hence, the city islackingin terms of sense of belongingbetween the neighborhood’s community. However, this is not the case for Sungmisan residents who tryto restore what Seoul city has lost which is the harmonized community.

The successstory of Sungmisan urban village started in 1994 when a group of young dual income families whowere unsatisfied with the education system bothpublic and private sector as well as were disappointed with the materialistic and individualisticlifestyle of the society. Hence, they decided join and launched the “Woori ChildcareCenter” which is the first childcareco ops for the neighborhood families. Since then,the community has been creating their own social infrastructures which makes the urban village a safe environment for children. The social infrastructures focuses to provide services for daily life such as cooperativecare for children and elderly, village schools, communitycafes and libraries, etc. The people even initiated various cultural activities that means to give a sense of shared history throughthe provision of community theatre, radio channels, festivals andart projects.

Therefore, the local community of Sungmisan urban village has developed their own neighborhood with the concept that emphasizes on the communities need on sharedspaces,shared rituals and supports to build social networks. In turn, the communitycreates their ownopportunities to lead the lives as their wish.

The strong relationship of the community has created an urban village that is socially and environmentally neighborhood. The community even became more empowered after the key event when the residents came together and created a ”Save Sungmisan Campaign” to strongly reject the proposeddevelopment of a proposed water distribution system at the nearby forest of Mt. Sungmi. Therefore, with the established socialsustainability of Sungmisan village community, they have successfullysaved the forest environment of Mt. Sungmi.

Figure 5.13: Sungmisan Urban Village Source: Google

Figure 5.14: Sungmisan village community gathering Source: Shareable.net

Other thanthat,the community also has a more democratic way of decision making in shaping their own neighborhood In the decision making process, the community reaches a shared consensus rather than relying on the majority vote rule. Although this takestimes,this isimportant to build a better solidarity and trust in the Sungmisan community. Moreover, this approach is also used to negotiates with the local authority to shape the place they livein.

More importantly, the Sungmisan community has created the physical spaces that can adapt tothe constantchanging needs and possibilities. The people canconstantly redefine and change the built environment uses for other purposes as they wish. Such as the street can become festival spaces, cafes for public meeting and the hill for community garden. The moveable theatre also has a multipurpose cultural functions. Thus, they definepublic spaces as places where peoplebuild shared histories of collaborative activities.

Nowadays, the successstory of Sungmisan urban village has inspired the government to implement community driven approach for development ofother urban villages and created the Village Community Movement (VCM) and the Seoul Community Support Center (SCSC) which aim to involve the local people to solve common problems using a system of interaction and interrelation for social life.

Finally, the Sungmisan urban village is a good practice to prove that an urban village where community is able to share the needs of everyday life can enhance the solidarity in solving common problems together and create a mutual beneficial networks.

Figure 5.16: Community Cafe Source: iCoop

Figure 5.17 Sungmisan Village Source: labgov.city

Figure 5.18: Community Garden in village school Source: Newcityzens.com

Figure 5.15: Village School Source: iCoop

5.4 Remedial Strategies

Six strategies is formulated based on the four principles of Everyday Urban Kampung ism. These strategies are important to be used as a direction in the conceptualization of alternatives remedial plans and the overall remedial frameworks whichwill be discussed in the next following chapters. Therefore, the sixstrategies are to be elaborated as follows.

PRINCIPLES STRATEGIES

Collective

Lifestyle & Publicness Green Community & Active Mobility

Sustainable Environment Cultural Identity & Sense of Place

Redefine kampung spaces to enhance social cohesion

Enhance sustainable kampung mobility

Adaptation of climate sensitive design

Encourage green lifestyle

Undertake urban design measures to increase imageability

Encourage mix-use activity and local & traditional business activity

Remedial

Redefine kampung spaces to enhance social cohesion

As a traditional urban kampung, Kg. Datuk Keramat islackingin terms of the spaces’ publicness for social cohesion of the community. The lack of vacant land and dense development limits the provision ofopen and public spaces. This strategy is to maximize the use of available space to enhance the social cohesion.

Enhance sustainable kampung mobility

Adaptation of climate sensitive design

Kg. Datuk Keramat has a low quality of walkability andabsence of cycling facilities. Active mobility is also not the preferred mode of mobility by the residents. This strategy is to ensure the optimal quality of active mobility that isinclusive, safe and comfortable which can interest and encourage the residents to walk or cycle totravel around Kg. Datuk Keramat and it also create a healthier lifestyle.

Climate change is a global issue that also negatively impacts to Kg. Datuk Keramat. The increasing rainfall intensity causes flooding and the exposure of solar radiation due tothe lack of tree coverage threatensthe health of the residents. Thus, this strategy is to create an urban kampung that is sustainable and responsive to climate change.

Encourage green lifestyle

Undertake urban design measures to increase imageability

To reach the state of sustainable urban kampung, green lifestyle shall be encouraged and practicedby the residents in their daily lifestyle.A sustainable urban kampung requires the participation from everyone which also includes community.A community that is aware of sustainability will make a sustainable urban kampung a reality

One of the vital issuein Kg. Datuk Keramat as a traditional urban kampung is the lack of cultural identity and imageability. Traditional urban kampung must bedistinctive than its surrounding of urban areas. This strategy is significant to enhance the imageability of the urban kampung, as well as the sense of place among the community at once.

Encourage mix-use activity and local & traditional business activity Kg. Datuk Keramat as a traditional urban kampung should be vibrant and emphasizes the daily kampung activity. Mix use activity shall be implemented to allow a variety of activities which represent the richness of the kampung life. This strategy is also to support local and traditional business activity to show the pride of the urban kampung community.

ALTERNATIVE DEVELOPMENT CONCEPTS

6.1 Alternative Concept 1: Chromatic Urban Kampung

The chromatic Urban Kampung concept aims to inject a new image and identity of Kampung Datuk Keramat asan traditional urban kampung. The word chromatic is defined as colorful and vibrant, thereby,to become a chromatic kampung, placemakingplays the most significant role in this concept. Many projects of this concept requires the implementation of placemaking. The urban kampung is to be regenerated throughthe implementation of thematic colorful painting for each buildings especially the residential houses. The method of placemaking is also used to improve the quality of the streets andalleysas well as in creating the fun street. The central node is pedestrianized intended for human activities, whilst the imageabilityis also improved by regenerating the Pasar Keramat and providing gateways. Shared and curbless street is introduced asanalternative tothe conventional traffic system. Finally, because of the unique and vibrant image, this concept turn Kg. Datuk Keramat to become anew tourism destination for locals, hence it will boost the local economy of urban kampung.

Strategies:

S1 –Redefine Kampung spaces to enhance social cohesion

S2 –Enhance sustainable kampung mobility

S5 Undertake urban design measures to increase imageability

S6 –Encourage mix-use activity and local & traditional business activity

Issue catered :

IP1 M1 : Traffic Congestion

IP1

M2 : Low Walkability

FLAGSHIP PROJECTS

1. PEDESTRIANIZATION OF CENTRAL NODE

• Create a paseo which provides public open space solely for pedestrian and cyclist

• Regenerate Pasar Keramat and preserved the visibility from the street level

• Alfresco dining around the center

• Create a Keramat Walk which integrates Pasar Keramat to the cemetery KuburKeramat

• Convert Parking spaces into public spaces

• Mix-used activities

Strategies:

S1 Redefine Kampung spaces to enhance social cohesion

S2 Enhance sustainable kampung mobility

S5 Undertake urban design measures to increase imageability

IP2

S1 : Lack of Public Space for Social Engagement

IP4 : Lack Of Identity And Image Quality

Figure 6.1: Public Plaza

Source: Google

S6 Encourage mix-use activity and local & traditional business activity

To mitigate:

IP1

M2 : Low Walkability

S1 : Lack of Public Space for Social Engagement

IP2

IP4 : Lack Of Identity And Image Quality

Figure 6.2: Colorful Kampung

Source: Google

2. THEMATIC REGENERATION

• Give a new identity to Kg. Datuk Keramat

• Re paint the buildings in Kg. Datuk Keramat with a certain theme

• Make Kg. Datuk Keramata to become a local tourism destination

• Placemaking the entire urban kampung

Strategies:

S5 Undertake urban design measures to increase imageability

To mitigate:

IP4 : Lack Of Identity And Image Quality

Figure 6.3: Placemaking

Source: Google

3. FUN STREET & ALLEY PLACEMAKING

• To create a public space along the street which allow variety of activities

• Parallel playground along the street and alleys

• Placemaking to enhance the elements of colorfulness

• Improve walkway and provide cycling facilities

Strategies

S1 Redefine Kampung spaces to enhance social cohesion

To mitigate:

M2 : Low Walkability

Figure 6.4: Shared Street and Curbless street

Source: Google

4. SHARED & CURBLESS STREET

• Introduce shared street to reduce congestion and to provide a safe intersection for pedestrian and cyclist

• Curbless street for a more pedestrian friendly streetscape

IP2

: Lack of Public Space for Social Engagement

IP2

S4 : Inadequate Provision And Non inclusive Design Of Public Facilities

Strategies:

S1 Redefine Kampung spaces to enhance social cohesion

S2 Enhance sustainable kampung mobility

To mitigate:

IP1

M2 : Low Walkability

M1 : Traffic Congestion

6.2 Alternative Concept 2: Low Carbon Urban Kampung

The Low Carbon Urban Kampung is a greener movement that isintended to reduce the carbon footprint of Kampung Datuk Keramat. This concept will give a moremodern image of the urban kampung. The concept implements a more enhanced features. The concept will turnthe street into a more people oriented where the lane for driveway islimited. This people oriented street will also come with blue and green infrastructures. Some parking area is converted into a water infiltration areas with rain garden, as well into pocketpark, these 2 features is to complement the blue and green corridors. The greeningmethod is also implemented tothe alleysand back lanes, and solar farm is also proposed for sustainable community energy, thesetwo projects are to encourage a greener lifestyle of the local community.

Strategies:

S1 –Redefine Kampung spaces to enhance social cohesion

S2 –Enhance Sustainable Kampung Mobility\

S3 Adaptation of Climate Sensitive Design

S4 –Encourage Green Lifestyle

S5 Undertake Urban Design Measures to Increase Imageability

S6 –Encourage mix-use activity and local & traditional business activity

Issue catered :

IP1 – M2 : Low Walkability

IP2 – S1 : Lack of Public Space for Social Engagement

IP2 S4: Inadequate Provision and Non-inclusive Design of Public Facilities

IP3 – E1 : Flash Flood

IP3 – E2 : Disruption of Water Supply

IP4 : Lack Of Identity And Image Quality

FLAGSHIP PROJECTS

1. PEOPLE ORIENTED STREET

• The street is redesigned to provide more spaces for pedestrian, human activities, landscaping, and cycling lane by reducing the width of the driveway

• Regenerate Pasar Keramat and preserved the visibility from the street level

• Alfresco dining around the center

• Create a Keramat Walk which integrates Pasar Keramat to the cemetery KuburKeramat

• Mix used activities

Strategies:

S1 Redefine Kampung spaces to enhance social cohesion

S2 Enhance Sustainable Kampung Mobility

S5 Undertake Urban Design Measures to Increase Imageability

S6 Encourage mix use activity and local & traditional business activity

To mitigate:

IP1 M2 : Low Walkability

IP2 – S3 : Lack of Public Space for Social Engagement

IP2 – S4: Inadequate Provision and Non inclusive Design of Public Facilities

IP4 : Lack Of Identity And Image Quality

Figure

2. BLUE CORRIDOR

• Adapting Sustainable Urban

conventional road drainage system

Figure

3. COMMUNITY ENERGY

• Build a community solar farm at the north vacant land for a more sustainable urban kampung energy

water infiltration area

Strategies

S3

Design

parking area

rain garden

To mitigate

Climate

Figure

Strategies:

S1 Redefine Kampung spaces to enhance social cohesion

S3 Adaptation of Climate Sensitive Design

To mitigate:

IP2 S1 : Lack of Public Space for Social Engagement

4. GREEN NETWORK AND ALLEY

•

a green network to be

with the blue corridor

the tree coverage

street

parking area

parks

park

vacant land

back lanes and

Lack Of Identity And Image Quality

IP4

Strategies:

S1 Redefine Kampung spaces to enhance social cohesion

S3 Adaptation of Climate Sensitive Design

S4 Encourage Green Lifestyle

To mitigate:

IP1 M2 : Low Walkability

IP2

: Lack of Public Space for Social Engagement

6.3 Alternative Concept 3: KampungKami Datuk Keramat

The concept of KampungKami Datuk Keramat intends to reconnect the social and cultural meanings with the urban kampung spaces. The name KampungKami means “Our Kampung” which it focuses to make people aware of their identity asan urban kampung community. Therefore, this concept aims to refamiliarize the urban kampung spaces with the community throughthe optimal use of public spaces for everyday kampung lifestyle. The community connector street is provided with community hangout point to enhance the opportunity for community engagement. The street andalleysare turned into a more children friendly where the childrencan play outdoor, hence the urban kampung area will look more vibrant with more activities. More importantly, this concept alsoaligns with sustainability where it has active green corridor and sustainable design to be implemented.

Strategies :

S1 –Redefine Kampung spaces to enhance social cohesion

S2 –Enhance Sustainable Kampung Mobility

S3 Adaptation of Climate Sensitive Design

S4 –Encourage Green Lifestyle S5 Undertake Urban Design Measures to Increase Imageability S6 –Encourage mix-use activity and local & traditional business activity

Issue catered :

IP1

IP1

M1 : Traffic congestion

M2 : Low Walkability

IP2 S1 : Lack of Public Space for Social Engagement

FLAGSHIP PROJECTS

1. COMMUNITY CONNECTOR STREET

• Provide community hangout point (also for neighborhood watch)

The use of permeable pavement for a more pedestrian friendly street

Timely traffic management to accommodate daily activities

Selection of traditional design for street furniture and Regenerate Pasar Keramat and preserved the visibility from the street

Alfresco dining around the center

Create a Keramat Walk

Mix used activities

Strategies:

S1 Redefine Kampung spaces to enhance social cohesion

S2 Enhance Sustainable Kampung Mobility

S5 Undertake Urban Design Measures to Increase Imageability

S6 Encourage mix-use activity and local & traditional business activity

IP2

S4: Inadequate Provision and Non-inclusive Design of Public Facilities

IP3

E1 : Flash Flood

IP3 E2 : Disruption of water supply

IP4 : Lack Of Identity And Image Quality

Figure 6.9: Community Connector street

Source: Google

To mitigate:

IP1

M1 : Traffic congestion

M2 : Low Walkability

S1 : Lack of Public Space for Social Engagement

S4: Inadequate Provision and Non inclusive Design of Public Facilities

IP4 : Lack Of Identity And Image Quality

Figure 6.10: Active Green Corridor

Google

2. ACTIVE GREEN CORRIDOR

• Provide community garden along the street

• Convert parking areas into open space

Encourage the urban farming for each households (front house planting)

• Urban farming at Taman Tasik

Convert School yard for weekend park

Strategies

S1 Redefine Kampung spaces to enhance social cohesion

Encourage green lifestyle

To mitigate:

S1 : Lack of public space for social engagement

Figure 6.11: Children Friendly

Google

3. CHILDREN FRIENDLY STREETSCAPE

• Alley Placemaking which can attract the children to play outdoor

Safe intersections

Limited on street parking

Strategies

S1 Redefine Kampung spaces to enhance social cohesion

S2 Enhance sustainable Kampung mobility

S5 Undertake Urban Design measures to increase imageability

To mitigate:

M2 : Low Walkability

S2: Lack of Public Space for Social Engagement

4. SUSTAINABLE DESIGN

• Adaptation of Water Sensitive Urban Design to the road drainage system

• Rainwater harvesting Build a community solar farm for sustainable energy

Increase the coverage of tree areas

Strategies

S3 Adaptation of Climate Sensitive Design

To mitigate:

Lack of Public space for social engagement

IP3

E1

Flash flood

Disruption of water supply

Figure 6.12: Sustainable Design

Google

Concept Evaluation & Justification

ISSUES AND PROBLEMS

SWOT

CONCEPT 1: CHROMATIC URBAN KAMPUNG

CONCEPT 2: LOW CARBON URBAN KAMPUNG

CONCEPT 3: KAMPUNGKAMI DATUK KERAMAT

• Stronger Kampung community collectivity

STRENTGHS

• Noticeable distinct image of the urban kampung.

• Giving a new identity results in a loss of original one

• The most environmentally sustainable concept

• Recreate the kampung atmosphere

• The concepts that responds to the daily activity of the urban kampung

WEAKNESSES

• Introduction of shared street model will be hard for residents to adapt

• Pedestrianization of central node will cause traffic inconvenience

• Reducing the width of the drive lane will worsen traffic congestion because the demand for car in Kuala Lumpur in general is still high

• Sustainable energy require higher capital cost

• Less visual distinctive features

• Sustainable energy require higher capital cost

OPPORTUNITIES

• The thematic and colorful image of the kampung has the potential to become a new local tourist destination which will boost the local economy

THREATS

• Too many visitors will disturb the comfort of the locals , worsen the traffic congestion, and further loss of originality

• Healthier urban kampung environment

• Revive the kampung community lifestyle

• Enhance the sense of togetherness

• Socially and environmentally more sustainable

• The program will fail if the community is not willing to contribute to the utilization of solar energy

• High dependency on community participation . If the program fails to encourage the community, there will be no obvious outcome

Selected Concept:

KAMPUNGKAMI

DATUK KERAMAT

After evaluating thethree concepts troughthe identification of strategies fulfillment and issue mitigated for each concepts. The evaluation indicates that concept 2 and concept 3 aligns with all the strategies, however, in terms of the issue mitigation, concept 3 mitigatesmore issues thanthe concept 2. Moreover, through SWOT analysis, concept 1 lacksin terms of sustainability principle, even the main project of this concept is to inject a new image to Kampung Datuk Keramat which it can threatenthe originalityof the traditional urban kampung. Moreover, concept 2 primarily focus on the greening of the environment where it does not emphasizesenough in reviving the kampung lifestyle. Therefore, concept 3; KampungKami Datuk Keramat is selected as itis more applicable to be implementedin Kg. Datuk Keramat as a traditional urban village. Lastly, the concept of KampungKami Datuk Keramat will reach the state of sustainability through the revival of Kampung lifestyle that is collective, green and vibrant.

KAMPUNGKAMI DATUK KERAMAT

The main idea of the concept “KampungKami Datuk Keramat” is to re familiarize Kampung Datuk Keramat as a traditional urban kampung, in which, it seeks to remind the people of Kampung Datuk Keramat about their identity and pride as well as their responsibility to continuously conserve the livability and sustainability of their urban kampung.

The name of this concept itself simply means “Our Kampung, Datuk Keramat”. Therefore, this concept highly emphasizes on the relationship building of the urban kampung community through various projects and program which consequently they can enhance the overall built environment quality and environmental quality of their urban kampung neighborhood.

Vision: Reconnecting cultural and social meanings of kampung community with their traditional urban kampung neighborhood.

Mission:

• To enhance the quality of everyday life through the regeneration of public realms

• To integrate kampung lifestyle with sustainability

•

To strengthen the cultural identity and sense of place

7.1 Remedial Framework

MISSIONS:

STRATEGIES:

S1 Redefine

Kampung spaces to enhance social cohesion

MIS1 –

To enhance the quality of everyday life through the regeneration of public realms

MIS2 –

To integrate kampung lifestyle with sustainability

MIS3 –

To strengthen the cultural identity and sense of place

S2 Enhance Sustainable Kampung Mobility

S3 Adaptation of Climate Sensitive Design

S4 –Encourage Green Lifestyle

S5 Undertake Urban Design Measures to Increase Imageability

S6 –Encourage mixuse activity and local & traditional business activity

FLAGSHIP PROJECTS:

P1 – Community Connector Street

• P1-A1: Streetscape Improvement

• P1-A2: Mix-use Activity

• P1-A3: Community Hangout Point

• P1-A4: Pasar Keramat Regeneration and Create Keramat Walk

• P1-A5: Urban Design Improvement

P2 Children Friendly Streetscape

• P2-B1: Alley Placemaking

• P2-B2: Safe School Zone & Safe intersections

P3 – Active Green Corridor

• P3-C1: Everyday Park and Weekend Park

• P3-C2: Urban Gardening

P4 –Sustainable Design

• P4-D1: Implement Water Sensitive Urban Design and Rainwater harvesting

• P4-D2: Community Solar Farm

Remedial Proposal: KampungKami

ISSUES::

IP1 – M1 : Traffic congestion

IP1 M2 : Low Walkability

IP2 – S1 : Lack of Public Space for Social Engagement

IP2 S4: Inadequate Provision and Non inclusive Design of Public Facilities

IP3 E1 : Flash Flood

IP3 – E2 : Disruption of water supply

IP4 : Lack Of Identity And Image Quality

Community Connector Street

The communityconnector street project seeks toturn the car oriented street into people oriented street which it gives the utmost priority on the people. Therefore, the street in this project is considered as everyday spaces that are flexible andadaptable which can be used by the community for variety of daily activities. One of the distinctive characteristic of an urban kampung is the vibrant lifestyle and interaction of the people in everyday spaces, thus, by this project will provide more spaces for the residents or community to engage, interact, and build a stronger sense of togetherness. Therefore, the components of this project varies which are the improvement of the streetscape, create a mix used activity, create a community hangout point as a social infrastructure, regeneration of Pasar Keramat and urban design improvement to strengthen thetangible identity of the urban kampung, as well as the creation of Keramat walk to showcase the historical value of Kampung Datuk Keramat as a traditional urban kampung.

7.2.1 P1-A1: STREETSCAPE IMPROVEMENT

The improvement of the streetscape is vital to the overall project of communityconnector street. This project component aims to change the street from the car oriented into pedestrian oriented as well as to redefine the street as a publicplace that provides more opportunity for social activity. Therefore, this component includes the widening of pedestrian walkway by limiting the on street parking,provide exclusive cycling lane and bicycle storage, improvelandscaping, adding inclusive design elements, and change the road pavement with more permeable materials which are flood resilience.

Benefits: Supports sustainable active mobility, more pedestrian friendly, enhance thethermal comforts, a more flexible andadaptable street which responds to urban kampung lifestyle.

Program:

• Cycling Programs:

• Jom! Cycle to School

This program is to encourage the parents to let their preliminary student kids to cycle to school in Kg. Datuk Keramat

• Cycle to Jannah

This program is to encourage the residents who wish to perform Jama’ah maghrib prayers to cycle to the Masjid.

• Community PlantingProgram

This program is to invite the residents to contribute tothe landscapeimprovement along the streets in Kg. Datuk Program.

Strategies:

Redefine kampung spaces to enhance social cohesion

N.T.S

Public Bicycle Storage

Pedestrian and Cycling Network

Cycling storage is provided at public facilities, open spaces and LRT stations.

This is to promote cycling as the preference for mode of mobility among the residents

S1 Enhance sustainable kampung mobility

S2

Issues catered:

IP1 – M1 Traffic congestion

IP1 M2 Low Walkability

IP2 – S1 Lack of Public Space for Social Engagement

IP2 – S4 Inadequate Provision and Non inclusive Design of Public Facilities

IP3 E1 Flash Flood

Stakeholders:

• Local Authority

• Residents

7.2.2 P1-A2: MIX-USE ACTIVITY

Mix use activity is significant to ensure the vibrancy of the urban kampung lifestyle as the identity of the urban kampung. The mix use component encourages the resident who wish to start businesses to open home based commercial business such as F&B and retail shop. More importantly, this component also encourage the residents to support thetraditional goods product commercial such as songkok, etc.

Benefits: By allowing home based commercial activities, the residents will have more option for daily needs shopping at short distance, thus it enhances the walkability. The mix use component also takes place at the street level where the street is a public space that can be used for other activities which responds tothe everyday activities. Thus, it also comes with thetimely based traffic management that can reduce thetraffic congestion.

Program:

• Traffic Management:

• Morning

• Afternoon

• Night

• Occasional Program

• Car free day every Sunday morning

• Friday prayer bazaar

• Ramadhan bazaar

• Muslim Community Gathering at the mosque

Strategies:

N.T.S

Figure 7.5: Mix use activity

Mix-use activities

Alfresco dining

Re purpose of Mini UTC for public facilities:

Mini-UTC For: Community library Community healthcare

Figure 7.6: Community Library

Source: Google

Redefine kampung spaces to enhance social cohesion S1 Enhance sustainable kampung mobility

S2

S6 Encourage mix use activity and local & traditional business activity

Issues catered:

IP1 – M1 Traffic congestion

IP1 M2 Low Walkability

IP2 – S1 Lack of Public Space for Social Engagement

IP2 S4 Inadequate Provision and Non inclusive Design of Public Facilities

IP4 Lack Of Identity And Image Quality

Stakeholders:

• Local Authority

• Residents

• Street vendors Benchmark:

• Sungmisan Urban Village, South Korea

KampungKami Datuk Keramat

A. Timely Based Mix-Use Activities

a. MorningMarket

In the morning before the morning urban commute andaround Fajr prayer (before 8 AM), one lane of the driveway of the street around Pasar Keramat can be used for morning market where the residents (after jamaah prayer for Fajr) can shop for fresh grocery products as well as for breakfast.

b. Afternoon Time

One of the worst traffic congestion time in Kg. Datuk Keramat is at 12 in the afternoon lunch time. Therefore, thetraffic operations for such normal hours is managed for 2 lanes driveways with no any street activities to avoid the worsen congestions of thetraffic.

c. Night-time

Meanwhile, at night, the community connector street can be used for street commercial activitiesand/or extend the alfresco dining (on the walkway) on to one lane of the driveways. Hence, more people can enjoy the vibrant night activities of the urban kampung area. The closure of one lane for this activity shall be after 8 PM in the evening, this is also to avoid traffic congestions.

Mosque Fajr Activities

Alfresco dining area and walkway Morning Market

Community gathering at the mosque

The kampung house can be used for home based F&B businesses

The kampung house can also based retail

Night street dining

A. Occasional Mix-use Activities

a. Friday Prayer Bazaar and Ramadhan bazaar

Friday bazaar and Ramadhan bazaar is common to find in Malaysia. The communityconnector street will enhance the experience of the bazaar by creating a more comfortable and pedestrian friendly streetscape. In this program, one lane of the driveway is to be closed for bazaar spaces.

b. Car Free Days

in every Sunday morning, car free day program is held to promote a healthy lifestyle of the residents of Kg. Datuk Keramat. This program requires the totaltemporal closure of some roadways around the central node of Kg. Datuk Keramat. Therefore, the community will have the full ability to use the outdoor streetspaces for various type of activities such as public groupgymnastics, Zumba, sport, playing zone for the kids, etc. Other thanthat,there also will be a bazaar along the street and the walkwayswhich consist of variety of commercial uses. In addition, the public space of Masjid area (to be elaborated in project 3) can be used for commercial activitiesas well such as thrift bazaar, foods and beverages, and others.

Friday prayer or Tarawih prayer Bazaar

Encourage traditional product businesses such as the well known Kedai songkok in Kg. Datuk Keramat

Bazaar in masjid public space area

Car free days activities on the roadways Bazaar

Resident’s house

7.2.3 P1-A3: COMMUNITY HANGOUT POINT

The community hangout point is a social infrastructure to beprovided at some of the alleys entrance (Lorong) in Kg. Datuk Keramat. The infrastructure provided is a small gazebo which the structure reflects the Malay identity of thetraditional urban kampung, hence, it will also enhance the imageability of the urban kampung. This social infrastructureis to be located on the walkways that are identified as wide enough, hence, the size of the gazebo varies depending on the space availability (Figure 7.9, shows the illustration).

Benefits: This community hangout pointprovides more spaces for the interactions between the residents. Other thanthat,this component also serves for community watch program which can increase the sense of togetherness and belongingbetween the residents as well as enhance the safety of the urban kampung.

Program:

• Neighborhood Watch

The neighborhood watch program is to remind the residents as a community that they also have the responsibility to keep their neighborhood safe. Thus, it requires the community participation and coordination with the policedepartment.

N.T.S

Figure 7.9: Community Hangout Point

Strategies:

S1

Redefine kampung spaces to enhance social cohesion

S5

Undertake urban design measures to increase imageability

Issues catered:

IP2 – S1 Lack of Public Space for Social Engagement

IP4 Lack Of Identity And Image Quality

Stakeholders:

• Local Authority

• Residents

• Police department

Community Hangout point

Figure 7.10: Community Hangout Point

7.2.4 P1-A4: PASAR KERAMAT REGENERATION AND CREATE KERAMAT WALK

A. Pasar Keramat Regeneration

Pasar Keramat is the core landmark and identity of Kampung Datuk Keramat. However, the currentcondition of the Pasar Keramat is poor, not visually pleasing and the appearance is not easily noticeable. Hence, this component aims to regenerate the Pasar Keramat through pedestrianization,placemaking, create a gateway at the entrance and re build with a more traditional look of architectural design.

Benefits: Enhance the aesthetic value, reduce congestions and enhance the functionality that cancreate more spaces for commercial activitiesand public interactions.

B. Keramat Walk

Keramat walk is a historical trail which tells the legend and history of Kampung Datuk Keramat. The Keramat walkwill start from the entrance of the Pasar Keramat, therein, it will make a connection between Pasar Keramat and KuburKeramat. However, the direction signage is also provided at the LRT Dato’ Keramat for the visitors. The infrastructure provided will be an information board which contains texts, interactive illustrations andalso QR code for online versions. This will increase the historical identity value of Kg. Datuk Keramat.

Strategies:

S1

Redefine kampung spaces to enhance social cohesion

S5

Undertake urban design measures to increase imageability

Issues catered:

IP1 – M1 Traffic congestion

IP1 – M2 Low Walkability

IP2 – S1 Lack of Public Space for Social Engagement

IP4 Lack Of Identity And Image Quality

Stakeholders:

KUBUR KERAMAT

• Local Authority

code for online version

PASAR KERAMAT

LRT DATO KERAMAT

Example in Makam Hang Tuah, Malacca

Pasar Keramat Regeneration

Keramat WalkN.T.S

Full pedestrian area through placemaking, this is also to reduce the traffic congestion in the area of Pasar Keramat.

Regenerate the architecture of Pasar Keramat which can represent the Malay culture.

Create a gateway to enhance the visibility and preserve the view of Pasar Keramat

Google

Example of Pasar gateway at Pasar Klewer, Surakarta, Indonesia

Example of architectural design for Pasar Keramat that reflects the cultural identity of a Malay traditional village

Improving to enhance Keramat. Although, of However, urban enhance urban can urban and

This component includes:

• Create three gateways at the site entrance points with traditional design that reflects the cultural identity.

• Create a landmark at the designated location

• Use thetraditional elements for the design of street furniture such as street lighting.

• Add traditional elements tothe existing bus stops as well as improving the bus stop facilities

Landmark Bus stop improvement Gateways

Undertake urban design measures to increase imageability

Issues catered:

Lack Of Identity And Image Quality

Stakeholders: Local Authority

Example of landmark in Kampung Morten, Malacca

Figure 7.15: Kampung Morten Source: Google

Figure 7.14: Urban Design Improvement

Create gateways to each of the entrance points to Kg. Datuk Keramat, which can reflect the Malay traditional village.

Add traditional elements to the design of all the bus stops. improve the facilities, provide information board which contains the bus information and schedule as well as brief story of Kg. Datuk Keramat and the map of Kg. Datuk Keramat

Example of traditional bus stop design in Malacca

Before

Add traditional elements to the design of the street furniture such as street lighting.

Example of Putrajaya.

KampungKami Datuk Keramat

Jalan Datuk Keramat

Project 2: Children Friendly Streetscape

The children friendly streetscape project aims to create everyday spaces in Kg Datuk Keramat that is friendlyfor the children age group. The safety of the children is to beprioritized in the planning of Kampung Datuk Keramat.A neighborhood that is safe for children, itis also safe for other age groups of the population, hence, children friendly streetscape means a everyone friendly streetscape. Other thanthat,this project also recognized the children as individuals who love to engage more with others throughthe fun playing activities. Therefore, this project also emphasizes on bringing the children back to play on the street. In doing so, the street activities (especially on the alleys) will be richer and more vibrant which evenenhance the kampung lifestyle of the neighborhood Therefore, to achieve those,this project comprises of two (2) components which are the alley placemaking to make everyday spaces more interesting for the children, and a safe zone and safe intersections to minimize the road crashes in the urban kampung area.

7.3.1 P2-B1: ALLEY PLACEMAKING

The vibrant life on the street is the important indicator to differ the life of an urban kampung with the life of modern residential urban area. Therefore, this project component seeks to bringback the kids to play at alleys of their houses throughthe implementation of placemaking. The component includes the creation playground markinggames and utilization permeablepavement that is more pedestrian friendly (compared to conventional asphalt),

Benefits: The placemaking of alleys in urban kampung area will givemore opportunities for the children as well as the other age groups to engage with their neighbors. This will create the image of vibrant urban kampung lifestyle

PlacemakingProgram

placemaking and community program, the community will have to engage and create a togetherness in improving their competition

Strategies:

Redefine kampung spaces to enhance social cohesion

S1 Enhance sustainable kampung mobilityS2

S5

Undertake urban design measures to increase imageability

Issues catered:

IP1 M2 Low Walkability

IP2 – S1 Lack of Public Space for Social Engagement

IP4 Lack Of Identity And Image Quality

Stakeholders:

Children

Friendly Alley

N.T.S

• Local Authority

• Residents

• Paint and coating companies

Benchmark:

• Kampung Sunter Jaya, Indonesia

• Kampung Pelangi, Indonesia

Community Participation in placemaking program

Figure 7.18: Kg. Sunter Jaya Placemaking

Source: ITDP

Figure 7.19: Alley Placemaking

P2-B2: SAFE SCHOOL ZONE & SAFE INTERSECTIONS

This project component aims to create a children friendly school zone and intersections throughthe implementation of placemaking. The school zone in Kampung Datuk Keramat should be a safe environment for the children or students to be around. Therefore, the street road marking with school areaand the creation of creative pedestrian intersections are implemented to warn the more carefully andaware of the surroundings walkways around the school area is to be enhanced playful walkway for a vibrant activityas well the wall fence of the schools complement quality of the streetscape

Benefits:a safeschool zone and safe intersections the level of walkability in Kg. Datuk Keramat attractive street public space which can enhance of the urban kampung.

Program:

• Community Placemaking

Safe School Zone road marking

Playful walkway placemaking Mural artwork painting Creative intersection painting

Strategies:

S1

Redefine kampung spaces to enhance social cohesion

S2

Enhance sustainable kampung mobility

S5

Undertake urban design measures to increase imageability

Issues catered:

IP1 M2 Low Walkability

IP2 – S1 Lack of Public Space for Social Engagement

IP4 Lack Of Identity And Image Quality

Stakeholders:

Safe School Zone & Safe Intersections

N.T.S

Community Participation in placemaking program

Figure 7.21: Placemaking

Source: Google

Figure 7.22: Safe School Zone and Intersections

• Local Authority

• Residents

• Paint and coating companies

• School students

• Street artists Benchmark:

• Kampung Sunter Jaya, Indonesia

• Kampung Pelangi, Indonesia

artwork on the school’s wall fence which

showcase the traditional culture

Umbrella to protect pedestrian (users) against rain or harmful sunlight at the intersections. (Example

Jeju island, S.

7.4 Project 3: Active Green Corridor

The active green corridor project aims to create more green spaces and elements in the urban kampung that is not only visually pleasingbut also inviting for healthier community activities. Hence, this project also seeks to integrate the vibrant and traditional kampung lifestyle with green lifestyle whichwill help to create a much healthier environment. Other than that,this project also encourages the residents to produce their own local foods whichwill make the community to become more self sustain. Furthermore, in the process they will also have better engagement throughthe variety of green activities. Therefore, this project has 2 components which are the creation of everyday space by turning vacant land and parking area into public spaces as well as the creation of weekend spaces in the school yard facilities, and lastly,itis the provision of urban street gardening and urban farmingfacilitiesfor the local food production activities.

7.4.1 P3-C1: EVERYDAY PARK AND WEEKEND PARK

A. Everyday Park

The provision of everyday park as a component of active green corridor project seeks to create green areas of publicpark which has the flexibility in use, and it can accommodate variety of human activities by also making it more creative and interesting. Thus, everyday park is proposed on available vacant land as well as on a surface parking area (Masjid Dato Keramat and the adjacent commercial area) hence it requires conversion and limit the number of parking lots.

B. Weekend Park

Similarly, weekend park also serves the main function as the everyday park to complement the overall project of active green corridor. However, the name of “Weekend” itself means; this park is onlyopen for publicduring the weekend only because this proposedpark is the use of the school’s yard and parking area (requires conversion and limitation) for publicpark during the weekend. Therefore, it can provide more spaces such as during the car free dayprogram (as elaborated in project P1-A2: Mix use Activity).

Benefits: The provision of everyday park and weekend park will enhance the active mobility by creating a more interesting destination which can attracts people to come. The unique features of the park will give anaesthetic image tothe urban kampung. Nevertheless, it provides more public space for community engagement.

Everyday park

N.T.S

Parking space for everyday park

Weekend Park

School ground and park are open for community during the weekend which allow more spaces for community activities in the urban kampung

Strategies:

Redefine kampung spaces to enhance social cohesion S1

Enhance sustainable kampung mobilityS2

S5

Undertake urban design measures to increase imageability

Issues catered:

IP1

– M2 Low Walkability

IP2 – S1 Lack of Public Space for Social Engagement

IP4 Lack Of Identity And Image Quality

Stakeholders:

• Local Authority

• Residents

Figure 7.26: Weekend park

Source: Google

Figure 7.25: Everyday Park

Park

7.4.2 P3-C2: URBAN GARDENING

The urban gardening project component aims to create a resilient and healthy environment of Kampung Datuk Keramat throughthe urban gardening as well as relationship building. There are 3 categories of urban gardening in this component:

1. Urban farmingfor local food production at TamanTasik Datuk Keramat

2. Urban gardening corridor along Jalan Keramat

3. Alley gardening for all landed residential area

Benefits: This project component will encourage a greener lifestyle of the community, hence, consequently, it will make a more self sustain neighborhood and strong relationship between the residents.

Program:

• Weekend Farming Program

This program is to invite all the residents to participate in the shared urban farming which cancreate a more self sustain community by having their own local food production

• Lorong Greening Program

This program is to invite all the resident to landscape and/or back

• Community

This program contribute along the

Active Green Corridor

Strategies:

S1

Redefine kampung spaces to enhance social cohesion

S4 Encourage green lifestyle

Issues catered:

IP2 – S1 Lack of Public Space for Social Engagement

Stakeholders:

• Local Authority

• Residents

Benchmark:

• Kampung Sunter jaya, Indonesia

N.T.S

1 2

Taman Tasik Datuk Keramat Urban Farming

1 2

Jalan Keramat Street Gardening

greening

example of Kampung Sunter Jaya, Indonesia

Urban farming at Taman Tasik Datuk Keramat which optimize the advantage of the water feature

gardening along Jalan Keramat to even enhance the vibrancy of street activities

An example of Burlington, USA

7.5 Project 4: Sustainable Design

The sustainable designproject aims to create an urban kampung that is responsive tothe global issue of climatechange as well as the local environmental issue such as the flood. This project will also help to enhance the overall environmental quality of Kampung Datuk Keramat. Therefore, there area two (2) components of this project, which are the implementation of water sensitive urban design elements to minimize the flood occurrence and itsimpacts, as well as the establishment of community solar farm to create a self sustain urban kampung community. More importantly,in the n process of implementing thetwo components, the participatory of the urban kampung residents is highly requires, and consequently, the residents can establish a stronger community relationship as well as the sense of togetherness.

7.5.1 P4-D1: IMPLEMENT WATER SENSITIVE URBAN DESIGN AND RAINWATER HARVESTING

Strategies:

The phenomenon of flashflood has posed a significant threattothe sustainability of Kg, Datuk Keramat. The poor and outdated drainage and irrigation system in urban kampung isidentified to be the main factor to the flashflood occurrence and disruption of water supply. The increasing rainfall due tothe climatechange exacerbated this issue. Therefore, the conventional drainage system is considered not sustainable and shall not be reliable. Therefore, the approach of water sensitive urban design (WSUD) is to be implementedin the urban kampung asan alternative option for the road drainage system. Other thanthat, rainwater harvesting is encouraged to be implemented by each families of landed houses in Kg. Datuk Keramat for a more sustainable living of the community.

Benefits: The green infrastructure of WSUD will enhance the water infiltrationin Kg, Datuk Keramat to minimize the flood occurrence. Moreover, the implementation of water sensitive urban design aims to re create the natural water cycle in urban area, by integrating with the rainwater harvesting system, it will create a sustainable water cycle by taking advantage of the rainwater and re using the wastewater for other uses.

Program:

• Home Rainwater Harvesting Program

This program is to encourage all the households of landed houses in Kg. Datuk Keramat to install rainwater harvesting system in their own houses.

S1

Redefine kampung spaces to enhance social cohesion

S3 Adaptation of climate sensitive design

S4 Encourage green lifestyle

N.T.S

Figure 7.30: WSUD and rainwater harvesting

The elements of water sensitive urban design is mainly provided along the main road drainage system

:Rainwater harvesting location

Each of the landed houses in Kg. Datuk Keramat

Figure 7.31: House rainwater harvesting

Source: Google

IP3 E1 Flash Flood

IP3 – E2 Disruption of water supply

Issues catered: Stakeholders:

• Local Authority

• Residents

How rain garden works:

7.32:

Google

Water sensitive urban design element to bee implemented along the road drainage system:

Rain garden to contain and infiltrate rainwater

Rill to channel the rainwater (alternative for the conventional drainage channel system

Rain Garden Rill

House rainwater harvesting:

Rainwater on the surface

Gutter protection screening to keep large debris from entering the gutters

Gutter to collect rainwater

Rain head allows a bit of self cleaning filtration options

First flush diverter to prevent contaminated rainwater from entering the tank

Tank screen to keep mosquitoes and pests out

Rainwater tanks

Insect proof flap valve (Same as tank screen)

Auto fill system to always keep a minimum amount of water in the tank

Pump system to distribute the rainwater to irrigation system

Irrigation filter to catch any large debris

level indicator to monitor the usafge from the tank

Figure 7.33:

Google

rainwater harvesting

7.5.2 P4-D2: COMMUNITY SOLAR FARM

As an urban kampung locatedin the urbanized area of Kuala Lumpur, the development of the urban kampung should be align with the goals of sustainability. This project component aims toturnthe urban kampung community in Kg. Datuk Keramat into a more sustainable lifestyle of the community. Therefore, the community solar farm is to beproposed at the designated area of the vacant land which is on the highest topographical levelin the site area. This community solar farm provides a more sustainable option for the urban kampung energy, in which the implementation of this project requires full participation of all the residents in Kg. Datuk Keramat.

Benefits: The community solar farm does not only have benefits in terms of energy sustainability, but this program that requires the resident's participation will also provide more opportunities for community engagement. Hence, this program will empower the community of Kg. Datuk Keramat.

Program:

• Community Solar Farming Program

Creating a committee to manage the program and to ensure the equal participation of all residents in the implementation of sustainablesolar energy in their urban kampung of Datuk Keramat.

Strategies:

S1

Redefine kampung spaces to enhance social cohesion

S3 Adaptation of climate sensitive design

S4 Encourage green lifestyle

Issues catered:

IP2 S1 Lack of Public Space for Social Engagement

Stakeholders:

• Local Authority

• Residents

Community Solar Farm

N.T.S

Figure

Google

The selected area is located on a vacant land at the highest topographical level point in the area of Kg. Datuk Keramat

Example of South Carolina Community

7.6 Remedial Evaluation Analysis

SWOT ANALYSIS

SWOT Project 1: Community Connector Street

• Improve the overall streetscape to be more flexible and adaptable for the rich activities of urban kampung community lifestyle

Project 2: Children Friendly Streetscape

• Create an urban kampung that highly prioritize on the safety of the children

Project 3: Active Green Corridor Project 4: Sustainable Design

STRENGTHS

• Tangible distinctive features of a traditional urban kampung through the urban design improvement

• Inclusive and comfortable outdoor environment

• Children friendly neighborhood means it is also safe for other age groups

• Create a more vibrant and interesting landscape

• Create an urban kampung community that practice green lifestyle

• Fully optimize the available spaces for green areas and for more uses

• Self resilient community

• A sustainable energy

• Reduce pollution and mitigate flood

• High environmental quality

• Create an Urban kampung community that contribute to combat climate change

WEAKNESSES

• Due to the narrow width of the road, the street design improvement might differ according to the actual condition of the current streetscape

• The changing trend to the digital videogames among the children, outdoor playing games might not significantly interest many children.

• The difficulty in the conversion process of the parking areas into public park which requires legal requirement

• Solar energy requires high capital cost for implementation

• The location of the proposed solar farm is at the edge of the site area and only accessible from Jalan Jelatek, hence it restricts the accessibility

OPPORTUNITIES

• The community relationship building will empower and inspire them to further enhance the overall quality of their urban kampung area

• Distinctive identity will enhance the sense of place

• Community pride

THREATS

• The Children activities on the street/outdoor will create a livelier urban kampung atmosphere

• The provision of more green public areas will improve the environmental quality as well as the social cohesion

• Kampung Datuk Keramat that is free from flood occurrence

• High reliability on community participation, if the community is not willing to play their role, the project will not show meaningful impacts.

7.6.2 LOGICAL FRAMEWORK MATRIX

INPUTS/PROJECTS:

P1 Community Connector Street

P1-A1: Streetscape Improvement

P1-A2: Mix use Activity

P1-A3: Community Hangout Point

P1-A4: Pasar Keramat

Regeneration and Create Keramat Walk

P1-A5: Urban Design Improvement

P2 – Children Friendly Streetscape

`

P2-B1: Alley Placemaking

OUTPUTS:

People oriented street

Timely based everyday spaces

Strong image of Pasar Keramat

Urban design elements that reflects the cultural identity

Variety of activities

OUTCOMES: IMPACTS:

Flexible, adaptable and interesting everyday spaces Walkable and inclusive streetscape and public spaces

Vibrant urban kampung

Increased imageability and sense of place

`

P2-B2: Safe School Zone & Safe intersections

P3 – Active Green Corridor

Interesting and unique everyday spaces

Safe pedestrian walkways

More green and public areas

Distinctive urban design

Strong community engagement

Revived urban kampung lifestyle Established Sustainable and green lifestyle community Established collective community

`

P3-C1: Everyday Park & Weekend Park

`

P3-C2: Urban Gardening

P4 Sustainable Design

Local food production

Increase surface permeability and rainwater infiltration

Safe everyday spaces

Green environment and flood resilience

Established healthy community

Created a sustainable environment

P4-D1: Implement Water Sensitive Urban Design and Rainwater harvesting

Water re cycling

Self sustain urban kampung

`

`

P4-D2: Community Solar Farm

Sustainable energy of the community

Proposal: KampungKami Datuk Keramat

7.7 Remedial Proposal Assessment

Table 7.2: Remedial Proposal Assessment

HYBRID DIMENSION 1: HERITAGE IDENTITY AND URBAN DESIGN THEME INDICATORS SCORE

HU1 –Traditional Village Criteria HU1 P1 Land Use Activity

1/3

HU1 P2 Malay Reserve Land 0/3

HU1 P3 Traditional House Architecture 1/3

HU1-P4 Visual Quality and Attraction Criteria:

o Availability of river or water body elements

o Public square or open space for leisure activities for the village community

o Views of the streets or small alleys that presents the image of the village

o The scenery and atmosphere of the village is still strong and not affected by planned development

✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓

o The surrounding scenery (outside the village) becomes the landscape background for the village which includes natural elements or unique human constructions.

Scoring:

2/3 3/3

• P1-Community Connector Street

• P2-Children friendly streetscape

✓

o 5 achieved criteria = 3 score

o 3-4 achieved criteria = 2 scores

o 1-2 achieved criteria = 1score

Continue…

HYBRID DIMENSION 1: HERITAGE IDENTITY AND URBAN DESIGN

THEME INDICATORS SCORE

HU2 – Cultural Identity and Urban Design Quality

HU2-P1 Cultural Identity and Sense of Place

Criteria (One score for each):

o Development should respond to special character precincts

o Corners and special sites should provide landmarks to improve the distinctiveness of the neighbourhood

o Artworks and local activities which reflects local identity and cultures are encouraged

3 scores maximum

HU2-P2 Access To Place

Criteria (1 score for each):

o Pedestrian circulation should be safe and accessible to all ages and abilities

o Integration of vehicles and pedestrians should be carefully considered with priority given to pedestrians.

✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓

o Pedestrian activity and quality pedestrian amenity should predominate at street level.

3 scores maximum

1/3 3/3

• P1-Community Connector Street

0/3 3/3

• P1-Community Connector Street

• P2-Children Friendly streetscape

HU2 P3 Lifestyle 3/3

TOTAL 8/21

Quality

Quality

HBYRID DIMENSION 2: OPTIMAL LAND USE

THEME INDICATORS

PERCENTAGE

HYBRID DIMENSION 3: PROSPEROUS COMMUNITY

THEME INDICATORS

PERCENTAGE

Land

HYBRID DIMENSION 4: COMMERCIAL ACCESSIBILITY

THEME INDICATORS SCORE

CT1 – Proximity to Commercial

CT2 –Social Engagement

CT1 P1 Proximity From Residential Areas To Commercial Areas 3/3

CT2 P1 Provision of Cultural and Art Centre Within Proximity of The Area 2/3

TOTAL 5/6

PERCENTAGE 83.33% Commercial Accessible

HYBRID DIMENSION 5: UNIVERSALLY ACCESSIBLE INSTITUTIONS AND PUBLIC FACILITIES

THEME INDICATORS SCORE

PF1 – Healthy Communities

PF2 – Public Facilities Location and Design

PF1 P1 Public and Recreational Facilities 3/3

PF2 P1 Transit Oriented Locations 3/3

PF2 P2 School Location and Access 3/3

PF2-P3 Universal Design

For non-residential area, universal accessibility for people of diverse abilities along 100% of public rights-of-way = 3 score

0/3 3/3

• P1-Community Connector Street

PF3 Public Park Development

PF3 P1 Parks and Recreation 3/3

PF3 P2 Public Park Maintenance 2/3

TOTAL 14/18 17/18

PERCENTAGE

77.7% Moderate Universal Accessibility 94.44% Universally Accessible

HYBRID DIMENSION 6: EFFICIENT INFRASTRUCTURE AND TRANSPORTATION

THEME INDICATORS SCORE

IT1 - Utility Efficiency

IT1 P1 The Volume of Daily Domestic Water Usage per Capita 1/3

IT1 P2 Decreasing in Disruption of Water Supply Case 1/3

IT1 P3 Decreasing in Disruption of Electric Supply Case 3/3

IT1 P4 Broadband Coverage Rate 3/3

IT2 –Waste Management System IT2 P1 Recycling Activities and Services 2/3

IT3 –Sewerage System

IT3 P1 The Percentage of Residential Gets Sewerage Service 3/3

IT4 –Linkage, Transportation and Transit IT4 P1 Location and Linkage 3/3

IT4 P2 Number of Integrated Public Transit 2/3

IT4-P3 Public Transit Stops

All existing transit stop is (1 score for each):

o Walking distance from any land uses within the neighborhood.

o Provided with shelters, benches, lighting and information displays

o Provided with well-publicized vehicle sharing facilities on site or within 500 m

3 scores maximum

IT4-P4 OKU-Accessible Transit Stops

Percentage of the total transit stops that are OKU accessible within the neighborhood:

o ≥30% = 1 score

o 31%-70% = 2 scores

o 71% -100% = 3 scores

✓ ✓ ✓

1/3 2/3

• P1 A5: Urban Design Improvement

0/3 3/3

KampungKami

Keramat

HYBRID DIMENSION 6: EFFICIENT INFRASTRUCTURE AND TRANSPORTATION

THEME INDICATORS SCORE

IT5-P6 Cycling Facilities

The neighborhood is provided with (if criteria 1 is complied, pick both or any of the following 2 criteria, 1 score for each):

o Cycling provision around the neighbourhood

o Cycling network connects to more than 10 diverse land uses

o Provides secure and covered bicycle storage (10% of nonresidential and 30% of residential)

3 scores maximum

IT4-P6 Neighborhood Walkability

Criteria:

o Sidewalks along 90% of street length (both side of the street)

o Mixed use and non residential buildings close to the sidewalk

o Lines 60% of sidewalk with non invasive trees

o Provides noon time shade along at least 40% of sidewalks

Scoring:

o 4 achieved criteria = 3 score

o 2-3 achieved criteria= 2 score

o 1 achieved criteria = 1 score

0/3 3/3

• P1-Community Connector Street

1/3 2/3

• P1-Community Connector Street

HYBRID DIMENSION 6: EFFICIENT INFRASTRUCTURE AND TRANSPORTATION

THEME INDICATORS

score

greater than 20% of built area)

total surface parking area

any

along

parking

the side or rear of buildings

bicycle storage for building occupants, bicycle parking

visitors, and spaces for carpool or shared vehicles.

Everyday Park and

HYBRID DIMENSION 7: SUSTAINABLE ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY

DIMENSION SCORE PERCENTAGE

TOTAL SCORE

1. Heritage Identity And Urban Design 8/21 14/21

38.1% (Low Quality) 66.66% Moderate Quality

63%

MODERATE SUSTAINABILITY

2. Optimal Land Use 9/12 10/12

75% (Moderate Optimality) 83.33% Optimal Land Use

3. Prosperous Community 5/5 100% (Prosperous Community)

4. Commercial Accessibility 5/6 83.33% (Commercial Accessible)

5. Universally Accessible Institutions And Public Facilities

14/18 17/18

77.7% (Moderate Universal Accessibility) 94.44% Universally Accessible

TOTAL SCORE

91/116

MODERATE SUSTAINABILITY

6. Efficient Infrastructure & Transportation 23/42 31/42

54.76% (Moderate Efficiency) 73.8% Moderate Efficiency

7. Sustainable Environmental Quality 9/12 75% (Moderate Quality)

TOTAL 73/116 91/116 63% 78%

The remedial proposal is assessed based on the seven (7) dimensional categories in the Hybrid assessment tool. The overall score for the assessment indicates thatthe remedial proposal will increase the sustainability index of Kg. Datuk Keramat by 15% at moderate level. Although this score falls under the same index, but there somesignificant improvementsin terms of each dimensional scoring. Refer to Table 7.3, the remedial proposal can enhance the index of dimension 1 on heritage identity and urban design from low quality at 38.1% to 66.6% or at moderate level. this indicates thatthe remedial proposal can successfully increase the imageability of Kampung Datuk Keramat. Furthermore, other improvement of the dimensional indexis the dimension 2 from moderate optimality to optimal land use, dimension 5 from moderate universal accessibility to universally accessible of public facilities, and lastlyis the increment by 19% for dimension 7 on efficient infrastructure and transportation at the same index of moderate efficiency.

8.O CONCLUSION

In conclusion, this planning and remedialreport has successfully achievedall thethree objectives as mentioned in chapter 1. This reporthas suggested three concept plansbased on the principle of Everyday Urban Kampung ism, which are the chromatic urban kampung concept, low carbon urban kampung concept, and KampungKami Datuk Keramat, hence, after thethorough analysis, the concept of KampungKami Datuk Keramat is selected as it fullyfulfills with all the required strategies and mitigatedmore issues. Other thanthat,the concept is also the most applicableas it highly considers the importance of public spaces and everyday spaces to revive the kampung lifestyle as the identity of the community of Kampung Datuk Keramat.

Furthermore, the concept of KampungKami Datuk Keramat aims to reconnect the cultural and social meanings of kampung community with theirtraditional urban kampung neighborhood. Therefore, there are 4 flagship projects which has its own importance to achieve the vision. The communityconnector project seeks to create a people oriented street as a part of everyday spaces for more variety of activities. The children friendly streetscape project aims to create a safe urban kampung environment that is vibrant of activities. The active green corridor project mainly seeks to create a healthier environment and integrate the kampung lifestyle with the green lifestyle. Lastly, the sustainable designproject is significant to create a more sustainable community and urban kampung neighborhood.

Finally, the proposed remedial plan is to be assessed with the hybrid indicator assessment tool, in which the result indicates thatthe remedial plan will be able to mainly enhance the quality of heritage identity and urban design of Kampung Datuk Keramat from low quality to moderate quality status index. In terms of the overall score, the assessment shows thatthe sustainabilitystatus index will be the same at moderate level, however, there is significant increment of thetotal percentage which is from 63% to 78%. Nevertheless, the proposed remedial plan will be able to revive the cultural identity of Kampung Datuk Kerama as a traditional urban kampung.

REFERENCES

Indonesia, I. (2018, October 19). Home. Retrieved January 04, 2021, from http://www.itdp indonesia.org/kampungkotabersama/rw01sunterjaya

Hamonangan, J. (2019, January 27). Kampung Proklim Sunter Jaya akan Diadopsi di Seluruh Kelurahan di Jakut. Retrieved January 04, 2021, from https://wartakota.tribunnews.com/2019/01/27/kampung proklim sunter jaya akan diadopsi di seluruh kelurahan di jakut

Liputan6.com. (2019, February 07). FOTO: Melihat Suasana Kampung Proklim Sunter Jaya. Retrieved January 04, 2021, from https://www.liputan6.com/news/read/3889828/foto melihat suasana kampung proklim sunter jaya?page=2

Jakarta's Urban Villages are Organic TOD Best Practices. (2019, September 09). Retrieved January 04, 2021, from https://www.itdp.org/2019/04/18/jakartas urban villages tod best-practices/

Adipradana, I. (n.d.). Thematic Kampung and " gotong royong " culture as the backbone of sustainable development. Retrieved January 06, 2021, from http://obs.agenda21culture.net/en/good practices/thematic-kampung and gotong royong culture backbone-sustainable development

Collective Life. (n.d.). Retrieved January 06, 2021, from https://idealsociety.squarespace.com/community

Cherry, K. (n.d.). Understanding Collectivist Cultures. Retrieved January 06, 2021, from https://www.verywellmind.com/what are collectivistic cultures 2794962

Lazzarini, L. (2016). The Everyday (in) Urbanism: What's New on the Spot.

Kelbaugh, D. (2000). Three Paradigms: New Urbanism, Everyday Urbanism, Post Urbanism An Excerpt From The Essential COMMON PLACE.BULLETIN OF SCIENCE, TECHNOLOGY & SOCIETY. doi:https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/027046760002 000406

Crawford, M., Speaks, M., & Mehrotra, R. (2005).Everyday urbanism: Margaret Crawford vs. Michael Speaks. Ann Arbor: Univ. of Michigan.

자동등록방지를위해보안절차를거치고있습니다

(n.d.). Retrieved

06, 2021, from http://icoop.coop/?faq=story-korean social-economy-24 sungmisan village story village not map_201709

Sharing and cooperative practices for local sustainable development: The urban village communities in Seoul. The case of the Sungmisan Village. (2017, August 24). Retrieved January 06, 2021, from https://labgov.city/theurbanmedialab/sharing and cooperative-practices-for local sustainable development the urban village communities in seoul the case of the sungmisan village/

Gangnam Style To SungmisanStyle: South Korea's urban villages. (n.d.). Retrieved January 06, 2021, from http://www.sociallife.co/blog/post/Gangnam Style To Sungmisan Style/

The urban village of Sungmisan. (n.d.). Retrieved January 06, 2021, from http://www.newcityzens.com/en/266/the urban village of sungmisan

Maxwell-Gaines, C. (2020, July 27). Rainwater Harvesting 101: Your How-To Collect Rainwater Guide. Retrieved January 11, 2021, from https://www.watercache.com/education/rainwater harvesting 101

THANK YOU