Goleta Parks Master Plan by KTUA

Goleta Parks

Facilities & Playgrounds Master Plan “Adopted” January 2020

Neighborhood Services and Public Safety Department

City of Goleta Parks, Facilities & Playgrounds Master Plan

Acknowledgements City of Goleta Vyto Adomaitis, Director of Neighborhood Services & Public Safety JoAnne Plummer, Parks & Recreation Manager, Project Manager City Council Paula Perotte, Mayor Kyle Richards, Mayor Pro Tempore Roger S. Aceves, Councilmember Stuart Kasdin, Councilmember James Kyriaco, Councilmember Parks and Recreation Commission Daryl West Nora Kelly Graciela Rodriguez Deborah Williams Wayne Rascati Megan Peterson KTUA Michael Singleton, Principal Juan Alberto Bonilla, Senior Planner Silvia Fang, GIS Analyst/Planner GreenPlay LLC Art Thatcher, Principal Accessibility Specialists Sandi L. Miles, Certified Access Specialist

Table of Contents

Contents 01

Executive Summary

1.1 Introduction................................................................................................................................................................................................2 1.2 Key Issues and Recurring Themes......................................................................................................................................................2 1.3 Recommendations...................................................................................................................................................................................3 1.4 Glossary of Terms....................................................................................................................................................................................3 1.5 Scope of the Document........................................................................................................................................................................ 4 1.6 Overview of the Document................................................................................................................................................................. 4

Planning Context

Existing Level of Service

2.1 Intended Uses of the Master Plan..................................................................................................................................................... 8 2.2 Parks and Open Space Division.......................................................................................................................................................... 8 2.3 Planning Process Methodology........................................................................................................................................................10 2.4 Previous Planning History for Parks and Recreation..................................................................................................................11 2.5 Policies, Guidelines, and Recommendations from other Studies.......................................................................................... 12 2.4 Demographic Profile.............................................................................................................................................................................16 19

3.1 Existing City Parks, Open Spaces, and Recreation Facilities................................................................................................... 20 3.2 Goleta Park Types................................................................................................................................................................................. 24 3.3 Park Distribution Analysis..................................................................................................................................................................27 3.4 ADA Accessibility................................................................................................................................................................................. 28

III

City of Goleta Parks, Facilities & Playgrounds Master Plan

Contents (Cont.) 04

Trends Analysis

4.1 Summary of Needs Assessment from Existing Study..............................................................................................................40 4.2 Summary of Key Trends.....................................................................................................................................................................40 4.3 Community Outreach......................................................................................................................................................................... 45 4.4 Summary of Key Public Recommendations.................................................................................................................................51 4.5 Population Trends.................................................................................................................................................................................52 4.6 Land Development Trends................................................................................................................................................................ 56 Recommendations & Action Plans

5.1 Overview of Recommendations.......................................................................................................................................................60 5.2 Recommendations for Meeting Population Based Standards..............................................................................................60 5.3 Recommendations that Help Provide Better Access to Parks ..............................................................................................74 5.4 Recommendations that Help to Reduce Deficiencies............................................................................................................. 78 5.5 Recommendations to Increase Access to Nature and Open Space.....................................................................................80 5.6 Recommendations that Help to Increase Funding of Parklands, Amenities and Programs.........................................81 5.7 Recommendations that Help to Increase Recreational Programs....................................................................................... 82 5.8 Recommendations that Help to Achieve the City’s Sustainability Goals.........................................................................84 5.9 Summary of Recommendations to Reduce Deficiencies and Equitable Distribution...................................................88 5.10 Maintenance Guidelines...................................................................................................................................................................94 5.11 Signage Policy.....................................................................................................................................................................................100 5.12 Recommendations for Utilizing Reclaimed Water for Parks.............................................................................................. 106 5.13 ADA Recommendations................................................................................................................................................................... 112 Appendices

115

Appendix A: City Park Accessibility Compliance Assessment..................................................................................................... 117 Appendix B: Stakeholder Interviews..................................................................................................................................................... 161 Appendix C: Survey Results.....................................................................................................................................................................175

Table of Contents

San Miguel Open SpaceV

City of Goleta Parks, Facilities & Playgrounds Master Plan

List of Figures

Planning Context

Existing Context

Trends Analysis

Figure 2-1: Figure 2-2: Figure 2-3: Figure 2-4:

Goleta’s General Location on the Coast.......................................... 9 2017 Goleta General Demographic Profile.....................................17 Goleta’s Racial Make-Up......................................................................17 Goleta Population Growth Trend.....................................................17

Figure 3-1: Existing Parks and Recreational Facilities .....................................21 Figure 3-2: ADA Accessibility Deficiencies per Park.......................................29 Figure 3-3: Residential Population Density........................................................30 Figure 3-4: Combined Parkshed and Level of Service.....................................31 Figure 3-5: Accessible Park Level........................................................................... 32 Figure 3-6: Accessible Park Acreage..................................................................... 32 Figure 3-7: Mini and Neighborhood Parkshed................................................... 33 Figure 3-8: Community and Regional Parkshed...............................................34 Figure 3-9: Active Parkshed.................................................................................... 35 Figure 3-10: Active Parkshed Gaps........................................................................36

Figure 4-1: City of Goleta Outdoor Activity Participation.............................41 Figure 4-2: City of Goleta Team Sport Participation.......................................41 Figure 4-3: Recreational Expenditures by Goleta Residents........................43 Figure 4-4: State of California Outdoor Recreation Economy....................43 Figure 4-5: City of Goleta Generational Breakdown.......................................44 Figure 4-6: Current Usage........................................................................................49 Figure 4-7: Importance of Future Facilities........................................................49 Figure 4-8: Future Facility Priorities.....................................................................50 Figure 4-9: Barriers to Participation.....................................................................50 Figure 4-10: Future Active Parks 5-minute Driveshed Gap........................... 53 Figure 4-11: Population Density Change ............................................................54 Figure 4-12: Active Parkshed Gaps with Population Growth....................... 55 Figure 4-13: Land Availability and Ownership...................................................56 Figure 4-14: Land Use Designation for Future Service Area......................... 57

Recommendations & Action Plans Figure 5-1: Reorganize Active Parks and Passive Open Spaces....................61 Figure 5-2: Potential Public Land Opportunities for New Parks.................64 Figure 5-3: Park Distribution and Acres through Joint Use......................... 67 Figure 5-4: Private Vacant Lands that are Potential Development............71 Figure 5-5: Proposed Park Access Projects BPMP 2018................................. 75 Figure 5-6: Potential other Park Connection Enhancements...................... 76 Figure 5-7: Recommended Park Master Plan.....................................................89 Figure 5-8: Future Active Parkshed Gaps...........................................................93 Figure 5-9: Park Signage Samples....................................................................... 103 Figure 5-10: Park Map (2009)................................................................................104 Figure 5-11: Distances from Recycled Water to Parks..................................108 Figure 5-12: Well Drained Soils Throughout Park System............................110

Table of Contents

List of Tables 03

Existing Context

Trends Analysis

Recommendations & Action Plans

Table 3-1: Table 3-2: Table 3-3: Table 3-6: Table 3-4: Table 3-5: Table 3-7: Table 3-8:

Table 4-1: Table 4-2: Table 4-3: Table 4-4:

Existing Park Type and Acreage.........................................................20 Existing Recreation Facilities Level of Service.............................. 22 Existing Recreation Facilities per Park............................................ 23 Existing Park Level of Service............................................................ 27 Parkshed Assumptions........................................................................ 27 Existing Parks and Recreational Facilities ..................................... 27 Existing Park Geographic Distribution............................................28 Number of ADA Accessibility Issues per Park..............................29

Water Sport Average Annual Growth..............................................41 Team Sport Average Annual Growth...............................................42 Nationwide Fitness Activity Trends.................................................42 Goleta Projected Population.............................................................. 52

Table 5-1: School Outdoor Facilities.....................................................................69 Table 5-2: Recommendation Prioritization........................................................86 Table 5-3: Future Park Type and Acreage............................................................88 Table 5-4: Future Recreation Facilities................................................................90 Table 5-5: Future Recreation Facilities Level of Service................................. 91 Table 5-6: Future LOS Summary after Recommendations...........................92 Table 5-7: Future Park Geographic Distribution...............................................92 Table 5-8: Screening Process Phase 1: Initial System Planning.................. 107 Table 5-9: Screening Process Phase 2: Park Planning...................................109 Table 5-10: Screening Process Phase 3: Park Design...................................... 111

Jonny D. Wallis Neighborhood Park VII

City of Goleta Parks, Facilities & Playgrounds Master Plan

VIII

01 Executive Summary

City of Goleta Parks, Facilities & Playgrounds Master Plan

1.1 Introduction

1.2 Key Issues and Recurring Themes

The Goleta Parks, Facilities, and Playgrounds Master Plan (Master Plan) provides an assessment of Goleta’s developed parks and playgrounds’ system, taking into account future growth in the community. The Master Plan provides a realistic view of the City’s parks and playgrounds and develops a vision for the future.

Issues regarding parks, recreation facilities, and programs were identified using various tools, including a review of existing plans and documents, intercept surveys, pop-up events, stakeholder meetings, inventory of existing facilities, level of services analysis, and a community workshop and presentation. A summary of the information gathered from these sources can be found in Chapter 4 and Appendix C. This information was analyzed and recommendations were developed to address the following key issues:

In order to accomplish these goals, the Master Plan includes:

A level of service analysis Program recommendations Park and facility improvement recommendations Open space A prioritized plan and schedule for implementation Recommendations for funding

The Master Plan allows the City to implement the General Plan’s goals and policies as related to parks, recreation facilities, and recreation service programs. To do so, this plan provides an in-depth analysis of existing park levels of service and trends, while at the same time identifying future park needs. As a result, the Master Plan can assist in the development of initiatives to enhance the existing parks and recreation system while fulfilling the needs of the community today and in the future.

Stow Grove Park

Some parks are not kept open or well-maintained The Goleta Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan lack integration Connectivity for all modes by including trails and pathways Security, safety, and lighting The lack of transportation that some residents have (especially low-income families and those under 17) for accessing parks and lack of equitable distribution of the park system The need for additional facilities such as a public swimming pool and a dog park The need for Joint Use Agreements with schools Lack of preservation of natural habitat as and within open space Some open space areas of natural habitat have park amenities and should be integrated with neighborhood or community parks Other open space areas could handle park amenities, but the adjacent neighborhoods are concerned about increased use of these open spaces Some existing park amenities need improvements and/or renovations

Chapter 1 | Executive Summary

1.3 Recommendations After analyzing the findings, community and stakeholder input, inventory of existing facilities, level of service analysis, and analysis of future recreation trends, a series of recommendations were developed to provide guidance for the improvement of Goleta’s parks, recreation facilities, and programs. The following summary provides an overview of the recommendations with more detail in Chapter 5.

Recommendations Summary

General Recommendations

Establish partnerships with schools to share recreation facilities Create a multi-use trail system either on or leading to parks including a linear park along Phelps Road, west of Pacific Oaks Road Provide sports and recreation facilities where possible at new parks Reclassify some non-natural open space areas as neighborhood parks Where appropriate, suggest adding amenities to non-natural portions of open space but do not utilize sensitive areas for anything other than trails Construct new parks and provide infill amenities at existing parks where room allows and where the amenities are missing for the area, such as a public swimming pool and a dog park Adjust the neighborhood park acres per 1,000 population from 2 to 1.5 acres, the community park from 3 to 2.5 acres, and the open space from 5 to 6 acres. This more accurately reflects the current inventory while maintaining the current 10 acres per 1,000 for all parks and matches the community priorities for open space. Continue to work with developers on helping to infill gaps of parks that are not within a 15-minute walk or 5-minute drive Integrate efforts with Goleta Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan Improve security, safety, and lighting Improve the transportation for accessing parks and consider how to improve the equal distribution of the park system Preserve and protect natural habitats within open space and parks Preserve and protect natural habitats as open space

Maintenance Standards

Improve park openness and perception of park maintenance levels Perform quality assurance reviews of each park periodically Evaluate and incorporate the use of technology and software systems to improve communications, scheduling, reservations, rentals, registration, etc. Use “After-Action Reports” to provide relevant details about incidents that occur at each park Develop protocols to protect sensitive areas with the help of environmental resources staff

Amenities

Signage Policy

Reclassify parks with amenities as neighborhood or community parks Improve and/or renovate park amenities Refine park facilities signage and interpretative signage guidelines as suggested in Chapter 5

Reclaimed Water Utilization for Parks

Perform three-phase screening process, based mostly on availability of reclaimed water.

1.4 Glossary of Terms The Master Plan uses the following terms with the associated definition. These definitions are consistent with the General Plan/Coastal Land Use Plan (GP/CLUP) where applicable. See the GP/CLUP for the standards that apply to the type of parks. Active Recreation: Structured individual or team activity that requires the use of special facilities, courses, fields, or equipment. Amenity: Aesthetic or other characteristics of a development that increase its desirability to a community or its marketability to the public. This may include recreational facilities, security systems, landscaping, and attractive street design. Developed Park: A park that has improvements and allows for more than only passive park uses. A developed park can include open space and natural features, but it also can include recreational equipment, courts, fields, playgrounds, generally parking, and non-native and native landscape treatments. Facility: The built features within parks that create opportunities to engage in specific games and activities. These can range from single courts or small play areas up to the recreation centers which supports a wide variety of selfdirected and programmed recreation. Natural habitat: Native or naturalized plant communities and natural features such as woodlands, riparian corridors, and varied undeveloped landscape, including but not limited to all areas designated as ESHA in the General Plan/ Coastal Land Use Plan.

City of Goleta Parks, Facilities & Playgrounds Master Plan

Open space: Any area of land that is essentially unimproved and designated for one or more of the following open space uses: (1) land for the preservation of natural resources; (2) land for the managed production of resources; (3) open space for outdoor recreation; (4) open space for public health and safety; and (5) protection of Native American cultural sites, including burial, historic or archaeological, sacred, or other cultural sites. Park: Public land for passive or active recreation (see developed park and open space for sub-categories). Passive natural area: Areas designated for passive recreation where minimal stress has been done to the site’s resources. Passive Recreation: Recreational activities that do not require prepared facilities like sports fields or pavilions. Playground: A space designed for children to play and explore. It may include playsets, interactive panels, and protective surfacing. The types of parks are defined in detail in Section 3.2 Goleta Park Types of this Master Plan.

1.5 Scope of the Document The scope of the Master Plan encompasses parks, facilities and playgrounds within the City of Goleta. The Master Plan has purview over the parks, playgrounds and portions of developed parks and open space with improved facilities in the City of Goleta parks system. Some open space areas within the City are dominated by natural habitat, and in these areas the goals of this Master Plan should be secondary to habitat preservation objectives in the General Plan/Coastal Land Use Plan or specific open space management documents for those areas.

1.6 Overview of the Document The Master Plan is organized by the following chapters: 1.

Executive Summary – Describes the purpose and goals of the Master Plan, identifies the key issues and recurring themes, and provides a summary of the recommendations.

2. Planning Context – Explains the context of the City of Goleta to California and the U.S., describes the functions of the Parks and Open Space Division, and provides an overview of the planning process methodology, as well as a review of past and existing planning documents relevant to the Master Plan. 3. Existing Conditions – Provides an analysis and inventory of Goleta’s existing park and recreation facilities, a description of each park classification, and a park distribution analysis that includes a Level of Service (LOS) analysis of existing facilities. 4. Trends Analysis – Analyzes recreation trends and summarizes the information gathered through community workshops, stakeholder meetings, intercept surveys, and invitation surveys. This chapter also examines projected demographics, vacant land, potential growth areas, and future equitable distribution of parks is identified. 5. Recommendations and Action Plans – Provides recommendations, goals, and standards to enhance the level of service and quality of existing facilities and programs, improve programming and service delivery, and increase financial opportunities. 6. Appendices – Includes the City Park Accessibility Compliance Assessment, interviews with stakeholders and survey results discussed throughout this Master Plan, a comprehensive list of all policies, plans, and ordinances applicable to parks.

Village at Los Carneros Park

At a Glance City Area

7.92 mi²

Population

30,847

Parks

Open Spaces

Playgrounds

Picnic Shelters

Tennis Courts

Basketball Courts

Baseball Fields

Multipurpose Fields

Pickleball Courts

Skateparks

Community Centers

1 5

City of Goleta Parks, Facilities & Playgrounds Master Plan

02 Planning Context

City of Goleta Parks, Facilities & Playgrounds Master Plan

2.1 Intended Uses of the Master Plan

2.2 Parks and Open Space Division

The Goleta Parks, Facilities, and Playgrounds Master Plan (Master Plan) is based on a comprehensive planning process that took place from February 2018 through May 2019. This process involved extensive research and analysis of the existing parks and playgrounds in Goleta, as well as staff and community input. This Master Plan provides an assessment of Goleta’s parks and playgrounds system, taking into account future growth in the community. The Master Plan is intended to provide a realistic view of the City’s parks and playgrounds as they exist now and as they could evolve into the future.

The City of Goleta is the fourth largest city in Santa Barbara County in terms of population, with approximately 30,847 residents. The city is located about nine miles west of Santa Barbara and 100 miles northwest of Los Angeles. Goleta is situated along U.S. Route 101, within a narrow coastal plain and is surrounded by a rich natural landscape that includes the Santa Ynez Mountains, the Pacific Ocean, and a two-mile shoreline. The University of California, Santa Barbara is located adjacent to and south of Goleta in Isla Vista, as shown in Figure 2-1.

Goleta’s parks and playgrounds facilities consist of nine neighborhood parks, five community parks, nine neighborhood open spaces, six regional open spaces, one community center, and three mini parks. These park types are defined in detail in Section 3.2 Goleta Park Types of this Master Plan. Citywide park master plans are usually intended to lay out visions for the future, as well as coherent steps for achieving these visions. The overall citywide master plan is not intended to go into detail on park design, park programming or park environmental review. No park facility should be constructed from this document without individual park master plans, designs, engineering and environmental review. Evergreen Open Space

The Parks and Open Space Division is part of the Public Works Department and is responsible for maintaining approximately 550.47 acres of city parks and open space. Additionally, this division is responsible for maintaining 31 landscaped street medians and 6,800 trees within the City right-of-way. The Parks and Open Space Division and the Goleta’s Planning and Environmental Review Department do both have some overlapping responsibilities for park planning, design, environmental review and permitting. The parks exist in three different zones, defined by natural or man-made barriers such as the freeway and rail line, lagoons, the Airport and other County lands, see Figure 2-1.

Chapter 2 | Planning Context

Figure 2-1: Goleta’s General Location on the Coast

City of Goleta Parks, Facilities & Playgrounds Master Plan

2.3 Planning Process Methodology The development process for this Master Plan included the formation of a project team comprised of City staff and the consultant, an analysis of existing conditions, a review of previous planning efforts, and engagement with community members and stakeholders. The planning process included the following key tasks:

Document collection and review Community engagement Facility inventory Existing conditions analysis

Level of service analysis Future plans Funding Findings and recommendations

2.3.1 Document Collection and Review Previous guiding policy documents and planning efforts were summarized and compared to historical and present demographic data. This would include the City’s 2015 Recreation Needs Assessment Study and the General Plan.

2.3.2 Community Engagement The planning process included a number of public outreach efforts designed to gather information from a broad range of local residents, stakeholders, and City staff through a series of public events, stakeholder meetings, popup events, and surveys. All opportunities for community engagement were available in English and Spanish.

2.3.3 Facility Inventory The facility inventory included the City’s existing parks, facilities, and open space and recorded recreation amenities and playgrounds. Other miscellaneous recreational amenities serving the needs of Goleta residents were also considered, even if they were not run by the Parks and Open Space Division. This included County Parks, State Parks, and homeowner association recreation facilities, as well as private/non-profit facilities.

2.3.4 Existing Conditions Analysis Existing amenities, usage patterns, site conditions, and park facilities were analyzed to determine facility and amenity needs, as well as compliance with the current American with Disabilities Act standards. Goleta’s parks and playgrounds’ system was then compared to other communities of similar size 10

and to regional and national standards to set level of service metrics to gauge if the community’s park, recreation, playground, and open space needs are being met.

2.3.5 Level of Service Analysis A Level of Service Analysis (LOS) was performed on the City’s parks and playgrounds’ system to determine the percentage of the population currently being serviced by these facilities and to identify any deficiencies in existing public facilities and amenities based on population based standards adopted by the City of Goleta.

2.3.6 Geographic Distribution Analysis The distribution of parks were also analyzed. Instead of using a fixed radius of 1/4 or 1/2-mile radius around the center of neighborhood parks for example, actual walk times and drivetimes were used that reflect the local context of street patterns, walking facilities and barriers that make it difficult to walk to a park. An overall goal of having most of the residents of Goleta be within a 15-minute walk or a 5-minute drivetime was used for neighborhood parks. For community parks and citywide facilities, a 10-minute drive time was used.

2.3.7 Future Plans The projected usage of parks and playground facilities was used to establish future needs. Additionally, a maintenance plan was developed for all recreation facilities, including a replacement plan for buildings and park amenities.

2.3.8 Funding Funding, revenue sources, and projected expenditures were reviewed, and a comprehensive financial plan should be developed for the modernization and maintenance of existing parks, as well as the construction of new facilities.

2.3.9 Findings and Recommendations The summary of recommended actions includes detailed findings and recommendations for future operations and funding. Recommendations were categorized into themes with goals, objectives, and an action plan for capital improvements and implementation of the Master Plan.

Chapter 2 | Planning Context

2.4 Previous Planning History for Parks and Recreation To ensure that the changing demographics and demands of the community are met, it is critical to note the importance of updating and coordinating all planning efforts. Incorporated in 2002, the City of Goleta had not adopted any guiding documents regarding parks and playground facilities until a Recreation Study was done in 2007. In 2015, the City completed a Recreation Needs Assessment. This Master Plan builds upon the previous studies and will serve as a guiding document for providing parks and playground facilities within Goleta. Previous planning documents include:

2.4.1 2006 General Plan/Coastal Land Use Plan The City of Goleta’s General Plan/Coastal Land Use Plan outlines the Public Park System Plan with the objective “to develop a well-maintained, interconnected system of multi-functional parks, recreation facilities and public open spaces that will meet the needs of existing and future residents and employees and that are attractive, safe, and accessible to all segments of the city’s population, and supportive of established neighborhoods.” The General Plan includes descriptions of all the parks by type, as included below in Section 3.2.

2.4.2 2007 Recreation Service Inventory The City of Goleta completed a recreation service inventory in 2007. The purpose of this study was to inventory the recreation providers serving the residents of Goleta, as well as to provide a tool to assist in the decisionmaking process regarding future recreation opportunities. Additionally, the inventory process also provided a mechanism to identify issues and findings for consideration. Among some of the findings, it was determined that most providers who operate independently do not perform outside their scope, so the City will have to be the lead agency for the residents with respect to recreation programming. The following conclusions and recommendations can be drawn from the recreation service inventory:

Create a mission statement for recreation services Expand CDBG Funds to Youth Scholarships directly managed by the City Become Members of the National Recreation and Park Association (NRPA) and the California Park and Recreation Society (CPRS)

Increase staff’s level of direct involvement with Girsh Park, the Goleta Valley Community Center, and possibly the Elings Aquatic Center Start a City Recreation Department and/or agency to form a Joint Powers Authority (JPA) to manage recreation for Goleta residents

2.4.3 2015 Recreation Needs Assessment The Recreation Needs Assessment was completed in 2015 and is meant to serve as a guide and implementation tool for the management and development of park facilities and programs within the City of Goleta. The assessment examined the community’s characteristics and inventoried existing parks and playground facilities, which were then used to identify any potential needs. Facility usage patterns, recreation standards, and population projections along with the needs identified through the facility inventory provided the basis to develop a series of recommendations that will allow the City to meet future needs and demands. However, the Needs Assessment document was intended to be flexible and updated periodically as a response to new opportunities and constraints. The following recommendations were developed based on the needs identified in the Needs Assessment Document:

Expand on current park classification system to incorporate a broader range of park types that are more representative of the use and features of each facility Develop a maintenance manual Establish Joint Use Agreements (JUA) and Memorandums of Understanding (MOU) that allow the use of recreation areas located on public school sites. Develop an effective and well-connected multi-use trail system. Provide an adequate number of sports facilities based on current and future population, that should include baseball and softball fields, soccer fields, bicycle and hiking paths, recreation centers, aquatic centers, and community gardens. Consider various projects for the rehabilitation and expansion of existing facilities. 11

City of Goleta Parks, Facilities & Playgrounds Master Plan

2.5 Policies, Guidelines, and Recommendations from other Studies The following plans were reviewed for relevance to this master planning effort and to ensure that all planning efforts are aligned and integrated.

2.5.1 City of Goleta General Plan The Goleta General Plan is the primary city-wide comprehensive plan that guides future growth. The General Plan contains goals and objectives that are meant to guide decisions and preserve the quality of life within the City of Goleta. The Open Space and Public Facilities Elements contain objectives and policies regarding existing park and recreational facilities, as well as open space. The following summaries and text excerpts reflect the policies that are consistent with the recommendations provided in this plan. Open Space Element

The recommendations of this plan are highly consistent with the recommendations of the Open Space Element, which intends to conserve open space wherever possible and ensure that they are equitably distributed around Goleta. Policy OS 4: Trails and Bikeways Objective: To designate, preserve, and expand a public trail system that will provide recreation opportunities for multiple types of users in diverse and attractive environmental settings and that will connect various parks and neighborhoods with the regional trail network and to Los Padres National Forest. OS 4.5: Trails shall be sited to minimize damage to riparian areas while allowing some public access. To the extent feasible, trail corridors should be located outside riparian areas but provide occasional contact to streams to allow public access and enjoyment of the resources. Where feasible, public trail easements should be located within the boundaries of flood control easements. All trail construction should minimize removal of riparian vegetation and utilize natural features and/or lateral fencing to discourage public access to streamside areas not directly within the trail alignment. Any fences constructed along trail corridors should allow for wildlife movement. Where necessary to prevent disturbance of nesting birds, sections of trails may be closed on a seasonal basis. At such times, alternative trail segments should 12

be provided, where feasible. In order to protect riparian resources, the number of creek crossings should be limited and maintenance should be conducted to minimize introduction and spread of invasive plants. Policy OS 6: Public Park System Plan Objective: To develop a well-maintained, interconnected system of multifunctional parks, recreation facilities and public open spaces that will meet the needs of existing and future residents and employees and that are attractive, safe, and accessible to all segments of the city’s population, and supportive of established neighborhoods. OS 6.2: Equitable Distribution of Park Facilities. To the extent feasible, park and recreation facilities shall be equitably distributed throughout the city to serve the various neighborhoods and all socioeconomic segments of the city’s population. Particular emphasis shall be placed on provision of new park and recreation facilities in areas that were under-served as of 2005 and in areas of the city that are designated for new residential use and development in the future. These areas include, but are not limited to, the Goleta Old Town (Old Town) and the Mid-Hollister areas. Policy OS 7: Adoption of Open Space Plan Map Objective: To designate, preserve, and protect significant open space resources including agricultural, ecological, recreational, and scenic lands in Goleta and surrounding areas for current and future generations. Policy OS 9: Financing Public Parks, Open Space Objective: To establish equitable methods that will generate sufficient financial resources to meet future needs for acquisition and improvement of public parks, recreation facilities, and open space areas. Land Use Element

The recommendations of this plan are to keep land uses consistent while providing an equitable distribution of park facilities. This master plan would remain consistent with the existing land use element. Policy LU 6: Park and Open Spaces. Objective: To provide land areas for public parks, recreation, and open space land uses and private recreational lands within the city and recognize the importance of their contribution to the overall quality of life in Goleta.

Chapter 2 | Planning Context

LU 6.2(d): Open Space/Passive Recreation. This use category is intended to identify and reserve areas with significant environmental values or resources, wildlife habitats, significant views, and other open space values. It may be used to designate both private and public open space areas. The category includes areas reserved for natural drainage courses that may be managed as part of the City’s stormwater management program. The following criteria and standards shall apply to lands within this designation: a. Open space lands are intended to maintain the land in a natural condition in order to protect and conserve sensitive habitats. b. Resource management activities, including, but not limited to, habitat restorations, are permitted. c. Minimal improvements to accommodate passive public use, such as trails, nature education, beach access, and public viewing areas, are permitted. d. Except for existing facilities, active recreational uses involving structures or improvements to the land shall not be permitted. e. Limited parking and public access improvements may be allowed provided that any adverse impacts on the associated resources are either avoided or mitigated. Policy LU 9: Coastal-Dependent and -Related Uses Objective: To designate lands in appropriate locations near or on the shoreline for uses that are dependent upon coastal locations and cannot readily be provided at inland sites. LU 9.2: Site #2 – Coastal Recreation. [GP/CP] This parcel, occupied as of 2005 by the Venoco EOF, is designated in the Open Space/Active Recreation use category. The requirements applicable to this site are as follows: d. Upon termination of the oil and gas processing use, the priority use for the site shall be coastal-dependent and coastal-related recreational uses that are conducted primarily outdoors or limited to small-scale structures. Adequate on-site parking shall be provided to serve all recreational uses (see related Policy OS 2).

Conservation Element

The recommendations of this plan are to keep open spaces consistent while providing an equitable distribution of park facilities. This master plan would remain consistent with the existing land use element. Policy CE 1: Environmentally Sensitive Habitat Area Designations and Policy Objective: To identify, preserve, and protect the city’s natural heritage by preventing disturbance of ESHAs. CE 1.6: Protection of ESHAs. Protection of ESHAs. [GP/CP] ESHAs shall be protected against significant disruption of habitat values, and only uses or development dependent on and compatible with maintaining such resources shall be allowed within ESHAs or their buffers. The following shall apply: a. No development, except as otherwise allowed by this element, shall be allowed within ESHAs and/or ESHA buffers. b. A setback or buffer separating all permitted development from an adjacent ESHA shall be required and shall have a minimum width as set forth in subsequent policies of this element. The purpose of such setbacks shall be to prevent any degradation of the ecological functions provided by the habitat area. c. Public accessways and trails are considered resource-dependent uses and may be located within or adjacent to ESHAs. These uses shall be sited to avoid or minimize impacts on the resource to the maximum extent feasible. Measures— such as signage, placement of boardwalks, and limited fencing or other barriers—shall be implemented as necessary to protect ESHAs. d. The following uses and development may be allowed in ESHAs or ESHA buffers only where there are no feasible, less environmentally damaging alternatives and will be subject to requirements for mitigation measures to avoid or lessen impacts to the maximum extent feasible: 1) public road crossings, 2) utility lines, 3) resource restoration and enhancement projects, 4) nature education, 5) biological research, and 6) Public Works projects as identified in the Capital Improvement Plan.

City of Goleta Parks, Facilities & Playgrounds Master Plan

e. If the provisions herein would result in any legal parcel created prior to the date of this plan being made unusable in its entirety for any purpose allowed by the land use plan, exceptions to the foregoing may be made to allow a reasonable economic use of the parcel. Alternatively, the City may establish a program to allow transfer of development rights for such parcels to receiving parcels that have areas suitable for and are designated on the Land Use Plan map for the appropriate type of use and development. Policy CE 2: Protection of Creeks and Riparian Areas Objective: Enhance, maintain, and restore the biological integrity of creek courses and their associated wetlands and riparian habitats as important natural features of Goleta’s landscape. CE 2.2: Streamside Protection Areas. A streamside protection area (SPA) is hereby established along both sides of the creeks identified in Figure 4-1. The purpose of the designation shall be to preserve the SPA in a natural state in order to protect the associated riparian habitats and ecosystems. The SPA shall include the creek channel, wetlands and/or riparian vegetation related to the creek hydrology, and an adjacent upland buffer area. The width of the SPA upland buffer shall be as follows: a. The SPA upland buffer shall be 100 feet outward on both sides of the creek, measured from the top of the bank or the outer limit of wetlands and/or riparian vegetation, whichever is greater. The City may consider increasing or decreasing the width of the SPA upland buffer on a case-by-case basis at the time of environmental review. The City may allow portions of a SPA upland buffer to be less than 100 feet wide, but not less than 25 feet wide, based on a site specific assessment if (1) there is no feasible alternative siting for development that will avoid the SPA upland buffer; and (2) the project’s impacts will not have significant adverse effects on streamside vegetation or the biotic quality of the stream. b. If the provisions above would result in any legal parcel created prior to the date of this plan being made unusable in its entirety for any purpose allowed by the land use plan, exceptions to the foregoing may be made to allow a reasonable economic use of the parcel, subject to approval of a conditional use permit.

Public Facilities Element

The Public Facilities Element intends to address the nature of existing facilities and services to ensure the present and future needs are met. This Element supports the recommendations of this plan. Policy PF 2: Other Facilities of the City of Goleta Objective: To provide the full range of municipal public facilities to meet the needs of the Goleta community. PF 2.2: Goleta Valley Community Center. The City should continue to maintain the current community center, and associated buildings, as a focal point for community activities and functions, including senior services, youth services, and various related classes and cultural and recreational activities. The City should evaluate whether the available facilities on that campus are adequate for community needs and create a planning process to develop any additional facilities as may be needed. Policy PF 5: School Facilities Objective: Ensure that adequate public school services and facility capacities are available to meet the long-term needs of both existing and new development in the city as well as service demands from outside Goleta’s boundaries. PF 5.5: Joint Use of School Facilities. The City supports joint use of facilities for various activities and programs such as recreational programs, cultural programs, City administrative activities, facility and vehicle maintenance, and other joint uses as appropriate.

2.5.2 Measure G2012: Goleta Agricultural Land Protection Initiative In November 6, 2012 the City of Goleta Agricultural Land Protection Initiative, Measure G ballot was approved by voters. Measure G amended the city’s General Plan to require that for the next twenty years, any proposed changes in the city’s policies regarding “certain land 10 acres or more currently designated as Agriculture” must be voted on by the city’s voters, rather than just the city council.

Chapter 2 | Planning Context

Measure G identifies lands affected by the initiative as heritage farmlands. Heritage farmlands under the measure are lands: 1.

Within the City of Goleta currently having a land use designation of “Agriculture” and which are 10 or more acres in size; and,

Outside of the City of Goleta but within the City Planning Area currently having a land use designation of “Agriculture” by the County of Santa Barbara and which are 10 acres or more m size.

Measure G does not apply to agriculture parcels of less than 10 acres. It also does not apply to vested rights a property owner has acquired in a pending development application or an existing activity. Measure G preplans heritage farmlands outside of the City of Goleta as “Agriculture.” Approximately 121 parcels outside of the City of Goleta would be subject to Measure G, even though their owners are not allowed to vote on the measure. These properties could only be annexed to the City as Agriculture unless approved by the voters of the City. Prior to December 31, 2032, any change to the land use designation of heritage farmlands or any change to the existing and proposed General Plan language adopted by Measure G will only be effective if approved by the voters of the City of Goleta. Measure G provides three exceptions to the voter approval requirement. The City Council can make the following changes without the approval of the voters of the City of Goleta, if the City Council makes certain findings specified in the initiative: 1.

Change needed to provide State mandated housing within the City of Goleta;

Change needed because the application of the policies would result in a violation of the Constitutional rights of the property owner; and

Change needed for the land to be developed for a public school or public park.

2.3.1 City of Goleta Strategic Energy Plan In December 2017, the City of Goleta City Council unanimously adopted a goal of 100% renewable electricity supply for the community by 2030 with an interim goal of 50% renewable electricity for municipal facilities by 2025. Following the adoption of this goal, the City of Goleta partnered with the County of Santa Barbara and the City of Carpinteria to commission the creation of a Strategic Energy Plan (SEP) to meet its 100% renewable electricity goals and improve the resiliency of the local electricity system by promoting local renewable energy development and energy efficiency deployment.

2.3.2 City of Goleta Climate Action Goals The City of Goleta has set climate change and sustainability goals to include 100% renewable energy by 2030. All plans and projects administered by the City of Goleta, should contribute to this goal either by lowering Green House Gas (GHG) emissions, lowering Vehicle Miles Traveled (VMT), producing renewable energy, or helping to mitigate sea level rise by adapting infrastructure or other coastal conditions. The methods of compliance with these goals for this park master plan include: 1)

The preservation of open space, natural parklands or planted parklands that will help in carbon dioxide sequestration in plant leaves, particulate matter removal, and oxygen production.

2) New plantings that will help in the reduction of urban heat island gain, based on the shading of pavements or the avoidance of constructing pavements that increase heat gain. 3) Reduction in VMT resulting from providing improved trails, walkways, bike lanes, and signage to walk to or bike to City parks, thereby reducing GHG production. 4) The increase in the availability of new parks and its equitable distribution to various populations throughout the city, that will save in travel time, often by way of reducing vehicle miles traveled. 5) The potential reduction in the use of potable water by replacing it with reclaimed water for use in irrigation systems or other suitable operations. 6) The use of renewable energy consumption or the generation of power from geothermal, wind or solar sources. 7)

The use of energy efficient lighting, bathroom mechanical venting / passive venting and other elements that will help in saving energy should be utilized.

8) The adaptation of park facilities, infrastructure or landforms in the area of potential sea level change. It should be noted, that other than the bluffs located along the Sperling Preserve / Ellwood Mesa coastal edge as well as Haskell’s Beach, that most parks will not have to deal with sea level rise. 9) The inclusion of educational programs and signage that will help to educate the public on climate change and other sustainability goals.

City of Goleta Parks, Facilities & Playgrounds Master Plan

2.3.3 Other Park Planning Documents This section recognizes that park planning of multiple facilities is a fluid process and that there is a hierarchy of planning that generally goes from a citywide parks master plan, to individual park master plans as well as feasibility and resource protection projects and other environmental review needed to protect resources and document decisions regarding open space. Current and recent studies include:

The 1987 Lake Los Carneros Master Plan The Lake Los Carneros County Park 1999 Updated Management Plan The 2009 Lake Los Carneros Trail Management Plan, Rehabilitation and Interpretive Program Review The 2004 Ellwood- Devereux Coast Open Space & Habitat Management Plan The 2014 Final Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration for the Ellwood Mesa Coastal Trails and Habitat Restoration Project The 2017 City of Goleta Strategic Plan The 2017 Goleta Urban Forest Management Plan The 2019 Final Ellwood Mesa/Sperling Preserve Open Space Monarch Butterfly Habitat Management Plan The 2019-21 Strategic Plan City of Goleta Creek & Watershed Management Plan (Pending)

Los Carneros Lake and the Ellwood Mesa/Sperling Preserve Open Space are regional open spaces with considerable natural habitat that is managed under the specific management plans listed above. These natural habitat areas have their own site-specific habitat management plans, which take precedent over this Master Plan. Please refer to these studies/documents for park specific improvements, priorities and recommendations.

2.4 Demographic Profile Gaining a clear understanding of the existing and projected demographic character of the City is an important component of the planning process for the Master Plan. By analyzing population data, trends emerge that can inform decision making and resource allocation strategies for the provision of public parks, recreation amenities, and open spaces. For example, if the population of young children was steadily on the rise and existing public recreation facilities

for young children, such as playgrounds, were barely meeting existing user demand, then the City may want to consider targeting investments to meet the increasing needs of this growing segment of the population. Key areas were analyzed to identify current demographic statistics and trends that impact the planning and provision of public parks and recreation services in Goleta. Community characteristics analyzed and discussed consist of:

Existing and projected total population Age distribution Racial and ethnic character Household information Household income

A demographic profile was completed using the most current data available (as of December 2018) the U.S. Census Bureau data and U.S. Census Bureau’s American Community Survey. A summary of demographic highlights is noted in Figure 2-22, followed by a more detailed demographic analysis. Key general 2017 demographic comparisons – City, State, and National: The estimated median age of Goleta residents was 36.6 years, higher than the median age for California (36.1) but lower than that of the United States (37.8). The median household income for Goleta in 2017 was estimated to be $87,068. This is higher than the median household income of $67,169 in California, and higher than the national median household income of $57,652. Goleta’s estimated population was almost evenly split between male (49.7 percent) and female (50.3 percent) residents. The populations of California and the United States are also roughly evenly divided between the sexes. The racial and ethnic make-up in Goleta is 69.1 percent white, 8.7 percent Asian, 1.9 percent black, 0.6 percent American Indian, 0.1 percent Pacific Islander, 14.5 percent some other race, and 5.1 percent two or more races. About 36.4 percent of the population identifies as Hispanic or Latino (see Figure 2-3).

Chapter 2 | Planning Context

Figure 2-3: Goleta’s Racial Make-Up

2.4.1 Goleta Population Growth Trend Santa Barbara County Association of Governments (SBCAG) projects that from 2017 to 2050, the city’s population will grow by 11.2 percent. The projected growth of Goleta’s population is represented in Figure 2-4.

Figure 2-2: 2017 Goleta General Demographic Profile

Source: 2017 American Community Survey 5-year Estimate

30,847

36.6

Population

Median Age

10,896

$87,068

Households

Median Income

Figure 2-4: Goleta Population Growth Trend

Source: 2017 American Community Survey 5-year Estimate, Santa Barbara County Association of Governments 2018 Regional Growth Forecast 2050

Source: 2017 American Community Survey 5-year Estimate 17

03 Existing Level of Service

City of Goleta Parks, Facilities & Playgrounds Master Plan

3.1 Existing City Parks, Open Spaces, and Recreation Facilities The City of Goleta prides itself on providing ample and high quality parks and recreational experiences for its citizens. The parks and recreation facility inventory provides a broad range of passive and active opportunities, that are well dispersed throughout the city. The City of Goleta currently has approximately 550 acres of park land. This includes 97 acres of developed parks of various sizes, 444 acres of neighborhood or regional open space, and a large community center that is nearly 10 acres in size. A gem of the community is the coastline. More than half of the city’s neighborhood or regional open space (248 acres) is along the coastline, including 20 acres of usable beaches, connected with five miles of coastal trails. Please see Figure 3-1 for a map of the existing parks and Table 3-1 for a listing of the park categories, acres and amenities. Overall, the City of Goleta exceeds its goals for population based parks. However, this is overstated from the large amount of open space that exceeds the population based standard for open space. Chapter 5 will discuss future deficits related to developed parklands that should focus on gaps where the proximity goals (15-minute walk, 5-minute drive) are not currently being met. Lake Los Carneros

Table 3-1: Existing Park Type and Acreage Goleta Park Type

Total Acres

Mini Parks

0.76

Neighborhood Park

25.67

Community Parks

70.57

Neighborhood Open Space

39.67 404.04

Regional Open Space

9.76

Community Center Total Park Acreage per 1,000 Residents (2017)

550.47 17.5

National Average

10.1

Ave. for cities with similar size (20k-50k)

9.6

Goleta Park Goal per 1,000 Residents

Chapter 3 | Existing Level of Service

Figure 3-1: Existing Parks and Recreational Facilities 21

City of Goleta Parks, Facilities & Playgrounds Master Plan

3.1.1 Existing Recreation Facilities

Table 3-2: Existing Recreation Facilities Level of Service

The Master Plan inventoried the City’s existing recreation facilities using both the Goleta Recreation Needs Assessment and through conducting on-site field work. Table 3-2 summarizes these facilities and compares them with the National Recreation and Park Association (NRPA) guideline service level and the Goleta Needs Assessment standards (one facility per number of population). The calculations are based on the current population level in the City of Goleta of 30,847 according to the 2017 Census ACS 5-Year Estimates. Table 3-3 shows the existing park and sports facilities available at each park. Because private parks may not be available to the public at all times, their analysis acreage is calculated as 25% of the actual acreage. The new Jonny D. Wallis Neighborhood Park now offers many new categories of amenities: handball court, concrete PingPong table, bocce ball court, pickleball court, and fitness nodes with exercise equipment. Since these new amenities are unique to this one park and the park has just been completed, they are not listed in Table 3-2 and 3-3. Please refer to Tables 5-2, 5-3 and 5-4 for where these facilities are documented. According to the available standards, the City currently has sufficient playgrounds and multi-purpose fields, but is deficient in most of the sports facilities, and pedestrian and bicycle trails.

Population Base 2017

30,847

Chapter 3 | Existing Level of Service

Table 3-3: Existing Recreation Facilities per Park

City of Goleta Parks, Facilities & Playgrounds Master Plan

3.2 Goleta Park Types This Master Plan generally follows the park type classification defined by the Goleta Recreation Needs Assessment. Parks are classified into six categories based on park size, function and character: Mini Parks, Neighborhood Parks, Neighborhood Open Space, Community Parks, Regional Open Space, and Special Use Parks.

3.2.1 Mini Parks

d. Typical facilities provided in neighborhood parks include playgrounds and associated equipment, picnic tables, open undeveloped areas, lawns or grassy areas for field games, and benches.

A mini park is characterized by its relatively small size and specialized facilities that serve a small local area and/or specific segment of the population, such as children or senior citizens. The following standards apply to mini or pocket parks: a. Mini parks typically serve nearby residents within a 15-minute walkshed. b. The typical size is one acre or less. c.

Mini parks should be located in close proximity to housing and/or other activity centers in the immediate neighborhood to provide accessibility and visibility.

d. Typical facilities provided in mini parks may include children’s play areas and equipment, exercise and fitness areas, outdoor seating and picnic areas, and plazas.

3.2.2 Neighborhood Parks Neighborhood parks provide the nearby residential neighborhood with active recreational facilities for a variety of age groups. The following standards apply to neighborhood parks: a. Neighborhood parks typically serve nearby residents within a 15-minute walkshed or 10-minute driveshed. 24

b. The typical size is less than 10 acres. Neighborhood parks should be easily accessible to the surrounding neighborhood population through safe pedestrian and bicycle access. Neighborhood parks do not generally require on-site parking, although a limited amount of parking may be provided.

e. Neighborhood parks may be developed as a school park or community center park.

Mini Park - Mathilda Park

3.2.3 Neighborhood Open Space Neighborhood open space areas integrate natural features such as trees, riparian corridors, and varied undeveloped landscape with the adjacent neighborhoods. The following standards apply to neighborhood open space areas: a. The primary emphasis is placed on protection of the natural resource, with limited passive recreation activities such as trails. Accordingly, the locations of these facilities are based upon the presence of natural resources rather than accessibility to a service area, which is also considered to be a 15-minute walkshed or a 10-minute driveshed. b. The typical size is variable and based upon the physical extent of the natural resource area. c.

Neighborhood open space areas should be made accessible to the surrounding neighborhood population through safe pedestrian and bicycle

Neighborhood Park - Jonny D. Wallis Park

Chapter 3 | Existing Level of Service

access, where feasible and appropriate. Onsite parking facilities are not appropriate in neighborhood open space areas. d. Typical facilities provided in neighborhood open space areas are limited to space for quiet or passive recreational activities. Structural or land improvements, other than dirt trails and resting areas, should be avoided in these areas. Some neighborhood open space areas may integrate with a small neighborhood park (as described above), usually consisting of a small playground or similar active area. Restrooms and facilities for more intensive, active forms of recreation are not appropriate improvements in neighborhood open space areas. Santa Barbara Shores Open Space

3.2.4 Community Parks Community parks include developed areas suited for intense active recreational activities, large natural areas suited for passive outdoor recreation, or a combination of both. These parks may contain special amenities, facilities, or features that attract people from throughout the surrounding community. The following standards apply to community parks: a. Community parks typically serve an area within a 5- to 10-minute driveshed. b. The typical size is 10 or more acres. c.

Stow Grove Park

Community parks should be easily accessible from the surrounding neighborhoods and by automobile from more distant neighborhoods. Since these facilities are intended to serve areas beyond their immediate neighborhoods, on-site parking and restroom facilities may be provided.

d. Multiple facilities for various types of users are typically provided in community parks, including both active and passive recreational facilities. Active facilities may include a range of formal and informal athletic fields (i.e., the play areas are less developed and generally not designed to support competitive play), tennis courts, play areas, developed picnic areas, and meeting and gathering spaces. Passive facilities may include areas for rest and relaxation with a mix of both improved areas (lawns and informal play areas) and unimproved natural areas.

3.2.5 Regional Open Space Regional open space areas are contiguous to or encompass significant natural resources and may include areas of historical, environmental, or ecological value. These areas may contain special amenities or features that attract people from throughout the city and the surrounding region. The following standards apply to regional open space areas: a. Regional open spaces should serve at least a 5- to 10-minute driveshed. b. The typical size should be appropriate for the protection of associated natural or open space resources. c.

Regional open spaces should be easily accessible from the surrounding neighborhoods and for visitors from more distant locations. Since these areas may attract people from distant locations, they may provide on-site parking and restroom facilities. Such services should be located on the periphery of the open space area

City of Goleta Parks, Facilities & Playgrounds Master Plan

and designed in a way to minimize any adverse impact on natural and visual resources. The capacity of such parking and restroom facilities should be consistent with the character and carrying capacity of the open space area. d. Typical facilities provided in regional open space areas are designed to be primarily passive in character, although historical and special purpose attractions may be included. The primary purpose of these areas is to protect their open space and natural values and passive recreation should be managed in a way that does not conflict with these values, while still providing appropriate public access. Current open space plans should be evaluated and updated on a regular basis.

3.2.6 School Facilities Schools provide playgrounds, sports and game areas, restrooms, and children’s play areas. The Needs Assessment identified two school districts within City boundaries, Goleta Union School District and Santa Barbara Unified School District. Combined, these two school districts include five elementary schools, a junior high school, and a high school. Currently, the City does not have an established joint use agreement with either district. The benefit of a well detailed joint use agreement would allow the school districts and the City to cooperate with each other for the purpose of improving facilities and organizing, promoting, and conducting recreation and education programs for children and adults. If any joint use school agreement is reached, future plans may count the schools’ recreation areas at 40 percent due to the limited amount of time the general public can access them. 26

3.2.7 Adjacent Parks and Recreation Facilities Most of the adjacent parks, open spaces, and facilities are located south or east of the city. Authorities managing adjacent parks include: Isla Vista Recreation and Park District, County of Santa Barbara, and University of California, Santa Barbara (UCSB). Goleta residents may use these spaces and facilities based on proximity and convenience. The Master Plan includes adjacent park and open spaces for geospatial analysis. Figure 3-4 through Figure 3-8 show parksheds serviced both by Goleta parks and some adjacent parks, so that spatial service gaps can be identified. However, these adjacent parks and facilities are not included in the level of service analyses and calculation.

Lake Los Carneros

3.2.8 Private Recreation Facilities Among the thirty-two parks mapped and listed as existing facilities, two non-public parks – Girsh Park and the Goleta Boys and Girls Club – are included because of their heavy usage and accessibility to residential neighborhoods. Some other private parks that have the potential to play bigger roles in the Goleta recreation systems are Deckers Park, Ice In Paradise indoor ice rink, and Cathedral Oaks Athletic Club. Deckers Park is located within the Cabrillo Business Park with benches, picnic tables, two half basketball courts, and a volleyball court. While Cathedral Oaks Athletic Club requires membership to use its many facilities, the ice rink has public sessions with an admission fee.

Sperling Preserve/Ellwood Mesa Open Space

Chapter 3 | Existing Level of Service

3.3 Park Distribution Analysis

Table 3-4: Parkshed Assumptions Speed Assumption

Parkshed Types

3.3.1 Parksheds Defined by Travel Time For each park type, a Geographical Information System (GIS) analysis generated a polygon representing a 15-minute walkshed (given a walking speed of 2.5 mph) and a 5-minute driveshed (includes total travel time with approximate delay due to traffic signals and finding parking). Resulting service catchment areas were overlaid on the city base map to see which regions were well covered by park access and to estimate the number of residents served by park type. Table 3-4 is a summary of the parkshed assumptions, and Table 3-5 shows which parksheds are applied to which park types.

15-minute walkshed

Other Assumptions

2.5 mph

0.625

8-minute bikeshed (not mapped)

10 mph

1-minute delay due to traffic signals and finding parking

5-minute driveshed

30 mph

2-minute delay due to traffic signals and finding parking

1.5

10-minute driveshed

30 mph

5-minute delay due to traffic signals and parking

2.5

The National Recreation and Park Association (NRPA) Level of Service (LOS) is a standard evaluation of park type and acreage across all park agencies based on what they offer their residents that is based on the Park, Recreation, Open Space and Greenway Guidelines. The LOS is defined as a ratio representing the minimum amount of open space and parkland needed to meet the recreation demands of the community, typically per 1,000 population, as shown in Table 3-6.

1.17

Table 3-5: Existing Parks and Recreational Facilities Park Types

Park Proximity Goal

Mini Parks

3.3.2 Level of Service Analysis

Equivalent Distance (Mile)

Populations within a 15-minute walkshed,

Neighborhood Park

or Populations within a 5-minute driveshed

Neighborhood Open Space Community Parks Regional Open Space

Populations within a 10-minute driveshed

Community Center

Table 3-6: Existing Park Level of Service

Park Service Area

Existing Acres per 1,000 Population (2017) based on Adj. Acres

Acres Needed to Meet Standard

Acres Surplus (or Deficit) Using Actual Acres

Total Acres Surplus (or Deficit) Using Adj. Acres

Actual Park Acreage

Adjusted Park Acreage*

Goleta Standard per 1,000 Population

26.43 80.33

26.43 61.60

2.00 3.00

0.86 2.00

61.69 92.54

(25.57) (12.21)

(35.26) (30.94)

443.71

430.77

5.00

13.96

154.24

289.48

141.29

550.47

518.79

10.00

16.82

308.47

242.00

210.32

Active Parks

Mini and Neighborhood Parks Community Parks and Center Open Space

Neighborhood & Regional Open Space All Parks

* Only 25% of Private Parks that are Publicly Accessible are Counted Toward the Park Standard

City of Goleta Parks, Facilities & Playgrounds Master Plan

3.3.3 Equitable Distribution of Parks A geographic distribution analysis correlates the distribution of parks and population. This analysis discusses different accessibility ranges for different park types. The set of analyses was performed on all existing parks, open space, and recreation facilities in the city, and by their categories. A GIS based parkshed analysis examined the walktime and drivetime to these facilities. Instead of using radius circles from parks that only consider a direct distance instead of actual walking, driving, or biking distances, this study utilizes actual network routes that lead to park and recreation facilities. This method is more accurate and is more appropriate to use, and it puts attention on the need to improve the local network to improve access to these park facilities. This analysis is important, since a general goal of access has been identified that neighborhood park users should live within walking or biking distance of neighborhood parks. Table 3-7 is a summary of the existing geographic distribution for parks based on 2017 population level of the City of Goleta. Most residents can access a park with a short drive, but only 76% of Goleta residents can access an active park with amenities (excluding open space) within walking distance. Parkshed types are further illustrated in Figure 3-6 through 3-8. To understand the demand, the analysis models current population where people reside. Figure 3-3 depicts the population density shown in residential land uses. The highest residential density occurs in the neighborhood east of Fairview and south of U.S. Route 101. The area south of Hollister between Ellwood Beach Drive and Storke Road also has population density higher than other parts of the city. Figure 3-4 shows combined parkshed of all park types and neighboring parks outside but close to Goleta city limit.

3.3.4 Bishop Ranch Bishop Ranch is a 240-acre property of agriculturally designated land located in North Goleta just north of U.S. Route 101, between Glen Annie Road and Los Carneros Road. This property is the single largest privately-owned parcel in Goleta, and it has historically been used for a cattle ranch and farm. In 2008, a residential and commercial development was proposed on the property. However, the Goleta City Council denied the project due to overwhelming public opposition in 2011. As of today, Bishop Ranch remains undeveloped and any changes to zoning to allow potential development will require a majority vote of the people. Although an open space, the ranch is not counted towards the regional open space park category. 28

Table 3-7: Existing Park Geographic Distribution Park Service Area

# Population Served 2017

% Population Served 2017

15-Minute Walking Distance (Neighborhood Parkshed) 15-Minute Walking Distance (Active Parkshed) 15-Minute Walking Distance (Combined Parkshed) 5-Minute Driving Distance (Community Parkshed) 5-Minute Driving Distance (Combined Parkshed)

22,414 23,085 25,055 27,086 28,481

72.7% 74.8% 81.2% 87.8% 92.3%

3.4 ADA Accessibility The City of Goleta Park Accessibility Compliance Assessment was derived from site inspections performed at each of the twenty-two City parks. Inspections were performed to verify compliance with both state code requirements as well as federal ADA standards. Site verification included accessible parking, amenities such as picnic tables, playground and tot lots, drinking fountains, bench seating, tennis courts, and sport fields. It was also noted in the reports if accessible circulation paths were provided to each of these areas in addition to access from the public right-of-way. For bench seating, it is not necessary to provide accessible benches, however it was noted if level wheelchair spaces were provided adjacent to the bench seating. See Figure 3-2 and Table 3-8 for ADA accessibility deficiencies per park. A visual inspection of the restrooms was conducted to evaluate their accessibility. Detailed notes were not provided since the budget or scope did not allow for this level of detail. Additionally, a visual inspection of trails, day use areas, and lake access at locations that provide ‘Outdoor Recreation Areas’ was also provided. Although there are no specific technical requirements included in the California Building Code, and the federal standards have not yet been adopted on the state level, it is important to note that the City of Goleta does fall under Title II in which public entities have an ongoing obligation to ensure that individuals with disabilities are not excluded from programs and services because facilities are unusable or inaccessible to them. There is no “grandfather clause” in the ADA that exempts older facilities. However, the law strikes a careful balance between increasing access for people with disabilities and recognizing the constraints many public entities face. It allows entities confronted with limited financial resources to improve accessibility without excessive expense. See Appendix A for a detailed analysis of ADA issues per park site.

Chapter 3 | Existing Level of Service

Figure 3-2: ADA Accessibility Deficiencies per Park

Table 3-8: Number of ADA Accessibility Issues per Park Park

ADA Accessibility Deficiencies

Stow Grove Andamar Park Haskell's Beach Evergreen Acres Bella Vista I & II San Miguel Neighborhood Park Brandon Winchester II La Goleta Sperling Preserve Armstrong Park

22 17 16 15 14 14 13 13 11 11 10

Park

Community Center Lake Los Carneros Stow Tennis Courts Winchester I Emerald Terrace University Village Santa Barbara Shores Armitos Park Nectarine Oro Verde Stonebridge

ADA Accessibility Deficiencies

9 8 8 8 6 5 4 3 2 0 0 29

City of Goleta Parks, Facilities & Playgrounds Master Plan

Figure 3-3: Residential Population Density

Chapter 3 | Existing Level of Service

Figure 3-4: Combined Parkshed and Level of Service as of 2017 Census

Combined Parkshed Service Area 15-Minute Walkshed 5-Minute Driveshed

# Population % Population Served 2017 Served 2017 25,055 81.2% 28,481

92.3%

City of Goleta Parks, Facilities & Playgrounds Master Plan

Based on the combined parkshed that looks at all park types and neighboring parks, the number and acreage of parks that are accessible to the residents within 15-minute walk were calculated and shown in Figure 3-4 and 3-5. White areas in both maps have no access to a park within 15-minute walking distance. Most of the city regions have more accessible park acreage than number of parks due the fact that most of Goleta’s park acreage are regional open spaces that are huge in size. But in both maps, the central city region south and west of Highway 101 Figure 3-5: Accessible Park Level are underserved. And residents in the east city region have less parks to go to within walking distance.

Figure 3-6: Accessible Park Acreage 32

Chapter 3 | Existing Level of Service

Figure 3-7: Mini and Neighborhood Parkshed

Neighborhood Parkshed Service Area 15-Minute Walking Distance 2 5-Minute Driving Distance

# Population % Population Served 2017 Served 2017 2,414 72.7% 27,842

90.3%

City of Goleta Parks, Facilities & Playgrounds Master Plan

Figure 3-8: Community and Regional Parkshed

Community Parkshed Service Area 5-Minute Driving Distance 10-Minute Driving Distance 2

# Population % Population Served 2017 Served 2017 27,086 87.8% 7,943

90.6%

Chapter 3 | Existing Level of Service

Figure 3-9: Active Parkshed

Active Parkshed Service Area 15-Minute Walking Distance 2 5-Minute Driving Distance

# Population % Population Served 2017 Served 2017 3,085 74.8 % 27,004

87.5%

City of Goleta Parks, Facilities & Playgrounds Master Plan

Overall, counting all parks of all types, the city is well covered by the 15-minute walkshed and 5-minute driveshed, except for several deficient pockets south of Hollister Avenue as well as at the northeast corner. Yet when excluding open spaces, more parkshed gaps appear. Figure 3-9 shows the city regions where no active parks exist that are within walking or short driving distance. The master plan will address measures to fill these parkshed gaps in the recommendation chapter. Figure 3-9a: Existing Active Parkshed Gaps using 15-min walk

Figure 3-9b: Existing Active Parkshed Gaps using 15-min walk

Figure 3-10: Active Parkshed Gaps

Girsh Park Chapter 3 | Existing Level of Service

City of Goleta Parks, Facilities & Playgrounds Master Plan

04 Trends Analysis

City of Goleta Parks, Facilities & Playgrounds Master Plan

4.1 Summary of Needs Assessment from Existing Study Community participation was an integral part of the 2015 Recreation Needs Assessment planning process. Additional methods were used during the community engagement process to gather input and solicit feedback on the City’s parks and playgrounds systems, including stakeholder interviews, community workshops, two questionnaires, and a telephone survey. Among the key findings from the 2015 community engagement process are the following:

Community Attitudes: The majority of participants think that Goleta is a desirable place to live due to its weather, its beaches, and small-town feel. However, they also agree that the City faces challenges, such as appropriate water supply, inadequate population growth management, traffic congestion, and potential loss of open space. Recreation Benefits and Facility Use: In most cases, participants identified Girsh Park and Stow Grove as the most popular recreation facilities in Goleta. Another popular destination is Goleta Beach, located in an unincorporated area outside city limits. Most residents use Goleta Beach and Stow Grove for picnicking and barbecuing, while Girsh Park is primarily used for sports, including soccer, baseball, softball, and basketball. Recreation Program Use: According to the telephone survey, about 33 percent of residents were frequent users of programs during the previous year, including senior adult services (12 percent). However, 41 percent of residents did not use any programs in that same time frame. Facilities and Programs Satisfaction: About 86 percent of residents said that they were very or somewhat satisfied with the existing park and recreation facilities and programs. Improvements Desired: Most respondents said that they would like to see more facilities in the City of Goleta, including skate parks, bike paths, public pools, lighting, and walking/hiking trails. Additionally, 67 percent of telephone survey respondent think that the City should add new programs, classes, or lessons.

4.2 Summary of Key Trends To supplement the 2015 Needs Assessment, recent recreation trends were research and summarized. The pace of social preferences and social changes today requires analyzing recreation trends from both a local and national level. Participation levels of the City of Goleta residents using data from the U.S. Census Bureau, combined with research of relevant national recreation trends, provides critical insights that help to plan for the future of recreation in Goleta. Learning from these new shifts in participation in outdoor recreation, sports, and cultural programs, is an essential component of parks and recreation master planning.

4.2.1 Household Participation in Outdoor Activities According to the 2018 Sports, Fitness, and Leisure Activities Topline Participation Report from the Sports and Fitness Industry Association (SFIA), outdoor recreation is an activity group that is continuing to capture the interest and attention of new audiences. Besides those older than 55, all other age groups listed camping as the number one activity among non-participants. Figure 4-1 demonstrates the participation in outdoor activities in the City of Goleta households according to data from the U.S. Census Bureau. For example, almost 15 percent of the City of Goleta households participated in overnight camping trips. Overnight camping, road biking, power boating, canoing/ kayaking, fresh and salt water fishing, frisbee, hiking, jogging/running, and birdwatching, were all popular activities. The most popular recreation activity for Goleta’s residents is visiting the beach, although beach destinations are mostly at the County of Santa Barbara’s Goleta Beach Park. Knowing that residents like to visit the beach may be an indication of the community’s interests in aquatic related programs. Table 4-1 shows the water sports with the highest and the lowest average annual growth from 2012 to 2017. Stand up paddling (SUP) has seen, on average, 20 percent annual growth in the last five years. According to the 2018 SFIA report, Millennials are more likely than other generations to engage in water sports.

Chapter 4 | Trends Analysis

Figure 4-1: City of Goleta Outdoor Activity Participation

4.2.2 Household Participation in Team Sports Figure 4-2 demonstrates the household participation of individual and team sports in the City. Golf, bowling, and basketball were all activities with over five percent of household participation. Nationally, according to the 2018 SFIA report, the activity with most growth over the last five years has been rugby with a more than 16 percent increase. Hockey, rugby, and lacrosse have all experienced an increase of participation. Ultimate Frisbee, touch football, and fast pitch softball have seen a significant decline in the last five years.

Figure 4-2: City of Goleta Team Sport Participation

Source: U.S. Census, ESRI Business Analyst

Table 4-1: Water Sport Average Annual Growth Water Sport Stand Up Paddling Kayaking (whitewater)

5 Year Avg. Annual Growth 20.2% 6.0%

Recreational Kayaking

5.2%

Rafting

-1.4%

Water Skiing

-3.8%

Jet Skiing

-5.0%

Source: 2018 Sports, Fitness, and Leisure Activities Topline Participation Report, 2012-2017

Source: U.S. Census, ESRI Business Analyst

City of Goleta Parks, Facilities & Playgrounds Master Plan

4.2.3 Nationwide Fitness Activity Trends According to the Sports and Fitness Industry Association, High Impact Intensity Training (HIIT) and cross-training style workouts, or CrossFit, are two of the top trending aerobic activities. CrossFit combines elements of gymnastics, weightlifting, running, rowing, and other sports to create a varied fitness regime. With regard to individual sports, off-road triathlons have seen almost 17 percent average annual growth for the last five years. These races, such as XTERRAs, consist of a competitive combination of swimming, mountain biking, and trail running (see Table 4-3). Pickle-ball, a paddle sport mixing badminton, tennis, and table tennis, is still trending, gaining an average eight percent growth each year. Growing even slightly faster is Cardio Tennis at 9.1 percent. Cardio Tennis is a fitness program that focuses on combining a full body workout with elements of tennis. Engaging non-participants is one of the challenges of parks and recreation agencies. According to the 2018 SFIA report, income has been seen to impact activity rates; those households making under $50,000 are significantly less active than those making more.

Table 4-2: Team Sport Average Annual Growth Team Sport

5 Year Avg. Annual Growth

Rugby

16.5%

Baseball

10.4%

Swimming on a Team

10.1%

Indoor Soccer

3.3%

Outdoor Soccer

-1.6%

Fast Pitch Softball

-2.7%

Touch Football

-3.5%

Ultimate Frisbee

-8.7%

Source: 2018 Sports, Fitness, and Leisure Activities Topline Participation Report, 2012-2017

Table 4-3: Nationwide Fitness Activity Trends 5 Year Avg. Annual Growth Aerobic Activity High Impact Intensity Training (HIIT)

9.3%

Cross-Training Style Workouts

6.6%

Row Machine

5.8%

Stair Climbing Machine

5.6%

Aquatic Exercise

5.0%

Tai Chi

5.0%

Strength Activity Kettleballs

7.0%

Individual Sports Triathlon (Off-Road)

17.1%

Martial Arts

11.2%

MMA for Fitness

11.1%

Trail Running

9.6%

Boxing for Fitness

6.2%

Racquet Sports Cardio Tennis

9.1%

Pickle-ball

8.5%

Source: 2018 Sports, Fitness, and Leisure Activities Topline Participation Report, 2012-2017

Chapter 4 | Trends Analysis

4.2.4 Recreational Expenditures According to the latest data from the U.S. Census Bureau, Goleta residents spent on average $1,221 a year on personal recreational expenditures, totaling almost $14 million in 2017 (see Figure 4-3). This included membership fees for social, recreation, and community clubs, fees for recreation lessons, camping fees, and recreation equipment purchases, and other related recreation expenses.

California Outdoor Recreation Economy

According to the 2017 Outdoor Industry Economy Report, in California alone, annual consumer spending in outdoor recreation is $92 billion, supporting 691,000 direct jobs, as shown in Figure 4-4. About 56 percent of California residents participate in outdoor recreation each year. Figure 4-3: Recreational Expenditures by Goleta Residents

Sports, Recreation, and Exercise Equipment

$2,564,931

691,000 $30.4 B direct state jobs

in wages and salaries

$92 B

$6.2 B

Entertainment/ Recreation Fees and Admissions

$10,189,407

Recreational Vehicles and Fees

$1,376,516

in consumer spending

$14,130,854

Source: U.S. Census, ESRI Business Analyst

in state/local tax revenue

Figure 4-4: State of California Outdoor Recreation Economy 43

43 Source: Outdoor Industry, 2017 Outdoor Recreation Economy Report

City of Goleta Parks, Facilities & Playgrounds Master Plan

4.2.5 Generational Changes Activity participation varies based on age, but it also varies based on generational preferences. In regard to generational activity, according to the SFIA report, Millennials had the highest percentage of those who were “active to a healthy level,” but 25 percent also remained sedentary. Nearly 28 percent of Generation X was inactive, with Baby Boomers at 33 percent inactive. Baby Boomers prefer low impact fitness activities such as swimming, cycling, aquatic exercise, and walking for fitness. Figure 4-5 demonstrates the breakdown of generations in Goleta. More than 65 percent of Generation Z was at least casually active in 2017, according to the 2018 SFIA report. In Goleta, Millennials make up the largest generational group, at 27 percent, followed by Generation Z (24 percent), Baby Boomers (23 percent), and finally Generation X (at only 20 percent). The Silent Generation is by far the smallest generational group, making up only 6 percent of the population.

Disk Golf Course at Evergreen Open Space

Figure 4-5: City of Goleta Generational Breakdown

Chapter 4 | Trends Analysis

4.3 Community Outreach This planning process included a number of public outreach efforts designed to gather updated preferences and recreation priorities from a broad range of local residents, stakeholders, and City staff through a series of public events, stakeholder meetings, and a survey.

4.3.1 Community Workshop A community workshop was conducted as part of the planning process to obtain community input and solicit feedback on existing parks and recreation facilities. This workshop was held on Wednesday, June 13, 2018 at the Goleta Valley Community Center between 6:00-8:00 pm. The workshop was designed as a conventional workshop to introduce the project in a formal setting to the community, where attendees had the opportunity to join one of four tables. This allowed participants to focus on the areas that they identify with the most. Each table had a team leader that asked a variety of questions designed to get a diverse understanding of the quadrant’s existing parks and recreation conditions. In addition to the table map exercises, attendees also had the opportunity to learn more about the parks and recreation facilities through photo boards that were printed and placed around the room. A total of 16 people attended and had the opportunity to share their thoughts on both parks and recreation challenges and opportunities for the City of Goleta.

Get Involv

ed!

Commun it

Wednesd a

Help us cre our park ate a citywide pla recreationfacilities and plan forn to enhance into the fut parks and ure!

y Works

hop #1

June 13 th 6:00 pm – 8:00 p m Goleta V alley Co mmunity 5679 Ho llister Ave, Center Golet

The Goleta Parks Fac ility & Pla process will yground create a Master Pla road map City’s agi n for address ng parks ing the and facilitie successful s. In ord ly accom er to do plish this input! Wh goa l, we nee at would d your you like What mig to see in ht your rec our parks? reation nee What do ds be in the you value in parks and future? to help ans recreation wer these ? Join us important questions.

a, CA 9311 7

For more info please JoAnne contact: Plum Parks & Rec mer reation Man jplummer@ ager cityofgolet a.org

City of Goleta Parks, Facilities & Playgrounds Master Plan

4.3.2 Pop-Up Outreach The pop-up outreach event took place on September 29, 2018 as part of the City’s Lemon Festival at Girsh Park. This yearly event draws thousands of residents from Goleta and nearby communities with food, entertainment, and family activities, making it one of the most anticipated events. A project booth was present to gather information on opportunities and existing issues from participants. Maps, @ data, and surveys were displayed and passed out at the booth Input! to gather information with an We Need Your , 10am-4pm 29 er mb estimated interaction with over 80 pte Se Girsh Park 17 d, Goleta, CA 931 people. More than 40 surveys were 7050 Phelps Roa completed. th

4.3.3 Stakeholder Interviews

will create a ounds Master Plan Facilities, and Playgr es. In order The Goleta Parks, parks and faciliti ssing the City’s aging What would road map for addre need your input! plish this goal, we be in recreation needs to successfully accom your might help our parks? What tion? Join us to you like to see in recrea and parks do you value in the future? What tant questions. answer these impor

Stop by our booth al at the Lemon Festiv e and help us creat a citywide plan to park our ce enhan facilities and plan for parks and recreatione! into the futur

contact: For more info please er JoAnne Plumm tion Manager Parks & Recrea eta.org jplummer@cityofgol

A total of 17 interviews were conducted with representatives of local organizations, community leaders, and elected officials between February and June 2018. The goal of these interviews was to obtain input from a broad group of stakeholders and establish relevant issues related to Goleta’s parks and playgrounds. A series of questions was asked to ensure that adequate input was received by all attendees. The stakeholder interviews key findings include: Keep parks open and well-maintained Carry out more family-oriented events Integrate efforts with the Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan Improve security, safety, and lighting Consider lack of transportation, especially for low-income families Build additional facilities such as a skate park, a public swimming pool, and a dog park Improve connectivity for all modes of transportation Better access for children (11-17 years old) Establish Joint Use Agreements with schools

Chapter 4 | Trends Analysis Goleta Lemon Festival at Girsh Park

47 47

City of Goleta Parks, Facilities & Playgrounds Master Plan

4.3.4 Intercept Survey Summary An intercept survey was developed as an additional resource to collect feedback from the community. A paper copy of the survey was distributed at the Goleta Lemon Festival. A digital version was posted on the City’s website and was kept active for three weeks. A total of 214 people completed the intercept survey. The results from this survey were used to analyze residents’ perspectives on parks and recreation in Goleta. They also provided the City with a current view of people’s opinions, concerns, and desires for the future of Goleta’s parks and playgrounds.

LETA PARK CITY OF GO

your AGE someone in CURRENT US ONCE A quently hasE A WEEK ONC nths, how fre MONTH past 12 mo OR MORE r 1. Over the k of Goleta par Visited a City eta trails or pathways Gol Used City of event City of Goleta Attended a beach courts Visited the Goleta tennis Used City of

According to the intercept survey results, respondents were most likely to have visited a Goleta park, with 99 percent having visited at least once in the past year and 62 percent at least once a week, as seen in Figure 4-6. These respondents are also heavy users of the City’s trails and pathways, with 95 percent having visited in the past year and a notable 54 percent having visited at least once a week. When asked the most important needs to be addressed over the next five to 10 years, three items rose to the top of the list as being very important to the intercept respondents:

Preserving open space Increasing trail and pathways connectivity Making improvements and/or renovations to existing park amenities.

About 55 percent of intercept respondents selected preserving open space as one of their top three choices, as shown in Figure 4-8. Adding aquatic facilities, 46 percent, and developing new parks, 32 percent, were also highly selected. Approximately 56 percent of intercept respondents indicated that improved conditions and maintenance of parks and facilities are the most important factors for increasing their utilization. Additionally, 38 percent of respondents would like to see better lighting in parks and trails and 36 percent would like more facilities and amenities (see Figure 4-9).

S INTERCEP

r r r r r

ne leta over the D PROGRAMS the City of Go CILITIES AN addressed in NOT needs to be 3 st important IMPORTANT 2 mo the r 1 2. What are r r es atics faciliti 1) Add aqu c fields/courts leti 2) Add ath ____ p new parks _________ 3) Develo : _________ ired des k Type of par activities programs and ay connectivity 4) Expand hw pat ting te exis trail and 5) Increase and/or renova rovements 6) Make imp parks ation center amenities at munity/recre expanded com or New 7) ce ________ ve open spa _________ 8) Preser _________ ___ ___ ___ 9) Other:

1. En los últimos 12 meses, con qué frecuencia alguien en su hogar ha: UNA VEZ AL MES

r r r r r

UNA VEZ EN ALGUNOS MESES

r r r r r

UNA VEZ AL AÑO

r r r r r

¿Qué actividades normalmente realiza en los parques de la Ciudad de Goleta? Fuera de la Ciudad de Goleta, ¿a dónde va a divertirse?

r terrconditi knowledge 01) r Bet service/staff ter customer or work 02) r Bet to where I live essibility ilities closer led acc isab d/d 03) r Fac ppe ter handica Bet on r rati 04) of ope anded hours ut offerings 05) r Exp nication abo roved commu and facilities) 06) r Imp (parks, trails, ter lighting enities am 07) r Bet and es re faciliti 08) r Mo

2. ¿Cuáles son las necesidades más importantes que deben abordarse en la Ciudad de Goleta en los próximos 5 a 10 años? NO ES IMPORTANTE 1

MUY IMPORTANTE 5

r r r

3. ¿Cuáles de los tres elementos de la lista anterior son las prioridades más altas para su hogar? (ESCRIBA LOS NUMEROS) Más imporante #__________ Segundo más importante #__________ Tercero

más importante #__________

4. ¿Cuáles son las áreas más importantes que, si fueran abordadas por la Ciudad de Goleta, aumentarían su uso de los parques e instalaciones recreativas en la Ciudad de Goleta? (MARQUE TODO LO QUE APLIQUE) 01) r Mejor 02) 03) 04) 05) 06) 07) 08)

r r r r r r r

estado y mantenimiento de parques e instalaciones Mejor servicio al cliente y conocimiento del personal Instalaciones más cercanas a donde vivo o trabajo Mejor accesibilidad para discapacitados Horas de operación extendidas Mejor comunicación sobre ofertas Mejor alumbrado (parques, senderos e instalaciones) Más instalaciones y servicios

09) 10) 11) 12) 13) 14) 15)

rs? xt 5 to 10 yea

r r r r r r r

r r r r r r

r r

r r r r r r

r r r r r r r

VERY IMPORTANT 5

r r r r r r r r r

r r r

r r r r r r

MBERS) (INSERT NU household? ties to your __ highest priori most important #________ the are of above _____ Third NO LO USÉ NO SÉ from the list r use of City ortant #_____ increase you three items ond most imp 3. Which leta, would ________ Sec the City of Go important #__ Mo dressed by rst ad r if t, tha ) nt areas r THAT APPLY 09) r More programs r most importa (CHECK ALL r at are ther ter parking n facilities? 4. Wh 10) r Bet er fees and recreatio nance of parks/facilities r leta parks r er pricing/us Go on/mainte 11) r Low yfinding

INSTALACIONES Y PROGRAMAS FUTUROS

1) Agregar instalaciones acuáticas 2) Agregar campos atléticos y canchas 3) Construir nuevos parques Tipo de parque deseado: ______________________ 4) Expandir los programas y las actividades 5) Aumentar la conectividad de los senderos y rutas 6) Hacer mejoras o renovar las instalaciones existentes en los parques 7) Centro de recreación o comunitario nuevo o ampliado 8) Preservar espacions abiertos 9) Otro: ___________________________________

r r r

r r r r r

r r r r

W DON’T KNO

DID NOT USE

ONCE A YEAR

ONCE EVER FEW MONTHS

FUTURE FA

USO ACTUAL UNA VEZ POR SEMANA O MÁS

household:Y

rks? of Goleta pa e in at City ically engag ies do you typ What activit te? you recrea a, where do City of Golet Outside of the

ENCUESTA SOBRE LOS PARQUES DE LA CIUDAD DE GOLETA

Visitado algún parque de la Ciudad de Goleta Usado los senderos de la Ciudad de Goleta Asistido a un evento de la Ciudad de Goleta Visitado la playa Usado las cachas de tenis de la Ciudad de Goleta

T SURVEY

Más programas Mejor estacionamiento Precios y tarifas de usuario más bajos Mejor señalización Seguridad mejorada Conectividad WiFi Otro:

/wa ter signage y 12) r Bet and securit roved safety 13) r Imp ty i connectivi WiF r 14) er: Oth 15) r

Chapter 4 | Trends Analysis

Figure 4-6: Current Usage

Figure 4-7: Importance of Future Facilities

City of Goleta Parks, Facilities & Playgrounds Master Plan

Figure 4-8: Future Facility Priorities

Figure 4-9: Barriers to Participation

Chapter 4 | Trends Analysis

4.4 Summary of Key Public Recommendations According to the input received through the community outreach process, the parks, recreation facilities, and programs are actively used by Goleta’s residents. Key issues were identified through stakeholder meetings and interviews, a community workshop, a pop-up event, a community survey, a review of existing documents, an inventory, and a level of service analysis. All the information obtained from the aforementioned sources was analyzed and recommendations were developed to address the following key issues:

Explore the addition of indoor facilities, such as recreation centers and aquatic centers. Ensure continuation of maintenance of parks and recreation facilities. Explore improving and adding trail connectivity around the city. Make adjustments of facilities based on collected data.

Bella Vista Park

51 51

City of Goleta Parks, Facilities & Playgrounds Master Plan

4.5 Population Trends

4.5.2 Population Growth Distribution

In order to provide ample and high-quality park and recreation services in the future for Goleta residents, it is important to examine the future projected city demographics and potential growth areas within the city. Other factors to consider include: potential partnership with non-city assets, vacant land, and future level of service for the projected population. Understanding the community’s recreational needs, its social makeup, and the City’s ability to provide services is key to developing a long-range plan for Goleta’s parks and recreational facilities. This chapter highlights the demographic trends and future recreation needs that could influence the City’s future parks and recreation planning through 2035.

To understand the future demand, the analysis models projected residential distribution in 2035 using planned land use (see Figure 4-10). Figure 4-11 shows the change in residential density between 2015 and 2035. The City will expect new neighborhoods to form between Hollister Avenue and U.S. Route 101, with most of the increase in high-density residential. These new growth neighborhoods will become the most dense residential areas in the city.

4.5.1 Projected Population Growth According to SBCAG’s regional growth forecast, the City of Goleta will see a modest population growth in the near future, reaching approximately 33,700 persons in 2035. This represents an almost 10.7 percent increase over the 2015 population of 30,898. Goleta’s population growth rate of 2 percent is significantly higher in comparison to California’s 0.8 percent and 0.7 percent for the rest of the United States. These higher than regional and national growth rates may provide some predictability in recreation facilities usage, which can escalate the demand for park and recreation services. The current and projected population is illustrated in Table 4-4. However, parks, recreation facilities, and other services may also be used by the nearby residents of Isla Vista, UCSB, Santa Barbara, and unincorporated areas of Santa Barbara County. Table 4-4: Goleta Projected Population

Year

Population

Source

2010

29,397

Census ACS 2010

2015

30,541

Census ACS 2015

2017

30,847

Census ACS 2017

2020

32,200

SBCAG RGF 2018

2025

32,500

SBCAG RGF 2018

2030

33,100

SBCAG RGF 2018

2035

33,700

SBCAG RGF 2018

4.5.3 Equitable Distribution of Parks for Programmed Growth and Parks Spatial analysis on the distribution of parks allows the City to identify the future needs and deficiencies of the community and plan accordingly, especially around those areas that are expected to gain the most population by 2035. Figure 4-12 shows the future gaps within the 5-minute driveshed and 15-minute walkshed. New parks and recreation facilities should be centered in those areas with deficiencies that are expected to concentrate more density. This will make these facilities more accessible to a higher percentage of users who walk, bike, or drive. Future development should be located within shorter distance of these parks and recreation facilities to ensure an adequate level of service while at the same time encouraging alternate modes of traveling, traffic reduction, and healthier lifestyles. Both maps show that the current parkshed will not provide full coverage for these growth areas. Parkshed gaps occur between Hollister Avenue and U.S. Route 101, where new mixed use development is planned and additional park amenities and facilitated park access are needed. To close the gaps and improve park accessibility, new developments in these areas should provide additional parks and open space, and the City should create more safe and convenient corridors crossing the freeway.

Chapter 4 | Trends Analysis

Figure 4-10: Future Active Parks 5-minute Driveshed Gap

City of Goleta Parks, Facilities & Playgrounds Master Plan

Figure 4-11: Population Density Change

Chapter 4 | Trends Analysis

Figure 4-12: Active Parkshed Gaps with Population Growth 55

City of Goleta Parks, Facilities & Playgrounds Master Plan

4.6 Land Development Trends 4.6.1 Land Availability and Ownership The City of Goleta has approximately 123 acres of vacant land, as seen in Figure 4-13 below. City-owned or publicly-owned vacant land could be re-purposed for new neighborhood or community parks to help meet deficiencies in park and recreation services. Chapter 5 demonstrates how some of the vacant parcels can meet the needs of under-served areas of the city if parks are developed on these sites.

Figure 4-13: Land Availability and Ownership 56

Chapter 4 | Trends Analysis

4.6.2 Potential Expansion Area

eal

ll Be

o ny Ca

Cree

ree k

Jose

as C Veg

edro

San

Las

Ke llog gA

ve ros R arne

Hollis

ter A

Storke Rd

S Old

Me sa R

ro Atascade

Goleta Pier

Campus Lagoon Coal Oil Pt

Open Space / Passive Recreation

Planned Residential

Open Space / Active Recreation

General Commercial

Public / Quasi-public

Agriculture

ree

Creek

El Colegio Rd

UCSB

Single Family Residential

s r

Goleta Slough

Devereux Slough

Legend

Ign aci

n 217

Isla Vista

Land Use Designations for Future Service Areas

ek Cre

Rancho Goleta Lake

Amended by Reso. 09-59, 11/17/09

Devereux Cre ek

Pacific Ocean

Cre

Hollister Ave

e Jos

Santa Barbara Municipal Airport lps R

nio nto

nA Sa

101

Union Pacific RR

Hollister Ave

Phe

Ma ria

Patterson Av e

Fairview Ave

n tera L La Pa

£ ¤

Los Carneros Lake

C Los

101

Calle Real

£ ¤

Ellwood Pier

San P

Creek neros Los Car

Cathedral Oaks Rd

Fairview Ave

Cathedral Oaks Rd

k ee

Glen Annie Rd

n Call

Established golf course

Glen Annie Creek

El Encanto Creek

ek n Cre anyo Ellwo od C

Tecolo te

Creek

Winchester Canyon Creek

Creek

The General Plan/Coastal Land Use Plan of Goleta identified potential growth areas and physical boundary changes in Land Use Element LU 12.2. Figure 4-14 shows the land use designations for these potential land additions. Another planned park and/or open space addition is currently UCSB land.

Other Features

Goleta Pt

Pacific Ocean 0

1,200 Feet

2,400

Figure 2-4 POTENTIAL CITY OF GOLETA SERVICE AREAS

Goleta City Boundary Coastal Zone

Schools Future Service Area Boundary

Figure 4-14: Land Use Designation for Future Service Area - City of Goleta 2009

GENERAL PLAN/COASTAL LAND USE PLAN November 2009

City of Goleta Parks, Facilities & Playgrounds Master Plan

05 Recommendations & Action Plans

City of Goleta Parks, Facilities & Playgrounds Master Plan

5.1 Overview of Recommendations Recommendations were derived from community input including stakeholder interviews, community workshops, intercept surveys, statistically valid surveys, pop-up outreach, staff interviews, and the 2015 Needs Assessment Report. The recommendations were also informed by the Level of Service (LOS) analysis, geographic gap analysis, and funding considerations. The following discussion describes ways to increase LOS, equitable distribution, and the quality of the parks and recreation system. This is accomplished through adding and enhancing amenities, as well as a commitment to partner with private development and schools to lower the deficiencies and geographic distribution of neighborhood and community parks. Expanding recreational programs or partnerships with those that could deliver programs, is also important in order to provide access to services. It is equally important to look at improving organizational efficiencies, and augmenting financial opportunities and staffing for the division under Public Works. The following recommendations for providing park and recreation experiences are listed in order of priority for helping to meet future demand for park facilities, as well as equitable distribution of amenities and access to these facilities and potential programs that may or may not be offered in current situations. The Los Carneros Lake Natural and Historical Preserve and the Ellwood Mesa/Sperling Preserve Open Space have their own site-specific habitat management plans. These plans take precedence over this Master Plan for the details pertaining to the management of natural resources. 60

5.2 Recommendations for Meeting Population Based Standards The first five goals (and their supporting objectives) are focused on meeting the quantity of parks available to the public based on current and future populations. Parks standards are not only about the quantity of parks, but also about the equitable distribution of these facilities and the ability of the public to access these facilities. As stated in the General Plan Open Space Policy 6.2, “to the extent feasible, park and recreation facilities shall be equitably distributed throughout the city to serve the various neighborhoods and all socioeconomic segments of the city’s population. Particular emphasis shall be placed on provision of new park and recreation facilities in areas that are underserved.” 5.2.1 Recommendation Goal 1: Maximize active park acreage on public land without disturbing passive natural area. The city has over 500 acres of neighborhood and regional open space and several underutilized open space areas, but also some deficiency in active parks. This is partially due to inaccurate park categorization. Some neighborhood parks only have a small portion of active functions and the rest remain passive natural area, while some neighborhood open spaces have some flat lawn space with high infill potential for new parks. This two-way transformation between parks and open space is more like a specification of open land form. Goleta’s park system can benefit in the long run in that more potential parkland is identified without changing the form and nature of existing passive open space.

Objective 1.1 Re-categorize active parks and passive open spaces.

Detailed desktop inventory and measurements were done to specify and separate areas with playground and other existing park facilities versus passive unimproved natural areas. Three parks are suggested to be split or re-designated as neighborhood parks and neighborhood open spaces. Number 1 through 3 in Figure 5-1 point out these areas. Natural Open Space - This category assumes some level of natural habitat is left intact on site or has been created for the purposes of habitat restoration. In general, wetland, riparian corridor, trees, or oak woodland habitats make up this category. Peripheral trails with educational interpretive signage programs will be allowed in these areas, per General Plan policies CE 1.6 and 2.3. Entrance signage designating the park as natural open space should be installed along with posted rules on access restrictions and encouragement of environmental protection and limited access. Maintenance is limited to invasive removal, dead fuel removal and monitoring to prevent homeless encampments from occurring. General Open Space / Unimproved ParklandWhen an area has been left that may have been related to agricultural lands or other disturbed open space that is not considered to be native or natural from a habitat perspective, it should be considered as general open space. This would include areas graded by adjacent development that are dedicated as open space areas turned over to the City of Goleta. The property should be allowed to have access through the site with trails, interpretive signage, picnic areas, benches, open turfed fields or grasslands. Parking lots around the periphery of the site will be allowed as will restrooms. Activities associated with this type of parkland will be limited to low intensive activities requiring minimal facility

Chapter 5 | Recommendations and Action Plans

Figure 5-1: Reorganize Active Parks and Passive Open Spaces; Infill Opportunities in Existing Parks and Open Spaces # #

1 San Miguel Park is currently

categorized as a neighborhood park, while it is mostly unimproved natural land. Its available active space has a playground, a swing set and a multi-purpose field. It should be divided into 0.75-acre mini park and a linear open space along the creek.

0.75 Acres

Winchester Park is currently categorized as a neighborhood park, but it is mostly passive open space. Its available active space has a playground and a multi-purpose field. It should be divided into 0.32-acre mini park with the rest of the park remaining as open space.

0.32 Acres

City of Goleta Parks, Facilities & Playgrounds Master Plan

or amenity development. Uses should relate to the setting and be passive in nature but can include walking, hiking, biking, running, leashed dog walking, open play, picnicking, orienteering, geo-caches, distant nature viewing and education. Par-course exercise equipment, obstacle courses and adventure playgrounds with ropes courses should be allowed. Nature Centers, museums and cultural exhibits are allowed. Active sports fields, standard playgrounds, courts sports or skate parks would not be allowed. Lighting would be limited to security lighting only. Parklands in this category would be designated as neighborhood open space or regional open space if above 5 acres in size. Non-maintained for Public Access- Areas where there are no natural resources, no park facilities, and no desire to add park facilities should be considered Non-maintained. There should be no expectation by the community of maintenance or the addition of park amenities. These facilities would generally not be counted as parks since they support no uses and provide no amenities. Improved Parkland- All other parkland would be designated as improved parklands including miniparks, neighborhood parks or community parks and community centers. All facility types would be allowed, depending on the development of individual park master plans and public outreach for park development proposals. Several of the existing open space areas (or at least some portion of these open space areas) should be reclassified as improved parklands. These would include: San Miguel, Evergreen, Winchester 1, Santa Barbara Shores, Oro Verde and San Jose Creek.

Santa Barbara Shores Open Space is currently categorized as a neighborhood open space. Although it is mostly vegetated natural land, it has a small active area with a playground, a swing set and a multi-purpose field. It should be divided into 0.83-acre mini park and a linear open space with a dirt trail.

Brandon Park is a neighborhood open space under current categorization. Although it is mostly vegetated natural land, it has a small and relatively flat space. It should be divided into 0.4-acre mini park and an open space with a dirt trail. This mini park can also serve as a great connection between Brandon Drive and the two cul-de-sacs.

0.4 Acres 0.83 Acres

Stonebridge Open Space is currently categorized as a neighborhood open space. Although it is mostly vegetated natural land, it has a relatively flat area. It can be divided into 1.6-acre neighborhood park with some mature trees and a linear open space along San Pedro Creek.

Oro Verde Park is currently categorized as a neighborhood open space. The portion framed by Cambridge Drive and Via Salerno is a relatively flat and square space with sparsely distributed trees which is perfect for a 2.1-acre neighborhood park that alleviates local active park gaps.

1.6 Acres 2.1 Acres

Chapter 5 | Recommendations and Action Plans

Objective 1.2

Identify infill opportunities in open spaces

Goleta’s residents take pride in the rich open space provision within the city, and want the existing open space to remain mostly undeveloped. However, under the current categorization, not all the open spaces are entirely natural undeveloped areas. Some have flat, disturbed and non-natural space which presents infill opportunities and may have already been used as multi-purpose fields. Three open space areas have been suggested to be made in neighborhood parks with the potential for infill of passive or active amenities. Number 4 through 6 in Figure 5-1 point out these areas. Any development on sites containing natural habitat areas should be sited and designed to be fully consistent with policies in the General Plan/Coastal Land Use Plan Conservation Element. 5.2.2 Recommendation Goal 2: Consider publicly funded parklands to meet deficiencies. The city should consider the addition of publicly funded parkland to meet park acreage deficiencies. Figure 5-2 indicates a number of city or county lands that do not have major investments on them and that could be considered for future park development. This figure also shows privately held lands that have been designated for open space. If these are not resource based sensitive lands, then these areas could be considered for park development, including publicly accessible open space, dog parks, mini-parks or a natural resource based park with trails and educational/interpretive amenities associated with them. Objective 2.1 Focus on identifying a potential park site in areas where a park equity gap currently exists. First focus on under-served areas.

The first metric or approach for new park development is to place park facilities in the part of town where existing geographic gaps exist in terms of proximity of parks to existing populations. This is particularly important for neighborhood parks in areas where the demographics indicate higher densities, families and overall shortages of services for under-served populations and disadvantaged communities.

Objective 2.2 Focus on identifying potential park sites in areas where major growth is likely to occur and where undeveloped land could be dedicated for public use as required as a condition of project approvals.

The second metric or approach should be used to identify where major increases in future populations are planning to be allowed. Future populations may result in an overall deficiency in future park standards, so it would be logical to place new parks in these areas. This should be the first metric to be used for new parklands. Where possible, future development should be used to fund and construct facilities directly. But if the development occurs in a park poor area, then it is logical to combine the resources provided by the new development with those of the city to identify new parkland. Often, developers are willing to provide parklands that they dedicate to the city. Having parks very near their new development is often a selling feature for housing buyers. In some cases, the park demand from the new population may warrant the project to fully develop the park using their own financial resources. However, state law only allows the city to insist on park investments commensurate to the development’s fair share of any existing deficiency. Objective 2.3 Focus on identifying park sites in areas where the City of Goleta currently owns undeveloped or under-developed lands.

This third metric or approach should be used to identify potential parklands when the first two methods have not identified enough lands to meet deficiencies. A review of all undeveloped or underdeveloped lands owned by the City of Goleta should be identified and determined if they are in the right location for parklands and if this use is compatible with other departmental needs. Having the ownership of the land can dramatically decrease park development costs. Objective 2.4 Focus on identifying a potential park site in areas where lands are undeveloped and where the current land use or zoning designation is in a category that is fully served and where future demand is not likely to need these lands for future projects.

This fourth approach can be used to find parklands using or purchasing privately owned lands that may not be as expensive as other undeveloped lands in the city. A review of all undeveloped lands, especially in those areas where the current demand of land uses is being fully met should be identified. A review of future development trends may indicate the amount of available land for specific land uses is in excess of projected demand existing in some areas where a park deficiency is most acute.

City of Goleta Parks, Facilities & Playgrounds Master Plan

Figure 5-2: Potential Public Land Opportunities for New Parks #

Chapter 5 | Recommendations and Action Plans

This city-owned parcel is adjacent to the existing Deckers Park, a privately owned park located near the airport. The parcel is 2.3 acres in size and currently occupied by a corporation yard, but almost half of the space remains undeveloped. This land opportunity makes potential expansion of Deckers Park possible, although it depends on further study and cooperation with the developer of Deckers Park.

With the new residential development near Los Carneros Road, an increased demand for parks and recreational facilities in this “park-poor“ area will occur. The 1.1-acre city-owned vacant land at the corner is perfect for a new neighborhood park to serve this area.

1.7 Acres 1.1 Acres

This county-owned parcel is currently a linear natural area along the San Pedro Creek that is unimproved. It is adjacent to the existing Stow Tennis Courts, which is a community park. This is a good opportunity for a dirt trail along the creek bank to connect Stow Canyon Rd and Covington Way, although further study and coordination with the county would be needed to test feasibility.

This county-owned parcel is adjacent to Calle Real and a retail complex. The 1.1-acre vacant land at the corner is perfect for siting a neighborhood park to serve this “park-poor“ area.

1.1 Acres

City of Goleta Parks, Facilities & Playgrounds Master Plan

5.2.3 Recommendation Goal 3: Develop and implement Joint Use Agreements (JUA)/Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) with schools districts for use of amenities on school sites. Schools are well distributed around the city and contain general open space , natural turf and amenities that work well for park and recreation requirements. Although the funds for schools and parks are distinctively different, they are all based on tax payer or user fees from the public. Potential joint use of facilities is the first area that should be explored for helping to fill in park gaps or amenity deficiencies. Objective 3.1

Look for opportunities to create partnerships with schools.

The City should partner with the Goleta Union School District and the Santa Barbara Unified School District through MOUs or JUAs to provide open areas and use of school facilities for the community during after-school hours. The City should ensure that all future partnerships are accurately documented in a signed partnership agreement. Objective 3.2 Work with school districts to develop neighborhood parks at local schools.

Provide additional leisure opportunities for residents through the development of school sites for community use during after-school hours. The use of school property as neighborhood parks would reduce the need to purchase and build new recreation facilities. Figure 5-3 indicates schools that are in or near the areas where geographic gaps for parks exist. These include:

1. Brandon Elementary (Goleta Union) 2. Ellwood Elementary (Goleta Union) 3. Kellogg Elementary (Goleta Union) 4. La Patera Elementary (Goleta Union) 5. Goleta Valley Junior High and SB Charter School (S.B. Unified) 6. Dos Pueblos High (S.B. Unified)

Objective 3.3 Foster discussions and agreements that are mutually beneficial for both sides and ensure that roles and responsibilities are defined for each organization.

Partnerships benefit both sides of the providers and users. For an agreement to be sustainable or even agreed upon, both sides need to be willing to give in order to get the benefits. The public will benefit from neighborhood-close facilities that were paid for by taxpayers, the school can obtain benefit from assistance in capital costs and/or maintenance costs, and the City can benefit from meeting their obligations for providing recreational experiences for it’s citizens. The best items to focus on may be either assistance for adding capital investments or assistance for their maintenance requirements, depending on the school’s priorities. Increased maintenance may result from increased use of their lands, so maintenance responsibilities to assist or take over on all maintenance of the shared facilities is a common approach. Investments in facilities that a have a dual use for students during school hours and the general public in after school hours are better items to focus on for the City of Goleta to try and fund. Playgrounds make sense for elementary schools, while sports fields and court sports make the most sense for middle schools and high schools. Added facilities in these park areas could also be used by after school programs that would benefit from immediate access to these facilities. Security and liability are two important aspects to address in all joint use agreements. All schools could benefit from increased security. If the district is already trying to improve controlled access to their school grounds, then perhaps the city’s investment in gate requirements and automatic locking technologies could help them along in the process. Or the commitment for City staff to help monitor and secure the facilities during after school hours may also be part of an agreement. Generally, the more eyes on the park resulting from afternoon and weekend uses, the less likely that damaging or unsafe activities will occur. Finally, improved access through gates, trails and walkways benefit school users for improved walking and biking access to the schools, as well as the general publics access to these facilities. Creative thinking and communications are important for reaching agreements. A winwin with a give and take will be the only way an agreement can be reached and sustained into the future. The best way to approach these agreements is to start the conversation and identify what each party needs, what they are concerned about and what items they can not accept to occur. Solutions can then be developed that can benefit the City, the school and the community.

Chapter 5 | Recommendations and Action Plans

Figure 5-3: Expanding Park Distribution and Acres through Joint Use with Local Schools #

5 4

City of Goleta Parks, Facilities & Playgrounds Master Plan

Two areas exist at Brandon Elementary for joint use; area 1= 2.24 acres & area 2= 1.93 acres

One area exists at Ellwood Elementary School for joint use; area 3= 2.50 acres

One area exists at Kellogg Elementary School for joint use; area 4 = 4.88 acres

One area exists at La Patera Elementary School for joint use; area 5= 4.62 acres

One area exists at Goleta Valley Junior High School for joint use; area 6= 6.51 acres

One area exists at Dos Pueblos High School for joint use; area 7= 26 acres

Chapter 5 | Recommendations and Action Plans

Outdoor School Facilities

School Acreage Shared Use Acres if Fenced 25% Credit for Park Standard Assets List in Quantities Playground/ Tot Lot Parking Lot ADA Parking Multi-Purpose Field Backstop (small) Baseball Field Basketball Court Softball Field Handball Court Football Field Running Track Swimming Pool Tennis

Goleta Valley Jr. High/ S.B. Charter (S.B. Unified) Dos Pueblos High (S.B. Unified)

La Patera Elementary (Goleta Union)

Kellogg Elementary (Goleta Union)

8.75 2.50 0.63

9.00 4.88 1.22

8.00 4.62 1.16

17.80 6.51 1.63

77.25 26.00 6.50

5 1 2 2 2 1 4

2 2 3 1 3 1 3

2 1 3 1 3 1 5

1 1 2 2 3 1 4

1 10 4 2

1 16 2

129.05 8.25 48.68 4.17 12.17 1.04 10 7 36 12 13 9 26 1 23 1 1 1 4

Ellwood Elementary (Goleta Union)

Brandon Elementary (Goleta Union)

Ci tywi de Inventory of Outdoor School Potenti a l R ecrea ti on Assets i n Area s Wi th Pa rk Ga ps

TO TA L

Table 5-1: School Outdoor Facilities

5 10 1 1 1 1 4

Objective 3.4 Find an amenity that both the school district and the city have a need for and use that as the basis for an agreement.

The elementary schools of the Goleta Union and Santa Barbara School District could be sources of needed park amenities for the community. Table 5-1 summarizes numbers of different types of facilities by each public school within the city. The school district may be in need of funding for weekend security and ongoing maintenance. These two factors could be a source of common ground upon which a MOU could be based. The Santa Barbara Unified School District provides needed community athletic amenities to its students, but may need help in maintenance or additional supporting infrastructure. Perhaps they may be short in specific amenities that would be of benefit to the public as well. As part of any JUA/MOU, capital investment and maintenance would be the location to look for common ground and needs. Objective 3.5 Consider partnership for recreational programing.

When considering partnerships for recreational programming, exclusive or semi-exclusive lease agreements, service fees, and potential organization advertising or naming rights may be considered to allow the partnership to receive something of value to offset costs of operating the program. User fees may be the primary source of value for the partner, but if these fees are too high or if they cause the public land or facility to be used for making unreasonable profits, then revenue sharing would be required in the lease or MOU.

Ellwood Elementary

City of Goleta Parks, Facilities & Playgrounds Master Plan

5.2.4 Recommendation Goal 4: Continue to work with developers on providing infill parks for future populations. Based on Guiding Principles and Goals in the Open Space Element of the General Plan, Principle 2. Ensure that new parks and recreational services for the public are provided concurrent with new development. Figure 5-4 shows vacant land that is privately owned and appropriately zoned for new development. It should be noted that park deficiencies cannot be fully passed onto private developments other than their fair share that the development would add to the population, thereby making deficiencies that much more of a problem.

2.1 Acres

Decker’s Park has been a great asset to the business park. It is publicly accessible, with two half basketball courts, a multi-use field, benches, bike racks and paved trails. As residential developments emerges south of HWY 101, this park will play an increasingly important role providing recreation opportunities for the surrounding neighborhoods.

Developed Apartments

5.8 Acres

Objective 4.1 Recognize emerging publicly accessible private parks.

The new residential development, “Village at Los Carneros”, has recently been completed. It provides a mini park with a playground, a neighborhood park with a picnic area, and a paved trail. This case exemplifies how private infill development can help improve local park and recreation access. Even if the park is mostly used by local residents, it lowers the demand on other City run park facilities. These park types benefit all, even though they are often reviewed as private parks.

Although west Goleta south of HWY 101 is rich in large unimproved open spaces, there are few active parks with amenities available. A mini park with some play or sports amenities will greatly benefit the surrounding communities.

With proximity to a variety of businesses, community attractions and housing, a new mini park will be a valuable asset especially when new development occurs.

2.5 Acres 6.9 Acres

Similar to number 2, a new mini park will be a valuable asset especially when new development occurs.

8.8 Acres

Chapter 5 | Recommendations and Action Plans

Figure 5-4: Private Vacant Lands that are Potentially Developable within Park Gaps # #

6 4

3 8

With the new residential development near Los Carneros Road, an increased demand for parks and recreational facilities in this “park-poor“ area will occur. The private development opportunities across the street may accommodate another mini or neighborhood park.

5 15.3 Acres

1.1 Acres City-owned

Due to the proximity to the airport, a park site here may be appropriate to support existing and new development in the area. The park should be placed to connect with proposed bike lanes along South Fairview and South Kellogg by way of School Bus Lane.

11.8 Acres

City of Goleta Parks, Facilities & Playgrounds Master Plan

Objective 4.2 Be equitable in terms of financial responsibility when it comes to paying for future parks.

All levels of development create a demand on park facilities. Often, only large developments are required to dedicate, build or pay into park in-lieu funds. In some cases, park acreage may be adequate in an area of new growth, but special facilities or amenities are missing in the geographic areas. Citywide deficiencies of major facilities that are difficult to distribute around the city for closer access should also be considered if the amenity is in short supply based on current or future populations. In general, a distributed park system that is close into neighborhoods is always desired since users will drive less miles, and potentially walk or ride a bike to the park. Also, they are more apt to watch over a local park, be more involved in the sustainment of that park, and more likely to use a facility than one on the other side of town. Objective 4.3 Recognize the role of future development.

When park acreages are short in a specific geographic area or when a significant development of employment or residences is proposed, consider having the developer provide dedicated space for a park, build the park, or fund amenities in the park commensurate with their fair share of payments or investment based on the size of their development. Parks in employment areas, though an important element to encourage day time exercise and stress release, should always function as true parks with visibility and access assured. Objective 4.4 Be strategic about new park development.

If a development is to be built over multiple phases, and the initial number of units in the project is substantial or it is in an area with major park deficiencies, then it may be best to have the development build the park, pay for its fair share of the park up front, match with other available park funds for existing deficiencies in the area, or negotiate a credit account for future developer impact fees that would be released to the developer once the subsequent phases are implemented. 5.2.5 Recommendation Goal 5: Consider other parks and alternative recreation facilities when determining park deficiencies in certain areas. Linear parks, pocket parks, public plazas and other open space areas should count for some of the neighborhood’s requirements if they provide facilities for walking, running, biking, skating, exercise equipment, or peaceful contemplation and relaxation. 72

Objective 5.1

Think outside of the park.

Extend the park and activity experience into the community by providing connections to the park. These connections may include promenades, multiuse paths, tree corridors and other major plantings and space that make for comfortable and safe exercise and access to parks. Objective 5.2 parks.

Strive to connect open space areas to existing or planned

Consider connecting parks through open space systems that may be along roadways or reclaimed space from roadways that can also be used for drainage courses, urban forestry opportunities and traffic calming. Areas of significant habitat value within open space systems will be protected and not considered for development of park facilities. Objective 5.3 Identify opportunities to turn open space areas into linear connections that can provide nature appreciation and science and education.

Linear facilities can often tell stories about the community with an interpretive signage program that also marks wayfinding along with education and art. When deciding locations for linear facilities, areas of significant habitat value within open space systems should be protected from impacts by the project design, to the extent feasible. Objective 5.4 Consider private development of parklike spaces in the overall plan.

Public urban spaces that are built on private property should receive some form of credit for providing park and recreation space, but only if this space is highly visible, accessible, and contains design elements that focus on improving the built nature of the site, provides for walking and reflective contemplation, or that observes natural beauty on or near the site. Objective 5.5 Allow other forms of open space areas that are mostly natural areas to count towards park requirements.

Look for opportunities with private development that attempts to set aside natural open spaces by allowing some form of credit towards park requirements as long as the space is natural and not derelict and that this space is physically accessible through trails and also visually accessible to the public. Mitigation areas that do not allow human access should not be counted unless a small periphery of the natural space does accommodate trails and visual access to the open space area.

Chapter 5 | Recommendations and Action Plans

5.2.6 Recommendation Goal 6: Consider non-Goleta parks and programs in determining population-based demand and requirements. Not all park and recreation activities are done under the direction and on lands owned by the City of Goleta. Private for-profit and non-profit organizations often provide physical activity options for its citizens. Likewise, the adjacent County and City of Santa Barbara and University of California, Santa Barbara (UCSB) all provide recreational opportunities. Develop partnerships that recognize the fact that citizens do not see on the ground political boundary lines when they decide to use a park or recreate in a certain manner. Objective 6.1 Integrate parks on state or federal lands that do provide recreational opportunities for citizens of Goleta.

Where these areas are adjacent to city boundaries, work with the managing agencies of these lands to provide bike lanes, multi-use paths, walkways and trails that may allow the public to have recreational experiences getting to the park as well as at the park. Objective 6.2 Continue to work with private organizations and other service providers that are engaged in recreation programing and potentially offer City of Goleta park lands to deliver these programs.

Some form of revenue should be expected from the use of park lands. Recreational programming is often funded by local city organizations. Since

Goleta does not have a formal recreational program, having others provide these services has become the standard way of recreation program delivery for Goleta. Public facilities can and should be used to help deliver a broader recreational program. These partnerships provide savings to the city when a program is desired by the public. It is also easier to administer these programs than to actually run and staff them. There is a point, however, that exclusive and specialized recreational activities that are only benefiting a few citizens which use these public lands should be made to offset all costs through leasing, use permits or other shared revenue programs. Objective 6.3 Coordinate Recreational requirements with adjacent agencies.

Many of the students and faculty at UCSB utilize the extensive set of recreational programs and facilities on the campus. Those students that live on or near campus are not likely to create user demand on many of the City of Goleta’s park systems. However, faculty and students that live in the community probably do visit and utilize Goleta’s recreational amenities. But these same individuals are likely to use those at UCSB. So, for those students and faculty that live in the community, some credit for other available recreational facilities at UCSB should be factored into the population per acre methodology.

Paved Trail to a Neighborhood Park

City of Goleta Parks, Facilities & Playgrounds Master Plan

5.3 Recommendations that Help Provide Better Access to Parks

Objective 7.3 Locate new trails in new development where appropriate.

This section looks at ways to improve both non-vehicular access to parks, and also considers ADA Universal Access issues as well. See Appendix “A” for more detailed descriptions of deficiencies as seen from an ADA perspective.

Objective 7.4 Locate missing gaps in pedestrian and connectivity to parks, recreational facilities and open space.

5.3.1 Recommendation Goal 7: Implement the Active Transportation Plan, with an emphasis on Park Connections The recommendations from the Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan Project that was adopted in December 2018 should be used as a basis for improving bike and pedestrian access to parks and open spaces. This goal seeks to support the expansion of multi-use trail systems for walking, biking, jogging, and hiking both in and around public parks. Since 65% of all physical and recreational activity is related to linear activity (cycling, running, walking and hiking), this recreational use should be encouraged to start from a person’s home leading to a park and not just at the park itself. Based on the General Plan’s Open Space Element, Policy OS 6.4- “Neighborhood parks should be easily accessible to the surrounding neighborhood population through safe pedestrian and bicycle access. Neighborhood parks do not generally require on-site parking, although a limited amount of parking may be provided.” Objective 7.1

Identify open space areas that could benefit from new trails.

The Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan for the City of Goleta and the General Plan’s Pedestrian System Plan in Figure 7-5 has identified possible locations for paved bike paths and lanes as well as walkways. However, specific connections throughout the city where unpaved trails can be provided that connect the system of parks and open space need to be investigated further. When deciding locations for linear facilities, areas of significant habitat value within open space systems will be avoided. Objective 7.2

Develop plans to build new trails through open space areas.

It is recommended that the City develop plans for the design and construction of new trails and include the cost of developing the plans and construction of the trails (including mountain biking trails) in the CIP. Areas with valuable natural habitat will be avoided to the maximum extent feasible to preserve and protect its value for wildlife while allowing improved access for visitors. 74

The City should work with applicants of discretionary projects to coordinate the inclusion of trails within new development where appropriate. bicycle

Some gaps in pedestrian and bicycle connectivity to the existing parks and community centers were identified. Provide a more detailed analysis of missing gaps to further improve connectivity throughout the park system. Objective 7.5 Develop plans to fill in missing gaps in pedestrian and bicycle connectivity.

It is recommended that where feasible, these gaps should be addressed, and capital projects should be placed in the City’s budget to construct improvements. This may take the shape of new sidewalks, improved sidewalks, new trails, bike lanes, safety improvements at intersections, and streetscape enhancements. Objective 7.6 Work with other departments to implement plans to construct public improvements to increase the connectivity to parks.

A significant amount of usable linear space that could be used to connect people to parks without the use of motorized vehicles exists in public rightsof-way. Any unused street or under-used street should be considered for repurposing for walking, biking, running, skating, scootering or hiking. Connections that go beyond immediate park entrance improvements or near park adjustments, should be consistent with the recently adopted City of Goleta Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan. Figure 5-5 is from the adopted plan to show the proposed bike and pedestrian improvements that could help to improve access to parks and open spaces. Further discussion on park improvements that are directly adjacent to the park, are discussed in later sections of this Chapter. Some potential connections that are near park edges that would improve access by bike or by walking, have been shown on Figure 5-6. Depending on the width of the trail, the surface materials, the slope of the trail and visibility around corners, certain restrictions for uses on the trail may need to occur. Generally, the goal should be to have a surface and width that can accommodate runners, people with strollers, walkers, and hikers, as well as those on a mountain bike or commute bike (high pressure tire road bikes generally can only work on very firm or hard surface trails). If slopes are above 5%, then they should not be considered ADA compatible. If trails are less than 5’ in width, then bikes should not be allowed (counting the main path and clear areas on each

Chapter 5 | Recommendations and Action Plans

Figure 5-5: Proposed Park Access Projects from the Bike and Pedestrian Master Plan 2018

City of Goleta Parks, Facilities & Playgrounds Master Plan

Figure 5-6: Potential other Park Connection Enhancements

3 1

1 Available excess public ROW along Phelps Rd. could

be used to create a linear park and mini park that would connect Girsh Park and University Village Linear Park to Sperling Preserve trailhead. The unused ROW west of Canon Green Drive could become a mini-park. This will be consistent with the Ellwood-Devereux Coast Open Space and Habitat Management Plan.

2 A prefab pedestrian bridge should be considered

over San Jose Creek to provide convenient pedestrian and bicycle access to Armitos Park as well as to a bike path in Jonny D. Wallis Park. Both sides of the neighborhood would be connected and could walk to these parks. This is currently the Armitos Pedestrian and Bike Bridge Project under the City of Goleta’s Capital Improvement Projects. This will be consistent with the General Plan Policy CE 2.3.

3 Some form of access or pedestrian bridge would

be useful to connect residents on the east side of 217 to the proposed park and bike lanes and paths on the west side of 217. Costs may be prohibitive but the connectivity would provide improved access to a new park in this area. This should be considered for inclusion in the San Jose Creek Bike Path – Southern Extent Capital Improvement Project and will be consistent with the General Plan Policy CE 2.3.

Chapter 5 | Recommendations and Action Plans

side). Also, if there are abrupt corners in the trail, with thick vegetation blocking the full view of the upcoming trail, then bikes should not be allowed unless the trail is at least 8’ in width (including clear areas on each side).

specific facility without looking at the parking, path of travel, and use of the facility by those with physical challenges. A facility replacement requires that it is not only usable by those with disabilities, but it is also accessible.

5.3.2 Recommendation Goal 8: Improve direct access to and around parks for those that have mobility challenges.

Objective 8.3 Prioritize barrier removal amongst all other ADA requirements and commit to a dedicated percent of the City of Goleta’s financial resources to fix or remove these barriers on an annual basis.

Many in our society have extremely challenging physical limitations affecting mobility, but many more have varying degrees of physical capabilities and issues that may negatively affect their use of parks and recreation facilities. This plan included a Park Accessibility Compliance Assessment (see Appendix A) that was derived from site inspections performed at each of the City parks. Inspections were performed to verify compliance with both state code requirements as well as federal ADA Standards. Site verification included accessible parking, amenities such as picnic tables, playground and tot lots, drinking fountains, bench seating, tennis courts, and sport fields. Objective 8.1 Provide a more detailed review of the ADA issues and potential approaches to removal of these barriers.

A detailed review is needed to help determine the best way to remove barriers. These barriers should be tracked with each park renovation or addition of new park amenities. The resolution of ADA issues does not have to be immediate or extensive. However, the process of capital improvements, life cycle replacements, renovations and upgrades must take into account the need to remove existing barriers. Integrate known ADA issues into park planning, design, programming and budgeting. Compliance with ADA is best documented by integrating barrier removal into all facets of government review and capital investments.

Prioritization should take into account these four factors: 1) Is the barrier preventing an individual with a physical challenge from obtaining access to all of the recreational experiences? A key concept is that public programs and services, when viewed in their entirety, must be accessible to people with disabilities, but not all facilities must necessarily be made accessible. 2) Is there a potential safety hazard associated with the barrier that puts an individual at risk to harm, especially when fully-abled persons are not exposed to this same risk? 3) Although cost limitations are not considered a reason to not remove a barrier, if the solution requires damage to natural areas or cultural areas, then some exceptions can be made, or standards slightly decreased. When multiple experiences in one park setting are available, select the one solution that would be least damaging to natural and cultural resources and the least expensive to resolve as well. Focus on providing one equal experience at each park and not on all possible experiences. 4) Prioritize facilities that are heavily used or those that are likely to have the greatest number of persons with disabilities potentially using them.

Objective 8.2 Plan for consistent investments in ADA issues and barrier removals in all park and recreation planning, design and maintenance.

There is no “grandfather clause” in the ADA that exempts older facilities. However, the law strikes a careful balance between increasing access for people with disabilities and recognizing the constraints many public entities face. It allows entities confronted with limited financial resources to improve accessibility without excessive expense. A logical strategy is to identify facilities and amenities that are nearing the end of their life cycle or are in need of a great deal of repair. These project types clearly require the removal of the barrier and the adherence to local, state and federal ADA mandates. It is important to not concentrate on the

Park Entrance not ADA friendly 77

City of Goleta Parks, Facilities & Playgrounds Master Plan

Objective 8.4 Continually assess the current condition and if the city has above average financial resources in any given year, make sure that barrier removals are given their fair share or more of these resources.

A key ADA concept is that public entities have an ongoing obligation to make programs and services accessible to people with disabilities. This means that if many access improvements are needed, and there are insufficient resources to accomplish them in a single year, they can be spread out over time. It also means that rising or falling revenues can affect whether or not an access improvement can be completed in a given year. What might have been seen as an undue burden during an economic downturn could become possible when the economy improves and revenues increase. Thus, public entities should periodically reassess what steps they can take to make their programs and services accessible. Public entities should also consult with people with disabilities in setting priorities for achieving program access.

dogs that are timid or subject to harassment from larger more aggressive dogs. The City should consider the utilization of volunteer organizations that could be formed to assist in the monitoring and maintenance of each facility. Signage is essential for posting rules. Pick-up bags and trash cans as well as benches are needed. Objective 9.2 Enhance the enforcement of dog leash rules

While exploring opportunities for locations of designated off-leash dog parks, dog leash rules should be better enforced in the existing parks and open spaces for the safety of all users. The City has a contract with County Animal Services for the enforcement of off-leash dogs. The City may consider putting up more signs and organizing educational activities to help enhance the enforcement.

5.4 Recommendations that Help to Reduce Deficiencies This section indicates the types of facilities that are in the shortest supply and a strategy on how to implement or resolve the deficiencies. 5.4.1 Recommendation Goal 9: Address off-leash dog matters Objective 9.1 Initiate a study for the possibility of a designated dog park

There is significant interest for consideration of a dog park. A study should be initiated in order to determine the preferred location of permanent leash free dog parks within the city. The study will also need to determine the size, type, need for fencing and other possible amenities. For safety reasons, fencing should be required where dogs are allowed to be leash free. A fenced area also works for the benefit of dog owners since dogs can run off and potentially enter sensitive areas, playgrounds, roadways with cars or trails with runners, walkers and cyclists. Fencing will need to be non-obtrusive to the area’s residents and can generally be just 4 feet in height and should be well designed with wood framing, color chain link fabric or other mesh materials. The dog park should, be located away from a creek or water body, and be buffered away from natural or sensitive areas. It should be located where large multi-use fields are available so that adequate buffers can be made and for the exercise benefit of the dog and owner. The area should be divided for an area with small 78

Resident walking dog in the park

5.4.2 Recommendation Goal 10: Provide new or upgraded baseball fields (youth), softball fields (youth) and soccer fields (youth). After reviewing the park systems for available undeveloped space or underdeveloped space, consider adding infill sports fields to lands adjacent to existing parks that may be available for purchase: Develop a multi-purpose field at the existing Evergreen Park Renovate the athletic field at the Goleta Community Center Develop a multi-purpose field at Stow Grove Park Develop a second skate park in a convenient location Objective 10.1 Incorporate permanent youth baseball, softball, and soccer fields into the inventory.

Based on the existing facilities analysis, youth baseball, softball, and soccer fields within public parks are in short supply. The Park’s Division should develop additional fields to relieve pressure from over use of existing ones, as well as park areas that are not conducive to these sport activities but are currently being used for these purposes.

Chapter 5 | Recommendations and Action Plans

Objective 10.2 As a result of reviewing the entire parks systems for available undeveloped space or underdeveloped space, consider adding infill sports fields to the following existing parks:

Evergreen Park Goleta Community Center

Stow Grove Park Jonny D. Wallis Park

Objective 10.3 Review the entire park systems for available undeveloped space or underdeveloped space, consider adding infill sports fields to lands adjacent to existing parks that may be available for purchase.

At this point in time, there do not appear to be too many opportunities for adjacent park land acquisition. Further research will be required. Objective 10.4 After reviewing the entire parks systems for available undeveloped space or underdeveloped space as well as adjacent undeveloped lands, consider adding infill sports fields to new parks resulting from new development.

The shortage of citywide sports facilities cannot be put on the development in its entirety, but potentially available lands can be dedicated to the city in exchange for the developments fair share of park requirements. Objective 10.5 Annually update sports facility needs based on standards from the Needs Assessment or use national standards.

It is recommended that the City should carry out small additions of new sports facilities on an annual basis to reduce the current deficit. Annual investments should be applied to item 10.2 to 10.3 first.. 5.4.3 Recommendation Goal 11: Provide new or upgraded aquatic centers and recreation centers. Objective 11.1

Provide new public aquatic facilities and programs.

A community managed and operated pool should be considered a priority in this Master Plan, if funding sources or financial support is found. Funding for long term maintenance and operations needs to be factored in as well. The needs assessment, surveys and public participation at meetings verified the desire for a public pool. The pool (or aquatic center) should consider the inclusion of competition pools/lap pools, a wading pool, locker rooms, equipment room, entry lobby, recreational slides and splash-pads or spray-grounds. C0nsideration for a public swimming pool should include leisure, competitive, fitness and recreation opportunities in the programming for the facility. Additionally, consider collocating a recreation center/gymnasium with a swimming pool. It may also be a potential benefit to consider an aquatics center at the Goleta Valley Community

Center, given its central location, existing infrastructure and the under-served community that this area represents. Objective 11.2 Upgrade convenience and customer service amenities to existing facilities to increase usability and access to more.

The Division should investigate opportunities to add shade, storage buildings, security enhancements, lighting, benches, and other amenities appropriately at existing facilities as it is making improvements and augmenting existing facilities. These improvements may increase capacity or use levels if they are offered. Objective 11.3 Create additional recreational facilities and amenities at existing parks.

The prioritized facilities should be based on needs assessment and a higher priority put on those amenities that have the greatest citywide deficiency. Based on the existing facilities analysis and the LOS analysis, recommendations have been made for what types of facilities are needed. It is recommended that the City include the addition of these facilities and any ancillary improvements that will need to be done in order to accommodate these facilities in the Capital Improvement Program for design and implementation. Objective 11.4 Identify where existing missing amenities can go as part of new park development.

Once it has been decided that a new park is needed or that a park is to be partially built/funded by a development, then consider having the Master Plan work into the overall design the missing facilities that are deficient either in the immediate area or citywide. Objective 11.5 Maintain and improve existing facilities, parks, trails, and open spaces.

The Division should evaluate the condition of existing parks and trails on a routine basis. Evaluation methods should be developed to measure the quality of maintenance. Training of staff to guarantee maintenance up to City standards should happen on a continuous basis. Maintenance staffing should be observed and corrected as needed to meet present need for services, and an employment strategy for upcoming growth should be established. Oncea-month examinations of all facilities, parks, trails, and open spaces should be executed. Maintenance projects and annual maintenance demands should be undertaken on a consistent basis to decrease an accumulation of maintenance. Maintenance tasks should be prioritized and should be reviewed routinely. This should include developing costs, plans, and phasing recommendations. 79

City of Goleta Parks, Facilities & Playgrounds Master Plan

5.5 Recommendations to Increase Access to Nature and Open Space. This section suggests that part of the desire for recreation is formed around the desire to see and be part of nature. Open space and access to natural areas is an important aspect of any recreation plan, especially in areas with beaches, bluffs, creeks and mountains are prevalent like in Goleta. 5.5.1 Recommendation Goal 12: Preserve and make open space more accessible for the general public. Although not under the control of the City of Goleta, it may be possible to improve access trails and bike facilities to existing county, regional, state and federal lands. Objective 12.1 Work with other departments and landowners to preserve existing open space.

Preserving open space ranked the third highest priority in the statistically valid survey and scored highly in all the other public outreach. The City should work with the owners of open space, especially those that are public sector or land preservation organizations, to assist in protecting open space in areas where it is appropriate. These areas would include sensitive habitat, steep slopes, buffers to sensitive areas/uses, areas along streams, and areas recommended for trails. Objective 12.2 For new development seeking a discretionary permit, work with the applicant to preserve open space where appropriate.

It is recommended that City staff work with applicants of discretionary projects to preserve open space in beneficial areas. Preserving open space can be deemed as a community benefit to the project. Try to direct the project applicant’s site planning in a manner that allows for the preservation of open space and the presence of natural features. Discretionary approvals can be based on the preservation of natural features, and impacts or mitigations under CEQA can be minimized. Consider providing partial park credits for this space or consider providing density transfers or bonuses to accomplish the preservation of open space. 5.5.2 Recommendation Goal 13: Restore open space. In areas where open space exists but where this open space is disturbed, derelict or inaccessible, work with the agency or property owner to provide access if the City provides funds to enhance the overall space. A dedication of parkland or access easement would be required back from the private property owner, or an MOU from a related agency. 80

Objective 13.1 Where open space is already preserved or dedicated, look at ways of enhancing the habitat quality or the extent of habitat.

This can be done through access trails, interpretive facilities, revegetation, trash removal, and control fencing to keep people out of sensitive areas or private areas that need a buffer. When deciding locations for trails and interpretive facilities, areas of significant habitat value within open space systems will be avoided and protected. Objective 13.2 Where open space is already preserved or dedicated, look at ways of enhancing the publics use of the open space

On street parking may be required. Trails may be needed, or simply permission to access or the granting of easements. When deciding locations for trails, areas of significant habitat value within open space systems will be avoided and protected. Objective 13.3 Where open space is already preserved or dedicated, look at ways of enhancing the public’s understanding of nature.

This can be done by adding kiosks, signage and other interpretive facilities pointing out the sensitivity of these resources and the natural processes and values that many of the public are not aware of. When deciding locations for these interpretive facilities, areas of significant habitat value within open space systems will be avoided and protected. Objective 13.4 Where open space is already preserved, analyze site resources and plan for future sustainable preservation or infill.

Management plans for natural resource based parks are needed to protect these resources. General parkland should have park development master plans prepared in order to know the best location for infill amenities. Natural open spaces should have their own habitat management plans prepared in order to preserve, revegetate and maintain a high habitat value. For open spaces with existing habitat management plans, these plans will take precedence over this Parks Master Plan.

Chapter 5 | Recommendations and Action Plans

5.6 Recommendations that Help to Increase Funding of Parklands, Amenities and Programs Knowing what is needed is the first step in resolving park deficiencies. However, the most critical step is in identifying possible methods for paying for these facilities. 5.6.1 Recommendation Goal 14: Expand financial opportunities for park expansion, amenity infills or improved and accessible facilities.

Objective 14.2 Investigate supplementary funding sources.

The Division should continue to pursue funding strategies that provide alternative funds from the City’s General Fund:

Explore funding sources that strategically align with targeted services. Expand alternative funding for strategic initiatives through grants. Review and expand partnerships with Goleta Union School District and S.B. Unified School District. Explore additional Community Partnerships. Explore the opportunities for (and use of) sponsorships. Continue to apply for and use CDBG funding. Submit on the State of California’s Proposition 68 Parks, Environment and Water Bond for grant funding. Consider a bond referendum for expansion and operations of new facilities. Establish a state of the industry Cost Recovery and Financial Sustainability Program. Exploration of a foundation or “Friends of Goleta Parks.”

The best technique for implementing public park and recreation facilities is the leveraging of available funds against grants and other sources that require matching or in-kind services.

Objective 14.1 Create a best practice pricing model.

It is important for the City to develop a resource allocation and pricing philosophy that reflects the values of the community and the responsibility it has to the community. This philosophy will be especially important if the City moves forward in the development of new programs and additional and/ or expanded facilities, and as it strives for sustainability and determines how much it is willing to subsidize operations with tax dollars.

Objective 14.3 Study prospects to grow private sponsorships.

One means of accomplishing this goal is applying a process using an industry tool called the “Pyramid Methodology.” This methodology develops and implements a refined cost recovery philosophy and pricing policy based on current “best practices” as determined by the mission of the agency and the program’s benefit to the community and/or individual. Critical to this philosophical undertaking is the support and understanding of elected officials, and ultimately, citizens. Whether or not significant changes are called for, the agency wants to be certain that it is philosophically aligned with its residents. The development of the core services and cost recovery philosophy and policy is built on a very logical foundation, using the understanding of who is benefiting from recreation services to determine how the costs for that service should be offset.

The Division currently has sponsorship arrangements for special events, programs, and activities, and it should continue to explore additional sponsorship opportunities and build on existing sponsorships. All existing and future sponsorships should be evaluated to ensure that they are accurately portrayed in a signed sponsorship agreement. The Division should continue to grow sponsorship partnerships for special events, activities, and programs. Present and future sponsorships should be assessed to confirm that they are conforming to existing sponsorship policies and procedures. Objective 14.4 Track grant and charitable opportunities.

New grant opportunities for programming, facility improvements, and connectivity enhancements should be pursued at the federal, state, regional, and local levels. The Division may want to contemplate hiring a new position or contracting with a consultant capable of writing grants to explore, propose, and follow grants. The Proposition 68 grants are significant sources of possible funding if the projects can be planned and designed to address the grant evaluation criteria for either recreation, water quality or environmental enhancements in park systems. Ideally, a project that addresses all three areas is more likely to obtain grants than those that only address one of these three factors.

City of Goleta Parks, Facilities & Playgrounds Master Plan

5.7 Recommendations that Help to Increase Recreational Programs

Objective 15.1 Improve special event offerings.

Programs are a way of extending the use levels of park and recreation capital investments in facilities and amenities. It is also a good way to provide good will between the City of Goleta and its residents. Finally, active involvement in programs and special events also results in an engaged, healthy and active community.

Objective 15.2 Routinely analyze the usage of the programs, facilities, and services and make appropriate adjustments based on collected data.

5.7.1 Recommendation Goal 15: Increase partnerships for program delivery or have the city assume programs. Understanding core services in the delivery of parks and recreation services will allow the City to improve upon these areas while developing strategies to assist in the delivery of other services. The basis of determining core services should come from the vision and mission developed by the city and what brings the greatest community benefit in balance with the competencies of the division, current trends and the market. The City should pursue program development around the priorities identified by customer feedback, program evaluation process, and research. Those following criteria should be examined when developing new programs:

Need: outgrowth of a current popular program, or enough demonstrated demand to successfully support a minimal start (one class for instance) Budget: accounting for all costs and anticipated (conservative) revenues should meet cost recovery target established by the Department Location: appropriate, available and within budget Instructor: qualified, available and within budget Materials and supplies: available and within budget Marketing effort: adequate and timely opportunity to reach intended market, within budget

Further research into what types of programming would be successful needs to be done. Successful programs utilize continuous creative assessments, research, and planning. The City should establish a process that evaluates the success of current program offerings and criteria to determine if new program ideas should be instituted or if changes should be made to current programs. Decide if increased reliance on partnerships with non-profit organizations to deliver recreation programs is preferable to having the Department of Neighborhood Services and Public Safety create an expanded Parks and Recreation Division that can provide recreational programs, assuming additional funding sources are identified. 82

Using trends and demand data, the Division should add new special events that there is demand for and/or is trending in the parks and recreation field.

The Division should routinely measure the amount of participation in its facilities and services to determine the levels of usage and identify any trends in this usage. With this data, the Division can make appropriate changes to its supporting facilities or agreements with program providers to reflect this demand. Objective 15.3 Work with other service providers to enhance/develop programs to address changing needs and trends.

As needs and trends change, work with other recreation providers to supplement the needs of changing interests. Create agreements in writing with the service providers. Develop a web site where a member of the community can find out about all the other service providers’ recreational opportunities. Objective 15.4 Monitor the costs of programs and services.

The Division should augment partner provided programs and services as their demand increases. Staff should monitor resource allocation, spending, and cost recovery. Proper education of staff will help keep costs in-line. Program and services employees of partners should be routinely observed, and changes should be made to meet present needs. Future programs and services’ costs should be identified and analyzed. The City of Goleta awards grants through the Goleta City Grant Program of up to $5,000, for civic services, community projects, and public services that are of benefit to the residents of the City of Goleta. Eligible services and activities must be sponsored by non-profit organizations or governmental agencies. Categories of services and activities eligible for grants include:

Civic projects or services sponsored by Goleta community organizations Cultural activities (e.g. music, art, dance, recreation, etc.) Educational programs Special events Regional projects of benefit to Goleta residents Public services (e.g. senior services, youth programs, health services, etc.)

Chapter 5 | Recommendations and Action Plans

5.7.2 Recommendation Goal 16: Enhance division efficiencies.

Objective 16.3 Implement ranger program

Efficiencies could potentially free up funds for other recreational uses or they could be used to offer programs or improve existing facilities.

Protection of parks, open spaces and natural resources requires more field observation. Creating a ranger program will provide the needed weekend and evening patrolling of parks and open space to monitor after park hour activities.

Objective 16.1 Improve internal and external communication about division activities, special events, and services.

The Division utilizes a number of effective marketing tools and strategies actively promoting parks and recreation services in the community. These tools include email, social media, the Internet, and street banners. To continue to be successful, the Division should develop a marketing plan that will guide communication and promotion of its activities and facilities. Such a marketing effort will create greater awareness of city recreation offerings, and should include branding for the Division, use of social media, and development of the Division website and partnership opportunities. If developed, the Marketing Plan should be updated every five years, or as needed, and include marketing strategies that incorporate the efforts of partner departments, other local parks and recreation departments, and projects. As part of the Marketing Plan, the Division should evaluate wayfinding signage to facilities on roadway, pathways, and within parks. The Division should develop signage standards for parks, trails and providing measured distances and loops. Improved wayfinding signage will contribute to a greater sense of connectivity to parks, facilities, and pathways.

Sheltered Picnic Area in Jonny D. Wallis Park

Objective 16.2 Keep up with current demand by staffing properly.

As facilities, programs, and services are enhanced, it is necessary to have appropriate staffing levels. This may necessitate new positions. As recommendations in the Master Plan for expanded services, new facilities, bike paths and trails, parks, programs, and facility upgrades are implemented, it will be vital for the City to increase staffing levels as the Division’s responsibilities grow. This will require new positions in both recreation and maintenance. Additionally, the use of contractual part-time and seasonal employees should be considered to ensure that the practice is meeting the needs of the Division and the customers being served.

City of Goleta Parks, Facilities & Playgrounds Master Plan

5.8 Recommendations that Help to Achieve the City’s Sustainability Goals The City of Goleta has set climate change and sustainability goals to include 100% renewable energy by 2030. All plans and projects administered by the City of Goleta, should contribute to this goal either by lowering Greenhouse Gas (GHG) emissions, lowering Vehicle Miles Traveled (VMT), producing renewable energy, or helping to mitigate sea level rise by adapting infrastructure or other coastal conditions.

5.8.1 Recommendation Goal 17: Smart energy use Objective 17.1 Enhance Energy and Water Efficiency

Increase the use of energy efficient lighting, bathroom mechanical venting/passive venting and other elements that will help in saving energy should be utilized. Assess the potential reduction in the use of potable water by replacing it with reclaimed water for use in irrigation systems or other suitable operations. Wherever appropriate, consider the use of reclaimed water for plant material watering. Reclaimed water use in the flushing of toilets should also be considered.

Solar-powered LED lighting for Playground (Source: Google Image)

Objective 17.2 Promote Renewable Energy

Increase the use of renewable energy consumption or the generation of power from geothermal, wind or solar sources. All shade structures, parking lots and restroom buildings should consider the installation of solar PV panels in order to produce renewable energy. Either reverse metering or battery storage and local use should be considered. The generated power that is battery stored, could be used to light parks. Where electrical utilities are not available, consider the use of solar powered walkway lights as well as irrigation valves and controllers.

5.8.2 Recommendation Goal 18: Low impact park system Objective 18.1 Sequester Greenhouse Gasses (GHG)

The preservation of open space, natural parklands or planted parklands will help in carbon dioxide sequestration. In order to reduce GHG production, park project development and maintenance actions should minimize tree and vegetation removal and strive to add tree and vegetation in order to help sequester carbon dioxide and produce oxygen as well as to reduce urban heat island affects and heat gain through various dark surface Maintenance should also consider the removal of dead wood and high fuel materials in order to reduce wildland fires, that are large sources of carbon dioxide releases. This would not apply to locations where dead tree snags are encouraged as raptor perches. 84

LED lighting for Seating (Source: Google Image)

Chapter 5 | Recommendations and Action Plans

Objective 18.2 Mitigate Heat Island Effect

Concrete or natural surfaces should be used as much as possible in park surfaces especially for walkways and paths since asphalt surfaces produce heat and petrochemical off-gassing. New plantings should be used to help in the reduction of urban heat island gain, based on the shading of pavements or the avoidance of constructing pavements that increase heat gain. Objective 18.3 Tree Maintenance

In terms of long-term maintenance, tree removals should be minimized and if removal is essential, replacement ratios should consider the need to replace removed trees to be at least 50% of the biomass of the trees removed, satisfied by either replanting size or quantity of multiple tree plantings. This can be accomplished through the combination of quantity and size as well.

5.8.3 Recommendation Goal 19: Promote healthy lifestyle, active transportation and cultivate awareness

Solar Panel Shade Structure for Parking Lot (Source: Google Image)

Objective 19.1 Promote Active Transportation and Reduce Vehicle Miles Traveled (VMT)

Improving active transportation environment through providing improved trails, walkways, bike lanes, and signage to walk to or bike to City parks will reduce VMT, thereby reduce GHG production. Developments around existing parks should consider the addition of bike and pedestrian facilities that lead to the park. New park development should consider various entry points into the park that are the most convenient for pedestrian and bikes in order to assure access by walking or cycling. Private developments should consider the development of walking and bike facilities out to the far reaches of the development and if possible, further into the community to capture walking and biking all around the new park. In order to accommodate more access by bikes, bike racks should be included at all parks. Objective 19.2 Cultivate Awareness and Consensus

Consider the inclusion of educational programs and signage that will help to educate the public on climate change and other sustainability goals. Natural resource based parks, especially those located along the shoreline, should consider the use of educational interpretive signs discussing climate change, sustainable environmental practices, urban greening or renewable energy production as appropriate for that particular park and if logical or available locations where views or gathering areas may occur exist.

Solar Panel Shade Structure for Parking Lot (Source: Google Image)

City of Goleta Parks, Facilities & Playgrounds Master Plan

Table 5-2: Recommendation Prioritization Recommend ation Prioritization 5.2

5.3

5.4

5.5

5.6 5.7

5.8

Recommendations for Meeting Population Based Standards for Park, Amenities and Programs 1. Maximize active park acreage on public land without disturbing passive natural area. 2. Consider publicly funded park-lands to meet deficiencies. 3. Develop and implement JUA/MOU with schools districts for use of amenities on school sites. 4. Continue to work with developers on providing infill parks for future populations. 5. Consider other parks and alternative recreation facilities when determining park deficiencies in certain areas. 6. Consider non-Goleta parks and programs in determining population-based demand and requirements. Recommendations that Help Provide Better Access to Parks 7. Implement the Active Transportation Plan, with an emphasis on park connections. 8. Improve direct access to and around parks for those that have mobility challenges. Recommendations that Help to Reduce Deficiencies in Specific Needed Park Facilities and Amenities 9. Create a dog-friendly park system. 10. Provide new or upgraded baseball fields (youth), softball fields (youth), and soccer fields (youth). 11. Provide new or upgraded aquatic centers and recreation centers. Recommendations to Increase Access to Nature and Open Space. 12. Preserve and make open space more accessible for the general public. 13. Restore open space and enhance its use by the public. Recommendations that Help to Increase Funding of Parklands, Amenities and Programs 14. Expand financial opportunities for park expansion, amenity infills or improved and accessible facilities. Recommendations that Help to Increase Programmed Recreational Services 15. Either increase partnerships for program delivery or look at shifting recreational programming back to the City. 16. Enhance division efficiencies. Recommendations that Help to Achieve the City’s Sustainability Goals 17. Smart energy use. 18. Low impact park system. 19. Promote healthy lifestyle and cultivate awareness.

High Public Priority

Easy to Initiate

Short-term (< 2 yrs)

Mid-term (2-5 yrs)

Long-term (5-10 yrs)

x x

x x x x

x x

4 4

x x x

x x x x x x x

x x x x x

x x

x x x

x x

x x x

Bella Plans Vista Park Chapter 5 | Recommendations and Action

City of Goleta Parks, Facilities & Playgrounds Master Plan

5.9 Summary of Recommendations to Reduce Deficiencies and Equitable Distribution of Parklands and Amenities Based on the previously discussed options for improving the level of service, the geographic distribution and the addition of amenities, this section summarizes the improved scenario and Levels of Service that would exist if all of the proposed recommendations were put into place. Figure 5-11 displays the various types of opportunities that could occur throughout the City of Goleta. Color dots on previous maps and on Figure 11 include: existing parks # , recategorized parks # , potential new parks on public lands # , potential new parks on private lands that are likely to be heavily developed # , and potential public access to existing facilities at schools in areas where current geographic distribution is not ideal # . Table 5-2 includes a comparison of the maximum park acreage increases that can be expected from these additional recommendations. Table 5-3 reflects the reorganization of park categorization and newly recognized parks such as Decker’s Park and new parks in the Village at Los Carneros community. The table lists recreation facilities by park and park type as well as indicated the maximum number of acres that is reasonable to expect under this plan.

Armitos Park

Table 5-3: Future Park Type and Acreage Goleta Park Type

Exist Acres

Future Acres

Mini Parks

3.32

5.32

Neighborhood Park

23.38

37.52

Community Parks

70.57

Neighborhood Open Space

42.85

44.59

404.04

9.76

553.92

571.80

15.4

16.8

Regional Open Space Community Center Total Park Acreage per 1,000 Residents (2035)

National Average

10.1

Ave. for cities with similar size (20k-50k)

9.6

Goleta Park Goal per 1,000 Residents

Chapter 5 | Recommendations and Action Plans

52 51

41 49

School MOU Opportunities Brandon Elementary

1.0

49 Ellwood Elementary

0.6

50 Kellogg Elementary

1.2 1.2

Public Land Opportunities

41 Potential Neighborhood Park

Acres 1.1

Private Land Opportunities

42 Potential Neighborhood Park

1.1

45 Potential Neighborhood Park

2.5

43 Potential Creek Trail

1.7

46 Potential Mini Park

51 La Patera Elementary

1.0

1.6

2.0

47 Potential Mini/Neighborhood Park

52 Goleta Valley Jr. High/S.B. Charter

2.5

53 Dos Pueblos High

6.5

54 Mountain View Elementary

1.6

44 Potential Trail/Linear Park

89 Figure 5-7: Recommended Park Master Plan

City of Goleta Parks, Facilities & Playgrounds Master Plan

Table 5-4: Future Recreation Facilities (Existing + Proposed)

* Note: Newly constructed park completed during the final stages of this master plan

Chapter 5 | Recommendations and Action Plans

5.9.1 Future Recreation Facilities

Table 5-5: Future Recreation Facilities Level of Service (Existing + Proposed)

For future recreation facilities, Deckers Park and the Village at Los Carneros Park have been included in the LOS analysis since they have not been included in previous park inventory efforts. Deckers Park is a privately owned but publicly accessible neighborhood park located in the Cabrillo Business Park. It functions as a public park and should therefore be counted as a public park. Although the park is not close to any residential land uses, daytime park uses from the nearby commercial and employment centers have easy access to this asset. As mixed use development is being completed in this area and populations come in to the area between Hollister Avenue and U.S. Route 101, the park will help to provide daytime park and recreation needs for users working in this area or from new nearby neighborhoods. Thus, Deckers Park should be counted towards analysis standards in future conditions. Village at Los Carneros Park is a mini park recently finished within the new residential development. It is also privately owned but publicly accessible. Table 5-3 provides a summary of all existing and future parks and adds the proposed joint use facilities as well. Anticipated amenities in these new park areas have also been analyzed and some suggested amenities based on geographic distribution and prioritized deficient amenities have also been suggested. Table 5-4 provides a summary of the amenities and determine future deficiencies or surpluses.

City of Goleta Parks, Facilities & Playgrounds Master Plan

Table 5-6: Future LOS Summary after Recommendations have been Implemented

Table 5-7: Future Park Geographic Distribution Park Service Area

# Population Served 2017

% Population Served 2017

# Population Served 2035

% Population Served 2035

15-Minute Walking Distance (Neighborhood Parks)

22,858

74.1%

27,683

82.1%

15-Minute Walking Distance (All Active Parks)

23,455

76.0%

28,063

83.3%

15-Minute Walking Distance (All Parks)

25,654

83.2%

28,686

85.1%

5-Minute Driving Distance (Community Parks)

27,086

87.8%

30,046

89.2%

5-Minute Driving Distance (All Parks)

28,481

92.3%

32,381

96.1%

Population Base

2017

30,847

2035

33,700

Table 5-5 calculates the future population based standards, with the intent of reducing deficiencies as much as possible. Note slight adjustments in the park standard per 1,000 population has been made per park category, but the overall standard remains at 10 acres per 1,000 population. Table 5-6 shows how access to the future parks has been increased for 2035 Goleta populations, given the goals of a 15-minute walk and a 5-minute drive. Where access has been improved based on the recommendations in this Chapter and based on the implementation of the Bike and Pedestrian Master Plan, the access analysis has calculated the increase in populations that will benefit from these improvements.

Chapter 5 | Recommendations and Action Plans

Although the population forecast shows a 9% increase in population from 2017 to 2035, Goleta’s park service coverage can achieve great improvements if all of the recommendations are implemented. The most prominent increases are percentage of population served within a 15-minute walkshed of neighborhood parks and active parks.

Figure 5-8a: Future Active Parkshed Gaps using 15-min walk

As is shown in Figure 5-8, the majority of parkshed gaps where there is no active park within a 15-minute walk or 5-minute drive, are eliminated by implementing recommendations proposed in this chapter. The remaining parkshed gaps are mostly commercial land use areas. Our study does not show any feasible opportunities or solutions under current circumstances in several areas that remain as gaps. In the future, if any developable land occurs in these area, especially those with residential uses, the city should consider requiring park fees or constructed parks as a condition of approval for these developments.

Figure 5-8b: Future Active Parkshed Gaps using 5-min drive

Figure 5-8: Future Active Parkshed Gaps 93

City of Goleta Parks, Facilities & Playgrounds Master Plan

5.10 Maintenance Guidelines A park system benefits from park maintenance standards and practices that provides clear guidance for the maintenance of park sites. Properly developed standards can form the foundation for enhanced operations and quality maintenance practices. Park and recreation facilities within the City of Goleta are found to be maintained in a variety of conditions from poor to very good, with an overall rating of “weak but acceptable operating standard” by the National Recreation and Park Association (NRPA). Generally speaking, deferred maintenance needs are commonly found within park structures, facilities, and buildings. Specific needs include graffiti removal that is found regularly on structures in several parks, the need for better maintenance of bathroom structures, and trip-hazards resulting from large cracks and lifts in concrete pavement. The Open Space Element of the General Plan, under Section OS 6.10 states: “Design and Management of Public Parks and Open Space. The City should ensure that park, recreation, and open space facilities are designed and managed in a manner that is consistent with protection of the ecology of the natural systems at each park site and that will serve the needs of the intended user groups. The following criteria shall apply to the design and management of public parks and open space areas: a. Wherever feasible and appropriate, landscaping should emphasize native and drought-tolerant, noninvasive species that will reduce maintenance costs and water use and be supportive of wildlife habitats. b. To the extent feasible, the City shall maintain parks and open space areas without the use of herbicides, pesticides, chemical fertilizers, and other toxic substances. Herbicide use is restricted within 100 feet of the top-of-bank of any watercourse in parks and open space to those herbicides approved by the U.S. EPA. c. The types of improvements and facilities at each site should be based on the recreation and leisure needs of the targeted user groups and the physical opportunities and constraints of the site. d. Improvements should provide for convenient access by pedestrians from the adjacent neighborhood areas. e. The design of improvements shall provide for maximum visibility of the park from public streets and incorporate measures to assure adequate security and safety for users. 94

f. Provision of lighting shall be limited to the minimum needed for the types of uses planned in order to reduce light pollution and glare. Lights shall not be directed upward or into adjacent habitat. g. Adequate off-street parking to serve the intended uses shall be provided in order to minimize the burden placed on on-street parking in the neighborhood.” High priority landscape maintenance procedures need to include: Turf areas that are in non-usable conditions; The need to address improper mowing of turf areas and maintenance strips along trails; Pruning, trimming and thinning in and around shrubs; and The controlling of weeds in open spaces that do not have an existing site specific habitat management plan.

Based on interviews with park maintenance staff, overgrown areas do seem to contribute to homeless issues. This issue is particularly relevant to several parks that contain trees and shrubs along the outer fences, and where tree growth is found throughout Environmentally-Sensitive Habitat Areas (ESHA). It is essential that maintenance techniques and monitoring requirements be different in all open space areas that contain sensitive species, natural vegetation or surface water resources. One way to avoid environmental damage from maintenance activities is to designate open space areas as open space preserves, natural open space areas and general open space. Guidelines for each type should be customized but should always consider the following typical items for maintenance personnel and future rangers. These would include:

Damage resulting from off-leash dog use or equestrian uses Use of drones near areas of sensitive species Motorized vehicles other than emergency or maintenance vehicles in parks Open fires or signs of open fires that have occurred in the past Trail deterioration or volunteer trails created in areas where they are not desired Presence of invasive species found in natural areas Damage of native species from improper maintenance techniques.

The Lake Los Carneros Natural and Historical Preserve and the Ellwood Mesa/Sperling Preserve Open Space have their own site specific habitat management plans. These plans take precedence over this Master Plan for the details pertaining to the management of natural resources. Other park or open spaces may have the need for specific habitat management plans, and those plans should be considered as guidance for those parks.

Chapter 5 | Recommendations and Action Plans

5.10.1 Maintenance and Operational Guideline 1: Maintenance Level of Service In an effort to increase the public’s use of the park system, it is worthwhile to consider how to improve the perception and reality of park maintenance levels. There are many potential reasons for the public’s weak impression of the park system. There are some valid reasons why the level of maintenance may be below expectations. These reasons include lack of funding, unrealistic expectations on behalf of the public, City-wide priorities that compete for funding, maintenance operations suffering because staff is utilized for events/ programs, contracted maintenance firms under-performing, or perhaps a combination of many of the above. Below are some suggestions for potential methods of improving maintenance. Efficiencies in maintenance can be improved if the existing parks are grouped into tiers for parks with similar levels of maintenance requirements. A tiered approach that classifies parks into groups based upon maintenance needs could improve consistency in the level of maintenance service throughout the park system because it would help maintenance companies understand which types of parks require more (or less) maintenance. Providing specific, tierbased level of maintenance service requirements which include frequencies of trash pickup, and bathroom cleanings to contracted companies could also help highlight that level of service expectations differ from park to park. For the purposes of the Goleta parks system, these maintenance tiers could correspond to the Goleta Park Types as outlined in the Goleta Parks and Playgrounds Master Plan (Section 3.2, Figure 3-5) based on park size, function, and character. In this scheme, community parks require a higher level of maintenance effort, maintenance frequency, or maintenance expertise, and therefore could be placed in the highest “tier” of parks, whereas mini and neighborhood parks that require less maintenance would comprise the lowest tier.

However, maintenance needs may be different than those categories based on park size, function, and character. It may be helpful to include middle tiers that encompasses special needs, such as Nectarine or Armitos Parks, which are small neighborhood parks, yet have specific issues related to graffiti, used needles and bottles, and the homeless populations that occupy those spaces. Also, more passive use parks such as the neighborhood and regional open spaces may require more maintenance depending upon the type of land management desired. Whichever tier system chosen, the tier systems should ultimately be decided by the parks’ maintenance leadership based on similar levels of maintenance. Because written maintenance standards appear to only exist within maintenance contracts, taking verbiage from these contracts to craft a written set of maintenance guidelines available for the parks system to reference may be beneficial. Maintenance standards that may exist in contracts may unintentionally lead to a select few fully understanding the maintenance goals and expectations for each park. Creating a set of written maintenance standards that Parks and Open Space staff have access to could allow for a greater percentage of City staff that may review and understand the maintenance expectations of each park (or tier of parks), thus creating a shared vision for the level of maintenance the parks should have while simultaneously enlisting a larger number of staff to help identify any potential maintenance deficiencies. When maintenance operations are contracted to outside companies, often the level of quality control is lost as compared to in-house staff that reports directly to City staff. As such, it is recommended that as specific areas are targeted for improved maintenance operations, it may be advisable to bring these operations in-house under the direct supervision of Public Works Department. Additionally, for special events and programs, many municipalities utilize in-

City of Goleta Parks, Facilities & Playgrounds Master Plan

house staff to supplement the level of cleaning/trash removal that contracted maintenance companies provide. While this improves the experience of the special event/program at one park site, pulling staff away from their typical duties may lead to maintenance neglect at other park sites.

Increased quality assurance measures help objectively identify what is working well and also identify areas for improvement. The end goal should be the further refinement of maintenance operations that ensure that the public’s experience of a park consistently meets or exceeds their expectations.

It is recommended that staff continue investing in their professional development through CPRS Maintenance Management School or other similar courses, or by prioritizing networking with park maintenance staff from nearby municipalities. Opportunities to share the successes maintenance staff are experiencing while simultaneously learning new ideas about how other municipalities are addressing similar challenges may refine the maintenance processes of park maintenance.

5.10.3 Maintenance and Operational Guideline 3: Technology

5.10.2 Maintenance and Operational Guideline 2: Quality Assurance It is understood that park supervisors review the maintenance of the parks they oversee. “Secret shopper” tools, which are strategies to measure quality of service in a variety of industries, can be used to evaluate the Public Works Department internally. Additionally, it would be prudent for the public to have access to a customer care platform where park issues can be reported to park maintenance staff. One additional measure that is recommended is to provide dedicated staff to perform quality assurance reviews of each park site periodically. Higher maintenance-tier parks that experience frequent use may need to be reviewed six times a year, whereas parks that experience less use may only need to be reviewed three times a year. The frequency of park quality assurance reviews should align with the tiered category, for example, six reviews for top tier parks, four reviews for middle tier parks, and three reviews for the lowest tier of parks. The review checklist should be thorough and should include categories such as, but not limited to, landscape and irrigation, sports field wear-and-tear, building interior and exterior cleanliness, playground/site furnishings conditions, trash removal status, park staff/maintenance, staff friendliness, and general park aesthetics. Having dedicated staff responsible for quality assurance helps protect against the potential for subjectivity during the review process and developing objective, quantifiable review sheets will increase quality. Having the same staff member review all park sites, helps standardize the results. Reviewing sites using multiple different staff members that use subjective evaluation methods should be avoided as it leads to distorted findings. 96

Technology continues to change how we communicate as a culture, so it is important to regularly evaluate how well the current methods of communicating to, and receiving feedback from, the public are working. Online public input systems that integrate numerous different aspects of parks and recreation work including, but not limited to, league scheduling, reservations, rentals, passes, and registrations are becoming more robust each year. The City of Goleta utilizes the City Assist website to interact with members of the public on a variety of issues, from overgrown foliage and abandoned vehicles, to questions directly addressed to City Council. City Assist is monitored by a dedicated city staff member who follows each request to ensure that it is directed to the correct department and is completed in a timely fashion. The program can be expanded to include additional requests types as the City continues to grow. As new sports lighting projects are designed, it is important to specify a lighting control system that can be controlled remotely as well as be used to connect and control existing lighting systems. This form of master controls can save operational money and improve on energy use as well. Similar technologies exist for master irrigation control systems that can be controlled remotely and can be made to monitor leaks, efficiencies of application and overall water usage. With this information available, field repairs can be made that are beneficial in saving water and identifying problems early on, prior to water losses or erosion related damage. As Goleta moves toward reservation program software, any future lighting system should be integrated.

5.10.4 Maintenance and Operational Guideline 4: Safety A formal written process is recommended to be developed for how to evaluate and make important decisions which directly relate to the publics health, safety, and welfare regarding when park infrastructure is damaged. If a portion of a park site does need to be shut down due to safety concerns, dated

Chapter 5 | Recommendations and Action Plans

photographic documentation showing installed warning flagging, barricades, or signage should be obtained. It is important to review the processes and After-Action Reports with management staff to consider if opportunities for improvement exists. Such reports provide a glimpse into how well staff is trained to respond to situations using sound judgment. From a public relations standpoint, when a portion of a park site needs to be shut down for maintenance, it is beneficial to provide signage that includes Goleta Parks and Open Space branding and a number that can be called and a website address, if the public has questions regarding the closure. The number called will connect to a voice message that provides information regarding the start date of the closure, the reason for the closure and the work being performed, the anticipated opening of the site, and a “thank you” from the Parks and Open Space department for the publics patience. This “Frequently Asked Questions” voice message provides transparency for the public and frees up staff to perform their typical job responsibilities and spend less time answering the common questions.

5.10.5 Maintenance and Operational Guideline 5: Accessibility Park maintenance staff that oversees construction should receive training in U.S. Access Board/State of California accessibility standards. Some municipalities undertake small park infrastructure renovation projects, and these projects typically don’t go through a formal permitting process where accessibility review takes place. As such, the maintenance staff that oversees these projects needs to be able to identify if a proposed solution adheres to accessibility codes. Alternatively, the Public Works Department can have one staff member trained in accessibility review and then set up a process so that these renovation projects are reviewed by the trained staff member prior to ordering materials or commencing with construction activities. A third option is to simply hire a third-party accessibility consultant to review proposed projects prior to construction. While this additional step in the process may require time and money, developing park infrastructure that does not meet current accessibility codes and subsequently being required to replace this infrastructure or dealing with litigation that arises because of non-compliant construction is much costly.

Some accessibility standards that maintenance staff can have a direct hand in replacing include benches, trash receptacles, picnic tables, grills, camping facilities, picnic facilities, and viewing areas, as described in the U.S. Access Board Standards for Outdoor Developed Areas. Additionally, training key staff in Crime Prevention Through Environmental Design (CPTED) principles will also benefit Goleta Parks.

5.10.6 Maintenance and Operational Guideline 6: Sustainability After protocols have been established to protect the Environmentally Sensitive Habitat Areas in several of the Goleta parks, maintenance staff should be trained on how to protect the resources and provided maps highlighting these locations. This information will need to be repeated at a regular frequency (i.e. annually) due to staff turnover, and newly hired staff should also be provided with a map/list of the natural resource locations and the appropriate training. Since Goleta Parks and Open Space maintains landscape areas using contracted maintenance companies, this same natural resources protection information will need to be provided to maintenance contractors at reoccurring intervals. Protecting sensitive natural resources with third party maintenance contractors will require diligence considering new maintenance staff that is unfamiliar with the nuances of site specific natural resource protection will frequently be used to maintain the park. Inconspicuous signage that informs maintenance staff while minimally impacting the natural experience of the park may be useful. Once natural resource protection protocols are in place, it is advisable to include them in maintenance contracts so that contractors can be commended for their good performance, or alternatively, held accountable for their negligence. In general, park projects should utilize landscape plant species adapted to Goleta’s climate; those that require minimal supplemental irrigation, fertilization, or pruning once established. Existing parks which contain irrigated turf areas that experience infrequent use could be converted into native grass areas or low water use planting beds to conserve water. If potable water is currently being used to irrigate landscapes, an analysis of reclaimed water utility infrastructure may reveal opportunities to retrofit existing park irrigation systems and connect to adjacent reclaimed water utilities. To protect Goleta’s water bodies, staff should be trained in Integrated Pest Management (IPM) principles which effectively control pests while also minimizing the application of toxic chemicals. Staff that oversees construction 97

City of Goleta Parks, Facilities & Playgrounds Master Plan

projects where soil is disturbed should take National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) training courses to gain an understanding of stormwater best management practices and ensure soils from construction related activities are not transported away from the construction site. Where irrigated turf currently exists directly adjacent to water bodies, consider providing a vegetated buffer with plants/grasses that do not require fertilization between the turf and the water body to help protect the water body from eutrophication. For the older parks within the Goleta Parks and Open Space system, long range budgeting for complete replacement of aging facilities may be warranted. While it can be difficult to secure funding to completely rebuild an existing facility, good record keeping regarding the costs to address outdated facilities in need of replacement using a “band aid” maintenance strategy can be helpful. Simultaneously casting a new, energy efficient, exciting vision for new facilities may prove successful, especially if the vision for the park replacement is master planned utilizing a phased approach. Lastly, an Energy Audit of existing facilities will help identify areas where energy efficiency can be improved and may also provide useful information that helps prioritize the replacement of the least energy efficient parks.

5.10.7 Maintenance and Operational Guideline 7: Develop a Maintenance Manual Below are specific recommendations for creating a maintenance manual for the City of Goleta, as paraphrased from the 2015 Needs Assessment Study. Develop a Maintenance Manual that details park maintenance and operation tasks on a daily, weekly, and monthly basis. The Maintenance Manual should include existing specifications as well as: Outline clearly written maintenance objectives and frequency of care for each amenity based on the desired outcomes for a quality visitor experience in maintaining the parks for safety, aesthetics, recreation and sustainability including:

» » » » »

Landscape bed design, planting and maintenance standards Landscape turf and right of way mowing and maintenance standards Tree and shrub planting and maintenance standard Equipment maintenance and replacement standard Integrated Pest Management Plan

Formalize and schedule park facility inspections including playgrounds, specialized facilities such as skate parks, high-use visitor areas and buildings. Design standards for the development of park features such as sports fields, trails and buildings. Prepare a preventative maintenance plan developed for all park locations. Develop a life-cycle maintenance plan for buildings and park amenities. This should be built into daily operations, yearly capital improvement plans, and budgetary requests to maximize the value and useful life of these assets. Develop a soil management plan which includes regular soil testing in order to avoid issues with plant die-back and sparse or soggy turf conditions. The plan should include at a minimum:

Evaluate additional opportunities to “naturalize” many existing facilities, especially those built near and around creeks and other drainages. This could include the elimination of turf in areas of little public use and expansion of riparian and natural areas. Install a centrally-controlled irrigation system with soil sensors and an automated evapotranspiration (ET) based irrigation control and scheduling system that allows control of multiple sites to exact specifications and daily changes. Establish an Estimated Annual Water Use (EAWU) for various hydro-zones such as turf, sports fields and shrub beds Develop a process of evaluation and refinement to measure park maintenance success through established performance standards that should include:

Soil type and texture Infiltration rate pH Soluble salts and sodium Identification of limiting soil characteristics Planned soil management actions to remediation limiting soil characteristic

Establish park maintenance standards and frequency rates and tracking over several years Establish and track the cost per acre for each park and park type and tracking over several years Establish a minimum of training hours per year per employee with reevaluation of success of training and new requirements due to legislative changes

Chapter 5 | Recommendations and Action Plans

Equipment replacement schedules to be met and funded to the replacement outcomes desired

Develop a Sustainable Performance System with responsibility for the program handled by a dedicated Conservation Coordinator. The performance system should include at a minimum:

Native plant policy—eco-region Track utilities—partnership with utilities Recycling program Green waste composting Demonstration gardens Use of alternative energy sources Integrated Pest Management Program reflective of consistently changing needs of an urban park system

Habitat development beyond mitigation sites Community gardens Stormwater retention Human health, well-being and community values

Consider and establish policies appropriate for the installation and management of synthetic playing fields including:

Synthetic fields should be installed only at facilities which also have lights for night-time play Synthetic fields should be budgeted as a fixed asset and fully depreciated over the life of the “surface” A policy that states synthetic fields will be open for play except under extreme weather conditions

Girsh Park

City of Goleta Parks, Facilities & Playgrounds Master Plan

5.11 Signage Policy 5.11.1 Existing Conditions of Goleta Parks Signage Many of the heavily used parks in Goleta have signs of park names and/or rules at the entrances. Some of the larger community parks and open spaces such as Stow Grove Park and Los Carneros Natural and Historic Preserve, have signs for specific sections within the parks. Most of these signs are white metal panels often supported by wooden posts. Armitos Park, Evergreen Open Space, and Stow Grove Park have their own unique park name signs while other parks have either smaller name signs or no park signs at all. Some of the existing signs are relatively small and hard to read, and some signs are in poor condition. Not many of the signs have a consistent design, color or logo associated with them. Considering the fact that a relatively large percentage of the public do not know about all of the parks and the unique situation of the UCSB campus and other County of Santa Barbara lands around the City of Goleta, signage of parks is important and essential for improved perception and use of the parks.

Different styles of park identification signs

100

Dominant signs found in most parks

Identification signs with clear park names

Chapter 5 | Recommendations and Action Plans

Graffiti on a regulatory sign in Evergreen Open Space

Signs with too small of lettering

Older interpretive signs with limited graphics and color

Damaged signs and signs that are too small for clarity

This park entrance is not clear that it is a public park

Many parks have entrances with no identification signs

101

City of Goleta Parks, Facilities & Playgrounds Master Plan

5.11.2 Park Facilities Signage and Interpretive Guidelines This Master Plan suggests that the City adopt a four-tier general sign system, with adjustments for the different established park types. These guidelines are important for consistency, branding and appropriately sized signs that either identify the park or discuss regulatory or operational information signs. 1st Tier Monument Identification Signs: for the City’s most important Community and Regional Parks located at major entrances only and that should be viewed from major streets allowing for decision making of turns and wayfinding. 2nd Tier Entrance Identification Signs: for the main entrance of smaller Community and Neighborhood parks. These signs still need to be of sufficient size and clarity for wayfinding and turning decisions as seen from a vehicle. 3rd Tier Pedestrian Entrance Identification Signs: for Neighborhood Parks and Open Spaces where the entry is likely by foot or by bike. These signs can be used as the primary entry signs for smaller open spaces and neighborhood parks or as pedestrian level entry signs where vehicles are not the primary access point for the park. 4th Tier Informational Signs: This can include way-finding signs, kiosks and vertically-oriented pole signs to indicate minor entrances, edges of a park, or trails leading to a particular park.

1st Tier Monument Identification Signs

102

2nd Tier Entrance Identification Signs

On the following page are some general samples of what the 4 tiers of signs generally look like. Figure 5-12 provides a set of design samples of the suggested signage family. Please note that rather than the absolute design of each sign, these images are intended to represent the hierarchy, function and relative size of the interpretive materials. They do not dictate design details that should be used for each of the signage types. All four sign types should have a unifying design elements, most notably materials and the Goleta City Logo. Other unifying design elements can include, shape, height, font styles and general form. These are unifying elements. However, some uniqueness should be considered for each signage tier type as well as the park site itself. Generally the name of the park and the specific color of parts of the sign, should be looked at as the differentiating factors of design. This Master Plan suggests that the signage design incorporate key elements such as Goleta Parks logo, a park specific icon and a unique type-style and color of certain highlights of the overall sign. The materials should include concrete as base elements or pads with wood elements coming out of the concrete. Perhaps metal flat iron or other painted or metal with a patina should be around the base of the sign and at all joinery. Specific signage design styles may reference the example photos below and on the following pages.

3rd Tier Entrance Identification Signs

4th Level Informational Signs

Chapter 5 | Recommendations and Action Plans

CAL COSTAL TRAIL

Figure 5-9: Park Signage Samples

1.59 MILES

1st through 3rd Tier Identification Signs

LOS LOS CARNEROS CARNEROS NATURAL NATURAL0.5 AND AND HISTORIC HISTORIC PRESERVE PRESERVE MILES To

Viewpoint

3rd Tier Entrance Signs

1.59 MILES

4th Tier Informational Signs

2nd Tier Entrance Sign

NECTARINE NECTARINE PARK PARK

CAL COSTAL TRAIL

1st Tier Monument Sign

EMERALD EMERALD TERRACE TERRACE COMMUNITY COMMUNITY PARK PARK

0.5 MILES To

Viewpoint

Trail/Milestone Identification Wayfinding Sign

Interpretive Kiosk with Handout Pockets

Interpretive Wood Post

Free Standing Interpretive Wood Post

Interpretive Kiosk with Shade

103

City of Goleta Parks, Facilities & Playgrounds Master Plan

5.11.3 Example of Implementation As an example of how the hierarchy of signs should be used, Lake Los Carneros has been used to show the typical signage treatments envisioned at all parks. Currently, there is no official entrance feature at Lake Los Carneros. The park is accessible mostly through a vehicle entrance next to a county fire station, where there is only an entrance sign for the fire station and a small sign post for the museum. Hikers and bikers can access the park from Covington Way and La Patera Lane. Many on-line reviewers speak highly of the park, calling it a “hidden gem.” A clear signage system can surely make it easier for visitors to find and navigate, making this park more accessible and enjoyable for citizens and visitors. According to the Lake Los Carneros Trail Management Plan (2009), SBTC recommended the development of small, unobtrusive kiosks at each of the main entrances to provide users with basic information regarding use of the park and interpretive materials about the park relating to the area’s wildlife and natural features. Figure 5-13 is a map of the park from the SBTC document. The purple circles with letters represent recommended locations for different type of signs from the signage family introduced.

104

Figure 5-10: Park Map (2009)

E E

F E

B E

Chapter 5 | Recommendations and Action Plans

LOS LOS CARNEROS CARNEROS NATURAL NATURAL AND AND HISTORIC HISTORIC PRESERVE PRESERVE

0.5 MILES To

Viewpoint

1st Tier Monument Sign Main entrance with parking and other attractions on N Los Carneros Rd; currently no park name sign exists

3rd Tier Entrance Identification Sign As an official entry area for pedestrians, a sign is needed to identify the park and the entrance

4th Tier Wayfinding Informational Signs Various trail markers can help to identify trails and to suggest mileage and destinations

LOS LOS CARNEROS CARNEROS NATURAL NATURAL AND AND HISTORIC HISTORIC PRESERVE PRESERVE

2nd Tier Entrance Identification Sign Another paved entrance with unofficial parking on N La Patera Ln; currently no park name sign exists

3rd Tier Entrance Identification Sign Another version of how this 3rd Tier could be make to work along a trail entrance

4th Tier Visitor Kiosk with Handout Pockets Interpretive signs can exist where a resource is seen or where a walking entrance enters special park areas

105

City of Goleta Parks, Facilities & Playgrounds Master Plan

5.12 Recommendations for Utilizing Reclaimed Water for Parks The use of reclaimed water for park irrigation purposes is both a logical and sustainable option that should be considered for all parks. This general goal, however, should be applied in a comprehensive manner. Reclaimed water use can help to save on costs (less per unit cost), although the actual costs may be higher than the costs of using potable water. Factors affecting financial feasibility include capital costs of distribution, retrofitting, active water management practices as well as the cost of water to the City Parks Department. The extension of reclaimed water infrastructure is often not justifiable based only on water costs for a park system. However, if capital funding for reclaimed water infrastructure is going to occur in a particular geographic area, and a park can take advantage of this subsidized, droughttolerant, alternative source, it should be considered.

5.12.1 Three-Phase Screening Process There are a number of factors that need to be taken into account to decide if a park should switch its irrigation systems from potable to reclaimed, including:

Adjacency to existing recycled water distribution lines Timing/status of park in planning, design and renovation schedules Soil capability in respect to drainage and retention capability of existing soils Horticultural capability/salt-tolerance levels of existing or future plantings Use capability in respect to proximity to passive, active, or play or picnic areas Current or planned irrigation systems and their compatibility with reclaimed water

To determine whether a given park is suitable for implementing a reclaimed water irrigation strategy, a comprehensive, three-phase prioritization screening process is recommended. This is to align with the natural progression of park planning and design, but also so that critical feasibility factors are determined early in the process. Table 5-8 through Table 5-10 show a methodology that should be used, in sequential order from Phase 1 through Phase 3. Scores are achieved at each phase per park; if the minimum score is reached for a phase, the park can be moved to the next screening phase for further consideration. If the total for the park reaches at least 3 points for phase three, it is recommended to consider the project for reclaimed water irrigation. If the screening is performed for multiple parks, simply prioritize the highest scoring parks out of the list. 106

Screening Process Phase 1 is an initial System Planning effort at taking into account all parks in the City of Goleta. If the points entered in the form for a particular park are 3 or greater from Phase 1, it can be considered for moving it to Phase 2. Phase 2 recommends a park to be planned for reclaimed use if it has a 4 or higher point summary based on if the park is new or if parts of the park are new expansions or if the existing irrigation system needs a major retrofit. Phase 3 should only be considered after the reclaimed water access requirements in Phase 1 have been met and that the park is considered a good candidate based on the park status (existing or proposed) or one that is with a well-drained soil. Phase 3 factors are not considered feasibility factors but may provide an understanding of how capable or compatible the park is based on plants already in the park and on the type of existing irrigation system the park has operating.

Chapter 5 | Recommendations and Action Plans

Screening Process 1: Initial System Planning

Reclaimed Water Access: By far, distance from supply factors are the most critical metrics in making these decisions, therefore, it is recommended that access to existing (or planned) distribution of reclaimed water is considered first (see Table 5-8). If reclaimed water already exists in a portion of the park, then it should be used throughout the park. If reclaimed water is available at the edges of a park, then this should be a high priority park to consider for this use. Even if the project is within 200 feet to 1,000 feet, if allowable, it may be feasible to extend the distribution lines or provide a connector valve and meter and run a pressurized line to the park site. However, much beyond 1,000 feet the financial feasibility starts to become an infeasible choice. If reclaimed water is proposed in the area around an existing park that will bring reclaimed water to or near the park within a 3-year time-frame, it is probably within the window of the need to plan for it. However, if it is greater than 1,000 feet or beyond 3 years for access to reclaimed water, then other parks should be considered as a higher priority. This phase serves as a first-pass filter, since it involves the highest cost which determines the feasibility of considering irrigation for a park in the first place.

The City and its water provider, though having not implemented, have also considered reclaimed water reuse possibilities with recharging its potable water supplies. Although reclaimed water delivery and use is currently about a third the capacity of available supplies, there may be some potential minor impacts to the available reclaimed water supply. While no expansion is planned of the reclamation distribution system (per Dan Brooks, Chief Engineer, Goleta Water District, 1/8/2019), note that this phase of the screening process can accommodate future planned expansion in 3, 5, or 10 years. An analysis map showing distances to and from parks to reclamation lines is provided here. This map includes a list of the parks within an acceptable distance to recycled water distribution and their points scored on the first phase of the screening process (see Figure 5-115-14). Note that the parks visible on this map only include public parks owned and managed by the City of Goleta, since these parks will be considered for a reclamation irrigation strategy. If the reclaimed water line runs through the park itself, such as Bella Vista Park, then the score achieves a very high score of 10.

Table 5-8: Screening Process Phase 1: Initial System Planning SCREENING PROCESS PHASE 1: INITIAL SYSTEM PLANNING Reclaimed Water Access

SCORING POTENTIAL

Reclaimed Water at Park

Reclaimed Water Adjacent to Park (less than 200’)

Reclaimed Water Near Park (200’ to 500’)

Reclaimed Water Near Park (500’ to 1,000)

Far from Reclaimed Water (>1,000’)

Will be Serviced by Reclaimed Water in 3 years

Will be Serviced by Reclaimed Water in 5 years

Will be Serviced by Reclaimed Water in 10 years

1 SUBTOTAL

RECLAIMED WATER ACCESS POINTS

If above 3 points, move onto Phase 2

107

City of Goleta Parks, Facilities & Playgrounds Master Plan

Figure 5-11: Distances from Recycled Water to Parks

108

Chapter 5 | Recommendations and Action Plans

Screening Process Phase 2: Park Planning

After having succeeded through the first phase, this screening phase will rank the parks based on existing conditions, which includes park planning and soil capability. The factors involved with Phase 2 are more related to new park sequencing (see Table 5-9). Park Status: A new park can start with properly designed water distribution and irrigation methods from the beginning and the appropriate salt-tolerant types of plant material can be specified up front. Soil Capability and Reclaimed Water Relationships: A major factor in determining the feasibility of reclaimed water use is the type of soil including its chemical characteristics. Soil with high salinity levels would require salt tolerant plant species which are generally limited in number. In general, reclaimed water must be applied with greater control and management if it is high in Total Dissolved Solids (TDS), a measure of salinity and other solids. High TDS water causes a significant loss in water and nutrient uptake capability in most landscape plants due to salinity ions displacing critical ions and plants

become stressed. Soil water near the surface naturally evaporates, and plants will suffer if salts are not pushed away from the plant root zone on a regular basis. Saline water conditions tend to build-up on the soil surface, creating a crust to hinder water infiltration and a toxic evapotranspiration environment for plants. Any salt build-up around the root system can cause stunting in growth, tip burn of vegetation or other damage to the plant. 2018 reclaimed water analysis results of TDS at the Goleta Water District’s treatment facility range from 1,131 and 1,435 ppm, with an average of 1,238 ppm (per Lena Cox, Laboratory and Technical Services Manager, Goleta Sanitary District, 10 Jan. 2019). These numbers are generally high but for plants with various levels of salt tolerance this water is still considered usable. Interventions are recommended with midlevel TDS, such as leaching as the most common method (Irrigation Water Quality Standards and Salinity Management, Texas A&M Agrilife Extension, 2017) and moderate-level restricted use (Water Quality for Agriculture, 29 Rev. 1, FAO, 1994).

Table 5-9: Screening Process Phase 2: Park Planning SCREENING PROCESS PHASE 2: PARK PLANNING Park Status

SCORING POTENTIAL

Existing Park with Some Reclaimed Water Infrastructure

New Park in Design Phase

Programmed Park in Planning Phase

Existing Park with Expansion Areas

Park Needing Irrigation Replacement Soon

Soil Capability

SCORING POTENTIAL

Well Drained Loam / Sandy Soils

Semi-permeable Deep Soils

Modifiable Soils

Poorly Drained Clay Soils

-5

PARK STATUS POINTS

SOIL CAPABILITY POINTS

SUBTOTAL

If above 4 points, move onto Phase 3

109

City of Goleta Parks, Facilities & Playgrounds Master Plan

Figure 5-12: Well Drained Soils Throughout Park System

110

Chapter 5 | Recommendations and Action Plans

Soils conducive for reclaimed water use are those that are capable of allowing adequately flushing of TDS. Plants root zone depths vary across species and in various soil types but the majority of roots are generally found within the top 18” of the surface. Well drained soils that are deeper than 16” can generally minimize TDS build-up near the root zones. A map of well drained soils found in Goleta’s park system can be found on Figure 5-12. Note that the parks shown on this analysis map only include public parks owned and managed by the City of Goleta, since these will be the parks most eligible for consideration for irrigation. The categories on this map align with the “Well Drained Loam/Sandy Soils” factor in the screening table.

rates of low permeability soils necessary for effective leaching. Modifying the soil surface is limited to minimizing disturbance to existing plants and their roots. Some soils can be modified enough to increase drainage capability. Irrigation practices that apply excess water on a managed, regular basis, and applying supplemental irrigation during rain events (where allowed) can help to drive salts down below and out of the active plant root zone. But these methods are more expensive than having the favorable soils to start with.

Interventions can be used to mitigate the effects of higher TDS levels in reclaimed water and soils. These can encompass a proper, judicious selection of plant material that can handle higher TDS levels, as well as soil amendments and treatments. For existing sites it is not always easy, nor is it always simple to modify the infiltration

This phase is where the park planner can have the most control (see Table 5-10). The factors involved with Phase 3 are more about how and where in the park should one consider implementing reclaimed water use.

Screening Process Phase 3: Park Design

Table 5-10: Screening Process Phase 3: Park Design SCREENING PROCESS PHASE 3: PARK DESIGN Horticultural Capability

SCORING POTENTIAL

Wide Open Turf Fields

Generally Mixed Non-native Plantings

Drought Tolerant Natives Use Compatibility General Passive or Trail / Walkway Use

-1 SCORING POTENTIAL

IRRIGATION CAPABILITY POINTS

Active Sports

Near Playgrounds or Picnic Areas

-1

Current Irrigation Compatibility

SCORING POTENTIAL

Rotary or Flood / Stream Based System

HORTICULTURAL CAPABILITY POINTS

USE COMPATIBILITY POINTS

Typical Mixed System

Impact Irrigation / Large Coverage

-1

Drip or Emitter Based System

-2 SUBTOTAL

GRAND TOTAL FOR ALL PHASES (if above 10 points consider programming / implementing project)

If above 3 points, consider park as a candidate

0 111

City of Goleta Parks, Facilities & Playgrounds Master Plan

Horticultural Capability: Plants that are subjected to reclaimed water irrigation must be able to survive under sustained applications of water and live in soils that may be with higher salts levels. Each site evaluated should be considered for their ability to support plants conducive to living with these conditions. Existing ornamental plants must be identified as to their salt sensitivity level. Many ornamental plants are salt-sensitive and may not be able to tolerate reclaimed water with the TDS levels present. Some coastal native plant material can be capable of handling higher salinities in the soil and on their foliage, but most do not do well. Since natives require lower water use to start with, irrigation systems may not often be operated enough, and their inability to tolerate infrequent watering may be to their detriment. Potential possibilities of mitigating the increase in salt levels exposed to plants may include periodic reclaimed/potable water mixing, and potable water syringe cycling. Park Use Compatibility: When considering applications for reclaimed water, use regulations must be taken into account. Where conflicts are evident, modifications must be reviewed. Potable water use areas must be reviewed along with reclaimed water use areas. Some potable water use areas may need to be expanded due to restrictions of reclaimed water use. Health concerns of using reclaimed water around active sports fields (those sports where a player’s face/mouth may come in contact with the turf) may need to be avoided. However, timing of events and timing of irrigation application can offset some of these concerns. Natural waterways, water features, drinking fountains, exercise facilities, playgrounds and drainage facilities and other areas where potential contact with reclaimed water may occur, are concerns. In areas of a park where food is prepared or eaten, over-spray onto these areas may be a concern. Again, time of application and control of irrigation practices, where allowable, can still allow for reclaimed water use in these areas. However, the costs of water application techniques and monitoring will be higher. Current Irrigation Compatibility: Finally, if an existing irrigation system is in place and is not in need of whole replacement (operates sufficiently), then the types of irrigation equipment retrofitting should be considered. In general, low flow emitter, micro-spray or drip systems tend to clog up easily when their orifices are exposed to atmosphere, especially those only operated infrequently and in dry seasons. But when this type of irrigation covers extended plant root zones (orifices are not just localized at the plant), are operated regularly and can be cycled longer for leaching purposes, they can be an effective means of driving salts out of the root zone. On the other hand, sprinkler heads that cover large 112

areas can in built environments create over-spray onto non-landscape areas that is of concern. Generally, wide open areas are better for reclaimed water application, especially turf areas since they allow for irrigation systems that are less likely to clog and with less equipment may minimize retrofit costs. Some sprinkler heads may cause soil surface compaction with their large water drops, which can impact water infiltration. The most effective types of irrigation most closely imitate the broad coverage of rainfall. Smaller water drops of sprinkler heads with moderate throw distances allow for less over-spray and water that is better distributed. Summary

All of these factors should be considered in determining if and where to use reclaimed water in a park, and this screening process is one method to ensure everything is addressed. A master plan for reclaimed use in parks should be further developed to determine specific recommendations by Park maintenance staff, planning staff, as well as staff from the Goleta Sanitary Water Resource Recovery District.

5.13 ADA Recommendations Federal and state ADA requirements put the responsibility of access barrier removal on all responsible agencies when dealing with public facilities such as park trails, walkways, parking, restrooms and other recreation amenities. Every effort should be made to assure that new facilities meet the latest ADA standard and that existing facilities should be altered or enhanced to be brought into compliance. Exceptions to barrier removals include the relaxation of ADA standards if the full compliance of the standard will result in permanent negative impacts to natural resources or cultural resource of the site. Even in these situations, adhering to some improvement level is still required. However, assurance that at least one of each type of facility, amenity or access path is always required, not all existing facilities at each site may need to be brought into conformance, as long as each unique experience has at least one facility that is accessible. Trails do not need to be hard surface such as concrete or asphalt. However, a firm surface is required for ADA access compliance. This surface can be made of any material as long as it results in a firm wheel chair capable pathway. As mentioned above, not all trails will be required to be accessible, as long as each location, view, destination or amenity that is experienced in the park along this trail has at least one accessible surface.

Chapter 5 | Recommendations and Action Plans

A key concept that must be kept in mind, is that public programs and services, when viewed in their entirety, must be accessible to people with disabilities, but not all facilities must necessarily be made accessible. For example, if a city has multiple public swimming pools and limited resources, it can decide which pools to make accessible based on factors such as the geographic distribution of the sites, the availability of public transportation, the hours of operation, and the particular programs offered at each site so that the swimming program as a whole is accessible to and usable by people with disabilities. Another key concept is that public entities have an ongoing obligation to make programs and services accessible to people with disabilities. This means that if many access improvements are needed, and there are insufficient resources to accomplish them in a single year, they can be spread out over time. It also means that rising or falling revenues can affect whether or not an access improvement can be completed in a given year. What might have been seen as an undue burden during an economic downturn could become possible when the economy improves and revenues increase. Thus, public entities

ADA parking spaces at Girsh-Hochman Field

should periodically reassess what steps they can take to make their programs and services accessible. Public entities should also consult with people with disabilities in setting priorities for achieving program access. Please refer to Appendix A to see the ADA issues that should be addressed when any of these parks are added to, infilled with new amenities or upgraded in some manner. Any time a park is being renovated for any use addition or upgrade, a review of the ADA issues in this park should be conducted and a determination made if ADA improvements that are near the areas of renovation, can be added at the same time. For example, if a parking lot is to be resealed, then ADA striping, parking spaces, path of travel and signage should be added. However, if the adjacent walkway system does not have the appropriate ramps and walkway conditions, then these improvements should be added to the project. If, however, the City cannot afford to do these additional improvements, then the City should not imply that the full path of travel to a park destination is being provided.

113

City of Goleta Parks, Facilities & Playgrounds Master Plan

114

06 Appendices

Appendix A City Park Accessibility Compliance Assessment

City of Goleta Parks, Facilities & Playgrounds Master Plan

Accessibility Site Assessment for City Parks

City of Goleta

1.0

Intent of Report

When alterations to a primary function area are made to a Title II facility, the access to that area must be made accessible. This would include the “path of travel” which is defined by the ADA as “a continuous, unobstructed way of pedestrian passage by means of which the altered area may be approached, entered, and exited and which connects the altered area with an exterior approach (including sidewalks, streets, and parking areas), an entrance to the facility, and other parts of the facility”. It would also include “the restrooms, telephones, and drinking fountains serving the altered area.” (CFR 35.151(b)(1)(4ii) While the ADA provides ‘Safe Harbor’ for “path of travel” if it meets the specifications in either the 1991 ADA Standards, or the UFAS prior to March 15, 2012 (CFR 35.151(c), the California Building Code requires the “path of travel” to be upgraded when there is an alteration to existing buildings or facilities. (2016 CBC 202.4) However, if the altered facilities or elements covered by 35.151(a) or (b) that -were constructed or altered before March 15, 2012, and that do not comply with the 1991 Standards or with UFAS shall, on or after March 15, 2012, be made accessible in accordance with the 2010 ADA Standards. (CFR 35.151(c)(5)). One exception is if the following elements of the path of travel have been constructed or altered in compliance with the accessibility requirements of the ‘immediately preceding’ edition of the California Building Code, it shall not be required to retrofit such elements to reflect the incremental changes in the CBC solely because of an alteration to the area served by those elements of the path of travel. These areas include; a primary entrance to the building or facility, toilet and bathing facilities serving the area, drinking fountains serving the area, public telephones serving the area, and signs. (2016 CBC 11B-202.4, Exception 2).

Project Description and Basis of Inspection

The property located at the City of Goleta parks. Site survey and Accessibility report scope are for building existing park assessment.

Priority One: These items ensure a person can have access to the facility. These areas provide accessibility at the main entrance of a facility or improve a path of travel to the portion of the facility where program activities take place (for example, parking, walks, ramps, and stairs). Priority Two: These items include barrier removal that provides access to goods and services. Priority Three: A third level priority is placed on those barrier removal items that improve access to amenities (for example, drinking fountains, telephones, restrooms, site furnishings and vending machines).

Priority Four: These items include employee common use areas, not required for public access (nnot included in this scope of work).

Priority Five: These items include only items that are currently required by Title 24 of the California Building Code at the time of alterations and not required by the 2010 ADA Standards. These items are NOT required for barrier removal.

Severity Code ‘A’:

Item that creates a Safety Issue

‘B’:

Item that creates a major inconvenience to a significant number of people

‘C’:

Item that creates a minor inconvenience, however it is not compliant and creates a barrier

‘D’:

Required only in California Building Code, but is compliant with ADA Federal Regulations

This evaluation is based on the 2016 California Building Code, and the 2010 ADA Standards (ADAS). Future changes are not incorporated into this document and shall be confirmed to be compliant separately and are not within this scope of work. Site inspections were performed Monday, April 24th, 2017.

Ongoing Maintenance

Periodic maintenance to ensure continued accessibility is essential in providing a safe and usable environment. Signage, door opening pressures, and maintaining clear floor space and other elements and fixtures, available to the public, must be part of an ongoing maintenance schedule. Maintenance of accessible features is required and can be found at section 11B-108 within the CBC.

Acronyms ADA ADAS ANSI CBC

American with Disabilities Act American with Disabilities Act Standards American National Standards Institute California Building Code

Limitation of Liability

Consultant shall not be required to execute any documents in addition to this Report. Work required to improve site access may require permits from the local building department. It is the responsibility of the Owner to coordinate drawings, and local permit requirements with their local building department. The figures provided in the report are for reference only and are not intended for design or construction. As Building Codes change and dates of construction are unknown, it is the responsibility of the Owner’s Designer/Contractor to confirm the latest code during construction.

Findings and Recommended Actions

Information collected during site inspections is provided in this report detailing each item found to be in noncompliance with the 2010 ADA Standards, and the current 2016 California Building Code (CBC) Title 24 Standards. The criteria listed below were used to determine the priorities for addressing specific barriers in each building, facility and park.

5|P a g e

6|P a g e

118

Dwg ISA mm

Drawing International Symbol of Accessibility millimeter CASp Certified Access Specialist

Chapter 6 | Appendices

Accessibility Site Assessment for City Parks

Accessibility Site Assessment for City Parks City of Goleta

2.0

City of Goleta

Andamar Neighborhood Park

2.1

Park Facilities

Andamar Park is a local neighborhood park site located at the intersection of Andamar Way and Dara Road consisting of a 2.45 acre. Amenities on site include a picnic table, sport field and a tot lot/playground.

ANDAMAR PARK SITE SUMMARY

Below is a summary of items on site which are identified as accessible or nonaccessible. For an itemized list of items to bring these items into compliance refer to the matrix that is located in Section 24. 2.1.1 Accessible Route – Exterior There are no accessible routes provided at this site. An accessible route must be provided from the public right of way and shall connect all facilities on site including the picnic table, field sport areas, trash receptacles, and the tot lot/playground. Concrete path running slope at the east entrance to the site is 1.0%. Public bus stop is located at entrance of the site and needs to provide an accessible route or directional signage at that location. 2.1.2 Accessible Parking On-site parking not provided at this location. 2.1.3 Public Restrooms No public restrooms provided at this location. 2.1.4 Picnic Tables The existing picnic tables are not accessible and not connected to an accessible route. The California Building Code Section 11B-246.5 requires. Where picnic tables are provided, at least one picnic table, and one additional table for each 20 tables or fraction thereof, shall be accessible and comply as noted below:

SITE AMENITIES: Tot Lot

Missing Accessible Route

Picnic Table

7|P a g e

▪

30” x 48” clear floor space positioned for a forward approach

▪

Knee and toe clearance at dining surfaces shall extend 19 inches deep minimum at 27 inches above the finish floor or ground

▪

The tops of dining surfaces and work surfaces shall be 28 inches minimum and 34 inches maximum above the finish floor or ground

▪

Be located on an accessible route

▪

Provide a firm, stable, and slip resistant surface

2.1.5 Playground/Tot Lots The tot lot is not accessible and is not located on an accessible route.

2.2

Sport Facilities

This site includes an open field. The field is not located on an accessible route. An accessible route is required to connect to the boundary of each area of sport activity. Examples of areas of sport activity include: soccer fields, basketball courts, baseball fields, running tracks, skating rinks, and the area surrounding a piece of gymnastic equipment. While the size of an area of sport activity may vary from sport to sport, each includes only the space needed to play. Where multiple sports fields or courts are provided, an accessible route is required to each field or area of sport activity. If field sports are played at this location and lawn seating areas are provided, lawn seating areas and exterior overflow seating areas, where fixed seats are not provided, shall connect to an accessible route. 8|P a g e

119

City of Goleta Parks, Facilities & Playgrounds Master Plan Accessibility Site Assessment for City Parks

Accessibility Site Assessment for City Parks

City of Goleta

3.0

City of Goleta

Armitos Neighborhood Park

3.1

Park Facilities

Armitos Park is a local neighborhood park site located near the intersection of Armitos Avenue and South Kellogg Avenue consisting of 1.63 acres. Amenities on site include benches, sport field and a tot lot/playground. Below is a summary of items on site which are identified as accessible or nonaccessible. For an itemized list of items to bring these items into compliance refer to the matrix that is located in Section 24. 3.1.1 Accessible Route – Exterior This site provides an accessible route, however the slopes exceed the maximum allowed. Running slopes of 6.8% exceed the maximum allowed 5% for an accessible route. Running slopes exceeding 5% must provide a ramp. Cross slopes range from 2.4 to 3.1% and exceed the 1:48 maximum allowed. 3.1.2 Benches The slopes on the accessible route leading to and located in front of the bench range from 2.4% to 2.9% and do note meet the 1:48 maximum allowed. Benches are not required to be accessible, however 36 inches by 48 inches positioned near the bench with one side of the space adjoining an accessible route is highly recommended. The clear ground space shall not overlap the accessible route, or other clear ground spaces based on direction for federal projects. This is not a federal project, however as a Title II entity, the City of Goleta shall make all programs and services accessible. It is highly recommended to provide a minimum of one bench that provides a wheelchair space adjacent to one of the benches provided on this site. It is also recommended wheelchair space shall be located to provide shoulder alignment with adjacent bench. The shoulder alignment point of the wheelchair space shall be measured 36 inches from the front of the wheelchair space. The floor surface of the bench shall be at the same elevation as the floor surface of the wheelchair space. Slopes shall not exceed 1:48 maximum in any direction.

SITE AMENITIES: Tot Lot

Accessible Route

Bench

9|P a g e

3.1.3 Playground/Tot Lots The tot lot was not verified as part of this scope of work. Please refer to matrix located in Section 24 for required items for compliance.

3.2

Sport Facilities

This site includes an open field. Additional review will need to be provided to identify what sports activities are played at this location. An accessible route is required to connect to the boundary of each area of sport activity. Examples of areas of sport activity include: soccer fields, basketball courts, baseball fields, running tracks, skating rinks, and the area surrounding a piece of gymnastic equipment. While the size of an area of sport activity may vary from sport to sport, each includes only the space needed to play. Where multiple sports fields or courts are provided, an accessible route is required to each field or area of sport activity. If field sports are played at this location and lawn seating areas are provided, lawn seating areas and exterior overflow seating areas, where fixed seats are not provided, shall connect to an accessible route.

10 | P a g e

120

ARMITOS PARK SITE SUMMARY

Chapter 6 | Appendices

Accessibility Site Assessment for City Parks

Accessibility Site Assessment for City Parks City of Goleta

4.0

City of Goleta

Armstrong Neighborhood Park

4.1

Park Facilities

Armstrong Park is a local neighborhood park site located near Armstrong Road and Pacific Oaks Road consisting of a 0.69 acre. Amenities on site include a picnic table, sport field and a tot lot/playground.

ARMSTRONG PARK SITE SUMMARY

SITE AMENITIES: Tot Lot

11 | P a g e

Accessible Route

Picnic Table

Bench

▪

30” x 48” clear floor space positioned for a forward approach

▪

Knee and toe clearance at dining surfaces shall extend 19 inches deep minimum at 27 inches above the finish floor or ground

▪

The tops of dining surfaces and work surfaces shall be 28 inches minimum and 34 inches maximum above the finish floor or ground

▪

Be located on an accessible route

▪

Provide a firm, stable, and slip resistant surface

4.1.3 Benches Bench is not located on an accessible route and does not provide wheelchair space as noted below. Benches are not required to be accessible, however 36 inches by 48 inches positioned near the bench with one side of the space adjoining an accessible route is highly recommended. The clear ground space shall not overlap the accessible route, or other clear ground spaces based on direction for federal projects. This is not a federal project, however as a Title II entity, the City of Goleta shall make all programs and services accessible. It is highly recommended to provide a minimum of one bench that provides a wheelchair space adjacent to one of the benches provided on this site. It is also recommended wheelchair space shall be located to provide shoulder alignment with adjacent bench. The shoulder alignment point of the wheelchair space shall be measured 36 inches from the front of the wheelchair space. The floor surface of the bench shall be at the same elevation as the floor surface of the wheelchair space. Slopes shall not exceed 1:48 maximum in any direction. 4.1.4 Playground/Tot Lots The tot lot was not verified as part of this scope of work. Please refer to matrix located in Section 24 for required items for compliance. 12 | P a g e

121

City of Goleta Parks, Facilities & Playgrounds Master Plan

Accessibility Site Assessment for City Parks City of Goleta

5.0

4.2

Bella Vista I & II

Sport Facilities

SITE AMENITIES: Tot Lot

14 | P a g e

13 | P a g e

122

Accessible Route

Picnic Table

Bench

Chapter 6 | Appendices

Accessibility Site Assessment for City Parks City of Goleta 5.1

Park Facilities

Bella Vista is a neighborhood park site located near of the intersection of Placer Drive and Padova Drive consisting of 3.5 acres. Amenities on site include a picnic tables, benches, barbeque, a tot lot/playground and open fields. Below is a summary of items on site which are identified as accessible or nonaccessible. For an itemized list of items to bring these items into compliance refer to the matrix that is located in Section 24. 5.1.1 Accessible Route – Exterior This site does not provide an accessible route. The slopes exceed the maximum allowed. Running slopes of 5.6% to 19.8% exceed the maximum allowed 5% for an accessible route. Running slopes exceeding 5% must provide a ramp. Cross slopes range of 4.5% to 14.5% and exceed the 1:48 maximum allowed. The walks lead to stairs with no accessible options. Multiple locations have cracking with changes in elevation of more than ¼” vertical and/or ½” beveled creating tripping hazards.

Accessibility Site Assessment for City Parks

BELLA VISTA I & II SITE SUMMARY

City of Goleta

5.2

Sport Facilities

Bridges are not accessible and do not provide warning curbs or guards where applicable. 5.1.2 Picnic Tables The existing picnic table is not accessible and not connected to an accessible route. The California Building Code Section 11B-246.5 requires, where picnic tables are provided, at least one picnic table, and one additional table for each 20 tables or fraction thereof, shall be accessible and comply as noted below: ▪

30” x 48” clear floor space positioned for a forward approach

▪

Knee and toe clearance at dining surfaces shall extend 19 inches deep minimum at 27 inches above the finish floor or ground

▪

The tops of dining surfaces and work surfaces shall be 28 inches minimum and 34 inches maximum above the finish floor or ground

▪

Be located on an accessible route

▪

Provide a firm, stable, and slip resistant surface

5.1.3 Benches Benches are located adjacent to the tot lot. Benches are not required to be accessible, however 36 inches by 48 inches positioned near the bench with one side of the space adjoining an accessible route is highly recommended. The clear ground space shall not overlap the accessible route, or other clear ground spaces based on direction for federal projects. This is not a federal project, however as a Title II entity, the City of Goleta shall make all programs and services accessible. It is highly recommended to provide a minimum of one bench that provides a wheelchair space adjacent to one of the benches provided on this site. It is also recommended wheelchair space shall be located to provide shoulder alignment with adjacent bench. The shoulder alignment point of the wheelchair space shall be measured 36 inches from the front of the wheelchair space. The floor surface of the bench shall be at the same elevation as the floor surface of the wheelchair space. Slopes shall not exceed 1:48 maximum in any direction. 5.1.4 Playground/Tot Lots The tot lot was not verified as part of this scope of work. Please refer to matrix located in Section 24 for required items for compliance. 15 | P a g e

16 | P a g e

123

City of Goleta Parks, Facilities & Playgrounds Master Plan Accessibility Site Assessment for City Parks City of Goleta

6.0

Accessibility Site Assessment for City Parks City of Goleta

Brandon Park

6.1

Park Facilities

Brandon Park is a natural area located near the intersection of Brandon Drive and Calle Real consisting of 2.22 acres. The only amenities on this site includes open fields with a dirt path and one bench. Below is a summary of items on site which are identified as accessible or nonaccessible. For an itemized list of items to bring these items into compliance refer to the matrix that is located in Section 24. 6.1.1 Accessible Route – Exterior This site does not provide an accessible route. It is a dirt path leading from public right of way located on By federal definition this is not considered a ‘trail’. The ‘Summary of Accessibility Standards for Outdoor Developed Areas’ published by the U.S. Access Board which has been adopted for federal projects defines a trail; “as a pedestrian route developed primarily for outdoor recreational purposes. Pedestrian routes that are developed primarily to connect accessible elements, spaces, and buildings within a site are not a trail.” This path is intended to connect two locations and needs to be brought into compliance with a firm, stable, and slip resistant accessible route a minimum of 48-inches in width. SITE AMENITIES: Bench

6.1.2 Benches One bench is located adjacent to a parking location for a mobile home. The bench is totally inaccessible.

Accessible Route

Benches are not required to be accessible, however 36 inches by 48 inches positioned near the bench with one side of the space adjoining an accessible route is highly recommended. The clear ground space shall not overlap the accessible route, or other clear ground spaces based on direction for federal projects. This is not a federal project, however as a Title II entity, the City of Goleta shall make all programs and services accessible. It is highly recommended to provide a minimum of one bench that provides a wheelchair space adjacent to one of the benches provided on this site. It is also recommended wheelchair space shall be located to provide shoulder alignment with adjacent bench. The shoulder alignment point of the wheelchair space shall be measured 36 inches from the front of the wheelchair space. The floor surface of the bench shall be at the same elevation as the floor surface of the wheelchair space. Slopes shall not exceed 1:48 maximum in any direction.

17 | P a g e

6.2

Sport Facilities

No sport facilities were observed on site.

18 | P a g e

124

BRANDON PARK SITE SUMMARY

Chapter 6 | Appendices

Accessibility Site Assessment for City Parks

City of Goleta

7.0

Emerald Terrace Tennis Courts /Berkley Park

7.1

Park Facilities

Berkley Park\Emerald Terrace Tennis Courts is a local neighborhood park site located near of Berkley Road and Arundel Road consisting of 4.2 acres. Amenities on site include a picnic tables, benches, sport field, tennis courts and a tot lot/playground.

EMERALD TERRACE/ BERKLEY PARK SITE SUMMARY

SITE AMENITIES: Tot Lot

Accessible Route

Picnic Table

Sport Field

Bench

Tennis

7.1.2 Picnic Tables The existing picnic table is not accessible. The California Building Code Section 11B-246.5 requires where picnic tables are provided, at least one picnic table, and one additional table for each 20 tables or fraction thereof, shall be accessible and comply as noted below: ▪

30” x 48” clear floor space positioned for a forward approach

▪

Knee and toe clearance at dining surfaces shall extend 19 inches deep minimum at 27 inches above the finish floor or ground

▪

The tops of dining surfaces and work surfaces shall be 28 inches minimum and 34 inches maximum above the finish floor or ground

▪

Be located on an accessible route

▪

Provide a firm, stable, and slip resistant surface

19 | P a g e

7.1.3 Benches Benches provide adjacent space for wheelchair spaces and are compliant. However, additional benches located on throughout the site do not provide wheelchair spaces adjacent to bench locations. . 7.1.4 Drinking Fountains One standing drinking fountain was provided on site adjacent to the tennis courts. A second drinking fountain for wheelchair access is required. Additionally, pedestrian protection is required at all drinking fountains. 7.1.5 Playground/Tot Lots The tot lot and play structure is provided. These were not verified as part of this scope of work. Please refer to matrix located in Section 24 for required items for compliance.

20 | P a g e

125

City of Goleta Parks, Facilities & Playgrounds Master Plan

Accessibility Site Assessment for City Parks City of Goleta

8.0

7.2

Evergreen Acres Community Park

Sport Facilities

This site includes open field areas. Additional review will need to be provided to identify what sports activities are played at this location. An accessible route is required to connect to the boundary of each area of sport activity. Examples of areas of sport activity include: soccer fields, basketball courts, baseball fields, running tracks, skating rinks, and the area surrounding a piece of gymnastic equipment. While the size of an area of sport activity may vary from sport to sport, each includes only the space needed to play. Where multiple sports fields or courts are provided, an accessible route is required to each field or area of sport activity. If field sports are played at this location and lawn seating areas are provided lawn seating areas and exterior overflow seating areas, where fixed seats are not provided, shall connect to an accessible route. The following sport fields have been identified for this site.

SITE AMENITIES: Accessible Route

22 | P a g e

21 | P a g e

126

Bench

Tennis

Chapter 6 | Appendices

Accessibility Site Assessment for City Parks City of Goleta 8.1

Park Facilities

Evergreen Acres is a local neighborhood park site located near of Evergreen and Brandon Roads consisting of 29+ acres. Amenities on site include a picnic tables, benches, sport field, softball field, 18 hold disc golf, tennis/pickle ball courts and a tot lot/playground. Below is a summary of items on site which are identified as accessible or nonaccessible. For an itemized list of items to bring these items into compliance refer to the matrix that is located in Section 24. 8.1.1 Accessible Route – Exterior This site provides an accessible route, however the slopes exceed the maximum allowed. Running slopes exceed the maximum allowed 5% for an accessible route. Running slopes exceeding 5% must provide a ramp. Cross slopes exceed the 1:48 maximum allowed. Changes in elevation exceed ¼” vertical and ½” beveled and create tripping hazards. Concrete walk at San Pesaro running slopes of 18.3%, cross slopes of 5.1% on site. Concrete has cracks that create a tripping hazard.

Accessibility Site Assessment for City Parks

EVERGREEN ACRES SITE SUMMARY

City of Goleta 8.2

Sport Facilities

Multiple bridges on site with running slopes ranging from 8.7% to 15%. 8.1.2 Accessible Parking On-site parking is provided from San Milano Drive. No accessible parking spaces are provided. 8.1.3 Public Restrooms One portable restroom located at tennis courts is not accessible. A second portable restroom located near the tot lot is not on an accessible route. 8.1.4 Picnic Tables The existing picnic tables are not accessible and not connected to an accessible route. The California Building Code Section 11B-246.5 requires where picnic tables are provided, at least one picnic table, and one additional table for each 20 tables or fraction thereof, shall be accessible and comply as noted below: ▪

30” x 48” clear floor space positioned for a forward approach

▪

Knee and toe clearance at dining surfaces shall extend 19 inches deep minimum at 27 inches above the finish floor or ground

▪

The tops of dining surfaces and work surfaces shall be 28 inches minimum and 34 inches maximum above the finish floor or ground

▪

Be located on an accessible route

▪

Provide a firm, stable, and slip resistant surface

8.1.5 Benches Benches provide adjacent space for wheelchair spaces and are compliant. However, additional benches located throughout the site need to provide wheelchair spaces adjacent to bench locations. . 8.1.6 Playground/Tot Lots The tot lot and play structure is provided. These were not verified as part of this scope of work. Please refer to matrix located in Section 24 for required items for compliance. 23 | P a g e

24 | P a g e

127

City of Goleta Parks, Facilities & Playgrounds Master Plan

Accessibility Site Assessment for City Parks

City of Goleta

9.0

Lake Los Carneros

9.1

Park Facilities

Lake Los Carneros Natural and Historical Preserve (Rancho La Patera) is located on 139.9 acres near Los Carneros Road and Covington Way, and is also home to the Stow House Historic site and the Goleta Depot. Below is a summary of items on site which are identified as accessible or nonaccessible. For an itemized list of items to bring these items into compliance refer to the matrix that is located in Section 24. 9.1.1 Accessible Route – Exterior This site does not provide an accessible route. Asphalt utility road and recreational trail has cross slopes ranging from 0.1% to 5.6%. Running slopes exceed the maximum allowed 5% for an accessible route. Running slopes exceeding 5% must provide a ramp. Cross slopes exceed the 1:48 maximum allowed. Changes in elevation exceed ¼” vertical and ½” beveled and create tripping hazards. 9.1.2 Trails Outdoor recreation access provides access to the lake. The California Building Code Section 11B-246.7 requires trails, paths and nature walk areas, or portions of them, shall be constructed with gradients permitting at least partial use by wheelchair occupants. Buildings and other functional areas shall be served by paths or walks with firm and stable surfaces. The California Building Code does not provide technical assistance on what that would include. It is our recommendation to use the ‘Summary of Accessibility Standards for Outdoor Developed Areas’ published by the U.S. Access Board for technical provisions of trails, paths and nature walk areas access. 25 | P a g e

By federal definition most of the areas are not considered a ‘trail’. The Access Board defines a trail “as a pedestrian route developed primarily for outdoor recreational purposes. Pedestrian routes that are developed primarily to connect accessible elements, spaces, and buildings within a site are not a trail.” There are some trails on site, however most would be identified as an Outdoor Recreation Access Route. Outdoor Recreation Access Routes (ORAR) An ORAR is a continuous, unobstructed path that is intended for pedestrian use and that connects accessible elements, spaces, and facilities within camping and picnic facilities and at viewing areas and trailheads. ORARs cannot be used at other types of facilities, such as educational campuses, office parks, or theme parks. 9.1.3 Day Use Areas / Vista Points / Lake Access Outdoor recreation access provides access to a variety of locations at this site. The California Building Code Section 11B-246.4 requires day use areas, vista points, and similar areas to be accessible. The California Building Code does not provide technical assistance on what that means. It is our recommendation to use the ‘Summary of Accessibility Standards for Outdoor Developed Areas’ published by the U.S. Access Board for technical provisions of beach access.

26 | P a g e

128

LAKE LOS CARNEROS SITE SUMMARY

Chapter 6 | Appendices

Accessibility Site Assessment for City Parks City of Goleta

10.0

La Goleta

9.1.4 Nature Trails The California Building Code Section 11B-246.4 requires nature trails and similar educational and informational areas shall be accessible to individuals with vision impairments by the provision of rope guidelines, raised Arabic numerals and symbols, or other similar guide and assistance devices. 9.1.5 Accessible Parking On-site parking does not provide accessible parking at this location. Accessible parking needs to be added. 9.1.6 Public Restrooms Outhouse located along the asphalt utility road is not accessible, or on an accessible route. 9.1.7 Drinking Fountains No drinking fountains were observed on site. 9.1.8 Benches Benches are located on site. Benches are not required to be accessible, however 36 inches by 48 inches positioned near the bench with one side of the space adjoining an accessible route is highly recommended. The clear ground space shall not overlap the accessible route, or other clear ground spaces based on direction for federal projects. This is not a federal project, however as a Title II entity, the City of Goleta shall make all programs and services accessible. It is highly recommended to provide a minimum of one bench that provides a wheelchair space adjacent to one of the benches provided on this site. It is also recommended wheelchair space shall be located to provide shoulder alignment with adjacent bench. The shoulder alignment point of the wheelchair space shall be measured 36 inches from the front of the wheelchair space. The floor surface of the bench shall be at the same elevation as the floor surface of the wheelchair space. Slopes shall not exceed 1:48 maximum in any direction.

9.2

Sport Facilities

No sport facilities were observed on site.

28 | P a g e

27 | P a g e

129

City of Goleta Parks, Facilities & Playgrounds Master Plan

Accessibility Site Assessment for City Parks City of Goleta 10.1

Park Facilities

La Goleta is a natural area located near the intersection of La Goleta Road and Cathedral Oaks Road consisting of 6.13 acres. The only amenity on this site includes open fields with a dirt path.

Accessibility Site Assessment for City Parks City of Goleta

LA GOLETA SITE SUMMARY

11.0

Nectarine Park

SITE AMENITIES:

10.2

Sport Facilities

No sport facilities were observed on site.

29 | P a g e

130

Tot Lot

30 | P a g e

Accessible Route

Benches

Chapter 6 | Appendices

Accessibility Site Assessment for City Parks City of Goleta 11.1

Park Facilities

Nectarine Park is a local neighborhood park site located on Nectarine Avenue near the intersection of Mandarin Drive consisting of a 0.13 acre pocket park. Amenities on site include benches and a tot lot/playground.

Accessibility Site Assessment for City Parks City of Goleta

NECTARINE PARK SITE SUMMARY

12.0

Oro Verde

Below is a summary of items on site which are identified as accessible or nonaccessible. For an itemized list of items to bring these items into compliance refer to the matrix that is located in Section 24. 11.1.1 Accessible Route – Exterior This site provides an accessible route, however the slopes exceed the maximum allowed. Running slopes exceed the maximum allowed 5% for an accessible route. Running slopes exceeding 5% must provide a ramp. Cross slopes exceed the 1:48 maximum allowed. Changes in elevation exceed ¼” vertical and ½” beveled and create tripping hazards. Concrete walk at Nectarine from public right-of-way to play structure running slopes of 8.3%, cross slopes of 2.%4 to 3.8 at entry to park. Concrete has cracks that create a tripping hazard. 11.1.2 Benches Benches are not required to be accessible, however 36 inches by 48 inches positioned near the bench with one side of the space adjoining an accessible route is highly recommended. The clear ground space shall not overlap the accessible route, or other clear ground spaces based on direction for federal projects. This is not a federal project, however as a Title II entity, the City of Goleta shall make all programs and services accessible. It is highly recommended to provide a minimum of one bench that provides a wheelchair space adjacent to one of the benches provided on this site. It is also recommended wheelchair space shall be located to provide shoulder alignment with adjacent bench. The shoulder alignment point of the wheelchair space shall be measured 36 inches from the front of the wheelchair space. The floor surface of the bench shall be at the same elevation as the floor surface of the wheelchair space. Slopes shall not exceed 1:48 maximum in any direction.

32 | P a g e

11.1.3 Playground/Tot Lots The tot lot and play structure is provided. These were not verified as part of this scope of work. Please refer to matrix located in Section 24 for required items for compliance.

11.2

Sport Facilities

No sport facilities provided at this location.

31 | P a g e

131

City of Goleta Parks, Facilities & Playgrounds Master Plan

Accessibility Site Assessment for City Parks City of Goleta 12.1

Park Facilities

Oro Verde is an open space natural area located near the intersection of Cambridge Drive and Via Salerno consisting of 7.35 acres. No amenities are provided on this site.

Accessibility Site Assessment for City Parks City of Goleta

ORO VERDE SITE SUMMARY

13.0

12.2

Sport Facilities

No sport facilities were observed on site.

34 | P a g e

33 | P a g e

132

San Jose Creek

Chapter 6 | Appendices

Accessibility Site Assessment for City Parks

City of Goleta

13.1

Site Facilities

San Jose Creek is an open space natural area located near the intersection of Berkley Drive and Merida Drive. The only amenity on this site includes open space. The open space is not open to the public.

SAN JOSE CREEK SITE SUMMARY

14.0

San Miguel Park

13.2

Sport Facilities

SITE AMENITIES:

No sport facilities were observed on site.

Tot Lot

Accessible Route

Picnic Table

Benches

36 | P a g e

35 | P a g e

133

City of Goleta Parks, Facilities & Playgrounds Master Plan

Accessibility Site Assessment for City Parks

Accessibility Site Assessment for City Parks City of Goleta 14.1

Park Facilities

San Miguel Park is a neighborhood park site located between Rio Vista Road and Winchester Canyon Road consisting of 5.78 acres. Amenities on site include benches, picnic tables, sport field and a tot lot/playground. Below is a summary of items on site which are identified as accessible or nonaccessible. For an itemized list of items to bring these items into compliance refer to the matrix that is located in Section 24. 14.1.1 Accessible Route – Exterior This site provides an accessible route, however the slopes exceed the maximum allowed. Running slopes at path between public right of way and the bridge are 5.7%. This exceeds the maximum allowed 5% for an accessible route. Maximum running slope of 10.3% on the bridge. Running slopes exceeding 5% must provide a ramp. Ramps shall have a maximum slope of 8.33%. Cross slopes range from 2.4 to 3.1% and exceed the 1:48 maximum allowed. 14.1.2 Picnic Tables The existing picnic tables are not accessible and not connected to an accessible route. The California Building Code Section 11B-246.5 requires where picnic tables are provided, at least one picnic table, and one additional table for each 20 tables or fraction thereof, shall be accessible and comply as noted below: ▪

30” x 48” clear floor space positioned for a forward approach

▪

Knee and toe clearance at dining surfaces shall extend 19 inches deep minimum at 27 inches above the finish floor or ground

▪

The tops of dining surfaces and work surfaces shall be 28 inches minimum and 34 inches maximum above the finish floor or ground

▪

Be located on an accessible route

▪

Provide a firm, stable, and slip resistant surface

SAN MIGUEL SITE SUMMARY

City of Goleta 14.2

Sport Facilities

This site includes an open field. Additional review will need to be provided to identify what sports activities are played at this location. An accessible route is required to connect to the boundary of each area of sport activity. Examples of areas of sport activity include: soccer fields, basketball courts, baseball fields, running tracks, skating rinks, and the area surrounding a piece of gymnastic equipment. While the size of an area of sport activity may vary from sport to sport, each includes only the space needed to play. Where multiple sports fields or courts are provided, an accessible route is required to each field or area of sport activity. If field sports are played at this location and lawn seating areas are provided lawn seating areas and exterior overflow seating areas, where fixed seats are not provided, shall connect to an accessible route.

Accessibility Site Assessment for City Parks City of Goleta

15.0

Santa Barbara Shores

14.1.3 Benches There is no accessible route connected to the bench locations. Benches are not required to be accessible, however 36 inches by 48 inches positioned near the bench with one side of the space adjoining an accessible route is highly recommended. The clear ground space shall not overlap the accessible route, or other clear ground spaces based on direction for federal projects. This is not a federal project, however as a Title II entity, the City of Goleta shall make all programs and services accessible. It is highly recommended to provide a minimum of one bench that provides a wheelchair space adjacent to one of the benches provided on this site. It is also recommended wheelchair space shall be located to provide shoulder alignment with adjacent bench. The shoulder

alignment point of the wheelchair space shall be measured 36 inches from the front of the wheelchair space. The floor surface of the bench shall be at the same elevation as the floor surface of the wheelchair space. Slopes shall not exceed 1:48 maximum in any direction. 14.1.4 Playground/Tot Lots The tot lot was not verified as part of this scope of work. Please refer to matrix located in Section 24 for required items for compliance. 39 | P a g e

37 | P a g e

134

38 | P a g e

Chapter 6 | Appendices

Accessibility Site Assessment for City Parks

Accessibility Site Assessment for City Parks City of Goleta 15.1

Park Facilities

Santa Barbara Shores is a Regional Park and Open Space area located off of Santa Barbara Shores Drive consisting of 98+ acres. The amenities on this site includes walking trails, beach access, picnic bench, and tot lot/playground. Below is a summary of items on site which are identified as accessible or nonaccessible. For an itemized list of items to bring these items into compliance refer to the matrix that is located in Section 24. 15.1.1 Accessible Route – Exterior This site provides an accessible route, however the slopes exceed the maximum allowed. Walks from the public right- of-way to the tot lot location have cross slopes of 0.8% to 4.3%, and running slopes ranging from 6.3% to 9.8%. Running slopes exceed the maximum allowed 5% for an accessible route. Running slopes exceeding 5% must provide a ramp. Cross slopes exceed the 1:48 maximum allowed. Changes in elevation exceed ¼” vertical and ½” beveled and create tripping hazards. 15.1.2 Trails Outdoor recreation access provides access to the lake. The California Building Code Section 11B-246.7 requires trails, paths and nature walk areas, or portions of them, shall be constructed with gradients permitting at least partial use by wheelchair occupants. Buildings and other functional areas shall be served by paths or walks with firm and stable surfaces. The California Building Code does not provide technical assistance on what that would include. It is our recommendation to use the ‘Summary of Accessibility Standards for Outdoor Developed Areas’ published by the U.S. Access Board for technical provisions of trails, paths and nature walk areas access. By federal definition most of the areas are not considered a ‘trail’. The Access Board defines a trail “as a pedestrian route developed primarily for outdoor recreational purposes. Pedestrian routes that are developed primarily to connect accessible elements, spaces, and buildings within a site are not a trail.”

SANTA BARBARA SHORES SITE SUMMARY

City of Goleta

15.1.4 Nature Trails The California Building Code Section 11B-246.8 requires nature trails and similar educational and informational areas shall be accessible to individuals with vision impairments by the provision of rope guidelines, raised Arabic numerals and symbols, or other similar guide and assistance devices. 15.1.5 Beach Access Outdoor recreation access provide access to the beach. The California Building Code Section 11B-246.3 requires beaches to be accessible. The California Building Code does not provide technical assistance on what that means. It is our recommendation to use the ‘Summary of Accessibility Standards for Outdoor Developed Areas’ published by the U.S. Access Board for technical provisions of beach access. 15.1.6 Picnic Tables The existing picnic tables are not accessible and not connected to an accessible route. The California Building Code Section 11B-246.5 requires. Where picnic tables are provided, at least one picnic table, and one additional table for each 20 tables or fraction thereof, shall be accessible and comply as noted below; ▪

30” x 48” clear floor space positioned for a forward approach

▪

Knee and toe clearance at dining surfaces shall extend 19 inches deep minimum at 27 inches above the finish floor or ground

▪

The tops of dining surfaces and work surfaces shall be 28 inches minimum and 34 inches maximum above the finish floor or ground

▪

Be located on an accessible route

▪

Provide a firm, stable, and slip resistant surface

15.1.7 Playground/Tot Lots The tot lot was not verified as part of this scope of work. Please refer to matrix located in Section 24 for required items for compliance.

15.2

Sport Facilities

No sport facilities were observed on site.

There are some trails on site, however most would be identified as an Outdoor Recreation Access Route. Outdoor Recreation Access Routes (ORAR) An ORAR is a continuous, unobstructed path that is intended for pedestrian use and that connects accessible elements, spaces, and facilities within camping and picnic facilities and at viewing areas and trailheads. ORARs cannot be used at other types of facilities, such as educational campuses, office parks, or theme parks. 15.1.3 Day Use Areas / Vista Points Outdoor recreation access provide access to a variety of locations at this site. The California Building Code Section 11B-246.4 requires day use areas, vista points, and similar areas to be accessible. The California Building Code does not provide technical assistance on what that means. It is our recommendation to use the ‘Summary of Accessibility Standards for Outdoor Developed Areas’ published by the U.S. Access Board for technical provisions of beach access.

40 | P a g e

41 | P a g e

135

City of Goleta Parks, Facilities & Playgrounds Master Plan Accessibility Site Assessment for City Parks City of Goleta

16.0

Sperling Preserve

Accessibility Site Assessment for City Parks City of Goleta 16.1

Park Facilities

Sperling Preserve/Ellwood Mesa – 136.6 acres and home to Monarch overwintering sites located off of Coronado and Daytona Drives consisting of 137+ acres. The amenities on this site includes walking trails, beach access, and public parking. Below is a summary of items on site which are identified as accessible or nonaccessible. For an itemized list of items to bring these items into compliance refer to the matrix that is located in Section 24. 16.1.1 Accessible Route – Exterior This site provides an accessible route in some locations; however the slopes exceed the maximum allowed. The decomposed walk located near the parking area has cross slopes of 2.8% to 5.3%. The running slope adjacent to the portable restroom is 7.8%. Running slopes exceed the maximum allowed 5% for an accessible route. Running slopes exceeding 5% must provide a ramp. Cross slopes exceed the 1:48 maximum allowed. Changes in elevation exceed ¼” vertical and ½” beveled and create tripping hazards. 16.1.2 Trails Outdoor recreation access provides access to the ocean and the Goleta Butterfly Grove. The California Building Code Section 11B-246.7 requires trails, paths and nature walk areas, or portions of them, shall be constructed with gradients permitting at least partial use by wheelchair occupants. Buildings and other functional areas shall be served by paths or walks with firm and stable surfaces.

42 | P a g e

The California Building Code does not provide technical assistance on what that would include. It is our recommendation to use the ‘Summary of Accessibility Standards for Outdoor Developed Areas’ published by the U.S. Access Board for technical provisions of trails, paths and nature walk areas access. By federal definition most of the areas are not considered a ‘trail’. The Access Board defines a trail “as a pedestrian route developed primarily for outdoor recreational purposes. Pedestrian routes that are developed primarily to connect accessible elements, spaces, and buildings within a site are not a trail.” There are some trails on site, however most would be identified as an Outdoor Recreation Access Route. Outdoor Recreation Access Routes (ORAR) An ORAR is a continuous, unobstructed path that is intended for pedestrian use and that connects accessible elements, spaces, and facilities within camping and picnic facilities and at viewing areas and trailheads. ORARs cannot be used at other types of facilities, such as educational campuses, office parks, or theme parks. 16.1.3 Day Use Areas / Vista Points Outdoor recreation access provides access to a variety of locations at this site. The California Building Code Section 11B-246.4 requires day use areas, vista points, and similar areas to be accessible. The California Building Code does not provide technical assistance on what that means. It is our recommendation to use the ‘Summary of Accessibility Standards for Outdoor Developed Areas’ published by the U.S. Access Board for technical provisions of beach access.

43 | P a g e

136

SPERLING PRESERVE SITE SUMMARY

Accessibility Site Assessment for City Parks City of Goleta 16.1.4 Nature Trails The California Building Code Section 11B-246.8 requires nature trails and similar educational and informational areas shall be accessible to individuals with vision impairments by the provision of rope guidelines, raised Arabic numerals and symbols, or other similar guide and assistance devices.

Chapter 6 | Appendices

Accessibility Site Assessment for City Parks

16.1.5 Beach Access Outdoor recreation access provides access to the beach. The California Building Code Section 11B-246.3 requires beaches to be accessible. The California Building Code does not provide technical assistance on what that means. It is our recommendation to use the ‘Summary of Accessibility Standards for Outdoor Developed Areas’ published by the U.S. Access Board for technical provisions of beach access.

City of Goleta

16.1.6 Accessible Parking On-site parking is provided at this location. There ae currently 42 regular spaces, 1 van accessible and 2 car accessible space. This meets code and ADA requirements. The stall closest to the trail is noted as van accessible, however the access aisle is not full length of the parking stall as required in the California Building Code Section 11B-502.3.2.

Stonebridge Walkway is 2.6 acre neighborhood open space area located off of Cathedral Oaks and Stow Canyon Roads. The amenities on this site includes walking trail and open space.

The spaces have slopes ranging from 1.3% to 3.9%. Pavers will need to be leveled to meet 1:48 maximum slope in all directions. Some of the markings have faded and need to be maintained.

17.1

Park Facilities

The accessible route from the access aisles in some location are not flush due to weather erosion and will need to be maintained.

17.1.1 Accessible Route – Exterior There are no designated accessible routes at this location.

“Unauthorized Parking Sign” at main entrance is missing appropriate information as a permanent part of the sign as required in the California Building Code Section 11B-502.8.2.

17.1.2 Trails Outdoor recreation access provides access to the ocean and the Goleta Butterfly Grove. The California Building Code Section 11B-246.7 requires trails, paths and nature walk areas, or portions of them, shall be constructed with gradients permitting at least partial use by wheelchair occupants. Buildings and other functional areas shall be served by paths or walks with firm and stable surfaces.

16.1.7 Public Restrooms Portable restroom is provided at this location. It is not accessible. An accessible restroom needs to be provided with level landing at door and compliant threshold.

STONEBRIDGE WALKWAY SITE SUMMARY

16.2

Sport Facilities

No sport facilities were observed on site. Accessibility Site Assessment for City Parks

City of Goleta

17.0

Stonebridge Park

By federal definition most of the areas are not considered a ‘trail’. The Access Board defines a trail “as a pedestrian route developed primarily for outdoor recreational purposes. Pedestrian routes that are developed primarily to connect accessible elements, spaces, and buildings within a site are not a trail.” There are some trails on site, however most would be identified as an Outdoor Recreation Access Route. Outdoor Recreation Access Routes (ORAR) An ORAR is a continuous, unobstructed path that is intended for pedestrian use and that connects accessible elements, spaces, and facilities within camping and picnic facilities and at viewing areas and trailheads. ORARs cannot be used at other types of facilities, such as educational campuses, office parks, or theme parks. 17.1.3 Nature Trails The California Building Code Section 11B-246.8 requires nature trails and similar educational and informational areas shall be accessible to individuals with vision impairments by the provision of rope guidelines, raised Arabic numerals and symbols, or other similar guide and assistance devices.

17.2 44 | P a g e

Sport Facilities

No sport facilities were observed on site.

46 | P a g e

137 45 | P a g e

City of Goleta Parks, Facilities & Playgrounds Master Plan Accessibility Site Assessment for City Parks City of Goleta

18.0

Stow Tennis Courts

Accessibility Site Assessment for City Parks City of Goleta 18.1

Park Facilities

Stow Tennis Courts is a 2.6 acre local community park site and open space located between Stow Canyon Road and Valdez Avenue. Amenities include tennis and open space. Below is a summary of items on site which are identified as accessible or nonaccessible. For an itemized list of items to bring these items into compliance refer to the matrix that is located in Section 24. 18.1.1 Accessible Route – Exterior Entrance into site does not provide a sufficient maneuvering space for wheelchair access. A minimum 48” width level walk is needed at the south entrance of the site. Current cross slope ranges from 9.2% to 12.2% at this location. This site provides an accessible route, however the slopes exceed the maximum allowed. Running slopes exceed the maximum allowed 5% for an accessible route. Running slopes exceeding 5% must provide a ramp. Cross slopes exceed the 1:48 maximum allowed. Changes in elevation exceed ¼” vertical and ½” beveled and create tripping hazards. Concrete paths have cross slopes ranging from 2.5% to 12.2%. Running slopes range from 11.4% to 13.3%. SITE AMENITIES: Tennis Court

Accessible Route

18.2

Sport Facilities

Examples of areas of sport activity include: soccer fields, basketball courts, baseball fields, running tracks, skating rinks, and the area surrounding a piece of gymnastic equipment. While the size of an area of sport activity may vary from sport to sport, each includes only the space needed to play. Where multiple sports fields or courts are provided, an accessible route is required to each field or area of sport activity. If field sports are played at this location and lawn seating areas are provided lawn seating areas and exterior overflow seating areas, where fixed seats are not provided, shall connect to an accessible route. The following sport fields have been identified for this site. 18.2.1 Tennis Court The circulation path leading to the tennis courts is not accessible. Door maneuvering clearances do not provide 24” on the strike side of door. Gate hardware is not compliant. Slopes at door are 11.4%. Doors are not minimum 32” clear.

48 | P a g e

138

STOW TENNIS COURTS SITE SUMMARY

Chapter 6 | Appendices Accessibility Site Assessment for City Parks

Accessibility Site Assessment for City Parks

City of Goleta

19.0

Stow Grove Park

19.1

Park Facilities

Stowe Grove Park is a local neighborhood park site located near Evergreen and Brandon Roads consisting of 9+ acres. Amenities on site include barbeques, picnic tables, benches, drinking fountains, restroom, walking trails, horse shoe pits, baseball field, disc golf, sand volleyball, and a tot lot/playground.

STOW GROVE PARK SITE SUMMARY

From parking spaces to restrooms have cross slopes of 2.7%

▪

Around perimeter of restroom cross slope is 4.0%

▪

From accessible parking to covered picnic area running slopes of 0.8% to 6.5% and cross slopes ranging from 0.1% to 2.5%

SITE AMENITIES: Tot Lot

49 | P a g e

Accessible Route

Picnic Tables

Benches

19.1.2 Trails Outdoor recreation access provides access to the lake. The California Building Code Section 11B-246.7 requires trails, paths and nature walk areas, or portions of them, shall be constructed with gradients permitting at least partial use by wheelchair occupants. Buildings and other functional areas shall be served by paths or walks with firm and stable surfaces. The California Building Code does not provide technical assistance on what that would include. It is our recommendation to use the ‘Summary of Accessibility Standards for Outdoor Developed Areas’ published by the U.S. Access Board for technical provisions of trails, paths and nature walk areas access. By federal definition most of the areas are not considered a ‘trail’. The Access Board defines a trail “as a pedestrian route developed primarily for outdoor recreational purposes. Pedestrian routes that are developed primarily to connect accessible elements, spaces, and buildings within a site are not a trail.” There are some trails on site, however most would be identified as an Outdoor Recreation Access Route. Outdoor Recreation Access Routes (ORAR) An ORAR is a continuous, unobstructed path that is intended for pedestrian use and that connects accessible elements, and facilities within camping and picnic facilities and at viewing areas and trailheads. ORARs cannot be used at other types of facilities, such as educational campuses, office parks, or theme parks. 19.1.3 Day Use Areas / Vista Points / Lake Access Outdoor recreation access provides access to a variety of locations at this site. The California Building Code Section 11B-246.4 requires day use areas, vista points, and similar areas to be accessible. The California Building Code does not provide technical assistance on what that means. 50 | P a g e

139

Accessibility Site Assessment for City Parks City of Goleta Parks, Facilities & Playgrounds Master Plan

City of Goleta 19.2

Sport Facilities

Accessibility Site Assessment for City Parks City of Goleta It is our recommendation to use the ‘Summary of Accessibility Standards for Outdoor Developed Areas’ published by the U.S. Access Board for technical provisions of beach access. 19.1.4 Nature Trails The California Building Code Section 11B-246.4 requires nature trails and similar educational and informational areas shall be accessible to individuals with vision impairments by the provision of rope guidelines, raised Arabic numerals and symbols, or other similar guide and assistance devices.

Examples of areas of sport activity include: soccer fields, basketball courts, baseball fields, running tracks, skating rinks, and the area surrounding a piece of gymnastic equipment. While the size of an area of sport activity may vary from sport to sport, each includes only the space needed to play. Where multiple sports fields or courts are provided, an accessible route is required to each field or area of sport activity. If field sports are played at this location and lawn seating areas are provided lawn seating areas and exterior overflow seating areas, where fixed seats are not provided, shall connect to an accessible route. The following sport fields have been identified for this site. 19.2.1 Disc Golf Golf ‘tees’ are not located on an accessible route.

19.1.5 Accessible Parking On-site parking is provided. 66 regular parking stalls along with two car accessible parking stalls are provided. A minimum of three accessible stalls are required at this location. One van accessible stall needs to be provided.

19.2.2 Baseball Field Baseball field does not provide accessible route to sport activity, lawn seating areas, or player areas.

19.1.6 Public Restrooms One restroom building is located on this site not accessible. Multiple non-accessible items noted in this restroom.

19.2.3 Volleyball Court (Sand) Volleyball court does not provide an accessible route to sport activity.

19.1.7 Picnic Tables The existing picnic tables are not accessible and not connected to an accessible route. Some of the tables appear to be accessible tables, however they do not provide a minimum 27” knee clearances. The California Building Code Section 11B-246.5 requires. Where picnic tables are provided, at least one picnic table, and one additional table for each 20 tables or fraction thereof, shall be accessible and comply as noted below: ▪

30” x 48” clear floor space positioned for a forward approach

▪

Knee and toe clearance at dining surfaces shall extend 19 inches deep minimum at 27 inches above the finish floor or ground

▪

The tops of dining surfaces and work surfaces shall be 28 inches minimum and 34 inches maximum above the finish floor or ground

▪

Be located on an accessible route

▪

Provide a firm, stable, and slip resistant surface

19.1.8 Benches There is no accessible route connected to the bench locations. Benches are not required to be accessible, however 36 inches by 48 inches positioned near the bench with one side of the space adjoining an accessible route is highly recommended. The clear ground space shall not overlap the accessible route, or other clear ground spaces based on direction for federal projects. This is not a federal project, however as a Title II entity, the City of Goleta shall make all programs and services accessible. It is highly recommended to provide a minimum of one bench that provides a wheelchair space adjacent to one of the benches provided on this site. It is also recommended wheelchair space shall be located to provide shoulder alignment with adjacent bench. The shoulder alignment point of the wheelchair space shall be measured 36 inches from the front of the wheelchair space. The floor surface of the bench shall be at the same elevation as the floor surface of the wheelchair space. Slopes shall not exceed 1:48 maximum in any direction.

Accessibility Site Assessment for City Parks City of Goleta

20.0

University Village Park

19.1.9 Drinking Fountains Drinking fountains provided at this location are not accessible. Drinking fountain located at restroom building does not provide 27” minimum knee clearances. 19.1.10 Barbeques Protruding objects at barbeque areas. Barbeques must provide an accessible route, 48” around the barbeque, and must be within reach ranges. 19.1.11 Trash Receptacles Trash receptacles are not located on an accessible route.

52 | P a g e

19.1.12 Playground/Tot Lots The tot lot and play structure is provided. It is not located on an accessible route. Play equipment was not verified as part of this scope of work. Please refer to matrix located in Section 24 for required items for compliance. 51 | P a g e

140 53 | P a g e

Chapter 6 | Appendices

Accessibility Site Assessment for City Parks City of Goleta 20.1

Park Facilities

University Village Walk is a 3.16 acre open space greenbelt with walking path located between Davenport Road and Phelps Road. The only amenity on this site includes a walking path.

Accessibility Site Assessment for City Parks City of Goleta

UNIVERSITY VILLAGE SITE SUMMARY

21.0

Winchester I

20.2

Sport Facilities

No sport facilities were observed on site. SITE AMENITIES: Tot Lot

Accessible Route

Bench

55 | P a g e

54 | P a g e

141

City of Goleta Parks, Facilities & Playgrounds Master Plan

Accessibility Site Assessment for City Parks

Accessibility Site Assessment for City Parks City of Goleta 21.1

Park Facilities

Winchester I is a 3.4 acre neighborhood park and open space located on Calle Real road near Bradford Drive. The site amenities include benches and a tot lot/ playground and a walking path. Below is a summary of items on site which are identified as accessible or nonaccessible. For an itemized list of items to bring these items into compliance refer to the matrix that is located in Section 24. 21.1.1 Accessible Route – Exterior There is no designated accessible route at this location. Slopes at the entry include cross slopes of 2.6% to 5.6% and the running slopes range from 3.0% to 11.1%. None of the entries to the park are accessible.

WINCHESTER I SITE SUMMARY

City of Goleta the bench with one side of the space adjoining an accessible route is highly recommended. The clear ground space shall not overlap the accessible route, or other clear ground spaces based on direction for federal projects. This is not a federal project, however as a Title II entity, the City of Goleta shall make all programs and services accessible. It is highly recommended to provide a minimum of one bench that provides a wheelchair space adjacent to one of the benches provided on this site. It is also recommended wheelchair space shall be located to provide shoulder alignment with adjacent bench. The shoulder alignment point of the wheelchair space shall be measured 36 inches from the front of the wheelchair space. The floor surface of the bench shall be at the same elevation as the floor surface of the wheelchair space. Slopes shall not exceed 1:48 maximum in any direction. 21.1.5 Trash Receptacles Trash receptacles are not located on an accessible route. 21.1.6 Playground/Tot Lots The tot lot is not located on an accessible route. The tot lot structure was not verified as part of this scope of work. Please refer to matrix located in Section 24 for required items for compliance.

The slopes exceed the maximum allowed. Running slopes exceed the maximum allowed 5% for an accessible route. Running slopes exceeding 5% must provide a ramp. Cross slopes exceed the 1:48 maximum allowed. Changes in elevation exceed ¼” vertical and ½” beveled and create tripping hazards. Entries must be level and not exceed 1:48 in any direction.

21.2

21.1.2 Trails Outdoor recreation access provides access to the ocean and the Goleta Butterfly Grove. The California Building Code Section 11B-246.7 requires trails, paths and nature walk areas, or portions of them, shall be constructed with gradients permitting at least partial use by wheelchair occupants. Buildings and other functional areas shall be served by paths or walks with firm and stable surfaces.

If field sports are played at this location and lawn seating areas are provided lawn seating areas and exterior overflow seating areas, where fixed seats are not provided, shall connect to an accessible route.

By federal definition most of the areas are not considered a ‘trail’. The Access Board defines a trail “as a pedestrian route developed primarily for outdoor recreational purposes. Pedestrian routes that are developed primarily to connect accessible elements, spaces, and buildings within a site are not a trail.” There are some trails on site, however most would be identified as an Outdoor Recreation Access Route. Outdoor Recreation Access Routes (ORAR) An ORAR is a continuous, unobstructed path that is intended for pedestrian use and that connects accessible elements, and facilities within camping and picnic facilities and at viewing areas and trailheads. ORARs cannot be used at other types of facilities, such as educational campuses, office parks, or theme parks. 21.1.3 Nature Trails The California Building Code Section 11B-246.8 requires nature trails and similar educational and informational areas shall be accessible to individuals with vision impairments by the provision of rope guidelines, raised Arabic numerals and symbols, or other similar guide and assistance devices. 21.1.4 Benches There is no accessible route connected to the bench locations. Benches are not required to be accessible, however 36 inches by 48 inches positioned near

56 | P a g e

142

Sport Facilities

57 | P a g e

Chapter 6 | Appendices Accessibility Site Assessment for City Parks

Accessibility Site Assessment for City Parks

City of Goleta

22.0

Winchester II

22.1

Park Facilities

Winchester II is a 1.2 acre neighborhood park and open space located between Calle Real Road and Bradford Drive. No site amenities provided at this site except an open field.

WINCHESTER II SITE SUMMARY

22.2

Sport Facilities

This site includes an open field and a backstop. Additional review will need to be provided to identify what sports activities are played at this location. An accessible route is required to connect to the boundary of each area of sport activity.

58 | P a g e

59 | P a g e

143

City of Goleta Parks, Facilities & Playgrounds Master Plan Accessibility Site Assessment for City Parks

Accessibility Site Assessment for City Parks

City of Goleta

23.0

Haskell’s Beach

23.1

Park Facilities

Haskell’s Beach is located just below the Bacara Resort and Spa. This site provides a parking area for the general public and trail access to Haskell’s Beach which has informational signs along the way provided by the California Coastal Commission. This path leads to a small park-like area with grass and picnic tables just above the beach. This is where you will find the “Beach House” which has restrooms, showers, and a shaded alcove. Below is a summary of items on site which are identified as accessible or nonaccessible. For an itemized list of items to bring these items into compliance refer to the matrix that is located in Section 24. 23.1.1 Accessible Route – Exterior This site does not provide an accessible route from the parking to the trail. 23.1.2 Accessible Parking On-site parking is provided. 58 regular parking stalls along with one car and one van accessible parking stall are provided. A minimum of three accessible stalls are required at this location. The existing car accessible stall needs to provide an access aisle. The van stall has cross slopes of 3.3% at the passenger side of the car. The car accessible space has running slopes of 4.15 on the driver side of the car. There is no accessible route to connect the accessible parking locations and people are required to travel behind other cars to get to the trail leading to the beach.

60 | P a g e

23.1.3 Trails Outdoor recreation access provides access to the lake. The California Building Code Section 11B-246.7 requires trails, paths and nature walk areas, or portions of them, shall be constructed with gradients permitting at least partial use by wheelchair occupants. Buildings and other functional areas shall be served by paths or walks with firm and stable surfaces. The California Building Code does not provide technical assistance on what that would include. It is our recommendation to use the ‘Summary of Accessibility Standards for Outdoor Developed Areas’ published by the U.S. Access Board for technical provisions of trails, paths and nature walk areas access. By federal definition most of the areas are not considered a ‘trail’. The Access Board defines a trail “as a pedestrian route developed primarily for outdoor recreational purposes. Pedestrian routes that are developed primarily to connect accessible elements, spaces, and buildings within a site are not a trail.” There are some trails on site, however most would be identified as an Outdoor Recreation Access Route. Outdoor Recreation Access Routes (ORAR) An ORAR is a continuous, unobstructed path that is intended for pedestrian use and that connects accessible elements, spaces, and facilities within camping and picnic facilities and at viewing areas and trailheads. ORARs cannot be used at other types of facilities, such as educational campuses, office parks, or theme parks.

61 | P a g e

144

HASKELL’S BEACH SITE SUMMARY

Chapter 6 | Appendices

Accessibility Site Assessment for City Parks City of Goleta 23.1.4 Day Use Areas / Vista Points / Lake Access Outdoor recreation access provide access to a variety of locations at this site. The California Building Code Section 11B246.4 requires day use areas, vista points, and similar areas to be accessible. The California Building Code does not provide technical assistance on what that means. 23.1.5 Beach Access Outdoor recreation access provides access to the beach. The California Building Code Section 11B-246.3 requires beaches to be accessible. The California Building Code does not provide technical assistance on what that means. It is our recommendation to use the ‘Summary of Accessibility Standards for Outdoor Developed Areas’ published by the U.S. Access Board for technical provisions of beach access. 23.1.6 Nature Trails The California Building Code Section 11B-246.4 requires nature trails and similar educational and informational areas shall be accessible to individuals with vision impairments by the provision of rope guidelines, raised Arabic numerals and symbols, or other similar guide and assistance devices. 23.1.7 Public Restrooms Public restrooms are provided. There are non-compliant items noted in Section 24 of this report.

23.2

Sport Facilities

No sport facilities were observed on site.

62 | P a g e

145

City of Goleta Parks, Facilities & Playgrounds Master Plan

Accessibility Site Assessment for City Parks City of Goleta

24.0

City of Goleta Park Matrix

11B-206.2.1

206.2.2 206.2.2 206.2.2 206.2.2 216.6 403.5.1 (36") 403.5.3

11B-206.2.1 11B-206.2.1 11B-206.2.1 11B-206.2.1 11B-216.6 11B-403.5.1 11B-403.5.3

N/A

11B-403.7

Community Center

206.2.2

Haskell's Beach

Winchester II

Winchester I

11B-206.2.2

University Village

206.2.2

Stow Grove

Stow Tennis Courts

Stonebridge

11B-206.2.1

Sperling Preserve

206.2.2

Santa Barbara Shors

All routes are accessible

San Miguel Neighborhood Park

Oro Verde

Nectarine

La Goleta

11B-204.6.1

Lake Los Carneros

204.6.1

Evergreen Acres

All Entrances/Ground Floor Exits Located on accessible routes

Priority

Emerald Terrace

Armstrong Park

California Building Code

Brandon

Armitos Park

2010 ADA Standard

Item

Bella Vista I & II

Andamar Park

Park Facilities

Y Y Y

Severity

ACCESSIBLE ROUTES

Connects all buildings, facilities, and elements within the site An accessible route provided from each site arrival point - parking spaces - drop off areas - public streets and sidewalks - public transportations stops Directional signs Walks : 48-inches wide 60” x 60” turning space every 200’ Continuous gradients resting areas, 400 feet max. intervals Walks stable / slip resistant

63 | P a g e

146

Y Y

Y Y Y

Y Y

N N

Y Y

N N

Y Y

N N

Y Y

Y N

Y Y

Y Y Y

Y Y

Y N

Y Y

Y Y Y Y

Y N

Y Y

Chapter 6 | Appendices

Accessibility Site Assessment for City Parks City of Goleta

Evergreen Acres

Lake Los Carneros

La Goleta

Nectarine

San Miguel Neighborhood Park

Santa Barbara Shors

Sperling Preserve

Stow Tennis Courts

Stow Grove

University Village

Winchester I

Winchester II

Haskell's Beach

Community Center

N N

N Y

N N

N Y

N N

N Y

N N

Y Y

N N

Y Y

N N

Stonebridge

Emerald Terrace

Y N

Oro Verde

Brandon

Priority

Bella Vista I & II

402.2 403.3 403.3 303.2 303.3 302..3 302.3 304.1.-3

California Building Code

Armstrong Park

Walk: Cross slopes 1:48 max. Walk: Running slope 1:20 max. Ramps at slopes exceeding 5% Changes in level : 1/4" vertical 1/4" - 1/2" maximum beveled Grating opening ½” maximum Gratings perp. to travel direction Turning spaces

2010 ADA Standard

Armitos Park

Item

Andamar Park

Park Facilities

Severity

11B-4002.2 11B-403.3 11B-403.3 11B-303.2 11B-303.3 11B-302.3 11B-302.3 11B-304.1-3

WARNING CURBS Warning Curbs

N/A

11B-303.5

N/A N/A N/A

1013.2 & 3 1013.2 & 3 1013.2 & 3

5 5 5

D D D

307.2

11B-307.2

N/A

502.3.3

Required # of spaces provided

208.2

11B-208.2

Required accessible van spaces

208.2

11B-208.2

GUARDS Guards Provided Guards Height – 42” Guards Openings - 4” maximum

PROTRUDING OBJECTS Protruding objects

DETECTABLE WARNINGS Detectable Warnings: at 0” curbs

ACCESSIBLE PARKING Y

64 | P a g e

147

City of Goleta Parks, Facilities & Playgrounds Master Plan

Accessibility Site Assessment for City Parks City of Goleta

California Building Code

Priority

Severity

N/A

11B-502.8.2

N/A

11B-502.8.2

N/A

11B-502.8.1

N/A 502.7 N/A N/A 502.6 502.6 N/A 502.6 N/A N/A N/A N/A 502.2 N/A 502.4 502.4 502.5

11B-502.7.1 11B-502.7 11B-502.3.3 11B-502.6.4 11B-502.6.4 11B-502.6.4 11B-502.6.2 11B-502.6 11B-502.3.3 11B-502.3.3 11B-502.3.3 11B-502.2 11B-502.2 11B-502.2 11B-502.4 11B-502.4 11B-502.5

5 1 5 5 1 1 5 1 5 5 5 5 1 5 1 1 1

D A D D C A D C D D D D C D C C C

Unauthorized Parking Sign: provided at each entry. Unauthorized Parking Signinformation provided Unauthorized Parking Sign: 17 inches wide by 22 inches high Spaces & access aisles-Location Shortest ‘accessible route’ ISA symbol is 36” x36” ISA symbol - Location Signs: 60” above finish grade Signs: 60” above finish grade POT “Minimum Fine $250” sign “Van Accessible” sign Access Aisle: 12” “No Parking” Access Aisle: Cross hatch 36” Access Aisle:Cross hatch contrast Access aisle: 18' min. depth Van Access Aisle: 8’ min. Van Access Aisle: passenger side All Access Aisles: 1:48 max. slope All Accessible Stalls: 1:48 max. 98" min. height at pkg stalls

ACCESSIBLE PICNIC TABLES 65 | P a g e

148

Y Y Y Y Y Y Y N N Y

Y Y Y Y

Winchester II

Winchester I

University Village

Stow Grove

Stow Tennis Courts

Stonebridge

Santa Barbara Shors

San Miguel Neighborhood Park

Oro Verde

Nectarine

La Goleta

Lake Los Carneros

Evergreen Acres

Emerald Terrace

Brandon

Bella Vista I & II

Armstrong Park

Sperling Preserve Y Y Y Y Y Y

Community Center

2010 ADA Standard

Haskell's Beach

Item

Armitos Park

Andamar Park

Park Facilities

Y Y N Y Y

Y Y Y Y N

Y Y Y Y Y Y N N Y

Y N Y Y

Y Y Y

N N Y

Chapter 6 | Appendices

Accessibility Site Assessment for City Parks City of Goleta

11B-902 11B-902 11B-902.2 11B-306 11B-902.3 11B-206.2.2

3 3 3 3 3 1

C C C C C A

206.2.2

11B-206.2.2

N N Y N Y N

Community Center

University Village

Stow Tennis Courts

Sperling Preserve

Y Y

N N Y N N Y

N N Y Y Y N

Haskell's Beach

Winchester II

Winchester I

Stow Grove

Stonebridge

Oro Verde

? ? Y Y Y Y

Y Y Y Y

Nectarine

N N N Y Y N

N N N Y Y Y

La Goleta

Lake Los Carneros

N N N N Y N

Brandon

N N Y N Y Y

Santa Barbara Shors

226.1 / 902 226.1/902 902.2 306 902.3 206.2.2

San Miguel Neighborhood Park

Severity

Evergreen Acres

Priority

Emerald Terrace

California Building Code

Bella Vista I & II

5 percent min provided 1 of each type provided 30" x 48" forward approach 19" min. knee and toe clearance Surfaces : 28” min. and 34” max. Located on an accessible route

2010 ADA Standard

Armstrong Park

Item

Armitos Park

Andamar Park

Park Facilities

BENCHES

Located on an accessible route 30" x 48" clear floor space with shoulder alignment with the bench is provided and on a stable surface

SPORT COURTS Each area of sport activity: Accessible route connects to boundary Court sports, one accessible route directly connect both sides of the court Team/Player Seating: Located on accessible route

206.2.2

11B-206.2.2

206.2.12

11B-206.2.12

206.2.18

11B-206.2.18

Team or player seating: Min. one wheelchair space provided

206.7.9

11B-206.7.9

Wheelchair space slopes 1:48 max.

221.2.1.4

11B-221.2.1.4

Wheelchair single space 36” wide

802.1.1

11B-802.1.1

66 | P a g e

149

City of Goleta Parks, Facilities & Playgrounds Master Plan

Accessibility Site Assessment for City Parks City of Goleta

Wheelchair space front or rear approach 48 inches deep min. Wheelchair spaces side approach: 60” min. depth Wheelchair spaces adjoin accessible route Spaces do not overlap circulation path

802.1.2

11B-802.1.2

802.1.4

11B-802.1.4

802.1.5

11B-802.1.5

206.2.2

11B-206.2.2

N N N

BBQ 30" x 48" clear floor space Located on accessible route Reach Ranges:15” min.–48” max.

206.2.2 308.3

11B-206.2.2 11B-308.3

1A A

202.2

11B-202.2

240.1.1

11B-240.1.1

TOT LOT Building Additions: An accessible path of travel from the site arrival point to restrooms, drinking fountains, signs, public telephones Playground Additions. Where play areas are designed and constructed in phases, the requirements of Section 11B-240 shall apply to each successive addition so that when the addition is completed, the entire play area

67 | P a g e

150

Community Center

Haskell's Beach

Winchester II

Winchester I

11B-801.1.2

Stow Grove

801.1.2

Stonebridge

University Village

Stow Tennis Courts

Sperling Preserve

Santa Barbara Shors

San Miguel Neighborhood Park

Oro Verde

11B-801.2

Nectarine

Evergreen Acres

801.2

La Goleta

Emerald Terrace

Wheelchair double space min. 33 inches wide

Brandon

Severity

Bella Vista I & II

Priority

Armstrong Park

California Building Code

Armitos Park

2010 ADA Standard

Andamar Park Item

Lake Los Carneros

Park Facilities

Chapter 6 | Appendices

Accessibility Site Assessment for City Parks City of Goleta

Item

2010 ADA Standard

California Building Code

204.1

11B-2024.1 Exc. 2

1008.2

11B-1008.2

1008.2.1

11B-1008.2

Priority

Community Center

Haskell's Beach

Winchester II

Winchester I

University Village

Stow Grove

Stow Tennis Courts

Stonebridge

Sperling Preserve

Santa Barbara Shors

San Miguel Neighborhood Park

Oro Verde

Nectarine

La Goleta

Lake Los Carneros

Evergreen Acres

Emerald Terrace

Brandon

Bella Vista I & II

Armstrong Park

Armitos Park

Andamar Park

Park Facilities

Severity

complies with all the applicable requirements of Section 11B-240. Within play areas, protruding objects on circulation paths shall not be required to comply with Section 11B307 provided that ground level accessible routes provide vertical clearance in compliance with Section 11B-1008.2 Accessible routes serving play areas shall comply with Division 4 and Section 11B-1008.2 and shall be permitted to use the exceptions in Sections 11B-1008.2.1 through 11B1008.2.3. Where accessible routes serve ground level play components, the vertical clearance shall be 80 inches high minimum. Accessible routes serving ground level play components and elevated play components shall be permitted to use the exceptions in Section 11B1008.2.1.

Exception 1. Transfer systems complying with Section 11B-1008.3 1008.2.1, Exc. shall be permitted to connect elevated 1 play components except where 20 or

11B-1008.2, Exc. 1

68 | P a g e

151

City of Goleta Parks, Facilities & Playgrounds Master Plan

Accessibility Site Assessment for City Parks City of Goleta

Item

2010 ADA Standard

California Building Code

more elevated play components are provided no more than 25 percent of the elevated play components shall be permitted to be connected by transfer systems. Exception 2. Where transfer systems are provided, an elevated play component shall be permitted to 1008.2.1, Exc. 11B-1008.2, connect to another elevated play 2 Exc. 2 component as part of an accessible route. Clear width. Accessible routes connecting play components shall 1008.2.4 11B-1008.2.4 provide a clear width complying with Section 11B-1008.2.4. Ground level. At ground level, the 11Bclear width of accessible routes shall 1008.2.4.1 1008.2.4.1 be 60 inches (1524 mm) minimum. Ground level Exceptions 1. In play areas less than 1000 square feet (93 m2), the clear width of accessible routes shall be permitted to be 44 11Binches (1118 mm) minimum, if at least 1008.2.4.1 1008.2.4.1 one turning space complying with Section 11B-304.3 is provided where the restricted accessible route exceeds 30 feet (9144 mm) in length.

69 | P a g e

152

Priority

Severity

Community Center

Haskell's Beach

Winchester II

Winchester I

University Village

Stow Grove

Stow Tennis Courts

Stonebridge

Sperling Preserve

Santa Barbara Shors

San Miguel Neighborhood Park

Oro Verde

Nectarine

La Goleta

Lake Los Carneros

Evergreen Acres

Emerald Terrace

Brandon

Bella Vista I & II

Armstrong Park

Armitos Park

Andamar Park

Park Facilities

Chapter 6 | Appendices

Accessibility Site Assessment for City Parks City of Goleta

Item

Ground level Exception 2. The clear width of accessible routes shall be permitted to be 36 inches (914 mm) minimum for a distance of 60 inches (1524 mm) maximum provided that multiple reduced width segments are separated by segments that are 60 inches (1524 mm) wide minimum and 60 inches (1524 mm) long minimum. Elevated. The clear width of accessible routes connecting elevated play components shall be 36 inches (914 mm) minimum. Elevated Exception 1. The clear width of accessible routes connecting elevated play components shall be permitted to be reduced to 32 inches (813 mm) minimum for a distance of 24 inches (610 mm) maximum provided that reduced width segments are separated by segments that are 48 inches (1219 mm) long minimum and 36 inches (914 mm) wide minimum. Elevated Exception 2. The clear width of transfer systems connecting elevated play components shall be permitted to be 24 inches (610 mm) minimum.

2010 ADA Standard

California Building Code

1008.2.4.1

11B1008.2.4.1

1008.2.4.2

11B1008.2.4.2

1008.2.4.2 , Exc. 1

11B1008.2.4.2 , Exc. 1

1008.2.4.2 , Exc. 2

11B1008.2.4.2 , Exc. 2

Priority

Community Center

Haskell's Beach

Winchester II

Winchester I

University Village

Stow Grove

Stow Tennis Courts

Stonebridge

Sperling Preserve

Santa Barbara Shors

San Miguel Neighborhood Park

Oro Verde

Nectarine

La Goleta

Lake Los Carneros

Evergreen Acres

Emerald Terrace

Brandon

Bella Vista I & II

Armstrong Park

Armitos Park

Andamar Park

Park Facilities

Severity

70 | P a g e

153

City of Goleta Parks, Facilities & Playgrounds Master Plan

Accessibility Site Assessment for City Parks City of Goleta

Item

Play areas may be located on exterior sites or within a building. Where separate play areas are provided within a site for children in specified age groups (e.g., preschool (ages 2 to 5) and school age (ages 5 to 12)), each play area must comply with this section Where play areas are provided for the same age group on a site but are geographically separated (e.g., one is located next to a picnic area and another is located next to a softball field), they are considered separate play areas and each play area must comply with this section. Stairs that connect play components shall not be required to comply with Section 11B-504 except that striping complying with Section 11B-504.4.1 shall be provided. Play areas for children ages 2 and over shall comply with Section 11B-240. Where separate play areas are provided within a site for specific age groups, each play area shall comply with Section 11B-240.

71 | P a g e

154

2010 ADA Standard

California Building Code

240.1 DOJ Advisory

11B-240.1 DOJ Advisory

240.1 DOJ Advisory

11B-240.1 DOJ Advisory

210.1 Exc. 4

11B-210.1 Exc. 4

Priority

Severity

240.1

11B-240.1

Community Center

Haskell's Beach

Winchester II

Winchester I

University Village

Stow Grove

Stow Tennis Courts

Stonebridge

Sperling Preserve

Santa Barbara Shors

San Miguel Neighborhood Park

Oro Verde

Nectarine

La Goleta

Lake Los Carneros

Evergreen Acres

Emerald Terrace

Brandon

Bella Vista I & II

Armstrong Park

Armitos Park

Andamar Park

Park Facilities

Chapter 6 | Appendices

Accessibility Site Assessment for City Parks City of Goleta

Item

2010 ADA Standard

Play areas located in family child care facilities where the proprietor actually 240.1 Exc. 1 resides shall not be required to comply with Section 11B-240. In existing play areas, where play components are relocated for the purposes of creating safe use zones and the ground surface is not altered 240.1, Exc. 2 or extended for more than one use zone, the play area shall not be required to comply with Section 11B240. Where play components are altered and the ground surface is not altered, the ground surface shall not be 240.1, Exc. 4 required to comply with Section 11B1008.2.6 unless required by Section 11B-202.4. Ground level play components. Ground level play components shall be provided in the number and types required by Section 11B-240.2.1. Ground level play components that are provided to comply with Section 11B240.2 240.2.1.1 shall be permitted to satisfy the additional number required by Section 11B-240.2.1.2 if the minimum required types of play components are satisfied. Where two or more required

California Building Code

Priority

Community Center

Haskell's Beach

Winchester II

Winchester I

University Village

Stow Grove

Stow Tennis Courts

Stonebridge

Sperling Preserve

Santa Barbara Shors

San Miguel Neighborhood Park

Oro Verde

Nectarine

La Goleta

Lake Los Carneros

Evergreen Acres

Emerald Terrace

Brandon

Bella Vista I & II

Armstrong Park

Armitos Park

Andamar Park

Park Facilities

Severity

11B-240.1, Exc. 1

11B-240.1, Exc. 2

11B-240.1, Exc. 4

11B-240.2

72 | P a g e

155

City of Goleta Parks, Facilities & Playgrounds Master Plan

Accessibility Site Assessment for City Parks City of Goleta

Item

2010 ADA Standard

California Building Code

240.2.1.2

11B-240.2.1.2

Priority

Severity

ground level play components are provided, they shall be dispersed throughout the play area and integrated with other play components. Minimum number and types. Where ground level play components are provided, at least one of each type shall be on an accessible route and shall comply with Section 11B-1008.4. Additional number and types. Where elevated play components are provided, ground level play components shall be provided in accordance with Table 11B-240.2.1.2 and shall comply with Section 11B1008.4.

240.2.1.2

11B-240.2.1.2

Exception: If at least 50 percent of the elevated play components are connected by a ramp and at least 3 of the elevated play components 240.2.1.2, Exc. 11B-240.2.1.2, connected by the ramp are different 1 Exc. 1 types of play components, the play area shall not be required to comply with Section 11B-240.2.1.2

73 | P a g e

156

Community Center

Haskell's Beach

Winchester II

Winchester I

University Village

Stow Grove

Stow Tennis Courts

Stonebridge

Sperling Preserve

Santa Barbara Shors

San Miguel Neighborhood Park

Oro Verde

Nectarine

La Goleta

Lake Los Carneros

Evergreen Acres

Emerald Terrace

Brandon

Bella Vista I & II

Armstrong Park

Armitos Park

Andamar Park

Park Facilities

Chapter 6 | Appendices

Accessibility Site Assessment for City Parks City of Goleta

Item

Elevated play components. Where elevated play components are provided, at least 50 percent shall be on an accessible route and shall comply with Section 11B-1008.4.

2010 ADA Standard

California Building Code

240.2.2

240.2.1.2

11B-240.2.1.2

1008.2.5.3

11B1008.2.5.3

Priority

Community Center

Haskell's Beach

Winchester II

Winchester I

University Village

Stow Grove

Stow Tennis Courts

Stonebridge

Sperling Preserve

Santa Barbara Shors

San Miguel Neighborhood Park

Oro Verde

Nectarine

La Goleta

Lake Los Carneros

Evergreen Acres

Emerald Terrace

Brandon

Bella Vista I & II

Armstrong Park

Armitos Park

Andamar Park

Park Facilities

Severity

Min #

# Provided

Min # on ground level

different types ground

level 1 n/a n/a 2-4 1 1 5-7 2 2 8-10 3 3 11-13 4 3 14-16 5 3 17-19 6 3 20-22 7 4 23-25 8 4 26+ * 5 • 8 plus 1 for each additional 3, or fraction thereof, over 25

Handrails. Where required on ramps serving play components, the handrails shall comply with Section 11B-505 except as modified by Section 11B1008.2.5.3. Exceptions:

1. Handrails shall not be required on ramps located within ground level use

74 | P a g e

157

City of Goleta Parks, Facilities & Playgrounds Master Plan

Accessibility Site Assessment for City Parks City of Goleta

Item

2010 ADA Standard

California Building Code

zones. 2. Handrail extensions shall not be required.

Handrail gripping surfaces. Handrail gripping surfaces with a circular cross section shall have an outside diameter of 0.95 inch (24 mm) minimum and 1008.2.5.3 1.55 inches (39 mm) maximum. Where the shape of the gripping surface is non-circular, the handrail shall provide an equivalent gripping surface. Handrail height. The top of handrail gripping surfaces shall be 20 inches (508 mm) minimum and 28 inches (711 1008.2.5.3.2 mm) maximum above the ramp surface. Ground surfaces. Ground surfaces on accessible routes, clear floor or ground 11B-1008.2.6 spaces, and turning spaces shall comply with Section 11B-1008.2.6. Accessibility. Ground surfaces shall 11Bcomply with ASTM F 1951. Ground 1008.2.6.1 surfaces shall be inspected and

75 | P a g e

158

11B1008.2.5.3

11B1008.2.5.3.2

11B-1008.2.6 11B1008.2.6.1

Priority

Severity

Community Center

Haskell's Beach

Winchester II

Winchester I

University Village

Stow Grove

Stow Tennis Courts

Stonebridge

Sperling Preserve

Santa Barbara Shors

San Miguel Neighborhood Park

Oro Verde

Nectarine

La Goleta

Lake Los Carneros

Evergreen Acres

Emerald Terrace

Brandon

Bella Vista I & II

Armstrong Park

Armitos Park

Andamar Park

Park Facilities

Chapter 6 | Appendices

Accessibility Site Assessment for City Parks City of Goleta

Item

maintained regularly and frequently to ensure continued compliance with ASTM F 1951. Use zones. Ground surfaces located within use zones shall comply with ASTM F 1292 (1999 edition or 2004 edition). Transfer systems. Where transfer systems are provided to connect to elevated play components, transfer systems shall comply with Section 11B1008.3. Size. Transfer platforms shall have level surfaces 14 inches (356 mm) deep minimum and 24 inches (610 mm) wide minimum. Height. The height of transfer platforms shall be 11 inches (279 mm) minimum and 18 inches (457 mm) maximum measured to the top of the surface from the ground or floor surface.

2010 ADA Standard

California Building Code

11B1008.2.6.2

11B-1008.3

Priority

Community Center

Haskell's Beach

Winchester II

Winchester I

University Village

Stow Grove

Stow Tennis Courts

Stonebridge

Sperling Preserve

Santa Barbara Shors

San Miguel Neighborhood Park

Oro Verde

Nectarine

La Goleta

Lake Los Carneros

Evergreen Acres

Emerald Terrace

Brandon

Bella Vista I & II

Armstrong Park

Armitos Park

Andamar Park

Park Facilities

Severity

76 | P a g e

159

Appendix B Stakeholder Interviews

City of Goleta Parks, Facilities & Playgrounds Master Plan

Leadership Interviews February 28 – March 1, 2018 1. What are the key issues or values in the community that should be considered while updating the Parks and Open Space Master Plan? a. Pocket park incorporated into future plans b. Accessibility: i. Neighborhood ii. ADA c. Lack a parks in Old Town d. Need areas for family BBQ/pits e. Lack transportation f. Mixed bag, each park has its own feel g. Dog Wars…pocket parks becoming dog parks h. Untapped resource – creeks that run through community i. Go after low hanging fruit j. Wayfinding/signing k. Lots of walkers l. JUA with schools demand for field usage m. Balance active and passive recreation and parks n. What does the community want o. Struggle with outreach – getting people to engage p. Park space, are there places to go? q. West-side has grown with park space r. Set criteria for acquisition and actively pursue opportunities s. Framework and structure for acquisition – see handout from councilman* t. Connectivity via creek beds u. Pocket parks are valuable and parcels are available 2. What would you like to see as an outcome of this planning process? a. b. c. d. e. f. g. 162

Ten year plan w/ multi-year cycles or phases Plan forward Multi-year planning cycle The community will be built out in a few years ID where we need to add parks Champion maintenance as a high priority Lack of maintenance is a problem in the system

h. Deferred maintenance is common i. Sustainable – cheaper to maintain j. Integration with the Bike Master Plan k. Community is bike friendly l. Connectivity of parks to parks, trail to trail, neighborhood to parks m. Role of tourism in economic development, quality of life is important n. Land acquisition should be avoided o. Help develop the vision for the programming side p. Need to discuss the pros and cons of programming q. Elwood Bluff has conflicts between dogs and wildlife r. Should balance passive and active uses s. Old Town clearly under-served (editor’s note: improved with Jonny Wallis Park recently added) t. What is the target for the project study? Park space per capita by neighborhood park and by community parks? u. A goal should be more access to playgrounds v. Look at optimum park system without cost as a prohibition 3. What do you feel is the role of the City in providing indoor facilities, outdoor facilities, programs, parks and services? a. Don’t have indoor facilities i. Joint use agreements with schools could help ii. Should partner with other service providers b. Demand for outdoor facilities c. Gersh Park receives 100K annually – not a real partnership i. Eventually city takes it over ii. Consider 10 year transition of the park d. e. f. g. h. i. j.

Core service is park facilities City’s job to maintain it City is generally forward thinking Maximize resources On agenda to provide municipal pool/aquatic center (CIP 2012) Fields are valuable Better JUA/MOU for shared use of schools

Chapter 6 | Appendices

l. DP Pool – High School a JUA needs to allow the public to use this facility m. Partnerships need to be developed n. Engage with the community o. The master plan needs to be a dynamic document p. Land acquisition criteria and framework in place q. Pool r. Recycled water/reclaimed water what is the ROA s. What are additional revenue opportunities…Friends Group, Foundation

4. What should the collective vision of the City be and what can Park and Open Space do relative to parks, recreation services, facilities and programs that would most help achieve that key vision? a. The City needs to support Parks and Recreation Department instead of a division under the very broad Department of Neighborhood Services and Public Safety b. Maximize every opportunity available c. Can’t satisfy everyone d. Must be general in what we provide e. Safety is priority f. Don’t duplicate services g. Fairview Gardens – non-profit education and programs for kids h. Partnerships with schools 5. Thinking “Outside the Box” - What recreational facilities, amenities, events, programs or activities would you like to see Goleta provide or that offer something that is not currently available? a. b. c. d. e. f.

More things to do in general Must be prepared to take advantage of opportunities and move quickly Get more engaged with young constituents Look to add more part time employees and interns Take advantage of low interest rates and bonds Additional parcels can be obtained: the city has several remnant parcels

6. What do you think the Goleta Parks and Open Space should look like moving forward in 1, 5, 10 years? a. b. c. d. e. f. g. h. i. j. k.

Develop an interactive map for putting on-line Facilities need to be shown Parks all need to be shown Staffing needs to relate to the programs, maintenance and assets Capital component that identifies where the Park and Recreation Division needs to be in terms of staffing and management Typically, 5 years of projects need to be identified and funding requested Active transportation grant should be pursued All park and recreation grants need to be pursued Look at equal distribution of facilities Be responsive to citizens Service provider

Stakeholder Meetings: First Round February 28, 2018 – March 1, 2018 Interview #1

Park Maintenance Staff

Park inspections need to occur regularly City staff does whatever is not covered on the private maintenance contract – such as ground mowing Staff spends time on broken fences, water fountains fix, inspection of playground equipment Efforts include weed control in open space Efforts also include looking at problems with irrigation, any signage that needs to be repaired, and removal of graffiti Stow grove park – only restroom there that is not a porta potty is in bad condition and needs to be rebuilt Evergreen Park – there is a bathroom planned in the CIP Staff does stock 34 dog stations Stow – one of the biggest dog use areas One focus area for staff is monitoring the private maintenance contractor quality of work based on the contract requirements Big problem with graffiti - painting some bathrooms once a week Staff help out on 24 parks A lot of work goes into open space or marginal space weed control with 80% of removals being by hand weed whacking over 380 acres open space areas. A lot of brush clearing – trying to open it up to prevent homeless camping

163

City of Goleta Parks, Facilities & Playgrounds Master Plan

164

Clearing of the trails requires mowing 3 feet of the trail, but the city does not have the proper mower) – Also have to work around bird nesting season. Tractor flail mower (done research save $13,000 a year) costs $60,000 No policy for field use in many of the parks Parks close at sunset – nice if there were skylights in restrooms Better signage – people don’t know where they are – like Emerald Terrace (Berkley) – alley between homes Don’t have dog park Have to re-rake sand for playgrounds – six are in CIP to replace with other surfacing with flexible surfaces or compacted bark mulch) Tennis nets, wind screens, and volleyball nets – constantly have to repair Only have 70 employees city wide with just 6 in maintenance Ellwood Mesa – shut trails down because of the trees were dying due to the drought A lot of the parks are missing ADA access 6 playgrounds scheduled to be addressed with ADA improvements Started discussions on creating a ranger program A lot of effort goes into compliance issues not so much crime Domestic disputes can occur Will often find needles and bottles in parks Dogs need to be on leash and horses need to be on trails Would like to contract with security to do lock up if budgets allow Community center is on a difficult site / parcel Old town – nectarine – used every day – hot spot for hang outs and homeless – right next to homes – lots of graffiti, drugs, just a playground, school bus drop off Armitos park – hangout for homeless and some gang teens City is in negotiations of easement with apartment – community garden – bike path will be added for the recently completed Jonny Willis Park Renovation of Frisbee golf course – at evergreen with alternative holes 3 locations of tennis courts have graffiti, vandalism to the nets and windscreen damage problems Don’t have basketball or fields but will have at Hollister Kellogg Andamar – where they are replacing play ground – gopher, dogs off leash should put a barrier in on the City side. Stowe tennis gets the most dogs, dogs are here the most Lake Los Carneros – drop in place bathroom in approved CIP, sprinkler system to address historical facilities, going to rebuild Armstrong Park – hidden park, hasn’t had major problems

Bella Vista 1 and 2, problems with dogs off-leash, carve into the tables graffiti (2 is an empty lot 1 is a playground) Evergreen Park – get reclaimed water, field improvements, and adding parking lot (5 years down the road) San Miguel park behind houses, slope is high, studying this one. Winchester 2 – saying its open space not parkland but the city is putting new playground equipment in Winchester 1 – taking the swings out but put in outdoor equipment Santa Barbara shores doing playground renovation The County patrols their portion of the beach City hall is trying to relocate – wants to join it with a recreation center Goal – splitting in six sections – have their own section – safer, faster, All open space mowed down by June March 1 through November 30 – bird nesting October through March have to worry about butterflies Stow house – weed abatement – little train tracks

Interview #2

Parks and Recreation Commission Key issues and values:

Focused on little parks Updating small parks – four on the books – the equipment looks like it’s from the 60s The equipment is minimal The needs assessment had talked about the aging community and providing more activities for seniors Par courses are needed Signage is needed Goleta doesn’t operate programs – tap into other existing providers Agriculture is a big part of Goleta, AG is the fastest growing industry Ratio of development to open space. How much land do you put aside? Goleta beach – not officially in Goleta – 1 million visitors – million a year (County park) Surfing, kayaking, could the city run a program at the beach

Chapter 6 | Appendices

What do you think the City’s role is in providing programs?

Hear a lot about the city taking over and directly offering programs Hate to see a duplication of effort between City and providers so this would have to be done carefully UCSB has recreational programs for adults and children Maybe more partnerships need to be formed Community would like a pool If more of the programs would move in house see the department as bigger JoAnne has done a lot with the program but needs more help Grant writing takes a lot of time Goleta needs a place where the community can go and find out about all the recreation programs

Interview #4

Council-member Key issues heard from community Accessibility – good number of pocket parks exist that were remnant parcels – can have additional pocket parks since other parcels also exist – should inventory all parcels and capture potential pocket parks Residents in old town – don’t have a park in old town that you can go BBQ. Need a 10 year plan – 5 budget cycles – want to plan forward instead of piecemeal

Whats the role of the City of Goleta?

Interview #3

District Supervisor

Goleta is a mixed bag – micro communities exist, different opinions on dog use, pocket parks seem to be a big demand Untapped resource – creeks can be great greenways – but has to be handled carefully since they often abut private property Go after the low hanging fruit – signage, etc people more interested in parks and a lot of walking in parks JUAs – real demand for field usage primarily for practice One major comment that came from Needs Assessment was to increase the quality and frequency of maintenance No matter what we do with new park investments, maintenance has to take a primary role and should design to lower costs of maintenance Need to integrate parks with the bike master plan Bike paths need to connect to the parks In the 5 to 10 years involved with the City – the Supervisor doesn’t have a sense of the Division’s role, operations and funding Would like to find out what happened to DP pool – supposed to be dual use but it’s primarily high school students using it Struggle with outreach – getting people involved Monarch groves get the most attention and pride

Complex question. Don’t have a lot of indoor facilities. Need JUA with schools. Outdoor – JUA for their fields but highly competitive. Give money to Girsh. We haven’t truly partnered with them. Money went to maintenance and salaries. Eventually see the City taking it over.

What should the collective vision of the City be?

Maximize every opportunity we have People want trails Can’t satisfy everyone so have to be general in what is provided– Partnering with those who provide programs remains a good idea We should put inventory on web site – like to see that enhanced

Thinking outside the box Constantly be prepared for any opportunity from properties, development or grants Be engaged with younger constituents Santa Barbara can employ part time people, Goleta should consider part time and interns Map on the web site – work with chamber to create a map for tourists

As we think about the next 5 years, what are top priorities?

Staffing needs to be increased 5 year capital projects – should have at least 2 and 5 year projects Don’t have a good track record for building new parks – Should look at old town for additional parks and then other areas as well Go out to people with unmet needs – big constituency at Evergreen Park for disc golf 165

City of Goleta Parks, Facilities & Playgrounds Master Plan

Evergreen is a good example of a park that has potential There are more properties that can be obtained Piece of property in the back of the library should be considered (could build up to two stories on the library)

Interview #5

Interview #6

Council-member Key Issues and values

Parks and Recreation Commissioner Key Issues in the community Concerned about all of the development in the City, especially considering the drought and overall lack of available water Wants to see more green and more nature

What would you like to see the outcome of the planning process? Had attended all the Needs Assessment hearings – people overwhelmingly wanted swimming pool and skateboard parks. Small skate park at the new park – doesn’t address the concerns of the older kids

Thinking outside of the box

Expansions of beaches are never going to happen History of several non-profits providing services to seniors – focus on low income and the frail seniors. Dream would be to have a program and facility like Santa Barbara has with non-stop events for healthy seniors – yoga, Zumba, etc.

How do you see the role of the City?

Thinking about the next 5 years, what are the top priorities?

166

Keep on track with what has already been planned for Make each of the parks we currently have more inviting. Rather than creating something brand new in 5 years, make what we have better

The history of the area and its agricultural roots are important. Formerly agrarian and it’s in a transition but we need to preserve the open space aesthetic and natural setting. Under-served communities should be looked at. Find where they are and how the City is serving that community. The City has 101 separating us. Kind of in quadrants. The airport splits the community as well. Connectivity between the parks are important. Think about a system of parks and implement the bike / ped. plan Specific needs like an aquatic center Keep in mind private properties that are zoned as open space – look at properties at Elwood that abut the open space Refurbishment plan for equipment and facilities is needed. What standards do we apply to our equipment? Deferred maintenance is an issue. JUAs. Look at ways to partner better See a plan for 16 years. Come up with Milestones. Budgets. I’d like to see more of the City’s involvement in programs. What about a more robust Community Center. How can it be developed, improved, and expanded. More programs are needed. Good web site. Like to see the City take a more active lead in programs.

What do you think the collective vision should be? Parks and Open space – as a way to get people out of their living rooms, to get them to walk and see the community Parks should have benches

Chapter 6 | Appendices

Thinking outside the box

First thing that comes to mind – would be to have more concerts at Stowehouse for example The Damn dinner is great More movie nights and concerts in other park Partner with Girsh Park more often would be good Farmers market maybe with an International food truck event at the community center

As we think about the next 5 years, what are top priorities?

Long term needs – an aquatic center Major improvements to the community center – a lot of opportunities for improvement Excited to get the Jonny Wallis park off the ground Ellwood and the butterfly grove (and the plan being developed for it) Bishop Ranch – if someone can broker a deal Goleta beach – used by city residents, should be included as part of the discussion. Maybe collaboration with the county. Think more broadly – there is UCSB and Isla Vista to partner with

Interview #7

Council-member

What would you like see as the outcome? Not clear of the vision for recreational programming. If it’s hard to do then it’s a no go. The plan should discuss the pros and cons. Ellwood bluffs seems to have conflicts with the dogs Old town is under-served. Park space per capita needs to be looked at for equity. More access to playgrounds and pocket parks should be provided. Include parking since many parks do not have off-street parking Look at goals and not be constrained by cost.

What do you see as the role of the City indoor/outdoor? Aquatic center is needed Better MOU to share facilities with schools Need to have design and construction money for pool (in 5 year plan) don’t have money for acquisition of lands Take advantage of low interest rates

As we think about the next 5 years, what are top priorities? Acquisition of lands are important (if we don’t get it – it will be developed) Only one or two parks use recycled water. Do a cost benefit analysis on use of reclaimed water. Don’t want to pay the drought surcharges. The library gets $100k from the friends of Goleta library. The potential to engage the community and their money.

Key Issues and values in the community Land acquisition – active to passive (dogs and vegetables). The west side has gone through a spurt of development. Set up the criteria for acquiring parks early. When someone approaches – there hasn’t been an active let’s go find land effort. A framework, structure, the Council Resolutions need to be already in place. The plan should give us some criteria for overlay planning and requirements. For playgrounds – pocket parks can be successful

167

City of Goleta Parks, Facilities & Playgrounds Master Plan

Stakeholder Meetings: Second Round June 12, 2018 Interview #1

What are some of the strengths of the City’s parks?

They include a lot of pocket parks, are underutilized but when they are upgraded they are more heavily used. Want more of them upgraded. Like the fact that the City is looking at this more holistically The City has many potentials that should be considered a strength Pocket parks, Evergreen Park, and Stow Park can all be improved Have lots of program providers – hoping that it continues, partnerships should be a focus of the plan Environmental factors – wonderful setting City needs a public swimming pool, or a Joint Use Agreement at DP – get revenue to offset the expenses Families are a strength, families here do things together Strong athletic community (but not enough facilities to support them) Being a college town brings in resources and strengths The city has provided walk and bike paths to many pocket parks The Hollister bike path – will be a real plus Ice rink – does great Center is doing concerts in the park – want to do more movies this year Stow has great music in the park

What are some of the weaknesses?

168

Need a pool Need more athletic fields (open space to run and play and synthetic turf) and some lighted fields Deficit of 10 fields – for the most part, we need rectangular, multi purpose fields Off-leash dogs and skate boarding – need to be in the parks master plan – huge requirement Transportation for low-income – people can’t get to parks and programs Community Center - Back field that the City is working on, and converting the tennis fields to pickle-ball. They only have the lighted courts and get asked to use them for all kinds of things. All City parks close at dusk. Girsh is nearing capacity. They are looking at lighting their fields.

Girsh - Should consider more of a partnership with the City Lack of rain Traffic Lack of bathrooms Girsh park has parking problems (the City parks don’t have parking lots) Security concerns – especially at night

Programs and Activities

A lot of the Goleta Union schools don’t have after school programs on site Try to support our active seniors – build a lawn bowling and boccie court and create more pickle-ball courts Don’t want our seniors going to the SB WMCA Don’t have enough walking paths Need an adult soccer league and facilities to support them Try to limit competition between organizations – starting a softball league would add competition at Ewlings park

Improvements to Park Facilities

Disc golf – seems popular – wonder if there is a need to expand Upgrade the fields in the existing parks Tot lots Want changing tables for men’s and women’s bathrooms

Any facilities and spaces that can be re-purposed?

Tennis to pickle-ball Discussion of whether or not tennis is popular Add a wave pool

Are there other partners and stakeholders we should be talking to?

Girls softball (received the emails) Chamber of Commerce Old town Association Boys and Girls Club Girls Inc. Faith community – where they are gathering and getting information Club sports need more space

Chapter 6 | Appendices

As we think about the next 5 years, what are top priorities?

JUAs (with schools and other organizations) – can yield access to facilities like pools and fields Access needs to be improved – transportation, biking, The Community Center needs to improve the facilities More fields in general

What are young people between 11-17 doing in parks?.

Is the 13-17 age group’s recreation needs being met?

Disc golf After 6 grade it drops off Teen center with events, movies in the park, food truck rodeo

General notes

Evergreen and Ranch will be getting bathrooms Hollister Kellog will have a splash pad in phase 2 Ewlings has BMX and remote control car course Old town parklet near entrance to GVCC Add bike pump track Shade structures Lemon event at Girsh Fireworks at Girsh Beach use doesn’t happen a lot in Goleta – not a lot of access Staff and money is needed Belle Vista II would be a good place for a dog park

Interview #2

What are some of the strengths of the City’s parks? Likes the openness of the parks, not congested, well maintained Success in access to pickle-ball Family oriented – family and nature go hand in hand Old town strip incorporating trees but in park keep the mountain view open – hotels impeding view of mountains – make it open, inviting, clean and bright in old town area A lot of passive recreation opportunity

What are some of the weaknesses?

The area (old town) being tucked away Lighting for safety purposes

The challenge of shaded areas – people planning private events, not a lot of shaded areas, not a lot of indoor space one can reserve Having activities for youth to do indoor activities Not enough skate parks – vision of having them in different neighborhoods, like San Diego with skate spots All they can do is going to Zotos. 50 something members in roller derby The orchid ranch – private beach – very private The parks aren’t dynamic – not enough active recreation, lighting, summer nights just hanging out – stigma that bad things happen after sun goes down, a network of skate parks would be great, a lot of pocket parks are underutilized, not enough bike paths Outdoor fitness would be great Multi-generational park in Ventura could be repeated here

Programs and activities not currently involved

Skate camps Stomp lessons – it’s like Uber for skate lessons We don’t have a swimming program – organizations offer it Are there any low-cost kid leagues for football, baseball, etc., soccer (AYSO has scholarship but it’s not that accessible) Pool at DP – the city contributed to it a long time okay – but there was a loophole with lifeguards Swim and surf program – 3 miles from the ocean and don’t know how to swim – safety issue There is a youth cycling club – city does great with small grant programs, high end sport, and healthy lifestyle Outdoor gym Senior rec program Lighted courts for adult basketball Outdoor educational opportunities Gardening Las Cumbres Observatory does educational programs Arts and recreation Casino funded the public art

169

City of Goleta Parks, Facilities & Playgrounds Master Plan

Common Requested Improvements

Dog use – many want dog parks With developments popping up are there open space fees – park impact fees – there is a development that is on its way to PC – but they are planning on building a park Improvements to trails Lighting Safer bike routes to the beaches Miniature golf at a park – but bring your own equipment Corn hole toss Slice of land next to ice skating rink – is going to give it to the city for a great deal – could add skateboarding there

Facilities and amenities that can be re-purposed

Barnesdale historical – create open space around it Add an indoor water adventure

As we think about the next 5 years, what are top priorities?

Access 11-17-year olds Low cost trolley Yoga classes are during the day Leveraging gatherings that are already taking place Metal pole to hang for birthday party piñatas Metal poles could be used for hammock stations as well – bring your own hammock or slack line

Stakeholder Meetings: Third Round June 13, 2018 Interview #1

Council-member At the high school the Joint Use did not go through, the community raised money and then the school said no to the shared use For a short duration, a couple summers they opened it up because a someone came up with a plan

What are the key issues or values?

Old Town – most important, more of a challenge in mobility, new park is helping, boys and girls club is helping, purchase the 2.5 acres to the east where the bus barn is located for the school district The water situation problem won’t go away anytime soon Blessed that we have Girsh park – very active park Have a lot of open space - Evergreen is a very large open space, would like to see some equipment in all the open space Not opposed to having a pool – will need staffing, not necessarily in favor of having a park and rec department since a lot of people have eliminated park and rec departments, the city didn’t tap into reserves during recession Should consider Joint Use with the School Districts. Why reinvent the wheel when the facilities are there. In favor of contracting for staff and part-time staff.

What do you want to see with the Master Plan? The master plans should focus on a beginning and an end, end date to implement the plan and how much is it going to cost In favor of having a plan – because that is how you can get the money from grants and developers Skate board park – absolutely – realize that the HK is a smaller one, meant to be a neighborhood park, in favor of doing a larger one, thought he had land near Girsh, Stork road fire station, ice skating rink is awesome, donated the land for the rink, fire station is going to move per UCSB, going to happen just a matter of when, it’s realistic to think that land could be a skate park, 2 acres

170

Chapter 6 | Appendices

What should our collective vision be?

Are there other facilities and amenities (that could fit in with a skate park)?

Schools should be part of the partnership Community Center– we have a non-profit that runs it, already operates lean and mean, the City would be double the cost People care about fire, police, and public works Agrees with bike and pedestrian, just spent 4 million on class 1 bikeway

What should parks and open space look forward?

Every open space should have activities on them, like a tennis court, pickle ball, agriculture over 10 acres can’t be changed for 30 years unless vote of the people, Sperling reserve should be kept passive, where stow is county designated it as a preserve but there are some space there that could be active (prob would get a lot of push back though)

Interview #2

Resident and Skater Were involved in the Needs Assessment effort – advocated for skate parks around the community, though they got a small portion at HK with small skate plaza, they would like a network of skate parks Pay attention to trends in recreation

What are some of the strengths?

Open spaces that have more of an artistic appeal, that are skate boarder friendly Incorporate themes like in San Luis Obispo Tuckers grove – like it the way it is (It’s in the unincorporated area) North of Kellogg school there is a grassy area – Andamar Park (chicken man) Huge skating history here Company here is one of the biggest – where tony hawk got its start Andamar – places to sit, shade, can’t necessarily hang out at friends’ houses Like Lake C – would like asphalt all around but also like to hike Like Ellwood What other active – demand for soccer but demands are being met, BMX pump tracks, It’s a new activity – so why decision makers not making it a priority, skate boarding will hit the Olympics in 2020 Cleveland elem school in SB – they go two times a year and teach them safety. Would be a good idea here. Have a skate spot next to a school, can teach. Gives them more confidence. Another location – GVCC, they gave them space to build a ramp, then the City shut it down. Looking at the front, far right of the parking, just a half pipe

Weather allows for outdoor recreation Where would you propose a major park? Girsh Park, Evergreen, wouldn’t suggest Los Carneros Lake A min of 10,000 sf for a neighborhood park, 10,000-20,000 sf is a good range for a larger one, don’t know if Goleta could handle that size, but if there were 3-4 of the 10k size Skaters point in Santa Barbara to a 14k sf Skate park right by where all the tourists are, great park, Tony Hawk, GSM – they had a non-profit, did grant proposals

171

City of Goleta Parks, Facilities & Playgrounds Master Plan

Stakeholder Meetings: Fourth Round June 14, 2018

What should parks and open space look into the future for?

Interview #1

Elementary Teacher What are the key issues or values? As an elementary teacher AISO – youth sports are important – needs to be more, after school stuff not just run schools Senior activities (page youth center – is county) Don’t have the recreational sports – adult sports leagues – don’t have gym

What do you want to see with the Master Plan?

Need facilities and money If they had their own gym – then the volleyball teams could use it Should have a Park and Rec department if it’s sustainable – if we have enough of a population to co-exist with Santa Barbara – need to partner with SB

What is working well with parks now?

Having JoAnne is a blessing – knowledgeable and good at getting grants Getting parks into Old Town are great The maintenance is happening The improvements to the existing parks

What is not working well?

Need more programs and facilities Get people more engaged with social media – put things in Spanish

What should our collective vision be?

172

Making parks an enticing place to be with families – so they can put away their phones

Swimming pool – but the cost is huge Need beach volley ball courts – need to have three (in order to have high schools use for tournament). Can be at one of the parks and the high schools can use them Gym Biking – ways to get around The sand volleyball courts at Stow grove are not good Being a PE teacher the grass in the fields are bad (squirrels) – the facilities are maintained great right now so with more use they would be worse People need to be educated about recreational opportunities.

Chapter 6 | Appendices

Page intentionally left blank

173

Appendix C Survey Results

CITY GOLETA PARKS SURVEYMaster ENCUESTA SOBRE LOS PARQUES DE LA CIUDAD DE GOLETA City OF of Goleta Parks, Facilities & Playgrounds Plan

SurveyMonkey

Q1 Over the past 12 months, how frequently has someone in your household/En los últimos 12 meses, con qué frecuencia alguien en su hogar ha: Answered: 214

Visited a City of Goleta...

Used City of Goleta trail...

176

1 / 47

Skipped: 0

CITY OF GOLETA PARKS SURVEY ENCUESTA SOBRE LOS PARQUES DE LA CIUDAD DE GOLETA

ChapterSurveyMonkey 6 | Appendices

Attended a City of Gole...

Visited the beach/Visita...

Used City of Goleta tenni...

2 / 47

177

City of Goleta Parks, Facilities & Playgrounds Master Plan

CITY OF GOLETA PARKS SURVEY ENCUESTA SOBRE LOS PARQUES DE LA CIUDAD DE GOLETA

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

SurveyMonkey

90% 100%

ONCE A WEEK OR MORE/UNA VEZ POR SEMANA O MÁS ONCE A MONTH/UNA VEZ AL MES ONCE EVERY FEW MONTHS/UNA VEZ EN ALGUNOS MESES ONCE A YEAR/UNA VEZ AL AÑO

DID NOT USE/NO LO USÉ

DON'T KNOW/NO SÉ ONCE A WEEK OR MORE/UNA VEZ POR SEMANA O MÁS

ONCE EVERY FEW MONTHS/UNA VEZ EN ALGUNOS MESES

ONCE A YEAR/UNA VEZ AL AÑO

DID NOT USE/NO LO USÉ

DON'T KNOW/NO SÉ

TOTAL

WEIGHTED AVERAGE

Visited a City of Goleta park/Visitado algún parque de la Ciudad de Goleta

61.68% 132

21.03% 45

11.68% 25

4.21% 9

0.93% 2

0.47% 1

214

1.63

Used City of Goleta trails or pathways/Usado los senderos de la Ciudad de Goleta

53.74% 115

22.90% 49

15.89% 34

2.34% 5

3.74% 8

1.40% 3

214

1.84

7.94% 17

14.95% 32

39.25% 84

26.17% 56

9.35% 20

2.34% 5

214

3.21

48.13% 103

28.97% 62

18.22% 39

1.87% 4

2.80% 6

0.00% 0

214

1.82

6.07% 13

5.14% 11

7.94% 17

7.48% 16

68.69% 147

4.67% 10

214

4.42

Attended a City of Goleta event/Asistido a un evento de la Ciudad de Goleta Visited the beach/Visitado la playa Used City of Goleta tennis courts/Usado las cachas de tenis de la Ciudad de Goleta

178

ONCE A MONTH/UNA VEZ AL MES

3 / 47

CITY OF GOLETA PARKS SURVEY ENCUESTA SOBRE LOS PARQUES DE LA CIUDAD DE GOLETA

ChapterSurveyMonkey 6 | Appendices

Q2 What activities do you typically engage in at City of Goleta parks? ¿Qué actividades normalmente realiza en los parques de la Ciudad de Goleta? Answered: 185

Skipped: 29

RESPONSES

DATE

shopping, errands

10/27/2018 10:53 PM

Is Girsh Park a City of Goleta Park?

10/23/2018 9:19 PM

Taking my children and dog to play.

10/22/2018 11:31 PM

Picnic and frisbees

10/22/2018 10:13 PM

Walk, enjoy the outdoors peace and quiet - enjoy nature

10/22/2018 8:34 PM

Walking, dog walking, picnics,quiet time

10/18/2018 11:14 PM

Playground For Kids and party areas and dog walking

10/18/2018 4:39 PM

Picnic, Walking

10/18/2018 4:35 PM

Jog

10/18/2018 4:32 PM

Dog Walking

10/18/2018 4:12 PM

Walking and Biking

10/18/2018 4:07 PM

Beach, Trails, Pathways parks

10/18/2018 4:05 PM

Dog Walking running volleyball bike

10/18/2018 4:01 PM

Dog Walking Volleyball

10/18/2018 3:59 PM

Walking

10/18/2018 3:56 PM

Picnic and Events

10/18/2018 3:52 PM

Playgrounds

10/18/2018 3:49 PM

Kid Area, Bike Trail

10/18/2018 3:47 PM

Play games with family and friends

10/18/2018 3:42 PM

Walk

10/18/2018 3:39 PM

Beach walking

10/18/2018 3:37 PM

Swings playground dog park parties

10/18/2018 3:35 PM

Jungle Gym

10/18/2018 3:33 PM

4 / 47

179

CITY GOLETA PARKS SURVEYMaster ENCUESTA SOBRE LOS PARQUES DE LA CIUDAD DE GOLETA City OF of Goleta Parks, Facilities & Playgrounds Plan

180

SurveyMonkey

Playground , Picnic

10/18/2018 3:29 PM

Soccer/Basketball

10/18/2018 3:25 PM

Birthday Parties, Playground

10/18/2018 3:23 PM

Picnic or beach play

10/18/2018 3:22 PM

Playground

10/18/2018 3:19 PM

Hang out

10/18/2018 3:17 PM

Dog walking

10/18/2018 3:15 PM

Run, Play Sports

10/18/2018 3:08 PM

Biking, Walking, playing sports w/ friends

10/18/2018 3:05 PM

Baskteball

10/18/2018 3:00 PM

Walking

10/18/2018 2:59 PM

Soccer

10/18/2018 2:57 PM

Hiking and Biking

10/18/2018 2:55 PM

Dog Walking

10/18/2018 2:51 PM

Dog walking

10/18/2018 2:49 PM

Like to use the bike path for walking and riding my bike.

10/18/2018 2:46 PM

Volleyball, Tennis, Jog, Playing, Kids play-area

10/18/2018 2:41 PM

Lemon Fest

10/18/2018 2:25 PM

Kids and Business

10/18/2018 2:22 PM

Running , open spaces, roller blading

10/18/2018 2:15 PM

Playground equipment and dog park

10/18/2018 2:12 PM

Walking, Eating, Tennis, Sit/Rnit, Playground

10/18/2018 1:16 PM

walking, picnics, bird watching, visit playgrounds with grandchildren

10/17/2018 1:51 PM

Work on laptop in park, hike on trails, use the beach, AYSO soccer

10/16/2018 8:19 PM

Walking

10/16/2018 7:53 PM

Walking

10/16/2018 7:50 PM

Exercise

10/16/2018 6:43 AM

Walking at Lake Los Carneros. Pickleball at Evergreen space

10/14/2018 7:58 PM

5 / 47

CITY OF GOLETA PARKS SURVEY ENCUESTA SOBRE LOS PARQUES DE LA CIUDAD DE GOLETA

ChapterSurveyMonkey 6 | Appendices

Barbeques with family,taking nieces and nephew to parks to play.

10/14/2018 11:50 AM

Ellllwood mesa - 2 or 3 walks each week. In prior years I played and referred soccer - mens league - as referee for women's league, club and AYSO soccer.

10/13/2018 6:23 PM

Walking dog in Ellwood Bluffs; cycling from Winchester Canyon to SB and using the bike lanes/paths; bicycling on the beach when the tide is out.

10/13/2018 11:31 AM

Walking

10/13/2018 9:17 AM

Take grandchildren to different playgrounds.

10/12/2018 9:35 PM

bird watching

10/12/2018 7:45 PM

walk Ellwood Mesa, Bacara beach, Lake Los Carneros

10/12/2018 5:30 PM

Picnic, lounging

10/12/2018 2:24 PM

Skateboarding

10/12/2018 2:14 PM

playgrounds, dog walks, soccer and other sports

10/12/2018 12:48 PM

We use the playgrounds and beaches most often.

10/12/2018 8:42 AM

Walks with pet

10/12/2018 8:39 AM

Picnics

10/12/2018 6:38 AM

Skate boarding and bike

10/12/2018 1:09 AM

Walking my dog

10/11/2018 10:09 PM

Off road mountain biking while avoiding off leash dogs

10/11/2018 9:52 PM

Walking

10/11/2018 7:38 PM

Playground equipment for my three children.

10/11/2018 6:33 PM

Tennis. Goleta Beach walking. Goleta Beach picnics. Goleta Beach Horseshoes. Stow Park playground. Stow Park picnic. Stow Park walks. Girsh Park. Larger festivals. Lemon etc. soccer games and soccer practice. Girsh Park playground. Stow House and festivals Neighborhood Park near Placer. Looking forward to the new Park in Goleta Proper. I grew up here and I don’t care for the term Old Town Goleta. Thank you for asking these questions!

10/11/2018 6:31 PM

Walking, observing, appreciating and Tai Chi.

10/11/2018 5:33 PM

Taking my grands. Although they prefer the ones in SB - Kids World, Alice Keck, Shoreline and others that have varied equipment.

10/11/2018 4:28 PM

playground

10/11/2018 4:26 PM

Walking, picnicking, using childrjen’s playground with grandchildren

10/11/2018 4:10 PM

Playing with our kids and grandkids. Walking our dog.

10/11/2018 2:43 PM

None specific to parks, just walking through them

10/11/2018 2:14 PM

gatherings, exercise

10/11/2018 2:01 PM

6 / 47

181

CITY GOLETA PARKS SURVEYMaster ENCUESTA SOBRE LOS PARQUES DE LA CIUDAD DE GOLETA City OF of Goleta Parks, Facilities & Playgrounds Plan

182

SurveyMonkey

walking, playing with grandkids

10/11/2018 1:53 PM

walking my on leash dog.

10/11/2018 1:51 PM

Skate board, play basketball

10/11/2018 1:50 PM

pokemon Go and skateboarding

10/11/2018 1:33 PM

football skateboarding

10/11/2018 1:32 PM

Kids playing on the playground, picnics.

10/11/2018 1:31 PM

My baby plays on playgrounds. We ride bikes at parks. We love going to the beach all day. We walk on the paths in parks every day.

10/11/2018 1:23 PM

Play on the playground with my kids, host or attend children's birthday parties, play soccer

10/11/2018 1:18 PM

Family picnics, easy trails to walk

10/11/2018 1:16 PM

Playgrounds with daughter. Walking. Running.

10/11/2018 1:13 PM

Walking and visiting with friends.

10/11/2018 1:08 PM

Kick soccer ball with toddler, 9 yr old and 11 yr old, throw football, play on play equipment. AYSO events at Girsh.

10/11/2018 12:55 PM

Waking, biking

10/11/2018 12:55 PM

Fishing, bird watching, running (Lake Los Carneros)

10/11/2018 12:51 PM

walking/running

10/11/2018 12:48 PM

playgrounds

10/11/2018 12:48 PM

walking, swings.

10/11/2018 12:45 PM

Walk

10/11/2018 12:37 PM

Kids playgrounds, parties

10/11/2018 12:31 PM

Sports practices

10/11/2018 11:01 AM

Walking our dog. Enjoying nature.

10/11/2018 10:58 AM

Walking dogs, running

10/11/2018 9:08 AM

100

Play with grandchild or attend a event.

10/11/2018 8:34 AM

101

Walk and play ball with my dogs daily.

10/11/2018 8:26 AM

102

Kids playground, family BBQ/picnic, casual sports, fitness.

10/11/2018 8:20 AM

103

Baseball, frisbee, play on structure or swings, BBQ/picnic

10/10/2018 10:08 PM

104

Beach walks

10/10/2018 10:04 PM

105

Playground, swings, soccer, volleyball, frisbee,

10/10/2018 8:33 PM

106

Picnic, dog walking, volleyball.

10/10/2018 8:05 PM

7 / 47

CITY OF GOLETA PARKS SURVEY ENCUESTA SOBRE LOS PARQUES DE LA CIUDAD DE GOLETA

ChapterSurveyMonkey 6 | Appendices

107

Dog walks. Trail walks. Playgrounds.

10/10/2018 7:39 PM

108

Playground equipment

10/10/2018 5:45 PM

109

walk

10/10/2018 5:25 PM

110

Walk my dog

10/10/2018 5:18 PM

111

Walk through Stow Grove Park

10/10/2018 4:38 PM

112

Walk dog on leash at Lake Los Carneros, Stow Park, and Goleta Beach. Also hike on Elwood Mesa.

10/10/2018 4:03 PM

113

BBQs, social gatherings and sports practices especially Santa Barbara Soccer Club youth soccer practices at Girsh Park. Hiking and walking trails at Butterfly Preserve and beach at Haskell's.

10/10/2018 3:57 PM

114

Playground play and beach play with kiddos...

10/10/2018 3:37 PM

115

Tennis, walking

10/10/2018 3:20 PM

116

Hiking, nature walks, bird watching

10/10/2018 3:15 PM

117

we use the playgrounds.

10/10/2018 2:59 PM

118

Walking my dogs

10/10/2018 2:53 PM

119

Play sets - walks with dogs and children

10/10/2018 2:47 PM

120

walking

10/10/2018 2:43 PM

121

Play structures with my kids, play tennis, walk, bike, swim, picnic

10/10/2018 2:24 PM

122

I visit the open area near the tennis courts at least once a day. I use the tennis courts to train and play with my dog.

10/10/2018 2:12 PM

123

Walking

10/10/2018 2:05 PM

124

Play on play structures use paths play in grassy area

10/10/2018 1:49 PM

125

Walk dogs at Evergreen Park daily Walk bluffs at Elwood Enjoy Haskells beach

10/10/2018 1:35 PM

126

BBQ at Goleta Beach, and some Goleta events.

10/10/2018 12:44 PM

127

Birding Walking/hiking

10/10/2018 12:40 PM

128

I love to take my bicycle everywhere

10/10/2018 12:21 PM

129

walking

10/10/2018 11:57 AM

130

I walk my dog and star gaze.

10/10/2018 11:49 AM

131

Walking, hiking, dog walking

10/10/2018 11:43 AM

132

Walking, bicycling, playground use, picnicking, socializing with friends.

10/10/2018 11:35 AM

133

Various.

10/10/2018 10:58 AM

134

Walking

10/10/2018 10:57 AM

135

Bike paths, Swings with my son. Can't wait for the skatepark and splash pad.

10/10/2018 10:31 AM

8 / 47

183

CITY GOLETA PARKS SURVEYMaster ENCUESTA SOBRE LOS PARQUES DE LA CIUDAD DE GOLETA City OF of Goleta Parks, Facilities & Playgrounds Plan

184

SurveyMonkey

136

At parks (Stow Park and Lake Los Carneros): walking, picnicking, playing frisbee, playing catch. At the beach we walk, enjoy the sun and swim. At the tennis courts, we play tennis.

10/10/2018 10:30 AM

137

Picnic

10/10/2018 10:30 AM

138

Spectator

10/10/2018 10:24 AM

139

Walking

10/10/2018 10:19 AM

140

Walking and sitting and enjoying the view.

10/10/2018 10:17 AM

141

Playground and volleyball

10/10/2018 10:09 AM

142

Beach days with the family, walking at lake los Carneros, AYSO soccer, skateboarding at UCSB and within the city, BMX at Estero park pump track.

10/10/2018 9:28 AM

143

Tennis, disk golf,

10/9/2018 9:26 PM

144

Walking, hiking, walking our dog, picnics, group activities

10/9/2018 8:01 PM

145

walking, birdwatching, photography

10/9/2018 7:53 PM

146

Walking, bike riding, bird watching

10/9/2018 5:24 PM

147

Walking/jogging, watching people & kids enjoy the 3 swings at Winchester II (some older folks even swing their small dogs in the baby swing) Also enjoy the junior soccer and baseball activities/games in season. Haskell's Beach is fine in many different kinds of weather. Ellwood Mesa forest is another favorite walk , especially in butterfly season.

10/9/2018 4:23 PM

148

Kids play structures

10/9/2018 4:05 PM

149

Disc Golf at evergreen

10/9/2018 2:49 PM

150

We typically use the playground and grassy areas at traditional parks, and at the beach we use those plus the beach itself (although Goleta Beach is in HIGH need of repair + its grassy area is grassless!)

10/9/2018 1:51 PM

151

Using playground equipment, walk my dogs.

10/9/2018 12:39 PM

152

Trail walks, bike riding, beach combing, surfing, play on park equipment.

10/9/2018 6:37 AM

153

Soccer, frisbee, picnics, birthday parties, playing on play structures.

10/8/2018 10:55 PM

154

Walking, picnicking

10/8/2018 5:09 PM

155

Tennis, dog walking.

10/8/2018 4:46 PM

156

Walking, BBQ

10/8/2018 4:31 PM

157

Picnic, cornhole

10/8/2018 1:50 PM

158

Walking

10/8/2018 12:19 PM

159

Walking with dog. Tennis sometimes.

10/8/2018 5:24 AM

160

Playing with the kids. Running, climbing, swinging, sliding.

10/8/2018 5:23 AM

161

Kids (6 & 8) play on playground, Soccer

10/8/2018 4:05 AM

9 / 47

CITY OF GOLETA PARKS SURVEY ENCUESTA SOBRE LOS PARQUES DE LA CIUDAD DE GOLETA

ChapterSurveyMonkey 6 | Appendices

162

Played on the playgrounds and had picnics

10/8/2018 12:52 AM

163

Playgrounds with kids, walks, bike rides

10/7/2018 9:22 PM

164

Dog activities.

10/7/2018 9:20 PM

165

Walking

10/7/2018 9:19 PM

166

Baroque, walk dog

10/7/2018 8:48 PM

167

Soccer, baseball, play structure areas

10/7/2018 8:43 PM

168

Don’t use

10/7/2018 8:34 PM

169

Soccer, bike riding , running

10/7/2018 8:34 PM

170

Beach combing, swimming, sunbathing, napping, walking.

10/7/2018 8:29 PM

171

We take our children on “adventure walks” where they can explore, play on the play structures, visit with friends, and occasionally play disc golf.

10/7/2018 8:25 PM

172

playing with kids, some football, baseball or frisbee. also, occasionally tennis or pickleball.

10/7/2018 12:40 PM

173

goleta beach

10/7/2018 6:02 AM

174

Scootering, playing on equipment

10/6/2018 11:42 PM

175

Walking. Skateboarding.

10/6/2018 7:49 PM

176

playing catch or walking or swimming and sunning at the beach

10/6/2018 7:17 PM

177

Skateboarding but there’s no where to do it?

10/6/2018 12:58 PM

178

Walk, play on playground with grandchildren, use restroom if needed, watch a friends game, birthday parties, play at the beach, bbq with friends family.

10/6/2018 9:59 AM

179

Walking, running, walking dog

10/6/2018 9:49 AM

180

Beach walk

10/6/2018 9:22 AM

181

Toddler playground

10/5/2018 1:48 PM

182

skateboarding

10/5/2018 1:15 PM

183

Walking / playing with family

10/5/2018 12:49 PM

184

Playground with the kids.

10/4/2018 2:32 PM

185

Playgrounds

10/3/2018 11:53 AM

10 / 47

185

CITY GOLETA PARKS SURVEYMaster ENCUESTA SOBRE LOS PARQUES DE LA CIUDAD DE GOLETA City OF of Goleta Parks, Facilities & Playgrounds Plan

SurveyMonkey

Q3 Outside of the City of Goleta, where do you recreate? Fuera de la Ciudad de Goleta, ¿a dónde va a divertirse? Answered: 162

186

Skipped: 52

RESPONSES

DATE

Santa Barbara

10/27/2018 10:53 PM

In a different county

10/22/2018 11:31 PM

Hike trails or go to beach

10/22/2018 10:13 PM

Forest trails and parks - Waller Park in Santa Maria is nice, love to walk through La Cumbre mall for the beautiful plantings

10/22/2018 8:34 PM

cleaner beaches, mountains,

10/18/2018 11:14 PM

Parks in SB

10/18/2018 4:39 PM

County Parks

10/18/2018 4:35 PM

SB, Carp

10/18/2018 4:32 PM

Hikes

10/18/2018 4:28 PM

Santa Barbara Zoo

10/18/2018 4:14 PM

Beaches, Safe Neighborhoods

10/18/2018 4:12 PM

Girsch gym SB Beach

10/18/2018 4:01 PM

Girsch SB Beach

10/18/2018 3:59 PM

Beach

10/18/2018 3:56 PM

Santa Barbara

10/18/2018 3:49 PM

Mostly

10/18/2018 3:39 PM

Birsch Park

10/18/2018 3:37 PM

Alameda Park, Chase Palm Park, East Beach, Oak Park

10/18/2018 3:29 PM

Hiking trails/ Beach/cycling

10/18/2018 3:22 PM

Santa Barbara Shoreline

10/18/2018 3:19 PM

parks

10/18/2018 3:15 PM

SB parks, county dog parks

10/18/2018 3:11 PM

Santa Barbara

10/18/2018 3:08 PM

11 / 47

CITY OF GOLETA PARKS SURVEY ENCUESTA SOBRE LOS PARQUES DE LA CIUDAD DE GOLETA

ChapterSurveyMonkey 6 | Appendices

Isla vista & in the Santa Ynez mountains

10/18/2018 3:05 PM

Santa Barbara

10/18/2018 3:00 PM

YMCA S.B.

10/18/2018 2:59 PM

Santa Barbara

10/18/2018 2:55 PM

Beaches - Camping

10/18/2018 2:51 PM

Beaches

10/18/2018 2:49 PM

I stick to Goleta usually once in a while i'll go walk on cabrillo on bike path.

10/18/2018 2:46 PM

Bellton, Gaviota, State Beaches, Disneyland

10/18/2018 2:25 PM

Santa Barbara

10/18/2018 2:15 PM

Kids - Alice Kick and Moxi

10/18/2018 2:12 PM

Santa Barbara, Botanic Gardens

10/18/2018 1:16 PM

santa barbara

10/17/2018 1:51 PM

Beach, parks, hiking trails, skateparks, Off highway vehicle areas for motorcycles.

10/16/2018 8:19 PM

Santa Barbara, Ojai

10/16/2018 7:53 PM

Santa barbara

10/16/2018 7:50 PM

Mountains, beach, gyms,

10/16/2018 6:43 AM

Private tennis court, SWELL club

10/14/2018 7:58 PM

Cruises

10/14/2018 11:50 AM

cycling on bike paths and streets, hiking in SB 'Front Country'. We NEED access to the Goleta Hills/Front Country for hiking!

10/13/2018 6:23 PM

Cycling around SB, hikes around SB, botanic garden.

10/13/2018 11:31 AM

Hiking trails

10/13/2018 9:17 AM

University playground, Shoreline park and beach, playground across from Alice Keck Park, SB Botanic Garden.

10/12/2018 9:35 PM

SB county

10/12/2018 7:45 PM

golf courses: SB Municipal, Twin Lakes, Rancho Maria, San Marcos; Schott Center pilates classes

10/12/2018 5:30 PM

Ledbetter, mountain trails

10/12/2018 2:24 PM

Santa Barbara Skatepark

10/12/2018 2:14 PM

Beaches, museums

10/12/2018 8:42 AM

Walks with pet

10/12/2018 8:39 AM

12 / 47

187

CITY GOLETA PARKS SURVEYMaster ENCUESTA SOBRE LOS PARQUES DE LA CIUDAD DE GOLETA City OF of Goleta Parks, Facilities & Playgrounds Plan

188

SurveyMonkey

Golf courses

10/12/2018 6:38 AM

Skate park

10/12/2018 1:09 AM

East Beach volleyball courts Tucker’s, Hendry’s, Douglas Various Hiking trails

10/11/2018 10:09 PM

All natural undevoped areas away from urban cell phone drivers waiting at endless redlights

10/11/2018 9:52 PM

Santa Barbara parks.

10/11/2018 6:33 PM

Tucker’s Grove. Same rec there as above. Los Padres recreational area. Hendrys Beach. Stevens Park. Bike Paths There’s more.

10/11/2018 6:31 PM

Big Sur.

10/11/2018 5:33 PM

Ocean walk in Half Moon Bay

10/11/2018 5:22 PM

At aerobic and yoga classes that I have to drive into SB to attend. Would be nice if Adult Ed could offer these classes in the Goleta proper area.

10/11/2018 4:28 PM

bars

10/11/2018 4:26 PM

Coal Oil.Point, Shoreline Park. Navy Pier, Tucker’s Grove

10/11/2018 4:10 PM

The state beaches up and down the coast. Ski resorts,

10/11/2018 2:43 PM

Nowhere in particular

10/11/2018 2:14 PM

Santa Barbara

10/11/2018 2:01 PM

Los Padres

10/11/2018 1:52 PM

Santa Barbara

10/11/2018 1:50 PM

santa barbara and carp

10/11/2018 1:33 PM

skate park

10/11/2018 1:32 PM

Santa Barbara parks sometimes, Santa Barbara beaches, Carpinteria beach.

10/11/2018 1:31 PM

Parks and beachs in santa barbara or ventur. But we live in goleta so we mostly are in goleta

10/11/2018 1:23 PM

Santa Barbara

10/11/2018 1:18 PM

cachuma

10/11/2018 1:16 PM

Beaches. Rock gym. Trails.

10/11/2018 1:13 PM

Santa Barbara water front and Carpenteria.

10/11/2018 1:08 PM

Alameda park, Leadbetter beach, and butterfly

10/11/2018 12:55 PM

Solvang, Santa Barbara. Traveling to other cities and States.

10/11/2018 12:55 PM

Wilmington, Delaware

10/11/2018 12:51 PM

sb county, national/state parks/forests

10/11/2018 12:48 PM

13 / 47

CITY OF GOLETA PARKS SURVEY ENCUESTA SOBRE LOS PARQUES DE LA CIUDAD DE GOLETA

ChapterSurveyMonkey 6 | Appendices

SB Skatepark Solvang skatepark

10/11/2018 12:48 PM

carpinteria

10/11/2018 12:45 PM

Do not really.

10/11/2018 12:37 PM

Carpinteria

10/11/2018 12:31 PM

Field at La Colina Jr High School

10/11/2018 11:01 AM

Beaches, parks, mountains

10/11/2018 10:58 AM

County parks and trails

10/11/2018 9:08 AM

Beaches and hiking trails.

10/11/2018 8:34 AM

Central through Southern CA.

10/11/2018 8:20 AM

Refugio beach, hiking trails in the foothills, Santa Barbara parks

10/10/2018 10:08 PM

Butterfly Beach, Summerland Beach

10/10/2018 10:04 PM

Santa Barbara, State and National parks

10/10/2018 8:33 PM

Hendry's, Wilcox Property, Steven's Park

10/10/2018 8:05 PM

County Parks

10/10/2018 7:39 PM

Santa Barbara parks

10/10/2018 5:45 PM

hiking in the mountains and walking at the beach of Refugio

10/10/2018 5:25 PM

Arroyo Burro beach, Douglas Preserve, water front down town

10/10/2018 5:18 PM

San Antonio Creek Trail, More Mesa, Douglas Preserve.

10/10/2018 4:03 PM

Tucker's Grove, Goleta Beach, Shoreline Park, West Beach, Elings Park, Chase Palm Park, Kids World, Hilda Rae park, Alice Keck park, Alameda park.

10/10/2018 3:57 PM

We go to the sb city parks and san clemente parks (their water park is a great community model)

10/10/2018 3:37 PM

100

Santa Barbara

10/10/2018 3:20 PM

101

Various parks and beaches in the City of Santa Barbara and San luis Obispo County

10/10/2018 3:15 PM

102

The beaches - Campus Point, Haskell's; hikes in the hills

10/10/2018 2:59 PM

103

I don’t travel

10/10/2018 2:53 PM

104

Santa Barbara beach

10/10/2018 2:43 PM

105

Santa Barbara. Specifically Kids World and Shoreline

10/10/2018 2:24 PM

106

YMCA Sta Barbara, Look Out Park

10/10/2018 2:12 PM

107

Parks with large play structures

10/10/2018 1:49 PM

108

In SB...East Beach, Leadbetter, shoreline, Montecito beach, downtown shopping, festivals.

10/10/2018 12:44 PM

14 / 47

189

CITY GOLETA PARKS SURVEYMaster ENCUESTA SOBRE LOS PARQUES DE LA CIUDAD DE GOLETA City OF of Goleta Parks, Facilities & Playgrounds Plan

190

SurveyMonkey

109

Parks and trails throughout the south county

10/10/2018 12:40 PM

110

Hiking in the mountains, going to Santa Barbara...

10/10/2018 12:21 PM

111

through out the county

10/10/2018 11:57 AM

112

Hike Santa Barbara front country trails weekly. Camp and hike in Los Padres National Forest, Santa Barbara County Parks (Goleta Beach,Cachuma Lake, Jalama Beach, Tuckers Grove, Hendry's Beach...)

10/10/2018 11:49 AM

113

Santa Barbara beaches, trails, parks

10/10/2018 11:43 AM

114

County of SB parks, front country hiking trails, public beaches.

10/10/2018 11:35 AM

115

Santa Barbara

10/10/2018 10:58 AM

116

Sb parks, state parks

10/10/2018 10:57 AM

117

The beach.

10/10/2018 10:31 AM

118

Hendry's Beach, Elings Park, East & West Beach and the wharf, and the foothills (hiking). Also, El Capitan and Carpinteria state beaches (camping).

10/10/2018 10:30 AM

119

East beach

10/10/2018 10:30 AM

120

Everywhere

10/10/2018 10:24 AM

121

Morro Bay

10/10/2018 10:19 AM

122

No where else.

10/10/2018 10:17 AM

123

Santa Barbara parks

10/10/2018 10:09 AM

124

Skateparks in Santa Barbara, Solvang, Ojai, Oxnard, and San Luis Obispo. Bike trails in the foothills and at Eilings park. Surfing all over.

10/10/2018 9:28 AM

125

Santa Barbara skate park. Jalama beach.

10/9/2018 9:26 PM

126

Santa Barbara, especially dog parks - Douglas preserve, Hendry’s beach, etc.

10/9/2018 8:01 PM

127

S.B. County parks and open spaces.

10/9/2018 7:53 PM

128

Sands Beach, state parks, national parks

10/9/2018 5:24 PM

129

Sometimes one or both of us older folks go to Arroyo Burro Beach, but mostly we stay close to home.

10/9/2018 4:23 PM

130

Lake Cachuma

10/9/2018 2:49 PM

131

We pretty much stick entirely to Goleta. Occasionally we'll go to some of the SB beaches, but that's about it.

10/9/2018 1:51 PM

132

Beach, City of Santa Barbara parks.

10/9/2018 12:39 PM

133

Beach, skate parks in other towns, camping & backpacking.

10/9/2018 6:37 AM

134

City of Santa Barbara

10/8/2018 10:55 PM

135

Santa Barbara beaches, parks and hiking trails

10/8/2018 5:09 PM

136

Soccer, hiking, walking

10/8/2018 4:46 PM

15 / 47

CITY OF GOLETA PARKS SURVEY ENCUESTA SOBRE LOS PARQUES DE LA CIUDAD DE GOLETA

ChapterSurveyMonkey 6 | Appendices

137

Wharf, Ventura

10/8/2018 4:31 PM

138

Los Padres National Forest, Santa Barbara parks & beaches

10/8/2018 1:50 PM

139

Santa Barbara

10/8/2018 12:19 PM

140

Tahoe, San Francisco area. Los Osos.

10/8/2018 5:24 AM

141

Kids world, SB. Santa Barbara beaches, parks and trails

10/8/2018 5:23 AM

142

Santa Barbara Alameada Park, State Parks

10/8/2018 4:05 AM

143

SB City parks

10/8/2018 12:52 AM

144

Santa Barbara parks and beaches

10/7/2018 9:22 PM

145

Gymnasiums and East Beach

10/7/2018 9:20 PM

146

Beach, walk dog

10/7/2018 8:48 PM

147

Hawaii

10/7/2018 8:34 PM

148

Santa Barbara parks

10/7/2018 8:34 PM

149

Waterfront, various $B city parks, beaches between haskell's and carpinteria. I walk A LOT! It lessens the pain, or, at least, it takes my mind off of it. My adventures are at Facebook.com/captainmaxentropy

10/7/2018 8:29 PM

150

County parks and city of SB

10/7/2018 8:25 PM

151

santa barbara, county open space, and some state parks.

10/7/2018 12:40 PM

152

sb and Montecito

10/6/2018 11:42 PM

153

swimming and sunning at the beach

10/6/2018 7:17 PM

154

SB skate park but it is to crowded because the sport is growing so rapidly.

10/6/2018 12:58 PM

155

Santa Barbara parks, MOXI, zoo, sb natural history museum, sea center, breakwater, wharf...

10/6/2018 9:59 AM

156

Santa Barbara beaches

10/6/2018 9:49 AM

157

New York City

10/6/2018 9:22 AM

158

Los Padres National Forest

10/5/2018 1:48 PM

159

Skater's Point in Santa Barbara, CA.

10/5/2018 1:15 PM

160

Tuckers Grove, Shoreline Park, Mesa Park, Santa Barbara Skatepark (Skater's Point), smaller neighborhood parks, in the streets.

10/5/2018 12:49 PM

161

Santa Barbara parks and beaches.

10/4/2018 2:32 PM

162

Santa Barbara

10/3/2018 11:53 AM

16 / 47

191

CITY GOLETA PARKS SURVEYMaster ENCUESTA SOBRE LOS PARQUES DE LA CIUDAD DE GOLETA City OF of Goleta Parks, Facilities & Playgrounds Plan

SurveyMonkey

Q4 What are the most important needs to be addressed in the City of Goleta over the next 5 to 10 years? ¿Cuáles son las necesidades más importantes que deben abordarse en la Ciudad de Goleta en los próximos 5 a 10 años? Answered: 180

Skipped: 34

Preserve open space/Preser...

Make improvements...

192

17 / 47

CITY OF GOLETA PARKS SURVEY ENCUESTA SOBRE LOS PARQUES DE LA CIUDAD DE GOLETA

ChapterSurveyMonkey 6 | Appendices

Increase trail and pathway...

Develop new parks (speci...

Expand programs and...

18 / 47

193

CITY GOLETA PARKS SURVEYMaster ENCUESTA SOBRE LOS PARQUES DE LA CIUDAD DE GOLETA City OF of Goleta Parks, Facilities & Playgrounds Plan Add aquatics facilities/A...

New or expanded...

Add athletic fields/court...

194

19 / 47

SurveyMonkey

CITY OF GOLETA PARKS SURVEY ENCUESTA SOBRE LOS PARQUES DE LA CIUDAD DE GOLETA

ChapterSurveyMonkey 6 | Appendices

Other (specify below)/Otro...

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

NOT IMPORTANT/NO ES IMPORTANTE (no label)

60%

70%

(no label)

80%

90% 100%

(no label)

VERY IMPORTANT/MUY IMPORTANTE NOT IMPORTANT/NO ES IMPORTANTE

(NO LABEL)

6.67% 12

3.89% 7

6.11% 11

17.22% 31

Make improvements and/or renovate existing amenities at parks/Hacer mejoras o renovar las instalaciones existentes en los parques

8.33% 15

3.89% 7

19.44% 35

Increase trail and pathway connectivity/Aumentar la conectividad de los senderos y rutas

8.33% 15

7.78% 14

Develop new parks (specify type below)/Construir nuevos parques (Escribir tipo de parque deseado abajo)

14.44% 26

Expand programs and activities/Expandir los programas y las actividades Add aquatics facilities/Agregar instalaciones acuáticas

VERY IMPORTANT/MUY IMPORTANTE

TOTAL

WEIGHTED AVERAGE

66.11% 119

180

4.32

27.78% 50

40.56% 73

180

3.88

15.56% 28

25.00% 45

43.33% 78

180

3.87

6.67% 12

25.56% 46

18.33% 33

35.00% 63

180

3.53

11.67% 21

7.78% 14

26.67% 48

29.44% 53

24.44% 44

180

3.47

20.56% 37

10.56% 19

20.00% 36

18.33% 33

30.56% 55

180

3.28

New or expanded community/recreation center/Centro de recreación o comunitario nuevo o ampliado

15.00% 27

11.67% 21

32.78% 59

21.11% 38

19.44% 35

180

3.18

Add athletic fields/courts/Agregar campos atléticos y canchas

22.22% 40

18.33% 33

29.44% 53

11.67% 21

18.33% 33

180

2.86

51.11% 92

1.67% 3

7.78% 14

5.56% 10

33.89% 61

180

2.69

Preserve open space/Preservar espacions abiertos

Other (specify below)/Otro (Escribir abajo)

NOTES/NOTAS

DATE

20 / 47

195

CITY GOLETA PARKS SURVEYMaster ENCUESTA SOBRE LOS PARQUES DE LA CIUDAD DE GOLETA City OF of Goleta Parks, Facilities & Playgrounds Plan

196

SurveyMonkey

Follow guidelines from the state and other cities regarding tree choices. There are too many olive trees being planted. Olive trees, along with Mullberry trees, have a rating of “10” on the OPALS rating system (the Ogden Plant Allergy Level Scale). A 10 is the highest level. (For comparison, cat allergies are about a 3 on the 0-10 scale.) The city of Albuquerque banned olive trees in public spaces after a child died. Pima County in AZ also banned the tree. The excessive use of this tree in town is just irresponsible due to its effects on allergies, respiratory problems and the risk that someone could have an anaphylactic event on City/public land. The city should invest some money on preventively replacing the trees with other low-allergy trees.

10/22/2018 11:52 PM

Create parks with easy parking. Allow parks to be open late for teens to have a place to play.

10/22/2018 10:15 PM

1) Add parks that have Trees with some shade like Stow Grove 2) Keep a few places wild, i.e. not handicapped accessible, like parts of Ellwood Mesa 3) More dog friendly parks - the one near Turnpike doesn't even need a fence because of its topography, and it's surrounded by street parking - that is ideal!

10/22/2018 8:45 PM

please stop building in every open space in Goleta!!! we need more green spaces all over the City! Clean up the beaches, litter control in parks, more code enforcement for nuisance codes to keep city clean and safe

10/18/2018 11:19 PM

Types of Park desired: Skate Park , Handball courts

10/18/2018 2:17 PM

Most : 8 Second Important: 5 Third: 6

10/18/2018 1:59 PM

enforce leash laws for dogs

10/17/2018 2:00 PM

Add more pickle ball courts

10/16/2018 9:08 PM

Thank you for the old town skatepark, it is a great start. My kids will enjoy it, but I am an older skater (43yo) and prefer the more surf-oriented skate obstacles such as enclosed bowls and pools, and the nearest such obstacles are in Ojai and San Luis Obispo. The south coast would greatly benefit from a regional skatepark, and would bring people to Goleta from all over California.

10/16/2018 8:26 PM

Work on dredging and removal of tule reeds from Lake Los Carneros, we will loose the lake in less than 20 years at the rate it is filling in. Please consider a plan to preserve this special space used by so many members of the community on a daily basis.

10/14/2018 8:01 PM

Find a good place for a Bicycle track/Velodrome - It would be a HUGE draw for the area! Greatly increase visitor and hotel room occupancy! Any questions I suggest City contact the City of Emmaus PA to get their info on the impact the trexlertown Velodrome had on the area and it's businesses. It is a great opportunity to become a unique and oft visited city in the area. With california weather, velodrome activites could easy be a 365 thing. But don;t take existing good park space nor 'open space' like ellwood mesa or Lk Los Caneros !!!

10/13/2018 6:32 PM

Update the neighborhood pocket parks and add new children’s play equipment.

10/12/2018 9:47 PM

-maintain trails to avoid muddy spots where people/bicycles make new or wider trails around. -subsidize golf courses for local residents. -Open Dos Pueblos HS pool for year round open times for residents swim exercise or create new olympic size pool north of freeway. -prevent unleashed dogs on beach that disturb birds. -increase parking at Devereux Beach closer to bluffs. Create walking/bike paths away from traffic -create walking/bike bridges across 101 freeway between current roadway crossings. -Create parking and access trails up into Los Padres Forest (Glen Annie, Fairview, etc) -create observatory area up in foothills to allow easy star observing at night. -create natural history museum, maybe new buildings at Lake Los Carneros.

10/12/2018 5:56 PM

Offer golf!

10/12/2018 2:25 PM

-Water the Redwoods more; some are dying. -Mowing pathways protect people/pets from ticks.

10/12/2018 8:59 AM

10/12/2018 8:46 AM

21 / 47

CITY OF GOLETA PARKS SURVEY ENCUESTA SOBRE LOS PARQUES DE LA CIUDAD DE GOLETA

ChapterSurveyMonkey 6 | Appendices

We need lower pricing/ more programs/ more facilities/ more locations for our youth, families and community members. I have always been of the opinion the Ice Rink has been an extravagant community expense and ONLY for those of much household disposable income. It is not something our local kids can afford without bleeding their parents for money. Nor is it a place for kids to go hang out, meet up aka occupy them b/n school and home, which has ALWAYS & CONTINUES to be desperately needed. A TRUE COMMUNITY CENTER. Question is...Does local citizenry and local government, etc KNOW how to instill, provide and nuture community... here's a hint: it is not a building for ice.

10/11/2018 10:19 PM

Create beach volleyball courts so people don’t have to drive to East Beach. They don’t actually have to be at Goleta Beach.

10/11/2018 10:15 PM

Stop destroying what was a nice town. Every morning the traffic jams and poorly planned traffic lights remind me how our leaders have failed us. No money to maintenence but you want to start more projects?

10/11/2018 10:03 PM

We ARE getting a new park in Goleta Proper. Just want it BIG and great Parking as to say to the community. “ this is for everyone in Goleta not just the apartments across the street “. And surely parking will speak volumes to us! And a skate park. We drive all the way downtown for that activity! Maybe after our list is completed. In 8-10 years. A nice, I mean very nice art and craft show here in Goleta every Saturday as not to rival SB. And maybe even from 1-5. Which could lead people to finish up around 5 to dine out. And or, the art and craft show could have our youth have a booth or two or three. And have them sign up a month per youth. And perhaps go before a board for approval of their art or craft!

10/11/2018 6:53 PM

Create open space. Create a few trails. Do not create a lot of trails that require tending and taxes.

10/11/2018 5:38 PM

We need aquatic parks as well. Goleta, Haskell’s and Hendry’s beaches are over crowded

10/11/2018 2:57 PM

I don't know if it's a safety/liability issue, but there are hardly any playgrounds with swings anymore; so sad... need more swings!! Also, since ADA compliance requires playground material to be either rubber mulch or wood chips, the sand boxes are all going away, too. Double sad... I don't mean ADA compliance is sad, that's good, what's sad is no more sand boxes.

10/11/2018 2:22 PM

It would be nice to have places for preteen and teens to go for skateboarding and other activities. Right now, too many use neighborhood streets (including making their own ramps that sit on the street) - which is dangerous.

10/11/2018 2:20 PM

A real skatepark, like solvang

10/11/2018 1:58 PM

im aware of the small skatepark in old that hasnt opened yet, but for more experienced skaters this will not be enough. please consider a bigger skatepark with more advanced obstacles.

10/11/2018 1:46 PM

Although we don't have a dog, I think there is a big need for an off-leash area in Goleta. This is really because we end up with a lot of off-leash dogs running up to our kids when we are at the park, and they say there isn't anywhere for them to take the dogs.

10/11/2018 1:34 PM

Make beach access easier for people walking or riding bikes. The bike path to goleta beach is so dangerous.

10/11/2018 1:25 PM

Maximize open space. Keep Goleta as agricultural and low density as possible. Parks being a mix of playgounds, open space, and fields are ideal (like Stowe Park).

10/11/2018 1:18 PM

Maintain or update very old or damaged play equipment, maintain the green spaces with no restroom facilities to keep transients from congregating in those areas.

10/11/2018 1:03 PM

Goleta needs a skatepark that is supervised so delinquents and drug users don't take over like like the SB one.

10/11/2018 12:52 PM

certfied dog park where people and dogs can intermingle

10/11/2018 12:50 PM

Consider official carving out official fenced in dog parks thought city so as not to concentrate in just a couple or few neighborhoods.

10/11/2018 12:44 PM

22 / 47

197

CITY GOLETA PARKS SURVEYMaster ENCUESTA SOBRE LOS PARQUES DE LA CIUDAD DE GOLETA City OF of Goleta Parks, Facilities & Playgrounds Plan

198

SurveyMonkey

Goleta desperately needs a very large sports complex with lights. As the Commissioners of Friday Night Lights Youth Flag Football League, we struggle every season to find fields with lights so that the kids can play. We have to turn away kids every season because the schools district only allows us to play until 7:30pm at La Colina Jr High, due to the neighborhood. Santa Barbara has run out of space. The youth sports leagues in town struggle to find space for the kids to play sports. Lights are essential as the only city fields with lights are Cabrillo Ball Field, which is too small to hold multiple games. Please consider building a large sports complex with lights in Goleta. I'm sure it would be well used year round. It would also increase exposure to local businesses in Goleta. I don't know if there is any space left close to Old Town, but it would be nice to bring people to that part of town.

10/11/2018 11:17 AM

Consider establishing a volunteer Park Watch Program, to assist the City with park maintenance, safety, and park user education.

10/11/2018 11:04 AM

Native plants and bird habitat

10/11/2018 9:23 AM

Continue to offer family oriented activities. With the increasing senior population, introduce activities targeted to/for that age group, particularly outdoor activities. Ample youth activity is available, not so for seniors. Providing opportunities, i.e. a playground for seniors, to keep us “movIng” is important to our physical & mental health. So much senior activity is indoors at senior centers, not providing the environment to move as can be done outdoors.

10/11/2018 8:54 AM

Goleta valley community center could use a face lift. Parks are In Desperate need of newer more modern equipment. Added shade. I recently visited Fort Collins, Colorado They have amazing play structures, courts and amenities for the community to congregate and meet. Natural play areas around streams as well as moveable toys-zip lines and climbing structures. (I took video and pictures if you would like to view) If we have more neighborhood parks then people would be able to meet their neighbors. More free community events and programs, such as camps or workshops that bring families together.

10/10/2018 10:22 PM

Dog parks

10/10/2018 10:08 PM

Teen/Adult outdoor activities and equipment

10/10/2018 8:10 PM

Off leash dog walking areas with grass not dirt.

10/10/2018 7:43 PM

A recreation center for teens - arcade, ping pong, etc. with a swimming pool.

10/10/2018 5:49 PM

enforcing leashed dogs on trails

10/10/2018 5:29 PM

Off leash parks

10/10/2018 5:22 PM

PLEASE try to save what redwoods are left at Stow Grove. I see the gardeners come every week and they water the grass to overflowing, but the trees are bone dry. They need approximately 10 gal/day. (Ucanr.edu) I've lived here 50 yrs and the past ranger used to be out there every day watering and protecting the historical trees. If something isn't done soon our grandchildren may never enjoy the tree's coolness during the summer and fresh air year around. Please, I know we are in a drought, but can we divert some water to save these majestic trees?

10/10/2018 4:54 PM

Off-leash dog park

10/10/2018 4:10 PM

I just want our city to be more walkable. It often feels like we live in a concrete jungle and it would be nice to have pedestrian only areas.

10/10/2018 3:44 PM

Perserve and protect sensitivity habatit

10/10/2018 3:19 PM

FENCED free dog parks...by the Marketplace/Costco

10/10/2018 2:56 PM

We’d like to add hiking trails in Goleta foothills so we don’t always have to go to SB to hike. Thanks.

10/10/2018 2:31 PM

23 / 47

CITY OF GOLETA PARKS SURVEY ENCUESTA SOBRE LOS PARQUES DE LA CIUDAD DE GOLETA

ChapterSurveyMonkey 6 | Appendices

Pool

10/10/2018 2:17 PM

I have lived here all my life (50+ years), my children grew up here. We definitely need more events within Old Town Goleta, preferably at the Goleta Valley Community Center. It needs to be renovated, it has lots of history (prime location), where me and my sisters grew up (preschool, dance events, etc.).

10/10/2018 12:51 PM

Goleta has seen tremendous growth in its built environment. It needs to balance that with preservation of open space, riparian restoration, and green belts to ensure access to the natural environment. Preserve and restore riparian habitat

10/10/2018 12:44 PM

There is a great program in Seattle where residents can purchase solar panels on public buildings, recreation centers and parks. They get generous electricity credits over the years. This way, everyone could contribute to a carbon neutral environment even if you do not have the means to put up solar panels on your own home.

10/10/2018 12:27 PM

the more parks people can walk to the better the community

10/10/2018 12:02 PM

More accessible, trails, beaches and activities. Free fitness classes for seniors

10/10/2018 11:03 AM

We need skateparks. The one under construction in Old Town is too small, given the number of people who will use it every day.

10/10/2018 10:37 AM

Skate Park at Evergreen Park.

10/10/2018 7:30 AM

More dog parks (off leash), especially in Kellogg area. Pickle Ball courts in Kellogg area.

10/9/2018 8:09 PM

1. Enforce leash laws. Off-leash dogs are running rampant, frightening children and elderly, and destroying irreplaceable habitat. 2. Develop more neighborhood "pocket parks." 3. Resist the temptation to add infrastructure and "amenities" to natural areas and open spaces (Lake Los Carneros, the Ellwood Mesa complex).

10/9/2018 8:04 PM

provide more open space while protecting creeks

10/9/2018 5:31 PM

My response to many of these questions, except the last one, depends on what individual parks and open spaces you're targeting and how do you want to change them. I think better use of school grounds--more lights for night activities, for example-as well as judicious investments in equipment can expand different age groups ability to enjoy what we have now. The opaque process currently underway for spending undisclosed resources in new "play structures" and shade canopies in 8 City parks/open spaces is asking for trouble, in my opinion. The "public meetings" held on this plan so far have attracted minimal attendance and I doubt the online surveys have added to residents' understanding of what is proposed and why. The most recent consultant's survey o Goletans' wishes reported in the Monarch clearly shows what I've been hear around my neighborhood-invest in keeping and improving open space.

10/9/2018 4:44 PM

The Berkeley park had the swings removed a while back and nothing has been done to that park for the kids.

10/9/2018 4:10 PM

I believe our public spaces are of utmost importance, and in particular outdoor public spaces. Goleta Beach Park has been neglected, and it shows. I'd really love to see the beach brought back, and the recreation areas sodded with fresh grass and watered with recycle water from the Waste Treatment Plant.

10/9/2018 1:55 PM

Develop a skate park for Goleta residents.

10/9/2018 6:44 AM

10/8/2018 4:49 PM

Goleta is in desperate need of a community arts program and a performing arts center.

10/8/2018 12:21 PM

Please consider our disabled population. We have many kids in wheel chairs that cannot access our parks and beaches. Also many with sensory needs making many of our areas unsuitable for them and their families.

10/8/2018 5:35 AM

24 / 47

199

CITY GOLETA PARKS SURVEYMaster ENCUESTA SOBRE LOS PARQUES DE LA CIUDAD DE GOLETA City OF of Goleta Parks, Facilities & Playgrounds Plan

200

SurveyMonkey

We need a protected dog park. When Girsh closed the enclosed dog area, but still allows agility training to happen there, it was a travesty for all concerned.

10/8/2018 5:32 AM

Add bathrooms to parks

10/8/2018 12:54 AM

Stow Grove Park Volleyball courts

10/7/2018 9:23 PM

More dog friendly off leash parks

10/7/2018 8:54 PM

Stop noise pollution due to flights not following proper flight paths. Clear out tent cities on the bluffs

10/7/2018 8:46 PM

More soccer fields need to be available

10/7/2018 8:36 PM

Control off leash dogs!!!! Establish dog free areas. I'm tired of being bitten, attacked, sniffed, slimmed and bullied by irresponsible dog owners and their undisciplined curs.

10/7/2018 8:36 PM

i think open spaces with lights would be great. there are few/no open spaces that can be used after sunset in the winter (outside of girsh park soccer turf). because of sunset and work hours there are few chances for adults to engage in outdoor recreation in goleta during the winter. also, preserving open spaces like elwood bluffs is critical to allowing easy access to undeveloped areas.

10/7/2018 12:48 PM

skateboard parks

10/7/2018 6:07 AM

skate parks! larger play ground structure that has art/architectural interest as in big cities that use play grounds as part of their city image by making them state of the art and interesting.

10/6/2018 7:22 PM

Skateboarding is growing in such a fast pace but the kids of Goleta are out of luck do to lack of places to practice. It is difficult for the average teen to travel down town to the SB skate park unsupervised. The kids of Goleta will thrive with skate parks throughout Goleta and it will keep them busy and out of the streets and better yet out of trouble!

10/6/2018 1:05 PM

Keep beaches accessible

10/6/2018 10:07 AM

Develop a proper skatepark

10/6/2018 9:55 AM

Other

10/6/2018 9:30 AM

Need Skateparks for all ages in different neighborhoods.

10/5/2018 1:56 PM

The people of Goleta need another skatepark. I understand one has been built on Kellogg. That one has very limited space for skater's actions while skateboarding. Imagine building a basketball court at half the size and putting at least 10 people on the court. It would be packed and crowded! Every skateboarder at a skatepark has their own individual goal(where basketball players are all focused on the same hoop). With each skater having a different goal, comes countless points of the skater's paths intersecting. That is why size completely matters when building a skatepark. Skateboarder's imagination of tricks/ways to get from one spot to another are endless! A bigger skatepark creates a safer environment for older skaters and younger skaters. The sport of skateboarding is going to continue to grow and more and more people in Goleta will be looking for safe and fun place to ride their skateboards. Please, please, don't stop with just the Kellogg Skatepark. The children, the students, the parents, and the people of Goleta will be in need of more safe places to skateboard. Thank you for taking the time to read my notes.

10/5/2018 1:29 PM

Build more skateparks for various skill levels / terrains. The upcoming skate plaza at Old Town Park , sized at 5400 sq. ft., is designed for beginners and far too small to accomodate the needs of City of Goleta's community. The average neighborhood skatepark starts at 10,000 sq. ft.

10/5/2018 12:59 PM

More playground equipment

10/4/2018 2:41 PM

25 / 47

CITY OF GOLETA PARKS SURVEY ENCUESTA SOBRE LOS PARQUES DE LA CIUDAD DE GOLETA

ChapterSurveyMonkey 6 | Appendices

Q5 Which three items from the list above are the highest priorities to your household? ¿Cuáles de los tres elementos de la lista anterior son las prioridades más altas para su hogar? Answered: 180

Skipped: 34

Preserve open space/Preser...

Increase trail and pathway...

Make improvements...

Develop new parks (speci...

26 / 47

201

CITY GOLETA PARKS SURVEYMaster ENCUESTA SOBRE LOS PARQUES DE LA CIUDAD DE GOLETA City OF of Goleta Parks, Facilities & Playgrounds Plan

Add aquatics facilities/A...

Expand programs and...

Add athletic fields/court...

Other (specify below)/Otro...

New or expanded...

202

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

27 / 47

60%

70%

80%

90% 100%

SurveyMonkey

CITY OF GOLETA PARKS SURVEY ENCUESTA SOBRE LOS PARQUES DE LA CIUDAD DE GOLETA

ChapterSurveyMonkey 6 | Appendices

Most Important/Más imporante Second most important/Segundo más importante Third most important/Tercero más importante MOST IMPORTANT/MÁS IMPORANTE

SECOND MOST IMPORTANT/SEGUNDO MÁS IMPORTANTE

THIRD MOST IMPORTANT/TERCERO MÁS IMPORTANTE

TOTAL

WEIGHTED AVERAGE

54.55% 60

20.91% 23

24.55% 27

110

1.70

Increase trail and pathway connectivity/Aumentar la conectividad de los senderos y rutas

24.42% 21

44.19% 38

31.40% 27

2.07

Make improvements and/or renovate existing amenities at parks/Hacer mejoras o renovar las instalaciones existentes en los parques

23.17% 19

37.80% 31

39.02% 32

2.16

Develop new parks (specify type below)/Construir nuevos parques (Escribir tipo de parque deseado abajo)

32.35% 22

26.47% 18

41.18% 28

2.09

Add aquatics facilities/Agregar instalaciones acuáticas

46.27% 31

28.36% 19

25.37% 17

1.79

Expand programs and activities/Expandir los programas y las actividades

10.53% 4

47.37% 18

42.11% 16

2.32

Add athletic fields/courts/Agregar campos atléticos y canchas

25.00% 8

56.25% 18

18.75% 6

1.94

37.93% 11

24.14% 7

37.93% 11

2.00

14.29% 4

28.57% 8

57.14% 16

2.43

Preserve open space/Preservar espacions abiertos

Other (specify below)/Otro (Escribir abajo) New or expanded community/recreation center/Centro de recreación o comunitario nuevo o ampliado

28 / 47

203

CITY GOLETA PARKS SURVEYMaster ENCUESTA SOBRE LOS PARQUES DE LA CIUDAD DE GOLETA City OF of Goleta Parks, Facilities & Playgrounds Plan

SurveyMonkey

Q6 What are the most important areas that, if addressed by the City of Goleta, would increase your use of City of Goleta parks and recreation facilities? Answered: 175

Skipped: 39

Better condition/ma... Better lighting... More facilities a... Facilities closer to wh... Improved communicatio... More programs/Más... Improved safety and...

Other/Otro

Better parking/Mejo... WiFi connectivity... Lower pricing/user... Expanded hours of... Better

204

29 / 47

CITY OF GOLETA PARKS SURVEY ENCUESTA SOBRE LOS PARQUES DE LA CIUDAD DE GOLETA

ChapterSurveyMonkey 6 | Appendices

Better handicapped/... Better customer... Better signage/wayf... 0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90% 100%

ANSWER CHOICES

RESPONSES

Better condition/maintenance of parks/facilities/Mejor estado y mantenimiento de parques e instalaciones

56.00%

Better lighting (parks, trails, and facilities)/Mejor alumbrado (parques, senderos e instalaciones)

37.71%

More facilities and amenities/Más instalaciones y servicios

36.00%

Facilities closer to where I live or work/Instalaciones más cercanas a donde vivo o trabajo

30.29%

Improved communication about offerings/Mejor comunicación sobre ofertas

28.57%

More programs/Más programas

25.14%

Improved safety and security/Seguridad mejorada

24.00%

Other/Otro

21.14%

Better parking/Mejor estacionamiento

20.00%

WiFi connectivity/Conectividad WiFi

17.71%

Lower pricing/user fees/Precios y tarifas de usuario más bajos

16.57%

Expanded hours of operation/Horas de operación extendidas

14.29%

Better handicapped/disabled accessibility/Mejor accesibilidad para discapacitados

10.29%

Better customer service/staff knowledge/Mejor servicio al cliente y conocimiento del personal

7.43%

Better signage/wayfinding/Mejor señalización

4.00%

Total Respondents: 175 #

OTHER/OTRO

DATE

Dog Park near Girsch & Ellwood

10/18/2018 3:35 PM

30 / 47

205

CITY GOLETA PARKS SURVEYMaster ENCUESTA SOBRE LOS PARQUES DE LA CIUDAD DE GOLETA City OF of Goleta Parks, Facilities & Playgrounds Plan

206

SurveyMonkey

Bathroom Access

10/18/2018 2:53 PM

Need shuttle Costs

10/18/2018 2:43 PM

enforce dog leash laws

10/17/2018 2:00 PM

need large park north of cathedral oaks...would need to get agricultural land.

10/12/2018 5:56 PM

Off-leash dog parks/areas and sand volleyball courts

10/11/2018 10:15 PM

Limit growth to sustainable resources, better traffic flow with syncranized traffic light and rotarys. Stop airport growth

10/11/2018 10:03 PM

Skate Park

10/11/2018 6:53 PM

none of the above. Pay attention to trees and brush to limit invasives.

10/11/2018 5:38 PM

Several neighborhood parks in Goleta have no bathroom facilities at all, or just a portable toilet.

10/11/2018 2:22 PM

competition skatepark

10/11/2018 1:46 PM

Having a monitor at Girsh to help with the homeless and alcohol drinking

10/11/2018 1:03 PM

Water fountains with filtration

10/11/2018 1:00 PM

skatepark

10/11/2018 12:52 PM

Cannot really agree with the above suggestions or think of any on my own.

10/11/2018 12:44 PM

Sports fields with lights

10/11/2018 11:17 AM

Expanded outdoor senior activities

10/11/2018 8:54 AM

Fields with lights for flag football

10/10/2018 10:08 PM

Off leash dog space

10/10/2018 7:43 PM

Off leash

10/10/2018 5:22 PM

The parks are looking great except for poor Goleta Beach

10/10/2018 4:54 PM

Better play areas

10/10/2018 1:53 PM

Preserving and creating habitats for wildlife

10/10/2018 12:27 PM

Maintenance of Bike paths (clear weeds/tree branches and fix potholes/repave)

10/10/2018 10:37 AM

Skateboarding elements

10/10/2018 7:30 AM

more natural areas

10/9/2018 5:31 PM

Too much of Goleta open space has been given to hotels and residences without committed areas of open space to add balance to the area proposed for development. This should stop and new formulas created that value open space and green belts (with recycled water).

10/9/2018 4:44 PM

Disabled access

10/8/2018 5:35 AM

protected dog park

10/8/2018 5:32 AM

31 / 47

CITY OF GOLETA PARKS SURVEY ENCUESTA SOBRE LOS PARQUES DE LA CIUDAD DE GOLETA

ChapterSurveyMonkey 6 | Appendices

Bathrooms

10/8/2018 12:54 AM

Dog facilities

10/7/2018 8:54 PM

Dog free areas. Sunbathing areas.

10/7/2018 8:36 PM

skateboard parks

10/7/2018 6:07 AM

More Skate parks

10/6/2018 1:05 PM

More skaeboarding elements within the active and passive recreation open spaces.

10/5/2018 1:56 PM

SKATEPARKS PLEASE

10/5/2018 1:29 PM

We need skateparks.

10/5/2018 12:59 PM

32 / 47

207

CITY GOLETA PARKS SURVEYMaster ENCUESTA SOBRE LOS PARQUES DE LA CIUDAD DE GOLETA City OF of Goleta Parks, Facilities & Playgrounds Plan

SurveyMonkey

Q7 How satisfied has your household been with the quality of the City of Goleta/Qué tan satisfecho ha estado su hogar con la calidad de la Ciudad de Goleta: Answered: 179

Skipped: 35

Parks your household ha...

Recreation facilities y...

Programs or

208

33 / 47

CITY OF GOLETA PARKS SURVEY ENCUESTA SOBRE LOS PARQUES DE LA CIUDAD DE GOLETA

ChapterSurveyMonkey 6 | Appendices

Programs or services you...

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

NOT SATISFIED/NO SATISFECHO (no label)

60%

(no label)

70%

80%

90% 100%

(no label)

VERY SATISFIED/MUY SATISFECHO NOT SATISFIED/NO SATISFECHO

(NO LABEL)

VERY SATISFIED/MUY SATISFECHO

Parks your household has used over the past 2 years/Los parques que su hogar ha usado en los últimos 2 años

2.23% 4

6.15% 11

32.96% 59

39.66% 71

Recreation facilities your household has used over the past 2 years/Las instalaciones recreativas que su hogar ha utilizado en los últimos 2 años

5.03% 9

6.70% 12

39.66% 71

Programs or services your household has used/Los programas o servicios que su hogar ha utilizado

7.26% 13

10.06% 18

43.02% 77

34 / 47

TOTAL

WEIGHTED AVERAGE

18.99% 34

179

3.67

41.90% 75

6.70% 12

179

3.39

31.28% 56

8.38% 15

179

3.23

209

CITY GOLETA PARKS SURVEYMaster ENCUESTA SOBRE LOS PARQUES DE LA CIUDAD DE GOLETA City OF of Goleta Parks, Facilities & Playgrounds Plan

SurveyMonkey

Q8 How effective is the City of Goleta at reaching you with information on parks facilities and services? ¿Qué tan efectiva es la Ciudad de Goleta para brindarle información sobre los parques y servicios? Answered: 173

Skipped: 41

(no label)

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

NOT AT ALL EFFECTIVE/NADA EFECTIVO (no label) NOT AT ALL EFFECTIVE/NADA EFECTIVO (no label)

210

(no label)

80%

90% 100%

(no label)

VERY EFFECTIVE/MUY EFECTIVO

(NO LABEL) 16.76% 29

70%

16.76% 29

(NO LABEL)

31.21% 54

35 / 47

24.86% 43

VERY EFFECTIVE/MUY EFECTIVO

TOTAL

10.40% 18

173

WEIGHTED AVERAGE 2.95

CITY OF GOLETA PARKS SURVEY ENCUESTA SOBRE LOS PARQUES DE LA CIUDAD DE GOLETA

ChapterSurveyMonkey 6 | Appendices

Q9 Do you have any further comments about parks & recreation facilities and services in the City of Goleta? ¿Tiene algún comentario adicional sobre los parques, instalaciones y servicios recreativos en la ciudad de Goleta? Answered: 83

Skipped: 131

RESPONSES

DATE

Get rid of the olive trees. Make parks more handicap accessible.

10/22/2018 11:53 PM

We have many hidden parks, we either need more hidden ones or information more available about the ones we do have

10/22/2018 8:46 PM

clean the beach parks, save Goleta Beach and NEVER let the county use it as a DUMPING ground again! RUined our beach for a year, I still won't swim there.

10/18/2018 11:21 PM

Pay Per Use of Pools

10/18/2018 4:33 PM

Let's Build a Skate Park and Community Garden

10/18/2018 4:11 PM

More swings and slides please. There is an open space between El Camino Elementary and Turnpike that could use some light and maybe a small park

10/18/2018 4:07 PM

Playground for adults athletic obstacle type stations w/ suggestions exercise

10/18/2018 4:03 PM

We would love to see some free use tennis courts and more public pools

10/18/2018 3:51 PM

Bathroom and Water Fountains at neighborhood Parks

10/18/2018 3:42 PM

Happy to learn about the new parks and plans.

10/18/2018 3:38 PM

Dog Park please, at Grisch or Ellwood Vicinity

10/18/2018 3:36 PM

More advertising in Goleta programs - Lemon Festival

10/18/2018 3:32 PM

Organize pick-up games.Activities to bring community members together more

10/18/2018 3:07 PM

Off leash Dog area - Open it again

10/18/2018 2:54 PM

I would love access to an outdoor surrounding pool. I love doing laps and gyms just to use pools are expensive.

10/18/2018 2:48 PM

Lower basketball courts for young kids

10/18/2018 2:24 PM

something Goleta has that I love are open spaces by the beach, more Mesa, Elwood, along UCSB & they are always clean. The bike path to Goleta should have better lights and repairs. Many would benefit from this

10/18/2018 2:19 PM

An Area where young and old can mingle. Play board games and sports, bikes pump track

10/18/2018 2:14 PM

Additional Bathrooms and trash/recycle would be great.

10/18/2018 2:00 PM

36 / 47

211

CITY GOLETA PARKS SURVEYMaster ENCUESTA SOBRE LOS PARQUES DE LA CIUDAD DE GOLETA City OF of Goleta Parks, Facilities & Playgrounds Plan

212

SurveyMonkey

Isla Vista has had plans for a skatepark for decades with very little progress. This should be a top priority for both the student population and the local youth. Thank you! Viva Goleta!

10/16/2018 8:29 PM

Please have animal control occasionally visit Lake Los Carneros and cite those who don't pick up dog waste. Also put in animal proof trash bins so the crows don't pull the trash out. Love the new pickleball courts, thank you for that!!!

10/14/2018 8:03 PM

expanded facilities for non-organized activity would be great - especially for the very young. Better facilities for play by children 4 to 10 ish...

10/13/2018 6:35 PM

The bike lane on Hollister is not very safe. Cars pull out quickly into those lanes. As a regular cyclist, I still ride in the bike lane on the street but I am not comfortable with cars and would rather ride on a safe bike path. Goleta needs more offstreet bike paths. It would have been nice to put in a paved path from Ellwood Bluffs through the preserve, behind the houses, not along Hollister and connect that to UCSB paths. Also, the planter median on Hollister by the historic Oil/gas station has made cycling more dangerous. The lanes are too narrow for cars and the bikes have no where to go. Riding was much safer without the median. Please consider this for future medians throughout Goleta and think about expanding bike lanes if the medians are installed.

10/13/2018 11:38 AM

Need to replace playground equipment taken out of the Berkeley park and recreation area and restore it to a children’s/ family park as opposed to the illegal dog park!!

10/12/2018 9:55 PM

keep communications up via email, etc.

10/12/2018 5:57 PM

Would love if you included adult golf lessons!

10/12/2018 2:26 PM

Stowe House area can be more receptive to leashed dogs during presentations, please. Also, have open public restroom facilities, daylight hours.

10/12/2018 9:08 AM

10/12/2018 8:46 AM

It would be valued to have eg SBCC/Adult Ed center in collaboration with UCSB in Goleta that offers art, and programs we had before state budget cuts... When SB's ad ed program was one of the best in the nation....That tapped the human resources of our vastly skilled and educated residents. I currently go to SB from Ellwood to play ping pong 3x a wk,that SB Parks and Rec. Its $1 BUT it costs me !.5 gallons of gas - @ $7 per trip =#21 + 3= $24 a wk. Soo much fun but not sustainable - I am on food stamps/ discretionary income is VERY minimal. SOO MANY residents are on social services. Why don't we have that at the Goleta Community Center? etc. etc.

10/11/2018 10:32 PM

Need off-leash dog areas Need sand volleyball courts

10/11/2018 10:16 PM

Rifle & pistol range

10/11/2018 10:05 PM

Yes let’s get this going. Toilets at Stow for sure! It’s ridiculous. An outhouse next to a playground where very small children are playing and cannot control when the go and how to hold it for parents who do not want that type of bathroom and to run all the way to the other side. I bet not. The trees are too close! Lol

10/11/2018 7:03 PM

The parks are really outdated and need to be renovated like Santa Barbara has done.

10/11/2018 6:38 PM

Thank you for asking; I look forward to hearing about or seeing improvements in our local parks soon! Go Goleta!!

10/11/2018 2:22 PM

thanks for getting a skatepark built but this is a wading pool compared to the real thing. This is one area that can put the city on the map dont waste it on more basketball baseball or any other courts that are seasonal and arent tourist attractions.

10/11/2018 1:50 PM

Please dont make goleta beach or any goleta park have paid parking. We love spending time outside because it is healthy for us and we dont want to have to pay for that. Thanks

10/11/2018 1:27 PM

37 / 47

CITY OF GOLETA PARKS SURVEY ENCUESTA SOBRE LOS PARQUES DE LA CIUDAD DE GOLETA

ChapterSurveyMonkey 6 | Appendices

Overall I think the city is doing a fine job. The idea of a city pool is actually very appealing. Lots of land over near the airport that would be perfect for it (the old drive in location comes to mind). Playgrounds are also huge at parks. The more the better basically. I wouldn't mind more parks, more playgrounds, and more open space, but I also feel blessed with what we have. Oh. And a pedestrian over-crossing at La Patera going over the freeway. Might as well shoot-for-the-moon :)

10/11/2018 1:21 PM

Thank you for keeping the greenspace off Winchester and Calle Real mowed and clean.

10/11/2018 1:04 PM

Dedicated dog park, but not at the park behind Kellogg School. Too many kids passing through there. It should be at the open space up the street towards Cathedral Oaks rd. Should be fenced off to protect kids. But NOT behind Kellogg school.

10/11/2018 12:57 PM

WE NEED AN AQUATICS FACILITY

10/11/2018 12:47 PM

Be careful. Do not overuse existing neighborhood parks, to the detriment of close neighbors.

10/11/2018 12:45 PM

If you speak with other Commissioners (AYSO, YFL, club teams), they will also express the need for a large sports complex with lights. If we want our kids to get outside and play, we need to provide a safe, fun environment for them to do so. Feel free to contact us . Ted and Nevin Pallad (santabarbarafnl@gmail.com)

10/11/2018 11:23 AM

Thank you for sending out the survey and asking for public input.

10/11/2018 11:06 AM

Thank you for overall job well done.

10/11/2018 8:56 AM

I receive your email alerts. They are informative. Thank you for asking for input. Connecting the mountain side of the freeway with bike paths to Elwood/Camino real would be a great asset. I like the new bike path along hollister but extending it to sandpiper golf course and across the freeway to cathedral oaks would contribute to bike safety. Pedestrian overpass over freeway? Between Glen annie and Winchester canyon? I look forward to new and improved parks. We have such amazing natural beauty to take advantage of and be outside. Programs for teens! Thank you.

10/10/2018 10:28 PM

We need a field that can be used for Flag Football league, with lights and parking

10/10/2018 10:09 PM

I would love to help speed up the improvement of my local park, Andamar Park. Some type of community outreach program to get volunteers for projects could potentially speed up the project cycle and reduce some costs. I'm sure I'm not the only one willing to contribute, we live in an awesome community! Thanks for taking input.

10/10/2018 8:48 PM

My child is older now but when she was still using playground equipment I found myself wishing there were something like a "Parent Track" where adults could walk, jog or exercise while still in close proximity to the play area.

10/10/2018 8:14 PM

We need to save what remains of undeveloped land, and be sure dogs are leashed so people can be safe on trails and streets.

10/10/2018 5:31 PM

The Goleta Community Center is well overdue for a complete remodel and renovation to bring this center up to modern standards. Located in the heart of downtown Goleta surrounded by small businesses, young families and close to the Goleta Tech Hub companies, this is a great opportunity for the City to capitalize on creating a welcoming, multifunction center as a state-of-art Gateway to Goleta and work hub similar to WorkZones/Impact Hub with local business, family and entertainment events. Create activities here for diverse multigenerations, cultures and interests. Offer more office and event space here with modern, updated facilities including high speed internet, conference/meeting rooms, games/entertainment room, comfortable lounges, nonprofit space/hub and options for gathering a variety of folks together. First and foremost, hire an extraordinary Executive Director who will fundraise spectacularly to bring this to our community. We expect the City of Goleta to budget this position accordingly and provide seed funding to embark on this huge campaign.

10/10/2018 4:59 PM

Please see my comments about watering the redwoods at Stow Park. If they would have the water they need they would be less succeptable to disease. They are a big piece of Goleta's history! Thank You!!

10/10/2018 4:57 PM

no thanks :)

10/10/2018 3:47 PM

38 / 47

213

CITY GOLETA PARKS SURVEYMaster ENCUESTA SOBRE LOS PARQUES DE LA CIUDAD DE GOLETA City OF of Goleta Parks, Facilities & Playgrounds Plan

214

SurveyMonkey

Perserve habitat and open spaces including watering plants and trees.

10/10/2018 3:20 PM

It would be great to have a fenced-in area dogs can run loose in in the Costco area of Goleta, that is free and safe for little dogs.

10/10/2018 2:58 PM

The park we most use has people using drugs there that is a huge problem. Both in the park and the creek beside it. Also homeless people seem to be increasing. We kostly go to park for kids afe 1.5 to 7 so play structures areas are most important to our family

10/10/2018 1:55 PM

There is a Porta-Potty at Evergreen Park that is across from my house and an eyesore. It needs to have plants around it like the one by the kiddie park 200 yards away

10/10/2018 1:38 PM

I think the City of Goleta is going in the right direction. I would like to see more emphasis on Old Town Goleta, it most certainly needs upgrades (upgrades, bike lane, parking, Community Center renovation/usage, parking lot upgrade with more signage for the safety of children that is never taken into consideration), especially for the many families with children who live in this area.

10/10/2018 12:56 PM

Goleta is fortunate to have a variety of ecosystems that serve as habitat for birds. The city needs to be proactive in nurturing, preserving, and restoring these habitats to ensure ecosystem health and longevity.

10/10/2018 12:45 PM

Please add N/A options in future surveys :)

10/10/2018 12:28 PM

Remember to communicate with seniors and Noleta residents

10/10/2018 11:05 AM

We need a better bike path on the fairview overpass, and on Hollister ave through Old Town. Also, the path along Los Carneros Lake needs to be repaved.

10/10/2018 10:39 AM

10/10/2018 10:24 AM

Protect and preserve the Ellwood Mesa trees and butterfly habitat.

10/10/2018 10:24 AM

Pocket parks in neighborhoods need or attention. Missing equipment and play structures

10/10/2018 10:12 AM

Do everything possible to truly "preserve" Goleta's two precious and irreplaceable preserves--Lake Los Carneros and the Ellwood Mesa complex. This means: (1) responsible and active management; (2) better monitoring and security; and (3) serious leash law enforcement.

10/9/2018 8:06 PM

Before any City funds are invested in the poorly thought out program of removing swings and adding children's play structures to our open spaces/parks, please reconsider what staff is doing and why. If only healthy children are to be served in some parks say so.

10/9/2018 4:48 PM

The Berkeley park needs to be updated since the swings were removed a while ago.

10/9/2018 4:11 PM

An aquatics park & a skate park would both add a lot to the offerings for Goleta residents. Also, creating safe & connected bikeways like the one past Costco on Calle Real will encourage healthy levels of activity.

10/9/2018 6:48 AM

My family is disappointed with how the eucalyptus trees were trimmed along Pebble Beach Drive. The trees were just topped off and dead trees were left standing. There is one tree that had bare branches that was cut. This tree was where birds would come back seasonally and use as their perch. Some just came back and were seen flying all around appearing to be trying to figure out where they were going to go.

10/8/2018 11:08 PM

DOG PARK for north Goleta!

10/8/2018 5:33 AM

Improve playground equipment at existing parks. Look to Santa Barbara’s Kid’s World as an example. If Goleta is where families live, we should have amazing kid play places in town

10/8/2018 4:14 AM

39 / 47

CITY OF GOLETA PARKS SURVEY ENCUESTA SOBRE LOS PARQUES DE LA CIUDAD DE GOLETA

ChapterSurveyMonkey 6 | Appendices

Need more bathrooms at the parks

10/8/2018 12:55 AM

More and mare people today have dogs than in the past. Resteraunts and hotels are accepting more and I think parks should have more areas for dogs also

10/7/2018 8:57 PM

Need more open spaces and stop building hotels

10/7/2018 8:39 PM

Making sure that all public bathroom stay open during park hours and maintenance

10/7/2018 8:37 PM

Good job. High five. Participation �

10/7/2018 8:37 PM

i am largely unaware of park/rec offerings from the city. that being said, we have some great facilities in my neighborhood (belle vista park) that my kids are able to use regularly.

10/7/2018 12:51 PM

new skateboard parks

10/7/2018 6:08 AM

Litter clean up is always an issue especially where homeless reside.

10/6/2018 7:54 PM

Which skateboarding on the rise the present day youth and future youth deserve multiple places to skateboard at throughout the Goleta city without being harassed or yelled at for doing so.

10/6/2018 1:07 PM

I am concerned about homeless activity on the Ellwood bluffs

10/6/2018 9:32 AM

Skateboarding helps people forget about all of their problems right when they step on their skateboard. It helps skaters set a goal and work to achieve that goal. Skateboarding is amazing. I, along with the people of Goleta would love to have more safe place to meet other people that that love skateboarding as much as we do.

10/5/2018 1:33 PM

Goleta needs a full system of skateparks to fulfill the various terrains and skill levels of local skateboarders. Also, a system of skateparks gives the city great active recreation options and programming possibilities benefitting the whole community.

10/5/2018 1:07 PM

40 / 47

215

CITY GOLETA PARKS SURVEYMaster ENCUESTA SOBRE LOS PARQUES DE LA CIUDAD DE GOLETA City OF of Goleta Parks, Facilities & Playgrounds Plan

SurveyMonkey

Q10 Please Indicate your gender/Por favor indique su sexo: Answered: 177

Skipped: 37

Male/Masculino

Female/Fememino

Non-Binary/Thir d Gender/Gén...

Prefer not to say/Prefiero...

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

70%

80%

90% 100%

ANSWER CHOICES

RESPONSES

Male/Masculino

23.73%

Female/Fememino

67.80%

120

Non-Binary/Third Gender/Género no binario

0.00%

Prefer not to say/Prefiero no responder

8.47%

TOTAL

216

60%

177

41 / 47

CITY OF GOLETA PARKS SURVEY ENCUESTA SOBRE LOS PARQUES DE LA CIUDAD DE GOLETA

ChapterSurveyMonkey 6 | Appendices

Q11 What is your age? ¿Qué edad tiene? Answered: 177

Skipped: 37

Under 25/Menos de 25

25 - 34

35 - 44

45 - 54

55 - 64

65 - 74

75 or over/75 o más 0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90% 100%

ANSWER CHOICES

RESPONSES

Under 25/Menos de 25

4.52%

25 - 34

20.90%

35 - 44

19.77%

45 - 54

22.60%

55 - 64

17.51%

65 - 74

11.30%

3.39%

CITY OF GOLETA PARKS SURVEY ENCUESTA SOBRE LOS PARQUES DE LA CIUDAD DE GOLETA 75 or over/75 o más TOTAL

42 / 47

SurveyMonkey 177

217

CITY GOLETA PARKS SURVEYMaster ENCUESTA SOBRE LOS PARQUES DE LA CIUDAD DE GOLETA City OF of Goleta Parks, Facilities & Playgrounds Plan

SurveyMonkey

Q12 Which of these categories best applies to your household? Answered: 177

Skipped: 37

Single, no children/Sol...

Single with children at...

Single, children no...

Couple, no children/Par...

Couple with children at...

Couple, children no... 0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

70%

80%

90% 100%

ANSWER CHOICES

RESPONSES

Single, no children/Soltero(a), sin hijos

18.64%

Single with children at home/Soltero(a) con hijos en el hogar

4.52%

Single, children no longer at home (empty nester)/Soltero(a) con hijo que ya no viven en el hogar

4.52%

Couple, no children/Pareja, sin hijos

13.56%

Couple with children at home/Pareja con hijos en el hogar

43.50%

Couple, children no longer at home (empty nester)/Pareja con hijos que ya no viven en el hogar

15.25%

TOTAL

218

60%

177

44 / 47

CITY OF GOLETA PARKS SURVEY ENCUESTA SOBRE LOS PARQUES DE LA CIUDAD DE GOLETA

ChapterSurveyMonkey 6 | Appendices

Q13 Are you Hispanic or Latino? ¿Es hispano o latino? Answered: 177

Skipped: 37

Yes/Sí

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90% 100%

ANSWER CHOICES

RESPONSES

Yes/Sí

12.99%

87.01%

154

TOTAL

177

45 / 47

219

CITY GOLETA PARKS SURVEYMaster ENCUESTA SOBRE LOS PARQUES DE LA CIUDAD DE GOLETA City OF of Goleta Parks, Facilities & Playgrounds Plan

SurveyMonkey

Q14 What race do you identify as? ¿Con qué raza se identifica? Answered: 177

Skipped: 37

American Indian or...

Asian/Asiática

Black or African...

Native Hawaiian or...

White/Blanca

Other/Otro

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

70%

80%

90% 100%

ANSWER CHOICES

RESPONSES

American Indian or Alaska Native/Amerindia o nativo de Alaska

0.56%

Asian/Asiática

3.39%

Black or African American/Afroamericana

0.00%

Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander/Nativa de Hawái u otra isla del Pacífico

0.00%

White/Blanca

75.71%

134

Other/Otro

20.34%

TOTAL

220

60%

177

46 / 47

CITY OF GOLETA PARKS SURVEY ENCUESTA SOBRE LOS PARQUES DE LA CIUDAD DE GOLETA

ChapterSurveyMonkey 6 | Appendices

Q15 Does your household have a need for ADA (Americans with Disabilities Act) accessible facilities? ¿Su hogar necesita instalaciones accesibles para discapacidatos? Answered: 177

Skipped: 37

Yes/Sí

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

ANSWER CHOICES

RESPONSES

Yes/Sí

9.04%

90.96%

TOTAL

90% 100%

16 161 177

47 / 47

221

City of Goleta Parks, Facilities & Playgrounds Master Plan

Page intentionally left blank

222