San Marcos Armorlite Drive Grant Application by KTUA

CAPITAL GRANT APPLICAION FORM

CAPITAL GRANT APPLICATION FORM Project Title:

Armorlite Complete Street Corridor Applicant (Jurisdiction):

City of San Marcos Grant Amount Requesting:

$ 1,000,000.00

APPLICATION CHECKLIST Application Requirements: (Please indicate application completeness by checking the following boxes) Eight hard copies and one CD of the complete Smart Growth Incentive Program application (including all attachments, clearly labeled) Resolution including all statements provided in the Sample Resolution on page A-22 Format: provide narrative responses in the spaces provided in the application form Baseline data collection included in Scope of Work, Schedule, and Budget Documentation of matching funds Vicinity maps showing project locations; entitled land developments related to the project; and local/regional street, bicycle, transit, and highway facilities within and near the project area (may be printed up to 11x17 paper) Feasibility study or project study report (include in CD ONLY, do NOT attach as hard copy). Plans showing that minimum design standards has been met Project Scope of Work, Schedule and Budget

Recommended Application Elements: (Please check boxes if applicable) Documentation of support for the project from community groups or individuals (recommended but not required) Aerial photos and other photographs depicting existing conditions (recommended but not required) Phasing Plan (Only applicable to projects requesting more than $1 million)

If any of the above-required elements are not included with the application by the January 18, 2013 deadline, the application will be deemed ineligible.

CAPITAL GRANTS FY 2011 â&#x20AC;&#x201C; FY 2013 SMART GROWTH INCENTIVE PROGRAM GRANT APPLICATION FORM

A-1

PROJECT SUMMARY

PROJECT SUMMARY Applicant (Agency):

City of San Marcos Project Title:

Armorlite Complete Street Corridor Smart Growth Opportunity Area Identifier:

SM-3 Mixed Use Transit Corridor & SM-4 Special Use Center

Project Area Limits: e.g. 4th St. between Laurel St. and Ash St., and 5th St. between Laurel St. and Ash St. The project includes the public right of way of Armorlite Drive between North Las Posas Road and Bingham Drive and then on Bingham Drive between Armorlite to the entrance of Mission Sports Park, inclusive of Bailey Court. The smart growth projects and related pedestrian connectivity, public spaces and park facilities are located on each side of Armorlite, extending as far north as West Mission Road. See Figures 1 & 2 in the attachment package.

Brief Project Description: Please provide a brief description of the proposed project in the space provided below. Enhancements to Armorlite Drive that will go above and beyond developer requirements for this street. The roadway is intended to be made into a multi-modal complete street with enhanced walkways, bike racks, street furnishings, pedestrian lighting, mid-block crossings and a Class 1 bike path located on the north side of the street. The project also includes the extension of bike facilities to Mission Sports Park by way of Class 2 or Class 3 facilities along Bingham Drive and Bailey Court. Finally, though not paid for by the SGIP funds, the project includes easements and improvements related to a public park and a pedestrian promenade and bridge connection to Palomar College and adjacent bus and light rail stations.

Primary Contact Person (Project Manager): Title:

Isaac Etchamendy

Assistant Engineer, Engineering Division, City of San Marcos

Street Address:

1 Civic Center Driver

Phone:

City and Zip Code: E-mail Address:

(760) 744-1050

San Marcos, CA 92069

ietchamendy@san-marcos.net

OTHER PROJECT PARTNERS: Consultants Collaborative, Inc. San Marcos

Integral Communities, Encinitas

SGIP Grant Funds Request Amount $ 1,000,000.00 Matching Funds $ 1,033,972.00 Total Project Cost $ 2,033,972.00 Total Project Cost = SGIP Grant Funds + Matching Funds

CAPITAL GRANTS FY 2011 â&#x20AC;&#x201C; FY 2013 SMART GROWTH INCENTIVE PROGRAM GRANT APPLICATION FORM

A-3

PROJECT SUMMARY

Can this project be broken into phases? (Y/N) ___ If yes, briefly list phased scope and costs: (Please note, that if the proposed project is requesting more than $1 million in SGIP funds, a phasing plan is required)

Due to the nature of the roadway improvements and its relationship to the adjacent developments and essential roadway improvements, all of the proposed enhancements will need to be completed at the same time as the roadway reconfiguration. Special landscape treatments, lighting and street furnishings ($180,000) and the extension of bike facilities along Bingham Drive and Bailey Court ($20,000) are the only elements that can be put into a subsequent phase.

CAPITAL GRANTS FY 2011 â&#x20AC;&#x201C; FY 2013 SMART GROWTH INCENTIVE PROGRAM GRANT APPLICATION FORM

A-4

PROJECT LOCATION MAP

Please insert the proposed project location map here, or include the map as attachment 1 in your application.

CAPITAL GRANTS FY 2011 â&#x20AC;&#x201C; FY 2013 SMART GROWTH INCENTIVE PROGRAM GRANT APPLICATION FORM

A-5

PROJECT COSTS AND FUNDING

PROJECT COSTS AND FUNDING TOTAL ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: Summary of Cost Estimates Category

Cost $ 5,000.00

Baseline Data Collection Preliminary Engineering or Planning

$ 0.00

Engineering Project Management

$ 33,972.00

Contract Engineering Environmental Clearance

$ 84,930.00 $ 0.00

Right-of-Way Acquisition

$ 0.00

Final Design

$ 84,390.00

Construction Construction Management

$ 126,543.00

Construction Contract

SGIP Enhancements Developer Improvements

$ 848,597.00 $ 850,000.00

Total Project Cost

$ 2,033,972.00

Funding Sources: Funding Source SGIP Grant Funds Requesting Amount Matching Funds (specify source) Other (specify source) Total Funding

Amount

Source

$ 1,000,000.00 SGIP $ 1,000,000.00 Developer $ 33,972.00 City of SM $ $ 2,033,972.00

MINIMUM DESIGN STANDARDS & GUIDELINES Clearly illustrate that the minimum design standard is being met. Plans provided must be actual cross-section drawings. (Provide photographs, if applicable) See Eligibility Criteria for more information on design standards and guidelines.

CAPITAL GRANTS FY 2011 â&#x20AC;&#x201C; FY 2013 SMART GROWTH INCENTIVE PROGRAM GRANT APPLICATION FORM

A-6

In the space provided below, please provide a description of the proposed project that addresses the following; please limit to one page.   

Project setting Project objectives Relationship of project to existing and planned land uses and transportation facilities in the project area

Applicants are encouraged to also provide the following attachments:    

Location(s) Map of the Project Area Map of Entitled Land Development projects related to the project A site plan, renderings, and typical cross sections depicting project-level detail, not to exceed 11x17 inches Aerial photo and other photographs depicting existing conditions

Please ensure that all graphic materials submitted are legible

Project Setting: The “San Marcos Armorlite Drive Complete Street Corridor” is located within the Mission Road Focus Area 1 [MRFA] as designated by the City of San Marcos General Plan. The MRFA builds on the existing industrial and commercial character of this area, while fostering a land use mix that better responds to the area’s proximity to Palomar Community College, North County Transit District [NCTD] Palomar College Bus Transit Center, and the Sprinter Rail Station at Palomar College. The San Marcos General Plan Update and Implementing Zoning Elements designates this Smart Growth area to include mixed uses including housing to help provide students a choice of close access to the campus and to provide a choice to residents in the area to utilize the substantial transit options available near the project site or to circulate more efficiently and safely along new pedestrian walks and bike facilities. Armorlite is a key street that connects North Las Posas Road to Bingham Drive. The Armorlite Drive Complete Street Corridor will tie together proposed development projects along North Las Posas Road as well as two entitled development projects, Palomar Station project and Davia Village. Armorlite will act as a new multi-modal corridor that will also provide enhanced access to the proposed pedestrian bridge that will span over W. Mission Road from Palomar College to the entirety of the MRFA. The current setting consists mostly of industrial business parks, with a high percentage of empty parcels along Armorlite and in the general area (see Figures 3). The recently upgraded Mission Sports Park sits at the end of several streets (Bingham, Bailey Court, and Armorlite) and is isolated both visually and physically. Access to the Park by bike or by walking is very limited but will be improved by this plan. Project Objectives: Figures 3 shows some of the issues and opportunities the proposed project is trying to address. The following objectives guide this project: • Incorporation of Armorlite Drive as a multi-modal green street corridor that provides connections to the Palomar Sprinter Station, NCTD bus hub as well as pedestrian and bicycle connections to San Marcos, the Inland Rail Trail and other regional destinations (see Figures 13-15). • Armorlite Drive (between North Las Posas Road to Bingham Drive) will set the character for this smart growth area by providing a specific design theme and sense of place associated with a complete street and public realm spaces including a park (see Figure 16-21). • Existing street width is 66’ and includes one lane of travel in each direction with on street parallel parking (see Figure 22, Section A-1). The proposed street width is 74’ and will include on street angled parking on one side, one lane of travel in each direction, a dedicated two-way cycle track, traffic calming, 6’ pedestrian zone, a 5’ greening zone, horizontal deflection (chicane), mid-block pedestrian crossings and bulb-outs (see Figure 22, Section A-2 and A-3).

CAPITAL GRANTS FY 2011 – FY 2013 SMART GROWTH INCENTIVE PROGRAM GRANT APPLICATION FORM

A-7

PROJECT SUMMAY/DETAIL DESCRIPTION

PROJECT SUMMARY/ DETAIL DESCRIPTION

PROJECT SUMMAY/DETAIL DESCRIPTION

Relationship of Project to Existing & Planned Uses: PLEASE 4 and 5 show the current and proposed land use setting for the project area. The City of San Figures Marcos has developed policies as a part of the General Plan and the Palomar Station Specific Plan that promote mixed-use compact development patterns (see Figure 6 and 7). Specific land use changes will occur as a result of the Davia Village project and the Palomar Station project and they are directly related to this request for SGIP funds. Ultimately, the Armorlite Drive Complete Street Corridor will invigorate the MRFA and demonstrate positive visual and physical changes that will encourage the transition of land uses from light industrial to a mix of business park, retail and residential components. This transition will spur other land use changes (such as the North County Times / Union Tribune site) so that the area will embrace smart growth policies and take advantage of the extensive transit improvements and proximity to Palomar Community College (see Figure 8 and 9).

CAPITAL GRANTS FY 2011 â&#x20AC;&#x201C; FY 2013 SMART GROWTH INCENTIVE PROGRAM GRANT APPLICATION FORM

A-8

Intensity of Planned Development in the Smart Growth Opportunity Area Please explain if this project is located within an area, where a specific plan, community plan, master EIR, or other mechanism allows for administrative or expedited approval of development projects.

The project is located within the SM-3 Mixed Use Transit Corridor and is within a 1/4 mile of the SM-4 Special Use Center (see Figure 6).The Specific Plan area in San Marcos is the future site of the Palomar Station development (see Figure 7). The Specific Plan area is entitled under the San Marcos General Plan approved by the San Marcos City Council in February of 2012. The Davia Village project is being processed as a discretionary permit under the rezone that occurred as part of the implementing element of the General Plan. The zoning changed from “Light Industrial” to “Mixed Use 1”. The plan is in its final stages and is being processed as a Specific Plan, trying to increase density.

Entitled Development Density within a ¼ mile Radius of Proposed Capital Project Site, Mix of Uses, and New Affordable Housing Development Please provide the following information for each entitled development project located within a ¼-mile of the proposed capital project.  Project Name  Number of Affordable Housing Units  Location Restricted to Very-Low Income Residents  Land Uses  Estimated Gross Lease Area for  Units per Net Residential Acre Commercial/Office/Retail Uses  Total Number of Units  Estimated Construction Completion Date  Number of Affordable Housing Units

The approved Palomar Station Specific Plan has 370 residential units (586 bedrooms), with 33 units reserved for affordable housing of which 23 will be Very-Low Income Housing Units (see Figure 19). Another 23 units will be paid for off-site through in-lieu fees (see Figure 9). This mixed use development includes 44,000 SF of commercial/retail space, 5,000 SF of food services, 5,400 SF of live/work space, and a half acre active use park. Parking is provided with 954 spaces on-site with 40 of these shared spaces between retail and residential uses and another 53 spaces located next to these developments for public street parking. These two factors represent a shared parking strategy to help balance parking resources with varying demands so that parking is not overbuilt. Davia Village is almost complete in its entitlement. It currently has 368 planned units with 19,855 SF devoted to commercial/retail space and 8,895 SF identified as live/work space. Parking quantities are reduced to 1.5 spaces per unit and is seeking shared parking strategies and other TDM measures. The current zoning allows a 30 units to the acre. If the Davia Village Specific Plan is approved, it will allow the project to go to 36 units to the acre. Since this density is still not approved, 30 units to the acre should be used in calculations since this is fully allowed under the existing zoning.

CAPITAL GRANTS FY 2011 – FY 2013 SMART GROWTH INCENTIVE PROGRAM GRANT APPLICATION FORM

A-9

LAND USE AND TRANSPORTATION CHARACTERISTICS

Transportation Demand Management (TDM) Characteristics Please describe any existing or proposed transportation demand management strategies associated with existing or planned development in the project area. TDM strategies can include incentives such as transit pass programs for employees or residents in the area, vanpool/carpool programs, parking cashout programs for employees, car or bike sharing programs, shuttle services to rail stations or major destinations, and other strategies.

The two proposed infill projects associated with this corridor are subject to consistency review as part of the Specific Plan Development Review Process or as part of a discretionary action related to a planned development permit. In order to support smart growth concepts, increase transit use and improve cost efficiencies associated with parking, the City requires the submittal of a TDM plan. The City will consider reductions in parking requirements if the project exemplifies industry accepted best management practices for parking such as: • Moderate to high densities that support shared use and parking resource turnovers (proposed). • Mixed use within a 10-minute walk zone that decreases parking demand (proposed). • Inclusionary affordable housing that decreases parking demand (proposed). • Senior or assisted housing that decreases parking demand (not proposed). • Maximum parking facilities provided for tenants and residents to assure excessive and subsidized parking does not occur (the proposed parking ratios are considered to be a maximum, though would not be considered smart growth levels of managed parking, Davia is seeking a 1.5 parking ratio per unit). • Shared parking strategies for offset peak uses where demand for parking is at identifiable offset periods such as residential and retail uses (proposed). • Transit pass paid for by the development or through an association or assessment (proposed). • Priority parking for vanpool and carpool users (proposed). • Non-reserved tenant & resident spaces that use parking supply at higher efficiency levels (proposed). • Developer or agency supplied shuttle to the trolley station (not needed based on distance). • Funding of off-site pedestrian enhancements and connections (proposed). • Funding of on-site pubic use easements to provide better pedestrian connectivity (proposed). • Funding of near-site public uses and services such as parks, public spaces, and neighborhood supporting retail and food services (proposed). • Support for multi-modal choices (proposed). • Support for bike racks, street furnishings and pedestrian level lighting (proposed). • Support for traffic calming to improve pedestrian and bike use safety (proposed).

Urban Design Characteristics and Community Context Please respond to the following questions in the space provided below.   

How do the urban design characteristics of the project area support smart growth? For the project area, is there adopted guidance in place such as urban design guidelines, specific area plans, or formbased codes that regulate the design of buildings and infrastructure to support smart growth? Identify the mix of public and private land uses in the project area and how the uses meet local needs for goods, services, entertainment, etc. within walking distance of residents or employees.

The development projects along Armorlite Drive embody the principles of Smart Growth through efficient mixed land use, multi-modal choices, high density mid-rise structures and design elements that create a vibrant human scaled community. Significant emphasis has been placed on the walkability of the planned developments and their connectivity to the community. Retail services are provided at each corner of the Palomar Station complex, placed along pedestrian walks that include inviting facades and outdoor spaces for social interaction. Sidewalk cafes and other urban outdoor amenities (see Figures 10, 11, 16 and 19) foster this interaction and offer gathering places that create a sense of place and destination. The street has been designed to be more than a place for vehicles, it is a place for people. CAPITAL GRANTS FY 2011 – FY 2013 SMART GROWTH INCENTIVE PROGRAM GRANT APPLICATION FORM

A-10

LAND USE AND TRANSPORTATION CHARACTERISTICS

The proposed building frontages related to Palomar Station and Davia Village, are vibrant and have minor setback variations for varied sight-lines and aesthetic appeal. However, even with this variation, there is also consistency of street walls, creating an enclosed and defined urban feel. The buildings include sand-finished stucco, wood knee braces and slate tile veneer. Decorative metal awnings and railings provide further interest. The facades of the buildings would retain visual interest through the use of these different materials, which would also break up the bulk and scale of the building. Surface parking has been limited with much of the parking incorporated into the ground floor of the structures or away from the public streets. A 60,000 SF park in the Davia Village development, as well as other landscape improvements and open spaces, will accommodate active as well as passive recreation. Both planned developments have large inviting entries from Armorlite Drive into courtyard areas that are characterized by walking paths and shade trees. For the project area, is there adopted guidance in place such as urban design guidelines, specific area plans, or form based codes that regulate the design of buildings and infrastructure to support smart growth? The Palomar Station development project is an approved Specific Plan under the San Marcos General Plan adopted by the San Marcos City Council in February of 2012 (see Figure 7 and 19). The Palomar Station specific plan is “form-based” in that it emphasizes building forms over individual land uses for achieving walkable neighborhoods, energy and resource efficiency, mixed use and transit-oriented development, and transportation demand management solutions. The adjacent properties such as Davia Village are mixed use zoning, subjecting them to consistency review. This requires project compliance with clearly defined Smart Growth polices and development standards. The review criteria provide urban design guidelines for building forms, scale, uses, textures, densities, mass, architectural articulation, frontage, universal access for pedestrians, cyclists and transit, parking and transportation demand management strategies, etc. Identify the mix of public and private land uses in the project area and how the uses meet local needs for goods, services, entertainment, etc. within walking distance of residents or employees. The land uses proposed along Armorlite Drive will provide goods and services within walking distance of all local residents, college students and transit users (see Figures 5, 8, and 18). The adjacent Sprinter and bus transit center along with the Inland Rail Trail, further these opportunities. Existing services within walking distance include George’s Burgers located on Armorlite Drive, Mission Sports Park, several religious facilities, Palomar College, as well as furniture and design outlets located to the south. The completion of the mixed use development projects on Armorlite will supplement these existing destinations supporting those who live, work and learn within the immediate area, the option of walking or riding to these local services (see Figure 18 and 21).

CAPITAL GRANTS FY 2011 – FY 2013 SMART GROWTH INCENTIVE PROGRAM GRANT APPLICATION FORM

A-11

QUALITY OF PROJECT For this section, please provide answers in bullet format. A short, concise narrative may be provided, if necessary, to describe the project.

QUALITY OF PROJECT

Support for Public Transit Describe how the completed project will support the use of regional public transit service in the project area in the space provided below. For example:  Does the project improve roadway bus access within the community, and if so, how?  How does the project facilitate better access to transit facilities for pedestrians (both able-bodied and disabled) and bicyclists?  Does the project enhance bus stop and station area environments, and if so, how?  Are there any other elements of the project that will promote use of public transit?

Describe how the completed project will support the use of regional public transit service in the area. • The immediate area is well-serviced by bus and light rail connections. However, the pedestrian environment as it is now, will not sufficiently encourage walking and bicycle access to these transit facilities due to gaps in walkways, non-existent connections and minimal buffers between pedestrians and vehicles. The related development projects will provide this missing connectivity through a public access easement and through the construction of a pedestrian bridge across the rail tracks and Mission Road (see Figure 12, 13, and18). • The Armorlite Drive project will support the use of public transit by improving access to the Palomar College Sprinter Station and regional bus lines located on the Palomar campus. Not only will the physical connections be made by the Palomar Station development project, these connections will be well designed, safe and activated through high quality design. • The Armorlite Drive Complete Street Corridor project will provide better connectivity throughout the corridor through the use of wider sidewalks, enhanced crosswalk striping, mid-block crossings and new curb ramps bulb-outs at intersections to improve pedestrian visibility, reduce pedestrian crossing distances, calm traffic, and improve pedestrian universal access and safety (see Figure 18, 12 and 22). • The project will provide enhanced lighting, furnishings, paving and landscaping, and improved universal access and connectivity to the sidewalk (see Figure 21). • The project will install a cycle track along the northern side of Armorlite Drive from Las Posas Road to Bingham Drive. The cycle track will not only benefit cyclists, but will also provide a buffer between pedestrians and traffic (see Figure 18, 21 and 22). • The smart growth aspects of the proposed infill projects will increase the number of people within walking distance of the existing transit stops. • Inclusionary affordable housing will also support increased levels of transit use (see Figure 9).

CAPITAL GRANTS FY 2011 – FY 2013 SMART GROWTH INCENTIVE PROGRAM GRANT APPLICATION FORM

A-12

Describe how the infrastructure changes being proposed will directly improve pedestrian and bicycle access and reduce vehicle miles traveled in the project area. If the street is being redesigned, how will the new design prioritize access for pedestrians and bicyclists? For example:  If pedestrian enhancements are proposed, please describe them in detail, and discuss why these enhancements will encourage increased pedestrian activity in the area.  If bicycle facilities are proposed, please describe them in detail and discuss why these enhancements will encourage increased cycling activity in the area.  If the project proposes public gathering space enhancements, please discuss how the enhancements will help promote pedestrian or bicycle activity in the project area.  How does the project handle parking? Describe how proposed changes to parking in the project area will emphasize greater mobility for all users, and how proposed parking might impact the design characteristics of the neighborhood.  Are there any other elements of the proposed project that will promote walking and bicycling in the project area?

Providing Transportation Choices Describe how the infrastructure changes being proposed will directly improve pedestrian and bicycle access and reduce vehicle miles traveled in the project area. If the street is being redesigned, how will the new design prioritize access for pedestrians and bicyclists? The primary focus of the proposed SGIP enhancement project is the creation of a complete street for Armorlite through traffic calming and the introduction of bike facilities and enhanced pedestrian facilities. The project elements, including but not limited to the SGIP enhancement project, that will improve the cycling and walking environment include: • The creation of a Class 1 Bike Path / Two-way Cycle Track (see Figures 15, 17, 18, and 22) • The use of offset buffers, painted Cycle Track lanes across driveways, the installation of warning signs will increase the safety of this type of bike facility (see Figures 21 and 22). • The extension of bike facilities all the way to Mission Sports Park, including the option of Class 1, 2 or 3 facilities. The best options will depend on the future development potential of adjacent businesses as well as the comparison of other safety, right of way and convenience factors through the San Marcos Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan (see Figure 18 and 23). • The creation of a pedestrian bridge across the rail tracks and Mission Road (see Figure 12). • The installation of three mid-block crossings with associated technology including in pavement flashers, sign flashers, sensors that activate and deactivate the flashers, ladder style crosswalks, raised speed table, advance stop bar with “stop here when flashing” signage, median refuges and improved pedestrian lighting (see Figures 16, 18, 21 and 22). • The creation of a pleasant walking environment resulting from street trees, street furnishings, pedestrian level lighting and parkway buffering between walkways and vehicles (see Figure 22). • The safety and stress reduction benefits by creating traffic calming measures resulting from a road diet, lane width reductions, angled parking, street tree canopy enclosure of road edges, edge friction related to angled parking, a chicane and other narrowing of the apparent width of the roadways (see Figure 17, 18, 21 and 22). • Coupled with close proximity of major destinations such as Palomar College and major transit options, all of the proposed improvements will have a substantial affect on lowering single-drive alone trips, lower vehicle miles traveled and decrease green-house gas emissions.

CAPITAL GRANTS FY 2011 – FY 2013 SMART GROWTH INCENTIVE PROGRAM GRANT APPLICATION FORM

A-13

QUALITY OF PROJECT

Providing Transportation Choices

QUALITY OF PROJECT

CAPITAL GRANTS FY 2011 â&#x20AC;&#x201C; FY 2013 SMART GROWTH INCENTIVE PROGRAM GRANT APPLICATION FORM

A-14

Describe how the proposed improvements enhance a sense of place and creates destinations for people in the project area. How will the design features of the proposed improvements activate public places within the area and attract private investment?

• The Armorlite Drive improvements would create a sense of place and distinction along this roadway corridor and along its publicly accessible edges (see Figures 16, 17, 18 and 21). • These enhancements will not only provide connectivity, but become part of the destination. The planned park in the Davia Village project allows for an expansion of the public realm into the current privately held properties (see Figure19). • Pedestrian and bike facility improvements will promote users to continue on from this neighborhood park to regional destinations such as the Mission Sports Park, Palomar College, the abundance of transit facilities and the Inland Rail Trail (see Figure 13 and 18). • The adjacent properties that are not currently planned for redevelopment will benefit from these enhancements and will be enticing and desirable by future development investors (see Figure 5 and 8).

Addressing Project Area Issues 



List any distinct needs identified by the local community that will be addressed by the project objectives (such as but not limited to improving pedestrian access for special populations such as the elderly or disabled, or enhancing public safety). Please identify any cultural or natural resources within the project area. Explain how such resources have been addressed in the project design.

• The project area is currently an industrial area with community goals to make it a mixed use zone. While improving the quality of infrastructure may help, these type of elements do not effectively improve the public realm (see Figure 3). • As the industrial zone is converted there is a strong need for multi-modal transportation options, calmed traffic, improved lighting, and the creation of public places that interface with well designed private living spaces. • Existing, planned and recently constructed projects would greatly benefit from improved connectivity. • All portions of the population will benefit from improved bike and pedestrian safety. However, those that are young with lowered judgement and motor skills as well as the aging population that also suffers from lower motor skills, will benefit greatly by these improvements. • Potential connections include Palomar College, Mission Sports Park, the Davia Village, Palomar Station, the Inland Rail Trail, the regional bus transfer station, and the Palomar College Sprinter Station (see Figures 12, 18 and 19). There are no known cultural or natural resources in the area that will be affected by the street improvements or the related development projects.

CAPITAL GRANTS FY 2011 – FY 2013 SMART GROWTH INCENTIVE PROGRAM GRANT APPLICATION FORM

A-15

QUALITY OF PROJECT

Community Enhancement

Sustainability

QUALITY OF PROJECT

Describe any low impact development features of this project.

• Armorlite Drive improvements will incorporate best management practices for low impact development (see Figures 17 and 21). • Low impact development will be achieved through the use of narrowed travel and parking lanes, Silva cell (or equivalent device), stormwater management systems, permeable pavements, shade trees, and bio-swales. Narrowed travel and parking lanes will minimize paved areas, slow traffic, and facilitate pedestrian movements. The volume of on-site stormwater created will be reduced below current conditions. • To reduce stormwater runoff, porous pavements will be incorporated as permeable concrete near Silva cells (or other similar device). • Decorative un-grouted pavers will be used at and near pedestrian crossings and around tree wells at the sidewalk level. • Silva cells (or equivalent device) will promote evapo-transporation with subsurface storage capacity, and promote shade tree growth by providing root aeration and supplemental water. As these trees grow larger they will reduce heat gain upon adjacent paved areas and buildings and lower the drying affect of other plant material covered in the tree’s shade. • Bio-swales, bio-retention basins and bio-infiltration trenches will be used in the median and bulb-out planter areas as well as along the parkway strips. • The utilization of drought tolerant species will further promote efficient and sustainable landscapes. • Cobble and boulders (or other rock) will be used to enhance the aesthetics of planted areas while decreasing water use. • Several varieties of bark mulching will be used to lower maintenance and water use.

Universal Design If applicable, describe how the project will incorporate universal design principles, and go above and beyond Public Rights-of-Way Accessibility Guidelines in ensuring access for elderly and disabled persons.

• As a complete street project, a pedestrian-friendly universal design was the leading goal of the vision for Armorlite Drive. The streetscape design meets and exceeds accessibility requirements and adheres to the principles of universal design, providing access for people of all levels of mobility (see Figures 16, 17 18 and 21). • Shade trees, wide sidewalks and a separated cycle track will provide a comfortable walking environment separated from vehicular and bicycle traffic. Bulb-outs will provide increased pedestrian visibility and a shortened crossing distance for pedestrians. The bulb-outs will also include directional curb ramps with detectable warnings which exceed ADA design standards (see Figure 21). • Enhanced crosswalks and traffic calming will slow traffic and increase safety for pedestrians. Increased lighting will help to make the walkway on the street safe and accessible for all. Speed tables and in pavement flashers are example features that will improve safety. In-pavement flashers will be motion activated and will not require the user to activate a push button (see Figures 16, 21 and 22). • On-street parking spaces for people with disabilities will be provided in locations where off-street spaces are not available.

CAPITAL GRANTS FY 2011 – FY 2013 SMART GROWTH INCENTIVE PROGRAM GRANT APPLICATION FORM

A-16

COMPLETION OF MAJOR MILESTONES Please indicate if the proposed project has already completed any of the following milestones. If not, please note the anticipated completed date. Phase 1. Feasibility Study

Completed or Proposed Completed

2. Environmental Clearance

Completed

3. Right-of-Way Acquisition

Start/ End Dates

Completed

4. Final Design

11/15/13 Proposed ____________________________________________________________________________________

If the project has not yet obtained environmental clearance or fully acquired right-of-way, please describe the following in the space provided (Â˝ page max.): Is the project located in an environmentally sensitive area? Are there potential environmental issues that may delay project implementation or prohibit project approval? The project has already acquired the dedication for an additional 8' of Armorlite beyond the current 66' right of way from the adjacent developments. Environmental clearance was obtained as part of the General Plan Update and as part of the Specific Plan Application for Palomar Station. Further study will be required to determine the most appropriate bicycle connection from the cycle track to Mission Sports Park. Options include reduced lane widths and a Class 2 bike lane or a Class 3 bike lane with shared lane markings on Bingham and/or Bailey Court. This determination will be made in the forthcoming San Marcos Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan and no environmental review would be required for either option.

CAPITAL GRANTS FY 2011 â&#x20AC;&#x201C; FY 2013 SMART GROWTH INCENTIVE PROGRAM GRANT APPLICATION FORM

A-17

PROJECT READINESS

Are right-of-way acquisitions required to complete this project? If so, please identify.

The project has already arranged for 8' of additional right of way on the south side of Armorlite, to be dedicated by the two adjacent developments. No costs or agreements will need to be developed.

EVIDENCE OF LOCAL COMMITMENT  

Describe how community involvement in the development of this project. Explain community planning efforts that led to this project, community workshops, or other meetings that have been held, and stakeholder groups that have participated. Please identify known opposition from community planning groups, business associations, community development corporations or other stakeholders in the project area, and how their concerns are being addressed.

Applicants are also encouraged to attach letters of support from the community for the proposed project.

The General Plan Update for San Marcos started in the Fall of 2009. A comprehensive public involvement process was established by City Council. The public participation program included a series of workshops, a telephone survey, youth program, newsletters, a project website and a project phone line. In Addition, the City Council established a General Plan Advisory Committee composed of a cross-section of community members to provide feedback to the General Plan team. Through these efforts, the community's input was solicited at key steps in the process and the policy framework of the General Plan reflects the priorities, needs and aspirations of the community. In addition to the activities discussed above, City staff made efforts to include community members in the General Plan update process by being present at community events and through the display of maps and other materials at the City of San Marcos Development Services Department. The Specific Plan for the Palomar Station project has also been part of community group meetings and public hearings for some time. These projects, and the proposed conditions along Armorlite have been vetted extensively with the public and local stakeholders. Issues over right of way and on-street parking along Armorlite have been resolved. The only exception would be on-street parking removal along Bingham or Bailey Court as discussed in the previous section. The Palomar Station and the Armorlite project are consistent with the following 8 guiding principles found in the General Plan, including: 1. Creating a Vibrant Destination City 2. Assuring a Strong Local Economy and Employment Base 3. Connecting People to Places 4. Enhancing the Educational and Academic Hub 5. Providing a City of Choices 6. Sustaining Environmental Quality 7. Building a Greener Community 8. Creating a Healthy and Safe Community

CAPITAL GRANTS FY 2011 – FY 2013 SMART GROWTH INCENTIVE PROGRAM GRANT APPLICATION FORM

A-18

Permit review and approval processes for the basic street have been accomplished. If the street is modified for the enhancements, further review and coordination will be required. No further environmental review or right of way issues will result with these enhancements. These requirements have been covered in the design, engineering and project management costs shown in this application.

CAPITAL GRANTS FY 2011 â&#x20AC;&#x201C; FY 2013 SMART GROWTH INCENTIVE PROGRAM GRANT APPLICATION FORM

A-19

PROJECT READINESS

Other Project Readiness Notes: A feasibility study was done by Fehr and Peers and KTU+A and has been incorporated into the attachments. Engineering feasibility studies have been completed by the project applicants for Palomar Station and Davia Villages and has resulted in complete working drawings for the basic street improvements. This includes cost estimates, stormwater runoff plans and calculations and detailed grading, drainage and horizontal / vertical control. The proposed enhancements are above and beyond these improvements. Subsequent final design and engineering will be required to merge the basic street with the enhanced street.

SUPPORTIVE POLICIES AND PROGRAMS

SUPPORTIVE POLICIES AND PROGRAMS MATCHING FUNDS In the table below, please describe any and all sources and amounts of approved matching funds. Matching funds may include in-kind staff costs associated with project oversight, up to 10 percent of the total project cost. Funding Source

Amount

Developer Financed Construction of Standard Road

$ 850,000.00

Developer Fair Share of Construction Management

$ 65,000.00

Developer Soft Costs Associated with Standard Road

$ 85,000.00

City Project Management & Overview (in-kind)

$ 33,972.00

Total Matching Funds

$ 1,033,972.00

Please briefly describe any additional relevant aspects of the proposed project For clarity purposes, the enhancement SGIP funds will be used only for (see Figure 24): 1) Cycle track construction including demolition, paving, curb and gutter work, plantings, path striping, warning signage, and painted green lane markings. 2) Extension of a Class 2 or 3 facility up Bingham and/or Bailey Court. 3) Mid-block pedestrian crossings including marked crosswalks, in-pavement flashers, signage with flashers, sensors, bulb-outs to funnel walkers through sensors, and adjacent pedestrian lighting. 4) Stormwater runoff enhancements including Silva cells, permeable pavers, permeable concrete, ungrouted pavers, bio-swales in parkways, bio-basins in bulb-outs, and infiltration trenches along roadway edges. 5) Enhanced pedestrian level lighting using lighted bollards (standard lights provided by developer). 6) Street furnishings including benches and bike racks. 7) Enhanced street tree plantings to reduce runoff, lower urban heat island affects and calm traffic. 8) Wayfinding signage and small amounts of public art / interpretive panels. Developers associated with Davia Village and Palomar Station will be responsible for the following: 1) All project soft-costs associated with the development of the standard street improvements. 2) Demolition, grading, sub-surface treatments, paving and striping of the roadway surface. 3) Curb and gutter work associated with street, not counting the landscaped median at the east end. 4) Vehicular level lighting, regulatory signage and other elements in the roadway surface including traffic signal detectors. 5) All landscape requirements outside of the immediate public right of way. 6) All costs associated with providing the public easement including the promenade connector pavements, curb and gutter work, street trees, landscape plantings, tree grates, pedestrian level lighting, wayfinding signage and benches. 7) All costs associated with the pedestrian bridge, and the public park along Armorlite. These costs are not considered part of the matching grant funds, but are discussed here to demonstrate the commitments to project elements that are essential for linking the developments with major destinations to the north. The City of San Marcos will be responsible for the following: 1) Previous feasibility consultant costs (not counted towards match since already completed). 2) Project management through the total process. 3) Project monitoring & construction management (reimbursed by the developers, counted in the match). 4) Conduct the baseline conditions as required by the grant (reimbursed by SANDAG). CAPITAL GRANTS FY 2011 â&#x20AC;&#x201C; FY 2013 SMART GROWTH INCENTIVE PROGRAM GRANT APPLICATION FORM

A-20

In the section below, state the scope of work, schedule, budget, and project deliverables (including specific quantities and locations of improvements). Please note that if this project is funded, this will be added to the grant agreement and the grantee will be held to this scope, budget, and schedule, for the purpose of project oversight. Applicants are required to identify phasing for the project, in the event that the project cannot be fully funded by SANDAG. Please click here to complete the Excel Scope of Work, Schedule, and Budget sheet and attach to application.

CAPITAL GRANTS FY 2011 â&#x20AC;&#x201C; FY 2013 SMART GROWTH INCENTIVE PROGRAM GRANT APPLICATION FORM

A-21

SCOPE OF WORK, SCHEDULE, AND BUDGET

SGIP Capital Grants

SANDAG SMART GROWTH INCENTIVE GRANT PROGRAM SCOPE OF WORK, SCHEDULE, AND BUDGET Project Title: City of San Marcos Armorlite Drive Complete Streets Corridor

Project Location/Limits: City of San Marcos on Armorlite Drive, between North Las Posas and Bingham, including a portion of Bingham and Bailey Court north of Armorlite

Project Description: The SGIP will be used for pedestrian, bike, stormwater runoff, universal access, sustainability elements, placemaking elements & traffic calming elements to the street. Developer funded matched improvements include demolition, utility relocations, grading, sub-‐base, compaction, curb, gutter, drainage, paving, striping & signage.

Contract No.: Project (TNet) No.:

SANDAG Use Only SANDAG Use Only

Task No.

Task Description

Deliverable/s

Start Date

Completion Date SANDAG Funds

Matching Funds

TOTAL

Baseline Conditions Data Collection

Report

May-‐13

Nov-‐13

City Project Management

Report

May-‐13

Nov-‐13

$33,972

Prepare construction plans and specs

100% Plans

May-‐13

Nov-‐13

$84,860

$85,000

$169,860

May-‐13

Jun-‐13

$25,458

$25,500

3.2 60% Plans

Jul-‐13

Aug-‐13

$25,458

$25,500

3.3 90% Plans

Sep-‐13

Oct-‐13

$25,458

$25,500 $8,500

3.1 30% Plans

3.4 100% Plans

$5,000

Oct-‐13

Nov-‐13

$8,486 $61,543

$5,000

Bid Package & Construction Admin.

Contract

Feb-‐14

Jul-‐13

Award Contract Phase 1 Developer

Contract

Feb-‐14

Jul-‐13

Award Contract Phase 2 SGIP

Contract

Feb-‐14

Jul-‐13

$803,597

Award Contract Phase 3 Bike Lane / Route

Contract

Feb-‐14

Jul-‐13

$45,000

$65,000

$126,543

$850,000

TOTALS $1,000,000 $1,033,972 $2,033,972 PROJECT REVENUES Items

Source

Design & Engineering Data Collection/Report CM (SGIP Portion) SGIP Grant Construction

SANDAG SANDAG SANDAG SANDAG

Project Management

Design & Engineering CM (Developer Portion) Standard Road Costs

TOTALS

City

Developer Developer Developer

FY 2013 $84,860 $5,000 $0 $0

FY 2014

TOTAL

$61,543 $848,597

SANDAG TOTAL $33,972

$1,000,000

CITY TOTAL

$33,972

$85,000 $65,000 $850,000

DEVELOPER TOTAL $0 $1,058,832 $975,140

$1,000,000 $2,033,972

San Marcos Armorlite Drive Complete Street Corridor

Page 21

To:

□

Office of Planning and Research 1400 Tenth Street, Room 121 Sacramento, CA 95814

√

From: (Public Agency) City of San Marcos 1243 National City Boulevard National City, CA 91950

San Diego County Clerk-Recorder's Office

1600 Pacific Highway, Suite 260 San Diego, CA 92101 Project Title:

Armorlite Drive Smart Growth Corridor This project is located on Armorlite Drive between Las Posas Road and Bingham Drive.

Project Location – Specific:

Project Location – City:

San Marcos, California

Project Location - County:

San Diego County

Description of Nature, Purpose, and Beneficiaries of Project: The project will enhance the Amorlite Drive corridor and encourage future redevelopment through the following improvements: increase community engagement through public art, electronic signs indicating the arrival time of the next sprinter and bus; install bicycle racks; install corner bulbouts and handicap accessible curb ramps at intersections; install enhanced crosswalks and pedestrian refuges; install landscaping in center medians and in areas where the curb is being extended; install ornamental street lighting along the corridor; and increase the buffer between pedestrians and vehicles through diagonal and parallel on-street parking; install a dedicated cycle track to connect to the bicycle master plan. Name of Public Agency Approving Project:

City of San Marcos, California

Name of Person or Agency Carrying Out Project:

Maryam Babaki, Project Manager

Exempt Status: (check one)

□ □ □ √

Ministerial (Sec. 21080(b)(1); 15268); Declared Emergency (Sec. 21080(b)(3); 15269(a)); Emergency Project (Sec. 21080(b)(4); 15269(b)(c)); Categorical Exemption. Class 1, Section 15301 (c)

□ Statutory Exemption. State code number:

This project is exempt because the improvements will not impact the overall rightReasons why project is exempt: of-way width or change the overall facility use. Minor alterations are being provided that will improve the existing urban environment by improving safety, encouraging alternative modes of transportation that will reduce gas emissions, and reducing the amount of impervious surface. Lead Agency Contact Person:

Maryam Babaki

Area Code/Telephone/Extension:

If filed by applicant: 1. Attach certified document of exemption finding. 2.

Has a Notice of Exemption been filed by the public agency approving the project?

760-744-1050

□Yes □No

Signature: __________________________________ Date: ___________________ Title: ___________________________

□ Signed by Lead Agency □ Signed by Applicant

Date received for filing at OPR:

Armorlite Drive Complete Street Corridor S a n da g S m a r t G r o w t h I n c e n t i v e P r o g r a m C a p i t a l G r a n t

Application Attachments

City of San Marcos

We the people of San Marcos imagine a vibrant community, rich in its ethnic and cultural diversity, working cooperatively to build a center for commerce, building upon a broad foundation of high-quality educational institutions, and imagining a community that values quality of life while promoting the interest of all its citizens.

Figure-1: Regional Location Map

SM-4

MISSIO

PACIFIC

BALBOA

TRANSIT CEN TER

DESCANSO

San Marcos Armorlite Complete Street Corridor

The area is converting from industrial to mixed uses in order to take advantage of its location

Armorlite needs to evolve from a low volume business park street to a complete street for all modes

S OLIV O LOS

Mission Sports Park

ARMORLITE

BINGHAM

NEWPORT

LAS POSAS

CREEK

TAULBEES

VIA

PACIFIC

NAVAJO

PAWNEE

H EC

CHEROKEE

VALLECITOS DE ORO

LOS VALLECITOS

RANCHO SANTA FE

Armorlite currently has no sidewalks or bike facilities nor lighting or pedestrian crossings

DESCANSO

SEMINOLE

08TH

AUTUM

SM-3

OSAGE

09TH

Bike lanes & an urban trail exist along North Las Posas & should be extended down Armorlite Drive

BAILEY

Sprinter Palomar College Station

ATLANTIC

L WAL

KNOLL

CAPALINA

Mission Sports Park is isolated and can not be accessed easily without a vehicle

RICHMAR

Palomar College Transit Center

KIRK

Applied Scholastics Academy

ITE

CO M

GRA N

A pedestrian bridge will be added to connect the bus & rail stations to each other & the college

DUNDEE

San Marcos Middle School

Palomar Community College

PALMAC

PAC IFIC

COS

HELMSDAL

EEN

DE LEONE

MAR

HA LTE R

The current area has a low density with empty parcels and low intensity industrial uses

Figure-2: Vicinity Location Map

RD ABE

PALO

ERA

The Inland Rail Trail runs through this area but does not connect to this smart growth area

HENSON

M PO

BEL

PALM

IELO

LAD

CTE

IL GU

LOMA ALTA

C CTE

C CON

HOLLENCREST

D AVN

CTE

San Marcos Planning Area SA NT AF

AN AVNDA BL

INTRODUCTION

City of San Marcos

FIGUR E 1- 2

AVNDA VERD

AVNDA AZUL

CURRY CO

LC CTE DU

Figure-3: Existing Issues and Opportunities

TA VIS

A GR

R PA

AR BO

K AL DW

Smart Growth Areas

HA AT AN Y AR AIS D

M CO

San Marcos Armorlite Drive Complete Street Corridor

N BE

R VE

LA MIRADA

LIN

N SA

E E RE C Use Center

ID Corridor Mixed Use Transit KS

Special

Page 1

CO M

PALM

PALMAC

LOS

OLIV O

C PAC IFI

DE LEONE

BALBOA

PACIFIC

Parks and Open Space

11.0

Undeveloped

30.2

-30.2

PACIFIC

NEWPORT

LAS POSAS

S OLIV O

NAVAJO

PALM

CO M

SEMINOLE

Davia Village SPA LOS VALLECITOS

Home Depot/Commerce Square

CREEK FIC

Collucci/Mobile

NAVAJO

O SANTA FE

LOS

PAWNEE

PALMAC

OSAGE

LAS POSAS

HA AT AN Y AR AIS D

R PA

DESCANSO

PAWNEE

ARMORLITE

Specific Plan Area (SPA) 09TH

BAILEY

BINGHAM

Palomar Station SPA

NEWPORT

3.0

BALBOA

28.7

BINGHAM

HOLLENCREST

C PAC IFI

DE LEONE

RANCHO SANTA FE

BINGHAM

NEWPORT

LOMA ALTA

LAS POSAS

HOLLENCREST

PACIFIC

LAS POSAS

BALBOA

PACIFIC

NAVAJO

NEWPORT

BINGHAM

CO NEWPORT ME T

PALM

PALMAC

BINGHAM

CO M LAS POSAS

PACIFIC

PAC IFIC

PACIFIC

LOMA ALTA

PALM

LOS

BALBOA NAVAJO

OLIV O LOS

PACIFIC

PAWNEE

RANCHO SANTA FE

ET CO M

PALM

PALMAC

PAC IFIC

BALBOA

OLIV O

CO M BALBOA

PACIFIC

OLIV O

PALMAC

PAC IFI

PAWNEE

DE LEONE

NAVAJO

RANCHO SANTA FE

PAWNEE

HOLLENCREST

BINGHAM

NEWPORT

LAS POSAS

PACIFIC

RANCHO SANTA FE LOMA ALTA

BALBOA

PACIFIC PACIFIC

LOS

PALM

PALMAC

PAC IF

DE LEONE

HOLLENCREST

LOMA ALTA DE LEONE

HOLLENCREST

PALM

PALMAC

PAC IFIC

CO M

25.7

Education

HA AT AN Y AR AIS D

-9.8

10.0

19.8

KNOLL

Transportation / Utilities

LK WA RD N A M BOAUTU

TRANSIT CEN TER

DESCANSO

Sma

R PA

-3.8

C ER

79.6

RICHMAR

H EC

83.4

M CO

VALLECITOS DE ORO

-2.5

CAPALINA

LA MIRADA

TA VIS

N BE

SID

A ND

EEN

D AR BO

K EE CR

RD ABE

ARC K OLS WA

L WAL

R VE

BINGHAM

ITE

KIRK

A GR

NEWPORT

CHEROKEE

PCAE ER LOM

HA AT AN Y AR AIS D

LAS POSAS

GRA N

VALLECITOS DE ORO

14.3

EEN

CREEK

DUNDEE

VIA

N SA

LOS VALLECITOS

E HELMSDAL

E E E UseCRCenter

HENSON

08TH

RD ABE

PACIFIC

AN GR

HA LTE R

PACIFIC

IL GU

NAVAJO

SEMINOLE

ID Corridor Mixed Use Transit KS

Special

N BE

M PO

TA VIS

L ME

R PA

NAVAJO

D AVN

KNOLL

IL GU

EL EB

CT 09TH

ATLANTIC

190.1 Acres

San Marcos Armorlite Drive Complete Street Corridor

ARMORLITE

Figure-7: San Marcos Specific Plan TAULBEES Areas

BAILEY

SM-3

LAD Smart TE Growth Areas

HA AT AN Y AR AIS D

IELO

ERA

H EC

C CTE

DESCANSO

N BE

CE M

A CO P

A ND

AUTUM

D AVN

VALLECITOS DE ORO

AN AVNDA BL

R VE

16.8

K EE CR

AVNDA VERD

AVNDA AZUL

VIA

26.8

Military

26.8

Light Industry

A GR

SID

Commercial

KNOLL

17.1

AR BO

O CURRYZ C

19.4

K AL DW

C CON

SM-4

L CTE DU

ITE

OSAGE CO

LK WA LOS VALLECITOS RD A BO

Mixed Use 14%

Commercial 8%

SID

DESCANSO

KIRK

MISSIO

2.3

M CO

-0.6

Mixed Use

M CO

GRA N

TRANSIT CEN TER

ATLANTIC

N SA

TA VIS

Light Industry 42%

0.4

SA NT AF

1.0

N SA

Multi Family

Single Family LIN 0%

TAULBEES

Change in Acres

Single Family

Education 15%

Planned Land Use

N BE

R VE

M CO

Multi Family 10%

H EC

VALLECITOS DE ORO

VIA

LA MIRADA

Parks and Military Undeveloped Open Space 0% 78 0% 6%

Existing Land S Use CO

TAULBEES TA VIS

R VE

A GR

HA AT AN Y AR AIS D

LK WA

R PA

D AR BO

LOS VALLECITOS

A ND

DESCANSO

CREEK

M CO

ARMORLITE

MINOLE

N BE

BAILEY

COS

K EE CR

RICHMAR

A Planned LandSUse OSAGE LA Density MIRADAResidential Very Low N N IO S Low Density Residential AUTUM IS M E SEMINOLE Low Medium Density Residential ID S K EE Medium Density Residential CR Mixed Use 1 Mixed Use 3 Mixed Use 4 09TH CREEK Transportation, Industrial Utilities 5% Light Industrial 08TH CHEROKEE Commercial and Office Open Space LA MIRADA Parks Public/Institutional Specific Plan Area EEN

R VE

TA VIS

TRANSIT CEN TER

ATLANTIC

RD ABE

VIA

LA MIRADA

LIN

DESCANSO

AN AVNDA BL

RICHMAR

ARMORLITE

TAULBEES

MISSIO

CAPALINA

TRAN SIT CEN TER

BAILEY

BEL

HA LTE R

H EC

IELO

ERA

MISSIO

C CTE

LAD

KNOLL

L WAL

HA AT AN D

EEN

RK PA

AR BO

LOS VALLECITOS

VIA

TAULBEES

DUNDEE S CO AR M N SA

MAR

CTE

AN GR

K AL DW

HENSON

AVNDA VERD

PALO

RD ABE

M CO

Light Industry 44%

AUTUM

E HELMSDAL

08TH Figure-5: Planned Land Uses within 1/4 mile Radius of the Project CHEROKEE

COS

AVNDA AZUL O

KIRK

CH CON

N BE

TA VIS

KNOLL

H EC

TA F

L CTE DU

CTE

SY ORO VALLECIT AROSAIDE M

UZ CR

A IRKW

RA VE

ATLANTIC

VIA

CREEK LL

Transportation, Utilities 10%

DUNDEE

LIN

RICHMAR

Figure-6: Smart MEL M Growth Areas PO SA N

BAILEY

ARMORLITE

VALLECITOS DE ORO

IL GU

CAPALINA

LOS VALLECITOS

Mixed Use 0%

ITE

L WAL

O CURRY C

EEN

Education 13%

RD ABE

D AVN

HELMSDAL

HENSON

ITE

GRA N

KNOLL

HA LTE R

09TH

AN AVNDA BL

LOS VALLECITOS

SEMINOLE

GRA N

LO BEL

HA LT

NC H

0%ER EL CO Education MM PO LA MIRADA SAMilitary NT AF E and Open Space PA Parks LOM ARC OS Undeveloped H EC

IL GU

CTE

O L78

VALLECITOS DE ORO

D AVN

CIE CTE

AN AVNDA BL

AVNDA VERD

OSAGE

LC CTE DU

AVNDA AZUL

ARMORLITE

DESCANSO

AUTUM

BAILEY

MISSIO

HENSON

EEN

TRANSIT CEN TER

CURRY CO

BAILEY

D ER E LA

RICHMAR

SEMINOLE Land Use Single Family Single Family Multi Family 1% ERA 1% N Multi Family LCE LAD AUTUM CTE DU CTE Mixed Use ATLANTIC LO CIE Commercial CTE Commercial Undeveloped 09TH CREEK 9% O Parks and Open ELL B E 16% Heavy Industry Space CT TAULBEES 6% Light Industry 08TH CHEROKEE DESCANSO Transportation, UtilitiesA Military

ISSION

DUNDEE

KIRK

ARMORLITE

DESCANSO

HEL

RD ABE

OSAGE

DESCANSO

MAR

COS

EEN

ATLANTIC

PALO

MAR

DUNDEE

DESCANSO L WAL KIRK

TRANSIT CEN TER

M CREEKPO

ITE

PALO

CH A

MISSIO

Figure-4: Existing Land Uses within 1/4 mile Radius of the Project 78 CAPALINA

COS

INOLE

CAPALINA community, rich in its ethnic and cultural We the people of San Marcos imagine a vibrant TRANSIT CEN TER A HA H C LTE diversity, working cooperatively toCONbuild a MEcenter for commerce, building upon a broad L R GRA M NI T foundation of high-quality educational institutions, and imagining a community that values E PO E HELMSDAL SA ATLANTIC NT quality of life while promoting the interest of all its citizens. AF

HENSON

MAR

GRA N

BEL

RD ABE

PALO

HA LTE R

LO C C IE CTEOS

MAR

CTE

LO BEL

PALO

AN CO

E MM

CH A

RDE

IL GU

CTE

IELO

LAD

CTE

O MB

D AVN

C CTE

AN AVNDA BL

AVNDA VERD

LC CTE DU

ERA

TAULBEES

Page 2 R

S CO

D AVN

CTE

ER LAD

We the people of San Marcos imagine a vibrant community, rich in its ethnic and cultural E HELMSDAL IELO diversity, working cooperatively to build a center for commerce, building upon a broad foundation of high-quality educational institutions, and imagining a community LO DUNDEEthat values BEL CTE quality of life while promoting the interest of all its citizens. IL GU

OLIV O

S PALM

CO M

PAC IFIC

PALMAC

CHEROKEE

K EE CR

A GR

K EE CR

AR BO

San Marcos Armorlite Drive Complete Street Corridor

NEWPORT NEWPORT

LAS POSAS

R PA

D AR BO

LK WA

347

HA AT AN Y AR AIS D

K AL DW M

M CO

R PA

347

M CO E

N SA

LIN

C ER

N BE

347

TA VIS

UZ A

445

N SA

TA VIS

N BE

LIN

CR R VE

Transit Routes Serving Adjacent Stop

TAULBEES VIA

445

347

RA VE

08TH

CREEK Sprinter Palomar College Station Sprinter Palomar College Station Sprinter Light Rail Sprinter Light Rail LA MIRADA CHEROKEE 304 Transit Stops Transit Stops LA MIRADA Transit Routes Routes Transit

445

VIA

09TH

LOS VALLECITOS

TAULBEES

LAS POSAS

304

CREEK

BINGHAM

BALBOA

PACIFIC

78 SEMINOLE

PACIFIC

08TH

347

OSAGE

PACIFIC

09TH

445

Figure-11: Davia Village

DESCANSO

CONCEPTUAL DESIG

ARMORLITE

BINGHAM

PACIFIC

SEMINOLE

DESCANSO 304

H EC

Figure-10: Perspective of Palomar Station

OCTOBER 1, 2012

445

BAILEY

AUTUM

VALLECITOS DE ORO

* The project is allowed 30 units to the acre under current zoning, the Specific Plan is attempting to obtain 36 units per acre ** Based on apartment size, market rate & overall costs, all units are classified as affordable *** 15% or 56 affordable housing units were required, 33 will be built and remaining will be paid with in lieu fees

Late 2013

NAVAJO

54,400

DE LEONE

9%***

ATLANTIC

PAWNEE

370

Early 2014

NAVAJO

25.8

TER TRANSIT CEN347

305

N 305 MISSIO

304

305

DESCAN SO

RICHMAR

ARMORLITE

304

305

CAPALINA

RANCHO SANTA FE

Mixed

HOLLENCREST

N. & S. of Armorlite Dr

MAR ATLANTIC COS

304

OSAGE PALOMAR STATION PEDESTRIAN BRIDGE

RANCHO SANTA FE

Palomar Station

Estimated DESCANSO Completion

305

PAWNEE

19,855

Estimated Gross Lease E ID Area forEERetail KS CR Use

PALO

L WAL

H EC

100%**

A BO

KIRK

KNOLL

368

GRA N

VALLECITOS DE ORO

30*

TRANSIT CENTER

HA LTE R

EEN

Mixed

1001 Armorlite Dr.

HA AT AN Y AR AIS D

Davia Village

DU/ Acre

Land Use

DUNDEE

RD ABE

% of Affordable LK WA Units RD R PA

Location

Project Name

TotalCE ER #MMof CO Units

BALBOA

A GR

LIN

N BE

R VE

LA MIRADA

TA VIS

N SA

E MM

LOS

C PALMAC

PALM

CO M

LOMA ALTA

HOLLENCREST

BINGHAM

NEWPORT

PAC IFI

ET CO M

PALM

BALBOA

PACIFIC

LAS POSAS

MISSIO

HENSON

P E SA Figure-13: Existing Transit Found within the StudyBAILEY Area NT A

C AR

No. of Affordable Units Restricted to Very-Low Income

HELMSDAL

EEN

BEL

RD ABE

IELO

ER LAD

O MB

C CTE

CTE

IL GU

L WAL

ITE

LC CTE DU

CTE

C CON

VIA

PACIFIC

KIRK

CAPALINA

Figure-9: Proposed Data of Entitled Projects in the Study Area TAULBEES OS

NAVAJO

DUND

D AVN

COS

HELMSDA

GRA N

AN AVNDA BL

MAR

AVNDA VERD

PALO

BEL

ER LAD

IELO

HA LTE R

L ME

AVNDA AZUL

M PO

CTE

IL GU

CE C CTE

C CON

CURRY C

PAWNEE

D AVN

N AVNDA BLA

CREEK

AVNDA VERD

EROKEE

H EC

LOS VALLECITOS

VALLECITOS DE ORO

NT AF

L CTE DU

CTE

Union Tribune (not entitled but likely to redevelop based on rezone from industrial to mixed use & current owner) SA

ARMORLITE

OSAGE

BAILEY

DESCANSO

SEMINOLE

Pacific Industrial No. 1

TRANSIT CEN TER

ATLANTIC

AUTUM

L AVNDA AZU

Davia Village

KNOLL

APALINA

RICHMAR

O CURRY C

MISSIO

Figure-12: Proposed Pedestrian Bridge

Palomar Station SPA

EEN

PALMAC

COS

PAC IFI

MAR

Legend

RD ABE

PALO

LOMA ALTA

L WAL

DE LEONE

H ALT KIRK L ER Entitled GRA Development in Smart Growth Area Figure-8: ME NI T OM

C CON

LOS

OLIV O

HENSON

C CTE

AN AVNDA BL

AVNDA VERD

AVNDA AZUL

O CURRY C

L CTE DU

SID

Page 3

SID

PALMAC

PALM

PAC IFIC

CO M

PACIFIC

NAVAJO

S OLIV O

BALBOA

PACIFIC

PALM

BINGHAM

CO M

PAWNEE BALBOA

NEWPORT LAS POSAS

PACIFIC

NEWPORT

NAVAJO

LAS POSAS

PAWNEE

HA AT AN Y AR AIS D

RANCHO SANTA FE

RANCHO SANTA FE PACIFIC

BINGHAM

NEWPORT

LAS POSAS NEWPORT

PALMAC

PAC IFIC

DE LEONE

HOLLENCREST

LOS

OLIV O

LOMA ALTA

CO M

BALBOA

CO M

PACIFIC

AR BO

LAS POSAS

A GR

K AL DW

R PA

N SA

TA VIS

K EE CR

SID

A GR

ER M M CO N

N BE

R VE

D LIN

N BE

H EC

NAVAJO

LOS

DE LEONE

HOLLENCREST

PALM

PALMAC

PAC IFIC

PALM

PACIFIC

PALMAC

PAC IFIC

BALBOA

KNOLL

PAWNEE

H EC

N SA

R PA

HA AT AN Y AR AIS D

R PA

AR BO

K AL DW

HA AT AN Y AR AIS D

M CO

10’ Wide Class 1 Two-way Cycle Track with 5’ Buffer from Roadway

VALLECITOS DE ORO

TA VIS

VALLECITOS DE ORO

PACIFIC

KNOLL

HENSON

EEN

LIN

LOS VALLECITOS

A GR

Mid-block Pedestrian Crossing with In-road Flashers

KS EE CR

AUTUM

TAULBEES

LA MIRADA

Planned Class 3

R VE

N BE

R VE

A BO Traffic Calming using Road Diet, Edge Friction (Trees, Chicanes, Parking & Bulbouts) & Speed Table

LOS VALLECITOS

VIA

SID

VIA

N SA

K EE CR

RICHMAR

Figure-16: Model Showing Enhance Ped. Crossings

ARMORLITE

Class 2 Lane or Class 3 Route with Sharrows

CREEK

Planned Class 2

LK WA

A GR

CHEROKEE

AR BO

HA AT AN Y AR AIS D

K AL DW

Class 2

E RC

Planned Class 3

R PA

VIA

M CO

Class 2 Planned Class 2

Planned Class 1 M

SEMINOLE

Class 1

Class 1 Cycle Track

A MIRADA 78 SLA

Planned Class 1

Bike Facilities

TA VIS

C AR

Class 1

CHEROKEE

L WAL

ARMORLITE

TAULBEES

08TH

TRANSIT CEN TER

CREEK

DESCANSO

Bike Facilities

KIRK

BAILEY

N BE

09TH

TAULBEES

Figure-17: Project Site Plan with Major Features

TA VIS

M CON

LA MIRADA

SEMINOLE

DA LIN LOS VALLECITOS

A ND

MISSIO

H EC

08TH OSAGE

CREEK

H EC

DESCANSO

LA MIRADA

DESCANSO

KNOLL

VALLECITOS DE ORO

09TH

TAULBEES

BAILEY

RD ABE

AUTUM OSAGE

AUTUM

DUNDEE

TRANSIT CEN TER

KNOLL

ARC OS ARMORLITE DESCANSO

VALLECITOS DE ORO

CHEROKEE

CREEK

GRA ATLANTIC NI T E

RICHMAR

LOS VALLECITOS

PACIFIC

HA LTE R

E HELMSDALN MISSIO

Figure-15: Proposed Bike Facilities in the Area PALO M

ARMORLITE

DESCANSO

RANCHO SANTA FE

IL GU

EEN

LO C IE

RICHMAR

D ER E LA

ATLANTIC

R VE

NAVAJO

COS

HENSON

EEN

E MM

BAILEY

VIA

PAWNEE

MAR

RD ABE

D AVN

E TE DULC LMSDCALE

RD ABE

Existing Bike Facilities Class 1 Class 2

Facilities

CAPALINA

SEMINOLE

HEROKEE

EEN

08TH

MISSIO

TRANSIT CEN TER

OSAGE

BAILEY

SA NT AF

DESCANSO

APALINA

OSAGE

PALO

KCIRHKA CON

RD ABE

DESCANSO

09TH

AN AVNDA BL

ITE

GRA N

ATLANTIC PALO Figure-14: Existing Bike Facilities in the Area E MAR

ATLANTIC

CTE We the people of San Marcos imagine a vibrant community, rich inDUNits ethnic and cultural LO DEE BEL LO E N T BEL upon a broad N building CAPALINA C diversity, working cooperatively to build a center for commerce, E AUTUM T MISSIO C foundation of high-quality educational institutions, and imagining a community that values quality of life while promoting theTRAinterest of all its citizens. NSIT CEN TER L WAL

HA LTE R

COS

AVNDA VERD

AVNDA AZUL

DE LEONE

NT AF

ITE

O MB

HOLLENCREST

GRA N

CURRY C

A D ER E LA

MM PO

MAR CT COS IELO IL GU

PALO

C CTE

CAPALINA CH CON

AN AVNDA BL

O MB

AVNDA VERD

LCE CTE DU

M PO

D AVN

AVNDA AZUL

CURRY C

SA NT AF

Special Driveway Markings & Signage to Warn of TwoWay Bike Travel

K EE CR

SID

Bio-Swales to Capture Runoff from Walkway and Cycle Track

section a-a

6’ Walkway Parallels Cycle Track with 2’ Infiltration Trench

section b-b

Street Trees with Silva Cells (or similar product) to Capture Runoff section c-c

Cycle Track Transitions to Painted Lane & Bike Box

Wrap-around Bulb-outs for Angled Parking & BioBasin for Water Quality

San Marcos Armorlite Drive Complete Street Corridor

Permeable Concrete or Asphalt Parking Areas with Sub-surface Drainage

Horizontal Deflection / Chicane to Slow Approaching Traffic

Raised Speed Table with Stop Bar & “Stop Here When Flashing” Signs

Bulb-outs with Lighted Bollards, Benches & Plants to Control Direction of Walk

Pedestrian Level Lighting with Overall Higher than Normal Ambient Lighting

Landscaped Median with Planting Area Below Street Level to Capture Runoff Page 4

CO M

O ME T

AN SIT CEN TER TR Figure-18: Overview of the Pedestrian and Bike Facilities and Connection Options to Mission Sports Park Class 2 Bike Lanes or Class 3 Bike Route with Sharrows continued from Armorlite Dr. to Mission Sports Park

10’ improved public easement for Pedestrian connection to the Sprinter Station, Pedestrian Bridge and Palomar College

Mission Sports Park Entrance

BAILEY Class 2 Bike Lanes or Class 3 Bike Route with Sharrows continued from Armorlite Dr. to Mission Sports Park

Class 1 Two-Way Cycle Track on the North Side of Armorlite with painted driveways, warning signs & a bike box at the west end

Mission Sports Park Entrance

ARMORLITE Mid-block crosswalk -same features as crossing shown to the left, but with a raised speed table, additional light bollards and street furnishings

DESCAN SO

San Marcos Armorlite Drive Complete Street Corridor

NEWPORT

LAS POSAS

LOS VALLECITOS

NACTO Guidance will be used for the final design of the Cycle Track

Mid-block crosswalk -same features as crossing shown to the far left, but with a median refuge provided

BINGHAM

Mid-block crosswalk with inroad flashers, flashing sign, auto-trip sensors, ladder style markings, stop bar, “stop here” sign with integral flashers & controlled access points to walkway

Extended Curbs

Page 5

Figure-19: Proposed Project Site Plan

Pedestrian Bridge (Non SGIP) Public Promenade Connection (Non SGIP)

Palomar Station North (Non SGIP)

SGIP Secondary Boundary SGIP Primary Boundary

Armorlite Complete St.

Palomar Station South (Non SGIP) Public Park (Non SGIP)

Davia Village (Non SGIP)

San Marcos Armorlite Drive Complete Street Corridor

Page 6

E CO M We the people of San Marcos imagine a vibrant community, rich in its ethnic and cultural diversity, working cooperatively to build a center for commerce, building upon a broad foundation of high-quality educational institutions, and imagining a community that values quality of life while promoting the interest of all its citizens.

Figure-20: Key Map for Section & Perspective Locations

TRAN SIT CEN TER

MISSION

Proposed Pedestrian Bridge from Transit Center

Section C Section C-1 Section C-2 Section C-3

Section B

3 Section A-1

Section A-2

2 4

San Marcos Armorlite Drive Complete Street Corridor

ARMORLITE Section A-3

Extended Curbs

BINGHAM

Page 7

Figure-21: Proposed Project Perspectives

San Marcos Armorlite Drive Complete Street Corridor

Page 8

Figure-22: Proposed Armorlite Cross Sections and the Promenade Connector to the Rail Station & Pedestrian Bridge

Section A-1: Existing Armorlite

UNIMPROVED ROW

PARKING LANE

TRAVEL LANE

Section A-2: Proposed Section at Angled Parking

PARKING LANE

WALKWAY

10’ OVERALL BIKE PATH

PLANTED BUFFER

66’ ROW

Section A-3: Proposed Section at Crosswalk

WALKWAY

10’ OVERALL BIKE PATH

PLANTED BUFFER

TRAVEL LANE

CHICANE / PLANTER AREA

TRAVEL LANE

ANGLED PARKING WITH BACK UP SPACE

66’ EXPANDED TO 74’ ROW

8’ WALKWAY (NEW ROW DEDICATED)

Section B: Proposed Pedestrian Promenade to Rail Station

WALKWAY

9’-10' WALKWAY IN EASEMENT

HEAD-IN PARKING

PARKING AISLE

HEAD-IN PARKING

BIO-SWALE

74’ ROW

San Marcos Armorlite Drive Complete Street Corridor

Page 9

Section C Existing

SIDEWALK

PARKING

TRAVEL LANE

Section C-1: Class 2 Narrow Bike Lanes (no loss of parking)

PARKING

SIDEWALK

Section C-2: Class 2 Wider Bike Lanes (lost parking)

SIDEWALK

BIKE LANE

San Marcos Armorlite Drive Complete Street Corridor

TRAVEL LANE

BIKE LANE

PARKING

SIDEWALK

PARKING

BIKE LANE

TRAVEL LANE

BIKE LANE

PARKING

SIDEWALK

Section C-3: Class 3 Bike Route with Sharrows

SIDEWALK

PARKING

TRAVEL LANE WITH

SHARROWS

PARKING

SIDEWALK

Page 10

Figure-23: Project Cost Feasibility Analysis

Figure-24: Project Matching Share Obligations and Sources

ARMORLITE DRIVE COMPLETE STREET CORRIDOR ENHANCEMENTS

Project :

Project Length (Feet) Project Length (Miles) Cost Linear Feet

1,764 0.334

1/18/13 KTU+A

Prepared by :

$481.06

No. of Intersections

Bike & Pedestrian Related Paving Items

Raised Speed Table Paving Asphalt for Cycle Track Grading / Compaction / Base for Cycle Track 6" Curb & Gutter for Landscaped Median Decorative Pavers (including base) Near Trees & @ Plazas Curb Ramps Leading to Crosswalks

Unit Cost $10,000.00 $2.50 $1.50 $20.00 $10.00 $2,500.00

Unit EA SF SF LF SF EA

QTY 1 17,640 17,640 1,200 3,000 6 Paving Totals:

Cost Estimate $10,000 $44,100 $26,460 $24,000 $30,000 $15,000 $149,560

Landscape Enhancements Beyond Developer Requirements Items

Mulch (2" layer, 3:1 slopes or less) Soil Prep Boulders (large) Boulder (medium) Boulder (small) Cobble Groundcover Bioswale Landscape Fabric Trees (15 gallon, 24" Box) Irrigation Meter Automatic Irrigation System (Includes Backflow)

Unit Cost $30.00 $1.00 $110.00 $110.00 $110.00 $70.00 $2.50 $2.50 $0.50 $300.00 $30,000.00 $2.00

Unit SY SF Ton Ton Ton Ton SF SF SY EA EA SF

Stormwater Items

Silva Cells Silva Cell Mainline Drain Base Course

Unit Cost $85.00 $20.00 $20.00

Unit CF LF CF

QTY 250 12,500 24 40 20 100 7,500 10,000 12,500 84 2 7,500 Landscape Totals: QTY 1,000 3,492 1,000 Stormwater Totals:

Cost Estimate $7,500 $12,500 $2,640 $4,400 $2,200 $7,000 $18,750 $25,000 $6,250 $25,200 $60,000 $15,000 $186,440 Cost Estimate $85,000 $69,840 $20,000 $174,840

Site Furnishings Items

Tree Grates Bike Rack (multi bay) Bollard / Pedestrian Lighting Benches (6' long)

Unit Cost $1,000.00 $2,000.00 $750.00 $1,200.00

Unit EA EA EA EA

QTY 18 3 36 24 Furnishings Totals:

CONSTRUCTION SGIP ROW Enhancements Developer ROW Improvements

$848,597 $850,000

Total SGIP+Developer

$1,698,597

Costs Costs In-‐Kind City Absorbed by Invoiced to SOFT COSTS Services Developer SANDAG Baseline Data (required by SANDAG to monitor the project) City Project Management

$5,000

$33,972

Contract Engineering-‐35% (SGIP Elements in ROW) Contract Engineering-‐35% (Developer Elements in ROW) Environmental Clearance

$42,500

$42,430

Right of Way Acquisition Final Design-‐ 100% (SGIP Projects in ROW) Final Design-‐ 100% (Developer Projects in ROW) Construction Management Total $ Soft Costs Total % Soft Costs

$33,972 2.00%

$42,500 $65,000 $150,000 8.83%

$42,430 $61,543 $151,403 8.91%

Total Soft Costs

$5,000 $33,972 $42,430 $42,500 $0 $0 $42,430 $42,500 $126,543 $335,375 19.74%

Rate

2.00% 5.00% 5.00% 0.50% 0.00% 5.00% 5.00% 7.45%

TOTAL CONSTRUCTION INCLUDING SOFT COSTS

$85,000 $65,000 Developer Construction Costs for a Standard Street $850,000 Total Developer $1,000,000

Design & Engineering (Developer Construction) Construction Management (Developer Construction)

Project Management (Developer + SGIP Construction) Total City

$33,972 $33,972

Leveraged Match $1,033,972 SGIP Request $1,000,000 Total Project

$2,033,972

Cost Estimate $18,000 $6,000 $27,000 $28,800 $79,800

Signage Items

Bike Path Signs (with core drilling) Mid-Block "Flashing Stop Here when Flashing Signs Wayfinding/Informative Signs

Unit Cost $300.00 $1,000.00 $350.00

Unit EA EA EA

QTY 6 6 6 Signage Totals:

Cost Estimate $1,800 $6,000 $2,100 $9,900

Bike & Pedestrian Facilities Items

Class 1 Centerline Dashed Striping Class 1 Buffer Striping Special Pavement Markings / Stop Bars, Thermoplastic Bike Lane Green Paint (at Driveways & Intersections) Bike Boxes Class 2 Bike Lane to Mission Sports Park Class 3 Route to Mission Sports Park (signs & sharrows) Class 1 Bike Path Symbol Marking, Paint Class 2 Bike Lane Symbol Marking, Paint Ladder Style Crosswalk Striping at Mid-block Crossings Mid-block In Pavement Flashers with Sensors

San Marcos Armorlite Drive Complete Street Corridor

Unit Cost $1.50 $2.00 $145.00 $4.00 $5,500.00 $2.00 $250.00 $80.00 $80.00 $7,500.00 $25,000.00

Unit LF LF EA SF EA LF EA EA EA EA EA

QTY 1,764 3,528 23 2,718 1 2,200 14 16 16 3 3

Cost Estimate $2,646 $7,056 $3,335 $10,872 $5,500 $4,400 $3,500 $1,280 $1,280 $22,500 $75,000

Speical Facilities Totals:

$137,369

Total Contingency (15%) Grand Total*

$737,909 $110,686 $848,595

Page 11