The Newtonite Friday, Jan. 22, 2016 • Volume 94
Newton North High School, 457 Walnut St., Newtonville, Mass. 02460
Students, faculty debate library use
Maya Abou-Rizk Housing hundreds of books, over two dozen computers, classrooms for independent work, and multiple printers, the Library Learning Commons (LLC) serves as an ideal area for students to study, to work on individual or group projects, and to collaborate on research or other assignments. However, students have expressed discontent regarding the library’s limited hours of operation—7:30 a.m. until school ends. Students who arrive to school early, wait for the bus after school, or have sports practices that do not start until one or two hours after the school day ends think the LLC is not completely fulfilling its purpose, according to interim vice principal Amy Winston. The administrators have recognized these complaints and, as of this week, have extended the library’s hours until 4:20 p.m. Mondays, Wednesdays, and Thursdays. Winston said these complaints stem from members of the school community often confusing the LLC program with its space. The LLC program’s purpose is to support students and their learning through research and help with work in their classes. “That support is what the librarians are responsible for. Their job, like the other teachers at the school, is to be here during the [school] day,” said Winston. Senior Alexa Gershkowitz, captain of the dance team, said that the library should be open until all students’ sports practices start. “All our practices start at 4:15 p.m., and I think there should be somewhere for us to go finish homework until then,” she said. Students are not permitted to work in the hallways, on Main Street, or any of the open spaces in the building because of the lack of supervision. Sophomore Liz Reikine, a member of the girls’ diving team, said that the few times she went after school to go to the library, it had closed “fairly early, maybe an hour after school had ended.” However, because her diving practice started at 5 p.m. every day, “I ended up not being able to rely on the library as a place to get my work done, which should be what it’s for,” she said. Students without access to printers or computers at home also said that the school library is not completely fulfilling its purpose. Senior Nicole Algarin, who does not have printer access at home, said that utilizing the public library for
by
printing her assignments is not ideal. “There are people who go to North that need these computers and printers. The Newton Free Library charges for the computer and printing paper, and sometimes I don’t even have the money for that, and I work. Imagine students who don’t work and whose parents don’t make enough money,” she said. When asked about these students using the LLC for completing and printing assignments, librarian Annette Tate said, “The library is a teaching facility and not a public library. Our system does its best to accommodate for those students, and it’s definitely not enough, but at the same time it is not the responsibility of this space and program to do so when there is a public library down the street.” Pilot program counselor Susan Mucci and counselor Jerry Etienne will staff the LLC in its new, extended afterschool hours. “The space will be open but that doesn’t mean that there will be librarians there to help students with library functions,” Winston said. “We are looking to see how many students are using [the LLC], how it is being used, and if we can use the space in an appropriate way. We don’t want it to be a used as a ‘hang-out’ space but rather a space for kids to work on group projects.” In order to learn more from other schools’ libraries, Newton Public Schools library coordinator Chris Swerling will be responsible for finding out how different schools use their libraries, programs, and supports. Winston said, “We are hoping that the information she brings back will help us think more proactively about some things we want to do and how we can expand our current program. For example, do we want to hire a librarian after school to help our students? Is that a way that we want to use our space and our resources?” Winston’s overriding concern is that there is not enough supervision and administrators on duty to handle the possible “abuse of the space” after school hours are over. She said that the North community should also be mindful and respectful when thinking about further options. “I understand the librarians’ concern for the books, computers, and other resources in the library because if any of it gets destroyed there’s no money to replace it. So, we have to really think thoughtfully about how we are going to use, but also preserve, this space.”
Devin Perlo
Juniors Amanda Powers, Adela Miller, and Izzy Tils do homework together in the Library Learning Commons Tuesday, Jan. 19.
Josh Shub-Seltzer
Members of Jubilee Singers perform at North’s annual holiday concert Tuesday, Dec. 22.
State officials to blend MCAS, PARCC in disputed ‘MCAS 2.0’ Emily Moss In November, the Massachusetts Board of Education voted to change the course of standardized testing with a new assessment, unofficially known as “MCAS 2.0,” which will eventually become a requirement at North and at schools across the state. Even before the new test has received an official name, however, it has provoked significant controversy. The change comes less than a year after Massachusetts piloted another test—created by the Partnership for Assessment of Readiness for College and Careers (PARCC)—in grades K-8. MCAS 2.0 will draw on both PARCC and the original MCAS, which was first introduced in 1998. Critics of MCAS 2.0 have raised a number of concerns. Even apart from the substance of the proposed assessment, many dislike the prospect of still more uncertainty and tumult in the state’s testing regimen. Literacy specialist Kalpana Guttman, who coordinated PARCC testing at Burr Elementary School last year, said, “Students were guinea pigs for PARCC, and we’re worried that they will be once again for MCAS 2.0.” She added that implementing the new test so quickly is “like putting a car on the road without taking it for a test drive.” Critics disagree about the best alternative, with some calling for a return to the original MCAS and others urging that PARCC be fully implemented. Supporters of MCAS 2.0, meanwhile, say that the shift will allow state officials to incorporate the strongest elements of the PARCC test, the product of a national consortium, while also giving them the flexibility to tailor assessments as needed to Massachusetts students and permitting them to maintain overall control of the process. In the by
words of Massachusetts secretary of education James Peyser, quoted in the Boston Globe, MCAS 2.0 will allow the state to draw “on the best of both PARCC and MCAS, while ensuring that Massachusetts is able to control its own destiny.”
Logistics of MCAS 2.0
MCAS 2.0 will take effect in grades K-8 as early as next year, according to Massachusetts Department of Education assistant chief of staff Lauren Greene. However, the test will not be implemented as quickly at the high school level—the test will not be a graduation requirement until the Class of 2020; however, it is unclear when the class will take the exam. Once implemented, MCAS 2.0 will likely replace the original MCAS test as a graduation requirement, according to superintendent David Fleishman. Fleishman said he expects the test to be more difficult than the original MCAS, placing greater emphasis on critical and creative thinking. Fleishman noted, moreover, that the decision to retain state control over standardized testing may also in part have been a response to the controversy over PARCC. “There is growing criticism of testing, and PARCC is symbolic of a national test,” said Fleishman. “What can appear confusing about MCAS 2.0 is that we are told that most of the questions will be similar to PARCC, but the state does not want to call the test PARCC.”
PARCC versus MCAS
The state’s decision to switch to MCAS 2.0 appears to have reinvigorated existing debates regarding PARCC versus MCAS. One of the few points that most people involved in the debate agree on is that PARCC is a tougher test.
According to the Boston Globe, “results from last year’s pilot demonstrated that students found the PARCC exams significantly more difficult than the MCAS tests.” Beyond that, there is little agreement about the two tests and especially about which test better serves the students of Massachusetts. Although results from the two tests are not strictly comparable, they are broadly consistent with the Boston Globe’s claim. According to data presented by the MCAS chief analyst and acting PARCC director Robert Lee, approximately eight percent fewer Massachusetts students in grades K-8 “met expectations” on PARCC than reached at least “proficient” on MCAS. The same data showed that in voluntary high school pilot tests, only 39 percent of students were labeled “college and career ready” on the PARCC English Language Arts (ELA) test as compared to 91 percent who reached at least “proficient” on the MCAS ELA test. Still, supporters of PARCC see it as the most advanced assessment of its kind. PARCC chief of assessment Jeff Nellhaus, who previously played a key role in designing MCAS, declared, “MCAS was the best 20th century test. PARCC is the best 21st century test.” As an example of PARCC’s superiority, Nellhaus argued that its emphasis on using evidence to support a claim, particularly on the ELA assessment, aligns more closely with the skills that students need to succeed in college. “You don’t write an essay off the top of your head in college,” said Nellhaus. In PARCC, “students are asked to read multiple texts and then draw evidence from them to write an extended argument or informational piece.” ◆ continued on page 11