First Day of School Special

Page 1

Newtonite ◆ Tuesday, Sept. 2, 2014 • Volume 93

Newton North High School, 457 Walnut St., Newtonville, Mass. 02460

Superintendent acknowledges his mistakes Maxwell Kozlov Over the course of the summer, news sources revealed that parts of superintendent David Fleishman’s commencement address at this year’s high school graduations closely matched passages from a commencement speech given by governor Deval Patrick. In light of these events, the Newtonite sat down with Fleishman for his response to his violation of a value—academic integrity—by which all students must abide: Q: Many Newton residents found your first statement to the public frustratingly unapologetic. The second statement you released, however, has a much more apologetic tone. Did something change in your attitude towards your plagiarism? A: The first statement was just an acknowledgement of what happened, and not a statement to the community. The second release was a statement to the community that spelled out my mistakes. Q: What are your thoughts regarding your actions? A: It was a serious mistake; I should have credited Governor Deval Patrick. I regret and apologize for my actions. I failed to lead by example. Q: How have you prepared for speeches in the past? A: Usually I spend much more time on speeches, start early, talk to people about my ideas, and put it all together. I did none of those things for this speech. It was a big, costly mistake. Contrary to by

Robin Donohoe

Face off: Juniors Robbie Ranta and Trevor Martinez-Tobin scrimmage at football practice Friday, Aug. 22 in Dickinson Memorial Stadium.

School board chair Matt Hills defends committee’s actions Maxwell Kozlov Throughout July, the School Committee met in executive session, meetings closed to the public, to discuss superintendent David Fleishman’s plagiarism after hearing allegations against him in late June. Prior to any acknowledgement by Fleishman or the School Committee, The Lion’s Roar, one of South’s newspapers, released an article July 23 detailing Fleishman’s plagiarism. The Newtonite sat down with School Committee chair Matt Hills to address concerns about the school board’s process. Q: How do you approach a situation like this? A: Any time you’re dealing with charges or allegations, you have to go through the same process: look at the facts and assess them. Looking at the facts means looking at the context, which is always different. Q: Do you think Fleishman’s punishment fit his crime? A: I’m not going to use the word crime. I think the punishment was entirely appropriate given what the situation was. Not every transgression deserves capital punishment and not every transgression deserves to be overlooked. And this was neither overlooked nor capital punishment. Q: How would you respond to critics that say a harsher punishment would be more appropriate? A: I’m glad to know that there are some number of people out there who think a week’s pay is insignificant. That’s news to many people who work. I have heard from people that think a harsher punishment by

would have been more appropriate and I have heard that a much lighter punishment would have been more appropriate. I feel like this was just life. At the end of the day, we are a school board. It’s up to us to look at all the facts of the situation in a way that many people can’t do and use our own judgment as to what’s appropriate. I understand that any decision we make, some people will agree, some people will think it’s too harsh, and some people will think it’s too light. I’m very comfortable that our decision was the right decision. Q: What message does it send that the situation was handled with money? Could students therefore “pay” their way out of plagiarism? A: This is not an analogous situation. Fleishman is an employee. He made a mistake. He was fined for a certain portion of his salary. A student may get a warning. A student may get a zero. No, a student is not able to “pay” their way out of it any more than an employee is able to get a lower grade on a paper. Remember that this is while they’re working for a week. Not being suspended for a week and not coming to work. They’re coming to work, and they’re not getting paid for the week. Q: What lesson should students take away from this? A: Be careful and spend time on everything you do. Don’t make the mistake Dr. Fleishman made. Q: I’ve heard students say that considering what occurred, they should get a “free pass” on plagiarizing. How would you respond? A: (laughing) Nice try . . . but

there are no “free passes.” Dr. Fleishman did not get a free pass and students will not either. David had a serious punishment for a serious mistake. Simply declaring that one is now entitled to a free pass bears no relationship to what actually happened. The answer is the rules are still in effect for everyone. Q: Do you think his plagiarism was intentional or unintentional? A: My assessment is that it was completely unintentional. We got a range of opinions on whether this was just sloppy or plagiarism. Q: Would it have been released without The Lion Roar’s exposé? A: Executive sessions to discuss a personnel issue should remain confidential, other than the requirement of the law to make minutes publically available. However, from the very beginning, we completely understood that this was going to be public. It wasn’t even the slightest notion that this could be kept confidential nor was there any conversation we had to keep it quiet. When I was first made aware of the issue by a teacher, the teacher made clear that a number of people at South: parents, teachers, and other people in the South community, knew about it and were talking about it. Too many people knew about it and that was just a fact for us, so we went about our process in executive session, examining the issues, determining how we were going to respond, and dealing with this issue like we would with any other personnel issue. We had almost entirely finished our deliberations before the Lion’s Roar article came out.

my other speeches, I did this one really quickly, and I did not collaborate with others. However, I received no gain from it; it was just a foolish mistake. Q: What can students take away from this? A: The lesson here is to be as careful with speeches as writing. You have to credit your work. I made my whole ordeal and punishment public so everyone could learn a lesson. I believe in accountability, and I was held accountable. Q: How does your plagiarism compare to student plagiarism? A: If students plagiarize, it’s to get a better grade on their transcript. I had no advantage to plagiarizing; it was hasty and sloppy what I did. Plagiarism means getting an advantage. I didn’t get a pass, so the students won’t either. Trust me, no one wants to go through what I’ve been going through. Q: Do you think your punishment fit your crime? What message does it sends to students that your punishment was money? A: A dock of pay is a serious consequence for employees. It sends a message, because I actually work for the money, as opposed to a sports player who might go on vacation and still get paid. Q: Do you think you would have had a different punishment if your plagiarism had been clearly intentional? A: I don’t think the School Committee thought about it as intentional or unintentional when they decided my punishment.

School pilots SFA’s new ‘No Homework’ policy Emily Moss Between meeting new teachers, exploring new subject areas, and attempting to navigate complicated new schedules, high school students often find themselves overwhelmed at the beginning of the school year. In an effort to reduce student stress levels, this school will be piloting a new policy during first semester which gives students one homework-free date per term. The policy is based on a bill the Student Faculty Administration (SFA) voted on last year. In the pilot, students will have one homework-free Wednesday in term one and one homeworkfree weekend in term two. If fully approved, one homework-free Wednesday and one weekend will be instituted during terms three and four, respectively. The bill was proposed last year by juniors Benjamin Cole, Jonathan Halpern, and Sophia Ly, who were a part of the SFA, and was inspired by a similar policy implemented at South by

during the 2011-2012 school year. According to Ly, SFA members will reconvene at the end of the semester-and principal Jennifer Price will make a final decision regarding whether to pass the bill or not. The bill is meant as a “goodwill gesture” to students but is not meant to fully solve the problem of student stress, according to English teacher Kate Shaughnessy, an SFA member. “One of the things I like about the proposal is that it opened up a lot of conversations,” said Shaughnessy, adding that the bill has prompted members of the school community to discuss whether there should be limits on the number of honors and AP classes that students take or whether the school should eliminate the weighted GPA. In addition to preventing students from receiving homework on specific weekends and Wednesdays, the bill discourages teachers from grading during these periods so that everyone can have a break.

See inside for blurbs on new teachers, a feature on the marijuana dispensary opening in Newtonville, and articles on the search for a viable student social area at this school.

page 3

page 5

pages 6-7


Turn static files into dynamic content formats.

Create a flipbook
Issuu converts static files into: digital portfolios, online yearbooks, online catalogs, digital photo albums and more. Sign up and create your flipbook.