References

References

1. CPWR – The Center for Construction Research and Training. The Construction Chart Book. 6th Edition, CPWR, 2018. 2. Bryden JE, Andrew LB. Serious and Fatal Injuries to Workers on Highway Construction Projects. Transportation Research Record. 1999;1657(1):42-47. 3. Young Ai Kim; Boong Yeol Ryoo; Yong-Su Kim; and Woon Chan Huh. Major Accident Factors for Effective Safety Management of Highway Construction Projects. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, ASCE, Volume 139, Issue 6, 2013. 4. Md Mahmudur Rahman, Lesley Strawderman, Teena Garrison, Deborah Eakin, Carrick C. Williams. Work zone sign design for increased driver compliance and worker safety. Accident Analysis & Prevention, Vol. 106, 2017, Pages 67-75. 5. Tang Q, Cheng Y, Hu X, Chen C, Song Y, Qin R. Evaluation Methodology of LeaderFollower Autonomous Vehicle System for Work Zone Maintenance. Transportation Research Record. January 2021. 6. Pratt, S.G., Fosbroke, D.E. and Marsh, S.M. Building Safer Highway Work Zones: Measures to Prevent Worker Injuries from Vehicles and Equipment. National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH) Publication No. 2001-128., 2001. 7. Emrah Kazan, Mumtaz A. Usmen. Worker safety and injury severity analysis of earthmoving equipment accidents, Journal of Safety Research,Vol 65, 2018, Pages 73-81 8. FHWA. International Technology Scanning Program: Bringing Global Innovations to U.S. Highways, Office of International Programs, Federal Highway Administration, 2002. 9. Reeder, G. D.; Nelson, G. A. 3D Engineered Models for Highway Construction: The Iowa Experience. Report No. InTrans Project 14-489. Iowa Department of Transportation, 2015. 10. Heikkila, R.; Jaakkola, M. Automation of Road Construction – The State of the Art in Europe. Proceedings of the 23rd International Symposium on Automation and Robotics in Construction. Tokyo, Japan, 2006 11. Torres, H. N.; Ruiz, M. J.; Chang, G. K; Anderson, J. L.; Garber, S. Automation in Highway Construction Part I: Implementation Challenges at State Transportation Departments and Success Stories. Report No. FHWA-HRT-16-030. Federal Highway Administration, 2018. 12. NCHRP. Use of Automated Machine Guidance within the Transportation Industry. The National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. ISBN 978-0-309-47485-6 | DOI 10.17226/25084, 2018. 13. Fort Robotics. Safe Remote Control: Remote Controller for Autonomous Systems and Heavy Equipment. Available at: https://fortrobotics.com/wireless-industrial-remote-control/. Accessed on June 28th, 2021. 14. CivRobotics. CivRobotics Products. Available at: https://www.civrobotics.com/products. Accessed on June 28th, 2021. 15. Boerner, A. Remote-controlled Demolition Robot Cuts Labor Costs 90% on Texas Bridge Project. For Construction Pros.com, 2018. Available at: https://www.forconstructionpros.com/profit-matters/article/20989120/remote-controlleddemolition-robot-cuts-labor-costs-90-on-texas-bridge-project. Accessed on June 28th, 2021.

73

16. McGuire, M.; Rys, M; Rys, A. A Study of How Unmanned Aircraft Systems Can Support the Kansas Department of Transportation’s Efforts to Improve Efficiency, Safety, and Cost Reduction. Report No. K-TRAN: KSU-15-3. Kansas Department of Transportation, 2016. 17. Wang, X.; Al-Shabbani, Z.; Sturgill, R.; Kirk, A.; Dadi, G. B. Estimating Earthwork VolumesThrough Use of Unmanned Aerial Systems, Safety, and Cost Reduction. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 2630, 2017, pp. 1–8. http://dx.doi.org/10.3141/2630-01 18. Hugenholtz, C. H.; Walker, J.; Brown, O.; Myshak, S. Earthwork Volumetrics with an Unmanned Aerial Vehicle and Softcopy Photogrammetry. Journal of Surveying Engineering, Volume 141 Issue 1, 2015. 19. Dwyer, C. Automated Roadway Pavement Marker Placement System. Report No. FHWAHIF-11-048. Office of Infrastructure, Federal Highway Administration, 2011. 20. Yen, K.; Lasky, T. A. Research to Integrate Color and Thermal Imaging IR Cameras with Caltrans 3D-GPR and GNSS/INS System. Report No. CA20-3608. California Department of Transportation, 2020. 21. Rupnow, T.; Coco, M. L.; White, G.; Yamaura, J. Evaluation of HeadLight: An EConstruction Inspection Technology. Report No. FHWA/LA.19/618. Louisiana Department of Transportation and Development, 2020. 22. Masadam T.; Riley, P.; Haag, M. U. Evaluation of New or Emerging Remote Inspection Technologies for Conduits Ranging from 12” to 120” Spans. Report No. FHWA/OH-2017-46. Ohio Department of Transportation, 2017. 23. FHWA. Research and Technology Program. Federal Highway Administration. Available at: https://highways.dot.gov/research. Accessed on June 28th, 2021. 24. Mix Equipment Magazine. Meet the SilobotTM. Available at: https://www.mixequipmentmag.com/operations/article/21105442/meet-the-silobot. Accessed on June 28th, 2021. 25. Sebesta, S.; Wang, F.; Scullion, T.; Liu, W. New Infrared and Radar Systems for Detecting Segregation in Hot-Mix Asphalt Construction. Report No. FHWA/TX-05/0-4577-2. Texas Department of Transportation, 2006. 26. Heddericj, J. PAVE IR Update. Rutgers Asphalt Paving Conference, 2014 27. MOBA. PAVE IR Solutions. MOBA Mobile Automation, 2017 28. Gibb, S.; Le, T.; La, M. H.; Schmid, R.; Berendsen, T. A Multi-functional Inspection Robot for Civil Infrastructure Evaluation and Maintenance. Proceedings of the 2017 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS), Vancouver, BC, Canada, 2017. 29. Advanced Robotics and Automation Laboratory. Research Area 1: Automated Civil Infrastructure Inspection with Robotic Systems. ARA, University of Nevada, Available at: https://ara.cse.unr.edu/?page_id=183. Accessed on June 28th, 2021. 30. Ward, A. B.; Newman, J. K.; Herring IV, G. B. Assessment of LiDAR- and Photogrammetry- based Airfield Roughness Profiling Techniques. Report No. 465397. U.S. Army Engineer Research and Development Center, 2019. 31. Prosser-Contreras, M.; Atencio, E.; La Rivera, F. M; Herrera, R. F. Use of Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs) and Photogrammetry to Obtain the International Roughness Index (IRI) on Roads. Applied Sciences. MDPI, 2020, 10, 8788; doi:10.3390/app10248788

74

32. Grandsaert, P. J. Integrating Pavement Crack Detection and Analysis Using Autonomous Unmanned Aerial Vehicle Imagery. Thesis Dissertation. Department of the Air Force, Air University, Air Force Institute Of Technology, 2015. 33. Mogawer, W. S.; Xie, Y.; Austerman, A. J.; Dill, C.; Jiang, L.; Gittings, J. E. The Application of Unmanned Aerial Systems In Surface Transportation - Volume II-B: Assessment of Roadway Pavement Condition with UAS. Report No. 19-010. Massachusetts Department of Transportation, 2019. 34. White, W.; Lasky, T. A. Evaluation of Remote Control Mowers for Roadside Management. Report No. CA20-2730. California Department of Transportation, 2019. 35. Bennett, D.; Velinsky, S. A. Deployment Support and Caltrans’ Implementation of the Sealzall Machine. Report No. CA13-2215. California Department of Transportation, 2014. 36. Caltrans. Caltrans Uses New Tree Removal Technology – Safer, Faster and Efficient. Available at: https://dot.ca.gov/news-releases/news-release-2020-039. Accessed on June 30th , 2021. 37. Hargadon, A.; Hoblit, B.; Olson, E. Automated Roadway debris Vacuum (ARDVAC). Draft Report. California Department of Transportation, 2006. 38. Jones, M. H.; Burkett Jr., G. W.; White, W. A.; Velinsky, S. A. Continued Research, Evaluation, and Implementation of Methods to Reduce Roadside Trash. Report No. CA-20121103. California Department of Transportation, 2012. 39. Chaplin, J.; Magisson, E. Development of a Trash Harvester for MnDOT –Phase II. Report No. MN/RC 2008-21. Minnesota Department of Transportation, 2008 40. Miller, C. M.; Custer, P. B.; Donnelly, S.; Kennedy, M. J. Evaluation of Box Culvert Maintenance Methods. Report No. FHWA/OH-2015/7. Ohio Department of Transportation, 2015 41. Caltrans. Donnelly, S.; Kennedy, M. J. Evaluation of Culvert Cleaning Technology. Research Results. Caltrans Division of Research, Innovation and System Information, California Department of Transportation, 2013. 42. Hard-Line. Donnelly, S.; Kennedy, M. J. LP401 Culvert Cleaning Project Arizona - 2019. Hard-Line, 2019. 43. CDOT. CDOT and Partners Drive Safety with World’s First Self-Driving Work Zone Vehicle. Colorado Department of Transportation, 2017. Available at: https://www.codot.gov/news/2017-news/august/cdot-and-partners-drive-safety-with-world2019sfirst-self-driving-work-zone-vehicle. Accessed on June 30th, 2021. 44. Royal Truck & Equipment INC. ATMA. Royal Truck & Equipment INC. Available at: https://royaltruckandequipment.com/autonomous. Accessed on June 30th, 2021. 45. FHWA. Highway Materials Engineering Course (HMEC): Asphalt Materials and Paving Mixtures (F module), Federal Highway Administration, U.S. Department of Transportation, 2018. 46. Mohammad L., M. M. Hassan, and M. Kim. Effects of Paver Stoppage on Temperature Segregation in Asphalt Pavements. J. Mater. Civ. Eng., vol. 29, no. 2, 2017. 47. Rahman M., J. R. A. Grenfell, S. J. Arulanandam, and A. Ianakiev. Influence of thermal segregation on asphalt pavement compaction, Transp. Res. Rec., no. 2347, pp. 71–78, 2013. 48. Mohammad L., P. Phaltane, and M. Kim. Effects of Temperature Segregation on the Volumetric and Mechanistic Properties of the Asphalt Mixtures, FHWA/LA.17/604, Louisiana Department of Transportation and Development, 2019.

75

49. Byzyka J., M. Rahman, and D. A. Chamberlain. Thermal segregation of asphalt material in road repair,” J. Traffic Transp. Eng., vol. 4, no. 4, pp. 360–371, 2017. 50. Scasphalt. Using Pave-IR to detect Thermal Segregation in Asphalt Paving by MOBA: Mobile Automation. Available at: http://www.scasphalt.org/uploads/5/6/3/8/56382339/new_technology_for_quality_assurance.pdf. Accessed in October 2021. 51. Sebesta S., T. Scullion, W. Liu, and G. Harrison. Pilot Implementation of PAVE-IR for Detecting Segregation in Hot-Mix Asphalt Construction, FHWA/TX-06, Texas Department of Transportation. 2006. 52. SHRP. SHRP2 Solution: Technologies to Enhance Quality Control on Asphalt Pavements: Pave-IR Scan Primer,” Strategic Highway Research Program, 2016. 53. MOBA. Pave-IR System. MOBA Pave-IR Microsite, Avaliable at: https://paveir.com/pages/index.html. Accessed in October 2021. 54. PennDOT. Commonwealth of Pennsylvania Department of Transportation Publication 408. Pennsylvania Department of Transportation, 2021. 55. Li X., Z. Zhou, X. Lu, K. Xiong, X. Wang, and Z. You, “Temperature segregation of warm mix asphalt pavement: Laboratory and field evaluations,” Constr. Build. Mater., vol. 136, pp. 436–445, 2017. 56. AASHTO. Standard Practice for Continuous Thermal Profile of Asphalt Mixture Construction. AASHTO PP 80-20. American Association of State and Highway Transportation Officials. 2021. 57. Sebesta S. and T. Scullion. Statewide Implementation of Pave-IR in the Texas Department of Transportation, FHWA/TX-12/5-4577-05-. Texas Department of Transportation, Austin, Texas, 2012. 58. TxDOT. Thermal Profile of Hot Mix Asphalt, Tex-244-F, Texas Department of Transportation. 2015. 59. LaDOTD. “Application of Quality Assurance Specifications for Asphalt Concrete Mixtures,” Louisiana Department of Transportation and Development. 2016. 60. MnDOT. Quality Management-Paver Mounted Thermal Profile (PMTP) Method. MnDOT SP2016-65, Minnesota Department of Transportation. 2016. 61. Landefeld C. Evaluation of Pave-IR Thermal Imaging for Asphalt Pavement Uniformity. Report No. N/A. Ohio Department of Transportation, 2014. 62. Sebesta S., and T. Scullion. Performance Monitoring Pavements with Thermal Segregation in Texas. Texas Department of Transportation, FHWA/TX-12/0-6080-1, Austin, Texas, 2012. 63. Khazanovich, L., Hoegh, K., Conway, R., and Dai, S. Non-Destructive Evaluation of Bituminous Compaction Uniformity Using Rolling Density. Second Strategic Highway Research Program, Washington, DC., 2017. 64. Bonnaure, F., G. Gest, A. Gravois, and P. Uge. A New Method of Predicting the Stiffness of Asphalt Paving Mixtures. Proceedings of the Association of Asphalt Paving Technologists, Vol. 46, pp. 64–104. 1977. 65. Pellinen, T. K., Jiansheng Song, and Shangzhi Xiao. Characterization of hot mix asphalt with varying air voids content using triaxial shear strength test. Proceedings of the 8th Conference on Asphalt Pavements for Southern Africa (CAPSA'04). Vol. 12, 2004.

76

66. Witczak, M. and O. Fonseca. Revised predictive model for dynamic (complex) modulus of asphalt mixtures. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board 1540: 15-23, 1996. 67. Killingsworth, B. M. NCHRP research results digest 291: quality characteristics for use with performance related specifications for hot-mix asphalt. TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C. 2004 68. Linden, R. N., Joe P. Mahoney, and Newton C. Jackson. Effect of compaction on asphalt concrete performance. Transportation Research Record 1217, 1989. 69. PennDOT. Section 405: Evaluation of Asphalt Pavement Longitudinal Joint Density and Payment of Incentive/Disincentive. Pennsylvania Department of Transportation (PennDOT) Publication 408. PennDOT: 400 North St., Fifth Floor Harrisburg, PA 17120, 2020 70. Zhao S, Al-Qadi IL, Algorithm development for real-time thin asphalt concrete overlay compaction monitoring using ground-penetrating radar, NDT and E International, 2019. 71. Wang S, Zhao S, Al-Qadi IL. Real-Time Monitoring of Asphalt Concrete Pavement Density during Construction using Ground Penetrating Radar: Theory to Practice. Transportation Research Record. 2673(5):329-338, 2019. 72. AASHTO. Asphalt Surface Dielectric Profiling System Using Ground Penetrating Radar; American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO) Standard Practice; Designation: PP 98-201. AASHTO: Washington, DC, 2020, 98.9. 73. Diamanti N, Annan AP, Jackson SR, Klazinga D. A GPR-Based Pavement Density Profiler: Operating Principles and Applications. Remote Sensing. 13(13):2613, 2021. 74. Wilson, B., S. Sebesta, and T. Scullion, Evaluation of the Rolling Density Meter for Rapid Continuous Measurement of Asphalt Mixture Density, FHWA/TX/-17/0-6889-R1, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, 2019 75. Wilson, B. T. and S. Sebesta. Comparison of Density Tests for Thin Hot Mix Asphalt Overlays. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., pp. 148-156., 2015. 76. Saarenketo, T. and T. Scullion.Road evaluation with ground penetrating radar. Journal of Applied Geophysics 43.2: 119-138, 2000. 77. Sebesta, S., T. Scullion, and T, Saarenketo. Using infrared and high-speed groundpenetrating radar for uniformity measurements on new HMA layers. Transportation Research Board. 2013. 78. Leng, Z. and I.L. Al-Qadi. An innovative method for measuring pavement dielectric constant using the extended CMP method with two air-coupled GPR systems. NDT & e International 66: 90-98, 2014. 79. Bradbury, R. Dai, S. HMA Compaction Assessment Using GPR Rolling Density Meter, NEAUPG, Atlantic City, NJ, 2018 80. Shangguan, P. and I. L. Al-Qadi. Calibration of fdtd simulation of gpr signal for asphalt pavement compaction monitoring. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing 53.3: 1538-1548, 2015. 81. Maser, K. and A. Carmichael. Ground Penetrating Radar Evaluation of New Pavement Density. No. WA-RD 839.1., 2015. 82. Sommerfeldt, Rob. Ground Penetrating Radar Surveys Could Save Transportation Departments Money. Point of Beginning RSS, Point of Beginning, 6 Aug. 2020,

77

83. Saarenketo, T. and P. Roimela. Ground penetrating radar technique in asphalt pavement density quality control. Proceedings of the seventh international conference on ground penetrating radar. Vol. 2., 1998. 84. Popik, M., K. Maser, and C. Holzschuher. Using high-speed ground penetrating radar for evaluation of asphalt density measurements. Annual conference & exhibition of the transportation association of Canada, Canada., 2010. 85. Hoegh, K., Khazanovich, L., Dai, S., and H.T. Yu. Evaluating asphalt concrete air void variation via GPR antenna array data. Case Studies in Non-destructive Testing and Evaluation: 2733, 2015 86. Tang, Q., Cheng, Y., Hu, X., Chen, C., Song, Y., Qin, R. Evaluation Methodology of Leader-Follower Autonomous Vehicle System for Work Zone Maintenance. Transportation Research Record. Vol 2675I5) 107 – 119, 2021. 87. Missouri Department of Transportation. Leader-Follower Truck Mounted Attenuator System Request for Proposal. Jefferson City, MO, 2018. 88. Theiss, L., Bligh, R. P. Worker Safety During Operations with Mobile Attenuators. FHWA/TX-13/0-6707-1. Texas Department of Transportation, 2013. 89. Wenall, J. Alternative TMA carriers: Crash test with a tractor, an articulated front-end loader and a rigid frame. VTI rapport 684A. VTI, Sweden, 2009. 90. Ross, H.E. Jr., D. L. Sicking, R.A. Zimmer, and J. D. Michie. Recommended Procedures for the Safety Performance Evaluation of Highway Features. NCHRP Report 350, National Cooperative Highway Research Program, Transportation Research Board of the National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1993. 91. Buth, C. E, R. M. Olson, J. R. Morgan, W. L. Campise, and J. C. Heslop. Truck-Mounted Attenuators. Report No. RF 7015, Texas Transportation Institute, College Station, Texas, March 1986. 92. MNDOT. Governor’s Advisory Council on Connected & Automated Vehicles. Destination CAV, MNDOT 2020. 93. Blazina, E. Legislature pushes automated safety vehicles at PennDOT, turnpike maintenance sites. Pittsburgh Post-Gazette. 2018 94. PennDOT. REQUEST FOR INFORMATION FOR Highly Automated Work Zone Vehicles. RFI NUMBER 3518RFI02, Pennsylvania Department of Transportation, 2019. 95. Arrington, D., Tang, Q., Hu, X., Nylen, A., Weldon, T., Drum, T. Autonomous Maintenance Technology Literature Review. CDOT-2021-06. Colorado Department of Transportation, 2021. 96. Kohls, A. G. Autonomous Truck Mounted Attenuator (ATMA) Pilot. RES 2019-15. Tennessee Department of Transportation. 2020. 97. Transportation Research Board. Enhance Work Zone Safety with New Technologies. TRB Webinar presentation, 2020. 98. Descant, S. Colorado DOT Launches Autonomous Vehicles to Improve Worker Safety. 2017. Avaliable at: https://www.gov tech.com/fs/data/Colorado-DOT-Launches-Autonomous-Ve hicles-to-Improve-Worker-Safety.html. Accessed on October 12th, 2021 99. Colorado Department of Transportation. Autonomous Maintenance Technology (AMT) Pool Fund. 2018. http:// www.csits.colostate.edu/autonomous-maintenance-technolo gy.html.

78

100. Hu, X. and Tang, Q. (2020). Modeling and Development of Operation Guidelines for Leader- Follower Autonomous Truck-Mounted Attenuator Vehicles. Mid-America Transportation Center, University of Nebraska–Lincoln, Missouri University of Science and Technology. 101. PennDOT (2021). CAV Initiatives. Available at: https://www.penndot.gov/ProjectAndPrograms/ResearchandTesting/Autonomous%20_Vehicles/ Pages/CAV-Initiatives.aspx. Accessed on October 12th, 2021. 102. PennDOT. Temporary Traffic Control Guidelines. Publication 213. Pennsylvania Department of Transportation, 2021. 103. PennDOT (2021). CAV Initiatives. Available at: https://www.penndot.gov/ProjectAndPrograms/ResearchandTesting/Pages/AutonomousVehicle-Testing-FAQs.aspx. Accessed on October 12th, 2021.

79