1
2
2
3
4
5
CLOSER TO YOU JASPER KRABBÉ
Closer to you
“You can never find someone’s identity in a single fixed image,” says Jasper Krabbé’. “Today, in this era of Facebook and instant information, there are hundreds and thousands of images out there, often showing exactly the same subject. Like on a Google search, I was interested in discovering whether from a huge number of images, one complete picture can finally emerge. From my many images of Floor, both exuberant and withdrawn, I hope what comes out is the reality of who she is.“
Whether highly realistic or merely a few minimal lines showing a profile, Jasper’s recent drawings continue the long tradition in which the portrait represents the purest relationship between the interpretation of an image and its context. Employing various materials, in a mismatch of styles and framing, two hundred of his portraits of Floor, most of them reproduced in this book, are also installed in broken order in the Kunsthal in Rotterdam. He decided to limit his series to a precise period – twelve months in the life of the woman with whom he has been together for 15 years. He set out to encompass all the emotional subtleties and exaggerations, honesty and secrecy, to overlap the territory between intimacy and public behaviour. The result provides a panorama of visual obsession, close surveillance and undeniable affection. She is shown with make-up, and without make-up, wearing fashionable clothes and nude. Sometimes she poses with confidence, sometimes she appears uncertain.
“I’m fascinated by all the different appearances she has. Floor has so many distinct looks, from melancholic and silent, to being brutally shameless in-yourface. This is also reflected in the way each portrait is made. Some are confined, literally boxed-in with paint. Some are isolated in solitude, others are open, less cropped, more relaxed. The difference in her mood is translated through the technique, although sometimes it’s the other way around.” This creates an ever-changing point-of-view, a celebration of diversity, free from repetition. Each sequence of portraits is created using different techniques and shifting moods. Images and references are combined, the perspective is altered. The atmosphere partly depends on the way each scene is set-up. The narrative lies in the intimacy itself, focusing on the small moments in a larger life-story. “It’s a declaration of love, and a method of research, but it’s in no way scientific. I’m trying to get closer to the woman with whom I live. It’s about getting through layers to find the true identity.” 8
In Jasper’s imagery, Floor’s attitude ranges in scope from the brazenly sexual to the bored, as she undertakes the casual activities of domestic life. The artist himself refers back to Bonnard’s wife portrayed in the bath, or stepping out of the bath, and the women in the paintings of Balthus, combing their hair. Jasper notes that he has been partly inspired by artists long gone, by the shadows and silhouettes of Modigliani, Schiele and Munch, and the erotic drawings of Ingres, but also by his younger contemporaries. However, he is equally inspired by the visual language of film-posters, street art, old trading cards and packaging.
In many of his early paintings, Jasper depicted objects and architectural details including Thai statues, Moroccan arabesques and Italian columns to fix them to precise geographical locations. In his recent portraits of his wife, this is less obvious. She has been depicted at home in Amsterdam, in London, in Spain, in the south of France, in hotel rooms, and in such hopelessly romantic places as Bali, Biarritz and Curaçao. The location, however, is less important than her reaction to her surroundings, seen in the angle of her face, the tilt of her head, the direction of her gaze. We often see her located in transit, in unscripted moments such as when she is looking for duty-free lipstick at Schiphol airport. Jasper’s representations themselves cross many stylistic boundaries, the academic versus the refined versus the rough. Many take a graphic approach. These are far from romantic, resembling instead instructional illustrations or meticulous sketches for a brochure.
Other works are not strictly classical portraits at all, maybe only showing the back of Floor’s head, a highlighted limb, or several superimposed images. Reveling in their own brand of originality, some of these works are like those out-of-focus snapshots you immediately discard, but which in fact might be more honest representations of a person than the flattering, staged photos shown to friends. However, even with only the use of a few lines of dull colour, the close bond between the artist and his subject is immediately evident. “Some of the pictures are almost deathly portraits, in which the light alludes to life. I wanted to freeze the silent atmosphere. Floor is asleep. In my mind, this also incorporates the emotion of being able to think that she might not be here. You try to put this emotion of loss into the image. So I think that several of my drawings reveal a morbid feeling, perhaps with a mask-like face. 9
10
I have also made a few pictures in which I think she is hiding, moments in which she doesn’t want to be seen. At these times, she seems very distant. In a way, she can be very shy. But it’s still all part of me being continually on her case, nonstop.” Jasper pauses, then he shrugs with a smile. “You don’t want to make your own wife into an object, but ….”
I’ve known Jasper, and followed his work, since he was still a teenager. I’ve been Floor’s friend for as long as she has been together with Jasper. And from the very beginning, I’ve also known her through Jasper’s eyes, mirrored, reflected and transformed in his watercolours, drawings, rushed ink sketches and rough paintings, as well as in a couple of his large-scale portraits on canvas. Over this time, in different cities, I’ve also curated several shows of Jasper’s paintings and drawings.
Today, Floor is cooking in the kitchen. She is using several pots and pans on the stove at the same time, plus lots of chopped garlic. I’ve flown in from Rome and I am visiting Jasper and Floor in their Amsterdam house. We’ve just shared a bottle of red wine together. But now, Jasper is driving one of his daughters to a dance-class on his motorbike. So here I am, alone with Floor and a couple of ginger-coloured cats. Sometimes, the joy of being an observer, like the thrill of being an artist, is that you don’t necessarily need to be impartial.
The fact that Floor is a beautiful woman is an objective truth. The fact that in her professional life, she is a doctor specialized in aesthetic medicine, makes this anatomical focus additionally fascinating. She is a beautiful woman, in no need of cosmetic help, working in the field of making other women more beautiful, and feel more attractive. She is a natural beauty, assisting in the rejuvenation and synthetic beauty of other women. And she is the ongoing subject of an artist, her husband, who sees this beauty in all its many facets and moods, on a daily basis. Jasper even paints Floor while she is dreaming. So I mention to Floor that in the 1960s and 1970s, David Hockney regularly drew his young Californian partner Peter Schlesinger while he was asleep, or laying in the sun, or reading, or whenever else Schlesinger wasn’t aware he was being scrutinized. Hockney turned Schlesinger into his complicit model, and one of the few authentic male muses of the 20th century. But eventually, this constant attention made Schlesinger feel that the artist’s voyeurism was invasive and intrusive, even an imposition. 11
Floor responds. “I don’t feel that I am being watched, not at all. But if I was, I would like it. If I’m reading a book, and Jasper is making a portrait, that’s fine. Sometimes I don’t even realize that he is drawing me. I trust him. I trust that he won’t make me scary or ugly. We’ve been together so long, I find it unusual that he still spends time looking so closely at me. Even after all these years.” “Of course, I like some of his images more than others, but even so, I still have a distance from them. They aren’t me. They are pictures of me.”
Jasper Krabbé is best known for his vast oil paintings of sparse landscapes in bleached colours and his composite works, resembling schematic diaries, in which hundreds of pages from small notebooks are affixed in neat rows to broad canvases. The human figure often appears as a fragment in a larger setting. He also produces reams of smaller works, including jewel-like self-portraits. Five years ago, one hundred of these self-portraits were gathered together in a book, as a volume dedicated to the equal roles of artistic perception and selfperception, as a manual of gestural bravura. Jasper notes that a sense of confrontation exists in his paintings of Floor, revealing different layers of annoyance and aggravation to those which are present in his self-portraiture. “When the subject is outside of me, it clearly gives me distance. The subject is over there, not in your own skin, not pricking at your nerves. So my pictures of Floor are not as introverted as my selfportraits. They don’t seem so lonely. They are softer, more gentle, caught with a looser hand. With myself, I seem to be tougher, constantly angry.” In the series dedicated to his wife, the materials and frames are almost always used, second-hand, or found. Her face emerges from the surface of torn cardboard, handmade watercolour paper, wooden panels, and note book pages. Her features are outlined and shaded in lead pencil, crayon, watercolour, gouache, charcoal and thin paint. The techniques are opaque. The finished works often appear damaged, oxidized, fragile yet resilient. “I am drawing on paper which is not meant to be drawn on. It’s too thin and it tears. Or it is a strip of hard cardboard that shows rubbed marks and dents. The ink catches on the paper. I achieve these effects for free, from these older materials I use. Chance helps the end result. The pencil line doesn’t stick properly to the raw cardboard. The paint forms a pool. It gives a disturbance which I really like, and it adds to the idea that the picture belongs to the moment in which it is created. It’s also connected to the idea that Floor is ageless, so a portrait of her might have been produced in the Renaissance, or in the 19th century, or ten minutes ago.” 12
In some portraits, the paper provided the starting point, in others, the painting was inspired by a particular junk-shop frame. The more elaborate frames make a bold statement, others draw little attention. Some are made from plastic and cost 50 cents to buy, others are antique, gilded and expensive. In their diversity, they punctuate the wall like Morse Code.
“I bought several Indian frames from a store in Paris. They were meant for devotional images, or holy texts, the focus of a daily offering, to be worshipped every day. They spoke to me about the spiritual aura of a physical object. Besides their age, their function was very much in line with my idea of my portraits of Floor as being part of a shrine. The Indian frames show the signs of change over time. The varnish has peeled off. Some of the glass was already broken, so I have left it that way. But I also like the humbleness of someone who has bought a cheap frame from a supermarket, not as an aesthetic choice, but as a practical one.” For Jasper, it is essential that all the works come together in the single idea that Floor could have been born at any time. She is an ageless beauty, simultaneously ancient and contemporary, depicted using the aesthetics and incidental beauty of chance.
“I like the space, the shift, between all the different styles I use. For example, an abstract, primitive mood in one painting only becomes apparent when the work itself is finished. In retrospect, I see the influence of African sculptures. I suppose you can say that the true link filling all the spaces in between, is my hand. And how I see Floor, through my portraits of her. The more personal it is, the more universal it becomes.”
Jonathan Turner
13
14
15
Coloured crayon on cardboard, 25.5 x 19.5 cm, London 2010
Facebook, or the Muse at Work
Dante had his Beatrice, Petrarch his Laura, Rembrandt his Saskia, and Rubens his Eleonore. The Pre-Raphaelites had their dramatic redhead Elizabeth Siddal. Camille Claudel was Rodin’s muse. Picasso’s included Fernande, Dora, Françoise and Jacqueline. The most celebrated muse of the 20th century was perhaps Gala, who inspired a host of artists, including Dali. More recently, Karl Lagerfeld as the monarch of the fashion world, first had Claudia Schiffer, then a whole series of successors. And now Jasper Krabbé has Floor.
Art history reveals a clear pattern. With very few exceptions, the artist has always been male and the muse female. However, the relationship between the two has not necessarily always been sexual. Emilie Flöge, the woman who for so long enthrilled Gustav Klimt, is said to have died a virgin. She was Klimt’s maîtresse en titre, to be shown off on public occasions, but for sex he chose other women. As critic John Berger points out in his seminal book Ways of Seeing, the traditional relationship between the artist and his muse is one where the man acts and the woman serves as a passive, decorative object.
The original nine Muses were the Greek goddesses of the arts and science. They were the daughters of Zeus, the central figure in the Greek pantheon, and their role was to provide inspiration. The power of the muse still lies in her ability to get inside the artist’s mind and plant the seed for a new artistic vision. Since the 19th century, however, the great narratives have gone and the role of art has changed. Relieved of the burden of imitating the world of sensory experience, artists have turned their attention to mental concepts, now regarded as the only true reality.
17
Coloured crayon on paper, 32.5 x 24.5 cm, Amsterdam 2010
Whereas in the past the aim was to create a cohesive image of a harmonious world, regarded as the truth, in the modern era the attention has focused on a process of individualisation, seeking to isolate the particular and unique from the more general. This shift has created problems for portraiture – perhaps the most important territory of the muse. How can the artist gain access to the subject’s inner self, except via his or her outward appearance? The English term portrait derives, via the French, from the Latin word protractum, the past participle of the verb protrahere, meaning to bring to light. The etymology of the word suggests something more than mere imitation. After all, what is brought to light must previously have been in the dark. Portraits are revelatory: they penetrate the obscurity of the subject’s personality to spotlight hidden features. By doing so they render specific what was initially general and homogenous.
Jasper Krabbé has his Floor: she is his muse, his wife and the mother of his children. It is she who has inspired him to produce his portraits, day in day out for the last two years. The series now comprises 250 works and is regarded by the artist as a work-in-process. Executed predominantly on paper and in small formats, the portraits contain references both to works by renowned artists of the past like Manet, Schiele, Balthus, Hockney and Warhol, and to those of contemporaries like John Currin, Karen Kilimnik, Elizabeth Peyton and Alex Katz. Owing a heavy debt to art history, the artist also has another source on which to draw: the tradition of his own family, a dynasty of painters that stretches back to his great-grandfather, a gifted portrait painter. The entire series can also be seen as a sign of the times and perhaps as an ode to the present. Krabbé’s portraits call to mind the question once posed by the French philosopher Deleuze: whether our identity does not consist of trying out every possible combination.
19
20
Today, the human face remains a frequent motif in art. Artists explore not only the traditional portrait as we know it from art history, but also the novel possibilities presented by modern media like photography, film, television and computers. Krabbé’s portraits – and the meandering way in which he experiments with different styles and forms – reflect more than just the way the artist sees his wife. The game he plays in order to fathom her (essentially enigmatic) identity also implies a reflection on the genre itself, on the structure of the portrait and what characterises the image as such.
To translate the idea of the muse to the contemporary world, Krabbé has executed the portraits of Floor in a range of different styles and media and has explicitly conceived of them as a single coherent work of art. In addition, he has chosen to present the pictures in a disparate collection of frames picked up over time from junk markets and second-hand shops. Each individual image of Floor therefore inhabits a context that possesses its own history. In this way, Krabbé has elevated the series of portraits to iconic status, endowing them with a divine presence. It is not the ostensibly familiar divinity of the role model, but the unique and individual presence of the everyday.
The artist sees it as the great achievement of today’s art that styles can be mixed and matched at will: an Old Master drawing can rub shoulders with a film poster, alongside a classic Expressionist painting, next to an advertisement. The game is to use the combinations of individual portraits, each with its own atmosphere, to express the idea that our worldview – and therefore our view of the individual – is inevitably fragmentary. Given that the perspective and the concept of identity are now multiple, the portrait has become by definition a search-engine in which you can click on endless links in order to arrive at a broader conceptual picture of the subject. The portrait has transmuted into Facebook and the muse provides the inspiration to continue the search.
Pietje Tegenbosch
21
22
23
24
26
27
28
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
40
42
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
54
55
56
57
58
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
88
89
91
92
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
103
104
108
109
110
111
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
121
122
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
146
147
148
149
152
153
154
155
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
189
190
192
193
194
195
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
208
210
212
214
215
216
217
218
219
220
221
222
225
226
227
228
229
230
232
234
236
237
238
240
243
244
245
246
247
248
249
251
252
253
254
255
256
ARCHIVE
257
25 Indian ink and graphite on paper 35 x 27 cm Amsterdam 2010
26 Graphite on paper 33 x 25 cm San Sebastian 2010
27 Coloured crayon on paper 23 x 20 cm Amsterdam 2010
29 Crayon on cardboard 26.5 x 21.5 cm Puymeras 2010
30 Coloured crayon on paper 30.5 x 23 cm Dalfsen 2010
31 Graphite on paper 24.5 x 31.5 cm Puymeras 2010
33 Indian ink on paper 32.5 x 25 cm Amsterdam 2010
34 Coloured crayon on paper 32 x 26 cm Dalfsen 2010
35 Watercolour and graphite on cardboard 32 x 26.5 cm Saint Paul de Vence 2010
36 Watercolour on paper 34 x 26 cm Arles 2010
37 Coloured crayon on cardboard 25.5 x 19.5 cm Ibiza 2010
39 Watercolour on paper 24.5x 32.5 cm London 2011
40 Pen and collage on paper 26.5 x 20 cm Amsterdam 2011
40 Pen on cardboard 16 x 12 cm Biarritz 2010
41 Graphite on paper 25.5 x 19.5 cm Arles 2010
258
43 Coloured crayon on paper 26,5 x 20 cm San Sebastian 2010
44 Coloured crayon on paper 18,5 x 13,5 cm Puymeras 2010
45 Graphite and coloured crayon on cardboard 23 x 28,5 cm Biarritz 2010
47 Coloured crayon on cardboard 23,5x 20,5 cm Amsterdam 2010
48 Graphite on paper 25 x 31 cm Claviers 2010
49 Coloured crayon on cardboard 22 x 21 cm San Sebastian 2010
50 Ink and graphite on paper 31,5 x 26 cm Biarritz 2010
51 Graphite on paper 34 x 26,5 cm Rosaire chapel, Vence 2010
53 Indian ink and graphite on paper 31,5 x 25,5 cm Amsterdam 2010
54 Coloured crayon on paper 25 x 32,5 cm Dalfsen 2010
56 Watercolour on cardboard 30 x 20,5 cm Claviers 2010
57 Watercolour and graphite on cardboard 28,5 x 23,5 cm Amsterdam 2010
59 Ink on paper 37,5 x 23,5 cm Paris 2010
60 Crayon on paper 29,5 x 21,5 cm Dalfsen 2010
61 Coloured crayon on paper 20 x 15 cm Curaรงao 2011
259
63 Watercolour and coloured crayon on paper 32 x 26 cm Saint Tropez 2010
64 Coloured crayon on paper 22 x 17 cm Curaรงao 2010
66 Watercolour on paper 30 x 22 cm Dalfsen 2010
67 Ink and crayon on paper 37 x 29 cm Ramatuelle 2010
68 Watercolour on paper 26.5 x 21.5cm Dalfsen 2010
69 Ink on paper 35 x 27 cm Paris 2010
70 Watercolour on paper 31.5 x 25 cm Dalfsen 2010
72 Coloured crayon on cardboard 25 x 17 cm Paris 2010
73 Coloured crayon on paper 26.5 x 20.5 cm Amsterdam 2010
74 Graphite on paper 48.5 x 41 cm Paris 2010
75 Ink on paper 34 x 26 cm Amsterdam 2010
76 Graphite on paper 19.5 x 25.5 cm San Sebastian 2010
77 Coloured crayon on cardboard 34.5 x 24.5 cm San Sebastian 2010
79 Watercolour on paper 32.5 x 24.5cm Claviers 2010
80 Coloured crayon on paper 18 x 13 cm Saint Paul de Vence 2010
260
81 Coloured crayon on paper 25 x 31 cm San Sebastian 2010
83 Coloured crayon on paper 28 x 23 cm Claviers 2010
84 Coloured crayon on paper 22.5 x 17.5 cm Claviers 2010
85 Coloured crayon on paper 22 x 17 cm Arles 2010
87 Coloured crayon on cardboard 27.5 x 22.5 cm Paris 2010
88 Watercolour on paper 34 x 26 cm Bloemendaal 2010
89 Coloured crayon on paper 21.5 x 27.5 cm Klein Curaรงao 2010
90 Watercolour and graphite on paper 32 x 22.5 cm Faucon 2010
91 Ink on paper 26 x 20 cm Dalfsen 2010
92 Graphite on paper 20 x 15 cm San Sebastian 2010
93 Watercolour on paper 28.5 x 23.5 cm Amsterdam 2011
94 Watercolour and graphite on paper 29.5 x 24.5 cm Paris 2010
96 Pencil on cardboard 36 x 28 cm Dalfsen 2010
97 Graphite on paper 44.5 x 33.5 cm Nuits Saint Georges 2010
98 Watercolour on paper 24.5x 32.5 cm London 2011
261
99 Ink on cardboard 37.5 x 34 cm Paris 2010
101 Watercolour and coloured crayon on paper 45.5 x 35.5 cm Amsterdam 2010
102 Coloured crayon on cardboard 26 x 21 cm Paris 2010
104 Watercolour and graphite on cardboard 18.5 x 26 cm San Sebastian 2010
105 Coloured crayon on cardboard 32 x 23 cm Paris 2010
106 Graphite and watercolour on paper 26 x 45.5 cm Amsterdam 2010
108 Coloured crayon, watercolour on paper 34 x 26 cm St. Tropez 2010
111 Watercolour on paper 33 x 25 cm Bilbao 2010
113 Coloured crayon on paper 30.5 x 22.5 cm Ommen 2010
114 Coloured pencil on paper 26 x 34 cm Amsterdam 2010
115 Watercolour and graphite on paper 33 x 25 cm Claviers 2010
117 Ink on paper 32.5 x 24.5 cm Claviers 2010
119 Watercolour on paper 32 x 22.5 cm Amsterdam 2010
120 Indian ink on cardboard 37 x 30.5 cm Amsterdam 2010
122 Watercolour and graphite on paper 19.5 x 14.5 cm Amsterdam 2010
262
123 Graphite on cardboard 32.5 x 28 cm Ramatuelle 2010
124 Watercolour and graphite on paper 32.5 x 24.5 cm. San Sebastian 2010
126 Watercolour and graphite on paper 32 x 26 cm Claviers 2010
127 Coloured crayon on cardboard 23.5 x 17.5 cm Madrid 2010
129 Watercolour on paper 41 x 33.5 cm Paris 2010
130 Graphite on cardboard 34 x 26.5 cm Curaรงao 2010
131 Graphite on cardboard 34 x 25.5 cm Amsterdam 2011
132 Coloured crayon on paper 27 x 22 cm Faucon 2010
133 Watercolour and coloured crayon on paper 29 x 23 cm Amsterdam 2011
135 Watercolour on paper 32.5 x 24.5 cm Dalfsen 2010
136 Graphite and watercolour on paper 25 x 32.5 cm Saint Paul de Vence
137 Red chalk on paper 33 x 25 cm Paris 2010
138 Graphite on paper 26 x 20.5 cm Saint Paul de Vence 2010
139 Pen on cardboard 27 x 21.5 cm Amsterdam 2010
140 Indian ink on cardboard 23 x 28 cm Amsterdam 2009
263
141 Graphite on cardboard 20.5 x 32.5 cm Dalfsen 2010
142 Graphite on paper 45 x 50 cm Amsterdam 2010
143 Indian ink on paper 47 x 37 cm Amsterdam 2011
144 Ink on paper 32.5 x 24.5 cm Amsterdam 2010
145 Watercolourand indian ink on paper 42 x 32.5 cm Amsterdam 2009
146 Watercolour and graphite on paper 32.5 x 24.5 cm Saint Jean de Luz 2010
148 Coloured crayon on paper 27 x 23 cm Dalfsen 2011
149 Coloured crayon on paper 23 x 18 cm Amsterdam 2011
150 Graphite on cardboard and paper 33 x 42.5 cm
152 Watercolour and graphite on paper 32.5 x 24.5 cm Biarritz 2010
153 Watercolour and tape on cardboard 27.5 x 22 cm Paris 2010
154 Watercolour on paper 26 x 34 cm Saint Jean de Luz 2010
155 Watercolour on paper 34 x 26 cm Amsterdam 2010
156 Watercolour on paper 26 x 34 cm Amsterdam 2010
158 Coloured crayon and watercolour on cardboard 27 x 35 cm Bali 2011
264
159 Coloured crayon on paper 17 x 12.5 cm Dalfsen 2010
161 Graphite on paper 37 x 28.5 cm Paris 2010
162 Coloured crayon on cardboard 20 x 25 cm San Sebastian 2010
163 Watercolour on paper 34 x 26 cm Biarritz 2010
164 Coloured crayon on paper 27 x 37 cm Mallorca 2011
167 Coloured crayon on cardboard 30 x 23 cm Klein Curaรงao 2010
168 Watercolour on cardboard 23 x 34 cm Dalfsen 2011
169 Coloured crayon and graphite on cardboard 18 x 30 cm Curaรงao 2011
171 Coloured crayon on cardboard 27 x 22 cm Curaรงao 2011
172 Coloured crayon on cardboard 31.5 x 23.5 cm 2010
173 Coloured crayon on cardboard 25 x 20 cm Arles 2010
175 Coloured crayon on paper 47 x 36 cm Umalas Bali 2011
177 Watercolour and graphite on paper 33.5x 25 cm Claviers 2010
178 Coloured caryon on cardboard 24 x 41 cm Dalfsen 2010
179 Graphite on cardboard 27 x 22 cm Dalfsen 2010
265
180 Watercolour on cardboard 31.5 x 23 cm San Sebastian 2010
182 Coloured crayon on paper 36 x 27 cm Dalfsen 2011
183 Watercolour on paper 32 x 27 cm Ubud, Bali 2011
184 Watercolour on paper 28.5 x 22.5 cm Paris 2010
185 Watercolour and tape on paper 36.5 x 26.5 cm Amsterdam 2011
187 Coloured crayon on paper 32 x 27.5 cm London 2011
188 Watercolour on paper 42 x 50.5 cm Ommen 2011
190 Coloured crayon on paper 13 x 17 cm Puymeras 2010
191 Watercolour and graphite on cardboard 42 x 24.5 cm Mallorca 2011
192 Graphite on paper 31 x 25.5 cm 2010
194 Coloured crayon on paper 53.5 x 43.5 cm
195 Coloured crayon on paper 41 x 37 cm Amsterdam 2010
196 Graphite on paper 43.5 x 33.5 cm Amsterdam 2010
197 Graphite on paper 31 x 27.5 cm Maastricht, Amsterdam 2011
198 Graphite and watercolour on paper 30.5 x 24.5 cm Amsterdam 2010
266
199 Graphite on paper 57 x 44 cm Amsterdam 2011
200 Watercolour and graphite on paper 31 x 26 cm Ramatuelle 2010
201 Coloured crayon on cardboard 32.5 x 27 cm Biarritz 2010
202 Watercolour and crayon on paper 34.5 x 26 cm Puymeras 2010
205 Watercolour on paper 31.5 x 24 cm Amsterdam 2010
206 Coloured crayon on cardboard 32.5 x 27.5 cm Maastricht 2011
207 Coulored crayon on paper 32 x 25 cm Amsterdam 2011
208 Graphite on paper 33.5 x 24.5cm Antwerp 2011
209 Coloured pencil on paper 26 x 34 cm Amsterdam 2010
211 Graphite on paper 27 x 20 cm London 2011
212 Coloured crayon on paper 28 x 21 cm Amsterdam 2011
213 Coloured crayon on cardboard 31 x 26.5 cm Mallorca 2011
214 Graphite 44 x 57 cm Bali 2011
216 Watercolour and graphite on paper 32.5 x 24.5 cm Puymeras 2010
217 Watercolour and graphite on paper 32.5 x 24.5 cm Faucon 2010
267
219 Coloured crayon on paper 44 x 33 cm Ubud Bali 2011
220 Watercolour and graphite on paper 33 x 25 cm San Sebastian 2010
221 Watercolour on paper 33 x 25 cm Amsterdam 2010
223 Graphite on paper 55 x 42 cm
224 Graphite on paper 31.5 x 26 cm Claviers 2010
226 Watercolour and graphite on paper 32.5 x 24.5 cm San Sebastian 2010
227 Coloured crayon on paper 31 x 23.5 cm Port de Soller 2011
228 Coloured crayon on paper 23.5 x 20 cm Amsterdam 2010
229 Watercolour on paper 26.5 x 20 cm Amsterdam 2011
231 Watercolour, graphite on paper 57 x 44 cm Amsterdam 2011
232 Coloured crayon on cardboard 26 x 21 cm Antwerpen 2011
233 Coloured crayon on paper 41 x 30 cm Amsterdam 2010
235 Graphite on paper 32 x 22.5 cm Amsterdam 2011
236 Indian ink on paper 25 x 20 cm Amsterdam 2010
237 Coloured crayon on cardboard 40 x 32 cm Faucon 2010
268
238 Coloured crayon on cardboard 20 x 23 cm Mallorca 2011
239 Crayon on cardboard 30 x 25.5 cm New York 2011
241 Coloured crayon on paper 32,5 x 27.5 cm Soller 2011
242 Indian ink on cardboard 43.5 x 43.5 cm London 2011
244 Watercolour on paper 25 x 33.5 cm Dalfsen 2010
245 Indian ink on paper 44.5 x 36 cm Amsterdam 2011
246 Graphite and watercolour on paper 32.5 x 24.5 cm Claviers 2010
247 Graphite and tape on paper 19.5 x 25.5 cm Amsterdam 2010
249 Watercolour and graphite on paper 48 x 38 cm Amsterdam 2011
250 Graphite and tape on paper 19.5 x 25.5 cm Amsterdam 2010
251 Graphite on paper 26.5 x 21.5 cm Dalfsen 2011
253 Coloured crayon on cardboard 42.5 x 32 cm Amsterdam 2010
254 Watercolour on cardboard 23 x 24 cm New York 2011
6 Florrie (Swan) Oil on canvas 230 x 140 cm Amsterdam 2011
8 Coloured crayon on cardboard 23 x 17 cm London 2011
269
270
271
COLOPHON
WBOOKS, ZWOLLE INFO@WBOOKS.COM WWW.WBOOKS.COM TEXT JONATHAN TURNER PIETJE TEGENBOSCH DESIGN JASPER KRABBÉ AND RICHARD VAN DER HORST PHOTOGRAPHY COPYRIGHT ANNE DOKTER (pgs. 2, 4, 12, 270) COPYRIGHT CARMEN KEMMINK (pgs. 1, 22) TECHNICAL PHOTOGRAPHY AND IMAGE EDITING KEES KUIL ADDITIONAL PHOTOGRAPHY JASPER KRABBÉ
PRINT PRINTER TRENTO JASPER KRABBÉ WOULD LIKE TO THANK JONATHAN TURNER FOR HIS ENDURING SUPPORT. PIETJE TEGENBOSCH FOR JUMPING IN AT THE LAST MOMENT. RICHARD VAN DER HORST FOR HIS KEEN EYE. HANS VAN DE WILLIGE AND CARIJN OOMKENS AT WBOOKS. EMILY ANSENK AND JANNET DE GOEDE AT DE KUNSTHAL. KEES KUIL FOR HIS PATIENCE AT THE SCREEN. ANNE DOKTER FOR HER PICTURES OF THE STUDIO. CARMEN KEMMINK FOR HER PICTURE ‘IN DE NIS’. SIET ZUYDERHOF FOR THE BUNCH OF FRAMES HE STILL HAD LYING AROUND. CHRISTINE BERTHOLLIER IN PARIS FOR THE INDIAN FRAMES. JAN SIX FOR THE 17TH CENTURY FRAMES. AND LAST BUT NOT LEAST FLORRIE WHO SAT FOR EVERY PAGE.
copyright jasper krabbé 2012 © 2012 wbooks / the authors ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. NO PART OF THE CONTENTS OF THIS BOOK MAY BE REPRODUCED OR TRANSMITTED IN ANY FORM OR BY ANY MEANS, ELECTRONIC OR MECHANICAL, INCLUDING PHOTOCOPY, RECORDING, OR ANY OTHER INFORMATION STORAGE AND RETRIEVAL SYSTEM, WITHOUT THE PRIOR WRITTEN PERMISSION OF THE COPYRIGHT HOLDERS. THE PUBLISHERS HAVE MADE EVERY EFFORT TO ACKNOWLEDGE THE COPYRIGHT OF WORKS ILLUSTRATED IN THIS BOOK. SHOULD ANY PERSON, DESPITE THIS, FEEL THAT AN OMISSION HAS BEEN MADE, THEY ARE REQUESTED TO INFORM THE PUBLISHERS OF THIS FACT.
isbn 978 90 891 0280 5 isbn 978 90 400 0718 7 (special edition) nur 653
272
2